Projections of the Population of Texas and Counties in Texas
by Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050
Md. Nazrul Hoque, Ph.D.
Hobby Center for Public Policy
University of Houston
306 McElhinney Hall
Houston, TX 77204-5021
Email: mnhoque@uh.edu
Clyde McNeil, MBA
C.T. Bauer College of Business
University of Houston
Houston, TX 77201-5021
Jim Granato, Ph.D.
Director
Hobby Center for Public Policy
University of Houston
306 McElhinney Hall
Houston, TX 77204-5021
Email: jgranato@uh.edu
Projections of the Population of Texas and Counties in Texas
by Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050
Texas is one of the fastest growing states in the United States. The population of
Texas will increase from 25.1 million in 2010 to 31.2, 40.5 or 54.4 million in 2050
depending on the projection scenario (Figure 1 and Table 1). These projections were
prepared by the personnel of the University of Houston Hobby Center for Public Policy
and the Texas State Data Center. Population projections were completed using a
cohort-component projection technique. The basic characteristics of this technique are
the use of separate cohorts - persons with one or more common characteristics - and the
separate projection of each of the major components of population change - fertility,
mortality, and migration for each cohort. The scenarios shown make the same
assumptions about birth and death rates, but assume different net migration rates based
on alternations of 2000 to 2010 age, sex, and race/ethnicity specific patterns of net
migration. The 0.0 scenario assumes net migration is equal to zero (meaning there is no
migration or in and out migration are equal) and growth occurred only as a result of
natural increase (the difference between the number of births and number of deaths).
The 0.5 scenario assumes rates of net migration equal to one-half of the 2000-2010 trend
and the 1.00 scenario assumes a continuation of 2000-2010 patterns of the net migration.
1
Projections are shown for the total population and for each of four racial/ethnic
groups: Non-Hispanic White (Anglo), Non-Hispanic Black or African American, Hispanic
of all races and Non-Hispanic Others (mainly Asian and Others). These consist of the
following census categories: Non-Hispanic White alone, Non-Hispanic Black or African
American alone, Hispanics of all races, and persons in all other non-Hispanic racial
groups referred to as the Other population group. The Other population group also
includes all persons listing two or more races.
The data in Table 1 suggest that the Texas population will continue to grow and will
be increasingly diverse. From 2010 to 2050, under the 0.0 migration scenario, the Texas
population would increase from 25,145,561 to 31,246,355 in 2050.
This growth
represents an annualized rate of growth of 0.6 percent for the total projection period of
2010 through 2050. Under the 0.5 migration scenario, the Texas population would
increase to 40,502,749 million in 2050 with an annualized growth rate of 1.5 percent.
Under the 1.0 migration scenario, the Texas population would increase to 54,369,297
2
million in 2050 with an annualized growth rate of 2.9 percent.
What is equally evident from the data in Table 1 is that the projected growth will
involve substantial levels of net in-migration. Under the 0.50 scenario, net migration
would be 9,256,394, and under the 1.0 scenario, net migration would be 23,122,942.
Although it is impossible to discern what proportion of the projected net migration would
involve in-migration from other states versus immigration from other nations, under the
1.0 scenario, a substantial proportion of the total growth would be due to in-migrants and
immigrants, and their descendants. What this suggests is that the future growth of the
Texas population is likely to be impacted by events that occur outside the state rather
than relying on natural increase of current residents. The 0.0 scenario shows that Texas
would increase its population by more than 0.6 percent per year even if its only growth
were through natural increase.
In other words, even if Texas experienced no net
in-migration or immigration, its population would grow as rapidly as that projected for the
nation. Under a wide array of circumstances, the Texas population is likely to continue to
grow in the coming decades.
Continuing Growth in Minority Populations, 2010-2050
The data in Tables 2 and 3 and also in Figures 2 and 3 show that the pattern of
rapid growth in minority populations in recent decades is likely to continue, but the ethnic
differentials in rates of growth are most represented by Table 2. For example, from 2010
to 2050 under the 0.0 scenario, the Anglo population is projected to decline by 6.8
percent, but the Black population increases by 12.4 percent, the Hispanic population by
64.4 percent, and the Other population by 30.9 percent. Under the 0.5 scenario, the
3
Anglo population is projected to decline by only 1.2 percent while the Black population
would increase by 40.8 percent, the Hispanic population would increase by 127.4
percent, and the Other population by 161.0 percent. Under the 1.0 scenario, the Anglo
population is projected to grow by only 4.9 percent, the Black population would increase
by 76.6 percent, the Hispanic population by 215.6 percent, and the Other population by
432.5 percent.
As a result of such differentials in growth, the proportion of the population that is
minority increases rapidly. Under the 1.00 scenario the proportion of Anglo population
decreases from 45.3 percent in 2010 to 22.0 percent in 2050. Black population decreases
from 11.5 percent in 2010 to 9.4 percent in 2050. On the other hand, the proportion of
4
the population that is Hispanic increases from 37.6 percent in 2010 to 54.9 percent by
2050. Other population increases from 5.6 percent in 2010 to 13.7 percent by 2050.
Examined in terms of the total impact of each ethnic group on the net change in the
population of Texas under the 0.0 scenario, more than 100 percent of the growth would
be due to minority population growth. The reason is because the Anglo population will
have below replacement fertility level. Under the 1.0 scenario, 98.1 percent of the net
growth in the population of Texas from 2010 to 2050 would be due to minority population
growth (see Table 3). The Anglo population would account only for 1.9 percent of the
growth, the Black population for 7.6 percent, the Hispanic population for 69.8 percent,
and the Other population for 20.7 percent of the total net population change in the
population of Texas from 2010 through 2050.
Texas’s population growth will be
increasingly dependent on minority population growth with Hispanics playing a
5
particularly important role in the growth of minority populations in the state.
An Aging Population, 2010-2050
The Texas population is relatively young with a median age of 33.6 years in 2010,
the second youngest population of any state in the United States (only Utah had a
younger population).
The projections of the age distribution of the future Texas
population are shown in Tables 4 and 5. As the data in these tables suggest, the Texas
population will age substantially over 40 years. The population 65 years of age or older
was only 10.3 percent of the total population in 2010 (compared to 13.0 percent in the
nation as a whole) but would increase to 19.5 or 17.4 percent by 2050 depending on the
migration scenario of 0.5 and 1.0, respectively. Similarly, median age would increase
from 33.6 in 2010 to 39.3 or 38.5 in 2050, depending on the migration scenario of 0.5 or
1.0. Under the 1.00 scenario, the median age for Anglos would increase from 41.3 in
2010 to 46.8 by 2050, the median age for Blacks would increase from 32.1 to 42.7 by
2050, the median age for Hispanics would increase from 27.0 to 34.8 by 2050, and for
Others it would increase from 31.2 to 39.0 by 2050.
Two aspects of the aging process are important to note. First, the aging process
is more accentuated in the first part of the projection period than during the second part of
the period. Under the 1.0 scenario, the proportion of the population that is 65 years of
age or older shows rapid increase from 2010 to 2030 and level by 2040. The proportion of
population that is 65 years of age and over increases from 10.3 percent in 2010 to 13.1
percent in 2020 and 16.0 percent in 2030.
By 2040, however, the percent of the
population that is elderly increases only to 16.9 percent and by 2050 it is 17.4 percent.
6
The reason that the elderly population increases more rapidly after 2010 is because of the
impact of the baby-boom generation. This group includes those persons born in the
years 1946 through 1964 was approximately one-third of the Texas population in 2010.
Since their numbers are so large, changes in their ages disproportionately impact the
overall age structure of the population. This group begins to enter elderly ages in 2011.
At present, it might be more appropriate to refer to the Texas population as a middle-age
population rather than an elderly population.
A second important feature of the aging process in the Texas population is that it
varies widely by ethnicity. In 2010, 15.4 percent of Anglos were 65 years of age or older
but only 7.6 percent of Blacks, 5.6 percent of Hispanics and 6.5 percent of the Others
population were in elderly ages. Although all ethnic populations show increased aging
over the projection period, by 2050 (under the 1.0 scenario), the proportion of the Anglo
population that is 65 years of age or older increases to 28.0 percent while the Black and
Hispanic populations show 19.9 and 13.3 percent respectively in the elderly ages by
2050. The Other population will increase from 6.5 percent in 2010 to 14.9 percent in
2050.
The comparison of population pyramids for 2010 and 2050 shows that Texas’s
population is projected to continue to age due to low fertility and higher life expectancy.
The proportion of children (under age 15) is expected to decline from 22.8 percent in 2010
to 18.8 percent in 2050. The proportion of population 65 years of age and older is
expected to increase from 10.3 percent in 2010 to 17.4 in 2050. The proportion of the
working age population is expected to decline from 66.9 percent in 2010 to 63.8 percent
in 2050. As a result, the dependency ratio will increase from 49.6 in 2010 to 56.7 in 2050.
7
The aged dependency ratio will increase from 15.5 in 2010 to 27.2 in 2050, which means
in 2010 there were 6.5 working age people for each person of 65 years of age and above
while in 2050 there would be less than 4 persons.
Overall, then, the projected population patterns for Texas suggest that it will likely
continue to show relatively high rates of growth. This growth, together with the existing
characteristics of the population, will increase the ethnic diversity of the population and
cause it to become an increasingly older population with the demands on services
associated with increased age and diversity.
Patterns and Trends for Metropolitan Statistical Areas in Texas, 2010-2050
In this section, we briefly examine the trends in population growth, ethnicity and
age projected to occur in the 25 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in Texas.
8
Because of the large number of areas involved, only summary data are presented in this
section. In addition, because of the large number of individual MSAs, the discussion
emphasizes patterns among MSAs for the total projection period from 2010 to 2050, but
data for intermediate periods are shown in the tables. In most cases, trends between
2010 and 2050 are incremental so that one can assume that the direction of the trend
from 2010 to 2050 applies to intermediate periods as well.
The data in Tables 6 and 7 shows that the Metropolitan Statistical Areas are
expected to generally maintain their relative order by population size except San
Antonio-New Braunfels. Under the 1.0 scenario, Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington would
remain the largest MSA with a projected population of 16,367,293 million, followed by the
Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land MSA with a projected population of 14,221,267
million. In 2050, Austin-Round Rock would be the third largest MSA with a population of
5,176,940 million. San Antonio-New Braunfels would be the fourth largest MSA in 2050
with a population of 4,294,232 million. These four MSAs contained 64.5 percent of the
state's population in 2010 and are projected (under the 1.0 scenario) to account for
almost 74 percent of the total population of Texas by 2050.
Under the 1.00 scenario, Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington MSA would increase its
population
from
6,426,214
in
2010
to
16,367,293
in
2050.
Houston-The
Woodlands-Sugar Land MSA would increase its population from 5,920,416 in 2010 to
14,221,267 in 2050. During the projection period, under the 1.00 scenario, Dallas-Fort
Worth-Arlington MSA would gain the most population of 9,941,079, followed by
Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land MSA with a gain of 8,300,079, and Austin-Round
Rock with a gain of 3,460,651 persons.
9
In terms of percent population change, under the 1.00 scenario, Austin-Round
Rock would gain the most, with an increase of 201.6 percent during the projection period
of 2010-2050, followed by Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington MSA with an increase of 154.7
percent, Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land with an increase of 140.2 percent,
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission with an increase of 129.7 percent, and the Killeen-Temple
MSA with an increase of 112.9 percent. The Laredo MSA is projected to increase its
population by nearly 111.7 percent from 2010 to 2050. The Texarkana MSA would gain
the least population during the projected period (5.9 percent).
Overall the data in Table 6 suggest that growth will continue to be concentrated among
10
the state's largest metropolitan areas and in areas along the Texas-Mexico border with
reduced rates of growth occurring in the more rural parts of the state. In fact, the four
largest MSAs contained 64.5 percent of the population of Texas in 2010 and are
projected to contain (under the 1.0 scenario) 73.7 percent of the population in 2050.
Data in Tables 7, 8 and 9 also suggests that for nearly all MSAs, as for the state as a
whole, the growth of minority populations is projected to be pervasive. In virtually all
areas, minority growth exceeds that for the Anglo population. In most MSAs, the Anglo
decline will be offset by minority increases.
Similarly, the proportion of the total
population that is minority would increase rapidly. Under the 1.00 scenario, the minority
population will increase in the Abilene MSA from 31.7 percent in 2010 to 55.7 percent in
2050, Amarillo from 35.4 percent in 2010 to 69.6 percent in 2050, the Austin-Round Rock
MSA from 45.3 in 2010 to 69.0 percent in 2050, Beaumont-Port Arthur from 40.7 percent
in 2010 to 67.1 in 2050, the Brownsville-Harlingen MSA from 89.3 percent to 96.6 in 2050,
Bryan-College Station from 40.1 percent in 2010 to 64.8 in 2050, Corpus Christi from 63.6
percent in 2010 to 82.8 percent in 2050, the Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington MSA from 49.5
percent in 2010 to 78.4 percent in 2050, El Paso from 86.9 percent in 2010 to 95.4
percent in 2050, the Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land MSA from 60.4 to 83.8 in
2050, the Killeen-Temple MSA from 45.9 to 67.7 percent in 2050, the Laredo MSA from
96.6 percent in 2010 to 98.5 in 2050, the Longview MSA from 34.0 percent in 2010 to 68.1
percent in 2050, Lubbock from 43.1 percent in 2010 to 65.8 percent in 2050, the
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission MSA from 92.2 percent in 2010 to 96.1 percent in 2050,
Midland from 46.8 percent in 2010 to 76.5 percent in 2050, the Odessa MSA from 58.9
percent in 2010 to 86.0 percent in 2050, the San Angelo MSA from 41.9 percent in 2010
11
to 63.1 percent in 2050, the San Antonio-New Braunfels MSA from 64.0 percent in 2010
to 78.0 percent in 2050, the Sherman-Denison MSA from 21.3 percent in 2010 to 56.4 in
2050, Texarkana from 33.7 percent in 2010 to 54.8 percent in 2050, the Tyler MSA from
37.8 percent in 2010 to 69.8 percent in 2050, the Victoria MSA from 51.3 percent in 2010
to 72.8 percent in 2050, the Waco MSA from 41.6 percent in 2010 to 69.7 percent in 2050,
and Wichita Falls from 28.6 percent in 2010 to 53.6 percent in 2050.
In 2010, 16 of 25 MSAs had 50 percent or more of Anglo population, but under the
projected population none of the MSAs would have 50 percent or more of the Anglo
population in 2050. Finally, the pervasiveness of minority population growth is evident in
the data in Table 8 which indicate that the number of Anglos would show an absolute
decline in 19 of 25 MSAs of the state from 2010 to 2050 and there would not be a single
region in which Anglo population growth would account for a majority of that MSA’s
population growth.
Patterns and Trends for Council of Government Regions in Texas, 2010-2050
In this section, we briefly examine the trends in population growth, ethnicity and
age projected to occur in the 24 Council of Government (COG) Regions in Texas.
Because of the large number of areas involved, only summary data are presented in this
section.
In addition, because of the large number of individual COG Regions, the
discussion emphasizes patterns among COGs for the total projection period from 2010 to
2050, but data for intermediate periods are shown in the tables by race/ethnicity. In most
cases, trends between 2010 and 2050 are incremental so one can assume that the
direction of the trend from 2010 to 2050 applies to intermediate periods as well.
12
The data in Table 10 show that the Council of Government Regions is expected to
generally maintain their relative order by population size. In 2050, as in 2010, the North
Central Texas COG containing Dallas and Fort Worth would be the largest region of the
state, followed by the Houston-Galveston COG. In 2010, the Capital Area Planning
Council (which includes the City of Austin) was the fourth largest Council of Government
Region, however, by 2050 it would be the third largest COG. In 2010, the Alamo Area
COG (which includes San Antonio) was the third largest Council of Government Region,
and by 2050 it would be the fourth largest Region. These four Council of Government
Regions contained 66.4 percent of the state's population in 2010 and are projected (under
the 1.0 scenario) to account for 75.0 percent of the total population of Texas by 2050.
13
However, due to quite different rates of overall growth, the relative population sizes
of the areas would change dramatically such that the North Central Region would
become substantially larger than the Houston-Galveston Region by 2050.
If the
projected patterns prevail (under the 1.0 scenario), the North Central Texas Region would
have a population of more than 16.5 million in 2050 compared to 14.4 million in the
Houston-Galveston area. Similarly, although the population of the Alamo Area COG
was more than 60 percent larger than that for the Capital Area Planning Region in 2010,
by 2050, the Capital Area is projected (under the 1.0 scenario) to have a larger population
than the Alamo Area, 5.4 and 4.5 million, respectively. Under the 1.00 scenario, the
North Central Texas COG would gain the most population with 10.0 million, followed by
the Houston-Galveston COG with a gain of 8.3 million, the Capital Area with a gain of 3.5
million, the Alamo Area with a gain of 2.2 million, and the Lower Rio Grande Valley with a
gain of 1.4 million.
In terms of percent population change, the Capital Area would increase its
population by 192.8 percent, followed by North Central Texas by 152.9 percent,
Houston-Galveston by 136.8 percent, Lower Rio Grande Valley by 112.9 percent, Central
Texas by 103.4 percent, Alamo Area 97.8 percent, South Texas by 93.3 percent. Concho
Valley is expected to increase its population by only 11.3 percent from 2010 to 2050.
Overall the data in Tables 10 and 11 suggest that growth will continue to be
concentrated among the state's largest metropolitan centers and in areas along the
Texas-Mexico border with reduced rates of growth occurring in the more rural parts of the
state. In fact, if one examines the proportion of the state's population accounted for by
the eight largest regions in 2010 and those eight projected to decrease or increase less
14
than 10 percent from 2010 to 2050, the concentration of the state’s population is evident.
The eight largest regions contained 75.6 percent of the population of Texas in 2010 and
are projected to contain (under the 1.0 scenario) 84.1 percent of the population in 2050.
On the other hand, those eight areas with the slowest population growth from 2010 to
2050 contained 12.4 percent of the state's population in 2010 but would have only 6.1
percent in 2050. The future distribution of the Texas population thus promises to present
significant and diverse challenges for service provision.
Substantial increases in
services will be required in large metropolitan centers and along the Texas-Mexico border
while even fewer people will be spread over large areas to be served in other regions.
As a result of the expected patterns of population distribution in Texas, both problems of
creating sufficient services in time to meet the needs of rapidly growing areas and those
of providing adequate access to services in sparsely settled areas are likely to remain
realities of service provision in Texas.
Data in Tables 9 through 12 show that in nearly all COGs, as for the state as a
whole, the growth of minority populations is projected to be pervasive. In virtually all
areas, minority growth exceeds that for the Anglo population. Similarly, the proportion of
the total population that is minority would increase rapidly. In 2010, only the Alamo Area
(37.2 percent), Coastal Bend (34.0 percent), Houston-Galveston (39.9 percent), Lower
Rio Grande (8.8 percent), Middle Rio Grande (15.1 percent), Permian Basin (46.5
percent), Rio Grande (13.8 percent), and South Texas (3.6 percent) COGs were less than
50 percent Anglo population.
In sum, in 2010 there were only 8 of 24 Council of
Government Region with Anglo population less than 50 percent while by 2050 (under the
1.0 scenario), all of the state's 24 COG Regions would have less than 50 percent Anglos
15
population. Finally, the pervasiveness of minority population growth is evident in the
data in Table 12 which indicate that the number of Anglos would show an absolute
decline in 19 of 24 regions of the state from 2010 to 2050 (under the 1.0 scenario) and
there would not be a single region in which Anglo population growth would account for a
majority of that region's population growth.
The final pattern noted for the state that is also evident for COGs is that of the
aging of the population (see Tables 11). Although there is clear evidence of differences
in median ages among regions (as regions with larger minority populations generally
have lower median ages), the pervasiveness of the aging trend is apparent. In all
regions the median age of the population in 2050 is older than in 2010 (under the 1.0
scenario). Larger proportions of elderly persons will be a reality impacting service needs
in virtually every region of the state in the 21st century.
Patterns and Trends in Counties in Texas, 2010-2050
In this section, we briefly examine the patterns and trends of population change in
Texas counties. Under the 1.00 scenario, during the projected period Harris County will
gain the most population (3,435,368) and retain its status as the most populous county in
Texas. Collin County will gain the second most with an increase of 3,019,499 persons,
followed by Denton County with an increase of 2,368,983 persons, Fort Bend County with
an increase of 2,153,178 persons, and Tarrant County with 1,688,000. Under the same
scenario, Newton County will lose the most (2,872), followed by Coke County (958), and
Hutchinson County (883), Jackson County (709), and Fisher County (679).
16
In terms of percent population change, under the 1.00 scenario, Hays County will
gain the most with an increase of 424.5 percent, followed by Collin County increasing by
386.0 percent, Fort Bend County increases by 367.8 percent, Williamson County
increases by 367.7 percent, and Denton County will increase by 357.5 percent. Loving
County may lose the most with a decline of 51.2 percent, followed by Coke County with a
decline of 28.9 percent, Motley County with a decline of 24.1 percent, and Newton County
with a decline of 19.9 percent. In sum, 36 of 254 counties may lose population during the
projections period under the 1.00 scenario.
17
Summary and Implications
In this section we describe the basic demographic changes projected to impact
Texas and regions throughout Texas through 2050. The results show several important
patterns including the following:
1. The Texas population is likely to increase substantially under a wide variety of
circumstances. Thus, under the 1.0 scenario that assumes 2000-2010 patterns of net
in-migration, the population of the state would reach 54,369,273 million by 2050, an
increase of more than 116 percent from 2010. Even under the assumption that growth
occurs only as a result of natural increase (that net migration is zero), the population of
the state would increase by nearly 4.8 million from 2010 to 2050, an increase of 24.3
percent.
2. A large proportion of the increase under the 1.0 scenario is projected to be due
to in-migrants to Texas from other states in the United States and from immigrants to
Texas from other nations.
More than 79 percent of the net growth in the state's
population is projected to be due to in-migrants and immigrants and their descendants.
3. The Texas population will become increasingly ethnically diverse. Whereas
the Anglo population (under the 1.0 scenario) is projected to increase by 4.9 percent from
2010 to 2050, the Black population would increase by 76.6 percent, the Hispanic
population by 215.6 percent, and the Other population by 432.5 percent. By 2050, the
proportion of the population that is Anglo would be only 22 percent while the Hispanic
population would account for 54.9 percent, the Black population for 9.4 percent, and the
Other population for 13.7 percent of the total population of Texas. Of the total net
18
change in the population of Texas from 2010 to 2050, 98.1 percent is projected to be due
to growth in the minority population of the state. Under the 1.0 scenario, Hispanic
population expected to surpass the Anglo population by 2017. In 2017, the proportion of
the Hispanic population would be 41.0 percent compared with the Anglo proportion of
40.9 percent.
4. The population will also become older than it is at present. By 2050, 17.4
percent of the population, compared to 10.3 percent in 2010, would be 65 years of age or
older under the 1.0 scenario. Most of the aging of the population in proportional terms
will occur during the periods of 2010 to 2030 when the baby boomers (those born
between 1946 and 1964) begin to enter elderly ages. Thus, between 2010 and 2030,
the population 65 years of age and older shows the most rapid proportional growth of any
age group, increasing from 10.3 percent in 2010 to 13.1 in 2020, and 16.0 percent of the
population by 2030.
5.
The Texas population in the early part of the next century will likely be
characterized by growth, diversity and maturity. The demands likely to be placed on
state services can be expected to reflect these characteristics.
6. Patterns of regional population change show rapid population growth in the
state's large urban centers with growth in the North Central Region, Houston-Galveston,
the Capital Area, and the Alamo Area COGs potentially leading to very large urban
concentrations (all with more than 2 million persons) in these regions by 2050. In
addition, rapid growth is projected to occur in regions along the Texas-Mexico border.
Slow growth will occur in the Panhandle, South East Texas and West Texas. Overall,
the patterns of regional growth examined here suggest a further concentration of the
19
Texas population.
7. Changes in ethnic and age characteristics projected for the state are generally
pervasive across regions of the state. In 2010, there were 16 of Council of Government
Regions with more than 50 percent of their population identified as Anglo. By 2050, none
of the 24 regions would have more than 50 percent of the population identified as Anglo
and all 24 regions would increase their minority proportions. Similarly, all 24 regions
show an aging of their population bases over the projection period.
Overall, then, the data in this report show Texas to be a state with a population
which is likely to experience substantial growth in the coming decades and one which will
likely become increasingly diverse and mature. The results show that such growth will
not be as evident in the state's rural areas as in its larger metropolitan areas and in
regions along the Texas-Mexico border. However, the patterns of increasing diversity
are likely to occur in virtually all parts of the state. Although all projections are subject to
error and must be used with caution, it appears that the Texas population is one that will
likely grow and require substantial additional services as well as an increasing diversity of
services in the coming decades.
20
Acknowledgement:
The author would like to acknowledge the help of Dr. Jeffrey A. Jordan for producing the
Figures 5 through 7. The author would also like to acknowledge the help of Lisa Espinoza
for formatting all the tables and Beverly Pecotte for editorial assistance.
References:
Texas Population Estimates and Projections Program
2014
Projections of the Population of Texas and Counties in Texas by Age,
Sex and Race/Ethnicity for 2010-2050. Texas State Data Center, University
of Texas at San Antonio.
21
Table 1: Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of the Population by Race/Ethnicity
from 2020 to 2050 for Texas Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration
____________________________________________________________________________________
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
_______________ ______________ _______________ _____________ __________
%
Number
%
Year
Number
%
Number
Number
%
Number
____________________________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
11,397,345
11,536,110
11,422,646
11,070,270
10,619,646
45.3
42.4
39.4
36.5
33.9
2,886,825
3,094,463
3,226,030
3,268,073
3,244,154
11.5
11.4
11.1
10.8
10.4
9,460,921
11,044,873
12,657,347
14,178,639
15,549,474
37.6
40.5
43.7
46.8
49.8
1,400,470
1,563,164
1,688,187
1,788,322
1,833,081
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.9
5.9
25,145,561
27,238,610
28,994,210
30,305,304
31,246,355
5.6
6.4
7.3
8.2
9.0
25,145,561
28,813,282
32,680,217
36,550,595
40,502,749
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
11,397,345
11,723,184
11,792,588
11,593,202
11,265,371
45.3
40.7
36.0
31.7
27.9
2,886,825
3,274,738
3,616,745
3,876,830
4,065,757
11.5
11.4
11.1
10.6
10.0
9,460,921
11,963,951
14,900,906
18,095,574
21,516,362
37.6
41.5
45.6
49.5
53.1
1,400,470
1,851,409
2,369,978
2,984,989
3,655,259
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
9,460,921 37.6 1,400,470 5.6 25,145,561
2010
11,397,345 45.3 2,886,825 11.5
2020
11,914,045 39.0 3,466,308 11.3 12,968,026 42.5 2,193,599 7.2 30,541,978
12,176,401 32.8 4,055,033 10.9 17,575,656 47.3 3,347,994 9.0 37,155,084
2030
2040
12,143,626 27.1 4,599,532 10.2 23,156,968 51.5 5,055,770 11.2 44,955,896
2050
11,954,615 22.0 5,097,826
9.4 29,859,012 54.9 7,457,844 13.7 54,369,297
____________________________________________________________________________________
22
Table 2: Percent Change for Selected Time Periods for Projected Population
by Race/Ethnicity for Texas Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and
Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration
______________________________________________________________
Time
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
______________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010-2020
2020-2030
2030-2040
2040-2050
2010-2050
1.2
-1.0
-3.1
-4.1
-6.8
7.2
4.3
1.3
0.7
12.4
16.7
14.6
12.0
9.7
64.4
11.6
8.0
5.9
2.5
30.9
8.3
6.4
4.5
3.1
24.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010-2020
2020-2030
2030-2040
2040-2050
2010-2050
2.9
0.6
-1.7
-2.8
-1.2
13.4
10.4
7.2
4.9
40.8
26.5
24.5
21.4
18.9
127.4
32.2
28.0
26.0
22.5
161.0
14.6
13.4
11.8
10.8
61.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010-2020
20.1
37.1
21.5
4.5
56.6
2020-2030
35.5
2.2
17.0
52.6
21.7
2030-2040
-0.3
13.4
31.8
51.0
21.0
2040-2050
-1.6
10.8
28.9
47.5
20.9
4.9
432.5
2010-2050
76.6
215.6
116.2
____________________________________________________________
23
Table 3: Percent of Net Change in Texas Population from 2010-2050
Due to Each Race/Ethnicity Group Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration
_______________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Percent
Number
_______________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-777,699
357,329
6,088,553
432,611
6,100,794
-12.8
5.9
99.8
7.1
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-131,974
1,178,932
12,055,441
2,254,789
15,357,188
-0.9
7.7
78.5
14.7
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
557,270
1.9
Black
2,211,001
7.6
Hispanic
20,398,091
69.8
Other
6,057,374
20.7
Total
29,223,736
100.0
________________________________________________________________
24
Table 4: Population by Age Group and Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projected Population by Age Group
and by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 for Texas Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and
Race/Ethnicity Specific Net Migration
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
____________
Age
____________
____________ ____________
___________
Group
Number
%
Number
%
Number
%
Number
%
Number %
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
00-14
15-64
65+
1,913,245
7,724,035
1,760,065
16.8
664,360 23.0
67.8 2,004,091 69.4
15.4
218,374 7.6
2,807,175 29.7
6,120,825 64.7
532,921 5.6
353,810 25.3 5,738,590 22.8
956,134 68.2 16,805,085 66.9
90,526 6.5 2,601,886 10.3
1,891,604
7,282,754
2,361,752
16.4
641,060 20.7
63.1 2,108,948 68.2
20.5
344,455 11.1
2,933,251 26.6
325,710 20.8 5,791,625 21.3
7,214,560 65.3 1,052,192 67.3 17,658,454 64.8
897,062 8.1
185,262 11.9 3,788,531 13.9
1,801,344
6,691,302
2,930,000
15.8
615,070 19.1
58.5 2,099,874 65.1
25.7
511,086 15.8
3,139,115 24.8
285,342 16.9 5,840,871 20.1
8,063,560 63.7 1,099,000 65.1 17,953,736 62.0
1,454,672 11.5
303,845 18.0 5,199,603 17.9
1,672,071
6,425,962
2,972,237
15.1
576,901 17.7
58.1 2,095,881 64.1
26.8
595,291 18.2
3,358,137 23.7
291,359 16.3 5,898,468 19.5
8,753,061 61.7 1,065,536 59.6 18,340,440 60.5
2,067,441 14.6
431,427 24.1 6,066,396 20.0
1,607,421
6,118,931
2,893,294
15.1
543,891 16.8
57.7 2,062,551 63.5
27.2
637,712 19.7
3,495,873 22.5
275,777 15.0 5,922,962 19.0
9,454,738 60.8 1,031,400 56.3 18,667,620 59.7
2,598,863 16.7
525,904 28.7 6,655,773 21.3
2020
00-14
15-64
65+
2030
00-14
15-64
65+
2040
00-14
15-64
65+
2050
00-14
15-64
65+
25
Table 4: Continued
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
Age
____________
____________
____________ ____________
___________
Group
Number
%
Number
%
Number
%
Number
%
Number %
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
00-14
15-64
65+
1,913,245
7,724,035
1,760,065
16.8
664,360 23.0
67.8 2,004,091 69.4
15.4
218,374 7.6
2,807,175 29.7
6,120,825 64.7
532,921 5.6
353,810 25.3 5,738,590 22.8
956,134 68.2 16,805,085 66.9
90,526 6.5 2,601,886 10.3
1,917,330
7,398,516
2,407,338
16.4
666,351 20.3
63.1 2,246,260 68.6
20.5
362,127 11.1
3,103,152 25.9
396,006 21.4 6,082,839 21.1
7,926,632 66.3 1,260,183 68.1 18,831,591 65.4
934,167 7.8
195,220 10.5 3,898,852 13.5
1,843,762
6,901,785
3,047,041
15.6
675,679 18.7
58.6 2,371,444 65.6
25.8
569,622 15.7
3,638,908 24.4
424,674 17.9 6,583,023 20.1
9,673,408 64.9 1,601,846 67.6 20,548,483 62.9
1,588,590 10.7
343,458 14.5 5,548,711 17.0
1,732,313
6,719,000
3,141,889
14.9
669,041 17.3 4,199,136 23.2
527,173 17.7 7,127,663 19.5
58.0 2,503,342 64.5 11,512,326 63.6 1,919,327 64.3 22,653,995 62.0
27.1
704,447 18.2 2,384,112 13.2
538,489 18.0 6,768,937 18.5
1,685,809
6,471,394
3,108,168
15.0
661,676 16.3 4,701,715 21.9
612,643 16.8 7,661,843 18.9
57.4 2,599,631 63.9 13,604,329 63.2 2,283,167 62.4 24,958,521 61.6
27.6
804,450 19.8 3,210,318 14.9
759,449 20.8 7,882,385 19.5
2020
00-14
15-64
65+
2030
00-14
15-64
65+
2040
00-14
15-64
65+
2050
00-14
15-64
65+
26
Table 4: Continued
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
Age
____________
___________
____________
____________ ____________
Group
Number
%
Number
%
Number %
%
Number
%
Number
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
00-14
15-64
65+
1,913,245
7,724,035
1,760,065
16.8
664,360 23.0
67.8 2,004,091 69.4
15.4
218,374 7.6
2,807,175 29.7
6,120,825 64.7
532,921 5.6
353,810 25.3 5,738,590 22.8
956,134 68.2 16,805,085 66.9
90,526 6.5 2,601,886 10.3
1,943,494
7,516,333
2,454,218
16.3
692,866 20.0
63.1 2,392,624 69.0
20.6
380,818 11.0
479,860 21.9 6,400,104 21.0
3,283,884 25.3
8,710,920 67.2 1,507,914 68.7 20,127,791 65.9
973,222 7.5
205,825 9.4 4,014,083 13.1
1,887,375
7,119,240
3,169,786
15.5
742,329 18.3 4,216,233 24.0
627,406 18.7 7,473,343 20.1
58.5 2,677,579 66.0 11,623,660 66.1 2,331,791 69.7 23,752,270 63.9
26.0
635,125 15.7 1,735,763 9.9
388,797 11.6 5,929,471 16.0
1,794,798
7,026,004
3,322,824
775,958 16.9 5,253,688 22.7
944,637 18.7 8,769,081 19.5
14.8
57.8 2,989,632 65.0 15,152,142 65.4 3,435,652 67.9 28,603,430 63.6
27.4
833,942 18.1 2,751,138 11.9
675,481 13.4 7,583,385 16.9
2020
00-14
15-64
65+
2030
00-14
15-64
65+
2040
00-14
15-64
65+
2050
00-14 1,768,144 14.8
805,218 15.8 6,320,815 21.2 1,342,001 18.0 10,236,178 18.8
15-64 6,845,066 57.2 3,276,166 64.3 19,567,650 65.5 5,001,372 67.1 34,690,254 63.8
65+
3,341,405 28.0 1,016,442 19.9 3,970,547 13.3 1,114,471 14.9 9,442,865 17.4
_____________________________________________________________________________________
27
Table 5: Median Age in 2010 and Projected Median Age from 2020 to 2050
by Race/Ethnicity for Texas Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and
Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration
___________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
___________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
41.3
43.2
44.9
45.9
46.0
32.1
34.9
37.7
40.0
41.6
27.0
29.5
31.8
33.8
35.2
31.2
36.1
40.1
43.0
46.3
33.6
36.0
37.8
39.1
40.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
41.3
43.3
45.1
46.2
46.4
32.1
35.1
37.9
40.3
42.2
31.2
34.8
37.2
39.1
41.7
27.0
29.3
31.4
33.6
34.9
33.6
35.6
37.0
38.2
39.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
41.3
32.1
27.0
31.2
33.6
43.4
29.0
33.7
2020
35.3
35.1
2030
45.4
38.1
31.2
35.2
36.2
2040
46.6
40.6
33.5
36.6
37.4
2050
42.7
34.8
38.5
46.8
39.0
___________________________________________________________________
28
Table6: Total Population and Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projected Population and Percent Population Change 2010-2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for Metropolitan Statistical Areas in Texas - Ranked by Total Population Size in 2010
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
Metropolitan
Total
Total
Total
2010- 20202010Total
Total
203020402020
2040
2050
2030
2040
2050
Statistical Area
2010
2030
2020
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land
San Antonio-New Braunfels
Austin-Round Rock
El Paso
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
Corpus Christi
Brownsville-Harlingen
Killeen-Temple
Beaumont-Port Arthur
Lubbock
Waco
Amarillo
Laredo
College Station-Bryan
Longview
Tyler
Abilene
Wichita Falls
Midland
Odessa
Sherman-Denison
San Angelo
Victoria
Texarkana
6,426,214
5,920,416
2,142,508
1,716,289
804,123
774,769
428,185
406,220
405,300
403,190
290,805
252,772
251,933
250,304
228,660
214,369
209,714
165,252
151,306
141,671
137,130
120,877
111,823
94,003
92,565
6,957,648
6,433,891
2,313,475
1,877,175
892,932
890,857
456,331
464,304
450,696
421,656
312,063
266,848
268,579
293,121
249,325
224,761
220,574
175,288
157,032
154,161
153,315
124,234
117,555
101,405
95,735
7,379,698
6,834,855
2,450,959
1,985,268
976,981
1,015,658
480,606
528,434
486,290
435,716
331,685
280,061
283,195
338,098
270,140
232,304
227,673
181,945
162,916
164,551
167,301
125,852
123,004
108,051
98,20629
7,664,893
7,108,254
2,538,919
2,062,870
1,045,601
1,136,305
496,505
592,589
519,834
442,858
347,881
289,405
294,210
381,800
288,619
236,711
231,380
186,101
167,070
172,583
180,950
125,110
127,718
113,241
98,772
7,796,401
7,244,050
2,594,968
2,109,573
1,105,730
1,255,303
509,515
662,685
546,533
446,711
362,933
297,211
301,472
425,655
309,861
239,274
233,182
189,192
169,945
178,734
193,477
123,168
132,112
118,544
98,626
8.3
8.7
8.0
9.4
11.0
15.0
6.6
14.3
11.2
4.6
7.3
5.6
6.6
17.1
9.0
4.8
5.2
6.1
3.8
8.8
11.8
2.8
5.1
7.9
3.4
6.1
6.2
5.9
5.8
9.4
14.0
5.3
13.8
7.9
3.3
6.3
5.0
5.4
15.3
8.3
3.4
3.2
3.8
3.7
6.7
9.1
1.3
4.6
6.6
2.6
3.9
4.0
3.6
3.9
7.0
11.9
3.3
12.1
6.9
1.6
4.9
3.3
3.9
12.9
6.8
1.9
1.6
2.3
2.5
4.9
8.2
-0.6
3.8
4.8
0.6
1.7
1.9
2.2
2.3
5.8
10.5
2.6
11.8
5.1
0.9
4.3
2.7
2.5
11.5
7.4
1.1
0.8
1.7
1.7
3.6
6.9
-1.6
3.4
4.7
-0.1
21.3
22.4
21.1
22.9
37.5
62.0
19.0
63.1
34.8
10.8
24.8
17.6
19.7
70.1
35.5
11.6
11.2
14.5
12.3
26.2
41.1
1.9
18.1
26.1
6.5
Table6: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
Total
Total
Total
20302040Metropolitan
Total
Total
2010- 20202010Statistical Area
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land
San Antonio-New Braunfels
Austin-Round Rock
El Paso
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
Corpus Christi
Brownsville-Harlingen
Killeen-Temple
Beaumont-Port Arthur
Lubbock
Waco
Amarillo
Laredo
College Station-Bryan
Longview
Tyler
Abilene
Wichita Falls
Midland
Odessa
Sherman-Denison
San Angelo
Victoria
Texarkana
6,426,214
5,920,416
2,142,508
1,716,289
804,123
774,769
428,185
406,220
405,300
403,190
290,805
252,772
251,933
250,304
228,660
214,369
209,714
165,252
151,306
141,671
137,130
120,877
111,823
94,003
92,565
7,404,982
6,897,952
2,471,484
2,077,981
926,532
948,305
465,145
479,754
477,518
427,759
320,076
271,168
278,000
305,881
263,661
234,459
231,653
175,677
156,518
159,634
157,045
128,734
117,615
101,497
95,768
8,485,436
7,924,671
2,802,711
2,441,548
1,053,889
1,145,413
500,143
560,637
547,096
452,948
351,288
291,572
306,787
367,576
302,430
256,095
254,486
183,516
162,762
178,392
177,335
136,387
123,685
108,521
98,803
30
9,643,009
8,964,115
3,103,481
2,829,932
1,168,178
1,345,740
524,797
641,946
621,249
475,501
380,643
308,660
335,200
429,823
341,087
278,405
276,544
188,921
167,401
196,130
198,503
142,117
128,473
114,028
100,006
10,838,399
10,004,950
3,387,802
3,255,574
1,277,950
1,553,142
545,602
728,518
696,115
498,736
410,896
325,432
363,218
494,081
387,785
302,763
299,745
192,719
170,667
213,872
220,012
147,280
132,422
119,409
100,503
15.2
16.5
15.4
21.1
15.2
22.4
8.6
18.1
17.8
6.1
10.1
7.3
10.3
22.2
15.3
9.4
10.5
6.3
3.4
12.7
14.5
6.5
5.2
8.0
3.5
14.6
14.9
13.4
17.5
13.7
20.8
7.5
16.9
14.6
5.9
9.8
7.5
10.4
20.2
14.7
9.2
9.9
4.5
4.0
11.8
12.9
5.9
5.2
6.9
3.2
13.6
13.1
10.7
15.9
10.8
17.5
4.9
14.5
13.6
5.0
8.4
5.9
9.3
16.9
12.8
8.7
8.7
2.9
2.9
9.9
11.9
4.2
3.9
5.1
1.2
12.4
11.6
9.2
15.0
9.4
15.4
4.0
13.5
12.1
4.9
7.9
5.4
8.4
14.9
13.7
8.7
8.4
2.0
2.0
9.0
10.8
3.6
3.1
4.7
0.5
68.7
69.0
58.1
89.7
58.9
100.5
27.4
79.3
71.8
23.7
41.3
28.7
44.2
97.4
69.6
41.2
42.9
16.6
12.8
51.0
60.4
21.8
18.4
27.0
8.6
Table6: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
Total
Total
Total
20302040Metropolitan
Total
Total
2010- 20202010Statistical Area
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
6,426,214
7,920,671
9,970,678 12,728,992
16,367,293
23.3
25.9
27.7
28.6
154.7
Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land
5,920,416
7,413,214
9,278,789 11,519,566
14,221,267
25.2
25.2
24.1
23.5
140.2
San Antonio-New Braunfels
2,142,508
2,635,183
3,182,644
3,735,981
4,294,232
23.0
20.8
17.4
14.9
100.4
2,306,857
3,960,317
5,176,940
31.6
30.5
201.6
Austin-Round Rock
1,716,289
3,035,547
34.4
30.7
El Paso
804,123
956,347
1,117,352
1,256,169
1,374,133
18.9
16.8
12.4
9.4
70.9
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
774,769
1,005,539
1,531,900
29.8
26.5
129.7
1,271,656
1,779,370
20.5
16.2
Corpus Christi
428,185
470,995
511,462
535,772
549,777
10.0
8.6
4.8
2.6
28.4
Brownsville-Harlingen
406,220
493,571
584,883
668,322
741,902
21.5
18.5
14.3
11.0
82.6
Killeen-Temple
405,300
504,546
609,745
729,596
862,962
24.5
20.9
19.7
18.3
112.9
Beaumont-Port Arthur
403,190
432,734
469,376
511,586
563,180
7.3
8.5
9.0
10.1
39.7
Lubbock
290,805
327,424
368,058
407,438
447,819
12.6
12.4
10.7
9.9
54.0
252,772
274,757
324,043
346,550
8.7
9.6
7.6
37.1
Waco
301,130
6.9
Amarillo
251,933
287,313
332,477
386,410
450,905
14.0
15.7
16.2
16.7
79.0
Laredo
250,304
317,733
392,768
464,297
529,784
26.9
23.6
18.2
14.1
111.7
College Station-Bryan
228,660
278,843
337,071
398,066
472,029
21.9
20.9
18.1
18.6
106.4
Longview
214,369
245,142
284,782
334,759
397,916
14.4
16.2
17.5
18.9
85.6
Tyler
209,714
243,064
283,362
329,198
382,835
15.9
16.6
16.2
16.3
82.6
Abilene
165,252
175,333
182,823
188,637
192,599
6.1
4.3
3.2
2.1
16.5
Wichita Falls
151,306
154,865
159,416
162,286
163,597
2.4
2.9
1.8
0.8
8.1
Midland
141,671
164,862
191,558
219,061
247,378
16.4
16.2
14.4
12.9
74.6
Odessa
137,130
159,521
184,384
234,964
16.3
15.6
14.0
11.8
71.3
210,246
Sherman-Denison
120,877
133,647
148,507
163,197
180,032
10.6
11.1
9.9
10.3
48.9
San Angelo
111,823
116,707
121,421
123,650
123,502
4.4
4.0
1.8
-0.1
10.4
Victoria
94,003
101,363
107,571
111,865
114,873
7.8
6.1
4.0
2.7
22.2
Texarkana
92,565
95,118
97,31431
97,949
98,030
2.8
2.3
0.7
0.1
5.9
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Table 7:
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Abilene Metropolitan Statistical Area
______________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
______________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
68.3
65.9
63.5
61.2
59.7
7.0
7.2
7.3
7.5
7.5
21.2
23.1
25.1
27.0
28.5
3.5
3.8
4.1
4.3
4.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
68.3
64.6
60.4
56.5
52.9
7.0
7.1
7.2
7.2
7.1
21.2
24.1
27.4
30.5
33.4
3.5
4.2
5.0
5.8
6.6
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
68.3
62.7
56.3
50.2
44.3
7.0
7.1
7.1
6.8
6.4
21.2
25.5
30.3
34.9
39.0
32
3.5
4.7
6.3
8.1
10.3
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Amarillo Metropolitan Statistical Area
______________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
_______________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
64.6
61.3
57.9
54.5
51.5
5.8
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.8
25.1
28.0
31.1
34.2
37.1
4.5
4.8
5.1
5.4
5.6
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
64.6
59.2
53.1
47.2
41.4
5.8
5.8
5.8
5.7
5.5
25.1
29.6
34.6
39.5
44.3
4.5
5.4
6.5
7.6
8.8
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
64.6
56.7
47.8
38.7
30.4
5.8
5.9
5.8
5.5
5.1
25.1
31.4
38.5
45.6
51.9
33
4.5
6.0
7.9
10.2
12.6
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area
______________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
_______________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
54.7
52.0
49.0
45.7
42.7
7.0
6.9
6.7
6.5
6.2
31.4
34.0
37.1
40.4
43.6
6.9
7.1
7.2
7.4
7.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
54.7
50.8
46.2
41.4
37.1
7.0
6.7
6.4
6.0
5.6
31.4
34.7
38.8
43.1
47.1
6.9
7.8
8.6
9.5
10.2
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
54.7
49.7
43.5
36.8
31.0
7.0
6.5
6.0
5.5
4.9
31.4
35.4
40.5
45.9
50.7
34
6.9
8.4
10.0
11.8
13.4
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Beaumont-Port Arthur Metropolitan Statistical Area
_____________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
_____________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
59.3
57.3
55.1
53.0
51.1
24.2
24.4
24.5
24.5
24.5
12.5
14.0
15.7
17.5
19.2
4.0
4.3
4.7
5.0
5.2
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
59.3
55.5
51.4
47.0
42.6
24.2
24.1
23.7
22.8
21.6
12.5
15.7
19.5
23.9
28.7
4.0
4.7
5.4
6.3
7.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
59.3
53.4
46.9
39.9
32.9
24.2
23.8
22.3
19.8
16.8
12.5
17.6
24.2
32.0
40.2
35
4.0
5.2
6.6
8.3
10.1
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Brownsville-Harlingen Metropolitan Statistical Area
_________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
_________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
10.7
8.2
6.3
5.0
3.9
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
88.1
90.6
92.5
94.0
95.1
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
10.7
8.3
6.3
4.8
3.6
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
88.1
90.4
92.3
93.8
94.9
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
10.7
8.2
6.3
4.7
3.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
88.1
90.3
91.9
93.2
94.0
36
0.9
1.2
1.5
1.9
2.4
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
College Station-Bryan Metropolitan Statistical Area
_________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
_________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
59.9
56.2
53.6
50.8
48.5
11.5
11.6
11.4
11.2
10.8
22.5
25.8
28.6
31.7
34.5
6.1
6.4
6.4
6.3
6.2
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
59.9
54.9
50.6
46.1
42.2
11.5
11.4
11.1
10.6
9.9
22.5
26.8
30.8
35.4
39.7
6.1
6.9
7.5
7.9
8.2
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
59.9
53.2
47.1
40.6
35.2
11.5
11.4
10.8
10.1
8.8
22.5
27.9
33.3
39.4
44.9
37
6.1
7.5
8.8
9.9
11.1
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Corpus Christi Metropolitan Statistical Area
_________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
_________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
36.4
33.6
31.0
28.4
26.5
3.1
3.0
2.9
2.8
2.7
57.7
60.4
63.1
65.7
67.8
2.8
3.0
3.0
3.1
3.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
36.4
32.3
28.5
24.8
21.8
3.1
3.0
2.8
2.7
2.5
57.7
61.5
65.1
68.4
71.2
2.8
3.2
3.6
4.1
4.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
36.4
30.8
25.6
21.1
17.2
3.1
3.0
2.8
2.5
2.3
57.7
62.6
67.1
70.7
73.3
38
2.8
3.6
4.5
5.7
7.2
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington Metropolitan Statistical Area
_________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
_________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
50.5
47.7
44.9
41.9
39.1
14.7
14.6
14.4
14.1
13.8
27.4
30.0
32.9
36.0
39.1
7.4
7.7
7.8
8.0
8.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
50.5
45.1
39.7
34.5
29.8
14.7
14.9
14.7
14.3
13.6
27.4
31.4
35.8
40.1
44.3
7.4
8.6
9.8
11.1
12.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
50.5
42.6
34.7
27.7
21.6
14.7
15.0
14.8
13.9
12.7
27.4
32.8
38.6
43.7
48.0
39
7.4
9.6
11.9
14.7
17.7
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
El Paso Metropolitan Statistical Area
_________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
13.1
11.8
10.6
9.7
8.9
2.6
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.2
82.2
83.6
84.9
85.9
86.8
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
13.1
10.9
9.0
7.6
6.4
2.6
2.4
2.3
2.1
2.0
82.2
84.4
86.2
87.6
88.6
2.1
2.3
2.5
2.7
3.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
13.1
9.9
7.6
5.9
4.6
2.6
2.4
2.1
1.9
1.7
82.2
85.2
87.4
88.7
89.4
40
2.1
2.5
2.9
3.5
4.3
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land Metropolitan Statistical Area
_________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
_________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
39.6
37.0
34.4
31.8
29.6
16.8
16.5
16.1
15.6
15.0
35.4
38.2
41.2
44.3
47.3
8.2
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
39.6
34.7
30.1
26.0
22.2
16.8
16.4
15.7
14.8
13.8
35.4
39.6
43.9
48.0
51.9
8.2
9.3
10.3
11.2
12.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
39.6
32.7
26.3
20.7
16.2
16.8
16.1
15.0
13.6
12.2
35.4
40.9
46.2
50.9
54.6
41
8.2
10.3
12.5
14.8
17.0
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Killeen-Temple Metropolitan Statistical Area
_________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
_________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
54.1
51.9
49.6
47.7
46.3
18.6
18.9
19.1
19.0
18.8
20.3
21.8
23.5
25.2
26.6
7.0
7.4
7.8
8.1
8.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
54.1
50.5
46.4
42.7
39.2
18.6
18.5
18.3
17.6
16.7
20.3
22.9
26.0
29.0
32.0
7.0
8.1
9.3
10.7
12.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
54.1
49.0
43.1
37.4
32.3
18.6
18.0
17.1
15.5
13.6
20.3
24.1
28.6
32.9
36.5
42
7.0
8.9
11.2
14.2
17.6
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Laredo Metropolitan Statistical Area
_________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
3.4
3.0
2.7
2.5
2.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
95.7
96.1
96.4
96.7
97.0
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
3.4
2.9
2.5
2.2
2.0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
95.7
96.2
96.6
97.0
97.4
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
3.4
2.8
2.2
1.9
1.5
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
95.7
96.2
96.7
97.0
97.2
43
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.2
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Longview Metropolitan Statistical Area
_________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
66.0
63.6
60.8
58.1
55.7
17.2
17.2
17.2
16.9
16.7
14.1
16.3
18.7
21.4
23.8
2.7
2.9
3.3
3.6
3.8
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
66.0
61.6
56.2
50.5
44.7
17.2
16.8
16.2
15.1
13.9
14.1
18.4
23.6
29.6
35.7
2.7
3.2
4.0
4.8
5.7
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
66.0
59.0
50.3
40.9
31.9
17.2
16.6
15.3
13.2
10.8
14.1
20.7
29.2
38.6
47.9
44
2.7
3.7
5.2
7.3
9.4
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Lubbock Metropolitan Statistical Area
_________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
_________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
56.9
53.6
50.4
47.5
45.1
7.0
7.1
7.2
7.2
7.2
32.6
35.6
38.6
41.4
43.8
3.5
3.7
3.8
3.9
3.9
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
56.9
52.2
47.5
43.2
39.4
7.0
7.0
7.0
6.9
6.7
32.6
36.6
40.6
44.2
47.4
3.5
4.2
4.9
5.7
6.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
56.9
50.7
44.5
39.0
34.2
7.0
6.9
6.8
6.3
5.7
32.6
37.6
42.3
46.2
49.0
45
3.5
4.8
6.4
8.5
11.1
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission Metropolitan Statistical Area
________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
_________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
7.8
5.8
4.4
3.5
2.8
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
90.6
92.7
94.2
95.2
96.0
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
7.8
6.3
4.9
3.9
3.2
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
90.6
92.1
93.4
94.3
95.0
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
7.8
6.8
5.8
4.7
3.9
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
90.6
91.4
92.2
92.9
93.2
46
1.2
1.5
1.7
2.1
2.6
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Midland Metropolitan Statistical Area
_________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
53.2
49.6
45.9
42.5
39.5
6.2
6.0
6.0
5.9
5.7
37.9
41.5
45.0
48.4
51.5
2.7
2.9
3.1
3.2
3.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
53.2
47.4
41.5
36.1
31.1
6.2
5.9
5.7
5.3
5.0
37.9
43.5
49.0
54.2
58.8
2.7
3.2
3.8
4.4
5.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
53.2
44.8
36.9
29.7
23.5
6.2
5.9
5.4
4.8
4.1
37.9
45.6
52.9
59.3
64.3
47
2.7
3.7
4.8
6.2
8.1
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Odessa Metropolitan Statistical Area
________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Other
Hispanic
_________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
41.1
37.3
33.4
29.8
26.5
4.1
4.0
3.8
3.7
3.6
52.7
56.6
60.7
64.4
67.9
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
41.1
35.2
29.4
24.4
20.0
4.1
3.9
3.7
3.6
3.4
52.7
58.7
64.5
69.6
74.1
2.1
2.2
2.4
2.4
2.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
41.1
32.5
25.0
18.9
14.0
4.1
3.9
3.5
3.2
2.9
52.7
61.1
68.6
74.5
79.3
48
2.1
2.5
2.9
3.4
3.8
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
San Angelo Metropolitan Statistical Area
________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
_________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
58.1
54.9
51.8
49.0
46.9
3.6
3.6
3.4
3.3
3.2
35.5
38.5
41.7
44.5
46.7
2.8
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.2
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
58.1
53.8
49.7
45.8
42.4
3.6
3.6
3.3
3.2
3.0
35.5
39.4
43.4
47.0
50.2
2.8
3.2
3.6
4.0
4.4
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
58.1
52.3
46.7
41.4
36.9
3.6
3.6
3.3
3.1
2.8
35.5
40.5
45.5
49.8
53.3
49
2.8
3.6
4.5
5.7
7.0
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
San Antonio-New Braunfels Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
36.0
33.6
31.1
28.8
26.7
6.1
6.0
5.9
5.8
5.7
54.1
56.4
58.9
61.2
63.3
3.8
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
36.0
32.7
29.5
26.4
23.9
6.1
6.0
5.9
5.8
5.6
54.1
56.8
59.4
61.8
63.6
3.8
4.5
5.2
6.0
6.9
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
36.0
32.0
28.2
24.8
22.0
6.1
6.1
5.9
5.7
5.4
54.1
56.9
59.3
60.8
61.1
50
3.8
5.0
6.6
8.7
11.5
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Sherman-Denison Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
78.7
76.3
73.8
71.2
69.0
5.7
5.9
6.1
6.2
6.3
11.3
13.3
15.3
17.6
19.7
4.3
4.5
4.8
5.0
5.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
78.7
74.5
69.4
63.6
57.5
5.7
5.7
5.6
5.4
5.1
11.3
14.8
19.1
24.2
29.8
4.3
5.0
5.9
6.8
7.6
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
78.7
72.3
63.9
54.0
43.6
5.7
5.5
5.2
4.7
4.0
11.3
16.6
23.7
32.2
41.4
51
4.3
5.6
7.2
9.1
11.0
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Texarkana Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
66.3
64.6
62.8
61.2
59.9
24.0
24.9
25.7
26.3
27.0
6.5
7.2
7.9
8.6
9.1
3.2
3.3
3.6
3.9
4.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
66.3
63.3
60.1
56.8
53.5
24.0
25.3
26.2
26.8
27.3
6.5
7.7
9.1
10.7
12.4
3.2
3.7
4.6
5.7
6.8
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
66.3
61.6
56.5
50.9
45.2
24.0
25.6
26.5
26.4
25.5
6.5
8.3
10.4
13.0
15.7
52
3.2
4.5
6.6
9.7
13.6
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Tyler Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
___________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
62.2
58.9
55.5
52.2
49.3
17.7
18.2
18.4
18.4
18.4
17.2
19.7
22.6
25.6
28.3
2.9
3.2
3.5
3.8
4.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
62.2
56.9
51.2
45.3
39.7
17.7
17.9
17.4
16.8
15.9
17.2
21.6
26.8
32.3
37.8
2.9
3.6
4.6
5.6
6.6
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
62.2
54.8
46.6
38.1
30.2
17.7
17.5
16.2
14.5
12.5
17.2
23.5
31.3
39.2
46.6
53
2.9
4.2
5.9
8.2
10.7
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Victoria Metropolitan Statistical Area
_________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
_________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
48.7
45.7
42.6
39.8
37.5
5.9
5.9
6.0
6.0
6.1
43.2
45.9
48.6
51.1
53.0
2.2
2.5
2.8
3.1
3.4
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
48.7
44.5
40.1
36.0
32.2
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.9
6.0
43.2
47.0
50.8
54.1
56.8
2.2
2.6
3.2
4.0
5.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
48.7
43.0
37.4
32.0
27.2
5.9
6.0
6.0
6.0
5.9
43.2
48.1
52.5
56.0
58.2
54
2.2
2.9
4.1
6.0
8.7
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Waco Metropolitan Statistical Area
_________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
_________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
58.4
55.3
52.5
49.9
47.7
15.2
15.3
15.0
14.6
14.2
23.4
26.3
29.2
32.0
34.6
3.0
3.1
3.3
3.5
3.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
58.4
53.3
48.4
43.5
38.9
15.2
15.3
14.9
14.3
13.5
23.4
27.9
32.7
37.6
42.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.6
5.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
58.4
51.3
43.9
36.9
30.3
15.2
15.2
14.6
13.4
11.9
23.4
29.7
36.7
43.7
50.5
55
3.0
3.8
4.8
6.0
7.3
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Wichita Falls Metropolitan Statistical Area
________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
71.4
69.2
66.7
64.5
62.5
8.9
9.0
9.2
9.3
9.4
15.2
17.0
19.0
20.8
22.6
4.5
4.8
5.1
5.4
5.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
71.4
67.6
63.5
59.2
55.1
8.9
9.0
9.1
9.1
9.0
15.2
18.2
21.5
25.0
28.5
4.5
5.2
5.9
6.7
7.4
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
71.4
8.9
15.2
4.5
2020
65.7
9.1
19.6
5.6
2030
59.3
9.1
24.8
6.8
2040
52.9
8.7
30.3
8.1
2050
46.4
8.2
36.0
9.4
________________________________________________________________
56
Table 7: (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2000 and Projected Percent
of the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2010 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Wichita Falls Metropolitan Statistical Area
________________________________________________________________
Year
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
71.4
69.2
66.7
64.5
62.5
8.9
9.0
9.2
9.3
9.4
15.2
17.0
19.0
20.8
22.6
4.5
4.8
5.1
5.4
5.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
71.4
67.6
63.5
59.2
55.1
8.9
9.0
9.1
9.1
9.0
15.2
18.2
21.5
25.0
28.5
4.5
5.2
5.9
6.7
7.4
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
71.4
8.9
15.2
4.5
2020
65.7
9.1
19.6
5.6
2030
59.3
9.1
24.8
6.8
2040
52.9
8.7
30.3
8.1
2050
46.4
8.2
36.0
9.4
________________________________________________________________
57
Table 8:
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for Abilene Metropolitan Statistical Area
___________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
____________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
34.6
35.5
39.0
40.0
40.9
40.2
39.2
41.7
43.4
42.5
29.0
32.2
35.8
37.1
38.6
25.6
29.5
32.1
34.9
37.8
25.4
31.6
37.3
41.4
45.8
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
34.6
35.2
38.3
39.0
40.0
40.2
39.7
41.8
43.5
42.3
29.0
32.0
35.5
36.8
38.1
25.6
29.1
31.6
34.5
37.3
25.4
30.2
33.5
36.3
40.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
34.6
34.8
37.3
37.8
38.9
40.2
40.3
42.0
43.1
41.0
29.0
31.8
35.4
36.6
37.4
25.6
28.8
31.1
34.3
37.6
25.4
29.3
31.7
33.9
37.3
58
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for Amarillo Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
34.4
36.4
38.1
39.2
40.5
40.6
41.7
43.6
44.5
45.0
30.4
33.3
36.6
38.8
41.0
24.5
27.4
29.8
32.4
34.0
27.9
32.6
36.2
39.4
43.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
34.4
35.9
37.1
37.9
39.0
40.6
42.1
44.2
45.1
45.3
30.4
33.0
36.1
38.1
40.4
24.5
27.1
29.5
32.3
33.9
27.9
30.5
32.6
34.7
37.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
34.4
35.5
35.8
36.1
36.7
40.6
42.6
44.7
45.3
45.1
30.4
33.2
36.1
38.0
39.5
24.5
26.8
29.2
31.8
33.3
27.9
29.2
30.5
31.8
33.1
59
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
32.6
36.2
38.9
39.7
40.7
37.8
41.4
45.6
47.5
47.2
32.1
35.4
38.1
40.7
42.2
26.1
28.7
30.5
32.6
34.2
29.2
33.2
37.0
40.0
44.2
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
32.6
35.8
37.9
38.7
39.8
37.8
40.6
44.8
47.2
47.0
32.1
35.5
38.1
40.7
42.5
26.1
28.3
30.1
32.5
34.0
29.2
32.9
35.7
38.1
41.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
32.6
35.3
36.9
37.7
38.8
37.8
39.9
44.0
46.7
46.6
32.1
35.5
38.0
40.5
42.4
26.1
28.0
29.8
32.5
34.1
29.2
32.8
35.0
36.9
39.7
60
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for Beaumont-Port Arthur Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
37.0
37.8
39.1
40.2
40.7
42.2
42.5
43.3
44.2
44.1
33.3
34.4
36.3
37.8
39.0
26.5
29.2
31.2
33.0
34.4
29.8
33.3
36.8
39.4
41.9
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
37.0
37.5
38.2
38.5
38.5
42.2
43.0
43.7
44.5
44.0
33.3
34.7
36.4
37.7
38.5
26.5
28.5
30.0
31.6
32.4
29.8
31.7
33.8
34.9
36.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
37.0
37.1
36.8
36.2
35.6
42.2
43.5
44.1
44.1
43.1
33.3
35.3
36.9
38.0
38.2
26.5
27.9
29.2
30.7
31.2
29.8
30.2
31.5
32.1
32.7
61
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for Brownsville-Harlingen Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
30.6
30.3
31.5
32.1
32.4
54.6
55.8
52.9
50.6
51.3
33.7
39.4
44.0
48.4
50.0
28.3
28.7
30.3
30.9
31.6
36.9
41.2
43.3
45.8
48.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
30.6
30.6
31.8
32.7
32.8
54.6
57.4
56.9
53.6
52.7
33.7
39.3
44.5
48.7
49.9
28.3
28.8
30.5
31.4
32.0
36.9
39.5
40.3
42.5
44.4
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
30.6
31.0
32.2
33.3
33.4
54.6
59.3
61.2
57.9
54.6
33.7
38.6
41.9
45.2
44.5
28.3
28.9
30.7
32.0
32.5
36.9
38.9
38.9
40.6
41.9
62
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for College Station-Bryan Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
25.8
28.0
27.8
28.5
30.3
27.2
29.2
28.3
28.2
29.8
28.1
30.5
33.5
35.4
37.5
22.8
23.7
24.3
25.9
27.4
25.1
29.1
30.7
33.6
37.7
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
25.8
28.3
28.8
29.6
31.7
27.2
29.6
29.6
29.6
31.7
28.1
30.7
34.2
36.5
38.8
22.8
24.1
25.2
26.9
28.9
25.1
29.4
32.5
34.7
38.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
25.8
28.5
29.5
30.4
32.3
27.2
29.8
30.4
30.2
32.3
28.1
31.4
35.3
38.2
40.6
22.8
24.7
26.3
27.7
29.7
25.1
29.6
34.6
36.1
38.2
63
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for Corpus Christi Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
36.0
37.3
38.4
39.4
39.7
45.8
46.4
46.5
46.6
45.0
35.2
37.4
39.8
41.9
42.7
30.7
32.8
34.6
36.4
37.5
33.7
37.7
41.7
45.5
48.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
36.0
37.0
37.9
39.2
39.5
45.8
47.3
47.3
47.3
45.3
35.2
37.4
39.8
42.1
42.8
30.7
32.6
34.6
36.7
37.8
33.7
36.0
38.2
40.0
41.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
36.0
36.8
37.5
39.0
39.2
45.8
48.4
48.6
48.2
45.8
35.2
38.0
40.9
43.5
44.0
30.7
32.4
34.5
37.0
38.1
33.7
34.7
36.1
36.8
37.2
64
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.6
36.7
38.8
40.3
41.8
40.4
43.2
45.5
46.7
47.5
31.8
35.0
37.5
39.9
41.7
25.3
28.4
30.9
33.5
35.2
31.1
36.2
40.2
43.0
46.7
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.6
35.9
37.2
38.6
40.1
40.4
43.1
45.3
46.5
47.5
31.8
35.4
38.0
40.7
43.0
25.3
28.0
30.3
32.9
34.3
31.1
34.5
36.2
38.2
41.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.6
35.1
35.7
37.0
38.5
40.4
42.9
45.1
46.2
47.5
31.8
35.7
38.2
41.2
44.0
25.3
27.7
29.8
32.6
33.7
31.1
33.1
33.6
35.2
37.9
65
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for El Paso Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
31.3
32.8
35.1
36.8
37.6
41.5
41.9
43.6
44.1
42.9
31.7
34.0
36.3
37.6
37.9
29.9
31.5
34.1
36.0
36.9
30.3
34.9
39.3
41.0
43.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
31.3
32.3
34.4
36.1
36.7
41.5
41.6
42.8
42.9
41.4
31.7
33.9
36.1
37.3
37.5
29.9
31.1
33.6
35.6
36.3
30.3
33.6
36.0
36.3
38.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
31.3
31.7
33.8
35.5
35.8
41.5
41.0
41.6
40.4
38.6
31.7
34.0
36.2
37.2
37.0
29.9
30.7
33.2
35.3
35.7
30.3
32.5
33.9
33.5
34.8
66
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land Metropolitan
Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Other
Black
Hispanic
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.2
36.5
38.9
40.5
41.9
41.4
44.2
46.4
47.5
48.0
32.0
35.3
38.4
41.1
43.0
26.6
30.0
32.5
34.7
36.6
33.5
38.6
43.5
46.6
49.4
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.2
35.9
37.9
39.4
40.8
41.4
43.9
46.3
47.5
48.1
32.0
35.4
38.4
40.9
42.9
26.6
29.8
32.3
34.7
36.4
33.5
37.3
40.8
42.9
45.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.2
35.3
37.1
38.6
40.2
41.4
43.6
46.1
47.6
48.2
32.0
35.5
38.3
40.7
42.5
26.6
29.7
32.2
34.9
36.7
33.5
36.3
39.0
40.8
42.8
67
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for Killeen-Temple Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
30.0
33.1
35.3
36.1
38.0
34.5
36.4
39.9
39.4
39.9
28.5
31.8
34.4
36.0
37.4
24.5
27.1
29.2
31.9
34.0
25.5
29.5
32.5
35.7
40.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
30.0
32.4
34.2
34.8
36.3
34.5
36.0
39.7
39.3
39.4
28.5
31.7
34.5
36.2
37.4
24.5
26.5
28.3
30.8
32.2
25.5
28.3
30.3
32.7
35.4
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
30.0
31.8
33.0
33.2
34.0
34.5
35.4
39.2
38.4
38.0
28.5
31.6
34.7
36.5
37.1
24.5
26.1
27.6
29.7
30.6
25.5
27.4
28.7
30.8
32.3
68
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for Laredo Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
27.8
28.9
30.9
32.3
33.1
35.4
38.2
41.6
43.4
44.4
31.1
36.7
38.3
38.9
40.7
27.4
28.6
30.5
31.9
32.7
33.1
38.5
45.7
51.7
55.2
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
27.8
28.9
30.9
32.6
33.3
35.4
37.6
40.3
40.9
41.6
31.1
36.8
38.4
39.5
40.6
27.4
28.6
30.6
32.3
33.0
33.1
37.1
43.3
47.3
48.7
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
27.8
28.8
31.0
32.9
33.5
35.4
36.8
38.9
38.0
38.5
31.1
37.3
38.7
40.8
39.4
27.4
28.5
30.8
32.7
33.4
33.1
35.8
39.3
40.3
40.6
69
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for Longview Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
37.1
38.2
40.1
41.3
42.0
42.5
42.7
43.8
45.6
45.5
34.5
36.4
38.7
40.9
42.1
23.5
27.4
29.6
32.4
34.1
25.6
30.6
34.8
38.3
42.8
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
37.1
38.1
39.4
39.8
40.3
42.5
43.8
45.2
47.0
47.2
34.5
36.7
39.0
41.3
42.5
23.5
27.2
29.2
32.0
33.2
25.6
28.0
30.2
32.9
34.8
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
37.1
37.9
38.3
38.0
37.8
42.5
44.8
46.8
48.3
48.4
34.5
37.3
39.8
42.8
44.1
23.5
27.2
29.3
31.8
32.6
25.6
26.1
28.1
30.8
31.2
70
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for Lubbock Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
30.6
33.0
34.8
35.4
36.4
35.6
37.1
39.7
39.5
39.0
28.3
30.8
32.8
34.5
36.0
25.6
28.2
30.0
32.0
33.4
26.3
31.3
34.7
37.9
41.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
30.6
32.0
33.1
33.7
34.5
35.6
36.0
37.8
36.6
36.4
28.3
30.6
32.8
34.5
35.9
25.6
27.7
29.4
31.2
32.3
26.3
30.9
33.6
36.1
38.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
30.6
31.0
31.7
32.1
32.8
35.6
34.6
35.1
33.2
33.3
28.3
30.3
32.5
34.0
35.0
25.6
27.2
28.9
30.4
31.2
26.3
30.6
33.4
35.2
37.1
71
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for McAllen-Edinburg-Mission Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
28.3
29.4
31.3
33.0
33.9
55.4
53.8
50.6
50.3
52.7
31.1
35.1
38.1
39.8
40.9
26.7
28.3
30.4
32.2
33.2
34.5
38.8
41.3
44.4
48.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
28.3
29.7
31.7
33.9
34.8
55.4
56.6
55.3
53.9
55.8
31.1
35.1
37.5
38.8
39.5
26.7
28.4
30.7
33.0
34.0
34.5
37.1
37.9
40.6
43.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
28.3
29.9
32.3
34.8
35.7
55.4
60.3
62.9
60.4
60.4
31.1
34.9
37.7
39.7
40.3
26.7
28.5
31.1
33.7
34.7
34.5
35.8
35.8
38.3
40.8
72
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for Midland Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.5
35.7
38.0
39.1
39.9
42.2
42.4
45.0
46.5
46.3
32.0
34.1
37.5
39.1
41.1
25.6
28.7
31.1
33.3
35.1
29.9
34.8
38.3
39.9
42.2
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.5
35.4
37.3
38.3
39.1
42.2
42.2
44.9
46.7
46.5
32.0
34.2
37.9
39.7
41.7
25.6
28.8
31.4
33.8
35.6
29.9
32.6
34.1
34.7
35.7
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.5
35.1
36.7
37.7
38.2
42.2
42.1
44.8
46.6
46.4
32.0
35.1
39.2
42.0
43.9
25.6
29.0
31.7
34.3
35.9
29.9
31.4
32.2
32.8
33.4
73
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for Odessa Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
31.4
33.6
35.8
36.1
37.0
42.0
42.2
44.9
47.9
47.6
31.3
33.4
36.2
37.6
39.4
25.7
28.3
29.8
31.3
32.7
30.9
36.0
40.7
43.5
47.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
31.4
33.3
35.1
35.7
36.4
42.0
42.7
45.3
48.1
47.7
31.3
33.0
34.8
35.8
36.7
25.7
28.5
30.3
32.0
33.4
30.9
34.1
37.7
39.8
43.4
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
31.4
33.0
34.6
35.4
36.1
42.0
43.3
45.7
48.2
47.7
31.3
32.6
34.4
35.2
35.5
25.7
28.6
30.7
32.7
34.0
30.9
33.2
35.4
38.0
41.3
74
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for San Angelo Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
34.4
35.8
36.3
36.2
36.9
41.3
40.9
41.8
40.5
39.2
28.8
33.7
37.0
37.6
39.1
27.0
29.0
30.4
32.4
33.7
27.7
32.8
38.4
41.3
45.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
34.4
35.5
35.4
35.4
36.1
41.3
41.2
41.3
39.9
38.4
28.8
33.5
36.4
36.7
37.9
27.0
28.7
30.2
32.3
33.7
27.7
31.1
34.6
36.2
39.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
34.4
35.1
34.6
34.5
34.8
41.3
41.7
40.7
38.8
36.7
28.8
33.1
36.1
35.7
36.6
27.0
28.5
30.1
32.2
33.3
27.7
30.0
32.2
33.6
36.1
75
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for San Antonio-New Braunfels Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
34.1
36.1
38.2
39.7
40.7
42.7
44.4
45.8
46.9
46.8
33.4
35.1
37.5
38.9
38.5
29.4
32.1
34.6
36.8
38.5
30.4
34.5
38.3
41.3
43.8
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
34.1
35.9
37.7
39.2
40.2
42.7
44.5
46.0
47.1
47.0
33.4
35.3
37.7
39.3
39.1
29.4
31.9
34.3
36.6
38.2
30.4
32.8
35.0
36.4
38.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
34.1
35.7
37.3
38.8
39.7
42.7
44.6
46.5
48.0
48.2
33.4
35.5
37.9
39.8
39.9
29.4
31.8
34.0
36.5
38.0
30.4
31.5
33.1
34.3
35.5
76
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for Sherman-Denison Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
39.5
40.1
41.2
43.4
44.7
43.6
44.5
44.2
46.3
47.0
33.2
34.6
37.8
40.2
42.3
23.1
27.7
30.6
33.6
36.1
26.6
32.8
39.4
45.3
51.2
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
39.5
40.2
40.6
41.9
42.4
43.6
45.9
46.3
47.7
47.9
33.2
34.6
37.8
40.1
42.0
23.1
27.0
29.3
31.9
33.2
26.6
30.8
36.2
40.4
44.9
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
39.5
40.2
39.4
39.5
39.2
43.6
47.4
48.8
48.9
48.4
33.2
34.6
38.2
41.0
43.1
23.1
26.5
28.6
30.9
31.0
26.6
29.6
33.8
37.7
41.9
77
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for Texarkana Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
37.9
38.6
39.2
40.6
41.5
42.1
42.8
42.6
43.5
43.7
32.7
33.6
35.5
37.3
38.0
27.4
29.9
31.8
33.8
35.8
26.8
31.7
35.2
39.8
45.4
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
37.9
38.3
38.4
39.4
40.0
42.1
42.9
42.4
43.2
43.0
32.7
33.5
35.5
37.2
37.7
27.4
28.7
29.7
31.2
31.9
26.8
29.8
33.0
37.2
42.7
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
37.9
37.9
37.5
37.9
38.2
42.1
43.2
42.3
42.8
42.1
32.7
33.4
35.3
36.7
36.9
27.4
27.8
28.1
29.3
28.9
26.8
28.9
32.1
36.5
41.5
78
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for Tyler Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
35.6
36.6
39.6
41.4
42.8
42.3
42.6
44.1
47.2
48.4
31.8
33.2
37.7
39.5
40.6
23.0
26.8
29.6
32.8
34.7
25.9
31.1
35.5
39.6
44.2
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
35.6
36.2
38.5
39.5
40.5
42.3
43.5
44.8
47.8
48.6
31.8
32.7
36.9
38.2
39.0
23.0
26.8
29.6
32.7
34.2
25.9
29.5
32.5
35.8
39.2
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
35.6
35.6
37.0
37.6
38.1
42.3
44.4
45.5
47.7
48.1
31.8
32.1
36.0
36.7
37.0
23.0
26.8
29.6
32.7
33.8
25.9
28.5
31.1
34.5
36.9
79
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for Victoria Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
37.1
36.5
36.3
36.7
36.7
45.9
44.9
43.1
42.4
40.2
35.5
33.6
33.3
34.4
34.2
28.7
30.4
32.0
33.9
35.0
29.7
29.1
30.4
30.9
30.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
37.1
36.5
36.1
36.4
36.2
45.9
45.6
44.4
43.5
41.4
35.5
33.5
33.3
34.6
34.3
28.7
30.2
31.8
33.6
34.8
29.7
27.6
28.0
27.0
26.9
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
37.1
36.7
36.1
36.2
35.8
45.9
46.8
46.3
45.6
43.9
35.5
33.5
33.5
34.6
34.3
28.7
30.3
31.9
33.6
34.7
29.7
25.7
25.7
25.0
25.7
80
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for Waco Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.2
34.6
36.5
37.5
38.3
40.1
40.4
40.9
40.9
39.8
31.2
33.3
37.2
39.9
42.0
24.1
27.6
30.0
32.6
34.4
22.6
28.3
32.5
37.2
42.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.2
34.0
35.4
36.1
36.6
40.1
41.2
41.3
41.2
39.6
31.2
33.5
37.4
40.2
42.2
24.1
27.0
29.1
31.3
32.4
22.6
27.4
30.6
34.4
38.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.2
33.3
34.1
34.4
34.2
40.1
42.0
41.7
41.1
38.5
31.2
33.8
37.8
40.7
42.6
24.1
26.4
28.3
30.1
30.7
22.6
27.0
29.6
32.6
35.3
81
Table 8 (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity for 2000 and Projected for 2010 to 2040
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific
Net Migration for Wichita Falls Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
35.2
36.0
37.2
37.8
38.4
40.0
40.2
40.6
40.7
40.1
29.7
31.8
33.5
34.3
35.6
24.8
27.7
29.9
32.6
34.3
26.5
31.0
34.7
37.8
42.2
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
35.2
35.7
36.5
36.7
37.2
40.0
40.7
40.8
40.9
39.9
29.7
31.7
33.3
34.1
35.2
24.8
27.2
29.3
31.7
33.1
26.5
29.5
31.7
34.3
37.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
35.2
40.0
29.7
24.8
26.5
2020
35.4
41.2
32.1
26.7
29.0
35.6
40.9
30.5
2030
34.5
28.6
2040
35.4
40.6
35.5
30.7
32.4
2050
35.3
38.9
36.3
31.6
34.4
__________________________________________________________
82
Table 9:
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Abilene Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
126
2,678
18,781
2,355
23,940
0.5
11.2
78.5
9.8
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-10,605
2,111
29,196
6,765
27,467
-38.6
7.7
106.3
24.6
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-27,554
806
40,026
14,069
27,347
-100.7
2.9
146.4
51.4
100.0
83
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Amarillo Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-7,312
2,950
48,417
5,484
49,539
-14.8
6.0
97.7
11.1
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-11,890
5,258
97,402
20,515
111,285
-10.6
4.7
87.5
18.4
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-25,154
8,262
170,468
45,396
198,972
-12.7
4.2
85.7
22.8
100.0
84
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Number
Race/Ethnicity
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-37,645
11,086
381,001
38,842
393,284
-9.6
2.8
96.9
9.9
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
269,466
60,781
996,189
212,849
1,539,285
17.6
3.9
64.7
13.8
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
668,660
132,216
2,086,264
573,511
3,460,651
19.3
3.8
60.3
16.6
100.0
85
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Beaumont-Port Arthur Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-11,394
12,074
35,396
7,445
43,521
-26.1
27.7
81.3
17.1
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-27,135
10,218
92,925
19,538
95,546
-28.4
10.7
97.3
20.4
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-53,945
-2,976
176,153
40,758
159,990
-33.7
-1.9
110.1
25.5
100.0
86
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Brownsville-Harlingen Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-17,359
216
272,397
1,211
256,465
-6.8
0.1
106.2
0.5
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-5.2
0.1
103.4
1.7
100.0
-16,718
206
333,362
5,448
322,298
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-18,187
453
339,362
14,054
335,682
-5.4
0.1
101.1
4.2
100.0
87
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
College Station-Bryan Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
13,822
6,944
55,259
5,176
81,201
16.9
8.6
68.1
6.4
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
26,751
12,058
102,539
17,777
159,125
16.8
7.6
64.4
11.2
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
29,497
15,308
160,260
38,304
243,369
12.1
6.3
65.9
15.7
100.0
88
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Corpus Christi Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-20,433
223
98,126
3,414
81,330
-25.2
0.3
120.7
4.2
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-36,611
445
141,117
12,466
117,417
-31.2
0.4
120.2
10.6
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-60,532
-864
155,741
27,247
121,592
-49.8
-0.7
128.1
22.4
100.0
89
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-195,064
132,867
1,287,037
145,347
1,370,187
-14.2
9.7
93.9
10.6
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-16,416
537,142
3,039,355
852,104
4,412,185
-0.4
12.2
68.9
19.3
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
279,373
1,142,440
6,102,478
2,416,788
9,941,079
2.8
11.5
61.4
24.3
100.0
90
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
El Paso Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-8,375
4,137
299,301
6,544
301,607
-2.8
1.4
99.2
2.2
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-23,961
4,813
471,918
21,057
473,827
-5.0
1.0
99.6
4.4
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-43,077
2,503
568,252
42,332
570,010
-7.5
0.4
99.7
7.4
100.0
91
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-199,041
88,564
1,331,665
102,446
1,323,634
-15.0
6.7
100.6
7.7
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-115,429
383,352
3,094,213
722,398
4,084,534
-2.9
9.4
75.8
17.7
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-27,063
734,371
5,664,744
1,928,799
8,300,851
-0.2
8.8
68.2
23.2
100.0
92
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Killeen-Temple Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
34,074
27,175
63,013
16,971
141,233
24.2
19.2
44.6
12.0
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
54,724
40,628
140,035
55,428
290,815
18.7
14.0
48.2
19.1
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
60,052
41,747
232,852
123,011
457,662
13.1
9.1
50.9
26.9
100.0
93
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Laredo Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
1,208
290
173,314
539
175,351
0.7
0.2
98.8
0.3
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
0.5
0.1
99.0
0.4
100.0
1,191
241
241,449
896
243,777
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-190
160
275,130
4,380
279,480
-0.1
0.1
98.4
1.6
100.0
94
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Longview Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-8,026
3,071
26,590
3,270
24,905
-32.2
12.3
106.8
13.1
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-6,233
5,336
77,817
11,474
88,394
-7.0
6.0
88.0
13.0
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-14,358
6,070
160,208
31,627
183,547
-7.8
3.3
87.3
17.2
100.0
95
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Lubbock Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-1,966
5,909
64,232
3,953
72,128
-2.8
8.2
89.1
5.5
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-3,432
7,380
99,841
16,302
120,091
-2.8
6.1
83.1
13.6
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-12,293
5,479
124,392
39,436
157,014
-7.8
3.5
79.2
25.1
100.0
96
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-26,122
606
503,463
2,587
480,534
-5.4
0.1
104.8
0.5
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-10,538
1,108
772,996
14,807
778,373
-1.3
0.1
99.3
1.9
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
8,597
2,245
956,736
37,023
1,004,601
0.9
0.2
95.2
3.7
100.0
97
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Midland Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-4,955
1,459
38,417
2,142
37,063
-13.4
3.9
103.7
5.8
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-8,881
1,855
72,070
7,157
72,201
-12.3
2.6
99.8
9.9
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-17,396
1,440
105,384
16,279
105,707
-16.5
1.4
99.7
15.4
100.0
98
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Odessa Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-4,935
1,353
58,979
950
56,347
-8.8
2.4
104.7
1.7
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-12,327
1,879
90,804
2,526
82,882
-14.9
2.3
109.6
3.0
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-23,313
1,115
113,892
6,140
97,834
-23.8
1.1
116.4
6.3
100.0
99
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
San Angelo Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-3,038
214
22,006
1,107
20,289
-15.1
1.1
108.5
5.5
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-8,803
-58
26,797
2,663
20,599
-42.7
-0.3
130.1
12.9
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-19,408
-542
26,108
5,521
11,679
-166.2
-4.6
223.5
47.3
1 00.0
100
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
San Antonio-New Braunfels Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-81,325
18,799
483,342
31,644
452,460
-18.0
4.2
106.8
7.0
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
33,942
61,138
997,392
152,822
1,245,294
2.7
4.9
80.1
12.3
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
172,296
100,456
1,465,005
413,967
2,151,724
8.0
4.7
68.1
19.2
100.0
101
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Sherman-Denison Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-10,116
822
10,578
1,007
2,291
-441.6
35.9
461.7
44.0
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-10,416
513
30,203
6,103
26,403
-39.4
1.9
114.4
23.1
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-16,684
281
60,914
14,644
59,155
-28.3
0.5
103.0
24.8
100.0
102
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Texarkana Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-2,244
4,355
2,912
1,038
6,061
-37.0
71.9
48.0
17.1
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-7,522
5,168
6,354
3,938
7,938
-94.7
65.1
80.0
49.6
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-17,087
2,814
9,340
10,398
5,465
-312.7
51.5
170.9
190.3
100.0
103
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Tyler Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-15,167
5,617
29,967
3,051
23,468
-64.6
23.9
127.7
13.0
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-11,250
10,547
77,211
13,523
90,031
-12.5
11.7
85.8
15.0
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-15,022
10,704
142,477
34,962
173,121
-8.7
6.2
82.3
20.2
100.0
104
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Victoria Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-1,461
1,739
22,254
2,009
24,541
-6.0
7.1
90.7
8.2
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-7,387
1,605
27,253
3,935
25,406
-29.1
6.3
107.3
15.5
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-14,642
1,300
26,228
7,984
20,870
-70.2
6.2
125.7
38.3
100.0
105
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Waco Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-5,735
3,737
43,569
2,868
44,439
-12.9
8.4
98.0
6.5
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-21,352
5,720
79,271
9,021
72,660
-29.4
7.9
109.1
12.4
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-42,936
2,983
115,911
17,820
93,778
-45.8
3.2
123.6
19.0
100.0
106
Table 9 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Wichita Falls Metropolitan Statistical Area
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-1,954
2,629
15,326
2,638
18,639
-10.5
14.1
82.2
14.2
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-14,151
2,003
25,644
5,865
19,361
-73.1
10.3
132.5
30.3
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
-32,155
-261.5
Black
-68
-0.6
Hispanic
35,883
291.9
Other
8,631
70.2
Total
12,291
100.0
_________________________________________________________
107
Table 10: Total Population and Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projected Population and Percent Population Change 2010-2050
Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for Council of Government Regions in
Texas - Ranked by Total Population Size in 2010
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
Council of
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
20102020203020402010Government Region
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
North Central Texas
Houston-Galveston
Alamo Area
Capital Area
Lower Rio Grande Valley
East Texas
Rio Grande
Coastal Bend
Central Texas
Panhandle
Permian Basin
South Plains
South East Texas
Deep East Texas
Heart of Texas
South Texas
West Central Texas
Brazos Valley
Ark-Tex
Nortex
Texoma
Golden Crescent
Middle Rio Grande
Concho Valley
6,539,950
6,087,133
2,249,718
1,830,003
1,203,123
829,749
825,913
571,280
449,641
427,927
417,679
411,659
388,745
378,477
349,273
330,590
327,390
319,447
281,947
222,860
193,229
188,626
167,010
154,192
7,078,266
6,609,165
2,420,546
1,990,364
1,379,945
861,370
916,503
611,764
495,988
459,948
458,358
444,473
406,787
392,749
366,438
388,425
342,621
342,950
292,790
230,830
198,889
199,870
187,820
161,751
7,507,196
7,018,314
2,558,514
2,098,589
1,571,478
883,590
1,002,213
647,922
533,081
491,421
494,236
475,908
420,661
405,459
382,348
449,572
354,150
366,058
301,405
239,102
202,668
210,861
210,478
168,986
7,797,896
7,297,940
2,646,681
2,174,611
1,758,905
893,533
1,072,421
675,230
567,906
517,885
526,205
503,117
427,989
414,721
393,165
510,665
361,005
385,532
305,946
244,753
202,729
219,289
232,556
108
174,624
7,935,383
7,440,144
2,704,140
2,220,862
1,951,002
901,205
1,134,759
700,708
596,381
540,372
554,032
529,163
431,938
425,594
403,263
575,273
367,328
408,260
309,685
249,408
201,528
228,096
257,700
180,131
8.2
8.6
7.6
8.8
14.7
3.8
11.0
7.1
10.3
7.5
9.7
8.0
4.6
3.8
4.9
17.5
4.7
7.4
3.8
3.6
2.9
6.0
12.5
4.9
6.1
6.2
5.7
5.4
13.9
2.6
9.4
5.9
7.5
6.8
7.8
7.1
3.4
3.2
4.3
15.7
3.4
6.7
2.9
3.6
1.9
5.5
12.1
4.5
3.9
4.0
3.4
3.6
11.9
1.1
7.0
4.2
6.5
5.4
6.5
5.7
1.7
2.3
2.8
13.6
1.9
5.3
1.5
2.4
0.0
4.0
10.5
3.3
1.8
1.9
2.2
2.1
10.9
0.9
5.8
3.8
5.0
4.3
5.3
5.2
0.9
2.6
2.6
12.7
1.8
5.9
1.2
1.9
-0.6
4.0
10.8
3.2
21.3
22.2
20.2
21.4
62.2
8.6
37.4
22.7
32.6
26.3
32.6
28.5
11.1
12.4
15.5
74.0
12.2
27.8
9.8
11.9
4.3
20.9
54.3
16.8
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Table 10: Continued
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
Total
2030Council of
Total
Total
Total
Total
20102020204020102050
Government Region
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
North Central Texas
Houston-Galveston
Alamo Area
Capital Area
Lower Rio Grande Valley
East Texas
Rio Grande
Coastal Bend
Central Texas
Panhandle
Permian Basin
South Plains
South East Texas
Deep East Texas
Heart of Texas
South Texas
West Central Texas
Brazos Valley
Ark-Tex
Nortex
Texoma
Golden Crescent
Middle Rio Grande
Concho Valley
6,539,950
6,087,133
2,249,718
1,830,003
1,203,123
829,749
825,913
571,280
449,641
427,927
417,679
411,659
388,745
378,477
349,273
330,590
327,390
319,447
281,947
222,860
193,229
188,626
167,010
154,192
7,529,519
7,075,093
2,586,176
2,200,953
1,453,822
897,131
950,385
620,189
523,489
471,251
469,448
451,636
413,151
404,527
374,621
399,830
344,797
362,015
296,490
231,365
205,755
201,744
187,729
162,166
8,621,461
8,111,578
2,924,534
2,573,614
1,735,641
965,057
1,079,420
665,829
595,042
519,668
522,173
493,274
438,434
428,835
401,244
474,870
358,886
407,910
310,231
240,982
217,964
215,032
208,598
169,940
9,789,186
9,157,981
3,230,136
2,967,407
2,021,145
1,026,765
1,194,976
699,139
670,395
567,127
573,520
531,410
461,529
446,855
422,345
549,811
367,057
451,812
320,342
247,548
226,554
225,329
227,365
174,861
10,995,559
10,205,569
3,519,081
3,398,682
2,319,393
1,095,762
1,306,261
728,111
746,827
615,669
624,145
569,812
485,214
465,082
443,249
627,363
373,596
504,274
330,826
252,827
234,278
235,724
246,699
178,746
15.1
16.2
15.0
20.3
20.8
8.1
15.1
8.6
16.4
10.1
12.4
9.7
6.3
6.9
7.3
20.9
5.3
13.3
5.2
3.8
6.5
7.0
12.4
5.2
14.5
14.6
13.1
16.9
19.4
7.6
13.6
7.4
13.7
10.3
11.2
9.2
6.1
6.0
7.1
18.8
4.1
12.7
4.6
4.2
5.9
6.6
11.1
4.8
13.5
12.9
10.4
15.3
16.4
6.4
10.7
5.0
12.7
9.1
9.8
7.7
5.3
4.2
5.3
15.8
2.3
10.8
3.3
2.7
3.9
4.8
9.0
2.9
12.3
11.4
8.9
14.5
14.8
6.7
9.3
4.1
11.4
8.6
8.8
7.2
5.1
4.1
4.9
14.1
1.8
11.6
3.3
2.1
3.4
4.6
8.5
2.2
68.1
67.7
56.4
85.7
92.8
32.1
58.2
27.5
66.1
43.9
49.4
38.4
24.8
22.9
26.9
89.8
14.1
57.9
17.3
13.4
21.2
25.0
47.7
15.9
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
109
Table 10: Continued
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
Total
2030Council of
Total
Total
Total
Total
20102020204020102050
Government Region
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
North Central Texas
Houston-Galveston
Alamo Area
Capital Area
Lower Rio Grande Valley
East Texas
Rio Grande
Coastal Bend
Central Texas
Panhandle
Permian Basin
South Plains
South East Texas
Deep East Texas
Heart of Texas
South Texas
West Central Texas
Brazos Valley
Ark-Tex
Nortex
Texoma
Golden Crescent
Middle Rio Grande
Concho Valley
6,539,950
6,087,133
2,249,718
1,830,003
1,203,123
829,749
825,913
571,280
449,641
427,927
417,679
411,659
388,745
378,477
349,273
330,590
327,390
319,447
281,947
222,860
193,229
188,626
167,010
154,192
8,049,465
7,591,647
2,759,232
2,441,264
1,525,927
936,323
980,456
624,454
551,856
484,478
479,978
457,807
418,420
418,106
382,710
409,389
347,819
382,528
301,626
231,941
213,118
204,094
186,755
162,585
10,115,541
9,466,708
3,323,204
3,190,612
1,888,065
1,059,245
1,142,673
671,447
659,690
554,343
547,298
506,423
455,653
455,430
419,015
493,464
363,456
453,474
321,195
241,920
234,926
218,376
203,184
169,742
12,888,231
11,712,202
3,886,655
4,129,875
2,236,009
1,192,453
1,281,526
697,181
780,639
633,691
613,899
550,335
498,941
482,461
447,898
570,742
371,954
524,839
338,929
248,400
254,726
228,685
213,427
172,198
16,541,609
14,416,642
4,450,313
5,358,126
2,560,965
1,355,704
1,398,989
707,916
914,416
726,044
676,892
591,983
551,607
504,915
474,365
638,866
375,854
609,323
359,693
252,635
276,147
236,514
218,192
171,587
23.1
24.7
22.6
33.4
26.8
12.8
18.7
9.3
22.7
13.2
14.9
11.2
7.6
10.5
9.6
23.8
6.2
19.7
7.0
4.1
10.3
8.2
11.8
5.4
25.7
24.7
20.4
30.7
23.7
13.1
16.5
7.5
19.5
14.4
14.0
10.6
8.9
8.9
9.5
0.5
4.5
18.5
6.5
4.3
10.2
7.0
8.8
4.4
27.4
23.7
17.0
29.4
18.4
12.6
12.2
3.8
18.3
14.3
12.2
8.7
9.5
5.9
6.9
15.7
2.3
15.7
5.5
2.7
8.4
4.7
5.0
1.4
28.3
23.1
14.5
29.7
14.5
13.7
9.2
1.5
17.1
14.6
10.3
7.6
10.6
4.7
5.9
11.9
1.0
16.1
6.1
1.7
8.4
3.4
2.2
0.4
152.9
136.8
97.8
192.8
112.9
63.4
69.4
23.9
103.4
69.7
62.1
43.8
41.9
33.4
35.8
93.3
14.8
90.7
27.6
13.4
42.9
25.4
30.6
11.3
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
110
111
Table 11
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Alamo Area Council of Governments
_____________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
_____________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
37.2
34.5
31.9
29.4
27.4
5.9
5.9
5.8
5.7
5.6
53.2
55.7
58.3
60.7
62.8
3.7
3.9
4.0
4.2
4.2
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
37.2
33.8
30.4
27.3
24.6
5.9
5.9
5.8
5.7
5.5
53.2
56.0
58.8
61.2
63.2
3.7
4.3
5.0
5.8
6.7
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
37.2
33.1
29.2
25.8
22.9
5.9
5.9
5.8
5.5
5.2
53.2
56.1
58.6
60.2
60.7
3.7
4.9
6.4
8.5
11.2
112
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Ark-Tex Council of Governments
______________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
______________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
69.6
67.0
64.2
61.6
59.4
16.2
16.6
16.8
16.8
16.7
11.3
13.2
15.4
17.6
19.5
2.9
3.2
3.6
4.0
4.4
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
69.6
65.9
62.0
57.6
53.1
16.2
16.6
16.6
16.3
15.8
11.3
14.1
17.4
21.2
25.1
2.9
3.4
4.0
4.9
6.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
69.6
64.4
58.4
51.4
43.9
16.2
16.5
16.2
15.1
13.6
11.3
15.2
20.1
25.9
31.9
2.9
3.9
5.3
7.6
10.6
113
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Brazos Valley Council of Governments
_______________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
61.5
57.8
55.0
52.1
50.0
12.7
12.8
12.6
12.3
11.8
20.9
24.1
27.0
30.1
32.8
4.9
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.4
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
61.5
56.9
52.7
48.1
44.0
12.7
12.5
12.0
11.5
10.7
20.9
25.0
29.1
33.8
38.4
4.9
5.6
6.2
6.6
6.9
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
61.5
55.4
49.4
42.9
37.1
12.7
12.3
11.6
10.7
9.3
20.9
26.2
31.8
38.1
44.1
4.9
6.1
7.2
8.3
9.5
114
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Capital Area Council of Governments
_______________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
56.1
53.2
49.9
46.6
43.5
6.8
6.7
6.6
6.4
6.1
30.5
33.3
36.5
39.8
43.1
6.6
6.8
7.0
7.2
7.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
56.1
52.1
47.5
42.5
37.9
6.8
6.5
6.2
5.9
5.5
30.5
34.0
38.1
42.5
46.7
6.6
7.4
8.2
9.1
9.9
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
56.1
50.9
44.7
37.8
31.9
6.8
6.4
5.9
5.4
4.8
30.5
34.7
39.8
45.4
50.3
6.6
8.0
9.6
11.4
13.0
115
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Central Texas Council of Governments
_______________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
_______________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
55.7
53.3
50.7
48.7
47.1
17.4
17.7
18.0
17.9
17.7
20.4
22.1
24.0
25.8
27.4
6.5
6.9
7.3
7.6
7.8
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
55.7
52.1
47.8
43.9
40.4
17.4
17.4
17.3
16.7
15.9
20.4
23.0
26.2
29.3
32.3
6.5
7.5
8.7
10.1
11.4
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
55.7
50.5
44.6
38.7
33.5
17.4
17.0
16.2
14.9
13.1
20.4
24.2
28.7
33.0
36.7
6.5
8.3
10.5
13.4
16.7
116
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Coastal Bend Council of Governments
_______________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
_______________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
34.0
31.3
28.7
26.2
24.1
3.2
3.1
2.9
2.8
2.7
60.3
63.0
65.7
68.3
70.5
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.7
2.7
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
34.0
30.3
26.8
23.6
20.8
3.2
3.0
2.9
2.7
2.6
60.3
63.8
67.1
70.2
72.8
2.5
2.9
3.2
3.5
3.8
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
34.0
29.3
24.8
20.9
17.6
3.2
3.0
2.8
2.6
2.4
60.3
64.6
68.5
71.6
73.9
2.5
3.1
3.9
4.9
6.1
117
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Concho Valley Council of Governments
_______________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
_______________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
58.2
54.8
51.4
48.5
46.1
2.8
2.8
2.7
2.6
2.5
36.6
39.9
43.3
46.3
48.8
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.6
2.6
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
58.2
54.1
49.8
46.0
42.6
2.8
2.8
2.7
2.5
2.4
36.6
40.5
44.6
48.3
51.5
2.4
2.6
2.9
3.2
3.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
58.2
52.9
47.7
42.7
38.1
2.8
2.8
2.6
2.4
2.2
36.6
41.4
46.2
50.6
54.4
2.4
2.9
3.5
4.3
5.3
118
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Deep East Texas Council of Governments
________________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
69.2
66.5
63.7
61.0
58.9
15.4
15.7
15.8
15.8
15.6
13.1
15.2
17.5
19.9
21.9
2.3
2.6
3.0
3.3
3.6
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
69.2
66.0
62.4
58.4
54.6
15.4
15.5
15.4
15.2
14.8
13.1
15.8
19.1
22.8
26.4
2.3
2.7
3.1
3.6
4.2
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
69.2
65.3
60.5
54.7
48.6
15.4
15.3
14.8
14.0
12.9
13.1
16.6
21.1
26.4
31.9
2.3
2.8
3.6
4.9
6.6
119
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
East Texas Council of Governments
_______________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
68.5
65.7
62.7
59.6
57.1
15.0
15.2
15.2
15.0
14.7
14.0
16.3
19.0
21.9
24.5
2.5
2.8
3.1
3.5
3.7
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
68.5
64.3
59.4
53.9
48.2
15.0
14.9
14.4
13.7
12.8
14.0
17.8
22.6
28.0
33.8
2.5
3.0
3.6
4.4
5.2
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
68.5
62.6
55.1
46.6
37.7
15.0
14.6
13.6
12.0
10.2
14.0
19.4
26.7
35.0
43.6
2.5
3.4
4.6
6.4
8.5
120
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission
________________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
52.8
48.9
45.3
42.0
39.3
6.0
6.1
6.1
5.9
5.7
39.0
42.5
45.8
49.0
51.7
2.2
2.5
2.8
3.1
3.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
52.8
48.0
43.2
38.7
34.6
6.0
6.0
5.9
5.6
5.3
39.0
43.5
47.9
52.3
56.1
2.2
2.5
3.0
3.4
4.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
52.8
46.6
40.6
34.6
29.5
6.0
6.1
5.9
5.5
5.0
39.0
44.5
49.9
54.9
58.8
2.2
2.8
3.6
5.0
6.7
121
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Heart of Texas Council of Governments
________________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
61.9
58.6
55.6
52.7
50.4
13.7
13.9
13.7
13.4
13.0
21.7
24.7
27.7
30.7
33.3
2.7
2.8
3.0
3.2
3.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
61.9
57.4
52.7
47.9
43.4
13.7
13.8
13.4
12.9
12.2
21.7
25.8
30.4
35.2
40.0
2.7
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.4
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
61.9
55.7
49.2
42.4
35.8
13.7
13.7
13.0
12.1
10.8
21.7
27.3
33.7
40.4
47.1
2.7
3.3
4.1
5.1
6.3
122
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Houston-Galveston Area Council
_______________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
_______________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
39.9
37.3
34.7
32.2
29.8
16.8
16.5
16.1
15.6
15.0
35.2
38.0
41.0
44.1
47.2
8.1
8.2
8.2
8.1
8.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
39.9
35.1
30.5
26.2
22.6
16.8
16.4
15.7
14.8
13.8
35.2
39.4
43.7
47.9
51.7
8.1
9.1
10.1
11.1
11.9
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
39.9
33.1
26.7
21.0
16.5
16.8
16.1
15.0
13.7
12.2
35.2
40.7
46.0
50.7
54.4
8.1
10.1
12.3
14.6
16.9
123
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Lower Rio Grande Valley Development Council
________________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
8.8
6.7
5.1
3.9
3.1
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
89.7
91.9
93.6
94.8
95.7
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.0
0.9
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
8.8
7.0
5.4
4.2
3.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
89.7
91.5
93.0
94.1
94.9
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.4
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
8.8
7.3
5.9
4.6
3.8
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
89.7
91.0
92.1
93.0
93.4
1.1
1.4
1.7
2.1
2.5
124
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Middle Rio Grande Development Council
_______________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
15.1
13.3
11.5
10.1
8.9
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
83.1
84.9
86.7
88.2
89.5
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
15.1
13.2
11.3
9.8
8.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
83.1
85.0
86.9
88.5
89.9
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
15.1
13.1
11.1
9.6
8.4
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.4
83.1
85.0
86.8
88.2
89.3
1.2
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
125
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Nortex Regional Planning Commission
________________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
73.8
71.2
68.5
65.9
63.7
7.0
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.3
15.5
17.7
20.0
22.3
24.3
3.7
4.0
4.3
4.5
4.7
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
73.8
70.1
65.9
61.8
57.6
7.0
7.1
7.1
7.0
6.9
15.5
18.6
22.2
25.9
29.7
3.7
4.2
4.8
5.3
5.8
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
73.8
68.5
62.4
55.8
49.2
7.0
7.0
6.9
6.6
6.1
15.5
20.0
25.4
31.4
37.5
3.7
4.5
5.3
6.2
7.2
126
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
North Central Texas Council of Governments
______________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
_______________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
50.9
48.0
45.2
42.2
39.5
14.5
14.5
14.3
14.0
13.6
27.3
29.9
32.8
35.9
39.0
7.3
7.6
7.7
7.9
7.9
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
50.9
45.5
40.1
34.8
30.2
14.5
14.7
14.6
14.2
13.5
27.3
31.3
35.7
40.1
44.2
7.3
8.5
9.6
10.9
12.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
50.9
42.9
35.1
27.9
21.8
14.5
14.9
14.6
13.8
12.6
27.3
32.7
38.5
43.7
48.0
7.3
9.5
11.8
14.6
17.6
127
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Panhandle Regional Planning Commission
_______________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
_______________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
60.8
57.0
53.2
49.6
46.6
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.4
4.3
31.0
34.5
38.0
41.4
44.4
3.7
4.0
4.3
4.6
4.7
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
60.8
55.3
49.5
44.0
38.8
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.3
4.1
31.0
35.8
40.8
45.6
50.1
3.7
4.4
5.2
6.1
7.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
60.8
53.1
45.0
36.8
29.4
4.5
4.5
4.4
4.2
3.8
31.0
37.5
44.2
50.6
56.2
3.7
4.9
6.4
8.4
10.6
128
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Permian Basin Regional Planning Commission
______________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
______________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
46.5
43.0
39.6
36.3
33.4
4.7
4.6
4.4
4.3
4.1
46.6
50.1
53.6
56.9
60.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.4
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
46.5
41.5
36.7
32.3
28.4
4.7
4.5
4.3
4.1
3.8
46.6
51.5
56.3
60.6
64.6
2.2
2.5
2.7
3.0
3.2
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
46.5
39.8
33.7
28.3
24.0
4.7
4.5
4.2
3.8
3.3
46.6
53.0
58.8
63.7
67.5
2.2
2.7
3.3
4.2
5.2
129
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Rio Grande Council of Governments
______________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
______________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
13.8
12.4
11.0
10.1
9.2
2.5
2.4
2.4
2.3
2.2
81.6
83.1
84.5
85.5
86.5
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
13.8
11.5
9.6
8.0
6.8
2.5
2.4
2.2
2.1
2.0
81.6
83.8
85.7
87.2
88.3
2.1
2.3
2.5
2.7
2.9
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
13.8
10.6
8.1
6.3
4.9
2.5
2.3
2.1
1.9
1.7
81.6
84.6
86.9
88.3
89.1
2.1
2.5
2.9
3.5
4.3
130
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
South East Texas Regional Planning Commission
_______________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
_______________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
58.8
56.7
54.6
52.4
50.4
24.3
24.5
24.6
24.7
24.6
12.9
14.4
16.1
17.9
19.7
4.0
4.4
4.7
5.0
5.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
58.8
54.9
50.8
46.4
41.8
24.3
24.3
23.7
22.8
21.6
12.9
16.1
20.0
24.5
29.4
4.0
4.7
5.5
6.3
7.2
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
58.8
53.0
46.2
39.2
32.1
24.3
23.8
22.3
19.8
16.7
12.9
18.0
24.8
32.6
41.0
4.0
5.2
6.7
8.4
10.2
131
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
South Plains Association of Governments
_______________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
_______________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
53.0
49.4
45.8
42.5
39.8
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.0
38.0
41.5
45.0
48.2
51.0
2.9
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.2
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
53.0
48.3
43.6
39.6
36.0
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.0
5.7
38.0
42.2
46.3
49.9
53.2
2.9
3.4
4.0
4.5
5.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
53.0
47.2
41.5
36.4
32.1
6.1
6.1
5.9
5.6
5.1
38.0
42.9
47.5
51.2
53.9
2.9
3.8
5.1
6.8
8.9
132
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
South Texas Development Council
_______________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
3.6
3.2
2.8
2.5
2.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
95.6
96.0
96.4
96.8
97.2
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
3.6
3.1
2.7
2.5
2.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
95.6
96.1
96.5
96.9
97.3
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
3.6
3.1
2.7
2.3
2.0
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
95.6
96.0
96.4
96.7
96.9
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
133
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Texoma Council of Governments
_______________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
_______________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
79.0
76.8
74.1
71.5
69.3
5.3
5.4
5.6
5.6
5.6
11.9
13.8
16.0
18.3
20.4
3.8
4.0
4.3
4.6
4.7
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
79.0
75.3
70.7
65.4
59.8
5.3
5.2
5.1
4.9
4.6
11.9
15.1
19.2
24.0
29.3
3.8
4.4
5.0
5.7
6.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
79.0
73.4
65.9
57.0
47.2
5.3
5.1
4.8
4.3
3.7
11.9
16.7
23.2
30.9
39.5
3.8
4.8
6.1
7.8
9.6
134
Table 11 (continued)
Percent of Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projections of
the Population by Race/Ethnicity from 2020 to 2050 Under Alternative
Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
West Central Texas Council of Governments
______________________________________________________________
Anglo
Hispanic
Year
Black
Other
_______________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
69.4
66.5
63.4
60.8
58.7
5.1
5.3
5.5
5.5
5.5
22.8
25.3
28.0
30.5
32.5
2.7
2.9
3.1
3.2
3.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
69.4
65.5
61.5
57.5
53.8
5.1
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.2
22.8
26.1
29.7
33.2
36.6
2.7
3.1
3.5
4.0
4.4
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010
2010
69.4
5.1
22.8
2.7
2020
64.3
5.2
27.2
3.3
2030
58.5
5.2
32.1
4.2
2040
52.7
5.0
36.9
5.4
2050
47.1
4.6
41.5
6.8
________________________________________________________________
135
Table 12:
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Alamo Area Council of Governments
_______________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
_______________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
34.5
36.4
38.3
39.8
40.7
43.6
45.0
45.9
46.9
46.7
33.3
35.1
37.5
38.9
38.5
29.4
32.1
34.5
36.7
38.4
30.5
34.6
38.5
41.4
43.9
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
34.5
36.2
37.9
39.3
40.2
43.6
45.3
46.5
47.5
47.4
33.3
35.3
37.7
39.2
39.1
29.4
31.9
34.2
36.6
38.1
30.5
32.9
35.1
36.5
38.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
34.5
36.0
37.6
39.1
39.9
43.6
45.7
47.5
48.8
48.9
33.3
35.5
37.9
39.8
39.9
29.4
31.7
34.0
36.5
37.9
30.5
31.6
33.3
34.3
35.6
136
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Ark-Tex Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
39.0
39.3
39.6
40.9
41.6
43.8
44.3
43.6
44.5
44.8
34.6
35.3
37.1
39.4
40.6
23.5
26.9
29.7
32.3
33.7
27.0
30.4
33.2
36.3
40.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
39.0
39.3
38.9
39.6
39.5
43.8
45.1
44.4
44.9
44.7
34.6
35.5
37.3
39.6
40.5
23.5
26.1
28.1
30.4
30.8
27.0
28.4
30.3
32.7
33.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
39.0
39.4
38.1
37.5
36.5
43.8
46.1
45.9
45.6
44.8
34.6
36.2
38.0
40.5
41.1
23.5
25.3
26.8
28.4
28.2
27.0
26.3
27.4
30.4
30.5
137
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Brazos Valley Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
29.0
30.6
31.4
31.4
32.7
32.9
33.7
34.2
32.8
33.3
30.1
31.9
35.2
36.9
38.8
23.3
24.8
25.8
27.3
28.8
25.3
29.3
31.4
34.1
37.9
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
29.0
30.7
32.0
32.3
33.5
32.9
34.5
36.0
35.3
35.3
30.1
32.1
35.6
37.7
39.7
23.3
25.0
26.3
27.8
29.5
25.3
29.5
32.7
34.8
38.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
29.0
30.7
32.4
32.7
33.6
32.9
35.0
37.1
36.7
36.1
30.1
32.6
36.5
39.1
41.2
23.3
25.2
26.8
28.2
29.8
25.3
29.6
34.0
35.1
37.4
138
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Capital Area Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.1
36.6
39.1
39.9
40.8
38.7
42.0
45.8
47.5
47.2
32.2
35.5
38.2
40.9
42.4
26.0
28.7
30.5
32.6
34.2
29.2
33.2
36.9
40.0
44.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.1
36.2
38.2
39.0
39.9
38.7
41.3
45.3
47.6
47.4
32.2
35.6
38.2
40.9
42.7
26.0
28.3
30.2
32.5
34.0
29.2
32.9
35.7
38.0
41.4
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.1
35.8
37.3
38.0
39.0
38.7
40.7
44.7
47.5
47.3
32.2
35.6
38.1
40.6
42.5
26.0
28.0
29.8
32.5
34.0
29.2
32.8
34.9
36.8
39.6
139
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Central Texas Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
30.8
33.6
35.6
36.4
38.1
36.2
37.3
40.3
40.0
40.2
28.7
31.9
34.5
36.2
37.5
24.6
27.1
29.2
31.8
33.7
25.6
29.5
32.6
35.8
40.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
30.8
32.9
34.6
35.1
36.4
36.2
37.0
40.1
40.0
39.8
28.7
31.8
34.6
36.3
37.5
24.6
26.6
28.4
30.8
32.2
25.6
28.4
30.3
32.7
35.4
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
30.8
32.3
33.5
33.5
34.2
36.2
36.5
39.8
39.3
38.5
28.7
31.7
34.7
36.7
37.2
24.6
26.2
27.7
29.7
30.7
25.6
27.5
28.8
30.8
32.3
140
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Coastal Bend Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
35.8
36.6
37.5
38.3
38.4
45.7
46.2
46.2
46.4
44.9
34.7
36.5
38.9
40.4
40.8
30.9
32.4
33.9
35.3
36.1
32.8
36.7
41.0
44.8
46.9
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
35.8
36.4
37.2
38.1
38.2
45.7
47.0
46.9
46.8
44.8
34.7
36.5
38.9
40.5
40.7
30.9
32.2
33.9
35.5
36.3
32.8
35.3
37.9
39.6
40.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
35.8
36.4
37.0
38.2
38.1
45.7
48.0
48.0
47.5
45.0
34.7
36.8
39.5
41.3
41.1
30.9
32.1
34.0
36.1
36.8
32.8
34.2
35.8
36.3
37.1
141
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Concho Valley Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
36.9
37.6
37.7
37.8
38.1
44.2
43.8
43.9
42.3
41.3
29.3
34.4
38.1
39.3
41.1
28.5
30.4
31.9
33.5
34.6
29.3
34.1
39.3
43.3
46.9
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
36.9
37.5
37.2
37.2
37.3
44.2
44.5
44.1
42.0
40.4
29.3
34.2
37.6
38.5
39.8
28.5
30.2
31.7
33.5
34.5
29.3
32.3
36.3
38.1
40.9
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
36.9
37.4
36.7
36.6
36.6
44.2
45.5
44.5
41.8
39.5
29.3
33.9
37.2
37.9
38.4
28.5
30.0
31.6
33.6
34.5
29.3
30.9
33.5
34.7
37.1
142
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Deep East Texas Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
39.1
38.8
38.5
38.9
38.8
44.6
44.1
42.3
42.3
41.5
33.8
34.7
36.6
37.7
38.8
24.3
27.1
29.3
31.6
32.6
27.1
29.5
32.0
34.3
36.2
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
39.1
39.6
39.2
39.4
39.2
44.6
46.1
45.2
44.8
43.7
33.8
34.8
36.6
37.8
38.6
24.3
27.1
29.4
31.9
33.1
27.1
27.6
28.2
30.0
29.9
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
39.1
40.7
40.4
40.1
39.3
44.6
48.3
49.4
48.3
46.9
33.8
35.7
37.9
39.2
39.4
24.3
27.0
29.5
32.5
33.8
27.1
25.5
25.4
26.7
26.7
143
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
East Texas Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
38.6
39.1
40.2
41.4
42.1
44.1
44.4
44.3
45.6
46.0
35.0
36.0
39.0
41.2
42.5
23.7
27.2
29.6
32.1
33.3
27.2
31.0
34.4
37.6
41.2
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
38.6
39.2
39.7
40.2
40.2
44.1
45.7
46.2
47.3
47.5
35.0
36.1
39.0
41.2
42.3
23.7
26.7
28.7
31.0
31.6
27.2
28.7
30.8
33.2
34.9
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
38.6
39.4
39.0
38.5
37.6
44.1
47.2
48.7
49.0
48.9
35.0
36.6
39.3
41.7
42.3
23.7
26.3
28.3
30.4
30.5
27.2
26.9
28.6
31.1
31.9
144
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
38.9
38.3
37.7
38.2
38.2
47.5
47.4
45.2
44.4
43.2
37.6
37.3
37.7
39.4
40.8
28.6
30.5
32.0
33.8
34.8
31.1
31.2
33.2
34.4
34.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
38.9
38.3
37.5
37.8
37.6
47.5
48.3
46.7
45.5
44.1
37.6
37.4
37.9
39.5
40.4
28.6
30.2
31.7
33.5
34.5
31.1
29.9
30.9
30.9
29.8
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
38.9
38.5
37.6
37.6
37.1
47.5
49.5
49.0
47.5
46.2
37.6
37.8
38.4
39.9
40.9
28.6
30.2
31.7
33.5
34.4
31.1
27.6
28.0
28.0
27.2
145
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Heart of Texas Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
35.5
36.3
37.6
38.5
39.0
42.5
42.5
42.1
42.2
41.3
32.4
34.3
37.8
40.5
42.5
24.2
27.7
30.2
32.7
34.3
23.2
28.9
32.8
37.1
41.5
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
35.5
36.1
37.0
37.7
37.8
42.5
43.8
43.7
43.8
42.5
32.4
34.5
38.0
40.8
42.7
24.2
27.1
29.2
31.3
32.3
23.2
27.8
31.0
34.6
38.4
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
35.5
36.0
36.3
36.5
35.9
42.5
45.4
46.2
45.7
43.8
32.4
34.9
38.5
41.5
43.2
24.2
26.5
28.4
30.2
30.7
23.2
27.1
29.5
32.5
35.1
146
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Houston-Galveston Area Council
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.2
36.5
38.9
40.4
41.8
41.5
44.1
46.3
47.3
47.8
32.1
35.3
38.4
41.0
42.9
26.6
30.0
32.4
34.7
36.5
33.5
38.5
43.4
46.5
49.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.2
35.9
37.9
39.4
40.8
41.5
43.9
46.3
47.5
48.0
32.1
35.4
38.4
40.9
42.8
26.6
29.8
32.2
34.6
36.3
33.5
37.2
40.7
42.8
45.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.2
35.4
37.1
38.6
40.1
41.5
43.7
46.1
47.5
48.1
32.1
35.5
38.3
40.7
42.5
26.6
29.7
32.2
34.8
36.6
33.5
36.2
38.9
40.7
42.6
147
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Lower Rio Grande Valley Development Council
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
29.1
29.8
31.4
32.7
33.4
54.9
54.6
51.4
50.3
52.0
31.4
36.2
40.2
42.4
43.7
27.3
28.5
30.4
31.8
32.7
35.0
39.3
41.8
44.8
48.4
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
29.1
30.0
31.8
33.5
34.2
54.9
56.8
55.7
53.6
54.6
31.4
36.2
40.0
41.7
42.2
27.3
28.6
30.7
32.5
33.4
35.0
37.8
38.6
41.1
43.8
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
29.1
30.3
32.3
34.4
35.0
54.9
59.7
62.0
59.4
58.7
31.4
35.9
39.7
41.6
41.4
27.3
28.7
31.0
33.3
34.1
35.0
36.8
36.7
38.9
41.2
148
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Middle Rio Grande Development Council
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
32.8
32.4
33.1
33.3
33.1
47.6
47.7
46.5
46.9
45.0
29.0
35.0
41.1
46.7
49.0
30.4
30.2
31.5
31.7
31.8
28.8
34.0
38.7
42.2
46.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
32.8
32.7
33.4
33.6
33.3
47.6
48.3
46.8
45.9
42.7
29.0
35.1
41.1
46.6
49.7
30.4
30.4
31.8
32.2
32.4
28.8
33.8
37.9
39.7
44.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
32.8
33.2
34.1
34.5
34.2
47.6
49.5
47.8
45.7
41.4
29.0
35.1
41.0
46.9
48.4
30.4
30.9
32.6
33.4
33.5
28.8
32.3
33.2
35.2
38.6
149
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Nortex Regional Planning Commission
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
37.4
37.5
38.3
38.8
39.3
42.3
42.2
41.7
42.0
41.4
30.3
32.7
34.6
36.0
37.2
24.7
27.8
30.0
32.5
34.1
27.4
31.5
35.3
38.1
42.2
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
37.4
37.5
38.0
38.2
38.3
42.3
43.0
42.5
42.7
41.8
30.3
32.5
34.6
35.8
36.8
24.7
27.3
29.3
31.7
33.0
27.4
30.0
32.4
34.7
37.8
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
37.4
37.6
37.5
37.2
36.7
42.3
44.0
43.8
43.6
41.9
30.3
32.8
35.6
37.1
37.6
24.7
26.8
28.5
30.7
31.6
27.4
29.4
30.8
32.7
34.7
150
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
North Central Texas Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.6
36.7
38.8
40.3
41.7
40.4
43.2
45.4
46.6
47.3
31.8
34.9
37.5
39.9
41.7
25.3
28.3
30.8
33.5
35.2
31.1
36.2
40.1
43.0
46.7
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.6
35.9
37.2
38.6
40.1
40.4
43.1
45.3
46.4
47.4
31.8
35.3
38.0
40.7
43.0
25.3
27.9
30.2
32.8
34.2
31.1
34.5
36.2
38.2
41.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.6
35.1
35.7
37.0
38.4
40.4
42.9
45.1
46.1
47.4
31.8
35.6
38.2
41.2
44.0
25.3
27.6
29.8
32.5
33.7
31.1
33.1
33.5
35.2
37.9
151
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Panhandle Regional Planning Commission
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
34.7
36.2
37.3
38.3
39.3
42.3
42.8
43.6
44.1
44.2
31.3
34.1
37.1
39.4
41.3
24.9
27.7
30.0
32.5
33.7
27.9
32.2
35.5
38.3
41.6
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
34.7
35.8
36.4
37.0
37.7
42.3
43.3
44.2
44.4
44.2
31.3
33.9
36.8
38.8
40.7
24.9
27.4
29.6
32.0
33.2
27.9
30.4
32.4
34.1
36.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
34.7
35.4
35.3
35.4
35.6
42.3
43.9
44.9
44.7
43.9
31.3
34.0
36.8
38.7
39.8
24.9
27.1
29.1
31.5
32.5
27.9
28.9
29.7
31.0
31.6
152
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Permian Basin Regional Planning Commission
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.3
35.0
36.9
37.5
38.3
42.2
42.3
44.3
46.0
45.7
32.8
34.7
37.8
39.6
41.4
27.0
29.3
31.1
32.7
34.0
30.6
35.1
38.7
41.1
44.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.3
34.7
36.2
36.8
37.5
42.2
42.3
44.0
45.2
44.4
32.8
34.6
37.6
39.3
41.0
27.0
29.3
31.2
33.0
34.3
30.6
33.4
35.7
36.9
38.9
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
33.3
34.4
35.6
36.2
36.7
42.2
42.2
43.6
43.8
42.0
32.8
34.8
38.0
40.2
41.8
27.0
29.3
31.5
33.5
34.8
30.6
31.9
32.7
34.0
35.6
153
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Rio Grande Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
31.6
32.9
35.1
36.7
37.5
42.2
42.5
43.9
44.2
42.8
31.6
34.0
36.3
37.6
37.9
30.0
31.5
34.1
35.9
36.7
30.4
34.8
39.2
41.0
43.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
31.6
32.4
34.5
36.1
36.6
42.2
42.4
43.4
43.3
41.5
31.6
33.9
36.1
37.3
37.6
30.0
31.1
33.6
35.6
36.2
30.4
33.6
36.0
36.4
38.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
31.6
31.9
33.9
35.6
35.8
42.2
42.1
42.5
41.4
39.2
31.6
34.0
36.3
37.2
37.0
30.0
30.7
33.2
35.3
35.7
30.4
32.5
33.9
33.6
34.8
154
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
South East Texas Regional Planning Commission
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
36.9
37.6
39.0
40.1
40.6
42.1
42.4
43.2
44.1
43.9
33.2
34.2
36.2
37.6
38.9
26.6
29.3
31.2
33.0
34.4
29.8
33.4
36.9
39.6
42.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
36.9
37.4
38.0
38.3
38.4
42.1
42.9
43.7
44.4
44.0
33.2
34.5
36.3
37.5
38.4
26.6
28.5
30.0
31.6
32.4
29.8
31.8
33.9
35.0
36.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
36.9
36.9
36.7
36.1
35.5
42.1
43.4
44.1
44.1
43.1
33.2
35.1
36.8
37.8
38.1
26.6
27.9
29.2
30.7
31.2
29.8
30.3
31.6
32.2
32.8
155
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
South Plains Association of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
31.5
33.4
35.1
35.8
36.5
38.6
38.9
40.8
41.4
40.8
28.7
31.4
34.4
36.0
37.8
25.9
28.4
30.1
31.9
33.1
26.6
31.5
35.0
38.0
41.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
31.5
32.6
33.8
34.3
35.0
38.6
38.1
39.4
38.9
38.0
28.7
31.2
34.3
36.0
37.4
25.9
28.0
29.7
31.4
32.4
26.6
31.0
33.8
36.1
38.6
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
31.5
31.8
32.5
32.9
33.5
38.6
37.1
37.3
35.6
34.8
28.7
30.9
33.9
35.5
36.4
25.9
27.7
29.4
30.9
31.7
26.6
30.7
33.4
35.1
37.0
156
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
South Texas Development Council
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
28.1
29.0
30.6
31.5
32.2
36.4
39.0
42.2
44.7
46.8
31.3
37.2
38.6
40.2
42.5
27.8
28.6
30.2
31.0
31.8
33.4
38.7
45.8
51.6
55.3
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
28.1
29.0
31.0
32.4
33.0
36.4
38.7
41.5
43.8
45.6
31.3
37.3
38.7
41.3
42.5
27.8
28.7
30.6
32.0
32.7
33.4
37.4
43.6
47.5
49.1
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
28.1
29.2
31.4
33.2
33.8
36.4
38.4
41.2
43.4
45.7
31.3
37.6
39.5
42.3
42.3
27.8
28.8
31.0
32.8
33.5
33.4
36.1
39.5
40.7
41.0
157
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
Texoma Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
39.7
40.0
40.7
42.4
43.4
44.0
44.4
43.6
45.2
45.5
33.6
35.1
37.9
40.3
42.3
23.5
27.5
30.4
33.2
35.2
27.5
32.8
38.6
43.3
48.6
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
39.7
40.5
40.5
41.6
41.9
44.0
46.1
46.1
47.1
47.0
33.6
35.0
37.8
40.3
41.9
23.5
26.7
29.1
31.7
32.8
27.5
31.0
35.6
39.2
43.4
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
39.7
40.9
39.9
39.8
39.2
44.0
47.9
49.3
49.0
48.2
33.6
35.1
38.2
40.8
42.8
23.5
26.2
28.4
30.8
31.0
27.5
29.2
32.2
35.2
39.8
158
Table 12: (continued)
Median Age by Race/Ethnicity Under Alternative Assumptions
of Age, Sex, and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for
West Central Texas Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Year
Total
Anglo
Black
Hispanic Other
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
37.7
37.6
39.4
40.5
41.2
43.7
42.6
42.8
44.4
43.8
29.8
32.4
36.7
38.5
40.1
26.3
29.4
32.0
34.5
36.5
26.6
32.3
37.8
41.4
46.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
37.7
37.6
39.0
39.8
40.2
43.7
43.7
43.6
44.9
43.9
29.8
32.3
36.6
38.4
39.5
26.3
29.0
31.3
33.8
35.6
26.6
30.9
34.5
37.2
41.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
2010
37.7
43.7
29.8
26.3
26.6
2020
37.7
45.0
32.1
28.6
29.7
2030
38.6
45.2
36.5
30.6
31.9
2040
38.8
45.7
38.2
33.1
34.3
2050
39.0
43.9
38.9
34.9
37.8
_____________________________________________________________
159
160
Table 13:
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Alamo Area Council of Governments
____________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
____________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-99,109
18,754
502,572
32,205
454,422
-21.8
4.1
110.6
7.1
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
27,560
60,976
1,027,456
153,371
1,269,363
2.2
4.8
80.9
12.1
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
178,773
100,108
1,505,146
416,568
2,200,595
8.2
4.5
68.4
18.9
100.0
161
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Ark-Tex Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-12,343
6,271
28,428
5,382
27,738
-44.5
22.6
102.5
19.4
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-20,553
6,734
50,985
11,713
48,879
-42.1
13.8
104.3
24.0
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-38,163
3,266
82,627
30,016
77,746
-49.1
4.2
106.3
38.6
100.0
162
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Brazos Valley Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
7,358
7,762
67,235
6,458
88,813
8.3
8.7
75.7
7.3
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
25,537
13,444
126,886
18,960
184,827
13.7
7.3
68.7
10.3
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
29,996
16,241
201,676
41,963
289,876
10.3
5.6
69.6
14.5
100.0
163
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Capital Area Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-58,314
11,241
397,616
40,316
390,859
-14.9
2.9
101.7
10.3
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
265,807
60,841
1,027,642
214,389
1,568,679
16.9
3.9
65.5
13.7
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
679,319
132,947
2,138,252
577,605
3,528,123
19.2
3.8
60.6
16.4
100.0
164
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Central Texas Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
30,232
27,408
71,718
17,382
146,740
20.6
18.7
48.9
11.8
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
51,102
40,767
149,506
55,811
297,186
17.2
13.7
50.3
18.8
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
55,661
41,846
243,864
123,404
464,775
11.9
9.0
52.5
26.6
100.0
165
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Coastal Bend Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-24,468
598
148,948
4,350
129,428
-19.0
0.5
115.1
3.4
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-42,443
593
185,139
13,542
156,831
-27.1
0.4
118.1
8.6
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-69,736
-1,293
178,629
29,036
136,636
-51.1
-0.9
130.7
21.3
100.0
166
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Concho Valley Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-6,814
187
31,456
1,110
25,939
-26.3
0.7
121.3
4.3
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-13,636
-98
35,664
2,624
24,554
-55.5
-0.4
145.2
10.7
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-24,215
-623
36,802
5,431
17,395
-139.2
-3.6
211.6
31.2
100.0
167
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Deep East Texas Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-11,074
8,320
43,456
6,415
47,117
-23.5
17.7
92.2
13.6
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-7,473
10,539
73,083
10,456
86,605
-8.7
12.2
84.4
12.1
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-16,694
7,015
111,448
24,669
126,438
-13.1
5.5
88.1
19.5
100.0
168
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
East Texas Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-54,082
7,829
104,984
12,725
71,456
-75.7
11.0
146.9
17.8
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-40,125
15,468
254,655
36,015
266,013
-15.0
5.8
95.7
13.5
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-57,229
13,347
475,206
94,631
525,955
-10.9
2.5
90.4
18.0
100.0
169
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Golden Crescent Regional Planning Commission
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-9,784
1,670
44,349
3,235
39,470
-24.8
4.2
112.4
8.2
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-17,901
1,177
58,668
5,154
47,098
-38.0
2.5
124.6
10.9
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-29,995
575
65,590
11,718
47,888
-62.7
1.2
137.0
24.5
100.0
170
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Heart of Texas Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-12,818
4,267
58,540
4,001
53,990
-23.7
7.9
108.4
7.4
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-23,942
6,030
101,765
10,123
93,976
-25.5
6.4
108.3
10.8
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-46,349
3,194
147,715
20,532
125,092
-37.1
2.6
118.1
16.4
100.0
171
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Houston-Galveston Area Council
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-209,990
91,680
1,365,897
105,424
1,353,011
-15.6
6.8
101.0
7.8
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-129,387
385,680
3,133,629
728,514
4,118,436
-3.2
9.4
76.1
17.7
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-49,693
733,577
5,703,069
1,942,556
8,329,509
-0.6
8.8
68.5
23.3
100.0
172
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Lower Rio Grande Valley Development Council
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-43,974
798
787,196
3,859
747,879
-5.9
0.1
105.3
0.5
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-27,749
1,274
1,122,440
20,305
1,116,270
-2.5
0.1
100.6
1.8
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-9,770
2,643
1,313,718
51,251
1,357,842
-0.8
0.2
96.8
3.8
100.0
173
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Middle Rio Grande Development Council
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-2,399
241
91,894
954
90,690
-2.7
0.3
101.3
1.1
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-4,295
167
82,921
896
79,689
-5.4
0.2
104.1
1.1
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-7,080
15
56,020
2,227
51,182
-13.9
0.0
109.5
4.4
100.0
174
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Nortex Regional Planning Commission
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-5,462
2,679
25,927
3,404
26,548
-20.6
10.1
97.7
12.8
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-19,085
1,945
40,536
6,571
29,967
-63.7
6.5
135.3
21.9
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-39,966
-198
60,049
9,890
29,775
-134.2
-0.7
201.7
33.2
100.0
175
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
North Central Texas Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-196,290
133,845
1,311,257
146,621
1,395,433
-14.1
9.6
94.0
10.5
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-16,506
537,782
3,079,987
854,346
4,455,609
-0.4
12.1
69.1
19.2
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
274,812
1,141,769
6,160,131
2,424,947
10,001,659
2.8
11.4
61.6
24.2
100.0
176
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Panhandle Regional Planning Commission
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-7,830
3,694
107,149
9,432
112,445
-7.0
3.3
95.3
8.4
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-20,895
5,819
175,681
27,137
187,742
-11.2
3.1
93.6
14.5
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-45,993
8,093
275,108
60,909
298,117
-15.4
2.7
92.3
20.4
100.0
177
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Permian Basin Regional Planning Commission
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-8,859
2,919
137,970
4,323
136,353
-6.5
2.1
101.2
3.2
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-16,650
3,719
208,566
10,831
206,466
-8.0
1.8
101.0
5.2
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-31,699
2,512
262,234
26,166
259,213
-12.3
1.0
101.2
10.1
100.0
178
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Rio Grande Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-9,444
4,145
307,369
6,776
308,846
-3.0
1.3
99.5
2.2
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-25,053
4,818
479,316
21,267
480,348
-5.2
1.0
99.8
4.4
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-43,807
2,502
571,874
42,507
573,076
-7.6
0.4
99.8
7.4
100.0
179
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
South East Texas Regional Planning Commission
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-10,713
11,860
34,946
7,100
43,193
-24.8
27.5
80.9
16.4
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-25,402
10,169
92,496
19,206
96,469
-26.3
10.5
95.9
19.9
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-50,708
-2,688
175,846
40,412
162,862
-31.1
-1.7
108.0
24.8
100.0
180
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
South Plains Association of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-7,707
6,609
113,601
5,001
117,504
-6.6
5.6
96.7
4.3
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-13,319
7,796
146,412
17,264
158,153
-8.4
4.9
92.6
10.9
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-28,148
5,269
162,667
40,536
180,324
-15.6
2.9
90.2
22.5
100.0
181
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
South Texas Development Council
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
886
287
242,912
598
244,683
0.4
0.1
99.3
0.2
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
1,245
236
294,361
931
296,773
0.4
0.1
99.2
0.3
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
648
151
303,104
4,373
308,276
0.3
0.0
98.3
1.4
100.0
182
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
Texoma Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-13,133
1,014
18,277
2,141
8,299
-158.2
12.2
220.2
25.8
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-12,764
567
45,708
7,538
41,049
-31.1
1.4
111.3
18.4
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-22,577
124
86,172
19,199
82,918
-27.2
0.1
103.9
23.2
100.0
183
Table 13 (continued)
Percent of Net Change from 2010-2050 Due to Each Race/Ethnicity
Group Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/EthnicitySpecific Net Migration for
West Central Texas Council of Governments
__________________________________________________________
Race/Ethnicity
Number
Percent
__________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-11,568
3,251
44,856
3,399
39,938
-28.9
8.1
112.3
8.5
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anglo
Black
Hispanic
Other
Total
-26,047
2,489
61,939
7,825
46,206
-56.3
5.4
134.0
16.9
100.0
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anglo
-50,117
-103.4
Black
609
1.3
Hispanic
81,144
167.4
Other
16,828
34.7
Total
48,464
100.0
____________________________________________________________
184
185
Table 14: Total Population and Population by Race/Ethnicity in 2010 and Projected Population and Percent Population Change
2010-2050 Under Alternative Assumptions of Age, Sex and Race/Ethnicity-Specific Net Migration for Counties in Texas –
Alphabetical Listing
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
20102020203020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Assuming Zero Net Migration (0.0 Scenario)
Anderson
Andrews
Angelina
Aransas
Archer
Armstrong
Atascosa
Austin
Bailey
Bandera
Bastrop
Baylor
Bee
Bell
Bexar
Blanco
Borden
Bosque
Bowie
Brazoria
Brazos
Brewster
Briscoe
58,458
14,786
86,771
23,158
9,054
1,901
44,911
28,417
7,165
20,485
74,171
3,726
31,861
310,235
1,714,773
10,497
641
18,212
92,565
313,166
194,851
9,232
1,637
60,186
16,450
91,979
22,926
9,060
1,924
48,394
29,718
7,908
20,107
77,713
3,644
33,577
348,738
1,870,689
10,480
668
18,316
95,735
337,724
214,735
9,808
1,724
61,244
17,973
96,610
22,325
9,202
1,886
51,994
30,831
8,705
19,566
81,327
3,562
35,187
377,619
1,992,798
10,533
692
18,535
98,206
358,541
234,965
10,405
1,768
61,342
19,378
100,020
21,732
9,015
1,802
54,440
31,363
9,429
18,394
82,528
3,468
36,191
405,601
2,078,166
10,235
668
18,443
98,772
374,615
253,555
11,094
1,793
61,012
20,682
102,725
21,648
8,679
1,713
56,773
32,018
10,074
17,434
82,786
3,356
36,851
428,845
2,136,918
10,022
630
18,655
98,626
383,428
274,958
12,068
1,839
186
3.0
11.3
6.0
-1.0
0.1
1.2
7.8
4.6
10.4
-1.8
4.8
-2.2
5.4
12.4
9.1
-0.2
4.2
0.6
3.4
7.8
10.2
6.2
5.3
1.8
9.3
5.0
-2.6
1.6
-2.0
7.4
3.7
10.1
-2.7
4.7
-2.3
4.8
8.3
6.5
0.5
3.6
1.2
2.6
6.2
9.4
6.1
2.6
0.2
7.8
3.5
-2.7
-2.0
-4.5
4.7
1.7
8.3
-6.0
1.5
-2.6
2.9
7.4
4.3
-2.8
-3.5
-0.5
0.6
4.5
7.9
6.6
1.4
-0.5
6.7
2.7
-0.4
-3.7
-4.9
4.3
2.1
6.8
-5.2
0.3
-3.2
1.8
5.7
2.8
-2.1
-5.7
1.1
-0.1
2.4
8.4
8.8
2.6
4.4
39.9
18.4
-6.5
-4.1
-9.9
26.4
12.7
40.6
-14.9
11.6
-9.9
15.7
38.2
24.6
-4.5
-1.7
2.4
6.5
22.4
41.1
30.7
12.3
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Brooks
Brown
Burleson
Burnet
Caldwell
Calhoun
Callahan
Cameron
Camp
Carson
Cass
Castro
Chambers
Cherokee
Childress
Clay
Cochran
Coke
Coleman
Collin
Collingsworth
Colorado
Comal
Comanche
Concho
Cooke
Coryell
7,223
38,106
17,187
42,750
38,066
21,381
13,544
406,220
12,401
6,182
30,464
8,062
35,096
50,845
7,041
10,752
3,127
3,320
8,895
782,341
3,057
20,874
108,472
13,974
4,087
38,437
75,388
7,837
39,167
17,437
43,529
40,260
22,648
13,680
464,304
13,059
6,235
30,531
8,889
37,277
53,662
7,317
10,805
3,538
3,209
8,900
828,675
3,263
21,339
110,894
14,316
4,213
40,175
81,351
8,458
39,626
17,623
44,299
42,011
23,795
13,988
528,434
13,734
6,408
30,473
9,732
39,346
56,407
7,655
10,833
3,914
3,182
8,968
865,233
3,500
21,878
113,146
14,790
4,309
41,797
87,176
9,135
39,250
17,375
44,408
42,586
24,592
13,885
592,589
14,211
6,444
30,007
10,446
39,836
58,604
8,042
10,613
4,183
3,105
8,969
884,212
3,724
22,218
112,556
15,198
4,386
42,601
92,342
9,848
38,850
17,082
44,902
42,544
25,175
13,742
662,685
14,696
6,400
29,609
11,159
39,446
60,948
8,460
10,343
4,427
3,045
9,063
865,919
3,920
22,864
111,647
15,778
4,447
43,366
95,405
187
8.5
2.8
1.5
1.8
5.8
5.9
1.0
14.3
5.3
0.9
0.2
10.3
6.2
5.5
3.9
0.5
13.1
-3.3
0.1
5.9
6.7
2.2
2.2
2.4
3.1
4.5
7.9
7.9
1.2
1.1
1.8
4.3
5.1
2.3
13.8
5.2
2.8
-0.2
9.5
5.6
5.1
4.6
0.3
10.6
-0.8
0.8
4.4
7.3
2.5
2.0
3.3
2.3
4.0
7.2
8.0
-0.9
-1.4
0.2
1.4
3.3
-0.7
12.1
3.5
0.6
-1.5
7.3
1.2
3.9
5.1
-2.0
6.9
-2.4
0.0
2.2
6.4
1.6
-0.5
2.8
1.8
1.9
5.9
7.8
-1.0
-1.7
1.1
-0.1
2.4
-1.0
11.8
3.4
-0.7
-1.3
6.8
-1.0
4.0
5.2
-2.5
5.8
-1.9
1.0
-2.1
5.3
2.9
-0.8
3.8
1.4
1.8
3.3
36.3
2.0
-0.6
5.0
11.8
17.7
1.5
63.1
18.5
3.5
-2.8
38.4
12.4
19.9
20.2
-3.8
41.6
-8.3
1.9
10.7
28.2
9.5
2.9
12.9
8.8
12.8
26.6
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Cottle
Crane
Crockett
Crosby
Culberson
Dallam
Dallas
Dawson
Deaf Smith
Delta
Denton
De Witt
Dickens
Dimmit
Donley
Duval
Eastland
Ector
Edwards
Ellis
El Paso
Erath
Falls
Fannin
Fayette
Fisher
Floyd
1,505
4,375
3,719
6,059
2,398
6,703
2,368,139
13,833
19,372
5,231
662,614
20,097
2,444
9,996
3,677
11,782
18,583
137,130
2,002
149,610
800,647
37,890
17,866
33,915
24,554
3,974
6,446
1,587
4,966
4,192
6,473
2,757
7,740
2,606,067
14,704
21,906
5,306
720,105
20,550
2,495
11,027
3,765
12,708
19,019
153,315
2,162
159,859
889,003
40,486
18,388
34,480
24,174
4,025
6,876
1,616
5,522
4,549
6,880
3,080
8,644
2,792,044
15,512
24,918
5,347
763,485
21,051
2,524
12,206
3,786
13,550
19,258
167,301
2,202
169,689
972,618
43,511
18,581
35,019
24,104
4,099
7,393
1,650
5,884
4,769
7,166
3,311
9,531
2,938,026
16,430
28,004
5,342
791,841
21,345
2,511
13,222
3,700
14,351
19,260
180,950
2,228
174,273
1,041,020
46,112
18,563
35,018
23,565
4,118
7,785
1,678
6,182
5,053
7,445
3,569
10,370
3,049,758
17,330
31,343
5,316
796,412
21,760
2,477
14,421
3,687
15,189
19,388
193,477
2,285
175,957
1,100,897
49,136
18,507
34,994
23,169
4,150
8,192
188
5.4
13.5
12.7
6.8
15.0
15.5
10.0
6.3
13.1
1.4
8.7
2.3
2.1
10.3
2.4
7.9
2.3
11.8
8.0
6.9
11.0
6.9
2.9
1.7
-1.5
1.3
6.7
1.8
11.2
8.5
6.3
11.7
11.7
7.1
5.5
13.7
0.8
6.0
2.4
1.2
10.7
0.6
6.6
1.3
9.1
1.9
6.1
9.4
7.5
1.0
1.6
-0.3
1.8
7.5
2.1
6.6
4.8
4.2
7.5
10.3
5.2
5.9
12.4
-0.1
3.7
1.4
-0.5
8.3
-2.3
5.9
0.0
8.2
1.2
2.7
7.0
6.0
-0.1
-0.0
-2.2
0.5
5.3
1.7
5.1
6.0
3.9
7.8
8.8
3.8
5.5
11.9
-0.5
0.6
1.9
-1.4
9.1
-0.4
5.8
0.7
6.9
2.6
1.0
5.8
6.6
-0.3
-0.1
-1.7
0.8
5.2
11.5
41.3
35.9
22.9
48.8
54.7
28.8
25.3
61.8
1.6
20.2
8.3
1.4
44.3
0.3
28.9
4.3
41.1
14.1
17.6
37.5
29.7
3.6
3.2
-5.6
4.4
27.1
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Foard
Fort Bend
Franklin
Freestone
Frio
Gaines
Galveston
Garza
Gillespie
Glasscock
Goliad
Gonzales
Gray
Grayson
Gregg
Grimes
Guadalupe
Hale
Hall
Hamilton
Hansford
Hardeman
Hardin
Harris
Harrison
Hartley
Haskell
1,336
585,375
10,605
19,816
17,217
17,526
291,309
6,461
24,837
1,226
7,210
19,807
22,535
120,877
121,730
26,604
131,533
36,273
3,353
8,517
5,613
4,139
54,635
4,092,459
65,631
6,062
5,899
1,405
620,488
10,748
20,442
18,646
20,064
307,372
6,941
23,907
1,354
7,252
21,350
24,085
124,234
129,243
27,928
137,706
40,356
3,405
8,344
6,128
4,251
56,845
4,489,883
68,752
6,274
5,880
1,448
653,326
10,874
21,073
20,068
22,858
318,459
7,361
23,525
1,464
7,271
23,077
25,817
125,852
134,510
29,050
143,384
44,781
3,569
8,300
6,735
4,391
58,334
4,790,725
71,399
6,640
5,943
1,416
667,200
10,849
21,473
21,316
25,644
321,886
7,782
23,178
1,505
7,050
24,687
27,640
125,110
138,490
29,642
144,899
49,255
3,679
8,315
7,239
4,490
58,436
5,011,544
72,722
6,874
5,950
1,413
656,122
10,777
22,102
22,604
28,208
320,135
8,175
23,496
1,530
6,847
26,541
29,650
123,168
141,308
30,318
143,186
54,005
3,757
8,396
7,715
4,581
57,740
5,144,422
73,674
7,060
5,972
189
5.2
6.0
1.3
3.2
8.3
14.5
5.5
7.4
-3.7
10.4
0.6
7.8
6.9
2.8
6.2
5.0
4.7
11.3
1.6
-2.0
9.2
2.7
4.0
9.7
4.8
3.5
-0.3
3.1
5.3
1.2
3.1
7.6
13.9
3.6
6.1
-1.6
8.1
0.3
8.1
7.2
1.3
4.1
4.0
4.1
11.0
4.8
-0.5
9.9
3.3
2.6
6.7
3.9
5.8
1.1
-2.2
2.1
-0.2
1.9
6.2
12.2
1.1
5.7
-1.5
2.8
-3.0
7.0
7.1
-0.6
3.0
2.0
1.1
10.0
3.1
0.2
7.5
2.3
0.2
4.6
1.9
3.5
0.1
-0.2
-1.7
-0.7
2.9
6.0
10.0
-0.5
5.1
1.4
1.7
-2.9
7.5
7.3
-1.6
2.0
2.3
-1.2
9.6
2.1
1.0
6.6
2.0
-1.2
2.7
1.3
2.7
0.4
5.8
12.1
1.6
11.5
31.3
60.9
9.9
26.5
-5.4
24.8
-5.0
34.0
31.6
1.9
16.1
14.0
8.9
48.9
12.0
-1.4
37.4
10.7
5.7
25.7
12.3
16.5
1.2
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Hays
Hemphill
Henderson
Hidalgo
Hill
Hockley
Hood
Hopkins
Houston
Howard
Hudspeth
Hunt
Hutchinson
Irion
Jack
Jackson
Jasper
Jeff Davis
Jefferson
Jim Hogg
Jim Wells
Johnson
Jones
Karnes
Kaufman
Kendall
Kenedy
157,107
3,807
78,532
774,769
35,089
22,935
51,182
35,161
23,732
35,012
3,476
86,129
22,150
1,599
9,044
14,075
35,710
2,342
252,273
5,300
40,838
150,934
20,202
14,824
103,350
33,410
416
183,040
4,139
80,156
890,857
36,333
25,064
50,806
36,969
23,709
36,604
3,929
90,670
23,379
1,738
9,339
14,901
36,806
2,453
264,860
5,859
45,962
160,685
20,662
15,203
110,241
33,619
453
202,195
4,513
80,912
1,015,658
37,362
26,821
50,119
38,552
23,642
37,991
4,363
95,009
24,698
1,854
9,643
15,755
37,817
2,461
275,032
6,432
51,024
169,289
20,995
15,519
117,098
34,317
477
218,271
4,862
81,109
1,136,305
37,891
28,171
49,000
39,614
23,668
38,926
4,581
97,933
25,546
1,884
9,790
16,420
38,511
2,416
281,893
6,994
56,375
173,814
21,016
15,765
121,108
33,973
476
235,986
5,180
82,173
1,255,303
38,637
29,245
48,223
40,653
23,804
39,277
4,833
100,748
26,231
1,921
9,958
17,098
39,073
2,474
287,222
7,601
62,653
176,390
20,982
15,854
122,944
33,307
465
190
16.5
8.7
2.1
15.0
3.5
9.3
-0.7
5.1
-0.1
4.5
13.0
5.3
5.5
8.7
3.3
5.9
3.1
4.7
5.0
10.5
12.5
6.5
2.3
2.6
6.7
0.6
8.9
10.5
9.0
0.9
14.0
2.8
7.0
-1.4
4.3
-0.3
3.8
11.0
4.8
5.6
6.7
3.3
5.7
2.7
0.3
3.8
9.8
11.0
5.4
1.6
2.1
6.2
2.1
5.3
8.0
7.7
0.2
11.9
1.4
5.0
-2.2
2.8
0.1
2.5
5.0
3.1
3.4
1.6
1.5
4.2
1.8
-1.8
2.5
8.7
10.5
2.7
0.1
1.6
3.4
-1.0
-0.2
8.1
6.5
1.3
10.5
2.0
3.8
-1.6
2.6
0.6
0.9
5.5
2.9
2.7
2.0
1.7
4.1
1.5
2.4
1.9
8.7
11.1
1.5
-0.2
0.6
1.5
-2.0
-2.3
50.2
36.1
4.6
62.0
10.1
27.5
-5.8
15.6
0.3
12.2
39.0
17.0
18.4
20.1
10.1
21.5
9.4
5.6
13.9
43.4
53.4
16.9
3.9
6.9
19.0
-0.3
11.8
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Kent
Kerr
Kimble
King
Kinney
Kleberg
Knox
Lamar
Lamb
Lampasas
La Salle
Lavaca
Lee
Leon
Liberty
Limestone
Lipscomb
Live Oak
Llano
Loving
Lubbock
Lynn
McCulloch
McLennan
McMullen
Madison
Marion
808
49,625
4,607
286
3,598
32,061
3,719
49,793
13,977
19,677
6,886
19,263
16,612
16,801
75,643
23,384
3,302
11,531
19,301
82
278,831
5,915
8,283
234,906
707
13,664
10,546
819
48,544
4,549
300
3,686
35,447
3,884
51,527
15,086
20,607
7,596
19,016
17,191
17,082
81,082
24,499
3,548
11,696
17,815
83
299,140
6,450
8,502
248,460
771
14,282
10,394
865
47,648
4,547
316
3,749
38,711
4,145
52,728
16,448
21,495
8,166
19,132
17,966
17,350
85,284
25,317
3,817
11,788
16,419
79
317,791
7,014
8,758
261,480
795
14,826
9,926
843
46,701
4,448
313
3,782
42,082
4,410
53,121
17,819
21,891
8,660
19,004
18,236
17,505
87,919
25,953
4,011
11,754
15,297
67
333,269
7,446
8,909
270,842
802
15,278
9,463
825
46,410
4,454
286
3,874
45,605
4,680
53,336
19,311
22,283
9,186
18,978
18,357
17,962
89,830
26,658
4,167
11,861
14,839
50
347,502
7,986
9,184
278,704
808
15,833
9,198
191
1.4
-2.2
-1.3
4.9
2.4
10.6
4.4
3.5
7.9
4.7
10.3
-1.3
3.5
1.7
7.2
4.8
7.5
1.4
-7.7
1.2
7.3
9.0
2.6
5.8
9.1
4.5
-1.4
5.6
-1.8
-0.0
5.3
1.7
9.2
6.7
2.3
9.0
4.3
7.5
0.6
4.5
1.6
5.2
3.3
7.6
0.8
-7.8
-4.8
6.2
8.7
3.0
5.2
3.1
3.8
-4.5
-2.5
-2.0
-2.2
-0.9
0.9
8.7
6.4
0.7
8.3
1.8
6.0
-0.7
1.5
0.9
3.1
2.5
5.1
-0.3
-6.8
-15.2
4.9
6.2
1.7
3.6
0.9
3.0
-4.7
-2.1
-0.6
0.1
-8.6
2.4
8.4
6.1
0.4
8.4
1.8
6.1
-0.1
0.7
2.6
2.2
2.7
3.9
0.9
-3.0
-25.4
4.3
7.3
3.1
2.9
0.7
3.6
-2.8
2.1
-6.5
-3.3
0.0
7.7
42.2
25.8
7.1
38.2
13.2
33.4
-1.5
10.5
6.9
18.8
14.0
26.2
2.9
-23.1
-39.0
24.6
35.0
10.9
18.6
14.3
15.9
-12.8
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Martin
Mason
Matagorda
Maverick
Medina
Menard
Midland
Milam
Mills
Mitchell
Montague
Montgomery
Moore
Morris
Motley
Nacogdoches
Navarro
Newton
Nolan
Nueces
Ochiltree
Oldham
Orange
Palo Pinto
Panola
Parker
Parmer
4,799
4,012
36,702
54,258
46,006
2,242
136,872
24,757
4,936
9,403
19,719
455,746
21,904
12,934
1,210
64,524
47,735
14,445
15,216
340,223
10,223
2,052
81,837
28,111
23,796
116,927
10,269
5,457
3,875
39,023
62,775
48,032
2,235
148,704
25,936
4,871
9,775
20,049
483,418
24,899
13,313
1,228
69,817
50,682
14,869
16,024
362,278
11,475
2,228
85,082
29,450
24,426
120,942
11,271
6,068
3,851
41,089
72,335
50,296
2,181
158,483
27,285
4,952
10,141
20,402
507,853
27,902
13,452
1,227
76,033
53,423
15,055
16,836
380,659
12,958
2,424
87,295
30,564
24,832
124,304
12,263
6,520
3,762
42,690
81,691
51,366
2,104
166,063
28,408
4,993
10,410
20,548
520,288
30,974
13,632
1,180
82,163
55,682
14,869
17,484
391,397
14,321
2,468
87,660
31,209
24,862
123,482
13,071
7,021
3,716
44,325
92,230
51,937
2,049
171,713
29,928
5,060
10,713
20,862
522,040
33,987
13,910
1,152
89,389
57,978
14,773
18,108
398,122
15,649
2,499
86,976
31,868
24,766
120,569
13,706
192
13.7
-3.4
6.3
15.7
4.4
-0.3
8.6
4.8
-1.3
4.0
1.7
6.1
13.7
2.9
1.5
8.2
6.2
2.9
5.3
6.5
12.2
8.6
4.0
4.8
2.6
3.4
9.8
11.2
-0.6
5.3
15.2
4.7
-2.4
6.6
5.2
1.7
3.7
1.8
5.1
12.1
1.0
-0.1
8.9
5.4
1.3
5.1
5.1
12.9
8.8
2.6
3.8
1.7
2.8
8.8
7.4
-2.3
3.9
12.9
2.1
-3.5
4.8
4.1
0.8
2.7
0.7
2.4
11.0
1.3
-3.8
8.1
4.2
-1.2
3.8
2.8
10.5
1.8
0.4
2.1
0.1
-0.7
6.6
7.7
-1.2
3.8
12.9
1.1
-2.6
3.4
5.4
1.3
2.9
1.5
0.3
9.7
2.0
-2.4
8.8
4.1
-0.6
3.6
1.7
9.3
1.3
-0.8
2.1
-0.4
-2.4
4.9
46.3
-7.4
20.8
70.0
12.9
-8.6
25.5
20.9
2.5
13.9
5.8
14.5
55.2
7.5
-4.8
38.5
21.5
2.3
19.0
17.0
53.1
21.8
6.3
13.4
4.1
3.1
33.5
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Pecos
Polk
Potter
Presidio
Rains
Randall
Reagan
Real
Red River
Reeves
Refugio
Roberts
Robertson
Rockwall
Runnels
Rusk
Sabine
San Augustine
San Jacinto
San Patricio
San Saba
Schleicher
Scurry
Shackelford
Shelby
Sherman
Smith
15,507
45,413
121,073
7,818
10,914
120,725
3,367
3,309
12,860
13,783
7,383
929
16,622
78,337
10,501
53,330
10,834
8,865
26,384
64,804
6,131
3,461
16,921
3,378
25,448
3,034
209,714
16,990
46,183
132,628
8,553
10,943
125,564
3,860
3,312
12,975
14,750
7,753
1,025
17,153
81,678
10,807
55,266
10,514
8,872
26,880
71,127
6,141
3,784
18,113
3,548
26,891
3,296
220,574
18,369
46,433
143,147
9,286
10,912
129,330
4,337
3,284
12,835
15,704
8,121
1,088
17,552
85,577
11,179
56,848
10,172
8,747
26,975
77,622
6,254
4,068
19,234
3,676
28,140
3,620
227,673
19,705
46,363
153,071
9,999
10,647
130,425
4,679
3,208
12,622
16,638
8,361
1,096
17,689
87,041
11,400
57,424
9,768
8,605
26,513
83,376
6,356
4,291
20,193
3,725
29,293
3,858
231,380
21,066
46,758
161,513
10,918
10,549
129,347
5,024
3,231
12,594
17,565
8,721
1,089
17,821
84,970
11,764
57,618
9,632
8,632
26,093
89,745
6,464
4,415
21,136
3,802
30,350
4,008
233,182
193
9.6
1.7
9.5
9.4
0.3
4.0
14.6
0.1
0.9
7.0
5.0
10.3
3.2
4.3
2.9
3.6
-3.0
0.1
1.9
9.8
0.2
9.3
7.0
5.0
5.7
8.6
5.2
8.1
0.5
7.9
8.6
-0.3
3.0
12.4
-0.8
-1.1
6.5
4.7
6.1
2.3
4.8
3.4
2.9
-3.3
-1.4
0.4
9.1
1.8
7.5
6.2
3.6
4.6
9.8
3.2
7.3
-0.2
6.9
7.7
-2.4
0.8
7.9
-2.3
-1.7
5.9
3.0
0.7
0.8
1.7
2.0
1.0
-4.0
-1.6
-1.7
7.4
1.6
5.5
5.0
1.3
4.1
6.6
1.6
6.9
0.9
5.5
9.2
-0.9
-0.8
7.4
0.7
-0.2
5.6
4.3
-0.6
0.7
-2.4
3.2
0.3
-1.4
0.3
-1.6
7.6
1.7
2.9
4.7
2.1
3.6
3.9
0.8
35.8
3.0
33.4
39.7
-3.3
7.1
49.2
-2.4
-2.1
27.4
18.1
17.2
7.2
8.5
12.0
8.0
-11.1
-2.6
-1.1
38.5
5.4
27.6
24.9
12.6
19.3
32.1
11.2
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Somervell
Starr
Stephens
Sterling
Stonewall
Sutton
Swisher
Tarrant
Taylor
Terrell
Terry
Throckmorton
Titus
Tom Green
Travis
Trinity
Tyler
Upshur
Upton
Uvalde
Val Verde
Van Zandt
Victoria
Walker
Waller
Ward
Washington
8,490
60,968
9,630
1,143
1,490
4,128
7,854
1,809,034
131,506
984
12,651
1,641
32,334
110,224
1,024,266
14,585
21,766
39,309
3,355
26,405
48,879
52,579
86,793
67,861
43,205
10,658
33,718
8,791
72,663
9,892
1,233
1,504
4,544
8,247
1,956,598
140,946
1,046
13,768
1,660
35,686
115,817
1,125,881
14,469
21,760
40,252
3,679
28,709
55,181
53,344
94,153
71,462
46,929
11,580
34,333
9,201
85,414
10,238
1,297
1,538
4,903
8,781
2,073,248
146,962
1,080
14,839
1,669
38,938
121,150
1,187,826
14,194
21,641
40,946
3,997
31,579
61,690
54,149
100,780
74,652
50,490
12,478
34,692
9,317
99,039
10,552
1,353
1,511
5,100
9,244
2,148,314
151,200
1,097
16,031
1,631
41,987
125,834
1,232,915
13,725
21,223
40,797
4,200
34,177
68,461
53,700
106,191
77,040
53,603
13,287
34,488
9,360
115,415
10,847
1,352
1,470
5,280
9,699
2,178,210
154,468
1,088
17,265
1,590
44,864
130,191
1,263,296
13,464
20,901
40,348
4,343
37,193
76,081
53,353
111,697
79,546
56,609
14,040
34,286
194
3.5
19.2
2.7
7.9
0.9
10.1
5.0
8.2
7.2
6.3
8.8
1.2
10.4
5.1
9.9
-0.8
-0.0
2.4
9.7
8.7
12.9
1.5
8.5
5.3
8.6
8.7
1.8
4.7
17.5
3.5
5.2
2.3
7.9
6.5
6.0
4.3
3.3
7.8
0.5
9.1
4.6
5.5
-1.9
-0.5
1.7
8.6
10.0
11.8
1.5
7.0
4.5
7.6
7.8
1.0
1.3
16.0
3.1
4.3
-1.8
4.0
5.3
3.6
2.9
1.6
8.0
-2.3
7.8
3.9
3.8
-3.3
-1.9
-0.4
5.1
8.2
11.0
-0.8
5.4
3.2
6.2
6.5
-0.6
0.5
16.5
2.8
-0.1
-2.7
3.5
4.9
1.4
2.2
-0.8
7.7
-2.5
6.9
3.5
2.5
-1.9
-1.5
-1.1
3.4
8.8
11.1
-0.6
5.2
3.3
5.6
5.7
-0.6
10.2
89.3
12.6
18.3
-1.3
27.9
23.5
20.4
17.5
10.6
36.5
-3.1
38.8
18.1
23.3
-7.7
-4.0
2.6
29.4
40.9
55.7
1.5
28.7
17.2
31.0
31.7
1.7
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
20102020203020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Webb
Wharton
Wheeler
Wichita
Wilbarger
Willacy
Williamson
Wilson
Winkler
Wise
Wood
Yoakum
Young
Zapata
Zavala
250,304
41,280
5,410
131,500
13,535
22,134
422,679
42,918
7,110
59,127
41,964
7,879
18,550
14,018
11,677
293,121
43,450
5,594
137,167
14,504
24,784
450,281
44,034
7,944
62,531
41,113
8,850
19,019
16,782
13,372
338,098
45,840
5,822
142,881
15,398
27,386
471,909
45,458
8,665
65,402
40,098
9,894
19,726
19,628
15,267
381,800
47,738
6,020
147,442
16,126
30,011
486,570
45,125
9,243
66,532
38,782
10,777
20,195
22,832
17,127
425,655
49,359
6,224
150,923
16,881
33,014
484,961
43,766
9,830
66,941
38,380
11,621
20,734
26,602
19,199
195
17.1
5.3
3.4
4.3
7.2
12.0
6.5
2.6
11.7
5.8
-2.0
12.3
2.5
19.7
14.5
15.3
5.5
4.1
4.2
6.2
10.5
4.8
3.2
9.1
4.6
-2.5
11.8
3.7
17.0
14.2
12.9
4.1
3.4
3.2
4.7
9.6
3.1
-0.7
6.7
1.7
-3.3
8.9
2.4
16.3
12.2
11.5
3.4
3.4
2.4
4.7
10.0
-0.3
-3.0
6.4
0.6
-1.0
7.8
2.7
16.5
12.1
70.1
19.6
15.0
14.8
24.7
49.2
14.7
2.0
38.3
13.2
-8.5
47.5
11.8
89.8
64.4
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Assuming Net Migration Equal to One-Half of 2000-2010 (0.5 Scenario)
Anderson
Andrews
Angelina
Aransas
Archer
Armstrong
Atascosa
Austin
Bailey
Bandera
Bastrop
Baylor
Bee
Bell
Bexar
Blanco
Borden
Bosque
Bowie
Brazoria
Brazos
Brewster
Briscoe
Brooks
Brown
58,458
14,786
86,771
23,158
9,054
1,901
44,911
28,417
7,165
20,485
74,171
3,726
31,861
310,235
1,714,773
10,497
641
18,212
92,565
313,166
194,851
9,232
1,637
7,223
38,106
61,202
16,987
93,295
24,550
9,431
1,911
52,224
32,774
8,088
22,439
88,279
3,609
33,629
371,281
1,967,590
11,527
663
19,382
95,768
372,259
226,878
9,982
1,709
7,802
39,935
63,373
19,224
99,831
25,123
9,910
1,838
59,951
37,706
9,060
23,862
106,301
3,500
35,119
429,284
2,216,912
12,494
681
20,466
98,803
438,727
262,701
10,637
1,720
8,288
41,050
64,222
21,482
105,199
25,096
10,069
1,714
66,787
42,974
10,058
24,143
125,914
3,342
35,743
492,019
2,442,098
12,778
645
20,993
100,006
512,195
299,137
11,165
1,717
8,775
41,184
64,243
23,676
110,080
25,204
9,931
1,570
73,182
49,168
11,085
24,073
148,450
3,144
35,856
557,163
2,656,573
12,913
589
21,533
100,503
588,988
343,698
11,794
1,716
9,256
41,034
196
4.7
14.9
7.5
6.0
4.2
0.5
16.3
15.3
12.9
9.5
19.0
-3.1
5.5
19.7
14.7
9.8
3.4
6.4
3.5
18.9
16.4
8.1
4.4
8.0
4.8
3.5
13.2
7.0
2.3
5.1
-3.8
14.8
15.0
12.0
6.3
20.4
-3.0
4.4
15.6
12.7
8.4
2.7
5.6
3.2
17.9
15.8
6.6
0.6
6.2
2.8
1.3
11.7
5.4
-0.1
1.6
-6.7
11.4
14.0
11.0
1.2
18.5
-4.5
1.8
14.6
10.2
2.3
-5.3
2.6
1.2
16.7
13.9
5.0
-0.2
5.9
0.3
0.0
10.2
4.6
0.4
-1.4
-8.4
9.6
14.4
10.2
-0.3
17.9
-5.9
0.3
13.2
8.8
1.1
-8.7
2.6
0.5
15.0
14.9
5.6
-0.1
5.5
-0.4
9.9
60.1
26.9
8.8
9.7
-17.4
62.9
73.0
54.7
17.5
100.1
-15.6
12.5
79.6
54.9
23.0
-8.1
18.2
8.6
88.1
76.4
27.8
4.8
28.1
7.7
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Burleson
Burnet
Caldwell
Calhoun
Callahan
Cameron
Camp
Carson
Cass
Castro
Chambers
Cherokee
Childress
Clay
Cochran
Coke
Coleman
Collin
Collingsworth
Colorado
Comal
Comanche
Concho
Cooke
Coryell
Cottle
Crane
17,187
42,750
38,066
21,381
13,544
406,220
12,401
6,182
30,464
8,062
35,096
50,845
7,041
10,752
3,127
3,320
8,895
782,341
3,057
20,874
108,472
13,974
4,087
38,437
75,388
1,505
4,375
18,502
47,748
44,401
23,935
14,060
479,754
13,499
6,319
31,323
8,880
41,934
55,557
7,330
11,276
3,503
3,163
8,945
975,957
3,249
21,903
128,974
14,583
4,242
40,951
84,400
1,579
5,028
19,770
52,700
51,327
26,659
14,822
560,637
14,678
6,550
31,861
9,618
49,836
60,764
7,665
11,803
3,829
3,075
9,089
1,211,461
3,422
22,887
150,591
15,226
4,309
43,398
93,638
1,590
5,712
20,508
56,473
57,444
29,203
15,196
641,946
15,611
6,699
31,678
10,129
58,010
65,857
7,919
12,041
3,994
2,912
9,063
1,496,177
3,561
23,535
169,835
15,640
4,322
44,979
103,118
1,592
6,204
21,086
60,532
63,211
31,666
15,440
728,518
16,663
6,737
31,326
10,605
66,757
71,816
8,179
12,111
4,135
2,791
9,137
1,794,493
3,674
24,497
188,057
16,176
4,264
46,484
110,876
1,564
6,699
197
7.7
11.7
16.6
11.9
3.8
18.1
8.9
2.2
2.8
10.1
19.5
9.3
4.1
4.9
12.0
-4.7
0.6
24.7
6.3
4.9
18.9
4.4
3.8
6.5
12.0
4.9
14.9
6.9
10.4
15.6
11.4
5.4
16.9
8.7
3.7
1.7
8.3
18.8
9.4
4.6
4.7
9.3
-2.8
1.6
24.1
5.3
4.5
16.8
4.4
1.6
6.0
10.9
0.7
13.6
3.7
7.2
11.9
9.5
2.5
14.5
6.4
2.3
-0.6
5.3
16.4
8.4
3.3
2.0
4.3
-5.3
-0.3
23.5
4.1
2.8
12.8
2.7
0.3
3.6
10.1
0.1
8.6
2.8
7.2
10.0
8.4
1.6
13.5
6.7
0.6
-1.1
4.7
15.1
9.0
3.3
0.6
3.5
-4.2
0.8
19.9
3.2
4.1
10.7
3.4
-1.3
3.3
7.5
-1.8
8.0
22.7
41.6
66.1
48.1
14.0
79.3
34.4
9.0
2.8
31.5
90.2
41.2
16.2
12.6
32.2
-15.9
2.7
129.4
20.2
17.4
73.4
15.8
4.3
20.9
47.1
3.9
53.1
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Crockett
Crosby
Culberson
Dallam
Dallas
Dawson
Deaf Smith
Delta
Denton
De Witt
Dickens
Dimmit
Donley
Duval
Eastland
Ector
Edwards
Ellis
El Paso
Erath
Falls
Fannin
Fayette
Fisher
Floyd
Foard
Fort Bend
3,719
6,059
2,398
6,703
2,368,139
13,833
19,372
5,231
662,614
20,097
2,444
9,996
3,677
11,782
18,583
137,130
2,002
149,610
800,647
37,890
17,866
33,915
24,554
3,974
6,446
1,336
585,375
4,143
6,774
2,740
7,725
2,621,131
14,663
22,308
5,359
822,601
20,574
2,477
10,982
3,767
12,733
19,325
157,045
2,164
179,078
922,609
40,917
18,667
36,070
26,197
3,991
6,806
1,392
742,705
4,447
7,623
3,042
8,652
2,859,701
15,458
25,853
5,497
1,014,812
21,154
2,452
11,966
3,754
13,529
19,802
177,335
2,171
213,832
1,049,546
44,495
19,008
38,179
28,041
3,974
7,193
1,402
928,474
4,561
8,485
3,181
9,593
3,086,679
16,237
29,506
5,532
1,242,750
21,453
2,397
12,674
3,641
14,186
19,830
198,503
2,163
249,455
1,163,720
47,464
18,953
39,458
29,103
3,904
7,381
1,358
1,143,079
4,666
9,547
3,353
10,561
3,311,187
16,951
33,421
5,487
1,495,119
21,931
2,285
13,347
3,599
14,757
19,810
220,012
2,110
286,483
1,273,360
50,665
18,648
40,514
30,110
3,789
7,581
1,306
1,368,744
198
11.4
11.8
14.3
15.2
10.7
6.0
15.2
2.4
24.1
2.4
1.4
9.9
2.4
8.1
4.0
14.5
8.1
19.7
15.2
8.0
4.5
6.4
6.7
0.4
5.6
4.2
26.9
7.3
12.5
11.0
12.0
9.1
5.4
15.9
2.6
23.4
2.8
-1.0
9.0
-0.3
6.3
2.5
12.9
0.3
19.4
13.8
8.7
1.8
5.8
7.0
-0.4
5.7
0.7
25.0
2.6
11.3
4.6
10.9
7.9
5.0
14.1
0.6
22.5
1.4
-2.2
5.9
-3.0
4.9
0.1
11.9
-0.4
16.7
10.9
6.7
-0.3
3.4
3.8
-1.8
2.6
-3.1
23.1
2.3
12.5
5.4
10.1
7.3
4.4
13.3
-0.8
20.3
2.2
-4.7
5.3
-1.2
4.0
-0.1
10.8
-2.5
14.8
9.4
6.7
-1.6
2.7
3.5
-2.9
2.7
-3.8
19.7
25.5
57.6
39.8
57.6
39.8
22.5
72.5
4.9
125.6
9.1
-6.5
33.5
-2.1
25.3
6.6
60.4
5.4
91.5
59.0
33.7
4.4
19.5
22.6
-4.7
17.6
-2.2
133.8
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Franklin
Freestone
Frio
Gaines
Galveston
Garza
Gillespie
Glasscock
Goliad
Gonzales
Gray
Grayson
Gregg
Grimes
Guadalupe
Hale
Hall
Hamilton
Hansford
Hardeman
Hardin
Harris
Harrison
Hartley
Haskell
Hays
Hemphill
10,605
19,816
17,217
17,526
291,309
6,461
24,837
1,226
7,210
19,807
22,535
120,877
121,730
26,604
131,533
36,273
3,353
8,517
5,613
4,139
54,635
4,092,459
65,631
6,062
5,899
157,107
3,807
11,076
21,118
19,188
20,805
321,519
6,944
26,702
1,351
7,595
21,771
24,507
128,734
132,907
29,320
158,712
39,596
3,392
8,528
6,146
4,248
59,349
4,683,874
70,528
6,256
5,879
211,934
4,190
11,514
22,302
21,229
24,602
350,673
7,317
28,672
1,431
8,056
23,979
27,110
136,387
144,994
31,885
189,140
42,963
3,479
8,616
6,825
4,357
63,687
5,262,009
76,023
6,605
5,959
273,247
4,582
11,778
23,114
22,998
28,832
374,837
7,623
30,223
1,450
8,293
25,891
30,259
142,117
158,334
33,839
220,138
45,912
3,506
8,593
7,398
4,404
66,742
5,799,833
81,190
6,717
5,949
346,625
4,922
12,018
23,944
24,813
33,144
396,723
7,833
31,954
1,424
8,541
28,090
34,315
147,280
173,213
35,969
249,990
48,700
3,461
8,503
7,911
4,472
68,888
6,304,828
88,192
6,780
5,993
438,425
5,300
199
4.4
6.6
11.4
18.7
10.4
7.5
7.5
10.2
5.3
9.9
8.8
6.5
9.2
10.2
20.7
9.2
1.2
0.1
9.5
2.6
8.6
14.5
7.5
3.2
-0.3
34.9
10.1
4.0
5.6
10.6
18.3
9.1
5.4
7.4
5.9
6.1
10.1
10.6
5.9
9.1
8.7
19.2
8.5
2.6
1.0
11.0
2.6
7.3
12.3
7.8
5.6
1.4
28.9
9.4
2.3
3.6
8.3
17.2
6.9
4.2
5.4
1.3
2.9
8.0
11.6
4.2
9.2
6.1
16.4
6.9
0.8
-0.3
8.4
1.1
4.8
10.2
6.8
1.7
-0.2
26.9
7.4
2.0
3.6
7.9
15.0
5.8
2.8
5.7
-1.8
3.0
8.5
13.4
3.6
9.4
6.3
13.6
6.1
-1.3
-1.0
6.9
1.5
3.2
8.7
8.6
0.9
0.7
26.5
7.7
13.3
20.8
44.1
89.1
36.2
21.2
28.7
16.2
18.5
41.8
52.3
21.8
42.3
35.2
90.1
34.3
3.2
-0.2
40.9
8.0
26.1
54.1
34.4
11.8
1.6
179.1
39.2
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Henderson
Hidalgo
Hill
Hockley
Hood
Hopkins
Houston
Howard
Hudspeth
Hunt
Hutchinson
Irion
Jack
Jackson
Jasper
Jeff Davis
Jefferson
Jim Hogg
Jim Wells
Johnson
Jones
Karnes
Kaufman
Kendall
Kenedy
Kent
Kerr
78,532
774,769
35,089
22,935
51,182
35,161
23,732
35,012
3,476
86,129
22,150
1,599
9,044
14,075
35,710
2,342
252,273
5,300
40,838
150,934
20,202
14,824
103,350
33,410
416
808
49,625
82,139
948,305
37,816
24,968
55,668
37,501
24,312
37,034
3,923
96,046
22,998
1,731
9,353
14,663
36,967
2,455
267,188
5,826
45,436
173,103
21,570
15,575
128,122
38,847
452
814
52,458
85,307
1,145,413
40,266
26,580
59,479
40,053
24,668
38,805
4,343
107,574
23,783
1,804
9,693
15,200
37,919
2,421
283,813
6,288
49,604
198,761
22,958
16,095
158,947
44,741
477
843
55,039
88,118
1,345,740
41,786
27,614
61,791
42,564
24,701
39,868
4,458
119,853
23,968
1,816
9,742
15,441
38,274
2,337
300,728
6,697
53,465
225,251
23,868
16,294
194,001
50,357
474
795
56,355
92,682
1,553,142
43,308
28,205
63,908
45,890
24,560
40,183
4,590
134,056
23,871
1,790
9,765
15,649
38,194
2,336
319,868
7,114
57,519
254,140
24,631
16,202
233,532
55,395
458
755
57,544
200
4.6
22.4
7.8
8.9
8.8
6.7
2.4
5.8
12.9
11.5
3.8
8.3
3.4
4.2
3.5
4.8
5.9
9.9
11.3
14.7
6.8
5.1
24.0
16.3
8.7
0.7
5.7
3.9
20.8
6.5
6.5
6.8
6.8
1.5
4.8
10.7
12.0
3.4
4.2
3.6
3.7
2.6
-1.4
6.2
7.9
9.2
14.8
6.4
3.3
24.1
15.2
5.5
3.6
4.9
3.3
17.5
3.8
3.9
3.9
6.3
0.1
2.7
2.6
11.4
0.8
0.7
0.5
1.6
0.9
-3.5
6.0
6.5
7.8
13.3
4.0
1.2
22.1
12.6
-0.6
-5.7
2.4
5.2
15.4
3.6
2.1
3.4
7.8
-0.6
0.8
3.0
11.9
-0.4
-1.4
0.2
1.3
-0.2
-0.0
6.4
6.2
7.6
12.8
3.2
-0.6
20.4
10.0
-3.4
-5.0
2.1
18.0
100.5
23.4
23.0
24.9
30.5
3.5
14.8
32.0
55.6
7.8
11.9
8.0
11.2
7.0
-0.3
26.8
34.2
40.8
68.4
21.9
9.3
126.0
65.8
10.1
-6.6
16.
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Kimble
King
Kinney
Kleberg
Knox
Lamar
Lamb
Lampasas
La Salle
Lavaca
Lee
Leon
Liberty
Limestone
Lipscomb
Live Oak
Llano
Loving
Lubbock
Lynn
McCulloch
McLennan
McMullen
Madison
Marion
Martin
Mason
4,607
286
3,598
32,061
3,719
49,793
13,977
19,677
6,886
19,263
16,612
16,801
75,643
23,384
3,302
11,531
19,301
82
278,831
5,915
8,283
234,906
707
13,664
10,546
4,799
4,012
4,686
300
3,718
35,597
3,854
52,249
14,879
21,837
7,853
19,304
18,032
18,221
85,828
25,137
3,583
11,736
19,468
81
306,938
6,364
8,625
252,501
769
14,761
10,770
5,421
4,032
4,723
315
3,756
39,018
4,038
54,505
15,949
24,174
8,658
19,519
19,562
19,651
96,315
26,638
3,855
11,745
19,269
77
336,835
6,830
8,964
272,564
788
15,799
10,463
6,032
4,026
4,551
306
3,740
42,231
4,176
56,265
16,935
26,112
9,410
19,313
20,467
20,716
106,191
27,792
4,035
11,531
18,654
63
365,090
7,068
8,949
289,707
785
16,666
9,831
6,396
3,876
4,337
271
3,771
45,268
4,328
58,118
17,912
28,076
10,323
18,979
21,070
22,089
116,253
29,032
4,169
11,345
18,483
45
393,999
7,350
8,981
306,784
766
17,627
9,187
6,779
3,760
201
1.7
4.9
3.3
11.0
3.6
4.9
6.5
11.0
14.0
0.2
8.5
8.5
13.5
7.5
8.5
1.8
0.9
-1.2
10.1
7.6
4.1
7.5
8.8
8.0
2.1
13.0
0.5
0.8
5.0
1.0
9.6
4.8
4.3
7.2
10.7
10.3
1.1
8.5
7.8
12.2
6.0
7.6
0.1
-1.0
-4.9
9.7
7.3
3.9
7.9
2.5
7.0
-2.9
11.3
-0.1
-3.6
-2.9
-0.4
8.2
3.4
3.2
6.2
8.0
8.7
-1.1
4.6
5.4
10.3
4.3
4.7
-1.8
-3.2
-18.2
8.4
3.5
-0.2
6.3
-0.4
5.5
-6.0
6.0
-3.7
-4.7
-11.4
0.8
7.2
3.6
3.3
5.8
7.5
9.7
-1.7
2.9
6.6
9.5
4.5
3.3
-1.6
-0.9
-28.6
7.9
4.0
0.4
5.9
-2.4
5.8
-6.6
6.0
-3.0
-5.9
-5.2
4.8
41.2
16.4
16.7
28.2
42.7
49.9
-1.5
26.8
31.5
53.7
24.2
26.3
-1.6
-4.2
-45.1
41.3
24.3
8.4
30.6
8.3
29.0
-12.9
41.3
-6.
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Matagorda
Maverick
Medina
Menard
Midland
Milam
Mills
Mitchell
Montague
Montgomery
Moore
Morris
Motley
Nacogdoches
Navarro
Newton
Nolan
Nueces
Ochiltree
Oldham
Orange
Palo Pinto
Panola
Parker
Parmer
Pecos
Polk
36,702
54,258
46,006
2,242
136,872
24,757
4,936
9,403
19,719
455,746
21,904
12,934
1,210
64,524
47,735
14,445
15,216
340,223
10,223
2,052
81,837
28,111
23,796
116,927
10,269
15,507
45,413
39,448
63,293
52,466
2,255
154,213
26,296
4,967
9,787
20,658
564,926
25,317
13,435
1,222
71,702
52,991
14,608
16,046
370,473
12,016
2,235
86,614
30,629
25,109
138,373
11,795
17,051
48,894
41,823
72,834
59,429
2,161
172,360
27,889
5,154
10,120
21,529
698,439
28,925
13,692
1,193
80,093
58,575
14,514
16,856
399,947
14,345
2,401
90,934
32,955
26,330
163,780
13,528
18,450
51,675
43,482
81,836
65,348
2,057
189,734
28,912
5,352
10,335
21,920
852,925
32,982
13,895
1,115
88,150
64,251
13,972
17,226
421,032
16,903
2,399
94,059
34,462
27,097
191,733
15,244
19,702
53,629
44,774
91,056
70,471
1,941
207,093
30,308
5,584
10,478
22,306
1,026,627
37,420
14,250
1,046
97,224
70,606
13,522
17,571
438,408
19,813
2,397
96,458
35,889
27,870
223,325
16,953
20,878
55,686
202
7.5
16.7
14.0
0.6
12.7
6.2
0.6
4.1
4.8
24.0
15.6
3.9
1.0
11.1
11.0
1.1
5.5
8.9
17.5
8.9
5.8
9.0
5.5
18.3
14.9
10.0
7.7
6.0
15.1
13.3
-4.2
11.8
6.1
3.8
3.4
4.2
23.6
14.3
1.9
-2.4
11.7
10.5
-0.6
5.0
8.0
19.4
7.4
5.0
7.6
4.9
18.4
14.7
8.2
5.7
4.0
12.4
10.0
-4.8
10.1
3.7
3.8
2.1
1.8
22.1
14.0
1.5
-6.5
10.1
9.7
-3.7
2.2
5.3
17.8
-0.1
3.4
4.6
2.9
17.1
12.7
6.8
3.8
3.0
11.3
7.8
-5.6
9.1
4.8
4.3
1.4
1.8
20.4
13.5
2.6
-6.2
10.3
9.9
-3.2
2.0
4.1
17.2
-0.1
2.6
4.1
2.9
16.5
11.2
6.0
3.8
22.0
67.8
53.2
-13.4
51.3
22.4
13.1
11.4
13.1
125.3
70.8
10.2
-13.6
50.7
47.9
-6.4
15.5
28.9
93.8
16.8
17.9
27.7
17.1
91.0
65.1
34.6
22.6
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Potter
Presidio
Rains
Randall
Reagan
Real
Red River
Reeves
Refugio
Roberts
Robertson
Rockwall
Runnels
Rusk
Sabine
San Augustine
San Jacinto
San Patricio
San Saba
Schleicher
Scurry
Shackelford
Shelby
Sherman
Smith
Somervell
Starr
121,073
7,818
10,914
120,725
3,367
3,309
12,860
13,783
7,383
929
16,622
78,337
10,501
53,330
10,834
8,865
26,384
64,804
6,131
3,461
16,921
3,378
25,448
3,034
209,714
8,490
60,968
134,041
8,676
11,870
133,494
3,850
3,308
13,113
14,880
7,659
1,011
18,281
97,466
10,804
59,141
11,271
9,005
29,335
70,122
6,180
3,801
18,434
3,557
27,749
3,305
231,653
9,477
71,198
147,734
9,431
12,568
148,264
4,294
3,238
12,943
15,956
7,906
1,049
19,959
120,573
11,109
65,601
11,400
8,877
32,141
75,073
6,287
4,086
20,057
3,709
30,052
3,598
254,486
10,670
81,023
161,602
10,115
12,765
162,786
4,566
3,085
12,514
17,010
7,937
1,037
21,442
146,334
11,140
71,817
10,980
8,560
34,520
78,669
6,289
4,266
21,598
3,727
32,152
3,794
276,544
11,589
89,949
175,083
10,828
12,858
177,431
4,824
3,000
12,064
18,054
8,050
995
23,001
171,220
11,246
78,542
10,609
8,278
37,195
81,990
6,317
4,358
23,305
3,790
34,172
3,981
299,745
12,359
98,953
203
10.7
11.0
8.8
10.6
14.3
-0.0
2.0
8.0
3.7
8.8
10.0
24.4
2.9
10.9
4.0
1.6
11.2
8.2
0.8
9.8
8.9
5.3
9.0
8.9
10.5
11.6
16.8
10.2
8.7
5.9
11.1
11.5
-2.1
-1.3
7.2
3.2
3.8
9.2
23.7
2.8
10.9
1.1
-1.4
9.6
7.1
1.7
7.5
8.8
4.3
8.3
8.9
9.9
12.6
13.8
9.4
7.3
1.6
9.8
6.3
-4.7
-3.3
6.6
0.4
-1.1
7.4
21.4
0.3
9.5
-3.7
-3.6
7.4
4.8
0.0
4.4
7.7
0.5
7.0
5.4
8.7
8.6
11.0
8.3
7.0
0.7
9.0
5.7
-2.8
-3.6
6.1
1.4
-4.1
7.3
17.0
1.0
9.4
-3.4
-3.3
7.7
4.2
0.4
2.2
7.9
1.7
6.3
4.9
8.4
6.6
10.0
44.6
38.5
17.8
47.0
43.3
-9.3
-6.2
31.0
9.0
7.1
38.4
118.6
7.1
47.3
-2.1
-6.6
41.0
26.5
3.0
25.9
37.7
12.2
34.3
31.2
42.9
45.6
62.3
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Stephens
Sterling
Stonewall
Sutton
Swisher
Tarrant
Taylor
Terrell
Terry
Throckmorton
Titus
Tom Green
Travis
Trinity
Tyler
Upshur
Upton
Uvalde
Val Verde
Van Zandt
Victoria
Walker
Waller
Ward
Washington
Webb
Wharton
9,630
1,143
1,490
4,128
7,854
1,809,034
131,506
984
12,651
1,641
32,334
110,224
1,024,266
14,585
21,766
39,309
3,355
26,405
48,879
52,579
86,793
67,861
43,205
10,658
33,718
250,304
41,280
10,022
1,225
1,497
4,529
8,155
2,039,890
140,047
1,048
13,586
1,647
36,666
115,884
1,198,485
15,328
22,061
42,411
3,701
28,703
54,457
55,778
93,902
72,239
52,133
11,438
36,052
305,881
43,551
10,441
1,274
1,494
4,896
8,584
2,287,581
145,736
1,073
14,398
1,603
41,363
121,881
1,342,829
15,603
22,062
45,500
4,022
31,267
59,790
58,720
100,465
76,209
62,492
12,098
38,145
367,576
45,988
10,584
1,285
1,442
5,043
8,847
2,528,520
149,857
1,075
15,207
1,543
46,110
126,657
1,474,822
15,239
21,479
48,254
4,200
33,323
64,750
60,374
105,735
79,290
74,071
12,591
39,504
429,823
47,559
10,651
1,264
1,357
5,138
9,051
2,758,129
152,648
1,045
15,982
1,457
51,170
130,632
1,612,674
14,790
20,772
51,008
4,410
35,545
69,644
61,957
110,868
82,655
86,862
12,954
40,804
494,081
48,693
204
4.1
7.2
0.5
9.7
3.8
12.8
6.5
6.5
7.4
0.4
13.4
5.1
17.0
5.1
1.4
7.9
10.3
8.7
11.4
6.1
8.2
6.5
20.7
7.3
6.9
22.2
5.5
4.2
4.0
-0.2
8.1
5.3
12.1
4.1
2.4
6.0
-2.7
12.8
5.2
12.0
1.8
0.0
7.3
8.7
8.9
9.8
5.3
7.0
5.5
19.9
5.8
5.8
20.2
5.6
1.4
0.9
-3.5
3.0
3.1
10.5
2.8
0.2
5.6
-3.7
11.5
3.9
9.8
-2.3
-2.6
6.1
4.4
6.6
8.3
2.8
5.2
4.0
18.5
4.1
3.6
16.9
3.4
0.6
-1.6
-5.9
1.9
2.3
9.1
1.9
-2.8
5.1
-5.6
11.0
3.1
9.3
-2.9
-3.3
5.7
5.0
6.7
7.6
2.6
4.9
4.2
17.3
2.9
3.3
14.9
2.4
10.6
10.6
-8.9
24.5
15.2
52.5
16.1
6.2
26.3
-11.2
58.3
18.5
57.4
1.4
-4.6
29.8
31.4
34.6
42.5
17.8
27.7
21.8
101.0
21.5
21.0
97.4
18.
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
20102020203020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Wheeler
Wichita
Wilbarger
Willacy
Williamson
Wilson
Winkler
Wise
Wood
Yoakum
Young
Zapata
Zavala
5,410
131,500
13,535
22,134
422,679
42,918
7,110
59,127
41,964
7,879
18,550
14,018
11,677
5,612
135,811
14,600
25,763
534,882
50,232
8,039
68,070
44,567
9,191
19,408
16,925
13,251
5,929
141,049
15,580
29,591
667,844
58,085
8,857
78,265
46,250
10,737
20,569
19,983
14,918
6,249
145,291
16,352
33,459
825,127
64,775
9,528
88,876
46,751
12,225
21,437
23,342
16,384
6,676
148,625
17,326
37,733
992,814
70,061
10,209
100,448
47,786
13,881
22,277
27,215
17,903
205
3.7
3.3
7.9
16.4
26.5
17.0
13.1
15.1
6.2
16.7
4.6
20.7
13.5
5.6
3.9
6.7
14.9
24.9
15.6
10.2
15.0
3.8
16.8
6.0
18.1
12.6
5.4
3.0
5.0
13.1
23.6
11.5
7.6
13.6
1.1
13.9
4.2
16.8
9.8
6.8
2.3
6.0
12.8
20.3
8.2
7.1
13.0
2.2
13.5
3.9
16.6
9.3
23.4
13.0
28.0
70.5
134.9
63.2
43.6
69.9
13.9
76.2
20.1
94.1
53.3
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Assuming Net Migration Equal to 2000-2010 (1.0 Scenario)
Anderson
Andrews
Angelina
Aransas
Archer
Armstrong
Atascosa
Austin
Bailey
Bandera
Bastrop
Baylor
Bee
Bell
Bexar
Blanco
Borden
Bosque
Bowie
Brazoria
Brazos
Brewster
Briscoe
Brooks
Brown
58,458
14,786
86,771
23,158
9,054
1,901
44,911
28,417
7,165
20,485
74,171
3,726
31,861
310,235
1,714,773
10,497
641
18,212
92,565
313,166
194,851
9,232
1,637
7,223
38,106
62,245
17,487
94,245
26,041
9,847
1,970
55,946
36,542
8,426
25,100
100,746
3,715
33,428
394,509
2,062,088
13,018
698
20,522
95,118
410,571
239,527
10,226
1,672
7,619
40,617
65,595
20,222
101,812
27,558
10,642
1,964
67,524
46,640
9,885
29,059
140,463
3,722
34,292
483,841
2,439,700
15,460
692
22,632
97,314
540,453
292,333
10,854
1,628
7,803
42,131
66,941
22,753
107,469
27,296
11,312
1,852
77,771
59,582
11,338
31,255
195,452
3,614
33,716
586,329
2,809,942
16,937
629
23,757
97,949
711,049
348,817
10,952
1,519
7,695
42,188
66,754
24,794
112,170
26,276
11,775
1,733
86,122
76,037
12,711
31,965
272,723
3,522
32,001
703,159
3,179,649
17,697
527
24,395
98,030
924,456
419,114
10,739
1,436
7,329
41,595
206
6.5
18.3
8.6
12.4
8.8
3.6
24.6
28.6
17.6
22.5
35.8
-0.3
4.9
27.2
20.3
24.0
8.9
12.7
2.8
31.1
22.9
10.8
2.1
5.5
6.6
5.4
15.6
8.0
5.8
8.1
-0.3
20.7
27.6
17.3
15.8
39.4
0.2
2.6
22.6
18.3
18.8
-0.9
10.3
2.3
31.6
22.0
6.1
-2.6
2.4
3.7
2.1
12.5
5.6
-1.0
6.3
-5.7
15.2
27.7
14.7
7.6
39.1
-2.9
-1.7
21.2
15.2
9.6
-9.1
5.0
0.7
31.6
19.3
0.9
-6.7
-1.4
0.1
-0.3
9.0
4.4
-3.7
4.1
-6.4
10.7
27.6
12.1
2.3
39.5
-2.5
-5.1
19.9
13.2
4.5
-16.2
2.7
0.1
30.0
20.2
-1.9
-5.5
-4.8
-1.4
14.2
67.7
29.3
13.5
30.1
-8.8
91.8
167.6
77.4
56.0
267.7
-5.5
0.4
126.7
85.4
68.6
-17.8
34.0
5.9
195.2
115.1
16.3
-12.3
1.5
9.2
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Burleson
Burnet
Caldwell
Calhoun
Callahan
Cameron
Camp
Carson
Cass
Castro
Chambers
Cherokee
Childress
Clay
Cochran
Coke
Coleman
Collin
Collingsworth
Colorado
Comal
Comanche
Concho
Cooke
Coryell
Cottle
Crane
17,187
42,750
38,066
21,381
13,544
406,220
12,401
6,182
30,464
8,062
35,096
50,845
7,041
10,752
3,127
3,320
8,895
782,341
3,057
20,874
108,472
13,974
4,087
38,437
75,388
1,505
4,375
19,763
52,456
49,202
25,263
14,768
493,571
14,442
6,526
32,050
8,901
47,621
57,663
7,460
11,655
3,458
3,095
9,274
1,150,398
3,243
22,688
150,366
14,855
4,299
41,744
86,638
1,578
5,349
22,160
62,876
63,015
29,570
16,383
584,883
16,551
6,924
33,012
9,453
64,504
65,537
7,916
12,278
3,644
2,925
9,586
1,712,183
3,420
24,152
199,936
15,632
4,376
44,816
98,517
1,570
6,385
23,843
71,614
77,373
33,816
17,961
668,322
18,428
7,213
33,060
9,656
88,058
73,442
8,240
12,480
3,619
2,610
9,613
2,575,965
3,626
24,964
252,268
15,966
4,381
47,022
111,930
1,534
7,283
24,931
79,985
92,180
37,899
19,667
741,902
20,569
7,370
32,834
9,612
119,555
83,259
8,409
12,503
3,527
2,361
9,555
3,801,840
3,908
25,492
305,977
16,052
4,277
48,881
124,214
1,478
8,147
207
15.0
22.7
29.3
18.2
9.0
21.5
16.5
5.6
5.2
10.4
35.7
13.4
6.0
8.4
10.6
-6.8
4.3
47.0
6.1
8.7
38.6
6.3
5.2
8.6
14.9
4.9
22.3
12.1
19.9
28.1
17.0
10.9
18.5
14.6
6.1
3.0
6.2
35.5
13.7
6.1
5.3
5.4
-5.5
3.4
48.8
5.5
6.5
33.0
5.2
1.8
7.4
13.7
-0.5
19.4
7.6
13.9
22.8
14.4
9.6
14.3
11.3
4.2
0.1
2.1
36.5
12.1
4.1
1.6
-0.7
-10.8
0.3
50.4
6.0
3.4
26.2
2.1
0.1
4.9
13.6
-2.3
14.1
4.6
11.7
19.1
12.1
9.5
11.0
11.6
2.2
-0.7
-0.5
35.8
13.4
2.1
0.2
-2.5
-9.5
-0.6
47.6
7.8
2.1
21.3
0.5
-2.4
4.0
11.0
-3.7
11.9
45.1
87.1
142.2
77.3
45.2
82.6
65.9
19.2
7.8
19.2
240.7
63.8
19.4
16.3
12.8
-28.9
7.4
386.0
27.8
22.1
182.1
14.9
4.6
27.2
64.8
-1.8
86.2
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Crockett
Crosby
Culberson
Dallam
Dallas
Dawson
Deaf Smith
Delta
Denton
De Witt
Dickens
Dimmit
Donley
Duval
Eastland
Ector
Edwards
Ellis
El Paso
Erath
Falls
Fannin
Fayette
Fisher
Floyd
Foard
Fort Bend
3,719
6,059
2,398
6,703
2,368,139
13,833
19,372
5,231
662,614
20,097
2,444
9,996
3,677
11,782
18,583
137,130
2,002
149,610
800,647
37,890
17,866
33,915
24,554
3,974
6,446
1,336
585,375
4,082
7,247
2,722
8,054
2,639,966
14,756
22,599
5,805
943,020
20,937
2,482
10,870
3,873
12,596
19,857
159,521
2,174
200,285
952,366
41,649
19,236
37,727
28,422
3,913
6,688
1,365
888,595
4,203
8,645
2,901
9,333
2,939,645
15,491
26,213
6,274
1,377,090
21,702
2,449
11,501
3,963
12,999
20,686
184,384
2,126
267,038
1,113,070
45,787
20,121
41,603
32,538
3,793
6,852
1,330
1,314,652
4,126
10,023
2,890
10,583
3,235,511
15,961
29,432
6,496
2,047,293
22,240
2,261
11,638
3,877
12,949
20,757
210,246
2,063
349,418
1,251,834
48,976
20,213
44,507
35,293
3,550
6,747
1,244
1,920,868
4,002
11,305
2,867
11,719
3,528,964
16,047
32,166
6,692
3,031,597
22,847
2,085
11,349
3,819
12,419
20,461
234,964
1,966
448,922
1,369,890
52,086
19,673
47,234
37,438
3,295
6,502
1,110
2,738,553
208
9.8
19.6
13.5
20.2
11.5
6.7
16.7
11.0
42.3
4.2
1.6
8.7
5.3
6.9
6.9
16.3
8.6
33.9
18.9
9.9
7.7
11.2
15.8
-1.5
3.8
2.2
51.8
3.0
19.3
6.6
15.9
11.4
5.0
16.0
8.1
46.0
3.7
-1.3
5.8
2.3
3.2
4.2
15.6
-2.2
33.3
16.9
9.9
4.6
10.3
14.5
-3.1
2.5
-2.6
47.9
-1.8
15.9
-0.4
13.4
10.1
3.0
12.3
3.5
48.7
2.5
-7.7
1.2
-2.2
-0.4
0.3
14.0
-3.0
30.8
12.5
7.0
0.5
7.0
8.5
-6.4
-1.5
-6.5
46.1
-3.0
12.8
-0.8
10.7
9.1
0.5
9.3
3.0
48.1
2.7
-7.8
-2.5
-1.5
-4.1
-1.4
11.8
-4.7
28.5
9.4
6.4
-2.7
6.1
6.1
-7.2
-3.6
-10.8
42.6
7.6
86.6
19.6
74.8
49.0
16.0
66.0
27.9
357.5
13.7
-14.7
13.5
3.9
5.4
10.1
71.3
-1.8
200.1
71.1
37.5
10.1
39.3
52.5
-17.1
0.9
-16.9
367.8
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Franklin
Freestone
Frio
Gaines
Galveston
Garza
Gillespie
Glasscock
Goliad
Gonzales
Gray
Grayson
Gregg
Grimes
Guadalupe
Hale
Hall
Hamilton
Hansford
Hardeman
Hardin
Harris
Harrison
Hartley
Haskell
Hays
Hemphill
10,605
19,816
17,217
17,526
291,309
6,461
24,837
1,226
7,210
19,807
22,535
120,877
121,730
26,604
131,533
36,273
3,353
8,517
5,613
4,139
54,635
4,092,459
65,631
6,062
5,899
157,107
3,807
11,838
21,997
20,080
21,681
335,006
6,969
29,929
1,351
8,518
22,345
24,928
133,647
136,671
30,863
182,526
38,415
3,320
8,802
6,513
4,456
62,163
4,885,616
72,253
6,321
6,072
246,119
4,389
13,018
23,991
23,016
26,509
382,798
7,321
35,003
1,383
9,781
24,879
28,608
148,507
157,592
35,188
246,038
40,103
3,303
9,061
7,629
4,765
69,832
5,777,639
80,962
6,665
6,336
372,120
5,002
14,076
25,375
25,150
32,175
431,323
7,554
38,754
1,340
10,741
26,835
33,790
163,197
185,923
38,715
321,869
40,601
3,151
8,981
8,670
5,041
76,886
6,660,246
92,038
6,734
6,354
556,982
5,655
15,175
26,369
26,701
38,054
484,451
7,566
41,558
1,237
11,354
28,324
40,897
180,032
223,052
42,163
407,388
39,930
2,963
8,668
9,598
5,407
83,322
7,527,827
109,867
6,653
6,290
824,070
6,351
209
11.6
11.0
16.6
23.7
15.0
7.9
20.5
10.2
18.1
12.8
10.6
10.6
12.3
16.0
38.8
5.9
-1.0
3.3
16.0
7.7
13.8
19.4
10.1
4.3
2.9
56.7
15.3
10.0
9.1
14.6
22.3
14.3
5.1
17.0
2.4
14.8
11.3
14.8
11.1
15.3
14.0
34.8
4.4
-0.5
2.9
17.1
6.9
12.3
18.3
12.1
5.4
4.3
51.2
14.0
8.1
5.8
9.3
21.4
12.7
3.2
10.7
-3.1
9.8
7.9
18.1
9.9
18.0
10.0
30.8
1.2
-4.6
-0.9
13.6
5.8
10.1
15.3
13.7
1.0
0.3
49.7
13.1
7.8
3.9
6.2
18.3
12.3
0.2
7.2
-7.7
5.7
5.5
21.0
10.3
20.0
8.9
26.6
-1.7
-6.0
-3.5
10.7
7.3
8.4
13.0
19.4
-1.2
-1.0
48.0
12.3
43.1
33.1
55.1
117.1
66.3
17.1
67.3
0.9
57.5
43.0
81.5
48.9
83.2
58.5
209.7
10.1
-11.6
1.8
71.0
30.6
52.5
83.9
67.4
9.7
6.6
424.5
66.8
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Henderson
Hidalgo
Hill
Hockley
Hood
Hopkins
Houston
Howard
Hudspeth
Hunt
Hutchinson
Irion
Jack
Jackson
Jasper
Jeff Davis
Jefferson
Jim Hogg
Jim Wells
Johnson
Jones
Karnes
Kaufman
Kendall
Kenedy
Kent
Kerr
78,532
774,769
35,089
22,935
51,182
35,161
23,732
35,012
3,476
86,129
22,150
1,599
9,044
14,075
35,710
2,342
252,273
5,300
40,838
150,934
20,202
14,824
103,350
33,410
416
808
49,625
84,178
1,005,539
39,349
24,916
61,274
38,504
25,147
37,715
3,981
101,894
22,540
1,712
9,689
14,356
37,167
2,478
268,231
5,735
44,487
186,847
22,286
16,265
149,063
44,958
462
809
57,004
89,810
1,271,656
42,943
26,091
71,175
42,634
26,086
39,926
4,282
122,641
22,727
1,746
10,353
14,398
38,021
2,411
291,737
6,023
46,867
235,730
24,446
17,611
215,415
58,229
494
795
64,156
95,277
1,531,900
44,967
26,475
78,328
47,610
26,250
41,296
4,335
149,788
22,135
1,646
10,787
14,011
37,949
2,180
322,226
6,128
47,853
299,530
26,599
18,214
308,894
73,221
484
734
67,829
103,301
1,779,370
46,180
25,950
84,406
54,993
26,056
41,709
4,243
186,827
21,267
1,539
11,041
13,366
37,207
2,081
362,564
6,090
47,533
383,739
28,660
17,816
438,487
88,689
438
677
69,353
210
7.2
29.8
12.1
8.6
19.7
9.5
6.0
7.7
14.5
18.3
1.8
7.1
7.1
2.0
4.1
5.8
6.3
8.2
8.9
23.8
10.3
9.7
44.2
34.6
11.1
0.1
14.9
6.7
26.5
9.1
4.7
16.2
10.7
3.7
5.9
7.6
20.4
0.8
2.0
6.9
0.3
2.3
-2.7
8.8
5.0
5.3
26.2
9.7
8.3
44.5
29.5
6.9
-1.7
12.5
6.1
20.5
4.7
1.5
10.0
11.7
0.6
3.4
1.2
22.1
-2.6
-5.7
4.2
-2.7
-0.2
-9.6
10.5
1.7
2.1
27.1
8.8
3.4
43.4
25.7
-2.0
-7.7
5.7
8.4
16.2
2.7
-2.0
7.8
15.5
-0.7
1.0
-2.1
24.7
-3.9
-6.5
2.4
-4.6
-2.0
-4.5
12.5
-0.6
-0.7
28.1
7.7
-2.2
42.0
21.1
-9.5
-7.8
2.2
31.5
129.7
31.6
13.1
64.9
56.4
9.8
19.1
22.1
116.9
-4.0
-3.8
22.1
-5.0
4.2
-11.1
43.7
14.9
16.4
154.2
41.9
20.2
324.3
165.5
5.3
-16.2
39.8
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Kimble
King
Kinney
Kleberg
Knox
Lamar
Lamb
Lampasas
La Salle
Lavaca
Lee
Leon
Liberty
Limestone
Lipscomb
Live Oak
Llano
Loving
Lubbock
Lynn
McCulloch
McLennan
McMullen
Madison
Marion
Martin
Mason
4,607
286
3,598
32,061
3,719
49,793
13,977
19,677
6,886
19,263
16,612
16,801
75,643
23,384
3,302
11,531
19,301
82
278,831
5,915
8,283
234,906
707
13,664
10,546
4,799
4,012
5,052
299
3,816
35,499
3,762
53,136
14,620
23,399
8,210
19,830
19,104
19,495
90,780
26,085
3,797
11,854
21,407
81
313,938
6,239
9,040
255,521
771
15,654
11,384
5,606
4,211
5,318
306
3,896
38,202
3,844
56,747
15,232
27,387
9,420
20,256
21,494
22,103
108,512
28,319
4,374
11,803
22,697
76
352,940
6,473
9,610
281,009
774
17,585
11,531
6,382
4,329
5,198
277
3,896
40,018
3,800
60,460
15,440
31,337
10,455
19,918
22,927
24,086
128,582
29,756
4,930
11,473
22,787
58
390,972
6,443
9,827
303,830
727
19,495
10,991
6,949
4,199
4,969
241
3,828
40,555
3,695
64,970
15,304
35,589
11,537
19,205
23,515
26,297
151,846
30,871
5,507
10,984
22,551
40
430,186
6,328
9,854
326,877
653
21,611
10,105
7,454
4,007
211
9.7
4.5
6.1
10.7
1.2
6.7
4.6
18.9
19.2
2.9
15.0
16.0
20.0
11.6
15.0
2.8
10.9
-1.2
12.6
5.5
9.1
8.8
9.1
14.6
7.9
16.8
5.0
5.3
2.3
2.1
7.6
2.2
6.8
4.2
17.0
14.7
2.1
12.5
13.4
19.5
8.6
15.2
-0.4
6.0
-6.2
12.4
3.8
6.3
10.0
0.4
12.3
1.3
13.8
2.8
-2.3
-9.5
0.0
4.8
-1.1
6.5
1.4
14.4
11.0
-1.7
6.7
9.0
18.5
5.1
12.7
-2.8
0.4
-23.7
10.8
-0.5
2.3
8.1
-6.1
10.9
-4.7
8.9
-3.0
-4.4
-13.0
-1.7
1.3
-2.8
7.5
-0.9
13.6
10.3
-3.6
2.6
9.2
18.1
3.7
11.7
-4.3
-1.0
-31.0
10.0
-1.8
0.3
7.6
-10.2
10.9
-8.1
7.3
-4.6
7.9
-15.7
6.4
26.5
-0.6
30.5
9.5
80.9
67.5
-0.3
41.6
56.5
100.7
32.0
66.8
-4.7
16.8
-51.2
54.3
7.0
19.0
39.2
-7.6
58.2
-4.2
55.3
-0.1
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Matagorda
Maverick
Medina
Menard
Midland
Milam
Mills
Mitchell
Montague
Montgomery
Moore
Morris
Motley
Nacogdoches
Navarro
Newton
Nolan
Nueces
Ochiltree
Oldham
Orange
Palo Pinto
Panola
Parker
Parmer
Pecos
Polk
36,702
54,258
46,006
2,242
136,872
24,757
4,936
9,403
19,719
455,746
21,904
12,934
1,210
64,524
47,735
14,445
15,216
340,223
10,223
2,052
81,837
28,111
23,796
116,927
10,269
15,507
45,413
39,696
63,502
56,907
2,406
159,256
26,786
5,240
10,050
21,462
660,481
25,817
13,917
1,196
73,458
55,437
14,314
16,176
376,623
12,755
2,233
88,026
31,708
25,965
159,119
12,385
17,026
51,908
41,864
72,149
68,762
2,467
185,176
28,410
5,662
10,581
22,985
965,553
30,308
14,677
1,114
83,503
64,176
13,723
16,833
413,594
16,203
2,404
94,084
34,900
28,047
220,119
14,861
18,197
58,037
42,445
78,836
79,797
2,374
212,112
29,133
6,043
10,914
23,779
1,415,763
35,643
15,691
1,023
92,853
73,444
12,645
16,876
438,565
20,295
2,357
99,829
36,819
29,646
311,672
17,477
18,721
62,845
41,834
83,377
89,087
2,317
239,924
29,495
6,437
11,113
24,244
2,061,972
42,278
17,117
918
101,881
84,173
11,573
16,548
455,730
24,935
2,309
105,721
38,057
31,224
453,381
20,012
18,593
66,807
212
8.2
17.0
23.7
7.3
16.4
8.2
6.2
6.9
8.8
44.9
17.9
7.6
-1.2
13.8
16.1
-0.9
6.3
10.7
24.8
8.8
7.6
12.8
9.1
36.1
20.6
9.8
14.3
5.5
13.6
20.8
2.5
16.3
6.1
8.1
5.3
7.1
46.2
17.4
5.5
-6.9
13.7
15.8
-4.1
4.1
9.8
27.0
7.7
6.9
10.1
8.0
38.3
20.0
6.9
11.8
1.4
9.3
16.0
-3.8
14.5
2.5
6.7
3.1
3.5
46.6
17.6
6.9
-8.2
11.2
14.4
-7.9
0.3
6.0
25.3
-2.0
6.1
5.5
5.7
41.6
17.6
2.9
8.3
-1.4
5.8
11.6
-2.4
13.1
1.2
6.5
1.8
2.0
45.6
18.6
9.1
-10.3
9.7
14.6
-8.5
-1.9
3.9
22.9
-2.0
5.9
3.4
5.3
45.5
14.5
-0.7
6.3
14.0
53.7
93.6
3.3
75.3
19.1
30.4
18.2
22.9
352.4
93.0
32.3
-24.1
57.9
76.3
-19.9
8.8
34.0
143.9
12.5
29.2
35.4
31.2
287.7
94.9
19.9
47.1
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Potter
Presidio
Rains
Randall
Reagan
Real
Red River
Reeves
Refugio
Roberts
Robertson
Rockwall
Runnels
Rusk
Sabine
San Augustine
San Jacinto
San Patricio
San Saba
Schleicher
Scurry
Shackelford
Shelby
Sherman
Smith
Somervell
Starr
121,073
7,818
10,914
120,725
3,367
3,309
12,860
13,783
7,383
929
16,622
78,337
10,501
53,330
10,834
8,865
26,384
64,804
6,131
3,461
16,921
3,378
25,448
3,034
209,714
8,490
60,968
134,475
8,683
13,134
142,109
3,908
3,439
13,468
14,934
7,514
994
19,553
115,985
11,010
63,351
12,186
9,340
32,428
68,331
6,482
3,920
18,906
3,734
28,649
3,440
243,064
10,480
68,878
150,155
9,155
15,142
171,030
4,404
3,387
13,497
16,004
7,525
987
22,578
168,455
11,344
75,713
12,997
9,317
39,026
70,310
6,812
4,341
20,986
4,026
31,841
3,953
283,362
12,796
74,657
166,994
9,335
16,358
207,994
4,688
3,207
13,105
16,667
7,221
946
25,406
240,581
11,307
90,123
12,501
8,802
45,924
69,911
6,886
4,604
22,884
4,062
34,398
4,527
329,198
15,098
77,464
184,439
9,169
17,101
255,054
4,882
3,044
12,569
16,875
6,880
865
27,984
333,656
11,071
107,817
11,344
8,233
53,703
67,771
6,854
4,813
24,680
3,974
36,487
5,085
382,835
17,540
77,616
213
11.1
11.1
20.3
17.7
16.1
3.9
4.7
8.4
1.8
7.0
17.6
48.1
4.8
18.8
12.5
5.4
22.9
5.4
5.7
13.3
11.7
10.5
12.6
13.4
15.9
23.4
13.0
11.7
5.4
15.3
20.4
12.7
-1.5
0.2
7.2
0.1
-0.7
15.5
45.2
3.0
19.5
6.7
-0.2
20.3
2.9
5.1
10.7
11.0
7.8
11.1
14.9
16.6
22.1
8.4
11.2
2.0
8.0
21.6
6.4
-5.3
-2.9
4.1
-4.0
-4.2
12.5
42.8
-0.3
19.0
-3.8
-5.5
17.7
-0.6
1.1
6.1
9.0
0.9
8.0
14.5
16.2
18.0
3.8
10.4
-1.8
4.5
22.6
4.1
-5.1
-4.1
1.2
-4.7
-8.6
10.1
38.7
-2.1
19.6
-9.3
-6.5
16.9
-3.1
-0.5
4.5
7.8
-2.2
6.1
12.3
16.3
16.2
0.2
52.3
17.3
56.7
111.3
45.0
-8.0
-2.3
22.4
-6.8
-6.9
68.4
325.9
5.4
102.2
4.7
-7.1
103.5
4.6
11.8
39.1
45.9
17.6
43.4
67.6
82.6
106.6
27.3
Table 14: Continued
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
%Change %Change %Change %Change %Change
County
Total
Total
Total
2030Total
Total
2010202020402010name
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2020
2030
2040
2050
2050
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Stephens
Sterling
Stonewall
Sutton
Swisher
Tarrant
Taylor
Terrell
Terry
Throckmorton
Titus
Tom Green
Travis
Trinity
Tyler
Upshur
Upton
Uvalde
Val Verde
Van Zandt
Victoria
Walker
Waller
Ward
Washington
Webb
Wharton
9,630
1,143
1,490
4,128
7,854
1,809,034
131,506
984
12,651
1,641
32,334
110,224
1,024,266
14,585
21,766
39,309
3,355
26,405
48,879
52,579
86,793
67,861
43,205
10,658
33,718
250,304
41,280
10,297
1,214
1,515
4,651
8,230
2,127,850
138,279
1,047
13,323
1,639
37,790
114,995
1,277,007
16,618
22,646
45,120
3,886
28,593
53,256
58,259
92,845
72,778
58,002
11,213
37,673
317,733
43,271
10,978
1,229
1,494
5,119
8,597
2,532,853
141,994
1,057
13,678
1,588
44,022
119,675
1,519,407
18,060
23,007
51,477
4,476
30,341
56,400
63,838
97,790
76,782
78,038
11,522
41,527
392,768
45,121
11,380
1,177
1,440
5,364
8,587
2,993,599
144,077
1,000
13,741
1,492
50,482
122,004
1,749,761
18,356
22,469
58,713
4,954
30,996
57,859
68,084
101,124
79,859
104,095
11,471
44,477
464,297
45,368
11,598
1,055
1,266
5,548
8,410
3,497,034
144,272
875
13,424
1,385
57,313
121,963
2,011,009
18,078
21,376
67,047
5,503
30,803
57,736
72,513
103,519
83,588
136,570
11,167
47,223
529,784
44,461
214
6.9
6.2
1.7
12.7
4.8
17.6
5.2
6.4
5.3
-0.1
16.9
4.3
24.7
13.9
4.0
14.8
15.8
8.3
9.0
10.8
7.0
7.2
34.2
5.2
11.7
26.9
4.8
6.6
1.2
-1.4
10.1
4.5
19.0
2.7
1.0
2.7
-3.1
16.5
4.1
19.0
8.7
1.6
14.1
15.2
6.1
5.9
9.6
5.3
5.5
34.5
2.8
10.2
23.6
4.3
3.7
-4.2
-3.6
4.8
-0.1
18.2
1.5
-5.4
0.5
-6.0
14.7
1.9
15.2
1.6
-2.3
14.1
10.7
2.2
2.6
6.7
3.4
4.0
33.4
-0.4
7.1
18.2
0.5
1.9
-10.4
-12.1
3.4
-2.1
16.8
0.1
-12.5
-2.3
-7.2
13.5
-0.0
14.9
-1.5
-4.9
14.2
11.1
-0.6
-0.2
6.5
2.4
4.7
31.2
-2.7
6.2
14.1
-2.0
20.4
-7.7
-15.0
34.4
7.1
93.3
9.7
-11.1
6.1
-15.6
77.3
10.7
96.3
23.9
-1.8
70.6
64.0
16.7
18.1
37.9
19.3
23.2
216.1
4.8
40.1
111.7
7.7
Wheeler
5,410
5,934
6,723
7,808
9,249
9.7
13.3
16.1
18.5
71.0
Wichita
131,500
133,363
136,496
138,494
139,319
1.4
2.3
1.5
0.6
5.9
Wilbarger
13,535
14,897
16,186
17,182
18,076
10.1
8.7
6.2
5.2
33.6
Willacy
22,134
26,817
35,787
39,693
17.6
13.5
79.3
31,526
21.2
10.9
Williamson
422,679
633,783
940,542 1,380,749
1,976,958
49.9
48.4
46.8
43.2
367.7
42,918
57,292
73,396
89,858
33.5
28.1
17.2
145.5
Wilson
105,355
22.4
Winkler
7,110
8,371
9,416
10,284
10,982
17.7
12.5
9.2
6.8
54.5
Wise
59,127
74,490
95,538
123,315
160,900
26.0
28.3
29.1
30.5
172.1
Wood
41,964
48,594
54,088
57,291
60,260
15.8
11.3
5.9
5.2
43.6
Yoakum
7,879
9,591
11,690
13,821
16,006
21.7
21.9
18.2
15.8
103.1
18,550
21,593
22,933
7.4
8.4
6.2
5.4
30.2
Young
19,914
24,160
14,018
17,043
20,016
22,853
21.6
17.4
11.0
81.0
Zapata
25,376
14.2
Zavala
11,677
12,895
13,964
14,477
14,552
10.4
8.3
3.7
0.5
24.6
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
215