INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
The Best Place to Start
2015-2016 PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT BY DISCIPLINE
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING
The Program Review Report assesses the viability and quality of credit and non-credit instructional programs to support program improvement through Area Improvement Plans,
as established by College Procedure 2.03.01.18: Program Review. The Office of Institutional Research provides the data, which are by academic year as of August 31, 2015; the Office of
Institutional Effectiveness produces the report, which presents the data by program. Standards are marked as “Met” or “Not Met” based on DISTRICT (“D”), not site, performance. Data
by site are shown where available (if unavailable, boxes are blank). Standards after slashes denote critical thresholds, which identify especially unacceptable performance (and if not met,
are marked "Not Met-Critical"). Results are color-coded, as follows:
STANDARD MET
STANDARD NOT MET
STANDARD NOT MET - CRITICAL
Overall Viability Indicator score 50% or lower or unmet Graduation and Student Success prompts formal review by the Program Review Committee. The Committee's authority
concerning program continuation is limited to recommending that the senior instructional administrators review the program's capacity to improve its service to students and the
community. The final decision on program continuation rests with the President.
Program Type: Career & Technical Program
Mandatory Accreditation: Yes
Report’s Recommendation Last Year: No Formal Review
Fully Accredited? (Y/N): Yes
Program Review Committee Action required this year: In Need of Formal Review - Viability
50% or less, Chair informs VP of Unmet Student Success
Reason Why Not Fully Accredited:
THE PROGRAM’S RECENT PERFORMANCE SCORES (Citation of a year such as "1415" or "2015" refers to the 2014-2015 academic year.)
12-13
13-14
14-15
2015-2016
VIABILITY
12-13
13-14
14-15
2015-2016
87.50%
88.24%
75%
44.44%
QUALITY
50%
75%
100%
50%
RECENT RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE
2012-2013
Review: Yolanda Ahner reported that Mr. Steve Smith, Dr. Jaime Farias, and she would meet to review the Program Review Procedure on May 6, 2013. Yolanda Ahner requested that any review of the Advanced Technology
Industrial Manufacturing be postponed after the May 6 meeting. The PRC voted unanimously to decide whether the Advanced Technology Industrial Manufacturing Technology Program would require a review after the meeting on
May 6, 2013.
2013-2014
None
2014-2015
None
SOURCES 1. State Annual Data Profile, Mainframe, 2. Annual Data Profile and/or Automated Student and Adult Learner Follow-up System, 3. Mainframe/State Lonestar, EMSI proprietary database, 4. Program Review Status Form completed by Dean of District
Discipline Coordinator/CE Dean/Director, 5. Master Class Schedule (Mainframe), 6. Banner, 7. Master Class Schedule (Mainframe), Fac. Employment Status (Mainframe), 8. SLO Assessment Task Force; TracDat database (All fields must have data for applicable
cycle—no blank fields), 9. Credit Student Faculty Evaluation, 10. Graduate Survey, 11. Employer Survey, 12. Advisory Committee Survey & Minutes, 13. THECB Statewide Annual Licensure Report, 14. Faculty Development Records, 15. Non-Credit Faculty
Evaluation, 16. Course Syllabus (Curriculum Office), 17. Advisory Committee Survey & Minutes, Program Review Status Form completed by Dean of District Discipline Coordinator/CE Dean/Director, 18. DACUM Audit (Curriculum Office), 19. Curriculum
Office, 20. Advisory Committee Survey & Minutes, Employer Survey, 21. Student Banner Files, Budget Office, Public Community/Junior & Technical College Basis of Legislative Appropriations, 22. Credit Academic History.
OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT OF RESEARCH AND ACCOUNTABILITY
Z:RS/2015-2016 RPT/PROGREVRPT 1516-YR ADVANCEDTECHINDUSTRIALMANUFACTURING
EPCC does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, gender, age, disability, veteran status, sexual orientation, or gender identity.
4/15/2016
1
VIABILITY (Overall viability score 50% or lower or unmet Graduation and Student Success prompts formal review by the Program Review Committee)
1516 Rpt
(District Data as
of Aug. 31, 2015)
1213
1314
1415
Rpt
Rpt
Rpt
1. No. of Graduates Within latest 5-year period (Fall, Spring, Summer)
provided by the State (State counts graduates with more than 1 award more than
once) (For info. only, after the score: Latest 5-yr award total known to EPCC,
if not the State) Source: 1 Standard: 25/<15
44. For inf.
Only,
EPCC
Data: 52
62. For
inf. Only,
EPCC
Data: 71*
73. For inf.
only, EPCC
Data: 70*
72. For inf. only,
EPCC Data: 55*
2. Student Success Percent of students employed/transfer/enter military
w/in 1 yr of grad., for last 3 years provided by the State. Source: 2
Standard: 90%/<50%
97.7%
98%
90.9%
85.2%
1. Workforce Demand Whether the no. of new and replacement jobs in
the field forecast for El Paso, Hudspeth, Dona Ana, Luna, & Otero counties
during the 5 years following this report’s publication meets/exceeds the no.
of graduates during the 5 years preceding this report’s publication. (See end
of report for data) Source: 3 Standard: Yes
2. Contact/Credit Hours per FT Faculty Sufficient contact/credit hours for
all discipline courses, District-wide, disregarding lecturers, for FT faculty
workload for last 3 years (F/Sp). (Excluding C.E. courses) (Unduplicated)
(Cred. Tran. & Career & Tech. versions of programs share the same results)
Source: 4 Standard: Yes/No
3. Class Fill Rate Percent of classes 75% full (Including C.E. students),
based on optimum and no. of students in each section for last 3 years on
census date, excluding MILS (UTEP ROTC), MUAP (independent Music
study), MUSR (recitals), Independent Study, Virtual College of Texas,
NCBO, classes whose instructors are not paid by EPCC; if room capacity is
below optimum, score reflects room capacity. (For info. only, after score the
measure is also calculated w/o concurrent students.) (For info. only,
District average fill rate appears after foregoing data (No. of seats filled
divided by no. of seats available)) Source: 5 Standard: 80%/<50%
4. Enrollment Trends Seat count (including C.E. students) is increasing,
level or decreasing no more than 5% from the benchmark year (1st yr. of
last 3 yrs.), based on program-specific courses. (For info. only, after the
score measure calculated w/o C.E. students.) (For info. only, appears the
unduplicated no. of students by year) Source: 6 Standard: Yes/>10%
decrease
Yes, for 72
graduates
in last 5
years.
Yes, for 67
graduates
in last 5
years.
Yes, for 66
graduates in
last 5 years.
Yes, for 53
graduates in last
5 years.
No
No
Yes
No
D: 74%
Dist. Seat
Count:
86.1%
D: 95%
Dist. Seat
Count:
105.3%
Class Fill
without
concurrent,
D: 84%,
VV: 84%**
D: 94.7%
Dist. Seat
Count: 106.7%
Class Fill
without
concurrent, D:
85.8%, VV:
85.8%**
D: 94.3%
Dist. Seat Count:
106.8% Class Fill
without
concurrent, D:
92.4%, VV:
92.4% **
94.3%
D: No, 28%,
Undupl.
2010: 116,
2012: 93
D: Yes,
12%,
Undupl.
2011: 95,
2013: 100
Enrollment
without
concurrent,
D: Yes,
26%, VV:
Yes, 26%**
D: Yes, 8.6%,
Undupl.
2012: 94,
2014: 99
Enrollment
without
concurrent,
D: Yes, 19.2%,
VV: Yes,
19.2%**
D: No, -28.3%,
Undupl.
2013: 101,
2015: 83
Enrollment without
concurrent,
D: No, -24%,
VV: No, -24**
No,
-28.3%
5. Full-Time Faculty in Discipline There is at least 1 FT instructor with
primary teaching load in the discipline. (Sept. 1-May 1 of latest year) (Cred.
Tran. & Career & Tech. versions of programs share the same results) Source: 7
Standard: Yes/No
6. Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) For each 2-year cycle, has the
program documented & implemented the recommendations for its active
SLOs and completed its assessment process for its active SLOs? Source: 8
Standard: Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
INDICATOR
ASC
FT.
BLISS
MdP
NW
RG
TM
VV
STATE-MANDATED
INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT
*2013-2014 revisions to the Program Review procedure increased the period of years covered from 3 to 5 and changed the standard from 15/<10 to 25/<15.
**2013-2014 revisions to the Program Review procedure required that C.E. students be included in the scored calculation. For information only, a second calculation was required to be made without including C.E. students; the change may affect Advanced
Technology Industrial Manufacturing, Electrical Technology, HVAC, and Machining Technology.
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING 2
QUALITY
INDICATOR
1516 Rpt (District
Data as of Aug. 31,
2015)
1213
1314
1415
Rpt
Rpt
Rpt
D: 83%
D: 85%
D: 78.7%
D: 77.8%
77.8%
D: 92%
D: 89%
D: 93%
D: 93%
93%
100%
95%
96.3%
Lacks 3 yrs of data
100%
100%
100%
Lacks 3 yrs of data
96%
97.9%
98.5%
Lacks 3 yrs of data
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0%
No Full-Time
Faculty
ASC
FT.
BLISS
MdP
NW
RG
TM
VV
STAKEHOLDER SATISFACTION/PROGRESS
1. Student Satisfaction with Program Based on fall/spring percent of
students satisfied with labs & technology averaged for the last 3 years.
(Surveys scored 1 or 0 based on combined on averaged of responses:
“Excellent”: 1, “Good”: 1, “Acceptable”: 1, “Weak”: 0, “Unacceptable” =
0. Average of 1=Satisfaction) Source: 9 Standard: 80%
2. Student Evaluation of Faculty Percent of satisfaction in fall/spring
averaged for last 3 years, based on question: "Would you recommend
instructor?" Source: 9 Standard 80%
3. Graduate Satisfaction with Program Based on percent of cumulative
graduates satisfied with “usefulness of my major courses w/ respect to my
job,” “availability of courses in my major,” & “level of technology in my
major.” (Combined average of all 3 responses) for previous 3 years.
Source: 10 Standard: 80%
4. Employer Satisfaction Percent of surveyed employers satisfied with
graduates for last 3 years. Names of employers surveyed provided by the
Dean/District-wide Coordinator. (Surveys scored 1 or 0 based on the
combined average of the 8 responses: “Excellent” = 1, “Good” = 1,
“Acceptable” = 1, “Weak” = 0, “Unacceptable" = 0. An average of 1
indicates satisfaction) Source: 11 Standard: 80%
5. Advisory Committee Satisfaction with Program Percent of surveyed
members satisfied, based on averaged percent of satisfaction for the last 3
years. (Surveys scored 1 or 0 based on the combined average of the eleven
responses: “Excellent” = 1, “Good” = 1, “Acceptable” = 1, “Weak” = 0,
“Unacceptable" = 0. An average of 1 indicates satisfaction.) Source: 12
Standard: 80%
6. Student Licensure/Certification, As Applicable Percent of
graduates/completers receiving licensure/certification, based on annual pass
rate for the most recent year. Source: 13 Standard: 90%
INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT
1. Full-Time Faculty Development For most recent year, percent of FT
teaching Faculty at 2 prof. development activities during the fall semester
(1st day of fall Faculty Development Week (FDW) through last day of final
exams) and percent of FT teaching Faculty at 2 such activities during spring
semester (1st day of spring FDW through last day of final exams). If FT
faculty teach in 2 or more programs, their attendance is credited to all the
programs. Source: 14 Standard: 100%
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING 3
INDICATOR
1213
1314
1415
Rpt
Rpt
Rpt
1516 Rpt
(District Data
as of Aug. 31,
2015)
2. Part-Time Faculty Development For most recent year, percent of
PT teaching Faculty at 1 prof. development activity during fall semester
(1st day of fall Faculty Development Week (FDW) through last day of
final exams) and percent of PT teaching Faculty at 1 such activity during
spring semester (1st day of spring FDW through last day of final exams).
If PT faculty teach in 2 or more programs, their attendance is credited to
all the programs. Source: 14 Standard: 75%
0%
17%
30%
14.3%
3. Sections taught by Full-Time Faculty Percent of sections taught by
FT Faculty for last 3 years, excluding MILS (UTEP ROTC), MUAP
(independent Music study), MUSR (recitals), Independent Study, Virtual
College of Texas, NCBO, classes whose instructors are not paid by
EPCC. Source: 7 Standard: 50%
4. Course Syllabus Reviewed/revised within the last 3 years, based on
no. of course syllabi in the program and the revision date of each
syllabus. Source: 16 Standard: Yes
5. Advisory Committee Meetings Held at least once annually, based
on the meeting date(s) of each program advisory committee for the last 3
years. Source: 17 Standard: Yes
6. DACUM Completion within last 5 years, based on completion date
of each program DACUM. Source: 18 Standard: Yes
7. DACUM Findings Incorporated, as appropriate, into curriculum,
based on most recent DACUM Audit for each program. Source: 18
Standard: Yes
8. Secondary Articulation Agreements, as appropriate Percent of
ISD requests for articulation addressed through analysis of EPCC course
objectives for last 3 years. Source: 19 Standard: 100%
9. Post-Secondary Articulation Agreements, as appropriate Written
evidence of attempted/revised articulation within the last 3 years.
Source: 4 Standard: Yes
10. Program Accreditation, As Applicable Maintains/actively seeking
voluntary accreditation, based on documentation of accreditation or
application for accreditation for last 3 years. Source: 4 Standard: Yes
11. Community Benefit/Service Percent of surveyed advisory
committee members acknowledging program meets community needs for
each of the last 3 years. Source: 12 Standard: 85%
12. Program Need Percent of surveyed employers acknowledging
program is needed for each of the last 3 years. Names of surveyed
employers identical to those used by Employer Satisfaction indicator.
Source: 11 Standard: 85%
13. Competitive Advantage: Quality Percent of surveyed respondents
acknowledging EPCC meets/exceeds quality of proprietary schools for
each of the last 3 years. (Combined average of responses on both the
Advisory Committee Survey and the Employer Survey) Source: 20
Standard: 85%
D: 0%
D: 0%***
D: 12.6%***
D: 15.4%***
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
100%
100%
100%
100%
N/A
Yes
N/A
Yes
Yes
Yes
N/A
Yes
100%
100%
100%
Lacks 3 yrs
of data
100%
100%
100%
Lacks 3 yrs
of data
95%
95%
95%
Lacks 3 yrs
of data
ASC
FT.
BLISS
MdP
NW
RG
TM
VV
15.4%
***2013-2014 revisions to the Program Review procedure reduced the standard from 60% to 50%.
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING 4
VIABILITY INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT INDICATOR 1 - WORKFORCE DEMAND
Measure: Whether the sum of new and replacement jobs in the field forecast for El Paso and Hudspeth Counties and the New Mexico counties of Dona Ana, Luna and Otero
during the 5 years following the publication of the Program Review Report meets or exceeds the number of graduates during the 5 years preceding the publication of the report. To ensure
that the data include career paths addressed by the program, each program shall provide the IE Office with a list of jobs for which it prepares graduates.
The listings are from the EMSI database, which was created in 2001, in consultation with the Association of Community College Trustees (ACCT), to track occupational demand and
wages nationally, by state and by region, drawing on some 91 databases, which include those of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The number preceding each occupational title is the
unique Bureau of Labor Statistics SOC (Standard Occupational Classification) number assigned to each job title. Job titles were specified by the disciplines. Numerical anomalies may be
due to rounding.
TOTAL NUMBER OF JOBS PER YEAR
SOC
Code
11-3071
13-1081
17-3012
17-3013
17-3024
17-3029
25-2023
25-2032
25-9031
41-9031
47-2111
47-3013
47-5042
49-1011
49-2011
49-2092
49-2094
Occupation
Transportation, Storage,
and Distribution
Managers
Logisticians
Electrical and
Electronics Drafters
Mechanical Drafters
Electro-Mechanical
Technicians
Engineering
Technicians, Except
Drafters, All Other
Career/Technical
Education Teachers,
Middle School
Career/Technical
Education Teachers,
Secondary School
Instructional
Coordinators
Sales Engineers
Electricians
Helpers--Electricians
Mine Cutting and
Channeling Machine
Operators
First-Line Supervisors of
Mechanics, Installers,
and Repairers
Computer, Automated
Teller, and Office
Machine Repairers
Electric Motor, Power
Tool, and Related
Repairers
Electrical and
Electronics Repairers,
Commercial and
213
217
220
224
227
Total
New/Replacement
Jobs
34
319
64
331
65
341
67
351
68
360
69
56
21
56
21
57
22
57
22
213
216
219
60
61
417
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Average
Hourly
Wage
(2014)
Education Required
$35.45
High school diploma or equivalent
57
<10
$32.86
$33.43
Bachelor's degree
Associate's degree
58
22
<10
<10
$25.49
$28.38
Associate's degree
Associate's degree
221
222
28
$24.04
Associate's degree
62
64
65
11
$23.83
Bachelor's degree
426
434
442
449
80
$25.55
Bachelor's degree
335
345
354
363
371
48
$28.65
Master's degree
36
1311
294
<10
38
1339
304
<10
40
1366
313
<10
41
1393
321
<10
42
1420
328
<10
<10
215
56
<10
$40.95
$20.50
$12.82
No Data
Bachelor's degree
High school diploma or equivalent
High school diploma or equivalent
High school diploma or equivalent
1157
1172
1186
1200
1212
185
$25.26
High school diploma or equivalent
280
283
285
288
290
34
$15.36
Some college, no degree
43
43
43
43
43
<10
$14.93
Postsecondary non-degree award
132
136
138
141
143
22
$21.68
Postsecondary non-degree award
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING 5
TOTAL NUMBER OF JOBS PER YEAR
SOC
Code
49-2095
49-2097
49-2098
49-9011
49-9012
49-9031
49-9041
49-9043
49-9062
49-9071
49-9091
49-9098
49-9099
51-1011
51-2022
51-2023
51-4011
51-4012
51-4021
Occupation
Industrial Equipment
Electrical and
Electronics Repairers,
Powerhouse, Substation,
and Relay
Electronic Home
Entertainment
Equipment Installers and
Repairers
Security and Fire Alarm
Systems Installers
Mechanical Door
Repairers
Control and Valve
Installers and Repairers,
Except Mechanical Door
Home Appliance
Repairers
Industrial Machinery
Mechanics
Maintenance Workers,
Machinery
Medical Equipment
Repairers
Maintenance and Repair
Workers, General
Coin, Vending, and
Amusement Machine
Servicers and Repairers
Helpers--Installation,
Maintenance, and Repair
Workers
Installation,
Maintenance, and Repair
Workers, All Other
First-Line Supervisors of
Production and
Operating Workers
Electrical and Electronic
Equipment Assemblers
Electromechanical
Equipment Assemblers
Computer-Controlled
Machine Tool Operators,
Metal and Plastic
Computer Numerically
Controlled Machine
Tool Programmers,
Metal and Plastic
Extruding and Drawing
Machine Setters,
Operators, and Tenders,
Metal and Plastic
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Total
New/Replacement
Jobs
Average
Hourly
Wage
(2014)
Education Required
50
52
54
55
56
11
$29.64
Postsecondary non-degree award
149
146
144
142
142
21
$14.07
Postsecondary non-degree award
213
218
224
229
233
38
$18.32
High school diploma or equivalent
31
31
31
31
31
<10
$14.18
High school diploma or equivalent
166
169
171
173
174
32
$18.48
High school diploma or equivalent
57
57
57
57
57
<10
$13.57
High school diploma or equivalent
371
384
397
409
419
95
$20.02
High school diploma or equivalent
263
263
264
266
269
22
$16.78
High school diploma or equivalent
66
71
75
78
81
23
$16.45
Associate's degree
3890
3951
4008
4062
4106
526
$13.80
High school diploma or equivalent
40
38
36
35
34
<10
$13.81
High school diploma or equivalent
664
671
677
684
689
107
$11.33
High school diploma or equivalent
191
195
198
202
204
26
$17.32
High school diploma or equivalent
1280
1277
1278
1281
1289
88
$22.63
Postsecondary non-degree award
275
275
275
276
279
19
$12.63
High school diploma or equivalent
111
104
99
97
98
<10
$14.23
High school diploma or equivalent
201
206
211
216
220
42
$16.79
High school diploma or equivalent
44
45
46
47
48
<10
$17.44
High school diploma or equivalent
327
317
310
305
303
24
$12.92
High school diploma or equivalent
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING 6
TOTAL NUMBER OF JOBS PER YEAR
SOC
Code
51-4022
51-4023
51-4031
51-4032
51-4061
51-4192
51-4193
51-4199
51-8099
51-9198
Occupation
Forging Machine Setters,
Operators, and Tenders,
Metal and Plastic
Rolling Machine Setters,
Operators, and Tenders,
Metal and Plastic
Cutting, Punching, and
Press Machine Setters,
Operators, and Tenders,
Metal and Plastic
Drilling and Boring
Machine Tool Setters,
Operators, and Tenders,
Metal and Plastic
Model Makers, Metal
and Plastic
Layout Workers, Metal
and Plastic
Plating and Coating
Machine Setters,
Operators, and Tenders,
Metal and Plastic
Metal Workers and
Plastic Workers, All
Other
Plant and System
Operators, All Other
Helpers--Production
Workers
39
39
38
38
38
Total
New/Replacement
Jobs
<10
92
89
87
85
84
285
280
277
275
22
22
22
<10
<10
17
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Average
Hourly
Wage
(2014)
Education Required
$14.83
High school diploma or equivalent
<10
$15.14
High school diploma or equivalent
274
11
$12.26
High school diploma or equivalent
22
22
<10
$16.07
High school diploma or equivalent
<10
<10
<10
<10
No Data
High school diploma or equivalent
17
17
17
17
<10
$18.20
High school diploma or equivalent
30
30
30
30
30
<10
$13.12
High school diploma or equivalent
65
65
65
65
66
<10
$16.76
High school diploma or equivalent
46
46
47
47
47
<10
$25.69
High school diploma or equivalent
707
696
688
682
682
58
$9.93
Less than high school
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING 7