HOUSING TRENDS, FACTORS, AND FORCES

advertisement

HOUSING TRENDS,

FACTORS, AND

FORCES

By: Andy Carswell,

University of Georgia

Georgia Institute for Community Housing

Tifton, GA

February 26, 2008

Single-Family Housing Starts

1,900

(Thousands of Units, SAAR)

1,700

1,500

1,300

1,100

900

700

500

89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

Source: NAHB

12

Multifamily Housing Starts

500

(Thousands of Units, SAAR)

450

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

Source: NAHB

13

Housing Starts Per Capita

0.010

0.009

0.008

0.007

0.006

0.005

0.004

0.003

CA, AZ, NV, FL

All Other States

MI, IN, OH

0.002

0.001

0.000

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Source: New York Federal Reserve, Economy.com, Mortgage Bankers Association of America

0.010

0.009

0.008

0.007

0.006

0.005

0.004

0.003

0.002

0.001

0.000

New Home Sales

1,400

(Thousands of units, Seasonally Adjusted)

1,300

1,200

1,100

1,000

900

800

700

600

500

400

300

89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

Source: NAHB

11

12

Percent

Prime Conventional Conforming

Home Mortgage Rates

Fixed-Rate Mortgages

10

8

6

4

Adjustable Rate Mortgages

2

0

89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

Source: NAHB

10

Real GDP Forecast

4.5%

4.0%

3.5%

3.0%

2.5%

2.0%

1.5%

1.0%

0.5%

0.0%

0.6%

3.8%

3.9%

1.5%

2.3%

2.4%

2.5%

2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6%

2007

Q1

2007

Q2

2007

Q3

2007

Q4

2008

Q1

2008

Q2

2008

Q3

2008

Q4

2009

Q1

2009

Q2

2009

Q3

2009

Q4

2.6%

Source: NAHB

Unemployment Forecast

5.0%

4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9%

4.8%

4.7% 4.7%

4.8% 4.8%

4.6%

4.6%

4.5%

4.4%

4.5% 4.5%

4.3%

2007

Q1

Source: NAHB

2007

Q2

2007

Q3

2007

Q4

2008

Q1

2008

Q2

2008

Q3

2008

Q4

2009

Q1

2009

Q2

2009

Q3

2009

Q4

4.9%

Vacant Year-Round Housing Units on the

Market

(000s)

No. of Units

(left scale)

(Percent)

6500

6000

5500

5000

4500

4000

3500

3000

2500

% of Housing Stock

(right scale)

2000

80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07

6

5

4

3

2

6

Georgia and Projected Household

Growth

Top 5 Counties

Chattahoochee (+58%)

Barrow (+32%)

Newton (+31%)

Paulding (+30%)

Forsyth (+29%)

Bottom 5 Counties

Butts (-30%)

DeKalb (-19%)

Liberty (-18%)

Taliafero (-13%)

Ware (-13%)

Percent of Defaults Due to Non-Owner

Occupied Loans

Nevada

Arizona

Florida

California

All other states

Total US

Prime Loans

Percent of Share of prime home prime defaults due to non-owner occupied loans as of purchase loan originations for nonowner occupied properties in 2005, based on HMDA

June 30,

2007

32%

26%

25%

21%

13%

29%

29%

32%

14%

15%

16% 17%

Nevada

Arizona

Florida

California

All other states

Total US

Subprime Loans

Percent of Share of subprime subprime defaults due home purchase loan originations for nonto non-owner occupied loans as of owner occupied properties in 2005, based on HMDA

June 30,

2007

24%

18%

14%

14%

14%

15%

11%

15%

7%

10%

12% 10%

Source: MBA, Home Mortgage Disclosure Act 2005 Report

Mortgage Delinquency Data

Source: Equifax/Moody’s Economy. COM

Historical Data Patterns

Industry and Market

Determinants of Foreclosure

• LTV Ratios (+)

• House Price Appreciation (-)

• Sub-Prime Lender (+)

• Mortgage Type  Non-FRM (+)

• Savings Rate (-)

• Servicing by Primary Lender (-)

• Interest Rates (+)

Human/Individual Factors

Associated with Foreclosure

• Divorce (+)

• Health Care Exps. (+)

• Unemployment (+)

• Seasonal Nature of Job (+)

• # of Dependents (+)

• Non-Housing Wealth (-)

• FTHB Status (+)

• Gambling (+)

Pre-purchase Homeownership Counseling’s Effects on

Default and Foreclosure

• Positive effect overall as a risk mitigator

• Little in the way of followup procedures

• Questionable purchasing behavior of FTHB

• More vulnerable to predatory lenders after origination than before

Community Costs of Foreclosure

• Fire Risks

• Increasing Crime

• Administrative/Municip al Costs

• Property Value Effects

Foreclosure and Mortgage Fraud

• Fraud-for-property schemes vs. fraud-forprofit schemes

• Clustering effect

• Adverse community effects

• Difficulty in researching fraud effects on foreclosure

Mortgage Fraud – Case Study

Concentration of Mortgage Fraud

So, Who’s To Blame for the

Affordability Problem?

• Land as a finite resource

• Government infatuated with homeownership

• Liberalized financing of mortgages

• Building codes

• Mortgage fraud

• Suburbanization

• Housing norms

• Inflexible nature of market rents

• Lack of availability of Section 8

• Growth of subprimes

• The dominance of the “stick-built” market

Possible Solutions to

Affordability Problem

• Solid, yet realistic, homeownership counseling programs

• Reducing the stigma of manufactured housing

• Reducing the influence of the sub-prime market

• Living wage campaigns

• Land trusts

• Housing trust funds

Other Housing Items Dominating My World

Predatory lending and anti-fraud legislation

Rise of gated communities

Rise of New Urbanism

Effects of foreclosure laws on bankruptcy behavior

Housing (in)equality

Appraisals, assessments, and proper valuation

Residential property management

Employer-assisted housing

Any Questions?

Andrew T. Carswell, Ph.D.

Assistant Professor

Dept. of Housing & Consumer Economics

University of Georgia

109 Dawson Hall

Athens, GA 30602

Ph: (706) 542-4867

Fax: (706) 542-4397 carswell@fcs.uga.edu

Download