Session VI: UK and US Enforcement Update and Lessons from Some Key Cases Mark Amorosi, Partner, K&L Gates Washington. D.C. Robert Hadley, Partner, K&L Gates London David Savell, Senior Associate, K&L Gates London © Copyright 2015 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights reserved. SEC Enforcement Activities Mark Amorosi, Partner, K&L Gates Washington. D.C. © Copyright 2015 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights reserved. SEC Division of Enforcement – New Regime SEC Chair Mary Jo White First SEC chair who was a criminal prosecutor Get-tough stances (Madoff, financial crisis) “First and foremost a law enforcement agency” “Broken windows” speech Enforcement Director, Andrew Ceresney Also a criminal prosecutor Long-time colleague of Chair White Case production during White and Ceresney’s first year Seven hundred and fifty five cases (up from 686) with $4.2 billion awarded (up from $3.4 billion) Asset Management Unit Continuing huge case production since creation in 2010 Former deficiency letters can now be enforcement cases 180 | SEC Division of Enforcement – Asset Management Unit Created in 2010 and is the largest of the specialised units 60+ lawyers, five industry specialists, access to HO and 11 regional offices Coordinated approach with co-chiefs in D.C. and L.A. Specialisation and training AMU leadership change Julie Riewe (D.C. based) – joined SEC in 2005 Notable recent speech entitled “Conflicts, Conflicts, Conflicts” Has stated that there are “no shades of grey” Marshall Sprung (L.A. based) – joined SEC in 2003 Four other units created as well: (1) Complex Financial Instruments Unit (formerly, Structured and New Products), (2) Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Unit, (3) Market Abuse Unit, and (4) Municipal Securities and Public Pension Unit 181 | SEC Division of Enforcement – New Approaches Risk identification initiatives – e.g. aberrational performance Partnerships with other divisions Division of Economic Risk Analysis for risk assessment OCIE for surveillance Investment Management for theory No more silos Gatekeeper focus: attorneys, accountants, compliance professionals Requiring admissions in settlements Started by Chair White and is an outlier among federal agencies Problem: Criteria unclear as to what admissions in what kind of cases Whistleblower Program gaining momentum 182 | SEC Division of Enforcement – New Approaches Shift to in-house administrative proceedings Dodd-Frank Act substantially expanded SEC’s power to bring cases before its own administrative law judges instead of in federal court FYE 30 September 2014, 57% in court vs. 43% as administrative cases – trend is approaching 50%-50% AMU’s rationale for preferring in-house proceedings Issues for defendants Limited discovery Time to trial No jury No evidence rules (hearsay allowed) Appeal is to the SEC Commissioners Further federal court of appeals review is limited 183 | SEC Division of Enforcement – AMU Priorities “Hedge Fund Aberrational Performance Initiative” “Mutual Fund Fee Initiative” “Bond Fund Valuation Initiative” “Problem Adviser Initiative” Adequacy of risk disclosure (e.g., subprime exposure) Misrepresentations concerning performance or strategies Conflicts issues (e.g., nondisclosure) Books and records; Form ADV issues Special Issues Private equity: “Zombie” funds Mutual funds Investment advisers 184 | UK and US Enforcement Update and Lessons from Some Key Cases Robert Hadley, Partner, K&L Gates London David Savell, Senior Associate, K&L Gates London © Copyright 2015 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights reserved. FCA Enforcement 2014/15 Credible deterrence Market abuse insider dealing Criminal prosecution Higher fines – £700 million so far in 2015, resources focused on LIBOR and FX manipulation More prohibitions Senior management/individual responsibility Compensation for consumers 186 FCA Enforcement 2014/15 (Cont.) More cases on… CASS client money – £180 million (£126 million after 30% discount) Anti-money laundering controls – £3 million (£2.1 million after 30% discount) More thematic and enforcement work Transaction reporting – £18.979 million (£13.285 million after 30% discount) 187 FCA Enforcement 2014/15 (Cont.) 188 Process Thematic review Skilled person’s report Attestation Enforcement 189 Senior Management Attestations 2014 – 59 Wholesale and Investment Management – 21 Q1 2014/15 – 38 Wholesale and Investment Management – 27 Senior Managers Regime for banks Banking Reform Act 2013, regime comes into force 7 March 2016 Senior managers to submit ‘statement of responsibilities’ – FCA will be able to clearly identify individuals responsible for breaches as part of the aim to bring more successful enforcement cases against individuals Senior managers will be liable to disciplinary action unless they can prove that they took reasonable steps to prevent or stop the breach 190 Individual Responsibility Anthony Wills, compliance officer at Bank of Beirut £28,000 (£19,600 after 30% discount) Statement of Principle 4 (open and co-operative with regulators) Senior management pressure does not excuse misconduct: ‘uniquely placed to understand the full position in relation to Bank of Beirut’s regulatory compliance and as such should have resisted any senior management influence’ No prohibition 191 Individual Responsibility LIBOR/EURIBOR Martin Brokers (UK) Limited – £3.6 million (though reduced to £600,000 for financial circumstances and 30% discount) David Caplin, CEO – £300,000 (£210,000 after 30% discount). Prohibition from SIF Jeremy Kraft, compliance officer – £150,000 (£105,000 after 30% discount). Prohibition from SIF Ensure effective oversight, remedy Martins’ lack of controls, compliance culture Broker supervision assumed by CEO/delegated by compliance officer NIPS Code Entertainment 192 LIBOR/EURIBOR Global approach to enforcement On 20 May 2015, six banks agreed to pay a combined $5.6 billion to regulators, including the DoJ, CFTC and Federal Reserve, in the US and to the FCA in relation to FX and LIBOR manipulation Paul Robson pleaded guilty to DOJ indictment of conspiracy to manipulate JPY LIBOR in August 2014. Subsequently, the FCA made a prohibition order against him in February 2015 193 Conflicts of Interest Aviva Investors Global Services Limited £25.15 million (£17.6 million after 30% discount). Principle 3 (Systems and Controls) Principle 8 (Conflicts of interest) Allocation of trades – ‘cherry picking’ Thematic review. ‘Dear CEO letter’ Identify, assess and manage the risk of inherent conflicts of interest associated with side-by-side management Systems and controls to record and allocate client orders (COBS 11.3.2, 11.5.2) Co-operation ‘far beyond the level expected’ www.fca.org.uk/static/pubs/other/conflicts-of-interest.pdf November 2012 194 Conflicts of Interest Barclays Bank PLC £355,540,000 (£284 million after 20% discount) Principle 3 (systems and controls) FX Policies relating to conflicts of interest were not specific to the FX business Widespread use of chatrooms – unmonitored 195 Individual Responsibility Tariq Carrimjee v FCA – Upper Tribunal Adviser to Mr Goenke Firm principal, including compliance officer Blind eye = lack of integrity Approved persons should remain alive to the risk of market abuse by clients and deal with these appropriately Overturned finding of lack of integrity £89,000 Prohibition? New Tribunal powers 196 Systems and Controls AML: Bank of Beirut (UK) Limited £3 million (£2.1 million after 30% discount). Restriction on new customers from high-risk jurisdictions 180 days (reduced 30% to 126 days) Had failed to carry out adequate risk assessments of higher-risk customers and verify the identity and source of funds of higherrisk customers Develop, implement and conduct an adequate compliance monitoring plan specific to financial crime Remediation exercise of its customer files Inaccurate assurances to the FCA De-risking FCA has stated in its 2015/2016 Business Plan that it expects firms to avoid denying services to particular services or customer categories 197 AML/ABC Thematic Review Senior management oversight Challenge/controls/risk assessment new customers Fourth Money Laundering Directive 198 Enforcement 2015 Thematic review of how asset management firms control the risk of market abuse (February 2015): Firms need to increase and improve post-trade surveillance to investigate potentially suspicious trades Although firms had generally good controls to identify insider information in clear situations, practices to avoid inside information or identify its receipt when it is not expected were often informal and inconsistently applied www.fca.org.uk/static/documents/thematic-reviews/tr15-01.pdf Middle management: New thematic review planned on culture change programmes with a particular focus on remuneration, appraisal and promotion decisions of middle management 199 Enforcement 2015/16 LIBOR/FX Individuals/senior management Higher fines Conflicts of interest Market abuse systems and controls Friends with US 200