6.976 High Speed Communication Circuits and Systems Lecture 7 Noise Modeling in Amplifiers

advertisement
6.976
High Speed Communication Circuits and Systems
Lecture 7
Noise Modeling in Amplifiers
Michael Perrott
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Copyright © 2003 by Michael H. Perrott
Notation for Mean, Variance, and Correlation
ƒ
Consider random variables x and y with probability
density functions fx(x) and fy(y) and joint probability
function fxy(x,y)
- Expected value (mean) of x is
-
ƒ Note: we will often abuse notation and denote
as a random variable (i.e., noise) rather than its mean
The variance of x (assuming it has zero mean) is
- A useful statistic is
ƒ If the above is zero, x and y are said to be uncorrelated
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Relationship Between Variance and Spectral Density
Two-Sided Spectrum
One-Sided Spectrum
Sx(f)
Sx(f)
2A
A
ƒ
-f2 -f1 0
f1
f2
f
0
f1
f2
f
Two-sided spectrum
- Since spectrum is symmetric
ƒ
One-sided spectrum defined over positive frequencies
- Magnitude defined as twice that of its corresponding
two-sided spectrum
ƒ
M.H. Perrott
In the next few lectures, we assume a one-sided
spectrum for all noise analysis
MIT OCW
The Impact of Filtering on Spectral Density
|H(f)|2
Sx(f)
AB
B
A
0
f
f
0
x(t)
ƒ
Sy(f)
H(f)
0
f
y(t)
For the random signal passing through a linear,
time-invariant system with transfer function H(f)
- We see that if x(t) is amplified by gain A, we have
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Noise in Resistors
ƒ
Can be described in terms of either voltage or current
R
R
in
en
ƒ
k is Boltzmann’s constant
ƒ
T is temperature (in Kelvins)
- Usually assume room temperature of 27 degrees Celsius
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Noise In Inductors and Capacitors
ƒ
Ideal capacitors and inductors have no noise!
C
ƒ
L
In practice, however, they will have parasitic resistance
- Induces noise
- Parameterized by adding resistances in parallel/series
with inductor/capacitor
ƒ Include parasitic resistor noise sources
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Noise in CMOS Transistors (Assumed in Saturation)
ID
G
D
Drain Noise (Thermal and 1/f)
S
ƒ
Transistor Noise Sources
Gate Noise (Induced and Routing Parasitic)
Modeling of noise in transistors must include several noise
sources
- Drain noise
ƒ Thermal and 1/f – influenced by transistor size and bias
- Gate noise
ƒ Induced from channel – influenced by transistor size and bias
ƒ Caused by routing resistance to gate (including resistance of
polysilicon gate)
ƒ Can be made negligible with proper layout such as fingering of
devices
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Drain Noise – Thermal (Assume Device in Saturation)
ind
G
VGS
VD>∆V
S
ƒ
D
Thermally agitated carriers in the
channel cause a randomly varying
current
-
γ is called excess noise factor
ƒ = 2/3 in long channel
ƒ = 2 to 3 (or higher!) in short
channel NMOS (less in PMOS)
gdo will be discussed shortly
M.H. Perrott
2
ind
∆f
4kTγgdo
f
MIT OCW
Drain Noise – 1/f (Assume Device in Saturation)
ind
G
VGS
VD>∆V
S
ƒ
Traps at channel/oxide interface
randomly capture/release carriers
D
2
ind
∆f
-
Parameterized by Kf and n
4kTγgdo
ƒ Provided by fab (note n ≈ 1)
ƒ Currently: Kf of PMOS << Kf of
NMOS due to buried channel
To minimize: want large area (high WL)
M.H. Perrott
drain
1/f noise
drain thermal noise
f
1/f noise
corner frequency
MIT OCW
Induced Gate Noise (Assume Device in Saturation)
ing
indg
G
VGS
VD>∆V
S
ƒ
Fluctuating channel potential
couples capacitively into the gate
terminal, causing a noise gate
current
D
2
ing
∆f
slope =
20 dB/decade
4kTδgdo
- δ is gate noise coefficient
ƒ Typically assumed to be 2γ
- Correlated to drain noise!
M.H. Perrott
f
5 ft
α
MIT OCW
Useful References on MOSFET Noise
ƒ
Thermal Noise
- B. Wang et. al., “MOSFET Thermal Noise Modeling for
Analog Integrated Circuits”, JSSC, July 1994
ƒ
Gate Noise
- Jung-Suk Goo, “High Frequency Noise in CMOS Low
-
M.H. Perrott
Noise Amplifiers”, PhD Thesis, Stanford University,
August 2001
ƒ http://www-tcad.stanford.edu/tcad/pubs/theses/goo.pdf
Jung-Suk Goo et. al., “The Equivalence of van der Ziel and
BSIM4 Models in Modeling the Induced Gate Noise of
MOSFETS”, IEDM 2000, 35.2.1-35.2.4
Todd Sepke, “Investigation of Noise Sources in Scaled
CMOS Field-Effect Transistors”, MS Thesis, MIT, June 2002
ƒ http://www-mtl.mit.edu/research/sodini/sodinitheses.html
MIT OCW
Drain-Source Conductance: gdo
ƒ
ƒ
gdo is defined as channel resistance with Vds=0
- Transistor in triode, so that
- Equals g
m
for long channel devices
Key parameters for 0.18µ NMOS devices
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Plot of gm and gdο versus Vgs for 0.18µ NMOS Device
4
Vgs
M1
1.8µ
W
=
L
0.18µ
3.5
Transconductance (milliAmps/Volts)
Id
Transconductances gm and gdo versus Gate Voltage Vgs
3
gd0=µnCoxW/L(Vgs-VT)
2.5
2
1.5
gm (simulated in Hspice)
1
0.5
0
0.4
ƒ
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Gate Voltage Vgs (Volts)
1.6
1.8
2
For Vgs bias voltages around 1.2 V:
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Plot of gm and gdο versus Idens for 0.18µ NMOS Device
Transconductances g m and g do versus Current Density
4
Vgs
M1
1.8µ
W
=
L
0.18µ
3.5
Transconductance (milliAmps/Volts)
Id
3
2.5
gd0=µnCoxW/L(Vgs-VT)
2
1.5
gm (simulated in Hspice)
1
0.5
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Current Density (microAmps/micron)
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Noise Sources in a CMOS Amplifier
RD
enD
RG
enG
Rgpar
engpar
ing
ID
RG
RD
1
gg
Cgd
vgs
Cgs
Cdb
gmvgs
-gmbvs
ro
ind
Vout
Csb
endeg
vs
Vin
M.H. Perrott
RS
Rdeg
MIT OCW
Remove Model Components for Simplicity
RD
enD
RG
enG
Rgpar
engpar
ing
ID
RG
RD
1
gg
Cgd
vgs
Cgs
Cdb
gmvgs
-gmbvs
ro
ind
Vout
Csb
endeg
vs
Vin
M.H. Perrott
RS
Rdeg
MIT OCW
Key Noise Sources for Noise Analysis
RD
enD
RG
enG
ing
ID
RG
vgs
Cgs
ind
gmvgs
RD
Vout
endeg
vs
Vin
ƒ
Rdeg
RS
Transistor gate noise
ƒ
Transistor drain noise
Thermal noise
M.H. Perrott
1/f noise
MIT OCW
Apply Thevenin Techniques to Simplify Noise Analysis
iout
G
Zg
Zgs
ing
vgs
Cgs
D
gmvgs
ind
S
iout
Zdeg
G
Zg
Zgs
vgs
Cgs
gmvgs
D
indg
S
Zdeg
ƒ
Assumption: noise independent of load resistor on drain
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Calculation of Equivalent Output Noise for Each Case
iout
G
Zg
Zgs
ing
vgs
Cgs
D
gmvgs
ind
S
iout
Zdeg
G
Zg
Zgs
vgs
Cgs
gmvgs
D
indg
S
Zdeg
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Calculation of Zgs
iout
G
D
itest
Zgs vtest
Zg
vgs
Cgs
gmvgs
S
v1 Z
deg
ƒ
Write KCL equations
ƒ
After much algebra:
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Calculation of η
iout
G
Zg
Zgs
vgs
Cgs
gmvgs
D
itest
S
v1
Zdeg
ƒ
Determine Vgs to find iout in terms of itest
ƒ
After much algebra:
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Calculation of Output Current Noise Variance (Power)
iout
Iout
G
G
D
S
Zg
D
Zg
Zgs
vgs
Cgs
gmvgs
indg
Zdeg
S
Zdeg
ƒ
To find noise variance:
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Variance (i.e., Power) Calc. for Output Current Noise
ƒ
Noise variance calculation
ƒ
Define correlation coefficient c between ing and ind
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Parameterized Expression for Output Noise Variance
ƒ
Key equation from last slide
ƒ
Solve for noise ratio
ƒ
Define parameters Zgsw and χd
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Small Signal Model for Noise Calculations
iout
Iout
G
G
D
S
Zg
D
Zg
Zgs
vgs
Cgs
gmvgs
indg
Zdeg
S
Zdeg
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Example: Output Current Noise with Zs = Rs, Zdeg = 0
Source
iout
Rs
Vin
ens
Zgs
vgs
Cgs
gmvgs
ƒ
Step 1: Determine key noise parameters
ƒ
Step 2: calculate η and Zgsw
indg
- For 0.18µ CMOS, we will assume the following
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Calculation of Output Current Noise (continued)
ƒ
Step 3: Plug values into the previously derived expression
Drain Noise Multiplying Factor
- For w << 1/(R C
s
- For w >> 1/(R C
s
gs):
Gate noise contribution
gs):
Gate noise contribution
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Plot of Drain Noise Multiplying Factor (0.18µ NMOS)
Drain Noise Multiplying Factor Versus Frequency for 0.18 µ NMOS Device
1
f << 1/(2πRsCgs)
Drain Noise Gain Factor
0.95
0.9
0.85
0.8
f >> 1/(2πRsCgs)
0.75
1/100
1/10
1
10
100
Normalized Frequency --- f/(2πRsCgs) (Hz)
ƒ
Conclusion: gate noise has little effect on common
source amp when source impedance is purely resistive!
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Broadband Amplifier Design Considerations for Noise
2
indg
∆f
drain
1/f noise
4kTγgdo
drain thermal noise
gate noise contribution
with purely resistive
source impedance
f
1/f noise
corner frequency
ƒ
1
2πRsCgs
Drain thermal noise is the chief issue of concern
when designing amplifiers with > 1 GHz bandwidth
- 1/f noise corner is usually less than 1 MHz
- Gate noise contribution only has influence at high
frequencies (such noise will likely be filtered out)
ƒ
Noise performance specification is usually given in
terms of input referred voltage noise
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Narrowband Amplifier Noise Requirements
2
indg
∆f
drain
1/f noise
4kTγgdo
drain thermal noise
gate noise contribution
with purely resistive
source impedance
f
1/f noise
corner frequency
ƒ
Narrowband
amplifier
frequency range
1
2πRsCgs
Here we focus on a narrowband of operation
- Don’t care about noise outside that band since it will be
filtered out
ƒ
Gate noise is a significant issue here
- Using reactive elements in the source dramatically
impacts the influence of gate noise
ƒ
Specification usually given in terms of Noise Figure
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
The Impact of Gate Noise with Zs = Rs+sLg
Source
iout
Rs
Vin
ens
Lg
Zgs
vgs
Cgs
gmvgs
ƒ
Step 1: Determine key noise parameters
ƒ
Step 2: Note that η =1 , calculate Zgsw
indg
- For 0.18µ CMOS, again assume the following
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Evaluate Zgsw At Resonance
Source
iout
Rs
Vin
ens
Lg
Zgs
vgs
Cgs
gmvgs
indg
ƒ
Set Lg such that it resonates with Cgs at the center
frequency (wo) of the narrow band of interest
ƒ
Calculate Zgsw at frequency wo
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
The Impact of Gate Noise with Zs = Rs+sLg (Cont.)
ƒ
Key noise expression derived earlier
ƒ
Substitute in for Zgsw
Gate noise contribution
ƒ
Gate noise contribution is a function of Q!
- Rises monotonically with Q
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
At What Value of Q Does Gate Noise Exceed Drain Noise?
2
indg
∆f
4kTγgdo
Narrowband
amplifier
frequency range
drain thermal noise
gate noise contribution
Q2
f
wo/2π
ƒ
Determine crossover point for Q value
=1
- Critical Q value for crossover is primarily set by process
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Calculation of the Signal Spectrum at the Output
Source
iout
Rs
ens
Vin
Lg
Zgs
vgs
Cgs
gmvgs
indg
ƒ
First calculate relationship between vin and iout
ƒ
At resonance:
ƒ
Spectral density of signal at output at resonant frequency
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Impact of Q on SNR (Ignoring Rs Noise)
2
indg
∆f
4kTγgdo
Narrowband
amplifier
frequency range
signal spectrum
Q2
drain thermal noise
gate noise contribution
Q2
f
wo/2π
ƒ
SNR (assume constant spectra, ignore noise from Rs):
ƒ
For small Q such that gate noise < drain noise
ƒ
M.H. Perrott
- SNR
out
improves dramatically as Q is increased
For large Q such that gate noise > drain noise
- SNR
out
improves very little as Q is increased
MIT OCW
Noise Factor and Noise Figure
Rs
Equivalent output
referred current noise
(assumed to be independent
of Zout and ZL)
enRs
vin
vx
Zin
Linear,Time Invariant
Circuit
(Noiseless)
ƒ
Definitions
ƒ
Calculation of SNRin and SNRout
M.H. Perrott
Zout
inout
iout
ZL
MIT OCW
Calculate Noise Factor (Part 1)
Source
iout
Rs
ens
Lg
Zgs
Vin
ƒ
Cgs
gmvgs
indg
First calculate SNRout (must include Rs noise for this)
-R
s
noise calculation (same as for Vin)
- SNR
ƒ
vgs
out:
Then calculate SNRin:
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Calculate Noise Factor (Part 2)
ƒ
Noise Factor calculation:
ƒ
From previous analysis
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Calculate Noise Factor (Part 3)
ƒ
Modify denominator using expressions for Q and wt
ƒ
Resulting expression for noise factor:
Noise Factor scaling coefficient
- Noise factor primarily depends on Q, w /w , and process specs
o
M.H. Perrott
t
MIT OCW
Minimum Noise Factor
Noise Factor scaling coefficient
ƒ
We see that the noise factor will be minimized for
some value of Q
- Could solve analytically by differentiating with respect
to Q and solving for peak value (i.e. where deriv. = 0)
ƒ
ƒ
In Tom Lee’s book (pp 272-277), the minimum noise
factor for the MOS common source amplifier (i.e. no
degeneration) is found to be:
Noise Factor scaling coefficient
How do these compare?
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Plot of Minimum Noise Factor and Noise Factor Vs. Q
Noise Factor Scaling Coefficient Versus Q for 0.18 µ NMOS Device
8
Noise Factor Scaling Coefficient
7
6
c = -j0
c = -j0.55
5
c = -j1
c = -j0
4
c = -j0.55
3
0
Minimum across
all values of Q and
1
Note: curves
meet if we
approximate
Q2+1 Q2
2
1
M.H. Perrott
Achievable values as
a function of Q under
the constraint that
1
= wo
LgCgs
1
2
3
c = -j1
LgCgs
4
5
Q
6
7
8
9
10
MIT OCW
Achieving Minimum Noise Factor
ƒ
For common source amplifier without degeneration
- Minimum noise factor can only be achieved at
-
ƒ
resonance if gate noise is uncorrelated to drain noise
(i.e., if c = 0) – we’ll see this next lecture
We typically must operate slightly away from resonance
in practice to achieve minimum noise factor since c will
be nonzero
How do we determine the optimum source impedance
to minimize noise figure in classical analysis?
- Next lecture!
M.H. Perrott
MIT OCW
Download