The Space Shuttle Thermal Protection System Daniel Kwon 16.885J Final Presentation

advertisement
The Space Shuttle Thermal Protection System
Daniel Kwon
16.885J Final Presentation
December 6, 2005
Outline
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Requirements and design
TPS performance and evaluation
New requirements
Maintenance techniques
New technology
Conclusions
Space Shuttle Thermal Protection System
2
TPS requirements
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Orbiter structure temperature < 350° F
Reusable for 100 missions
Maintain integrity
Acceptable aerodynamic surface
Minimal weight, maintenance, and
refurbishment
Space Shuttle Thermal Protection System
3
Design summary: Ceramic Tiles
High purity silicon
HRSI – black
LRSI – white
Reaction cured glass
(RCG) coating
ƒ SIP
ƒ Room Temperature
Vulcanizer (RTV)
ƒ Gap Fillers
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Space Shuttle Thermal Protection System
4
Design summary: RCC
ƒ Leading edge structure system (LESS) and nose cap
ƒ All-carbon composite: rayon cloth graphitized &
impregnated with resin polymer
ƒ Regions of orbiter > 2300° F
ƒ Operational temp. of
-200 to 3000° F
ƒ LESS consists of 22
RCC panels
ƒ RCC parts form a
hollow shell Æ internal
radiation
Space Shuttle Thermal Protection System
5
Performance Summary
ƒ Overall, measured surface
temperatures lower than
requirement, and lower
than predicted
ƒ Some areas of excessive
tile-to-tile heating (gap
filler fix)
ƒ Excellent mechanical performance
ƒ Test phase: no tiles from underneath detached, small amount of
damage to tiles, some LRSI tiles fell off
ƒ Recommend similar system (SIP, RTV) for future designs
Space Shuttle Thermal Protection System
6
Evaluation
ƒ Positive aspects
ƒ Extremely good thermal performance
ƒ Reusable
ƒ Ease of maintenance
ƒ Negative aspects
ƒ Low impact resistance
ƒ Loss of gap fillers (localized heating)
Space Shuttle Thermal Protection System
7
New Requirements
1. Maintain higher amount of structural
integrity
2. Tile condition must be easily
monitored during a mission
3. TPS must have on-orbit repair
capabilities
4. Reduced maintenance to reduce costs
Space Shuttle Thermal Protection System
8
Meeting maintenance requirements
ƒ Challenges:
ƒ Large number of components: > 30,000
ƒ Complex tile acceptance logic
New Techniques
ƒ On-orbit maintenance
ƒ Backflip maneuver, Tile repair kit, RCC
repair kit (GRABER), SAFER propulsion
system, laser topography sensor
ƒ Rapid Re-Waterproofing
ƒ Electronic tracking (maintenance)
system
Space Shuttle Thermal Protection System
9
TUFI: Toughened Uni-Piece Fibrous Insulation
ƒ Ceramic tile concept
developed by NASA Ames
ƒ Coated with Alumina
Enhanced Thermal Barrier
(AETB)
ƒ Same SIP, RTV used
ƒ 1-2 order of magnitude
more resistant to damage
ƒ Maximum operational
temp = 2500° F
Space Shuttle Thermal Protection System
10
Blanket Insulation: TABI and CRI
ƒ Silica-based blanket type TPS
ƒ Upgrades to FRSI
ƒ Quilted blankets with integrated ceramic
ƒ Improve strength and outer surface
ƒ Tailorable Advanced Blanket Insulation (TABI) – NASA Ames
ƒ Ceramic fiber with Q-fiber felt insulation
ƒ Conformal Reusable Insulation (CRI) - Boeing
ƒ Ceramic matrix composite
Space Shuttle Thermal Protection System
11
Metallic TPS
ƒ Lightweight metallic structure
enclosing a high-efficiency
fibrous insulation
ƒ ARMOR (Adaptable Robust
Metallic Operable Reusable)
TPS – NASA LaRC
ƒ Inconel honeycomb structure
enclosing Saffil insulation
ƒ More damage tolerant, but
lower operational
temperatures
Space Shuttle Thermal Protection System
12
Metallic TPS, con’t
ƒ Several variation of Metallic TPS exist
ƒ Honeycomb material
ƒ Inconel, Titanium, other alloys
ƒ Insulation layer
ƒ Saffil, Internal Multiscreen Insulation (IMI)
ƒ Operational temperature: 2000 - 2200° F
Space Shuttle Thermal Protection System
13
Hot Structures
ƒ Metallic primary structure acts as a heat sink
ƒ Integrated structure and TPS Æ large mass savings
ƒ Progress highly dependant on materials research
and fabrication processes
ƒ Operational temperatures ~1500° F
ƒ Candidate systems
ƒ Gamma Titanium aluminide (TiAl)
ƒ Metal matrix composites
ƒ Nickel metal foam
Space Shuttle Thermal Protection System
14
Conclusions
ƒ TUFI tile system
replaces HRSI
ƒ TABI systems used to
upgrade FRSI
ƒ No RCC replacement
ƒ Metallic TPS have high
future potential
ƒ Improved maintenance
techniques currently in
practice
Space Shuttle Thermal Protection System
High
Temp.
current
requirements
new
requirements
RCC
HRSI
LRSI
TUFI
Metallic TPS
TABI
FRSI
Hot
Structures
High Durability
15
Interfaces 1: Interactions between shuttle subsystems
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
Structures
Aerodynamics
Environmental control system
Guidance, Navigation, & Control
External Tank and Solid Rocket
Boosters
Space Shuttle Thermal Protection System
16
Download