2/11/15 Problem Set 2 Advanced Futures Strategies Problem 1 C(S,X,t) + B(X,t) = S + P(S,X,t) C(S,X,t) – P(S,X,t) = S – B(X,t) C(S,X,t) – P(S,X,t) = 80 – 80 = 0 So, you buy the stock and pay with borrowed money. If futures price is accurate predictor, then expected return from holding stock is risk-free rate If stock pays dividends, then futures price is 80e(r-d)t 1 2/11/15 Problem 2 C(S,X,t) – P(S,X,t) = S – B(X,t) $5.59 – $5.59 = 80 – 80 = 0 • If you try different volatilities, will still find puts and calls have equal value. Problem 3 C(S,X,t) + B(X,t) = S + P(S,X,t) C(S,X,t) + B(X,t) – S = P(S,X,t) • C(S,X,t) = S * N(d1) – B(X,t) * N(d2) • Then, P(S,X,t) = S*N(d1)–B(X,t)*N(d2)–S+B(X,t) P(S,X,t) = S*(N(d1)–1) + B(X,t)*(1–N(d2)) • If S/X = 80/40, then N(d1) and N(d2) both approach 1. So, the put is nearly without value and need not be synthesized 2 2/11/15 Problem 4 • Yes, just fix“moneyness ratio” at 2 and proceed from there • Would be easier to maintain hedge Problem 6 • The implied repo rate for a given term is (F–S)/S • If equilibrium not maintained, one could arbitrage repo agreements against futures contracts 3 2/11/15 Problem 7 • With IMM Index of 93 Ø F = 100 – (100–93)(90/360) = 98.25 Ø For $1,000,000 contract, futures price would total $982,500 • Let’s arbitrage! Bonds as commodities (Problem 7) $982,500 % o Rep d e i l Imp $973,370 $973,067.09 4 = 7.3 e t a R 7.10% 48 days NY Jan 28 F=98.25 91 days 7.17% 139 days Profit = $302.81 NY Mar 17 NY June 16 $1,000,000 4 2/11/15 Problem 8 • The desired beta is half the beta for the portfolio • If the beta for the futures contract is one, the amount involved in the futures position would be half the value of the portfolio • If beta of futures contract not exactly one, then multiply 0.5 times the beta of the futures contract • The beta of the futures contract on the stock market index is e(r-d)t Problem 9a • • • • • Starting beta is 1.25 The desired beta is 1 Index future price is 1250 Let’s assume the beta for the futures contract is 1 Then the amount involved in the futures position would be ((1/1.25) –1)*12,500,000 = –2,500,000 • Number of contracts to sell is (2,500,000/1250) / 250 = 8 5 2/11/15 Problem 9b • Portfolio drops from $12,500,000 to $11,750,000 • Index future drops from 1250 to 1181.25 • The index has dropped 5.5%, and the portfolio has dropped 6% from their original values Ø (6/5.5 is only 1.09, so the drop in the portfolio was not as great as its beta would predict, and so there may have been some alpha capture). • Profit from the futures position would be the number of contracts (-8)times the multiplier (250) times 1181.25 – 1250 Ø So, the profit would be $137,500 • Added to the new value of the portfolio, you would have $11,887,500, reducing the loss to 4.9% of the original value of the portfolio. Ø This is a bit less than the 5.5% drop on the index, which is consistent with a beta of 1 combined with some alpha capture. Problem 10 (assume storage costs same both places) Sell oil €600,000 Buy oil $1,000,000 FRA today $1 = € 0.60 5% Replace for €614,977.39 FRA later €629,240.41 Profit = €14,263.02 NY today 3% $1 = € 0.62 NY later Sell for $1,014,903.88 What is not balanced? 6