Reclaimed wastewater facility using Ozone and Ceramic Membranes Shinjiro Kanaya, METAWATER USA Motoharu Noguchi, METAWATER,Co.Ltd Insert your company logo or name here AMTA/AWWA© 1 Background 1. Water Reuse Project in Japan “Sewer Vision 2100” Water shortage in urban area, Tokyo, Yokohama, Kobe, etc. Encourage developing water reclamation technology 2. Increased reclaimed water demand Growing demand for water reuse of secondary effluent Non-portable reuse, Landscaping irrigation etc. METAWATER and Tokyo Metropolitan government have conducted collaborative research since 2006 Full scale installation in 2010 AMTA/AWWA© 2 Tokyo metropolitan government • • • • • Population: 12 Million / Service area : 1,800km2(700sq miles) Bureau of Water work 1,400MGD : Treated wastewater 130 MGD : reuse water for landscaping and sprinkling 100 MGD: use for non-portable reuse, sanitary flushing, etc • 1MGD ozone + polymeric membrane operated since 2005 • 2MGD ozone+ ceramic membrane operated in 2010 AMTA/AWWA© 3 Water reclamation development target Produce “high quality” & “low cost” reclaimed water High Sprinkling, Snow melting, etc. Landscape, Sanitary flushing, etc. RO Conventional technologies Cost Activated Carbon MF/UF Ozone + Sandfilter Sandfilter Low Industrial use, water recharge, etc. Ozone + Ceramic Membrane. New value Secondary effluent Low Water quality High AMTA/AWWA© 4 Benefit of Ceramic Membrane System • High quality water – Mechanical strength • High integrity -No breakage – Uniform pore size distribution • Reliable physical separation • Water saving – High feed water recovery >98% • Energy Saving – Electric power consumption< 0.1 kWh/m3 (0.38 Wh/gal) • Low Maintenance – Long membrane Life >20years – Easy chemical cleaning • Design flexibility – Combination with enhanced treatment (e.g.) coagulation, pre-ozonation, Powdered Activated Carbon (PAC) AMTA/AWWA© 5 Ceramic Membrane Element Nominal pore size Dimension Membrane surface area Size of channel Number of channel Material Flow rate 0.1micron 180mm x 1,500mmL ( 7.1” x 59.1”) 25m2 (269ft2) 2.5mm (0.1”) 2000 Ceramic 18gpm at 100gfd AMTA/AWWA© 6 Structure of Ceramic membrane element Raw water channel Cross section Filtrate channel Raw water Filtrate Water collection slit Support layer Membrane layer (0.1micron pore size) Membrane Surface AMTA/AWWA© 7 Filtration and backwash process Backwash process Filtration process Reverse flow Raw water Dead-end filtration Operation Mode Pressure TMP< 20psi Duration 1 - 2hr Wastewater Compressed air Backwash water Backwash water Filtrate Schematic diagram Discharge Wastewater Reverse flow by filtrate 70psi 2 - 20 seconds Air flushing by air/water 30psi 2-5 seconds Total 1minutes AMTA/AWWA© 8 Concept of combination of Ozonation/ Coagulation / Ceramic membrane Coagulation Improvement Ozonation Coagulation Microorganisms & Virus Inactivation TOC & DOC Removal Color and Odor Removal Reduce TMP increasing rate Ozone Resistance Coagulate / pin floc Fouling control Ceramic Membrane Turbidity / Particle Removal Stable Operation Robustness >120 installation, No breakage to date since first installation in1998 AMTA/AWWA© 9 Schematic flow of Water reclamation system *Biofilter Ozonation ・NO2 removal ・ Color removal Coagulation improvement ・SS removal Secondary Effluent Biofilter Ceramic membrane ・Dead-end filtration ・Backwash interval:1-3hrs Filtrate Coagulant Ozone contactor DO3 Blower Coagulation Coagulation tank pump Ozonizer * Biofilter process is optional AMTA/AWWA© 10 Operation Result • Test site: • Raw water: • Flow: Shibaura WWTP, Tokyo Secondary effluent Biofilter-O3-coagulation- MF ceramic membrane • Pilot testing – Period: 2006-2008 – Single membrane module unit • Full scale operation – 1.8 MGD (108 membranes) – Start up April 2010 AMTA/AWWA© 11 Pilot test - Equipment Ozone Contactor Ceramic Membrane unit Single membrane unit Capacity: 18.3gpm at 100gfd AMTA/AWWA© 12 Pilot test - Results (ozonation / coagulation effect) 40 3.6kPa/day (0.5psi/day) 30 5.8 20 2.9 4.3 0.9kPa/day (0.1psi/day) 10 1.4 0 O3=6mgO3/L, PACl=0mgAl/L 8.7 60 13kPa/day (1.9psi/day) 40 20 2.9 1.2kPa/day (0.2psi/day) 0 0 5 10 Time course (day) 15 Preozonation effect on TMP increase rate TMP increase rate reduced 1/4 by ozonation 5.8 0 5 10 Time course (day) TMP (psi at 25C) O3=0mgO3/L, PACl=4.8mgAl/L TMP (kPa at 25C) 50 O3=6mgO3/L, PACl=2.4mgAl/L 80 TMP (psi at 25C) TMP (kPa at 25C) O3=6mgO3/L, PACl=4.8mgAl/L 15 PACl coagulation effect on TMP increase rate TMP increase rate reduced 1/10 by coagulant(PACl) AMTA/AWWA© 13 DOC [mgC/L] Pilot test - TOC fraction distribution Secondary effluent Biofilter effluent Ozone treated water Ceramic MF effluent 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 DOM AHS HoN HiA DOM: Dissolved Organic Matter •AHS: Hydrophobic Acid •HoN: Hydrophobic Neutrals •HiA: Hydrophilic Acid •Bas: Bases •HiN: Hydrophilic Neutrals BaS HiN (Komatsu, et al) AMTA/AWWA© 14 Pilot test - Coagulation enhancement by ozonation 1. Ozone imparts negative charge to particles 2. Negative charged particles attract to positive charged coagulant 3. Neutral floc formed course high permeability cake layer ー ー+ーー ーー ー ー ー+ーー ーー ー Particle ー ー+ーー ーー ー ー ー+ーー ーー ー ー ー+ーー ーー ー Ozone ーー ー ー ー +ーーー +ーー ーー ー OHAlーOHOH Al Al OHAl ー Al OHAl ー ー +ー ー ー ー ーー ー+ ー ーー ー OHAlOHOH Al Al OHAl ーー Al OHAl ー ー ー +ーー ーー+ーー ーー ー Coagulant Removed by MF Ceramic membrane AMTA/AWWA© 15 Full scale installation (Shibaura WWTP) • Capacity : 1.85MGD (7,000 m3/day) • Biofilter : φ4.5m x 4 tanks = 120 m/day • Ozonizer : 133ppd 2.5 kg-O3/hr x 2 • Ceramic membrane : 54membrane x 2units Ceramic membrane building Ozonizer building Operated since April 2010 Ozone contactor Biofilter AMTA/AWWA© 16 Full scale installation (Shibaura WWTP) •Membrane unit (6racks, 9membranes per rack) •Each rack can be isolated AMTA/AWWA© 17 Full scale operation – TMP Long term Residual ResidualO3 O3:0.1 :0.1~ ~0.5mgO3/L 0.5mgO3/L(0.3 (0.3mg/L mg/Lmore morethan than90% 90%of oftime) time) pH pHcontrol control:6.3 :6.3~ ~6.8 6.8 PACl PACldosage:20 dosage:20~ ~68mgPACl/L 68mgPACl/L BW BWcycle: cycle:2hours 2hours CEB: CEB: soak soak10ppm 10ppmHypo Hypo11per per3-7days 3-7days TMP Flux 20 CIP 200 CIP 1 rack per month 160 15 120 10 80 5 40 0 1-Apr-10 Flux (gfd) Initial TMP(Psid at 25 ℃) 25 0 28-Sep-10 27-Mar-11 23-Sep-11 21-Mar-12 17-Sep-12 16-Mar-13 Stable membrane filtration demonstrated at the high flux without CIP. AMTA/AWWA© 18 Full scale operation - Distribution of ozone injection rate Dissolved ozone concentration of ozone contactor effluent Ratio (%) 20 0.1mgO3/L 0.3mgO3/L 0.5mgO3/L 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Ozone injection rate (mgO3/L) •Dissolved ozone of 0.3mg/L •Average ozone dosage : 7mgO3/L AMTA/AWWA© 19 Full scale operation – Membrane Cleaning by residual ozone 12 0.5 TMP ozone concentrasion 0.4 9 0.3 6 0.2 3 0.1 0 24-Jan-11 25-Jan-11 0.0 26-Jan-11 Ozone conc. before membrane (mgO3/L) TMP (Psid at 25℃) 15 Ozone cleaning period Ozone residual 0.1mg/L AMTA/AWWA© 20 Full scale operation - Reclaimed water quality SS mg/L COD mg/L DOC mg/L T-P mg/L Turbidity NTU Raw water (2nd effluent) 1.4 (0 – 5) 9.3 (4 – 13) 5.9 (3 – 8) 0.4 (0.1 – 3.4) 1.6 (0.3 – 7.7) 15 (4 – 23) Color Unit MPN Coliform /100mL 330 – 2800 1400 Norovirus Copy/L 870 Color Biofilter effluent Ozone effluent Ceramic membrane filtrate Target Value – <1 n/a 5.2 (3 – 7) 5.6 (2 – 7) 0.1 (0 – 1) 7.4 (3 – 11) 5.6 (2 – 7) 0.3 (0.1 – 1.6) 0.5 (0.1 – 2.8) 15 (4 – 23) 0.2 (0 – 0.7) 2.8 (0.9 – 4.4) 3.8 (1 – 5) 4.3 (2 – 6) 0.1 (0.0 – 0.5) <0.1 (0 – 0.6) 1.0 (0.1 – 2.8) 70 – 240 ND ND Not detected 2200 630 ND ND n/a – n/a n/a n/a <1 3 average (min. – max.) Norovirus : upper value=G1, lower value=G2 AMTA/AWWA© 21 Full scale operation - Turbidity & color 16 Raw water Biofilter effluent Membrane filtrate Turbidity (NTU) 14 12 10 8 Target <1 6 4 2 Color (Color unit) 0 25May Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr 20 15 Target <3 10 5 0 May Jul 2010 Oct Jan Apr 2011 Jul Oct Jan Apr 2012 AMTA/AWWA© 22 Full scale operation - Water quality Color removal Raw water (Secondary effluent) Membrane filtrate AMTA/AWWA© 23 Conclusions 1) 1) AAhybrid hybridsystem systemof ofpre-ozonation pre-ozonation/coagulation/ceramic /coagulation/ceramicmembrane membrane filtration filtrationwas washighly highlyeffective effectivefor forreclaimed reclaimedwastewater wastewatertreatment. treatment. 2) 2) Hybrid Hybridsystem systemoperated operatedwith withvery veryhigh highfiltration filtrationflux fluxof of 3 2 100gfd 100gfd(4.2m (4.2m3/m /m2/d) /d)stable stablemembrane membranefiltration filtration demonstrated demonstratedwithout withoutCIP. CIP. 3) 3) Dissolved Dissolvedozone ozonewas waseffective effectiveto toremove removeorganic organicfoulants foulantswith with “NO” “NO”deleterious deleteriouseffect effecton onceramic ceramicmembrane. membrane. 4) 4) Hybrid Hybridsystem systemwas waseffective effectivefor forthe theremoval removalof oforganic organicmatters, matters, COD by 50%, and color by about 80% as well as Bacteria and virus, CODMn Mn by 50%, and color by about 80% as well as Bacteria and virus, and andproduced producedsafe safewater waterepidemiologically. epidemiologically. Quality Qualityof ofthe thefiltrate filtrate met metthe theCalifornia Californiastandards. standards. AMTA/AWWA© 24 Acknowledgement AMTA/AWWA© 25