Fall 2013 Math SLO Assessment

advertisement
Fall 2013 Math SLO Assessment
Math Level Objective 1
Objective 2
Objective 3
Objective 4
Objective 5
14
15
29
33
43
48
89.58%
10
15
29
33
39
48
81.25%
13
15
30
33
43
48
89.58%
5
15
25
33
30
48
62.50%
11
15
29
33
40
48
83.33%
x
n
16
17
32
34
38
44
9
10
6
6
14
15
13
13
10
13
69
74
19
19
29
33
9
12
264
290
91.03%
x
n
15
17
31
34
35
44
7
10
4
6
8
15
8
13
8
13
67
74
17
19
26
33
5
12
231
290
79.66%
x
n
14
17
31
34
26
44
8
10
6
6
13
15
11
13
10
13
68
74
19
19
30
33
11
12
247
290
85.17%
12
12
12
12
12
12
9
9
28
29
32
32
17
22
17
20
35
39
138
151
91.39%
9
9
27
29
28
32
18
22
15
20
34
39
131
151
86.75%
7
9
26
29
29
32
14
22
18
20
23
39
117
151
77.48%
50
13
12
6
6
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
15
15
9
15
SLO #4… 0.1^2 proved to be difficult
Poor attendance, study habits. Difficult to connect with students just once per week
7
9
26
29
25
32
9
22
15
20
24
39
106
151
70.20%
14
15
14
15
11
15
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
26
30
16
21
48
53
12
12
39
43
16
16
27
30
12
14
2
2
5
5
23
28
12
15
57
68
18
23
10
19
21
22
3
4
19
36
34
35
40
61
453
552
82.07%
27
30
20
21
45
53
12
12
22
43
14
16
28
30
12
14
2
2
5
5
22
28
11
15
60
68
12
23
7
19
20
22
4
4
19
36
34
35
48
61
436
552
78.99%
25
30
17
21
47
53
12
12
37
43
13
16
28
30
11
14
2
2
4
5
24
28
11
15
65
68
11
23
11
19
19
22
2
4
19
36
15
35
52
61
434
552
78.62%
21
30
15
21
40
53
11
12
34
43
12
16
28
30
10
14
2
2
4
5
19
28
12
15
53
68
16
23
14
19
20
22
3
4
27
36
30
35
42
61
427
552
77.36%
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
18
90
15
13
62
6
65
62
51
41
29
12
93
15
16
46
6
64
56
54
45
37
20
85
15
17
69
5
66
59
44
42
35
22
102
22
111
12
17
7
64
21
49
42
36
7
71
76
63
45
43
22
111
17
17
79
7
71
76
63
45
43
22
111
17
17
79
7
71
76
63
45
43
22
111
17
17
79
7
71
76
63
45
43
26
30
21
21
47
53
9
12
29
43
11
16
28
30
9
14
2
2
5
5
22
28
11
15
63
68
16
23
12
19
19
22
4
4
27
36
24
35
55
61
454
552
82.25%
23
17
48
11
41
30
21
53
12
43
29
14
2
30
14
2
22
28
61
68
15
19
19
22
4
4
3
36
24
35
56
61
400
493
81.14%
90
90
90
10
11
17
17
11
21
490
600
81.67%
11
11
16
17
13
21
484
600
80.67%
10
11
17
17
14
21
498
600
83.00%
104
104
34
38
28
30
62
68
91.18%
35
38
27
30
62
68
91.18%
29
38
25
30
54
68
79.41%
105
105
105
105
105
105
33
37
46
52
19
26
23
39
21
25
10
13
152
192
79.17%
32
37
52
52
18
26
31
39
22
25
8
13
163
192
84.90%
34
37
46
52
20
26
21
39
24
25
8
13
153
192
79.69%
35
37
46
52
19
26
24
39
9
25
10
13
143
192
74.48%
105H
7
7
7
7
100.00%
4
7
4
7
57.14%
7
7
7
7
100.00%
7
7
7
7
100.00%
116
2
2
2
2
100.00%
2
2
2
2
100.00%
2
2
2
2
100.00%
120
120
120
120
120
24
45
18
14
15
116
24
45
21
16
16
122
22
45
7
15
12
101
24
45
21
16
16
122
20
45
17
14
10
106
24
45
21
16
16
122
9
11
17
17
17
21
398
504
78.97%
24
45
9
9
7
94
24
45
21
16
16
122
Many did not complete online homework.
6
7
6
7
85.71%
Most who failed the course struggled with the material from the first to the last day.
on #4, classical method perfect, but many had trouble with the P-value.
95.08%
82.79%
86.89%
77.05%
132
18
20
18
20
90.00%
19
20
19
20
95.00%
17
20
17
20
85.00%
226
226
226
10
12
19
24
15
18
44
54
81.48%
11
12
19
24
16
18
46
54
85.19%
11
12
18
24
13
18
42
54
77.78%
8
12
17
24
15
18
40
54
74.07%
227
12
15
12
15
80.00%
7
15
7
15
46.67%
10
15
10
15
66.67%
12
15
12
15
80.00%
228
26
30
26
30
86.67%
21
30
21
30
70.00%
26
30
26
30
86.67%
First 2 SLOs were a bit challenging. Students who failed were underprepared.
Download