This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
2005
Senior Authors
Michael Stamm, Cynthia La Barge, and Kraig Roozeboom, Dept. of Agronomy,
Kansas State Univ., Manhattan
Other Contributors
NATIONAL WINTER CANOLA
VARIETY TRIAL
Robert Aiken, KSU Northwest Research-Extension Center, Colby
Richard Auld, Texas Tech University, Lubbock
Robert Bacon, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
Brian Baldwin, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State
David Baltensperger, University of Nebraska, Scottsbluff
Harbans Bhardwaj, Virginia State University, Petersburg
David Bordovsky, Texas A&M University, Vernon
Ernst Cebert, Alabama A&M University, Normal
Ellsworth Christmas, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Shawn Conley, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Russ Freed, Michigan State University, East Lansing
William Heer, KSU South Central Experiment Field, Hutchinson
Duane Johnson, Montana State University, Kalispell
Jerry Johnson, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins
Joe Johnson, Mississippi State University, Holly Springs
John Kelly, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
Jim Klein, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale
Rick Kochenower, Oklahoma State University, Goodwell
Jim Krall, University of Wyoming, Torrington
Kelly Kusel, KSU Southeast Agricultural Research Center, Parsons
John Lamle, Johnston Seed Company, Enid
Kevin Larson, Colorado State University, Walsh
Dave LeGare, University of Minnesota, Crookston
Edwin Lentz, Ohio State University, Findlay
James Long, KSU Southeast Agricultural Research Center, Parsons
Vic Martin, KSU South Central Experiment Field, Hutchinson
Howard Mason, University of Missouri, Columbia
Gene McVay, Johnston Seed Company, Enid
Lenis Nelson, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Calvin Pearson, Colorado State University, Fruita
Paul Porter, University of Minnesota, St. Paul
Paul Raymer, University of Georgia, Griffin
Charlie Rife, Blue Sun Biodiesel, Torrington
Paul Rose, University of Georgia, Griffin
Michael Schmidt, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale
Greg Schwab, University of Kentucky, Lexington
Randy Smoot, University of Missouri, Novelty
David Starner, Virginia Tech University, Orange
Don Wysocki, Oregon state University, Pendelton
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★ ★
★
★
★
★ ★★
★
★★
★
★
Contents of this publication may be freely reproduced for educational purposes. All other rights reserved. In each
case, give credit to the author(s), name of the work, Kansas State University, and the date the work was published.
This Report of Progress was edited, designed, and printed by the
Department of Communications at Kansas State University.
Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, Manhattan 66506
SRP 954
Feb. 2006
K-State Research and Extension is an equal opportunity provider and employer. These materials may be available in
alternative formats.
1250
Report of Progress 954
Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................1
2005 NATIONAL WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL.................................................................1
Objectives.....................................................................................................................................1
Procedures ................................................................................................................................... 2
2004-2005 Growing Conditions..................................................................................................2
Test Locations ..............................................................................................................................2
Results ..........................................................................................................................................2
Acknowledgments........................................................................................................................2
RESULTS FROM THE 2005 NATIONAL WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL
Meridianville, AL, Table 1 ..........................................................................................................3
Griffin, GA, Table 2.....................................................................................................................4
Orange, VA, Table 3....................................................................................................................5
Petersburg, VA, Table 4 ..............................................................................................................6
Southeast Winter Canola Summary, 1996-2005, Figure 1...................................................7
Belleville, IL, Table 5 ..................................................................................................................9
Carbondale, IL, Table 6 .............................................................................................................10
Columbia City, IN, Table 7 .......................................................................................................11
East Lansing, MI, Table 8..........................................................................................................12
Thief River Falls, MN, Table 9 .................................................................................................13
Columbia, MO, Table 10...........................................................................................................14
Fremont, OH, Table 11..............................................................................................................15
Midwest Winter Canola Summary, 1996-2005, Figure 2...................................................16
Fruita, CO, Table 12 ..................................................................................................................18
Walsh, CO, Table 13..................................................................................................................19
Hutchinson, KS, Table 14..........................................................................................................20
Kalispell, MT, Table 15.............................................................................................................21
Lincoln, NE, Table 16................................................................................................................22
Sidney, NE, Table 17.................................................................................................................23
Enid, OK, Table 18 ....................................................................................................................24
Goodwell, OK, Table 19............................................................................................................25
Chillicothe, TX, Table 20 ..........................................................................................................26
Lingle, WY, Table 21 ................................................................................................................27
Great Plains Winter Canola Summary, 1996-2005, Figure 3............................................28
Pendelton, OR, Table 22............................................................................................................30
Sources for Seed and Blackleg Ratings for Entries in the National Winter Canola Variety
Trial, Table 23............................................................................................................................31
Contribution No. 06-189-S from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.
i
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial
Canola production fits well in Great
Plains agriculture. Canola makes an excellent
rotational crop with winter wheat. Yields of wheat
following canola are reported to be 8 to 12%
better than yields of wheat following wheat.
Because canola is a broadleaf crop, moreeffective and less-expensive herbicides can be
used to control grassy weeds. No major diseases
are common between canola and wheat, so canola
can help break weed and disease cycles. Standard
small-grains equipment is used to grow canola, so
a major investment in equipment is not needed to
grow a small acreage. Because canola is an
oilseed, its commodity price is not tied to that of
grains, allowing the producer to spread economic
risk to more than one commodity class.
INTRODUCTION
Canola is a special type of oilseed rape
defined by its low contents of erucic acid (less
than 2 percent in the oil) and glucosinolates (less
than 30 micromoles per gram in the oil-free
meal). The term “canola” was coined by the
Western Canadian Oilseed Crushers Association
in 1978. Food and oil-processing industries have
a great interest in canola because it produces
high-quality oil that is lower in saturated fat than
other sources of dietary fats. The meal remaining
after oil extraction is used as a protein
supplement by the livestock industry.
Winter canola yields are generally 30%
greater than yields of the spring types. Winter
canola is planted in late summer. The plants must
reach the 6 to 8 true-leaf stage and about 8 to 10
inches in height to increase winter survival.
Plants over-winter as rosettes and bolt early the
next spring. Harvest takes place about the same
time as winter wheat harvest in a given area.
In 1985, the Food and Drug
Administration of the United States ruled that
rapeseed oil with less than 2 percent erucic acid
was safe for human consumption. As a result,
canola research began in the United States in the
late 1980s. Industrial rapeseed had been
investigated earlier but, because of the limited
demand for this product, interest was low. Winter
canola production was attempted in many parts of
the United States in the late 1980s, but was not
successful. The failure was primarily because
there were few adapted varieties, little localized
management information, and few local markets
for the crop. Since that time, canola-quality lines
have been developed that possess significant
enhancements in yield potential, winter hardiness,
and stress tolerance during the grain-filling
period. Production research has produced
management recommendations consistent with
local conditions. Increased oil consumption has
led to increased demand for canola seed and
market interest by oil processors.
2005 NATIONAL WINTER CANOLA
VARIETY TRIAL
Objectives
The objectives of these tests are to
evaluate germplasm over a wide range of
environments, determine what canola varieties
and experimental lines are adapted to what areas,
and to increase the visibility of winter canola
across the regions. The National Winter Canola
Variety Trial (NWCVT) has been coordinated
from Kansas State University since the 1994-95
growing season. The NWCVT was established to
evaluate not only released varieties but also
advanced lines with potential to become released
canola varieties. Information obtained from these
tests will help determine what experimental lines
should be released and where released cultivars
might be marketed. Over the past few years, this
nursery has expanded the number of
environments, and now has locations in the Great
Plains, Midwest, Southeast, and the Pacific
Northwest. The wide diversity in environments
has increased our knowledge and understanding
of winter rapeseed germplasm for use in the
United States.
1
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
KS; East Lansing, MI; Thief River Falls, MN;
Columbia, MO; Kalispell, MT; Lincoln and
Sidney, NE; Fremont, OH; Enid and Goodwell,
OK; Pendelton, OR; Chillicothe, TX; Orange and
Petersburg, VA; and Lingle, WY).
Procedures
The NWCVT was distributed to 39
locations in 23 states in the fall of 2004. This test
included 13 released varieties and hybrids and 26
experimental lines, from five different breeding
programs.
Management guidelines were supplied to
each cooperator, but past experience at that
locality was used for final management decisions.
Local management, site descriptions, and
growing conditions can be found on the page for
each location established. All tests were planted
in small plots (approximately 100 square feet)
and replicated three times. The University of
Idaho, Moscow, ID, performed analysis for totaloil results. Results for yield and winter survival at
most locations also include 2-year and 3-year
summaries. Lines are listed in order, from highest
to lowest yields for 2005. This test was continued
in 2005-2006 and includes 19 experimental lines,
14 released cultivars, and 5 experimental hybrids
from Germany. Seven breeding programs
contributed to the test, and it was distributed to 45
locations in 23 states.
Results
Yields were comparable to 2004. Three of
the 22 locations included at least one line with
yields greater than 4000 lb/a. Seven of the 22
locations included at least one line with yields
greater than 3000 lbs/a. Eleven of the 22 locations
included at least one line with yields greater than
2000 lbs/a. ‘Kronos’, NPZ0326, ‘Wichita’,
KS9135-exp, ‘Titan’, and KS7436-055-exp all
yielded well at a number of locations, and many
other lines have consistently performed well in
specific regions where they are best adapted.
Winter hardiness continues to be an
important trait to consider when selecting a
winter canola cultivar. Winter hardiness has been
improved over the past several years, but
variability still exists for this trait in available
cultivars. Of all the cultivars planted in the Great
Plains locations, Wichita had the highest winter
survival values. Several other lines had high
average winter survival where differential winterkill occurred, including: KS9124-exp, KS3018exp, KS9135-exp, and ‘Plainsman’.
2004-2005 Growing Conditions
Temperature and precipitation data are
plotted for each location. The temperature graphs
for each location include 30-year normal and
actual 2004-05 daily maximum and minimum
temperatures (oF). The precipitation graph
includes the 30-year normal and the actual
cumulative precipitation for 2004-05. In general,
the 2004-05 growing season was normal for
precipitation and temperatures, and most
locations were able to establish adequate stands.
Winter conditions were mild in some locations
and colder in others, especially where differential
winterkill was observed. In some locations, heavy
spring thunderstorms dramatically affected yield.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was funded in part by the
National Canola Research Program, United States
Department of Agriculture, Cooperative States
Research Program, and the Kansas Agricultural
Experiment Station. Assistant Scientist Cindy La
Barge and student workers Andy Klein, Doug
Miller, and Matt Davis assisted with the planting,
care, harvest, and data preparation for some of
these tests.
Test Locations
Of the 39 tests distributed in 2004, 17
locations were either lost due to the winter or
abandoned before harvest due to severe lodging
or shattering. Twenty-two locations in 17 states
were harvested (Meridianville, AL; Fruita and
Walsh, CO; Griffin, GA; Belleville and
Carbondale, IL; Columbia City, IN; Hutchinson,
2
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Meridianville, Alabama
60
Ernst Cebert, Alabama A&M University
C u m u la t ive
P re c ip it a t io n -in .
50
Planted after fallow on 10/7/2004 at 6.3 lb/a in 7.5-in. rows
40
0 4 -0 5
30
20
Harvested on 6/16/2005
Pesticides: Treflan 1.5 pt/a
Irrigation: none
Decatur silty clay loam, pH: 6.2, P test: high, K test: high
30-30-30 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
60-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 624 ft, Lattitude: 34°35'N
N o rm a l
10
p la n t
b lo o m
h a rve s t
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
100
Te m p e ra t u re -F
80
60
40
20
Dry at planting.
b lo o m
p la n t
h a rve s t
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
1 1/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 1. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Meridianville, Alabama.
Line
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
VSX-2
Titan
ARC2180-1
KS7436-055
Abilene
Wichita
KS9135
Baldur
Jetton
NPZ 0326
Kronos
Ceres
KS7436
KS9124
Virginia
Baros
KS2169
KS420B
Plainsman
KS3018
Rasmus
ARC2189-1
KS2098
ARC92004-1
KS2064
Sumner
ARC92007-2
KS2185
-------------lb/ac------------2427
-1890
2412
-1832
--1519
--1470
1906
1716
1427
2083
1751
1405
2155
-1402
--1379
2232
1994
1363
--1301
1194
1982
-1193
1596
1373
1184
1726
1430
1154
1903
-1154
2189
1900
1108
--1103
--1102
--1009
1761
1524
998
--983
2180
-963
--953
--916
1513
-891
--717
--701
1341
-674
---
------------%-----------100
-100
100
-100
--100
--100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
-100
--100
100
100
100
--100
100
-100
97
98
99
100
100
100
100
-100
100
100
100
--100
--98
--100
100
100
100
--100
100
-100
--98
--100
100
-100
--100
--100
100
-100
--100
Mean
LSD (0.05)
CV (%)
1178
669
35
100
2
1
1877
1628
100
100
%
98
91
92
96
97
92
86
93
91
93
88
77
94
93
90
99
91
83
80
88
85
92
83
90
93
75
87
95
90
11
8
Maturity
Plant
Height
Lodging
Shattering
Test
Weight
Total
Oil
date
4/10
4/10
4/11
4/9
4/9
4/10
4/11
4/11
4/10
4/10
4/11
4/10
4/10
4/11
4/10
3/29 e
4/7
4/10
4/14 l
4/8
4/9
4/10
4/13 l
4/11
4/10
4/10
4/11
4/8
date
6/10
6/10
6/12
6/12
6/10
6/10
6/11
6/11
6/8
6/11
6/11
6/10
6/9
6/12
6/9
6/6
6/8
6/10
6/13
6/9
6/10
6/10
6/16
6/12
6/10
6/10
6/10
6/8
in.
45
51
50
41
49
46
47
47
36
47
51
47
47
45
39
45
40
39
52
44
43
49
53
52
45
40
48
36
%
%
-----------------------------
%
39.5
41.0
39.2
39.8
38.8
39.2
39.5
41.2
39.6
40.0
39.8
39.1
39.7
39.1
40.2
42.3
39.8
39.2
39.1
38.6
40.1
38.9
39.2
39.9
39.9
39.7
39.3
40.0
4/10
2
1
6/11
3
1
lb/bu
46.1
47.6
46.3
47.4
48.4
48.1
48.4
47.9
45.8
46.6
47.6
46.9
48.1
47.4
45.0
44.8
47.0
46.3
46.9
46.6
45.8
47.0
47.6
47.0
46.6
48.1
45.8
47.4
46.9
1.1
1.5
50%
Bloom
e
e
e
e
e
l
e
l
e
45
5
6
t
t
t
s
t
s
s
s
t
t
t
t
s
s
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
439
----
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
3
39.7
1.0
1.2
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Griffin, Georgia
60
Paul Raymer and Paul Rose, University of Georgia
C u m u la t ive
P re c ip it a t io n -in .
50
Planted after wheat on 10/6/2004 at 5 lb/a in 7-in. rows
40
0 4 -0 5
30
20
Harvested on 6/17/2005
Pesticides: Capture, Treflan, and Poast
Irrigation: none
Cecil sandy clay loam, pH: 6.4, P test: high, K test: high
49-98-147 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
120-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 924 ft, Lattitude: 33°16'N
N o rm a l
10
p la n t
b lo o m
h a rve s t
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
100
T e m p e ra t u re -F
80
60
40
20
p la n t
b lo o m
h a rve s t
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 2. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Griffin, Georgia.
Line
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
Wichita
Virginia
Baros
Jetton
VSX-2
Baldur
KS420B
KS2185
NPZ 0326
Sumner
Titan
KS2169
ARC2180-1
Kronos
KS7436
KS7436-055
Rasmus
KS3018
KS2064
KS9135
ARC92004-1
ARC2189-1
ARC92007-2
Abilene
KS9124
Ceres
Plainsman
KS2098
-------------lb/ac------------2417
2225
3063
2353
2200
2916
--2873
2279
2130
2849
2319
-2799
--2758
--2739
--2630
--2620
2595
--2557
2270
-2495
--2432
--2357
2196
-2334
1838
1860
2307
--2261
1909
-2199
--2186
--2123
1596
-2117
1845
-2104
--2067
1751
-2011
1681
1663
1870
1562
-1792
1660
1521
1492
1032
1205
1328
---
------------%-----------100
100
100
100
100
100
100
--100
100
100
100
100
-100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
100
-100
--100
--100
100
-100
100
100
100
--100
100
-100
--100
--100
100
-100
100
-100
--100
100
-100
100
100
100
100
-100
100
100
100
100
100
100
---
Mean
LSD (0.05)
2353
455
100
NS
1953
1851
100
100
50%
Bloom
%
-----------------------------
date
4/6
4/4
3/27 e
4/4
4/5
4/3
4/3
3/31
4/6
4/4
4/6
4/4
4/4
4/6
4/4
4/2
4/3
4/3
4/6
4/7
4/5
4/6
4/4
4/6
4/7
4/6
4/9 l
4/8 l
---
4/4
2
Plant
Height
Lodging
Shattering
Test
Weight
Total
Oil
date
6/13
6/12
6/7 e
6/14
6/15
6/13
6/15
6/11
6/14
6/10
6/15
6/13
6/16
6/13
6/14
6/10
6/13
6/13
6/16
6/17
6/17
6/16
6/16
6/11
6/16
6/15
6/17
6/19 l
in.
59
51
49
52
54
62
56
48
57
53
61
53
63
62
58
53
51
53
58
58
64
63
62
55
60
51
65
61
%
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
%
-----------------------------
lb/bu
-----------------------------
%
43.0
43.8
46.2
43.4
43.3
43.0
43.5
43.2
42.4
44.6
43.9
41.8
42.8
42.3
43.8
44.8
43.1
41.9
43.2
42.0
43.5
42.5
42.4
41.1
42.0
42.5
40.7
42.4
6/14
2
57
5
1
--
---
---
42.9
1.2
Maturity
s
s
s
t
s
t
t
t
s
t
t
t
s
t
t
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
4
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Orange, Virginia
50
David Starner, N. Piedmont AREC, Virginia Tech.
C u m u la t ive
P re c ip it a t io n -in .
40
Planted after fallow on 10/8/2004 at 5 lb/a in 7-in. rows
30
0 4 -0 5
20
N o rm a l
Harvested on 6/29/2005
Pesticides: Capture 2 EC, Treflan
Irrigation: none
Davidson clay loam, pH: 6.39, P test: 12(M), K test: 149(H)
25-118-40 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
60-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 505 ft, Lattitude: 38°13'N
10
p la n t
b lo o m
h a rve s t
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
100
Te m p e ra t u re -F
80
60
40
20
p la n t
b lo o m
h a rve s t
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 3. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Orange, Virginia.
Line
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
Baldur
Kronos
Wichita
NPZ 0326
Jetton
Sumner
VSX-2
KS2185
Abilene
ARC2189-1
Baros
KS2169
Titan
KS9135
ARC2180-1
ARC92007-2
KS3018
KS7436
KS2064
ARC92004-1
KS420B
KS9124
KS7436-055
Rasmus
Virginia
Ceres
KS2098
Plainsman
-------------lb/ac--------------4793
3843
-4544
3757
3469
4493
--4203
4010
3563
3316
3833
--3823
3130
-3808
--3807
3281
3033
3785
--3745
--3636
--3629
3401
-3604
3206
-3513
--3487
2785
-3485
--3462
3162
3050
3432
--3365
2677
-3322
--3289
3065
-2999
--2962
2817
-2643
2593
2619
2526
2363
2422
2336
--1680
1994
1889
Mean
LSD (0.05)
CV (%)
3508
737
13
2915
2833
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
------------%-------------90
77
-87
78
84
87
--78
79
85
85
--82
64
-85
--83
67
70
83
--88
--87
--78
73
-83
78
-88
--87
70
-83
--78
75
83
82
--87
64
-80
--80
71
-82
--80
67
-82
65
62
74
73
63
73
--83
75
64
72
82
13
10
68
78
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
Maturity
Plant
Height
Lodging
Shattering
Test
Weight
%
date
4/21
4/22
4/21
4/21
4/22
4/20
4/21
4/18
4/21
4/21
4/18
4/21
4/21
4/22
4/21
4/22
4/19
4/22
4/20
4/22
4/22
4/22
4/20
4/22
4/22
4/24
4/25
4/26
date
6/24
6/23
6/23
6/23
6/23
6/23
6/23
6/21
6/21
6/24
6/22
6/23
6/24
6/24
6/23
6/23
6/23
6/25
6/23
6/25
6/25
6/25
6/23
6/25
6/25
6/25
6/26
6/28
in.
61
59
59
59
55
58
56
52
53
57
53
54
55
56
62
60
53
59
53
57
56
56
48
54
52
53
58
55
%
%
7
47
30
7
7
10
13
27
50
43
33
17
7
17
13
27
7
17
33
30
17
37
13
0
30
40
20
63
%
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
lb/bu
78
83
88
85
77
78
85
83
75
88
88
80
82
85
87
87
85
73
82
85
83
73
57
70
48
57
87
53
50.5
50.3
50.6
50.0
50.4
51.4
49.5
51.0
49.9
49.6
50.4
50.1
49.3
49.9
49.9
50.4
50.6
50.8
50.6
50.0
48.4
50.3
51.0
48.1
48.3
50.5
48.9
48.1
40.7
39.5
39.0
39.5
40.2
39.4
40.2
40.2
38.1
39.1
41.6
38.2
40.5
39.3
39.2
38.9
38.2
39.6
39.2
38.9
38.0
38.7
39.7
40.1
38.8
37.9
38.1
36.5
78
13
10
4/22
2
1
24
35
91
5
0
0
50.0
1.0
1.2
39.2
2.1
2.6
e
e
e
l
l
l
6/24
2
1
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
l
l
56
5
6
t
t
t
t
t
s
s
t
s
t
t
t
t
s
s
t
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
5
Total
Oil
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Petersburg, Virgina
50
Harbans Bhardwaj, Virginia State University
C u m u la t ive
P re c ip it a t io n -in .
40
0 4 -0 5
Planted after white lupin on 10/8/2004 at 6 lb/a in 15-in.
rows
30
20
N o rm a l
10
p la n t
Harvested on 6/28/2005
Pesticides: none
Irrigation: none
Abell sandy loam, pH: NA, P test: NA, K test: NA
100-100-100 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 134 ft, Lattitude: 37°14'N
b lo o m
h a rve s t
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
100
T e m p e ra t u re -F
80
60
40
20
p la n t
b lo o m
h a rve s t
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 4. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Petersburg, Virgina.
Line
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
Rasmus
VSX-2
ARC2189-1
Baldur
Virginia
Abilene
Titan
Sumner
KS3018
KS9135
KS7436-055
Wichita
Kronos
Ceres
Jetton
KS2169
Baros
ARC92007-2
NPZ 0326
KS420B
ARC92004-1
KS2064
KS2185
Plainsman
KS9124
ARC2180-1
KS2098
KS7436
-------------lb/ac------------2588
-1838
2926
-1835
--1641
--1614
2765
3031
1598
2369
2417
1589
2428
-1579
--1551
--1492
2500
-1487
--1441
1336
2771
2926
1307
2589
-1299
1893
1736
1293
2676
2529
1271
--1254
--1229
2048
-1223
--1217
--1212
2070
-1198
--1162
--1077
1743
1717
1006
1956
-991
--802
--749
1777
1918
------------%-----------100
100
-100
100
-100
--100
--100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
-100
--100
--100
100
-100
--100
100
100
100
100
-100
100
100
100
100
100
100
--100
--100
100
-100
--100
--100
100
-100
--100
--100
100
100
100
100
-100
--100
--100
100
100
Mean
LSD (0.05)
CV (%)
1332
456
21
100
NS
--
2250
2317
100
100
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
Maturity
%
Plant
Height
Lodging
Shattering
Test
Weight
Total
Oil
%
%
date
date
in.
-----------------------------
-----------------------------
-----------------------------
43
40
47
42
36
43
45
42
42
46
37
44
48
44
35
39
41
45
42
40
47
43
40
47
42
45
47
41
----
----
----
43
4
6
s
t
s
t
t
s
t
t
t
s
s
t
t
s
t
t
t
lb/bu
%
-----------------------------
-----------------------------
-----------------------------
-----------------------------
----
----
----
----
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
6
Height - inches
ARC2189-1
KS2185
KS2098
KS9135
Kronos
Sumner
KS3018
Titan
Wichita
KS7436-055
KS420B
KS7436
Jetton
KS9124
ARC92007-2
Ceres
Virginia
NPZ 0326
Mean
Abilene
Plainsman
Rasmus
KS2169
VSX-2
ARC92004-1
Kronos
Plainsman
Baldur
ARC92007-2
Titan
KS9135
KS7436
NPZ 0326
KS9124
Wichita
Mean
Ceres
Abilene
KS2064
VSX-2
Sumner
KS3018
Rasmus
KS420B
Jetton
Baros
KS2169
Virginia
KS7436-055
KS2185
-7
ARC2180-1
-5
ARC2189-1
-3
Baros
-1
KS2098
1
KS2064
3
ARC2180-1
5
Baldur
7
ARC92004-1
Survival - %
7
Figure 1. Southeast Winter Canola Summary, 1996-2005.
KS2098
Plainsman
ARC92004-1
KS9124
Ceres
ARC92007-2
ARC2180-1
Mean
KS2064
KS3018
KS7436-055
Abilene
KS2185
KS420B
KS9135
KS7436
ARC2189-1
KS2169
Wichita
Sumner
Rasmus
Baros
Jetton
NPZ 0326
Titan
Virginia
Kronos
VSX-2
Baldur
Yield - lb/a
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
700
500
300
100
-100
-300
-500
-700
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
4
50% Bloom
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
Plainsman
KS2098
KS9124
KS9135
Ceres
Kronos
Wichita
ARC92004-1
ARC2189-1
NPZ 0326
Titan
Rasmus
Mean
ARC2180-1
KS2064
ARC92007-2
Baldur
KS420B
KS7436
Sumner
VSX-2
Jetton
Virginia
Abilene
KS2169
KS7436-055
KS3018
KS2185
Baros
Baros
Titan
Baldur
KS7436-055
Sumner
KS2185
KS7436
VSX-2
ARC92004-1
NPZ 0326
Rasmus
KS420B
ARC92007-2
Wichita
KS2064
Mean
Jetton
ARC2189-1
ARC2180-1
KS9135
Ceres
KS3018
Kronos
KS9124
Virginia
Abilene
KS2098
KS2169
Plainsman
-10
3.0
Total Oil-%
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
-1.0
Note: Values are averages of the differences
between each cultivar and the mean of Jetton,
Ceres, Plainsman, and Wichita for yield
(lb/a), winter survival (%), total oil content
(%), plant height (inches), and 50% bloom
date (days). The number of observations for
each trait is represented by the different
colors of the bars (as shown at right).
0 to 9
Observations
10-19
Observations
More than 20
Observations
Figure 1. Southeast Winter Canola Summary, 1996-2005 (continued).
8
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Belleville, Illinois
Mike Schmidt and Jim Klein, Southern Illinois University,
Carbondale
50
Planted on 10/6/2004 at 10 lb/a in 7.5-in. rows
30
C u m u la t ive
P re c ip it a t io n -in .
40
0 4 -0 5
20
Harvested on 6/22/2005
Pesticides: Treflan
Irrigation: none
Stoy silt loam, pH: NA, P test: NA, K test: NA
18-46-60 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
120-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 415 ft, Lattitude: 37°47'N
N o rm a l
10
p la n t
b lo o m
h a rve s t
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
100
Te m p e ra t u re -F
80
60
40
20
p la n t
b lo o m
h a rve s t
0
7 /1
8/1
9/1
1 0/1
11 /1
1 2/1
1/1
2/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 5. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Belleville, Illinois.
Line
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
KS9124
KS2185
ARC2189-1
VSX-2
ARC2180-1
KS2169
KS9135
KS7436-055
NPZ 0326
Rasmus
KS7436
KS2064
Virginia
Jetton
Abilene
Casino
Kronos
KS2098
Wichita
Baldur
Sumner
ARC92007-2
Baros
Plainsman
ARC92004-1
KS3018
Ceres
Titan
-------------lb/ac------------3540
-4318
--4189
--4073
3555
-4036
--4024
--3981
3467
-3941
--3936
--3910
3533
-3827
3249
3328
3822
--3776
3534
3751
3774
3599
3780
3754
3036
3104
3750
3011
2840
3738
3195
-3663
--3602
3138
3383
3591
3447
--3412
--3382
2993
-3286
--3242
3078
2786
3226
3099
-3064
--3002
2766
3023
2732
2817
--
Mean
LSD (0.05)
CV (%)
3661
828
14
3197
3232
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
------------%-----------87
-90
--77
--80
73
75
---82
73
--73
83
-57
----77
60
67
-73
79
84
63
--53
69
79
82
88
77
70
75
81
83
89
77
67
81
---80
87
91
80
67
--70
--82
-77
--77
63
74
83
85
-80
50
--50
50
67
53
67
-70
14
12
77
83
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
Maturity
Plant
Height
Lodging
Shattering
Test
Weight
Total
Oil
%
83
93
97
93
97
83
77
73
93
77
87
70
83
97
87
90
90
90
90
87
77
87
93
77
87
67
43
73
date
-----------------------------
date
-----------------------------
in.
55
47
56
46
53
49
53
44
51
49
52
51
49
46
53
54
51
58
50
54
51
53
50
54
53
50
52
51
%
-----------------------------
%
-----------------------------
lb/bu
49.8
50.8
49.9
49.9
48.5
50.6
50.6
51.2
51.4
48.6
51.0
49.6
48.3
50.0
52.1
51.7
52.7
48.7
51.9
49.7
52.9
50.4
50.3
49.4
50.9
50.8
50.0
48.5
%
-----------------------------
84
12
9
----
----
51
6
7
----
----
50.4
2.2
2.7
----
t
s
t
s
t
s
t
s
s
t
s
s
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
9
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Carbondale, Illinois
Mike Schmidt and Jim Klein, Southern Illinois University,
Carbondale
50
Planted on 9/22/2004 at 10 lb/a in 7.5-in. rows
30
C u m u la t ive
P re c ip it a t io n -in .
40
0 4 -0 5
20
Harvested on 6/21/2005
Pesticides: Treflan
Irrigation: none
Stoy silt loam, pH: NA, P test: NA, K test: NA
18-46-60 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
120-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 400 ft, Lattitude: 38°30'N
N o rm a l
10
b lo o m
p la n t
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
3/1
4/1
h a rve s t
5/1
6/1
7/1
100
Te m p e ra t u re -F
80
60
40
20
p la n t
b lo o m
h a rve s t
0
7 /1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 6. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Carbondale, Illinois.
Line
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
ARC2189-1
KS2169
KS7436-055
NPZ 0326
Kronos
KS2185
Casino
KS2064
Jetton
KS9124
KS9135
Rasmus
VSX-2
ARC92004-1
KS3018
Virginia
Baros
ARC92007-2
Ceres
Wichita
Plainsman
ARC2180-1
KS7436
KS2098
Titan
Abilene
Sumner
Baldur
-------------lb/ac--------------3594
--3146
--3079
--3035
2405
-2961
--2960
2523
2183
2875
2814
--2634
2449
2365
2621
2534
-2473
2598
-2450
2388
-2429
2393
-2388
2091
-2368
--2349
2166
2180
2291
--2266
2080
-2235
2315
1849
2209
2197
1963
2201
2165
1592
2153
--2068
1960
2105
2009
--1897
2298
-1893
1889
1758
1734
--1600
---
Mean
LSD (0.05)
CV (%)
2455
720
18
2331
2059
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
------------%-------------88
--77
57
--60
--79
-80
--78
93
92
93
--70
77
80
78
90
-88
43
65
-63
68
-79
-78
80
-73
63
--75
74
70
--72
77
-67
50
68
71
80
82
72
63
78
76
45
--84
85
80
--83
79
-70
88
84
85
63
--60
--70
29
25
78
80
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
Maturity
Plant
Height
Lodging
Shattering
Test
Weight
Total
Oil
%
date
-----------------------------
date
-----------------------------
in.
57
50
53
46
50
50
56
49
52
55
46
50
52
49
51
52
47
55
54
49
56
47
53
57
49
47
48
48
%
%
-----------------------------
lb/bu
47.7
49.1
49.2
48.7
50.4
48.8
50.1
49.8
48.4
49.0
47.1
46.9
48.5
46.9
46.9
49.1
47.9
47.2
47.1
49.1
47.3
48.0
50.6
49.0
48.9
47.9
48.4
47.0
%
-----------------------------
----
----
51
8
10
----
48.4
2.3
2.9
----
90
87
70
87
93
87
97
90
83
90
63
70
93
97
60
73
100
90
40
87
63
100
83
87
100
80
87
83
83
19
14
t
t
t
s
t
t
t
s
t
t
s
t
t
t
t
t
s
t
t
s
t
s
t
t
t
s
s
s
0
0
5
28
30
3
0
0
0
7
40
3
0
32
23
18
3
5
8
23
10
7
2
0
23
5
3
27
11
31
175
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
10
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Columbia City, Indiana
E.P. Christmas/Shawn Conley, NE Purdue Agric. Center
50
C u m u la t ive
P re c ip it a t io n -in .
40
Planted after wheat on 9/9/2004 at 5 lb/a in 6-in. rows
30
0 4 -0 5
20
Harvested on 7/18/2005
Pesticides: Trifluralin 1.2 pt/a
Irrigation: none
Boyer sandy loam, pH: 6.5, P test: 30ppm, K test: 220ppm
31-80-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
120-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 825 ft, Lattitude: 41°6'N
N o rm a l
10
p la n t
b lo o m
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
6/1
7/1
100
T e m p e ra t u re -F
80
60
40
20
p la n t
b lo o m
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
1 1/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
5/1
Table 7. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Columbia City, Indiana.
Line
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
KS9135
Abilene
Baldur
Baros
KS2185
Sumner
Wichita
Casino
KS2064
Titan
Kronos
KS2169
SW 013154
NPZ 0326
KS2098
KS3018
KS7436-055
KS7436
ARC92007-2
SW 013173
ARC2180-1
DKW13-86
Virginia
KS9124
ARC2189-1
Jetton
Rasmus
VSX-2
ARC92004-1
Plainsman
Ceres
SW 013253
SW 013121
DKW13-62
SW 013211
SW 013022
-------------lb/ac------------2040
-2463
1885
1593
2429
--2428
--2317
--2285
--2284
1890
1529
2284
1883
1508
2279
--2239
1978
-2234
1787
-2153
2117
--2072
1842
-2066
--2029
--2019
--2001
--1999
1544
1367
1970
1572
-1918
1720
-1916
--1900
1724
-1842
1578
1473
1817
1442
-1806
--1764
1573
1496
1731
1570
-1690
1440
-1656
1317
-1642
1293
1176
1453
1156
1026
1256
1147
-1188
1404
-1180
1269
-1054
1089
-865
956
--
Mean
LSD (0.05)
CV (%)
1899
330
11
1598
1386
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
------------%-----------93
-87
92
91
83
33
--33
----73
53
--47
73
82
87
91
73
--90
30
65
-43
72
---80
57
78
-37
----73
--87
63
--67
83
89
63
82
-37
68
-57
--30
65
-40
70
79
92
-83
33
--53
77
84
33
67
-33
67
-37
68
-57
78
81
10
55
68
13
57
-13
57
-17
58
-7
53
-13
57
-48
22
28
74
82
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
%
date
5/4
5/4
5/3
5/2
4/26
4/29
5/3
5/4
5/4
5/4
5/4
5/2
5/5
5/4
5/5
5/2
5/3
5/6
5/5
5/7
5/3
5/2
5/2
5/4
5/4
5/2
5/4
5/3
5/4
5/6
5/5
5/6
5/6
5/5
5/6
5/7
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
80
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
67
100
100
100
100
100
99
12
8
5/4
3
1
Maturity
l
e
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
date
6/23
6/21
6/26
6/29
6/21
6/22
6/25
6/24
6/22
7/1
6/30
6/23
6/25
6/26
6/28
6/21
6/22
6/24
6/24
6/27
6/27
6/26
6/25
6/23
7/3
6/29
6/28
6/28
6/28
6/28
6/25
7/3
7/4
7/2
6/24
7/2
6/26
4
1
e
e
e
e
e
e
l
e
e
e
e
e
e
l
l
l
l
e
l
Plant
Height
Lodging
Shattering
Test
Weight
in.
48
48
51
46
44
47
47
48
50
54
53
44
45
47
50
44
42
46
53
44
49
45
41
46
55
40
45
44
52
50
47
51
51
52
50
40
%
-------------------------------------
%
-------------------------------------
lb/bu
%
47.0
47.7
46.8
44.7
46.8
47.3
46.9
46.5
47.2
46.4
44.9
46.2
46.2
45.4
46.6
45.3
45.8
46.3
45.5
44.7
44.7
46.1
46.1
45.1
43.3
44.2
43.3
44.7
44.9
44.9
44.7
43.5
42.4
42.8
43.2
41.4
37.2
35.4
36.5
38.9
36.3
36.5
36.2
36.4
36.3
37.1
36.9
35.9
36.2
36.4
37.3
36.1
35.9
37.3
37.0
37.1
35.8
36.0
35.5
35.7
33.8
35.9
35.6
34.3
35.1
35.6
36.4
33.6
35.7
36.1
31.7
36.0
----
----
45.3
1.3
1.7
36.0
1.8
2.4
47
5
7
t
s
t
t
t
s
s
t
s
s
t
s
s
s
t
s
s
s
t
t
t
t
t
t
s
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
11
Total
Oil
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
East Lansing, Michigan
50
Russ Freed, Michigan State University
Planted on 9/8/2004 at 5 lb/a in 6-in. rows
C u m u la tive
P re c ip it at io n -in .
p la nt
40
b lo o m
30
0 4 -0 5
20
Harvested on 7/13/2005
Pesticides: NA
Irrigation: none
Capac loam, pH: NA, P test: NA, K test: NA
19-19-19 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
125-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 880 ft, Lattitude: 42°40'N
N o rm a l
10
0
7/1
8 /1
9 /1
1 0 /1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
3/1
4 /1
5 /1
6/1
7/ 1
100
Te m p e ra t u re -F
80
60
40
20
p la n t
b lo o m
0
7 /1
8/1
9/1
10/1
1 1 /1
12/1
1 /1
2 /1
6/1
7 /1
Table 8. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at East Lansing, Michigan.
Line
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
Abilene
KS9135
SW 013154
Plainsman
Kronos
DKW13-86
Sumner
Virginia
KS2098
Wichita
SW 013022
SW 013173
SW 013211
ARC92007-2
NPZ 0326
KS2004
KS7436-055
Jetton
ARC2180-1
Titan
Baros
KS3018
SW 013121
Rasmus
KS9124
ARC2189-1
KS2169
Baldur
Casino
KS2185
ARC92004-1
DKW13-62
KS7436
VSX-2
KS2064
Ceres
SW 013253
-------------lb/ac------------2096
2323
2554
1644
-2531
2092
-2422
1698
1832
2347
1742
-2331
2227
-2183
--2174
1626
1964
2065
--2063
1751
1938
2044
1612
-2015
1757
-1989
1501
-1986
2092
-1982
--1968
--1937
--1905
1532
1993
1844
--1795
2193
-1788
--1777
--1776
1335
-1563
1521
1625
-1423
1316
-1337
--1303
--1301
--1266
1559
1921
1177
--1173
1456
-996
899
-898
946
1551
830
1240
-647
--504
1156
1716
403
1071
--
Mean
LSD (0.05)
CV (%)
1671
1008
18
1596
1852
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
------------%-----------84
89
67
82
-63
78
-55
63
75
25
83
-65
91
-82
--67
75
83
50
--43
84
89
67
79
-57
82
-63
65
-30
75
-50
--75
--47
--30
67
78
33
22
--67
-33
15
----37
15
58
-10
55
-15
58
-13
--10
----30
15
58
72
23
--8
54
-10
55
-10
55
70
3
52
-7
--5
53
68
---34
57
52
67
78
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
%
date
5/10
5/11
5/10
5/9
5/11
5/11
5/9
5/10
5/11
5/9
5/10
5/8
5/9
5/9
5/10
5/11
5/10
5/11
5/11
5/9
5/10
5/10
5/10
5/11
5/12
5/11
5/11
5/11
5/11
5/9
5/11
5/9
5/11
5/11
5/10
5/11
5/11
88
92
85
92
93
92
90
80
93
92
93
93
85
77
95
90
90
90
92
88
92
90
92
87
92
93
82
90
93
90
88
93
93
90
90
90
88
90
21
7
5/10
3
9
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
e
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
Maturity
Plant
Height
Lodging
Shattering
Test
Weight
Total
Oil
date
--------------------------------------
in.
48
48
48
51
47
46
41
48
41
45
46
45
49
43
43
50
44
47
46
56
46
41
50
46
53
55
49
43
50
40
47
46
50
55
44
---
%
--------------------------------------
%
--------------------------------------
lb/bu
--------------------------------------
%
--------------------------------------
----
47
2
8
----
----
----
----
s
s
t
s
t
s
t
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2002, 2004, and 2005.
12
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Thief River Falls, Minnesota
Paul Porter and Dave LeGare, University of Minnesota
40
C u m u la t ive
P re c ip it a t io n -in .
30
Planted after barley on 9/2/2004 at 5 lb/a in 6-in. rows
Swathed 7/4/2005 to 7/21/2005
Harvested 7/10/2005 to 7/30/2005
Pesticides: Assure II (7 oz/a) 9/29, Stinger (7 oz/a) 5/16
Irrigation: none
Roliss loam, pH: NA, P test: 18, K test: 332
34-42-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
120-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 1115 ft, Lattitude: 48°1'N
20
0 4 -0 5
p la n t
10
b lo o m
N o rm a l
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
4/1
5/1
7/1
100
Te m p e ra t u re -F
80
60
40
20
p la n t
Some entries were lost because of differential winter kill
due to tillage differences. All plots on plowed ground were
killed over the winter. Surviving plots were on barley
stubble.
b lo o m
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
6/1
7/1
Table 9. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Thief River Falls, Minnesota.
Line
KS2169
KS2185
Kronos
KS7436
Wichita
KS9135
Casino
KS9183
KS9124
KS2098
KS2064
Sumner
ARC92004-1
KS2004
KS3018
Plainsman
Largo
Mean
LSD (0.05)
CV (%)
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
-------------lb/ac--------------1272
--1244
--1134
--1076
--1074
--1069
--1051
--1019
--1017
--1016
--1006
--987
820
--778
--717
--555
--448
--958
297
19
--
--
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
------------%-------------80
--80
--87
--80
--80
--90
--73
--80
--70
--80
--83
--80
--80
43
----77
57
----90
77
30
18
--
--
50%
Bloom
Maturity
%
date
date
93
90
100
70
87
93
77
93
87
90
93
97
90
80
80
83
97
88
25
11
6/13
6/12
6/12
6/14
6/15
6/14
6/15
6/13
6/14
6/14
6/14
6/12
6/15
6/15
6/12
6/16
6/8
7/19
7/20
7/20
7/20
7/19
7/19
7/21
7/19
7/19
7/20
7/20
7/16
7/19
7/22
7/17
7/22
7/4
Fall
Stand
6/13
3
2
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
e
7/19
3
2
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
e
Plant
Height
Lodging
Shattering
in.
%
%
37
37
41
40
38
40
44
40
42
42
41
35
45
38
36
46
32
11
7
11
s
s
t
t
s
t
t
t
t
t
t
s
t
s
s
t
s
3
4
3
4
4
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
6
4
3
4
1
20
Total
Oil
lb/bu
%
------------------
52.7
53.3
53.3
52.8
53.1
53.2
52.7
52.6
52.7
52.9
53.1
52.7
52.1
52.3
51.3
52.2
51.6
39.6
39.0
37.7
40.0
38.1
38.8
37.9
38.6
38.6
38.8
39.1
39.5
37.2
38.2
36.2
37.5
36.9
----
52.6
0.7
0.8
38.3
1.7
2.7
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
13
Test
Weight
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Columbia, Missouri
50
Howard Mason, University of Missouri
C um ula tive
P rec ipita tion -in .
40
Planted on 9/13/2004 at 8 lb/a in 7.5-in. rows
30
0 4 -05
20
Harvested on 6/22/2005
Pesticides: none
Irrigation: none
Mexico silt loam, pH: NA, P test: NA, K test: NA
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
100-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 870 ft, Lattitude: 38°32'N
N orm a l
10
p lan t
blo o m
h a rve s t
0
7/1
8/ 1
9/ 1
1 0 /1
1 1 /1
1 2 /1
1/ 1
2/ 1
3/1
4/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
100
Te m p e ra t u re -F
80
60
40
20
p la n t
Dry fall conditions resulted in relatively poor stands.
Heaving and winter kill further reduced stands, resulting in
relatively poor yields.
b lo o m
h a rve s t
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
5 /1
6/1
7 /1
Table 10. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Columbia, Missouri.
Line
NPZ 0326
KS9135
KS9124
KS2169
KS2098
Casino
Baldur
ARC2189-1
Baros
Kronos
Sumner
ARC2180-1
KS2185
KS2064
Titan
Abilene
ARC92007-2
Virginia
KS3018
Wichita
KS7436
Jetton
Rasmus
ARC92004-1
VSX-2
Ceres
Plainsman
KS7436-055
Mean
LSD (0.05)
CV (%)
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
-------------lb/ac--------------1068
1129
-1036
1291
-983
--953
--899
977
836
884
--863
--859
--833
1021
-820
848
851
814
--814
--791
--773
766
-772
943
895
753
890
-733
1029
1250
728
--725
949
770
691
632
1045
964
580
908
1083
577
823
-557
706
-512
938
-405
743
902
400
691
750
377
--744
421
35
858
829
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
------------%-------------78
84
-75
85
-75
--65
--78
80
82
72
58
--52
----63
55
72
-77
77
67
55
----72
--77
77
-67
84
82
78
58
72
-53
68
72
--78
82
80
70
77
79
62
50
64
71
78
-65
48
67
-47
67
-74
77
65
80
73
68
43
--64
19
18
75
76
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
%
38
43
42
42
55
48
67
63
62
67
45
57
45
40
73
43
52
45
33
35
47
53
47
58
50
23
38
37
date
4/15
4/16
4/15
4/15
4/16
4/16
4/16
4/17
4/15
4/16
4/15
4/16
4/14
4/15
4/16
4/16
4/16
4/17
4/15
4/15
4/18
4/16
4/16
4/18
4/16
4/17
4/17
4/16
48
23
29
4/16
1
1
e
e
e
l
e
e
e
e
l
e
e
l
l
l
l
Maturity
Plant
Height
Lodging
Shattering
Test
Weight
Total
Oil
date
-----------------------------
in.
39
43
40
38
46
40
40
42
36
38
39
42
37
41
40
39
39
36
40
36
39
37
37
41
35
36
43
34
%
8
12
10
18
15
18
17
12
18
18
17
17
22
20
15
20
17
15
20
13
22
13
12
23
12
28
15
20
%
-----------------------------
lb/bu
-----------------------------
%
-----------------------------
----
39
3
5
17
10
35
----
----
----
t
s
t
s
t
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
t
s
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
14
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Fremont, Ohio
50
Edwin Lentz, The Ohio State University
Planted after wheat on 9/15/2004 at 5.8 lb/a in 7-in. rows
C u m u la t ive
P re c ip it a t io n -in .
p la n t
40
30
b lo o m
N o rm a l
20
Harvested on 7/11/2005
Pesticides: Select 5 oz.
Irrigation: none
Hoytville silty clay loam, pH: NA, P test: NA, K test: NA
150-150-150 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
90-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 636 ft, Lattitude: 41°21'N
0 4 -0 5
10
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
3 /1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
6 /1
7 /1
100
T e m p e ra t u re -F
80
60
40
20
p la n t
b lo o m
0
7 /1
8/1
9 /1
10/1
11 /1
12 /1
1/1
2 /1
Table 11. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Fremont, Ohio.
Line
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
KS2185
KS9124
NPZ 0326
ARC92004-1
KS2098
KS419B
Wichita
Baldur
KS9135
Rasmus
Kronos
Abilene
KS3018
KS7436
Virginia
Jetton
KS2169
Sumner
ARC2189-1
VSX-2
KS2064
KS7436-055
ARC92007-2
Baros
Plainsman
ARC2180-1
Titan
Ceres
-------------lb/ac--------------2586
2814
-2576
--2533
2641
-2373
--2332
--2263
2606
-2251
--2239
2765
-2227
2711
-2226
2544
-2217
2430
-2213
--2178
2426
-2164
2693
-2134
2591
-2023
2003
--1927
--1907
--1907
2600
-1889
--1816
--1750
2092
-1744
--1639
2299
-1627
--1421
2129
-945
1871
--
Mean
LSD (0.05)
CV (%)
2040
570
17
2467
--
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
------------%-------------99
96
-99
--97
88
-90
--95
--96
90
-92
--86
91
-99
87
-89
81
-94
99
-97
--100
90
-97
68
73
-82
79
---98
--98
65
--62
69
---100
--99
77
75
---96
96
-99
--96
91
-94
86
-96
91
17
11
88
--
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
%
65
68
67
63
70
62
65
63
68
62
70
67
57
65
65
55
70
62
70
62
60
57
67
53
53
53
40
45
date
5/8
5/9
5/9
5/9
5/9
5/9
5/9
5/10
5/9
5/10
5/10
5/10
5/9
5/9
5/9
5/9
5/9
5/9
5/9
5/10
5/9
5/10
5/9
5/9
5/9
5/9
5/10
5/9
62
13
12
5/9
1
1
e
e
e
e
l
l
l
l
l
e
l
l
e
l
l
e
l
e
l
l
l
l
e
Maturity
Plant
Height
Lodging
Shattering
Test
Weight
Total
Oil
date
-----------------------------
in.
55
54
57
60
58
58
54
56
58
55
59
54
56
54
50
50
55
55
58
52
62
54
61
55
61
58
61
56
%
-----------------------------
%
-----------------------------
lb/bu
-----------------------------
%
39.6
39.8
40.0
39.2
40.0
39.6
39.4
40.0
39.6
40.1
39.9
39.0
37.5
39.8
39.4
39.4
39.0
39.7
38.0
39.8
39.3
40.7
39.6
41.7
39.2
40.1
39.9
39.7
----
56
5
6
----
----
----
39.6
1.4
1.7
s
s
t
t
t
s
t
t
s
s
s
s
t
s
t
s
t
t
t
t
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
15
ARC2189-1
Plainsman
KS419B
sw 013253
KS2098
Titan
sw 013121
Casino
ARC92004-1
ARC92007-2
DKW13-62
KS9124
sw 013211
KS9135
KS7436
ARC2180-1
KS9183
KS2064
sw 013154
Mean
Kronos
Baldur
Abilene
DKW13-86
Wichita
sw 013173
Rasmus
Ceres
KS2004
Sumner
NPZ0326
KS2169
VSX-2
Baros
KS3018
Virginia
sw 013022
KS7436-055
KS2185
Jetton
Largo
Height - inches
Largo
KS2098
NPZ0326
KS2185
DKW13-86
sw 013154
KS3018
KS9135
KS2064
KS9124
KS2169
sw 013173
KS9183
Abilene
Casino
Kronos
KS7436
Sumner
KS419B
Wichita
ARC92007-2
Plainsman
Mean
Titan
ARC92004-1
Jetton
Baros
ARC2180-1
Virginia
KS7436-055
sw 013022
Ceres
Rasmus
Baldur
ARC2189-1
KS2004
VSX-2
sw 013211
sw 013121
DKW13-62
sw 013253
Survival - %
KS419B
NPZ0326
KS2185
KS2169
ARC2189-1
KS9135
KS7436-055
DKW13-86
sw 013154
Virginia
Jetton
KS2098
Kronos
KS9124
sw 013173
ARC2180-1
KS9183
Rasmus
Baros
KS2064
Wichita
KS2004
Abilene
Titan
VSX-2
KS3018
Baldur
Sumner
ARC92007-2
Casino
KS7436
ARC92004-1
Mean
Ceres
Plainsman
sw 013121
sw 013022
sw 013211
Largo
sw 013253
DKW13-62
Yield - lb/a
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
500
300
100
-100
-300
-500
20
15
10
5
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
Figure 2. Midwest Winter Canola Summary, 1996-2005.
16
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
3
50% Bloom
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
Plainsman
sw 013253
Casino
KS2004
sw 013121
ARC92004-1
ARC2189-1
sw 013154
KS2098
Baldur
KS9124
KS9135
sw 013022
DKW13-62
sw 013173
ARC2180-1
Ceres
sw 013211
Kronos
KS419B
KS7436-055
KS9183
NPZ0326
VSX-2
KS2064
KS2169
ARC92007-2
KS7436
Mean
Baros
KS3018
Wichita
Titan
DKW13-86
Rasmus
Jetton
Abilene
Virginia
Sumner
KS2185
-4
3.0
2.5
Total Oil-%
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
Baros
KS7436-055
sw 013022
sw 013173
DKW13-62
KS7436
KS2169
Titan
DKW13-86
sw 013121
KS2185
Rasmus
Baldur
KS9135
ARC92007-2
Virginia
NPZ0326
KS2098
Sumner
KS2064
sw 013154
ARC2180-1
Wichita
KS9183
Jetton
Mean
Ceres
Kronos
KS2004
KS9124
VSX-2
Abilene
Casino
Largo
KS3018
ARC92004-1
sw 013253
Plainsman
KS419B
sw 013211
ARC2189-1
-2.0
Note: Values are averages of the differences
between each cultivar and the mean of Jetton,
Ceres, Plainsman, and Wichita for yield
(lb/a), winter survival (%), total oil content
(%), plant height (inches), and 50% bloom
date (days). The number of observations for
each trait is represented by the different
colors of the bars (as shown at right).
0 to 9
Observations
10-19
Observations
More than 20
Observations
Figure 2. Midwest Winter Canola Summary, 1996-2005 (continued).
17
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Fruita, Colorado
50
Calvin Pearson, Colorado State University
C u m u la t ive
P rec ip it a t io n -in .
40
Planted after soybean on 9/8/2004 at 4.5 lb/a in 30-in.
rows
30
20
p la nt
b lo o m
04 -0 5
10
Harvested on 7/26/2005
Pesticides: Treflan 1.5 pt/a
Irrigation: furrow irrigation
Glenton very fine sandy loam, pH: NA, P test: NA, K test:
NA
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
75-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 4596 ft, Lattitude: 39°10.81'N
N o rm a l
0
7 /1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
1 2 /1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4 /1
5/1
6 /1
7/ 1
6/1
7/1
100
Te m p e ra t u re -F
80
60
40
20
p la n t
b lo o m
0
There were 10 ten days when temperatures reached or
exceeded 100°F. The average growing season at Fruita
is 181 days (28°F base), compared with 199 days for
2005.
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
Table 12. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Fruita, Colorado.
Line
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
Baldur
Rasmus
Titan
Kronos
Jetton
Virginia
NPZ 0326
Ceres
Baros
KS7436-055
ARC92007-2
ARC2189-1
Sumner
ARC92004-1
KS2185
ARC2180-1
Abilene
VSX-2
Wichita
KS2169
KS9135
KS7436
KS3018
Casino
KS9124
KS2064
Plainsman
KS2098
-------------lb/ac--------------3027
--2989
--2867
--2854
--2834
--2659
--2602
--2587
--2554
--2532
--2497
2384
--2367
--2271
--2244
--2221
--2200
--2171
--2161
--2134
--2104
--2087
--2007
--1936
--1857
--1769
--1597
--1543
---
------------%-------------100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
97
----100
--100
Mean
LSD (0.05)
CV (%)
2324
533
14
100
2
1
--
--
--
--
50%
Bloom
Maturity
%
date
date
93
97
90
90
97
83
100
77
97
93
100
97
97
97
93
97
93
97
97
100
90
87
93
87
97
90
97
97
94
12
8
4/18
4/18
4/18
4/18
4/19
4/19
4/19
4/19
4/16
4/16
4/19
4/19
4/16
4/19
4/15
4/18
4/18
4/19
4/18
4/18
4/20
4/18
4/18
4/19
4/19
4/18
4/22
4/20
--------------------------------
64
3
3
Fall
Stand
4/18
1
1
e
e
e
e
l
Lodging
Shattering
in.
%
%
64
62
65
65
58
61
64
70
60
58
64
66
62
68
62
66
62
62
62
62
68
60
62
65
64
67
68
68
12
3
2
7
0
3
17
0
32
5
14
12
8
10
3
5
10
20
8
12
22
4
3
2
12
8
3
10
9
19
130
Plant
Height
s
s
t
s
s
t
t
s
t
t
t
Total
Oil
lb/bu
%
1
1
0
2
1
0
2
1
2
1
2
2
3
4
2
4
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
3
1
7
43.4
39.5
35.1
38.2
40.7
39.3
37.7
37.1
38.9
37.7
36.9
34.5
35.2
34.2
35.0
34.3
37.5
38.5
32.5
35.1
36.9
36.2
29.8
34.1
34.0
36.9
32.1
30.4
37.3
36.9
36.1
35.2
37.2
37.2
35.5
37.4
36.3
36.9
37.7
35.3
34.3
35.6
33.4
35.8
33.4
36.1
34.2
33.8
35.9
36.5
33.4
32.4
33.1
34.9
32.9
33.4
2
3
106
36.1
4.7
8.0
35.3
2.6
3.6
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
18
Test
Weight
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Walsh, Colorado
Kevin Larson, Plainsman Research Center, Colorado
State University
Planted after wheat on 9/9/2004 at 5 lb/a in 12-in. rows
30
C u m u la tive
P re c ip itation-in .
25
20
04 -05
15
10
Harvested on 6/28/2005
Pesticides: Treflan 1.5 pt/a
Irrigation: furrow, once in fall and once in spring
Richfield silty loam, pH: 7.7, P test: 6.2ppm, K test:
490ppm
75-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 3950 ft, Lattitude: 37°26'N
N o rm a l
5
h arve s t
blo om
p la nt
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11 /1
1 2/1
1 /1
2/1
3 /1
4 /1
3/1
4 /1
5/1
6/1
7/1
100
Te m p e ra t u re -F
80
60
40
20
b lo o m
p la n t
h a rve s t
0
Good moisture throughout the season and a mild winter
resulted in excellent survival and yields. There was little
pest damage, lodging, or shattering.
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1 /1
2/1
5 /1
6/1
7/1
Table 13. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Walsh, Colorado.
Line
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
Maturity
Plant
Height
Lodging
Shattering
Test
Weight
%
%
Total
Oil
-------------lb/ac--------------2482
--2462
--2409
--2402
--2366
--2290
--2129
--2125
--2109
--2092
--2033
--2000
1941
--1881
--1875
--1862
--1808
--1775
--1703
--1689
--1676
--1617
--1610
--1599
--1544
--1518
--1300
--436
---
------------%-----------100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
---
%
date
date
in.
lb/bu
%
NPZ 0326
Kronos
ARC2189-1
Baldur
Wichita
ARC92007-2
Abilene
KS9135
KS2064
KS2169
ARC2180-1
Rasmus
KS9124
Titan
Jetton
Casino
VSX-2
ARC92004-1
Baros
KS2098
KS7436
Plainsman
KS2185
KS7436-055
Virginia
Sumner
KS3018
Ceres
83
57
52
42
47
70
43
57
42
50
85
35
45
38
62
25
53
55
63
48
40
37
32
23
23
42
43
5
4/20
4/19
4/19
4/18
4/17
4/19
4/19
4/20
4/18
4/18
4/19
4/18
4/20
4/18
4/20
4/20
4/19
4/20
4/17
4/21
4/19
4/21
4/17
4/19
4/20
4/16
4/18
4/20
-----------------------------
67
61
60
59
57
63
63
64
58
56
68
58
58
60
59
61
60
61
57
68
58
68
54
52
52
53
63
52
-----------------------------
-----------------------------
-----------------------------
35.9
36.1
36.4
37.6
36.2
37.5
36.9
36.2
36.0
36.1
34.6
36.3
36.4
37.8
36.0
36.5
35.5
36.0
37.7
35.7
37.4
36.3
36.6
37.1
35.9
36.3
34.8
34.1
Mean
LSD (0.05)
1883
532
100
NS
46
29
4/18
--
---
60
--
---
---
---
36.3
--
--
--
--
--
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
19
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Hutchinson, Kansas
Bill Heer and Vic Martin, Kansas State University South
Central Experiment Field
50
Planted on 9/15/2004 at 5 lb/a in 8-in. rows
30
C u m u la t ive
P re c ipit a t io n -in.
40
0 4 -0 5
20
Harvested on 6/22/2005
Pesticides: Treflan
Irrigation: none
Ost silt loam, pH: NA, P test: NA, K test: NA
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 1570 ft, Lattitude: 37°56'N
10
N o rm al
b lo o m
p la n t
h a rve s t
0
7/ 1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11 / 1
12/1
1/ 1
2/1
3/1
4/ 1
3/1
4/1
5/ 1
6/ 1
7/ 1
100
Te m p e ra t u re -F
80
60
40
20
p la n t
Heavy rains and high winds delayed harvest and caused
extensive shattering.
b lo o m
h a rve s t
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 14. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Hutchinson, Kansas.
Line
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
Abilene
KS2185
Titan
Kronos
KS9124
Wichita
KS7436-055
SW 013022
NPZ 0326
KS9135
KS2169
KS420B
KS7436
KS419
Rasmus
Sumner
Jetton
KS2064
Plainsman
ARC2180-1
DKW13-62
VSX-2
DKW13-86
Virginia
ARC2189-1
KS2098
Baros
ARC92007-2
SW 013121
SW 013173
Baldur
ARC92004-1
Ceres
SW 013253
SW 013154
SW 013211
-------------lb/ac------------2281
2722
1472
--1342
2339
-1322
2286
-1308
2159
-1285
2295
2684
1282
--1282
1847
-1263
--1248
2140
-1246
--1233
--1232
2115
2445
1226
--1206
2115
-1191
2108
2371
1181
2095
2627
1176
1118
--1110
1871
2328
1103
--1098
1787
-1095
2166
-1066
2060
-1048
2076
2553
1046
--998
--932
--905
1934
-841
1875
-815
1832
-787
--760
1767
-754
1729
2224
754
1569
-573
1711
-539
1457
--
Mean
LSD (0.05)
CV (%)
1079
305
17
1987
2314
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
------------%-----------100
100
100
--100
100
-99
100
-100
100
-100
100
100
100
--99
100
-99
--100
100
-100
--100
--100
100
100
100
--100
100
-100
100
100
100
100
100
100
--99
100
100
100
--98
98
-97
98
-95
100
-99
99
99
98
--99
--100
--100
100
-100
99
-98
100
-99
--100
100
-100
100
100
99
99
-98
100
-100
77
88
-99
11
7
99
100
Fall
Stand
%
99
100
98
100
99
98
97
99
100
97
100
100
100
99
97
99
98
99
99
100
99
98
100
97
100
100
99
99
96
98
97
99
70
99
99
99
98
8
5
50%
Bloom
date
4/10
4/8 e
4/10
4/10
4/11
4/10
4/9
4/11
4/10
4/11
4/9
4/11
4/11
4/11
4/10
4/8
4/11
4/10
4/13
4/11
4/12
4/11
4/10
4/10
4/11
4/14
4/7 e
4/10
4/17 l
4/13
4/9
4/12
4/12
4/13
4/15
4/12
4/11
1
1
Maturity
Plant
Height
Lodging
Shattering
date
-------------------------------------
in.
52
46
51
49
50
48
45
42
46
54
46
47
49
50
49
48
44
52
59
50
49
44
47
47
51
52
50
48
51
50
49
51
53
54
47
49
%
----
49
4
5
s
s
s
t
s
Total
Oil
%
38.3
39.3
40.7
38.4
38.9
38.6
39.5
38.9
39.7
39.2
38.3
38.6
39.5
38.8
38.6
38.9
37.9
39.1
40.0
38.8
39.7
38.3
39.3
38.5
38.8
39.6
41.6
38.1
37.2
39.6
40.0
38.5
40.1
38.5
38.3
37.0
%
lb/bu
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
5
0
0
2
7
4
15
12
5
7
4
4
15
13
7
20
2
7
17
10
17
4
27
30
12
4
6
11
5
22
13
43
15
50
68
22
28
8
37
70
30
1
4
335
18
19
63
48.8
48.9
49.3
49.0
48.2
48.8
48.7
46.6
48.7
48.6
48.9
47.6
48.4
47.9
46.4
49.6
47.4
49.2
48.7
47.5
48.7
47.1
48.0
48.1
47.5
47.8
46.8
47.6
48.0
47.5
48.9
48.4
49.1
47.4
45.7
48.9
48.1
1.3
1.7
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
20
Test
Weight
39.0
1.6
2.0
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Kalispell, Montana
20
Duane Johnson, Montana State University
C u m u la t ive
P re c ip it at io n-in .
15
Planted on 9/10/2004 at 5 lb/a in 6-in. rows
Swathed on 7/25/2005
Harvested on 8/1/2005
Pesticides: NA
Irrigation: none
P test: NA, K test: NA
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 2970 ft, Lattitude: 48°19'N
0 4 -05
10
5
N orm a l
b loo m
p la n t
0
7/1
8/ 1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/ 1
4/ 1
5 /1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/ 1
6/1
7/1
100
Te m p e ra t u re -F
80
60
40
20
p la n t
b lo o m
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
Table 15. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Kalispell, Montana.
Line
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
Kronos
NPZ 0326
ARC92007-2
KS9135
Titan
ARC2189-1
ARC2180-1
KS3018
Baldur
ARC92004-1
KS9124
Baros
Wichita
Jetton
Abilene
VSX-2
KS2169
KS2098
Sumner
KS7436-055
KS2185
Ceres
KS2064
KS7436
KS2004
Virginia
Plainsman
Casino
Rasmus
-------------lb/ac--------------5023
--4428
3629
--3578
--3401
--3388
--3363
--3361
--3283
--3262
--3194
--3147
--3130
--3127
--3113
--3106
--3073
--3005
--2899
--2897
--2890
--2885
--2867
--2848
--2721
--2518
--2339
--2002
--1738
---
Mean
LSD (0.05)
CV (%)
3111
838
16
--
--
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
Maturity
------------%-------------85
--82
--81
--75
--94
--98
--88
--91
--87
--87
--91
--90
--89
--90
--95
--82
64
----75
--89
--83
72
----79
--100
67
--62
----98
64
--57
----76
%
100
100
100
100
83
100
100
100
87
100
100
99
100
98
81
100
100
100
83
59
100
48
90
99
100
83
93
95
57
date
5/13
5/14
5/14
5/15
5/14
5/14
5/14
5/12
5/12
5/15
5/15
5/15
5/11
5/13
5/14
5/14
5/13
5/16
5/10
5/13
5/10
5/14
5/14
5/15
5/15
5/13
5/16
5/14
5/11
date
7/30
7/28
7/26
7/29
7/28
7/30
7/28
7/31
7/27
7/28
8/1
7/28
7/27
7/29
7/28
7/31
7/29
7/31
7/27
7/31
7/28
7/31
7/29
7/31
7/28
8/1
7/31
8/1
7/31
92
14
9
5/14
1
1
82
25
19
--
--
l
l
l
e
e
l
l
e
7/30
3
1
l
e
e
l
e
l
e
l
e
e
l
e
e
l
e
l
l
l
e
l
e
l
l
l
e
l
l
l
l
Plant
Height
Lodging
Shattering
Test
Weight
Total
Oil
in.
59
55
61
63
59
59
58
61
54
62
58
55
50
48
56
53
59
61
56
50
50
59
57
54
62
57
69
58
54
%
92
20
60
62
20
53
83
38
23
83
75
58
67
20
75
30
30
75
53
20
68
20
83
60
60
17
17
52
45
50
39
47
%
------------------------------
lb/bu
53.9
52.9
53.1
53.7
52.9
53.5
53.5
53.6
53.1
53.3
53.1
52.9
53.4
53.0
53.8
53.3
53.3
53.0
53.6
52.7
52.8
53.7
53.1
53.1
52.9
53.5
53.4
53.9
53.0
%
------------------------------
----
53.3
0.8
0.9
----
57
7
7
t
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
t
s
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
21
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Lincoln, Nebraska
30
Lenis Nelson, University of Nebraska
C u m u la tive
P re c ip ita tion -in .
Planted after oats on 9/16/2004 at 5 lb/a in 9-in. rows
20
N orm a l
0 4 -0 5
10
Harvested on 7/7/2005
Pesticides: Treflan
Irrigation: none
Crete silt loam, pH: NA, P test: NA, K test: NA
60-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 1217 ft, Lattitude: 48°8'N
p la n t
blo o m
h arves t
0
7 /1
8 /1
9 /1
1 0/1
1 1 /1
1 2 /1
1 /1
2 /1
3 /1
4 /1
5 /1
6 /1
7 /1
100
Te m p e ra t u re -F
80
60
40
20
p la n t
b lo o m
h a rve s t
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12 /1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4 /1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 16. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Lincoln, Nebraska.
Line
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
Baldur
Titan
Rasmus
Virginia
ARC2180-1
VSX-2
KS9135
KS2185
NPZ 0326
KS7436-055
KS9124
Jetton
SW 013211
Abilene
Kronos
DKW13-86
KS7436
Casino
ARC2189-1
SW 013253
DKW13-62
Ceres
SW 013121
KS2098
Sumner
ARC92007-2
Wichita
ARC92004-1
KS3018
KS2169
Baros
KS2004
SW 013022
KS2064
Plainsman
SW 013173
SW 013154
-------------lb/ac--------------1681
1893
-1505
1489
1543
-1465
--1451
--1363
1927
-1354
1853
-1254
--1239
--1203
--1202
1582
-1198
1509
2192
1195
1621
-1194
1655
1969
1189
1921
-1179
1562
-1173
1830
2323
1137
1537
1959
1126
--1115
1501
-1099
1371
-1087
1449
1992
1055
1643
-1044
--1043
1516
1857
977
1423
-974
1549
1976
921
1251
-862
--855
--851
--841
1205
-835
1146
-822
--771
1145
1544
767
1281
-594
924
--
Mean
LSD (0.05)
CV (%)
1111
185
10
1518
1987
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
------------%-------------100
98
-100
87
-98
--97
--100
97
-98
96
-100
--100
--100
--100
98
-100
99
99
100
98
-97
96
97
97
99
-100
99
-100
100
100
100
97
98
100
--100
99
-100
100
-100
95
96
100
97
-100
93
--95
97
98
100
-100
99
99
100
99
-100
--100
--97
--100
99
-100
99
-98
--98
99
99
100
99
-98
94
-100
99
4
2
97
98
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
Maturity
Plant
Height
Lodging
%
date
--------------------------------------
date
--------------------------------------
in.
52
57
50
51
54
50
56
51
56
52
57
48
55
52
53
50
53
56
53
52
52
56
48
54
53
53
51
55
54
52
49
58
47
53
60
46
48
----
----
53
4
5
97
98
87
100
100
100
100
100
100
97
88
100
100
100
100
100
92
98
100
100
100
75
90
100
100
100
100
100
93
100
100
97
100
100
95
100
97
97
8
5
t
s
s
t
t
t
s
s
t
s
s
t
s
t
s
s
Shattering
Test
Weight
%
%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
27
0
0
3
0
0
0
5
10
0
0
2
13
382
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
22
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
30
15
16
3
12
lb/bu
49.0
48.4
46.4
48.5
46.9
48.0
49.3
48.8
48.7
49.9
48.4
48.1
49.8
49.1
48.6
49.2
49.3
49.3
47.1
48.6
48.9
48.2
48.4
48.3
49.6
48.5
50.3
47.6
49.0
48.7
49.0
48.5
46.1
49.0
48.4
48.6
46.6
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
22
48.5
0.9
1.1
Total
Oil
%
35.5
35.8
36.1
34.8
34.8
35.5
34.6
34.2
34.5
35.9
35.6
34.7
34.3
34.1
34.2
35.8
36.0
35.2
35.3
34.6
36.8
33.7
34.1
35.6
35.0
34.8
34.4
33.0
33.8
35.3
35.6
34.5
34.1
34.8
34.5
35.9
35.6
34.9
1.4
1.9
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Sidney, Nebraska
30
David Baltensperger, University of Nebraska
C u m u la tive
P re c ip ita tion -in .
Planted after potato on 9/10/2004 at 8 lb/a in 12-in. rows
20
0 4 -0 5
10
Harvested on 7/15/2005
Pesticides: Treflan
Irrigation: 10 in. during trial period
Tripp fine sandy loam, pH: NA, P test: NA, K test: NA
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
50-0-52 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 3967 ft, Lattitude: 41°9'N
N o rm a l
p la n t
b lo o m
h arves t
0
7 /1
8 /1
9 /1
1 0/1
1 1 /1
1 2 /1
1 /1
2 /1
3 /1
4 /1
5 /1
6 /1
7 /1
100
Te m p e ra t u re -F
80
60
40
20
p la n t
b lo o m
h a rve s t
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12 /1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4 /1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 17. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Sidney, Nebraska.
Line
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
KS7436-055
Rasmus
KS2185
Titan
Jetton
Abilene
Virginia
Kronos
NPZ 0326
KS9124
KS2004
KS9135
Wichita
Baros
VSX-2
ARC92004-1
Plainsman
KS7436
KS2064
ARC2180-1
ARC2189-1
Baldur
KS2169
KS3018
ARC92007-2
Ceres
Sumner
KS2098
Casino
-------------lb/ac--------------3258
3706
-3217
--3151
3881
-3117
3473
2903
3057
3447
2915
3055
--3045
3944
-3036
--3020
3347
-3014
3370
-2951
3320
-2839
3791
3101
2782
--2735
3333
-2732
2695
3307
-2684
3010
2050
2661
3266
2808
2633
--2627
--2624
--2578
--2561
--2468
--2419
3340
-2403
2867
2141
2387
3367
2876
2294
--2279
3227
2567
------------%-----------100
--100
100
-100
--100
100
-100
100
94
100
100
83
100
--100
100
-100
--100
100
-100
100
-100
100
-100
100
81
100
--100
100
-100
100
-100
100
-100
100
91
100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
--100
100
-100
100
71
100
100
86
100
--100
100
83
Mean
LSD (0.05)
CV (%)
2753
545
12
100
NS
--
3332
2763
100
84
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
Maturity
Plant
Height
Lodging
Shattering
%
------------------------------
date
------------------------------
date
------------------------------
in.
50
57
48
58
48
53
52
58
53
56
57
54
48
57
53
57
53
58
54
53
54
57
53
52
50
58
49
57
52
%
------------------------------
%
------------------------------
----
----
----
54
6
5
----
----
s
t
s
t
s
t
s
t
t
t
t
t
s
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
s
s
t
s
t
s
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
23
Test
Weight
Total
Oil
lb/bu
%
52.2
50.2
52.4
51.1
50.5
51.2
50.6
52.7
51.5
50.9
50.2
51.5
50.9
49.7
51.3
49.2
50.1
52.3
50.8
51.2
51.0
48.3
51.5
50.5
51.8
52.8
51.2
51.8
51.8
51.1
1.3
1.6
37.7
36.5
36.4
37.3
35.2
36.1
35.8
36.0
36.3
36.0
35.5
35.8
36.9
38.2
35.1
35.7
35.5
37.1
36.5
34.7
35.5
37.2
35.7
35.0
36.4
36.4
36.5
35.9
35.6
36.1
0.8
1.1
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Enid, Oklahoma
40
Gene McVay/John Lamle, Johnston Seed Co.
C um u la tive
P rec ipita tion-in.
30
Planted after wheat on 9/16/2004 at 5 lb/a in 8-in. rows
04-05
20
10
Harvested on 6/22/2005
Pesticides: NA
Irrigation: none
P test: NA, K test: NA
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
90-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 1227 ft, Lattitude: 36°26'N
N orm a l
plan t
blo om
h a rve s t
0
7/1
8 /1
9 /1
1 0/1
11 /1
1 2/ 1
1 /1
2 /1
3/1
4/1
5/ 1
6/1
7/ 1
1 00
Te m p e ra t u re -F
80
60
40
20
p la n t
Heavy rains and high winds delayed harvest and caused
extensive shattering.
b lo o m
h a rve s t
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12 /1
1/1
2 /1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 18. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Enid, Oklahoma.
Line
KS7436-055
KS2185
NPZ 0326
Wichita
KS9124
Abilene
Rasmus
Plainsman
KS2064
KS9135
KS7436
Titan
KS2098
KS2169
KS419
Baldur
ARC2180-1
VSX-2
Baros
Sumner
DKW13-86
SW 013253
Virginia
Jetton
Ceres
DKW13-62
ARC2189-1
ARC92004-1
KS420B
ARC92007-2
Kronos
SW 013154
SW 013121
SW 013173
SW 013211
SW 013022
Mean
LSD (0.05)
CV (%)
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
-------------lb/ac--------------1566
--1484
--1356
--1337
--1333
--1278
1219
--1195
--1189
--1149
--1114
--1046
--1039
--1029
--1026
--973
--947
--932
--930
--905
--899
--858
--848
--830
--821
--819
--808
--789
--775
--764
--697
--640
--628
--614
--592
--423
--968
293
19
--
--
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
------------%-------------95
--100
--93
--98
--95
--98
--94
--92
--98
--95
--95
--95
--98
87
----96
85
----94
--97
--100
--97
--96
--95
--95
--97
--92
--95
--95
--97
--95
--93
--94
--95
88
----93
82
--67
--94
9
6
--
--
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
%
83
97
93
93
90
98
78
85
93
95
88
97
90
77
93
93
97
93
93
92
90
93
83
92
67
95
97
97
97
97
97
92
88
87
93
92
91
11
7
date
4/4
4/3
4/5
4/4
4/6
4/5
4/4
4/8
4/4
4/5
4/5
4/8
4/7
4/4
4/4
4/6
4/7
4/4
4/3
4/4
4/6
4/9
4/5
4/5
4/6
4/10
4/6
4/6
4/7
4/7
4/7
4/10
4/10
4/8
4/9
4/8
4/6
2
1
e
e
e
e
e
l
e
e
l
e
e
e
e
e
l
e
l
l
l
l
l
l
Maturity
Plant
Height
Lodging
date
-------------------------------------
in.
41
45
43
46
43
48
43
51
51
47
46
48
54
45
48
41
45
42
47
46
41
48
42
36
40
41
46
46
46
45
42
46
39
42
41
34
%
----
44
5
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
10
0
7
5
0
3
7
3
0
0
0
0
5
0
3
0
7
20
0
10
0
3
2
2
11
269
t
t
t
s
s
s
Test
Weight
Total
Oil
%
lb/bu
22
25
28
22
25
18
13
28
37
23
28
18
37
32
37
32
27
18
83
33
53
37
15
18
53
20
30
40
15
57
43
67
42
63
35
17
33
21
39
51.0
50.2
49.5
49.8
49.9
50.0
48.8
49.9
49.7
49.7
50.6
50.3
49.0
48.4
49.2
50.2
48.3
49.0
49.0
50.7
49.7
49.6
47.7
48.5
50.7
49.7
48.0
49.9
48.1
48.7
49.6
47.7
47.9
48.2
49.5
47.4
%
38.6
37.1
38.9
37.4
38.5
37.8
37.7
36.6
36.4
38.5
38.0
36.7
36.2
36.8
38.7
38.6
35.8
37.4
41.4
38.4
37.5
35.7
36.3
37.3
37.6
36.4
37.2
37.0
35.5
36.5
36.1
36.6
35.0
37.2
35.8
36.0
49.3
1.3
1.6
37.2
1.9
2.5
Shattering
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
24
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Goodwell, Oklahoma
30
Rick Kochenower, Oklahoma State University
C u m u la tive
P re c ip ita t io n -in .
20
Planted on 9/29/2004 at 5 lb/a in 7.5-in. rows
0 4 -0 5
10
Harvested on 6/29/2005
Pesticides: NA
Irrigation: none
Richfield clay loam, pH: NA, P test: NA, K test: NA
75-40-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
125-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 3239 ft, Lattitude: 36°36'N
N o rm a l
p la n t
b lo o m
h a rve s t
0
7 /1
8 /1
9 /1
1 0 /1
11/1
1 2 /1
1 /1
2 /1
3 /1
4 /1
3/1
4/1
5 /1
6 /1
7 /1
100
Te m p e ra t u re -F
80
60
40
20
p la n t
b lo o m
h a rve s t
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10 /1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
5/1
6 /1
7/1
Table 19. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Goodwell, Oklahoma.
Line
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
Maturity
Plant
Height
Lodging
Shattering
%
83
100
87
97
93
80
97
83
100
93
93
100
87
73
100
100
100
93
97
97
83
97
97
97
80
53
100
97
97
100
97
90
97
100
90
97
92
10
7
date
-------------------------------------
date
-------------------------------------
in.
-------------------------------------
%
37
60
32
13
50
33
58
63
85
33
30
67
17
63
43
97
63
3
33
68
57
97
57
97
47
58
63
67
60
77
100
67
77
87
67
87
----
----
----
59
72
76
Titan
KS2169
Abilene
DKW13-86
ARC2180-1
Wichita
KS7436
Virginia
KS420B
Ceres
Sumner
Rasmus
Plainsman
Kronos
KS419
ARC92007-2
NPZ 0326
KS2064
KS2185
KS9135
KS7436-055
Baros
KS9124
VSX-2
SW 013121
Jetton
SW 013022
ARC2189-1
ARC92004-1
DKW13-62
SW 013211
SW 013253
Baldur
KS2098
SW 013154
SW 013173
-------------lb/ac------------2412
-2299
--2271
1756
1563
2263
1930
-2263
--2243
2204
1983
2230
1921
1897
2228
2236
2161
2207
--2162
1409
1348
2071
1780
1683
2065
1710
-2025
1432
1291
2010
2364
-1887
--1872
1551
-1821
--1810
--1805
--1796
1653
-1763
--1724
--1722
1823
-1686
1913
-1674
1431
-1655
1569
1706
1788
1560
1038
-1560
--1559
1260
-1483
1246
-1463
1333
-1401
1323
-1380
--1342
--1226
1034
-1192
1170
--
------------%-----------100
99
-100
--100
92
94
100
96
-100
--100
100
100
100
90
93
100
98
98
100
--100
87
90
100
94
95
100
97
-100
94
95
100
100
-100
--100
91
-100
--100
--100
--100
96
-100
--100
--100
97
-100
98
-100
90
-100
96
97
100
75
-100
--100
91
-100
91
-100
89
-100
90
-100
--100
--100
89
-100
89
--
Mean
LSD (0.05)
CV (%)
1814
650
22
100
NS
--
1645
1596
93
95
Test
Weight
Total
Oil
%
lb/bu
7
8
7
22
10
12
3
3
0
7
12
0
3
10
0
8
0
12
17
3
10
0
3
0
8
10
7
10
13
0
0
17
0
0
7
3
6
17
158
50.2
50.3
48.5
50.6
47.9
50.2
49.7
47.7
47.3
48.2
49.4
47.7
48.2
49.8
47.1
47.8
48.2
49.8
48.2
48.5
49.3
48.5
49.1
47.6
50.2
50.2
47.7
45.8
46.9
48.3
49.7
47.6
49.1
46.8
45.9
47.9
%
-------------------------------------
48.5
2.0
2.6
----
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
25
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Chillicothe, Texas
30
David Bordovsky, Texas A&M University
C u m u la tive
P re c ip itatio n -in .
25
Planted after canola on 10/15/2004 at 5 lb/a in 10-in. rows
0 4-0 5
20
15
10
Harvested on 6/6/2005
Pesticides: Treflan
Irrigation: 6 in pre-plant
Abilene clay loam, pH: NA, P test: NA, K test: NA
60-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 1401 ft, Lattitude: 34°11'N
N o rm a l
5
p la n t
blo o m
ha rve s t
0
7 /1
8 /1
9 /1
10 /1
1 1 /1
12/1
1 /1
2/1
3/1
4 /1
5 /1
6/1
7 /1
100
80
60
40
20
Te m p e ra t u re -F
p la n t
b lo o m
h a rve s t
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 20. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Chillicothe, Texas.
Line
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
KS2185
Wichita
KS7436-055
Jetton
DKW13-86
NPZ 0326
KS420B
VSX-2
KS7436
KS9124
Kronos
Baldur
KS2169
Virginia
Titan
Rasmus
KS419
KS2064
ARC2189-1
DKW13-62
Abilene
ARC92007-2
Sumner
KS9135
KS2098
ARC2180-1
Plainsman
ARC92004-1
Ceres
SW 013121
SW 013253
SW 013211
SW 013022
Baros
SW 013154
SW 013173
-------------lb/ac--------------2149
1834
1352
2064
--2007
1665
1243
1905
1667
-1895
--1888
--1884
1608
-1836
1668
1263
1809
1613
-1809
1201
-1803
--1786
--1754
1546
1176
1733
1708
1539
-1690
1524
-1672
--1665
--1664
--1638
1262
-1621
1382
1084
1596
1656
-1483
1472
1079
1466
1341
-1434
--1417
--1317
1297
924
1306
1296
-1294
1249
907
1236
1205
-1217
884
-1194
917
-1164
1097
-1133
--1050
1061
-989
961
--
------------%-----------100
--100
100
100
100
--100
99
99
100
99
-100
--100
--100
99
-100
100
100
100
100
-100
100
-100
--100
--100
100
100
100
100
-100
98
-100
--100
--100
--100
92
-100
99
99
100
100
-100
100
100
100
100
-100
--100
--100
99
99
100
99
-100
99
99
100
93
-100
100
-100
94
-100
85
-100
--100
98
-100
94
--
Mean
LSD (0.05)
CV (%)
1591
435
17
100
NS
--
1388
1048
98
99
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
%
date
3/23
3/31
3/30
3/30
3/31
3/31
3/30
3/31
3/31
4/2
4/1
3/30
3/30
3/30
3/30
3/30
3/30
3/31
3/31
4/8
3/31
3/30
3/30
4/1
4/2
3/30
4/4
3/30
4/3
4/9
4/8
4/3
4/2
3/23
4/5
4/7
52
48
39
45
48
53
45
51
45
51
53
43
44
40
38
42
56
47
48
51
43
49
48
53
50
53
38
55
37
45
48
42
52
44
47
51
47
8
11
4/1
2
1
e
l
l
l
e
Maturity
Plant
Height
Lodging
Shattering
date
-------------------------------------
in.
42
45
43
40
46
49
42
41
48
47
51
49
48
42
50
42
47
47
47
48
49
48
44
50
48
50
52
54
47
43
51
46
41
49
46
46
%
-------------------------------------
%
lb/bu
%
2
5
12
2
7
5
2
3
5
3
8
7
8
2
7
3
17
17
13
7
12
10
12
7
10
10
10
22
8
8
18
12
7
32
18
15
52.2
52.1
52.3
51.4
52.2
51.5
51.5
51.8
52.7
51.8
52.9
51.8
51.8
51.4
52.1
50.9
51.6
51.8
51.2
51.9
52.0
51.3
52.4
51.5
49.6
51.3
51.1
50.8
51.6
51.5
52.9
52.8
51.7
51.7
50.6
51.2
40.0
39.4
38.1
39.1
39.7
39.2
39.4
39.3
39.9
39.0
37.6
39.4
38.4
37.8
39.9
39.2
39.4
39.4
38.7
38.0
38.8
39.4
37.3
38.0
38.2
38.4
37.2
39.4
37.5
35.1
36.7
36.5
38.4
41.2
36.1
37.6
----
47
5
7
----
10
10
66
51.7
0.8
1.0
38.5
2.0
2.5
s
s
s
s
s
t
t
s
t
s
t
s
t
t
t
t
s
t
s
t
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005. 2003 data from Munday.
26
Test
Weight
Total
Oil
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Lingle, Wyoming
50
Jim Krall, University of Wyoming
C u m u la t ive
P re c ip it a t ion -in .
40
Planted after wheat on 8/30/2004 at 10 lb/a in 14-in. rows
30
20
Harvested on 8/2/2005
Pesticides: Treflan
Irrigation: lateral sprinkler
P test: NA, K test: NA
50-50-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 4180 ft, Lattitude: 42°07'N
0 4 -0 5
p la nt
10
b lo o m
N orm a l
0
7/ 1
8/1
9/1
1 0 /1
1 1 /1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3 /1
4 /1
5/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
6/1
7/1
100
Te m p e ra t u re -F
80
60
40
20
p la n t
b lo o m
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
Table 21. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Lingle, Wyoming.
Line
Ceres
KS7436-055
KS9135
KS9124
Titan
Kronos
KS2169
KS7436
KS2004
Baldur
Plainsman
Casino
KS3018
Rasmus
Wichita
KS2098
Sumner
Abilene
KS2064
ARC2189-1
ARC92007-2
NPZ 0326
Virginia
VSX-2
ARC2180-1
Jetton
Baros
ARC92004-1
KS2185
Mean
LSD (0.05)
CV (%)
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
-------------lb/ac------------878
1054
1201
--1044
1315
-1036
1115
-1012
1015
-992
1181
-979
--975
966
1419
940
1016
-913
--905
871
678
895
601
930
894
855
--843
757
-843
1111
1261
816
--815
760
936
813
880
1083
792
--789
--747
859
-739
--689
975
1235
670
744
-654
--585
767
1232
573
--482
948
-399
--824
320
24
886
1178
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
Maturity
Plant
Height
Lodging
Shattering
Test
Weight
Total
Oil
------------%-----------100
64
76
100
--100
92
-100
92
-100
91
-100
100
-100
--100
88
92
100
85
-100
--100
79
85
100
63
75
100
--100
63
-100
96
97
100
--100
77
84
100
77
84
100
--100
--100
88
-100
--100
90
93
100
85
-100
--100
91
94
100
--100
93
-100
---
%
87
99
99
96
93
100
95
100
95
98
98
99
96
90
97
95
90
100
95
98
97
100
94
100
98
99
99
100
99
97
8
5
date
------------------------------
date
------------------------------
in.
------------------------------
%
------------------------------
%
------------------------------
lb/bu
------------------------------
%
------------------------------
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
100
NS
--
83
88
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005. 2004 and 2003 data from Torrington.
27
KS2098
KS2004
ARC92004-1
Plainsman
KS9135
ARC2180-1
Titan
Casino
Kronos
KS2064
KS419
sw 013253
KS3018
KS7436
ARC2189-1
KS9124
ARC92007-2
NPZ 0326
Ceres
DKW13-62
sw 013211
Baldur
Mean
Abilene
Baros
KS2169
Wichita
sw 013154
Rasmus
sw 013121
Sumner
KS420B
DKW13-86
VSX-2
sw 013173
Virginia
KS2185
Jetton
KS7436-055
sw 013022
Height - inches
Wichita
KS9124
Plainsman
KS9135
Sumner
KS3018
KS2064
ARC2189-1
Baros
KS7436
Abilene
Casino
ARC2180-1
KS419
KS7436-055
KS420B
NPZ 0326
Virginia
Baldur
KS2185
Titan
ARC92004-1
KS2098
Mean
sw 013173
KS2004
sw 013154
DKW13-86
Kronos
VSX-2
ARC92007-2
KS2169
Jetton
Ceres
Rasmus
DKW13-62
sw 013253
sw 013121
sw 013211
sw 013022
Survival - %
NPZ 0326
Kronos
Titan
KS7436-055
KS9135
Baldur
Jetton
Virginia
KS9124
KS7436
KS2185
VSX-2
ARC2180-1
KS2169
Wichita
ARC2189-1
Rasmus
KS420B
Abilene
ARC92007-2
DKW13-86
KS419
KS2064
KS3018
Sumner
Baros
KS2004
Ceres
Mean
ARC92004-1
Casino
KS2098
Plainsman
sw 013121
sw 013211
sw 013253
sw 013173
DKW13-62
sw 013022
sw 013154
Yield - lb/a
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
500
300
100
-100
-300
-500
5
0
-5
-10
-15
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
Figure 3. Great Plains Winter Canola Summary, 1996-2005.
28
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
6
50% Bloom
4
2
0
-2
-4
sw 013121
sw 013253
sw 013154
DKW13-62
sw 013173
Plainsman
KS2098
sw 013211
sw 013022
Casino
Ceres
Titan
KS9124
ARC92004-1
KS2004
Kronos
KS9135
ARC2180-1
ARC2189-1
DKW13-86
Mean
ARC92007-2
KS420B
VSX-2
NPZ 0326
Jetton
KS2064
KS7436
Virginia
Baldur
KS3018
KS419
KS2169
Wichita
Abilene
KS7436-055
Rasmus
Baros
Sumner
KS2185
-6
2.5
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
-2.0
Baros
Baldur
KS7436
KS7436-055
DKW13-86
KS419
Titan
ARC92007-2
Sumner
NPZ 0326
Rasmus
DKW13-62
sw 013173
Virginia
KS2004
Mean
KS9135
ARC2189-1
Abilene
Casino
KS2064
Wichita
KS2185
sw 013022
Jetton
VSX-2
ARC92004-1
Ceres
KS9124
sw 013154
Plainsman
KS2098
KS2169
Kronos
KS420B
ARC2180-1
sw 013253
sw 013121
KS3018
sw 013211
Total Oil - %
2.0
Note: Values are averages of the differences
between each cultivar and the mean of Jetton,
Ceres, Plainsman, and Wichita for yield
(lb/a), winter survival (%), total oil content
(%), plant height (inches), and 50% bloom
date (days). The number of observations for
each trait is represented by the different
colors of the bars (as shown at right).
0 to 9
Observations
10-19
Observations
More than 20
Observations
Figure 3. Great Plains Winter Canola Summary, 1996-2005 (continued).
29
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Pendelton, Oregon
30
Don Wysocki, Oregon State University
C u m u la t ive
P re c ip it a t io n -in .
20
Planted on 9/14/2004
Swathed on 6/21/2005
Harvested on 7/6/2005
Pesticides: NA
Irrigation: none
P test: NA, K test: NA
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Elevation: 1513 ft, Lattitude: 45°42'N
N o rm a l
10
p la n t
0 4 -0 5
b lo o m
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
100
Te m p e ra t u re -F
80
60
40
20
p la n t
b lo o m
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12 /1
1/1
2/1
6/1
7/1
Table 22. Results from the 2005 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Pendelton, Oregon.
Line
2005
Yield*
2yr
3yr
Titan
ARC2180-1
Kronos
Baldur
Jetton
Wichita
ARC92007-2
KS9135
Sumner
VSX-2
KS7436
ARC92004-1
KS7436-055
Baros
Virginia
Rasmus
KS3018
Abilene
Athena
ARC2189-1
KS2064
KS419B
KS2169
NPZ 0326
KS2185
Plainsman
KS9124
Ericka
Ceres
KS2098
Salute
-------------lb/ac--------------3048
--2932
--2923
--2914
--2833
--2817
--2742
--2726
--2664
--2627
--2622
--2587
--2565
--2529
--2511
--2491
--2484
2442
--2426
--2320
--2285
--2256
--2241
--2230
--2227
--2163
--2088
--2032
--1983
--1969
--760
---
Mean
LSD (0.05)
CV (%)
2433
570
14
--
--
Winter Survival*
2005
2yr
3yr
------------%------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
--
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
Maturity
Plant
Height
Lodging
Shattering
Test
Weight
Total
Oil
%
--------------------------------
date
--------------------------------
date
--------------------------------
in.
--------------------------------
%
--------------------------------
%
--------------------------------
lb/bu
--------------------------------
%
--------------------------------
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
e - not statistically different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
* 2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
30
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 23. Sources for Seed and Blackleg Ratings for Entries in the National Winter Canola Variety Trial.
Seed Source
Line
1
Type
2
Herbicide
Tolerance
3
Blackleg Rating
2005
2yr
3yr
Seed Source
Line
Kansas State University
Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center
Svalöv Weibull
S-268 81 Svalöv
Manhattan KS 66506-5501
Sweden
1
Type
2
Herbicide
Tolerance
3
Blackleg Rating
2005
2yr
3yr
Abilene
OP
--
13
Casino
OP
--
--
--
--
OP
--
10
--
12
KS2004
--
--
SW 013022
OP
RR
--
--
--
KS2064
OP
--
20
--
--
SW 013121
OP
RR
--
--
--
KS2098
OP
--
--
--
SW 013154
OP
RR
--
--
--
KS2169
OP
--
17
27
--
--
SW 013173
OP
RR
--
--
--
KS2185
OP
--
43
--
--
SW 013211
OP
RR
--
--
--
KS3018
OP
--
43
--
--
SW 013253
OP
RR
--
--
--
43
--
--
--
KS419
OP
IMI
KS420B
OP
IMI
--
--
--
KS7436
OP
--
20
17
15
University of Arkansas
Department of Crop, Soil,
and Environmental Sciences
Fayetteville AR 72701
KS7436-055
OP
--
--
OP
--
13
23
--
KS9124
18
--
KS9135
OP
--
13
13
--
Plainsman
OP
--
7
17
22
ARC2180-1
OP
--
13
--
--
ARC2189-1
OP
--
10
--
--
12
ARC92004-1
OP
--
17
15
--
ARC92007-2
OP
--
13
18
--
Sumner
Wichita
OP
OP
SU
--
10
7
-14
Monsanto
800 North Lindberg Boulevard
Virginia State University
Agricultural Experiment Station
St. Louis MO 63167
Petersburg VA 23806
DKW13-62
OP
RR
--
--
--
DKW13-86
OP
RR
--
--
--
Virginia
OP
--
13
10
13
VSX-2
OP
--
13
12
--
LSD (0.10)
--
--
15
--
--
Mean
--
--
22
--
--
Norddeutche Pflanzenzucht (NPZ)
Hans-Georg Lembke KG
Hohenlieth Germany D-24363 Holtsee
Baldur
H
--
10
--
--
Baros
OP
--
10
--
--
Ceres
OP
--
20
19
13
Jetton
OP
--
12
12
Kronos
H
--
17
23
20
--
NPZ 0326
H
--
13
--
--
OP
--
17
19
--
H
--
13
15
--
Rasmus
Titan
1 OP = open pollinated, H = hybrid.
2 SU = sulfonylurea, IMI = imidazolinone, RR = glyphosate.
3 Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
Blackleg rated as total percentage of plants killed by blackleg or having severe basal stem canker.
Data collected at Griffin, GA, by D.V. Phillips and D. Spradlin.
Nurseries were located on, or adjacent to, fields infected with Phoma blackleg the previous season.
2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005; 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
31
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Senior Authors
Michael Stamm, Cynthia La Barge, and Kraig Roozeboom, Dept. of Agronomy,
Kansas State Univ., Manhattan
Other Contributors
Robert Aiken, KSU Northwest Research-Extension Center, Colby
Richard Auld, Texas Tech University, Lubbock
Robert Bacon, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
Brian Baldwin, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State
David Baltensperger, University of Nebraska, Scottsbluff
Harbans Bhardwaj, Virginia State University, Petersburg
David Bordovsky, Texas A&M University, Vernon
Ernst Cebert, Alabama A&M University, Normal
Ellsworth Christmas, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Shawn Conley, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Russ Freed, Michigan State University, East Lansing
William Heer, KSU South Central Experiment Field, Hutchinson
Duane Johnson, Montana State University, Kalispell
Jerry Johnson, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins
Joe Johnson, Mississippi State University, Holly Springs
John Kelly, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
Jim Klein, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale
Rick Kochenower, Oklahoma State University, Goodwell
Jim Krall, University of Wyoming, Torrington
Kelly Kusel, KSU Southeast Agricultural Research Center, Parsons
John Lamle, Johnston Seed Company, Enid
Kevin Larson, Colorado State University, Walsh
Dave LeGare, University of Minnesota, Crookston
Edwin Lentz, Ohio State University, Findlay
James Long, KSU Southeast Agricultural Research Center, Parsons
Vic Martin, KSU South Central Experiment Field, Hutchinson
Howard Mason, University of Missouri, Columbia
Gene McVay, Johnston Seed Company, Enid
Lenis Nelson, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Calvin Pearson, Colorado State University, Fruita
Paul Porter, University of Minnesota, St. Paul
Paul Raymer, University of Georgia, Griffin
Charlie Rife, Blue Sun Biodiesel, Torrington
Paul Rose, University of Georgia, Griffin
Michael Schmidt, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale
Greg Schwab, University of Kentucky, Lexington
Randy Smoot, University of Missouri, Novelty
David Starner, Virginia Tech University, Orange
Don Wysocki, Oregon state University, Pendelton
★
★
★
★
★
★
★ ★
★
★
★
★
★
★
★ ★★
★★
★
★
Contents of this publication may be freely reproduced for educational purposes. All other rights reserved. In each
case, give credit to the author(s), name of the work, Kansas State University, and the date the work was published.
This Report of Progress was edited, designed, and printed by the
Department of Communications at Kansas State University.
Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, Manhattan 66506
SRP 954
★
Feb. 2006
K-State Research and Extension is an equal opportunity provider and employer. These materials may be available in
alternative formats.
1250