This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
2011
Kansas Performance Tests with
Soybean Varieties
Report of Progress 1058
Kansas State University
Agricultural Experiment Station
and Cooperative Extension Service
standard dryland
irrigated
double-cropped
conventional
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
Test Objectives and Procedures........................................................................................................1
Data Interpretation............................................................................................................................1
Variety or Brand Selection ...............................................................................................................1
Summary of Entrants and Originators, Table 1................................................................................2
PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS
Emmett, Pottawatomie County (dryland), Table 2...........................................................................3
Topeka, Shawnee County (dryland), Table 3...................................................................................4
Topeka, Shawnee County (irrigated), Table 4..................................................................................5
Ottawa, Franklin County (dryland), Table 5 ....................................................................................6
Parsons, Labette County, Maturity Groups III-IV (dryland), Table 6..............................................8
Parsons, Labette County, Maturity Groups IV-V (dryland), Table 7...............................................8
Pittsburg, No-Till, Double-Cropped Maturity Groups IV-V (dryland), Table 8 .............................9
McCune, Crawford County, Maturity Groups III-IV (dryland), Table 9 ....................................... 9
McCune, Crawford County, Maturity Groups IV-V (dryland), Table 10 .......................................10
Erie, Neosho County, Maturity Groups III-IV (dryland), Table 11 ................................................11
Erie, Neosho County, Maturity Groups IV-V (dryland), Table 12 .................................................11
Scandia, Republic County (irrigated), Table 13 ............................................................................. 12
Belleville, Republic County (dryland), Table 14 ........................................................................... 13
Assaria, Saline County (dryland), Table 15 ................................................................................... 14
Hutchinson, Reno County (irrigated), Table 16 ............................................................................. 15
Garden City, Finney County (irrigated), Table 17 ..........................................................................16
Ottawa, Franklin County (conventional/dryland), Table 18 ............................................................18
Parsons, Labette County (conventional/dryland), Table 19 ............................................................18
Scandia, Republic County (conventional/irrigated), Table 20 ....................................................... 19
YIELD SUMMARY
Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2011 Roundup-Resistant Soybean Tests, Table 21....20
Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2011 Conventional Soybean Tests, Table 22.............24
APPENDIX
Descriptions of Roundup-Resistant Entries, Table 23......................................................................25
Description of Conventional Entries, Table 24 ................................................................................28
Electronic Access, University Research Policy, and Duplication Policy .........................................29
Contribution no. 12-214-S from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.
-i-
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
2011 KANSAS SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS
Lodging is rated at maturity by the following scores:
TEST OBJECTIVES AND PROCEDURES
1. Almost all plants erect
2. All plants slightly leaning or a few plants down
3. All plants leaning moderately (45%) or 25 to 50% of
plants down
4. All plants leaning considerably or 50 to 80% of plants
down
5. Almost all plants down
Soybean performance tests are conducted each year to
provide information on the relative performance of new
and established varieties and brands at several locations in
Kansas.
Seeds for tests are from private seed companies, certified
growers, and agricultural experiment stations (Table 1).
Seed quality, including factors such as purity and
germination, can be important in determining the
performance of a variety. Soybean seed used for private
and public entries in the Kansas Crop Performance Tests
is prepared professionally and usually meets or exceeds
Kansas Crop Improvement Certification standards.
Relative performance of a given variety comparable to
that obtained in these tests is best assured under similar
environmental conditions and cultural practices and with
the use of certified or professionally prepared seed. All
companies known to be developing and marketing
soybean varieties or brands are invited to submit test seed;
interested companies enter on a voluntary, fee-entry basis.
Height is the average length from the soil surface to the
top of the main stem of mature plants.
VARIETY OR BRAND SELECTION
Performance of soybean varieties or brands varies from
year to year and from location to location, depending on
factors such as weather, management practices, and
variety adaptation. When selecting varieties or brands,
producers should carefully analyze variety performance
for two or more years across locations. Performance
averaged over several environments will provide a better
estimate of genetic potential and stability than
performance based on a few environments.
Companies were invited to enter Roundup-resistant
varieties in either the Roundup trials or in the
conventional trials at Scandia, Ottawa or Parsons.
Small differences in yield between any two varieties or
brands usually are not important. Within maturity groups
at each location, an LSD (least significant difference) was
calculated. The significance level used to calculate the
LSD was 10%. Unless two varieties differ in yield by
more than the LSD, genetic yield potential of one entry
cannot be considered superior to that of another.
Entries were planted in four-row plots with rows 30
inches apart and were replicated three or four times each.
Seeding rate ranged from 7 to 12 seeds per foot of row.
The center two rows of each plot were harvested for yield.
Harvested row lengths ranged from 11 to 33 feet,
depending on location. Cultural practices and rainfall for
each test location are presented with each table. Results
from this year's tests are presented in Tables 2 through 20.
Relative yields of each entry from all locations are shown
in Tables 21 and 22. Test results also can be found online
at: http://www.ksu.edu/kscpt
The coefficient of variability (CV) represents an estimate
of the precision in the replicated yield trials. A CV of less
than 10% indicates a good test with a high level of
reliability. CVs ranging from 10 to 15% are usually
acceptable for performance comparisons. CVs greater
than 15% generally lack sufficient precision to provide
any more than a rough guide to cultivar performance. For
tests in which the precision was insufficient to statistically
compare performance among the entries, the LSD value
has been replaced with the designation NS, indicating that
seed yields were not significantly different.
DATA INTERPRETATION
Yields are recorded as bushels per acre (60 lb/bushel)
adjusted to 13% moisture content, when moisture data are
available. Seed yield also is expressed as a percentage of
the test average to assist in identifying entries that
consistently produce better than the average yield.
Maturity is the date on which 95% of the pods have
ripened (browned). Delayed leaf drop and green stems
are not considered when assigning maturity. About 1
week of good drying weather after maturing is needed
before soybeans are ready to harvest.
-1-
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 1. Entrants in the 2011 Kansas Soybean Performance Tests
Illinois Ag. Exp. Stn. (AES)
and USDA-ARS
Champaign-Urbana, Il
217-265-4062
aces.uiuc.edu
G2 Genetics, NuTech
NuTech Seed, LLC
Forest City, IA
641-581-3350
yieldleader.com
Pioneer
Pioneer Hi-Bred, Intl., Inc.
Lincoln, NE
800-258-5604
pioneer.com
Iowa State University
Ames, IA
515-292-3497
Midland
Midland Genetics Group
Ottawa, KS
785-242-3598
midlandgenetics.com
Progeny
Progeny Ag Products
Wynne, AR
870-238-2079
Kansas Ag. Exp. Stn. (AES)
Manhattan, KS
785-532-7243
Morsoy
MFA Incorporated
Columbia, MO
573-876-5363
morsoy.com
Rinck Seed Farm (Virginia
AES)
Niotaze, KS
620-673-5343
Advanced Genetics
Delange Seed Company
Girard, KS
620-724-6223
delangeseed.com
NK Brand
Garst Brand Seed
Minnetonka, MN
800-445-0956
garstseed.com
Taylor
Taylor Seed Farms, Inc
White Cloud, KS
800-742-7473
taylorseedfarms.com
Asgrow
Monsanto
St. Louis, MO
800-768-6387
asgrowanddekalb.com
Ohlde
Ohlde Seed Farms, Inc.
Palmer, KS
785-692-4555
Willcross
NeCo Seed Farms, Inc.
Garden City, MO
816-862-8203
willcross.com
Fontanelle
Fontanelle Seeds
Fremont, NE
402-721-1410
fontanelle.com
Phillips
Phillips Seed Farms, Inc
Hope, KS
785-949-2204
phillipsseed.com
Willcross
Willcross Seed
King City, MO
800-411-5957
-2-
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Lance Rezac Farm, Emmett, Pottawatomie County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist
Wabash silty clay, pH na, na% OM; P test: na, K test: na
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
Rainfall:
2.7
4.1
3.8
2.2
3.1
1.9
Good moisture at planting, but dry conditions throughout the growing
season.
17.8
Planted 5/24/2011 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 10/5/2011; 15 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 22oz/a Roundup WeatherMax postemergence
Table 2. Emmett, Pottawatomie County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
Table 2. Emmett, Pottawatomie County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
BRAND
NAME
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
NUTECH
NUTECH
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
6369
6373
7332
7342
7362
7372
7375
7384
7390
7420
3612NR2
3732NR2
3740NR2
3822NR2
3842NRR
3850NR2
3952NR2
4162NR2
4270NR2
4329NRR
7359
7425S
Exp 362R
Exp 421
EXP371
EXP382
EXP432
O-3721
O-391
O-3921
O-422
EXP 38D33
EXP 39D10
EXP 39T30
2350NS
2381N
RY2321N
RY2342N
RY2362N
RY2383N
RY2393N
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
49.6
41.8
-45.7
-101
50.2
44.4
-47.3
-102
41.1
----84
----109
53.5
45.4
----92
49.0
----100
44.0
----90
50.7
----103
43.9
-50.2
-115
56.4
50.4
----103
48.7
----99
49.6
----101
45.9
43.4
65.2
44.7
51.5
93
----110
53.9
51.5
----105
49.5
45.2
67.9
47.8
54.2 101
48.7
----99
51.2
----104
44.7
62.9
48.7
53.4 107
52.7
47.3
41.1
-44.2
-96
40.1
47.2
-43.7
-82
49.8
49.9
-49.9
-101
47.6
-61.0
--97
50.4
-56.3
--103
46.4
----95
----107
52.4
51.8
----106
51.5
---105
42.6
47.3
-45.7
-96
44.1
51.7
38.8
-45.3
-105
51.1
48.4
-49.8
-104
51.2
----104
41.6
----85
48.0
----98
44.8
----91
51.1
----104
48.4
----99
49.5
----101
----106
51.9
----107
52.4
51.2
----104
49.1
44.0
63.1
7.9
7.1
5.2
4.5
3.7
3.6
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-3-
95
101
------100
---99
-----102
93
107
113
------100
88
110
-----------
------------103
-----100
---97
89
------------------
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
9/24
9/25
9/21
9/26
9/25
9/25
9/24
9/25
9/26
9/30
9/21
9/21
9/21
9/24
9/24
9/26
9/21
9/30
9/28
10/1
9/24
9/30
9/21
9/28
9/24
9/22
9/26
9/24
9/22
9/24
9/26
9/21
9/21
9/24
9/21
9/24
9/21
9/21
9/21
9/23
9/22
1.3
1.5
1.8
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.8
1.3
1.0
1.8
1.0
1.8
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.5
1.5
1.3
1.5
1.8
2.5
1.5
1.0
2.0
1.8
1.0
1.8
2.0
1.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
1.5
1.8
2.5
1.0
1.3
1.8
1.3
1.5
1.0
Ht.
(in.)
27
29
25
23
27
28
28
26
24
29
26
25
28
28
26
27
28
28
26
30
28
27
25
32
27
28
25
26
25
26
26
30
26
30
27
25
26
27
26
30
27
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
J.D. Hanna, Erma Harden Farm, Topeka, Shawnee County; Eric Adee, agronomist
Reading silty clay loam, pH na, na% OM; P test: na, K test:
na
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
Rainfall:
2.2
4.6
2.3
0.9
2.4
2.8
Good moisture at planting, but dry conditions throughout the growing
season.
15.1
Planted 6/11/2011 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 10/14/2011; 27.5 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 1 qt. Prefix, preemergence; 22 oz. Roundup
WeatherMax + 8 oz. Shadow
Table 3. Topeka, Shawnee County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
Table 3. Topeka, Shawnee County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
NUTECH
NUTECH
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
78N71
79N62
7342
7362
7372
7382
7390
7402
7408
7420
7442
7460
3612NR2
3732NR2
3740NR2
3822NR2
3842NRR
3850NR2
3952NR2
4162NR2
4270NR2
4329NRR
4580RS2
7388
7425S
O-3721
O-391
X412
320 NR2Y
385NRS
386 NR2Y
387NR2Y
416 NR2Y
439 NRS
3911 RY
4211 RY
4510
4611 RY
4710 RY
4811 RY
4908RR
4911RY
5111RY
EXP 39D10
EXP 39T30
EXP 44T40
WX RR2397
WX RR2398
WX RR2477
WX RR2878
WX RY2481
69.2
60.1
68.5
71.1
70.1
61.5
69.2
66.8
61.8
55.2
55.5
48.2
70.8
57.8
69.6
43.9
65.2
70.7
61.3
69.9
69.0
59.9
57.4
69.7
65.5
64.5
76.2
74.7
60.4
60.8
65.6
57.7
59.5
57.5
71.9
70.6
69.2
72.8
65.0
66.8
58.9
70.1
70.6
66.8
60.9
63.5
48.0
61.3
57.3
55.6
67.3
33.5
-----38.2
--45.6
-46.5
--33.5
--41.8
--38.4
43.8
-39.0
39.2
42.7
39.4
--36.7
----------------38.4
--44.9
49.6
-4-
--------------67.7
--71.2
--66.3
65.2
65.0
------71.0
----------------------
51.4
-----53.7
--50.4
-47.4
--51.6
--56.3
--53.7
51.9
-54.4
52.4
-57.8
--48.8
-------------------50.3
58.5
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
--------------56.9
--61.2
--57.9
56.3
-------56.2
----------------------
108
94
107
111
110
96
108
104
97
86
87
75
111
90
109
69
102
110
96
109
108
94
90
109
102
101
119
117
94
95
103
90
93
90
112
110
108
114
102
104
92
110
110
104
95
99
75
96
90
87
105
90
-----103
--123
-125
--90
--113
--104
118
-105
106
-106
--99
-------------------121
134
10/2
10/2
10/1
10/2
10/3
10/2
10/3
10/3
10/2
10/3
10/4
10/5
9/30
9/30
9/30
10/1
10/1
10/3
10/1
10/5
10/4
10/4
10/5
9/30
10/4
10/2
10/3
10/5
10/1
9/30
10/1
10/2
10/5
10/5
10/7
10/3
10/6
10/6
10/6
10/6
10/11
10/13
10/13
10/1
10/2
10/3
10/7
10/1
10/9
10/5
10/7
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.3
2.0
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.7
1.3
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.7
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.7
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.7
1.7
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.7
1.7
2.0
2.7
3.7
1.0
1.3
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.7
1.0
--------------101
--106
--99
97
97
------106
----------------------
Ht.
(in.)
39
38
35
37
41
39
35
36
39
42
40
46
36
34
41
37
36
39
39
40
37
40
38
34
36
39
35
41
36
35
36
39
42
41
42
37
38
39
38
46
44
48
42
38
37
35
40
36
38
48
36
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 3 continued. Topeka, Shawnee County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
BRAND
NAME
WILLCROSS
WX RY2482
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
----106
67.9
64.0
37.1
66.9
12.7
8.7
7.6
11.0
4.4
6.8
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
--
--
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
10/8
1.7
Ht.
(in.)
45
Kansas River Valley Experiment Field, Topeka, Shawnee County; Eric Adee, agronomist
Eudora silt loam, pH na, na% OM; P test: na, K test: na
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June
Good moisture at planting, but dry conditions throughout the growing
season.
July Aug. Sept. Total
2.2
4.6
2.3
0.9
2.4
2.8 15.1
Rainfall:
Irrigation:
11.5
8.8
20.25
Planted 6/11/2011 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 10/18/2011; 27.5 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 1 qt. Prefix, preemergence; 22 oz. Roundup
WeatherMax + 5 oz. Shadow
Table 4. Topeka, Shawnee County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
Table 4. Topeka, Shawnee County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
NUTECH
NUTECH
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
7362
7372
7375
7382
7390
7402
7420
7439S
7442
7460
3612NR2
3732NR2
3822NR2
3842NRR
3850NR2
3952NR2
4162NR2
4329NRR
7388
7425S
O-3921
O-422
O-451
385NRS
386 NR2Y
416 NR2Y
439 NRS
93Y70
93Y92
93Y93
94Y40
3911 RY
4211 RY
4510
4611 RY
4710 RY
4811 RY
4908RR
4911RY
5111RY
66.6
55.8
56.1
57.1
61.5
50.9
52.7
49.7
53.6
64.3
59.1
51.8
54.6
60.0
62.3
53.7
57.7
60.6
54.2
51.5
69.0
65.6
57.7
47.1
72.6
60.0
49.8
68.2
62.9
53.1
60.1
53.9
51.6
58.1
54.7
54.9
54.9
59.0
50.3
67.7
----54.7
-48.4
49.9
-57.4
----50.6
--55.3
57.0
-53.9
-48.2
41.2
-----------------
-5-
-------80.6
------73.3
--------72.7
-----------------
----58.1
-50.6
49.8
-60.9
----56.5
--58.0
55.6
-61.5
-53.0
44.2
-----------------
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
-------60.1
------62.1
--------53.7
-----------------
116
97
98
100
107
89
92
87
94
112
103
90
95
105
109
94
101
106
95
90
120
114
101
82
127
105
87
119
110
93
105
94
90
101
95
96
96
103
88
118
----110
-97
100
-115
----102
--111
115
-108
-97
83
-----------------
10/7
10/9
10/8
10/6
10/11
10/8
10/11
10/7
10/12
10/14
10/5
10/7
10/6
10/7
10/7
10/8
10/10
10/11
10/9
10/9
10/8
10/9
10/9
10/6
10/8
10/12
10/9
10/6
10/8
10/11
10/10
10/12
10/10
10/11
10/12
10/13
10/11
10/18
10/16
10/17
3.0
2.7
4.3
4.3
3.0
3.0
3.3
2.7
3.7
3.7
3.0
3.3
3.0
3.0
3.3
3.0
3.0
4.0
3.0
2.3
3.0
3.0
3.3
3.3
3.0
3.3
3.3
3.0
4.0
2.7
4.0
3.7
2.0
2.7
3.0
3.7
4.0
3.7
4.0
3.7
-------115
------104
--------104
-----------------
Ht.
(in.)
49
55
50
50
47
47
52
47
48
54
44
43
50
43
45
51
50
51
45
46
45
49
46
45
46
54
46
52
54
48
49
51
49
47
45
47
50
47
60
43
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 4 continued. Topeka, Shawnee County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
BRAND
NAME
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
397RR
EXP 39D10
EXP 39T30
EXP 42T20
WX RR2398
WX RR2409
WX RR2440
WX RR2477
WX RR2878
WX RY2432
WX RY2460
WX RY2481
WX RY2482
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
55.9
----98
60.6
----106
44.7
----78
55.3
----97
50.5
-71.7
--88
61.8
----108
----110
63.2
54.2
-68.3
--95
56.0
54.8
73.8
55.4
61.5
98
54.4
----95
61.3
52.2
-56.8
-107
52.2
55.9
-54.1
-91
60.0
----105
57.3
49.7
70.2
12.4
14.0
12.4
9.6
9.5
11.8
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
--------110
-105
112
--
----102
--97
105
-----
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
10/7
10/7
10/6
10/10
10/8
10/9
10/9
10/13
10/12
10/11
10/10
10/13
10/16
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.3
2.7
2.7
3.7
2.0
2.7
3.7
2.0
2.3
4.0
Ht.
(in.)
42
48
50
48
49
49
45
42
52
51
43
46
50
East Central Kansas Experiment Field, Ottawa, Franklin County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist; James Kimball, tech.
Woodson silt loam, pH 6.2, 2.0% OM; P test: L, K test: L
39-100-100 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June
Rainfall:
2.2
4.6
2.3
July Aug. Sept. Total
0.9
2.4
2.8
Extended dry spell from July 1 through August 10th; only 8" of rainfall
from planting through maturity. Rains in August and September
salvaged what could have been a complete loss.
15.1
Planted 6/7/2011 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 10/19/2011; 25 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: na
Table 5. Ottawa, Franklin County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
Table 5. Ottawa, Franklin County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
NUTECH
AG4533N R2Y
AG4733S R2Y
AG4833N R2Y
AG5133N R2Y
7382
7390
7402
7420
7442
7460
K08-2509 RR
K08-2528 RR
3732NR2
3740NR2
3822NR2
3842NRR
3952NR2
4162NR2
4270NR2
4329NRR
4506NRR
4580RS2
4768NRR
4792RS2
R2 46X71N
R2 47X31N
R2 51X10N
R2 51X31N
R2S 48X10
7425S
23.3
25.1
22.0
28.5
23.9
23.4
24.3
23.9
23.5
22.9
22.2
21.9
21.0
21.5
24.9
24.6
19.1
20.5
23.3
21.3
23.4
21.1
28.1
22.7
24.4
20.8
24.5
24.3
23.8
20.4
-60.6
---52.0
-55.0
-53.3
---46.5
----52.8
57.3
53.3
61.0
60.4
---58.5
-59.3
57.6
-6-
------------------55.5
58.2
58.2
54.5
52.9
--------
-42.9
---37.7
-39.5
-38.1
---34.0
----38.1
39.3
38.4
41.1
44.3
---41.5
-41.6
39.0
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
------------------43.9
45.6
45.0
45.5
47.1
--------
100
107
94
122
102
100
104
102
100
98
95
94
90
92
106
105
82
88
100
91
100
90
120
97
104
89
105
104
102
87
-113
---97
-103
-99
---87
----99
107
99
114
113
---109
-111
107
------------------105
110
110
103
100
--------
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
10/5
10/9
10/9
10/11
9/28
9/29
10/1
10/3
10/5
10/8
10/2
9/29
9/25
9/23
9/28
9/27
9/27
10/3
10/3
10/3
10/5
10/8
10/9
10/9
10/9
10/9
10/9
10/10
10/9
10/5
1.0
1.5
1.3
1.8
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.8
1.0
1.3
1.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
1.8
1.0
Ht.
(in.)
24
23
24
32
30
24
25
32
28
29
31
26
25
25
26
26
27
29
24
26
29
29
30
24
25
24
25
33
28
24
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 5 continued. Ottawa, Franklin County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
BRAND
NAME
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
O-451
O-4595
O-4880
3911 RY
4211 RY
4510
4611 RY
4710 RY
4811 RY
4908RR
4911RY
5111RY
461-2R
487RRS
EXP 48T00
WX RR2397
WX RR2409
WX RR2440
WX RR2477
WX RR2878
WX RY2432
WX RY2460
WX RY2481
WX RY2482
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
25.1
----107
21.8
55.1
55.1
38.5
44.0
93
22.0
----94
22.4
----96
25.0
----107
22.4
----96
23.6
----101
25.6
----109
24.0
----103
----128
29.9
23.3
----100
----113
26.4
23.7
62.5
61.2
43.1
49.1 101
25.0
61.3
58.4
43.2
48.2 107
22.2
----95
22.4
---96
47.2
49.2
20.8
----89
21.3
----91
24.9
-51.7
--106
21.3
54.3
53.3
37.8
43.0
91
23.4
----100
24.8
60.2
-42.5
-106
24.5
61.0
-42.8
-105
----118
27.6
23.4
53.6
52.7
14.6
6.6
7.5
4.0
3.9
4.5
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-7-
-103
----------117
114
-----101
-112
114
--
-105
----------116
111
----98
101
-----
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
10/8
10/6
10/8
10/8
10/3
10/8
10/8
10/9
10/8
10/9
10/9
10/10
10/8
10/9
10/9
10/1
9/28
10/4
10/9
10/7
10/4
10/8
10/9
10/8
1.3
1.5
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.3
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.3
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.8
1.0
1.0
Ht.
(in.)
25
30
24
30
21
23
28
26
36
30
36
30
22
29
24
33
24
26
27
33
28
28
23
34
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Southeast Agricultural Research Center, Columbus, Cherokee County; Kelly Kusel, technician
Parsons silt loam, pH 6.3, 2.3% OM; P test: M, K test: M
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April
Rainfall:
2.4
May June
3.9
2.1
July Aug. Sept. Total
1.2
4.2
2.8
Very hot and dry over the growing season. Much of the rain came in
small increments that didn't do much for the crop. Insect pressures were
fairly heavy over most of the region. Very little disease pressure.
16.6
Planted 6/7/2011 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 10/26/2011; 17 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 3 oz. Canopy XL+ 1 pt. Dual II magnum; 22 oz.
Roundup Powermax+ .3 oz. First Rate
Table 6. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2009-2011
Table 6. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2009-2011
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
BRAND
NAME
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
3850NR2
4329NRR
4506NRR
4580RS2
3911 RY
4211 RY
4510
4611 RY
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
12.9
----76
15.2
34.1
59.1
24.7
36.1
89
31.8
63.2
25.5
38.0 112
19.1
40.0
61.7
29.5
40.2 111
18.9
----99
16.9
----104
17.6
16.0
----94
----116
19.7
34.4
59.0
17.0
9.2
4.0
16.6
3.4
3.7
2.8
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-99
92
116
-----
-100
107
105
-----
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
9/15
9/18
9/21
9/26
9/24
9/23
9/26
9/26
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Ht.
(in.)
25
29
32
26
28
25
26
30
Southeast Agricultural Research Center, Parsons, Labette County; Kelly Kusel, technician
Parsons silt loam, pH 6.3, 2.3% OM; P test: M, K test: M
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June
Rainfall:
2.4
3.9
2.1
July Aug. Sept. Total
1.2
4.2
2.8
Very hot and dry over the growing season. Much of the rain came in
small increments that didn't do much for the crop. Insect pressures were
fairly heavy over most of the region. Very little disease pressure.
16.6
Planted 6/7/2011 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 10/27/2011; 17 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 3 oz. Canopy XL+ 1 pt. Dual II magnum; 22 oz.
Roundup Powermax+ .3 oz. First Rate
Table 7. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2009-2011
Table 7. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2009-2011
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
ADVANCED GENETICS
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
NK
NK
NK
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
TAYLOR
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
AG5133N R2Y
AG4903
AG5503
AG5605
K04-3083RR
KS5507NRR
4768NRR
4792RS2
5182NR2
R2 47X31N
R2 51X10N
R2 51X31N
R2S 48X10
S46-A1 RR2 Brand
S52-F2 Brand
S54-V4 Brand
4710 RY
4811 RY
4908RR
4911RY
5111RY
EXP 48T00
WX RR2477
WX RR2498
WX RR2507
10.5
12.6
14.7
17.5
10.0
16.6
7.5
12.6
12.2
12.5
15.0
14.5
11.4
8.9
17.6
13.0
12.4
11.8
14.7
9.3
13.4
11.1
10.9
9.1
8.5
---37.8
35.9
33.8
----38.6
-34.8
-38.3
---41.1
----28.2
33.3
-8-
-----48.0
--------------------
---27.7
23.0
25.2
----26.8
-23.1
-28.0
---27.9
----18.7
20.9
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
-----32.8
--------------------
85
102
119
141
81
134
60
102
98
101
121
117
92
72
142
105
100
95
119
75
108
90
88
73
69
---112
107
100
----115
-103
-114
---122
----84
99
-----83
--------------------
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
10/12
10/6
10/15
10/13
10/1
10/18
9/21
9/26
10/17
9/29
10/7
10/11
9/26
9/23
10/16
10/13
9/26
9/27
10/6
10/3
10/8
9/26
10/2
9/22
9/24
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Ht.
(in.)
31
27
26
28
29
28
28
26
34
30
27
29
24
27
28
36
25
30
27
30
30
25
25
27
28
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 7 continued. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Group IV-V, 2009-2011
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
BRAND
NAME
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WX RR2544
WX RR2878
WX RY2481
WX RY2482
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
14.5
36.3
-25.4
-117
12.3
----99
11.1
----90
9.0
----73
12.4
33.7
57.9
14.8
9.6
4.1
2.2
4.0
2.7
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
108
----
-----
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
10/11
9/29
10/3
9/21
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Ht.
(in.)
29
32
25
31
Dale Roberds Farm, Pittsburg, Cherokee County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist
Parsons silt loam, pH na, na% OM; P test: na, K test: na
Dry conditions at planting and throughout the growing season.
Pesticides were used on heavy insect pressure in late August.
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
5.8
4.6
4.5
1.7
2.8
2.7 22.1
Rainfall:
Planted 6/15/2011 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 11/2/2011; 15 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 32 oz. Roundup PowerMax, 1/2 oz. Cadet, 1/2
quart Astound postemergence
Table 9. Pittsburg, Cherokee County No-Till Double-Crop Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2009-20
Table 8. Pittsburg, Cherokee County No-Till Double-Cropped Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 20092011
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
BRAND
NAME
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
NK
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
AG4903
AG5503
AG5605
K04-3083RR
KS5507NRR
4580RS2
4768NRR
4792RS2
5182NR2
S52-F2 Brand
WX RR2477
WX RR2498
WX RR2507
WX RR2544
WX RR2878
WX RY2481
WX RY2482
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
13.4
----93
11.0
----76
14.2
----99
51.6
41.6
35.2
37.3 131
18.8
48.5
29.6
33.2
32.0 124
17.8
14.8
----103
----140
20.2
15.7
----109
13.5
----94
11.3
----78
12.7
----88
12.7
46.1
43.1
29.4
34.0
88
13.0
47.1
37.6
30.1
32.6
90
15.6
53.4
33.4
34.5
34.1 108
15.3
-28.3
--106
11.4
----79
13.8
----96
14.4
46.0
33.9
9.1
13.8
18.7
3.2
5.0
5.4
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
---112
105
------100
102
116
----
---123
87
------127
111
99
83
---
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
------------------
1.5
1.3
1.3
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.8
1.3
1.5
2.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
Ht.
(in.)
34
33
34
39
35
35
38
33
39
34
32
37
40
36
41
33
43
Vernon Egbert Farm, McCune, Crawford County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist
Cherokee silt loam, pH na, na% OM; P test: na, K test: na
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June
Rainfall:
5.7
4.8
4.5
Dry conditions throughout the growing season. Pesticides were used on
heavy insect pressure in late August.
July Aug. Sept. Total
1.3
3.5
3.3
22.9
Planted 6/15/2011 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 11/1/2011; 11 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Authority First preemergencennnnce
Table 10. McCune, Crawford County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2009-2011
Table 9. McCune, Crawford County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2009-2011
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
FONTANELLE
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
86S40
4329NRR
4580RS2
18.3
28.5
28.7
35.8
-34.6
-9-
--59.5
--31.7
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
--40.9
69
108
109
9/25
10/5
10/8
1.0
1.0
1.0
--101
--108
Ht.
(in.)
31
32
28
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 9 continued. McCune, Crawford County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2009-2011
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
BRAND
NAME
MORSOY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
R2 46X71N
3911 RY
4211 RY
4510
4611 RY
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
25.3
----96
----108
28.5
27.5
----104
----110
29.0
25.7
----97
26.4
34.1
55.2
4.2
6.4
2.7
1.4
2.6
1.8
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
------
------
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
10/8
10/8
10/4
10/7
10/8
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Ht.
(in.)
31
29
29
29
31
Vernon Egbert Farm, McCune, Crawford County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist
Cherokee silt loam, pH na, na% OM; P test: na, K test: na
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June
Dry conditions throughout the growing season. Pesticides were used on
heavy insect pressure in late August.
July Aug. Sept. Total
5.7
4.8
4.5
1.3
3.5
3.3 22.9
Rainfall:
Planted 6/15/2011 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 11/1/2011; 11 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Authority First preemergencen
Table 11. McCune, Crawford County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2009-2011
Table 10. McCune, Crawford County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2009-2011
BRAND
NAME
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
NK
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
TAYLOR
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
AG4903
AG5503
AG5605
88S72
912 EXP
K04-3083RR
KS5507NRR
4768NRR
4792RS2
5182NR2
R2 47X31N
R2 51X10N
R2 51X31N
R2S 48X10
S52-F2
4710 RY
4811 RY
4908RR
4911RY
5111RY
EXP 48T00
WX RR2477
WX RR2498
WX RR2507
WX RR2544
WX RR2878
WX RY2481
WX RY2482
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
28.6
----99
27.1
----93
28.2
----97
----112
32.4
29.9
----103
36.9
-35.6
-118
34.2
30.5
37.6
35.6
34.1
34.6 105
28.8
----99
18.4
----63
30.3
----104
28.4
----98
24.5
32.9
-28.7
-84
----110
32.0
38.7
-35.8
-113
32.9
29.0
----100
29.2
----101
27.8
----96
37.7
-35.5
-115
33.3
----109
31.6
----110
31.9
----109
31.6
29.9
----103
27.5
33.5
-30.5
-95
24.3
34.2
-29.3
-84
29.4
41.1
-35.3
-101
27.9
----96
27.2
----94
24.5
----84
29.0
36.7
46.7
7.6
6.0
5.8
2.6
2.6
3.1
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
- 10 -
-----101
102
----90
-105
---103
----91
93
112
----
------76
----------------------
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
10/11
10/14
10/16
10/8
10/9
10/11
10/17
10/13
9/27
10/15
10/10
10/12
10/10
10/8
10/19
10/9
10/11
10/10
10/9
10/10
10/8
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/12
10/2
10/10
10/14
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Ht.
(in.)
30
30
25
31
28
32
24
33
30
31
33
22
28
30
26
29
33
32
33
27
29
28
32
32
27
38
28
34
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Joe Harris Farm, Erie, Neosho County; Kelly Kusel, technician
Lanton silt loam, pH 6.0, 2.2% OM; P test: H, K test: H
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April
Rainfall:
May June
3.2
4.4
4.0
July Aug. Sept. Total
0.2
2.6
2.4
16.8
Very hot and dry over the growing season. Excellent stands and good
early season moisture helped crop off to a strong start. Deeper soil
close to the river helped make for a successful growing season in the
riverbottom. No significant disease or insect pressure.
Planted 6/6/2011 at 9 seeds/ft; harvested 11/1/2011; 11 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 1 pt. Dual II Magnum+ 3 oz. Canopy; 1 qt. Gly4+.3
oz. First Rate; 1 qt. Gly4+ 2 oz. Butyrac; 1qt. Gly4+.25 oz Classic
Table 12. Erie, Neosho County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2009-2011
Table 11. Erie, Neosho County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2009-2011
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
BRAND
NAME
FONTANELLE
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
86S40
4270NR2
4506NRR
4580RS2
3911 RY
4211 RY
4510
4611 RY
461-2R
EXP 44T40
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
35.4
---96
64.2
33.4
-58.1
--91
29.8
----81
39.7
61.5
64.2
50.6
55.1 108
----114
41.8
35.2
----96
38.0
----104
35.5
----97
38.5
62.1
61.1
50.3
53.9 105
----110
40.2
36.7
60.0
56.5
4.6
6.9
8.3
2.0
4.9
5.0
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
---103
----104
--
-103
-114
----108
--
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
10/4
9/29
9/29
10/2
10/4
9/29
10/2
10/2
10/4
9/29
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Ht.
(in.)
35
37
46
35
38
36
36
38
37
35
Joe Harris Farm, Erie, Neosho County; Kelly Kusel, technician
Lanton silt loam, pH 6.0, 2.2% OM; P test: H, K test: H
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
Rainfall:
April
3.2
May June
4.4
4.0
July Aug. Sept. Total
0.2
2.6
2.4 16.8
Very hot and dry over the growing season. Excellent stands and good
early season moisture helped crop off to a strong start. Deeper soil
close to the river helped make for a successful growing season in the
riverbottom. No significant disease or insect pressure.
Planted 6/6/2011 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 11/1/2011; 11 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 1 pt. Dual II Magnum+ 3 oz. Canopy; 1 qt. Gly4+.3
oz. First Rate; 1 qt. Gly4+ 2 oz. Butyrac; 1qt. Gly4+.25 oz. Classic
Table 13. Erie, Neosho County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2009-2011
Table 12. Erie, Neosho County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2009-2011
BRAND
NAME
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
TAYLOR
88S72
912 EXP
K04-3083RR
KS5507NRR
4768NRR
4792RS2
4710 RY
4811 RY
4908RR
4911RY
5111RY
EXP 48T00
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
40.6
----96
----108
45.9
54.8
-49.0
-101
43.1
49.2
43.5
46.0
45.2 101
42.8
41.6
----98
----104
44.0
----104
44.2
----99
42.2
55.3
-49.2
-101
43.1
37.7
----89
----100
42.3
----100
42.4
55.9
49.3
42.5
7.5
9.3
7.3
3.8
6.3
4.2
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
- 11 -
--98
88
----99
----
---88
---------
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
10/6
10/6
10/9
10/14
10/8
10/6
10/7
10/7
10/10
10/9
10/6
10/6
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
Ht.
(in.)
37
37
47
34
44
38
39
48
40
45
36
38
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
North Central Experiment Field, Scandia, Republic County; Randall Nelson, agronomist
Crete silt loam, pH 7.1, 3.0% OM; P test: L, K test: H
Excellent conditions throughout spring; timely rains during the summer.
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
Rainfall:
1.6
3.4
3.1
5.2
4.4
1.0 18.7
Irrigation:
3.2
1.6
0.0
4.8
Planted 6/7/2011 at 9 seeds/ft; harvested 10/13/2011; 26 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 1.5 pt. Glyphosate postemergence
Table 14. Scandia, Republic County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
Table 13. Scandia, Republic County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
NK
NK
NK
NK
Nk
NUTECH
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
AG3231
AG3431
AG3432
AG3730
AG3731
AG3932
76N12
79N62
7342
7372
7373
7375
7382
7390
7420
K08-2509 RR
K08-2528 RR
3411NR2
3610NRR
3612NR2
3732NR2
3740NR2
3822NR2
3842NRR
3850NR2
3920NRS
3952NR2
S36-B6 Brand
S38-H8 Brand
S39-A3 Brand
S39-U2 Brand
S44-K7 Brand
7359
Exp 362R
EXP371
EXP382
O-332
O-3921
385NRS
386 NR2Y
387NR2Y
93Y70
93Y92
93Y93
94Y40
EXP 39D10
EXP 39T30
2350NS
2381N
RY2321N
RY2342N
RY2362N
64.5
65.3
72.7
62.4
63.1
65.6
60.3
56.1
63.7
62.0
64.8
58.1
56.8
63.2
58.4
63.7
63.4
64.5
53.5
63.3
69.9
54.7
62.9
62.3
54.5
58.2
62.1
72.3
57.6
61.2
67.8
52.5
56.4
68.2
55.3
60.7
62.8
67.4
55.9
55.3
62.5
62.1
64.4
60.1
56.1
54.9
62.3
54.3
62.2
62.3
60.9
61.6
---61.6
55.4
-----64.2
--60.2
52.1
---52.6
-----57.4
61.2
-61.2
55.9
65.3
------59.3
61.6
52.6
--------------
----------76.6
-------81.3
--73.0
--79.0
80.1
-86.5
-88.2
---77.1
78.1
--80.1
-77.1
--------------
- 12 -
---62.0
59.3
-----64.5
--61.7
55.3
---53.1
------59.7
----------61.1
64.5
54.3
--------------
3-yr.
avg.
----------68.5
-------62.5
-----68.2
66.5
-73.3
-71.6
------67.4
-61.9
--------------
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
105
107
119
102
103
107
99
92
104
101
106
95
93
103
95
104
104
105
87
103
114
89
103
102
89
95
101
118
94
100
111
86
92
111
90
99
103
110
91
90
102
101
105
98
92
90
102
89
102
102
100
101
10/1
9/30
10/1
10/1
10/1
10/4
10/2
10/3
10/3
10/4
10/2
10/2
10/1
10/3
10/4
10/4
10/3
9/30
9/30
10/1
10/2
10/1
10/3
10/3
10/2
10/3
10/1
9/30
10/1
10/1
10/2
10/3
9/30
9/30
10/3
10/2
9/30
10/2
10/2
10/1
10/2
10/1
10/2
10/4
10/4
10/1
10/3
9/30
10/2
9/30
9/30
9/30
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.7
1.7
1.0
1.7
2.3
1.3
2.3
2.3
2.7
2.7
2.7
3.0
2.7
2.3
1.3
3.0
1.0
1.3
2.3
1.0
2.3
2.3
2.0
2.3
1.7
1.7
2.0
3.0
1.7
2.0
1.7
2.0
1.0
1.3
2.3
2.3
2.0
1.7
2.3
2.3
1.7
2.0
2.0
1.0
2.7
2.0
1.0
1.7
1.0
---109
98
-----114
--107
92
---93
------108
----------105
109
93
--------------
----------98
-------104
--93
---102
------98
99
--102
-98
--------------
Ht.
(in.)
39
41
44
41
41
41
42
45
37
47
44
47
46
40
47
46
47
39
41
39
44
46
43
40
43
38
43
42
39
42
42
42
41
42
46
43
41
42
41
43
43
45
45
45
42
41
42
39
40
42
45
41
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 13 continued. Scandia, Republic County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
BRAND
NAME
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
RY2383N
RY2393N
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
57.9
----95
60.6
----99
61.2
56.5
78.5
8.0
10.6
3.7
6.6
7.6
4.0
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
---
---
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
10/2
10/2
1.0
2.3
Ht.
(in.)
43
43
North Central Kansas Experiment Field, Belleville, Republic County; Randall Nelson, agronomist
Crete silt loam, pH 7.1, 3.0% OM; P test: L, K test: H
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
1.6
3.4
3.1
5.2
4.4
1.0 18.7
Rainfall:
Excellent conditions throughout spring; hight heat at R3-R4. Timely rains
during the summer.
Planted 5/17/2011 at 9 seeds/ft; harvested 10/4/2011; 25 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 1.5 pt. Glyphosate postemergence
Table 15. Belleville, Republic County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
Table 14. Belleville, Republic County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
NK
NK
NK
NK
NK
NUTECH
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
AG3130
AG3231
AG3431
AG3432
AG3731
AG3931
78N71
79N62
7332
7342
7372
7375
7382
7390
7420
3411NR2
3610NRR
3612NR2
3732NR2
3740NR2
3822NR2
3842NRR
3850NR2
3920NRS
3952NR2
4162NR2
S31-L7 Brand
S34-N3 Brand
S36-B6 Brand
S38-H8 Brand
S39-A3 Brand
7359
Exp 362R
EXP371
EXP382
O-332
O-3721
O-391
O-3921
X412
320 NR2Y
65.0
76.4
69.6
78.9
73.9
70.6
70.5
70.7
61.6
69.7
68.7
71.8
63.8
69.6
58.0
73.2
67.3
74.9
68.0
61.8
68.0
75.3
64.1
67.5
73.1
63.4
67.1
62.7
67.1
62.3
69.8
63.0
72.7
60.8
65.5
67.7
61.6
64.7
71.3
63.7
71.4
62.1
---64.1
--------59.9
70.6
-50.6
--50.1
--49.2
57.8
---61.0
------56.9
55.9
52.8
57.8
---
----------------63.6
--58.7
--56.9
61.5
----67.6
--55.4
---70.2
------
- 13 -
63.6
---69.0
--------64.8
64.3
-59.0
--56.0
--56.7
62.7
----64.1
------62.3
58.8
58.8
64.6
---
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
----------------60.5
--56.9
--56.7
62.3
----64.0
------64.9
------
97
114
104
118
110
106
105
106
92
104
103
107
95
104
87
109
101
112
102
92
102
113
96
101
109
95
100
94
100
93
104
94
109
91
98
101
92
97
107
95
107
9/19
9/22
9/21
9/23
9/23
9/27
9/24
9/27
9/22
9/26
9/30
9/27
9/26
9/24
9/28
9/25
9/23
9/24
9/25
9/23
9/26
9/24
9/27
9/22
9/25
9/28
9/22
9/21
9/27
9/24
9/25
9/23
9/23
9/27
9/25
9/22
9/22
9/28
9/27
9/28
9/19
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.7
1.0
1.7
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.7
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.7
1.3
1.0
1.0
112
---116
--------108
127
-91
--90
---104
-----------103
-95
104
---
----------------106
--98
---103
-------93
---117
------
Ht.
(in.)
38
34
33
38
36
37
37
38
32
31
39
37
40
33
40
36
38
37
32
39
36
33
37
32
38
42
33
34
34
30
38
34
33
39
36
36
38
38
32
41
32
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 14 continued. Belleville, Republic County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
BRAND
NAME
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
416 NR2Y
417 NRSE
382-2R
EXP 39D10
EXP 39T30
2350NS
2381N
RY2321N
RY2342N
RY2362N
RY2383N
RY2393N
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
63.2
----94
63.7
52.6
50.8
58.2
55.7
95
57.2
----86
56.9
----85
66.5
----99
65.5
----98
----107
71.6
57.8
----86
68.0
----102
----109
72.9
64.2
----96
53.8
----80
66.9
55.4
59.8
8.9
10.7
8.8
8.0
7.5
7.2
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-95
-----------
-85
-----------
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
9/27
9/28
9/23
9/27
9/26
9/23
9/23
9/22
9/24
9/24
9/25
9/26
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.7
Ht.
(in.)
42
36
34
36
36
35
32
38
37
35
39
37
Clayton Short Farm, Assaria, Saline County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist
Ladysmith silty clay loam, pH na, na% OM; P test: na, K
test: na
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
Rainfall:
0.9
4.3
2.7
1.8
2.7
1.2
Dry conditions throughout the growing season.
13.7
Planted 6/6/2011 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 10/21/2011; 11 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 8 oz. Cobra, 8 oz. clethodim postemergence
Table 16. Assaria, Saline County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
Table 15. Assaria, Saline County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
ADVANCED GENETICS
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
NUTECH
AG 4233S R2Y
AG3731
AG3832
AG3931
AG3932
AG4232
AG4531
7372
7375
7382
7390
7402
7415SE
7420
7442
7460
7472
3411NR2
3610NRR
3612NR2
3732NR2
3740NR2
3822NR2
3842NRR
3850NR2
3920NRS
3952NR2
4162NR2
4270NR2
7388
17.4
16.2
12.4
14.6
19.2
21.0
19.5
15.3
15.1
15.3
16.4
16.8
15.1
18.6
19.7
21.6
20.7
9.1
14.2
13.1
12.8
19.4
13.6
15.2
10.7
14.1
13.6
14.1
18.9
15.5
----------33.3
--33.9
-31.2
-------------30.0
- 14 -
-------------------------------
----------24.9
--26.3
-26.4
-------------22.8
3-yr.
avg.
-------------------------------
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
112
104
79
94
123
135
125
98
97
98
105
108
97
119
126
138
133
58
91
84
82
124
87
97
69
90
87
90
121
99
----------132
--134
-123
-------------119
-------------------------------
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
10/15
9/28
9/30
10/1
10/3
10/5
10/11
10/8
10/6
10/2
10/8
10/2
10/13
10/6
10/4
10/16
10/13
9/22
9/27
9/24
9/27
10/1
9/29
9/30
9/29
10/4
9/25
10/15
10/9
9/29
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.7
1.0
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.0
1.7
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.3
1.0
1.0
Ht.
(in.)
23
29
25
28
25
33
28
30
29
28
28
25
28
33
27
28
38
26
29
25
27
28
30
26
28
25
29
28
29
29
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 15 continued. Assaria, Saline County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
BRAND
NAME
NUTECH
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
7425S
EXP432
O-3721
O-391
O-422
X412
320 NR2Y
387NR2Y
417 NRSE
454NR2YS
EXP 39D10
EXP 39T30
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
16.4
28.4
-22.4
-105
21.9
----140
33.6
19.3
---124
8.8
30.6
-19.7
-56
21.2
30.6
-25.9
-136
12.8
----82
14.5
----93
16.9
----108
15.1
29.7
54.4
22.4
33.1
97
19.5
----125
8.3
----53
12.9
----83
15.6
25.3
55.4
19.5
14.6
6.0
4.1
4.3
3.9
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
112
--121
121
---117
----
--------98
----
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
10/13
10/4
10/1
9/26
10/3
10/8
9/24
10/2
10/3
10/14
9/28
9/27
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
24
29
29
28
30
26
29
27
25
27
23
28
Richard Seck Farm, Hutchinson, Reno County; Bill Heer, agronomist
Punkin-Taver complex, pH na, na% OM; P test: na, K test: na
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
0.3
1.2
0.9
0.0
1.7
1.6
5.8
Rainfall:
Irrigation:
Planted 5/30/2011 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 11/2/2011; 30 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: na
Table 17. Hutchinson, Reno County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
Table 16. Hutchinson, Reno County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
AG 4233S R2Y
AG4533N R2Y
AG4733S R2Y
AG3632
AG3731
AG3832
AG3931
AG3932
79N62
86S40
6373
7372
7382
7390
7402
7415SE
7420
7442
7460
3822NR2
3842NRR
3850NR2
3952NR2
3981NR2
4032NR2
4162NR2
4289NRS
4329NRR
4506NRR
4580RS2
60.4
57.6
64.4
63.7
57.3
64.5
63.4
58.8
59.2
66.0
66.9
61.6
60.4
69.5
69.9
63.1
61.0
66.1
59.4
55.8
61.6
61.1
61.0
62.3
58.0
57.8
66.5
66.4
58.5
62.7
----85.0
-83.5
--84.1
85.2
--91.5
--76.6
-77.4
--86.8
-78.3
--83.3
80.5
78.5
79.6
--------------------80.5
----76.3
71.5
72.4
73.5
- 15 -
----71.2
-73.5
--75.1
76.1
--80.5
--68.8
-68.4
--74.0
-70.3
--74.9
73.5
68.5
71.2
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
---------------------76.1
----75.4
72.8
69.8
71.9
97
93
104
102
92
104
102
95
95
106
108
99
97
112
112
101
98
106
96
90
99
98
98
100
93
93
107
107
94
101
----106
--
-------
---106
--114
--96
-97
--108
-98
--104
101
98
99
--------------110
----104
98
99
100
10/6
10/4
10/8
9/27
9/28
9/30
10/1
10/3
10/3
10/3
10/3
10/5
10/2
10/4
10/4
10/6
10/6
10/5
10/10
10/3
10/2
10/3
9/26
10/5
10/1
10/1
10/5
10/3
10/10
10/5
-------------------------------
Ht.
(in.)
-------------------------------
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 16 continued. Hutchinson, Reno County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
BRAND
NAME
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
NK
NK
NUTECH
NUTECH
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
4792RS2
5182NR2
S39-A3
S44K7
7388
7425S
Exp 362R
Exp 421
EXP371
EXP432
O-391
O-3921
O-422
O-451
387NR2Y
417 NRSE
454NR2YS
486NRS
93Y70
93Y92
93Y93
94Y40
EXP 39D10
EXP 39T30
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
63.7
----102
58.6
----94
64.3
----103
57.0
----92
60.5
84.5
-72.5
-97
61.3
68.0
-64.7
-99
53.3
----86
61.0
-73.1
--98
57.2
----92
63.6
----102
55.4
73.2
-64.3
-89
62.2
----100
60.2
81.2
-70.7
-97
61.4
83.3
-72.4
-99
68.8
----111
64.9
79.7
74.0
72.3
72.9 104
64.0
----103
64.2
74.6
70.3
69.4
69.7 103
----120
74.5
70.3
----113
68.2
----110
63.6
----102
52.7
----85
60.7
----98
62.2
80.1
73.2
5.6
7.3
8.3
4.0
6.8
7.1
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
----105
85
----91
-101
104
-100
-93
-------
-------100
-------101
-96
-------
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
10/7
10/7
9/30
10/4
10/4
10/5
9/28
10/5
10/9
9/30
9/30
10/5
10/3
10/4
9/30
10/2
10/9
10/9
10/5
10/3
10/4
10/5
10/1
10/11
-------------------------
Ht.
(in.)
-------------------------
Southwest Research-Extension Center, Garden City, Finney County; Monty Spangler, technician
Keith silt loam, pH na, na% OM; P test: na, K test: na
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June
Test had to be replanted after rabbit damage. Very hot and dry
throughout growing season.
July Aug. Sept. Total
1.7
0.9
1.3
0.4
2.1
0.8
7.2
Rainfall:
Irrigation:
4.5
6.9
6.4
0.9 18.68
Planted 6/27/2011 at 10 seeds/ft; harvested 10/21/2011; 23 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: na
Table 19. Garden City, Finney County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
Table 17. Garden City, Finney County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
3822NR2
3842NRR
3850NR2
3952NR2
3981NR2
4032NR2
4162NR2
4289NRS
4329NRR
4506NRR
4580RS2
4792RS2
EXP382
O-3921
O-451
385NRS
386 NR2Y
387NR2Y
17.9
26.9
21.0
21.2
22.3
24.3
22.4
18.9
24.8
27.0
27.5
21.0
19.7
26.1
20.9
22.0
20.0
19.7
--46.7
-46.0
--39.9
48.4
-40.5
----47.3
---
--41.2
----42.3
52.5
41.6
34.6
----48.6
---
- 16 -
--33.9
-34.2
--29.4
36.6
-34.0
----34.7
---
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
--36.3
----33.7
41.9
-34.2
----39.3
---
80
120
94
95
100
108
100
84
111
121
123
94
88
117
93
98
89
88
--108
-106
--92
112
-94
----109
---
--98
----100
125
99
82
----115
---
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
-------------------
1.3
1.8
1.0
1.0
1.8
1.8
1.0
1.0
2.5
1.3
2.0
1.8
1.0
2.0
1.3
1.3
1.5
1.3
Ht.
(in.)
-------------------
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 17 continued. Garden City, Finney County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
BRAND
NAME
PHILLIPS
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
416 NR2Y
EXP 39D10
EXP 39T30
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
24.0
----107
21.2
----95
22.2
----99
22.4
43.2
42.1
7.9
13.5
8.9
2.2
7.9
5.2
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
- 17 -
----
----
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
----
2.0
1.5
1.0
Ht.
(in.)
----
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
East Central Kansas Experiment Field, Ottawa, Franklin County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist; James Kimball, tech.
Woodson silt loam, pH 6.2, 2.0% OM; P test: L, K test: L
39-100-100 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April
Rainfall:
2.2
May June
4.6
2.3
July Aug. Sept. Total
0.9
2.4
2.8
Extended dry spell from July 1 through August 10th; only 8" of rainfall
from planting through maturity. Rains in August and September
salvaged what could have been a complete loss.
15.1
Planted 6/7/2011 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 10/19/2011; 25 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 3 pts. Squadron+ 5 oz. Mertibuzen pre; 12.5 oz.
Cobra+ 6 oz. Shadow+ 1 pt. crop oil postemergencee
Table 22. Ottawa, Franklin County Dryland Conventional Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
Table 18. Ottawa, Franklin County Dryland Conventional Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
BRAND
NAME
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ASGROW
ILLINOIS AES
ILLINOIS AES
IOWA AES
IOWA AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MORSOY
MORSOY
PIONEER
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
AG4168N LL
AG4989N LL
AG5163N LL
AG5503 *RR check
LD00-2817P
LD00-3309
IA4004
IA4005
K05-4624
K07-1253
K07-1544
K07-1633
KS4607
KS5004N
LL 4880N
LL 5120N
94Y40 *RR check
4910
4928LL
5191
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
25.4
----96
28.5
59.0
-43.8
-108
28.4
----108
----125
33.0
26.6
52.9
40.2
39.8
39.9 101
17.2
36.1
44.2
26.7
32.5
65
26.0
37.4
46.8
31.7
36.7
98
22.8
----86
41.8
43.7
36.1
38.6 115
30.3
20.6
44.5
-32.6
-78
21.3
33.3
-27.3
-81
21.1
36.9
-29.0
-80
25.0
43.4
38.3
34.2
35.6
95
26.7
----101
28.2
45.5
-36.9
-107
58.6
-44.5
-115
30.4
23.7
----90
----114
30.2
26.9
----102
----133
35.2
26.4
43.8
44.8
17.2
8.9
4.9
5.4
4.7
2.6
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-135
--121
82
85
-95
102
76
84
99
-104
134
-----
----90
99
104
-98
---85
--------
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
10/2
10/9
10/10
10/14
10/2
9/28
9/28
9/30
10/2
9/26
9/24
9/28
10/3
10/9
10/2
10/10
10/3
10/9
10/9
10/10
1.0
1.0
1.8
1.8
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.3
1.5
2.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.3
1.3
1.8
1.3
2.0
Ht.
(in.)
32
29
26
30
28
24
26
25
25
26
22
26
27
24
33
24
27
36
31
33
Southeast Agricultural Research Center, Parsons, Labette County; Kelly Kusel, technician
Parsons silt loam, pH 6.3, 2.3% OM; P test: M, K test: M
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June
Rainfall:
2.4
3.9
2.1
July Aug. Sept. Total
1.2
4.2
2.8
Very hot and dry over the growing season. Much of the rain came in
small increments that didn't do much for the crop. Insect pressures were
fairly heavy over most of the region. Very little disease pressure.
16.6
Planted 6/7/2011 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 10/26/2011; 17 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 3 oz. Canopy XL+ 1 pt. Dual II magnum; 22 oz.
Roundup Powermax+ .3 oz. First Rate
Table 21. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Conventional Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2009-20
Table 19. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Conventional Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 20092011
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ASGROW
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MORSOY
MORSOY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
AG4989N LL
AG5163N LL
AG5503 *RR check
K05-4626
KS5004N
KS5502N
KS5507NRR *RR check
LL 4880N
LL 5120N
4910
4928LL
5191
11.5
11.0
15.0
11.4
15.9
15.7
17.9
7.0
10.4
7.7
13.2
11.6
24.0
--16.6
27.2
32.4
31.6
19.2
34.0
----
---50.0
50.0
45.4
46.2
------
- 18 -
17.8
--14.0
21.6
24.1
24.8
13.1
22.2
----
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
---26.0
31.0
31.2
31.9
------
92
88
120
91
127
126
143
56
83
62
106
93
89
--61
100
120
117
71
125
----
---97
97
88
89
------
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
10/4
10/6
10/15
10/6
10/4
10/16
10/18
9/18
10/6
10/1
10/3
10/9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Ht.
(in.)
24
22
27
24
27
27
28
27
24
28
24
30
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 19 continued. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Conventional Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V,
2009-2011
BRAND
NAME
VIRGINIA AES
HUTCHESON
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2010
2009
2011
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2010
2009
2011
14.5
30.8
-22.7
-116
12.5
27.1
51.8
13.9
8.8
5.2
2.1
2.8
3.2
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
114
--
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
10/16
1.0
Ht.
(in.)
28
North Central Kansas Experiment Field, Belleville, Republic County; Randall Nelson, agronomist
Crete silt loam, pH 7.1, 3.0% OM; P test: L, K test: H
0-0-0 lb N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
5.2
4.4
1.0 18.7
3.2
1.6
0.0
4.8
Planted 6/7/2011 at 9 seeds/ft; harvested 10/13/2011; 26 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 16 oz. Intensity, 0.3 oz. FirstRate postemergence
Rainfall:
Irrigation:
1.6
3.4
Excellent conditions throughout spring; timely rains during the summer.
3.1
Table 20. Scandia, Republic County Irrigated Conventional Soybean Performance Test, 2009-2011
BRAND
NAME
ADVANCED GENETICS
ILLINOIS AES
ILLINOIS AES
IOWA AES
IOWA AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
PIONEER
WILLCROSS
AG4168N LL
LD00-2817P
LD00-3309
IA4004
IA4005
K05-4624
K07-1253
K07-1544
K07-1633
KS4607
94Y40 *RR check
1137N
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2011
2010
2009
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2010
2009
54.2
----92
59.7
89.7
61.2
70.7 106
62.6
50.2
58.6
69.9
54.4
59.6
85
56.9
64.7
81.0
60.8
67.5
96
----105
62.4
54.7
51.4
82.7
53.1
62.9
92
53.7
-59.8
-111
65.9
72.0
-66.7
-104
61.3
64.1
-62.0
-101
59.9
49.9
80.5
56.8
64.7 108
63.7
57.7
----97
----104
61.3
59.2
61.7
78.2
7.1
8.4
2.8
6.1
7.1
3.0
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
- 19 -
-97
95
105
-83
87
117
104
81
---
-115
89
104
-106
---103
---
Mat.
2011
Lodge
score
10/3
10/1
10/3
10/1
10/4
10/5
10/5
10/3
10/5
10/5
10/5
10/3
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.7
1.0
2.5
1.5
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.5
1.7
Ht.
(in.)
45
44
37
42
35
41
42
36
40
41
41
43
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 21. Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from Roundup-Resistant Soybean Tests
Topeka Topeka
BRAND/NAME Emmett dryland irrigated Ottawa
Parsons
MG4 MG 5
Pittsburg
DMG 5
McCune
MG 4 MG 5
Erie
BelleHutch- Garden
MG 4 MG 5 Scandia ville Assaria inson City
Avg.
ADVANCED GENETICS
AG 4233S R2Y
-AG4533N R2Y
-AG4733S R2Y
-AG4833N R2Y
-AG5133N R2Y
--
------
------
-100
107
94
122
------
----85
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
112
-----
97
93
104
---
------
104
96
105
94
103
ASGROW
AG3130
AG3231
AG3431
AG3432
AG3632
AG3730
AG3731
AG3832
AG3931
AG3932
AG4232
AG4531
AG4903
AG5503
AG5605
----------------
----------------
----------------
----------------
----------------
------------102
119
141
------------93
76
99
----------------
------------99
93
97
----------------
----------------
-105
107
119
-102
103
--107
------
97
114
104
118
--110
-106
-------
------104
79
94
123
135
125
----
----102
-92
104
102
95
------
----------------
97
110
105
118
102
102
102
92
100
108
135
125
98
107
112
FONTANELLE
76N12
78N71
79N62
86S40
88S72
912 EXP
-------
-108
94
----
-------
-------
-------
-------
-------
------69
--- 112
-- 103
------96
--96
-- 108
99
--- 105
92 106
-------
-------
--95
106
---
-------
99
107
97
91
104
106
G2 GENETICS
6369
6373
7332
7342
7362
7372
7373
7375
7382
7384
7390
7402
7408
7415SE
7420
7439S
7442
7460
7472
101
102
84
109
92
100
-90
-103
115
---103
-----
---107
111
110
--96
-108
104
97
-86
-87
75
--
----116
97
-98
100
-107
89
--92
87
94
112
--
--------102
-100
104
--102
-100
98
--
--------------------
--------------------
--------------------
--------------------
--------------------
-----98
-97
98
-105
108
-97
119
-126
138
133
-108
---99
--97
-112
112
-101
98
-106
96
--
--------------------
101
105
88
106
107
101
106
97
97
103
107
103
97
99
98
87
103
104
133
- 20 -
--------------------
--------------------
---104
-101
106
95
93
-103
---95
-----
--92
104
-103
-107
95
-104
---87
-----
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 21 continued. Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from Roundup-Resistant Soybean Tests
Topeka Topeka
BRAND/NAME Emmett dryland irrigated Ottawa
KANSAS AES
K04-3083RR
K08-2509 RR
K08-2528 RR
KS5507NRR
Parsons
MG4 MG 5
Pittsburg
DMG 5
McCune
MG 4 MG 5
-----
-----
-----
-95
94
--
-----
81
--134
131
--124
MIDLAND
3411NR2
3610NRR
3612NR2
3732NR2
3740NR2
3822NR2
3842NRR
3850NR2
3920NRS
3952NR2
3981NR2
4032NR2
4162NR2
4270NR2
4289NRS
4329NRR
4506NRR
4580RS2
4768NRR
4792RS2
5182NR2
--99
101
93
110
105
101
-99
--104
107
-96
------
--111
90
109
69
102
110
-96
--109
108
-94
-90
----
--103
90
-95
105
109
-94
--101
--106
------
---90
92
106
105
--82
--88
100
-91
100
90
120
97
--
-------76
-------89
112
111
----
------------------60
102
98
-----------------103
140
109
94
------------------------------108
---109
--99
-63
-- 104
MORSOY
R2 46X71N
R2 47X31N
R2 51X10N
R2 51X31N
R2S 48X10
------
------
------
104
89
105
104
102
------
-101
121
117
92
------
96
--98
-84
-- 110
-- 113
------
------
NK
S31-L7 Brand
S34-N3 Brand
S36-B6 Brand
S38-H8 Brand
S39-A3 Brand
S39-U2 Brand
S44-K7 Brand
S46-A1RR2 Bran
S52-F2 Brand
S54-V4 Brand
-----------
-----------
-----------
-----------
-----------
-------72
142
105
--------78
--
-----------
--------100
--
-----------
-----------
82
-101
-109
102
-95
90
--87
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
NUTECH
7359
7388
7425S
- 21 -
-----
118
--105
Erie
BelleHutch- Garden
MG 4 MG 5 Scandia ville Assaria inson City
-----
101
--- 104
-- 104
101
--
--------------------------91
-----81
-108
--98
-- 104
---
Avg.
-----
-----
-----
-----
108
99
99
121
105
87
103
114
89
103
102
89
98
-------------
109
101
112
102
92
102
113
96
101
109
--95
---------
58
91
84
82
124
87
97
69
89
---90
121
--------
-----90
99
98
-98
100
93
93
-107
107
94
101
-102
94
-----80
120
94
-95
100
108
100
-84
111
121
123
-94
--
91
93
102
96
100
93
105
93
95
96
100
101
97
105
96
100
102
104
104
96
98
------
------
------
------
------
100
96
103
110
102
-- 100
-94
118 100
94
93
100 104
111
-86
--------
-----------
----103
-92
----
-----------
100
94
109
94
103
111
89
72
107
105
-99
105
-97
99
----
89
100
97
92
---
94
---
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 21 continued. Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from Roundup-Resistant Soybean Tests
Topeka Topeka
BRAND/NAME Emmett dryland irrigated Ottawa
OHLDE
Exp 362R
Exp 421
EXP371
EXP382
EXP432
O-332
O-3721
O-391
O-3921
O-422
O-451
O-4595
O-4880
X412
Parsons
MG4 MG 5
Pittsburg
DMG 5
McCune
MG 4 MG 5
Erie
BelleHutch- Garden
MG 4 MG 5 Scandia ville Assaria inson City
Avg.
97
103
95
107
106
-105
96
105
104
-----
------101
119
-----117
--------120
114
101
----
----------107
93
94
--
---------------
---------------
---------------
---------------
---------------
---------------
---------------
111 109
--90
91
99
98
--103 101
-92
-97
110 107
---------95
----140
-124
56
-136
---82
86
98
92
-102
--89
100
97
99
----
---88
----117
-93
----
101
100
92
98
116
102
105
92
110
113
100
93
94
98
PHILLIPS
320 NR2Y
385NRS
386 NR2Y
387NR2Y
416 NR2Y
417 NRSE
439 NRS
454NR2YS
486NRS
----------
94
95
103
90
93
-90
---
-82
127
-105
-87
---
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
-- 107
91
-90
-102
--94
-95
-------
93
--108
-97
-125
--
---111
-104
-103
103
-98
89
88
107
-----
98
92
102
100
100
99
88
114
103
PIONEER
93Y70
93Y92
93Y93
94Y40
-----
-----
119
110
93
105
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
101
105
98
92
-----
-----
120
113
110
102
-----
113
109
100
97
PROGENY
3911 RY
4211 RY
4510
4611 RY
4710 RY
4811 RY
4908RR
4911RY
5111RY
----------
112
110
108
114
102
104
92
110
110
94
90
101
95
96
96
103
88
118
96
107
96
101
109
103
128
100
113
99
104
94
116
------
----100
95
119
75
108
----------
108
104
110
97
------
----101
96
115
109
110
114
-96
-104
-97
--- 104
-99
-- 101
-89
-- 100
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
104
102
102
103
102
99
110
95
110
TAYLOR
382-2R
397RR
461-2R
487RRS
EXP 38D33
EXP 39D10
EXP 39T30
EXP 42T20
EXP 44T40
EXP 48T00
----104
85
98
----
-----104
95
-99
--
-98
---106
78
97
---
--101
107
-----95
-----------
---------90
-----------
-----------
---------109
------105
----------90
--- 102
---110
---- 100
--
86
----85
99
----
-----53
83
----
-----85
98
----
-----95
99
----
86
98
103
107
104
88
94
97
104
98
- 22 -
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 21 continued. Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from Roundup-Resistant Soybean Tests
Topeka Topeka
BRAND/NAME Emmett dryland irrigated Ottawa
WILLCROSS
2350NS
2381N
RY2321N
RY2342N
RY2362N
RY2383N
RY2393N
WX RR2397
WX RR2398
WX RR2409
WX RR2440
WX RR2477
WX RR2498
WX RR2507
WX RR2544
WX RR2878
WX RY2432
WX RY2460
WX RY2481
WX RY2482
91
104
99
101
106
107
104
--------------
-------75
96
--90
---87
--105
106
--------88
108
110
95
---98
95
107
91
105
-------96
-89
91
106
---91
100
106
105
118
Parsons
MG4 MG 5
---------------------
-----------88
73
69
117
99
--90
73
Pittsburg
DMG 5
-----------88
88
90
108
106
--79
96
- 23 -
McCune
MG 4 MG 5
---------------------
-----------103
95
84
101
96
--94
84
Erie
BelleHutch- Garden
MG 4 MG 5 Scandia ville Assaria inson City
---------------------
---------------------
89
98
102 107
102
86
100 102
101 109
95
96
99
80
---------------------------
---------------------
---------------------
---------------------
Avg.
93
104
96
101
105
99
95
85
92
98
101
95
85
81
109
96
97
106
94
97
"
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 22. Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2011 Conventional Soybean Tests
BRAND/NAME
Ottawa
Parsons MG 5
Scandia
AVG
ADVANCED GENETIC
AG4168N LL
AG4989N LL
AG5163N LL
96
108
108
-92
88
92
---
94
100
98
ILLINOIS AES
LD00-2817P
LD00-3309
101
65
---
106
85
103
75
98
86
---
96
105
97
96
KANSAS AES
K05-4624
K05-4626
K07-1253
K07-1544
K07-1633
KS4607
KS5004N
KS5502N
115
-78
81
80
95
101
--
-91
----127
126
92
-111
104
101
108
---
104
91
95
92
91
101
114
126
MORSOY
LL 4880N
LL 5120N
107
115
56
83
---
81
99
PROGENY
4910
4928LL
5191
114
102
133
62
106
93
----
88
104
113
VIRGINIA AES
HUTCHESON
--
116
--
116
WILLCROSS
1137N
--
--
104
104
IOWA AES
IA4004
IA4005
- 24 -
"
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 23. Description of Roundup-Resistant Entries in 2011 Soybean Performance Tests
BRAND
NAME
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
FONTANELLE
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
AG 4233S R2Y
AG4533N R2Y
AG4733S R2Y
AG4833N R2Y
AG5133N R2Y
AG2931
AG3039
AG3130
AG3231
AG3431
AG3432
AG3632
AG3730
AG3731
AG3832
AG3931
AG3932
AG4232
AG4531
AG4903
AG5503
AG5605
76N12
78N71
79N62
86S40
88S72
912 EXP
6369
6373
7332
7342
7362
7372
7373
7375
7382
7384
7390
7402
7408
7415SE
7420
7439S
7442
7460
7472
K04-3083RR
K08-2509 RR
K08-2528 RR
KS5507NRR
3411NR2
3610NRR
3612NR2
3732NR2
3740NR2
3822NR2
3842NRR
3850NR2
3920NRS
3952NR2
3981NR2
Maturity Flower Hilum
group color color
4.2
4.5
4.7
4.8
5.1
2.9
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.4
3.4
3.6
3.7
3.7
3.8
3.9
3.9
4.2
4.5
4.9
5.5
5.6
3.6
-3.9
4.6
4.8
5.2
3.6
3.7
3.3
3.4
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.7
3.8
3.8
3.9
4.0
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.6
4.7
4.8
3.0
3.0
5.2
--3.0
3.0
-3.0
3.0
--3.0
--
P
W
P
P
-P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
--P
------P
W
P
P
W
W
P
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
P
W
W
P
---P
------------
BL
BL
Bl
BL
-IB
IB
IB
IB
IB
IB
IB
IB
IB
IB
IB
IB
BL
IB
--IB
------Bl
Bl
BL
BR
BL
BL
Bl
BL
BL
BL
Bl
BL
BL
BR
Bl
Bl
BL
Bl
BL
---IB
------------
- 25 -
SCN Resistance
Phytophthora
R1 R3 R4 R14
Source
RR
Tolerance
STS
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- R -- --- R -- --- MR -- --- R -- --- R -- --- MR -- --- R -- --- R -- --- R -- --- R -- --- R -- --- R -- --- R -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- MR -- MR
-- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
R R R --- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R R --- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- R R --- R R --- R -- R
-- R R --- R -- R
-- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- -R R R R
-- -- -- --- -- -- --- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- -- -- --- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- -- -- --- -- -- --- R -- MR
-- -- -- --
PI88788
PI88788
---PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
--PI88788
--------PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
---PI437654
--PI88788
PI88788
-PI88788
PI88788
--PI88788
--
-Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1c
-Rps1c
Rps1k,7
Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1c
S
Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1c
S
Rps1k
Rps1a
Rps1c
--S
------Rps1k
Rps1k
-Rps1a
--Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
------------------
4.0
2.5
4.0
2.8
-6.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
7.0
5.0
5.0
6.0
4.0
6.0
5.0
5.0
7.0
--5.0
--------3.0
5.0
5.0
4.0
5.0
4.0
5.0
5.0
-5.0
5.0
6.0
--6.0
-5.0
------2.0
3.0
-2.0
2.0
--2.0
--
--STS
------------------STS
-----------------------------------------
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 23 continued. Description of Roundup-Resistant Entries in 2011 Soybean Performance Tests
BRAND
NAME
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
Nk
Nk
Nk
Nk
Nk
Nk
Nk
Nk
Nk
Nk
NUTECH
NUTECH
NUTECH
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
4032NR2
4162NR2
4270NR2
4289NRS
4329NRR
4506NRR
4580RS2
4768NRR
4792RS2
5182NR2
R2 46X71N
R2 47X31N
R2 51X10N
R2 51X31N
R2S 48X10
S31-L7 Brand
S34-N3 Brand
S36-B6 Brand
S38-H8 Brand
S39-A3 Brand
S39-U2 Brand
S44-K7 Brand
S46-A1 RR2 Brand
S52-F2 Brand
S54-V4 Brand
7359
7388
7425S
Exp 362R
Exp 421
EXP371
EXP382
EXP432
O-332
O-3721
O-391
O-3921
O-422
O-451
O-4595
O-4880
X412
320 NR2Y
385NRS
386 NR2Y
387NR2Y
416 NR2Y
417 NRSE
439 NRS
454NR2YS
486NRS
93Y70
93Y92
93Y93
94Y40
3911 RY
4211 RY
4510
4611 RY
4710 RY
4811 RY
4908RR
Maturity Flower Hilum
group color color
4.0
4.0
-4.2
4.3
4.5
-4.7
4.0
5.0
4.6
4.7
5.1
5.1
4.8
3.1
3.4
-3.8
3.9
3.9
4.4
4.6
5.2
5.4
3.5
3.8
4.2
-----------4.5
---3.8
---4.1
--4.8
----3.9
4.2
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
----------P
P
P
W
P
P
--W
W
-P
W
P
P
--------------P
---W
---W
--P
----P
P
P
P
P
P
W
----------BL
BL
Ib
BF
Bl
IB
--BL
Bl
-BL
BL
Bl
BF
--------------Br
---Bf
---B
--B
----IB
IB
BL
BL
BU
BL
Bl
- 26 -
SCN Resistance
Phytophthora
R1 R3 R4 R14
Source
RR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- -- -- --- R -- MR
-- -- -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- -- -- --- R -- --- -- -- --- MR -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- --- -- -- --- R -- MR
-- -- -- --- -- -- --- R -- MR
-- R -- R
-- -- -- --- R -- MR
-- -- -- --- R -- --- R -- R
-- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- -S R S MR
-- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- -R -- -- MR
-- -- -- --- -- -- --- MR -- MS
-- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- R -- --- R -- MR
-- -- -- --- R -- MR
-- -- MR --- R -- MR
S S S S
PI88788
PI88788
-PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
-PI88788
-PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
-PI88788
--PI88788
Pi88788
-PI88788
S
PI88788
Rps1k
--------------PI88788
-----------------------
-------Rps1c
--Rps1c
Rps1c
-Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1a
Rps1c
-Rps1c
S
-Rps1c
---------------------Rcl.7
------Rps1a
----Rps1c
--Rps1c
Rps1k
Rps1c
--
Tolerance
STS
2.0
2.0
-2.0
2.2
4.0
-4.0
2.0
2.0
3.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
4.0
5.0
-5.0
3.0
5.0
6.0
-4.0
5.0
--------------2.0
---1.7
---1.6
--1.8
------------
---STS
-STS
--STS
------------STS
-----------------------------------------
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 23 continued. Description of Roundup-Resistant Entries in 2011 Soybean Performance Tests
BRAND
NAME
PROGENY
PROGENY
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
TAYLOR
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
4911RY
5111RY
332-2R
382-2R
397RR
461-2R
487RRS
EXP 38D33
EXP 39D10
EXP 39T30
EXP 42T20
EXP 44T40
EXP 48T00
2350NS
2381N
RY2321N
RY2342N
RY2362N
RY2383N
RY2393N
WX RR2397
WX RR2398
WX RR2409
WX RR2440
WX RR2477
WX RR2498
WX RR2507
WX RR2544
WX RR2878
WX RY2432
WX RY2460
WX RY2481
WX RY2482
Maturity Flower Hilum
group color color
4.9
5.1
---4.5
4.8
------3.5
3.8
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
3.9
3.9
--4.4
4.7
4.9
5.0
5.4
--4.6
4.7
--
P
W
------------W
-----P
--P
M
P
P
W
--P
P
--
BL
BF
------------Bl
-----Bl
--Bl
Bl
IB
IB
Bf
--Bl
Bl
--
- 27 -
SCN Resistance
Phytophthora
R1 R3 R4 R14
Source
RR
-- -- -- --- R -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- MR -- MR
-- MR -- MR
-- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- R -- MR
-- -- -- --- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- R
-- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --
-----PI88788
PI88788
--------------------PI88788
------
-Rps1c
---Rps1a
Rps1a
-------Rps1k
Rps1c
----Rps1c
---------Rps1c
Rps1c
--
Tolerance
STS
-----3.0
2.0
-------1.7
------------4.0
--2.2
1.7
--
------STS
----------------STS
STS
STS
STS
STS
------
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 24. Description of Conventional Entries in 2011 Soybean Performance Tests
BRAND
NAME
Maturity Flower Hilum
group color color
SCN Resistance
R1 R3 R4 R14
Source
Phytophthora
RR
Tolerance
STS
ADVANCED GENETICS AG4168N LL
4.2
P
BL
-- R -- R
PI88788
Rps1c
3.0
-ADVANCED GENETICS AG4989N LL
5.0
P
Bf
-- MR -- --Rps1k
2.5
-ADVANCED GENETICS AG5163N LL
5.1
W
BL
-- R -- --Rps1k
2.8
-ILLINOIS AES
LD00-2817P
4.1
P
Ib
-- R -- -788/654
---ILLINOIS AES
LD00-3309
3.9
P
Bl
-- R -- -PI88788
---IOWA AES
IA4004
4.0
P
Ib
S S S S
-R
--IOWA AES
IA4005
4.0
---- -- -- -----KANSAS AES
K05-4624
4.5
---- -- -- -----KANSAS AES
K05-4626
4.8
---- -- -- -----KANSAS AES
K07-1253
4.2
---- -- -- -----KANSAS AES
K07-1544
3.8
---- -- -- -----KANSAS AES
K07-1633
4.2
---- -- -- -----KANSAS AES
KS4607
4.6
P
Bl
S S S S
-S
--KANSAS AES
KS5004N
5.0
W
IB
R R -- -PEKING
---KANSAS AES
KS5502N
5.2
P
IB
R R R R
PI437654
S
--MORSOY
LL 4880N
4.8
P
Bl
-- R -- MR PI88788
Rps1k
3.0
-MORSOY
LL 5120N
5.1
Wl
Bl
-- R -- MR PI88788
Rps1k
3.0
-PROGENY
4910
4.9
M
BL
-- R -- MR
----PROGENY
4928LL
4.9
P
BL
-- R -- MR
-Rps1c
--PROGENY
5191
5.1
W
BL
MR MR -- MR
----VIRGINIA AES
HUTCHESON
5.2
W
Bf
S S S S
-S
--WILLCROSS
1137N
3.7
---- -- -- --Rps1k
1.5
-Flower color: P=purple, W=white, M=mixed
Hilum color: BL=black, IB=imperfect black, BR=brown, BF=buff, G=grey, Y=yellow, M=mixed
SCN Resistance: R1, R3, R4, and R14 = Race 1, 3, 4, and 14, respectively, S=susceptible, R=resistant, MR=moderately resistant
Phytophthora Root Rot: RR=race resistance (major genes), H=heterogeneous; Tolerance=field tolerance score, 1=excellent to 9=poor
STS=sulfonylurea herbicide tolerant
Shattering score: 1=no shattering, 2=1 to 10% shattered, 3=11 to 25% shattered two weeks after maturity
All information supplied by entrant.
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
To access crop performance testing information electronically, visit our website. The information contained in this publication, plus
more, is available for viewing or downloading at:
www.agronomy.ksu.edu/kscpt
Excerpts from the
University Research Policy Agreement with Cooperating Seed Companies
Permission is hereby given to Kansas State University (KSU) to test varieties and/or hybrids designated on the attached entry forms
in the manner indicated in the test announcements. I certify that seed submitted for testing is a true sample of the seed being offered
for sale.
I understand that all results from Kansas Crop Performance Tests belong to the University and the public and shall be controlled by
the University so as to produce the greatest benefit to the public. Performance data may be used in the following ways: 1) Tables may
be reproduced in their entirety provided the source is referenced and data are not manipulated or reinterpreted; 2) Advertising statements by an individual company about the performance of its entries may be made as long as they are accurate statements about the
data as published, with no reference to other companies’ names or cultivars. In both cases, the following must be included with the
reprint or ad citing the appropriate publication number and title: “See the official Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment
Station and Cooperative Extension Service Report of Progress 1058, ‘2011 Kansas Performance Tests with Soybean Varieties,’ or the
Kansas Crop Performance Test website, www.agronomy.ksu.edu/kscpt, for details. Endorsement or recommendation by Kansas State
University is not implied.”
Contributors
Main Station, Manhattan
William T. Schapaugh, Jr., Professor (Senior Author)
Jane Lingenfelser, Assistant Agronomist
Nathan Keep, Research Assistant
Hatice Aslan, Research Assistant
Research Centers
Patrick Evans, Colby
Kelly Kusel, Parsons
Monty Spangler, Garden City
Dean Stites, Crawford County Extension
Experiment Fields
Eric Adee, Topeka
William Heer, Hutchinson
James Kimball, Ottawa
Randall Nelson, Belleville and Scandia
Cooperators
Vernon Egbert, McCune
Lance Rezac, Onaga
Dale Roberds, Pittsburg
Clayton Short, Assaria
Copyright 2011 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. Contents of this publicaiton may be freely reproduced for educational purposes. All other rights reserved. In each case, give credit to the author(s), 2011
Kansas Performance Tests with Soybean Varieties, Kansas State University, December 2011. Contribution no. 12-214-S from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.
Brand names appearing in this publication are for product identification purposes only. No endorsement is intended, nor is criticism
implied of similar products not mentioned.
Publications from Kansas State University are available at:
www.ksre.ksu.edu
Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
SRP 1058
K-State Research and Extension is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
December 2011
3,800