2012 Kansas Performance Tests with
Soybean Varieties
standard dryland
irrigated
double-cropped
conventional
Report of Progress 1076
Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
Test Objectives and Procedures........................................................................................................1
Data Interpretation............................................................................................................................1
Variety or Brand Selection ...............................................................................................................1
Summary of Entrants and Originators, Table 1................................................................................2
PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS
Emmett, Pottawatomie County (dryland), Table 2...........................................................................3
Topeka, Shawnee County (dryland), Table 3...................................................................................4
Topeka, Shawnee County (irrigated), Table 4..................................................................................5
Ottawa, Franklin County (dryland), Table 5 ....................................................................................6
Parsons, Labette County, Maturity Groups III-IV (dryland), Table 6..............................................7
Parsons, Labette County, Maturity Groups IV-V (dryland), Table 7...............................................7
Pittsburg, No-Till, Double-Cropped Maturity Groups IV-V (dryland), Table 8 .............................8
McCune, Crawford County, Maturity Groups III-IV (irrigated), Table 9 ...................................... 9
McCune, Crawford County, Maturity Groups IV-V (irrigated), Table 10 ......................................9
Erie, Neosho County, Maturity Groups III-IV (dryland), Table 11 ................................................10
Erie, Neosho County, Maturity Groups IV-V (dryland), Table 12 .................................................11
Scandia, Republic County (irrigated), Table 13 ..............................................................................11
Belleville, Republic County (dryland), Table 14 ........................................................................... 13
Assaria, Saline County (dryland), Table 15 ................................................................................... 14
Hutchinson, Reno County (irrigated), Table 16 ............................................................................ 15
Colby, Thomas County (irrigated), Table 17 .................................................................................16
Garden City, Finney County (irrigated), Table 18 .........................................................................17
Ottawa, Franklin County (conventional/dryland), Table 19 ..........................................................18
Scandia, Republic County (conventional/irrigated), Table 20 ...................................................... 18
Parsons, Labette County (conventional/dryland), Table 21 ...........................................................19
YIELD SUMMARY
Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2012 Roundup-Resistant Soybean Tests, Table 22....20
Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2012 Conventional Soybean Tests, Table 23.............23
APPENDIX
Descriptions of Roundup-Resistant Entries, Table 24 .....................................................................24
Description of Conventional Entries, Table 25.................................................................................26
Electronic Access, University Research Policy, and Duplication Policy ...........................back cover
Contribution no. 13-101-S from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.
-i-
2012 KANSAS SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS
Lodging is rated at maturity by the following scores:
TEST OBJECTIVES AND PROCEDURES
1. Almost all plants erect
2. All plants slightly leaning or a few plants down
3. All plants leaning moderately (45%) or 25 to 50% of
plants down
4. All plants leaning considerably or 50 to 80% plants
down
5. Almost all plants down
Soybean performance tests are conducted each year to
provide information on the relative performance of new
and established varieties and brands at several locations in
Kansas.
Seeds for tests are from private seed companies, certified
growers, and agricultural experiment stations (Table 1).
Seed quality, including factors such as purity and
germination, can be important in determining the
performance of a variety. Soybean seed used for private
and public entries in the Kansas Crop Performance Tests
is prepared professionally and usually meets or exceeds
Kansas Crop Improvement Certification standards.
Relative performance of a given variety comparable to
that obtained in these tests is best assured under similar
environmental conditions and cultural practices and with
the use of certified or professionally prepared seed. All
companies known to be developing and marketing
soybean varieties or brands are invited to submit test seed;
interested companies enter on a voluntary, fee-entry basis.
Height is the average length from the soil surface to the
top of the main stem of mature plants.
VARIETY OR BRAND SELECTION
Performance of soybean varieties or brands varies from
year to year and from location to location, depending on
factors such as weather, management practices, and
variety adaptation. When selecting varieties or brands,
producers should carefully analyze variety performance
for two or more years across locations. Performance
averaged over several environments will provide a better
estimate of genetic potential and stability than
performance based on only a few environments.
Companies were invited to enter Roundup-resistant
varieties in either the Roundup trials or the
conventional trials at Scandia, Ottawa, or Parsons.
Small differences in yield between any two varieties or
brands usually are not important. Within maturity groups
at each location, an LSD (least significant difference) was
calculated. The significance level used to calculate the
LSD was 10%. Unless two varieties differ in yield by
more than the LSD, genetic yield potential of one entry
cannot be considered superior to that of another.
Entries were planted in four-row plots with rows 30
inches apart and were replicated three or four times each.
Seeding rate ranged from 7 to 12 seeds per foot of row.
The center two rows of each plot were harvested for yield.
Harvested row lengths ranged from 11 to 33 feet,
depending on location. Cultural practices and rainfall for
each test location are presented with each table. Results
from this year's tests are presented in Tables 2 through 21.
Relative yields of each entry from all locations are shown
in Tables 22 and 23. Test results also can be found online
at: http://www.ksu.edu/kscpt
The coefficient of variability (CV) represents an estimate
of the precision in the replicated yield trials. A CV of less
than 10% indicates a good test with a high level of
reliability. CVs ranging from 10 to 15% are usually
acceptable for performance comparisons. CVs greater
than 15% generally lack sufficient precision to provide
any more than a rough guide to cultivar performance. For
tests in which the precision was insufficient to statistically
compare performance among the entries, the LSD value
has been replaced with the designation NS, indicating that
seed yields were not significantly different.
DATA INTERPRETATION
Yields are recorded as bushels per acre (60 lb/bushel)
adjusted to 13% moisture content when moisture data are
available. Seed yield also is expressed as a percentage of
the test average to assist in identifying entries that
consistently produce better than the average yield.
Maturity is the date on which 95% of the pods have
ripened (browned). Delayed leaf drop and green stems
are not considered when assigning maturity. About 1
week of good drying weather after maturing is needed
before soybeans are ready to harvest.
-1-
Table 1. Entrants in the 2012 Kansas Soybean Performance Tests
Illinois Ag. Exp. Stn. (AES)
and USDA-ARS
Champaign-Urbana, Il
217-265-4062
aces.uiuc.edu
G2 Genetics, NuTech
NuTech Seed, LLC
Forest City, IA
641-581-3350
yieldleader.com
NK Brand
Garst Brand Seed
Minnetonka, MN
800-445-0956
garstseed.com
Iowa State University
Ames, IA
515-292-3497
Kruger Seeds
Dike, IA
800-772-2721
krugerseed.com
Ohlde
Ohlde Seed Farms, Inc.
Palmer, KS
785-692-4555
Kansas Ag. Exp. Stn. (AES)
Manhattan, KS
785-532-7243
LG Seeds
Elmwood, IL
309-742-3302
lgseeds.com
Phillips
Phillips Seed Farms, Inc.
Hope, KS
785-949-2204
phillipsseed.com
Advanced Genetics
Delange Seed Company
Girard, KS
620-724-6223
delangeseed.com
Midland
Midland Genetics Group
Ottawa, KS
785-242-3598
midlandgenetics.com
Pioneer
Pioneer Hi-Bred, Intl., Inc.
Lincoln, NE
800-258-5604
pioneer.com
Asgrow
Monsanto
St. Louis, MO
800-768-6387
asgrowanddekalb.com
Morsoy
MFA Incorporated
Columbia, MO
573-876-5363
morsoy.com
Willcross
NeCo Seed Farms, Inc.
Garden City, MO
816-862-8203
willcross.com
Bayer CropScience
Dewitt, AR
870-351-0390
bayer.com
-2-
Lance Rezac Farm, Emmett, Pottawatomie County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist
Wabash silty clay, pH na, na% OM; P test: na, K test: na
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
April
Rainfall:
2.1
May June
0.4
3.7
July Aug. Sept. Total
0.8
2.5
2.6
12.0
Dry and hot conditions, but stand establishment was excellent and
vegetative development was good. Drought and heat stress were severe during
reproductive development, but plants responded favorably to rainfall the
third week of August and yields were fairly good.
Planted 5/8/2012 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 10/16/2012; 11 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Valor XLT preemergence, glyphosate
Table 2. Emmett, Pottawatomie County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012.
Table 2. Emmett, Pottawatomie County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012
BRAND
NAME
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
7323
7334
7342
7362
7373
7382
7390
7393
C3890R2
C3989R2
3612NR2
3633NR2
3822NRS2
3842NRR
3850NR2
3983NR2
4153NR2
4263NRS2
4270NR2
4373NR2
O-342
O-362
O-363
O-373
O-379
O-382
O-383
O-3921
O-421
376 NR2YS
388 NR2Y
392 NR2YS
Ex373 NR2Y
Ex389 NR2Y
94Y01
RY2343N
RY2363N
RY2373N
RY2393N
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
32.4
----93
31.7
----91
36.8
53.5
-45.2
-106
31.7
45.4
-38.6
-91
34.9
----100
34.4
----99
34.6
56.4
43.9
45.5
45.0
99
34.2
----98
36.1
----104
----109
37.8
48.7
-43.1
-108
37.5
---33.1
-95
53.9
---109
38.1
32.8
51.5
-42.2
-94
43.3 101
35.2
49.5
-42.4
45.2
----106
36.9
31.8
-45.2
--91
34.3
----99
35.4
52.7
44.7
44.1
44.3 102
----107
37.4
31.5
----91
37.3
47.6
26.9
--77
34.2
----98
35.8
----103
34.2
----98
33.4
--96
52.4
42.9
32.2
----93
35.0
51.7
38.8
43.4
41.8 101
36.6
--105
43.5
50.4
----109
37.8
32.6
----94
----108
37.6
----109
37.8
35.3
----101
35.2
----101
36.2
----104
----112
39.0
----109
38.0
32.3
51.2
-41.8
-93
34.8
49.1
44.0
5.0
7.9
7.1
2.1
4.5
3.7
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-3-
--109
92
--115
---99
------100
-----
-105
101
---107
--------105
----------104
----103
-102
--------88
------------
Mat.
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
9/23
9/18
9/25
9/22
9/24
9/24
9/26
9/23
9/25
9/20
9/21
9/23
9/24
9/20
9/23
9/22
9/28
9/29
9/26
9/29
9/19
9/19
9/23
9/19
9/20
9/25
9/25
9/23
9/25
9/25
9/24
9/27
9/24
9/20
9/25
9/24
9/28
9/24
9/24
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
32
30
29
30
33
32
28
31
33
31
30
32
33
31
30
30
25
34
29
27
32
31
29
32
31
33
32
30
32
35
31
33
32
32
33
33
28
32
27
J.D. Hanna, Erma Harden Farm, Topeka, Shawnee County; Eric Adee, agronomist
Wabash silty clay loam, pH na, na% OM; P test: na, K test: na
na
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
Rainfall:
2.1
1.5
3.0
1.0
4.3
1.7
Very hot and dry.
13.6
Planted 5/17/2012 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 10/19/2012; 27.5 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: glyphosate 22 oz + Outlook 12 oz + AMS
25th
Table 3. Topeka, Shawnee County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012.
Table 3. Topeka, Shawnee County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012
BRAND
NAME
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
1421
7362
7373
7382
7390
7393
7420
3612NR2
3633NR2
3850NR2
3983NR2
4153NR2
4263NRS2
4270NR2
4373NR2
4443NRS2
4580RS2
4593NRS2
O-383
O-3921
O-393
O-421
O-432
388 NR2Y
392 NR2YS
411 NR2Y
421 NR2Y
433 NR2YS
Ex389 NR2Y
93Y70
93Y92
94Y01
RY2373N
RY2393N
RY2443N
RY2460N
RY2482NS
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
----112
41.5
35.5
71.1
-53.3
-96
----101
37.6
34.6
61.5
-48.1
-93
31.3
69.2
38.2
50.3
46.2
84
34.6
----93
55.2
45.6
48.1
47.2 110
40.9
35.0
70.8
-52.9
-94
----107
39.6
33.1
70.7
41.8
51.9
48.5
89
----102
37.7
----105
38.8
----104
38.5
69.0
-53.2
48.3 101
37.4
38.4
-36.6
---99
----108
40.0
36.6
57.4
-47.0
-99
----104
38.6
----105
39.0
34.4
----93
36.7
----99
36.7
----99
36.8
----99
----100
37.2
----108
40.0
----105
38.8
----102
38.0
34.5
----93
----102
38.0
----104
38.6
33.0
----89
36.0
----97
----107
39.7
33.6
----91
----106
39.3
33.6
----91
--111
67.9
41.2
54.6
64.0
37.1
37.1
8.8
12.7
8.7
4.5
11.0
4.4
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-4-
-111
-96
108
-86
111
-110
---108
--
----103
-123
--113
----104
90
---------------------
----------------------
Mat.
10/6
10/4
10/4
10/1
10/5
10/2
10/3
10/2
9/30
10/5
10/3
10/5
10/5
10/5
10/5
10/4
10/1
10/4
10/5
10/6
10/2
9/29
10/4
10/6
10/4
10/5
10/4
10/5
10/2
10/5
10/3
10/5
10/4
10/2
10/5
10/1
10/4
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
24
26
28
29
20
26
28
24
24
22
30
20
29
20
22
27
25
29
24
23
25
24
23
26
26
27
23
25
26
28
26
26
25
25
25
24
30
Kansas River Valley Experiment Field, Topeka, Shawnee County; Eric Adee, agronomist
Eudora Silt loam, pH 6.41, 1.84% OM; P test: M, K test: VH
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
Rainfall:
2.1
1.5
3.0
1.0
4.3
1.7 13.6
Irrigation:
1.8
6.0
5.0
12.75
Very hot and dry.
Planted 5/9/2012 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 10/3/2012; 27.5 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Authority XL 5 oz + glyphosate 22 oz preemergence;
glyphosate 22 oz + Warrant 1.5 qt postemergence
Table 4. Topeka, Shawnee County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012.
Table 4. Topeka, Shawnee County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012
BRAND
NAME
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
HBK R4924
HBK RY4620
HBK RY4721
HBK RY5221
HBK RY5421
HBK RY5521
1421
7362
7373
7382
7390
7393
7420
3633NR2
3842NRR
3850NR2
3983NR2
4153NR2
4263NRS2
4373NR2
4443NRS2
O-383
O-3921
O-393
O-432
388 NR2Y
392 NR2YS
411 NR2Y
421 NR2Y
433 NR2YS
Ex389 NR2Y
93Y70
93Y92
94Y01
RY2373N
RY2393N
RY2443N
RY2460N
RY2482NS
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
----111
60.5
----104
56.6
47.5
----87
51.9
----95
----126
68.3
44.3
----81
----109
59.1
49.4
66.6
-58.0
-91
-48.4
--116
63.2
51.8
57.1
-54.5
-95
61.5
54.7
63.8
60.7 121
66.0
----109
59.1
52.7
48.4
59.6
55.9 122
66.5
----111
60.3
40.9
60.0
-50.5
-75
49.3
62.3
50.6
55.8
54.1
91
----107
58.3
50.1
----92
48.6
-50.8
--89
52.6
----97
37.7
----69
41.4
----76
69.0
53.9
68.5
63.6 125
68.0
53.2
----98
----125
68.0
----108
58.5
46.4
----85
----130
70.9
42.1
----77
38.6
----71
----119
65.0
68.2
-65.4
-115
62.6
54.9
62.9
-58.9
-101
50.2
----92
49.2
----90
----114
62.0
----106
57.6
54.2
55.2
61.3
52.3
49.0
90
43.2
--79
51.6
60.0
54.4
57.3
49.7
21.7
12.4
14.0
16.0
9.6
9.5
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-5-
-------116
-100
107
-92
-105
109
------120
--------119
110
-------
--------97
-110
-97
--102
--102
---108
-----------------
Mat.
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
9/27
9/24
9/26
9/30
10/5
10/4
9/25
9/18
9/21
9/19
9/22
9/19
9/24
9/18
9/22
9/20
9/24
9/23
9/21
9/24
9/25
9/18
9/18
9/21
9/28
9/17
9/22
9/21
9/25
9/20
9/19
9/19
9/20
9/23
9/17
9/21
9/24
9/25
9/23
3.0
2.3
3.0
3.3
3.7
2.7
2.3
2.3
3.3
3.3
3.0
2.3
3.0
3.3
3.0
2.3
2.3
2.0
1.7
3.3
2.3
1.3
3.3
2.3
2.3
1.3
2.3
3.0
3.0
2.0
3.7
2.7
1.7
3.0
3.3
3.0
1.3
2.7
3.0
55
56
57
56
42
44
52
46
50
49
49
50
54
49
48
50
50
45
50
50
45
50
46
49
49
51
49
48
49
45
47
52
46
48
46
49
50
45
50
East Central Kansas Experiment Field, Ottawa, Franklin County; Eric Adee, agronomist; James Kimball, technician
Woodson silt loam, pH na, na% OM; P test: na, K test: na
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
Rainfall:
0.7
1.6
0.5
1.2
0.6
5.2
Fairly good growing conditions early in the summer, but July and August were
extremely hot and dry.
9.8
Planted 5/15/2012 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 10/18/2012; 25 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Authority First preemergence, glyphosate
Table 5. Ottawa, Franklin County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012.
Table 5. Ottawa, Franklin County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012
BRAND
NAME
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
AG3833S R2Y
AG4233S R2Y
AG4533N R2Y
AG4700S R2Y
AG4733S R2Y
AG5133N R2Y
1421
7382
7390
7393
7420
7442
7460
3983NR2
4153NR2
4263NRS2
4270NR2
4373NR2
4443NRS2
4580RS2
4593NRS2
4703NR2
4792RS2
4813NRS2
R2 46X71N
R2 51X31N
R2 51X52N
R2S 47X12N
R2S 48X10
93Y70
93Y92
94Y01
RY2373N
RY2393N
RY2443N
RY2460N
RY2482NS
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
22.3
----95
----123
28.7
23.3
-24.9
-113
26.4
----113
26.5
25.1
60.6
27.5
38.5 127
29.8
24.9
28.5
-26.7
-106
----132
30.8
19.1
23.9
-21.5
-82
25.6
23.4
52.0
24.5
33.7 109
21.2
----91
19.5
23.9
55.0
21.7
32.8
83
19.3
23.5
-21.4
-82
21.1
22.9
53.3
22.0
32.4
90
17.7
----76
25.7
----110
21.8
----93
35.0 123
23.3
26.1
28.8
52.8
----122
28.5
----118
27.7
25.4
21.1
61.0
23.3
35.8 109
22.4
----96
17.4
----74
22.7
-24.7
-114
26.7
15.8
----68
21.1
24.4
-22.8
-90
24.3
-25.3
-112
26.3
21.3
----91
24.5
----105
23.8
59.3
25.6
36.8 117
27.3
21.6
----92
18.0
----77
21.7
----93
18.3
----78
20.1
---86
26.0
----111
38.6 132
60.2
27.8
30.8
24.8
27.6
15.2
--65
21.4
23.4
23.4
53.6
17.3
14.6
6.6
4.7
4.0
3.9
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-6-
--100
-107
122
-102
100
-102
100
98
---100
--90
--97
-104
104
--102
---------
----113
---97
-103
-99
----99
-114
--------111
---------
Mat.
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
10/2
10/5
10/5
10/9
10/9
10/14
10/13
9/28
10/10
10/3
10/5
10/8
10/15
10/2
10/9
10/9
10/10
10/10
10/13
10/11
10/10
10/9
10/12
10/10
10/12
10/12
10/13
10/13
10/10
10/4
10/2
10/4
9/26
9/25
10/6
10/8
10/11
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
26
25
26
24
25
29
25
28
24
26
29
27
30
27
22
28
24
25
26
24
27
29
26
30
27
29
29
30
25
27
27
27
25
25
26
25
28
Southeast Agricultural Research Center, Parsons, Labette County; Kelly Kusel, technician
Parsons Silt Loam, pH 6.1, 2.8% OM; P test: M, K test: H
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
Hot and dry through first half of season. Insect problems for much of
season. Unable to take maturities at Parsons because frost on Oct. 6, 7, 8
that killed top of plants but not the bottoms. No tests at Parsons
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
had shown any sign of maturity at this point. Freeze on Oct. 26, 27, 28
1.7
2.1
1.4
0.7
3.3
3.3 12.5
Rainfall:
finished plants for harvest. Yields were unexpectedly good.
Planted 6/6/2012 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 11/3/2012; 14 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 1.5 pt Boundary preemergence, 1 qt glyphosate
Table 6. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2010-2012.
Table 6. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2010-2012
BRAND
NAME
ASGROW
ASGROW
BAYER
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
PIONEER
PIONEER
AG4382
AG4533
HBK RY4620
7442
7460
4270NR2
4373NR2
4443NRS2
4580RS2
4593NRS2
93Y92
94Y01
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
----104
40.2
----108
41.9
38.3
----99
35.5
----92
----105
40.8
37.6
----97
38.5
-34.8
--99
37.5
----97
18.9
40.0
30.6
33.7 109
42.2
----104
40.1
37.3
----96
34.6
----89
38.7
17.0
34.4
5.6
16.6
9.2
2.6
3.4
3.7
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
--------111
----
------101
-116
----
Mat.
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
-------------
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
28
27
22
26
29
21
21
23
22
26
26
26
Southeast Agricultural Research Center, Parsons, Labette County; Kelly Kusel, technician
Parsons Silt Loam, pH 6.1, 2.8% OM; P test: M, K test: H
Hot and dry through first half of season. Insect problems for much of
season. Unable to take maturities at Parsons because frost on Oct. 6, 7, 8
killed top of plants but not the bottoms. No tests at Parsons
July Aug. Sept. Total
had shown any sign of maturity at this point. Freeze on Oct. 26, 27, 28
1.7
2.1
1.4
0.7
3.3
3.3 12.5
Rainfall:
finished plants for harvest. Yields were unexpectedly good.
Planted 6/6/2012 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 11/3/2012; 14 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 1.5 pt Boundary preemergence, 1 qt glyphosate
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
April May June
Table 7. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2010-2012.
Table 7. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2010-2012
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
CHANNEL
G2 GENETICS
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
AG4700S R2Y
AG4733S R2Y
AG5133N R2Y
AG4730
AG4831
AG4831
AG5233
AG5503
AG5533
AG5605
AG5632
AG5633
HBK R4924
HBK RY4721
HBK RY5221
HBK RY5421
HBK RY5521
5805R2
1491
K04-3083RR
KS5507NRR
4703NR2
4792RS2
38.0
42.9
35.4
38.4
40.5
40.6
39.3
40.4
42.6
43.3
41.3
41.1
40.6
42.1
39.4
39.9
44.2
42.7
38.8
38.4
40.2
41.2
43.2
--10.5
----14.7
-17.5
---------10.0
16.6
-12.6
-7-
---------37.8
---------35.9
33.8
---
--23.0
----27.6
-30.4
---------24.2
28.4
-27.9
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
---------32.9
---------28.1
30.2
---
95
108
89
96
102
102
99
101
107
109
104
103
102
106
99
100
111
107
97
96
101
103
108
--85
----119
-141
---------81
134
-102
---------112
---------107
100
---
Mat.
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
------------------------
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
3.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.8
1.0
1.0
1.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
22
21
31
23
25
25
21
30
33
28
30
28
31
31
32
26
31
34
32
29
29
28
25
Table 7 continued. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2010-2012
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
BRAND
NAME
MIDLAND
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
NK
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
5182NR2
R2 51X31N
R2 51X52N
R2 53X82N
R2 54X42N
R2 55X62N
R2S 48X10
R2S 56X02N
S52-F2 Brand
94Y70
94Y80
95Y10
95Y40
RR2544NS
RY2523N
RY2533N
RY2543N
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
33.3
12.2
-22.8
-83
39.7
14.5
-27.1
-100
38.3
----96
39.8
----100
40.9
----103
40.8
----102
11.4
34.8
26.7
29.4 105
41.9
----104
41.5
40.7
17.6
38.3
29.2
32.2 102
37.9
----95
---103
41.1
----105
41.9
37.7
-37.9
--94
26.6
29.8
14.5 36.3
38.6
97
35.6
----89
37.1
----93
38.5
----96
39.9
12.4
33.7
6.6
14.8
9.6
3.1
2.2
4.0
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
98
117
----92
-142
---------
------103
-114
---112
-----
Mat.
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
------------------
2.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
2.3
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
31
29
30
31
31
35
23
30
30
30
28
28
32
28
30
30
31
Dale Roberds Farm, Pittsburg, Cherokee County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist
Parsons Silt Loam, pH na, na% OM; P test: na, K test: na
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
April May June
Rainfall:
9.6
2.9
1.1
July Aug. Sept. Total
0.4
4.1
4.8
22.9
Dry and hot conditions, but stand establishment excellent and
vegetative development good. Drought and heat stress were severe during
reproductive development, but plants responded favorably to rainfall the
third week of August and yields were fairly good.
Planted 6/13/2012 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 11/6/2012; 15 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: glyphosate
Table 8. Pittsburg, Cherokee County No-Till Double-Crop Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2010-20
Table 8. Pittsburg, Cherokee County No-Till Double-Cropped Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 20102012
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
AG4382
AG4533
AG4730
AG4831
AG5233
AG5533
AG5633
K04-3083RR
KS5507NRR
433 NR2YS
454 NR2YS
499 NR2YS
Ex455 NR2YS
94Y70
94Y80
95Y10
95Y40
RR2544NS
RY2482NS
RY2523N
RY2533N
RY2543N
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
46.4
43.9
36.1
34.4
43.8
42.4
35.7
46.2
41.0
38.0
32.7
48.9
42.8
45.4
37.7
41.9
43.2
40.6
44.7
32.4
43.7
41.9
41.1
8.8
4.3
-------18.8
17.8
--------15.6
13.8
---14.4
18.7
3.2
-8-
-------51.6
48.5
-----42.1
--53.4
----46.0
9.1
5.0
-------32.5
29.4
--------28.1
29.3
----
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
Mat.
-------38.9
35.8
--------36.5
-----
113
107
88
84
107
103
87
112
100
92
80
119
104
110
92
102
105
99
109
79
106
102
-------131
124
--------------
10/18
10/20
10/18
10/20
10/15
10/26
10/24
10/18
10/26
10/14
10/20
10/20
10/17
10/16
10/17
10/25
10/21
10/21
10/18
10/18
10/24
10/19
-------112
105
-----92
--------
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
3.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
33
32
27
28
26
36
33
34
33
27
23
30
28
33
33
32
34
33
35
29
34
34
Vernon Egbert Farm, McCune, Crawford County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist
Cherokee silt loam, pH na, na% OM; P test: na, K test: na
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
April May June
7.4
5.0
2.0
Rainfall:
Irrigation:
Dry and hot conditions, but plots were irrigated from mid-to-late pod-fill.
Insect problems in early August required an insecticide application.
July Aug. Sept. Total
0.8
4.1
5.1 24.4
2.8
3.9 6.70
Planted 6/12/2012 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 11/1/2012; 11 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Authority First 84 oz, glyphosate
Table 9. McCune, Crawford County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2010-2012.
Table 9. McCune, Crawford County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2010-2012
BRAND
NAME
ASGROW
ASGROW
BAYER
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
AG4382
AG4533
HBK RY4620
1421
7420
7442
7460
4270NR2
4373NR2
4443NRS2
4580RS2
4593NRS2
93Y70
93Y92
94Y01
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
----105
54.6
51.4
----98
----104
54.3
51.1
----98
49.5
----95
50.9
----98
50.0
----96
49.7
----95
----110
57.4
----102
53.1
28.7
34.6
40.9
38.8 102
53.1
----111
58.2
50.1
----96
47.6
----91
51.9
----99
52.2
26.4
34.1
9.2
4.2
6.4
5.7
1.4
2.6
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
----------109
-----
----------101
-----
Mat.
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
10/12
10/11
10/12
10/7
10/4
10/5
10/11
10/6
10/6
10/10
10/7
10/10
9/28
10/2
10/3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
40
38
34
29
36
32
36
32
31
31
31
36
35
38
37
Vernon Egbert Farm, McCune, Crawford County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist
Cherokee silt loam, pH na, na% OM; P test: na, K test: na
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
Dry and hot conditions, but plots were irrigated from mid-to-late pod-fill.
Insect problems in early August required an insecticide application.
7.4
5.0
2.0
0.8
4.1
5.1 24.4
Rainfall:
2.8
3.9 6.70
Irrigation:
Planted 6/12/2012 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 11/1/2012; 11 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Authority First 84 oz, glyphosate
Table 10. McCune, Crawford County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2010-2012.
Table 10. McCune, Crawford County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2010-2012
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
BAYER
BAYER
AG4700S R2Y
AG4733S R2Y
AG5133N R2Y
AG4730
AG4831
AG5233
AG5533
AG5633
HBK R4924
HBK RY4721
58.2
60.5
50.4
58.8
57.1
57.1
50.4
50.4
54.5
56.5
-----------
-9-
-----------
-----------
3-yr.
avg.
-----------
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
107
111
92
108
105
105
92
92
100
104
-----------
-----------
Mat.
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
10/11
10/8
10/15
10/10
10/12
10/11
10/15
10/16
10/12
10/12
1.0
1.0
1.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.8
1.0
1.3
1.0
37
34
42
34
38
33
43
37
44
43
Table 10 continued. McCune, Crawford County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2010-2012
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
BRAND
NAME
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
G2 GENETICS
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
HBK RY5221
HBK RY5421
HBK RY5521
1491
K04-3083RR
KS5507NRR
4703NR2
4792RS2
4813NRS2
5182NR2
94Y70
94Y80
95Y10
95Y40
RR2544NS
RY2523N
RY2533N
RY2543N
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
55.3
----101
49.8
----91
49.2
----90
52.1
----96
57.1
34.2
36.9
45.7
42.7 105
49.4
30.5
37.6
40.0
39.2
91
----109
59.4
18.4
-39.8
-112
61.1
53.9
----99
49.8
30.3
-40.1
-91
56.2
----103
56.5
----104
54.5
----100
----105
57.4
40.9
41.0
29.4
47.7
52.4
96
53.9
----99
50.1
----92
53.3
----98
54.5
29.0
36.7
5.9
7.6
6.0
3.8
2.6
2.6
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
----118
105
-63
-104
---------
----101
102
-------------
Mat.
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
10/10
10/16
10/16
10/10
10/11
10/16
10/9
10/11
10/9
10/15
10/9
10/10
10/13
10/11
10/15
10/10
10/16
10/13
1.5
1.0
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.8
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.3
1.3
43
32
38
45
43
34
40
38
44
44
41
41
41
42
38
42
40
42
Joe Harris Farm, Erie, Neosho County; Kelly Kusel, technician
Lanton Silt Loam, pH 5.9, 3.1% OM; P test: H, K test: VH
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
April
Rainfall:
2.7
May June
2.6
1.1
July Aug. Sept. Total
0.4
3.2
5.7
15.7
Hot and dry through first half of season. Frost on Oct. 6, 7, 8 killed most
plants that were not finished. Maturities were estimated on latest
varieties. Yield were excellent given the conditions. Lodging rating done
on 1-5 scale in data collection book. Some shattering present.
on rep 1 only. Some shattering present.
Planted 5/21/2012 at 9 seeds/ft; harvested 10/24/2012; 14 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 1.5 pt Boundary preemergence, 1.5 pt Storm + 1/3 oz
Classic 6-14-12, 1.5 qt glyphosate, 1/3 oz Classic
Table 11. Erie, Neosho County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2010-2012.
Table 11. Erie, Neosho County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2010-2012
BRAND
NAME
ADVANCED GENETICS
ASGROW
ASGROW
BAYER
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
AG4533N R2Y
AG4382
AG4533
HBK RY4620
1421
7420
7442
7460
4263NRS2
4270NR2
4373NR2
4443NRS2
4580RS2
4593NRS2
93Y70
93Y92
94Y01
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
42.5
----96
----114
50.1
45.9
----104
----121
53.5
46.3
----105
36.8
----83
39.6
----90
43.3
----98
40.2
----91
44.1
33.4
-38.8
-100
46.7
----106
46.3
----105
39.7
61.5
45.7
50.9 117
51.6
43.2
----98
40.5
----92
39.4
----89
39.5
----90
44.1
36.7
60.0
8.5
4.6
6.9
4.4
2.0
4.9
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
- 10 -
---------91
--108
-----
------------103
-----
Mat.
9/26
9/30
9/30
9/30
9/25
9/24
9/25
9/30
9/26
9/26
9/24
9/28
9/29
9/29
9/15
9/16
9/22
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
44
46
47
40
41
47
42
47
43
41
42
40
39
45
46
45
46
Joe Harris Farm, Erie, Neosho County; Kelly Kusel, technician
Lanton Silt Loam, pH 5.9, 3.1% OM; P test: H, K test: VH
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
April
Rainfall:
2.7
May June
2.6
1.1
July Aug. Sept. Total
0.4
3.2
5.7
Hot and dry through first half of season. Frost on Oct 6, 7, 8 killed most
plants that were not finished. Maturities were estimated on latest
varieties. Yield was excellent given the conditions.
15.7
Planted 5/21/2012 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 10/24/2012; 14 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 1.5 pt Boundary preemergence, 1.5 pt Storm + 1/3 oz
Classic, 1.5 qt glyphosate, 1/3 oz Classic
Table 12. Erie, Neosho County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2010-2012.
Table 12. Erie, Neosho County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2010-2012
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
BRAND
NAME
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
G2 GENETICS
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
AG4700S R2Y
AG4733S R2Y
AG4730
AG4831
AG5233
AG5533
AG5633
HBK R4924
HBK RY4721
HBK RY5221
HBK RY5421
HBK RY5521
1491
K04-3083RR
KS5507NRR
4703NR2
4792RS2
4813NRS2
5182NR2
94Y70
94Y80
95Y10
95Y40
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
44.5
----94
47.1
----100
43.8
----93
----113
53.6
----114
53.8
----110
51.8
----112
53.1
47.9
----101
44.7
----95
47.6
----101
----110
52.1
----106
49.9
34.7
----73
47.2
43.1
54.8
45.2
48.4 100
42.8
49.2
48.1
48.5 113
53.4
42.1
----89
48.0
44.0
-46.0
-101
41.2
----87
45.2
----96
42.7
----90
48.1
----102
48.3
----102
46.4
----98
47.3
42.5
55.9
7.7
7.5
9.3
4.3
3.8
6.3
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-------------101
101
-104
-------
-------------98
88
---------
Mat.
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
9/30
9/28
9/28
10/6
10/2
10/13
10/13
10/5
10/3
10/5
10/11
10/13
9/30
10/10
10/13
10/3
10/1
10/1
10/12
9/29
9/30
10/10
10/5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.8
2.3
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.3
2.0
2.5
1.3
1.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
38
36
36
40
33
49
41
47
46
49
36
42
47
43
37
44
38
44
49
44
42
41
46
North Central Experiment Field, Scandia, Republic County; Randall Nelson, agronomist
Crete silt loam, pH 5.8, na% OM; P test: VL, K test: VH
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
April May June
July Aug. Sept. Total
Spring: warm, relatively normal precipitiation;
Summer: abnormally hot and dry. No insects or disease pressures.
Diseases: None
2.9
0.2
3.2
2.2
2.4
2.0 12.9
Rainfall:
Irrigation:
4.0
6.0
10.00
Planted 5/18/2012 at 9 seeds/ft; harvested 10/16/2012; 26 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: glyphosate
Table 13. Scandia, Republic County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012.
Table 13. Scandia, Republic County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
AG3432
AG3533
AG3731
AG3832
AG3833
7323
7334
7342
7362
7373
83.5
72.1
84.0
72.1
69.7
69.8
70.0
80.5
78.1
75.4
72.7
-63.1
----63.7
-64.8
--55.4
------64.2
- 11 -
78.1
-73.6
----72.1
-70.1
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
--67.5
------68.1
111
96
111
96
92
92
93
107
103
100
119
-103
----104
-106
--98
------114
Mat.
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
9/23
9/23
9/25
9/25
9/26
9/22
9/22
9/24
9/26
9/26
3.3
2.0
2.7
2.7
2.3
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
3.7
47
49
49
45
48
47
49
44
49
49
Table 13 continued. Scandia, Republic County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012
BRAND
NAME
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
Kruger
Kruger
Kruger
Kruger
Kruger
Kruger
Kruger
Kruger
Kruger
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
NK
NK
NK
NK
NK
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
7382
7390
7393
K2-3402
K2-3701
K2-3802
K2-3803
K2-3804
K2-3902
K2-4102
K2-4202
K2-4303
C3220R2
C3399R2
C3890R2
C3989R2
3423NR2
3612NR2
3633NR2
3822NRS2
3842NRR
3850NR2
3983NR2
4153NR2
S34-N3 Brand
S36-B6 Brand
S36-M8
S37-B1
S39-U2 Brand
O-342
O-362
O-363
O-383
O-3921
O-393
365 NR2Y
366 NR2Y
376 NR2YS
433 NR2YS
Ex373 NR2Y
Ex389 NR2Y
93Y70
93Y92
94Y01
RY2343N
RY2363N
RY2373N
RY2393N
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
70.8
56.8
-63.8
-94
78.2
63.2
60.2
70.7
67.2 104
77.6
----103
75.0
----99
76.9
----102
71.0
----94
----109
82.0
72.0
----95
73.7
----98
70.2
----93
70.6
----94
77.3
----102
75.6
----100
77.6
----103
78.1
----103
----106
80.2
77.0
----102
75.8
63.3
-69.6
-100
----105
79.0
62.9
67.7
72.5
--96
77.4
62.3
-69.9
-103
75.1
54.5
-64.8
99
69.5
57.4
74.4
----99
--67.9
-90
---76.7
----102
70.2 102
77.0
72.3
74.7
61.2
70.3
----93
76.2
----101
67.8
-74.9
-108
81.9
69.3
----92
--106
80.4
68.2
74.3
77.7
----103
----105
79.5
61.6
71.2
68.0
74.9
67.4
99
75.5
----100
67.4
----89
72.5
----96
73.0
----97
68.1
----90
78.3
----104
76.6
----101
62.1
-71.1
-106
80.1
64.4
-74.0
-111
83.5
74.2
----98
----106
79.8
76.3
----101
----105
79.4
72.4
60.6
-66.5
-96
75.5
61.2
56.5
5.5
8.0
10.6
5.6
6.6
7.6
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
- 12 -
93
103
---------------103
--102
89
---118
--111
----110
-------101
105
----99
-107
---------------------102
---------109
---------------
Mat.
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
9/25
9/29
9/29
9/19
9/25
9/26
9/26
9/29
9/27
9/30
9/30
9/29
9/24
9/23
9/26
9/26
9/20
9/23
9/23
9/25
9/30
9/28
9/26
9/27
9/24
9/25
9/24
9/26
9/29
9/23
9/23
9/25
9/26
9/29
9/30
9/24
9/23
9/29
9/29
9/24
9/23
9/25
9/30
9/30
9/25
9/26
9/23
9/27
3.3
3.0
2.7
1.7
2.0
2.3
1.0
2.0
2.7
3.0
2.7
2.3
2.3
2.7
2.0
3.0
2.0
1.7
2.3
1.7
2.7
3.3
3.0
3.0
2.3
2.3
3.3
2.7
3.3
2.7
3.3
2.0
1.0
3.3
2.7
3.0
1.7
2.0
2.7
3.0
3.3
2.7
2.7
3.7
3.0
3.0
3.3
2.7
48
46
45
46
48
48
49
51
48
48
54
44
47
46
47
51
46
47
50
49
46
51
49
40
48
49
40
42
45
49
47
42
48
44
46
48
43
46
44
46
45
49
47
53
47
46
47
47
North Central Kansas Experiment Field, Belleville, Republic County; Randall Nelson, agronomist
Crete silt loam, pH 5.8, na% OM; P test: VL, K test: VH
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
April
Rainfall:
2.9
May June
0.2
3.2
July Aug. Sept. Total
2.2
2.4
2.0
Spring: warm, relatively normal precipitiation;
Summer: abnormally hot and dry. No insects or disease pressures.
Diseases: None
12.9
Planted 5/23/2012 at 9 seeds/ft; harvested 10/8/2012; 25 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: glyphosate
Table 14. Belleville, Republic County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012.
Table 14. Belleville, Republic County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
Kruger
Kruger
Kruger
Kruger
Kruger
Kruger
Kruger
Kruger
Kruger
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
NK
NK
NK
NK
NK
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
AG3130
AG3432
AG3731
AG3832
AG3833
7323
7334
7342
7362
7373
7382
7390
7393
K2-3402
K2-3701
K2-3802
K2-3803
K2-3804
K2-3902
K2-4102
K2-4202
K2-4303
C3399R2
C3666R2
3423NR2
3612NR2
3633NR2
3822NRS2
3842NRR
3850NR2
3983NR2
4153NR2
S30-E9
S34-N3 Brand
S36-B6 Brand
S36-M8
S39-U2 Brand
O-332
O-342
O-362
O-363
O-373
O-379
O-383
O-3921
O-393
365 NR2Y
366 NR2Y
376 NR2YS
392 NR2YS
Ex373 NR2Y
Ex389 NR2Y
93Y92
49.1
46.4
55.9
51.5
45.2
47.5
45.9
58.6
50.1
44.3
50.9
51.5
43.5
54.2
53.2
51.4
51.8
48.5
44.6
61.6
52.2
59.8
50.2
53.1
46.0
52.7
49.0
50.2
56.0
50.6
46.7
47.6
51.7
47.6
56.3
50.9
48.4
46.6
42.3
47.6
54.7
48.3
46.2
60.4
39.9
46.6
42.5
50.2
49.7
54.7
46.7
53.4
50.4
65.0
78.9
73.9
----69.7
--63.8
69.6
-------------74.9
--75.3
64.1
---62.7
67.1
--67.7
-72.7
----71.3
---------
62.1
-64.1
--------59.9
-----------------49.2
----61.0
--56.9
------57.8
---------
- 13 -
57.1
62.7
64.9
----64.2
--57.4
60.6
-------------63.8
--65.7
57.4
---55.2
61.7
--57.2
-60.2
----55.6
---------
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
58.7
-64.6
--------60.3
-----------------54.6
----57.4
--61.5
------56.3
---------
98
92
111
102
90
94
91
117
100
88
101
102
86
108
106
102
103
96
89
122
104
119
100
106
91
105
97
100
111
101
93
95
103
95
112
101
96
93
84
95
109
96
92
120
79
93
84
100
99
109
93
106
100
97
118
110
----104
--95
104
-------------112
--113
96
---94
100
--101
------107
---------
112
-116
--------108
-------------------89
-----103
------104
---------
Mat.
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
9/17
9/18
9/26
9/28
9/24
9/21
9/21
9/26
9/28
9/28
9/28
9/29
9/29
9/21
9/24
9/26
9/23
9/25
9/28
10/1
10/1
9/25
9/18
9/18
9/18
9/23
9/21
9/29
9/28
9/28
9/26
9/27
9/20
9/19
9/26
9/26
9/24
9/22
9/17
9/24
9/29
9/21
9/18
9/24
9/24
9/29
9/21
9/29
10/1
10/1
9/19
9/21
9/26
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.7
29
29
31
29
27
27
28
28
33
33
32
31
30
31
34
31
29
30
31
32
36
28
32
28
29
24
30
32
29
31
32
27
31
32
30
27
30
28
29
32
29
29
32
31
27
28
32
31
33
33
30
35
34
Table 14 continued. Belleville, Republic County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012
BRAND
NAME
PIONEER
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
94Y01
RY2343N
RY2363N
RY2373N
RY2393N
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
40.4
----80
----116
58.1
----117
58.9
----104
52.3
47.9
53.8
-50.9
-95
50.3
66.9
55.4
13.7
8.9
10.7
9.4
8.0
7.5
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
----80
------
Mat.
9/29
9/29
9/29
9/25
9/27
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
1.0
1.3
1.3
1.0
1.0
34
33
29
26
34
Clayton Short Farm, Assaria, Saline County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist
Ladysmith silty clay loam, pH na, na% OM; P test: na, K
test: na
100-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
Dry and hot conditions, but stand establishment excellent and
vegetative development good. Drought and heat stress were severe during
reproductive development, but plants responded favorably to rainfall the
third week of August and yields were fairly good.
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
1.9
0.4
2.2
2.0
2.7
2.1 11.3
Rainfall:
Planted 6/1/2012 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 10/12/2012; 11 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Dual II Magnum, glyphosate
Table 15. Assaria, Saline County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012.
Table 15. Assaria, Saline County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
AG3833S R2Y
AG4233S R2Y
1421
7382
7390
7393
7420
7442
7460
C3890R2
C3989R2
C4340R2
3842NRR
3850NR2
3943NRS2
3981NR2
3983NR2
4123NR2
4153NR2
4263NRS2
4443NRS2
4580RS2
4593NRS2
4792RS2
4813NRS2
4963NRS2
O-373
O-379
O-382
O-393
O-421
O-432
O-442
O-451
O-453
376 NR2YS
388 NR2Y
33.7
33.3
40.7
36.9
38.2
36.6
37.8
35.1
40.4
35.3
41.2
38.8
36.7
34.2
38.6
36.7
36.7
36.0
30.4
34.7
38.8
37.8
39.2
38.1
34.8
40.3
35.5
34.6
38.6
40.5
36.5
35.0
37.4
41.2
40.0
30.6
33.5
-17.4
-15.3
16.4
-18.6
19.7
21.6
---15.2
10.7
-----------------21.9
------
----33.3
-33.9
-31.2
------------------------31.8
----
- 14 -
-25.4
-26.1
27.3
-28.2
27.4
31.0
---26.0
22.5
-----------------28.5
------
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
----29.3
-30.1
-31.1
-----------------------------
91
90
110
100
103
99
102
95
109
95
111
105
99
92
104
99
99
97
82
94
105
102
106
103
94
109
96
94
104
109
99
95
101
111
108
83
91
-112
-98
105
-119
126
138
---97
69
------------------------
----132
-134
-123
------------------------126
----
Mat.
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
9/29
9/29
10/2
9/28
9/29
9/29
9/30
9/30
10/1
9/28
9/28
9/30
9/29
9/26
9/30
10/1
9/29
9/30
10/2
9/30
10/2
10/2
10/2
10/3
10/2
10/2
9/25
9/25
9/29
9/29
10/1
9/30
10/1
10/1
10/1
9/29
9/24
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
27
25
27
28
23
26
28
28
33
27
26
26
26
22
28
30
27
29
23
27
27
25
29
28
32
27
28
25
26
28
30
22
28
26
30
29
26
Table 15 continued. Assaria, Saline County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012
BRAND
NAME
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
PIONEER
392 NR2YS
411 NR2Y
421 NR2Y
433 NR2YS
Ex373 NR2Y
Ex389 NR2Y
93Y70
94Y01
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
37.3
----101
----115
42.6
35.3
----95
37.8
----102
33.6
----91
----104
38.6
----105
38.9
37.1
----100
37.0
15.6
25.3
11.1
19.5
14.6
4.8
4.1
4.3
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
---------
---------
Mat.
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
10/1
9/28
9/30
10/2
9/26
9/25
9/28
9/29
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.5
29
28
21
26
26
28
27
31
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
1.0
1.5
1.8
2.0
1.8
2.3
2.0
1.8
1.0
1.3
2.3
1.0
1.3
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.3
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.8
1.0
2.3
2.0
1.8
1.0
1.0
31
32
30
36
29
36
32
28
28
31
40
33
32
34
31
32
31
30
25
29
31
34
32
33
24
31
29
30
32
35
39
32
29
30
Richard Seck Farm, Hutchinson, Reno County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist
Fine sandy loam, pH na, na% OM; P test: na, K test: na
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
Extremely hot and dry, but plots received frequent irrigation.
0.6
2.9
0.5
3.3
1.3
9.1
0.6
1.8
4.0
8.0
3.5 17.90
Planted 5/11/2012 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 10/15/2012; 11 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: glyphosate
Rainfall:
Irrigation:
1.0
Table 16. Hutchinson, Reno County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012.
Table 16. Hutchinson, Reno County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
OHLDE
OHLDE
AG3833S R2Y
AG4233S R2Y
AG4533N R2Y
HBK R4924
HBK RY4620
HBK RY4721
HBK RY5221
HBK RY5421
HBK RY5521
1421
1491
7420
7442
7460
C3666R2
C3890R2
C3989R2
C4211R2
3842NRR
3850NR2
3943NRS2
3981NR2
3983NR2
4123NR2
4153NR2
4263NRS2
4443NRS2
4580RS2
4593NRS2
4792RS2
4813NRS2
4963NRS2
O-382
O-383
49.3
47.2
50.1
56.1
53.1
51.2
51.9
42.2
38.3
70.3
68.1
60.0
60.9
53.6
53.3
44.6
48.4
57.5
53.1
49.6
51.2
67.7
61.4
60.7
55.3
49.9
49.6
59.0
64.3
57.2
51.8
62.1
55.2
52.7
-60.4
57.6
--------61.0
66.1
59.4
----61.6
61.1
-62.3
-----62.7
-63.7
-----
-----------76.6
-77.4
-----86.8
-78.3
-----79.6
-------
- 15 -
-53.8
53.9
--------60.5
63.5
56.5
----57.4
55.4
-65.0
-----60.9
-60.5
-----
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
-----------65.9
-63.5
-----65.8
-69.4
-----67.1
-------
89
85
91
101
96
93
94
76
69
127
123
109
110
97
96
81
88
104
96
90
93
122
111
110
100
90
90
107
116
103
94
112
100
95
-97
93
--------98
106
96
----99
98
-100
-----101
-102
-----
-----------96
-97
-----108
-98
-----99
-------
Mat.
9/30
9/30
9/30
10/5
9/29
10/1
10/2
10/9
10/13
10/2
10/4
10/2
10/1
10/2
9/25
9/26
9/27
9/29
9/27
9/26
9/30
10/5
10/1
9/29
10/1
9/29
9/27
10/3
10/1
10/4
9/30
10/6
9/28
9/24
Table 16 continued. Hutchinson, Reno County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012
BRAND
NAME
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
PIONEER
O-3921
O-393
O-432
O-442
388 NR2Y
392 NR2YS
411 NR2Y
421 NR2Y
433 NR2YS
454 NR2YS
499 NR2YS
Ex389 NR2Y
Ex455 NR2YS
93Y70
94Y01
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
48.5
62.2
-55.4
-88
56.5
----102
61.9
60.1
--109
63.6
55.3
----100
58.9
----107
53.8
----97
63.0
----114
55.5
----100
51.7
----93
58.3
----105
55.5
----100
58.0
----105
----122
67.6
53.3
74.5
-63.9
-96
56.5
----102
55.3
62.2
80.1
10.9
5.6
7.3
7.0
4.0
6.8
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
100
------------120
--
----------------
Mat.
9/29
9/28
9/29
10/2
9/27
9/28
10/1
9/28
10/1
10/2
10/9
9/26
9/30
9/28
9/29
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.3
2.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.3
31
29
28
31
31
30
33
29
32
33
34
33
33
31
31
Northwest Research-Extension Center, Colby, Thomas County; Pat Evans, technician
Keith silt loam, pH na, na% OM; P test: na, K test: na
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
Very hot, dry summer. No diseases noted. Plots were not uniform.
2.5
0.4
0.5
2.1
1.0
1.2
7.6
Rainfall:
4.8
5.8
17.3
Irrigation:
6.7
Planted 5/14/2012 at 9 seeds/ft; harvested 10/2/2012; 20 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: glyphosate 1.5 pt
1.5 pt/ac
Table 17. Colby, Thomas County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012.
Table 17. Colby, Thomas County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012
BRAND
NAME
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
OHLDE
OHLDE
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
C2835R2
C3111R2
C3220R2
3423NR2
3612NR2
3633NR2
3822NRS2
3842NRR
3850NR2
3983NR2
O-342
O-362
93Y70
93Y92
94Y01
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2010
2011
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011 2010
----98
58.3
----102
61.0
----106
63.3
54.0
----91
----97
57.8
----113
67.4
53.8
----90
----99
58.8
----103
61.1
----111
66.1
----103
61.4
----98
58.5
----104
62.2
55.0
----92
54.9
----92
-70.8
59.6
14.2
--5.5
10.0
4-4.6
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
- 16 -
----------------
----------------
Mat.
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
9/18
9/24
9/22
9/22
9/26
9/22
9/29
9/27
9/26
9/29
9/21
9/23
9/24
9/27
9/28
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
27
27
27
26
26
28
28
26
28
27
28
29
27
25
27
Southwest Research-Extension Center, Garden City, Finney County; Monty J. Spangler, technician
Keith silt loam, pH 7.6, 2.1% OM; P test: na, K test: na
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
Extremely dry and hot in spring and summer months. Emergence was
hampered by a Rhizoctonia infection. Plot samples were sent to
Manhattan for analysis; the infection was mentioned as a possible culprit,
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
but the definite cause was not determined. In July the study seemed to gather
1.3
0.3
0.9
1.9
1.0
1.9
7.3
Rainfall:
strength and began to have growth. Overall, the study seemed to recover well,
although some plots did not recover much and did not have enough plants
Irrigation:
2.6
6.6
6.9
4.7
3.9 24.71
harvested to produce data. Obtaining plot weight totals from the combine
was difficult, but harvest went well.
get a plot weight total from the plot combine. The harvest of the soybean
study went well.
Planted 5/14/2012 at 10 seeds/ft; harvested 10/16/2012; 23 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Sterling Blue, Spartan Charge, Integrity, crop oil
Applied pre-plant; Pursuit applied preemergence
Table 18. Garden City, Finney County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012.
Table 18. Garden City, Finney County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012
BRAND
NAME
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
HBK R4924
HBK RY4620
HBK RY4721
HBK RY5221
HBK RY5421
HBK RY5521
C3666R2
C3890R2
C3989R2
C4211R2
3850NR2
3943NRS2
3981NR2
3983NR2
4123NR2
4153NR2
4263NRS2
4443NRS2
4580RS2
4593NRS2
4792RS2
O-3921
O-393
O-432
O-442
93Y70
93Y92
94Y01
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
31.2
----80
39.1
----100
33.8
----86
26.0
----66
33.7
----86
25.8
----66
34.5
----88
45.8
----117
----135
52.8
43.8
----112
40.9
21.0
46.7
31.0
36.2 104
38.2
----97
22.3
46.0
34.3
38.2 118
46.2
39.2
----100
41.2
----105
35.2
----90
23.4
----60
46.1
----118
42.5
27.5
40.5
35.0
36.8 108
----123
48.3
36.8
21.0
-28.9
-94
45.3
26.1
-35.7
-116
38.5
----98
----122
47.7
45.5
----116
31.3
----80
41.8
----107
42.0
----107
39.2
22.4
43.2
14.2
7.9
13.5
6.6
2.2
7.9
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
- 17 -
----------94
-100
-----123
-94
117
-------
----------108
-106
-----94
----------
Mat.
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
10/6
10/6
10/5
10/6
10/14
10/15
9/27
9/26
9/27
9/26
9/26
10/4
10/4
9/27
9/28
10/5
10/4
10/3
10/5
10/4
10/8
9/27
9/26
9/27
10/2
9/26
9/25
9/26
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
33
26
29
33
32
32
25
25
26
26
28
28
27
25
28
24
25
26
26
29
28
25
25
25
25
23
23
24
East Central Kansas Experiment Field, Ottawa, Franklin County; Eric Adee, agronomist; James Kimball, technician
Woodson silt loam, pH na, na% OM; P test: na, K test: na
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
Rainfall:
0.7
1.6
0.5
1.2
0.6
5.2
Fairly good growing conditions early in the summer, but July and August
were extremely hot and dry.
9.8
nnnncence
Planted 5/29/2012 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 10/18/2012; 11 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Authority First preemergence
Table 19. Ottawa, Franklin County Dryland Conventional Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012.
Table 19. Ottawa, Franklin County Dryland Conventional Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
BRAND
NAME
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ILLINOIS AES
ILLINOIS AES
IOWA AES
IOWA AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
PIONEER
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
AG4244N LL
AG4989N LL
AG5163N LL
LD00-2817P
LD00-3309
IA4004
IA4005
K07-1544
K07-1633
K09-1599
KS4607
LL 4512N
LL 4880N
LL 4892N
RR check
94Y01
RR check
1137N
1347NLL
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
----110
34.5
33.4
28.5
59.0
31.0
40.3 106
28.4
-34.8
-130
41.1
32.4
26.6
52.9
29.5
37.3 103
21.8
17.2
36.1
19.5
25.0
69
30.1
26.0
37.4
28.1
31.2
96
22.8
-29.7
-116
36.5
27.9
21.3
33.3
24.6
27.5
89
32.0
21.1
36.9
26.6
30.0 102
32.7
----104
33.0
25.0
43.4
29.0
33.8 105
24.0
----76
30.4
28.2
45.5
29.3
34.7
97
25.1
----80
28.2
----90
----134
42.1
30.9
----98
31.5
26.4
43.8
22.5
17.2
8.9
8.4
5.4
4.7
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-108
108
101
65
98
86
81
80
-95
-107
-----
-135
-121
82
85
-76
84
-99
-104
-----
Mat.
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
10/6
10/19
10/18
10/7
10/2
9/24
10/4
9/21
9/29
10/5
10/9
10/11
10/11
10/16
10/7
10/4
10/16
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
30
28
24
28
24
26
26
23
28
27
27
33
32
28
31
32
27
North Central Kansas Experiment Field, Belleville, Republic County; Randall Nelson, agronomist
Crete silt loam, pH 5.8, na% OM; P test: VL, K test: VH
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
April
May June
July Aug. Sept. Total
Spring: warm, relatively normal precipitiation;
Summer: abnormally hot and dry. No insect or disease pressures.
Diseases: None
2.9
0.2
3.2
2.2
2.4
2.0 12.9
Rainfall:
Irrigation:
4.0
6.0
10.00
Planted 5/17/2012 at 9 seeds/ft; harvested 10/12/2012; 26 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: glyphosate
Table 20. Scandia, Republic County Irrigated Conventional Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012.
Table 20. Scandia, Republic County Irrigated Conventional Soybean Performance Test, 2010-2012
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
ILLINOIS AES
ILLINOIS AES
IOWA AES
IOWA AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
PIONEER
WILLCROSS
LD00-2817P
LD00-3309
IA4004
IA4005
K07-1544
K07-1633
K09-1599
KS4607
C3114LL
C3554
RR check
94Y01
RR check
1137N
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
69.6
58.4
62.4
67.9
64.8
63.7
67.4
65.8
62.5
67.2
66.4
68.5
65.4
10.0
9.2
62.6
50.2
56.9
62.4
61.3
59.9
-63.7
---61.3
59.2
7.1
6.1
59.7
58.6
64.7
-72.0
64.1
-49.9
----61.7
8.4
7.1
- 18 -
66.1
54.3
59.7
65.2
63.1
61.8
-64.8
---64.9
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
64.0
55.7
61.3
-66.0
62.6
-59.8
-----
106
89
95
104
99
97
103
101
96
103
102
105
106
85
96
105
104
101
-108
---104
97
95
105
-117
104
-81
-----
Mat.
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
9/24
9/23
9/26
9/29
9/27
9/29
9/26
9/30
9/26
9/25
9/26
9/27
4.0
3.7
4.3
2.7
3.7
4.3
4.0
2.7
4.0
3.3
3.0
3.0
48
44
46
42
47
44
33
45
41
48
45
43
Southeast Agricultural Research Center, Parsons, Labette County; Kelly Kusel, technician
Parsons Silt Loam, pH 6.1, 2.8% OM; P test: M, K test: H
Hot and dry through first half of season. Insect problems for much of
season. Unable to take maturities at Parsons because frost on Oct 6, 7, 8
killed top of plants but not the bottoms. No tests at Parsons
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
had shown any sign of maturity at this point. Freeze on Oct 26, 27, 28
1.7
2.1
1.4
0.7
3.3
3.3 12.5
Rainfall:
finished plants for harvest. Yields were unexpectedly good.
Planted 6/6/2012 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 11/3/2012; 14 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 1.5 pt Boundary preemergnthough
there were some plots cence
ence
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
Table 21. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Conventional Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2010-20
Table 21. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Conventional Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 20102012
BRAND
NAME
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
PIONEER
PIONEER
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
AG4989N LL
AG5163N LL
AG5333N
K09-5546
KS5004N
KS5502N
KS5507NRR RR check
LL 4880N
LL 4892N
LL 5120N
LL 5332N
RR check
94Y80
RR check
95Y40
1347NLL
1349NLL
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2012
2011
2010
avg.
3-yr.
avg.
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2012
2011
2010
37.3
11.5
24.0
24.4
24.3
98
11.0
-24.7
-101
38.3
37.0
----98
35.7
----94
36.8
15.9
27.2
26.4
26.6
97
15.7
32.4
28.5
29.8 109
41.2
17.9
31.6
29.9
30.5 111
41.9
37.1
7.0
19.2
22.1
21.1
98
33.9
----89
10.4
34.0
25.0
28.0 104
39.6
36.4
----96
----110
41.5
----102
38.8
32.5
----86
----106
40.1
37.9
12.5
27.1
8.7
13.9
8.8
3.9
2.1
2.8
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
- 19 -
92
88
--127
126
143
56
-83
------
89
---100
120
117
71
-125
------
Mat.
2012
Lodge
score
Ht.
(in.)
----------------
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.8
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
24
23
31
29
29
27
28
27
24
24
32
30
34
24
28
Table 22. Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2012 Roundup-Resistant Soybean Tests
Topeka Topeka
BRAND/NAME Emmett dryland irrigated Ottawa
Parsons
Pittsburg McCune
MG4 MG 5
DMG 5
MG 4 MG 5
Erie
BelleHutch- Garden
MG 4 MG 5 Scandia ville Assaria inson City Colby AVG
ADVANCED GENETICS
AG3833S R2Y
---
--
95
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
91
89
--
--
AG4233S R2Y
--
--
--
123
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
90
85
--
--
99
AG4533N R2Y
--
--
--
113
--
--
--
--
--
96
--
--
--
--
91
--
--
100
AG4700S R2Y
AG4733S R2Y
---
---
---
113
127
---
95
108
---
---
107
111
---
94
100
---
---
---
---
---
---
102
111
--
89
--
--
92
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
96
92
AG5133N R2Y
--
--
--
106
ASGROW
AG3130
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
98
--
--
--
--
98
AG3432
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- 111
92
--
--
--
--
101
AG3533
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
96
--
--
--
--
--
96
AG3731
AG3832
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
-- 111
-- 96
111
102
---
---
---
---
111
99
AG3833
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
92
90
--
--
--
--
91
AG4382
AG4533
---
---
---
---
104
108
---
113
107
105
98
---
114
104
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
109
104
AG4730
--
--
--
--
--
96
88
--
108
--
93
--
--
--
--
--
--
96
AG4831
--
--
--
--
--
102
84
--
105
--
113
--
--
--
--
--
--
101
AG4831
AG5233
---
---
---
---
---
102
99
-107
---
-105
---
-114
---
---
---
---
---
---
102
106
AG5503
--
--
--
--
--
101
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
101
AG5533
AG5605
---
---
---
---
---
107
109
103
--
---
92
--
---
110
--
---
---
---
---
---
---
103
109
AG5632
--
--
--
--
--
104
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
104
AG5633
--
--
--
--
--
103
87
--
92
--
112
--
--
--
--
--
--
99
BAYER
HBK R4924
--
--
111
--
--
102
--
--
100
--
101
--
--
--
101
80 --
99
HBK RY4620
--
--
104
--
99
--
--
104
--
121
--
--
--
--
96
100 --
104
HBK RY4721
HBK RY5221
---
---
87
95
---
---
106
99
---
---
104
101
---
95
101
---
---
---
93
94
86 -66 --
95
93
HBK RY5421
--
--
126
--
--
100
--
--
91
--
110
--
--
--
76
86 --
98
HBK RY5521
--
--
81
--
--
111
--
--
90
--
106
--
--
--
69
66 --
87
CHANNEL
5805R2
--
--
--
--
--
107
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
107
G2 GENETICS
1371
1421
95
--
104
112
101
109
-132
---
---
---
-98
---
-105
---
99
--
106
--- 110
-127
---
---
101
113
1491
--
--
--
--
--
97
--
--
96
--
73
--
--
--
123
--
--
97
7323
7334
93
91
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
92
93
94
91
---
---
---
---
93
92
110
7342
106
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- 107
117
--
--
--
--
7362
91
96
91
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- 103
100
--
--
--
--
96
7373
7382
100
99
101
93
116
95
-82
---
---
---
---
---
---
-- 100
-- 94
88
-101 100
---
---
---
101
95
7390
99
84
121
109
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- 104
102 103
--
--
--
103
7393
7420
98
--
93
110
109
122
91
83
---
---
---
-95
---
-83
-- 103
---
86
99
-- 102
-109
---
---
97
101
7442
--
--
--
82
92
--
--
98
--
90
--
--
--
95
110
--
--
94
7460
--
--
--
90
105
--
--
96
--
98
--
--
--
109
97
--
--
99
KANSAS AES
K04-3083RR
--
--
--
--
--
96
112
--
105
--
100
--
--
--
--
--
--
103
KS5507NRR
--
--
--
--
--
101
100
--
91
--
113
--
--
--
--
--
--
103
- 20 -
Table 22 continued. Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2012 Roundup-Resistant Soybean Tests
Topeka Topeka
BRAND/NAME Emmett dryland irrigated Ottawa
Parsons
Pittsburg McCune
MG4 MG 5
DMG 5
MG 4 MG 5
Erie
BelleHutch- Garden
MG 4 MG 5 Scandia ville Assaria inson City Colby AVG
KRUGER
K2-3402
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
99
108
--
--
--
--
104
K2-3701
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- 102
106
--
--
--
--
104
K2-3802
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
94
102
--
--
--
--
98
K2-3803
K2-3804
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
-- 109
-- 95
103
96
---
---
---
---
106
96
K2-3902
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
98
89
--
--
--
--
93
K2-4102
K2-4202
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
93
94
122
104
---
---
---
---
108
99
119
--
--
--
--
111
---
---
---
-- 98
-- 102
98
102
K2-4303
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- 102
LG SEEDS
C2835R2
C3111R2
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
C3220R2
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- 100
--
--
--
-- 106
103
C3399R2
C3666R2
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
-- 103
---
100
106
---
-96
-- -88 --
101
97
C3890R2
104
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- 103
--
95
81
117 --
100
C3989R2
109
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- 106
--
111
88
135 --
110
C4211R2
C4340R2
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
-105
104
--
112 --- --
108
105
MIDLAND
3423NR2
3612NR2
-108
-94
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
-- 102
-- 100
91
105
---
---
---
91
97
95
101
105
3633NR2
---
95
107
111
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- 105
97
--
--
-- 113
3822NRS2
109
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
96
100
--
--
--
3842NRR
3850NR2
94
101
-89
75
91
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
-- 103
-- 99
111
101
99
92
96
90
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
104
93
97 --
98
-106
-102
-107
-76
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
-99
-93
99
99
122
111
118 -100 111
113
100
3943NRS2
3981NR2
3983NR2
90
99
-- 99
104 103
97
97
4123NR2
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
97
110
105 --
104
4153NR2
91
105
92
110
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
90
95
82
100
90 --
95
4263NRS2
4270NR2
99
102
104
101
89
--
93
123
-97
---
---
-95
---
91
100
---
---
---
94
--
90
--
60 --- --
90
103
4373NR2
107
99
97
122
99
--
--
110
--
106
--
--
--
--
--
--
106
---
108
99
69
--
118
109
97
109
---
---
102
102
---
105
117
---
---
---
105
102
90
107
118 -108 --
101
107
4593NRS2
--
104
--
96
104
--
--
111
--
98
--
--
--
106
116
123 --
107
4703NR2
--
--
--
74
--
103
--
--
109
--
89
--
--
--
--
4792RS2
4813NRS2
---
---
---
114
68
---
108
95
---
---
112
99
---
101
87
---
---
103
94
4963NRS2
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
5182NR2
--
--
--
--
--
83
--
--
91
--
96
--
--
MORSOY
R2 46X71N
--
--
--
90
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
R2 51X31N
R2 51X52N
---
---
---
112
91
---
100
96
---
---
---
---
---
---
R2 53X82N
--
--
--
--
--
100
--
--
--
--
--
R2 54X42N
--
--
--
--
--
103
--
--
--
--
--
R2 55X62N
R2S 47X12N
---
---
---
-105
---
102
--
---
---
---
---
R2S 48X10
--
--
--
117
--
105
--
--
--
R2S 56X02N
--
--
--
--
--
104
--
--
--
4443NRS2
4580RS2
- 21 -
--
--
--
94
103
94
94 --- --
105
89
109
112
--
--
111
--
--
--
--
90
--
--
--
--
--
90
---
---
---
---
---
106
94
--
--
--
--
--
--
100
--
--
--
--
--
--
103
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
102
105
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
111
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
104
Table 22 continued. Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2012 Roundup-Resistant Soybean Tests
Topeka Topeka
BRAND/NAME Emmett dryland irrigated Ottawa
Parsons
Pittsburg McCune
MG4 MG 5
DMG 5
MG 4 MG 5
Erie
BelleHutch- Garden
MG 4 MG 5 Scandia ville Assaria inson City Colby AVG
NK
S30-E9
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
103
--
--
--
--
S34-N3 Brand
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- 102
95
--
--
--
--
98
S36-B6 Brand
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- 102
112
--
--
--
--
107
S36-M8
S37-B1
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
-- 93
-- 101
101
--
---
---
---
---
97
101
S39-U2 Brand
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- 108
96
--
--
--
--
102
S52-F2 Brand
--
--
--
--
--
102
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
102
OHLDE
O-332
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
93
--
--
--
--
93
O-342
91
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
92
84
--
--
-- 103
92
O-362
O-363
77
98
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
-- 106
-- 103
95
109
---
---
---
98
--
94
103
O-373
103
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
96
96
--
--
--
98
O-379
O-382
98
96
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
92
94
-- 104
-100
---
---
95
100
O-383
93
105
76
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- 105
--
O-3921
101
93
125
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
O-393
O-421
-105
99
99
98
--
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
O-432
--
99
125
--
--
--
--
--
--
O-442
O-451
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
O-453
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
PHILLIPS
365 NR2Y
366 NR2Y
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
103
120
--
95
--
99
79
--
88
116 --
100
-- 100
---
93 109
-99
102
--
98 --- --
100
101
--
--
--
--
95
109
122 --
110
---
---
---
---
101
111
100
--
116 --- --
106
111
--
--
--
--
--
108
--
--
--
108
---
---
---
---
89
96
84
100
---
---
---
---
87
98
99
83
--
--
--
97
-91
109 101
107
97
---
---
100
101
99
376 NR2YS
109
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
97
388 NR2Y
392 NR2YS
94
108
100
108
108
85
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
411 NR2Y
--
105
130
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
115
114
--
--
116
421 NR2Y
--
102
77
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
95
100
--
--
94
433 NR2YS
454 NR2YS
---
93
--
71
--
---
---
---
92
80
---
---
---
---
90
--
---
102
--
93
105
---
---
90
92
499 NR2YS
--
--
--
--
--
--
119
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
100
--
--
110
Ex373 NR2Y
Ex389 NR2Y
109
101
-102
-119
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
-- 104
-- 101
93
91
106 104
-105
---
---
99
106
--
--
--
--
104
--
--
--
--
--
--
113
--
--
PIONEER
93Y70
--
104
115
92
--
--
--
96
--
92
93Y92
--
89
101
77
96
--
--
91
--
89
94Y01
101
97
92
93
89
--
--
99
--
90
--
94Y70
94Y80
---
---
---
---
---
95
103
110
92
---
103
104
---
90
102
95Y10
--
--
--
--
--
105
102
--
100
--
95Y40
--
--
--
--
--
94
105
--
105
--
Ex455 NR2YS
- 22 -
--
--
--
122
-- 106
--
105
96
80 104
99
-- 111
100
--
--
107 92
95
98
80 100
102
107 92
---
---
---
---
---
---
100
102
102
--
--
--
--
--
--
102
98
--
--
--
--
--
--
101
96
Table 22 continued. Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2012 Roundup-Resistant Soybean Tests
Topeka Topeka
BRAND/NAME Emmett dryland irrigated Ottawa
WILLCROSS
RR2544NS
Parsons
Pittsburg McCune
MG4 MG 5
DMG 5
MG 4 MG 5
Erie
BelleHutch- Garden
MG 4 MG 5 Scandia ville Assaria inson City Colby AVG
--
--
--
--
--
97
99
--
96
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
97
RY2343N
104
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- 106
116
--
--
--
--
108
RY2363N
112
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- 101
117
--
--
--
--
110
RY2373N
RY2393N
109
93
107
91
90
114
78
86
---
---
---
---
---
---
-- 105
-- 96
104
95
---
---
---
---
99
96
RY2443N
--
106
106
111
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
108
RY2460N
RY2482NS
---
91
111
90
79
132
65
---
---
-109
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
104
91
RY2523N
--
--
--
--
--
89
79
--
99
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
89
RY2533N
--
--
--
--
--
93
106
--
92
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
97
RY2543N
--
--
--
--
--
96
102
--
98
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
99
Table 23. Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2012 Conventional Soybean Tests
BRAND/NAME
Ottawa
Parsons MG 5
Scandia
AVG
ADVANCED GENETIC
AG4244N LL
AG4989N LL
AG5163N LL
AG5333N
110
106
130
--
-98
101
98
-----
110
102
116
98
ILLINOIS AES
LD00-2817P
LD00-3309
103
69
---
106
89
105
79
IOWA AES
IA4004
IA4005
96
116
---
95
104
95
110
KANSAS AES
K07-1544
K07-1633
K09-1599
K09-5546
KS4607
KS5004N
KS5502N
89
102
104
-105
---
---94
-97
109
99
97
103
-101
---
94
99
103
94
103
97
109
LG SEEDS
C3114LL
C3554
---
---
96
103
96
103
MORSOY
LL 4512N
LL 4880N
LL 4892N
LL 5120N
LL 5332N
76
97
80
---
-98
89
104
96
------
76
97
85
104
96
134
98
--
-86
106
105
---
119
92
106
WILLCROSS
1137N
1347NLL
1349NLL
- 23 -
"
Table 24. Description of Roundup-Resistant Entries in 2012 Soybean Performance Tests
BRAND
NAME
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
CHANNEL
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
G2 GENETICS
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
KRUGER
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
AG3833S R2Y
AG4233S R2Y
AG4533N R2Y
AG4700S R2Y
AG4733S R2Y
AG5133N R2Y
AG3130
AG3432
AG3533
AG3731
AG3832
AG3833
AG4382
AG4533
AG4730
AG4831
AG4831
AG5233
AG5503
AG5533
AG5605
AG5632
AG5633
HBK R4924
HBK RY4620
HBK RY4721
HBK RY5221
HBK RY5421
HBK RY5521
5805R2
1371
1401
1421
1491
7323
7334
7342
7362
7373
7382
7390
7393
7420
7442
7460
K04-3083RR
KS5507NRR
K2-3402
K2-3701
K2-3802
K2-3803
K2-3804
K2-3902
K2-4102
K2-4202
K2-4303
C2835R2
C3111R2
C3220R2
C3399R2
C3666R2
C3890R2
Maturity Flower Hilum
Group color color
3.8
4.2
4.5
4.7
4.7
5.1
3.1
3.4
3.5
3.7
3.8
3.8
4.8
3.5
4.7
5.5
4.8
5.2
5.5
5.5
5.6
4.8
5.6
4.9
4.6
4.7
5.2
5.4
5.5
5.8
3.7
4.0
4.2
4.9
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.6
3.8
3.8
3.9
3.9
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
5.2
3.4
3.7
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.9
4.1
4.2
4.3
2.8
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.6
3.8
P
P
W
P
P
-P
P
-P
P
-P
P
P
-P
P
-P
P
-P
P
P
P
P
P
P
-W
P
W
W
W
P
P
W
P
W
W
P
W
W
W
-P
P
P
P
P
W
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
W
P
P
IB
BL
BL
BL
Bl
-IB
IB
-IB
IB
-BL
BL
BL
-BL
BL
-IB
IB
-BL
BL
BL
BL
IB
IB
IB
-BL
BL
BL
BL
BL
BR
BR
BL
Bl
BL
Bl
BL
Bl
BL
Bl
-IB
IB
IB
IB
BL
BL
BL
BL
IB
BL
IB
IB
B
B
B
IB
- 24 -
SCN Resistance
R1 R3 R4 R14
--------------------------------------R
-------R
----------------
R
R
R
---MR
MR
-R
R
R
R
R
--S
R
-R
MR
-S
R
-R
R
MR
--R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
-R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- MR
-- --- --- MR
-- --- MR
-- --- --- --- --- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
-- R
R --- R
R --- R
R --- R
R --- -R R
-- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --
Source
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
---PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI887888
--PI88788
-PI88788
PI88788
---------PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
-PI437654
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
MR14
MR14
MR14
MR14
MR14
MR14
Phytophthora
RR
Rps1c
-Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1c
-Rps1c
S
Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1c
-S
S
-S
S
-S
-Rps1c
Rps1c
----Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1a
-Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
---Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1a
Rps1a
Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1c
-Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1c
Tolerance
STS
4.0
4.0
2.5
3.0
4.0
-5.0
7.0
5.0
6.0
4.0
5.0
5.0
4.0
5.0
-7.0
5.0
-5.0
5.0
-5.0
-------4.0
6.0
4.0
4.0
5.0
4.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
-5.0
-6.0
---5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
7.0
1.0
-8.0
--2.0
STS
--STS
STS
------STS
STS
STS
--STS
STS
-STS
STS
----------------------------------------X
Table 24 continued. Description of Roundup-Resistant Entries in 2012 Soybean Performance Tests
BRAND
NAME
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
NK
NK
NK
NK
NK
NK
NK
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
OHLDE
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
C3989R2
C4211R2
C4340R2
3423NR2
3612NR2
3633NR2
3822NRS2
3842NRR
3850NR2
3943NRS2
3981NR2
3983NR2
4123NR2
4153NR2
4263NRS2
4270NR2
4373NR2
4443NRS2
4580RS2
4593NRS2
4703NR2
4792RS2
4813NRS2
4963NRS2
5182NR2
R2 46X71N
R2 51X31N
R2 51X52N
R2 53X82N
R2 54X42N
R2 55X62N
R2S 47X12N
R2S 48X10
R2S 56X02N
S30-E9
S34-N3 Brand
S36-B6 Brand
S36-M8
S37-B1
S39-U2 Brand
S52-F2 Brand
O-332
O-342
O-362
O-363
O-373
O-379
O-382
O-383
O-3921
O-393
O-421
O-432
O-442
O-451
O-453
365 NR2Y
366 NR2Y
376 NR2YS
388 NR2Y
392 NR2YS
411 NR2Y
Maturity Flower Hilum
Group color color
3.9
4.2
4.3
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
5.0
4.6
5.1
5.1
5.3
5.4
5.5
4.7
4.8
5.6
3.0
3.4
-3.6
3.7
3.9
5.2
----------------------
P
P
P
----------------------P
W
P
W
W
W
P
P
P
P
--P
W
-P
----------------------
IB
B
IB
----------------------BL
BF
IB
BF
BF
BF
IB
Bl
IB
IB
--IB
BF
-Bl
----------------------
- 25 -
SCN Resistance
Phytophthora
R1 R3 R4 R14
Source
RR
-- R -- --- R -- --- R -- --- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- -- -- --- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- -- -- --- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- MR -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- --- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- -- -- --- R -- MR
-- R -- R
-- -- -- --- -- -- --- R -- R
-- R -- R
-- -- -- --- R -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --
MR14
MR14
MR14
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI87788
PI88788
-PI88788
PI88788
-PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
-PI88788
PI88788
--PI88788
PI88788
-PI88788
----------------------
Rps1k
Rps1a
Rps1a
----------------------Rps1c
Rps1c
----Rps1c
Rps1c
-Rps1c
Rps1c
-Rps1c
Rps1c
------------------------
Tolerance
STS
---1.7
2.0
1.7
1.8
2.0
2.0
1.7
1.5
1.7
1.5
1.6
2.5
1.7
2.0
2.3
2.1
1.5
1.6
2.0
1.7
2.2
2.0
3.0
3.0
2.5
1.9
1.9
2.6
2.0
2.0
2.4
3.0
5.0
-4.0
4.0
5.0
4.0
----------------------
--X
---STS
--STS
----STS
--STS
-STS
-STS
STS
STS
-------STS
-STS
-----------------------------
Table 24 continued. Description of Roundup-Resistant Entries in 2012 Soybean Performance Tests
BRAND
NAME
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
421 NR2Y
433 NR2YS
454 NR2YS
499 NR2YS
Ex373 NR2Y
Ex389 NR2Y
Ex455 NR2YS
93Y70
93Y92
94Y01
94Y70
94Y80
95Y10
95Y40
RR2544NS
RY2343N
RY2363N
RY2373N
RY2393N
RY2443N
RY2460N
RY2482NS
RY2523N
RY2533N
RY2543N
Maturity Flower Hilum
Group color color
---------4.0
4.7
4.8
5.1
5.4
5.4
3.4
3.6
3.7
3.9
4.3
4.6
4.8
5.2
5.3
5.4
----------P
P
-W
------------
----------Bl
Bl
-Bl
------------
SCN Resistance
Phytophthora
R1 R3 R4 R14
Source
RR
----------MR
MR
-MR
------------
----------PI88788
PI88788
-PI88788
-PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
--------
-------------Rps1k
-Rps1k
Rps1c
Rps1c
--------
----------MR
MR
-R
------------
----------MR
MR
-S
------------
----------MR
MR
-R
------------
Tolerance
STS
----------5.0
6.0
-4.0
-1.5
1.8
2.4
--------
--------------------------
Table 25. Description of Conventional Entries in 2012 Soybean Performance Tests
BRAND
NAME
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ILLINOIS AES
ILLINOIS AES
IOWA AES
IOWA AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
AG4244N LL
AG4989N LL
AG5163N LL
AG5333N
LD00-2817P
LD00-3309
IA4004
IA4005
K07-1544
K07-1633
K09-1599
K09-5546
KS4607
KS5004N
KS5502N
C3114LL
C3554
LL 4512N
LL 4880N
LL 4892N
LL 5120N
LL 5332N
1137N
1347NLL
1349NLL
Maturity Flower Hilum
Group color color
4.2
5.0
5.1
5.3
4.1
3.9
4.0
4.0
3.8
4.2
4.2
5.2
4.6
5.0
5.2
3.1
3.5
4.5
4.8
4.8
5.1
5.3
3.7
4.7
4.9
W
P
W
P
P
P
P
-----P
W
P
P
P
P
P
W
Wl
P
----
BF
Bf
BL
BF
Ib
Bl
Ib
-----Bl
IB
IB
B
IB
BL
Bl
BL
Bl
BF
----
- 26 -
SCN Resistance
R1 R3 R4 R14
Source
-- R -- R
-- MR -- --- R -- --- R -- --- R -- --- R -- -S S S S
-- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- -S S S S
R R -- -R R R R
-- -- -- --- -- -- --- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --
PI88788
--PI88788
788/654
PI88788
-------PEKING
PI437654
-MR3
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
----
Phytophthora
RR
Rps3a
Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
--R
-----S
-S
--Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
---
Tolerance
STS
2.0
2.5
2.8
3.0
------------2.0
1.9
3.0
1.9
3.0
1.9
1.5
---
--------------------------
To access crop performance testing information electronically, visit our website. The information contained in this publication, plus
more, is available for viewing or downloading at:
www.agronomy.ksu.edu/kscpt
Excerpts from the
University Research Policy Agreement with Cooperating Seed Companies
Permission is hereby given to Kansas State University (KSU) to test varieties and/or hybrids designated on the attached entry forms
in the manner indicated in the test announcements. I certify that seed submitted for testing is a true sample of the seed being offered
for sale.
I understand that all results from Kansas Crop Performance Tests belong to the University and the public and shall be controlled by
the University so as to produce the greatest benefit to the public. Performance data may be used in the following ways: 1) Tables may
be reproduced in their entirety provided the source is referenced and data are not manipulated or reinterpreted; 2) Advertising statements by an individual company about the performance of its entries may be made as long as they are accurate statements about the
data as published, with no reference to other companies’ names or cultivars. In both cases, the following must be included with the
reprint or ad citing the appropriate publication number and title: “See the official Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment
Station and Cooperative Extension Service Report of Progress 1076, ‘2012 Kansas Performance Tests with Soybean Varieties,’ or the
Kansas Crop Performance Test website, www.agronomy.ksu.edu/kscpt, for details. Endorsement or recommendation by Kansas State
University is not implied.”
Contributors
Main Station, Manhattan
William T. Schapaugh, Jr., Professor (Senior Author)
Jane Lingenfelser, Assistant Agronomist
Nathan Keep, Research Assistant
Hatice Aslan, Research Assistant
Research Centers
Patrick Evans, Colby
Kelly Kusel, Parsons
Monty Spangler, Garden City
Dean Stites, Crawford County Extension
Experiment Fields
Eric Adee, Topeka
William Heer, Hutchinson
James Kimball, Ottawa
Randall Nelson, Belleville and Scandia
Cooperators
Vernon Egbert, McCune
Lance Rezac, Onaga
Dale Roberds, Pittsburg
Clayton Short, Assaria
Copyright 2012 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. Contents of this publicaiton may be freely reproduced for educational purposes. All other rights reserved. In each case, give credit to the author(s), 2012
Kansas Performance Tests with Soybean Varieties, Kansas State University, December 2012. Contribution no. 13-101-S from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.
Brand names appearing in this publication are for product identification purposes only. No endorsement is intended, nor is criticism
implied of similar products not mentioned.
Publications from Kansas State University are available at:
www.ksre.ksu.edu
Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
SRP 1076
K-State Research and Extension is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
December 2012
3,800