2013 Kansas Performance Tests with
Soybean Varieties
standard dryland
irrigated
double-cropped
conventional
Report of Progress 1094
Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
Test Objectives and Procedures........................................................................................................1
Data Interpretation............................................................................................................................1
Variety or Brand Selection ...............................................................................................................1
Summary of Entrants and Originators, Table 1................................................................................2
PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS
Onaga, Pottawatomie County (dryland), Table 2.............................................................................3
Topeka, Shawnee County (dryland), Table 3...................................................................................4
Topeka, Shawnee County (irrigated), Table 4..................................................................................5
Ottawa, Franklin County (dryland), Table 5 ....................................................................................6
Parsons, Labette County, Maturity Groups III-IV (dryland), Table 6..............................................7
Parsons, Labette County, Maturity Groups IV-V (dryland), Table 7...............................................7
McCune, Crawford County, Maturity Groups III-IV (irrigated), Table 8 ...................................... 8
McCune, Crawford County, Maturity Groups IV-V (irrigated), Table 9.........................................8
Erie, Neosho County, Maturity Groups III-IV (dryland), Table 10 ................................................9
Erie, Neosho County, Maturity Groups IV-V (dryland), Table 11 ................................................10
Scandia, Republic County (irrigated), Table 12 ............................................................................ 11
Belleville, Republic County (dryland), Table 13 .......................................................................... 11
Assaria, Saline County (dryland), Table 14 .................................................................................. 12
Hutchinson, Reno County (irrigated), Table 15 ............................................................................ 13
Colby, Thomas County (irrigated), Table 16 .................................................................................14
Garden City, Finney County (irrigated), Table 17 .........................................................................14
Ottawa, Franklin County (conventional, Liberty Link/dryland), Table 18.....................................15
Scandia, Republic County (conventional, Liberty Link/irrigated), Table 19................................. 15
Parsons, Labette County, MG III-IV (conventional, Liberty Link/dryland), Table 20...................16
Parsons, Labette County, MG IV-V (conventional, Liberty Link/dryland), Table 21 ....................16
YIELD SUMMARY
Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2013 Roundup-Resistant Soybean Tests, Table 22....17
Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2013 Conventional/LL Soybean Tests, Table 23.......19
APPENDIX
Descriptions of Roundup-Resistant Entries, Table 24 .....................................................................20
Description of Conventional/Liberty Link Entries, Table 25...........................................................22
K-State Soybean School Announcement..........................................................................................23
Electronic Access, University Research Policy, and Duplication Policy ..........................back cover
Contribution no. 14-039-S from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.
-i-
2013 KANSAS SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TESTS
Lodging is rated at maturity by the following scores:
TEST OBJECTIVES AND PROCEDURES
1. Almost all plants erect
2. All plants slightly leaning or a few plants down
3. All plants leaning moderately (45%) or 25 to 50% of
plants down
4. All plants leaning considerably or 50 to 80% of plants
down
5. Almost all plants down
Soybean performance tests are conducted each year to
provide information on the relative performance of new
and established varieties and brands at several locations in
Kansas.
Seeds for tests are from private seed companies, certified
growers, and agricultural experiment stations (Table 1).
Seed quality, including factors such as purity and
germination, can be important in determining the
performance of a variety. Soybean seed used for private
and public entries in the Kansas Crop Performance Tests
is prepared professionally and usually meets or exceeds
Kansas Crop Improvement Certification standards.
Relative performance of a given variety comparable to
that obtained in these tests is best assured under similar
environmental conditions and cultural practices and with
the use of certified or professionally prepared seed. All
companies known to be developing and marketing
soybean varieties or brands are invited to submit test seed;
interested companies enter on a voluntary, fee-entry basis.
Height is the average length from the soil surface to the
top of the main stem of mature plants.
VARIETY OR BRAND SELECTION
Performance of soybean varieties or brands varies from
year to year and from location to location, depending on
factors such as weather, management practices, and
variety adaptation. When selecting varieties or brands,
producers should carefully analyze variety performance
for two or more years across locations. Performance
averaged over several environments will provide a better
estimate of genetic potential and stability than
performance based on a few environments.
Companies were invited to enter Roundup-resistant
varieties in either the Roundup trials or the conventional/
Liberty Link trials at Scandia, Ottawa, or Parsons.
Small differences in yield between any two varieties or
brands usually are not important. Within maturity groups
at each location, LSD (least significant difference) was
calculated. The significance level used to calculate the
LSD was 10%. Unless two varieties differ in yield by
more than the LSD, genetic yield potential of one entry
cannot be considered superior to that of another.
Entries were planted in four-row plots with rows 30
inches apart and were replicated three or four times each.
Seeding rate ranged from 7 to 12 seeds per foot of row.
The center two rows of each plot were harvested for yield.
Harvested row lengths ranged from 11 to 33 feet,
depending on location. Cultural practices and rainfall for
each test location are presented with each table. Results
from this year's tests are presented in Tables 2 through 21.
Relative yields of each entry from all locations are shown
in Tables 22 and 23. Test results also can be found online
at: http://www.agronomy.ksu.edu/kscpt
The coefficient of variability (CV) represents an estimate
of the precision in the replicated yield trials. A CV of less
than 10% indicates a good test with a high level of
reliability. CVs ranging from 10 to 15% are usually
acceptable for performance comparisons. CVs greater
than 15% generally lack sufficient precision to provide
any more than a rough guide to cultivar performance. For
tests in which the precision was insufficient to statistically
compare performance among the entries, the LSD value
has been replaced with the designation NS, indicating that
seed yields were not significantly different.
DATA INTERPRETATION
Yields are recorded as bushels per acre (60 lb/bushel);
adjusted to 13% moisture content when moisture data are
available. Seed yield also is expressed as a percentage of
the test average to assist in identifying entries that
consistently produce better than the average yield.
Maturity is the date on which 95% of the pods have
ripened (browned). Delayed leaf drop and green stems
are not considered when assigning maturity. About 1
week of good drying weather after maturing is needed
before soybeans are ready to harvest.
-1-
Table 1. Entrants in the 2013 Kansas Soybean Performance Tests
Arkansas Ag. Exp. Stn. (AES)
Fayetteville, AR
479-871-6972
Bayer CropScience
DeWitt, AR
806-784-1228
bayer.com
NuTech/ G2 Genetics
NuTech Seed, LLC
Forest City, IA
641-581-3350
yieldleader.com
Iowa State University
Ames, IA
515-292-3497
LG Seeds
Elmwood, IL
800-752-6847
lgseeds.com
Phillips
Phillips Seed Farms, Inc
Hope, KS
785-949-2204
phillipsseed.com
Kansas Ag. Exp. Stn. (AES)
Manhattan, KS
785-532-7242
Midland
Midland Genetics Group
Ottawa, KS
785-242-3598
midlandgenetics.com
Pioneer
Pioneer Hi-Bred, Intl., Inc.
Lincoln, NE
800-258-5604
pioneer.com
Missouri Ag. Exp. Stn. (AES)
Portageville, MO
573-379-5875
Morsoy
MFA Incorporated
Columbia, MO
573-876-5363
morsoy.com
Progeny Ag Products
Wynne, AR
888-535-7333
progenyag.com
Advanced Genetics
Delange Seed Company
Girard, KS
620-724-6223
delangeseed.com
Mycogen Seeds
Indianapolis, IN
800-MYCOGEN
dow.com
Willcross
NeCo Seed Farms, Inc.
Garden City, MO
816-862-8203
willcross.com
Asgrow
Monsanto
St. Louis, MO
800-768-6387
asgrowanddekalb.com
NK Brand
Garst Brand Seed
Minnetonka, MN
800-445-0956
garstseed.com
-2-
Rezac Farm, Onaga, Pottawatomie County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist
Wabash silty clay, pH n/a % OM na; P test: , K test:
Rainfall:
Apri l May June
3.9
4.1
4.3
July Aug. Sept. Total
2.6
3.3
5.6
23.8
Conditions at planting were optimal, and seeds had adequate moisture
for germination. Early season seedling vigor was above-average. The
moisture ran out quickly, and conditions were extremely dry until early
fall, hurting yields. The wet weather persisted into harvest and varieties
shattered heavily before harvest could commence, resulting in lowerthan-expected yields.
Planted 5/13/2013 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 10/14/2013; 11 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Pre-emerge Authority First (4oz); Post-emerge
Roundup PowerMax (32oz)
Table 2. Emmett, Pottawatomie County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013.
Table 2. Onaga, Pottawatomie County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013
BRAND
NAME
ASGROW
ASGROW
LG SEEDS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MORSOY
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
PIONEER
AG3931
AG4531
C3989R2
3633NR2
3824NRS2
3884NR2
3983NR2
4044NR2
4373NR2
4543NRS2
R2 38X52N
363 NR2YE
375 NR2YS
383 NR2YE
384 NR2YS
392 NR2YS
411 NR2Y
433 NR2YS
94Y01
94Y50
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
3-yr.
AVG
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013 2012
2011
51.8
----96
----116
62.3
37.8
-48.4
-109
58.9
51.6
33.1
51.5
42.4
45.4
96
54.3
----101
49.9
----93
46.8
36.9
-41.9
-87
53.5
----99
52.6
37.4
52.7
45.0
47.6
98
----112
60.5
54.3
----101
53.2
----99
50.3
----93
51.7
----96
56.4
----105
51.9
37.6
-44.8
-96
51.2
----95
----110
59.2
57.2
35.2
-46.2
-106
49.1
----91
53.8
34.8
49.1
6.9
5.0
7.9
4.4
2.1
4.5
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-3-
--109
95
--106
-107
------108
--101
--
---105
----107
------------
Mat
9/25
10/2
9/23
9/20
9/22
9/21
9/27
9/26
9/28
9/27
9/23
9/22
9/24
9/21
9/22
9/25
9/28
9/27
9/25
9/30
2013
Lodge
score
2.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.8
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.8
2.0
Ht
(in.)
41
39
40
35
40
37
37
39
36
43
39
39
38
40
39
40
38
38
40
44
J.D. Hanna, Erma Harden Farm, Topeka, Shawnee County; Eric Adee, agronomist
The growing conditions varied considerably thorough the season, which
started out with a little later planting date with wet soils followed by
periods of dry and hot conditions until the last week of July. The last
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total week of July/first week of August started a period of rain and cooler
4.5
5.5
2.8
2.5
3.3
6.7 25.3 temperatures that really helped seed fill. SDS symptoms were
Rainfall:
throughout the irrigated trial, but not present in the dryland trial.
Planted 5/24/2013 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 10/10/2013; 27.5 ft. by 4-row plot; pesticides: Pre-emerge Sonic (3oz); Post-emerge Roundup
PowerMax (22oz)+Outlook (12oz)+AMS
Wabash silty clay loam, pH n/a, % OM na; P test: , K test:
Table 3. Topeka, Shawnee County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013.
Table 3. Topeka, Shawnee County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013
BRAND
NAME
ASGROW
ASGROW
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
PIONEER
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
AG3931
AG4531
3633NR2
3824NRS2
3884NR2
3983NR2
4044NR2
4373NR2
4543NRS2
4580RS2
R2 38X52N
R2 42X53N
R2 43X43N
R2S 47X12N
363 NR2YE
375 NR2YS
383 NR2YE
384 NR2YS
392 NR2YS
411 NR2Y
94Y01
94Y50
RY 2460S
RY 2494NS
WX 2434N
WX 2464N
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
3-yr.
AVG
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2011
2013
2012
----110
56.8
44.8
----86
39.6
65.2
48.9
54.3 112
58.1
53.5
----103
----113
58.6
51.0
37.7
-44.4
-98
52.7
----102
55.4
36.6
69.0
46.0
53.7 107
47.6
----92
46.2
36.6
57.4
41.4
46.7
89
----111
57.7
52.7
----102
47.9
----92
42.6
----82
----117
60.4
----112
57.8
54.7
----106
56.5
----109
47.6
40.0
-43.8
-92
53.6
38.8
-46.2
-103
55.7
36.0
-45.9
-108
46.7
----90
48.3
----93
42.1
----81
48.3
----93
48.4
----93
51.8
37.1
64.0
5.9
8.8
12.7
3.6
4.5
11.0
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-4-
--107
--102
-99
-99
--------108
105
97
------
--102
----108
-90
-----------------
Mat
9/23
9/28
9/24
9/22
9/23
9/24
9/25
9/26
9/22
9/28
9/22
9/27
9/27
9/30
9/24
9/24
9/22
9/24
9/24
9/26
9/25
9/26
9/30
10/4
10/6
9/27
2013
Lodge
score
2.0
1.3
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.8
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.5
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.8
1.5
1.0
1.3
1.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
1.3
1.3
4.0
2.0
Ht
(in.)
38
34
38
36
34
38
37
38
39
37
37
41
35
47
41
39
41
38
38
37
42
45
37
40
49
40
Kansas River Valley Experiment Field, Topeka, Shawnee County; Eric Adee, agronomist
Eudora Silt loam, pH n/a, % OM na; P test: , K tes
The growing conditions varied considerably thorough the season, which
started out with a little later planting date with wet soils followed by
periods of dry and hot conditions until the last week of July. The last
week of July/first week of August started a period of rain and cooler
temperatures that really helped seed fill. SDS symptoms were
throughout the irrigated trial, but not present in the dryland trial.
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
4.5
5.5
2.8
2.5
3.3
6.7 25.3
Rainfall:
Irrigation:
1.8
0.6
0.9
3.3
Planted 5/15/2013 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 10/10/2013; 27.5 ft. by 4-row plot; pesticides: Pre-emerge- Authority XL (5oz)+Dual II Mag
(1.5pt)+Fusion/Fusilade (4oz); Post-emerge Roundup PowerMax (22oz)+Outlook (12oz)+AMS
Table 4. Topeka, Shawnee County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013.
Table 4. Topeka, Shawnee County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013
BRAND
NAME
ASGROW
ASGROW
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
PIONEER
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
AG3931
AG4531
3633NR2
3824NRS2
3884NR2
3983NR2
4044NR2
4373NR2
4543NRS2
R2 42X53N
R2 43X43N
R2S 47X12N
363 NR2YE
375 NR2YS
383 NR2YE
392 NR2YS
411 NR2Y
94Y01
94Y50
RY 2460S
RY 2494NS
WX 2434N
WX 2464N
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
3-yr.
AVG
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013
2012
2011
64.7
----93
62.6
----90
68.6
60.3
60.0
64.5
63.0
99
----105
73.2
----109
75.4
71.7
58.3
-65.0
-103
60.8
----88
52.6
-66.8
-117
80.9
59.9
----86
----105
73.2
70.9
----102
54.6
----79
----118
82.2
----109
75.9
63.2
----91
57.4
46.4
-51.9
-83
66.8
70.9
-68.9
-96
50.2
-61.7
-105
73.2
64.2
----93
63.8
----92
68.6
----99
----119
82.3
----117
81.1
69.4
54.4
57.3
12.8
21.7
12.4
10.5
16.0
9.6
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-5-
--111
--107
-97
-------85
130
92
------
--105
---------------------
Mat
10/2
10/1
9/23
9/27
9/29
10/2
9/28
10/2
9/30
10/3
9/30
10/4
9/28
9/30
9/26
9/29
10/1
10/1
10/3
10/2
10/7
10/10
10/7
2013
Lodge
score
4.5
2.0
2.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.0
3.5
2.0
3.0
1.5
3.0
3.0
1.0
3.0
3.5
2.5
3.5
3.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
3.5
Ht
(in.)
41
37
36
44
37
44
39
39
44
44
37
47
40
40
41
40
42
44
47
40
39
50
46
East Central Kansas Experiment Field, Ottawa, Franklin County; Eric Adee, agronomist
Planted into little moisture but obtained adequate stands. Plants
had adequate moisture into growing season. June and July brought heat
and drought stress but enough moisture to keep plants growing. Average
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total rainfall throughout reproductive stages, with pod fill and canopy
3.7
2.9
6.0
2.4
5.2
5.5 25.7 closure having more moisture than vegetative. Overall, higher-thanRainfall:
anticipated yields.
Planted 5/23/2013 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 10/11/2013; 25ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Pre-emerge-6oz Authority XL and 1.5 pt Dual Magnum
Woodson silt loam, pH n/a, % OM na; P test: , K tes
Table 5. Ottawa, Franklin County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013.
Table 5. Ottawa, Franklin County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013
BRAND
NAME
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ASGROW
ASGROW
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
PIONEER
PIONEER
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
AG4422S R2Y
AG4700S R2Y
AG4844S R2Y
AG3931
AG4531
3983NR2
4044NR2
4373NR2
4543NRS2
4580RS2
4703NR2
4792RS2
4813NRS2
R2 42X53N
R2 43X43N
R2S 47X12N
94Y01
94Y50
RY 2460S
RY 2494NS
WX 2434N
WX 2464N
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
3-yr.
AVG
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013
2012
2011
60.1
----104
53.1
26.5
-39.8
-92
57.1
----99
----111
64.1
53.3
----92
61.4
17.7
-39.6
-106
----116
67.0
28.5
23.3
46.7
38.9 112
64.9
62.3
----108
56.9
25.4
21.1
41.2
34.5
99
59.3
17.4
-38.4
-103
52.0
26.7
22.7
39.4
33.8
90
54.7
15.8
-35.3
-95
61.7
----107
57.0
----99
55.3
24.5
-39.9
-96
56.0
21.7
-38.9
-97
57.5
----100
58.7
----102
53.5
----93
43.9
----76
59.0
----102
57.7
23.4
23.4
6.1
17.3
14.6
4.2
4.7
4.0
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-6-
-113
---76
-122
-109
74
114
68
--105
93
------
-------100
-90
-97
-----------
Mat
9/25
9/29
10/3
9/24
9/30
9/26
9/24
9/27
9/27
9/29
9/29
9/30
9/28
9/26
9/27
10/2
9/25
9/27
9/30
10/3
10/7
9/28
2013
Lodge
score
1.0
1.3
2.0
1.5
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.8
1.0
1.8
1.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
Ht
(in.)
31
34
36
34
31
34
34
33
38
35
36
36
40
32
33
43
33
40
35
35
47
39
Southeast Agricultural Research Center, Parsons, Labette County; Kelly Kusel, technician
Parsons Silt Loam, pH 6.1, % OM; P test: , K test:
April
Rainfall:
5.8
May June
5.9
3.4
July Aug. Sept. Total
4.0
6.0
7.9
Hot and dry conditions from planting until end of July. Late July and
early August rainfall were extremely beneficial to soybean crop. Frost
on October 25 did not affect yield or quality even though not all
soybeans had reached physiological maturity.
33.0
Planted 6/13/2013 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 11/15/2013; 14 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Sprayed June 14 with 1.5pt Dual ll Magnum + 6oz
Authority XL, July 25 with 1qt glyphosate + .33oz Classic
Table 6. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2011-2013.
Table 6. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2011-2013
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
BRAND
NAME
ASGROW
ASGROW
BAYER
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
PIONEER
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
AG3931
AG4531
HBK RY4620
4373NR2
4543NRS2
4580RS2
94Y50
P 4211 RY
P 4313 RY
P 4510 RY
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-yr.
AVG
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013
2012
2011
39.4
----94
41.3
----98
38.3
-42.3
-110
46.2
38.5
-40.8
-103
43.1
39.7
----95
41.7
42.2
18.9
42.0
34.3
99
----101
42.4
-17.6
--105
44.1
----103
43.4
38.9
-16.0
--93
42.0
38.7
17.0
7.7
5.6
16.6
3.9
2.6
3.4
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
--99
99
-109
-----
-----111
-104
-94
Mat
9/30
10/4
10/3
10/1
10/5
10/4
10/4
10/2
10/2
10/4
2013
Lodge
score
1.8
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.8
1.6
1.8
1.0
Ht
(in.)
37
36
36
35
38
36
39
36
35
36
Southeast Agricultural Research Center, Parsons, Labette County; Kelly Kusel, technician
Parsons Silt Loam, pH 6.1, % OM; P test: , K test:
April
May June
July Aug. Sept. Total
Hot and dry conditions from planting until end of July. Late July and
early August rainfall were extremely beneficial to soybean crop. Frost
on October 25 did not affect yield or quality even though not all
soybeans had reached physiological maturity.
5.8
5.9
3.4
4.0
6.0
7.9 33.0
Rainfall:
Planted 6/13/2013 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 11/15/2013; 14 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Sprayed June 14 with 1.5pt Dual ll Magnum + 6oz
Authority XL, July 25 with 1qt glyphosate + .33oz Classic
Table 7. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2011-2013.
Table 7. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2011-2013
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS
ASGROW
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MYCOGEN
MYCOGEN
MYCOGEN
MYCOGEN
MYCOGEN
PIONEER
PIONEER
AG4844S R2Y
AG5133N R2Y
R04-1250RR
R04-1268RR
AG5533
HBK RY4721
HBK RY5221
HBK RY5421
K04-3083RR
4703NR2
4792RS2
4813NRS2
5134NR2
R2 51X03N
R2 53X82N
R2S 47X12N
R2S 56X02N
5N478
X53479R2
X53510R2
X53540R2
X53550R2
94Y70
94Y80
48.1
47.2
43.8
46.7
48.0
43.3
45.7
46.3
39.1
45.1
46.4
40.8
45.5
43.5
44.9
50.3
43.0
40.5
51.3
45.1
44.4
47.1
44.1
48.5
-35.4
--42.6
42.1
39.4
39.9
38.4
41.2
43.2
38.1
--39.8
-41.5
-----37.9
41.1
-7-
-10.5
------10.0
-12.6
--------------
-41.3
--45.3
42.7
42.6
43.1
38.8
43.2
44.8
39.5
--42.4
-42.3
-----41.0
44.8
3-yr.
AVG
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013
2012
2011
-31.0
------29.2
-34.1
--------------
105
103
96
102
105
95
100
101
86
99
102
89
100
95
98
110
94
89
112
99
97
103
97
106
-89
--107
106
99
100
96
103
108
95
--100
-104
-----95
103
-85
------81
-102
--------------
Mat
10/9
10/15
10/22
10/19
10/16
10/7
10/11
10/14
10/9
10/7
10/7
10/8
10/7
10/7
10/19
10/8
10/19
10/8
10/7
10/22
10/22
10/20
10/6
10/7
2013
Lodge
score
1.0
2.8
2.0
2.3
2.5
1.8
2.5
1.5
1.8
1.9
1.3
1.3
1.0
1.3
2.5
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
1.3
1.8
1.8
2.0
Ht
(in.)
39
37
39
37
40
42
42
36
46
42
40
44
45
44
42
46
52
43
45
33
39
42
41
42
Table 7 continued. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2011-2013
BRAND
NAME
PIONEER
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
95Y10
RY 2494NS
RY 2513N
RY2533N
RY2543N
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
3-yr.
AVG
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013
2012
2011
41.9
-46.2
-110
50.4
----113
51.6
44.5
----97
42.6
37.1
-39.9
-93
38.5
-43.5
-106
48.5
45.7
39.9
12.4
6.3
6.6
14.8
3.4
3.1
2.2
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
105
--93
96
------
Mat
2013
Lodge
score
10/9
10/9
10/15
10/22
10/12
1.0
1.0
3.3
1.0
1.8
Ht
(in.)
42
39
47
39
43
Vernon Egbert Farm, McCune, Crawford County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist
Very wet and late spring caused planting to be delayed compared with
previous years. The wet conditions continued into stand establishment
and stunted seedling vigor. Moving into late vegetative and early
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total reproductive stages, a large wind storm caused a few varieties to lodge.
5.7 10.1
2.6
8.0
5.7
1.8 33.8 In mid productive stages, wet conditions persisted and signs of hypoxia
Rainfall:
2.1
4.2
6.3 were high, leading to increased disease and insect pressure. Late
season rains also hindered harvestability which caused some shattering
issues. Overall, yields were fair to good with later-maturing varieties
resisting shattering.
Planted 6/13/2013 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 11/13/2013; 11 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Pre-emerge Authority First (4oz); Post-emerge
Roundup PowerMax (32oz)
Cherokee silt loam, pH n/a, % OM na; P test: , K test:
Table 9. McCune, Crawford County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2011-2013.
Table 8. McCune, Crawford County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2011-2013
BRAND
NAME
ASGROW
ASGROW
BAYER
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
PIONEER
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
AG3931
AG4531
HBK RY4620
4373NR2
4543NRS2
4580RS2
94Y50
P 4211 RY
P 4313 RY
P 4510 RY
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
3-yr.
AVG
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013
2012
2011
37.4
----80
----108
50.5
47.9
54.3
-51.1
-102
47.2
57.4
-52.3
-101
----107
50.0
53.1
28.7
53.3
45.1 114
53.5
44.9
----96
39.7
-27.5
--85
47.8
----102
-29.0
--107
50.0
46.9
52.2
26.4
6.9
9.2
4.2
3.9
5.7
1.4
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
--104
110
-102
-----
-----109
-104
-110
Mat
2013
Lodge
score
10/7
10/17
10/19
10/9
10/12
10/17
10/21
10/9
10/13
10/16
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Ht
(in.)
28
29
29
29
34
31
33
27
28
29
Vernon Egbert Farm, McCune, Crawford County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist
Very wet and late spring caused planting to be delayed compared to
years previous. The wet conditions continued into stand establishment
and stunted seedling vigor. Moving into late vegetative and early
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total reproductive stages, a large wind storm caused a few varieties to lodge.
5.7 10.1
2.6
8.0
5.7
1.8 33.8 In mid productive stages, wet conditions persisted and signs of hypoxia
Rainfall:
2.1
4.2
6.3 were high, leading to increased disease and insect pressure. Late
season rains also hindered harvestability which caused some shattering
issues. Overall, yields were fair to good with later-maturing varieties
resisting shattering.
Planted 6/13/2013 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 11/13/2013; 11 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Pre-emerge Authority First (4oz); Post-emerge
Roundup PowerMax (32oz)
Cherokee silt loam, pH n/a, % OM na; P test: , K test:
Table 10. McCune, Crawford County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2011-2013.
Table 9. McCune, Crawford County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2011-2013
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
AG4844S R2Y
AG5133N R2Y
61.2
53.1
-50.4
-8-
---
-51.8
3-yr.
AVG
---
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013
2012
2011
106
92
-92
---
Mat
10/24
10/26
2013
Lodge
score
1.0
2.0
Ht
(in.)
34
32
Table 9 continued. McCune, Crawford County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2011-2013
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
BRAND
NAME
ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS
ASGROW
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MORSOY
MORSOY
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
R04-1250RR
R04-1268RR
AG5533
HBK RY4721
HBK RY5221
HBK RY5421
K04-3083RR
4703NR2
4792RS2
4813NRS2
5134NR2
R2 51X03N
R2S 47X12N
94Y70
94Y80
95Y10
RY 2494NS
RY 2513N
RY2533N
RY2543N
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-yr.
AVG
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013
2012
2011
55.4
----96
52.4
----91
51.8
50.4
-51.1
-89
56.1
56.5
-56.3
-97
57.4
55.3
-56.4
-99
49.8
-58.5
-116
67.2
56.4
57.1
34.2
56.8
49.2
97
57.5
59.4
-58.5
-99
61.3
61.1
18.4
61.2
46.9 106
58.3
53.9
-56.1
-101
59.0
----102
----111
64.5
----116
67.2
52.5
56.2
-54.4
-91
59.9
56.5
-58.2
-103
59.0
54.5
-56.8
-102
50.0
----86
58.5
----101
59.6
50.1
-54.9
-103
57.3
53.3
-55.3
-99
57.9
54.5
29.0
7.4
5.9
7.6
5.1
3.8
2.6
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
--92
104
101
91
105
109
112
99
---103
104
100
--92
98
------118
-63
------------
Mat
10/28
10/28
10/27
10/23
10/24
10/28
10/23
10/16
10/17
10/26
10/23
10/26
10/25
10/17
10/18
10/22
10/17
10/24
10/27
10/25
2013
Lodge
score
1.0
1.3
2.5
1.0
2.5
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
3.0
1.0
1.0
Ht
(in.)
32
34
33
38
39
32
40
35
33
40
40
37
41
35
37
34
30
41
34
38
Joe Harris Farm, Erie, Neosho County; Kelly Kusel, technician
Lanton Silt Loam, pH 5.9, % OM; P test: , K test:
Rainfall:
April
4.5
May June
4.3
3.9
July Aug. Sept. Total
9.0
3.2
9.1 34.0
Late July and early August rainfall were extremely beneficial to soybean
crop. Frost on October 25 did not affect yield or quality even though not
all soybeans had reached physiological maturity.
Planted 6/20/2013 at 9 seeds/ft; harvested 11/19/2013; 14 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Sprayed June 21 with 1.5pt Dual ll Magnum + 6oz
Authority XL, sprayed July 10 with .5 Classic + 2oz Butyrac 200, sprayed August 19 with 1qt glyphosate + .33oz Classic
Table 11. Erie, Neosho County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2011-2013.
Table 10. Erie, Neosho County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups III-IV, 2011-2013
BRAND
NAME
ASGROW
ASGROW
BAYER
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
PIONEER
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
AG3931
AG4531
HBK RY4620
4373NR2
4543NRS2
4580RS2
94Y50
P 4211 RY
P 4313 RY
P 4510 RY
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
3-yr.
AVG
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013
2012
2011
49.7
----95
----107
56.1
53.5
-55.7
-110
57.9
48.8
46.7
33.4
47.8
43.0
93
51.2
----98
51.7
51.6
39.7
51.7
47.7
98
50.2
----96
49.0
-35.2
--93
----105
55.1
-38.0
--106
55.5
52.5
44.1
36.7
7.0
8.5
4.6
4.4
4.4
2.0
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
-9-
--121
106
-117
-----
---91
-108
-96
-104
Mat
10/7
10/11
10/12
10/12
10/13
10/12
10/13
10/11
10/12
10/12
2013
Lodge
score
1.8
1.0
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
2.0
1.3
1.0
1.3
Ht
(in.)
35
34
33
34
38
35
39
33
33
33
Joe Harris Farm, Erie, Neosho County; Kelly Kusel, technician
Lanton Silt Loam, pH 5.9, % OM; P test: , K test:
April
Rainfall:
4.5
May June
4.3
3.9
July Aug. Sept. Total
9.0
3.2
9.1
Late July and early August rainfall were extremely beneficial to soybean
crop. Frost on October 25 did not affect yield or quality even though not
all soybeans had reached physiological maturity.
34.0
Planted 6/20/2013 at 9 seeds/ft; harvested 11/19/2013; 14 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Sprayed June 21 with 1.5pt Dual ll Magnum + 6oz
Authority XL, sprayed July 10 with .5 Classic + 2oz Butyrac 200, sprayed August 19 with 1qt glyphosate + .33oz Classic
Table 12. Erie, Neosho County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2011-2013.
Table 11. Erie, Neosho County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2011-2013
BRAND
NAME
ADVANCED GENETICS
ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS
ASGROW
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
KANSAS AES
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MORSOY
MORSOY
MYCOGEN
MYCOGEN
MYCOGEN
MYCOGEN
MYCOGEN
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
AG4844S R2Y
R04-1250RR
R04-1268RR
AG5533
HBK RY4721
HBK RY5221
HBK RY5421
K04-3083RR
4703NR2
4792RS2
5134NR2
R2S 47X12N
R2S 48X10
5N478
X53479R2
X53510R2
X53540R2
X53550R2
94Y70
94Y80
95Y10
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
3-yr.
AVG
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013
2012
2011
49.7
----88
57.6
----102
55.6
----98
51.8
-59.1
-118
66.4
51.9
44.7
-48.3
-92
47.6
-56.9
-117
66.2
59.2
52.1
-55.7
-105
49.7
47.2
43.1
48.5
46.7
88
50.3
42.1
-46.2
-89
52.7
48.0
44.0
50.4
48.2
93
58.5
----104
59.6
----105
54.7
----97
56.4
----100
61.9
----110
53.0
----94
51.5
----91
62.6
----111
53.5
42.7
-48.1
-95
56.2
48.1
-52.2
-99
59.0
48.3
-53.7
-104
56.5
47.3
42.5
5.2
7.7
7.5
3.5
4.3
3.8
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
- 10 -
---110
95
101
110
100
89
101
--------90
102
102
-------101
-104
------------
Mat
10/19
10/24
10/24
10/24
10/20
10/19
10/24
10/18
10/16
10/18
10/20
10/22
10/17
10/22
10/22
10/18
10/24
10/24
10/16
10/16
10/19
2013
Lodge
score
1.5
2.0
2.3
2.5
1.3
2.0
2.0
2.3
1.8
1.0
1.5
1.8
1.0
2.1
1.8
2.0
2.0
2.8
1.5
1.8
1.0
Ht
(in.)
36
35
36
38
40
41
36
40
38
36
41
39
36
40
39
40
37
36
37
38
36
North Central Experiment Field, Scandia, Republic County; Randall Nelson, agronomist
Crete silt loam, pH 5.8, % OM; P test: , K test:
April
May June
July Aug. Sept. Total
Planted into wet conditions and adequate moisture persisted. Adequate
moisture and cooler temps were seen throughout the growing season,
resulting in good yields throughout the test.
2.6
3.1
1.4
3.8
2.8
3.4 17.1
Rainfall:
Irrigation:
Planted 5/22/2013 at 9 seeds/ft; harvested 10/29/2013; 26 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 2 applications of Roundup (32oz)
Table 13. Scandia, Republic County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013.
Table 12. Scandia, Republic County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
BRAND
NAME
ASGROW
ASGROW
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
NK
NK
NK
NK
NK
NK
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
PIONEER
AG3931
AG4531
3423NR2
3633NR2
3824NRS2
3884NR2
3983NR2
4044NR2
S30-E9
S34-Z1 Brand
S36-B6 Brand
S38-S4 Brand
S38-W4 Brand
S39-U2 Brand
363 NR2YE
375 NR2YS
383 NR2YE
411 NR2Y
94Y01
94Y50
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-yr.
AVG
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013
2012
2011
----107
62.2
----102
59.2
51.8
77.0
-64.4
-89
56.6
79.0
62.3
67.8
66.0
98
50.9
----88
----105
60.9
74.4
-68.6
-108
62.7
----100
57.9
51.8
----89
----102
59.2
55.7
77.0
72.3
66.4
68.3
96
----106
61.4
----110
63.5
81.9
67.8
73.0
71.2 111
64.0
56.1
----97
----101
58.3
55.3
----96
53.5
----92
74.2
-67.6
-105
60.9
55.3
----96
75.5
61.2
57.9
8.3
5.5
8.0
6.6
5.6
6.6
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
--102
105
--99
---102
--108
----98
--
---102
------118
--111
-------
Mat
---------------------
2013
Lodge
score
---------------------
Ht
(in.)
---------------------
North Central Kansas Experiment Field, Belleville, Republic County; Randall Nelson, agronomist
Crete silt loam, pH 5.8, % OM; P test: , K test:
April
Rainfall:
2.6
May June
3.1
1.4
July Aug. Sept. Total
3.8
2.8
3.4
Planted into wet conditions and adequate moisture persisted. Adequate
moisture and cooler temps were seen throughout the growing season,
resulting in good yields throughout the test.
17.1
Planted 5/22/2013 at 9 seeds/ft; harvested 10/29/2013; 25 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 2 applications of Roundup (32oz)
Table 14. Belleville, Republic County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013.
Table 13. Belleville, Republic County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
ASGROW
ASGROW
LG SEEDS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
NK
NK
NK
NK
NK
NK
AG3931
AG4531
C3989R2
3423NR2
3633NR2
3824NRS2
3884NR2
3983NR2
4044NR2
S30-E9
S34-Z1 Brand
S36-B6 Brand
S38-S4 Brand
S38-W4 Brand
S39-U2 Brand
42.3
38.9
47.1
39.0
42.8
35.6
39.0
39.4
51.2
45.7
39.9
40.9
36.6
40.4
40.9
---46.0
49.0
--46.7
-51.7
-56.3
--48.4
70.6
----------67.1
----
- 11 -
---42.5
45.9
--43.1
-48.7
-48.6
--44.7
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013
2012
2011
3-yr.
AVG
-102
-94
-114
-94
-- .7 103
-86
-94
-95
-124
-110
-96
54.8
99
-88
-98
-99
---91
97
--93
-103
-112
--96
106
----------100
----
Mat
----------------
2013
Lodge
score
----------------
Ht
(in.)
----------------
Table 13 continued. Belleville, Republic County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013
BRAND
NAME
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
PIONEER
363 NR2YE
375 NR2YS
383 NR2YE
384 NR2YS
392 NR2YS
411 NR2Y
94Y01
94Y50
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
3-yr.
AVG
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013
2012
2011
42.8
----103
42.1
----102
37.0
----89
38.0
----92
42.5
54.7
-48.6
-103
----110
45.7
40.4
-43.1
-110
45.7
38.9
----94
41.4
50.3
66.9
13.1
13.7
8.9
7.4
9.4
8.0
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
----109
-80
--
---------
Mat
---------
2013
Lodge
score
---------
Ht
(in.)
---------
Clayton Short Farm, Assaria, Saline County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist
Planted into extremely dry conditions that persisted until late vegetative
stage, when conditions improved to above normal for this region.
Heat and mild drought persisted throughout reproductive
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total stages, but moisture was adequate for growth compared to 3 previous
2.3
5.9
2.2
5.8
5.0
2.8 24.0 years. Yields were average to above-average at harvest for this region.
Rainfall:
Planted 6/11/2013 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 10/15/2013; 11 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Pre-emerge Authority First (4oz); Post-emerge
Roundup PowerMax (32oz)
Ladysmith silty clay loam, pH n/a, % OM na; P test: , K tes
Table 15. Assaria, Saline County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013.
Table 14. Assaria, Saline County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013
BRAND
NAME
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ASGROW
ASGROW
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
PIONEER
AG4233S R2Y
AG4422S R2Y
AG3931
AG4531
3824NRS2
3850NR2
3981NR2
4123NR2
4263NRS2
4580RS2
4593NRS2
4614NRS2
375 NR2YS
383 NR2YE
384 NR2YS
392 NR2YS
411 NR2Y
417 NRSE
433 NR2YS
454 NR2YS
94Y01
94Y50
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
3-yr.
AVG
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013
2012
2011
47.8
33.3
17.4
40.6
32.8
99
44.6
----92
47.8
-14.6
--99
48.1
-19.5
--99
45.0
----93
45.7
34.2
10.7
40.0
30.2
94
36.7
-44.3
-107
51.9
46.1
36.0
-41.1
-95
34.7
-43.4
-107
52.0
37.8
-43.4
-101
49.0
45.6
39.2
-42.4
-94
----102
49.6
45.2
----93
----108
52.5
----101
48.9
37.3
-44.8
-108
52.3
48.5
42.6
-45.6
-100
41.5
-15.1
--86
37.8
-43.7
-102
49.6
----111
53.7
37.1
-43.8
-104
50.5
----103
49.8
48.4
37.0
15.6
8.9
11.1
19.5
5.1
4.8
4.1
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
- 12 -
90
----92
99
97
94
102
106
----101
115
-102
-100
--
112
-94
125
-69
-----------97
-----
Mat
10/4
10/7
9/30
10/6
9/29
9/25
10/2
9/30
10/6
10/7
10/6
10/6
10/1
9/26
9/30
10/1
10/5
10/3
10/6
10/6
10/5
10/7
2013
Lodge
score
1.0
1.0
2.3
2.8
2.0
2.5
2.8
2.0
1.5
1.5
1.8
2.8
1.0
1.5
2.3
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
3.0
2.5
Ht
(in.)
39
40
42
48
43
44
47
44
44
43
46
48
41
43
43
42
41
38
41
41
45
46
Richard Seck Farm, Hutchinson, Reno County; Bill Schapaugh, agronomist
Conditions were excellent early in the season with plenty of moisture for
planting. Irrigation applied during seed fill, but in lower amounts than
usual because of above-average rainfall in July and August.
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total and growth continued in an acceptable direction until early reproductive
3.6
5.6
2.5
5.6 11.2
3.9 32.4 stages when large amounts of precipitation hindered growth. Plants
Rainfall:
recovered well when soils dried and yielded above-average for this
Irrigation:
region.
Planted 5/14/2013 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 10/16/2013; 11 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Pre-emerge Authority First (4oz); Post-emerge
Roundup PowerMax (32oz)
Fine sandy loam, pH n/a, % OM na; P test: , K test:
Table 16. Hutchinson, Reno County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013.
Table 15. Hutchinson, Reno County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013
BRAND
NAME
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ASGROW
ASGROW
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
NUTECH/G2 GENETICS
NUTECH/G2 GENETICS
NUTECH/G2 GENETICS
NUTECH/G2 GENETICS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
PIONEER
AG4233S R2Y
AG4422S R2Y
AG4700S R2Y
AG3931
AG4531
C3650R2
C3770R2
C3989R2
C4544R2
CEX385R2
3824NRS2
3850NR2
3981NR2
3983NR2
4123NR2
4263NRS2
4443NRS2
4543NRS2
4580RS2
4593NRS2
4614NRS2
4792RS2
4813NRS2
4963NRS2
5134NR2
7390
7393
7403
7414
383 NR2YE
411 NR2Y
417 NRSE
433 NR2YS
454 NR2YS
469 NR2YS
499 NR2YS
94Y01
94Y50
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
3-yr.
AVG
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013
2012
2011
56.7
47.2
60.4
52.0
54.8
87
60.8
----93
65.3
----100
65.2
-63.4
--100
----107
69.6
57.2
----88
61.1
----94
59.4
48.4
-53.9
-91
62.2
----95
67.4
----103
60.9
----93
64.0
49.6
61.1
56.8
58.2
98
67.7
62.3
69.9
67.4 110
72.1
68.2
61.4
-64.8
-104
65.5
60.7
-63.1
-100
49.9
-60.4
-109
70.9
67.9
49.6
-58.8
-104
61.2
----94
68.0
59.0
62.7
63.5
63.2 104
67.5
64.3
-65.9
-103
----106
68.9
67.8
57.2
63.7
62.5
62.9 104
61.2
51.8
-56.5
-94
62.9
62.1
-62.5
-96
60.5
----93
-69.5
--107
69.9
66.8
----102
61.8
----95
70.3
-72.6
-115
74.9
64.2
----98
63.0
-65.9
-105
68.7
65.5
-64.9
--100
51.7
-61.0
-108
70.2
65.0
58.3
-61.7
-100
64.7
----99
55.5
-62.8
-107
70.0
55.9
56.5
-56.2
-86
----110
71.8
65.3
55.3
62.2
8.6
10.9
5.6
6.6
7.0
4.0
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
- 13 -
85
------88
---90
122
111
110
90
90
-107
116
-103
94
112
----127
-114
-93
105
-100
102
--
97
--102
-------98
100
-----101
--102
---112
-----104
-------
Mat
10/3
10/6
10/6
10/1
10/5
9/30
9/28
10/1
10/7
9/27
9/28
10/2
10/6
10/7
10/4
10/4
10/6
10/6
10/6
10/6
10/7
10/6
10/7
10/9
10/9
10/4
10/3
10/6
10/5
9/26
10/5
10/4
10/7
10/5
10/6
10/9
10/1
10/6
2013
Lodge
score
1.3
1.0
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.8
2.5
1.0
1.0
1.3
2.0
1.8
1.5
1.8
1.3
1.5
1.3
1.5
2.0
2.0
2.5
1.5
1.3
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.3
1.5
1.8
Ht
(in.)
27
30
34
31
33
34
30
32
36
32
34
33
36
35
34
33
32
39
35
38
39
37
39
36
42
29
29
30
33
33
34
31
34
33
38
36
31
38
Northwest Research-Extension Center, Colby, Thomas County; Pat Evans, technician
Keith silt loam, pH n/a
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
April May June
Very good conditions with no disease or insect problems.
July Aug. Sept. Total
0.4
1.6
2.3
2.5
0.9
5.0 12.7
Rainfall:
6.7
.96
1.9 15.4
Irrigation:
5.8
Planted 5/16/2013 at 9 seeds/ft; harvested 10/10/2013; 20 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: 2 applications of Roundup (32oz) 2
Table 17. Colby, Thomas County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, -2013.
Table 16. Colby, Thomas County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013
BRAND
NAME
ASGROW
ASGROW
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
PIONEER
PIONEER
AG3931
AG4531
C2835R2
C3055R2
C3111R2
C3220R2
C3399R2
3423NR2
3633NR2
3824NRS2
3884NR2
3983NR2
94Y01
94Y50
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011 AVG
3-yr.
AVG
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013
2012 2011 Mat
----104
87.5
84.8
----101
79.4
--94
68.9
58.3
78.6
----93
61.0
80.5
--96
70.8
79.0
--94
71.2
63.3
82.6
----98
54.0
80.1
--95
67.1
81.7
--97
67.4
72.1
80.2
----95
----111
93.4
66.1
--109
91.9
79.0
--107
89.8
54.9
72.4
87.3
----104
59.6
84.1
70.8
14.2
5.5
5.9
10.0
5.9
4.6
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
--98
-102
106
-91
113
--111
92
--
---------------
10/6
10/6
9/25
9/27
9/29
9/28
9/30
10/1
9/29
10/3
10/5
10/7
10/7
10/8
2013
Lodge
score
Ht
(in.)
2.5
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.7
2.0
1.8
2.0
2.8
2.5
34
34
32
30
33
32
32
35
35
34
33
33
32
33
Southwest Research-Extension Center, Garden City, Finney County; Monty J. Spangler, technician
Keith silt loam, pH n/a, % OM na; P test: , K test:
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
0.3
1.3
1.8
2.2
4.1
2.7 12.4
Rainfall:
1.2 13.1
.99
.76
4.5 5.7
Irrigation:
Planted into adequate moisture, but moisture reserves ran out quickly
early into vegetative growth. Heat and drought persisted throughout most
of the growing season. Iron chlorosis was an issue due to high-pH soil.
High winds and hail on July 31 damaged the top third of canopies.
recovered well when soils dried and yielded above-average for this
region.
Planted 5/17/2013 at 10 seeds/ft; harvested 10/18/2013; 23 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Preplant Sterling Blue, Spartan Charge;
Pre-emerge Prowl, Pursuit
Table 17. Garden City, Finney County Irrigated Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
ASGROW
ASGROW
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
PIONEER
PIONEER
AG3931
AG4531
C3650R2
C3770R2
C3890R2
C3989R2
C4211R2
3824NRS2
3850NR2
3981NR2
3983NR2
4123NR2
4263NRS2
4443NRS2
4543NRS2
4580RS2
4593NRS2
4614NRS2
4792RS2
4813NRS2
4963NRS2
5134NR2
94Y01
94Y50
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
22.4
21.9
27.5
20.9
31.7
33.8
26.4
24.5
25.7
33.6
29.9
20.7
16.4
27.8
27.5
37.2
22.7
35.9
38.7
39.0
28.5
32.6
26.5
41.3
28.9
27.8
9.5
----45.8
52.8
43.8
-40.9
46.2
39.2
41.2
23.4
46.1
-42.5
48.3
-36.8
---42.0
-39.2
14.2
6.6
--------21.0
22.3
-----27.5
--21.0
-----22.4
7.9
2.2
----38.8
43.3
35.1
-33.3
39.9
34.6
31.0
19.9
37.0
-39.9
35.5
-37.8
---34.3
--
3-yr.
AVG
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013
2012
2011
Mat
--------29.2
34.0
-----35.7
--32.2
------
78
76
95
72
110
117
91
85
89
116
103
72
57
96
95
129
79
124
134
135
99
113
92
143
9/20
9/30
9/19
9/19
9/19
9/21
9/24
9/21
9/15
9/26
9/22
9/23
9/24
9/25
9/25
9/29
9/26
9/30
10/1
9/27
10/1
10/1
9/19
9/27
----117
135
112
-104
118
100
105
60
118
-108
123
-94
---107
--
--------94
100
-----123
--94
------
2013
Lodge
score
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Ht
(in.)
20
19
24
21
24
23
20
23
21
22
20
20
21
20
22
21
22
21
20
23
20
22
23
22
East Central Kansas Experiment Field, Ottawa, Franklin County; Eric Adee, agronomist
Woodson silt loam, pH n/a, % OM na; P test: , K test:
April
Rainfall:
3.7
May June
2.9
6.0
July Aug. Sept. Total
2.4
5.2
5.5
25.7
Planted into dry conditions, harming stand establishment. Dry conditions
and heat persisted for most of the growing season until late reproductive
stages, when moisture and cooler temps prevailed. Varieties were able to
make up for early season drought conditions.
Planted 5/28/2013 at 8 seeds/ft; harvested 10/21/2013; 11 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: Pre-emerge-6oz Authority XL and 1.5 pt Dual
Magnum
Table 19. Ottawa, Franklin County Dryland Conventional Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013.
Table 18. Ottawa, Franklin County Dryland Conventional/Liberty Link Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
BRAND
NAME
ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS
ASGROW
ASGROW
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
IOWA AES
IOWA AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MISSOURI
MISSOURI
MORSOY
MORSOY
PIONEER
OSAGE
OZARK
UA4913C
UA5213C
UA5612
AG3931 RR check
AG4531 RR check
HBK LL4650
HBK LL4850
HBK LL4950
HBK LL5350
IA3023
IA4004
K04-3083RR RR check
K07-1633
K10-8556
MU EXP 4100N
MU EXP 4400N
LL 4653N
LLS 4823N
RR check
94Y01
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
3-yr.
AVG
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013
2012
2011
41.6
----82
41.8
----83
40.2
----79
44.8
----89
42.3
----84
----118
59.8
----119
60.0
----119
60.3
48.4
----96
48.3
----95
47.8
----94
52.8
----104
53.2
30.1
26.0
41.7
36.4 105
44.5
----88
53.5
32.0
21.1
42.8
35.5 106
52.3
----103
----119
60.0
51.3
----101
----111
56.3
47.7
----94
28.2
-42.4
-112
56.5
50.6
31.5
26.4
10.8
22.5
17.2
6.4
8.4
5.4
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
------------96
-102
-----90
------------98
-80
-------
Mat
10/23
10/13
10/4
10/13
10/26
9/26
10/1
9/27
10/2
10/15
10/13
9/22
9/22
10/6
9/24
9/25
9/25
9/26
9/28
10/6
9/26
2013
Lodge
score
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.5
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Ht
(in.)
32
36
35
35
37
37
36
39
36
42
31
27
35
44
36
25
36
38
32
41
34
North Central Kansas Experiment Field, Scandia, Republic County; Randall Nelson, agronomist
Crete silt loam, pH 5.8, % OM; P test: , K test:
April
May June
July Aug. Sept. Total
Planted into wet conditions and adequate moisture persisted. Adequate
moisture and cooler temps were seen throughout the growing season,
resulting in good yields throughout the test.
2.6
3.1
1.4
3.8
2.8
3.4 17.1
Rainfall:
Irrigation:
Planted 5/22/2013 at 9 seeds/ft; harvested 10/29/2013; 26 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides: na
Table 20. Scandia, Republic County Irrigated Conventional Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013.
Table 19. Scandia, Republic County Irrigated Conventional/Liberty Link Soybean Performance Test, 2011-2013
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
ASGROW
ASGROW
IOWA AES
IOWA AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MISSOURI
MISSOURI
PIONEER
AG3931
RR check
RR check
AG4531
IA3023
IA4004
K07-1633
K10-8556
MU EXP 4100N
MU EXP 4400N
RR check
94Y01
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
65.2
63.7
64.2
50.3
58.4
62.8
50.3
60.5
51.4
58.5
9.9
8.3
---62.4
63.7
---66.4
65.4
10.0
9.2
---56.9
59.9
----59.2
7.1
6.1
- 15 -
---56.4
61.1
---58.9
3-yr.
AVG
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013
2012
2011
---56.5
60.7
-----
111
109
110
86
100
107
86
103
88
---95
97
---102
---96
101
-----
Mat
----------
2013
Lodge
score
----------
Ht
(in.)
----------
Southeast Agricultural Research Center, Parsons, Labette County; Kelly Kusel, technician
Parsons Silt Loam, pH n/a, % OM na; P test: , K test:
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
5.8
5.9
3.4
4.0
6.0
7.9 33.0
Rainfall:
Hot and dry conditions from planting until end of July. Late July and early
August rainfall were extremely beneficial to soybean crop. Frost on
October 25 did not affect yield or quality even though not all soybeans
had reached physiological maturity.
Planted 6/13/2013 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 11/18/2013; 14 ft. by 2-row plot; pesticides:
Table . Parsons, Labette County Dryland Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Group IV-V, 2011-2013.
Table 20. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Conventional/Liberty Link Soybean Performance Test, MG III-IV, 2011-2013
BRAND
NAME
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
ASGROW
ASGROW
BAYER
MISSOURI
MISSOURI
RR check
AG3931
RR check
AG4531
HBK LL4650
MU EXP 4100N
MU EXP 4400N
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
39.7
52.0
36.5
28.5
35.1
38.4
7.5
3.6
---------
---------
------
3-yr.
AVG
------
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013
2012
2011
Mat
103
135
95
74
91
9/26
10/3
9/27
9/26
10/2
------
------
2013
Lodge
score
1.5
1.0
1.3
1.3
2.0
Ht
(in.)
39
36
40
35
38
Southeast Agricultural Research Center, Parsons, Labette County; Kelly Kusel, technician
Parsons Silt Loam,O
Loam, pH
OM
na; P test: , K test:
P n/a,
t/est:%, K
test:
0-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer
April
April May June July Aug. Sept. Total
5.8
5.9
3.4
4.0
6.0
7.9 33.0
Rainfall:
Hot and dry conditions from planting until end of July. Late July and early
August rainfall were extremely beneficial to soybean crop. Frost on
October 25 did not affect yield or quality even though not all soybeans
had reached physiological maturity.
Planted 6/13/2013 at 7 seeds/ft; harvested 11/18/2013 ; 14 ft. by 2-row plot
Table 21. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Conventional Soybean Performance Test, Maturity Groups IV-V, 2011-20
Table 21. Parsons, Labette County Dryland Conventional/Liberty Link Soybean Performance Test, MG IV-V, 2011-2013
BRAND
NAME
ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS
ASGROW
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MORSOY
MORSOY
PIONEER
OSAGE
OZARK
UA4913C
UA5213C
UA5612
AG5533
HBK LL4850
HBK LL4950
HBK LL5350
K04-3083RR
KS5004N
KS5502N
KS5507NRR
LL 5003N
LLS 4823N
95Y10
AVERAGES
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
ACRE YIELD, BUSHELS
2-yr.
2013
2012
2011
AVG
RR check
RR check
RR check
RR check
3-yr.
AVG
YIELD AS % OF
TEST AVERAGE
2013
2012
2011
----110
45.6
----98
40.7
39.0
----94
----109
45.1
----110
45.5
----112
46.5
----95
39.5
----105
43.6
39.0
----94
36.7
----88
36.8
15.9
38.2
30.7
95
39.5
41.2
15.7
40.8
32.4
97
40.4
38.6
41.9
17.9
40.3
32.8
93
----103
42.9
39.2
----94
----103
42.8
37.9
12.5
41.5
3.4
8.7
13.9
7.0
3.9
2.1
Values in bold are in the upper LSD group.
- 16 -
----------97
109
111
----
----------127
126
143
----
Mat
10/18
10/20
10/13
10/19
10/23
10/19
10/9
10/21
10/21
10/9
10/10
10/20
10/23
10/16
10/11
10/9
2013
Lodge
score
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.5
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Ht
(in.)
34
36
36
36
38
39
36
43
33
46
34
33
33
40
42
41
Table 22. Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2013 Roundup-Resistant Soybean Tests
Topeka Topeka
BRAND/NAME Onaga dryland irrigated Ottawa
ADVANCED GENETICS
AG4233S R2Y
--AG4422S R2Y
--AG4700S R2Y
--AG4844S R2Y
--AG5133N R2Y
--ARKANSAS
R04-1250RR
--R04-1268RR
--ASGROW
AG3931
96 110
AG4531
116
86
AG5533
--BAYER
HBK RY4620
--HBK RY4721
--HBK RY5221
--HBK RY5421
--KANSAS AES
K04-3083RR
--KS5507NRR
--LG SEEDS
C2835R2
--C3055R2
--C3111R2
--C3220R2
--C3399R2
--C3650R2
--C3770R2
--C3890R2
--C3989R2
109
-C4211R2
--C4544R2
--CEX385R2
--MIDLAND
3423NR2
--3633NR2
96 112
3824NRS2
101 103
3850NR2
--3884NR2
93 113
3981NR2
--3983NR2
87
98
4044NR2
99 102
4123NR2
--4263NRS2
--4373NR2
98 107
4443NRS2
--4543NRS2
112
92
4580RS2
-89
4593NRS2
--4614NRS2
--4703NR2
--4792RS2
--4813NRS2
--4963NRS2
--5134NR2
---
Parsons
MG4 MG 5
McCune
MG 4 MG 5
Erie
BelleHutch- Garden
MG 4 MG 5 Scandia ville Assaria inson City Colby AVG
------
-104
92
99
--
------
---105
103
------
---106
92
------
---88
--
------
------
99
92
----
87
93
100
---
------
------
93
96
96
99
97
---
---
---
96
102
---
96
91
---
102
98
---
---
---
---
---
---
98
97
93
90
--
111
92
--
94
98
--
--105
80
108
--
--89
95
107
--
--118
107
102
--
102
94
--
99
99
--
100
107
--
-----
-----
110
----
-95
100
101
102
----
-97
99
116
110
----
-92
117
105
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
107
95
105
107
---
---
---
86
--
---
97
--
---
88
--
---
---
---
---
---
---
89
93
-------------
-------------
-------------
-------------
-------------
-------------
-------------
-------------
-------------
--------114
----
-------------
-----88
94
-91
-95
103
-----95
72
110
117
91
---
-99
105
-109
-103
88
--117
-86
---------
------106
116
--112
-108
99
--103
90
95
---
----------103
-95
99
--------
----------------99
102
89
-100
----------101
-107
114
--------
----------------99
106
101
-102
----------93
-98
98
--------
----------------89
93
--104
89
98
88
-105
-108
100
--------------
94
103
86
-94
-95
124
--------------
--93
94
-107
--95
107
---101
94
102
------
--93
98
-110
104
-100
109
-104
94
104
103
106
-104
94
96
93
-95
93
-97 101
85
95
94
89
-94
-- 111 104
116
-- 111
103 109 102
--- 105
72
-89
57
-91
--- 104
96
-- 100
98
95
--- 104
129
79
-92
124
-- 111
--97
134
-- 105
135
-- 103
99
-97
113
-- 102
- 17 -
78 104 100
76 101 102
--- 106
94
94
93
93
96
96
94
94
98
98
-91
-83
-- 110
-- 108
-91
-95
-- 103
Table 22 continued. Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2013 Roundup-Resistant Soybean Tests
Topeka Topeka
BRAND/NAME Onaga dryland irrigated Ottawa
MORSOY
R2 38X52N
101 111
R2 42X53N
-102
R2 43X43N
-92
R2 51X03N
--R2 53X82N
--R2S 47X12N
-82
R2S 48X10
--R2S 56X02N
--MYCOGEN
5N478
--X53479R2
--X53510R2
--X53540R2
--X53550R2
--NK
S30-E9
--S34-Z1 Brand
--S36-B6 Brand
--S38-S4 Brand
--S38-W4 Brand
--S39-U2 Brand
--NUTECH/G2 GENETICS
7390
--7393
--7403
--7414
--PHILLIPS
363 NR2YE
99 117
375 NR2YS
93 112
383 NR2YE
96 106
384 NR2YS
105 109
392 NR2YS
96
92
411 NR2Y
95 103
417 NRSE
--433 NR2YS
110
-454 NR2YS
--469 NR2YS
--499 NR2YS
--PIONEER
94Y01
106 108
94Y50
91
90
94Y70
--94Y80
--95Y10
--PROGENY
P 4211 RY
--P 4313 RY
--P 4510 RY
--WILLCROSS
RY 2460S
-93
RY 2494NS
-81
RY 2513N
--RY2533N
--RY2543N
--WX 2434N
-93
WX 2464N
-93
Parsons
MG4 MG 5
McCune
MG 4 MG 5
Erie
BelleHutch- Garden
MG 4 MG 5 Scandia ville Assaria inson City Colby AVG
-105
102
--79
---
-107
99
--96
---
---------
---95
98
110
-94
---------
---111
-116
---
---------
-----105
97
--
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
---------
106
105
98
103
98
98
97
94
------
------
------
89
112
99
97
103
------
------
------
100
110
94
91
111
------
------
------
------
------
------
94
111
96
94
107
-------
-------
-------
-------
-------
-------
-------
-------
89
102
96
106
110
111
110
96
99
88
98
99
-------
-------
-------
-------
100
99
97
97
104
105
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
107
102
95
115
-----
-----
107
102
95
115
118
109
91
-83
96
------
------------
------------
------------
------------
------------
------------
------------
97
101
96
--92
------
103
102
89
92
103
110
------
-93
108
101
108
100
86
102
111
---
--98
--105
100
108
100
99
107
------------
------------
107
102
98
102
96
100
93
107
105
99
107
105
93
----
97
100
----
-101
----
--97
106
110
-96
----
--91
103
102
-96
----
--95
99
104
105
96
----
110
94
----
104
103
----
86
110
----
----
----
105
103
93
----
85
102
107
----
93
105
106
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
94
103
102
92
99
---119
117
102
93
---76
102
--------
-113
97
93
106
---
--------
-86
101
103
99
---
--------
--------
--------
--------
--------
--------
--------
--------
96
94
99
98
103
96
104
- 18 -
92 107 102
143 104 101
--94
--- 103
--- 105
Table 23. Yield as a Percentage of Test Average from 2013 Conventional/Liberty Link Soybean Tests
BRAND/NAME
Ottawa
Scandia
Parsons MG 4
Parsons MG 5
AVG
ARKANSAS
OSAGE
OZARK
UA4913C
UA5213C
UA5612
82
83
79
89
84
------
------
110
98
94
109
110
96
90
87
99
97
BAYER
HBK LL4650
HBK LL4850
HBK LL4950
HBK LL5350
119
96
95
94
-----
95
----
-95
105
94
107
95
100
94
IOWA AES
IA3023
IA4004
104
105
110
86
---
---
107
96
KANSAS AES
K07-1633
K10-8556
KS5004N
KS5502N
106
103
---
100
107
---
-----
--95
97
103
105
95
97
MISSOURI
MU EXP 4100N
MU EXP 4400N
119
101
86
103
74
91
---
93
99
MORSOY
LL 4653N
LL 5003N
LLS 4823N
111
-94
----
----
-103
94
111
103
94
- 19 -
Table 24. Description of Roundup-Resistant Entries in 2013 Soybean Performance Tests
BRAND
NAME
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ADVANCED GENETICS
ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS
ASGROW
ASGROW
ASGROW
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
LG SEEDS
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MIDLAND
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
MYCOGEN
MYCOGEN
MYCOGEN
AG4233S R2Y
AG4422S R2Y
AG4700S R2Y
AG4844S R2Y
AG5133N R2Y
R04-1250RR
R04-1268RR
AG3931
AG4531
AG5533
HBK RY4620
HBK RY4721
HBK RY5221
HBK RY5421
K04-3083RR
KS5507NRR
TEMP EXP 4.9
C2835R2
C3055R2
C3111R2
C3220R2
C3399R2
C3650R2
C3770R2
C3890R2
C3989R2
C4211R2
C4544R2
CEX385R2
3423NR2
3633NR2
3824NRS2
3850NR2
3884NR2
3981NR2
3983NR2
4044NR2
4123NR2
4263NRS2
4373NR2
4443NRS2
4543NRS2
4580RS2
4593NRS2
4614NRS2
4703NR2
4792RS2
4813NRS2
4963NRS2
5134NR2
R2 38X52N
R2 42X53N
R2 43X43N
R2 51X03N
R2 53X82N
R2S 47X12N
R2S 48X10
R2S 56X02N
5N478
X53479R2
X53510R2
Maturity Flower Hilum
group color color
4.2
4.4
4.7
4.8
5.1
5.5
5.4
3.9
4.5
5.5
4.6
4.7
5.2
5.4
4.8
5.2
4.9
2.8
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.2
4.5
3.8
3.0
3.0
3.8
3.0
3.8
3.0
3.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.5
4.0
4.0
4.6
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
5.1
3.8
4.2
4.3
5.1
5.3
4.7
4.8
5.6
4.7
4.7
5.1
P
P
P
W
-P
W
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
-P
-P
P
P
P
W
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
---------------------P
P
W
P
W
P
P
P
P
P
P
BL
BF
BL
BL
-BF
BF
IB
IB
IB
BL
BL
IB
IB
-IB
-IB
BL
IB
B
B
IB
IB
IB
IB
B
BL
IB
---------------------IB
BL
BL
BL
BF
IB
Bl
IB
BL
IB
BL
- 20 -
SCN resistance
R1 R3 R4 R14
Source
-- R -- R
-- R -- MR
-- -- -- --- R -- MR
-- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- R -- --- -- -- --- R -- --- -- -- --- R -- MR
-- R -- --- MR -- --- -- -- -R R R R
-- -- -- --- R -- --- -- -- --- R -- --- R -- --- R -- --- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- --- R -- --- R -- --- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- R
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- R
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- R
-- -- -- --- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- -- -- --- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- M
-- R -- M
-- R -- MR
-- R -- M
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- -- -- --- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
PI88788
PI88788
-PI88788
---PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
-----PI437654
-MR14
-MR14
MR14
MR14
--MR14
MR14
MR14
--PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI87788
PI88788
PI88788
-PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
-PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
-PI88788
----
Phytophthora
RR
--Rps1c
----S
Rps1c
S
Rps1c
Rps1c
-----Rps1c
-Rps1c
-Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1c
Rps1k
Rps1a
Rps1c
Rps1c
---------------------Rps1c
Rps1a
-Rps1c
-Rps1c
Rps1c
-IC
IC
IC
Tolerance
STS
4.0
4.0
3.0
4.0
---6.0
7.0
5.0
-------1.0
--8.0
---2.0
----1.7
1.7
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.5
1.7
2.0
1.5
2.5
2.0
2.3
2.0
2.1
1.5
2.0
1.6
2.0
1.7
2.2
2.0
2.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.4
7.0
8.0
8.0
--STS
------STS
--------------X
------STS
------STS
-STS
STS
-STS
STS
-STS
STS
STS
------STS
-STS
STS
STS
STS
Table 24 continued. Description of Roundup-Resistant Entries in 2013 Soybean Performance Tests
BRAND
NAME
MYCOGEN
MYCOGEN
NK
NK
NK
NK
NK
NK
NUTECH/G2 GENETICS
NUTECH/G2 GENETICS
NUTECH/G2 GENETICS
NUTECH/G2 GENETICS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PHILLIPS
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PIONEER
PROGENY
PROGENY
PROGENY
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
WILLCROSS
X53540R2
X53550R2
S30-E9
S34-Z1 Brand
S36-B6 Brand
S38-S4 Brand
S38-W4 Brand
S39-U2 Brand
7390
7393
7403
7414
363 NR2YE
375 NR2YS
383 NR2YE
384 NR2YS
392 NR2YS
411 NR2Y
417 NRSE
433 NR2YS
454 NR2YS
469 NR2YS
499 NR2YS
94Y01
94Y50
94Y70
94Y80
95Y10
P 4211 RY
P 4313 RY
P 4510 RY
RY 2460S
RY 2494NS
RY 2513N
RY2533N
RY2543N
WX 2434N
WX 2464N
Maturity Flower Hilum
group color color
5.4
5.5
3.0
3.4
-3.8
3.8
3.9
3.9
3.9
4.0
4.1
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.8
--4.1
--4.6
-4.0
-4.7
4.8
5.1
4.2
4.3
4.5
---5.3
5.4
---
W
P
P
W
-W
W
-W
P
P
W
-P
----W
------P
P
-P
P
P
--------
BF
BF
IB
BL
-BL
BL
-Bl
BL
BL
BL
-BL
----B
------Bl
Bl
-IB
BL
BL
--------
- 21 -
SCN resistance
Phytophthora
R1 R3 R4 R14
Source
RR
------------------R
------MR
MR
------------
--PI88788
PI88788
-S
PI88788
-PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
-PI88788
-----------PI88788
PI88788
------------
NG
NG
Rps1c
Rps1c
----Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
Rps1k
-Rps1c
-------------------------
R
R
R
R
-R
--R
R
R
R
-R
-----------MR
MR
-R
R
---------
--------R
----------------MR
MR
------------
MR
MR
R
R
-R
R
--R
R
R
-MR
----MR
------MR
MR
-MR
----------
Tolerance
STS
8.0
9.0
3.0
5.0
-4.0
4.0
5.0
-5.0
5.0
5.0
-9.0
----1.6
------5.0
6.0
--3.0
---------
---------------------------------------
Table 25. Description of Conventional/Liberty Link Entries in 2013 Soybean Performance Tests
BRAND
NAME
ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS
ARKANSAS
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
BAYER
IOWA AES
IOWA AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
KANSAS AES
MISSOURI
MISSOURI
MORSOY
MORSOY
MORSOY
OSAGE
OZARK
UA4913C
UA5213C
UA5612
HBK LL4650
HBK LL4850
HBK LL4950
HBK LL5350
IA3023
IA4004
K07-1633
K10-8556
KS5004N
KS5502N
MU EXP 4100N
MU EXP 4400N
LL 4653N
LL 5003N
LLS 4823N
Maturity Flower Hilum
group color color
5.6
5.2
4.9
5.2
5.6
4.6
4.8
4.9
5.3
3.0
4.0
4.2
3.4
5.0
5.2
4.1
4.5
4.6
5.0
4.8
P
P
P
P
P
P
W
W
W
P
P
--W
P
W
P
W
P
P
IB
BF
BL
BF
IB
BL
BL
IB
BL
Y
Ib
--IB
IB
BF
BL
BF
IB
IB
- 22 -
SCN resistance
R1 R3 R4 R14
Source
-- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- R -- --- R -- --- MR -- --- R -- -S S S S
S S S S
-- -- -- --- -- -- -R R -- -R R R R
-- -- -- --- -- -- --- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-- R -- MR
-------------PEKING
PI437654
--PI88788
PI88788
PI88788
Phytophthora
RR
-----Rps1c
Rps1k
Rps1c
Rps1k
S
R
---S
---Rps1c
--
Tolerance
STS
-----------------2.0
2.0
2.0
---------------------
1. K-State Soybean Schools scheduled at four locations in February
Kansas State University
NEW - 2014 Soybean Production Schools
‘Save the Date’
A series of four Kansas State University Soybean Production Schools will be offered in late February
2014 to provide in-depth training for soybean producers and key stakeholders. The
schools will be held at four locations around the state.
The one-day schools will cover a number of issues facing soybean growers: irrigation management,
weed control strategies, crop production practices, nutrient and soil fertility, and insect and disease
management.
The final dates and specific locations have been set. The focus of the Soybean Schools will be in
east central, southeast, northern and south central Kansas.
•
Feb. 24 – Topeka – Washburn Tech Conference Center
•
Feb. 25 – Pittsburg – Memorial Auditorium
•
Feb. 27 – Concordia – Cloud County Community College
•
Feb. 28 – Newton – Meridian Center
Certification credits will be offered (CCA Credits). More information on this specific point as well as
related to the final program for each Soybean School will be provided in future communications.
- Ignacio Ciampitti, Crop Production/ Cropping Systems Specialist
ciampitti@ksu.edu
- Doug Shoup, Southeast Area Crops and Soils Specialist
dshoup@ksu.edu
- 23 -
To access crop performance testing information electronically, visit our website. The information contained in this publication, plus
more, is available for viewing or downloading at:
www.agronomy.ksu.edu/kscpt
Excerpts from the
University Research Policy Agreement with Cooperating Seed Companies
Permission is hereby given to Kansas State University (KSU) to test varieties and/or hybrids designated on the attached entry forms
in the manner indicated in the test announcements. I certify that seed submitted for testing is a true sample of the seed being offered
for sale.
I understand that all results from Kansas Crop Performance Tests belong to the University and the public and shall be controlled
by the University so as to produce the greatest benefit to the public. Performance data may be used in the following ways: 1) Tables
may be reproduced in their entirety provided the source is referenced and data are not manipulated or reinterpreted; 2) Advertising
statements by an individual company about the performance of its entries may be made as long as they are accurate statements about
the data as published, with no reference to other companies’ names or cultivars. In both cases, the following must be included with the
reprint or ad citing the appropriate publication number and title: “See the official Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment
Station and Cooperative Extension Service Report of Progress 1094, ‘2013 Kansas Performance Tests with Soybean Varieties,’ or the
Kansas Crop Performance Test website, www.agronomy.ksu.edu/kscpt, for details. Endorsement or recommendation by Kansas State
University is not implied.”
Contributors
Main Station, Manhattan
William T. Schapaugh, Jr., Professor (Senior Author)
Jane Lingenfelser, Assistant Agronomist
Nathan Keep, Research Assistant
Hatice Aslan, Research Assistant
Research Centers
Patrick Evans, Colby
Kelly Kusel, Columbus
Monty Spangler, Garden City
Josh Coltrain, Crawford County Extension
Experiment Fields
Eric Adee, Topeka
Gary Cranmer, Hutchinson
James Kimball, Ottawa
Wendell Lilyhorn, Hutchinson
Randall Nelson, Belleville and Scandia
Cooperators
Vernon Egbert, McCune
Lance Rezac, Onaga
Dale Roberds, Pittsburg
Clayton Short, Assaria
Copyright 2013 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. Contents of this
publicaiton may be freely reproduced for educational purposes. All other rights reserved. In each case, give credit to the author(s),
2013 Kansas Performance Tests with Soybean Varieties, Kansas State University, December 2013. Contribution no. 14-039-S from the
Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.
Brand names appearing in this publication are for product identification purposes only. No endorsement is intended, nor is criticism
implied of similar products not mentioned.
Publications from Kansas State University are available at:
www.ksre.ksu.edu
Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
SRP1094
K-State Research and Extension is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
December 2013
3,800