Franklin R. Ward
Gary J. Lettman
Bruce A. Hiserote
Forest Service
Pacific Northwest
Research Station
~ A R O U I U R W ~ T I ~ ~
February, 2000
Abstract
FRANKLIN R. WARD was a forestry technician (now retired). Forestry Sciences
Laboratory, P.O. Box 3890, Portland, Oregon 97208-3890.
GARY J. LETMAN is the principal forest economist. Oregon Department of Forestry.
2600 State Street. Salem, Oregon 97310.
BRUCE A. HISEROTE is a forester, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, P.O. Box 3890.
Portland, Oregon 97208-3890.
This report presents the findings of a survey of primary forest products industries in
Oregon for 1998. The survey included the following sectors: lumber; veneer and
plywood; pulp and board; shake and shingle; log export; post, pole, and piling; and
chipping facilities. Tables, presented by sector and for the industry as a whole.
include characteristics of the industry, nature and flow of logs consumed, and
disposition of mill residues.
Keywords: Forest products industry, mill surveys, wood utilization, mill residues,
Oregon.
Acknowledgments
This publication is the result of a survey of Oregon's forest products industry. We
wish to thank the mill owners and operators who cooperated in providing the data for
this report and the Oregon Forest Industries Council for supporting this study.
Completion of this report required the assistance of staffs of the Pacific Northwest
Research Station and the Oregon Department of Forestry. In particular we thank
Sharon Martin and Kris Cody for providing needed document layout assistance.
Allison Wick provided needed administrative support.
Finally, thanks are due to the individuals who supported this effort. This project could
not have been completed without help, support, and encouragement from Sue Willits
from the Pacific Northwest Research Station and Ann Hanus and Dave Stere from the
Oregon Deparbnent of Forestry. Thomas J. Mills, Pacific Northwest Research Station
Director, and State Forester James E. Brown provided generous assistance
necessary for completion of this project.
For additional copies of this report or for more information, please contact
Gary Lettman of the Oregon Department of Forestry, mail to: glettman@odfstate.or.us
Summary
This report presents the results of a survey of the primary wood-processing industry
in Oregon for 1998. Data for the survey were obtained from a mail and telephone
canvass performed in 1999. Industry contacts for the survey were based on lists from
previous surveys, various directories of the forest products industry, and information
passed on by individual mill owners. Similar surveys were produced in 1968, in
cooperation with the Oregon Department of Forestry; in 1972, with Oregon State
University; and by the Pacific Northwest Research Station in 1976, 1982, 1985, 1988,
1992, and 1994. This survey identified the raw material inputs and characteristics of
the forest products industry. Data are shown separately for the following industries:
lumber; veneer and plywood; pulp and board; shake and shingle; log export; post,
pole, and piling; and chipping facilities.
The survey identified 183 separate operations that used about 4.5 billion board feet of
logs in 1998. The lumber (64 percent) and veneer and plywood (24 percent) sectors
were the major users. The pulp and board industry used an additional 140 million
board feet of roundwood and 6.1 million tons of chips, mill residue, and recycled fiber.
The industry as a whole generated about 8.8 million tons of residual materials, of
which less than 1 percent was not used.
Data for log consumption and product output are as reported by the mills.
Subsequent classification of these data (that is, by species, owner, origin, degree of
manufacturing, and other criteria) was based on percentage distributions provided by
the mills and may not agree precisely with other published figures. Figures in the
tables are based solely from mills who responded to the survey forms. Statistics on
mill residues are calculated from average factors applied to product output; thus, they
may differ from actual volumes for a given mill. lnformation collected from each mill
is acquired from formal records whenever possible. Some information had to be
estimated, however. Information for individual mills is strictly confidential, and any
information that could reveal details of an individual operation has been combined
with other data to avoid disclosure.
Prepared with support from the USDA Forest Sewice, Pacific Northwest Research Station,
and the Oregon Department of Forestty.
Highlights
Total number of mills in 1998'
Industry Characteristics
Tvpe of mill
Number
Sawmills
Veneer and plywood
Pulp and board
Shake and shingle
Post, pole, and piling
Chipping
Wood Consumption
93
43
29
7
8
20
Lane County, with 15, had the most sawmills; 18 percent of the State's sawmills.
The 51 largest sawmills accounted for 85 percent of total sawmill capacity.
A total of about 4.5 billion board feet of logs was consumed by Oregon's forest
industry.
Public lands were the source for 14 percent of log consumption; National forests
provided 35 percent of the logs from public lands.
Leading counties in roundwood consumption were:
County
Million board feet
Douglas
Lane
Log consumption by industry was:
lndustnr
Sawmills
Veneer
Chipping
Pulp and board
Log export
Shake and shingle, and
Post, pole, and piling
Percent
64
24
7
3
1
1
This listing shows the number of mills operating in 1998.
Not all mills participated in the suruey, so other data shown
in the summary, introduction, and tables in Appendix 2
are based on mills that responded to the survey.
Mill Residues
A total of about 8.8 million tons of residue was generated.
79 percent of the residue was wood; 21 percent was bark.
More than 99 percent of the wood and bark residue was used.
About 82 percent of wood residue went to pulp and board industries.
12 percent of wood residue was used for fuel.
About 80 percent of bark was used for fuel; about 20 percent was used for
miscellaneous purposes or went to pulp and board industries.
Contents
...............................................................................................................................................................................................
1
COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS SURVEYS..................................................................................................................................................
3
GLOSSARY ....................................................................................................................................................................................................
3
INTRODUCTION
..............................................................................................................................................................................3
...................................................................................................................................................................................
MEASUREMENT UNITS
3
LITERATURE CITED .........................................................................................................................................................................................
4
APPENDIX 1 ........................................................................................................................................................:........................................5
METRIC CONVERSIONS
Mill Residues .............................................................................................................................................................................................5
APPENDIX 2
....................................................................................................................................................................................................9
Detailed List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................................................... 9
Detailed Tables ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 11
Introduction
The forest products industry of Oregon continues to be the number one lumber
producer in the United States. In 1998 Oregon's sawmills produced 5.5 billion board
feet or about 15 percent of the Nation's lumber.
The forest products industry contributes significantly to the State's economy. The
activities of this industry are translated into jobs, payroll, tax contributions, and the
purchases of services and materials. The viability of the industry has even more
significance to many small communities. In some towns, the local mill may be the
only employer other than the service industry.
Changes in timber supply, technology, and product demand have resulted in a
markedly changed industry from the one that existed 20 years ago. Oregon has
fewer mills, greater diversification, a wider range of products, and more efficient use
of the timber resource.
For these reasons, up-to-date information on the forest industry is vital. Decisionmakers and planners, both within and outside the industry, need to know how the
industry is changing and how the resource is being used. This report provides much
of this information through a look at Oregon's forest products industry for 1998.
Coupled with similar reports for 1968 (Manock and others 1970), 1972 (Schultz and
Howard 1974), 1976 (Howard and Hiserote 1978), 1985 (Howard and Ward 1988),
1988 (Howard and Ward 1991), 1992 (Ward 1995), and 1994 (Ward 1996), this
information provides a basis for examining significant trends in industry
characteristics and timber use.
The forest products industry in Oregon was severely impacted by the depressed
national economy at the start of the 1980s. By 1983, the industry, spurred by
improvements in residential and commercial construction, was beginning to recover.
A comparison of log consumption between the 1982 and 1985 reports showed this
recovery. In 1982, reported log consumption by the forest products industry was 5.96
billion board feet. In 1985, this figure was 8.27 billion board feet, an increase of 39
percent. The 1988 report showed increases in log consumption slowing. Log
consumption in 1988 was 8.8 billion board feet, an increase of only 6 percent from
1985. Environmental constraints placed on federal forest lands in the late 1980s and
1990s caused a decline in log consumption. By 1998 log consumption had
decreased to 4.5 billion board feet.
There were at least 8 sawmills, 1 veneer and plywood mill, 1 shake and shingle mill,
2 pulp and board mills, 3 post, pole, and piling operations, and 2 chipping mills that
declined to participate in the survey. Information in Appendix 2 reflects only data from
mills responding to the survey.
Forest industry, as the term is used in this study, refers to seven primary woodprocessing industries: sawmills; veneer and plywood; pulp and board; shake and
shingle; post, pile, and piling; log export; and chipping facilities.
The location of the forest industry in Oregon is closely related to the geographic
distribution of the timber resource. As would be expected, a large share of the
industry is in the heavily timbered areas west of the Cascade Range. Figure 1 shows
about 85 percent of the log consumption occurred in western Oregon.
The State was divided into five resource areas for the study (figure 2). Designation of
these areas reflected both the nature of the timber resource and the historic
marketing structure of the industry. This is borne out by the study data, which show
that on average about 59 percent of the logs processed in a particular resource area
were harvested within the boundaries of that area.
Blue Mountain
-
Figure 1 Distribution of log consumption by resource area and industry.
Comparison With
Previous Surveys
The tabulation shows the number of mills by industry over time. These data are
taken from this report and from those developed in the 1968,1972,1976,1982,
1985, and 1988 reports.
Number of mills by year
Industry
1968
1972
1976
1982
1985
1988
1998
Sawmills
Veneer 8
PlyWood
Pulp & board
Shake & shingle
Post, pole, &
piling
Log export
Chipping
300
262
243
161
173
165
85
138
37
48
133
40
43
132
40
46
101
36
34
89
35
26
87
33
24
42
27
6
10
38
9
28
8
32
7
35
18
33
5
Total
523
-
-
526
-
498
-
372
-
365
2
-
183
360
183
<Thepost, pole, and piling and the log export industries were not included in the 1968 report. This listing
shows only the number of mills responding to the survey.
'Number of log export companies not available for 1998. Data about log exports were obtained from
U. S. Department of Commerce, Customs District special foreign trade statistics report on export of logs
from the Pacific Northwest.
5Datafor chipping operations collected for 1998 only.
MBF - Thousand board feet.
Glossary
-
Mill Each identifiable operation at one location: a sawmill with a large-log operation
and a small-log operation is counted as two mills; also, a sulfate and a groundwood
pulping process at one location is counted as two mills.
Metric Conversions
1 cubic foot = 0.02832 cubic meter
1 ton = 907.1849 kilograms
1 square foot = 0.0929 square meter
Measurement Units
The board foot is the unit of measure used in this report for all wood consumption,
with the exception of purchased or transferred veneer (square feet, 318-inch basis)
and mill residues (tons, dry weight) consumed by pulp mills and board mills. Some
chipping facilities reported wood in tons. The factor used by the chipping facilities
varied from five to eight tons per MBF. The conversion to board feet used for this
study was tons divided by 6 times 1,000. Consumption by mills not reported in these
units was converted by use of the following factors:
'
1 cord = 500 board feet
10.5 squares = 1,000 board feet (MBF)
1 lineal foot = 3.8 board feet
200 cubic-foot units = 1 bonedry ton
1 bonedry unit = 1.2 bonedry tons
Board-foot lumber tally is the unit of measure used for lumber production; square feet,
318 basis, for veneer and plywood production; square (100 square feet) for shake and
shingle production; and board-foot "local scale" for log export and post, pole, and
piling shipments.
Table 39.4 og consumption by veneer and plywood mills. by resource area. county. and diameter class of timber ...............................61
Table 4 W o g consumption by veneer and plywood mills. by resource area. county. and owner ..........................................................62
Table 4l-Dependency (by percentage) of veneer and plywood mills on timber. by resource area and owner ....................................... 63
Table 42-Log consumption by veneer and plywood mills. by resource area. county. and species .........................................................65
Table 43-Produdion and disposition of wood and bark residue by veneer and plywood mills. by resource area and county .................66
Table 44-Production
and disposition of wood residue by veneer and plywood mills. by resource area. county. and use .......................67
Table 45-Production and disposition of bark residue by veneer and plywood mills. by resource area. county. and use ........................68
Table 46--Number of pulp mills and board mills. by resource area. county. and type of operation..........................................................69
Table 47-Installed capacity of pulp mills and board mills. by resource area. county. and type of operation ........................................... 70
Table 4 8 - 4 verage number of operating days per year of pulp mills and board mills. by resource area .................................................. 71
Table 49-Wood cansumption by pulp mills and board mills. by resource area and type of material................................................... 71
Table 5 W o g consumption by pulp mills and board mills. by resource area and owner .........................................................................72
Table 51-Pulp mill and board mill consumption of chips from logs and sawdust and shavings. by resource area. type of material.
and State of origin ................................................................................................................................................................. 73
Table 52-Number of 'other industry' mills. by resource area. county. and type of industry .................................................................... 74
Table 53-Installed capacity of 'other industry" mills. by type of industry ..............................................................................................75
Table 54-Average number of operating days per year of 'other industry" mills. by resource area and type of mill .................................75
Table 55--W ood consumption by 'other industry" mills. by resource area. type of mill. and type of material..........................................76
Table 56-4og consumption by 'other industry" mills. by resource area. type of mill. and owner..........................................................77
Table 57-Dependency (by percentage) of 'other industry" mills on timber. by resource area. type of mill. and owner ...........................78
Table 5 8 - 4 og consumption by 'other industry" mills. by resource area. type of mill. and species .......................................................... 80
Table 59-Production and disposition of wood and bark residue by shake and shingle mills. by resource area ......................................81
............82
Table 61-Production and disposition of bark residue by shake and shingle mills. by resource area and use .........................................82
Table 66-Production and disposition of wood residue by shake and shingle mills. by type of residue. resource area. and use
Literature Cited
Howard, James 0.1984. Oregon's forest products industry: 1982. Resour. Bull.
PNW-118. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific
Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 79 p.
Howard, James 0.;Hiserote, Bruce A. 1978. Oregon's forest products industry:
1982. Resour. Bull. PNW-79. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 102 p.
Howard, James 0.;Ward, Franklin R. 1988. Oregon's forest products industry:
1985. Resour. Bull. PNW-RB-149. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 90 p.
Howard, James 0.;Ward, Franklin R. 1991. Oregon's forest products industry:
1988. Resour. Bull. PNW-RB-183. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 91 p.
Manock, Eugene R.; Choate, Grover A.; Gedney, Donald R. 1970. Oregon timber
industries, 1968, wood consumption and mill characteristics, Salem, OR: State of
Oregon, Department of Forestry. 122 p.
Schuldt, John P.; Howard, James 0.1974. Oregon forest industries, 1972, wood
consumption and mill characteristics. Spec. Rep. 427. Corvallis, OR: Oregon
State University. 113 p.
Ward, Franklin R. 1995. Oregon's forest products industry: 1992. Resour. Bull.
PNW-RB-207. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Pacific Northwest Research Station. 89 p.
Ward, Franklin R. 1997. Oregon's forest products industry: 1994. Resour. Bull.
PNW-RB-216. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Pacific Northwest Research Station. 70 p.
Western Wood Products Association. 1999. 1998 Statistical yearbook of the
western lumber industry. Portland, OR: Economic Services Department. 34 p.
Appendix 1
No attempt was made to get individual mills to quantify the amount of residue
produced. Although mills might be able to specify amounts of residue sold for highvalue uses (such as pulp chips), the low-value uses (such as mulch or fuel) are more
difficult to quantify. The mills therefore were asked to indicate only the percentage
distribution of their residue disposal. These percentages then were applied to residue
volume estimates derived through use of the following factors.
Softwood sawmill residue
1,000 board feet of lumber.'
- Average quantity of residue developed from producing
Dry weight
Solid volume2
T v ~ of
e output
Cubic feet
Wood residue:
Slabs, edgings,
sawmill trim
Planer trim
Sawdust
Planer shavings
Total wood residue
Bark
Western
Oreaon
Eastern
Oreqon
Tons
Percen?
36
3
16
16
24.5
2.0
10.9
10.9
0.486
.041
.216
.216
0.480
.036
.264
.A92
71
48.3
.959
.972
19
12.9
.258
.228
147
100.0
2.081
1.980
Lumber
Total all output
'
-
-
Based on data from Oregon mills compiled by Oregon State
University, School of Forestry, in 1967 and adjusted for changes
in lumber standards in 1974 by James 0.Howard.
Equivalent undried solid volume of residue.
Percentage of log by volume.
Softwood plywood residue -Average quantity of residue developed in producing
the equivalent of 1,000 square feet of 318-inch plywood (rough b a ~ i s ) : ~
Tvpe of output
Wood residue:
Log trim
Core
Veneer clip, roundup,
and spur trim
Dry trim and layup loss
Sander dust
Solid volume5
Dry weiqht
Cubic feet
Tons
3.4
6.3
0.048
.088
19.3
6.3
1.6
.270
.088
.022
36.9
.516
8.8
.A32
Plywood
34.9
.463
Total all output
80.6
1.111
Total wood residue
Bark
Hardwood sawmill residue -Average quantity of residue developed from producing
1,000 board feet of lumber by using a narrow kerf bandsaw: ..
Tvpe of residue
Dry tons
Coarse
Shavings
Bark
Sawdust
All residue factors, except sander dust and bark, are from data collected
in various mill studies by the Timber Quality and Product Yield Potential
of Western Softwoods Resources Project, Pacific Northwest Research Station,
and compiled by James 0.Howard. Sander dust and bark factors are based on
data from Oregon mills compiled in 1967 by Oregon State University, School of
Forestry.
Volumes are based on equivalent green volume.
Based on information furnished by Northwest Hardwood Inc., Portland, OR.
-
Shingle mill residue Average quantity of residue developed from using
1,000 board feet, Scribner scale, of logs or in producing the equivalent volume of
10.5 squares:'
Type of residue
Solid volume
Cubic feet
Percent
Dry weight
per thousand
board feet
Tons
From shingles:
Coarse
Fine
Bark
From shakes:
Coarse
Fine
Bark
From hip and
ridge and other:
Coarse
Fine
Bark
'
Based on discussions with the Redcedar Shingle Bureau,
Bellevue, WA.
.
APPENDIX 2 DETAILED INFORMATION
....................................................................................................................................................
I1
Table 1.4 umber of mills. by resource area and type of industry ............................................................................................................11
.........................................................................12
Table +Log flow to mills. by resource area. industry. and State............................................................................................................ 13
Table &Log flows. by resource area. county of use. and county and out-of-state origin........................................................................ 14
Table 5--Log flows to mills from National Forests. by resource area and county of use ......................................................................20
Table W o g flows to mills from National Forests. by resource area and industry ..................................................................................21
Table 7 - 4og consumption by mills, by resource area, industry. and owner ............................................................................................ 22
23
Table 8 - L o g consumption by mills, by resource area, industry, and species .........................................................................................
Table +Production and disposition of wood and bark residue by mills. by resource area. industry, and use ........................................ 25
Table 10-Number of sawmills, by resource area. county. and mill-size class ..................................................................................... 27
Table 11-Installed 8-hour capacity of sawmills, by resource area, county, and mill-size Class .........................................................28
Table 1 2 - 4umber of sawmills, by resource area, mill-size class. and type of headrig ........................................................................... 29
Table 13-Number of sawmills, by resource area, county, and selected equipment.......................................................................... 30
Table 2-Wood consumption by mills. by resource area. industry. and type of material
Table 14--Av erage number of operating days per year and average number of shifts per day by sawmills, by resource area and
mill size class ........................................................................................................................................................................31
Table 15-Wood consumption by sawmills, by resource area, mill-size class, and type of material .......................................................32
Table 16-Log consumption by sawmills, by resource area, mill-size class, and diameter class of timber ..............................................33
Table 17-Log consumption by sawmills, by resource area, county of use, and diameter class of timber ...............................................34
Table 1 U o g consumption by sawmills. by resource area, mill-size class, and 'owner.......................................................................... 35
Table 19-Log consumption by sawmills, by resource area, county of use, and owner ...................................................................... 36
Table 20-Dependency (by percentage) of sawmills on timber, by resource area, mill-size class, and owner........................................ 37
Table 21-Log consumption by sawmills, by resource area, mill-size class, and species................................................................... 39
Table 22-Log consumption by sawmills, by resource area. county of use, and species ......................................................................40
Table 23-Production and disposition of wood and bark residue by sawmills. by resource area and mill-size class ............................... 41
Table 24--Produdion and disposition of wood residue by sawmills, by resource area, mill-size class, type of residue, and use ............42
Table 25-Production and disposition of bark residue by sawmills, by resource area, mill-size class, and use .......................................
46
Table 26-Production and disposition of wood and bark residue by sawmills, by resource area and county .........................................47
Table 27-Production and disposition of wood residue by sawmills, by resource area, county, type of residue, and use ........................ 48
Table 28-Production and disposition of bark residue by sawmills, by resource area, county, and use .................................................52
Table 2 M u m b e r production by sawmills, by resource area, mill-size class, and degree of manufacture.............................................. 53
Table 3 U u m b e r production by sawmills, by resource area, mill-size class, and type of headrig..........................................................54
Table 31-Lumber production by sawmills, by resource area, county, and type of headrig..................................................................... 55
Table 3 2 4 u m b e r of veneer and plywood mills. by resource area, county. and type of mill ................................................................... 56
Table 33-Installed &hour capacity of veneer and plywood mills, by resource area..county, and type of mill ........................................57
Table -Number
of veneer and plywood mills, by resource area and minimum core diameter............................................................ 58
Table 35-Number of veneer and plywood mills, by resource area and maximum log diameter ............................................................ 58
Table 36-Average number of operating days per year of veneer and plywood mills. by resource area and type of mill .........................58
Table 3 7 4 u m b e r of veneer and plywood mills, by resource area. county, and selected equipment .................................................... 59
Table 3 U o g consumption by veneer and plywood mills. by resource area and county ........................................................................ 60
Table 3-09
consumption by veneer and plywood mills. by resource area. county. and diameter class of timber ...............................61
Table 4-09
consumption by veneer and plywood mills. by resource area. county. and owner ..........................................................62
Table 41-Dependency (by percentage) of veneer and plywood mills on timber. by resource area and owner .......................................63
Table 42-4-09 consumption by veneer and plywood mills. by resource area. county. and species .......................................................65
Table 43--P roduction and disposition of wood and bark residue by veneer and plywood mills. by resource area and county .................66
Table 44-Production and disposition of wood residue by veneer and plywood mills. by resource area. county. and use .......................67
Table 45-Production and disposlion of bark residue by veneer and plywood mills. by resource area. county. and use ........................68
Table 46-Number of pulp mills and board mills. by resource area. county. and type of operation ..........................................................69
Table 47-Installed capacity of pulp mills and board mills. by resource area. county. and type of operation ........................................... 70
Table 4 8 - 4 verage number of operating days per year of pulp mills and board mills. by resource area ..................................................71
Table 49-Wood consumption by pulp mills and board mills. by resource area and type of material.......................................................71
Table 5 0 - 4 og consumption by pulp mills and board mills. by resource area and owner .........................................................................
72
.
Table 5 1 - Pulp mill and board mill consumption of chips from logs and sawdust and shavings. by resource area. type of material
and State of origin................................................................................................................................................................. 73
Table 5 2 . 4 umber of 'other industly" mills. by resource area. county. and type of industry ....................................................................74
Table 53-Installed capacity of 'other industry" mills. by type of industry................................................................................................75
Table 54.4 verage number of operating days per year of 'other industry" mills. by resource area and type of mill.................................75
Table 55.W
Table 5-09
ood consumption by 'other industry" mills. by resource area. type of mill. and type of material...........................................76
consumption by 'other industry" mills. by resource area. type of mill. and owner ...........................................................77
Table 57--De pendency (by percentage) of 'other industry' mills on timber. by resource area. type of mill. and owner ...........................78
Table 58--Log consumption by 'other industry' mills. by resource area. type of mill. and species ...................................................80
Table 59-Production and disposition of wood and bark residue by shake and shingle mills. by resource area ......................................81
Table 6 b ~ r o d u c t i o nand disposition of wood residue by shake and shingle mills. by type of residue. resource area. and use
............82
Table 6 1 - P roduction and disposition of bark residue by shake and shingle mills. by resource area and use......................................... 82
All Industries
Appendix 2
Table I-Number' of mills, by resource area and type of industry, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
LUMBER
VENEER AND
PLYWOOD
PULP^ AND
BOARD
SHAKE AND
POST, POLE
SHINGLE E X P O R ~ AND PILING
NORTHWEST
26
6
5
2
WEST-CENTRAL
24
10
12
4
SOUTHWEST
21
23
4
-
CENTRAL
5
2
4
-
BLUE MOUNTAIN
9
1
2
-
ALL AREAS
85
42
27
6
-
v h e number of mills in this table are based on mills who responded to the survey.
b ~ a cpulping
h
process at a single location is considered an individual mill.
umber of log export companies not available.
Note: Totals among appendix tables may differ because of rounding.
CHIPPING
ALL
INDUSTRIES
1
4
44
2
8
60
-
3
51
1
2
14
1
1
14
5
18
183
All Industries
Table 2-Wood consumption by mills, by resource area, industry, and
type of material, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
AND INDUSTRY
ROUNDWOOD
OTHER WOODa
THOUSAND BOARD FEET
SCRIBNER LOG RULE
RESIDUE AND
OTHER FIBER^
TONS
DRY WEIGHT
NORTHWEST:
LUMBER
VENEER AND PLYWOOD
PULP AND BOARD
LOG EXPORT
CHIPPING
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
LUMBER
VENEER AND PLYWOOD
PULP AND BOARD
SHAKE AND SHlNGLEc
POST, POLE. AND PILING^
CHIPPING
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
LUMBER
VENEER AND PLYWOOD
PULP AND BOARD
LOG EXPORT
CHIPPING
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
LUMBER
VENEER AND PLYWOODe
PULP AND BOARDe
CHlPPlNGe
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
LUMBER
TOTAL
ALL AREAS:
LUMBER
VENEER AND PLYWOOD
PULP AND BOARD
SHAKE AND SHINGLE
LOG EXPORT
POST, POLE, AND PILING
CHIPPING
TOTAL
alndudespeeler mres and cants used by sawmills; bl&,
boards. and bolts used by shake and shingle mills: and
miscellaneous peeled products used by post, pole, and piling mills.
blncludesresidues from the sawmill, veneer and plywood, and shake and shingle industries, plus
chips from roundwood chipping plants, market pulp, and recycled fiber.
CNorthwest mmbined with West-Centralto avoid disdosure.
d~orthwest.Cental, and Blue Mountain combined with West-Centralto avoid disclosure.
eBlue Mountain combined with Central to avoid disdosure.
All Industries
Table S L o g flow to mills, by resource area, industry, and State, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
AND INDUSTRY
OREGON
WASHINGTON
CALIFORNIA
IDAHO
OTHER
ALL
STATES
THOUSAND BOARD FEET. SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
LUMBER
VENEER AND PLYWOOD
PULP AND BOARD
LOG EXPORT
CHIPPING
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
LUMBER
VENEER AND PLYWOOD
PULP AND BOARD
SHAKE AND SHINGLE^
POST, POLE, AND PILING^
CHIPPING
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
LUMBER
VENEER AND PLYWOOD
PULP AND BOARD
LOG EXPORT
CHIPPING
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
LUMBER
VENEER AND PLYWOOD'
PULP AND BOARD'
CHIP PING^
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
LUMBER
211,515
38,374
-
13.668
TOTAL
211.515
38,374
-
13,668
2,378,942
892.411
102,784
415
61,374
15,565
300,748
391,400
100,090
3,752,239
ALL AREAS:
LUMBER
VENEER AND PLYWOOD
PULP AND BOARD
SHAKE AND SHINGLE
LOG EXPORT
POST, POLE, AND PILING
CHIPPING
TOTAL
-
51,192
83,442
12,350
24.700
-
2,874,316
1,079,884
139,834
480
61,374
17,191
326,714
63.814
4,499,793
-
23,685
1,626
2.281
515,240
150,891
17,609
a~ofthwest
combined with West-Central to avoid disclosure.
b~orthwest,Central, and Blue Mountain combined with West-Central to avoid disclosure.
' ~ l u eMountain combined with Central to avoid disclosure.
263,557
39,114
-
-
263.557
13,668
3,941
-
65
-
Zr
-
-
3
Table 4--Log flows, by resource area, county of use, and county and out-of-state origin, Oregon, 1998
c
Q
2
.
3.
g.
NORTHWEST
RESOURCE AREA AND
COUNTY OF USE
TOTAL UNKNOWN
OREGON COUNTY CLACKAMAS CLATSOP COLUMBIA HOOD RIVER MARION MULTNOMAH POLK TILLAMOOK WASHINGTON YAMHILL
THOUSAND BOARD FEET, SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
CLACKAMAS AND MAR ION^
CLATSOP AND COLUMBIA~
HOOD RIVER, MULTNOMAH
a
AND WASHINGTON
POLK
TILLAMOOK AND YAMHILL*
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
BENTON
LANE^
a
LINCOLN AND LINN
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
CoosC
DOUGLAS
JACKSON, JOSEPHINE, AND
CURRY^^
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
CROOK, JEFFERSON,
KLAMATH, AND LAKE^^
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
a
BAKER AND UNION
GRANT, MORROW, AND
UMATILLA~
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
See footnotes at end of table.
197,790
161,781
437
33,904
120,286
303,466
138,030
128.294
157,571
43,669
15,954
6,913
929,361
235,581
76,030
744,984
291,169
3,600
46,140
-
--
19,732
57,610
--
24,251
17,460
-
9,461
15,509
73,346
143,153
148,056
-
1,344
7,860
10,759
-
17,982
8,164
11,315
-
1,112,183
17,982
19,963
19,479
2,548
-
275,794
682,206
62,213
372,808
--
6,912
180.906
1,138,906
63,467
498,488
---
--
----
---
360,277
360,277
137,437
137,437
--
-
-
1.987
1,987
86.991
--
--
-
-
124,522
211.513
--
---
--
-
3,752,240
889,488
163,116
174,447
84,409
-
-
-
6,912
-
-
-1,410
5,409
656
1,260
--
--
---
81,861
17,460
25,797
2,670
2,548
--
5,097
1,712
--
-
-
-
-
--
-
6,375
10,380
24,270
12,337
19,609
19,738
24,560
-
10,232
8,969
30,032
5,100
14,830
17.150
44,298
65,988
19,713
2,880
3,500
62,700
8,495
18,199
14,070
3,892
5,940
--
-
1,523
-
--
56,689
-
66,977
5,719
5,719
2,654
11,797
40,764
9.832
1,523
14,451
-
--
--
-
--
--
--
---
--
-
--
--
-
--
60.168
--
-
--
--
-
--
---
-
--
-
--
-
--
-
-
--
--
---
-
--
--
--
-
-
--
19,447
92,774
8,389
85,062
75,820
64,223
71,140
--
--
--
Table 4--Log flows, by resource area, county of use, and county and out-of-state origin, Oregon, 1998 (Continued)
WEST-CENTRAL
RESOURCE AREA AND
COUNTY OF USE
BENTON
LANE LINCOLN
SOUTHWEST
LlNN
COOS
CURRY
DOUGLAS
JACKSON
CENTRAL
JOSEPHINE
THOUSAND BOARD FEET, SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
a
CLACKAMAS AND MARION
CLATSOP AND COLUMBIAa
HOOD RIVER, MULTNOMAH
AND WASHINGTONa
POLK
TILLAMOOK AND YAMHlLLa
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
BENTON
LANE^
a
LINCOLN AND LINN
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOSC
DOUGLAS
JACKSON, JOSEPHINE, AND
CURRY^^
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
CROOK, JEFFERSON,
KLAMATH, AND LAKE^^
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
a
BAKER AND UNION
GRANT, MORROW, AND
UMATILLA~
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
See footnotes at end of table.
CROOK
DESCHUTES
JEFFERSON
Table 4--Log flows, by resource area, county of use, and county and out-of-state origin, Oregon, 1998 (Continued)
CENTRAL (CONTINUED)
RESOURCE AREA AND
COUNTY OF USE
KLAMATH
LAKE
WASCO
BLUE MOUNTAIN
WHEELER
BAKER
-
GRANT
HARNEY
-
-
MALHEUR
-
THOUSAND BOARD FEET, SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
a
CLACKAMAS AND MARION
CLATSOP AND COLUMBIA'
HOOD RIVER, MULTNOMAH
a
AND WASHINGTON
POLK
a
TILLAMOOK AND YAMHlLL
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
BENTON
LANE^
LINCOLN AND L~NN'
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOS"
DOUGLAS
JACKSON, JOSEPHINE, AND
CURRY^^
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
CROOK, JEFFERSON,
KLAMATH, AND LAKEae
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
BAKER AND UNION'
GRANT, MORROW, AND
UMATILLA'
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
See footnotes at end of table.
-
MORROW
UMATILLA
UNION
WALLOWA
Table 4--Log flows, by resource area, county of use, and county and out-of-state origin, Oregon, 1998 (Continued)
STATE OF WASHINGTON
RESOURCE AREA AND
COUNTY OF USE
TOTAL
WASHINGTON
UNKNOWN
COUNTY ASOTIN
CLALLAM
CLARK
COLUMBIA
COWLITZ
GRAYSHARBOR
THOUSAND BOARD FEET. SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
CLACKAMAS AND MAR ION^
CLATSOP AND COLUMBIA~
HOOD RIVER, MULTNOMAH,
AND WASHING TON^
POLK
TILIAMOOK AND YAMHILLa
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
BENTON
LANE^
LINCOLN AND LINN~
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOSC
DOUGLAS
JACKSON, JOSEPHINE, AND
CURRY^^
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
CROOK, JEFFERSON,
ae
KIAMATH, AND LAKE
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
BAKER AND UNION^
GRANT, MORROW, AND
UMATILLA~
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
See footnotes at end of table.
KLlCKlTAT
LEWIS
PACIFIC
SKAGIT
3
Table &Log
Q
flows, by resource area, county of use, and county and outof-state origin, Oregon, 1998 (Continued)
E
-
STATE OF WASHINGTON (Continued)
RESOURCE AREA AND
COUNTY OF USE
SKAMANIA
THURSTON
WAHKIAKUM
WALLA WALLA
WHATCOM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
WHITMAN
THOUSAND BOARD FEET. SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
CLACKAMAS AND MARION'
CLATSOP AND COLUMBIAa
HOOD RIVER, MULTNOMAH,
AND WASHINGTONa
POLK
TILLAMOOK AND YAM HILL^
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
BENTON
LANE^
LINCOLN AND LINN'
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
coosb
DOUGLAS
JACKSON, JOSEPHINE, AND
CURRY^^
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
CROOK, JEFFERSON,
KLAMATH, AND LAKE"
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
BAKER AND UNION^
GRANT, MORROW, AND
UMATILLA~
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
See footnotes at end of table.
-
YAKIMA
TOTAL
UNKNOWN
CALIFORNIA COUNTY BUlTE
DEL NORTE
I'
Table 4--Log flows, by resource area, county of use, and county and outof-state origin, Oregon, 1998 (Continued)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
RESOURCE AREA AND
COUNTY OF USE
HUMBOLDT
MODOC
KINGS
STATE OF IDAHO
SlSKlYOU TEHAMA
TOTAL
TOTAL UNKNOWN
OTHER
IDAHO COUNTY BENEWAH BOISE CLEARWATER IDAHO KOOTENAI UTAH LEWIS NEZPERCE STATES
THOUSAND BOARD FEET, SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
CLACKAMAS AND MARION'
CLATSOP AND COLUMBIA'
HOOD RIVER, MULTNOMAH,
AND WASHINGTON'
--
-
--
--
--
--
-
--
--
--
---
---
---
--
--
-
--
--
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
--
--
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
--
27,000
-
--
-
--
--
-
--
-
-
-
--
--
35,614
--
-
WEST-CENTRAL:
BENTON
LANE^
LINCOLN AND LINN'
TOTAL
--
-
--
--
--
1,626
-
-
--
-
-
480
--
-
--
2,115
2,595
2,700
2,700
-
-
SOUTHWEST:
coosC
DOUGLAS
JACKSON, JOSEPHINE, AND
CURRY'*
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
CROOK, JEFFERSON,
KLAMATH, AND LAKE'^
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
BAKER AND UNION'
GRANT, MORROW, AND
UMATILLA'
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
-
--
3.360
480
8.053
11.413
480
--
-
-
--
-
--
--
--
--
--
-
--
-
--
--
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
1.200
--
-
--
--
-
-
--
--
1,200
--
-
-
---
---
-
11.281
11,281
-
--
--
-
-
---
--
-
-
--
---
--
--
24,587
24,587
--
--
--
--
-
-
-
16,934
6,500
313
--
420
3,339
-
1.461
2,782
2,119
--
-
-
-
.-
-
---
--
-
-
-
675
17,609
-
-
-
6,500
313
283
283
274
694
3,339
20
20
98
-1,559 2,782
2,119
--
11.413
11,761
1.626
27,182
2,700
17,609
6.500
313
283
694
3,339
20
1,559 2,782
2.119
63,814
--
-
-
--
'Combined to avoid disclosure.
b ~ a n County
e
includes one shake mill from Tillamook County and three post, pole, and piling mills from Baker, Klamath, and Washington Counties to avoid disclosure.
'Coos County includes 2 veneer mills from Curry County to avoid disclosure.
d~acksonCounty includes a pulp mill from Coos County and a board mill from Douglas County to avoid disclosure.
l la math County includes one veneer mill from Union County, two pulp and board mills from Union and Umatilla Counties, and one chipping mill from Umatilla County to avoid disclosure.
--
2
-
7
Q
c
2
i?
V)
Table &Log flows to mills from National Forests, by resource area and county of use, Oregon, 1998
V,
9
cn
RESOURCE AREA AND
COUNTY OF USE
OUT-OF-STATE ALL
MOUNT
ROGUE
WALLOWADESCHUTES FREMONT MALHEUR HOOD OCHOCO RIVER SlSKlYOU SlUSlAW UMATlLlA UMPQUA WHITMAN WILLAMElTE WINEMA FORESTS FORESTS
THOUSAND BOARD FEET. SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
CLACKAMAS AND MARIONa
CLATSOP AND COLUMBIA~
HOOD RIVER, MULTNOMAH,
AND WASHING TON^
POLK
TILLAMOOK AND YAMHILLa
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
BENTON
LANE^
LINCOLN AND LINNa
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOSC
DOUGLAS
JACKSON, JOSEPHINE, AND
CURRY^^
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
CROOK, JEFFERSON,
KLAMATH, AND LAKEae
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
BAKER AND UNIONa
GRANT, MORROW, AND
UMATILLA~
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
'Combined to avoid disclosure.
b ~ a nCounty
e
includes one shake mill from Tillamook County and three post, pole, and piling mills from Baker, Klamath, and Washington Counties to avoid disclosure.
CCoosCounty includes 2 veneer mills from Curry county to avoid disclosure.
*~acksonCounty includes a pulp mill from Coos County and a board mill from Douglas County to avoid disclosure.
e~lamath
County includes one veneer mill from Union County, two pulp and board mills from Union and Umatilla Counties, and one chipping mill from Umatilla County to avoid disclosure.
20
Table &Log flows to mills from National Forests, by resource area and industry, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA AND
INDUSTRY
DESCHUTES
FREMONT
MALHEUR
MOUNT
HOOD
OCHOCO
ROGUE
RIVER
SlSKlYOU
SIUSLAW
UMATILLA
UMPQUA
WALLOWAWHITMAN
OUT-OF-STATE
FORESTS
WlLLAMETTE
WlNEMA
2.612
2.575
-
-
4,009
452
2,898
3.169
9.418
ALL
FORESTS
THOUSAND BOARD FEET. SCRIBNERLOG RULE
NORTMST:
LUMBER
VENEER
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
LUMBER
VENEER
PULP AND BOARD
POST. POLE. AND PILING'
CHlPPlNG
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
LUMBER
VENEER
PULP AND BOARD
CHlPPlNG
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
LUMBER
VENEER^
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
LUMBER
TOTAL
ALL AREAS:
LUMBER
VENEER
PULP AND BOARD
SHAKE AND SHINGLE
POST. POLE, AND PILING
CHIPPING
TOTAL
2.838
15.300
-
445
-
-
13,350
3,690
-
-
13.350
3.690
2,638
15.300
13.350
14,484
2,624
1.739
1.159
-
-
8.954
-
-
-
8.733
-
6.084
-
-
-
-
-
3.046
-
4,831
-
-
-.
-
3.046
-
4,631
-
6.584
5,519
3,860
2.835
4,293
13,512
-
-
9,005
-
-
2.250
-
340
-
4,379
16,459
15.600
17.448
9.005
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
'~orthwest, Central, and Blue Mountain combined with West-Central to avoid disclosure.
behe Mountain combined with Central to avoid disclosure.
-
12,103
-
6.695
-
3,046
1.528
4.732
-
-
17.188
23,297
-
4.631
565
3,155
20,654
9,316
461
-
21
1,027
33.431
8,407
-
-
920
2,473
-
750
4.207
18.725
11.779
40.465
13.308
-
-
-
48.061
24.717
24.717
122.191
69.068
13,683
-
-
3.484
8,967
12.587
217.391
2
Table 7-Log
consumption by mills, by resource area, industry, and owner, Oregon, 1998.
RESOURCE AREA AND
INDUSTRY
STATE
NATIONAL
FOREST
BUREAU OF
LAND
MANAGEMENT
--b
3
OTHER
PUBLIC
PRIVATE
NATIVE
AMERICAN
OUT-OF
STATE
UNKNOWN
ALL
OWNERS
9.
C
%
(0
V)
THOUSAND BOARD FEET, SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
LUMBER
VENEER
PULP AND BOARD
SHAKE AND
LOG EXPORT
POST. POLE. AND PILING'
CHIPPING
TOTAL
SHINGLE^
WEST-CENTRAL:
LUMBER
VENEER
PULP AND BOARD
SHAKE AND SHINGLE^
POST. POLE. AND PILING'
CHIPPING
TOTAL
95,898
4.691
-
11.742
15,528
-
-
-
51,492
16.574
2.898
24.782
10.762
5,795
2,167
3.484
1.922
24.717
163,884
52.836
2.698
122.191
69.064
13.682
-
2,595
2.625
-
SOUTHWEST:
LUMBER
VENEER
LOG EXPORT
CHIPPING
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
LUMBER
VENEER^
BOARD^
PULP AND
POST. POLE, AND PILING'
CHIP PING^
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
LUMBER
VENEER^
BOARD^
PULP AND
POST, POLE. AND PILING'
-
-
CHIP PING^
TOTAL
ALL AREAS:
LUMBER
VENEER
PULP AND BOARD
SHAKE AND SHINGLE
LOG EXPORT
POST. POLE, AND PILING
-
-
2.167
3.484
-
D~orthwest
and West-Central combined to avoid disclosure.
'~orthwest, Central, and Blue Mountain combined with West-Central to avoid disclosure.
dBlue Mountain and Central combined to avoid disclosure.
-
5.692
-
-
-
551.247
104,002
-
9,859
-
317,628
32.748
-
25.1 16
994,661
159,594
25,116
27,242
27.242
-
-
Table 8-Log consumption by mills, by resource area, industry, and species, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
AND INDUSTRY
DOUGLAS-FIR
HEMLOCK
TRUE FIRS
SPRUCE
PONDEROSA
PINE
LODGEPOLE
PINE
WESTERN
REDCEDAR
OTHER
SOrrWOODS
RED
ALDER
OTHER
HARDWOODS
ALL
SPECIES
THOUSAND BOARD FEET. SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
LUMBER
VENEER
PULP AND BOARD
SHAKE AND SHINGLE"
LOG EXPORT
POST, POLE. AND
CHIPPING
TOTAL
PILING^
WEST-CENTRAL:
LUMBER
VENEER
PULP AND BOARD
SHAKE AND
POST. POLE, AND
CHIPPING
TOTAL
SHINGLE^
PILING^
SOUTHVEST:
LUMBER
VENEER
PULP AND BOARD
LOG EXPORT
CHIPPING
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
LUMBER
VENEER'
PULP AND BOARD'
POST. POLE, AND
CHIPPING'
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
LUMBER
VENEER'
PULP AND BOARD'
POST. POLE, AND
CHIPPING'
TOTAL
PILING^
PILING^
ALL AREAS:
LUMBER
VENEER
PULP AND BOARD
SHAKE AND SHINGLE
LOG EXPORT
POST. POLE, AND PILING
CHIPPING
TOTAL
a~orthwestand West-Central combined to avoid disclosure.
3
b~orthwest,
Central, and Blue Mountain combined with West-Central to avoid disclosure.
c
a
'Blue Mountain and Central combined to avoid disclosure.
1.
m
2
All Industries
Table 9--Production and disposition of wood and bark residue by mills, by resource area, industry,
and use, Oregon, 1998'
WOOD RESIDUE
RESOURCE AREA
AND INDUSTRY
PULP AND
BOARD
FUEL
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL
TONS. DRY WEIGHT
NORTHWEST:
LUMBER
VENEER
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
LUMBER
VENEER
C
SHAKE AND SHINGLE
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
LUMBER
VENEER
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
LUMBER
VENEER^
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
LUMBER
TOTAL
ALL AREAS:
LUMBER
VENEER
SHAKE AND SHINGLE
TOTAL
See footnotes at end of table.
UNUSED
ALL
WOOD
All Industries
Table $--Production and disposition of wood and bark residue by mills, by resource area, industry, and use,
Oregon, 1998' (Continued)
BARK RESIDUE
USEDb
RESOURCE AREA AND
INDUSTRY
PULP AND
BOARD
FUEL
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL
UNUSED
ALL
BARK
ALL
RESIDUE
97,276
511,978
6.140.552
2,677,472
3,358
8,821,382
TONS, DRY WEIGHT
NORTHWEST:
LUMBER
VENEER
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
LUMBER
VENEER
SHAKE AND SHINGLE'
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
LUMBER
VENEER
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
LUMBER
VENEER*
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
LUMBER
TOTAL
ALL AREAS:
LUMBER
VENEER
SHAKE AND SHINGLE
TOTAL
26,754
1,320
-
28,074
90,014
927,182
531,284
747.
1,459,213
97,276
328,735
13.281
82
1,282,671
545,885
829
4,927
57
1,287,598
545,885
886
342,098
1,829,385
4,984
1,834,369
'~esidueamounts are approximations derived using fadon shown in Appendix 1.
b~esidues
are not necessarily used in the area in which they are produced.
'Northwest and West-Central combined to avoid disclosure.
Blue Mountain and Central combined to avoid disclosure.
-
7,262
-
.
Sawmill Industry
Table 10-Number of sawmills, by resource area, county, and mill-size class,
Oregon, 1998
a
MILL-SIZE CLASS
RESOURCE AREA
AND COUNTY
D
C
B
A
ALL
CLASSES
NORTHWEST:
CLACKAMAS
CLATSOP
COLUMBIA
HOOD RIVER
MARION
MULTNOMAH
POLK
TILLAMOOK
WASHINGTON
YAMHILL
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
BENTON
LANE
LINCOLN
LlNN
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOS
CURRY
DOUGLAS
JACKSON
JOSEPHINE
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
CROOK
JEFFERSON
KLAMATH
LAKE
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
BAKER
GRANT
MORROW
UMATlLLA
UNION
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
a Class D mills = less than 40,000
A = 120,000 or more.
board-foot capacity per &hour shift; C = 40,000-79.999; B = 80,000-119,999;
Sawmill Industry
Table 11-Installed 8-hour capacity of sawmills, by resource area, county, and
mill-size class, Oregon, 1998
MILL-SIZE CLASS'
RESOURCE AREA
AND COUNTY
D
C
B
A
ALL
CLASSES
THOUSAND BOARD FEET, LUMBER TALLY
NORTHWEST:
CLACKAMAS
CLATSOP
COLUMBIA
HOOD RIVER
MARION
MULTNOMAH
POLK
TILLAMOOK
WASHINGTON
YAMHILL
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
BENTON
LANE
LINCOLN
LlNN
TOTAL
SOUTMNEST:
COOS
CURRY
DOUGLAS
JACKSON
JOSEPHINE
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
CROOK
JEFFERSON
KLAMATH
LAKE
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
BAKER
GRANT
MORROW
UMATILLA
UNION
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
a Class D mills = less than 40,000 board-foot capaclty per 8-hour shift; C = 40,000-79,999; B = 80,000-119,999;
A = 120,000 or more.
Sawmill Industry
Table 12-Number of sawmills, by resource area, mill-size class, and type of headrig,
Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AND
a
MILLSIZE CLASS
BAND
CHIPPING
CIRCULAR
GANG
SCRAGG
OTHER
1
2
1
-
-
NORTHWEST:
D
C
B
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
C
B
A
TOTAL
16
-
,
3
-
7
7
13
2
3
-
1
2
20
5
2
3
1
-
19
2
3
3
2
2
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
2
-
67
10
12
9
5
3
1
1
1
SOUTHWEST:
D
C
B
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
B
A
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
C
B
A
TOTAL
1
1
5
-
2
-
ALL AREAS:
b
C
B
A
TOTAL
a C l a D~ mills
~ = less than 40,000 board-foot capacity per &hour shift; C = 40,000-79,999;B = 80,000-119,999;
A = 120,000 or more.
Sawmill Industry
Table 13-Number of sawmills, by resource area, county, and selected equipment,
Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
AND COUNTY
NORTHWEST:
CLACKAMAS
CLATSOP
COLUMBLA
HOOD RIVER
MARION
MUCrNOMAH
POLK
TILLAMOOK
WASHINGTON
YAMHILL
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
BENTON
LANE
LINCOLN
LlNN
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOS
CURRY
DOUGLAS
JACKSON
JOSEPHINE
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
CROOK
JEFFERSON
KLAMATH
LAKE
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
BAKER
GRANT
MORROW
UMATlLlA
UNION
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
PLANER
CHIPPER
KILN
BARKER
ALL
TYPES
Sawmill Industry
Table 14--Average number of operating days per year and average
number of shifts per day by sawmills, by resource area and mill-size
class, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
D
C
B
A
AVERAGE DAYS PER YEAR
NORTHWEST
197
195
239
231
221
181
249
231
WEST-CENTRAL
SOUTHWEST
CENTRAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN
AVERAGE ALL ARE AS^
AVERAGE SHIFTS PER DAY
1.OO
1 .OO
1.50
1.88
-
2.00
1.38
1.60
1.17
1.OO
1.50
1.33
CENTRAL
-
-
2.00
1.67
BLUE MOUNTAIN
-
1.33
2.00
1.60
NORTHWEST
WEST-CENTRAL
SOUTHWEST
'Class D mills = less than 40,000 board-foot capacity per &hour shiff; C = 40,000-79,999;
6 = 80,000-119,999; A = 120,000 or more.
b~verage
of all mills within each mill size class.
,
Sawmill Industry
Table 15-Wood consumption by sawmills, by resource area, mill-size
class, and type of material, Oregon, 1998
-
RESOURCE AREA AND
MILL-SIZE CLASSa
ROUNDWOOD
OTHER WOODC
ALL WOOD
THOUSAND BOARD FEET. SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
D
C AND B~
A
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
C AND B~
A
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
D
C AND B~
A
TOTAL
CENfRAL.
B AND
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
C AND B~
A
TOTAL
ALL AREAS:
D
C AND B
B AND A
A
TOTAL
'Class D mills = less than 40,000 board-foot capacity per 8-hour shift; C = 40,000-79,999;
B = 80,000-119,999; A = 120.000 or more.
b~ombined
to avoid disclosure.
Clncludespeeler cores and cants used by sawmills; blocks, boards, and bolts used by shake
and shingle mills; and miscellaneous peeled products used by post, pole, and piling mills.
Sawmill Industry
Table 16-Log consumption by sawmills, by resource area, mill-size
class, and diameter class of timber, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA AND
MlLL-SlZE (3-ASSa
<5
510
11-20
21+
ALL
CLASSES
THOUSAND BOARD FEET, SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
D
C AND B~
A
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
C AND B~
A
TOTAL
SOUMWEST:
D
C AND B~
A
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
B AND
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
C AND B~
A
TOTAL
ALL AREAS:
D
C AND B~
B AND
A
TOTAL
'Class D mills = less than 40,000 board-foot capacity per 8-hour shift; C = 40,000-79,999;
B = 80,000-119,999; A = 120,000 or more.
b~ombined
to avoid disclosure.
Sawmill Industry
Table 17-Log consumption by sawmills, by resource area, county of use,
and diameter class of timber, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCEAREAAND
COUNTY OF USE
DIAMETER CLASSES (INCHES)
ALL DIAMETER
5-10
11-20
21+
CLASSES
<5
THOUSAND BOARD FEET, SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
CLACKAMAS AND MARIONa
CLATSOP AND COLUMBIAa
HOOD RIVER, MULTNOMAH,
AND WASHING TON^
POLK
TILLAMOOK AND YAM HILL^
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
BENTON
LANE
LINCOLN AND LINN~
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOS
DOUGLAS
JACKSON, JOSEPHINE, AND
CURRP
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
CROOK, JEFFERSON,
KLAMATH, AND LAKEa
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
BAKER AND UNIONa
GRANT. MORROW, AND
UMATILLA~
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
'Combined to avoid disclosure.
Table 18-Log consumption by sawmills, by resource area, mill-size class, and owner, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA AND
a
MILL-SIZE CLASS
STATE
NATIONAL
FOREST
BUREAU OF
LAND
MANAGEMENT
OTHER
PUBLIC
PRIVATE
NATIVE
AMERICAN
OUT-OF
STATE
ALL
OWNERS
THOUSAND BOARD FEET. SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
D
C AND ab
A
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
C AND ab
A
-
20,254
31,237
9,164
15,619
4,930
14,607
7.821
117,420
542.266
1,530
1.906
4,534
54.942
157,831
668,398
TOTAL
51,491
24,783
19,537
7,821
659,686
3,436
59,476
826,229
SOUTHWEST:
D
C AND B~
A
39
529
14,003
346
5,417
26.605
1,775
12,212
15,996
754
307
8,091
82,795
25,187
296,777
1,200
8,127
9,381
43,690
93,837
53,033
406,362
TOTAL
14,571
32,368
29,983
9,152
404,759
1,200
61,198
553,232
1,922
--
22,214
2.503
22,085
155.606
1,747
5,438
5,211
46.831
53,178
210,379
1,922
24,717
-
--
177,691
7,185
52,042
263,557
163,882
122,192
52,115
22,665
1,963,359
54,730
495,372
-
CENTRAL:
B AND
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
C AND B~
A
TOTAL
-
-
ALL AREAS:
D
C AND B~
B AND
A
TOTAL
a ~ l a sD
s mills = less than 40,000 board-foot capacity per 8-hour shift; C = 40,000-79,999; B = 80,000-119,999; A = 120,000 or more.
b~ombined
to avoid disclosure.
2,874,315
Table 19-Log consumption by sawmills, by resource area, county of use, and owner, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA AND
COUNTY OF USE
STATE
BUREAU OF
LAND
MANAGEMENT
NATIONAL
FOREST
OTHER
PUBLIC
PRIVATE
NATIVE
AMERICAN
OUT-OF .
STATE
ALL
OWNERS
THOUSAND BOARD FEET. SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
CLACKAMAS AND MARIONa
CLATSOP AND COLUMBIAa
HOOD RIVER, MULTNOMAH,
8
AND WASHINGTON
POLK
TILLAMOOK AND YAMHILLa
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
BENTON
LANE
LINCOLN AND LINN~
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOS
DOUGLAS
JACKSON, JOSEPHINE, AND
CURRY^
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
CROOK, JEFFERSON,
KIAMATH, AND LAKEa
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
BAKER AND UNION'
GRANT, MORROW, AND
UMATILLA'
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
'Combined to avoid disclosure.
22,102
21,315
10,718
282
219
-
219
282
159,174
114,786
5,359
-
64,685
68,988
262,476
205,653
20,693
1,700
30,088
252
2,376
5,191
490
-
111,991
67,031
98.265
4,500
-
-
-
-
34,995
18,666
130,294
179,998
87.397
259.137
95,898
11,742
2,595
5,692
551,247
9,859
317,628
994,661
14,445
22,787
14.260
107
20,821
3,854
3,400
15,660
477
2,548
5,273
-
55,529
478,184
125,972
1,530
1,906
28,960
19,752
10,764
104,989
564,007
157,233
51,492
24,782
19,537
7,821
659,685
3,436
59,476
826,229
1,370
12,673
346
20,866
345
22,875
2,035
6,811
76,627
248,199
--
2,240
33,085
82,963
344,509
529
11,156
6,763
307
79,932
1.200
25,874
125,761
14,572
32,368
29,983
9,153
404,758
1,200
61.199
553,233
169,977
33,050
5,028
236.637
28,582
-
-
169,977
33,050
5,028
236,637
-
4,953
-
80,657
1,380
21,675
108,665
1,922
19.764
1,922
163,884
-
-
.
-
28,582
-
-
97.034
5.806
30,367
154.893
24,717
-
-
177,691
7,186
52,042
263,558
122,191
52,115
22,666
1,963,358
54,731
495,372
2,874,318
?!
S
n
=
> W O O F
(D
- '
8
0
I
% 2
F
F:
v,
2
F:
%
I
Dmorn
D W ~ W
0) ?
"'
9
I
3rn
z
.I
.
I
.5.
(D
a
a
I
2
I
F
cn
3a
:
o ;fW
m
2
g ?
$
s g"'
>mooZ
0
1
2
z
a
8
I
0
%
%!3
D
9
TT
0,
(D
3a
Z
P
:
a
0
%
!swh)-
W
h)
A
w
W
- a - w
N
I w-.
A
l
N I N I
P
h)
h)
W l
PO:
I
I
I
4-
IIh)
-
- I
w
- N
I
4
I
4
1
1
a,
*
P
I
-r
h).!
I P
w w r w
I
l
- I
l
1
I I
W
(ow-
'2 G l - r . 4
0
O)PI
P
a-I
I
G
: - I
I
a
o
I
1 - 1
I
l
-r
l
I
(0
3
0
Y
s
A
z3
m3
?!
g
Bs
8
B
;J
I
W
W
! : : I
S
2
(D
(0
i%
4
V
S,
0
0
0
2
s
P
h)
A
a,VIcn-
.
l
W
P
h)
Wco-rh)
= V I l W
-
I-rI
VIWh)
I
I
1
h)
w
a, I
4
-uI
mh) I -
0
m
2
a
A
o w a w l
a
h)l I a,
s
A
a,
2
0
f
-.L
NN--
3
G
N
0
s
P
0
-4
I
h)N:
l
l
:
I
:
1
:
I l l
I l l
I
I
I
1
I :
I
I
i
l
l
1
1 1 1 :
N
I
Ih)I
I l l
h)
I
W
W
h)l I :
1
\
1
1
9s
z
c
gin.
"g
"
3
h)
W
:
wcv-VI-4
2P
I I
w
VI- W
m w h )
a,uIll-.
A
-l
sa,-
h)
P
az
A
-
,-a,
9
1 0 )
d
1
I
:
I l l
I
l
l
I
I
4
I
1
I :
P
-
.4h)IVI
I I - I
.4
I
VINI
C
8
s
rn
3
P1
I l l
I
I l l l
s
6
I
I l l
I
I 1
I
: : I :
I
I
l
l
I
1 1 1 :
%
zga!
D
-cn
57
5
0
Bs
7
5s
8;
0
0.-
O)
-Nmw
w
VI-W
A
GW
I
I
.4
I
I
I
P
: I l l
I
l
l
I l l
VI
Wh)
I
I
I
1
I !
h)
rnl - w
2 i3a-r
w
Ah)!
W
I
W
I I I I
I
W I I
I
l
l
Y 2-rda,
VI
I
W *
I
-
I I I I
I
I
l
l
I
I
1
I
I l l 1
I
I l l
I
I
l
l
1
I
n
ai
a
-g
0
(LI
La
w
w
s
"g
a
q
s .I
rn
N
u
A
Q)
2
x
;J
..
8
s
Qsnpul Il!uMeS
5
s
a,
I I I I
(D
g m
0
a,
bb
N
s
h,
a,
1 : : :
2
0
6
N - 1 1 -
3
cn
3
(P
-
I-
s
0
A
9
'
0
Table 20-Dependency (by percentage) of sawmills on timber, by resource area, mill-size class, and owner, Oregon, 1998 (Continued)
FOREST INDUSTRY
OWN WOOD SUPPLY
OTHER WOOD SUPPLY
RESOURCE AREA AND
MILL-SIZE CLASS'
0% 1-32% 33-66% 67-100%
0% 1-32% 3346% 67-100%
OTHER PRIVATE
0% 1-32% 33-66% 67-100%
NORTHWEST:
D
C
B
A
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
C
B
A
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
D
C
B
A
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
B
A
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
C
B
A
TOTAL
ALL AREAS:
D
C
B
A
TOTAL
-
a Class D mills
5
3
P
NUMBER OF MILLS
-
a-
= less than 40,000 board-foot capacity per &hour shift; C = 40,000-79,999; B = 80,000-119,999; A = 120,000 or more.
NATIVE AMERICAN
0% 1-32% 33-66% 67-100%
K
Table 21-Log consumption by sawmills, by resource area, mill-size class, and species, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
AND MILL-SIZE CLASSa
DOUGLAS-FIR
HEMLOCK
TRUE FIRS
SPRUCE
PONDEROSA LODGEPOLE
PINE
PINE
WESTERN
REDCEDAR
OTHER
SOFlWOODS
RED
ALDER
OTHER
HARDWOODS
1,658
ALL
SPECIES
THOUSAND BOARD FEET. SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
D
C AND Bb
A
624
37,767
656,403
9
5,610
37.010
-
-
92
1,859
-
14
18,352
231.427
TOTAL
694,794
249,779
42,629
1,859
-
14
92
113,250
518,283
9,276
100.611
130
23.969
176
6.740
-
-
TOTAL
631,533
109,887
24,099
6,916
SOUTHWEST:
D
C AND Bb
A
44,625
13,000
194,788
11,700
1,408
63
46,362
10.874
TOTAL
252,413
58,062
CENTRAL:
B AND
27.980
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
C AND Bb
A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
3,836
-
-
6,233
63,588
924.840
1,658
3,836
994,661
-
31,500
1.500
-
3,500
17.295
-
157,832
668.398
17,295
1,500
31,500
3,500
826,230
3,917
-
42.090
6.030
93,838
53,033
406,363
-
-
63
2,684
24,269
34,770
7,392
13,628
27,808
7.793
5,263
54.707
12,282
2,747
66,431
13,628
27,871
67,763
46,007
6,030
553,234
2,060
28,028
412
159.262
18,696
200
2,060
28,028
412
159,262
18,696
-
-
236.638
27,980
-
12,484
52,655
12,129
31.540
1,344
4,335
23,890
109.777
3,048
1,322
-
283
7,500
-
3,250
3,250
43,669
5,679
133,667
4,370
-
7,783
-
53,178
210,379
65,139
-
45,249
176,501
27,980
1,422,129
11,700
27,628
2,060
381,650
1,417
17,869
28.028
103.393
63
3,379
412
13,759
24,269
58,660
159.262
117.169
14
3,048
18,696
14.950
45,103
1,671,859
423,038
150,707
17,613
359,360
36,708
45,258
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
C AND Bb
A
TOTAL
ALL AREAS:
D
C AND B~
B AND
A
TOTAL
-
-
-
-
-
155
-
-
'class D mills = less than 40,000 board-foot capacity per 8-hour shift C = 40,000-79,999; B = 80,000-119,999; A = 120,000 or more.
b~ombined
to avoid disclosure
200
.
-
-
-
236,638
263,557
7,793
5,546
200
63.707
5,575
31,500
3,836
3,500
42.090
6.030
-
100,071
327,631
236,638
2.209.980
77,246
79,165
13.366
2,874,320
-
a
a
c
Table 22-Log consumption by sawmills, by resource area, county of use, and species, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
AND COUNTY OF USE
DOUGLAS-FIR
HEMLOCK
TRUEFIRS
SPRUCE
PONDEROSA
PINE
s
LODGEPOLE WESTERN
PINE
REDCEDAR
OTHER
SOFTWOODS
RED
ALDER
OTHER
HARDWOODS
-
ALL
SPECIES
-
THOUSAND BOARD FEET. SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
CLACKAMAS AND MARION'
CLATSOP AND COLUMBIA'
HOOD RIVER, MULTNOMAH,
AND WASHINGTON'
POLK
TILLAMOOK AND YAMHILL'
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
BENTON
LANE
LINCOLN AND LINNa
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOS
DOUGLAS
JACKSON, JOSEPHINE, AND
CURRY'
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
CROOK, JEFFERSON,
KLAMATH, AND LAKEa
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
BAKER AND UNION'
GRANT, MORROW, AND
UMATILLA'
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
'Combined to avoid disclosure.
65,140
3,250
43.669
5,679
. 133,666
4,370
-
7,783
-
-
263,557
1,671,859
423,038
150,707
17,613
359,359
36,708
45,258
77,246
79,165
13,366
2,874,319
Sawmill Industry
Table 23-Production and disposition of wood and bark residue by sawmills, by resource area and mill-size class,
Oregon, 1998
WOOD RESIDUE
RESOURCE AREAS AND
MILL-SIZE CLASS^
USED~
UNUSED
BARK RESIDUE
TOTAL
USED~
UNUSED
ALL RESIDUE
TOTAL
USED~. UNUSED
-
-
TONS, DRY WEIGHT
NORTHWEST:
D
C
C AND B
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
C
C AND B
A
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
D
C AND BC
A
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
B AND Ac
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
C AND B'
A
TOTAL
ALL AREAS:
D
C AND BC
B AND A'
A
TOTAL
'Class D mills = less than 40.000 board-foot capacity per &hour she; C = 40,000-79.999; B = 80,000-119,999; A = 120,000 or more.
b~esidues
are not necessarily used in the area in which they are produced.
'Combined to avoid disclosure.
TOTAL
Sawmill Industry
Table 24--Production and disposition of wood residue by sawmills, by resource area, mill-size class, type of
residue, and use, Oregon, 1998
COARSE RESIDUE
RESOURCE AREA AND
MILLSIZE CLASS^
PULP
BOARD
FUEL
MlSCELLANEOUS
TONS, DRY WEIGHT
NORTHWEST:
D
C AND BC
A
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
C AND BC
A
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
D
G AND Bc
A
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
B AND Ac
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
C AND BC
A
TOTAL
ALL AREAS:
D
C
C AND B
B AND AC
A
TOTAL
-
See footnotes at end of table.
-
-
TOTAL
UNUSED
TOTAL
Sawmill Industry
Table ZMroduction and disposition of wood residue by sawmills, by resource area, mill-size class, type of
residue, and use, Oregon, 1998 (Continued)
SHAVINGS
RESOURCE AREA AND
MILL-SIZE CLASS^
PULP
BOARD
FUEL
MISCELLANEOUS
TONS, DRY WEIGHT
NORTHWEST:
D
C AND BC
A
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
C AND BC
A
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
D
C
C AND B
A
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
B AND
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
C
C AND B
A
TOTAL
ALL AREAS:
D
C AND BC
B AND A'
A
TOTAL
See footnotes at end of table.
TOTAL
UNUSED
TOTAL
Sawmill Industry
Table 24-Production and disposition of wood residue by sawmills, by resource area, mill-size class, type of
residue, and use, Oregon, 1998 (Continued)
SAWDUST
RESOURCE AREA AND
MILLSIZE CLASSa
PULP
BOARD
FUEL
MISCELLANEOUS
TONS, DRY WEIGHT
NORTHWEST:
D
C AND BC
A
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
C AND BC
A
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
D
C AND BC
A
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
B AND AC
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
C AND BC
A
TOTAL
ALL AREAS:
D
C AND BC
B AND A'
A
TOTAL
See footnotes at end of table.
TOTAL
UNUSED
TOTAL
Sawmill Industry
Table 24-Production and disposition of wood residue by sawmills, by resource area, mill+ize class, type of
residue, and use, Oregon, 1998 (Continued)
ALL TYPES OF WOOD RESIDUE
RESOURCE AREA AND
MILLSIZE CLASS'
PULP
BOARD
FUEL
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL
UNUSED
TOTAL
TONS. DRY WEIGHT
NORTHWEST:
D
C AND BC
A
4,317
58,311
880,705
1,518
12,091
145,016
3.201
28,477
23.536
9,036
106,110
1,521,481
128
7,231
472,224
-
-
9,164
106,110
1,521,481
TOTAL
943,333
479,455
158,625
55.214
1,636,627
128
1,636,755
50,894
676.862
63,904
424,655
114,194
129.407
14,489
92.847
243,481
1,323,771
TOTAL
727,756
488,559
243.601
107,336
1,567,252
SOUTHWEST:
D
C AND BC
A
74,224
33,949
348.570
29,007
26,122
334,733
31,396
8,819
27,938
1,812
-
136,439
68,890
711,241
TOTAL
456,743
389,862
68,153
1.812
916,570
-
CENTRAL:
B AND A'
56.915
74,118
186.641
-
317,674
-
317,674
TOTAL
56,915
74,118
186.641
-
317,674
-
317,674
39,255
150,159
32,670
184.869
4,292
-
3.456
76,217
338.484
-
76,217
338,484
189,4.14
. 217,539
4,292
3,456
414,701
-
414,701
78,541
182,409
56,915
2,056.296
29,007
129,927
74,118
1,416.481
32,914
139.396
186,641
302,361
5,013
42,966
128
119,839
145,475
494,698
317,674
3,894,977
-
145.603
494,698
317,674
3,894.977
2,374,161
1,649,533
661,312
167,818
4,852,824
128
4,852.952
WEST-CENTRAL:
C AND BC
A
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
C
C AND B
A
TOTAL
ALL AREAS:
D
C AND BC
B AND AC
A
TOTAL
-
-
-
-
'
-
243,481
1,323,771
'Class D mills = less than 40,000 board-foot capacity per &hour shift; C = 40,000-79,999;B = 80,000-119,999; A = 120,000 or more.
b~esidues
are not necessarily used in the area in which they are produced.
'Combined to avoid disclosure.
1,567,252
136.439
68,890
711,241
916,570
Sawmill Industry
Table 2GProduction and disposition of bark residue by sawmills, by resource area, mill-size class, and use,
Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA AND
MILLSIZE CLASS'
PULP
BOARD
FUEL
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL
UNUSED
276
TOTAL
TONS, DRY WEIGHT
NORTHWEST:
D
C AND BC
A
16,770
TOTAL
17.708
938
-
--
162
12,035
273,795
2,044
16,512
111,249
3,144
28,547
401.814
285,992
129,805
433,505
2,477
3,420
28,547
404,291
2,753
436,258
-
,
WEST-CENTRAL:
C AND BC
A
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
D
C AND BC
A
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
B AND A'
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
C AND BC
A
TOTAL
ALL AREAS:
D
C
C AND B
C
B AND A
A
TOTAL
-
'Class D mills = less than 40,000 board-foot capacity per &hour shift C = 40,000-79,999; B = 80,000-119,999; A = 120,000 or more.
b~esidues
are not necessarily used in the area in which they are produced.
'combined to avoid disclosure.
Sawmill Industry
Table 26--Production and disposition of wood and bark residue by sawmills, by resource area and county,
Oregon, 1998
WOOD RESIDUE
RESOURCE AREA AND
COUNTY
USED~
UNUSED
TOTAL
BARK RESIDUE
USED~
UNUSED
ALL RESIDUE
TOTAL
TONS. DRY WEIGHT
NORTHWEST:
CLACKAMAS AND MAR ION^
CLATSOP AND COLUMBIA~
AND WASHINGTON'
POLK
TlLlAMOOK AND YAMHILL'
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
BENTON
LANE
LINCOLN AND LINNa
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOS
DOUGLAS
JACKSON, JOSEPHINE, AND
cum
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
CROOK, JEFFERSON,
KLAMATH, AND U K E a
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
BAKER AND UNIONa
GRANT, MORROW, AND
UMATILLA~
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
acornbindto avoid disclosure.
b~esidues
are not necessarily used in the area in which they are produced.
USED~ UNUSED
TOTAL
Sawmill Industry
Table 27-Production and disposition of wood residue by sawmills, by resource area, county, type of residue, and
use, Oregon, 1998
COARSE
RESOURCE AREA AND
COUNTY
PULP
BOARD
FUEL
MISCELLANEOUS
TONS, DRY WEIGHT
NORTHWEST:
CLACKAMAS AND MARIONa
CLATSOP AND COLUMBIA~
HOOD RIVER, MULTNOMAH,
AND WASHING TON^
POLK
TILLAMOOK AND YAMHILLa
TOTAL
WESTCENTRAL:
BENTON
LANE
LINCOLN AND LINN~
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOS
DOUGLAS
JACKSON, JOSEPHINE, AND
CURRYP
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
CROOK, JEFFERSON,
KLAMATH. AND LAKEa
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
BAKER AND UNIONa
GRANT, MORROW, AND
UMATILLA~
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
See footnotes at end of table.
TOTAL
UNUSED
TOTAL
Sawmill Industry
Table 27-Production and disposition of wood residue by sawmills, by resource area, county, type of residue, and
use, Oregon, 1998 (Continued)
SHAVINGS
RESOURCE AREA AND
COUNTY
PULP
BOARD
FUEL
MISCELLANEOUS
TONS, DRY WEIGHT
NORTHWEST:
CLACKAMAS AND MAR ION^
CLATSOP AND COLUMBIA'
HOOD RIVER, MULTNOMAH,
AND WASHINGTON'
POLK'
TILLAMOOK AND YAMHILLa
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
BENTON
LANE
LINCOLN AND LINN'
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOS
DOUGLAS
JACKSON. JOSEPHINE, AND
CURRY.
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
CROOK, JEFFERSON,
KIAMAM, AND UKEa
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
BAKER AND UNION.
GRANT, MORROW, AND
UMATILLA'
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
See footnotes at end of table.
TOTAL
UNUSED
TOTAL
Sawmill Industry
Table 27-Production and disposition of wood residue by sawmills, by resource area, county, type of residue, and
use, Oregon, 1998 (Continued)
RESOURCE AREA AND
COUNTY
PULP
BOARD
FUEL
MISCELLANEOUS
TONS, DRY M I G H T
NORTHWEST:
a
CLACKAMAS AND MARION
CLATSOP AND COLUMBIA~
HOOD RIVER, MULTNOMAH,
AND WASHINGTONa
POLK
TILLAMOOK AND YAMHILL'
TOTAL
WESTCENTRAL:
BENTON
LANE
LINCOLN AND LINN~
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOS
DOUGLAS
JACKSON, JOSEPHINE, AND
CURR?
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
CROOK. JEFFERSON.
KLAMATH. AND LAKE^
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
BAKER AND UNIONa
GRAM, MORROW, AND
UMATIW
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
See footnotes at end of table.
TOTAL
UNUSED
TOTAL
Sawmill Industry
Table 27-Production and disposition of wood residue by sawmills, by resource area, county, type of residue, and
use, Oregon, 1998 (Continued)
ALL TYPES OF WOOD RESIDUE
USED~
RESOURCE AREA AND
COUNTY
PULP
BOARD
FUEL
MISCELLANEOUS
TONS, DRY WEIGHT
NORTHWEST:
CLACKAMAS AND MAR ION^
CLATSOP AND COLUMBIAa
HOOD RIVER, MULTNOMAH,
AND WASHINGTON'
POLK
TILLAMOOK AND YAM HILL^
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
BENTON
LANE
LINCOLN AND LINN~
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOS
DOUGLAS
JACKSON, JOSEPHINE, AND
CURRV
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
CROOK, JEFFERSON,
KLAMATH. AND LAKE'
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
BAKER AND UNION^
GRAM, MORROW, AND
UMATILLA'
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
'Combined to avoid disclosure.
b~esidues
are not necessarily used in the area in which they are produced.
TOTAL
UNUSED
TOTAL
Sawmill Industry
Table 28-Production and disposition of bark residue by sawmills, by resource area, county, and use, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA AND
COUNTY
PULP
BOARD
FUEL
MISCELLANEOUS
TONS. DRY WEIGHT
NORTHWEST:
CLACKAMASAND MAR ION^
CLATSOPAND COLUMBIA~
HOOD RIVER. MULTNOMAH,
AND WASHING TON^
POLK
TILIAMOOK AND YAM HILL^
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
BENTON
LANE
LINCOLN AND LINN~
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOS
DOUGLAS
JACKSON, JOSEPHINE, AND
CURR?
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
CROOK, JEFFERSON,
KLAMATH,AND LAKE^
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
BAKER AND UNION^
GRANT. MORROW. AND
UMATILU~
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
'Residues are not necessarily used in the area in which they are produced.
b~ombined
to avoid disclosure.
TOTAL
UNUSED
TOTAL
Sawmill Industry
Table 29-Lumber production by sawmills, by resource area, mill-size class, and degree of
manufacture, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA AND
MILLSIZE CLASS^
GREEN
KILN-DRIED
TOTAL^
AIR-DRIED
SURFACED
ROUGH
THOUSAND BOARD FEET, LUMBER TALLY
NORTHWEST:
D
C
C AND B
A
8.862
63,927
1,137,918
1,404
46,720
616.600
178
-
10,444
110,647
1,754,518
2,575
109.305
1,704,204
7.869
1,342
50.314
TOTAL
1,210,707
664,724
178
1,875,609
1,816,084
59,525
170,240
994.846
80,330
394,668
14.000
250,570
1,403,514
186,556
1,277,024
64,014
126.490
1,165,086
474,998
14,000
1,654,084
1,463,580
190.504
SOUTHWEST:
D
C AND BC
A
47,446
15,000
506,886
95,374
56,837
227,432
225
-
15.600
143,045
71,837
749,918
131,422
63,587
662,476
11,623
8.250
87.442
TOTAL
569,332
379.643
15,825
964,800
857,485
107,315
CENTRAL:
B AND AC
8.421
309.902
8.505
326,828
317.056
9,772
TOTAL
8,421
309,902
8,505
326,828
317,056
9,772
3,333
87.444
73,483
260,790
1,597
-
78,413
348,235
73,905
343.296
4,508
4,939
90,777
334,273
1,597
426,648
417,201
9,447
56,308
252,500
8,421
2,727.094
96,778
257,370
309.902
1.499.491
403
1,597
8,505
29.600
153,489
511,467
326,828
4,256,185
133,997
433,353
317,056
3.987.000
19,492
78,114
9,772
269.1 85
3,044,323
2,163,541
40,105
5,247,969
4,871,406
376,563
WEST-CENTRAL:
C
C AND B
A
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
C
C AND B
A
TOTAL
ALL AREAS:
D
C AND BC
BAND AC
A
TOTAL
-
'
%lassD mills = less than 40,000 board-foot capacity per Bhour shii C = 40,000-79,999; B = 80,OOG119,999; A = 120,000 or more.
?oh1 of mgreen,''kilndried," and Lirdried;' also, total of 'rough" and 'surfaced."
'Combined to avoid disclosure.
Sawmill Industry
Table 30-Lumber production by sawmills, by resource area, mill-size class, and type of
headrig, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA AND
MILL-SIZE CLASS=
BAND
CHIPPING
CIRCULAR
GANG
SCRAGG
ALL
OTHER TYPES
THOUSAND BOARD FEET, LUMBER TALLY
NORTHWEST:
D
C AND Bb
A
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
C AND Bb
A
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
D
C AND B~
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
B AND
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
C AND B~
A
TOTAL
ALL AREAS:
D
C AND B~
BAND
A
TOTAL
%2bssD mills = less than 40.000 boatd-footcapacity per H o u r s h i C = 40,000-79,999; B = 80,000-119,999; A = 120,000 or more.
b~ombined
to avoid disclosure.
Sawmill Industry
Table 31-Lumber production by sawmills, by resource area, county, and type of headrig,
Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA AND
COUNTY
BAND
CHIPPING
CIRCULAR
GANG
SCRAGG
THOUSAND BOARD FEET. LUMBER TALLY
NORTHWEST:
CLACKAMAS AND MARION'
CLATSOP AND COLUMB~A~
HOOD RIVER, MULTNOMAH,
AND WASHING TON^
POLK'
TlLlAMOOK AND YAM HILL^
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
BENTON
LANE
LINCOLN AND LINN'
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOS
DOUGLAS
JACKSON, JOSEPHINE, AND
CURRP
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
CROOK, JEFFERSON,
KLAWTH, AND LAKE'
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
BAKER AND UNION^
GRANT, MORROW, AND
UMATILLA'
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
'Combined to avoid disclosure.
OTHER
ALLTYPES
Veneer and Plywood
Table 32-Number of veneer and plywood mills, by resource area,
county, and type of mill, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
AND COUNTY
NORTHWEST
COLUMBIA
MULTNOMAH
POLK
YAMHILL
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL
LANE
LlNN
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST
COOS
CURRY
DOUGLAS
JACKSON
JOSEPHINE
TOTAL
CENTRAL
KLAMATH
BLUE MOUNTAIN
UNION
ALL AREAS
VENEER
ONLY
VENEER AND
LAYUP
LAYUP
ONLY
ALL
TYPES
Veneer and Plywood
Table 33-Installed 8-hour capacity of veneer and plywood mills,
by resource area, county, and type of mill, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
AND COUNTY
VENEER
ONLY
VENEER AND
LAYUP
LAYUP
ONLY
THOUSAND SQUARE FEET
1318-INCH BASIS FOR PLYWOOD)
NORTHWEST:
COLUMBIA
MULTNOMAH
POLK
YAMHILL
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
LANE
LlNN
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOS
CURRY
DOUGLAS
JACKSON
JOSEPHINE
TOTAL
280
800
1,050
430
360
250
1,080
1.480
610
300
70
770
745
400
4,685
410
-
-
-
275
'668
1.057
1,885
5,495
2,000
-
396
-
3,962
8,530
2,750
-
CENTRAL:
KLAMATH
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
UNION
ALL AREAS
Veneer and Plywood
Table &Number of veneer and plywood mills, by resource area and
minimum core diameter, Oregon, 1998
MINIMUM CORE DIAMETER (INCHES)
RESOURCE AREA
3
NORTHWEST
-
WEST-CENTRAL
-
1
SOUTHWEST
1
-
CENTRAL
-
BLUE MOUNTAIN
-
-
ALL AREAS
1
3
4
5
6
1
-
1
1
-
-
4
3
6
9
1 1
1
12
LAYUP
ONLY
-
1
1
3
9
-
-
1
32
-
1 '
-
-
-
-
2
4
3
-
1
9
2
3
1
8
7
13
Table 35-Number of veneer and plywood mills, by resource area and
maximum log diameter, Oregon, 1998
MAXIMUM LOG DIAMETER (INCHES)
RESOURCE AREA
<24
24-30
31-36
37-42
43-48
49-54
54+
LAYUP
ONLY
1
-
-
1
-
1
4
3
3
2
5
9
-
-
-
3
9
13
NORT-ST
-
3
1
WEST-CENTRAL
-
2
-
SOUTHWEST
1
1
2
CENTRAL
-
. 1
1
-
BLUE MOUNTAIN
-
1
-
-
-
ALL AREAS
1
8
4
-
4
Table 36-Average number of operating days per year of
veneer and plywood mills, by resource area and type of mill,
Oregon, 1998
VENEER
ONLY
VENEER AND
LAYUP
NORTHWEST
236
238
240
WEST-CENTRAL
215
252
272
SOUTHWEST
227
273
276
CENTRAL
-
238
-
BLUE MOUNTAIN
-
253
-
AVERAGE ALL AREAS 226
260
272
RESOURCE AREAS
LAYUP
ONLY
.
Veneer and Plywood
Table 37--Number of veneer and plywood mills, by resource area, county, and selected
equipment, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
AND COUNTY
NORTHWEST:
COLUMBIA
MULTNOMAH
POLK
YAMHILL
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
LANE
LlNN
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOS
CURRY
DOUGLAS
JACKSON
JOSEPHINE
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
KLAMATH
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
UNION
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
4-FOOT
LATHE
&FOOT
LATHE
VENEER
CHIPPER
CORE
CHIPPER
COLD
PRESS
HOT
PRESS
BURNER
Veneer and Plywood
Table 38-Log consumption by veneer and plywood mills, by resource area and county,
Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
AND COUNTY
LOGS
THOUSAND BOARD FEET, SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
COLUMBIA. MULTNOMAH,
AND YAM HILL^
POLK
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
LANE
LlNN
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOS AND C U R R ~
DOUGLAS
a
JACKSON AND JOSEPHINE
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
a
K W T H AND UNION
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
UNION^
ALL AREAS
a Combined to avoid disclosure.
Veneer and Plywood
Table 39--Log consumption by veneer and plywood mills, by resource area, county,
and diameter class of timber, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
AND COUNTY
<5
DIAMETER (INCHES)5-10
11-20
21+
ALL DIAMETER
CLASSES
THOUSAND BOARD FEET, SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
COLUMBIA. MULTNOMAH,
AND YAM HILL^
POLK
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
LANE
LlNN
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
a
COOS AND CURRY
DOUGLAS
JACKSON AND JOSEPHINE~
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
a
KLAMATH AND UNION
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
UNION^
ALL AREAS
a Combined to avoid disclosure.
Q
Table 40-Log consumption by veneer and plywood mills, by resource area, county, and owner, Oregon, 1998
c
d
RESOURCE AREA
AND COUNTY
STATE
NATIONAL
FOREST
BUREAU OF
LAND
MANAGEMENT
2
OTHER
PUBLIC
PRIVATE
NATIVE
AMERICAN
OUT-OF
STATE
ALL
OWNERS
--
21,095
11.653
78,643
80.951
32,748
159,594
THOUSAND BOARD FEET, SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
COLUMBIA, MULTNOMAH,
AND YAM HILL^
POLK
TOTAL
-
104,002
37,422
-
70,662
215,360
57,945
32,967
--
10,293
46,436
25,455
82,464
417,219
106.472
39,938
37,422
343,967
32,967
82,184
606,155
4,668
1,000
-
74,111
837
37,976
118.592
-
4,668
1,000
-
74,111
837
37,976
118,592
52,836
69,064
48,390
37,422
650,893
33,804
187,475
1,079,884
904
3,787
5,921
9,607
1,315
1.310
4,691
15,528
2,625
29,536
2,035
1,509
25,693
10,904
29,805
10.133
31,571
38,106
-
49,408
54,594
WEST-CENTRAL:
LANE
LlNN
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOS AND CURRY^
DOUGLAS
JACKSON AND JOSEPHINEa
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
KLAMATH AND
UNION^
TOTAL
-
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
UNION^
ALL AREAS
a~ornbined
lo avoid disclosure.
Table 41-Dependency (by percentage) of veneer and plywood mills on timber, by resource area and owner, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
NATIONAL FOREST
STATE
BUREAU OF
LAND MANAGEMENT
0% 1-32% 3346% 67-100%
0% 1-32% 33-66% 67-100%
0% 1-32% 3346% 67-100%
OTHER PUBLIC
0% 1-32% 33-66% 67-100%
NUMBER OF MILLS
NORTHWEST
WEST-CENTRAL
SOUTHWEST
CENTRAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN
4
5
12
-
2
5
10
ALL AREAS
21
20
-
-
2
1
-
-1
--
-
2
6
15
2
1
4
4 .
8
-
1
26
16
-
-
3
7
14
1
1
3
3
8
1
-
-1
-
-
-
26
15
1
-
-
-
--
-
6
10
22
2
1
-
1
--
-
-
41
-
1
-
--
-
-
Table 41-Dependency (by percentage) of veneer and plywood mills on timber, by resource areas and owner, Oregon, 1998 (Continued)
......................
FOREST INDUSTRYOWN WOOD SUPPLY
OTHER WOOD SUPPLY
RESOURCE AREA
0% 1-32% 3366% 67-100%
0% 1-32% 3366% 67-100%
OTHER PRIVATE
NATIVE AMERICAN
0% 1-32% 3366% 67-100%
0% 1-32% 33-66% 67-100%
NUMBER OF MILLS
NORTHWEST
WEST-CENTRAL
SOUTHWEST
CENTRAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN
ALL AREAS
2
6
12
-
-
20-
---
3
2
7
1
1
5
14
2
3
-
-
5
5
17
2
1
3
30
1
1
1
-
-
1
-
9
I
2
I
3
5
-
I
I
-
1
3
12
1
4
3
6
1
-
-
17
14
4
4
-
1
-
I
1
-
9
2
6
10
22
2
-
40
-
-
-
-
-
-1
-
-
2
-
-
1
Table 42-Log consumption by veneer and plywood mills, by resource area, county, and species, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
AND COUNTY
DOUGLAS-FIR
HEMLOCK
TRUE FIRS
SPRUCE
PONDEROSA LODGEPOLE WESTERN
PINE
PINE
REDCEDAR
OTHER
SOFTWOODS
RED
ALDER
OTHER
HARDWOODS
ALL
SPECIES
THOUSAND BOARD FEET. SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
COLUMBIA, MULTNOMAH
AND YAM HILL^
POLK
TOTAL
-
29,049
-
34,688
-
-
150,830
31,162
900
11,188
-
25,323
282,025
62,565
1,500
78,000
8,817
45,098
22.453
1,000
12,096
4,098
369,913
88,317
67,551
17,194
-48,275
14.666
40.985
48,275
14,666
40,985
--
657,575
163,194
109,436
63,070
44,888
43,669
15,482
13.567
88,557
18,273
16.415
-
-
--
-
-
-
7,227
73
78,643
80,951
7,227
73
159,594
-
--
264
-
-
-
1,199
195,543
--
-
--
3,804
47,067
3,769
6,427
1,585
528
--
82,463
417,219
106,473
6,427
1,585
-
-
4,332
47,067
3,769
606,155
14.079
587
--
-
14,079
587
-
--
-
-
20,506
2,436
--
4.332
54,294
5,041
WEST-CENTRAL:
LANE
LlNN
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOS AND CURRY^
DOUGLAS
JACKSON AND JOSEPHINE'
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
KLAMATH AND UNION^
TOTAL
-
118,592
118,592
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
UNION^
ALL AREAS
'Combined to avoid disclosure.
1,079,884
Veneer and Plywood
Table W r o d u c t i o n and disposition of wood and bark residue by veneer and plywood mills, by resource area
and county, Oregon, 1998
WOOD RESIDUE
RESOURCE AREA
AND COUNTY
USEDUNUSED
BARK RESIDUE
TOTAL
USEDa
UNUSED
ALL RESIDUE
TOTAL
USEDa
UNUSED TOTAL
TONS. DRY WEIGHT
NORTHWEST:
COLUMBIA, MUCTNOMAH,
AND YAM HILL^
POLK
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
LANE
LINN
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
coos AND CURR?
DOUGLAS
JACKSON AND JOSEPHINE~
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
KLAMATHAND
UNION^
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
UNION^
ALL AREAS
-
'~esiduesare not necessarily used in the area or county in which they are produced.
b~ombined
to avoid disclosure.
-
--
Veneer and Plywood
Table 44--Production and disposition of wood residue by veneer and plywood mills, by resource area, county,
and use, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
AND COUNM'
PULP
BOARD
FUEL
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL
UNUSED
TOTAL
TONS, DRY WEIGHT
NORTHWEST:
COLUMBIA, MULTNOMAH,
AND YAM HILL^
POLK
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
LANE
LlNN
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOS AND CURRY^
DOUGLAS
JACKSON AND JOSEPHINE~
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
KLAMATHAND
TOTAL
1
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
1
ALL AREAS
11
UNION^
101,902
99.544
-
4,550
7,783
-
24,862
20,739
131,314
128,066
201,446
7,783
4,550
45,601
259,380
120,495
140.733
6,803
25,925
29,576
8,675
35,997
5,376
192,871
180,709
9,022
-
201.893
180.709
261,228
32,728
38,251
41,373
373.580
9,022
382.602
73,732
635,088
84.497
31,420
108,790
92,591
7.702
26,640
91.263
218
51,475
39,816
113,072
821,993
308,167
2,207
-
113,072
824,200
308,167
793,317
232,801
125,605
91,509
1,243,232
2,207
1,245,439
174,229
36.756
9,684
23,497
244,166
174,229
36,756
9,684
23,497
244,166
-
1,430,220
310,068
178,090
201,980
2,120,358
11,229
.
-
131,314
128,066
-
259.380
-
244,166
244,166
UNION^
'~esidues a n not necessarily used in the area or county in which they are produced.
b~ornbined
to avoid disclosure.
2,131,587
Veneer and Plywood
Table 45-Production and disposition of bark residue by veneer and plywood mills, by resource area, county,
and use, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
AND COUNTY
PULP
BOARD
FUEL
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL
UNUSED
TOTAL
-
311,744
TONS. DRY WEIGHT
NORTHWEST:
COLUMBIA, MULTNOMAH,
AND YAM HILL^
POLK
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
LANE
LlNN
TOTAL
SOUTMNEST:
coos AND CURRP
DOUGLAS
JACKSON AND JOSEPHINE~
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
KLAMATHAND
UNION^
TOTAL
-
-
298,463
13,281
311,744
-
-
62,854
-
62.854
-
62,854
-
62,854
-
-
531,284
13,281
545,885
-
,.
62,854
62,854
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
UNION^
ALL AREAS
1,320
'Residues are not necessarily used in the area or county in which they are produced.
b~ombined
to avoid didosure.
545,885
Table 46--Number of pulp mills and board mills, by resource area, county, and type of operation, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
AND COUNTY
NORTHWEST
CLACKAMAS
COLUMBIA
WASHINGTON
YAMHILL
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL
BENTON
LANE
LINCOLN
LlNN
........................
PULP MILL-------------------------SULFITE SULFATE GROUNDWOOD SEMICHEMICAL
---
--1
-
-
1
2
-
-
1
2
--
-- .
2
--.-
1
1
-
2
1
2
2
2
3
-
-
--
-
-
1
2
1
1
-
5
1
7
2
12
-
--
1
1
-
1
2
-
CENTRAL
DESCHUTES
KLAMATH
---
TOTAL
--
--
TOTAL
'
---------------------------------
BOARD MILL-------------------------------------ALL
HARDBOARD PARTICLEBOARD INSULATION BOARD COMPOSITION PANEL MILLS
-
SOUTHWEST
COOS
DOUGLAS
JACKSON
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN
UMATILLA
UNION
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
-
-
---
2
1
1
2
2
--
--
--
1
3
4
Table 47-Installed capacity of pulp mills and board mills, by resource area, county, and type of operation, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
AND COUNTY
.........................
PULP MILL---------------------SULFITE SULFATE GROUNDWOOD SEMICHEMICAL
------------------------------ BOARD MILL-------------------------------------HARDBOARD PARTICLEBOARD INSULATION BOARD COMPOSITION PANEL
24-HOUR CAPACITY (TONS)
118-INCH BASIS
NORTHWEST:
CLACKAMAS
COLUMBIA'
WASHINGTON'
-
-
--
-
2,400
260
540
--
2.400
800
--
2,040
408
1,600
--
1,260
LINCOLN
--
TOTAL
2,040
2,008
-
TOTAL
-
-
CENTRAL:
DESCHUTES
KLAMATH~
-
-
TOTAL
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
BENT ON^
LANE^
ALL AREAS
--
ANNUAL CAPACITY (MILLION SQUARE FEET)-114-INCH BASIS
18-INCH BASIS
314-INCH BASIS
170
-
-
-
1,260
264
490
-
305
-
1,000
-
373,797
-
-
-
-
-
-
182
450
-
-
266
176.494
-
--
-
-
-
266
632
176,494
--
2,040
4,408
800
2,260
700
374,919
176,494
305
.-
-
a~olumbia,Washington, and Yamhill Counties combined to avoid disclosure.
b~enton,Lane, and Linn Counties combined to avoid disclosure:
'Coos and Jackson Counties combined to avoid disclosure.
d ~ l u Mountain
e
Resource Area combined with Klamath County to avoid disclosure.
-
Table 48-Average number of operating days per year of pulp mills and board mills, by resource area, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
PULP MILL
BOARD MILL
NORTHWEST
WEST-CENTRAL
SOUTHWEST
351
CENTRAL
-
BLUE MOUNTAIN
-
AVERAGE ALL AREAS
321
Table 49-Wood consumption by pulp mills and board mills, by resource area and type of material, Oregon, 1998
CHIPS
RESOURCE AREA
ROUNDWOOD
THOUSAND BOARD FEET,
SCRIBNER LOG RULE
FROM MlLL
RESIDUE
FROM ROUNDWOOD
CHIPPING MILL
SAWDUST
-
SHAVINGS
BARK
RECYCLED FIBER
TONS, DRY WEIGHT-
MARKET PULP
TOTAL
-
NORTHWEST
25,116
767,332
196,370
22,434
-
-
430,433
24,366
1,440,935
WEST-CENTRAL
95,000
742,856
401,643
226,059
87,929
122,000
897,354
50
2,477,891
SOUTHWEST
--
191,875
-
393,869
317,236
199,900
221,000
-
1,323,880
p
BLUE MOUNTAIN'
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
a
139,834
1,762.907
. 856,685
742,082
807,372
322,600
24,416
6,064,849
a
a
-
ALL AREAS
1,548,787
a
m
n
;
I
'Combined to avoid disclosure.
a
c
rn
=t
Table 50-Log consumption by pulp mills and board mills, by resource area and owner, Oregon, 1998
E
RESOURCE AREA
STATE
NATIONAL
FOREST
BUREAU OF
LAND
MANAGEMENT
OTHER
PUBLIC
PRIVATE
NATIVE
AMERICAN
OUT-OF
STATE
UNKNOWN
ORIGIN
ALL
OWNERS
THOUSAND BOARD FEET. SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST
WEST-CENTRAL
SOUTHWEST
CENTRAL^
BLUE
MOUNTAIN^
ALL AREAS
'combined to avoid disclosure.
-
-
-
-
-
--
25,116
25,116
2,898
-
2,898
5,795
46,361
-
37,050
-
95,002
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7,887
-
11.831
-
--
19,718
-
-
-
-
-
2,898
13,682
2,898
-
-
58,192
-
37,050
25,116
139,836
2
2
Pulp and Board Industry
Table 51-Pulp mill and board mill consumption of chips from logs and sawdust and shavings, by
resource area, type of material, and State of origin, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA AND
TYPE OF MATERIAL
OREGON
WASHINGTON
CALIFORNIA
TONS, DRY WEIGHT
NORTHWEST:
CHlPS
SAWDUST AND SHAVINGS
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
CHlPS
SAWDUST AND SHAVINGS
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
CHlPS
SAWDUST AND SHAVINGS
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
CHlPS
SAWDUST AND SHAVINGS
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
CHlPS
SAWDUST AND SHAVINGS
TOTAL
ALL AREAS;
CHlPS
SAWDUST AND SHAVINGS
TOTAL
IDAHO
OTHER
TOTAL
Other Industries
Table 52-Number of "other industry" mills, by resource area, county, and type of industry,
Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
AND COUNTY
SHAKE AND
SHINGLE
EXPORT'
POST, PILE.
AND PILING
CHIPPING
ALL
TYPES
. NORTHWEST:
CLATSOP
COLUMBIA
TILLAMOOK
WASHINGTON
YAMHILL
TOTAL
.
WEST-CENTRAL:
BENTON
LANE
LlNN
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
COOS
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
KLAMATH
WASCO
TOTAL
-
-
1
2
3
-
-
1
1
2
5
18
29
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
BAKER
UMATILLA
TOTAL
ALL AREAS
6
Num.kr of export companies not available.
-
Other Industries
Table 53--Installed capacity of "other industry" mills, by type of industry, Oregon, 1998'
SHAKE AND
SHINGLE
POST, POLE,
AND PILING
&HOUR CAPACITY
SQUARES
ANNUAL CAPACITY
THOUSAND BOARD FEET
SCRIBNER LOG RULE
710
33,789
ALL OREGON
CHIPPING
ANNUAL CAPACITY
TONS
1,305.739
aCombinedto avoid disclosure.
Table &Average
number of operating days per year of "other industry" mills,
by resourcearea and type of mill, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
SHAKE AND SHINGLE
NORTHWEST
160
WEST-CENTRAL
111
SOUTHWEST
CENTRAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN
AVERAGE ALL AREAS
131
POST, POLE, AND PILING
CHIPPING
Other Industries
Table 55--Wood consumption by "other industry" mills, by resource area, type of mill, and
type of material, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA AND
TYPE OF MILL
ROUNDWOOD
OTHER WOOD
THOUSAND BOARD FEET, SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
SHAKE AND SHINGLEa
LOG EXPORT
POST, POLE, AND PILING^
CHIPPING
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
SHAKE AND SHINGLE^
POST, POLE, AND PILING^
CHIPPING
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
LOG EXPORT
CHIPPING
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
POST, POLE, AND
CHIP PING^
PILING^
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
POST, POLE. AND
CHIP PING^
PILING^
ALL AREAS:
SHAKE AND SHINGLE
LOG EXPORT
POST, POLE, AND PILING
CHIPPING
TOTAL
a~orthwest
and West-Central shake and shingle combined to avoid disclosure.
b~orthwest,Central, and Blue Mountain combined with West-Central to avoid disclosure.
'Blue Mountain combined with Central to avoid disclosure.
ALL
WOOD
Table 56-Log consumption by "other industry" mills, by resource area, type of mill, and owner, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
AND TYPE OF MILL
STATE
NATIONAL
FOREST
BUREAU OF
LAND
MANAGEMENT
OTHER
PUBLIC
PRIVATE
NATIVE
AMERICAN
OUT-OF
STATE
UNKNOWN
ORIGIN
ALL
OWNERS
THOUSAND BOARD FEET. SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
a
SHAKE AND SHINGLE
POST, POLE, AND PILING^
LOG EXPORT
CHIPPING
TOTAL
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
LOG EXPORT
CHIPPING
TOTAL
PILING^
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
POST, POLE, AND
PILING^
CHIP PING^
ALL AREAS:
SHAKE AND SHINGLE
LOG EXPORT
POST, POLE. AND PILING
CHIPPING
TOTAL
5.234
5,234
WEST-CENTRAL:
SHAKE AND SHINGLEa
POST, POLE, AND PILING^
CHIPPING
CENTRAL:
POST, POLE, AND
CHIPPING'
----
-
-
--
---
--
-
---
-
---
--
---
-
--
--
-
65,339
-
27,242
18,735
27,242
89,308
65,339
--
--
45,977
116,550
65
10
-
--
--
-
--
61
2,167
4,420
3,565
920
4,335
920
1,750
354
7,114
81,697
6,587
4,485
5,255
1,811
89,165
75
-
-
--
-
--
-
--
107
1,123
2,527
107
84,906
107
1,123
2,527
107
84,906
-
--
--
--
-
-
20,818
480
17,191
110,525
--
20,818
128,196
34,132
--
34,132
88.770
34,132
122,902
-
--
-
-
--
9,262
--
-
184
184
25.540
2.943
-
--
38.1 13
184
9,262
--
184
25,540
2,943
--
-
38,113
---
-
--
--
-
---
61
354
65
--
2.167
9,945
3,565
11,305
4,335
3,447
2,041
7,114
257.482
12,112
14,870
7,782
2,102
264,950
--
-
--
'~orthwest and West-Central shake and shingle combined to avoid disclosure.
b~orthwest,
Central, and Blue Mountain combined wilh West-Central to avoid disclosure.
'Blue Mountain combined with Central to avoid disclosure.
-
-.
-
--
-
61,374
10
2,943
-
39,553
480
61,374
17,191
326,716
3,018
--
100,927
405.761
--
--
--
Table 57-Dependency (by percentage) of "other industry" mills on timber, by resource area, type of mill, and owner, Oregon, 1998
NATIONAL FOREST
RESOURCE AREA
AND TYPE OF MILL
0% 1-32% 3366% 67-100%
BUREAU OF
LAND MANAGEMENT
STATE
0% 1-32% 3366% 67-100%
0% 1-32% 3366% 67-100%
NUMBER OF MILLS
NORTHWEST:
SHAKE AND SHINGLE
POST, POLE, AND PlLlNG
CHIPPING
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
SHAKE AND SHINGLE
POST, POLE, AND PlLlNG
CHIPPING
TOTAL
SOUTHWEST:
CHIPPING
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
POST, POLE, AND PILING
CHIPPING
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
POST, POLE, AND PlLlNG
CHIPPING
TOTAL
ALL AREAS:
SHAKE AND SHINGLE
POST. POLE, AND PlLlNG
CHIPPING
TOTAL
OTHER PUBLIC
0% 1-32% 3366% 67-100%
9
z
I'
Table 57-Dependency (by percentage) of "other Industry" mills on timber, by resource area, type of mill, and owner, Oregon, 1998
(Continued)
......................
OWN WOOD SUPPLY
RESOURCE AREA
AND TYPE OF MILL
--
FOREST INDUSTRY
OTHER WOOD SUPPLY
0% 1-32% 3366% 67-100%
0% 1-32% 3366% 67-100%
OTHER PRIVATE
NATIVE AMERICAN
0% 1-32% 3366% 67-100%
0% 1-32% 33-66% 67-100%
NUMBER OF MILLS
NORTHWEST:
SHAKE AND SHINGLE
POST, POLE, AND PILING
CHIPPING
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
SHAKE AND SHINGLE
POST, POLE, AND PILING
CHIPPING
TOTAL
--
6
--
-
3
-
-
2
1
3
-
-
6
--
-
--
-
-
3
-
-
1
---
I
-
-
1
2
1
2
1
5
1
3
3
2
6
3
5
11
1
-
1
2
2
-
1
1
1
1
1
--
-
-
2
2
-
-
1
2
-
1
1
-
-
1
1
1
2
1
4
1
1
-
1
3
2
3
2
-
1
-
1
-
-
1
-
-1
13
-
1
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
-
--
-
1
4
2
6
-
5
-
-
-
3
2
8
8
6
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
1
1
-
-
1
1
-
-
-
1
1
-
-
SOUTHWEST:
CHIPPING
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
POST, POLE, AND PILING
CHIPPING
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
POST, POLE, AND PILING
CHIPPING
TOTAL
ALL AREAS:
SHAKE AND SHINGLE
POST, POLE, AND PILING
CHIPPING
TOTAL
1
-
--
-
1
1
-
-
-- .
-
1
5
5
12
-
-
--
1
4
2
2
2
5
6
11
-
22
2
2
3
15
12
-
1
--
2
5
2
6
--
--
1
1
4
1
2
7
13
1
5
10
-
-
-
-
1
1
-
1
1
-
2
-
--
-
-
-
1
1
-
1
1
-
1
--
1
--
--
--
--
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
5
4
17
2
26
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
1
1
9e
-
3
Q
C
2
Table 58-Log consumption by "other industry" mills, by resource area, type of mill, and species, Oregon, 1998
RESOURCE AREA
AND TYPE OF MILL
DOUGLAS-FIR
HEMLOCK
TRUE FIRS
SPRUCE
PONDEROSA
PINE
LODGEPOLE
PINE
WESTERN
REDCEDAR
OTHER
SOFTWOODS
RED
ALDER
OTHER
HARDWOODS
ALL
SPECIES
THOUSAND BOARD FEET. SCRIBNER LOG RULE
NORTHWEST:
SHAKE AND
LOG EXPORT
b
POST, POLE, AND PILING
CHIPPING
SHINGLE^
TOTAL
WEST-CENTRAL:
SHAKE AND SHINGLE'
POST, POLE, AND PILING^
CHIPPING
TOTAL
23.701
-
545
-
-
-
-
33,715
9,133
3,288
937
21.382
57,416
9,678
3,286
937
21,362
-
-
--
272
1,090
27,242
-
-
5,409
15.468
89.308
272
1,362
5.681
16,556
116,550
-
-
--
36.136
38,319
480
17,191
110,525
36,136
38,319
128,196
--
-
38,114
--
-
38.114
272
-
-
-
480
918
2,400
80
461
147
386
918
2,460
608
866
-
-
10,121
3,683
-
3.683
-
-
-
14,330
23.050
8.986
2,523
37,380
8.986
2,523
-
-
-
-
9,900
1,402
9,900
1,402
10.121
-
-
-
-
-
1.362
-
--
.-
-
-
-
-
-
SOUTHWESf:
LOG EXPORT
CHIPPING
TOTAL
CENTRAL:
POST, POLE, AND
CHIPPING'
PILING^
13,008
TOTAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN:
POST, POLE, AND
CHIP PING^
13,008
PILING^
ALL AREAS:
SHAKE AND SHINGLE
LOG EXPORT
POST, POLE, AND PILING
CHIPPING
TOTAL
-
-
-
--
-
141330
86,314
-
-
5.661
461
3,830
948
-
-
15.709
2,400
31,543
-
22.426
99,280
61.004
17;19l
326.717
156,767
23,314
15,709
5.661
33.943
4,291
2,383
2,049
99,552
62,094
405,763
'~orthwestand West-Central shake and shingle combined to avoid disclosure.
b~orthwest,Central, and Blue Mountain combined with West-Central to avoid disclosure.
'Blue Mountain combined with Central to avoid disclosure.
--
Other Industries
Table 59--Production and disposition of wood and bark residue8 by shake and shingle mills, by resource area,
Oregon, 1998
WOOD RESIDUE
RESOURCE AREA
USED~ UNUSED
BARK RESIDUE
TOTAL
USED~ UNUSED
ALL RESIDUE
TOTAL
USED~
UNUSED
TOTAL
TONS, DRY WEIGHT
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.395
77
2.472
829
57
886
3,,224
134
3.358
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2,395
77
2,472
829
57
886
3,224
134
3,358
NORTHWESF
WEST-CENTRAL'
SOUTHWEST
CENTRAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN
ALL AREAS
'Residue amounts are approximationsderived using factors shown in Appendix 1.
%esidues are not necessarily used in the area in which they are produced.
'~orthwestand West-Central combined to avoid disclosure.
Other Industries
Table 6bProduction and disposition of wood residue' by shake and shingle mills, by type of residue,
resource area, and use, Oregon, 1998b
RESIDUE AND
RESOURCE AREA
PULP
BOARD
FUEL
MISCELLANEOUS
TOTAL
UNUSED
TOTAL
TONS, DRY WEIGHT
COARSE MATERIAL:'
-
-
587
108
695
-
3
698
ALL AREAS
-
-
587
108
695
3
698
FINE MATERIAL:'
NORTHWEST"
WEST-CENTRAL~
-
NORTHWEST"
WEST-CEN~RAL~
ALL AREAS
ALL TYPES OF MATERIAL:
NORTHWEST^
ALL AREAS
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.537
163
1,700
74
1.774
-
-
1,537
163
1,700
74
1,774
-
-
-
-
WEST-CENTRAL~
-
-
-
-
-
-
2,124
271
2.395
77
2,472
-
2,124
271
2.395
77
2,472
'~esidueamounts are approximations derived using factors shown in Appendix 1.
b~esiduesare not necessarily used in the area in which they are produced.
'Coarse residue indudes log trim, cores, veneer clippings, rejectedveneer, roundup, and spur trim.
d~orthwestand West-Central combined to avoid disclosure.
'Fine materialincludes sander dust.
Table 61-Production and disposition of bark residue' by shake and shingle mills, by resource area and
use, Oregon, 1998
USEDb
RESOURCE AREA
-
-
-
PULP
-
-
BOARD
-
-
-
FUEL
MISCELLANEOUS
- -
-
-
-
TOTAL
-
-
UNUSED
-
ALL BARK
--
TONS, DRY WEIGHT
NORTHWESF
WEST-CENTRAL~
SOUTHWEST
CENTRAL
BLUE MOUNTAIN
ALL AREAS
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
747
82
829
57
886
-
-
-
-
747
829
57
-
-
-
82
.Residue amounts are approximations derived using factors shown in Appendix 1.
bResiduesare not necessarily used in the area in which they are produced.
C~orthwest
and West-Central combined to avoid disclosure.
-
-
-
886 -