Enclosure 3A - Project Summary Form NATIONAL FIRE PLAN COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE AND WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE PROJECTS Application for Wildland Urban Interface Fuels / Education and Prevention / Community Planning for Fire Protection Projects Applicant Applicant/Organization: Global Action Plan, Inc. Phone: FAX: Email: 845-679-4830 845-679-4834 Info@globalactionplan.org Address (Street or P. O. Box, City, State, Zip): P.O. Box 428, Woodstock, NY 12498 Project Coordinator Project Coordinator (Name and Title): Elaine Sigvaldsen, Campaign Manager Organization/Jurisdiction: Deschutes County Sustainable Lifestyle Campaign/Livable Neighborhood Program Phone: 541-330-2646 FAX:541-385-3370 Email: ecoteam@empnet.com Project Information Project Title: Neighborhood Wildfire Safety Program Project Start: June 1, 2002 Project End: May 31, 2003 Federal Funding Request: $150,000 Total Project Funding: $150,000 Are you submitting multiple projects? If so, please explain and prioritize: no Brief Project Description: During the project period, July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003 with requested funding of $150,000, GAP will design and implement a wildfire safety and prevention outreach effort and deliver it through our already existing platform – the Livable Neighborhood Program (LNP). This outreach effort will take place within high hazard communities in Deschutes County, OR and focus on mitigating fire risk in the wildland urban interface (WUI). All fuels treatments will meet Oregon Senate Bill 360 guidelines. As a result of this outreach, 35 neighborhood groups will be formed protecting a minimum of 300 households representing over 100 acres of direct treatment on high value suburban property from forest fires. These groups will be located strategically along the urban interface to maximize the overall protection to the community resulting in actual protection to at least three times as many homes. Homes to be targeted will be identified by the local fire departments working in cooperation with the Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF), the US Forest Service (USFS) and Bureau of Land Management (BLM). This pilot project will be designed to be rapidly taken to scale in future years. Project Location: County: Congressional District: Deschutes County Deschutes County 2nd Project Type: Check appropriate project type. More than one type may be checked. If only Box (4) is checked, use Enclosure 4. (1) (2) x Wildland Urban Interface Fuels Project Wildland Urban Interface Education and Prevention Project (3) (4) Community Planning for Fire Protection Project Fuels Utilization and Marketing Project If the applicant is an unincorporated area, define the geographic area being represented: Enclosure 3B (Page 1 of 3) - Project Narrative Description Applications for funding must include a narrative response that describes the proposal. Please do not submit responses longer than one page, single space, 12-pitch font. Describe project including, but not limited to: project location Address these project implementation items as anticipated outcomes applicable: measures and reporting partners project income project time frames specify types of activities and equipment used amount or extent of actions (acres, number of homes, etc) environmental, cultural and historical resource requirements Over the past thirteen years Global Action Plan (GAP) has developed expertise and a proven track record in designing and managing effective neighborhood-based household behavior change programs and public participation strategies. During the project period, July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003 with requested funding of $150,000, GAP will design and implement a wildfire safety and prevention outreach effort and deliver it through our already existing platform – the Livable Neighborhood Program (LNP). This outreach effort will take place within high hazard communities in Deschutes County, OR and focus on mitigating fire risk in the wildland urban interface (WUI). All fuels treatments will meet Oregon Senate Bill 360 guidelines. As a result of this outreach, 35 neighborhood groups will be formed protecting a minimum of 300 households representing over 100 acres of direct treatment on high value suburban property from forest fires. These groups will be located strategically along the urban interface to maximize the overall protection to the community resulting in actual protection to at least three times as many homes. Homes to be targeted will be identified by the local fire departments working in cooperation with the Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF), the US Forest Service (USFS) and Bureau of Land Management (BLM). This pilot project will be designed to be rapidly taken to scale in future years. This program builds upon GAP’s successful public participation foundation established in Deschutes County. Since 1995 GAP’s programs have empowered 270 neighborhood teams, representing over 3,000 Deschutes County citizens, to create more resource efficient lifestyle practices. These efforts have received awards at a local, state and national level for successful public participation and behavior change. GAP will draw upon this network of volunteers to serve as neighborhood block leaders who will be trained by GAP staff to invite neighbors to participate on teams to make their neighborhood more livable. The Central Oregon Fire Coop (COFC) will provide literature and train block leaders in techniques to create defensible neighborhood space. This builds a strong neighborhood volunteer program, which will provide a significant non-cash match in labor and hand tools to accomplish on the ground fuel treatment projects. Other partners will include local fire marshals, county and city officials with a focus on the cities of Bend, Sisters/Camp Sherman, Sunriver, and La Pine. Appealing to neighbors on the broader issue of neighborhood livability and tying the fire safety action into this larger agenda of interest is the key to the recruitment success. The larger neighborhood livability agenda includes health and safety, greening and beautification, resource sharing and community building. GAP will adapt the following activities from the Firewise and Fire Free programs into the Livable Neighborhood Program: firewise landscaping and maintenance, installing clearly visible addresses on residences for emergency access, installing fire resistant drapery, and installation of noncombustible wire mesh screening, roofing, shutters, balconies and decks, when possible. A key focus of this project will be creating defensible space ranging from 30 to 100 feet around each home identified as playing a critical role in the WUI. Program deliverables include reports of measurable outcomes and accomplishments of at least 35 block based groups strategically selected to serve as an interface between the forest and the community. Because all treatments will be accomplished by local homeowners using local resources and trained by experts in federal guideline requirements an emphasis will be placed on avoiding ground disturbing activities. Therefore we do not expect cultural sites to be disturbed or any negative environmental impacts. Response: Enclosure 3B (Page 2 of 3) - Project Evaluation Criteria Applications for funding must include narrative responses that address the following four criteria. Within each criterion, subcriteria are listed in descending order of importance. Limit your responses to the areas provided. 1. Reducing Fire Risk. (40 points)) A. Describe how the proposal promotes reduction of risk in high hazard areas or communities. B. Describe how the proposed project benefits resources on federal land or adjacent non-federal land, or how it protects the safety of communities. C. To what extent does the project implement or create a cooperative fuels treatment plan or community fire strategy (include evidence of the plan if it already exists)? D. Explain to what extent the affected community or proponent has been involved or plans to involve the affected community in a qualified fuels education program (e.g., FIREWISE). E. Explain how the proposal (a) leads to, enhances or restores a local fire-adapted ecosystem, and/or (b) mitigates or leads to the mitigation of hazardous fuel conditions. F. How will the proposed treatments be maintained over time? Response: A. Using its proven methodology to empower neighborhoods, GAP will work in high hazard communities identified by local fire departments in partnership with federal land managers. This will provide tactical defensible space in case of catastrophic wildfires. B./E. Creating defensible space not only protects local communities, but also provides federal land managers greater flexibility in using fire to create healthy ecosystems in national forest and BLM lands in Deschutes County while protecting those lands from wildfires initiated on private lands during the peak of fire season. C. This project will implement local fuel treatment priorities coordinated by the Nature Conservancy’s National Fire Plan Learning Network grant. Participants in this coordinated process include the local Fire Chief’s Association, the ODF, the BLM, USFS and the local environmental groups represented by the Nature Conservancy. D. Emphasis will be placed on implementing the local Firefree program developed by Project Impact in Deschutes County. Training for block leaders will be provided by Central Oregon Fire Coop (COFC) staff and/or Student Conservation Association (SCA), and success will be evaluated by ODF staff. F. The goal of this program is to create educated neighborhood groups who will maintain these fuel treatments over time. Longitudinal studies of the GAP behavior change program model show that behavior change actions are sustained and improved. 2. Increasing local capacity. (30 points) A. How would the proposal improve or lead to the improvement of the local economy in terms of jobs and sustainable economic activity? How many jobs are expected to be created or retained and for how long (please distinguish between essentially yearround and seasonal jobs)? B. To what extent will this project be offered to serve as a model for other communities? C. Will biomass or forest fuels be utilized; if so, in what manner and how much? Response: A. Local homeowners, based on their financial abilities, will either do the treatments themselves or hire local contractors. Information accessing local arborists who can provide these services will be provided to the neighborhood groups thus stimulating local small businesses. We estimate that at least 100 homeowners will take advantage of these services sustaining several local contractors annually. B. GAP has a proven track record of creating models that are transferable to a state and national level. As a national pilot project, this exciting model focusing on defensible space will prove replicable and be offered to USFS, various agencies and communities wishing to utilize a fuels treatment program. C. An emphasis will be placed on utilizing the biomass locally for dust abatement, for composting and for firewood. Recycling and reducing solid waste is a key element of GAP's programs. Enclosure 3B (Page 3 of 3) - Project Evaluation Criteria 3. Increasing interagency and intergovernmental coordination. (15 Points) A. Describe how this project implements a local intergovernmental strategy plan, or creates such a plan. Describe the plan if it already exists. B. Explain the level of cooperation, coordination or strategic planning among federal, state, tribal, local government and community organizations. List the cooperators. Response: A. This project will implement local fuel treatment priorities coordinated by the Nature Conservancy’s National Fire Plan Learning Network grant. This group is implementing the Central Oregon Fire Strategy created by Central Oregon Fire Management Services (COFMS) and integrating into a local WUI fuel management strategy coordinated by Project Impact and ODF. B. The following cooperators will work within their capacity utilizing this project to meet the goals of National Fire Plan: COFMS (BLM and USDA Forest Service) Oregon Department of Forestry Project Impact Central Oregon Fire Coop Central Oregon Fire Chief’s Association Deschutes County Solid Waste Department Global Action Plan Heart of Oregon Core LaPine Community Action Team Student Conservation Association Sunriver Landowners Association City of Bend City of Redmond City of Sisters Bend Clean Air Committee Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 4. Expanding Community Participation. (15 Points) A. To what extent have interested people and communities been provided an opportunity to become informed and involved in this proposal? B. Describe the extent of local support for the project, including any cost-sharing arrangements. C. What are the environmental, social and educational benefits of the project? Response: A. GAP will utilize strong existing partnerships with local City and County agencies, Central Oregon Community College, Social Service agencies and draw upon its network of more than 3,000 local Deschutes County residents to be involved in this project. Not only will this grant provide critical defensible space information to existing teams throughout Deschutes County, but will expand upon an existing community outreach program that has proven track record of success. B. Resource materials and access to services for neighborhood teams will be provided at no cost by the Oregon Department of Forestry, local Community Action Teams, the Central Oregon Fire Coop, Deschutes County Solid Waste and Project Impact. The list of cooperators in section 3B will also offer resources as needed by households. C. The GAP Wildfire Safety Pilot Program as an education based fuels treatment program not only informs, but motivates participants to act on information. As neighbors work together they build more socially cohesive, safer and healthier communities which protect their economic assets from the destruction of wildfire. It also attracts financial resources from government agencies and organizations that are invested in educating citizens to better steward and protect their community and natural resources. This benefits the citizens, local government, the environment, neighborhoods and the overall livability of the community. Enclosure 3C - Project Work Form Tasks Time Frame Responsible Party Design Wildfire Safety Pilot program component and materials June 1, 2002-August 1, 2002 Global Action Plan Coordinate with various agency partners to identify critical WUI households July 15, 2002 - August 15, 2002 Global Action Plan Recruit, coordinate and train neighborhood block leaders in National Fire Plan actions and Livable Neighborhood Program July 1, 2002 - February 28, 2003 Global Action Plan and various National Fire Plan cooperators Enroll, educate and motivate residents in defensible space measures August 1, 2002 - June 30, 2003 Global Action Plan Treat 300 homes in critical WUI neighborhoods August 15, 2002 - June 30, 2003 Households, Student Conservation Association and/or various National Fire Plan cooperators Market the program locally through various media sources August 1, 2002-June 1, 2003 Global Action Plan Compile, analyze and report outcomes of project December 1, 2002 - June 30, 2003 Global Action Plan Market program nationally January 1, 2003 - June 30, 2003 Global Action Plan Enclosure 3D Project Budget Cost Category Description Personnel 2 FTE Program Staff Management & Admin. Staff Subtotal Federal Agency Applicant $65,652 $40,000 $105,652 Fringe Benefits 15% of personnel $15,848 Subtotal $15,848 Partner 1 $0.00 Partner 2 Total $0.00 $65,652 $40,000 $105,652 $15,848 $0.00 $0.00 $15,848 Travel $3,000 $3,000 Subtotal $3,000 $0.00 $0.00 $3,000 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Equipment Subtotal Supplies 300 LNP workbooks Misc. office supplies Subtotal $0.00 $0.00 $1,500 $500 $2,000 $0.00 $0.00 Contractual Subtotal Other Phone, rent, postage/shipping, copying, and indirect, etc. Subtotal Total Costs Project (Program) Income1 (using deductive alternative) 1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $23,500 $23,500 $150,000 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $23,500.00 $23,500.00 $150,000 $0.00 Program income is the gross revenue generated by a grant or cooperative agreement supported activity during the life of the grant. Program income can be made by recipients from fees charged for conference or workshop attendance, from rental fees earned from renting out real property or equipment acquired with grant or cooperative agreement funds, or from the sale of commodities or items developed under the grant or cooperative agreement. The use of Program Income during the project period may require prior approval by the granting agency.