Teaching Evaluation (TEVAL) Statistics
Xin (Jessie) Xie
Kansas State University
ECON 120
Summer 2013
ECON 540
Spring 2013
ECON 540
Fall 2012
ECON 120
Summer 2012
4.1
4.0
3.8
3.9
4.1
4.1
4.0
3.3
4.0
4.3
4.2
4.3
3.8
3.4
3.9
4.3
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.4
4.6
4.7
4.5
ECON 510
Spring 2012
ECON 120
Fall 2011
Spring 2011
ECON 510
Fall 2010
3.7
3.4
Did not
teach
3.1
3.3
3.8
4.1
4.0
4.1
3.5
3.8
4.3
3.8
3.9
Overall effectiveness as a teacher
Amount learned in the course
Made the course goals and objectives clear
Well prepared for class
Interest in helping students learn
Willingness to help outside of class
Overall effectiveness as a teacher
Amount learned in the course
Made the course goals and objectives clear
Well prepared for class
Interest in helping students learn
Willingness to help outside of class
3.2
3.6
3.7
3.7
4.2
ECON 120: Principle of Microeconomics
ECON 540: Managerial Economics
ECON 510: Intermediate Macroeconomics
Note: All ratings are out of 5 possible points and are adjusted for individual and cohort attributes.
Teval Report: Student Ratings of Instruction
Center for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning | Kansas State University
Faculty Member: Xie, Xin
Hr./Days: 1030 MTWUF Appt
Course #: ECON 120
College: Arts & Sciences
Term: Summer 2013
Responses from 15 of the 16 enrolled (94%)
Offered: In Class
Overall Effectiveness
Number Responding [VL=1, VH=5]
VL
L
M
H
VH
OMIT
Statistics
AVG
1
SD
Obtained Responses
1. Overall effectiveness as a teacher
11. Increased desire to learn about the subject
14. Amount learned in the course
0
1
0
1
1
1
4
8
1
8
4
10
2
1
3
0
0
0
0.8
0.9
0.7
3.7
3.2
4.0
2
Statistics
Comparative Status
3
Raw
Adjusted
3
Raw
Adjusted
3.7
3.2
4.0
4.1
3.7
4.0
Averages and Comparative Status
1. Overall effectiveness as a teacher
11. Increased desire to learn about the subject
14. Amount learned in the course
LM
LM
M
M
M
M
Ratings of Student Attributes and Instructional Styles
Number Responding [VL=1, VH=5]
VL
L
M
H
VH
OMIT
Statistics
SD
AVG
1
Relevant Student Attributes
12. Interest in the course before enrolling
13. Effort to learn in the course
1
0
2
0
9
2
1
8
2
5
0
0
1.0
0.7
3.1
4.2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
3
4
6
6
7
6
2
3
4
5
7
0
0
0
0
0.7
1.0
0.8
0.9
3.8
3.9
4.1
4.1
0
1
2
0
0
4
1
3
0
2
2
7
3
2
2
6
5
4
5
9
3
1
3
8
2
0
0
0
0
0
1.1
0.9
1.3
0.7
0.9
3.5
3.3
3.2
4.4
3.7
Instructional Styles
A. Establishing a Learning Climate
2. Made the course goals and objectives clear
3. Well prepared for class
5. Interest in helping students learn
10. Willingness to help outside of class
B. Facilitating Student Learning
4. Explained the subject clearly
6. Stimulated thinking about the subject
7. Made helpful comments on student work
8. Grading procedures fair and equitable
9. Realized when students did not understand
Instructor's Description of Class
A. Type of class
B. Class size
C. Physical facilities
D. Previously taught this course?
E. Approach significantly different this term?
F. Description of teaching load?
G. Attitude toward teaching this course
H. Control of course decisions
I. Differences in student preparation
J. Student enthusiasm
K. Student effort to learn
L. Additional comments?
1
2
3
Lecture
About right
Less than adequate
2-3
No
Average
I was really enthusiastic
Yes- I was responsible for all decisions
A minor problem
Low
Variable; sometimes high, sometimes low
No additional comments
STANDARD DEVIATION
RELATIVE TO KSU CLASSES RATED BY 10 OR MORE STUDENTS: H=UPPER 10%; HM=NEXT 20%; M=MIDDLE 40%; LM=NEXT 20%; L=LOWEST 10%
ADJUSTED FOR STUDENT CHARACTERISTICS & CLASS SIZE: SEE TEVAL GUIDE
page 1 of 1
Teval Report: Student Ratings of Instruction
Center for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning | Kansas State University
Faculty Member: Xie, Xin
Hr./Days: 1430 MWF
Course #: ECON 540
College: Arts & Sciences
Term: Spring 2013
Responses from 35 of the 42 enrolled (83%)
Offered: In Class
Overall Effectiveness
Number Responding [VL=1, VH=5]
VL
L
M
H
VH
OMIT
Statistics
AVG
1
SD
Obtained Responses
1. Overall effectiveness as a teacher
11. Increased desire to learn about the subject
14. Amount learned in the course
0
3
3
5
6
3
6
7
12
16
15
13
8
4
4
0
0
0
1.0
1.1
1.1
3.8
3.3
3.3
2
Statistics
Comparative Status
3
Raw
Adjusted
3
Raw
Adjusted
3.8
3.3
3.3
4.0
3.5
3.3
Averages and Comparative Status
1. Overall effectiveness as a teacher
11. Increased desire to learn about the subject
14. Amount learned in the course
M
LM
LM
M
M
LM
Ratings of Student Attributes and Instructional Styles
Number Responding [VL=1, VH=5]
VL
L
M
H
VH
OMIT
Statistics
SD
AVG
1
Relevant Student Attributes
12. Interest in the course before enrolling
13. Effort to learn in the course
3
0
2
2
15
9
13
17
2
7
0
0
1.0
0.8
3.3
3.8
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
5
4
4
3
17
18
16
17
10
13
14
14
0
0
0
1
0.9
0.6
0.8
0.6
4.0
4.3
4.2
4.3
3
2
2
0
3
6
3
1
0
4
6
9
7
3
8
14
16
16
18
10
6
5
9
14
10
0
0
0
0
0
1.2
1.0
1.0
0.6
1.2
3.4
3.5
3.8
4.3
3.6
Instructional Styles
A. Establishing a Learning Climate
2. Made the course goals and objectives clear
3. Well prepared for class
5. Interest in helping students learn
10. Willingness to help outside of class
B. Facilitating Student Learning
4. Explained the subject clearly
6. Stimulated thinking about the subject
7. Made helpful comments on student work
8. Grading procedures fair and equitable
9. Realized when students did not understand
Instructor's Description of Class
A. Type of class
B. Class size
C. Physical facilities
D. Previously taught this course?
E. Approach significantly different this term?
F. Description of teaching load?
G. Attitude toward teaching this course
H. Control of course decisions
I. Differences in student preparation
J. Student enthusiasm
K. Student effort to learn
L. Additional comments?
1
2
3
Lecture
About right
Satisfactory
1
No
Average
I was really enthusiastic
Yes- I was responsible for all decisions
A minor problem
Moderate; neither high nor low
Satisfactory
No additional comments
STANDARD DEVIATION
RELATIVE TO KSU CLASSES RATED BY 10 OR MORE STUDENTS: H=UPPER 10%; HM=NEXT 20%; M=MIDDLE 40%; LM=NEXT 20%; L=LOWEST 10%
ADJUSTED FOR STUDENT CHARACTERISTICS & CLASS SIZE: SEE TEVAL GUIDE
page 1 of 1
Teval Report: Student Ratings of Instruction
Center for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning | Kansas State University
Faculty Member: Xie, Xin
Hr./Days: 1230 MWF
Course #: ECON 540
College: Arts & Sciences
Term: Fall 2012
Responses from 29 of the 36 enrolled (81%)
Offered: In Class
Overall Effectiveness
Number Responding [VL=1, VH=5]
VL
L
M
H
VH
OMIT
Statistics
AVG
1
SD
Obtained Responses
1. Overall effectiveness as a teacher
11. Increased desire to learn about the subject
14. Amount learned in the course
1
2
0
2
3
6
5
16
10
17
4
11
4
4
2
0
0
0
0.9
1.0
0.9
3.7
3.2
3.3
2
Statistics
Comparative Status
3
Raw
Adjusted
3
Raw
Adjusted
3.7
3.2
3.3
3.8
3.3
3.4
Averages and Comparative Status
1. Overall effectiveness as a teacher
11. Increased desire to learn about the subject
14. Amount learned in the course
LM
LM
LM
M
LM
LM
Ratings of Student Attributes and Instructional Styles
Number Responding [VL=1, VH=5]
VL
L
M
H
VH
OMIT
Statistics
SD
AVG
1
Relevant Student Attributes
12. Interest in the course before enrolling
13. Effort to learn in the course
1
1
6
1
13
11
5
13
4
3
0
0
1.0
0.9
3.2
3.6
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
1
6
3
5
2
14
12
12
16
7
13
11
10
0
0
0
0
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
3.9
4.3
4.1
4.2
2
2
1
0
1
1
3
2
0
3
14
11
7
4
9
8
9
14
12
12
4
4
5
13
4
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
1.1
1.0
0.7
1.0
3.4
3.3
3.7
4.3
3.5
Instructional Styles
A. Establishing a Learning Climate
2. Made the course goals and objectives clear
3. Well prepared for class
5. Interest in helping students learn
10. Willingness to help outside of class
B. Facilitating Student Learning
4. Explained the subject clearly
6. Stimulated thinking about the subject
7. Made helpful comments on student work
8. Grading procedures fair and equitable
9. Realized when students did not understand
Instructor's Description of Class
A. Type of class
B. Class size
C. Physical facilities
D. Previously taught this course?
E. Approach significantly different this term?
F. Description of teaching load?
G. Attitude toward teaching this course
H. Control of course decisions
I. Differences in student preparation
J. Student enthusiasm
K. Student effort to learn
L. Additional comments?
1
2
3
Lecture
About right
Less than adequate
None
No
Average
I was really enthusiastic
Yes- I was responsible for all decisions
A minor problem
Moderate; neither high nor low
Satisfactory
No additional comments
STANDARD DEVIATION
RELATIVE TO KSU CLASSES RATED BY 10 OR MORE STUDENTS: H=UPPER 10%; HM=NEXT 20%; M=MIDDLE 40%; LM=NEXT 20%; L=LOWEST 10%
ADJUSTED FOR STUDENT CHARACTERISTICS & CLASS SIZE: SEE TEVAL GUIDE
page 1 of 1
Teval Report: Student Ratings of Instruction
Center for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning | Kansas State University
Faculty Member: Xie, Xin
Hr./Days: 1030 MTWUF
Course #: ECON 120
College: Arts & Sciences
Term: Summer 2012
Responses from 18 of the 20 enrolled (90%)
Offered: In Class
Overall Effectiveness
Number Responding [VL=1, VH=5]
VL
L
M
H
VH
OMIT
Statistics
AVG
1
SD
Obtained Responses
1. Overall effectiveness as a teacher
11. Increased desire to learn about the subject
14. Amount learned in the course
0
2
1
0
1
0
5
7
4
7
3
8
6
5
5
0
0
0
0.8
1.3
1.0
4.1
3.4
3.9
2
Statistics
Comparative Status
3
Raw
Adjusted
3
Raw
Adjusted
4.1
3.4
3.9
4.2
3.7
4.1
Averages and Comparative Status
1. Overall effectiveness as a teacher
11. Increased desire to learn about the subject
14. Amount learned in the course
M
LM
M
M
M
M
Ratings of Student Attributes and Instructional Styles
Number Responding [VL=1, VH=5]
VL
L
M
H
VH
OMIT
Statistics
SD
AVG
1
Relevant Student Attributes
12. Interest in the course before enrolling
13. Effort to learn in the course
2
0
4
1
8
2
1
10
3
5
0
0
1.2
0.8
2.9
4.1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
2
8
7
3
5
9
11
14
11
0
0
0
0
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.7
4.4
4.6
4.7
4.5
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
5
1
2
0
4
4
10
4
6
6
7
7
11
12
8
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
0.6
0.9
0.5
0.8
3.9
4.3
4.4
4.7
4.2
Instructional Styles
A. Establishing a Learning Climate
2. Made the course goals and objectives clear
3. Well prepared for class
5. Interest in helping students learn
10. Willingness to help outside of class
B. Facilitating Student Learning
4. Explained the subject clearly
6. Stimulated thinking about the subject
7. Made helpful comments on student work
8. Grading procedures fair and equitable
9. Realized when students did not understand
Instructor's Description of Class
A. Type of class
B. Class size
C. Physical facilities
D. Previously taught this course?
E. Approach significantly different this term?
F. Description of teaching load?
G. Attitude toward teaching this course
H. Control of course decisions
I. Differences in student preparation
J. Student enthusiasm
K. Student effort to learn
L. Additional comments?
1
2
3
Lecture
About right
Less than adequate
1
No
Average
I was really enthusiastic
Yes- I was responsible for all decisions
A minor problem
Moderate; neither high nor low
Variable; sometimes high, sometimes low
No additional comments
STANDARD DEVIATION
RELATIVE TO KSU CLASSES RATED BY 10 OR MORE STUDENTS: H=UPPER 10%; HM=NEXT 20%; M=MIDDLE 40%; LM=NEXT 20%; L=LOWEST 10%
ADJUSTED FOR STUDENT CHARACTERISTICS & CLASS SIZE: SEE TEVAL GUIDE
page 1 of 1
Teval Report: Student Ratings of Instruction
Center for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning | Kansas State University
Faculty Member: Xie, Xin
Hr./Days: 1330 MWF
Course #: ECON 510
College: Arts & Sciences
Term: Spring 2012
Responses from 30 of the 37 enrolled (81%)
Offered: In Class
Overall Effectiveness
Number Responding [VL=1, VH=5]
VL
L
M
H
VH
OMIT
Statistics
AVG
1
SD
Obtained Responses
1. Overall effectiveness as a teacher
11. Increased desire to learn about the subject
14. Amount learned in the course
1
4
1
2
7
4
13
6
12
7
7
8
7
6
5
0
0
0
1.0
1.3
1.0
3.6
3.1
3.4
2
Statistics
Comparative Status
3
Raw
Adjusted
3
Raw
Adjusted
3.6
3.1
3.4
3.7
3.2
3.3
Averages and Comparative Status
1. Overall effectiveness as a teacher
11. Increased desire to learn about the subject
14. Amount learned in the course
LM
LM
LM
LM
LM
LM
Ratings of Student Attributes and Instructional Styles
Number Responding [VL=1, VH=5]
VL
L
M
H
VH
OMIT
Statistics
SD
AVG
1
Relevant Student Attributes
12. Interest in the course before enrolling
13. Effort to learn in the course
0
0
5
3
14
9
4
11
7
7
0
0
1.0
0.9
3.4
3.7
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
10
7
8
6
10
10
9
10
8
12
12
13
0
0
0
0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
3.8
4.1
4.0
4.1
3
2
1
0
1
6
5
6
0
5
7
11
7
2
14
7
6
8
12
3
7
6
8
16
7
0
0
0
0
0
1.3
1.2
1.2
0.6
1.1
3.3
3.3
3.5
4.5
3.3
Instructional Styles
A. Establishing a Learning Climate
2. Made the course goals and objectives clear
3. Well prepared for class
5. Interest in helping students learn
10. Willingness to help outside of class
B. Facilitating Student Learning
4. Explained the subject clearly
6. Stimulated thinking about the subject
7. Made helpful comments on student work
8. Grading procedures fair and equitable
9. Realized when students did not understand
Instructor's Description of Class
A. Type of class
B. Class size
C. Physical facilities
D. Previously taught this course?
E. Approach significantly different this term?
F. Description of teaching load?
G. Attitude toward teaching this course
H. Control of course decisions
I. Differences in student preparation
J. Student enthusiasm
K. Student effort to learn
L. Additional comments?
1
2
3
Lecture
About right
Satisfactory
2-3
Yes
Average
I was really enthusiastic
Yes- I was responsible for all decisions
Not a problem
Mixed; both high and low
Variable; sometimes high, sometimes low
No additional comments
STANDARD DEVIATION
RELATIVE TO KSU CLASSES RATED BY 10 OR MORE STUDENTS: H=UPPER 10%; HM=NEXT 20%; M=MIDDLE 40%; LM=NEXT 20%; L=LOWEST 10%
ADJUSTED FOR STUDENT CHARACTERISTICS & CLASS SIZE: SEE TEVAL GUIDE
page 1 of 1
Teval Report: Student Ratings of Instruction
Center for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning | Kansas State University
Faculty Member: Xie, Xin
Hr./Days: 1730 TU
Course #: ECON 120
College: Arts & Sciences
Term: Fall 2011
Responses from 31 of the 34 enrolled (91%)
Offered: In Class
Overall Effectiveness
Number Responding [VL=1, VH=5]
VL
L
M
H
VH
OMIT
Statistics
AVG
1
SD
Obtained Responses
1. Overall effectiveness as a teacher
11. Increased desire to learn about the subject
14. Amount learned in the course
0
1
0
6
6
3
13
13
14
9
8
10
3
3
3
0
0
1
0.9
1.0
0.8
3.3
3.2
3.4
2
Statistics
Comparative Status
3
Raw
Adjusted
3
Raw
Adjusted
3.3
3.2
3.4
3.4
3.5
3.5
Averages and Comparative Status
1. Overall effectiveness as a teacher
11. Increased desire to learn about the subject
14. Amount learned in the course
LM
LM
LM
LM
M
LM
Ratings of Student Attributes and Instructional Styles
Number Responding [VL=1, VH=5]
VL
L
M
H
VH
OMIT
Statistics
SD
AVG
1
Relevant Student Attributes
12. Interest in the course before enrolling
13. Effort to learn in the course
2
0
6
1
13
11
7
15
2
3
1
1
1.0
0.7
3.0
3.7
0
0
0
0
3
0
2
0
8
4
11
13
12
14
10
7
8
13
8
11
0
0
0
0
0.9
0.7
0.9
0.9
3.8
4.3
3.8
3.9
0
3
3
0
0
10
4
8
0
7
10
12
9
3
15
7
7
4
16
5
4
5
7
12
4
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
1.2
1.3
0.6
0.9
3.2
3.2
3.1
4.3
3.2
Instructional Styles
A. Establishing a Learning Climate
2. Made the course goals and objectives clear
3. Well prepared for class
5. Interest in helping students learn
10. Willingness to help outside of class
B. Facilitating Student Learning
4. Explained the subject clearly
6. Stimulated thinking about the subject
7. Made helpful comments on student work
8. Grading procedures fair and equitable
9. Realized when students did not understand
Instructor's Description of Class
A. Type of class
B. Class size
C. Physical facilities
D. Previously taught this course?
E. Approach significantly different this term?
F. Description of teaching load?
G. Attitude toward teaching this course
H. Control of course decisions
I. Differences in student preparation
J. Student enthusiasm
K. Student effort to learn
L. Additional comments?
1
2
3
Lecture
About right
Satisfactory
1
No
Average
I was really enthusiastic
Yes- I was responsible for all decisions
Not a problem
Moderate; neither high nor low
Satisfactory
No additional comments
STANDARD DEVIATION
RELATIVE TO KSU CLASSES RATED BY 10 OR MORE STUDENTS: H=UPPER 10%; HM=NEXT 20%; M=MIDDLE 40%; LM=NEXT 20%; L=LOWEST 10%
ADJUSTED FOR STUDENT CHARACTERISTICS & CLASS SIZE: SEE TEVAL GUIDE
page 1 of 1
Teval Report: Student Ratings of Instruction
Center for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning | Kansas State University
Faculty Member: Xie, Xin
Hr./Days: 930 MWF
Course #: ECON 510
College: Arts & Sciences
Term: Fall 2010
Responses from 18 of the 33 enrolled (55%)
Offered: In Class
Overall Effectiveness
Number Responding [VL=1, VH=5]
VL
L
M
H
VH
OMIT
Statistics
AVG
1
SD
Obtained Responses
1. Overall effectiveness as a teacher
11. Increased desire to learn about the subject
14. Amount learned in the course
3
8
0
2
1
3
7
4
8
5
4
5
1
1
2
0
0
0
1.1
1.4
0.9
2.9
2.4
3.3
2
Statistics
Comparative Status
3
Raw
Adjusted
3
Raw
Adjusted
2.9
2.4
3.3
3.1
2.4
3.2
Averages and Comparative Status
1. Overall effectiveness as a teacher
11. Increased desire to learn about the subject
14. Amount learned in the course
L
L
LM
L
L
L
Ratings of Student Attributes and Instructional Styles
Number Responding [VL=1, VH=5]
VL
L
M
H
VH
OMIT
Statistics
SD
AVG
1
Relevant Student Attributes
12. Interest in the course before enrolling
13. Effort to learn in the course
1
0
2
1
6
6
7
4
2
7
0
0
1.0
1.0
3.4
3.9
1
0
0
1
2
2
3
0
4
4
3
2
8
9
9
7
3
3
3
8
0
0
0
0
1.1
0.9
0.9
1.0
3.6
3.7
3.7
4.2
4
3
3
2
4
4
4
3
0
4
5
5
2
4
4
4
4
5
6
4
1
2
5
6
2
0
0
0
0
0
1.2
1.2
1.5
1.2
1.3
2.7
2.9
3.3
3.8
2.8
Instructional Styles
A. Establishing a Learning Climate
2. Made the course goals and objectives clear
3. Well prepared for class
5. Interest in helping students learn
10. Willingness to help outside of class
B. Facilitating Student Learning
4. Explained the subject clearly
6. Stimulated thinking about the subject
7. Made helpful comments on student work
8. Grading procedures fair and equitable
9. Realized when students did not understand
Instructor's Description of Class
A. Type of class
B. Class size
C. Physical facilities
D. Previously taught this course?
E. Approach significantly different this term?
F. Description of teaching load?
G. Attitude toward teaching this course
H. Control of course decisions
I. Differences in student preparation
J. Student enthusiasm
K. Student effort to learn
L. Additional comments?
1
2
3
Lecture
About right
Satisfactory
None
No
Average
I was really enthusiastic
Yes- I was responsible for all decisions
A minor problem
Mixed; both high and low
Variable; sometimes high, sometimes low
No additional comments
STANDARD DEVIATION
RELATIVE TO KSU CLASSES RATED BY 10 OR MORE STUDENTS: H=UPPER 10%; HM=NEXT 20%; M=MIDDLE 40%; LM=NEXT 20%; L=LOWEST 10%
ADJUSTED FOR STUDENT CHARACTERISTICS & CLASS SIZE: SEE TEVAL GUIDE
page 1 of 1