Student Questionnaire Template Quality Review Framework Annex 6.5.2:

advertisement
Quality Review Framework Annex 6.5.2:
Student Questionnaire Template
Contact: Rob Traynor, Quality Assurance Coordinator, Academic Services, Student and Registry
Services
This template may be used and adapted for student questionnaires. The following headings represent the
recommended areas to be covered by the core elements of the questionnaire, with suggested questions
(although individual questions may vary depending on the type of teaching employed).
Feedback on your learning experience on the course/module/programme [delete as appropriate] is
extremely valuable and will help us to make improvements in future years. We would be most grateful if you
could answer the following questions. There is also an opportunity to provide comments at the end of the
questionnaire.
a. Attendance
What percentage of the total course do you estimate that you attended (please indicate)?
%
Please mark chosen answer with an “X”
b. Course Structure
1. The course aims were made clear at the start.
2. The course aims were met.
3. Teaching sessions were well-prepared and presented in a
logical order.
c. Assumed Knowledge
4. The starting standard was at the right level for me.
d. Supplementary Material (where issued)
5. The hand-outs/reading lists were useful.
e. Teaching Delivery
6. The lecturer was audible and the subject matter
clearly explained.
Definitely
agree
Mostly
agree
Neither
agree nor
disagree
Mostly
disagree
Definitely
disagree
Not
applicable
7. The pace of teaching was at the right speed.
8. Slides/overheads and other teaching aids were adequate and
well-prepared.
9. Online materials and activities were clearly structured and
presented and integrated well into the course (including Moodle).
f. Student Participation (where applicable)
10. Student participation was encouraged during the course.
11. When active participation online was required (e.g. discussion
forums, online development of materials, collaboration) this was
managed and supported effectively.
g. Workload and Feedback
12. The workload was manageable.
13. The criteria used for marking and assessment were clear in
advance.
14. The feedback provided on my coursework was helpful in
developing my understanding of the subject.
15. Feedback on my coursework was provided within one calendar
month.
16. Feedback was provided by the supervisor on research
projects/dissertations/long essays on at least one occasion.
h. Interest
17. The teaching was stimulating and helped make the subject
interesting.
i. Teaching Support Facilities (optional where applicable)
18. The computer terminals provided were adequate for my needs.
19. The space provided was sufficient for my needs.
20. Language laboratories were sufficiently equipped for my
needs.
21. The studios were adequate for my needs.
22. I was able to access all the recommended reading for my
course.
j. Student Comments
Please feel free to comment here on any aspect, positive or negative, of your learning experience on the
course/module/programme [delete as necessary].
Download