STUDENT ENGAGEMENT SURVEY RESULTS Jeronima Echeverria Dennis Nef

advertisement
STUDENT ENGAGEMENT
SURVEY RESULTS
California State University, Fresno
Jeronima Echeverria
Dennis Nef
1
Program Overview
Š What do we know about student
engagement on our campus?
Š Selected data from the 2005 NSSE survey
(approximately 650 first time students and
630 seniors).
Š Benchmark Comparisons on measures of
effective educational practice
Š CAAP Reading Test
2
What Really Matters in College
Student Engagement
The research is unequivocalImpact of college is largely
determined by individual effort.
Students are not passive recipients
of institutional efforts to
“educate” or “change” them.
Important to focus on ways in
which an institution can shape
its academic, interpersonal, and
extracurricular offerings to
encourage student engagement.
Pascarella & Terenzini. (2005). How college affects students:
A third decade of research
3
What Do We Know about
College Student Engagement?
What percentage of our students participate
in community service or volunteer work?
First-Year
More than 50%
Senior
More than 57%
4
What Do We Know about
College Student Engagement?
What percentage of our students participate
in co-curricular activities?
First-Year
47%
Senior
41%
5
What Do We Know about
College Student Engagement?
What percentage of our students worked
with classmates outside of class to
complete class assignments?
Senior
First-Year
84%
92%
6
What Do We Know about
College Student Engagement?
What percentage of Fresno State students
used an electronic medium (listserv, chat
group, Internet, instant messaging, etc.) to
discuss or complete an assignment?
First-Year
81%
Senior
89%
7
What Do We Know about
College Student Engagement?
What percentage of our students talked about
career plans with a faculty member or advisor?
First-Year
67%
Senior
81%
8
What Do We Know about
College Student Engagement?
What percentage of our students spend more
than 10 (20) hours per week preparing for
class (studying, reading, writing, doing
homework or lab work, analyzing data,
rehearsing, and other academic activities)?
First-Year
40% (12%)
Senior
49% (16%)
9
What Do We Know about
College Student Engagement?
How many hours per week do students
spend “using library resources in person”?
First-Year
Zero - 35%
Senior
Zero - 36%
More than 10 - 6%
More than 10 - 7%
10
What Do We Know about
College Student Engagement?
What percentage of our students work off
campus more than 10 hours per week for
pay?
Senior
First-Year
42%
52%
11
NSSE 2005
Fresno State Results
Š Thinking about your overall experience at this
institution, how would you rate the quality of
relationships with faculty and administrative personnel
and offices (Seniors only)?
ŠFor faculty, 1 is
unavailable, unhelpful,
unsympathetic and 7
is available, helpful,
sympathetic)
ŠFor staff, 1 is
Unhelpful,
inconsiderate, rigid; 7
is helpful, considerate,
flexible.
180
160
140
120
100
faculty
administrative
80
60
40
20
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
12
NSSE 2005
Fresno State Results
Š Thinking about your
overall experience at this
institution, to what extent
does the university
encourage contact
between students from
different economic, social,
and racial or ethnic
backgrounds?
250
200
150
First year
Senior
100
50
0
Very little
some
quite a bit very much
13
Carnegie Group Comparison
with Fresno State Results
percentage
Š In thinking about your undergraduate program as a
whole, including your major, have you done a
culminating senior experience (e.g., senior
comprehensive exam, capstone course, thesis or
project)?
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Fresno State
CSU
Masters
NSSE
Fresno
State
CSU
Masters
NSSE
14
NSSE 2005 Promising Findings
Š Most students (82%) would attend Fresno
State if they could start over again, and 80%
say they had a good or excellent educational
experience
15
Effective Educational Practices
Š NSSE used clusters of questions to measure:
Š Level of academic challenge
Š Active and collaborative learning
Š Student-Faculty interaction
Š Enriching educational experiences
Š Supportive campus environment
16
Benchmark Mean Comparisons
Level of Academic Challenge
Š Number of assigned readings
58
Š Number of assigned papers
56
#
54
#
52
#
50
#
#
&
48
First year
Seniors
Š Coursework emphasizing
analysis, synthesis,
judgement, application of
theory
Š Campus environment
emphasizing study
46
44
Fresno
State
CSU
Master's
NSSE 2005
Š Preparing for class
* P<.05, & P<.01, # P<.001
17
Benchmark Mean Comparisons
Active and Collaborative Learning
60
Š Asked questions in class
50
#
#
Š Contributed to discussion
&
40
First year
Seniors
30
20
Š Worked with other
students
Š Tutored or taught others
10
Š Service learning
0
Fresno
State
CSU
Master's
NSSE 2005
* P<.05, & P<.01, # P<.001
18
Benchmark Mean Comparisons
Student Faculty Interaction
Š Discussed grades,
assignments or career
plans
50
45
#
40
&
35
30
#
Š Discussed ideas from
readings outside of class
#
#
25
First year
Seniors
20
15
10
5
0
Fresno
State
CSU
Master's
NSSE 2005
Š Worked on activities
other than coursework
Š Prompt feedback on
performance
* P<.05, & P<.01, # P<.001
19
Benchmark Mean Comparisons
Enriching Educational Experiences
Š Co-curricular activities
45
40
&
35
Š Community Service
#
Š Internship, field
experiences, etc
30
25
First year
Seniors
#
20
Š Study abroad
Š Independent study
15
10
5
0
Fresno
State
CSU
Master's
NSSE 2005
* P<.05, & P<.01, # P<.001
Š Serious conversations with
students of different
ethnicity
Š Electronic discussions
Š Learning community
20
Benchmark Mean Comparisons
Supportive Campus Environment
Š Academic support
62
Š Help to cope with nonacademic responsibilities
60
#
58
#
#
56
#
First year
Seniors
54
Š Quality of relationships
with others-faculty, staff
and students
Š Social opportunities
52
50
48
Fresno
State
CSU
Master's
NSSE
2005
* P<.05, & P<.01, # P<.001
21
Effective Educational Practices
Comparisons
Š When compared to the top 10% and the top 50%
of institutions in the NSSE survey on these
benchmarks, California State University, Fresno
results are significantly lower for all clusters at
both the first-year and senior level.
22
Additional Insights-CAAP
Š Nationally normed reading test
Š 695 students spring 2005
Š Close to national average (slightly below)
Š Significant differences between
Š Transfer students (+) and those who started at Fresno State
Š Students in non-professional (+) and professional majors
Š Females (+) and males
Š No significant difference
Š With increased number of units
23
Follow-up on CAAP Reading
Š Attention to those entering as freshmen
Š University One, Learning Resource Center and Reading
Faculty
Š Attention to students declaring majors in professional
areas of study
Š Business and Agricultural Sciences and Technology
collaborating in follow-up this year
Š Attention to pedagogical practices that can improve
student reading skills
Š TLT and Reading Faculty working together
24
How Do I Find Out More?
Results and Analysis will be posted to
the IRAP Website www.csufresno.edu/ir
E-mail cleimer@csufresno.edu
.
25
Download