Cabrillo College Participatory Governance Handbook
Committee Critique Form
Committee Name:
Your Name (optional):
Please choose the number that best represents your feelings:
Evaluation Scale:
(1) Absolutely not
(2) No
(3) Yes
(4) Absolutely (5) N/A
Agenda
1. An Agenda was made available to all participants prior to the meeting.
2. The objectives of the meeting were clearly stated on the agenda.
3. Agenda items were appropriate for this group at this type of meeting.
4. The agenda contained just the right number of items for the time
available.
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
Meeting Type/Space/Size/Composition
1. This meeting was necessary to address the topic of concern.
2. The type of meeting was appropriate to the task/concern.
3. The right kinds of people were in attendance.
4. The size of the group was appropriate.
5. The meeting room was of appropriate size and arrangement.
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
Meeting Process
1. The agenda was followed closely.
2. The meeting started and finished on time.
3. The meeting met the stated objective(s).
4. The meeting accomplished its purpose.
5. Decisions were made effectively.
6. Time utilization was effective.
7. Summary agreements were made and action items assigned.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Facilitator/Recorder
1. Facilitator kept the group focused on the common task.
2. Facilitator kept the meeting moving.
3. Facilitator brought group to closure, agreeing on action items.
4. Recorder captured the basic ideas of the meeting.
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
Total Score
/80