KEY
Studen Equity
Disproportionate Impact Index*
* DII= subgroup rate/reference group rate. Proportion of the reference group
105% and above
95% to 104.99%
80% to 94.99%
70% to 79.99%
below 70%
DII Key
High performer
No concern
Moderate concern
Concern
Great concern
10/27/2014
PRO
A. ACCESS
Student Equity
PRO
ACCESS
Santa Cruz County
Demographic
Total
Female
GENDER Male
Unknown
African-American
American Indian/Alaskan
Native
Asian
Latino
ETHNICITY
Multi-Ethnicity
Pacific Islander
Unknown
White, non-Latino
AGE
OTHER
19 or Less
20 to 24
25 to 29
30 to 34
35 to 39
40 to 49
50 +
Unknown
Disability
Economically Disadvantaged
Foster Youth
Veterans
Cabrillo College
Percent
Santa Cruz County
Cabrillo,
Disproportionate
(Reference
Percent
Population Count
Spring 2014
Impact Index* (DII)
Group)
DII Descriptor
262,382
100%
12,707
100%
131,469
130,913
0
50.1%
49.9%
0.0%
6,801
5,853
53
53.5%
46.1%
0.4%
106.8%
92.3%
NA
High performer
Moderate concern
2,304
978
10,658
84,092
7,661
292
0
156,397
0.9%
0.4%
4.1%
32.0%
2.9%
0.1%
0.0%
59.6%
157
56
464
4,713
616
28
250
6,423
1.2%
0.4%
3.7%
37.1%
4.9%
0.2%
2.0%
50.6%
141.2%
118.0%
89.9%
115.7%
166.1%
197.7%
NA
84.8%
High performer
High performer
Moderate concern
High performer
High performer
High performer
67,297
24,391
17,597
16,152
15,918
35,869
85,158
0
23,709
32,239
250
13,172
25.6%
9.3%
6.7%
6.2%
6.1%
13.7%
32.5%
0.0%
9.0%
12.3%
0.1%
5.0%
2,707
4,524
1,723
903
575
818
1,456
1
1,228
8,681
50
141
21.3%
35.6%
13.6%
7.1%
4.5%
6.4%
11.5%
0.01%
9.7%
68.3%
0.4%
1.1%
83.0%
383.0%
202.2%
115.5%
74.7%
47.1%
35.3%
NA
106.9%
555.9%
413.0%
22.1%
Moderate concern
High performer
High performer
High performer
Concern
Great concern
Great concern
Moderate concern
High performer
High performer
High performer
Great concern
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010; Calif. Community College Chancellors Office (CCCCO) Data Mart; 2012 American Community Survey;
Cabrillo Financial Aid awards and headcount (18,312) for academic year 2013-14, and Family and Children's Services Foster Care and Adoptions
Programs, a division of the Human Services Department, County of Santa Cruz.
* DII= subgroup rate/reference group rate. Proportion of the reference group
A. Access data for template
10/27/2014
A. ACCESS
Student Equity
PRO
A. ACCESS TO EDUCATION
Disproportionated Impact
SC County vs. Cabrillo College
80%
68.3%
70%
60% 53.5%
50%
50.6%
46.1%
37.1%
40%
35.6%
30%
21.3%
20%
13.6%
10%
0.4% 1.2% 0.4%
3.7%
4.9%
7.1%
0.2% 2.0%
11.5%
4.5% 6.4%
9.7%
0.01%
0.4% 1.1%
0%
Cabrillo
Series4
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010; Calif. Community College Chancellors Office (CCCCO) Data Mart; 2012 American Community Survey;
Cabrillo Financial Aid awards and headcount (18,312) for academic year 2013-14, and Family and Children's Services Foster Care and Adoptions
Programs, a division of the Human Services Department, County of Santa Cruz.
Bars colored "green" when Cabrillo is higher than the SC County
A. Access data for template
10/27/2014
B. Course Success-Retention
Student Equity
PRO
Cabrillo College Credit Course Completion/Success Rate Summary Report, Academic Year 2013-14, Primary Terms Only
Basic Skills
2013-2014
POPULATION
GROUP
Cabrillo Total
GENDER Female
Male
Unknown
AfricanETHNICITY American
American
Indian/Alaskan
Native
Asian
Latino
Multi-Ethnicity
Pacific Islander
Unknown
White NonLatino
AGE 1 to 17
18 & 19
20 to 24
25 to 29
30 to 34
35 to 39
40 to 49
50 +
Unknown
Completion
Enrollme Completi Success Completi Success Reference Disproportionate Completion DII
nt Count on Count Count
on Rate
Rate
Group Impact Index (DII) Descriptor
*
3,947
3,350
2,344
85%
59%
2,230
1,706
11
1,915
1,424
11
1,356
978
10
86%
83%
100%
61%
57%
91%
64
48
24
75%
38%
23
132
2,511
140
10
60
19
121
2,148
114
8
51
16
101
1,454
84
8
38
83%
92%
86%
81%
80%
85%
70%
77%
58%
60%
80%
63%
1,007
841
619
93
1,437
1,121
430
288
149
256
173
0
78
1,208
941
367
261
118
225
152
0
54
739
657
286
215
93
180
120
0
84%
84%
84%
84%
85%
91%
79%
88%
88%
N/A
61%
58%
51%
59%
67%
75%
62%
70%
69%
N/A
B. CourseSuccessRetention_data for template_2013-14-v2-NC-TM
10/27/2014
X
100%
97%
116%
No concern
No concern
High performer
90% Moderate concern
X
X
99%
No concern
110%
102%
98%
96%
102%
High performer
No concern
No concern
No concern
No concern
100%
No concern
93%
93%
93%
94%
100%
87%
97%
97%
Moderate concern
Moderate concern
Moderate concern
Moderate concern
No concern
Moderate concern
No concern
No concern
Success
Success DII
Disproportionate
Descriptor
Impact Index (DII) *
100% No concern
94% Moderate concern
150% High performer
61% Great concern
113% High performer
124%
94%
98%
130%
103%
High performer
Moderate concern
No concern
High performer
No concern
100% No concern
78%
69%
79%
89%
100%
84%
94%
93%
Concern
Great concern
Concern
Moderate concern
No concern
Moderate concern
Moderate concern
Moderate concern
1
B. Course Success-Retention
Student Equity
PRO
Cabrillo College Credit Course Completion/Success Rate Summary Report, Academic Year 2013-14, Primary Terms Only
Basic Skills
2013-2014
POPULATION
GROUP
Completion
Enrollme Completi Success Completi Success Reference Disproportionate Completion DII
nt Count on Count Count
on Rate
Rate
Group Impact Index (DII) Descriptor
*
SPECIAL POPULATIONS
2,073
1,814
1,354
88%
65%
CALWORKS
NOT CALWORKS
55
2,018
52
1,762
36
1,318
95%
87%
65%
65%
X
ASC
NOT ASC
184
1,889
163
1,651
125
1,229
89%
87%
68%
65%
X
EOPS
NOT EOPS
130
1,943
116
1,698
80
1,274
89%
87%
62%
66%
FOSTER YOUTH
NOT FOSTER
YOUTH
27
19
15
70%
56%
2,046
1,795
1,339
88%
65%
VETERAN
NOT VETERAN
35
2,038
29
1,785
25
1,329
83%
88%
71%
65%
100%
108%
100%
101%
100%
No concern
High performer
No concern
No concern
No concern
102%
No concern
Success
Success DII
Disproportionate
Descriptor
Impact Index (DII) *
100%
100%
100%
104%
100%
No concern
No concern
No concern
No concern
No concern
94% Moderate concern
X
100%
No concern
80% Moderate concern
100% No concern
85% Moderate concern
X
100%
No concern
100% No concern
X
95%
100%
No concern
No concern
110% High performer
100% No concern
Note: Basic Skills Special Population data includes all 200 Level Math, English and ESL sections.
Source: CCCCO Data Mart for gender, ethnicity and age data; Cabrillo SOFIA database for Special Populations.
* DII= subgroup rate/reference group rate. Proportion of the reference group
B. CourseSuccessRetention_data for template_2013-14-v2-NC-TM
10/27/2014
2
B. Course Success-Retention
Student Equity
PRO
Cabrillo College Credit Course Completion/Success Rate Summary Report, Academic Year 2013-14, Primary Terms Only, cont.
Non-Basic Skills
2013-2014
POPULATION
GROUP
Cabrillo Total
Enrollmen Completio
t Count
n Count
Success
Count
Completio
n Rate
Success
Rate
76,791
66,785
55,809
87%
73%
39,995
34,943
29,760
87%
74%
36,586
210
31,652
190
25,879
170
87%
90%
71%
81%
1,156
995
757
86%
65%
Indian/Alaskan
Asian
Latino
380
2,713
28,975
323
2,395
24,961
261
2,085
19,736
85%
88%
86%
69%
77%
68%
Multi-Ethnicity
Pacific Islander
Unknown
White NonLatino
4,309
165
1,335
3,727
143
1,192
3,087
106
1,029
86%
87%
89%
72%
64%
77%
37,758
33,049
28,748
88%
76%
1,648
20,604
29,176
9,408
4,451
2,831
3,677
4,993
3
1,483
18,019
24,961
8,122
3,921
2,482
3,263
4,531
3
1,223
14,599
20,327
6,944
3,420
2,199
2,930
4,164
3
90%
87%
86%
86%
88%
88%
89%
91%
100%
74%
71%
70%
74%
77%
78%
80%
83%
100%
GENDER Female
Male
Unknown
AfricanETHNICITY American
American
AGE 1 to 17
18 & 19
20 to 24
25 to 29
30 to 34
35 to 39
40 to 49
50 +
Unknown
B. CourseSuccessRetention_data for template_2013-14-v2-NC-TM
10/27/2014
Completion
Disproportionate Completion DII
Reference Impact Index (DII) Descriptor
*
Group
X
X
X
Success
Success DII
Disproportionate
Descriptor
Impact Index (DII) *
100%
No concern
100% No concern
95%
No concern
95% No concern
109%
High performer
75%
Concern
86% Moderate concern
78%
Concern
88% Moderate concern
78%
Concern
90% Moderate concern
101% No concern
89% Moderate concern
82% Moderate concern
94% Moderate concern
73%
Concern
88% Moderate concern
84% Moderate concern
101% No concern
87% Moderate concern
100% No concern
82%
78%
77%
81%
85%
86%
88%
92%
110%
Moderate concern
Concern
Concern
Moderate concern
Moderate concern
Moderate concern
Moderate concern
Moderate concern
High performer
109% High performer
89%
85%
84%
89%
92%
93%
96%
100%
120%
Moderate concern
Moderate concern
Moderate concern
Moderate concern
Moderate concern
Moderate concern
No concern
No concern
High performer
3
B. Course Success-Retention
Student Equity
PRO
Cabrillo College Credit Course Completion/Success Rate Summary Report, Academic Year 2013-14, Primary Terms Only, cont.
Non-Basic Skills
2013-2014
POPULATION
GROUP
SPECIAL POPULATIONS
CALWORKS
Enrollmen Completio
t Count
n Count
78,205
Cabrillo
Total 67,278
Success
Count
Completio
n Rate
Success
Rate
56,224
86%
72%
Completion
Reference Disproportionate Completion DII
Group
Impact Index (DII) Descriptor
*
1,545
1,332
1,123
86%
73%
NOT CALWORKS
76,660
65,946
55,101
86%
72%
ASC
NOT ASC
7,330
70,875
6,309
60,969
5,447
50,777
86%
86%
74%
72%
X
EOPS
NOT EOPS
3,208
74,997
2,740
64,538
2,291
53,933
85%
86%
71%
72%
X
X
FOSTER YOUTH
NOT FOSTER
YOUTH
687
525
365
76%
53%
77,518
66,753
55,859
86%
72%
X
VETERAN
NOT VETERAN
1,521
76,684
1,327
65,951
1,052
55,172
87%
86%
69%
72%
X
Success
Success DII
Disproportionate
Descriptor
Impact Index (DII) *
100%
101%
No concern
No concern
100% No concern
101% No concern
100%
No concern
100% No concern
104%
100%
99%
100%
73.7%
No concern
No concern
No concern
No concern
Concern
104%
100%
99%
100%
74%
100%
No concern
100% No concern
96%
100%
No concern
No concern
96% No concern
100% No concern
No concern
No concern
No concern
No concern
Concern
*Non-Basic Skills Special Population data excludes all 200 Level Math, English and ESL sections.
Source: CCCCO Data Mart for gender, ethnicity and age data; Cabrillo SOFIA database for Special Populations.
* DII= subgroup rate/reference group rate. Proportion of the reference group
B. CourseSuccessRetention_data for template_2013-14-v2-NC-TM
10/27/2014
4
C. ESL and Basic Skills
Metric
Student Equity
Disproportionate
Cohort
Size
Cohort
Rate
164
12.8%
Female
Male
101
61
11.9%
14.8%
X
100% No concern
AGE
< 20 years old
21
23.8%
X
100% No concern
AGE
20 to 24 years old
35
17.1%
72% Concern
AGE
AGE
25 to 39 years old
70
38
11.4%
5.3%
48% Great concern
1 to 9
100.0%
800% High performer
Category
Group
All
GENDER
GENDER
Remedial
ESL
PRO
40+ years old
ETHNICITY
African American
ETHNICITY
American Indian/Alaska Native
0
N/A
ETHNICITY
Asian
16
12.5%
ETHNICITY
Filipino
1 to 9
0.0%
ETHNICITY
Latino
137
10.2%
White
Received ASC Services
Did Not Receive ASC Services
0
1 to 9
Not Avail.
Not Avail.
N/A
60.0%
40.0%
12.0%
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Avail.
Not Avail.
18.5%
ETHNICITY
ETHNICITY
ACCESSIBILITY
ACCESSIBILITY
INCOME
INCOME
Pacific Islander
9.1%
Reference
Impact Index (DII) DII Descriptor
Group
*
80% Moderate concern
22% Great concern
X
100% No concern
0% Great concern
82% Moderate concern
480% High performer
335% High performer
X
100% No concern
204% High performer
X
100% No concern
For Remedial ESL, disproportionate impact is evident for ages 20 and older, and Filipinos (note the
latter's small sample size).
* DII= subgroup rate/reference group rate. Proportion of the reference group
Metric
Cohort
Rate
All
1716
42.8%
GENDER
Female
Male
47.1%
38.0%
X
GENDER
754
721
100% No concern
81% Moderate concern
AGE
< 20 years old
992
48.8%
X
100% No concern
AGE
20 to 24 years old
AGE
25 to 39 years old
255
165
31.4%
33.9%
64% Great concern
69% Great concern
AGE
40+ years old
71
19.7%
40% Great concern
ETHNICITY
African American
32
37.5%
77% Concern
ETHNICITY
American Indian/Alaska Native
11
27.3%
56% Great concern
ETHNICITY
Asian
41
51.2%
105% High performer
ETHNICITY
Filipino
34
61.8%
127% High performer
ETHNICITY
Latino
677
36.5%
ETHNICITY
Pacific Islander
ETHNICITY
White
17
603
29.4%
48.6%
Not Avail.
Not Avail.
45.6%
Not Avail.
Not Avail.
38.8%
All
Remedial
English
Disproportionate
Cohort
Size
Category
Group
ACCESSIBILITY
Received ASC Services
ACCESSIBILITY
Did Not Receive ASC Services
INCOME
Economically Disadvantaged
INCOME
Not Economically Disadvantaged
42.4%
46.3%
Reference
Impact Index (DII) DII Descriptor
Group
*
75% Concern
X
60% Great concern
100% No concern
X
107% High performer
100% No concern
X
84% Moderate concern
100% No concern
For Remedial English, disproportionate impact is evident for males, students aged 20 and older, African
Americans, Native Americans/Alaska Natives, Latinos, and Pacific Islanders.
* DII= subgroup rate/reference group rate. Proportion of the reference group
C. ESL and Basic Skills Completion_data for template
10/27/2014
1
C. ESL and Basic Skills
Metric
Student Equity
Disproportionate
Cohort
Size
Cohort
Rate
All
1716
32.9%
GENDER
Female
727
37.0%
GENDER
Male
593
27.7%
AGE
< 20 years old
AGE
20 to 24 years old
675
315
36.1%
29.5%
AGE
25 to 39 years old
AGE
40+ years old
221
119
36.2%
17.6%
100% No concern
49% Great concern
ETHNICITY
African American
21
4.8%
13% Great concern
ETHNICITY
American Indian/Alaska Native
19
15.8%
41% Great concern
ETHNICITY
Asian
26
26.9%
70% Concern
ETHNICITY
Filipino
10
60.0%
157% High performer
ETHNICITY
Latino
479
25.7%
67% Great concern
ETHNICITY
Pacific Islander
ETHNICITY
White
14
672
42.9%
38.2%
X
112% High performer
100% No concern
31.8%
X
96% No concern
100% No concern
Category
All
Remedial
Math
PRO
Group
ACCESSIBILITY
Received ASC Services
ACCESSIBILITY
Did Not Receive ASC Services
Not Avail.
Not Avail.
INCOME
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Avail.
32.6%
INCOME
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Avail.
33.2%
33.1%
Reference
Impact Index (DII) DII Descriptor
Group
*
X
100% No concern
75% Concern
X
100% No concern
82% Moderate concern
98% No concern
X
100% No concern
For Remedial Math, disproportionate impact is evident for males, students over 40,
African Americans, Native Americans/Alaska Natives, Asians and Latinos.
* DII= subgroup rate/reference group rate. Proportion of the reference group
C. ESL and Basic Skills Completion_data for template
10/27/2014
2
C2. Foster Youth
Student Equity
PRO
2012-2013
Class
Group
English 100 Foster Youth
Not Foster Youth
Math 152
Foster Youth
Not Foster Youth
Enrollment Completion
Count
Count
Success
Count
Completion
Rate
Success
Rate
16
13
7
81.3%
43.8%
1491
1290
974
86.5%
65.3%
14
10
5
71.4%
35.7%
1922
1466
895
76.3%
46.6%
C2. Foster Youth_Engl100Math152FY_data for template
10/27/2014
Reference
Group
Completion
Completion
Disproportion Disproportionate
ate Impact
Impact Index
Index (DII)
(DII)
93.9% No concern
X
X
Success
Success
Disproportionate Disproportionate
Impact Index
Impact Index
(DII)
(DII)
67% Great concern
100.0% No concern
100.0% No concern
93.6% No concern
77% Concern
100.0% No concern
100.0% No concern
1
D. Degree and Cert. Completion
Metric
Student Equity
Category
Cohort
Rate
48.8%
Reference Disproportionate Disproportionate
Impact Index*
Impact Description
Group
All
1716
Female
895
Male
52.1%
45.4%
X
807
AGE
< 20 years old
1716
51.8%
X
AGE
20 to 24 years old
117
26.5%
51% Great concern
AGE
25 to 39 years old
81
40+ years old
30.9%
40.8%
60% Great concern
49
ETHNICITY
African American
30
36.7%
67% Great concern
ETHNICITY
American Indian/Alaska Native
19
36.8%
67% Great concern
ETHNICITY
Asian
55
61.8%
113% High performer
ETHNICITY
Filipino
27
48.1%
88% Moderate concern
ETHNICITY
Latino
557
37.7%
69% Great concern
ETHNICITY
Pacific Islander
10
109% High performer
ETHNICITY
White
909
60.0%
54.9%
ACCESSIBILITY Received ASC Services
Not Avail.
ACCESSIBILITY Did Not Receive ASC Services
Not Avail.
All
GENDER
GENDER
AGE
Completion
Overall
Cohort
Size
Group
PRO
INCOME
INCOME
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Avail.
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Avail.
44.6%
49.1%
45.4%
52.8%
100% No concern
87% Moderate concern
100% No concern
79% Concern
X
100% No concern
91% Moderate concern
X
100% No concern
86% Moderate concern
X
100% No concern
For Completion Overall, disproportionate impact is evident for ages 20 and older, African Americans, Native Americans/
Alaska Natives, and Latinos.
* DII= subgroup rate/reference group rate. Proportion of the reference group
Metric
Category
Cohort
Rate
69.9%
Reference Disproportionate Disproportionate
Impact Index*
Impact Description
Group
All
542
Female
283
Male
73.1%
66.3%
X
258
AGE
< 20 years old
507
71.8%
X
AGE
20 to 24 years old
13
54% Great concern
AGE
25 to 39 years old
13
38.5%
38.5%
AGE
40+ years old
1 to 9
55.6%
77% Concern
ETHNICITY
African American
1 to 9
80.0%
112% High performer
ETHNICITY
American Indian/Alaska Native
1 to 9
33.3%
47% Great concern
ETHNICITY
Asian
20
75.0%
105% High performer
ETHNICITY
Filipino
1 to 9
66.7%
93% Moderate concern
ETHNICITY
Latino
82
62.2%
87% Moderate concern
ETHNICITY
Pacific Islander
1 to 9
ETHNICITY
White
100.0%
71.5%
All
GENDER
GENDER
Completion
Prepared
Cohort
Size
Group
383
100% No concern
91% Moderate concern
100% No concern
54% Great concern
140% High performer
X
100% No concern
For Completion Prepared, disproportionate impact is evident for ages 20 and older, and Native Americans/
Alaska Natives (note small sample sizes).
* DII= subgroup rate/reference group rate. Proportion of the reference group
D.NEW D- Degree and Cert Completion
11/3/2014
1
D. Degree and Cert. Completion
Metric
Student Equity
Category
All
1716
GENDER
Female
612
GENDER
Male
AGE
AGE
All
Completion
Remedial
Cohort
Size
Group
PRO
Cohort
Rate
39.0%
Reference Disproportionate Disproportionate
Impact Index*
Impact Description
Group
X
549
42.3%
35.5%
< 20 years old
961
41.2%
X
20 to 24 years old
104
AGE
25 to 39 years old
25.0%
29.4%
61% Great concern
68
AGE
40+ years old
40
37.5%
91% Moderate concern
ETHNICITY
African American
25
65% Great concern
ETHNICITY
American Indian/Alaska Native
16
28.0%
37.5%
ETHNICITY
Asian
35
ETHNICITY
Filipino
54.3%
42.9%
127% High performer
21
ETHNICITY
Latino
475
33.5%
ETHNICITY
Pacific Islander
1 to 9
ETHNICITY
White
55.6%
42.8%
526
100% No concern
84% Moderate concern
100% No concern
71% Concern
88% Moderate concern
100% No concern
78% Concern
130% High performer
X
100% No concern
For Completion Remedial, disproportionate impact is evident for ages 20-39 and African Americans.
and Latinos.
* DII= subgroup rate/reference group rate. Proportion of the reference group
D.NEW D- Degree and Cert Completion
11/3/2014
2
D. Degree and Cert. Completion
Metric
Student Equity
Category
All
1716
GENDER
Female
895
GENDER
Male
AGE
All
Cohort
Rate
66.1%
Reference Disproportionate Disproportionate
Impact Index*
Impact Description
Group
807
65.9%
66.3%
X
100% No concern
< 20 years old
1716
66.1%
X
100% No concern
AGE
20 to 24 years old
117
65.8%
100% No concern
AGE
25 to 39 years old
81
40+ years old
67.9%
65.3%
103% No concern
49
ETHNICITY
African American
30
70.0%
106% High performer
ETHNICITY
American Indian/Alaska Native
19
47.4%
71% Concern
ETHNICITY
96% No concern
AGE
Persistence
Overall
Cohort
Size
Group
PRO
99% No concern
99% No concern
Asian
55
ETHNICITY
Filipino
27
63.6%
66.7%
101% No concern
ETHNICITY
Latino
557
65.2%
98% No concern
ETHNICITY
Pacific Islander
10
ETHNICITY
White
909
70.0%
66.3%
ACCESSIBILITY Received ASC Services
Not Avail.
ACCESSIBILITY Did Not Receive ASC Services
Not Avail.
INCOME
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Avail.
INCOME
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Avail.
79.3%
65.1%
67.4%
64.6%
106% High performer
X
100% No concern
122% High performer
X
100% No concern
104% No concern
X
100% No concern
For Persistence Overall, above, disproportionate impact is evident for Native Americans/Alaska Native.
* DII= subgroup rate/reference group rate. Proportion of the reference group
Metric
Category
Cohort
Size
Cohort
Rate
65.1%
Reference Disproportionate Disproportionate
Impact Index*
Impact Description
Group
All
542
Female
283
Male
65.0%
65.1%
X
258
AGE
< 20 years old
507
66.1%
X
AGE
20 to 24 years old
13
46.2%
AGE
25 to 39 years old
13
69.2%
105% High performer
AGE
40+ years old
1 to 9
33.3%
50% Great concern
ETHNICITY
African American
1 to 9
60.0%
95% No concern
ETHNICITY
American Indian/Alaska Native
1 to 9
66.7%
ETHNICITY
Asian
20
55.0%
ETHNICITY
Filipino
1 to 9
66.7%
105% High performer
ETHNICITY
Latino
82
70.7%
112% High performer
ETHNICITY
Pacific Islander
1 to 9
158% High performer
ETHNICITY
White
100.0%
63.4%
All
GENDER
GENDER
Persistence
Prepared
Group
383
100% No concern
100% No concern
100% No concern
70% Concern
105% High performer
87% Moderate concern
X
100% No concern
For Persistence Prepared, disproportionate impact is evident for ages 20-24 and over 40 (note small samples).
* DII= subgroup rate/reference group rate. Proportion of the reference group
D.NEW D- Degree and Cert Completion
11/3/2014
3
D. Degree and Cert. Completion
Metric
Student Equity
All
1716
Cohort
Rate
66.6%
GENDER
Female
612
66.3%
GENDER
Male
549
66.8%
AGE
< 20 years old
961
66.1%
AGE
20 to 24 years old
104
103% No concern
AGE
25 to 39 years old
68
68.3%
67.6%
AGE
40+ years old
40
72.5%
110% High performer
ETHNICITY
African American
25
72.0%
105% High performer
ETHNICITY
American Indian/Alaska Native
16
43.8%
64% Great concern
ETHNICITY
Asian
35
68.6%
100% No concern
ETHNICITY
Filipino
21
66.7%
98% No concern
ETHNICITY
Latino
475
64.2%
94% Moderate concern
ETHNICITY
Pacific Islander
1 to 9
66.7%
68.4%
98% No concern
Category
All
Persistence
Remedial
PRO
ETHNICITY
Group
White
Cohort
Size
526
Reference Disproportionate Disproportionate
Impact Index*
Impact Description
Group
X
100% No concern
101% No concern
X
100% No concern
102% No concern
X
100% No concern
For Persistence Remedial, disproportionate impact is evident for Native Americans/Alaska Natives.
* DII= subgroup rate/reference group rate. Proportion of the reference group
D.NEW D- Degree and Cert Completion
11/3/2014
4
D. Degree and Cert. Completion
Metric
Student Equity
Category
All
1716
GENDER
Female
895
GENDER
Male
AGE
AGE
All
Cohort
Rate
68.8%
Reference Disproportionate Disproportionate
Impact Index*
Impact Description
Group
807
68.8%
69.3%
X
100% No concern
< 20 years old
1716
70.6%
X
100% No concern
20 to 24 years old
117
25 to 39 years old
81
51.3%
61.7%
40+ years old
49
67.3%
95% No concern
ETHNICITY
African American
30
66.7%
94% Moderate concern
ETHNICITY
American Indian/Alaska Native
19
82% Moderate concern
ETHNICITY
Asian
55
57.9%
67.3%
ETHNICITY
Filipino
27
70.4%
ETHNICITY
Latino
557
65.5%
93% Moderate concern
ETHNICITY
Pacific Islander
10
99% No concern
ETHNICITY
White
909
70.0%
70.6%
ACCESSIBILITY Received ASC Services
Not Avail.
ACCESSIBILITY Did Not Receive ASC Services
Not Avail.
AGE
AGE
30 Units
Overall
Cohort
Size
Group
PRO
INCOME
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Avail.
INCOME
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Avail.
76.9%
68.2%
71.9%
65.0%
99% No concern
73% Concern
120% High performer
95% No concern
100% No concern
X
100% No concern
113% High performer
X
100% No concern
111% High performer
X
100% No concern
For 30 Units Overall, disproportionate impact is evident for students ages 20-24.
* DII= subgroup rate/reference group rate. Proportion of the reference group
Metric
Category
Cohort
Size
Cohort
Rate
66.8%
Reference Disproportionate Disproportionate
Impact Index*
Impact Description
Group
All
1716
Female
612
Male
67.8%
66.3%
X
549
AGE
< 20 years old
961
68.5%
X
AGE
20 to 24 years old
104
77% Concern
AGE
25 to 39 years old
68
52.9%
64.7%
AGE
40+ years old
40
65.0%
95% No concern
ETHNICITY
African American
25
64.0%
93% Moderate concern
ETHNICITY
American Indian/Alaska Native
16
91% Moderate concern
ETHNICITY
Asian
35
62.5%
68.6%
100% No concern
ETHNICITY
Filipino
21
76.2%
111% High performer
ETHNICITY
Latino
475
63.6%
92% Moderate concern
ETHNICITY
Pacific Islander
1 to 9
97% No concern
ETHNICITY
White
66.7%
68.8%
All
GENDER
GENDER
30 Units
Remedial
Group
526
100% No concern
98% No concern
100% No concern
94% Moderate concern
X
100% No concern
For 30 Units Remedial, disproportionate impact is evident for ages 20-24.
* DII= subgroup rate/reference group rate. Proportion of the reference group
D.NEW D- Degree and Cert Completion
11/3/2014
5
D. Degree and Cert. Completion
Metric
Student Equity
Category
All
542
GENDER
Female
283
GENDER
Male
AGE
All
30 Units
Prepared
Cohort
Size
Group
PRO
Cohort
Rate
73.1%
Reference Disproportionate Disproportionate
Impact Index*
Impact Description
Group
X
258
71.0%
75.6%
< 20 years old
507
74.6%
X
AGE
20 to 24 years old
13
38.5%
52% Great concern
AGE
25 to 39 years old
13
62% Great concern
AGE
40+ years old
1 to 9
46.2%
77.8%
104% No concern
ETHNICITY
African American
1 to 9
80.0%
109% High performer
ETHNICITY
American Indian/Alaska Native
1 to 9
33.3%
46% Great concern
ETHNICITY
Asian
20
65.0%
89% Moderate concern
ETHNICITY
Filipino
1 to 9
50.0%
68% Great concern
ETHNICITY
Latino
82
76.8%
105% High performer
ETHNICITY
Pacific Islander
1 to 9
100.0%
73.1%
137% High performer
ETHNICITY
383
White
100% No concern
106% High performer
X
100% No concern
100% No concern
For 30 Units Prepared, disproportionate impact is evident for ages 20-39, Native Americans/Alaska
Natives, and Filipinos.
* DII= subgroup rate/reference group rate. Proportion of the reference group
D.NEW D- Degree and Cert Completion
11/3/2014
6
D. Degree and Cert. Completion
Metric
Student Equity
All
955
Cohort
Rate
50.2%
GENDER
Female
485
50.1%
GENDER
Male
463
50.5%
X
100% No concern
AGE
< 20 years old
326
57.4%
X
100% No concern
AGE
20 to 24 years old
227
57.3%
AGE
25 to 39 years old
240
40+ years old
40.0%
40.7%
70% Concern
162
ETHNICITY
African American
12
50.0%
98% No concern
ETHNICITY
American Indian/Alaska Native
14
42.9%
84% Moderate concern
ETHNICITY
Asian
18
50.0%
98% No concern
ETHNICITY
Filipino
15
80.0%
ETHNICITY
Latino
270
47.0%
ETHNICITY
Pacific Islander
1 to 9
ETHNICITY
White
541
100.0%
51.0%
ACCESSIBILITY Received ASC Services
Not Avail.
57.4%
ACCESSIBILITY Did Not Receive ASC Services
Not Avail.
49.6%
Category
All
AGE
Career/Tech
nical
Education
(CTE)
PRO
Cohort
Size
Group
INCOME
Economically Disadvantaged
Not Avail.
57.8%
INCOME
Not Economically Disadvantaged
Not Avail.
41.1%
Reference Disproportionate Disproportionate
Impact Index*
Impact Description
Group
99% No concern
100% No concern
71% Concern
157% High performer
92% Moderate concern
196% High performer
X
100% No concern
116% High performer
X
100% No concern
141% High performer
X
100% No concern
For CTE, disproportionate impact is evident for students aged 25 and older.
* DII= subgroup rate/reference group rate. Proportion of the reference group
D.NEW D- Degree and Cert Completion
11/3/2014
7
E. Transfer
Student Equity
Cohort Year = 2007-08; Years to transfer = 6 years
Cabrillo Total
GENDER
ETHNICITY
Female
Male
Unknown
African-American
American Indian/Alaskan
Asian
Fillipino
Latino
Pacific Islander
Unknown
White Non-Latino
1 to 17
18 & 19
20 to 24
25 to 29
AGE
30 to 34
35 to 39
40 to 49
50 +
Unknown
Acquired Brain Injury
Developmentally Delayed
Learner
Learning Disabled
Mobility Impaired
DISABILITY
Other Disability
Psychological Disability
Speech/Language Impaired
None
NO AID RECEIVED
Received BOG (Brd. of
ECONOMICALLY Governor) Aid
DISADVANTAGED Received Loans
Received Other Financial Aid
(FINANCIAL AID)
(Except BOG or Pell)
Received Pell Grant
Received Scholarship
Received Workstudy Aid
PRO
Cohort Transfer Transfer
Count Count
Rate
1,330
713
605
12
21
11
37
24
381
6
97
753
580
600
69
25
16
11
15
13
1
2
458
266
188
4
8
3
13
6
102
5
32
289
215
211
13
6
6
1
4
1
1
0
34%
37%
31%
33%
38%
27%
35%
25%
27%
83%
33%
38%
37%
35%
19%
24%
38%
9%
27%
8%
100%
0%
1
56
6
20
6
2
1,237
604
0
24
1
5
2
0
426
240
0%
43%
17%
25%
33%
0%
34%
40%
676
52
192
21
270
463
181
15
84
136
77
6
Reference
Group
X
Disproportionate
Transfer Index*
100%
83%
89%
Disproportionate
Transfer Descriptor
99%
71%
92%
65%
70%
217%
86%
100%
99%
94%
50%
64%
100%
24%
71%
21%
267%
No concern
Moderate concern
Moderate concern
No concern
Concern
Moderate concern
Great concern
Great concern
High performer
Moderate concern
No concern
No concern
Moderate concern
Great concern
Great concern
No concern
Great concern
Concern
Great concern
High performer
124%
48%
73%
97%
High performer
Great concern
Concern
No concern
100%
100%
No concern
No concern
28%
40%
71%
102%
Concern
No concern
31%
29%
43%
40%
78%
74%
107%
101%
Concern
Concern
High performer
No concern
X
X
X
X
Source: CCCCO Data Mart, Transfer Velocity Cohort Tracker (excludes Foster Youth & FY comparison)
*Foster Youth Source: SOFIA Faculty Inquiry System; due to lack of availability of Foster Data prior to Fall 2013 and short time-totransfer window, counts are based on "Transfer Directed" figures, not actual transfer counts. Transfer directed = students who
successfully completed transfer-level math or English at Cabrillo.
* DII= subgroup rate/reference group rate. Proportion of the reference group
E. Transfer-AllGroups_data for template
10/27/2014
1
E. Transfer
Student Equity
Cohort Year = Fall 2013; Years to transfer directed = 1 year*
Foster Youth
43
14 33%
68%
FOSTER YOUTH* First Time Students - Foster
1,262
606 48%
X
100%
Youth Status Unknown
PRO
Great concern
No concern
Grey text box indicates groups with fewer than 10 students in starting cohort. Red bold text indicates disproportionate impact
based on 80% rule. Source: CCCCO Data Mart, Transfer Velocity Cohort Tracker (excludes Foster Youth & FY comparison)
*Foster Youth Source: SOFIA Faculty Inquiry System; due to lack of availability of Foster Data prior to Fall 2013 and short time-totransfer window, counts are based on "Transfer Directed" figures, not actual transfer counts. Transfer directed = students who
successfully completed transfer-level math or English at Cabrillo.
* DII= subgroup rate/reference group rate. Proportion of the reference group
E. Transfer-AllGroups_data for template
10/27/2014
2