The Refugee Crisis in the Levant Demographics and Risk Factors for Conflict in Jordan and Lebanon Lauren Barnhart, Laura Blackerby, Katherine Close, Harrison Doyle, Amber Duncan, Maria Eckrich, Wesley Fox, Ben Fredrickson, Anthony Junta, Shannon Mills, Nicholas Parker, Angel Sharma, and Mark Tynan 1 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ......................... 3 VI. When do Refugees Cause Conflict in Their Host Countries? ................................... 10 II. Introduction .................................... 4 VII. Risk Factors for Refugee-Related III. Methodology .................................. 4 Conflict in Lebanon and Jordan .......... 14 A. Militarization of Refugees .......... 14 B. Capability of Host Governments to IV. Overall Demographic Changes ......... 5 A. Syria ......................................... 5 B. Lebanon .................................... 5 Prevent Refugee Militarization ... 15 C. Long-term Alienation of Young Refugees.......................................... 17 C. Jordan ....................................... 6 IX. Conclusions .................................... 19 V. Case Studies of Demographic Change in the Levant ....................................... 8 A. Aleppo, Syria ............................. 8 B. Shebaa, Lebanon ....................... 9 C. Mafraq, Jordan .......................... 9 2 Executive Summary T he aim of this paper is to explore the effects of the Syrian civil war on the demographics of the Levant, and to identify risk factors that indicate refugees may destabilize host countries. Our research indicates that flows of Syrian refugees are straining resources in Jordan and Lebanon, but are not yet contributing to conflict spillover because (A) refugee communities in these countries are not militarized; and (B) because the host governments possess the capacity and willingness to prevent militarization. We identify three risk factors that may increase the likelihood of refugee-related conflict: militarization of refugees; degradation of the capacity of security forces in Lebanon and Jordan; and, the persistence of a young, marginalized refugee population that is younger than the native populations in Lebanon and Jordan. Using case studies of Aleppo in Syria, the town of Shebaa in Lebanon, and the Mafraq Governorate in Jordan, we explore the potential challenges associated with an influx of refugees, while also demonstrating how the presence of refugees alone is not sufficient to cause the collapse of public order or state stability. This paper also draws on past refugee crises to understand the circumstances under which refugee flows have been known to spread violence to refugeehosting countries. Finally, our research finds that refugee flows may cause changes in the demographic structure of host countries. Drawing from the “youth bulge” theory, we find that societies with rapidly growing youth populations often develop rampant unemployment and large pools of disaffected youth, who are in turn more susceptible to recruitment into rebel or extremist groups. The influx of displaced youth in Jordan and Lebanon means that the age structures of these countries are at risk of delayed maturation. If not integrated into the host society through employment and educational opportunities, young Syrian refugees may have destabilizing consequences for Jordan and Lebanon. Key Findings Syrian refugees are straining resources of host countries, but refugees are not yet contributing to conflict spillover in the Levant because: Refugees in Jordan and Lebanon do not appear to be militarized The governments of Jordan and Lebanon have the capacity and willingness to prevent the militarization of refugees Risk Factors Risk factors to monitor for signs of refugee-related conflict: 1. Militarization of refugees 2. Capability of host governments to prevent refugee militarization, recruitment in refugee camps, and militant infiltration of refugee communities 3. Long-term alienation of refugee youth 3 Introduction Since 2011, a devastating civil war in Syria has driven nearly 11 million people from their homes, of which more than four million have fled the country. 1 Most of these refugees have sought shelter in the neighboring states of Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey, and Iraq. The flow of refugees has strained the capacity of host governments and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) to respond to the crisis, leaving many refugees impoverished and vulnerable. This, combined with growing sectarian tensions and terrorist networks in the region, raises concerns that the massive population displacement could destabilize Syria’s neighbors, and lead to a spillover of the civil war. The purpose of this paper is to assess the demographic changes occurring in Lebanon, Jordan and Syria as a result of the refugee crisis and to identify risk factors for refugee-related conflict and destabilization. Our research indicates Syrian refugees are indeed straining resources of host countries—but are not yet contributing to conflict spillover in Lebanon and Jordan because: international and regional media sources. We also interviewed regional experts, scholars, and humanitarian aid workers. For the second part of our study – an analysis of the potential implications of the refugee crisis for Jordan and Lebanon – we drew on the above sources as well as peer-reviewed academic literature analyzing the impact of refugees and demographic changes on political stability and conflict. At the client’s request, the scope of this paper is limited to assessing the implications of the refugee crisis for Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan. We recognize that Iraq and particularly Turkey – which has accepted nearly half of all Syrian refugees – are also experiencing significant demographic change as a result of the crisis; however we do not address them in this paper. The migration of refugees to countries outside of the Levant falls outside of the scope of this paper. Figure 1. Movements of Syrian Refugees (A) Refugee communities in those countries do not appear to be militarized; and (B) Host governments possess the capacity and willingness to prevent militarization of refugees. However, there are signs that the refugee population is at risk of becoming militant and that the young, marginalized refugee population may pose long -term challenges to their host countries. The longer the refugee crisis continues, the higher the likelihood that refugees in Jordan and Lebanon will engage in crossborder attacks with Syria, challenge host governments, and clash with local populations. Methodology To identify demographic changes resulting from refugee flows, we examined data from a variety of publicly-available sources, including reports from international organizations such as the UNHCR and the International Labour Organization (ILO), and Syria’s neighbors have borne the brunt of the refugee crisis, with Turkey taking in more than 2 million refugees, Lebanon accepting over a million, and Jordan taking in over 600,000. (Data source: UNHCR) 4 Overall Demographic Changes in Syria, Jordan and Lebanon The civil war in Syria has generated a population of 10.6 million displaced persons and refugees that is characterized by youth, poverty and low education. As a result of these population movements, people are now concentrated in camps and urban areas in northern and western Syria, eastern Lebanon and northern Jordan. In the following section, we detail the key changes in settlement patterns, age structure, and socioeconomic status in each country. These three factors are critical to assessing the potential implications of population movements on the countries of the Levant. Half of Syria’s Population is Displaced More than 50 percent of Syria’s population of 21.1 million has been displaced internally or fled the country as a result of the civil war that began in 2011. Since January 2014, there has been a steady growth in the number of refugees registering with UNHCR in neighboring countries. The most concentrated outflow of refugees occurred in December 2014, when 500,000 UNHCR-registered refugees fled the country.2 There are nearly twice as many internally displaced persons (IDPs) within Syria as there are refugees outside the country. This is significant because if fighting in Syria worsens or spreads, millions more Figure 2. Population of Syria Syrians may attempt to flee the country. Nearly all IDP camps are located near borders with Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon, further compounding this risk.3 Currently, four million of the total 6.5 million IDPs within Syria are located in three governorates – Aleppo, Damascus and Idlib – all of which border neighboring countries.4 The civil war has pushed millions of Syrians into poverty, which further catalyzes migration out of the country and increases suffering among those who remain. In 2014, more than 80 percent of people remaining in Syria were estimated to be living in poverty, and 65 percent were living in extreme poverty, unable to meet their basic needs.5 The Syrian Center for Policy Research estimates unemployment in Syria increased from 15 percent to 58 percent between 2011 and the end of 2014.6 Not only does this drive migration, it may also pose challenges for rebuilding the Syrian economy after the war. Displaced Syrians tend to be very young. Children under 18 make up more than half of the Syrian population, and this age structure is also reflected in the population of registered Syrian refugees in the Levant.7 This youthful age structure means that many displaced Syrians are children who are growing up in poverty and have limited access to education. If this situation continues, these refugee children may grow to feel marginalized within their host communities and underprepared to contribute to the rebuilding of Syria. Additionally, the Syrian population is younger than the populations of Lebanon and Jordan, meaning that the influx of Syrian refugees has made the populations of those countries more youthful. In Lebanon, refugees disrupt the transition to a more stable society Nearly half of Syria’s prewar population of 22 million people has been displaced by the war, either as refugees or Internally Displaced Persons (iDPs). (Data sources: UNHCR, World Bank) Lebanon has accepted the greatest number of refugees in proportion to its population. With over one million Syrian refugees now residing in Lebanon, one in five people in the country is a Syrian refugee.8 This influx of overwhelmingly young and impoverished refugees has increased competition for resources such as housing, but the biggest challenges are likely to come in the future if refugees remain in Lebanon longterm without the ability to work or integrate into Lebanese society. 5 Initially, Syrian refugees entering Lebanon settled in areas near the Syrian border, such as the Bekaa Valley. While Syrian refugees are predominantly Sunni, the areas in which they initially settled were largely Shia and Christian. As Syrians continued to arrive and border areas reached their absorption capacity, refugees began to move deeper into Lebanon, settling throughout the country’s Sunni, Shia and Christian communities.9 Today, the largest numbers of refugees in Lebanon are in Beirut, the Bekaa Valley and in the north near Tripoli. The relative youth of Syrian refugees compared to the native Lebanese population has fundamentally altered the age structure of Lebanon by lowering the median age of the population. Lebanon has been transitioning from a youthful to a more mature population age structure, which may have benefits for the stability of the country. The influx of young Syrian Figure 4: Total population of Lebanon, 2015 Approximately 1 in 5 people living in Lebanon today is a Syrian refugee. (Data sources: UNHCR, World Bank) refugees has disrupted this maturation process. If the refugees are not repatriated or resettled, Lebanon may take longer to complete the demographic transition to a more mature population. Figure 3: Syrian Refugee Populations in Lebanese Syrian refugees also tend to be poorer than Districts, October 2015 the native Lebanese population. Without sufficient humanitarian aid or the ability to work, refugees tend to adopt negative coping strategies like child labor and crime in order to survive economically. The UNHCR’s Lebanon Response Plan estimates that 37.5 percent of all Lebanese live below the poverty line.10 Meanwhile, the poverty rate of Syrian refugees is estimated at 70 percent, up from 50 percent in 2014.11 The most economically vulnerable refugee populations are in the Bekaa, Hermel, and Akkar districts.12 In Jordan, refugees settle in northern cities Refugees have settled throughout Lebanon, with the largest populations in the Bekaa Valley, Beirut, and northern Lebanon. (Data source: UNHCR) The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan has taken in fewer refugees than Lebanon – 630,176 registered refugees as of November 2015. Syrian refugees in Jordan are more likely to be separated from the Jordanian population by living in large refugee camps or poor urban areas.13 The flow of Syrian refugees into Jordan has increased Jordan’s population by at least 8 percent, a much smaller percentage than in Lebanon.14 The greatest influx of refugees into Jordan 6 now accepted nearly 60 percent of the refugee population.20 Figure 5: Population of Jordan Jordan also has several refugee camps, which serve 17.9 percent of the refugee population in the country. 21 The largest of these camps, Zaatari, was opened in 2012 and with nearly 80,000 inhabitants it has effectively become the fourth most populous city in Jordan.22 Syrian refugees and the native Jordanian population are both predominantly Sunni, so refugee settlement has not affected sectarian divisions in Jordan. Syrian refugees make up about eight percent of the population of Jordan. (Data sources: UNHCR, World Bank) occurred in 2013, when more than 300,000 refugees entered the country. The decline in the number of refugees entering the country in 2014 and 2015 is attributed to border restrictions implemented by the Jordanian government.15 As with the refugee population overall, more than half of Syrian refugees in Jordan are under the age of 18. The refugee population is younger than the native Jordanian population.23 This poses challenges for Jordan’s educational system, slows the country’s demographic transition, and means that more than 300,000 Syrian children are growing up in refugee camps and poor urban communities. In May 2015, the UNHCR found that 86 percent of Syrian refugees in Jordan were living below the In addition to registered refugees, Jordan’s government estimates that more than 600,000 unregistered Syrian migrants live Figure 6: Refugee settlement in Jordan in Jordan, bringing the total number of Syrians in Jordan to approximately 1.3 million.16 There is little data currently available about the population of unregistered refugees. However, in February 2016, the Jordanian government will release results of a nationwide census that officials have indicated will include data on all residents of the country, including refugees and other foreign nationals.17 The influx of refugees has placed the greatest stress on already poor areas in northern Jordan, where the majority of refugees have settled. Over 80 percent of Syrian refugees in Jordan have settled in cities, with Amman, Irbid, and Zarqa hosting the greatest numbers.18 Before the influx of refugees, the north of Jordan already contained 57 percent of the population living below the poverty line.19 Already suffering from high levels of poverty and vulnerability, the governorates of Amman, Irbid, Mafraq and Zarqa have The largest refugee populations in Jordan are in the country’s northernmost governorates. (Data source: UNHCR) 7 poverty line and 10 percent were living in extreme poverty, meaning they cannot meet basic needs.24 The poverty rate of Syrian refugees is significantly higher than that of the native Jordanian population; only 14.4 percent of Jordanians live below the poverty line.25 Refugees are not authorized to work in Jordan, so most are reliant on international assistance, savings, and work in the informal sector for income. Poverty among refugees in Jordan is not distributed evenly throughout settlement areas. Refugees living in northern Jordan are more likely to live in poverty, compared with those living in the center, south, or east of the country.26 Case Studies of Demographic Change in the Levant The following section explores how demographic changes are playing out on the ground in three subnational areas: the city of Aleppo in Syria, the town of Shebaa in Lebanon, and the Mafraq Governorate in Jordan. These localities showcase some of the potential challenges associated with the influx of refugees, while also demonstrating that refugees alone are not sufficient to cause the large-scale collapse of public order or ultimately threaten state stability. Aleppo, Syria: Accepted many IDPs, but did not collapse until attacked from the outside Aleppo, Syria’s commercial center and most populous city, was largely spared the violence that spread throughout the country in the early years of the civil war.27 In 2011 and 2012, the city of Aleppo, with a population of 2.1 million, absorbed an estimated 100,000 or more IDPs from other regions in Syria. This influx strained local resources and contributed to the rise of large informal settlements with poor access to basic sanitation and infrastructure.28 The increased burden of IDPs came after years of drought and disruption had already driven nearly half of Aleppo’s population into informal settlements.29 However, this population influx and the scarcity of resources to support IDPs did not spark conflict in the city. Aleppo’s robust business environment, significant Figure 7: Aleppo at night before and after the civil war spread to the city The civil war took over a year to reach Aleppo, despite the arrival of more than 100,000 IDPs. When fighting did come to Aleppo, the effects were devastating. (Image source: New York Times) police presence, and prominent clerics discouraging violence, worked to placate the city’s residents – including the largely Sunni merchant class – and maintained relative calm for over a year of fighting throughout the rest of the country.30 Even as fighting raged throughout the country, Aleppo itself did not see major violence in 2011 and much of 2012.31 Furthermore, fighting did not break out in Aleppo until the Free Syrian Army and al-Tawhid Battalion stormed the city in July and August 2012.32 According to one rebel commander who stormed the city: “We waited and waited for Aleppo to rise, and it didn't. We couldn't rely on them to do it for themselves so we had to bring the revolution to them.”33 “We waited and waited for Aleppo to rise, and it didn't. We couldn't rely on them to do it for themselves so we had to bring the revolution to them.” -Syrian rebel commander Today, Aleppo is scarcely recognizable as the commercial center it once was. Previously a refuge for many IDPs in the early days of the Syrian conflict, by 8 March 2013, more than one million Syrians had fled the Aleppo governorate itself, displaced by intense fighting between the Syrian government and Free Syrian Army that has damaged nearly a third of all structures in the city.34 Shebaa, Lebanon: Refugees cause resource shortages, but not conflict In Shebaa, Lebanon, a largely Sunni town in a region known for strong support of Hezbollah, violence between refugees and native Lebanese has been minimal despite an influx of Sunni refugees and increased strain on local services.35 Located in southeastern Lebanon, bordering Syria, Shebaa hosts nearly 3,000 registered Syrian refugees according to UNHCR, however local officials estimate the number to be as high as 4,500.36 Despite electricity, water, and housing shortages, the residents of Shebaa have largely refused to turn away refugees, most of whom are women and children, opting to shelter the Syrians in local schools, mosques, and private residences.37 Though some residents complain about declining wages, the mayor of Shebaa insists the town has a duty to take in those who might otherwise be killed in their home country.38 Residents of Shebaa - Shia, Sunni, and Druze alike - report that they are committed to preventing spillover from Syria, and they praise the Lebanese Army for enforcing border controls that prevent Syrian fighters from crossing into Lebanon with legitimate refugees.41 Pointing to the town’s military presence, careful monitoring of refugees, and the noninflammatory messaging of local preachers, residents insist the town remains secure despite intense clashes between rebel groups just across the border.40 Lebanon, with its delicate political balance, history of civil war, and the highest per capita rate of refugees in the world, has faced dire predictions of impending instability since the early days of the Syrian crisis. 41 Yet, violent clashes between refugees and citizens are rare, even in some of the country’s most vulnerable communities, such as Shebaa. As fighting in Syria moves beyond its fifth year, spillover to Lebanon remains localized and short-lived. This is not to say that Lebanon is politically stable. Though the recent bombings targeting Shia communities in Beirut prompted displays of unity from the city’s residents, continued infiltration of Lebanon by militants and attacks of a sectarian nature could undermine stability.42 Community policing in Zaatari has helped Jordanian police have more frequent positive interactions with refugees. Mafraq, Jordan: Security forces and community policing quell violence Located north of Amman, the population of the Mafraq governorate in Jordan has doubled as a result of hosting Zaatari, the country’s largest refugee camp. While Mafraq illustrates some of the challenges associated with a burgeoning youth population, the area is another example of relative stability in the face of large refugee flows. Mafraq has received 154,744 Syrian refugees since the beginning of the conflict, two-thirds of whom live below the poverty line.43 Refugees in Mafraq experience the highest levels of vulnerability among refugees in Jordan, as they lack basic needs and frequently resort to the use of emergency coping strategies to secure income.44 Despite harsh living conditions and aid shortfalls, Jordanian security forces have been able to quell violence within Mafraq’s refugee communities – such as the Zaatari camp – relatively quickly. In April 2014, riots and clashes with police resulted in the death of a single refugee, before calm was restored within days. 45 Learning from incidents such as the April riots, Jordanian authorities have stepped up patrols, implemented new community policing initiatives with the help of UK advisors, and launched investigations into those responsible for inciting the violence.46 Early indications from the community policing initiatives have been positive, as residents have become more comfortable reporting crimes to the authorities, and the 9 Jordanian police have increased their interactions with the refugee population.47 positive While the situation in Mafraq appears to pose little threat to Jordan’s stability in the short term, the Zaatari camp also illustrates the potentially destabilizing effects on Jordan’s demographics in the coming years. Thirty-five percent of the Syrian refugee population in Jordan is between 5 and 17 years of age, and the Jordanian school system is already overcrowded and overstretched.48 Even as Jordanian schools implement a double-shift system, one in three children in the Zaatari camp do not attend school.49 This severe underenrollment has led aid agencies and officials to warn of a “lost generation” of refugee children. Without quality education for these children, the long-term economic and social stability of individuals, families, and communities may be at risk.50 The effect on Jordan, should these refugees fail to return to Syria, could be destabilizing, straining social services and exacerbating the “youth bulge,” discussed in detail below. When Do Refugees Cause Violent Conflict in Their Host Countries? Syrian refugees have not yet destabilized Lebanon and Jordan, but there is concern that they might do so in the future. To assess this issue, we looked at past refugee crises to identify the circumstances in which refugees might cause conflict in their host countries. Although the vast majority of individual refugees are innocent victims of conflict, studies have shown that refugee flows are statistically significant contributors to the eruption of civil wars in host countries.51 One key way that refugee flows can create conflict is by facilitating the spread of rebel networks from a neighboring civil war – a scenario that is of great concern in the Syrian case.52 The spread of rebel networks through refugee flows occurs when combatants flee a civil war as part of a group of refugees, or when civilians mobilize politically and militarily after arriving as refugees in their host country. When refugees are politically mobilized and armed – either from the start or over time – they may use refugee camps and communities as bases for political and military activity.53 Most frequently, these “refugee-warriors” launch cross-border attacks against their home country, but they can also challenge host country authorities or clash with local populations.54 Either activity threatens to destabilize the countries in which refugees find sanctuary. Examples of refugees provoking conflict spillover include the Hutu refugees in Zaire in the mid-1990s and the Palestinian refugees in Jordan in the late 1960s. In both cases, militant leaders among the refugees used the sanctuary of their host country to re-engage in the conflict in their home country. In 1994, following the genocide in Rwanda and the takeover of the Rwandan government by a Tutsi force, Hutu refugees fled to refugee camps in Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of Congo). Some of these refugees had been leaders of the former government and the militias that organized the genocide, and they used the refugee camps as bases to launch cross-border attacks against Rwanda. Retaliation by the Rwandan government against the camps escalated to war between Rwanda and Zaire.55 In another example, a group of highly politicized Palestinian refugees operating through the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) challenged the authority of the Jordanian government in 1970. In defiance of the orders of King Hussein, the PLO launched cross-border attacks against Israel, formed police forces, collected taxes in refugee camps, hijacked airplanes and landed them in Jordanian territory, and even tried to kill the King himself. The subsequent crackdown by the Jordanian government, known as Black September, led to the deaths of an estimated 1,000 people.56 While it is possible for refugee flows to cause conflict spillover in host states, it is not inevitable. Three factors affect the likelihood of refugee-related conflict: 1.The cause of the refugees’ flight; 2.The response of the receiving country; 3.The ability of militants to control aid intended for refugees.57 The likelihood that refugees will engage in militant activity depends in part on their reasons for fleeing their home country.58 Whether refugees are situational, persecuted, or state-in-exile determines their “political cohesion” and readiness to militarize.59 These can be broken down into three general types: 10 Situational refugees are the least likely to become violent: they flee their homes to escape the general chaos of war and they want to return home as soon as fighting ends. Many Syrians fit the profile of situational refugees. was the case with Zaire and the Hutu refugees who attacked Rwanda.63 In contrast, Tanzania also took in Hutu refugees in 1994 but was willing and able to manage security in the camps so that they did not serve as safe havens for combatants.64 Persecuted refugees flee because parties to the civil war directly target them, whether for ethnic, political, or other reasons. The experience of persecution can motivate these refugees to organize themselves in pursuit of political goals like retribution against their persecutors or political rights in their host country. This political mobilization, which is more likely to occur the longer a refugee crisis lasts, may increase the chances that refugees will attack their home state or challenge their host government.60 State-in-exile refugees have the highest propensity for violence. State-in-exile refugees flee due to defeat in war, and they seek the sanctuary of a neighboring country in order to plan their re-engagement in the civil war.61 The Hutu refugees fleeing Rwanda after the genocide fit this profile, as many were military and political leaders who sought to recapture their country from the Tutsi forces that had stopped the genocide and taken over the government. Finally, the approach to providing humanitarian aid can affect whether militant groups are able to take advantage of refugee camps as sanctuaries. From the perspective of militants, one of the key benefits of refugee camps is the access they provide to the food, housing, and money provided by international aid agencies. Collecting these resources frees militants from having to provide these goods for themselves and their families. As refugees become politically and militarily mobilized, leaders sometimes attempt to divert humanitarian aid through “taxes” on other refugees or other interference with the distribution of aid in camps in order to fund militant activities. The policies of aid organizations on who receives aid, and how it is distributed, affect whether militants can take advantage of these resources.65 The policies of the refugee-receiving country also affect whether refugees become militarized and generate violent conflict. A host government must be both capable and willing to prevent combatants from infiltrating refugee camps.62 Capability is a function of the intelligence, technology, personnel, and political will of the host government. Weak states may simply be unable to identify and separate militants from civilians within the refugee population, allowing militants to exploit refugee camps as bases for crossborder attacks, recruitment, and stealing of humanitarian aid. More commonly, the host government is unwilling to maintain the civilian character of refugee camps because the government tacitly or overtly supports one side in the neighboring civil war. For example, if a host country government is a rival of the sending country government, the host government may encourage refugees to use camps as sanctuaries for fighters. This Political mobilization, which is more likely to occur the longer a refugee crisis lasts, may increase the chances that refugees will attack their home state or host government. Malawi is an example of a country that successfully managed an enormous influx of refugees when observers worried the nation would be unable to cope.66 In the late 1980s, Malawi took in approximately one million refugees fleeing the civil war in Mozambique. With refugees making up nearly 10 percent of its already struggling population, Malawi initially struggled to provide for the refugees. However, in cooperation with the UNHCR and the World Food Program, Malawi focused on integrating 11 refugees into local communities by providing refugees with access to land and employment.67 When the civil war in Mozambique ended, the refugees returned home. Malawi had several key factors in its favor for preventing the spread of conflict: the refugees fled their homes for situational reasons, and sought to return as soon as it was peaceful; Malawi’s government was highly motivated to prevent the civil war in Mozambique from spreading into its borders; and extensive cooperation with international partners enabled Malawi to manage the provision of aid in a way that did not support militants.68 A youthful, marginalized refugee population may present long-term challenges In addition to facilitating the spread of rebel networks, refugee flows may cause changes in birth, death, and migration rates in host countries that can have destabilizing effects over the next 10-15 years. The “youth bulge” thesis, developed over the past four decades through the successive efforts of political demographers, asserts that states with youthful age structures face an elevated risk of experiencing armed intrastate conflict and other types of political violence.69 According to a 2007 report by Population Action International, 80 percent of civil conflicts between 1970 and the end of the millennium took place in nations where more than half of the population had not reached the age of 30.70 Today, there are 67 countries worldwide that have youth bulges, or youthful age structures, and 60 of these are experiencing social unrest and violence with at least 25 battle deaths per year.71 For a modern state, a median age of 25 years appears as a milestone. When the median age rises above 25 and the youth population begins to shrink, the incidence of civil conflict declines measurably, and the chance of being a stable, liberal democracy increases markedly.72 If, however, a country’s youth population increases in size, the quantity of available job prospects, resources and opportunity for social mobility fall. This may lead to social discontent, followed by unrest. In turn, this gives governments the excuse to implement campaigns of oppression – and the cycle continues.73 Further, this theory argues that societies with rapidly growing youth populations often develop rampant unemployment and large pools of disaffected youths who are more susceptible to recruitment into rebel or extremist groups. This process may be exacerbated in countries with weak political institutions, which are the most vulnerable to youth-bulge-related violence and social unrest. 74 “...if young people are left with no alternative but unemployment and poverty, they are increasingly likely to join a rebellion as an alternative way of generating an income.” - Henrik Urdal, demographer While youth bulges are an important demographic indicator, it is important to note that they do not alone cause civil conflict or violence. The key variable is a lack of societal integration of the youth population. As demographer Henrik Urdal puts it, “if young people are left with no alternative but unemployment and poverty, they are increasingly likely to join a rebellion as an alternative way of generating an income.” 75 Studies have shown a direct relationship between cohort size and unemployment: large youth cohorts are associated with an increase in youth unemployment rates. These studies have also shown that youths belonging to larger cohorts generally have lower opportunity costs relative to those born into smaller cohorts.76 High unemployment, a mismatch of jobs and skills, and political insecurity have made it difficult for youth to stimulate economic growth and makes the youth bulge a net drain on resources rather than a bonus to economic and social development.77 Richard Cincotta, a political demographer with the Stimson Center, has conducted extensive research on 12 youth bulge theory and, in particular, has refined the theory to represent a demographic arrangement known as “persistent minority youth bulge.” In coining this term, Cincotta refers to “a rapidly growing, agestructurally youthful minority that is politically dissonant and regionally or residentially segregated within a more mature country-level population.”78 Cincotta concludes that in youthful, economically depressed, politically embittered geographic corners of otherwise developed states, conflicts involving a youthful minority can grind on for decades, extracting debilitating political, social, and economic costs.79 This is concerning because it is precisely what is occurring in Jordan and Lebanon. Young Syrian refugees are entering these countries where they are minorities, segregated, unable to work, living in impoverished conditions, and rapidly changing the age structure of their host nations. Unless Syrian refugees are properly integrated into Lebanese and Jordanian society, there is a risk of a persistent minority youth bulge with the repercussions Cincotta predicts. Figure 8: Syrian Population Pyramid, 2014 The age structure of the Syrian population shows a significant youth bulge. (Image source: CIA World Factbook) Figure 9: Lebanese Population Pyramid, 2014 The silver lining of the youth bulge A youthful age structure does not necessarily have only negative repercussions. Countries with aging populations, including Lebanon, could reap long-term benefits from the refugee influx, as it has the potential to renew the supply of young workers on whom these countries’ economies depend. In fact, many European countries are experiencing a youth-drain situation; Italy, Greece, Germany, Portugal, Finland and Bulgaria are countries where at least 20 percent of the population is age 65 or older.80 Coping with rising numbers of dependents and concomitant declines in the working-age population is already posing considerable social, economic and political challenges in these countries, and likely will do so in other societies as they age, including the U.S., where 14.8 percent of the population now is 65 or older.81 If given the opportunity to work and integrate into society, refugees could bring tangible benefits to their host countries. Lebanon’s age structure has been maturing and the youth population has been shrinking. (Image source: CIA World Factbook) Figure 10: Jordanian Population Pyramid, 2014 The population age structure in Jordan is skewed younger than that of Lebanon. (Image source: CIA World Factbook) 13 Risk Factors for Refugee-related Conflict in Lebanon and Jordan As previously discussed, the likelihood that refugee flows will lead to violence in the host country in the short-term is low, based on the characteristics of the refugee population and the policies of the receiving state. In the next 10-15 years, refugees may change the age structure of a country to make it more youthful. If the refugee crisis persists and refugees are not integrated, countries may experience civil unrest and violence. In the following section, we discuss risk factors for conflict and assess the extent to which they are present in Lebanon and Jordan. We identify three risk factors that may indicate impending conflict stemming from refugee flows: 1. Militarization of Syrian refugees; 2. Lack of capability or willingness by the Lebanese and Jordanian governments to prevent refugee militarization; 3. A persistent population of young, marginalized Syrian refugees. Risk factor #1: Militarization of refugees When refugees take up arms, they can cause conflict in both their host country and their country of origin. Based on past refugee crises, we identify three indicators to determine whether Syrian refugees are mobilizing militarily and politically in ways that could lead to cross-border attacks or host country conflict. First, the presence of militant leadership in refugee communities may to lead to refugee camps being used as staging grounds for violence. Militant leaders can control the information that reaches the refugees and the distribution of humanitarian aid. This may cause other refugees to mobilize because they believe their safety is in jeopardy.82 Furthermore, when militants lead refugee camps, they are likely to allow rebel groups from the home country to operate in the refugee camps and communities.83 As the militant group’s base of operations expands in the refugee camps, the local population may also aid or be compelled to aid the militants. This can lead to a second important indicator of militarization: military recruitment in refugee camps. Syrian refugees who are dependent on foreign assistance have very few productive alternatives to joining rebel organizations, which may offer vulnerable young people an income and a sense of purpose.84 Persistent recruitment in refugee camps by Syrian rebel groups may lead to the spread of conflict. Third, militant infiltration of refugee communities can serve to support a war economy, relieve combatants of the need to secure food and resources in other ways, and compel refugees to join the militant group that controls their aid. Approaches to capturing aid money and food include stealing it at the source, controlling the distribution of aid, and levying taxes on refugee populations. If militant groups are found to be intercepting aid intended for refugees, it may provoke and prolong conflict. The presence of militant leadership in refugee communities may lead to refugee camps being used as staging grounds for violence. Using these three indicators of militarization, we can assess the current situation in Jordan and Lebanon to determine the plausibility that refugees will take up arms. In Jordan, the Zaatari refugee camp operates under the formal authority of the Jordanian government and the UNHCR. The camp has an informal leadership structure consisting of street leaders, district leaders, and imams. We find little evidence that combatants in the civil war are controlling the camp. Operating with informal authority in the localities they occupy, the Zaatari street leaders closely coordinate with the more formal authorities of the UNHCR, which manages relief operations in the camp, and with the Jordanian security forces. While these community leaders fill a vital role in managing day-to-day life within the refugee camp and providing a source of information for relief and security organizations, their power within the 14 camp is checked by the more formal authorities of the UNHCR and, most importantly, the Jordanian security forces.85 The continued authority of these organizations reduces the risk of militant leadership taking control. Syrian refugees are overwhelmingly Sunni, a group that has been the backbone of the Syrian rebellion, and most refugees fled from rebel-dominated areas bearing the brunt of the Syrian military’s crackdown on the uprising.86 However, refugee recruitment in camps does not appear to be a major problem. In 2012 and 2013, there were reports that the Free Syrian Army (FSA) recruited dozens of refugees in Jordan’s camps.87 After 2013, however, we find few, if any, credible reports of widespread recruitment in Jordan’s refugee camps. Community leaders fill a vital role in managing day -to-day life in the refugee camps, but their power is checked by the more formal authorities of the UNHCR and the Jordanian security forces. Perhaps most importantly, there has been little indication of infiltration by extremist groups such as ISIS and Jabhat al-Nusra.88 Jordan has been careful not to take a hard stance for or against the Assad regime and the government has sought to avoid militarization of rebel groups within its borders because of the internal security risk.89 Jordan has also increased border security to prevent militants entering Jordan disguised as refugees. Jordanian commanders report that would-be entrants are carefully screened and suspected militants detained or denied access.90 Lebanon may be at greater risk than Jordan of refugee-related violence due to its weaker security forces and the presence of Syrian rebel groups in border areas. The situation in the Baalbak town of Arsal, on the border with Syria, illustrates this danger. ISIS and Jabhat al-Nusra are active near Arsal and have carried out bombings and attacks, most notably in August 2014 when Islamist groups killed three and captured more than two dozen members of the Lebanese security forces.91 Arsal is host to almost 100,000 Syrian refugees, and Lebanese security forces have conducted frequent raids looking for militants hidden among the refugees.92 There have been scattered reports of Syrian refugees aligning with groups like ISIS and Jabhat alNusra. In one case, local news media reported that Syrian refugees raised an ISIS flag in front of the municipal building in Arsal in protest of a crackdown on refugees by the Lebanese army.93 Other reports indicated that this may have been done in protest after the army burned down a refugee camp. The credibility of these reports and the extent of the problem is difficult to ascertain with publicly-available sources, but this case highlights the danger that grievances against the Lebanese government may spur refugees to align with militant groups.94 Terrorist attacks and instances of conflict spillover in Lebanon are not necessarily attributable to the presence of refugees. Politics in Syria and Lebanon have long been intimately connected, and Syrian rebel groups view Lebanon as a target independent of the refugee situation. While some Syrian refugees in Lebanon may be involved with militant groups, there is little, if any, indication of widespread militarization of refugees.95 Risk factor #2: Capability of host governments to prevent militarization Jordanian and Lebanese security forces have the military capacity to conduct effective counterinsurgency and policing operations. These activities have helped mitigate any emerging militant activity in refugee communities. As long as Lebanese and Jordanian security forces continue to demonstrate capacity to conduct effective counterterrorism and policing of refugees without resorting to indiscriminate, lethal violence against civilians, refugees are not likely to cause violent conflict. 15 Under direct control of the King, Jordan’s military, known as the Jordanian Armed Forces (JAF), is among the most professional in the region. While small compared to other regional militaries, JAF benefits from high levels of defense spending relative to GDP, and strong relations with their US and UK counterparts, who help with training. The responsibilities of Jordan’s military forces, including its well-trained air force and special operations crews, include border and internal security. These forces are more than capable of combat and assisting in international expeditionary missions. Further, Jordan has developed a highly sophisticated Special Forces training center, which has enhanced its 14,000-member Special Forces division.96 In addition to the JAF, the Kingdom also boasts an excellent intelligence service, the General Intelligence Directorate (GID). The agency is known for its exceptional collection capabilities, and it has a strong history of success against top al-Qaeda and the Islamic State leaders within Iraq. Moreover, GID also has close ties to many Sunni groups throughout the region, which proved successful at weeding out key al-Qaeda members, and is currently a critical player in efforts to defeat the Islamic State.97 On the other hand, the Lebanese Armed Forces’ (LAF) main role has been the containment and mitigation of localized violence within Lebanon. Moreover, it has also served as a mediator between warring groups in the region. Despite such efforts, Lebanon continues to experience periodic terrorist attacks. For example, in November 2013, an “al-Qaeda -inspired” militant group carried out a bombing of the Iranian embassy in Beirut, which killed 25 people. 98 Two years later, on November 12, 2015, Beirut was struck by a pair of suicide bombings that killed 41, with another 200 people wounded in a Hezbollahcontrolled area.99 It is important to note that the Syrian civil war has had political and security implications for Lebanon beyond the refugee influx. The existence of terrorist attacks in Lebanon should not necessarily be considered a result of refugee movements unless those attacks can be traced to refugee communities. In September 2013, Lebanon began implementing a five-year plan to modernize LAF’s capabilities and draw up a strategy to determine force requirements, including the potential incorporation of Hezbollah into the LAF.100 This shift in policy is a result of the fragility of the LAF, which has frequently relied on Hezbollah to help address security issues in Lebanon. The ability of security forces to undertake targeted, measured, and effective actions that do not escalate tensions is just as important as sheer power. In an effort to crack down on violence within the country, the LAF undertook a series of security measures (as yet undisclosed) throughout the country during the month of October 2015. According to a press release from Lebanon’s Ministry of Defense’s on November 10, 2015, these new security measures led to the arrest of over 1,000 individuals involved in terrorist operations, assaulting citizens using lethal force, and narcotics trafficking.101 The LAF has also erected monitoring towers in sensitive areas along the Lebanese-Syrian border.102 According to Basem Shabb, a member of the Lebanese parliamentary Committee for National Defense and Interior, the LAF’s elite units, most notably the rangers, commandos and navy seals, “were specifically trained in urban warfare and in confronting irregular forces and counterinsurgency.”103 In an effort to strengthen its capacity, the LAF has accepted $5 billion worth of military aid from the US and Saudi Arabia over the past eight years. This has resulted in a sizable increase in the firepower of the LAF, which has doubled its arsenal of M198 howitzer guns. These guns, in conjunction with M-60A3 and M48A5 armored tanks, have contributed to the LAF’s efforts to suppress insurgency with “continuous and accurate firepower.”104 Equally important, Lebanon’s recent receipt of Cessna aircraft from the US has provided the LAF with advanced surveillance and reconnaissance abilities.105 Saudi Arabia most recently funded the 16 purchase of $3 billion worth of French weapons and military equipment to bolster the LAF’s capabilities.106 While the military aid bolsters the LAF’s capabilities to be an adequate security force, military capacity cannot be assessed solely in terms of troop numbers and military material. As the Syrian civil war demonstrates, the ability of security forces to undertake targeted, measured, and effective actions that do not escalate tensions is just as important as sheer power. For example, before the war, the Syrian military enjoyed a reputation as a relatively competent and professional security force.107 However, the security forces were ineffective in containing conflict because they could not consistently and accurately distinguish between adversaries and civilians. The military used indiscriminate violence to quash early revolts, sparking uprisings and army defections that became the core of the opposition to the Assad regime. In early 2011, regime forces arrested and reportedly tortured 14 or 15 school children, prompting a demonstration on March 18, in which security forces opened fire and killed four people.108 Regime forces further targeted innocent civilians by open firing at people attending the funeral of those killed during the demonstration.109 The regime again fired upon protesters in Dara’a on March 20 and March 25, and killed even more civilians during a raid on a hospital on March 22.110 According to the Congressional Research Service, “violent government response to an isolated incident in the southern town of Dara’a in March provided a decisive spark for the emergence of protest movements.”111 The first official opposition group, the Free Syrian Army, was spearheaded by Syrian army defectors and local militiamen disgusted by the actions of government forces.112 The Syrian case study demonstrates that brutal and indiscriminate action against restive populations can contribute to the eruption of widespread violence. Risk factor #3: Long-term marginalization of young refugees Because Syrian refugees are making the populations of Jordan and Lebanon younger, these countries are at risk for future political instability if the Syrian refugees are not repatriated, relocated, or integrated. For a modern state, a median age of 25 years appears as a milestone; around that timeframe, the incidence of civil conflict declines dramatically, and the chance of being a stable, liberal democracy increases markedly.113 The current median age of the Lebanese population is 29.4 years, excluding the influx of Syrian refugees, while the current median age of Syrians is 20.8 and 22.5 for Jordanians.114 This concern is relevant for Lebanon and Jordan because the Syrian refugee population tends to be younger than the native population. If the crisis continues and refugees are not repatriated or integrated, Syrian refugees could constitute a rapidly growing youthful minority that is politically marginalized and regionally or residentially segregated within an older host country population.115 Prior to the Syrian civil war and resulting refugee influx, Lebanon’s population was headed towards maturation, which promised increased prospects for internal security and stability. However, with the enormous influxes of displaced youth, the country instead faces an enormous population of foreign children who, as they progress to teenagers and young adults, will create a youth bulge that is likely to pose serious threats to Lebanon’s security and stability. For a modern state, a median age of 25 years appears as a milestone; around that timeframe, the incidence of civil conflict declines dramatically. Similarly, Jordan is experiencing a massive influx of child refugees into its predominantly young population. In 2025, the median age of Jordan is expected to be roughly 24.9 years old. This indicates that Jordan may have more time before a youth bulge poses a threat to its internal political stability. However, as the median age of the population moves closer to 25, there is greater risk of this occurring. It is important to recognize that all of the risk factors are present for this youth bulge to become a legitimate 17 problem for Jordan in the future, if refugees are not resettled or integrated into society. If the refugee-driven youth bulge persists, Syrian refugees could be at the center of a “demographic security dilemma.” This dilemma is a situation in which a state (such as Lebanon or Jordan) “permits or promotes the political, economic, and social marginalization of an ethno-religious minority.”116 Syrian refugees could fit the profile of this ethnoreligious minority. Under conditions of being denied education, economic opportunity, and social services, ethno-religious minorities are likely to have higher fertility rates than the more privileged majority. 117 This can be because the oppressed minority group retains more traditional gender relationships and because they are confined to low-income urban neighborhoods and neglected rural regions.118 Without proactive policies to bring youthful communities into the economic, social, and political mainstream, we see many turn towards radical and traditionalist religious political organizations. Thus the demographic security dilemma: the more states marginalize a minority group, the more those youthful minorities tend to grow as a proportion of the state’s population. In turn, the growth in the minority population further exacerbates the circumstances for political discontent and revolution.119 Syrian refugees could be at the center of a “demographic security dilemma.” This has ramifications for the Middle East, especially in Jordan and Lebanon, which have taken in large refugee populations that are younger than their native populations. If young refugees are not repatriated or integrated and are instead marginalized within their host countries, Jordan and Lebanon may experience an elevated risk of the demographic security dilemma and other civil conflict. Figure 11: Risk assessment framework for population age structure Countries like Jordan and Lebanon that have intermediate and maturing majority populations but young minority populations run a higher risk of experiencing a demographic security dilemma and eventual ethnoreligious conflict (Image source: Richard Cincotta, “Minority Youth Bulges and the Future of Intrastate Conflict.”) 18 Conclusions The influx of Syrian refugees into Lebanon and Jordan creates a fragile situation in both countries, but the refugees themselves are not yet provoking conflict in their host countries. The key reasons for this are that the Syrian refugees are not militant and that the host governments possess the capability and willingness to prevent refugees from taking up arms. However, the risk that Syrian refugees will spark conflict in Lebanon and Jordan increases if the refugees begin to mobilize militarily and politically. Risk factors to look for include: a pattern of refugee participation in cross-border attacks or attacks within the host countries, militant leaders taking control of refugee camps and communities, and degraded capacity of Lebanese and Jordanian security forces. In the medium- to long-term, the young age structure of the refugee population worsens the youth bulge phenomenon in Lebanon and Jordan, threatening to create a large population of marginalized young people who may spark conflict. As a key partner, the United States can support Lebanon and Jordan in successfully managing the refugee crisis in several ways: First, it is important to maintain the civilian character of refugee camps and communities. The U.S. can support Lebanon and Jordan by ensuring that their security forces continue to receive the hardware needed to maintain their military capacity. In conjunction, the U.S. can provide training programs to increase effectiveness and professionalism. Sustaining or increasing military aid and training programs may be critical for building Jordanian and Lebanese military capacity. The ability to identify militant activity and flows of weapons into refugee communities can lead to early identification of militant activity, which will be critical to mounting an effective response. Second, the U.S. should support Lebanon and Jordan in planning for the eventual integration of refugees who are not able to return to Syria. Even if the civil war ends and many refugees return home, the level of destruction and destitution in Syria means that thousands of Syrians will inevitably stay in Lebanon and Jordan. Enabling these refugees to integrate economically and socially into their communities through education, employment, and access to social services can limit the refugees’ sense of marginalization. This can circumvent the dangerous potential of the youth bulge. In this regard, the U.S. can support Lebanon and Jordan by funding development and social cohesion projects that benefit both refugees and native communities, encouraging government planning for refugee integration, and promoting employment opportunities for refugees. For example, corporate partnerships could allow private companies to work with host countries to establish job placement schemes, which allow refugees to secure work. This in turn allows the refugees to legally contribute to the economy of their host country, thereby elevating their status as valued members of society, and enhancing their relationship with the local population.120 In the meantime, the U.S. should support adequate funding for the UNHCR, World Food Programme, and other organizations tasked with providing aid to refugees. If refugees feel marginalized and unable to meet their basic needs, they may perceive a lower threshold for taking up arms and engaging in the civil war. Recommendations Support security forces to maintain the civilian character of refugee camps and communities Encourage host governments to integrate refugees by offering opportunities for employment and education Fund economic development and social cohesion projects Maintain adequate funding for refugee aid organizations Increase options for resettlement of refugees Achieve a peaceful resolution to the Syrian civil war 19 Third, the resettlement of Syrian refugees in other countries can lessen the burden on Syria’s neighbors. The U.S. can contribute by increasing and expediting its refugee acceptance program. Other countries, including in Europe, should also be encouraged and supported in accepting additional refugees to provide relief for Lebanon and Jordan. In fact, countries with aging populations can actually benefit from the injection of youthful refugee populations into their workforces. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the U.S. should continue to seek a peaceful resolution to the Syrian Civil War. Only an end to the war will enable the large-scale repatriation of refugees and dramatically reduce the burden on Lebanon and Jordan. Although some refugees will stay on after the war, the vast majority can be expected to return home. 20 Notes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. “Syria Regional Refugee Response: Interagency Information Sharing Portal,” UNHCR, accessed November 17, 2015, http://data.unhcr.org/syrianrefugees/ regional.php#_ga=1.182256495.91437624.1441377489. Ibid. “Syria: Conflict Without Borders. Number and Location of Refugees and IDPs,” Humanitarian Information Unit, Department of State, August 27, 2015, https://hiu.state.gov/ Products/ Syria_ConflictWithoutBorders_Displacement_2015Aug27 _HIU_U1283.pdf. “Syrian Arab Republic: Humanitarian Snapshot (as of 30 November 2015),” ReliefWeb, November 30, 2015, http:// reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/ syr_humsnap_a4l_november2015.pdf . “Alienation and Violence: Impact of Syria Crisis Report 2014,” Syrian Center for Policy Research, March 2015, 46. Ibid. “Syria Regional Refugee Response.” Michael Pizzi, “In Syria’s War Refugees, Lebanon Sees Echoes of Palestinian Crisis,” Al Jazeera, January 6, 2015, http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/1/6/lebanonsyria-refugees.html and Rana Ksaifi, “SYRIA REFUGEE RESPONSE: LEBANON Syrian Refugees Registered,” UNHCR, September 30, 2015. “Syrian refugees head to Lebanon’s Shia south,” IRIN, January 29, 2013, http://www.irinnews.org/report/97355/ syrian-refugees-head-to-lebanon-s-shia-south. “Lebanon Crisis Response Plan 2015-2016,” UNOCHA, December 15, 2014, http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/ files/resources/2015-2016_Lebanon_CRP_EN.pdf. “Greater support in countries of first asylum needed to stem refugee outflows,” UNHCR, August 26, 2015, www.unhcr.org/55ddd2c86.html. Ibid. “Registered Syrians in Jordan: External Statistical Report ,” UNHCR, October 31, 2015, http://data.unhcr.org/ syrianrefugees/download.php?id=9702. Doris Carrion, “Syrian Refugees in Jordan: Confronting Difficult Truths,” Chatham House, September 2015, https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/ field/ field_document/20150921SyrianRefugeesCarrion.pdf. Luigi Achilli, “Syrian Refugees in Jordan: a Reality Check,” Migration Policy Centre, February 2015, http:// cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/34904/MPC_201502_PB.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. “For Many Syrians in Lebanon and Jordan, Now is the Time to Go,” Washington Post, 21 September 2015, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/for-many-syriansin-lebanon-and-jordan-now-is-the-time-togo/2015/09/21/513dfc9a-5d4a-11e5-8475781cc9851652_story.html “Census includes all people on Jordanian soil, PM,” Jordan News Agency, 28 November 2015. http://petranews.gov.jo/ nepras/2015/Nov/28/9000.htm 18. “Registered Syrians in Jordan: External Statistical Report,” UNHCR, November 15, 2015, http://data.unhcr.org/ syrianrefugees/download.php?id=9792. 19. Omar Dahi, “The Refugee Crisis in Lebanon and Jordan: The Need for Economic Development Spending,” Forced Migration Review, September 2014, http:// www.fmreview.org/syria/dahi#sthash.ID04cywZ.dpuf. 20. Ibid. 21. “Registered Syrians in Jordan.” 22. Phoebe Weston, “Inside Zaatari refugee camp: the fourth largest city in Jordan,” The Telegraph, August 5, 2015., http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/ jordan/11782770/What-is-life-like-inside-the-largestSyrian-refugee-camp-Zaatari-in-Jordan.html. 23. “Registered Syrians in Jordan.” 24. “Jordan Refugee Response: Vulnerability Assessment Framework Baseline Survey,” UNHCR, May 2015, 14, http://www.medbox.org/jordan-refugee-responsevulnerability-assessment-framework-baseline-survey-may2015/download.pdf. 25. “Jordan Poverty Reduction Strategy: Final Report,” UNDP, January 28 2013, 31, http://www.jo.undp.org/ content/dam/jordan/docs/Poverty/ Jordanpovertyreductionstrategy.pdf 26. “Jordan Refugee Response,” 15. 27. Khaled Yacoub Oweis, “Uprising Finally Hits Syria’s ‘Silk Road’ City,” Reuters, February 4, 2012, http:// www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/04/us-syria-aleppoidUSTRE81213720120204. 28. “ALEPPO - Governorate Profile,” ACAPS, March 2013, 1, http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/ Aleppo%20Governorate%20profile%20March% 202013.pdf and “Syria Crisis – Aleppo City Report,” REACH, June 2014, 4, http://www.reach-initiative.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/06/Aleppo-City-Key-InformantsAssessment-Syria-Crisis.pdf. 29. “ALEPPO - Governorate Profile,” 8. 30. Oweis,“Uprising Finally Hits Syria’s ‘Silk Road’ City.” 31. “Security forces storm Syrian city of Aleppo, activist group says,” CNN, September 27, 2011, http:// www.cnn.com/2011/09/27/world/meast/syria-unrest/ and Erika Solomon, “Pro-Assad Gun, Knife Attack Kills Four Protestors,” Reuters, May 3, 2012, http://www.reuters.com/ article/2012/05/03/us-syria-protestidUSBRE8420E820120503#4W3eFqOcmh1e7oc2.97. 32. Luke Harding and Martin Churov, “Syrian Rebels Fight Assad Troops in Aleppo,” The Guardian, July 22, 2011, Accessed October 27, 2015, http://www.theguardian.com/ world/2012/jul/22/syrian-rebels-fight-aleppo. 33. Erika Solomon, “Rural Fighters Pour into Syria's Aleppo for Battle,” Reuters, July 29, 2012, Accessed October 27, 2015, http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/29/us-syriacrisis-aleppo-idUSBRE86S06T20120729. 34. “ALEPPO - Governorate Profile,” ACAPS, March 2013, 14. 35. Mohamed Zaatari, “Hezbollah prepares for Liberation Day 21 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. ceremony in Nabatieh,” The Daily Star, May 23, 2015, http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Lebanon-News/2015/ May-23/299092-hezbollah-prepares-for-liberation-dayceremony-in-nabatieh.ashx and Nour Samaha, “The Strange Case of Lebanon’s Shebaa,” Al-Jazeera English, July 2, 2013, http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/ features/2013/07/20137218585519150.html. Rana Ksaifi, “Syria Refugee Response: Lebanon Syrian Refugees Registered,” UNHCR, February 28, 2015, http:// data.unhcr.org/syrianrefugees/download.php?id=9602 and Samya Kullab and Ghinwa Obeidi, “Shebaa, the Town Caught in the Middle,” The Daily Star, February 27, 2015, http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Lebanon-News/2015/ Feb-27/288953-shebaa-the-town-caught-in-themiddle.ashx. Scott Simon, “Places Transformed: Syrian Refugees Overwhelm Camps, Towns,” NPR, May 4, 2013, http:// www.npr.org/2013/05/04/181053781/a-place-transformedthe-birth-of-a-jordanian-refugee-camp and Samaha, “The Strange Case of Lebanon’s Shebaa.” Simon, “Places Transformed.” Mohamed Zaatari, “Shebaa Residents Back Syrian Rebel Ban,” The Daily Star, November 10, 2014. Ibid. David Schenker, “Why Refugee Influx Threatens Lebanon, Jordan Stability,” The Washington Institute, April 10, 2014, Accessed October 10, 2015, http:// www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/whyrefugee-influx-threatens-lebanon-jordan-stability and “Syrian Refugee Crisis Threatens Lebanon’s Stability: Report,” The Daily Star, June 5, 2012, http:// www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Politics/2012/Jun-05/175723syrian-refugee-crisis-threatens-lebanons-stabilityreport.ashx. John Owens, “Squabbling Politicians Find Unity in Wake of Beirut Bombings,” VOA, November 19, 2015, http:// www.voanews.com/content/squabbling-politicians-findunity-wake-beirut-bombings/3065604.html. “Mafraq Governorate Fact Sheet,” UNHCR, April 26, 2015, 2, http://reliefweb.int/report/jordan/mafraqgovernorate-factsheet-april-2015 and “UNHCR Syria Regional Refugee Response,” UNHCR Syria Regional Refugee Response, December 2, 2015, http:// data.unhcr.org/syrianrefugees/region.php?id=77&. “Mafraq Governorate Factsheet,” UNHCR, August 18, 2015, 1, http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/ resources/MafraqFactSheetJULY.pdf. “Syria Crisis: Deadly Clash in Jordan’s Zaatari Camp,” BBC, April 6, 2014, http://www.bbc.com/news/worldmiddle-east-26908587 and Tamer al-Samadi, “Jordan Fears Pro-Syrian Regime ‘Sleeper Cells’ in Zaatari,” Al-Monitor, April 9, 2014, http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/ security/2014/04/jordan-zaatari-camp-syria-refugees-riotssleeper-cells.htm and “On the Beat in Zaatari: How UK Aid Is Helping Keep Syrians Safe in the World’s Second Largest Refugee Camp,” Medium, September 15, 2015, https://medium.com/syria-crisis-how-uk-aid-is-helping/onthe-beat-in-zaatari-c72962740e9c#.fsxlj8rtm. “On the Beat in Zaatari.” 47. Rana F. Sweis, “Jordan’s Schools Buckle Under Weight of Syrian Refugees,” The New York Times, October 6, 2013, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/07/world/middleeast/ jordans-schools-buckle-under-weight-of-syrianrefugees.html?_r=0. 48. “Jordan’s Zaatari Refugee Camp Turns 3, Challenges for the Future of the Thousands Living There,” UNHCR, July 28, 2015, http://www.unhcr.org/55b89a1a9.html 49. Amy R. West, “Syrian Refugees Need More Than Food,” Al Jazeera America, March 9, 2014, http:// america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2014/3/education-forsyrianrefugeesinsufficient.html. 50. Idean Salehyan and Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, “Refugees and the Spread of Civil War,” International Organization 60, no. 02 (2006), 338. 51. Ibid. 52. Fiona B. Adamson, “Crossing Borders: International Migration and National Security,” International Security 31, no. 1 (2006), 192. 53. Sarah Kenyon Lischer, Dangerous Sanctuaries: Refugee Camps, Civil War, and the Dilemmas of Humanitarian Aid, (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006), 15. 54. Ibid., 23. 55. Ibid., 26-27. 56. Ibid., 10. 57. Edward O. Mogire. Victims as Security Threats: Refugee Impact on Host State Security in Africa. (Surrey: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. 2011), 15. 58. Lischer, Dangerous Sanctuaries, 19. 59. Ibid., 10. 60. Ibid., 19. 61. Salehyan and Gleditsch, "Refugees and the spread of civil war," 10-11. 62. Lischer, Dangerous Sanctuaries, 23. 63. Ibid., 30. 64. Adamson, Crossing Borders. 191-192. 65. Sheila Rule, “600,000 Mozambique Refugees Tax an Already Desperate Malawi,” The New York Times, July 18, 1988, http://www.nytimes.com/1988/07/18/world/600000mozambique-refugees-tax-an-already-desperatemalawi.html. 66. Salehyan and Gleditsch, “Refugees and the spread of civil war,” 361. 67. Ibid. 68. Richard Cincotta, “Life Begins After 25: Demography and the Societal Timing of the Arab Spring,” Foreign Policy Research Institute, January 2012, http://www.fpri.org/ articles/2012/01/life-begins-after-25-demography-societaltiming-arab-spring. 69. Lionel Beehner, “The Effects of ‘Youth Bulge’ on Civil Conflicts,” Council on Foreign Relations, April 27, 2007, http://www.cfr.org/world/effects-youth-bulge-civilconflicts/p13093. 70. Katherine Carter, “Is Youth Bulge a ‘Magic Indicator’ for the Failed States Index?” New Security Beat, October 17, 2013, http://www.newsecuritybeat.org/2013/10/youth22 bulge-magic-indicator-failed-states-index. 71. Cincotta, “Life Begins After 25.” 72. Beehner, “The Effects of ‘Youth Bulge’ on Civil Conflicts.” 73. Ibid. 74. Henrik Urdal, “A Clash of Generations? Youth Bulges and Political Violence,” International Studies Quarterly 50, no. 3 (2006): 610. 75. Ibid., 610-611. 76. “The Implications of the Youth Bulge in Middle East and North African Populations,” NATO Parliamentary Assembly, January 25, 2011, http://www.nato-pa.int/ default.asp?SHORTCUT=2342. 77. Richard Cincotta, “Minority Youth Bulges and the Future of Intrastate Conflict,” New Security Beat, October 13, 2011, http://www.newsecuritybeat.org/2011/10/minorityyouth-bulges-and-the-future-of-intrastate-conflict/. 78. Ibid. 79. Drew Desilver, “Refugee Surge Brings Youth to an Aging Europe,” Pew Research Center, October 8, 2015, http:// www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/10/08/refugee-surgebrings-youth-to-an-aging-europe/. 80. Ibid. 81. Lischer, Dangerous Sanctuaries, 25. 82. Ibid., 10. 83. Salehyan and Gleditsch, “Refugees and the Spread of Civil War,” 401. 84. Denis Sullivan and Sarah Tobin, “Security and Resilience among Syrian Refugees in Jordan,” Middle East Research and Information Project, October 14, 2014, accessed October 22, 2014, http://merip.org/mero/mero101414. 85. Associated Press, “Syria Rebels Recruit at Refugee Camp,” KTAR News, November 11, 2013. 86. Ibid. 87. Ibid. 88. Marwan Muasher, “Jordan’s Ambiguous Syria Policy,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, June 9, 2014, accessed October 22, 2015, http:// carnegieendowment.org/2014/06/09/jordan-s-ambiguoussyria-policy. 89. Karin Laub, “AP Interview: Jordan Says Syria Militants Try to Sneak in,” Business Insider, August 16, 2015, accessed November 13, 2015, http:// www.businessinsider.com/ap-ap-interview-jordan-sayssyria-militants-try-to-sneak-in-2015-8. 90. Laila Bassam, “Lebanon Arrests Five Syrians, One Palestinian Suspect in Beirut Bombings: Security Source,” Reuters, November 14, 2015, http://www.reuters.com/ article/2015/11/14/us-mideast-crisis-lebanonidUSKCN0T314120151114#E3e2FKJIhx7ZSvWu.97. 91. “Lebanon: Arsal Border Town Tocked by Bomb,” BBC News, November 5, 2015, accessed December 5, 2015, http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-34735117. 92. Atassi, Basma, “A Voice of Horror from Lebanon’s Arsal,” Al Jazeera, August 8, 2014, accessed December 5, 2015, http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2014/08/voice- horror-from-lebanon-arsal-20148613521787274.html and Sohl, Nidal, “Army Raids Arsal Refugee Camp,” May 28, 2015, accessed December 5, 2015, http:// www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Lebanon-News/2015/May28/299586-army-raids-arsal-refugee-camp.ashx. 93. Moore, Jack, “ISIS Flag Raised By Syrian Refugees in Arsal Camp in Lebanon,” International Business Times, September 25, 2014, accessed December 5, 2015, http:// www.ibtimes.co.uk/isis-flag-raised-by-syrian-refugeesarsal-camp-lebanon-1467209. 94. Carrion, Doris, “Are Syrian Refugees a Security Threat to the Middle East?” Reuters, September 15, 2015, accessed December 5, 2015, http://blogs.reuters.com/greatdebate/2015/09/15/are-syrian-refugees-a-security-threat-tothe-middle-east/. 95. Mencutek, Zeynep Şahin, “The Impact of the Syrian Refugee Crisis in Lebanon,” POMEAS Policy Brief, No. 10, June 2015, 6, http://www.pomeas.org/Home/index.php/ publications/pomeas-briefs/491-the-impact-of-the-syrianrefugee-crisis-in-lebanon. 96. “Chapter 7: Middle East and North Africa,” The Military Balance 115, no. 1 (2015): 335. 97. Shane Harris, “The Mouse that Roars,” Foreign Policy, September 12, 2014, accessed November 14, 2015, http:// foreignpolicy.com/2014/09/12/the-mouse-that-roars/. 98. Martin Chulov, “Lebanon ‘captures Iranian embassy bombing mastermind,” The Guardian, January 1, 2014, accessed December 1, 2015, http://www.theguardian.com/ world/2014/jan/01/lebanon-captures-iranian-embassybombing-mastermind. 99. “Lebanon holds day of mourning after deadly Beirut blasts,” BBC News, November 13, 2015, accessed November 14, 2015, http://www.bbc.com/news/worldmiddle-east-34805466. 100. “Chapter 7: Middle East and North Africa,” The Military Balance 115, no. 1 (2015): 338. 101. “Results of the Security Measures During October,” Ministry of Defense, Lebanese Armed Forces, accessed November 12, 2015, http://www.lebarmy.gov.lb/en/ content/results-security-measures-during-october. 102. Basem Shabb, “The Syrian Conflict and the Ascendency of the Lebanese Armed Forces,” Middle East Institute, November 25, 2014, accessed November 14, 2015, http:// www.mei.edu/content/article/syrian-conflict-andascendancy-lebanese-armed-forces. 103. Ibid. 104. Ibid. 105. Awad Mustafa, “Saudi, US Aid Boost Lebanese Firepower,” DefenseNews, July 11, 2015, accessed November 14, 2015, http://www.defensenews.com/story/ defense/land/weapons/2015/07/11/lebanon-firepower-saudi -us-increases/29913841/. 106. Oliver Holmes, “French Weapons Arrive in Lebanon in $3 Billion Saudi-funded Deal,” Reuters, April 20, 2015, accessed November 21, 2015, http://uk.reuters.com/ article/2015/04/20/uk-mideast-crisis-lebanon-armyidUKKBN0NB0GE20150420. 107. Joseph Holliday, “The Syrian Army: Doctrinal Order of Battle,” Institute for the Study of War, February 2013, 5, 23 http://www.understandingwar.org/sites/default/files/ SyrianArmy-DocOOB.pdf. 108. Hugh Macleod and Other, “Inside Deraa,” Al Jazeera, April 19, 2011, http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/ features/2011/04/201141918352728300.html and “In Syria, Crackdown After Protests,” New York Times, March 18, 2011, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/19/world/ middleeast/19syria.html. 109. “Guide: Syria Crisis,” BBC News, April 9, 2012, http:// www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-13855203. 110. Jeremy M. Sharp, “Unrest in Syria and U.S. Sanctions Against the Assad Regime,” Congressional Research Service, August 9, 2011, 3, http://fpc.state.gov/documents/ organization/171370.pdf. 111. Ibid., 1. 112. Joseph Holliday, “Middle East Security Report 3: Syria’s Armed Opposition,” Institute for the Study of War, March 2012, 9, http://www.understandingwar.org/sites/default/ files/Syrias_Armed_Opposition.pdf. and “Defecting Troops from 'Free Syrian Army', Target Assad Security Forces,” World Tribune, August 3, 2011, http:// www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2011/ me_syria0973_08_03.asp and Sharp, “Unrest in Syria and U.S. Sanctions Against the Assad Regime,” 8. 113. Cincotta, “Life Begins After 25.” 114. “World Population Prospects: Key Findings and Advance Tables,” United Nations, 2015, 34-35, http://esa.un.org/ unpd/wpp/publications/files/key_findings_wpp_2015.pdf. 115. Cincotta, “Minority Youth Bulges and the Future of Intrastate Conflict.” 116. Ibid. 117. Ibid. 118. Ibid. 119. Ibid. 120. “The Benefits of Belonging: Local Integration Options and Opportunities for Host Countries, Communities, and Refugees,” UNHCR, July 29, 2011, 7, http:// www.refworld.org/docid/4e56170b2.html. 24 References Achilli, Luigi. “Syrian Refugees in Jordan: A Reality Check.” Migration Policy Centre. February 2015. 1-12. http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/34904/MPC_2015-02_PB.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Adamson, Fiona B. “Crossing Borders: International Migration and National Security.” International Security 31, no. 1 (2006), 165199. Alami, Mona. “The Lebanese Army and the Confessional Trap.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. June 25, 2014. http://carnegieendowment.org/sada/?fa=56014. “ALEPPO - Governorate Profile: Syria Needs Analysis Project.” ACAPS. March 2013. 1-16. http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Aleppo%20Governorate%20profile%20March%202013.pdf. “Alienation and Violence: Impact of Syria Crisis Report 2014.” Syrian Center for Policy Research. March 2015, 1-66. http://www.unrwa.org/sites/default/files/alienation_and_violence_impact_of_the_syria_cr isis_in_2014_eng.pdf. al-Samadi, Tamer. “Jordan Fears Pro-Syrian Regime ‘Sleeper Cells’ in Zaatari.” Al-Monitor. April 9, 2014. http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/security/2014/04/jordan-zaatari-camp-syria-refugees-riots-sleeper-cells.html. “Arsal Security Situation under Control: Mayor.” The Daily Star. August 15, 2015. http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Lebanon-News/2015/Aug-15/311255-arsal-security-situation-under-control-mayor.ashx. Bassam, Laila. “Lebanon Arrests Five Syrians, One Palestinian Suspect in Beirut Bombings: Security Source.” Reuters. November 14, 2015. http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/11/14/us-mideast-crisislebanonidUSKCN0T314120151114#E3e2FKJIhx7ZSvWu.97. Beehner, Lionel.“The Effects of ‘Youth Bulge’ on Civil Conflicts.” Council on Foreign Relations. April 27, 2007. http://www.cfr.org/world/effects-youth-bulge-civil-conflicts/p13093. “Beirut Blasts Reveal Gaps in Lebanon’s Security: Experts.” Albawaba News. November 18, 2015. http://www.albawaba.com/news/beirut-blasts-reveal-gaps-lebanon%E2%80%99s-security-experts-770220. Carrion, Doris. “Syrian Refugees in Jordan: Confronting Difficult Truths.” Chatham House. September 2015. 1-16. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/field/field_document/20150921SyrianRefugeesCarrion.pdf. Carter, Katherine.“Is Youth Bulge a ‘Magic Indicator’ for the Failed States Index?” New Security Beat. October 17, 2013. http://www.newsecuritybeat.org/2013/10/youth-bulge-magic-indicator-failed-states-index. “Census Includes All People on Jordanian Soil, PM.” Jordan News Agency. November 28, 2015. http://petranews.gov.jo/nepras/2015/Nov/28/9000.htm. “Chapter 7: Middle East and North Africa.” The Military Balance 115, no. 1 (2015): 303-362. Chulov, Martin. “Lebanon ‘Captures Iranian Embassy Bombing Mastermind.” The Guardian. January 1, 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/01/lebanon-captures-iranian-embassy-bombing-mastermind. Cincotta, Richard. “Life Begins After 25: Demography and the Societal Timing of the Arab Spring.” Foreign Policy Research Institute. January 2012. http://www.fpri.org/articles/2012/01/life-begins-after-25-demography-societal-timing-arab-spring. “Minority Youth Bulges and the Future of Intrastate Conflict.” New Security Beat. October 13, 2011. http://www.newsecuritybeat.org/2011/10/minority-youth-bulges-and-the-future-of-intrastate-conflict/. “Daesh and Nusra Militants Clash outside Lebanese Border Town.” Albawaba News. May 25, 2015. http://www.albawaba.com/news/daesh-and-nusra-militants-clash-outside-lebanese-border-town-699078. Dahi, Omar. “The Refugee Crisis in Lebanon and Jordan: The Need for Economic Development Spending.” Forced Migration Review. September 2014. 1-3. http://www.fmreview.org/syria/dahi#sthash.ID04cywZ.dpuf. 25 “Defecting Troops from 'Free Syrian Army', Target Assad Security Forces.” World Tribune. August 3, 2011. http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2011/me_syria0973_08_03.asp. Desilver, Drew. “Refugee Surge Brings Youth to an Aging Europe.” Pew Research Center. October 8, 2015. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/10/08/refugee-surge-brings-youth-to-an-aging-europe/. “For Many Syrians in Lebanon and Jordan, now is the Time to Go.” Washington Post. September 21, 2015. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/for-many-syrians-in-lebanon-and-jordan-now-is-the-time-to-go/2015/09/21/513dfc9a5d4a-11e5-8475-781cc9851652_story.html. “Greater Support in Countries of First Asylum Needed to Stem Refugee Outflows.” UNHCR. August 26, 2015. http://www.unhcr.org/55ddd2c86.html. “Guide: Syria Crisis.” BBC News. April 9, 2012. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-13855203. Harris, Shane. “The Mouse that Roars.” Foreign Policy. September 12, 2014. http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/09/12/the-mouse-that-roars/. Harding, Luke and Martin Churov. "Syrian Rebels Fight Assad Troops in Aleppo." The Guardian. July 22, 2011. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jul/22/syrian-rebels-fight-aleppo. Holliday, Joseph. “Middle East Security Report 3: Syria’s Armed Opposition.” Institute for the Study of War. March 2012. 1-57. http ://www.understandingwar.org/sites/default/files/Syrias_Armed_Opposition.pdf. “The Syrian Army: Doctrinal Order of Battle.” Institute for the Study of War. February 2013. 1-19. http://www.understandingwar.org/sites/default/files/SyrianArmy-DocOOB.pdf. Holmes, Oliver. “French Weapons Arrive in Lebanon in $3 Billion Saudi-funded Deal.” Reuters. April 20, 2015. http://uk.reuters.com/article/2015/04/20/uk-mideast-crisis-lebanon-army-idUKKBN0NB0GE20150420. “Militants Pull out of Lebanese Border Town with Captives.” Reuters. August 7, 2014. http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/08/07/us-lebanon-security-arsal-idUSKBN0G70HC20140807#1qgeZvi7CfExVLoL.97. “In Syria, Crackdown After Protests.” New York Times. March 18, 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/19/world/middleeast/19syria.html. “Jordan Poverty Reduction Strategy: Final Report.” UNDP. January 28, 2013. 1-258. http://www.jo.undp.org/content/dam/jordan/docs/Poverty/Jordanpovertyreductionstrategy.pdf. “Jordan Refugee Response: Vulnerability Assessment Framework Baseline Survey.” UNHCR. May 2015. 1-103, http://www.medbox.org/jordan-refugee-response-vulnerability-assessment-framework-baseline-survey-may-2015/download.pdf. “Jordan’s Zaatari Refugee Camp Turns 3, Challenges for the Future of the Thousands Living There.” UNHCR. July 28, 2015. http://www.unhcr.org/55b89a1a9.html. Ksaifi, Rana. “Syria Refugee Response: Lebanon Syrian Refugees Registered.” UNHCR. September 30, 2015. http://data.unhcr.org/syrianrefugees/download.php?id=9602. Kullab, Samya and Ghinwa Obeidi. “Shebaa, the Town Caught in the Middle.” The Daily Star. February 27, 2015. http://www.dailystar.com.lb/ArticlePrint.aspx?id=288953&mode=print. Laub, Karin. “AP Interview: Jordan Says Syria Militants Try to Sneak in.” Business Insider. August 16, 2015. http://www.businessinsider.com/ap-ap-interview-jordan-says-syria-militants-try-to-sneak-in-2015-8. “Lebanon Crisis Response Plan 2015-2016.” UNOCHA. December 15, 2014. 1-99. http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/2015-2016_Lebanon_CRP_EN.pdf. “Lebanon Holds Day of Mourning after Deadly Beirut Blasts.” BBC News. November 13, 2015. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-34805466. 26 Leigh, Karen. “In Arsal, a Common Enemy Faces Hezbollah and Lebanon’s Army.” Syria Deeply. August 5, 2014. http://www.syriadeeply.org/articles/2014/08/5898/arsal-common-enemy-faces-hezbollah-lebanons-army/. Lischer, Sarah Kenyon. Dangerous Sanctuaries: Refugee Camps, Civil War, and the Dilemmas of Humanitarian Aid. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006. Macleod, Hugh and Other. “Inside Deraa.” Al Jazeera. April 19, 2011. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2011/04/201141918352728300.html. “Mafraq Governorate Factsheet.” UNHCR. April 26, 2015. 1-2. http://reliefweb.int/report/jordan/mafraq-governorate-factsheet-april-2015. “Mafraq Governorate Factsheet.” UNHCR. August 18, 2015. 1-2. http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/MafraqFactSheetJULY.pdf. Mogire, Edward O. Victims as Security Threats: Refugee Impact on Host State Security in Africa.. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2011. Muasher, Marwan. “Jordan’s Ambiguous Syria Policy.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. June 9, 2014. http://carnegieendowment.org/2014/06/09/jordan-s-ambiguous-syria-policy. Mustafa, Awad. “Saudi, US Aid Boost Lebanese Firepower.” DefenseNews. July 11, 2015. http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/land/weapons/2015/07/11/lebanon-firepower-saudi-us-increases/29913841/. Nakhoul, Samia. “Lebanese Army Surrounds Border Town, Evacuates Refugees.” Reuters. August 6, 2014. http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/08/06/us-lebanon-security-arsal-idUSKBN0G616W20140806#BueIZQCS7SYMZbpB.97. “On the Beat in Zaatari: How UK Aid Is Helping Keep Syrians Safe in the World’s Second Largest Refugee Camp.” Medium. September 15, 2015. https://medium.com/syria-crisis-how-uk-aid-is-helping/on-the-beat-in-zaatari-c72962740e9c#.fsxlj8rtm. Oweis, Khaled Yacoub. “Uprising Finally Hits Syria’s ‘Silk Road’ City.” Reuters. February 4, 2012. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/04/us-syria-aleppo-idUSTRE81213720120204. Owens, John. “Squabbling Politicians Find Unity in Wake of Beirut Bombings.” Voice of America. November 19, 2015. http://www.voanews.com/content/squabbling-politicians-find-unity-wake-beirut-bombings/3065604.html. Pizzi, Michael. “In Syria’s War Refugees, Lebanon Sees Echoes of Palestinian Crisis.” Al Jazeera. January 6, 2015. http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/1/6/lebanon-syria-refugees.html. “Registered Syrians in Jordan.” UNHCR. External Statistical Report. November 15, 2015. http://data.unhcr.org/syrianrefugees/download.php?id=9792. “Registered Syrians in Jordan.” UNHCR. External Statistical Report. October 31, 2015. http://data.unhcr.org/syrianrefugees/download.php?id=9702. “Results of the Security Measures During October.” Ministry of Defense. Lebanese Armed Forces. http://www.lebarmy.gov.lb/en/content/results-security-measures-during-october. Rule, Sheila. “600,000 Mozambique Refugees Tax an Already Desperate Malawi.” The New York Times. July 18, 1988. http://www.nytimes.com/1988/07/18/world/600000-mozambique-refugees-tax-an-already-desperate-malawi.html. Salehyan, Idean and Kristian Skrede Gleditsch. “Refugees and the Spread of Civil War.” International Organization 60, no. 02 (2006): 335-366. Samaha, Nour. “The Strange Case of Lebanon’s Shebaa.” Al-Jazeera English. July 2, 2013. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2013/07/20137218585519150.html. Schenker, David. “Why Refugee Influx Threatens Lebanon, Jordan Stability.” The Washington Institute. April 10, 2014. http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/why-refugee-influx-threatens-lebanon-jordan-stability. 27 “Security Forces Storm Syrian City of Aleppo, Activist Group Says.” CNN. September 27, 2011. http://www.cnn.com/2011/09/27/world/meast/syria-unrest/. Shabb, Basem. “The Syrian Conflict and the Ascendency of the Lebanese Armed Forces.” Middle East Institute. November 25, 2014. http://www.mei.edu/content/article/syrian-conflict-and-ascendancy-lebanese-armed-forces. Sharp, Jeremy M. “Unrest in Syria and U.S. Sanctions Against the Assad Regime.” Congressional Research Service, August 9, 2011. 1-30. http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/171370.pdf. Simon, Scott. “Places Transformed: Syrian Refugees Overwhelm Camps, Towns.” NPR. May 4, 2013. http://www.npr.org/2013/05/04/181053781/a-place-transformed-the-birth-of-a-jordanian-refugee-camp. Solomon, Erika. “Pro-Assad Gun, Knife Attack Kills Four Protesters.” Reuters. May 3, 2012. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/03/us-syria-protest-idUSBRE8420E820120503#4W3eFqOcmh1e7oc2.97. Sullivan, Denis and Sarah Tobin. “Security and Resilience among Syrian Refugees in Jordan.” Middle East Research and Information Project. October 14, 2014. http://merip.org/mero/mero101414. Sweis, Rana F. “Jordan’s Schools Buckle Under Weight of Syrian Refugees.” The New York Times. October 6, 2013. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/07/world/middleeast/jordans-schools-buckle-under-weight-of-syrian-refugees.html?_r=0. “Syria: Conflict Without Borders. Number and Location of Refugees and IDPs.” Humanitarian Information Unit, Department of State. August 27, 2015. https://hiu.state.gov/Products/Syria_ConflictWithoutBorders_Displacement_2015Aug27_HIU_U1283.pdf. “Syria Crisis – Aleppo City Report.” REACH. June 2014. 1-17. http://www.reach-initiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Aleppo-City-Key-Informants-Assessment-Syria-Crisis.pdf. “Syria Crisis: Deadly Clash in Jordan’s Zaatari Camp.” BBC. April 6, 2014. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-26908587. “Syrian Arab Republic: Humanitarian Snapshot (as of 30 November 2015).” ReliefWeb. November 30, 2015. http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/syr_humsnap_a4l_november2015.pdf. “Syrian Refugee Crisis Threatens Lebanon’s Stability: Report.” The Daily Star. June 5, 2012. http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Politics/2012/Jun-05/175723-syrian-refugee-crisis-threatens-lebanons-stability-report.ashx. “Syrian Refugees Head to Lebanon’s Shia South.” IRIN. January 29, 2013. http://www.irinnews.org/report/97355/syrian-refugees-head-to-lebanon-s-shia-south. “Syria Regional Refugee Response: Interagency Information Sharing Portal.” UNHCR. http://data.unhcr.org/syrianrefugees/regional.php#_ga=1.182256495.91437624.1441377489. “The Benefits of Belonging: Local Integration Options and Opportunities for Host Countries, Communities, and Refugees.” UNHCR (2008): 1-46. “The Implications of the Youth Bulge in Middle East and North African Populations.” NATO Parliamentary Assembly. January 25, 2011. http://www.nato-pa.int/default.asp?SHORTCUT=2342. “UNHCR Syria Regional Refugee Response.” UNHCR. December 2, 2015. http://data.unhcr.org/syrianrefugees/region.php?id=77&. Urdal, Henrik. “A Clash of Generations? Youth Bulges and Political Violence.” International Studies Quarterly 50, no. 3 (2006): 114. West, Amy R. “Syrian Refugees Need More Than Food.” Al Jazeera. March 9, 2014. http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2014/3/education-for-syrianrefugeesinsufficient.html. 28 Weston, Phoebe. “Inside Zaatari Refugee Camp: The Fourth Largest City in Jordan.” The Telegraph. August 5, 2015. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/jordan/11782770/What-is-life-like-inside-the-largest-Syrian-refugeecamp-Zaatari-in-Jordan.html. “World Population Prospects: Key Findings and Advance Tables.” United Nations. 2015. 1-59. http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/publications/files/key_findings_wpp_2015.pdf. Zaatari, Mohamed. “Hezbollah prepares for Liberation Day ceremony in Nabatieh.” The Daily Star. May 23, 2015. http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Lebanon-News/2015/May-23/299092-hezbollah-prepares-for-liberation-day-ceremony-innabatieh.ashx. 29