Institute of Archaeology University College London INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY UCL - INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY GEOARCHAEOLOGY: SEDIMENTS AND SITE FORMATION PROCESSES ARCL 2017 Term I, 2014/5, Room 612 Thursday 11:00-13:00 Year 2/3 Option, 0.5 unit Turnitin Class ID: 783195 Turnitin Password IoA1415 Co-ordinator: Dr Manuel Arroyo-Kalin E-mail: m.arroyo-kalin@ucl.ac.uk - Room 401, Tel 02076797523 (Internal 27523) ARCL 2017 Geoarchaeology: Sediments and Site Formation Processes This course is an introduction to the study of the physical properties of landscapes as they pertain to archaeological evidence. Students will review key principles of physical geography, learn approaches to study site formation processes, examine different geoarchaeological case studies, and gain initial laboratory experience in the use of techniques to characterise sediments and soils in archaeological contexts. Week I. Session 1. Session 2. 02 October 2014 Introduction: Geoarchaeology’s history and goals Basic geoarchaeological concepts and methods Week II. Session 3. Session 4. 09 October 2014 The Toolkit of Geoarchaeology Biomantles and Post-Depositional Processes Week III. Session 5. Session 6. 16 October 2014 Slope processes Alluvial processes Week IV. Session 7. Session 8. 23 October 2014 Glaciation and the Loess record Coastal environments Week V. Session 9. Session 10. 30 October 2014 Arid and semi-arid environments The humid tropics Study Week: 3-7 Nov 2014 Week VI. Session 11. Session 12. 13 November 2014 Occupations I: Caves and rock-shelters Occupations II: Open-air sites Week VII. Session 13. Session 14. 20 November 2014 Practical 1: Characterising sediments and soils Practical1: (continued) Week VIII. Session 15. Session 16. 27 November 2014 Occupations III: Human impact on the landscape Occupations IV: Landscape engineering and anthropogenic soils Week IX. Session 17. Session 18. 4 December 2014 Practical 2: ‘Remote-sensing’ sediments and soils Practical 2: (continued) Week X. Session 19. Session 20. 11 December 2014 Practical 3: ‘Ground-truthing’ sediments and soils Practical 3: (continued) ASSIGNMENT #1: ESSAY DUE ON 11 December 2014 ASSIGNMENT #2: LAB REPORT DUE on 17 January 2015 ARCL 2017 1 Geoarchaeology: Sediments and Site Formation Processes – 2014/5 ARCL 2017 Dr Manuel Arroyo-Kalin (course coordinator/lecturer) Email: m.arroyo-kalin@ucl.ac.uk Office: 401 1. OVERVIEW BASIC TEXTS: The field of geoarchaeology has a number of important texts, each emphasising different aspects of the subdiscipline. Butzer, K. W. (1982). Archaeology as Human Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. French, C. A. I. (2003). Geoarchaeology in Action: Studies in Soil Micromorphology and Landscape Evolution. London: Routledge Goldberg, P., & Macphail, R. (2006). Practical and Theoretical Geoarchaeology. Oxford: Blackwell. Holliday, V. T. (2004). Soils in Archaeological Research. New York, Oxford University Press. Rapp, G., & Hill, C. L. (1998).Geoarchaeology: the earth-science approach to archaeological interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press. Waters, M. R. (1992). Principles of Geoarchaeology: a North American perspective. Tucson: University of Arizona Press METHODS OF ASSESSMENT: This course is assessed by means of one essay (not exceeding 4,200 words) that contributes 70% of the course grade, and one laboratory report (not exceeding 1,575 words) that contributes 30% of the course grade1. The Essay assignment is to discuss the main research problems, challenges, and methods pertaining to a particular depositional archaeological environment (e.g. rockshelter, aeolian, alluvial, etc.) or type of site-formation (cave site, desert campsite, tell site, shell midden, etc.). The paper should consist of an overview of the characteristics of the sedimentary environment or site formation processes, and the critical appraisal of two or more geoarchaeological case studies. The Laboratory Report will consist of sediment descriptions, data from laboratory analyses, and a summary discussion of results. Other aspects of both assignments, as well as possible approaches to them, will be discussed in class in advance of the submission deadline. If students are unclear about the nature of either assignment, they should discuss this with the Course Coordinator in timely fashion. Also, the Course Coordinator is willing to discuss an outline of the student's approach to their essay assignment, provided this is planned suitably in advance of the submission date. The deadline for the essay is 11 December 2014. The deadline for the laboratory report is 17 January 2015. TEACHING METHODS: The course is taught through lectures and laboratory practicals. Before attending sessions, students should read the required readings for each session, especially relevant chapters in the Goldberg and Macphail textbook (see bibliography). The reading list is current but small modifications will most likely be introduced as the course proceeds. Laboratory sessions have been incorporated into the scheduled sessions for the course. 1 Word counts exclude the title page, the table of contents, any lists of figures and tables, abstract, preface, acknowledgements, bibliography, lists of references, captions, contents of tables and figures, and appendices. ARCL 2017 2 WORKLOAD: There will be 14 hours of lectures and 6 hours of laboratory sessions for this course. Students will be expected to undertake around 88 hours of reading for the course, plus 80 hours preparing for and producing the assessed work. This adds up to a total workload of 188 hours for the course. PREREQUISITES: This course does not have a prerequisite. Due to its introductory nature, students are not required to have a prior background in earth sciences or previous laboratory experience. 2. AIMS, OBJECTIVES AND ASSESSMENT AIMS: This course is an introduction to Geoarchaeology. The aim of the course is to provide a basic understanding of the role of earth sciences in answering archaeological questions. OBJECTIVES AND LEARNING OUTCOMES: On successful completion of this course a student should understand how sediment studies contribute to archaeological problem-solving both on-site and in the reconstruction of past environments. This will include a basic knowledge of common techniques for sediment recording, grain size analyses, and sedimentological methods for determining past depositional environments associated with archaeological sites, and principles of site formation processes. The student will also be familiar with basic analyses of anthropogenic sediments and soils. A student is expected to be able to demonstrate improved skills of observation and critical reflection on academic topics. 3. SCHEDULE TEACHING SCHEDULE:. Lectures will take place in Room 612 from 11:00-13:00 on Thursdays during Term 1 (excluding reading week). Laboratory sessions will take place at the Sedimentology Lab, Room B50, as per the programme. Students will be organised in groups and practicals will take place between from 10:00-12:00. 4. SYLLABUS Week I. Session 1. 02 October 2014 Introduction: Geoarchaeology’s history and goals Some consider Geoarchaeology as one more archaeological specialism, others as a specific approach to the entire archaeological record. In order to familiarise students with these positions, the introductory lecture examines the historical relationship between the earth sciences and archaeology. This relation is the foundation upon which Geoarchaeology has developed and, in some ways, it is the platform that enables contributions from different earth sciences (geology, geomorphology, physical geography, pedology, etc.) to make contributions to the field of archaeology. Required readings: Goldberg, P., & Macphail, R. (2006).Practical and Theoretical Geoarchaeology. Oxford: Blackwell. Pp 1-6 Rapp, G., & Hill, C. L. (1998).Geoarchaeology: the earth-science approach to archaeological interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press. Ch. 1 Suggested readings: Butzer K.W. (1980). Context in archaeology: An alternative perspective. Journal of Field Archaeology 7: 417-422. ARCL 2017 3 Wilkinson, T. J. (2003). Archaeological Landscapes of the Near East. Tucson, Arizona: University of Arizona Press. Ch. 1. Additional reference works: Daniel, G. (1967). The Origins and Growth of Archaeology. Chapter 3: Geology and the Antiquity of Man, pp 46-78. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Grayson, D. (1985). The establishment of human antiquity. New York: Academic Press. Session 2. Basic geoarchaeological concepts and methods In this session we will lay out the basic principles and key concepts upon which geoarchaeological practice is based.We will examine the contrast between soils and sediments, review the main types of sedimentary processes and soil forming dynamics, and outline how an understanding of them enable us to decode sequential records of landscape evolution (stratigraphy). Required readings: Goldberg, P., & Macphail, R. (2006).Practical and Theoretical Geoarchaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, Chs. 1-3 Butzer, K. W. (1982). Archaeology as Human Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chs. 3, 5 Butzer, K. W. (2008). Challenges for a cross-disciplinary geoarchaeology: The intersection between environmental history and geomorphology. Geomorphology, 101, 402-411. Rapp, G., & Hill, C. L. (1998).Geoarchaeology: the earth-science approach to archaeological interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press. Ch. 2 English Heritage. (2004). Geoarchaeology: Using earth sciences to understand the archaeological record. Swindon: EH Publications. Gladfelter, B. G. (1981). Developments and directions in Geoarchaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 4, 343-364. Waters, M. R. (1992). Principles of Geoarchaeology: a North American perspective. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. Pp. 2-114 Suggested readings: French, C. A. I. (2003). Geoarchaeology in Action: Studies in Soil Micromorphology and Landscape Evolution. London: Routledge. Ch. 1 Dincauze, D. (2000). Environmental archaeology : principles and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ch. 11, pp 257-290 Stein, J. K. (1993). Scale in archaeology, geosciences, and geoarchaeology. In J. K. Stein & A. R. Linse (Eds.), Effects of scale on archaeological and geoscientific perspectives: Geological Society of America. Limbrey, S. (1975).Soil science and archaeology. New York: Academic Press. Hassan F. (1978). Sediments in archaeology: methods and implications for palaeoenvironmental and cultural analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology 5: 197-213 Week II. Session 3. 09 October 2014 The Toolkit of Geoarchaeology What is the toolkit employed in geoarchaeological research? In this session we examine the most important techniques currently used by geoarchaeologists. Required readings: Wilkinson, T. J. (2003). Archaeological Landscapes of the Near East. Tucson, Arizona: University of Arizona Press. Ch. 3. Goldberg, P., & Macphail, R. (2006).Practical and Theoretical Geoarchaeology. Oxford: Blackwell. Ch. 15-17 ARCL 2017 4 English Heritage. (2004). Geoarchaeology: Using earth sciences to understand the archaeological record. Swindon: EH Publications. Woods, W. I. (2003).Development of anthrosol research. In J. Lehmann, D. Kern, B. Glaser & W. Woods (Eds.), Amazonian Dark Earths: Origins, Properties and Management (pp. 3-14). Dordrecht: Kluwer Press. O'Connor, T., & Evans, J. G. (1999).Environmental Archaeology: Principles and Methods (2nd ed.). Stroud: Sutton Publishing. Ch. 10 Courty, M.-A., Macphail, R., & Goldberg, P. (1989).Soils and Micromorphology in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ch 3. Session 4. Biomantles and Post-Depositional Processes In this session we examine in further detail the interface between environments and the landscape, i.e. what earth scientists call biomantles. As we will review in this session, biomantles are dynamic and in constant evolution. Many of the processes that shape biomantles over time are of direct concern to archaeologists because they shape the burial environments of archaeological evidence and can modify the original integrity of archaeological remains. Required readings: Goldberg, P., & Macphail, R. (2006).Practical and Theoretical Geoarchaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, Ch 3 Balek, C. L. (2002). Buried Artifacts in Stable Upland Sites and the Role of Bioturbation: A Review. Geoarchaeology, 17(1), 41-51. Butzer, K. W. (1982). Archaeology as Human Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ch 7 Cremeens, D. L. (2003). Geoarchaeology of Soils on Stable Geomorphic Surfaces: Mature Soil Model for the Glaciated Northeast. In D. L. Cremeens& J. P. Hart (Eds.), Geoarchaeology of Landscapes in the Glaciated Northeast. New York: University of the State of New York. French, C. A. I. (2003). Geoarchaeology in Action: Studies in Soil Micromorphology and Landscape Evolution. London: Routledge. Ch 2 Holliday, V. T. (2004). Soils in Archaeological Research. New York, Oxford University Press, Ch 3 Johnson, D. L. (2002). Darwin Would Be Proud :Bioturbation , Dynamic Denudation , and the Power of Theory in Science, Geoarchaeology17(1), 7-40. Johnson, D. L., Domier, J. E. J., & Johnson, D. N. (2005). Reflections on the nature of soil and its biomantle. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(1), 11-31. Phillips, J. D., &Lorz, C. (2008).Origins and implications of soil layering.Earth-Science Reviews, 89, 144-155. Holliday, V. T. (2004). Soils in Archaeological Research. New York: Oxford University Press. Waters, M. R. (1992). Principles of Geoarchaeology: a North American perspective. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. Ch7 Additional reference works: Duchaufour, P. (1982). Pedology: Pedogenesis and Classification. London: George Allen &Unwyn. Holliday, V. T. (1989). Paleopedology in archaeology. In A. Bronger& K. W. G. Valentine (Eds.), Paleopedology. Nature and Application of Paleosols (pp. 187-206). Cremlingen: CatenaVerlag. Schaetzl, R., & Anderson, S. (2005). Soils. Genesis and Geomorphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ch.1 0 Limbrey, S. (1975).Soil science and archaeology. New York: Academic Press. Stoops, G, V Marcelino, F Mees (2010) Interpretation of micromorphological features of soils and regoliths. London: Elsevier Birkeland, P. W. (1999). Soils and Geomorphology (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ARCL 2017 5 Week III. 16 October 2014 The nature of the archaeological record is strongly determined by the characteristics and overall evolution of the physical setting where archaeological remains become buried. In the sessions before study week we will examine the main characteristics of different settings, highlighting their dominant geomorphological processes and discussing how these impact the preservation and integrity of archaeological remains . Session 5. Slope processes The lecture will introduce the main features and dynamics associated with slopes. Most geoarchaeologists understand slope processes based on land surface unit models. A number of topics need to be introduced to make sense of these: the dissection of landforms by streams, surface flows, mass movement, colluviation, the soil catena. As will be seen, the dynamics described by these topics bear significantly on our understandings of erosion, sedimentation/deposition, and soil formation. Hence, they impact the preservation of archaeological remains and the formation of the archaeological record. Required readings: Goldberg, P., & Macphail, R. (2006).Practical and Theoretical Geoarchaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.Ch. 4 French, C. A. I. (2003). Geoarchaeology in Action: Studies in Soil Micromorphology and Landscape Evolution. London: Routledge. Pp 20-25, 30-34, Ch 5 Rapp, G., & Hill, C. L. (1998).Geoarchaeology: the earth-science approach to archaeological interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press. Ch 3 Butzer, K. W. (1982). Archaeology as Human Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ch. 4, 53-54 Birkeland, P. W. (1999). Soils and Geomorphology (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 184-185; 238-240 Waters, M. R. (1992). Principles of Geoarchaeology: a North American perspective. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. Ch 5, pp. 230-232 Additional reference works: Ruhe, R. V. (1975). Geomorphology. Geomorphic Processes and Surficial Geology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. Schaetzl, R., & Anderson, S. (2005). Soils. Genesis and Geomorphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Session 6. Alluvial processes. The lecture will introduce the main features of alluvial and lacustrian contexts and how they impact the preservation of archaeological evidence. Processes of erosion, sedimentation and deposition, and soil formation associated with alluvial environments will be examined in further detail. Human settlements and site formation processes in alluvial environments will be discussed. Required readings: Goldberg, P., & Macphail, R. (2006).Practical and Theoretical Geoarchaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, Ch 5 Rapp, G., & Hill, C. L. (1998).Geoarchaeology: the earth-science approach to archaeological interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp 59-66 Holliday, V. T. (2004). Soils in Archaeological Research. New York, Oxford University Press, Ch 7 (relevant section on alluvial processes) ARCL 2017 6 Huckleberry, G. (2001).Archaeological Sediments in Dryland Alluvial Environments. In J. K. Stein & W. R. Farrand (Eds.), Sediments in Archaeological Context (pp. 67--92). Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press. Waters, M. R. (1992). Principles of Geoarchaeology: a North American perspective. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. Ch 5, pp 219-225. French, C. A. I. (2003). Geoarchaeology in Action: Studies in Soil Micromorphology and Landscape Evolution. London: Routledge. Ch. 9 Case studies: Lathrap, D. W. (1968). Aboriginal occupation and changes in river channel on the central Ucayali, Peru. American Anthropologist, 33(1), 62-79. Larsen, C. E. (1985). Geoarchaeological Interpretation of Great Lakes Coastal Environments. In J. K. Stein & W. R. Farrand (Eds.), Archaeological sediments in context (pp. 91-110).Orono: Center for the Study of Early Man, Institute for Quaternary Studies, University of Maine at Orono. Hassan, F. A. (1985). Fluvial Systems and Geoarchaeology in Arid Lands: With Examples from North Africa, the Near East and the American Southwest. In J. K. Stein & W. R. Farrand (Eds.), Archaeological sediments in context (pp. 53-68).Orono: Center for the Study of Early Man, Institute for Quaternary Studies, University of Maine at Orono. Feibel, C. S. (2001). Archaeological Sediments in Lake Margin Environments. In J. K. Stein & W. R. Farrand (Eds.), Sediments in Archaeological Context (pp. 127-147). Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press. Additional reference works: Brown, A. G. (1997). Alluvial geoarchaeology: floodplain archaeology and environmental change.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reading, H. G. (Ed.). (2004). Sedimentary Environments: Processes, Facies and Stratigraphy. London: Blackwell Science. Ch 3, 4. Week IV. Session 7. 23 October 2014 Glaciation and the Loess record Glaciers reset the landscape and many landforms in post-glacial landscapes originate in glacial dynamics. Glacial and periglacial activity, moreover, are at the source of one of the most highly active aeolian dynamics – the deposition of loess. In this lecture we will introduce the main features associated with glacial and periglacial environments and examine how they impact the preservation of archaeological evidence. Human settlements and site formation processes in glacial and periglacial environments will be discussed. Required readings: Rapp, G., & Hill, C. L. (1998).Geoarchaeology: the earth-science approach to archaeological interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp 71-74. Benedict, J. B. (2005). Rethinking the fourth of July Valley site: A study in glacial and periglacial geoarchaeology. Geoarchaeology, 20(8), 797-836. doi:10.1002/gea.20084 Texier, J. P., Bertran, P., Coutard, J. P., Francou, B., Gabert, P., Guadelli, J. L., et al. (1998). TRANSIT, an experimental archaeological program in periglacial environment: Problem, methodology, first results. Geoarchaeology, 13(5), 433-473. Dodonov, A. E. (2007). Loess records: Central Asia. In S. A. Elias (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of Quaternary Science (pp. 1418-1429). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Porter, S. C. (2007). Loess records: China. In S. A. Elias (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science (pp. 1429-1440). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Rousseau, D.-D., Derbyshire, E., Antoine, P., &Hatté, C. (2007). Loess records: Europe. In S. A. Elias (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science (pp. 1440-1456). Amsterdam: Elsevier. ARCL 2017 7 Zárate, M. (2007). Loess records: South America. In S. A. Elias (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science (pp. 1466-1479). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Case Studies Schweger, C. (1985). Geoarchaeology of Northern Regions: Lessons from Cryotubation at Onion Portage, Alaska. In J. K. Stein & W. R. Farrand (Eds.), Archaeological sediments in context (pp. 127-142).Orono: Center for the Study of Early Man, Institute for Quaternary Studies, University of Maine at Orono. Benedict, J. B. (2005). Rethinking the fourth of July Valley site: A study in glacial and periglacial geoarchaeology.Geoarchaeology, 20(8), 797-836. Additional reference works: Reading, H. G. (Ed.). (2004). Sedimentary Environments: Processes, Facies and Stratigraphy. London: Blackwell Science. Ch 11 Schaetzl, R., & Anderson, S. (2005). Soils.Genesis and Geomorphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. PP. 263-277 McCulloch, R. D., Bentley, M. J., Tipping, R. M., &Clapperton, C. M. (2005). Evidence for Late-Glacial ice dammed lakes in the Central Strait of Magellan and Bahia Inútil, Southernmost South America. Geografiska Annaler, Series A: Physical Geography 87A(2), 335-362. Session 8. Coastal environments The lecturewill introduce the main features of coastal contexts and examine how they impact the preservation of archaeological evidence. Processes of sedimentation, erosion and deposition, with special emphasis on the effects of sea-level change, will be examined in further detail. Human settlements and site formation processes along shores of water bodies will be discussed. Required readings: Goldberg, P., & Macphail, R. (2006).Practical and Theoretical Geoarchaeology. Oxford: Blackwell,,Ch 7 Wells, L. E. (2001). Archaeological Sediments in Coastal Environments. In J. K. Stein & W. R. Farrand (Eds.), Sediments in Archaeological Context (pp. 149-181). Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press. Dickinson, W. R., Burley, D. B., & Shutler, R. (1994).Impact of Hydro-Isostatic Holocene Sea-Level Change on the Geologic Context of Island Archaeological Sites, Northern Ha’apai Group, Kingdom of Tonga. Geoarchaeology, 9(2), 85-111. Bell M., and Neumann H. (1997). Prehistoric inter-tidal archaeology and environments in the Severn Estuary, Wales.World Archaeology 29: 95-113. Kraft, J. C. (1985). Marine Environments: Paleogeographic Reconstructions in the Littoral Region. In J. K. Stein & W. R. Farrand (Eds.), Archaeological sediments in context (pp. 111-1127).Orono: Center for the Study of Early Man, Institute for Quaternary Studies, University of Maine at Orono. Suggested readings: Reading, H. G. (Ed.). (2004). Sedimentary Environments: Processes, Facies and Stratigraphy. London: Blackwell Science. Ch 6, 7 Dincauze D.F. (2000). Environmental Archaeology: Principles and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapt.10, Landforms of shores and shallow water, pp 227-250. ARCL 2017 8 Week V. Session 9. 30 October 2014 Arid and semi-arid environments The lecture will introduce the main features associated with arid and semi-arid environments. Include here are erosion due to restricted vegetation cover, aeolian processes and deflation. We will examine how they impact the preservation of archaeological evidence. Required readings: Goldberg, P., & Macphail, R. (2006).Practical and Theoretical Geoarchaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, Ch 6 Boardman, J., & Bell, M. (1992). Past and present soil erosion: linking archaeology and geomorphology. In M. Bell & J. Boardman (Eds.), Past and present soil erosion: archaeological and geographical perspectives (pp. 1-7). Oxford: Oxbow. Butzer, K. W. (2003). The Nature of Mediterranean Europe: An Ecological History. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93, 494–498. Holliday, V. T. (2004). Soils in Archaeological Research. New York, Oxford University Press, Ch 7 (relevant section on Aeolian processes) Rapp, G., & Hill, C. L. (1998).Geoarchaeology: the earth-science approach to archaeological interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press, Ch 3, pp 54-57 Waters, M. R. (1992). Principles of Geoarchaeology: a North American perspective. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. Ch 4, pp 185-210 Case Studies: Fanning, P. C., Holdaway, S. J., Rhodes, E. J., & Bryant, T. G. (2009). The surface archaeological record in arid Australia: Geomorphic controls on preservation, exposure, and visibility. Geoarchaeology, 24(2), 121-146. Field, J., &bannin, E. B. (1998).Hillslope Processes and Archaeology in WadiZiqlab, Jordan. Geoarchaeology, 13(6), 595-616. Haynes, C. V. (2000). Geochronology and Climate Change of the Pleistocene–Holocene Transition in the Darb el Arba’in Desert, Eastern Sahara. Geoarchaeology, 16(1), 117-141. Additional reference works: Reading, H. G. (Ed.). (2004). Sedimentary Environments: Processes, Facies and Stratigraphy. London: Blackwell Science. Ch 5 Session 10. The humid tropics The lecture will introduce the main features associated with humid tropical environments. Included here are some specific geomorphological features common to the humid tropical belt, the nature of precipitation and weathering, and the characteristics of soil formation. Required readings: Mercader, J., Martí, R., Martínez, J. L., & Brooks, A. (2002).The nature of ‘stone-lines ’in the African Quaternary record: archaeological resolution at the rainforest site of Mosumu, Equatorial Guinea. Quaternary International, 89, 71-96. McBrearty, S. (1990). Consider the Humble Termite: Termites as Agents of Post-depositional Disturbance at African Archaeological Sites. Journal of Archaeological Science, 17, 111-143. Pärssinen, M. H., Salo, J. S., &Räsänen, M. E. (1996).River floodplain relocations and the abandonment of Aborigine settlements in the Upper Amazon Basin: A historical case study of San Miguel de Cunibos at the Middle Ucayali River. Geoarchaeology, 11(4), 345-359. Beach, T. (1999). Soil constraints on Northwest Yucatán, Mexico: Pedoarchaeology and Maya subsistence at Chunchucmil. Geoarchaeology, 13(8), 759-761. ARCL 2017 9 Barse, W. (2003).Human occupation in the Orinoco. In J. Mercader (Ed.), Under the Canopy: the Archaeology of Tropical Rainforests (pp. 249-270). London: Rutgers University Press. Study Week: 3-7 Nov 2014 Week VI. Session 11. 13 November 2014 Occupations I: Caves and rock-shelters The lecture will introduce the main features associated with the study of archaeological cave and rock shelters. Processes of sedimentation, erosion and deposition, as well as chemical processes affecting cave site sediments, will be examined in further detail. Human settlements, site formation processes, and palaeoenvironmental implications of cave geoarchaeology will be discussed. Required readings: Goldberg, P., & Macphail, R. (2006).Practical and Theoretical Geoarchaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, Ch 8 Goldberg, P., & Mandel, R. D. (2008).Caves and Rockshelters. In M. P. Editor-in-Chief: Deborah (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Archaeology (pp. 966-974). New York: Academic Press. Butzer K.W. (1982). Archaeology as Human Ecology: Method and Theory for a Contextual Approach Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. A Pleistocene prototype: cave sediments, pp 79-85 and An example of cave geo-archaeology: Cueva Morin, pp 85-87. Waters M.R. (1992). Principles of Geoarchaeology. Tucson: University of Arizona. In Chapter 5, Rockshelters and caves, pp 240-247. Laville, H. (1976). Deposits in calreous rock shelters: analytical methods and climatic interpretation. In D. A. Davidson & M. L. Shackley (Eds.), Geoarchaeology. Earth Science and the Past (pp. 137-157). London: Gerald Duckworth and Co. Farrand, W. R. (2001). Archaeological Sediments in Rockshelters and Caves. In J. K. Stein & W. R. Farrand (Eds.), Sediments in Archaeological Context (pp. 29-66). Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press. Rapp, G., & Hill, C. L. (1998).Geoarchaeology: the earth-science approach to archaeological interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press, Ch 3 Suggested readings: Araújo, A., Feathers, J., Arroyo-Kalin, M., &Tizuka, M. M. (2008).Lapa das Boleiras rockshelter: stratigraphy and formation processes at a Paleoamerican site in Central Brazil. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35(12), 3186-3202 Boschian, G. and Montagnari-Kokelj, E. (2000) Prehistoric shepherds and caves in the Trieste Karst (Northeastern Italy).Geoarchaeology 15(4): 331-371. Hunt, C., Davison, J., Inglis, R., Farr, L., Reynolds, T., Simpson, D., et al. (2010). Site formation processes in caves: The Holocene sediments of the HauaFteah, Cyrenaica, Libya. [doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.01.021]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37(7), 1600-1611. Mercader, J., Martí, R., González, I. J., Sánchez, A., &García, P. (2003).Archaeological site formation in rain forests: insights from the Ituri rock shelters, Congo. Journal of Archaeological Science, 30, 45-65. Bar-Yosef O., Vandermeersch B., Arensburg B., Belfer-Cohen A., Goldberg P., Laville H., Meignen L., Rak Y., Speth J.D., Tchernov E., Tillier A.-M., and Weiner S. (1992). The Excavations in Kebara Cave, Mt. Carmel.Current Anthropology 33: 497-550. Session 12. Occupations II: Open-air site It is not just artefacts, structures and pits that make up the archaeology: the sediment matrix within which these have formed is worthy of attention. This lecture examines the growing importance of geoarchaeological research of occupation deposits ARCL 2017 10 Required readings: Goldberg, P., & Macphail, R. (2006).Practical and Theoretical Geoarchaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, Ch 10, 11 Butzer, K. W., Miralles, I., &Mateu, J. F. (1983).Urban Geo-archaeology in Medieval Alzira (Prov. Valencia, Spain).Journal of Archaeological Science, 10, 333-349. Fernández, F. G., Terry, R. E., Inomata, T., & Eberl, M. (2002). An Ethnoarchaeological Study of Chemical Residues in the Floors and Soils of Q’eqchi’ Maya Houses at Las Pozas, Guatemala. Geoarchaeology, 17(6), 487-519. Davidson, D. A. (1976). Processes of Tell Formation and Erosion. In D. A. Davidson & M. L. Shackley (Eds.), Geoarchaeology. Earth Science and the Past (pp. 255-266). London: Gerald Duckworth and Co. Shahack-Gross, R., Albert, R.-M., Gilboa, A., Nagar-Hilman, O., Sharon, I., & Weiner, S. (2005). Geoarchaeology in an urban context: the uses of space in a Phoenician monumental building at Tel Dor (Israel). Journal of Archaeological Science 32, 1417-1431. Rosen, A. M. (1985). Cities of clay: the geoarchaeology of tells. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Butzer, K. W., Miralles, I., &Mateu, J. F. (1983).Urban Geo-archaeology in Medieval Alzira (Prov. Valencia, Spain).Journal of Archaeological Science, 10, 333-349. Stein, J. K., Deo, J. N., & Phillips, L. S. (2003). Big sites - Short time: Accumulation rates in archaeological sites. Journal of Archaeological Science, 30(3), 297-316. Villagran, X. S., Balbo, A. L., Madella, M., Vila, A., & Estevez, J. (2011). Stratigraphic and spatial variability in shell middens: microfacies identification at the ethnohistoric site Tunel VII (Tierra del Fuego, Argentina). Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 3(4), 357-378. Week VII. Session 13. 20 November 2014 Practical 1: Characterising sediments and soils In the first laboratory session we will review the basics of field and laboratory sediment characterisation. The sessions will take place in the geoarchaeology laboratory. Be ready to use what you have learned so far to interpret the depositional environments of samples. Required readings: Goldberg, P., & Macphail, R. (2006).Practical and Theoretical Geoarchaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, Ch 15 NRCS Soil Survey Manual Ch 3: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ref/?cid=nrcs142p2_054253 Session 14. Practical1: (continued) Continuation of the laboratory session. Week VIII. Session 15. 27 November 2014 Occupations III: Human impact on the landscape Causality in landscape change is often associated with either external or autogenic forcing. However, human societies have greatly impacted and transformed vast tracts of the earth’s landscape. This lecture will focus on the geoarchaeological study of human impact on the landscape. Required readings: Goldberg, P., & Macphail, R. (2006).Practical and Theoretical Geoarchaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, Ch 9 McKoy, M. D., &Hartshorn, A. S. (2007). Wind Erosion and Intensive Prehistoric Agriculture: A Case Study from the Kalaupapa Field System, Moloka’i Island, Hawai’i. Geoarchaeology, 22(5), 511532. ARCL 2017 11 French, C. A. I., Sulas, F., & Madella, M. (2009). New geoarchaeological investigations of the valley systems in the Aksum area of northern Ethiopia. Catena, 78, 218-233. Bell, M. (1992). The Prehistory of Soil Erosion. In M. Bell & J. Boardman (Eds.), Past and present soil erosion: archaeological and geographical perspectives. Oxford: Oxbow. Butzer, K. W. (1996). Ecology in the Long View: Settlement Histories, Agrosystemic Strategies, and Ecological Performance. Journal of Field Archaeology, 23(2), 141-150 Butzer, K. W. (2005). Environmental history in the Mediterranean world: cross-disciplinary investigation of cause-and-effect for degradation and soil erosion. Journal of Archaeological Science, 32, 1773-1800. Beach, T., Dunning, N., Luzzadder-Beach, S., Cook, D. E., &Lohse, J. (2006).Impacts of the ancient Maya on soils and soil erosion in the central Maya Lowlands. Catena, 65(2), 166-178. French, C. A. I. (2003). Geoarchaeology in Action: Studies in Soil Micromorphology and Landscape Evolution. London: Routledge. Ch. 12 Wilkinson, T. J. (2003). Archaeological Landscapes of the Near East. Tucson, Arizona: University of Arizona Press. Ch 4-6 Suggested readings: Van Andel, T. H. (1998). Paleosols, red sediments, and the Old Stone Age in Greece. Geoarchaeology, 13(4), 361-390. Various Authors (2005) Geoarchaeology Special Issue: Landscape and Land Use—Geoarchaeological Approaches to Human Impact, 20(2) Session 16. Occupations IV: Landscape engineering and anthropogenic soils The surface of the planet has been vastly remodelled as a result of human inhabitation. In this session we examine geoarchaeological approaches to landscape engineering and the study of anthropogenic soils. Required readings: Arroyo-Kalin, M., Neves, E. G., & Woods, W. I. (n.d.). Anthropogenic dark earths of the Central Amazon region: remarks on their evolution and polygenetic composition. In W. I. Woods (Ed.), Terra Preta Nova – a tribute to WimSombroek. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Davidson, D., & Simpson, I. (2005). The time dimension in landscape ecology: cultural soils and spatial pattern in early landscapes. In J. A. Wiends& M. R. Moss (Eds.), Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology (pp. 152-158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. McKey, D., Rostain, S., Iriarte, J., Glaser, B., Birk, J. J., Holst, I., et al. (2010).Pre-Columbian agricultural landscapes, ecosystem engineers, and self-organized patchiness in Amazonia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(17), 7823-7828. Blume, H.-P., &Leinweber, P. (2004).Plaggen Soils: landscape history, properties, and classification. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 167(3), 319-327. Woods, W. I. (2003).Development of anthrosol research. In J. Lehmann, D. Kern, B. Glaser & W. Woods (Eds.), Amazonian Dark Earths: Origins, Properties and Management (pp. 3-14). Dordrecht: Kluwer Press. Macphail, R. I., Galinie, H., & Verhaeghe, F. (2003).A future for Dark Earth? Antiquity, 77(296), 349358. Week IX. Session 17. 4 December 2014 Practical 2: ‘Remote-sensing’ sediments and soils Geoarchaeological analyses used to study of soil and sediment samples will be taught in the geoarchaeology laboratory ARCL 2017 12 Required readings: Goldberg, P., & Macphail, R. (2006).Practical and Theoretical Geoarchaeology. Oxford: Blackwell. Ch. 15-17 Session 18. Practical 2: (continued) Continuation of the laboratory session. Week X. Session 19. 11 December 2014 Practical 3: ‘Ground-truthing’ sediments and soils The basics of micromorphological analyses will be taught in the geoarchaeology laboratory Required readings: Courty, M.-A., Macphail, R., & Goldberg, P. (1989).Soils and Micromorphology in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bullock, P., Fedoroff, N., Jongerius, A., Stoops, G., &Tursina, T. (1986). Handbook for Soil Thin Section Description (1st ed.). Wolverhampton, UK: Waine Research Publications. Goldberg, P., & Macphail, R. (2006).Practical and Theoretical Geoarchaeology. Oxford: Blackwell. Ch. 16 Session 20. Practical 3: (continued) Continuation of the laboratory session. 5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION LIBRARIES AND OTHER RESOURCES: Use UCL Explore to identify where readings are found. Most of them are located in either the Archaeology or Science libraries. Students are asked to organise themselves in order to share in the loan of books of which only few copies are available. Please contact the course coordinator if a specific item cannot be found in UCL. INFORMATION FOR INTERCOLLEGIATE AND INTERDEPARTMENTAL STUDENTS: Students enrolled in Departments outside the Institute should obtain the Institute’s coursework guidelines from Judy Medrington (email j.medrington@ucl.ac.uk), which will also be available on the IoA website. HEALTH AND SAFETY: The Institute has a Health and Safety policy and code of practice which provides guidance on laboratory work. This code of practice is revised annually and the new edition can be consulted online. All work undertaken in the Institute is governed by these guidelines and students have a duty to be aware of them and to adhere to them at all times. This is particularly important in the context of the laboratory undertaken as part of this course. INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY COURSEWORK PROCEDURES: General policies and procedures concerning courses and coursework, including submission procedures, assessment criteria, and general resources, are available in your Degree Handbook and on the following website: http://wiki.ucl.ac.uk/display/archadmin. It is essential that you read and comply with these. Note that some of the policies and procedures will be different depending on your status (e.g. undergraduate, postgraduate taught, affiliate, graduate diploma, intercollegiate, interdepartmental). If in doubt, please consult your course co-ordinator. Revised: 01 October 2014/MA-K ARCL 2017 13