PLEASE NOTE this is a sample reading list for the 2015-16 academic year
– precise seminar content may change from year to year.
WEEK 1: HUME’S STANDARD OF TASTE
By way of an introduction to some of the issues that will exercise Kant, particularly the objectivity or
otherwise of judgements of taste, we begin by considering Hume’s empiricist approach to some of
the same issues. Hume’s essay is widely anthologized; and is one of the most discussed essays in
aesthetics, as the bibliography below (taken from Theodore Gracyk’s SEP article) attests.
Required Reading
Hume ‘Of the Standard of Taste’ (available on-line at the following URLs):
http://web.mnstate.edu/gracyk/courses/phil%20of%20art/hume%20on%20taste.htm
http://www.csulb.edu/~jvancamp/361r15.html#Bibliography
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1760hume-taste.asp
http://www.davidhume.org/texts/fd.html
Further Reading
Carroll, Noël (1984). "Hume's Standard of Taste," Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 43: 181-94.
Costelloe, Timothy M. (2003). "Hume, Kant, and the ‘Antinomy of Taste’," Journal of the History of
Philosophy, 41: 165-85.
––– (2007). Aesthetics and Morals in the Philosophy of David Hume (Routledge Studies in Eighteenth
Century Philosophy), London: Routledge.
Dadlez, Eva M. (2002). "The Vicious Habits of Entirely Fictitious People: Hume on the Moral
Evaluation of Art," Philosophy and Literature, 26: 143-56.
Jason Gaiger, ‘The True Judge of Beauty and the Paradox of Taste’, European Journal of Philosophy,
8:1 (2002), 1-19
Galgut, Elisa (2001). "The Poetry and the Pity: Hume's Account of Tragic Pleasure," British Journal of
Aesthetics, 41: 411-24.
Gracyk, Theodore (1994). "Rethinking Hume's Standard of Taste," Journal of Aesthetics and Art
Criticism, 52: 168-82.
Gracyk ‘Hume’s Aesthetics’ Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume-aesthetics/
Guyer, Paul (2005). "The Standard of Taste and the ‘Most Ardent Desire of Society’," in Paul Guyer,
Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 37-74.
Hester, Marcus (1979). "Hume on Principles and Perceptual Ability," Journal of Aesthetics and Art
Criticism, 37: 295-302.
Jones, Peter (1993). "Hume's Literary and Aesthetic Theory," in David Fate Norton (ed.), The
Cambridge Companion to Hume, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 255-280.
Kivy, Peter (1967). "Hume's Standard of Taste: Breaking the Circle," British Journal of Aesthetics, 7:
57-66.
––– (1983). "Hume's Neighbor's Wife: An Essay in the Evolution of Hume's Aesthetics," British
Journal of Aesthetics, 23: 195-208.
Korsmeyer, Carolyn (1976). "Hume and the Foundations of Taste," Journal of Aesthetics and Art
Criticism, 35: 201-15.
––– (1995). "Gendered Concepts and Hume's Standard of Taste," in P. Z. Brand and Carolyn
Korsmeyer (eds.), Feminism and Tradition in Aesthetics, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State
University Press.
Levinson, Jerrold (2002). "Hume's Standard of Taste: The Real Problem," Journal of Aesthetics and
Art Criticism, 60: 227-238.
––– (2003). "The Real Problem Sustained: Reply to Wieand", Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,
61: 398-99.
MacLachlan, Christopher (1986). “Hume and the Standard of Taste”, Hume Studies, 12: 18-38.
MacMillan, Claude (1986). "Hume, Points of View and Aesthetic Judgments", The Journal of Value
Inquiry, 20: 109-23.
Marshall, David (1995). "Arguing by Analogy: Hume's Standard of Taste," Eighteenth-Century Studies,
28: 323-43.
Mason, Michelle (2001). "Moral Prejudice and Aesthetic Deformity: Rereading Hume's ‘Of the
Standard of Taste’," Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 59: 59-71.
Mothersill, Mary (1989). "Hume and the Paradox of Taste," in George Dickie, Richard Sclafani and
Robin Ronald (eds.), Aesthetics: A Critical Anthology, New York: St. Martin's Press: 269-86.
––– (1998). "Hume, David, ‘Of the Standard of Taste’" in Michael Kelly (ed.), The Encyclopedia of
Aesthetics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, Volume 2: 428-33.
Neill, Alex (1998). "‘An Unaccountable Pleasure’: Hume on Tragedy and the Passions," Hume Studies,
24: 335-354.
––– (1992). "Yanal and Others on Hume on Tragedy," Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 50: 151154.
––– (1999) "Hume's ‘Singular Phænomenon’," British Journal of Aesthetics, 39: 112-125.
Osborne, Harold (1967). "Hume's Standard and the Diversity of Aesthetic Taste," British Journal of
Aesthetics, 7: 50-56.
Perricone, Christopher (1995). "The Body and Hume's Standard of Taste," Journal of Aesthetics and
Art Criticism, 53: 371-8.
Rose, Mary Carman (1976). "The Importance of Hume in the History of Western Aesthetics," British
Journal of Aesthetics, 16: 218-29.
Ross, Stephanie (2008). "Humean Critics: Real or Ideal?," British Journal of Aesthetics, 48: 20-28.
Anthony Saville, ‘Hume, Kant and the Standard of Taste’ in Saville, Kantian Aesthetics Pursued,
Edinburgh University Press, 1993.
Shelley, James (1994). "Hume's Double Standard of Taste," Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,
52: 437-45.
––– (1998). "Hume and the Nature of ‘Taste’," Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 56: 29-38.
––– (2001). "Empiricism: Hutcheson and Hume", in Berys Gaut and Dominic M. Lopes (eds.),
Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, London: Routledge: 37-49.
––– (2004). "Hume's Principles of Taste: A Reply to Dickie," British Journal of Aesthetics, 44: 84-89.
Shiner, Roger A. (1996). "Hume and the Causal Theory of Taste," Journal of Aesthetics and Art
Criticism, 54: 237-49.
Shusterman, Richard (1989). "Of the Scandal of Taste: Social Privilege as Nature in the Aesthetic
Theories of Hume and Kant," Philosophical Forum, 20: 211-29.
Sverdlik, Steven (1986). "Hume's Key and Aesthetic Rationality," Journal of Aesthetics and Art
Criticism, 45: 69-76.
Townsend, Dabney (2001). Hume's Aesthetic Theory: Taste and Sentiment, London: Routledge.
Wieand, Jeffrey (1983). "Hume's Two Standards of Taste," Philosophical Quarterly, 34: 129-42.
––– (2003). "Hume's Real Problem," Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 61: 395-98.
Yanal, Robert J. (1991). "Hume and Others on the Paradox of Tragedy," Journal of Aesthetics and Art
Criticism, 49: 75-76.
Zangwill, Nick (2001). "Hume, Taste, and Teleology," in The Metaphysics of Beauty, Ithaca: Cornell
University Press: 149-65.
WEEK 2: REFLECTIVE JUDGEMENT IN CJ INTRODUCTIONS
This week provides a general introduction to Kant’s aesthetics. Topics will include the place of the
third Critique in Kant’s Critical Philosophy, but will focus largely on questions internal to the Critique
of Judgement itself: notably, what Kant means by ‘aesthetic’, ‘taste’ and, especially, ‘reflective
judgement’ in this context.
Required Reading
Kant’s preface to the first edition;
Published Introduction; especially §§IV-VII
‘First (Unpublished) Introduction;’ especially §§ V-VIII.
Commentaries
Wenzel, introduction; pp. 1-18
Kemal, Kant’s Aesthetic Theory, chapter 1
Crawford, Kant’s Aesthetic Theory, pp. 29-36.
Allison, chapters 1-2; especially pp. 30-64
Guyer, Kant and the Claims of Taste, Chapter 2
Further Reading
Alexander Rueger and Sahan Evren, ‘The Role of Symbolic Representation in Kant’s Theory of Taste,’
BJA, 45: 4, 2005
Andrew Chignell, ‘Beauty as a Symbol of Natural Systematicity, BJA, 46:4, Oct 2006
M Zinkin, ‘Kant and the Pleasure of ‘Mere’ Reflection,’ 55:5, October 2012
P.Guyer and T Cohen ‘Introduction’ to Guyer & Cohen (eds.), Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics.
E. Schaper ‘Taste, Sublimity and Genius: The Aesthetics of Nature and Art’ in P. Guyer (ed.)
Cambridge Companion to Kant.
M. Budd ‘The Pure Judgement of Taste as an Aesthetic Reflective Judgement’ British Journal of
Aesthetics, Vol. 41, 2001, pp. 247-60.
D. Heinrich ‘Kant’s Explanation of Aesthetic Judgement’ in Aesthetic Judgement and the Moral Image
of the World.
D. Bell ‘The Art of Judgement,’ Mind, 96, 1987; pp. 221-244
P. Crowther ‘The Significance of Kant’s Pure Aesthetic Judgement’, British Journal of Aesthetics, Vol.
36, No. 2, April 1996.
P. Guyer ‘Kant’s Principles of Reflecting Judgement’ in P. Guyer (ed.) Kant’s Critique of the Power of
Judgement.
H. Ginsborg, ‘Reflective Judgement and Taste’ in Nous Vol. 24, No.1 March 1990.
J. Floyd ‘Heautonomy: Kant on Reflective Judgement and Systematicity’ in H. Parrett, ed., Kants
Äesthetik.
A.C. Genova ‘Kant’s Complex Problem of Reflective Judgement’ in Chadwick & Cazeaux (eds.),
Immanuel Kant. Critical Assessments: Vol. IV.
C. Fricke ‘Explaining the Inexplicable: The Hypothesis of the Faculty of Reflective Judgement in Kant’s
third Critique, in Nous Vol. 24, No.1 March 1990.
R. Pippin, ‘The Significance of Taste: Kant, Aesthetic and Reflective Judgement’ Journal of the History
of Philosophy 34, 1996; pp. 549-69.
P. Guyer ‘Kant’s Distinction between the Beautiful and the Sublime’ in Review of Metaphysics, 35,
1982/3; pp. 753-83.
WEEK 3: ANALYTIC OF THE BEAUTIFUL (FIRST/SECOND MOMENTS)
This week and next focus on the most influential aspect of the third Critique, its analysis of
the grounds and distinctive nature of aesthetic judgement. Kant divides the Analytic into
‘four moments:’ Quality, Quantity, Relation and Modality. Taken together these map out
Kant’s conception of aesthetic judgement. But the relation between the four moments (in
particular what is supposed to ground what) remains controversial. This week we focus on
the first two moments, Quality and Quantity, paying special attention to §9, and idea of a
‘harmonious free play of the faculties,’ a proper understanding of which Kant claims is ‘the
key’ to the critique of taste.
Required Reading
Kant, CJ §§1-9
Commentaries
Wenzel, chapters 1-2; pp. 19-53.
Kemal, chapters 2-3
Crawford, pp. 37-54
Allison, chapters 3-5
Guyer, chapters 3-5
Further Reading
P. Guyer ‘Pleasure and Society in Kant’s Theory of Taste’ in Guyer & Cohen (eds.), Essays in Kant’s
Aesthetics.
H. Allison ‘Pleasure and Harmony in Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Critique of the Causal Reading’ in H.
Parrett, ed., Kants Äesthetik.
H. Ginsborg, ‘On the Key to Kant’s Critique of Taste’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 72, 1991; pp. 290313.
H. Ginsborg, The Role of Taste in Kant’s Theory of Cognition, especially chapter 3.
H. Ginsborg, ‘Kant on the Subjectivity of Taste’ and K. Ameriks ‘New Views on Kant’s Judgement of
Taste’ in H. Parrett, ed., Kants Äesthetik.
H. Ginsborg, ‘Lawfulness without Law: Kant on the Free Play of Imagination and Understanding,’
Philosophical Topics, Vol. 25, No. 1, 1997; pp. 37-83.
F. Rush, ‘The Harmony of the Faculties’, Kant-Studien 92, 2001; pp. 38-61.
B. Longuenesse ‘Kant’s Theory of Judgement, and Judgements of Taste: On Henry Allison’s Kant’s
Theory of Taste’, H. Ginsborg ‘Aesthetic Judging and the Intentionality of Pleasure,’ H. Allison, Reply
to the Comments of Longuenesse and Ginsborg,’ a Symposium in Inquiry Vol. 46, No. 2, June 2003.
P. Guyer, ‘The Harmony of the Faculties Revisited’ in R. Kukla (ed.) Reflecting on Sensibility:
Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy; also available in P. Guyer Values of Beauty.
M. Budd, The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature, Essay 2: Section I,
P. Guyer, ‘Disinterestedness and Desire in Kant’s Aesthetics’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,
36, 1977/8; pp. 449-60.
Rachel Zuckert, ‘A New Look at Kant’s Theory of Pleasure,’ JAAC 60:3, Summer 2002
WEEK 4: ANALYTIC OF THE BEAUTIFUL (THIRD/FOURTH MOMENTS)
Having considered Quality and Quantity (‘disinterestedness’ and universality) last week we move on
to Relation and Modality (‘formal purposiveness’ and necessity) this week. Topics include what Kant
means by ‘form’ and ‘purposiveness,’ and how he understands the relation between ‘pure’ and
‘dependent’ judgements of taste (typically, but not always, aesthetic judgements of nature and
aesthetic judgements of art). We shall also look at Kant’s postulate of a ‘sensus communis’
underwriting such judgements’ claim to universality.
Required Reading
Kant, CJ §§10-22 (+ General Comment), §§39-40
Commentaries
Wenzel, chapters 3-4; pp. 54-93
Kemal, chapter 4
Allison, chapters 6-7
Guyer, chapter 6
Further Reading:
P. Guyer ‘Free and Adherent Beauty: A Modest Proposal’ in British Journal of Aesthetics,
Vol. 42, No. 4, October 2002, reprinted in Guyer, Values of Beauty.
E. Schaper ‘Free and Dependent Beauty’ in E. Schaper, Studies in Kant’s Aesthetics.
G. Scarre ‘Free and Dependent Beauty’ in Immanuel Kant Critical Assessments Vol. IV.
P. Crowther, ‘The Claims of Perfection: A Revisionary Defense of Kant’s Theory of Dependent
Beauty,’ International Philosophical Quarterly 26, 1986, pp. 61-74.
D. Dutton, ‘Kant and the Conditions of Artistic Beauty,’ British Journal of Aesthetics Vol. 34 1994, pp.
226-41.
M. Budd, The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature, Essay 2: Section I
J-F. Lyotard ‘The Communication of Taste’ in Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublime
Rachel Zuckert, ‘The Purposiveness of Form: A Reading of Kant’s Aesthetic Formalism, Journal of the
History of Philosophy, 44:4, Oct 2006
Alexander Rueger, ‘Beautiful Surfaces: Kant on Free and Dependent Beauty in Nature and Art,’
British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 16:3, 2008
WEEK 5: DEDUCTION OF PURE AESTHETIC JUDGEMENTS
We jump forward to the Deduction of Pure Aesthetic Judgements this week. The deduction is
Kant’s attempt to justify the pure judgement of taste’s claim to universality by grounding it in
its own a priori principle. There is controversy over exactly what constitutes the Deduction
with different commentators locating it differently and finding attempts scattered throughout
the text, as early as §9 and §§20-2. We shall focus on §30-40.
Required Reading
Kant, CJ §§30-38 (+ General Comment)
Commentaries
Wenzel, pp. 81-93
Kemal, chapter 5
Crawford, chapters 3-6
Allison, chapter 8
Guyer, chapters 7-9
Further Reading
In addition to much of the reading under weeks 3-4, see also:
Karl Ameriks, ‘Kant and Objectivity of Taste’ British Journal of Aesthetics Vol. 23, No. 1, 1983 and
‘How to Save Kant’s Deduction of Taste’ Journal of Value Inquiry, 16, 1982.
Michael J Young, ‘Kant’s View of Imagination’ Kant-Studien. 79: 1-4.
NB. NO CLASS IN WEEK 6
WEEK 7: ART, BEAUTY, MORALITY
We consider Kant’s various remarks about the relation between artistic and natural beauty and
morality or ‘moral interest.’ Topics will include how Kant thought of the relation between morality
on the one hand, and natural and artistic beauty on the other, the role of aesthetic ideas in this
account, the formal analogies between aesthetic and moral judgement, the idea of beauty as a
‘symbol’ of morality, and the relation between beauty and the ‘supersensible’ in the Dialectic.
Required reading
Kant, CJ; §§41-42; + Dialectic of Aesthetic Judgement; §§55-60.
Commentaries
Wenzel, chapter 6
Kemal, chapter 6
Crawford, chapters 6-7
Allison, chapters 9-11
Guyer, chapter 11
Further Reading
M. Budd, The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature, Essay 2: Section II
P. Guyer ‘Interest, Nature and Art: A Problem in Kant’s Aesthetics,’ Review of Metaphysics, Vol. 31,
1977/8; pp. 580-603.
T. Cohen ‘Why Beauty is a Symbol of Morality,’ in Cohen & Guyer (eds.) Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics.
R. Pippin, ‘The Significance of Taste: Kant, Aesthetic and Reflective Judgement’ Journal of the History
of Philosophy 34, 1996; pp. 549-69.
P. Guyer Kant and the Experience of Freedom, essays in Part II.
P. Guyer, ‘The Symbols of Freedom in Kant’s Aesthetics’ and S. Kemal ‘The Practical Postulates of
Freedom and Beauty as a Symbol of Morality’ in H. Parret (ed.) Kants Äesthetik.
K. Dusing, ‘Beauty as the Transition from Nature to Freedom in Kant’s Critique of Judgement,’ Nous
24, 1990; pp. 79-92.
S. Kemal ‘The Importance of Artistic Beauty’, in Immanuel Kant. Critical Assessments: Vol IV
WEEK 8: EDMUND BURKE ON THE SUBLIME (TBC)
Here we take a step back from the third Critique to look back at Edmund Burke’s emphasis on
physiological aspects of the experience of the sublime, by way of a contrast with Kant’s approach to
be considered next week. This week to be confirmed, depending on progress so far. If we are
behind, we may have to skip it, or incorporate some of this material into the following week on the
Kantian sublime.
Required Reading
Edmund Burke, A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. Ed.
James T. Boulton, Routledge Classics, 2008. Excerpts from Part II tbc.
Further Reading
James Shelley, ‘18th Century British Aesthetics’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aesthetics-18th-british/
Richard Shusterman,’Somaesthetics and Burke’s Sublime’ British Journal of Aesthetics 45:4, 2005,
323-341.
Anthony Quinton, ‘Burke on the Sublime and Beautiful, Philosophy: The Journal of the Royal Institute
of Philosophy, JA 61.36 71-3
Carolyn Korsmeyer ‘Terrible Beauties’, in Matthew Kieran (ed.) Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics
and the Philosophy of Art, Oxford: Blackwell, 2006
Ronald Hepburn, ‘The Concept of the Sublime: Has it any Relevance for
Philosophy Today?’. Dialectics and Humanism 15 (1988): 137–55.
Paul Guyer ‘The Beautiful and the Sublime’ in Kant and the Experience of Freedom, CUP 1993.
Paul Crowther, The Kantian Sublime: From Morality to Art, Oxford: Clarendon 1989
Peter Kivy, The Seventh Sense, Oxford: Clarendon 2003.
Phillip Shaw, The Sublime, London: Routledge 2006
WEEK 9: KANT ON THE SUBLIME (MATHEMATICAL/DYNAMIC)
This week we look at Kant’s discussion of two kinds of aesthetic judgements of the sublime, based
on the apprehension of overwhelming magnitude and overwhelming force. Despite the inability of
our sensory capacities to present such phenomena in their totality to intuition, Kant maintains that
our ability to cognize phenomena of such magnitude and force nonetheless confirms the superiority
of our rational or ‘supersensible’ natures. Though marginalized in analytic third Critique
interpretation, the sublime became a topic of renewed interest among continental philosophers
with the advent of postmodernism, when it was used to theorize art, notably by Lyotard.
Required Reading
Kant, CJ §§23-29
Commentaries
Wenzel, chapter 6
Allison, chapter 13
Further Reading
Malcolm Budd ‘Delight in the Natural World Kant on the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature’ Part III:
The Sublime in Nature, BJA 38:2 (1998) 233-50.
Malcolm Budd, The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature, Essay 2: Section III.
Paul Crowther, The Kantian Sublime: From Morality to Art, Oxford: Clarendon 1989
Kirk Pillow, Sublime Understanding, MIT
Kirk Pillow ‘Form and Content in Kant’s Aesthetics: Locating Beauty and the Sublime in the Work of
Art’ Journal of the History of Philosophy, 32:3, July 1994.
Rudolph Makkreel, Imagination and Interpretation in Kant.
Donald Crawford ‘The Place of the Sublime in Kant’s Aesthetic Theory’ in R. Kennington (ed.) The
Philosophy of Immanuel Kant.
P. Guyer ‘Kant’s Distinction between the Beautiful and the Sublime’ in Review of Metaphysics, 35,
1982/3; pp. 753-83.
Jean-François Lyotard, Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublime, Standford University Press 1994,
Jean-François Lyotard, The Inhuman, Polity 1991.
WEEK 10: FINE ART, GENIUS AND AESTHETIC IDEAS
We conclude with Kant’s positive account of fine art, the division of arts, genius as the productive
capacity responsible for fine art, and the distinctive function of works of art in Kant’s theory. Topics
will include the relation between Kant’s account of aesthetic judgement and his theory of artistic
production, the relation between natural and artistic beauty, and Kant’s claim that works of art are
able to indirectly present what typically transcends intuition, namely ideas, in sensuous form. We
will focus on genius and aesthetic ideas (§§46-9 in particular).
Required Reading:
Kant, CJ; §§43-54
Commentaries
Wenzel, chapter 5
Crawford, chapter 8
Allison, chapters 12
Guyer, chapters 12
Further Reading
P. Crowther, 'Beyond Formalism: Kant's Theory of Art' in Critical Aesthetics and Postmodernism.
W. Desmond 'Kant and the Terror of Genius: Between Enlightenment and Romanticism', and R.
Makreel ‘On Sublimity, Genius and the Explication of Aesthetic ideas’ H. Parrett, ed., Kants Äesthetik.
R. Makkreel, Imagination and Interpretation in Kant.
K. Rogerson, Kan’s Aesthetics: The Roles of Form and Expression.
D. Crawford ‘Kant’s Theory of Creative Imagination’ in Cohen & Guyer, eds., Essays in Kant's
Aesthetics.
P. Guyer, ‘Exemplary Originality: Genius, Universality and Individuality’ in Guyer, Values of Beauty.
T. Cohen, ‘The Inexplicable: Some Thoughts after Kant’, in B. Gaut & P. Livingston (eds.) The Creation
of Art New Essays in Philosophical Aesthetics.
K. Pillow ‘Jupiter’s Eagle and the Despot’s Hand Mill: Two Views of Metaphor in Kant’, Journal of
Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 59, No. 2, Spring 2001.
K. Pillow ‘Form and Content in Kant’s Aesthetics: Locating Beauty and the Sublime in the Work of
Art’ Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. 32., No. 3, July 1994.
A.T. Nuyen ‘The Kantian Theory of Metaphor’ Philosophy and Rhetoric 22, 1989, pp. 95-109.
L. Zuidervaart. ‘“Aesthetic Ideas” and the Role of Art in Kant’s Ethical Hermenutics’ and B. Sassen
‘Artistic Genius and the Question of Creativity’ in P. Guyer (ed.) Kant’s Critique of the Power of
Judgement.
I. Stadler, ‘The Idea of Art and its Criticism: A Rational Reconstruction of a Kantian Doctrine’ in Cohen
and Guyer (eds.) Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics.
S. Kemal, ‘The Production of Fine Art’, Kant and Fine Art, chapter 2.
D.W. Gotshalk ‘Form and Expression in Kant’s Aesthetics’ in Kant. Critical Assessments: Vol. IV.
R.K. Elliott, ‘The Unity of Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgement,’ Kant. Critical Assessments IV.
P. Guyer ‘Formalism and Theory of Expression in Kant’s Aesthetics’ in Kant Studien 68.
D. Costello, ‘Kant after LeWitt: Towards an Aesthetics of Conceptual Art,’ P. Goldie & E. Schellekens
(eds.) Philosophy and Conceptual Art, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
D.Costello, ‘Kant and the Problem of Strong Non-Perceptual Art,’ BJA (53.3) July 2013
Christian Wenzel, ‘Beauty, Genius and Mathematics: Why did Kant Change his Mind’, History of
Philosophy Quarterly, 18:4, October 2001.
Angela Breitenbach, ‘Beauty in Proofs: Kant on Aesthetics in Mathematics, European Journal of
Philosophy, forthcoming
Samantha Matherne, ‘The Inclusive Interpretation of Kant’s Aesthetic Ideas’ BJA, 53:1, January 2013
Andrew Chignall, ‘Kant on the Normativity of Taste: The Role of Aesthetic Ideas,’ Australasian
Journal of Philosophy, 85:3, 2007