Container Port Of UK
（英国集装箱港口）
一、The world trade for container
transportation demand
二、British major container ports
World Trade(Billion Dollar)
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
Year
6000
4000
2000
0
1999
2003
2005
2006
2008
Trade and globalization, promoted
the rapid rise of global trade
One of the largest container ports
in Europe——Felixstowe
一、Port of Felixstowe(PFL) profile
二、Felixstowe Facilities
• Currently has nine of container berths , length 3972meters and
depth is 15 meters.
• 50,000m² of covered warehousing on a 22 acre site equipped to
handle almost anything
• Newly racked food grade warehousing
• Temperature controlled facility
• Covered marshalling areas with multi-loading bays with dock
levellers
• Extensive outdoor storage facilities
• 24 hour CCTV security
三、The advantage and the main
routes of port Felixstowe
• The superior geographical position makes
the current status of Felix's port
• Main routes to UK others ports and
Europe and world’s other ports
四、Main goods through port of
Felixstowe
Northeast emerging container
port -Teesport
• The reason of Teesport port emerging
• Location of Teesport
• Container port Facilities
The End
Thank You
2009-06-05
YANGSHAN
DEEP SEA PORT UPDATE
• BLUE PLAN OF YANGSHAN (XIAO YANGSHAN) PROJECT
• SPECIFICATIONS OF YANGSHAN TERMINAL
• SIPG’S OBJECTIVES FOR YANGSHAN PHASE I
• MARKETING/OPERATIONAL CONCERNS
• TARIFF ANALYSIS – WGQ vs YANGSHAN
• CARRIERS’ GENERAL FEEDBACK
Blue Plan Of Yangshan Terminal
Yangshan Develop Plan (XiaoYangshan Part)
Area
Wharf function
Length (M) Berth Throughput (teu)
Forecast
construction ship/ferry
1,000
coastal/river feeder
1,350
8
2,000,000
Y2010
container terminal
1,500
5
2,500,000
Y2009
container terminal (phase I)
1,600
5
3,000,000
Y2005
container terminal (phase II)
1,400
4
2,500,000
Y2006
container terminal (phase III)
2,600
7
5,000,000
Y2007-2008
LNG ship
1,650
Oil tank
1,900
29
15,000,000
Western Part
Yangshan
Mid part
Eastern part
Total
13,000
Organization Of Yangshan Terminal – Phase I
 Terminal Operator:
Shanghai Shengdong International Container Terminal Co.,Ltd
(SSICT)
 Investor:
Shanghai Port Container Company (SPC)
Shanghai International Port (Group) Co.,Ltd (SIPG)
51%
49%
- Terminal specifications – Phase I
18
22nd Sep,2005
M/V “Clementine Maersk” test
berthing on Yangshan Phase I
terminal.
30th Nov,2005
TNWA CEX M/V “APL Iris” made
her first calling on Yangshan Phase I
terminal.
Investment Of Yangshan Terminal – Phase II
Investor:
Hutchison Whampoa
AP Moller Maersk
SIPG
COSCO
China Shipping
32%
32%
16%
10%
10%
- DONGHAI BRIDGE
 Spans 32KM with 2 way 6 lanes (exclude 2 parking lanes)
 Function for transportation, power/water supplies and
communication
 Yearly capacity of movements 4 millions teus (design capacity)
 Linked up on 25th of May 2005 and was opened for traffic in Middle
of Nov.2005.
 No toll fee after opening
- LUCHAOGANG AREA
 Industrial Area: about 200km
 Harbor New City: about 100km
 Connect with Yangshan Inter’l Port through “DONGHAI” Bridge
 Simultaneous development of Port, Urban Area, Industrial Area and
Bridge with respective emphasis, to make this area a key composite
of Shanghai Inter’l Shipping Center
 Lingang Group is the developer of Lingang Industrial Area,
undertaking the tasks of infrastructure construction and commercial
development.
 Layout Plan
Rail Station
Luchaogang Town
Supporting Area
(Phase I)
Int’l Carrying
Trade
Composite
Usage
Service & Trade
Int’l Procurement & Distribution
 Advantages
ation
• Policy
-
Most favorable and open policy in china
• Land
-
Comparatively abundant
Low cost
• Labour
-
Low cost
Supported with industry research & learning base
• Freight
-
Fast multimodal transport with efficient operation to lower inland transportation cost
• Operation
-
Search for top strategic partnership
• Scale
-
combination of both tax and tax-free business
Simultaneous development of the Logistics zone, the port and the equipment
industrial area
• Information Flow
-
Integrated Speedy Customs Clearance, transparent government affairs, and online
services
Integrated information with the support of related sectorsC
ompetitive
SIPG’s Objectives For Yangshan Phase I
 ENSURE A SMOOTH PHASE I OPERATION FOR THE YANGSHAN
PROJECT
 ACHIEVE 2.7-3 MILLIONS THROUGHPUT IN 2006 TO PRESENT A
BRILLIANT FEAT & PREDICT TO 3.5 MILLIONS BY END OF 2007
 SET A FAIR PLAN TO MOVE INTER-TERMINAL SERVICE TO PHASE I BY
EACH INDIVIDUAL NEGOTIATION WITH CARRIERS
 ALL EUROPE STRINGS ARE SELECTED AS PHASE I CALLERS
>>> THE BACKGROUND INFORMATIONS AS FOLLOW
Inter asia 28.7%
Austria 2.3%
Domitic 1,154,349
T/S 2,014,018
Inter Asia 4,171,065
Austria 327,829
Latin.America 1.6%
Africa 1.5%
North.America 23.9%
MED 5.1%
EU 2,146,541
Latin America 236,438
Russia 78,962
MED 739,065
Africa 213,057
North America 3,472,214
Russia 0.5%
EU 14.7%
T/S 13.8%
Domistic 7.9%

ABOVE PIE-CHART INDICATES SHANGHAI CONTAINER THROUGHPUT BY
TRADE WISE IN 2004
 2.14 MILLION TEUS FOR EUROPE ON LINEHAULS +
0.8 MILLION TEUS FM TRANSHIPMENT, TOGETHER WITH REASONABLE
VOLUME GROWTH WILL SUPPORT TO TARGET OF 2.7-3 MILLIONS

EXISTING SERVICES WILL BE MOVED TO YANGSHAN PHASE
I
Service Code
Current terminal
TA
TD
TNWA CEX
G.Alliance Loop D
G.Alliance Loop B
G.Alliance Loop F
CS/ZIM AEX2
CS AEX1
LT CEM
CMA FAL
CYHK AE1
CYHK AE2
CYHK PDM
MSL AE7
MSC SILK
PIL/WANHAI FES
CSAV AME
WGQ Phase I
WGQ Phase I
WGQ Phase II
WGQ Phase I
WGQ Phase II
WGQ Phase II
WGQ Phase II
WGQ Phase IV
WGQ Phase V
WGQ Phase V
WGQ Phase IV
WGQ Phase IV
WGQ Phase IV
WGQ Phase IV
WGQ Phase V
Wed
Sat
Sun
Thu
Mon
Thu
Sat
Mon
Sat
Sat
Wed
Sat
Sun
Fri
Wed
Thu
Sun
Mon
Fri
Tue
Fri
Sun
Tue
Sun
Sun
Thu
Sun
Mon
Sat
Thu
ALLIANCE
/SLOT PARTNER
SERVICE
TNWA
CEX
LOOP B
G.Alliance
LOOP D
LOOP F
CS/ZIM
AEX2
CS
AEX1
LT
CEM
CMA
FAL
AE1
CYHK
AE2
PDM
MSL
AE7
MSC
SILK
PIL/WANHAI
FES
CSAV
AME
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
Marketing Concerns
- CARGO FLOW FOR IMPORT/EXPORT

Exaggerate market competition in EU service due to slot increment
- Deep port allow much more loading without draft limitation
- Deep port stimulate carrier to allocate more big ships

Trucking cost impact (Incremental cost to customers)
Origin/Distance
Trucking cost 20'
Trucking cost 40'
Jiang Su area
Zhe Jiang area
(Around 100 km)
(Around 40 km)
usd 80
usd 30
usd 100
usd 40
- Feeder service could be more requested in Jiangsu area
- Possible cargo(ex Zhejiang origins) will migrate to Ningbo port

Exaggerate market competition in EU service due to slot increment
- Deep port allow much more loading without draft limitation
- Deep port stimulate carrier to allocate more big ships

Trucking cost impact (Incremental cost to customers)
Origin/Distance
Trucking cost 20'
Trucking cost 40'
Jiang Su area
Zhe Jiang area
(Around 100 km)
(Around 40 km)
usd 80
usd 30
usd 100
usd 40
- Feeder service could be more requested in Jiangsu area
- Possible cargo(ex Zhejiang origins) will migrate to Ningbo port
 T/S operation for river feeder in WGQ
- River barge service cut-off for export will be advanced by 2 days
- Total transit time will be increased
- Sea-going feeder will raise up its rate (at a later stage)
 Limited/Increased cost for international T/S at this stage
 Wayport shipment influence
- EU wayport service meet competition from WGQ direct service
- Wayport service for EU in WGQ challenge EU in Yangshan
 Empties return – inbound laden
Most inbound clients prefer to return to PUDONG depots but they all predict depots in
LUCHAOGANG will become popular once phase II & III start to operate
Operational Concerns
 Vessel Operation
- No draft limitation
- Flexible berthing/sailing time
- Less steaming time by saving along 10hrs
- Weather impact is an uncertain factor on terminal operation
 Export Cargo
- Customs pre-declaration is required before gate-in
- Tax refund can be applied upon cargoes’ in terminal
- More spending on truckage/time for land transportation
- Bridge risk by weather factors and traffic condition
 Import Cargo
- No penalty due to late customs declaration
- Free port policy declaration
- More spending on truckage/time for land transportation
- Bridge risk by weather factors and traffic condition
 Empty Reposition
- 2 Scenario offered by SIPG for empty repositioning: to WGQ (by barge)
to Luchao port (by trucking)
- Higher reposition cost from Yangshan terminal to Pudong depot(Appr. USD90/wagon)
- Export empty picking up in Luchao area is needed to develop gradually
 Inland and Coastal T/S Service
- ‘Marine shuttle buses’ are set for inland river feeder’s T/S at WGQ (3 Gangs per Day)
- Extra cost/time spending on T/S between WGQ and SSICT for export
- For export, CY-cut is to be advanced by 2 days at WGQ
- Weather/sea condition impact (if marine shuttle bus suspend by bad weather)
- Steaming is saved for costal feeder service
 Un-containerized cargo operation
- Floating crane dispatch from inner port is with difficulty
- Shipper’s barges for break bulk are not sea-going vessel
- Bridge transportation over the sea is another big risk
Tariff Analysis - WGQ vs Yangshan
(In RMB)
 Pilot Fee (Cost Down)
Normal Day
Holiday / Night
Holiday night
Surcharge
WGQ
YangShan
0.765*NRT
1.148*NRT
1.530*NRT
4,000
0.530*NRT
0.795*NRT
1.060*NRT
NIL
 Tug Fee (Cost Down)
LOA
WGQ
YangShan
95 <L< 122 <L< 155 <L< 180 <L< 220 <L< 280 <L
18,400
18,000
33,100
22,200
35,200
28,800
42,200
32,200
55,600
38,900 45,800
 Stevedoring Charge (Cost Down)
Container Type
20F
20E
20DG
20RF
20E(RF)
40F
40E
40DG
40RF
40E(RF)
WGQ 1(05/06)
467.2
322.9
513.8
513.8
355.9
700.9
484.3
770.8
770.8
533.7
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
WGQ 2/4/5(05/06)
513.9
355.2
565.2
565.2
391.5
771.0
532.7
847.9
847.9
587.1
468.1
323.6
514.7
514.7
356.6
702.2
485.3
772.2
772.2
534.8
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
514.9
356.0
566.2
566.2
392.3
772.4
533.8
849.4
849.4
588.3
YangShan
425.5
294.1
467.9
467.9
324.1
638.3
441.1
702.0
702.0
486.1
Stevedoring charge in WGQ to be increased by 10% fm 2006
 “Marine Shuttle Bus” T/S charges at WGQ (Cost Up)
- By Shuttle Feeder: RMB350/RMB575 PER S2/S4
- By Shuttle Trucking: RMB500/RMB750 PER S2/S4
 Other port Charge (no change)
(Mooring/Unmooring, Hatch cover moving, Wharfage, Fresh water supply, Tally fee,
Harbour
due, Tonnage due…etc.)
Carriers’ General Feedback
 A fair shifting plan by using same trade service
 Yearly workable days of terminal is still the key concern even 339
days
is announced by SIPG
 Seeking more cost absorbing by SIPG for T/S operations & empty
reposition between WGQ & Yangshan, and extension of free storage at
port or Luchaogang areas
 Gradually development of empty picking up for export shipment in
Luchaogang depots
 Most carrier plan to set on-site office in Yangshan terminal area