TABLES 3.1. Hot States for Class Action Cases by Case Type (Reported Judicial Decisions).................................... 64 3.2. Hot States for Class Action Cases by Case Type (General Press) ............................................. 65 4.1. Profile of Consumer Class Action Case Studies ............... 140 4.2. Profile of Mass Tort Class Action Case Studies ............... 141 5.1. Price and Benefit Comparisons of Bausch & Lomb Contact Lenses ............................................ 165 8.1. Sacramento Cable’s Process for Settling Accounts ............ 212 8.2. Proposed Cy Pres Distribution ........................... 220 10.1. Single Rounding Only After Semiannual Premium Calculated.......................................... 258 10.2. Double Rounding at Annual Premium and After Semiannual Premium Calculated ........................ 258 10.3. Projected Settlement Distribution ........................ 275 10.4. Final Settlement Group Counts, Allocations, Fees, and Net Recoveries ......................................... 281 12.1. Ownership and Production Activities at the Harcros Chemical Facility..................................... 320 12.2. Sources of the Settlement Fund .......................... 327 12.3. Uses of the Settlement Fund ............................ 327 12.4. Gert Town Exposure Zones ............................. 329 12.5. Exposure Points per Month ............................. 330 12.6. Compensation for Illness .............................. 331 xix xx Class Action Dilemmas 12.7. Adjustments Based on Point Score ........................ 331 12.8. Adjustments of Exposure Points by Age .................... 331 12.9. Award for Devaluation of Real Property in Gert Town .......... 332 13.1. Louisiana-Pacific Inner-Seal Siding Litigation ............... 344 13.2. Louisiana-Pacific’s Contributions to the Common Settlement Fund ..................................... 351 14.1. Major Features of Beeman Settlement ..................... 381 14.2. Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel for Beeman and Cox ................ 385 14.3. Comparison of the Beeman, Initial Cox, and Final Cox Settlements......................................... 388 15.1. How the Ten Class Actions Began ........................ 404 15.2. How Defendants Responded to the Ten Class Actions ......... 408 15.3. Forum Choice in the Ten Class Actions .................... 412 15.4. Claims Underlying the Ten Class Actions ................... 417 15.5. Amount of Compensation Collected by Class Members ........ 428 15.6. How the Ten Class Actions Affected Defendants’ Practices ...... 431 15.7. Amounts Awarded to Class Counsel for Fees and Expenses, Compared with Average Cash Payment to Class Members ...... 434 15.8. The Price Tag to Resolve the Ten Class Actions, Not Including Defendants’ Own Legal Fees and Expenses .......... 439 15.9. Circumstances of Certification .......................... 447 15.10. Notice of Certification in Ten Class Actions ................. 449 15.11. Notice of Settlement and Claiming Procedures in Ten Class Actions ............................................ 451 15.12. What Class Members Were Told About the Ten Class Actions ............................................ 453 15.13. Disbursement Rates, Type of Fund, and Notice and Claiming Procedures .................................. 458 15.14. How Judges, Objectors, and Intervenors Affected Class Action Outcomes..................................... 460 15.15. Basis for Awarding Class Counsel Fees ..................... 464 Tables xxi 15.16. A Comparison of Class Counsel Fees, with Reported Hours, in Five Class Actions .................................. 466 B.1. Number of Articles ................................... 513 B.2. Number of Cases..................................... 519 B.3. Number of Cases (Weighted) ............................ 519 C.1. Number of Interviews, by Type of Firm or Organization ........ 524 E.1. Comparative Class Action Case Study Settlement Structure, Costs, and Distribution Summary ........................ 547 E.2. Contact Lens Pricing Litigation: Roberts v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc., Settlement Structure, Costs, and Distribution Summary .......................................... 562 E.3. Bank Brokerage Product Litigation: Pinney v. Great Western Settlement Structure, Costs, and Distribution Summary ........ 565 E.4. Collateral Protection Insurance Litigation: Graham v. Security Pacific Housing Services, Inc., Settlement Structure, Costs, and Distribution Summary ........................ 568 E.5. Cable TV Late Fee Litigation: Selnick v. Sacramento Cable Settlement Structure, Costs, and Distribution Summary ........ 571 E.6. Credit Life Insurance Premium Overcharging Litigation: Inman v. Heilig-Meyers Settlement Structure, Costs, and Distribution Summary ................................ 574 E.7. Insurance Premium Double Rounding Litigation: Martinez v. Allstate and Sendejo v. Farmers Settlement Structure, Costs, and Distribution Summary ........................ 576 E.8. Blood Clotting Products for Hemophiliacs: In re Factor VIII or IX Concentrate Blood Products Settlement Structure, Costs, and Distribution Summary ........................ 580 E.9. Harcros Toxic Chemical Factory Litigation: Atkins v. Harcros Settlement Structure, Costs, and Distribution Summary .......................................... 583 E.10. Oriented Strand Board Home Siding Litigation: In re Louisiana-Pacific Inner-Seal Siding Settlement Structure, Costs, and Distribution Summary ........................ 585 E.11. Polybutylene Pipes Litigation: Cox v. Shell Oil Settlement Structure, Costs, and Distribution Summary ................ 589