Facilities Master Plan Evaluation and Update
Summer 2012
Goals and Objectives
Facilities Plan Priorities (p. IV):
Status Update
Recommendation
DRAFT ‐ FOR DISCUSSION ONLY
Links to 2012 Strategic Plan
• Maximize functional space
> Renovate facilities
> Address program needs
> Increase distance learning
Student Services, Administration, Theatre building
nearly complete, Academic Building in process,
Multiple bond funded facility and equipment
upgrades.
• Eliminate non-functional space
> Remove temporary buildings
> Replace aging facilities
Keep this in the plan, but refocus portables
replacement to "as funding allows" and "as
Some portable buildings have been removed or are portables reach end-of-life". Long-run plan is to
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
on schedule to be removed, but several portable
replace portables after they have run their useful
5.3 Develop partnerships for utilization of the
buildings remain. Building renovations and new
life and after existing facilities have been updated.
available buildings.
buildings are helping to address aging facilities.
It would be inefficient to replace a functional
portable bldg with a new bldg when other bldgs
need repair.
• Improve efficiency/utilization of facilities
> Consolidate related programs
> Create flexible, interdisciplinary spaces
• Continue to position the District to receive
state funding
Modify to focus on maintaining and improving
functionality of existing space first, before building
new projects. Use data and evidence to inform
initiatives.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
5.3 Develop partnerships for utilization of the
available buildings.
1.2 Continuously assess and evaluate programs to
provide effective educational programs and
services for all learners.
No or little action.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
5.3 Develop partnerships for utilization of the
available buildings.
3.3 Increase funding available for strategic
The District is in line to receive state infrastructure
initiatives.
bond funding and needs to renovate or replace
Keep in the plan. Modify focus to be on bond
4.2 Improve instructional labs to support effective
exisitng buildings with seismic, ADA, or
projects that maintain or improve existing facilities.
teaching and learning.
health/safety issues.
5.1 Enhance support for the college community.
Keep in the plan. Moditfy to focus on aligning
programs to outcomes and to long term funding
forecast and creating interdisciplinary spaces when
a small capital investment is required.
Links to 2012 Ed Master Plan
4.3 Enhance distance education or eLearning.
5.1 Improve student engagement among all
students.
5.1 Improve student engagement among all
students.
3.2 Student learning will be a visible priority in all
practices and structures.
3.4 Systematically use data to inform decision
making.
1.2 Improve support for students.
Facilities Master Plan Goals (p. VI):
Keep in the plan. Refocus that the District is
1.3 Students will be able to complete their desired
currently overbuilt square footage-wise for number
educational goals.
of students served and significant growth funding is
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
unlikely in the 3 to 5 year forecast.
• Base facilities recommendations on
Educational Master Plan growth projections
Facilities plans are informed by long term FTES
forecasts.
• Prioritize projects to support current and
projected needs
Keep in the plan. Modify to emphasize prioritization
Facilities Planning Committee prioritizes requests. based on student learning, evidence, and low-cost 3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
updating of existing facilities over new construction.
7/17/2012 11:29 AM
1
5.1 Improve student engagement among all
students.
3.2 Student learning will be a visible priority in all
practices and structures.
3.4 Systematically use data to inform decision
making.
Copy of Facilities Master Plan Evaluation1.xlsx Sheet1
Facilities Master Plan Evaluation and Update
Summer 2012
Goals and Objectives
Status Update
Several portable buildings have been removed or
are on schedule to be removed, but several
• Replace portable buildings with permanent
portable buildings remain. Building renovations
facilities
and new buildings are helping to address aging
facilities.
• Create flexible, interdisciplinary spaces to
support a variety of activities
New buildings and facility upgrades are in process.
• Develop sites and facilities to attract
students
New buildings and facility upgrades are in process.
• Develop student gathering areas (indoor
and outdoor)
New buildings and facility upgrades are in process.
There may be more events in the new theatre.
• Incorporate sustainable design principles in May be happening, but CR needs a set of priorities
all development*
for new projects.
7/17/2012 11:29 AM
Links to 2012 Strategic Plan
Keep this in the plan, but refocus portables
replacement to "as funding allows" and "as
portables reach end-of-life". Long-run plan is to
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
replace portables after they have run their useful
5.3 Develop partnerships for utilization of the
life and after existing facilities have been updated. available buildings.
It's inefficient to replace a functional portable bldg
when existing bldgs need repair.
Remove/Modify. Focus needs to be on maximizing
existing space and less on additional renovations.
New buildings and facility upgrades are in process. Modify to emphasize prioritization based on student 3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
learning, evidence, and low-cost updating of
existing facilities over new construction.
• Develop campuses to promote
collaboration (faculty, students & staff)
• Encourage students and community
members to spend time on campus
Recommendation
DRAFT ‐ FOR DISCUSSION ONLY
Remove. For this item, it is probably better
addressed elsewhere. For example, funds might
be better spent on employee development and
release time to serve on accrediation teams, rather
than facility upgrades.
Keep in the plan. Modify the focus to low-cost
improvments to residence halls, student center,
and marquees and signage. Also, improving
lighting, and technology.
Keep in the plan, but consolidate with item above.
Modify to focus on the campus auxiliaries and on
student government.
Remove. While this is an admirable goal, it is
probably better addressed elsewhere. Also, given
limited state bond funding, CR's focus needs to be
on maintaining existing facilities and keeping
current on equipment. Also, this item duplicates the
two above.
Keep in the plan. Modify to focus on the
development of a set of best practices and
expectations. Focus needs to be on sustainability
and lowest total cost of ownership for the District as
a result of the particular project. This list can then
be provided to architects and planners at the start
of an engagement.
2
Links to 2012 Ed Master Plan
5.1 Improve student engagement among all
students.
3.2 Student learning will be a visible priority in all
practices and structures.
3.4 Systematically use data to inform decision
making.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
1.6 Support staff and faculty development and
instructional innovation.
1.5 Professional development programs will be
focused on improvement of educational
effectiveness.
3.6 Increase number of institutional employees who
have accreditation experience.
1.4 Enhance student support and student
engagement.
5.1 Enhance support for the college community.
5.1 Improve student engagement among all
students.
1.4 Enhance student support and student
engagement.
5.1 Enhance support for the college community.
5.1 Improve student engagement among all
students.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
5.1 Enhance support for the college community.
5.3 Develop partnerships for utilization of the
available buildings
5.1 Improve student engagement among all
students.
5.3 Increase student engagement in the
community.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
5.1 Enhance support for the college community.
5.4 Faculty and staff will model positive
engagement in the college community.
Copy of Facilities Master Plan Evaluation1.xlsx Sheet1
Facilities Master Plan Evaluation and Update
Summer 2012
Goals and Objectives
• Consider life cycle costs and reduce
maintenance needs*
• Address ADA issues and increase
accessibility*
Status Update
Total Cost of Ownership has been integrated into
integrated planning decision-making.
Recommendation
Keep in the plan, but merge with the item above.
Keep in the plan, but merge with two items above
as part of the list of expectations for District
architects and planners. Focus must be that
Funds have been budgeted for ADA improvements.
project plans identify and address all accessibility
New signage is in place and accessible pathways
issues so the completed project meets current
have been completed.
standards -- Grandfathered compliance is not
acceptable to the District, even if the project
qualifies for grandfathered status.
DRAFT ‐ FOR DISCUSSION ONLY
Links to 2012 Strategic Plan
Links to 2012 Ed Master Plan
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
5.1 Enhance support for the college community.
4.2 Update the comprehensive technology
replacement plan.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
5.1 Enhance support for the college community.
1.6 Improve success among underrepresented
populations.
Sustainable Design Principles (p. VI):
• Minimize the negative long-term effect on
the environment.
• Conserve natural resources
• Use recyclable/recycled materials.
• Maximize use of renewable resources,
• Maximize energy efficiency and utilization.
• Provide for aggressive and thorough pursuit
of rebates and incentives.
• Provide for environmental quality, Improve
interior air quality and lighting, Mitigate noise
factors, Reduce negative influence of waste
products*
Keep in the plan, but merge with other starred
items above into a list of expectations for District
Some of these have been integrated into building architects and planners. Refocus to emphasize
projects, such as use of reclaimed wood. However, lowest total cost of ownership to the District. For
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
other initiatives were not included in projects, for
example, in cases where use of reclaimed
5.1 Enhance support for the college community.
example new bldgs are not LEED or energy star
materials drives up total costs, then reclaimed
certified.
materials will be omitted. Refocus to emphasize
third-party certifications, such as LEED and Energy
Star over "architect's preference".
• Facilitate use of alternate forms of
transportation: Public transportation,
Bicycles, Carpooling, Non-fossil vehicular
fuels
A new bus shelter was built.
Remove. This initiative is probably better
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
addressed elsewhere. For example, a grant might
5.1 Enhance support for the college community.
help with alternate transportation.
5.4 Faculty and staff will model positive
engagement in the college community.
4.2 Update the comprehensive technology
replacement plan.
5.3 Increase student engagement in the
community.
Recommended Master Plan (p. 18, 34, 50):
Some portable bldgs have been removed or are on
• Replace portables buildings with permanent schedule to be removed, but portable bldgs remain.
facilities
Building renovations and new bldgs are helping to
address aging facilities.
Student Services, Administration, Theatre building
• Re-purpose and seismically upgrade
nearly complete, Academic Building in process,
vacated buildings
Multiple bond funded facility and equipment
upgrades.
7/17/2012 11:29 AM
Keep in the plan. Refocus to a long term plan to
phase out portables as funding allows and as
portables reach end-of-life.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
5.3 Develop partnerships for utilization of the
available buildings.
Modify to focus on maintaining and improving
functionality of existing space. Moditfy to align
programs to long term funding forecast.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
5.3 Develop partnerships for utilization of the
available buildings.
3
5.1 Improve student engagement among all
students.
Copy of Facilities Master Plan Evaluation1.xlsx Sheet1
Facilities Master Plan Evaluation and Update
Summer 2012
Goals and Objectives
Status Update
Recommendation
DRAFT ‐ FOR DISCUSSION ONLY
Links to 2012 Strategic Plan
Links to 2012 Ed Master Plan
Student Services, Administration, Theatre building
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
Keep, but merge with item above. Moditfy to align
nearly complete, Academic Building in process,
5.3 Develop partnerships for utilization of the
programs to long term funding forecast.
Multiple bond funded facility and equipment
available buildings.
upgrades.
5.1 Improve student engagement among all
students.
New academic buildings and faculty offices being
clustered due to renovation.
Remove/Modify. While admirable goal, it is
probably better addressed elsewhere. Also, given
limited state bond funding, CR's focus needs to be
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
on maintaining existing facilities and keeping
current equipment. Emphasize meeting this goal in
cases that require a small investment.
5.1 Improve student engagement among all
students.
• Create flexible, interdisciplinary spaces to
support a variety of activities
New academic buildings.
Remove. While this is an admirable goal, it is
probably better addressed elsewhere. Also, given
limited state bond funding, CR's focus needs to be 3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
on maintaining existing facilities and keeping
current equipment.
5.1 Improve student engagement among all
students.
5.3 Increase student engagement in the
community.
• Develop student gathering areas
• Develop outdoor spaces
Keep in the plan. Modify to focus on the campus
New buildings and facility upgrades are in process.
auxiliaries and on student government.
1.4 Enhance student support and student
engagement.
5.1 Enhance support for the college community.
• Expand science labs (as previously
designed)
Done at Mendocino and in process at Del Norte
1.3 Students will be able to complete their desired
educational goals.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
• Construct new bookstore (Del Norte)
No action.
• Increase visibility to the community
New marquee is in process.
• Create buffer to high school
No action.
• Renovate existing facilities
• Cluster related programs
• Bring woodworking program to the campus
No action.
(Mendocino)
• Develop the campus for multiple uses
(Mendocino)
No action.
• Develop student housing (Mendocino)
No action.
7/17/2012 11:29 AM
Keep.
Remove. Given state funding, this is not
affordable.
Remove. Given state funding, scarce capital
dollars will be better spent on maintaining existing
facilities.
Remove. Given state funding, scarce capital
dollars will be better spent on maintaining existing
facilities.
Remove. Given state funding, scarce capital
dollars will be better spent on maintaining existing
facilities.
Remove. Given state funding, scarce capital
dollars will be better spent on maintaining existing
facilities.
Remove. Does not align with long term funding
forecast.
4
5.1 Improve student engagement among all
students.
5.3 Increase student engagement in the
community.
4.1.Provide lab equipment and technology to
effectively support instructional needs
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
Copy of Facilities Master Plan Evaluation1.xlsx Sheet1
Facilities Master Plan Evaluation and Update
Summer 2012
Goals and Objectives
• Create a conference center (Mendocino)
Status Update
No action.
Recommendation
Remove. Does not align with long term funding
forecast.
DRAFT ‐ FOR DISCUSSION ONLY
Links to 2012 Strategic Plan
Links to 2012 Ed Master Plan
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
New Construction Projects and Renovation Projects (p. 20, 36, 52):
Eureka:
• Student Services/Administration/Theatre
Building
• Academic Complex
• New Residence Hall
1.4 Enhance student support and student
engagement.
4.1 Improve technology infrastructure to support all
Building construction nearly completed.
Remove. Project nearly complete.
college operations.
5.2 Support/increase cultural activities at the
college.
1.4 Enhance student support and student
engagement.
Building construction on two academic buildings is
4.1 Improve technology infrastructure to support all
Keep in the plan.
in progress.
college operations.
4.2 Improve instructional labs to support effective
teaching and learning.
1.3 Students will be able to complete their desired
Remove and modify. Refocus to renovating and
educational goals.
maximizing existing dorms and less on additional 3.1 Reduce reliance on apportionment-based
No action.
renovations. Focus on renovating the two existing funding.
residence halls first.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
5.1 Improve student engagement among all
students.
5.2 Develop a vibrant student center.
5.3 Increase student engagement in the
community.
4.1.Provide lab equipment and technology to
effectively support instructional needs.
5.1 Improve student engagement among all
students.
Some offices in the Administration building have
• Forum and Administration Buildings (16 and
been moved to the new building creating vacant
18)
space in the old Administration bldg.
Modify the plan. Old plan talks about seismic
improvements and repurposing. (Note: Vacated
bldgs CANNOT change their "DSA purpose" and
cannot require students to enter.) Focus instead
should be on renovating lower floor Admin bldg for
support operations, such as IR and IR, while
second floor should be marketed for partnerships.
3.1 Reduce reliance on apportionment-based
funding.
3.4 Increase community support for the college.
5.3 Develop partnerships for utilization of the
available buildings.
5.3 Develop partnerships for utilization of the
available buildings.
• Student Union (20)
Modify. Old plan talks about moving the bookstore
and other major changes. Focus of any
renovations needs to be on updating the existing
space and less on repurposing or other more costly
initiatives.
1.4 Enhance student support and student
engagement.
3.1 Reduce reliance on apportionment-based
funding.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
5.1 Improve student engagement among all
students.
5.2 Develop a vibrant student center.
7/17/2012 11:29 AM
No action.
5
Copy of Facilities Master Plan Evaluation1.xlsx Sheet1
Facilities Master Plan Evaluation and Update
Summer 2012
Goals and Objectives
• Physical and Life Sciences Buildings (10
and 12)
• Library (10)
Status Update
Recommendation
DRAFT ‐ FOR DISCUSSION ONLY
Links to 2012 Strategic Plan
Links to 2012 Ed Master Plan
Modify. Old plan talks about doing major seismic
upgrades and repurposing this space for high
No action. New bldg construction is in progress, so
school, 4 year university or community use. Focus
no departments have moved out yet.
needs to be on working with a strategic partner
who will utilize the space.
Remove. The old plan talks about demolishing a
building (#10) to create "Expansive views to the
New Learning Resource Center constructed.
water ". New plan needs to emphasize updating
existing facilities while avoiding more costly
changes.
3.1 Reduce reliance on apportionment-based
funding.
5.3 Develop partnerships for utilization of the
3.4 Increase community support for the college.
available buildings.
5.3 Develop partnerships for utilization of the
available buildings.
1.4 Enhance student support and student
engagement.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
4.1 Improve technology infrastructure to support all
college operations.
Modify. Old plan discusses additional lab space.
The Science lab upgrade that is in progress will
Science lab upgrade plans completed and
upgrade the existing facility, but will not be a major
constrcution planned for Summer 2013. Upgrade,
expansion. Focus needs to be on updating exisitng
not expansion.
facilities, before trying to expand. Addresses
health and safety issues.
1.4 Enhance student support and student
engagement.
4.1.Provide lab equipment and technology to
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
effectively support instructional needs
4.1 Improve technology infrastructure to support all
college operations.
Del Norte:
• Lab Expansion
• New Buildings
• Gateway Entry
• Parking/Drop-Off
No action.
Modify. Old plan discusses replacing
temporary/portable space. The long-run plan is to
replace portables after they have run their useful
life and after existing facilities have been updated. 3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
It would be inefficient to replace a functional
portable bldg with a new bldg when other existing
bldgs are in need of updating and repair.
No action.
Remove/modify. Old plan discusses increasing the
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
college's visibility and creating pedestrian
5.5 Increase communications and outreach to the
pathways. New plan is to update the marquee for
community.
visibility and safety.
5.3 Increase student engagement in the
community.
No action.
Modify. Old plan discussed expanded parking and
a new drop-off area. Such plans are not affordable
3.1 Reduce reliance on apportionment-based
without a Del Norte parking fee, and even with a
funding.
parking fee, would need several years to generate
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
enough cash. New plan to emphasize updating
existing parking lot and other less costly updates.
1.2 Improve support for students.
Mendocino:
7/17/2012 11:29 AM
6
Copy of Facilities Master Plan Evaluation1.xlsx Sheet1
Facilities Master Plan Evaluation and Update
Summer 2012
Goals and Objectives
Status Update
• Woodworking and Gallery
No action.
• Student Housing/Conference Center
No action.
• Additional Parking
• Some of the buildings on campus are in
need of renovation in order to support the
programs that are housed there.
No action.
Mendocino Science Lab upgrade completed.
Recommendation
DRAFT ‐ FOR DISCUSSION ONLY
Links to 2012 Strategic Plan
3.1 Reduce reliance on apportionment-based
Modify. Old plan discussed a new campus bldg.
funding.
Will need significant outside support to fund a new
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
bldg.
5.1 Enhance support for the college community.
1.3 Students will be able to complete their desired
educational goals.
Remove. Old plan discussed a new residence hall.
3.1 Reduce reliance on apportionment-based
New plan will emphasize updating the existing
funding.
Euereka halls before considering any expansion.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
Remove. Old plan discussed expanded parking.
Such plans are not affordable without a Mendocino
3.1 Reduce reliance on apportionment-based
parking fee, and even with a parking fee, would
funding.
need several years to generate enough cash. New
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
plan to emphasize maintaining the existing parking
lot.
1.3 Students will be able to complete their desired
educational goals.
Keep. Exisiting sicence lab was upgraded and has
1.4 Enhance student support and student
re-opened. This item aligns well with the new focus
engagement.
on updating existing facilities.
4.1 Improve technology infrastructure to support all
college operations.
Links to 2012 Ed Master Plan
4.1.Provide lab equipment and technology to
effectively support instructional needs
4.1.Provide lab equipment and technology to
effectively support instructional needs.
5.1 Improve student engagement among all
students.
New items not included in old Facilities Master Plan:
• Southern Humboldt (Garberville)
Not listed in old plan.
New entry. New project in progress to provide a
basic educational site in Garberville. A key to this
site will be developing external partnerships to
generate revenue to support this operation.
FPC and BPC recommended Measure Q bond allocations - all are currently in progress:
Since these initiative arose after the previous
update to the Facilities Master Plan, it
demonstrates the District's commitment to
continuous re-evaluation and continuous quality
improvement.
• District-wide ADA and safety compliance
• Security, including marquee upgrades and Not listed in old plan.
fire alarm
New entry. Project provides for necessary ADA
accomodations and health and safety upgrades to
existing facilities across the entire District. This item
illustrates the new direction to taking care of
existing facilities before new expansions.
7/17/2012 11:29 AM
7
1.4 Enhance student support and student
engagement.
3.4 Increase community support for the college.
5.3 Develop partnerships for utilization of the
available buildings.
1.2 Improve support for students.
5.3 Increase student engagement in the
community.
3.5 Practice continuous quality improvement.
1.3 Students will be able to complete their desired
educational goals.
1.6 Improve success among underrepresented
1.4 Enhance student support and student
populations.
engagement.
3.6 Practice continuous adherence to accreditation
standards.
Copy of Facilities Master Plan Evaluation1.xlsx Sheet1
Facilities Master Plan Evaluation and Update
Summer 2012
Goals and Objectives
• Athletic facility upgrades
Status Update
Not listed in old plan.
• Automotive Technology Lab upgrade
Not listed in old plan.
Voice over IP (VOIP) to replace PBX &
phones
Not listed in old plan.
Firing range upgrade
Not listed in old plan.
Welding area cover expansion
Not listed in old plan.
Parking lots, fencing, etc.
Not listed in old plan.
Old library seismic upgrade
Not listed in old plan.
CTE computer lab upgrades (MT, DM, DT,
etc.)
7/17/2012 11:29 AM
Not listed in old plan.
Recommendation
New entry. Potential accessibility and gender
equity issues were identified in existing athletic
facilites that must be corrected. Repurposing of
the dilapidated old pool area addresses a safety
concern. Updates to fields addresses safety
issues. Numerous PE courses utilize the fields and
buildings as "classrooms/labs" in addition to athletic
teams.
DRAFT ‐ FOR DISCUSSION ONLY
Links to 2012 Strategic Plan
3.6 Practice continuous adherence to accreditation
standards.
4.2 Improve instructional labs to support effective
teaching and learning.
5.7 Increase public support for the college.
2.2 Respond to business and industry short-term
training needs.
4.2 Improve instructional labs to support effective
teaching and learning.
4.3 CTE programs will have technology relevant to
their disciplines.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
New entry. Updates aging technology
4.1 Improve technology infrastructure to support all
infrastructure, expands existing maxed out internet
college operations.
connection and reduces some operating costs.
4.4 Improve efficiency through technology.
1.3 Students will be able to complete their desired
educational goals.
New entry. Addresses upgrades required by
3.6 Practice continuous adherence to accreditation
program accreditation body for health and safety
standards.
and accessibility issues.
4.2 Improve instructional labs to support effective
teaching and learning.
4.2 Improve instructional labs to support effective
teaching and learning.
New entry. Enhances existing program facilities.
4.3 CTE programs will have technology relevant to
their disciplines
1.4 Enhance student support and student
New entry. Updates to existing facilities to address
engagement.
aging infrastructure.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
New entry. Update vacated space for additional
5.3 Develop partnerships for utilization of the
meeting rooms.
available buildings.
4.1 Improve technology infrastructure to support all
college operations.
4.2 Improve instructional labs to support effective
New entry. Enhances existing program facilities.
teaching and learning.
4.3 CTE programs will have technology relevant to
their disciplines
New entry. Project plan emphasizes updating the
existing auto lab to address safety issues, aging
infrastructure, and acquire new hybrid vehicles,
and possibly a small expansion for a better overall
lab.
8
Links to 2012 Ed Master Plan
4.1.Provide lab equipment and technology to
effectively support instructional needs.
5.1 Improve student engagement among all
students.
2.4 CTE Programs respond to community training
needs.
4.1.Provide lab equipment and technology to
effectively support instructional needs
4.3 Enhance distance education or eLearning.
4.4 Effectively utilize technology in teaching.
2.4 CTE Programs respond to community training
needs.
4.1.Provide lab equipment and technology to
effectively support instructional needs
2.4 CTE Programs respond to community training
needs.
4.1.Provide lab equipment and technology to
effectively support instructional needs
5.1 Improve student engagement among all
students.
2.4 CTE Programs respond to community training
needs.
4.1.Provide lab equipment and technology to
effectively support instructional needs.
4.4 Effectively utilize technology in teaching.
Copy of Facilities Master Plan Evaluation1.xlsx Sheet1
Facilities Master Plan Evaluation and Update
Summer 2012
Goals and Objectives
Status Update
Exterior paint and light upgrades
Not listed in old plan.
Fire Science equipment and apparatus
storage
Not listed in old plan.
Emergency Response Training Center
Not listed in old plan.
Itech Innovations Lab establishment
(solar,thermal,water/waste)
Not listed in old plan.
Construction Technology Lab upgrade
Not listed in old plan.
Reserve for repurposing vacated buildings,
incl faculty ofcs
Not listed in old plan.
Ag Dept Tompkins Hill barn renovation/
replacement
Not listed in old plan.
Roof replacement
Not listed in old plan.
HVAC, boiler equipment
Not listed in old plan.
Energy conservation
Not listed in old plan.
7/17/2012 11:29 AM
Recommendation
DRAFT ‐ FOR DISCUSSION ONLY
Links to 2012 Strategic Plan
New entry. Updates to existing facilities to address 1.4 Enhance student support and student
aging infrastructure.
engagement.
4.2 Improve instructional labs to support effective
teaching and learning.
New entry. Enhances existing program facilities.
4.3 CTE programs will have technology relevant to
their disciplines
4.2 Improve instructional labs to support effective
teaching and learning.
New entry. Enhances existing program facilities.
4.3 CTE programs will have technology relevant to
their disciplines
4.2 Improve instructional labs to support effective
teaching and learning.
New entry. Enhances existing program facilities.
4.3 CTE programs will have technology relevant to
their disciplines
4.2 Improve instructional labs to support effective
New entry. Enhances existing program facilities. teaching and learning.
Also, addresses health and safety issues.
4.3 CTE programs will have technology relevant to
their disciplines
New entry. Provides funds to update existing
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
facilities for District use or a partner. Vacated
5.3 Develop partnerships for utilization of the
space is in need of basic upgrades. Addresses
available buildings.
health and safety issues.
4.2 Improve instructional labs to support effective
New entry. Enhances existing program facilities. teaching and learning.
Addresses health and safety issues.
4.3 CTE programs will have technology relevant to
their disciplines
3.1 Reduce reliance on apportionment-based
New entry. Roof replacement on existing Eureka
funding.
residence hall.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
5.1 Enhance support for the college community.
1.4 Enhance student support and student
engagement.
New entry. Updates to existing facilities to address
3.1 Reduce reliance on apportionment-based
aging infrastructure.
funding.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
3.1 Reduce reliance on apportionment-based
New entry. Reduce operational costs with efficiency
funding.
upgrades. Also leverage funds with rebates, etc.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
9
Links to 2012 Ed Master Plan
5.1 Improve student engagement among all
students.
2.4 CTE Programs respond to community training
needs.
4.1.Provide lab equipment and technology to
effectively support instructional needs
2.4 CTE Programs respond to community training
needs.
4.1.Provide lab equipment and technology to
effectively support instructional needs
2.4 CTE Programs respond to community training
needs.
4.1.Provide lab equipment and technology to
effectively support instructional needs
2.4 CTE Programs respond to community training
needs.
4.1.Provide lab equipment and technology to
effectively support instructional needs
1.2 Improve support for students.
2.4 CTE Programs respond to community training
needs.
4.1.Provide lab equipment and technology to
effectively support instructional needs
5.1 Improve student engagement among all
students.
5.2 Develop a vibrant student center.
1.2 Improve support for students.
1.2 Improve support for students.
Copy of Facilities Master Plan Evaluation1.xlsx Sheet1
Facilities Master Plan Evaluation and Update
Summer 2012
Goals and Objectives
Carpet replacement
Maint & Dining equipment, mini-bookstore,
portable bldgs
Status Update
Recommendation
DRAFT ‐ FOR DISCUSSION ONLY
Links to 2012 Strategic Plan
1.4 Enhance student support and student
engagement.
3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
Not listed in old plan.
New entry. Replace aging carpets, reduce trip
hazards.
Not listed in old plan.
New entry. New equipment is required to maintain
new facilities. Potential mini-bookstore to better
3.1 Reduce reliance on apportionment-based
serve students. Portable bldgs may continue to be funding.
used, despite long term goal of phasing out such 3.2 Improve college operational efficiencies.
bldgs.
Links to 2012 Ed Master Plan
1.2 Improve support for students.
1.2 Improve support for students.
NOTES:
Several items are duplicates and will be merged.
New focus is on updating, maintaining and renovating our existing, aging facilities whereas old plan emphasized new construction and often ignored repair needs. For example, the old plan discusses two new dorms, but does not mention significant capital
repairs required on the existing dorms. Also, dorm funds are self-supporting, so these funds cannot support such large scale new construction projects.
New focus is on low total cost of ownership and projects with a low cost; Less moving around, less tearing out walls, etc.; More repairing existing space, updating existing space, and dealing with ADA, health and safety needs.
Some items in the old plan would expand or increase auxiliary cost, for example for additional parking. These funds are self supporting and cannot support significant expansion.
With vacated space where new construction was funded with state bond funds, the old space cannot be repurposed from its existing "DSA use". For example, the old Library's existing DSA designation is general meeting space, so it cannot be renovated to
be faculty offices. It can only be renovated to continue to be general meeting space. Also, the vacated space can never involve an activity that would require a student to enter the building, so even a renovated classroom could no longer be used as a
classroom. Students may continue to enter the old building, but cannot be required to enter it.
7/17/2012 11:29 AM
10
Copy of Facilities Master Plan Evaluation1.xlsx Sheet1