Redwoods Community College District
Enrollment Management Committee (EMC)
Monday, November 15, 2010
Boardroom
MINUTES
PRESENT
Jennifer Bailey, Anna Duffy, David Gonsalves (phone), Kathy Goodlive,
Utpal Goswami, Melissa Green, Sheila Hall, Anita Janis (phone),
Allen Keppner, Pam Kessler, Geisce Ly (phone), Maggie Lynch,
Michael Peterson, Keith Snow-Flamer(Co-Chair), Bruce Wagner (CoChair)
MINUTES
Minutes from the November 1, 2010, EMC meeting were approved as
presented.
ACTION ITEMS
Final Wait List
Recommendations
Final revisions were made to the Waitlist Procedure. The website will be
updated to reflect the recent changes to the wait list process. . Students
will also be notified to check web advisor for their wait list status. There
was consensus among committee member to approve the Final Wait List
Procedure.
EM Scorecard
There was discussion about how information regarding advisor caseload
retention is going to be used and what the purpose of gathering this
information is. It was noted that there are many factors that cannot be
controlled within an advisor’s caseload. The intention of the scorecard is
to: 1) to measure strategic performance; 2) facilitate continuous quality
improvement; and 3) to provide a visual display of the most important
information needed to achieve the college’s access and success
objectives. After continued discussion several revisions were suggested.
Bruce and Keith will draft a recommendation to take to cabinet for their
approval of the scorecard.
Operating
Agreement
The EMC Operating agreement was reviewed with suggested revisions
from Bruce and Keith. Committee members identified additional
revisions to be made. Bruce and Keith will make revisions and return to
the committee for approval at the next meeting on November 29.
DISCUSSION
ITEMS
Strategies for
Summer Session
Discussion took place regarding strategies for a summer session this
year. In January a determination will be made regarding the availability
of funds and there needs to be a plan in place if funding is identified for
the summer.
Discussion also took place regarding the following:
 Recommendation regarding the growth of FTES
 Success of students enrolled in a high number of units




When would summer session begin?
Are there any savings obtained by not offering summer?
Required summer programs, i.e., LVN, Administration of Justice
and the Farm.
50% law
The committee also stressed the importance of early and clear
communication to students and the community once a decision is made
regarding the fate of the summer session.
Next steps include:
 Identification of talking points to accurately disseminate
information.
 Bruce will contact Deans to get input on courses that must be
offered during the summer.




Carried Over
Agenda Items
REPORTS
Tabled Reports
ADJOURN
SUBMITTED
BY
FTES Projections
TLU Allocations
Multiple Measures
Enrollment Management & Student Satisfaction Survey
5.1 IR Status
5.2 101 Corridor Survey
.
The meeting was adjourned at 2:30 p.m.
lw