The University of Georgia
Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development
College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences
Economic Vitality Index and Human Vitality Index
Data Summaries and Calculations
Prepared by: Katy Swickard and John McKissick
Center Report 05-01
February 2005
Table of Contents
Foreword…………………………………………………………………………………………………..1
Calculations used in Determining Grades……………………………………………...………………….2
Economic Vitality Index Data Summaries………………………………………………………………...8
Key………………………………………………………………………………………………...8
Benchmarks for 1980 EVI Southeastern States (SE)……………………………………………...8
Benchmarks for 1980 EVI United States………………………………………………………….8
Summaries of Grades by Year and Number of Grades Assigned Each Year
for both Percent of Southeastern States and United States……………………………….. 9
1980 Grades for a County as a Percent of Southeastern States (SE)……………………………...10
1990 Grades for a County as a Percent of Southeastern States (SE)……………………………...14
2001 Grades for a County as a Percent of Southeastern States (SE)……………………………...18
1980 Grades for a County as a Percent of United States………………………………………….22
1990 Grades for a County as a Percent of United States………………………………………….26
2001 Grades for a County as a Percent of United States………………………………………….30
Economic Vitality Maps…………………………………………………………………………………..34
Figure 1. 1980 Southeastern States EVI…………………………………………………………..34
Figure 2. 1990 Southeastern States EVI…………………………………………………………..35
Figure 3. 2001 Southeastern States EVI…………………………………………………………..36
Figure 4. 1980 United States EVI…………………………………………………………………37
Figure 5. 1990 United States EVI…………………………………………………………………38
Figure 6. 2001 United States EVI…………………………………………………………………39
Human Vitality Index Summaries………………………………………………………………………...40
Key………………………………………………………………………………………………...40
Benchmarks for 1980 Southeastern States (SE)…………………………………………………..40
Benchmarks for 1980 United States………………………………………………………………40
Summaries of Grades by Year and Number of Grades Assigned Each Year
for both Percent of Southeastern States and United States………………………………..41
1980 Grades for a County as a Percent of Southeastern States (SE)……………………………...42
1990 Grades for a County as a Percent of Southeastern States (SE)……………………………...46
2001 Grades for a County as a Percent of Southeastern States (SE)……………………………...50
1980 Grades for a County as a Percent of United States………………………………………….54
1990 Grades for a County as a Percent of United States………………………………………….58
2001 Grades for a County as a Percent of United States………………………………………….62
Human Vitality Maps……………………………………………………………………………………..66
Figure 7. 1980 HVI……………………………………………………………………………….66
Figure 8. 1990 Southeastern States HVI………………………………………………………….67
Figure 9. 2000 Southeastern States HVI………………………………………………………….68
Figure 10. 1990 United States HVI……………………………………………………………….69
1
Figure 11. 2000 United States HVI……………………………………………………………….70
1
Foreword
The Georgia Rural Development Council (GRDC) requested that a single index, capable of
showing the economic and human vitality condition of each county in the state of Georgia, be
formulated. It is important that the index be able to be benchmarked against other states and over a
period of time.
The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) of the GRDC proposed that the set of variables
selected should represent the most important human and economic factors of the state. Furthermore,
the TAC proposed 1980 as the benchmark year. The Economic Vitality Index and the Human
Vitality Index would be calculated for 1980, 1990, 2000 and forward as the latest data available
allows.
Specifically, the Technical Advisory Committee recommended the following process to form
the benchmarks used to compare Georgia’s counties to seven Southeastern States and the United
States. The calculations were performed for both the Human Vitality Index and the Economic
Vitality Index.
2
Calculations used in Determining Grades:
Economic Vitality and Human Vitality Indices
1. Choose the variables that best describe economic conditions of Georgia’s Counties as well as the
South Eastern states. The following variables were chosen due to their economic significance:
Per Capita Income
Unemployment Rate
Population
Percent Below Poverty
Employment
Average Weekly Wage
(PCI)
(Unemp)
(POP)
(POV)
(Emp)
(AWW)
1977-2002
1977-2002
1977-2002
1979, 1989, 1999
1977-2001
1977-2001
US Census Bureau
Bureau of Labor Statistics
US Census Bureau
US Census Bureau
Bureau of Economic Analysis
Bureau of Economic Analysis
*Titles of worksheets are noted by “name”.
*The raw numbers can be found in worksheet “data”.
2. The first step in the process is to make sure each set of data is in the appropriate form. Some
variables be cannot used in the raw data form. For example, Rate Changes and Moving Averages for
Employment “Emp”, Average Weekly Wage “AWW”, and Population “Pop” need to be calculated
before being used. However, Unemployment “Unemp” and Per Capita Income “PCI” can be used to
find MAVG’s by averaging three years already given in the data set (1978-1980, 1988-1990, 19982000, 1999-2001). Poverty Rates were used as given in “data”.
In order to create Moving Averages (MAVG) for the years 1980, 1990, 2000, 2001, the rate
changes first need to be calculated between those four years. The result will be three numbers. The
average must then be taken of these three rate changes to get the actual MAVG.
For example, for Appling County’s 1980 Employment Moving Average data was taken from
1977-1980. Find the rate change for 1977-’78, 1978-’79, 1979-’80.
Rate Change: 1978 –1 , 1979 –1 , 1980 –1
1977
1978
1979
⇓
⇓
⇓
5177 -1 ,
4837 –1 ,
4828 –1
4933
5177
4837
⇓
⇓
⇓
= -.006 = -.60%
Moving Avg: (.0495 + -.0657 +
-.0019)
3
This is the 1980 MAVG for Appling County. Continue this process for the other years and
repeat for AWW and POP.
To find Appling County’s 1980 Unemployment MAVG we only need to average the
numbers given in the data set “data”, as they are already in proper form.
3
1980 MAVG: average(1978,1979,1980) =
(6.3+5.4+7.4) =
6.4
3
Continue for the other years and repeat process for PCI. Remember for Percent Below
Poverty just use the number given: Appling County 1979 POV = 29.0%
3. Take these Moving Averages and copy/paste them into a new worksheet by referencing them to
the first sheet: “emprank” “poprank” “povrank” “unemprank” “awwrank” “pcirank”. The data must
be ranked first before assigning quintiles.
Use this Excel Tool:
Tools/Data Analysis/Rank and Percentile
Example: “emprank”
Input: MAVG (all counties, one year at a time)
Input: (highlight all of 1980’s county MAVG)
The table should be sorted by ‘Percent’ in descending order. Next, assign Quintiles by setting up a
formula in the column to the right of the Percent. The Quintiles are assigned 0-4 by 20% cutoffs. In
the Percent column, the values >= to 80% are given 4’s, >= to 60% are given 3’s and so on. Do this
for Employment, PCI, AWW, and Pop. For Unemployment and Poverty, 4 is considered bad, so the
cutoffs will go like this: values >= 80% are given 0’s, >= to 60% are given 1’s and so on.
Example: “emprank” 1980 4’s are assigned at a cutoff of 80.30% and above, 3’s are 60.10%
and above, 2’s are 40.50% and above, 1’s are 20.20% and above and everything below receives a 0.
“pov” 1980 start with 0’s given to 80.30% and above, 1’s are 60.70%, 2’s are 41.10%, 3’s
are 20.20%, and everything below receives a 4.
Each rank will be slightly different as for the percentages. Do this for each year and variable;
again keep in mind if the variable should receive a 4 or 0 for the top cutoffs.
Finally, highlight the ranked columns including the new quintiles and sort by ‘Point’,
ascending. The Point corresponds to the order of the counties and we want them to match up.
(***When the Rank and Percentile is first performed, the numbers do not match up correctly with
the county names.)
Now that we have started to copy/paste numbers from one worksheet to another, try to
reference all of the numbers from the page you are copying from. This is so if you need to change or
update numbers it will make the changes in all the worksheets that have used that number. For
example, if we need to update a number in “emp” for Appling County’s 1990 MAVG in step 2, it
will automatically update the number in step 3 and so on.
4
4. The next step it to find each county’s MAVG as a percent of the average of the Southeastern (SE)
states and the United States. First you need to take the average of the seven Southeastern States’
MAVG. These numbers should be a part of every calculation so far except they will not have been a
part of the ranking and assigning Quintiles in step 3. There will be SE state and US numbers fro each
year.
In same worksheet create a comparison of each county to the state averages and the US
averages. Name the columns ‘% of SE states’ and ‘% of US’. Examples are from Appling County
“emprank” 1980.
A. Find the Georgia County as a percent of the South Eastern State average
-.0060 = -21%
= County MAVG Æ
SE AVG
.0284
B. Find the Georgia County as a percent of the U.S. Average
= County MAVG Æ
-.0060 = -20.99%
US AVG
.0287
Do this for each year and each variable!!
5. Take all the Quintiles from the ranking and put them into a new worksheet- “80scores”
On this sheet you will see the FIPS code, metro codes, and econ_regs.
Starting with 1980, all six variables should be listed with the Quintile values from the
original rankings from “---rank” worksheets. Average these Quintiles across for each county. These
averages will be used to assign grades for each county.
Example: Appling County “80scores”
Unemp
1
Emp
0
Pop
0
AWW
0
PCI
1
POV
0
Average
0.33
Somewhere on the sheet there should be the Scoring Ranges that give the numerical values
for the grades. The grade is a three-part formula.
A.) Interim 1: assigns grades to counties with Averages >= 1.8333 = C up to A. If the average
is less than 1.8333 it is given ‘other’.
B.) Interim 2: assigns grades to counties with Averages < 1.8333 from C- to F. If the average
is greater than 1.8333 it is given ‘other interval’.
C.) Grade: pulls the letter grade from A) and B)
Do the same for each year. “90scores” “00scores” “01scores”
5
Example: Appling County “80scores” part A) and B)
Interim1
Interim2
Other interval F
Final:
Unemp
1
Emp
0
Pop
0
AWW
0
PCI
1
POV
0
Average
0.33
Grade
F
Interim1
Interim2
Other interval F
-Since the Average (0.33) is less than 1.8333, Interim 1 is given ‘other interval’. Interim 2’s formula
then sees that 0.33 is less than 0.5 and gives the county an ‘F’. Finally, the column with Grade will
pull the actual letter grade from Interim 1 or Interim 2.
Scoring Range: used in parts A) and B).
Scoring Ranges
A
3.833333
A3.5
B+ 3.166667
B
2.833333
B2.5
C+ 2.166667
C
1.833333
C1.5
D+ 1.166667
D
0.833333
D0.5
F
0
6. Transfer the column of ‘% of SE states’ for each variable from 1980 onto a new worksheet
“SE1980” (reference the numbers to the original). This worksheet should have all the 1980 numbers
for each variable.
•
For each variable, rank the data using the same procedure in 3. Sort by Percent, descending.
•
Assign Quintiles 0-4 same as before (using the 20% cutoffs)
•
Scroll down through the columns and find where the Quintiles end at 4 and 3 begins. The
number in ‘Column 1’ that is in the same row as the very last 4 will be the new benchmark
for assigning 4’s for this specific variable in all other years. Copy this number in a new
worksheet just for your reference. Do the same for 3,2,1,0 and each variable (each variable
will have different benchmarks that will be used for each year.)
•
All six variables from 1980 will be on this one worksheet with all of the ranks and quintiles.
•
When finished sort back by Point, ascending!
6
Example: from “SE1980” Employment. The cells have been sorted by Percent, descending. The
number in ‘Column1’, which corresponds to the very last 4 in ‘Quintile’, is 152.91%. This
number will be used in the rankings in worksheets “SE1990” and “SE2001” as the cutoff for 4’s.
This replaces 80%.
Point
69
Column1
Rank
154.08%
31
114
152.91%
32
158
104
152.18%
151.63%
33
34
Percent
Quintile
81.00%
4
80.30%
4
79.70%
3
79.10%
3
The final benchmark numbers for Employment:
Employment
4 152.91%
3 92.60%
2
57.30%
1
3.30%
7. Somewhere in the same worksheet copy (by referencing) all quintiles from each variable in 1980’s
rankings (by 20%’s) so that they are side by side. Do not include any of the rankings; Quintiles only.
Find the average of Quintiles across each variable for each county and assign grades as we did in 5.
Always use the same Score Range. (You may find it easier to copy the Score Range to each sheet as
you work).
**** Do all of 6. and 7. for ‘County as a % of US’: “US1980” Æ you will have different
benchmarks for US numbers!!
Record all the benchmarks on one worksheet so that they are easier to reference in the
formulas “SEbchmrk” “USbchmrk”.
8. Go back to worksheets with original ranks “Empranks” etc. where the SE and US numbers were
calculated. Next to each column of 1990 and 2001 ‘% of SE’ and ‘% of US’ values assign Quintiles
using the new benchmarks from “SE1980” and “US1980” referencing the worksheets “SEbchmrk”
and “USbchmrk”.
For example: in “Emprank” (Employment only) for 1990 county as a ‘% of SE states’, assign
quintiles using benchmarks:
If >= 1.5291, 4
>= 0.926, 3
>= 0.573, 2
>= 0.033, 1
0
7
Values above 152.914% are assigned 4’s, above 92.63% are given 3’s, above 57.32% are given 2’s,
above 3.3% are given 1’s everything below are given 0’s
*** See how these are not the 80%, 60%, 40%, 20% cutoffs as used previously in “80scores” or
“SE1980”. The numbers above are different for each variable! You will use the same variable
benchmark for each year.
9. Now transfer (by referencing) all of these new Quintiles to new worksheets “SE1990, SE2000,
SE2001” respectively. Do the same for the US worksheets.
Follow the process in step 5. to assign grades to each county. You will use the same Scoring
Range and formulas for Interims 1 and 2 and to pull the final grade out. You will want to end up
with grades for each county from SE1990, SE2001, US1990, and US2001. The grades for SE and
US 1980 are used from the step 5. They will always be the same because we used 20% cutoffs. Use
1980 as a Benchmark to compare the other years to.
Example: Appling County “SE1990”
Unemp
POV
Emp
Pop
AWW
PCI
Grades versus Base 1980
1990
1989
1990
1990
1990
1990Average
0
2
0
0
0
1
Grade
1D-
Economic Vitality Index Summaries
Interim1
Interim 2
Other intervalD-
8
Key and Benchmarks
Key:
Emp: Employment
Pop: Population
Pov: Poverty Rate
AWW: Average Weekly Wage
Unemp: Unemployment Rate
PCI: Per Capita Income
AVG: Averages
Bureau of Economic Analysis
US Census Bureau
Us Census Bureau
Bureau of Economic Analysis
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Bureau of Economic Analysis
Cutoffs for all SE Grades using 1980's Benchmark
4
3
2
1
Employment
152.91%
92.60%
57.30%
3.30%
4
3
2
1
Population
166.55%
96.10%
56.38%
11.73%
0
1
2
3
Poverty
162.83%
130.96%
107.78%
90.98%
0
1
2
3
Unemployment
109.96%
98.70%
89.58%
79.39%
4
3
2
1
AWW
114.29%
103.95%
94.35%
86.35%
4
3
2
1
PCI
91.97%
86.10%
79.66%
71.94%
Cutoffs for all US Grades using 1980's Benchmark
4
3
2
1
Employment
151.51%
91.76%
56.78%
3.27%
0
1
2
3
Unemployment
107.89%
96.84%
87.89%
77.89%
4
3
2
1
Population
247.11%
142.59%
83.65%
17.41%
4
3
2
1
AWW
121.53%
110.53%
100.33%
91.82%
0
1
2
3
Poverty
226.61%
182.26%
150.00%
126.61%
4
3
2
1
PCI
92.98%
87.05%
80.53%
72.73%
Summaries of Grades by Year and Number of Grades Assigned Each Year
For both Percent of Southeastern States and United States
9
SE
1980
Emp
2.00
Pop
2.00
Pov
2.01
Aww
2.00
Unemp
2.01
PCI
2.00
AVG
2.00
1990
1.04
2.18
2.01
1.79
2.27
1.98
1.88
2001
1.50
2.18
2.08
2.21
1.82
1.84
1.94
Counts
SE 1980 SE 1990 SE 2001 Diff. 1980/'90 Diff. 1980/'01 Diff. 1990/'01
11
14
19
3
8
5
47
51
57
36
37
38
1
2
1
122
105
95
75
54
38
-21
-37
-16
155
145
145
33
40
50
7
17
10
A
B
C
D
F
Total
US
4
14
14
159
159
159
159
159
159
10
10
0
1980
Emp
2.00
Pop
2.00
Pov
2.01
Aww
2.00
Unemp
2.01
PCI
2.00
AVG
2.00
1990
0.74
2.55
2.18
1.57
1.51
0.74
1.55
2001
1.32
2.76
1.92
1.94
1.01
0.74
1.62
Counts
A
B
C
D
F
Total
US 1980 US 1990 US 2001 Diff. 1980/'90 Diff. 1980/'01 Diff. 1990/'01
11
4
6
-7
-5
2
47
24
44
36
20
38
-16
2
18
122
84
80
75
60
36
-15
-39
-24
155
136
131
33
52
51
19
18
-1
4
23
28
159
159
159
159
159
159
19
24
1980 Grades for a County as a Percent of SE States (EVI)
5
10
County
SE 1980
Employment
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
APPLING
0
0
0
0
1
1
0.3
F
ATKINSON
3
1
0
1
0
0
0.8
D
BACON
1
0
1
0
2
1
0.8
D
BAKER
2
0
1
0
4
0
1.2
D+
BALDWIN
3
0
3
2
3
3
2.3
C+
BANKS
1
3
4
1
3
1
2.2
C+
BARROW
3
3
3
2
1
3
2.5
B-
BARTOW
2
2
4
0
1
3
2.0
C
BEN HILL
3
3
1
4
2
2
2.5
B-
BERRIEN
3
1
2
4
4
1
2.5
B-
BIBB
1
0
2
3
1
4
1.8
C
BLECKLEY
1
1
3
3
4
2
2.3
C+
BRANTLEY
4
4
2
0
1
1
2.0
C
C-
BROOKS
2
3
0
1
4
0
1.7
BRYAN
4
4
2
4
0
2
2.7
B-
BULLOCH
4
3
2
2
4
1
2.7
B-
BURKE
4
0
0
4
0
2
1.7
C-
BUTTS
2
2
3
1
0
2
1.7
C-
CALHOUN
0
0
0
0
2
0
0.3
F
CAMDEN
4
4
2
1
3
4
3.0
B
CANDLER
CAR
ROLL
0
3
0
0
4
1
1.3
D+
2
1
3
1
1
3
1.8
C
CATOOSA
4
4
4
0
3
3
3.0
B
CHARLTON
0
1
2
2
2
2
1.5
C-
CHATHAM
1
1
3
2
2
4
2.2
C+
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1
4
4
0
0
0
1.5
C-
CHATTOOGA
1
0
3
0
0
2
1.0
D
CHEROKEE
4
4
4
2
4
4
3.7
A-
CLARKE
2
3
2
2
3
4
2.7
B-
CLAY
0
0
0
4
2
0
1.0
D
CLAYTON
4
3
4
3
3
4
3.5
AC
CLINCH
3
1
1
2
3
1
1.8
COBB
4
4
4
4
4
4
4.0
A
COFFEE
3
2
1
1
0
1
1.3
D+
COLQUITT
2
2
2
2
2
2
2.0
C
COLUMBIA
4
4
4
4
4
4
4.0
A
COOK
0
2
2
1
2
1
1.3
D+
B-
COWETA
2
3
3
2
2
4
2.7
CRAWFORD
2
4
3
2
1
3
2.5
B-
CRISP
0
0
0
3
0
1
0.7
D-
DADE
2
3
3
3
3
2
2.7
B-
DAWSON
4
4
2
1
1
3
2.5
B-
DECATUR
0
2
1
3
3
1
1.7
C-
DEKALB
4
0
4
1
4
4
2.8
B
Employment
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
SE 1980
County
11
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
DODGE
2
0
1
3
2
1
1.5
C-
DOOLY
0
0
0
3
2
0
0.8
D
DOUGHERTY
3
2
2
4
1
4
2.7
B-
DOUGLAS
4
4
4
2
4
4
3.7
A-
EARLY
2
1
0
4
4
0
1.8
C
ECHOLS
4
3
1
3
3
0
2.3
C+
C+
EFFINGHAM
0
4
3
0
4
3
2.3
ELBERT
3
1
2
3
0
3
2.0
C
EMANUEL
1
1
1
3
1
0
1.2
D+
D+
EVANS
0
1
1
0
3
2
1.2
FANNIN
0
1
1
2
0
1
0.8
D
FAYETTE
4
4
4
1
4
4
3.5
A-
FLOYD
1
0
4
1
1
4
1.8
C
FORSYTH
4
4
4
2
4
4
3.7
A-
FRANKLIN
1
1
2
2
0
2
1.3
D+
FULTON
3
2
2
1
1
4
2.2
C+
GILMER
3
0
2
0
1
2
1.3
D+
GLASCOCK
1
4
2
0
0
4
1.8
C
GLYNN
3
3
3
1
3
4
2.8
B
GORDON
3
3
4
2
0
2
2.3
C+
GRADY
3
1
1
3
4
1
2.2
C+
GREENE
3
1
1
3
4
0
2.0
C
A-
GWINNETT
4
4
4
3
3
4
3.7
HABERSHAM
3
1
4
0
1
2
1.8
C
HALL
4
3
4
2
2
4
3.2
B+
HANCOCK
0
0
0
4
1
0
0.8
D
HARALSON
2
2
4
1
1
4
2.3
C+
HARRIS
0
3
3
0
4
4
2.3
C+
HART
0
2
3
2
0
2
1.5
C-
HEARD
0
3
3
0
2
2
1.7
C-
HENRY
4
4
4
2
3
4
3.5
A-
HOUSTON
1
3
4
0
3
4
2.5
B-
IRWIN
0
2
1
0
4
0
1.2
D+
B-
JACKSON
3
2
4
2
3
2
2.7
JASPER
1
0
2
1
4
3
1.8
C
JEFF DAVIS
2
0
3
4
3
3
2.5
B-
JEFFERSON
2
2
0
3
0
1
1.3
D+
JENKINS
0
3
0
4
3
0
1.7
C-
JOHNSON
0
1
1
4
3
1
1.7
C-
JONES
0
3
4
4
4
3
3.0
B
LAMAR
2
2
3
0
2
3
2.0
C
LANIER
1
3
0
1
4
1
1.7
CC+
LAURENS
3
2
2
4
0
3
2.3
LEE
4
4
3
0
3
2
2.7
B-
LIBERTY
4
4
2
0
2
1
2.2
C+
LINCOLN
2
0
3
3
1
1
1.7
C-
LONG
2
4
1
3
1
0
1.8
C
LOWNDES
1
1
2
3
2
3
2.0
C
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
County
SE 1980
Employment
12
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
LUMPKIN
3
3
3
1
2
2
2.3
C+
MACON
4
4
0
4
0
0
2.0
C
MADISON
1
4
3
4
2
2
2.7
B-
MARION
0
0
0
1
3
0
0.7
D-
MCDUFFIE
1
3
2
3
0
3
2.0
C
MCINTOSH
4
0
0
1
2
0
1.2
D+
D+
MERIWETHER
0
1
2
4
0
1
1.3
MILLER
1
3
1
1
4
0
1.7
C-
MITCHELL
2
3
0
1
1
1
1.3
D+
MONROE
4
4
3
4
2
3
3.3
B+
MONTGOMERY
2
0
1
1
4
1
1.5
C-
MORGAN
3
3
2
4
1
3
2.7
B-
MURRAY
4
4
4
1
0
2
2.5
BC
MUSCOGEE
1
1
3
1
1
4
1.8
NEWTON
4
2
4
2
2
4
3.0
B
OCONEE
3
4
4
1
4
4
3.3
B+
OGLETHORPE
1
2
2
2
3
1
1.8
C
PAULDING
4
4
4
2
3
3
3.3
B+
B-
PEACH
1
3
1
4
2
4
2.5
PICKENS
2
2
3
1
1
3
2.0
C
PIERCE
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.0
D
PIKE
4
4
4
0
2
3
2.8
B
C-
POLK
1
0
3
2
0
3
1.5
PULASKI
0
2
1
3
3
2
1.8
C
PUTNAM
4
4
2
4
4
3
3.5
A-
QUITMAN
0
2
0
3
0
0
0.8
D
RABUN
2
4
3
4
2
1
2.7
B-
RANDOLPH
1
1
0
0
2
0
0.7
D-
RICHMOND
2
3
3
0
1
4
2.2
C+
ROCKDALE
4
4
4
4
4
4
4.0
A
SCHLEY
3
3
1
1
1
2
1.8
C
SCREVEN
3
2
0
3
3
1
2.0
C
SEMINOLE
1
2
1
3
4
1
2.0
C
SPALDING
2
2
3
1
3
4
2.5
B-
STEPHENS
1
0
4
0
0
3
1.3
D+
STEWART
0
0
0
3
0
0
0.5
D-
SUMTER
4
2
1
4
1
2
2.3
C+
TALBOT
0
0
2
4
3
0
1.5
C-
TALIAFERRO
2
0
0
0
0
2
0.7
D-
TATTNALL
1
0
0
2
3
0
1.0
D
TAYLOR
0
0
0
4
0
2
1.0
D
TELFAIR
3
1
1
4
1
0
1.7
C-
TERRELL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
F
THOMAS
2
1
2
2
3
3
2.2
C+
TIFT
2
1
1
3
2
2
1.8
C
TOOMBS
1
1
1
1
2
2
1.3
D+
C+
TOWNS
3
4
1
2
4
0
2.3
TREUTLEN
2
0
0
2
1
0
0.8
D
TROUP
1
3
3
3
1
3
2.3
C+
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
County
SE 1980
Employment
13
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
TURNER
3
2
0
4
2
0
1.8
Grade
C
TWIGGS
0
3
3
3
0
0
1.5
CC-
UNION
4
4
1
0
1
0
1.7
UPSON
2
2
4
0
4
3
2.5
B-
WALKER
0
1
4
2
0
3
1.7
C-
WALTON
3
1
3
2
3
3
2.5
B-
WARE
1
0
2
3
1
3
1.7
C-
WARREN
0
3
0
0
0
1
0.7
D-
WASHINGTON
3
1
1
3
2
3
2.2
C+
C+
WAYNE
3
2
2
4
1
2
2.3
WEBSTER
1
1
0
4
4
1
1.8
C
WHEELER
0
2
0
3
4
1
1.7
C-
WHITE
2
3
3
1
2
2
2.2
C+
WHITFIELD
2
2
4
0
1
4
2.2
C+
WILCOX
1
1
0
2
0
0
0.7
D-
WILKES
3
2
2
3
3
2
2.5
B-
WILKINSON
3
2
3
4
4
3
3.2
B+
WORTH
3
1
1
3
2
1
1.8
C
Averages
2
2
2
2
2
2
1990 Grades for a County as a Percent of SE States (EVI)
14
SE 1990
County
APPLING
Employment
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
0
0
2
0
0
1
0.5
D-
ATKINSON
3
0
1
0
1
1
1.0
D
BACON
0
0
1
2
1
1
0.8
D
BAKER
0
0
1
4
0
1
1.0
D
BALDWIN
2
1
3
0
3
3
2.0
C
BANKS
1
3
3
0
2
2
1.8
C
BARROW
1
4
4
4
0
3
2.7
B-
BARTOW
4
4
4
4
0
3
3.2
B+
BEN HILL
3
0
1
0
0
2
1.0
D
BERRIEN
0
1
2
4
0
2
1.5
C-
BIBB
3
0
2
0
2
4
1.8
C
BLECKLEY
0
0
2
4
2
3
1.8
C
BRANTLEY
4
4
2
4
0
0
2.3
C+
BROOKS
3
0
1
2
3
0
1.5
C-
BRYAN
3
4
4
1
2
3
2.8
B
BULLOCH
4
4
0
4
3
1
2.7
B-
BURKE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
F
BUTTS
1
0
3
4
0
1
1.5
C-
CALHOUN
0
0
0
3
0
2
0.8
D
CAMDEN
4
4
4
2
1
3
3.0
B
CANDLER
4
2
1
0
2
2
1.8
C
CARROLL
2
4
4
4
1
2
2.8
B
CATOOSA
3
3
4
0
4
2
2.7
B-
CHARLTON
1
1
2
2
0
0
1.0
D
CHATHAM
3
1
3
2
2
4
2.5
B-
CHATTAHOOCHEE
0
0
4
4
0
2
1.7
C-
CHATTOOGA
1
1
4
0
0
1
1.2
D+
CHEROKEE
4
4
4
3
3
4
3.7
A-
CLARKE
2
4
0
4
3
4
2.8
B
CLAY
4
0
0
0
0
0
0.7
D-
CLAYTON
3
4
4
1
2
4
3.0
B
CLINCH
0
0
1
4
0
0
0.8
D
COBB
3
4
4
1
4
4
3.3
B+
COFFEE
4
1
1
4
0
2
2.0
C
COLQUITT
1
0
1
1
1
2
1.0
D
COLUMBIA
4
4
4
1
4
4
3.5
A-
COOK
1
0
1
0
0
0
0.3
F
COWETA
3
4
4
4
2
4
3.5
A-
CRAWFORD
0
4
4
3
0
1
2.0
C
CRISP
1
0
0
2
0
2
0.8
D
4
3
4
0
0
1
2.0
C
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
DADE
SE 1990
County
Employment
15
DAWSON
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
1
4
4
3
0
4
2.7
B-
DECATUR
2
0
1
3
2
2
1.7
C-
DEKALB
1
2
4
3
3
4
2.8
B
DODGE
4
2
1
2
0
0
1.5
C-
DOOLY
3
0
0
4
0
1
1.3
D+
DOUGHERTY
1
0
1
4
0
3
1.5
C-
DOUGLAS
4
4
4
4
3
4
3.8
A
EARLY
2
0
0
4
0
2
1.3
D+
ECHOLS
1
3
4
4
0
1
2.2
C+
EFFINGHAM
3
4
4
4
3
3
3.5
A-
ELBERT
1
0
2
2
0
2
1.2
D+
EMANUEL
3
0
1
0
0
1
0.8
D
EVANS
4
3
1
4
3
2
2.8
B
FANNIN
3
1
3
4
0
0
1.8
C
FAYETTE
4
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A
FLOYD
1
1
4
4
0
4
2.3
C+
FORSYTH
4
4
4
3
3
4
3.7
A-
FRANKLIN
3
2
3
1
0
3
2.0
C
FULTON
1
1
2
3
1
4
2.0
C
GILMER
3
4
3
4
0
3
2.8
B
GLASCOCK
2
1
3
0
1
2
1.5
C-
GLYNN
2
3
4
1
3
4
2.8
B
GORDON
4
3
4
0
0
3
2.3
C+
GRADY
3
0
1
0
2
1
1.2
D+
GREENE
3
2
1
4
0
1
1.8
C
GWINNETT
4
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A
HABERSHAM
4
3
4
0
2
3
2.7
B-
HALL
3
4
4
2
2
4
3.2
B+
HANCOCK
3
0
0
4
0
0
1.2
D+
HARALSON
0
3
4
1
0
2
1.7
C-
HARRIS
1
3
4
4
3
4
3.2
B+
HART
3
2
4
0
2
3
2.3
C+
HEARD
4
4
2
4
1
0
2.5
B-
HENRY
4
4
4
4
3
4
3.8
A
HOUSTON
1
3
4
2
3
4
2.8
B
IRWIN
0
0
0
0
0
1
0.2
F
JACKSON
4
4
4
4
2
3
3.5
A-
JASPER
0
4
3
0
0
2
1.5
C-
JEFF DAVIS
3
2
2
4
2
2
2.5
B-
JEFFERSON
1
0
0
4
0
1
1.0
D
JENKINS
0
0
0
1
0
0
0.2
F
JOHNSON
0
0
1
0
1
0
0.3
F
1
3
4
0
3
4
2.5
B-
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
JONES
SE 1990
County
Employment
16
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
LAMAR
1
0
3
4
1
1
1.7
C-
LANIER
2
0
1
3
1
1
1.3
D+
LAURENS
3
1
2
3
0
3
2.0
C
LEE
1
4
4
2
2
2
2.5
B-
LIBERTY
0
4
3
2
0
0
1.5
C-
LINCOLN
2
3
2
3
0
2
2.0
C
LONG
0
4
1
0
1
0
1.0
D
LOWNDES
3
2
2
4
2
3
2.7
B-
LUMPKIN
4
4
3
4
4
2
3.5
A-
MACON
2
0
0
4
0
1
1.2
D+
MADISON
0
4
3
3
1
2
2.2
C+
MARION
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
F
MCDUFFIE
4
1
1
4
0
2
2.0
C
MCINTOSH
2
0
1
3
0
0
1.0
D
MERIWETHER
1
3
1
3
0
0
1.3
D+
MILLER
0
0
1
4
3
2
1.7
C-
MITCHELL
1
0
0
0
0
1
0.3
F
MONROE
0
4
4
0
0
3
1.8
C
MONTGOMERY
1
1
1
4
0
1
1.3
D+
MORGAN
2
2
3
0
0
3
1.7
C-
MURRAY
2
4
4
0
0
1
1.8
C
MUSCOGEE
1
0
2
3
1
4
1.8
C
NEWTON
3
4
4
4
0
3
3.0
B
OCONEE
4
4
4
4
4
4
4.0
A
OGLETHORPE
4
2
3
4
1
2
2.7
B-
PAULDING
4
4
4
4
1
3
3.3
B+
PEACH
3
4
1
4
1
4
2.8
B
PICKENS
0
4
4
3
0
4
2.5
B-
PIERCE
3
3
2
3
0
1
2.0
C
PIKE
1
4
4
0
1
2
2.0
C
POLK
0
0
3
0
0
2
0.8
D
PULASKI
4
0
1
4
1
3
2.2
C+
PUTNAM
4
4
3
0
0
3
2.3
C+
QUITMAN
0
3
0
4
0
0
1.2
D+
RABUN
3
3
4
4
1
1
2.7
B-
RANDOLPH
1
0
0
3
0
0
0.7
D-
RICHMOND
2
0
2
3
1
4
2.0
C
ROCKDALE
4
4
4
2
4
4
3.7
A-
SCHLEY
0
0
2
1
0
1
0.7
D-
SCREVEN
1
0
1
0
0
1
0.5
D-
SEMINOLE
1
2
0
4
2
1
1.7
C-
SPALDING
2
3
3
3
1
3
2.5
B-
2
2
3
2
0
2
1.8
C
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
STEPHENS
SE 1990
County
Employment
17
STEWART
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
F
SUMTER
1
0
1
1
0
2
0.8
D
TALBOT
1
1
1
4
0
0
1.2
D+
TALIAFERRO
2
0
0
4
0
1
1.2
D+
TATTNALL
3
0
1
4
2
1
1.8
C
TAYLOR
1
0
0
4
0
1
1.0
D
TELFAIR
3
0
0
0
0
1
0.7
D-
TERRELL
0
0
0
2
0
0
0.3
F
THOMAS
1
0
1
2
1
3
1.3
D+
TIFT
3
2
1
4
1
2
2.2
C+
TOOMBS
3
0
1
0
0
2
1.0
D
TOWNS
4
3
4
2
2
1
2.7
B-
TREUTLEN
3
0
0
0
0
0
0.5
D-
TROUP
3
2
3
2
1
4
2.5
B-
TURNER
1
0
0
0
0
1
0.3
F
TWIGGS
0
1
1
2
0
0
0.7
D-
UNION
1
4
2
4
3
1
2.5
B-
UPSON
0
0
4
0
1
1
1.0
D
WALKER
2
1
4
1
0
2
1.7
C-
WALTON
1
4
4
3
1
3
2.7
B-
WARE
1
0
2
0
0
1
0.7
D-
WARREN
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
F
WASHINGTON
3
1
1
4
2
3
2.3
C+
WAYNE
4
2
2
0
0
2
1.7
C-
WEBSTER
4
0
1
4
0
1
1.7
C-
WHEELER
0
0
0
4
1
0
0.8
D
WHITE
3
4
4
4
3
4
3.7
A-
WHITFIELD
3
2
4
0
2
4
2.5
B-
WILCOX
4
0
0
2
4
1
1.8
C
WILKES
1
0
1
4
1
3
1.7
C-
WILKINSON
2
0
3
2
3
3
2.2
C+
WORTH
1
2
1
2
0
1
1.2
D+
Averages
2
2
2
2
1
2
1.9
2001 Grades for a County as a Percent of SE States (EVI)
18
SE 2001
County
Employment
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
APPLING
0
2
2
0
0
0
0.7
D-
ATKINSON
0
2
1
0
0
1
0.7
D-
BACON
1
1
0
0
0
2
0.7
D-
BAKER
0
2
1
4
0
0
1.2
D+
BALDWIN
0
1
2
0
1
2
1.0
D
BANKS
4
4
4
0
4
1
2.8
B
BARROW
4
4
4
0
4
2
3.0
B
BARTOW
4
4
4
1
2
4
3.2
B+
BEN HILL
0
0
1
0
0
3
0.7
D-
BERRIEN
0
1
2
3
0
1
1.2
D+
BIBB
0
0
1
2
1
4
1.3
D+
BLECKLEY
1
2
2
0
2
3
1.7
C-
BRANTLEY
4
4
2
0
0
0
1.7
C-
BROOKS
0
1
1
4
0
1
1.2
D+
BRYAN
4
4
4
4
4
3
3.8
A
BULLOCH
4
3
0
0
4
1
2.0
C
BURKE
4
2
0
0
0
1
1.2
D+
BUTTS
3
4
4
0
1
2
2.3
C+
CALHOUN
3
3
0
4
0
0
1.7
C-
CAMDEN
0
0
4
0
3
1
1.3
D+
CANDLER
0
0
0
2
0
1
0.5
D-
CARROLL
0
4
3
4
1
2
2.3
C+
CATOOSA
4
4
4
3
4
2
3.5
A-
CHARLTON
4
2
1
4
3
0
2.3
C+
CHATHAM
4
1
2
0
3
4
2.3
C+
CHATTAHOOCHEE
4
3
4
4
0
4
3.2
B+
CHATTOOGA
0
3
3
0
3
0
1.5
C-
CHEROKEE
4
4
4
1
4
4
3.5
A-
CLARKE
1
3
0
3
4
4
2.5
B-
CLAY
0
1
0
4
0
1
1.0
D
CLAYTON
2
4
4
4
3
2
3.2
B+
CLINCH
0
1
1
0
0
0
0.3
F
COBB
4
4
4
4
4
4
4.0
A
COFFEE
3
3
1
0
0
2
1.5
C-
COLQUITT
0
2
1
0
0
1
0.7
D-
COLUMBIA
4
3
4
2
4
4
3.5
A-
COOK
0
3
1
0
0
0
0.7
D-
COWETA
4
4
4
0
4
4
3.3
B+
CRAWFORD
4
1
3
4
2
0
2.3
C+
CRISP
0
1
0
2
0
1
0.7
D-
4
3
4
1
4
1
2.8
B
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
DADE
SE 2001
County
Employment
19
DAWSON
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
4
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A
DECATUR
0
1
1
2
0
1
0.8
D
DEKALB
0
3
4
3
3
4
2.8
B
DODGE
1
0
2
0
1
1
0.8
D
DOOLY
0
2
1
4
0
0
1.2
D+
DOUGHERTY
0
0
0
1
0
4
0.8
D
DOUGLAS
4
4
4
2
4
4
3.7
A-
EARLY
3
0
0
4
0
2
1.5
C-
ECHOLS
4
4
0
0
3
0
1.8
C
EFFINGHAM
4
4
4
3
4
3
3.7
A-
ELBERT
4
1
2
1
0
2
1.7
C-
EMANUEL
0
1
0
1
0
1
0.5
D-
EVANS
4
4
0
0
2
1
1.8
C
FANNIN
4
4
4
4
3
1
3.3
B+
FAYETTE
4
4
4
4
4
4
4.0
A
FLOYD
2
2
3
4
2
4
2.8
B
FORSYTH
4
4
4
4
4
4
4.0
A
FRANKLIN
3
3
3
2
3
3
2.8
B
FULTON
4
3
2
4
3
4
3.3
B+
GILMER
4
4
4
3
4
0
3.2
B+
GLASCOCK
4
1
2
0
0
1
1.3
D+
GLYNN
1
2
3
0
4
4
2.3
C+
GORDON
1
4
4
0
0
3
2.0
C
GRADY
0
2
1
4
0
0
1.2
D+
GREENE
0
4
1
4
0
2
1.8
C
GWINNETT
4
4
4
4
4
4
4.0
A
HABERSHAM
3
4
4
0
3
3
2.8
B
HALL
4
4
4
4
4
4
4.0
A
HANCOCK
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
F
HARALSON
4
3
3
4
0
2
2.7
B-
HARRIS
1
3
4
0
4
4
2.7
B-
HART
4
2
3
0
0
2
1.8
C
HEARD
4
4
3
4
0
0
2.5
B-
HENRY
4
4
4
2
4
4
3.7
A-
HOUSTON
4
3
4
0
4
4
3.2
B+
IRWIN
0
2
2
4
0
1
1.5
C-
JACKSON
4
4
4
0
4
3
3.2
B+
JASPER
4
4
3
3
3
2
3.2
B+
JEFF DAVIS
0
1
1
1
0
1
0.7
D-
JEFFERSON
0
0
1
4
0
1
1.0
D
JENKINS
0
1
0
4
0
0
0.8
D
JOHNSON
0
1
1
4
0
1
1.2
D+
4
3
4
2
3
3
3.2
B+
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
JONES
SE 2001
County
Employment
20
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
LAMAR
0
4
4
1
0
1
1.7
C-
LANIER
4
0
2
2
1
0
1.5
C-
LAURENS
2
2
2
0
0
2
1.3
D+
LEE
4
4
4
0
3
1
2.7
B-
LIBERTY
4
0
3
3
0
0
1.7
C-
LINCOLN
0
2
3
0
0
1
1.0
D
LONG
4
3
1
1
4
0
2.2
C+
LOWNDES
0
1
2
0
1
3
1.2
D+
LUMPKIN
4
4
3
1
4
3
3.2
B+
MACON
3
1
0
0
0
1
0.8
D
MADISON
4
3
4
4
4
2
3.5
A-
MARION
0
3
1
3
0
0
1.2
D+
MCDUFFIE
0
1
2
2
0
3
1.3
D+
MCINTOSH
2
3
2
2
1
0
1.7
C-
MERIWETHER
0
0
2
3
0
2
1.2
D+
MILLER
0
0
1
0
0
2
0.5
D-
MITCHELL
4
2
0
0
0
1
1.2
D+
MONROE
4
3
4
1
0
1
2.2
C+
MONTGOMERY
0
3
1
4
0
1
1.5
C-
MORGAN
3
3
4
0
3
4
2.8
B
MURRAY
4
4
4
0
3
1
2.7
B-
MUSCOGEE
0
0
2
3
0
4
1.5
C-
NEWTON
4
4
4
2
4
3
3.5
A-
OCONEE
4
4
4
4
4
4
4.0
A
OGLETHORPE
4
4
3
4
4
1
3.3
B+
PAULDING
4
4
4
4
4
0
3.3
B+
PEACH
3
3
1
2
0
3
2.0
C
PICKENS
4
4
4
0
4
4
3.3
B+
PIERCE
4
2
2
4
1
2
2.5
B-
PIKE
4
4
4
1
2
2
2.8
B
POLK
4
2
3
2
0
1
2.0
C
PULASKI
0
2
2
4
0
2
1.7
C-
PUTNAM
4
3
3
0
4
3
2.8
B
QUITMAN
3
1
1
2
0
0
1.2
D+
RABUN
4
4
4
4
4
2
3.7
A-
RANDOLPH
0
0
0
3
0
1
0.7
D-
RICHMOND
1
0
1
0
0
4
1.0
D
ROCKDALE
4
3
4
2
4
4
3.5
A-
SCHLEY
4
3
1
0
1
1
1.7
C-
SCREVEN
0
0
1
0
0
1
0.3
F
SEMINOLE
1
0
1
4
1
2
1.5
C-
SPALDING
1
1
3
4
1
3
2.2
C+
0
1
3
4
1
3
2.0
C
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
STEPHENS
SE 2001
County
Employment
21
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
STEWART
0
0
1
0
0
2
0.5
D-
SUMTER
0
1
1
0
0
2
0.7
D-
TALBOT
0
1
0
1
0
0
0.3
F
TALIAFERRO
0
0
1
4
0
0
0.8
D
TATTNALL
0
3
0
3
0
0
1.0
D
TAYLOR
1
1
0
4
0
0
1.0
D
TELFAIR
0
0
1
0
0
0
0.2
F
TERRELL
1
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
F
THOMAS
4
1
2
4
1
4
2.7
B-
TIFT
0
2
1
2
1
3
1.5
C-
TOOMBS
0
1
0
2
0
1
0.7
D-
TOWNS
4
4
4
0
4
3
3.2
B+
TREUTLEN
0
2
0
0
0
0
0.3
F
TROUP
4
2
3
4
1
4
3.0
B
TURNER
4
1
0
0
0
0
0.8
D
TWIGGS
0
1
1
0
0
0
0.3
F
UNION
4
4
4
1
4
2
3.2
B+
UPSON
0
1
3
2
0
1
1.2
D+
WALKER
3
1
4
0
3
2
2.2
C+
WALTON
4
4
4
3
4
2
3.5
A-
WARE
0
0
1
0
0
1
0.3
F
WARREN
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
F
WASHINGTON
0
1
1
0
0
3
0.8
D
WAYNE
1
2
2
1
0
1
1.2
D+
WEBSTER
0
0
1
3
1
1
1.0
D
WHEELER
2
2
0
4
0
0
1.3
D+
WHITE
4
4
4
1
3
3
3.2
B+
WHITFIELD
2
3
4
3
4
4
3.3
B+
WILCOX
1
3
1
0
0
0
0.8
D
WILKES
0
0
2
0
0
3
0.8
D
WILKINSON
3
1
2
2
0
2
1.7
C-
WORTH
0
0
2
4
0
1
1.2
D+
Averages
2
2
2
2
2
2
1.9
1980 Grades for a County as a Percent of United States (EVI)
22
US 1980
County
Employment
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
APPLING
0
0
0
0
1
1
0.3
F
ATKINSON
3
1
0
1
0
0
0.8
D
BACON
1
0
1
0
2
1
0.8
D
BAKER
2
0
1
0
4
0
1.2
D+
BALDWIN
3
0
3
2
3
3
2.3
C+
BANKS
1
3
4
1
3
1
2.2
C+
BARROW
3
3
3
2
1
3
2.5
B-
BARTOW
2
2
4
0
1
3
2.0
C
BEN HILL
3
3
1
4
2
2
2.5
B-
BERRIEN
3
1
2
4
4
1
2.5
B-
BIBB
1
0
2
3
1
4
1.8
C
BLECKLEY
1
1
3
3
4
2
2.3
C+
BRANTLEY
4
4
2
0
1
1
2.0
C
BROOKS
2
3
0
1
4
0
1.7
C-
BRYAN
4
4
2
4
0
2
2.7
B-
BULLOCH
4
3
2
2
4
1
2.7
B-
BURKE
4
0
0
4
0
2
1.7
C-
BUTTS
2
2
3
1
0
2
1.7
C-
CALHOUN
0
0
0
0
2
0
0.3
F
CAMDEN
4
4
2
1
3
4
3.0
B
CANDLER
0
3
0
0
4
1
1.3
D+
CARROLL
2
1
3
1
1
3
1.8
C
CATOOSA
4
4
4
0
3
3
3.0
B
CHARLTON
0
1
2
2
2
2
1.5
C-
CHATHAM
1
1
3
2
2
4
2.2
C+
CHATTAHOOCHEE
1
4
4
0
0
0
1.5
C-
CHATTOOGA
1
0
3
0
0
2
1.0
D
CHEROKEE
4
4
4
2
4
4
3.7
A-
CLARKE
2
3
2
2
3
4
2.7
B-
CLAY
0
0
0
4
2
0
1.0
D
CLAYTON
4
3
4
3
3
4
3.5
A-
CLINCH
3
1
1
2
3
1
1.8
C
COBB
4
4
4
4
4
4
4.0
A
COFFEE
3
2
1
1
0
1
1.3
D+
COLQUITT
2
2
2
2
2
2
2.0
C
COLUMBIA
4
4
4
4
4
4
4.0
A
COOK
0
2
2
1
2
1
1.3
D+
COWETA
2
3
3
2
2
4
2.7
B-
CRAWFORD
2
4
3
2
1
3
2.5
B-
CRISP
0
0
0
3
0
1
0.7
D-
DADE
2
3
3
3
3
2
2.7
B-
DAWSON
4
4
2
1
1
3
2.5
B-
County
Employment
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
US 1980
23
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
DECATUR
0
2
1
3
3
1
1.7
C-
DEKALB
4
0
4
1
4
4
2.8
B
DODGE
2
0
1
3
2
1
1.5
C-
DOOLY
0
0
0
3
2
0
0.8
D
DOUGHERTY
3
2
2
4
1
4
2.7
B-
DOUGLAS
4
4
4
2
4
4
3.7
A-
EARLY
2
1
0
4
4
0
1.8
C
ECHOLS
4
3
1
3
3
0
2.3
C+
EFFINGHAM
0
4
3
0
4
3
2.3
C+
ELBERT
3
1
2
3
0
3
2.0
C
EMANUEL
1
1
1
3
1
0
1.2
D+
EVANS
0
1
1
0
3
2
1.2
D+
FANNIN
0
1
1
2
0
1
0.8
D
FAYETTE
4
4
4
1
4
4
3.5
A-
FLOYD
1
0
4
1
1
4
1.8
C
FORSYTH
4
4
4
2
4
4
3.7
A-
FRANKLIN
1
1
2
2
0
2
1.3
D+
FULTON
3
2
2
1
1
4
2.2
C+
GILMER
3
0
2
0
1
2
1.3
D+
GLASCOCK
1
4
2
0
0
4
1.8
C
GLYNN
3
3
3
1
3
4
2.8
B
GORDON
3
3
4
2
0
2
2.3
C+
GRADY
3
1
1
3
4
1
2.2
C+
GREENE
3
1
1
3
4
0
2.0
C
GWINNETT
4
4
4
3
3
4
3.7
A-
HABERSHAM
3
1
4
0
1
2
1.8
C
HALL
4
3
4
2
2
4
3.2
B+
HANCOCK
0
0
0
4
1
0
0.8
D
HARALSON
2
2
4
1
1
4
2.3
C+
HARRIS
0
3
3
0
4
4
2.3
C+
HART
0
2
3
2
0
2
1.5
C-
HEARD
0
3
3
0
2
2
1.7
C-
HENRY
4
4
4
2
3
4
3.5
A-
HOUSTON
1
3
4
0
3
4
2.5
B-
IRWIN
0
2
1
0
4
0
1.2
D+
B-
JACKSON
3
2
4
2
3
2
2.7
JASPER
1
0
2
1
4
3
1.8
C
JEFF DAVIS
2
0
3
4
3
3
2.5
B-
JEFFERSON
2
2
0
3
0
1
1.3
D+
JENKINS
0
3
0
4
3
0
1.7
C-
JOHNSON
0
1
1
4
3
1
1.7
C-
JONES
0
3
4
4
4
3
3.0
B
LAMAR
2
2
3
0
2
3
2.0
C
LANIER
1
3
0
1
4
1
1.7
C-
County
Employment
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
US 1980
24
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
LAURENS
3
2
2
4
0
3
2.3
C+
LEE
4
4
3
0
3
2
2.7
B-
LIBERTY
4
4
2
0
2
1
2.2
C+
LINCOLN
2
0
3
3
1
1
1.7
C-
LONG
2
4
1
3
1
0
1.8
C
LOWNDES
1
1
2
3
2
3
2.0
C
LUMPKIN
3
3
3
1
2
2
2.3
C+
MACON
4
4
0
4
0
0
2.0
C
MADISON
1
4
3
4
2
2
2.7
BD-
MARION
0
0
0
1
3
0
0.7
MCDUFFIE
1
3
2
3
0
3
2.0
C
MCINTOSH
4
0
0
1
2
0
1.2
D+
MERIWETHER
0
1
2
4
0
1
1.3
D+
MILLER
1
3
1
1
4
0
1.7
C-
MITCHELL
2
3
0
1
1
1
1.3
D+
MONROE
4
4
3
4
2
3
3.3
B+
C-
MONTGOMERY
2
0
1
1
4
1
1.5
MORGAN
3
3
2
4
1
3
2.7
B-
MURRAY
4
4
4
1
0
2
2.5
B-
MUSCOGEE
1
1
3
1
1
4
1.8
C
NEWTON
4
2
4
2
2
4
3.0
B
OCONEE
3
4
4
1
4
4
3.3
B+
OGLETHORPE
1
2
2
2
3
1
1.8
C
PAULDING
4
4
4
2
3
3
3.3
B+
PEACH
1
3
1
4
2
4
2.5
B-
PICKENS
2
2
3
1
1
3
2.0
C
PIERCE
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.0
D
PIKE
4
4
4
0
2
3
2.8
B
POLK
1
0
3
2
0
3
1.5
C-
PULASKI
0
2
1
3
3
2
1.8
C
A-
PUTNAM
4
4
2
4
4
3
3.5
QUITMAN
0
2
0
3
0
0
0.8
D
RABUN
2
4
3
4
2
1
2.7
B-
RANDOLPH
1
1
0
0
2
0
0.7
D-
RICHMOND
2
3
3
0
1
4
2.2
C+
ROCKDALE
4
4
4
4
4
4
4.0
A
SCHLEY
3
3
1
1
1
2
1.8
C
SCREVEN
3
2
0
3
3
1
2.0
C
SEMINOLE
1
2
1
3
4
1
2.0
C
SPALDING
2
2
3
1
3
4
2.5
B-
STEPHENS
1
0
4
0
0
3
1.3
D+
STEWART
0
0
0
3
0
0
0.5
D-
SUMTER
4
2
1
4
1
2
2.3
C+
TALBOT
0
0
2
4
3
0
1.5
C-
County
Employment
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
US 1980
25
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
TALIAFERRO
2
0
0
0
0
2
0.7
D-
TATTNALL
1
0
0
2
3
0
1.0
D
TAYLOR
0
0
0
4
0
2
1.0
D
TELFAIR
3
1
1
4
1
0
1.7
C-
TERRELL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
F
THOMAS
2
1
2
2
3
3
2.2
C+
TIFT
2
1
1
3
2
2
1.8
C
TOOMBS
1
1
1
1
2
2
1.3
D+
TOWNS
3
4
1
2
4
0
2.3
C+
TREUTLEN
2
0
0
2
1
0
0.8
D
TROUP
1
3
3
3
1
3
2.3
C+
TURNER
3
2
0
4
2
0
1.8
C
TWIGGS
0
3
3
3
0
0
1.5
C-
UNION
4
4
1
0
1
0
1.7
C-
UPSON
2
2
4
0
4
3
2.5
B-
WALKER
0
1
4
2
0
3
1.7
C-
WALTON
3
1
3
2
3
3
2.5
B-
WARE
1
0
2
3
1
3
1.7
C-
WARREN
0
3
0
0
0
1
0.7
D-
WASHINGTON
3
1
1
3
2
3
2.2
C+
WAYNE
3
2
2
4
1
2
2.3
C+
WEBSTER
1
1
0
4
4
1
1.8
C
WHEELER
0
2
0
3
4
1
1.7
C-
WHITE
2
3
3
1
2
2
2.2
C+
WHITFIELD
2
2
4
0
1
4
2.2
C+
WILCOX
1
1
0
2
0
0
0.7
D-
WILKES
3
2
2
3
3
2
2.5
B-
WILKINSON
3
2
3
4
4
3
3.2
B+
WORTH
3
1
1
3
2
1
1.8
C
Averages
2
2
2
2
2
2
2.0
1990 Grades for a County as a Percent of United States (EVI)
26
US 1990
County
Employment
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
APPLING
0
0
2
0
0
0
0.3
F
ATKINSON
3
0
1
0
0
0
0.7
D-
BACON
0
0
1
1
0
0
0.3
F
BAKER
0
0
1
4
0
0
0.8
D
BALDWIN
3
1
3
0
3
1
1.8
C
BANKS
1
3
4
0
1
0
1.5
C-
BARROW
1
4
4
2
0
1
2.0
C
BARTOW
4
4
4
3
0
1
2.7
B-
BEN HILL
3
0
2
0
0
0
0.8
D
D+
BERRIEN
0
0
3
4
0
0
1.2
BIBB
3
0
3
0
2
3
1.8
C
BLECKLEY
0
0
3
4
2
1
1.7
C-
BRANTLEY
4
3
3
3
0
0
2.2
C+
BROOKS
4
0
1
0
3
0
1.3
D+
BRYAN
4
4
4
0
1
1
2.3
C+
BULLOCH
4
4
1
4
3
0
2.7
B-
BURKE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
F
BUTTS
1
0
4
3
0
0
1.3
D+
CALHOUN
0
0
0
2
0
0
0.3
F
CAMDEN
4
4
4
1
0
1
2.3
C+
CANDLER
4
2
1
0
1
0
1.3
D+
CARROLL
3
3
4
3
0
1
2.3
C+
CATOOSA
4
3
4
0
3
0
2.3
C+
CHARLTON
2
1
3
0
0
0
1.0
D
CHATHAM
3
1
3
1
1
4
2.2
C+
CHATTAHOOCHEE
0
0
4
2
0
0
1.0
D
CHATTOOGA
1
1
4
0
0
0
1.0
D
CHEROKEE
4
4
4
2
3
3
3.3
B+
C+
CLARKE
2
3
1
4
2
1
2.2
CLAY
4
0
0
0
0
0
0.7
D-
CLAYTON
4
3
4
0
1
2
2.3
C+
CLINCH
0
0
1
2
0
0
0.5
D-
COBB
3
4
4
0
3
4
3.0
B
COFFEE
4
1
2
4
0
0
1.8
C
COLQUITT
1
0
2
0
0
0
0.5
DB+
COLUMBIA
4
4
4
0
4
3
3.2
COOK
1
0
2
0
0
0
0.5
D-
COWETA
4
4
4
3
1
3
3.2
B+
CRAWFORD
0
4
4
2
0
0
1.7
C-
CRISP
1
0
1
1
0
0
0.5
D-
DADE
4
3
4
0
0
0
1.8
C
DAWSON
1
4
4
1
0
1
1.8
C
County
Employment
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
US 1990
27
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
DECATUR
2
0
2
1
1
0
1.0
D
DEKALB
1
2
4
1
2
4
2.3
C+
DODGE
4
2
2
1
0
0
1.5
C-
DOOLY
3
0
0
3
0
0
1.0
D
DOUGHERTY
1
0
1
2
0
1
0.8
D
DOUGLAS
4
3
4
4
3
2
3.3
B+
EARLY
2
0
0
2
0
0
0.7
D-
ECHOLS
1
2
4
4
0
0
1.8
C
EFFINGHAM
3
4
4
4
2
1
3.0
B
ELBERT
2
0
2
1
0
0
0.8
D
EMANUEL
3
0
1
0
0
0
0.7
D-
EVANS
4
2
1
4
3
0
2.3
C+
FANNIN
4
1
3
4
0
0
2.0
C
FAYETTE
4
4
4
2
4
4
3.7
A-
FLOYD
2
1
4
2
0
2
1.8
C
FORSYTH
4
4
4
2
3
4
3.5
A-
FRANKLIN
3
1
4
0
0
1
1.5
C-
FULTON
2
0
3
2
0
4
1.8
C
GILMER
3
4
3
4
0
1
2.5
B-
GLASCOCK
2
0
3
0
1
0
1.0
D
GLYNN
3
3
4
0
2
3
2.5
B-
GORDON
4
3
4
0
0
1
2.0
C
GRADY
3
0
2
0
1
0
1.0
D
C-
GREENE
4
2
1
2
0
0
1.5
GWINNETT
4
4
4
2
4
4
3.7
A-
HABERSHAM
4
2
4
0
2
1
2.2
C+
HALL
3
4
4
0
2
2
2.5
B-
HANCOCK
3
0
0
3
0
0
1.0
D
HARALSON
0
2
4
0
0
0
1.0
D
HARRIS
2
3
4
4
2
2
2.8
B
HART
3
1
4
0
2
1
1.8
C
HEARD
4
4
3
4
0
0
2.5
B-
HENRY
4
4
4
2
3
3
3.3
B+
HOUSTON
2
3
4
0
3
2
2.3
C+
IRWIN
0
0
1
0
0
0
0.2
F
JACKSON
4
3
4
4
2
1
3.0
B
JASPER
0
3
3
0
0
0
1.0
D
JEFF DAVIS
3
1
3
2
1
0
1.7
C-
JEFFERSON
1
0
0
3
0
0
0.7
D-
JENKINS
0
0
1
0
0
0
0.2
F
JOHNSON
0
0
2
0
1
0
0.5
D-
JONES
1
3
4
0
3
2
2.2
C+
LAMAR
1
0
4
4
0
0
1.5
C-
LANIER
2
0
1
1
1
0
0.8
D
County
Employment
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
US 1990
28
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
LAURENS
3
1
2
2
0
1
1.5
C-
LEE
1
3
4
0
1
0
1.5
C-
LIBERTY
0
4
3
1
0
0
1.3
D+
LINCOLN
3
2
3
2
0
0
1.7
C-
LONG
0
4
2
0
0
0
1.0
D
LOWNDES
3
1
2
3
1
1
1.8
C
LUMPKIN
4
4
4
3
3
0
3.0
B
MACON
2
0
1
3
0
0
1.0
D
MADISON
0
3
4
2
1
0
1.7
C-
MARION
0
0
1
0
0
0
0.2
F
MCDUFFIE
4
1
2
2
0
0
1.5
C-
MCINTOSH
2
0
2
2
0
0
1.0
D
MERIWETHER
2
2
2
2
0
0
1.3
D+
MILLER
0
0
2
2
2
0
1.0
D
MITCHELL
1
0
1
0
0
0
0.3
F
MONROE
0
3
4
0
0
1
1.3
D+
MONTGOMERY
2
1
1
4
0
0
1.3
D+
MORGAN
2
2
4
0
0
1
1.5
C-
MURRAY
3
4
4
0
0
0
1.8
C
MUSCOGEE
1
0
3
1
0
2
1.2
D+
NEWTON
3
3
4
2
0
1
2.2
C+
OCONEE
4
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A
OGLETHORPE
4
2
4
4
1
0
2.5
B-
PAULDING
4
4
4
3
0
1
2.7
B-
PEACH
3
3
1
3
0
2
2.0
C
PICKENS
0
3
4
2
0
2
1.8
C
PIERCE
3
2
2
1
0
0
1.3
D+
PIKE
1
4
4
0
1
1
1.8
C
POLK
0
0
4
0
0
0
0.7
D-
PULASKI
4
0
1
4
0
1
1.7
CC+
PUTNAM
4
4
4
0
0
1
2.2
QUITMAN
0
2
0
4
0
0
1.0
D
RABUN
3
3
4
2
1
0
2.2
C+
RANDOLPH
1
0
0
2
0
0
0.5
D-
RICHMOND
2
0
3
1
0
3
1.5
CB+
ROCKDALE
4
4
4
0
3
4
3.2
SCHLEY
0
0
2
0
0
0
0.3
F
SCREVEN
1
0
2
0
0
0
0.5
D-
SEMINOLE
1
1
1
4
1
0
1.3
D+
SPALDING
2
2
4
2
0
1
1.8
C
STEPHENS
2
2
3
0
0
1
1.3
D+
STEWART
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
F
SUMTER
1
0
1
0
0
0
0.3
F
TALBOT
1
1
1
4
0
0
1.2
D+
County
Employment
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
US 1990
29
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
TALIAFERRO
2
0
0
4
0
0
1.0
D
TATTNALL
4
0
2
2
2
0
1.7
C-
TAYLOR
1
0
1
4
0
0
1.0
D
TELFAIR
4
0
1
0
0
0
0.8
D
TERRELL
0
0
1
0
0
0
0.2
F
THOMAS
1
0
2
0
0
1
0.7
D-
TIFT
3
1
2
4
0
0
1.7
C-
TOOMBS
3
0
1
0
0
0
0.7
D-
TOWNS
4
2
4
1
1
0
2.0
C
TREUTLEN
3
0
1
0
0
0
0.7
D-
TROUP
4
2
4
1
0
2
2.2
C+
TURNER
1
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
F
TWIGGS
0
1
1
0
0
0
0.3
F
UNION
1
4
3
4
2
0
2.3
C+
UPSON
0
0
4
0
1
0
0.8
D
WALKER
3
1
4
0
0
0
1.3
D+
WALTON
1
4
4
1
0
1
1.8
C
WARE
1
0
2
0
0
0
0.5
D-
WARREN
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
F
WASHINGTON
3
1
2
3
1
1
1.8
C
WAYNE
4
1
2
0
0
0
1.2
D+
WEBSTER
4
0
2
4
0
0
1.7
C-
WHEELER
0
0
0
4
0
0
0.7
D-
WHITE
4
4
4
4
2
2
3.3
B+
WHITFIELD
3
2
4
0
1
3
2.2
C+
WILCOX
4
0
1
0
3
0
1.3
D+
WILKES
1
0
2
3
0
1
1.2
D+
WILKINSON
3
0
4
0
3
1
1.8
C
WORTH
1
1
1
1
0
0
0.7
D-
Averages
2
2
3
2
1
1
1.5
2001 Grades for a County as a Percent of United States (EVI)
30
US 2001
County
Employment
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
APPLING
0
1
2
0
0
0
0.50
D-
ATKINSON
0
1
1
0
0
0
0.33
F
BACON
1
0
1
0
0
0
0.33
F
BAKER
0
1
1
4
0
0
1.00
D
BALDWIN
0
1
3
0
0
0
0.67
D-
BANKS
4
4
4
0
3
0
2.50
B-
BARROW
3
4
4
0
3
0
2.33
C+
BARTOW
4
4
4
0
1
2
2.50
B-
BEN HILL
0
0
2
0
0
1
0.50
D-
BERRIEN
0
1
3
1
0
0
0.83
D
BIBB
0
0
2
0
0
4
1.00
D
BLECKLEY
1
2
3
0
1
1
1.33
D+
BRANTLEY
4
3
4
0
0
0
1.83
C
BROOKS
0
1
1
4
0
0
1.00
D
BRYAN
4
4
4
4
4
1
3.50
A-
BULLOCH
3
2
1
0
4
0
1.67
C-
BURKE
4
2
0
0
0
0
1.00
D
BUTTS
3
4
4
0
0
0
1.83
C
CALHOUN
3
2
1
4
0
0
1.67
C-
CAMDEN
0
0
4
0
3
0
1.17
D+
CANDLER
0
0
1
0
0
0
0.17
F
CARROLL
0
4
4
3
1
1
2.17
C+
CATOOSA
4
3
4
1
4
0
2.67
B-
CHARLTON
4
2
2
3
2
0
2.17
C+
CHATHAM
3
1
4
0
2
4
2.33
C+
CHATTAHOOCHEE
4
2
4
2
0
3
2.50
B-
CHATTOOGA
0
2
4
0
2
0
1.33
D+
CHEROKEE
4
4
4
0
4
4
3.33
B+
CLARKE
1
2
0
1
4
1
1.50
C-
CLAY
0
1
0
4
0
0
0.83
D
CLAYTON
1
4
4
3
3
0
2.50
B-
CLINCH
0
1
1
0
0
0
0.33
F
COBB
4
4
4
2
4
4
3.67
A-
COFFEE
2
3
2
0
0
0
1.17
D+
COLQUITT
0
2
2
0
0
0
0.67
D-
COLUMBIA
4
3
4
0
4
2
2.83
B
COOK
0
2
2
0
0
0
0.67
D-
COWETA
4
4
4
0
4
3
3.17
B+
CRAWFORD
4
1
4
4
2
0
2.50
B-
CRISP
0
1
0
0
0
0
0.17
F
DADE
4
2
4
0
4
0
2.33
C+
DAWSON
4
4
4
1
4
3
3.33
B+
County
Employment
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
US 2001
31
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
DECATUR
0
1
1
0
0
0
0.33
F
DEKALB
0
2
4
1
2
4
2.17
C+
DODGE
1
0
3
0
0
0
0.67
D-
DOOLY
0
1
2
3
0
0
1.00
D
DOUGHERTY
0
0
1
0
0
2
0.50
D-
DOUGLAS
4
3
4
0
4
2
2.83
B
EARLY
2
0
1
3
0
0
1.00
D
ECHOLS
4
4
0
0
2
0
1.67
C-
EFFINGHAM
4
4
4
1
4
1
3.00
B
D+
ELBERT
3
1
3
0
0
0
1.17
EMANUEL
0
1
1
0
0
0
0.33
F
EVANS
4
3
1
0
2
0
1.67
C-
FANNIN
4
3
4
2
3
0
2.67
B-
FAYETTE
4
4
4
2
4
4
3.67
A-
FLOYD
1
1
4
2
1
2
1.83
C
FORSYTH
4
4
4
4
4
4
4.00
A
FRANKLIN
3
3
4
0
2
1
2.17
C+
FULTON
4
2
3
4
2
4
3.17
B+
GILMER
3
4
4
1
3
0
2.50
B-
GLASCOCK
4
1
3
0
0
0
1.33
D+
GLYNN
1
1
4
0
4
4
2.33
C+
GORDON
1
3
4
0
0
1
1.50
C-
GRADY
0
1
2
3
0
0
1.00
D
D+
GREENE
0
3
2
3
0
0
1.33
GWINNETT
4
4
4
2
4
4
3.67
A-
HABERSHAM
2
4
4
0
3
1
2.33
C+
HALL
4
4
4
3
4
2
3.50
A-
HANCOCK
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
F
HARALSON
4
3
4
2
0
0
2.17
C+
HARRIS
1
3
4
0
4
3
2.50
B-
HART
4
2
4
0
0
1
1.83
C
HEARD
4
4
4
4
0
0
2.67
B-
HENRY
4
4
4
0
4
1
2.83
B
HOUSTON
4
3
4
0
3
2
2.67
B-
IRWIN
0
2
3
3
0
0
1.33
D+
JACKSON
3
4
4
0
3
1
2.50
B-
JASPER
3
4
4
1
2
0
2.33
C+
JEFF DAVIS
0
1
2
0
0
0
0.50
D-
JEFFERSON
0
0
1
2
0
0
0.50
D-
JENKINS
0
1
0
2
0
0
0.50
D-
JOHNSON
0
1
1
4
0
0
1.00
D
JONES
4
2
4
0
2
1
2.17
C+
LAMAR
0
3
4
0
0
0
1.17
D+
LANIER
4
0
3
1
1
0
1.50
C-
County
Employment
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
US 2001
32
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
LAURENS
1
1
3
0
0
0
0.83
D
LEE
4
4
4
0
2
0
2.33
C+
C-
LIBERTY
3
0
4
2
0
0
1.50
LINCOLN
0
1
4
0
0
0
0.83
D
LONG
4
3
2
0
4
0
2.17
C+
LOWNDES
0
1
3
0
1
1
1.00
D
LUMPKIN
4
4
4
0
4
1
2.83
B
MACON
3
1
1
0
0
0
0.83
D
MADISON
4
3
4
2
4
0
2.83
B
MARION
0
2
2
1
0
0
0.83
D
MCDUFFIE
0
1
3
0
0
1
0.83
D
MCINTOSH
1
3
2
0
1
0
1.17
D+
MERIWETHER
0
0
3
1
0
0
0.67
D-
MILLER
0
0
2
0
0
1
0.50
D-
MITCHELL
3
2
1
0
0
0
1.00
D
MONROE
4
3
4
0
0
0
1.83
C
D+
MONTGOMERY
0
2
2
4
0
0
1.33
MORGAN
3
3
4
0
3
3
2.67
B-
MURRAY
4
4
4
0
3
0
2.50
B-
MUSCOGEE
0
0
4
2
0
3
1.50
C-
NEWTON
4
4
4
0
3
1
2.67
B-
OCONEE
4
3
4
3
4
2
3.33
B+
OGLETHORPE
4
3
4
4
4
0
3.17
B+
PAULDING
4
4
4
2
4
0
3.00
B
PEACH
2
2
2
0
0
1
1.17
D+
PICKENS
4
4
4
0
4
2
3.00
B
PIERCE
4
1
3
2
1
0
1.83
C
PIKE
4
4
4
0
2
0
2.33
C+
POLK
4
2
4
0
0
0
1.67
C-
PULASKI
0
1
3
4
0
0
1.33
D+
B-
PUTNAM
4
3
4
0
4
1
2.67
QUITMAN
2
1
2
0
0
0
0.83
D
RABUN
4
3
4
3
4
1
3.17
B+
RANDOLPH
0
0
1
1
0
0
0.33
F
RICHMOND
1
0
2
0
0
2
0.83
D
ROCKDALE
4
3
4
0
4
3
3.00
B
SCHLEY
3
2
2
0
1
0
1.33
D+
SCREVEN
0
0
2
0
0
0
0.33
F
SEMINOLE
1
0
1
4
0
0
1.00
D
SPALDING
1
1
4
3
0
1
1.67
C-
STEPHENS
0
1
4
4
0
1
1.67
C-
STEWART
0
0
2
0
0
0
0.33
F
SUMTER
0
1
2
0
0
0
0.50
D-
TALBOT
0
1
1
0
0
0
0.33
F
County
Employment
Population
Poverty
AWW
Unemployment
PCI
US 2001
33
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
TALIAFERRO
0
0
1
4
0
0
0.83
D
TATTNALL
0
2
1
1
0
0
0.67
D-
TAYLOR
1
1
1
4
0
0
1.17
D+
TELFAIR
0
0
2
0
0
0
0.33
F
TERRELL
1
0
0
0
0
0
0.17
F
THOMAS
3
1
3
4
0
2
2.17
C+
TIFT
0
1
2
0
1
1
0.83
D
TOOMBS
0
1
1
0
0
0
0.33
F
TOWNS
4
4
4
0
3
1
2.67
B-
TREUTLEN
0
1
1
0
0
0
0.33
F
TROUP
4
1
4
2
1
3
2.50
B-
TURNER
4
1
1
0
0
0
1.00
D
TWIGGS
0
1
2
0
0
0
0.50
D-
UNION
4
4
4
0
4
1
2.83
B
UPSON
0
1
4
0
0
0
0.83
D
WALKER
2
1
4
0
2
0
1.50
C-
WALTON
4
4
4
1
4
0
2.83
B
WARE
0
0
2
0
0
0
0.33
F
WARREN
0
0
1
0
0
0
0.17
F
WASHINGTON
0
1
1
0
0
1
0.50
D-
WAYNE
1
2
3
0
0
0
1.00
D
WEBSTER
0
0
2
1
1
0
0.67
D-
WHEELER
2
2
1
4
0
0
1.50
C-
WHITE
3
4
4
0
3
1
2.50
B-
WHITFIELD
1
3
4
1
4
3
2.67
B-
WILCOX
1
2
2
0
0
0
0.83
D
WILKES
0
0
3
0
0
1
0.67
D-
WILKINSON
2
1
3
0
0
0
1.00
D
WORTH
0
0
3
3
0
0
1.00
D
Averages
2
2
3
1
1
1
2
Maps
34
Figure 1. 1980 Benchmark SE EVI
35
Figure 2. 1990 SE EVI
36
Figure 3. 2001 SE EVI
37
Figure 4. 1980 US EVI
38
Figure 5. 1990 US EVI
39
Figure 6. 2001 US EVI
40
Human Vitality Index Summaries
Key and Benchmarks
Key:
BAP: Bachelor's +/pop25 + (bachelor's or more)
Potwork: Population 18-64/total population (potential workforce)
SFHH: Male/female hh families with own or related children/# of families {80,90 are own children only,
while 00 is related}
Pcincm: Income maintenance payments/BEA pop (per income maintenance)
Pcmed: Public assistance medical payments/BEA pop (per capita pa med payments)
Cutoffs for all SE Grades using 1980's Benchmark
BAP
POTwork
Cutoffs for all US Grades using 1980's Benchmark
SFHH
BAP
POTwork
SFHH
4
78.23%
4 100.66%
1 123.46%
4
65.01%
4
98.94%
1 121.37%
3
63.55%
3 97.75%
2 99.18%
3
52.86%
3
96.23%
2
97.50%
2
54.82%
2 94.31%
3 83.69%
2
45.60%
2
92.79%
3
82.27%
1
47.03%
1 91.18%
4 68.24%
1
39.41%
1
89.58%
4
67.08%
Pcincm
Pcmed
Pcincm
Pcmed
1
162.08%
1 181.48%
1
155.82%
1
121.60%
2
129.89%
2 151.12%
2
124.44%
2
101.26%
3
103.04%
3 111.36%
3
98.72%
3
74.61%
4
80.90%
4 80.83%
4
77.57%
4
54.16%
41
Summaries of Grades by Year and Number of Grades Assigned Each Year
For both Percent of Southeastern States and United States
SE
1980
BAP
2
Potwork
2
SFHH
2
Pcincm
2
Pcmed
2
AVG
2
1990
1.82
2.27
1.67
1.85
2.2
1.96
2000
1.91
2.72
1.58
1.92
2.55
2.13
Count
A
B
C
D
SE 1980 SE 1990 SE 2000 Diff. 1980/'90 Diff. 1980/'00 Diff. 1990/'00
17
17
27
0
10
10
59
62
40
42
35
2
-5
-7
95
101
45
36
39
-9
-6
3
136
148
43
41
47
-2
4
6
F
14
23
11
Total
159
159
159
159
159
159
1980
BAP
2.00
Potwork
2.00
1990
1.77
2000
2.11
US
Count
A
B
C
D
9
-3
-12
SFHH
2.00
Pcincm
2.00
Pcmed
2.00
AVG
2.00
2.47
1.38
2.09
1.65
1.88
3.21
1.19
1.84
1.60
1.99
US 1980 US 1990 US 2000 Diff. 1980/'90 Diff. 1980/'00 Diff. 1990/'00
17
14
22
-3
5
8
57
52
57
40
38
35
-2
-5
-3
102
90
91
45
38
34
-7
-11
-4
145
133
148
43
43
57
0
14
14
F
14
26
11
Total
159
159
159
159
159
159
12
-3
-15
42
1980 Grades for a County as a Percent of SE States (HVI)
SE 1980
County
APPLING
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcincm
Pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
1
1
2
1
2
1.4
D+
ATKINSON
0
1
3
0
1
1
D
BACON
1
1
2
1
2
1.4
D+
BAKER
0
0
0
1
2
0.6
DC+
BALDWIN
4
4
0
3
1
2.4
BANKS
0
3
4
4
4
3
B
BARROW
2
2
3
3
3
2.6
B-
BARTOW
0
3
3
4
4
2.8
B-
BEN HILL
2
1
1
1
1
1.2
D+
BERRIEN
0
2
3
2
3
2
C
C+
BIBB
4
4
0
2
1
2.2
BLECKLEY
3
4
2
2
0
2.2
C+
BRANTLEY
0
1
4
3
3
2.2
C+
D-
BROOKS
2
0
1
0
0
0.6
BRYAN
0
2
3
2
3
2
C
BULLOCH
4
4
2
3
3
3.2
B+
BURKE
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
BUTTS
1
3
1
2
2
1.8
C-
CALHOUN
1
0
1
0
0
0.4
F
C+
CAMDEN
2
3
1
3
2
2.2
CANDLER
3
0
1
1
0
1
D
CARROLL
4
3
2
4
3
3.2
B+
B+
CATOOSA
1
4
3
4
4
3.2
CHARLTON
0
0
1
1
2
0.8
D-
CHATHAM
4
4
0
2
1
2.2
C+
CHATTAHOOCHEE
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
CHATTOOGA
0
2
3
3
3
2.2
C+
CHEROKEE
3
3
4
4
4
3.6
A-
CLARKE
4
4
0
4
3
3
B
CLAY
3
0
1
0
0
0.8
D-
CLAYTON
3
4
1
4
4
3.2
B+
CLINCH
1
1
1
1
1
1
D
COBB
4
4
2
4
4
3.6
A-
COFFEE
2
2
2
1
1
1.6
CC-
COLQUITT
2
1
2
1
2
1.6
COLUMBIA
4
4
2
4
4
3.6
A-
COOK
0
1
1
2
3
1.4
D+
COWETA
3
2
2
2
2
2.2
C+
CRAWFORD
1
2
1
2
1
1.4
D+
CRISP
3
1
0
0
0
0.8
DB+
DADE
2
4
3
3
4
3.2
DAWSON
0
3
4
2
4
2.6
B-
DECATUR
2
1
2
1
1
1.4
D+
DEKALB
4
4
0
4
4
3.2
B+
43
SE 1980
County
DODGE
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcincm
Pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
1
1
2
1
1
1.2
D+
DOOLY
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
DOUGHERTY
4
3
0
1
1
1.8
C-
DOUGLAS
3
3
4
4
4
3.6
A-
EARLY
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
ECHOLS
0
0
1
2
0
0.6
D-
EFFINGHAM
0
2
4
3
3
2.4
C+
ELBERT
2
2
2
1
2
1.8
C-
EMANUEL
1
1
3
0
0
1
D
EVANS
1
0
0
0
0
0.2
F
C+
FANNIN
0
3
4
2
3
2.4
FAYETTE
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
FLOYD
4
4
2
4
2
3.2
B+
A-
FORSYTH
3
4
4
4
4
3.8
FRANKLIN
2
3
4
3
1
2.6
B-
FULTON
4
4
0
1
0
1.8
C-
GILMER
1
3
4
2
2
2.4
C+
GLASCOCK
0
1
4
1
0
1.2
D+
GLYNN
4
3
1
3
3
2.8
B-
GORDON
1
3
4
4
4
3.2
B+
GRADY
1
0
2
2
3
1.6
C-
GREENE
0
0
0
2
1
0.6
D-
GWINNETT
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
HABERSHAM
3
4
4
4
4
3.8
A-
HALL
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
HANCOCK
1
0
0
0
0
0.2
F
HARALSON
1
2
4
3
3
2.6
BB+
HARRIS
4
3
3
3
3
3.2
HART
2
2
3
3
4
2.8
B-
HEARD
0
2
3
2
2
1.8
C-
HENRY
3
4
4
4
3
3.6
A-
HOUSTON
4
4
1
4
3
3.2
B+
IRWIN
0
0
1
1
1
0.6
D-
JACKSON
2
3
3
4
3
3
B
JASPER
3
1
2
2
3
2.2
C+
JEFF DAVIS
2
2
4
2
3
2.6
B-
JEFFERSON
1
0
0
0
0
0.2
F
JENKINS
1
1
1
0
1
0.8
D-
JOHNSON
0
1
2
1
2
1.2
D+
JONES
4
3
3
3
2
3
B
LAMAR
2
2
1
3
3
2.2
C+
LANIER
0
0
3
0
1
0.8
D-
LAURENS
3
2
2
2
2
2.2
C+
LEE
3
3
3
3
4
3.2
B+
LIBERTY
4
4
2
4
3
3.4
B+
LINCOLN
1
2
4
2
3
2.4
C+
44
SE 1980
County
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcincm
Pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
0
3
4
1
2
2
C
LOWNDES
4
4
0
3
2
2.6
B-
LUMPKIN
3
4
3
3
4
3.4
B+
MACON
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
MADISON
2
3
3
3
3
2.8
B-
MARION
0
0
1
0
0
0.2
F
MCDUFFIE
2
2
0
2
1
1.4
D+
LONG
MCINTOSH
0
1
0
0
2
0.6
D-
MERIWETHER
1
1
1
2
1
1.2
D+
MILLER
1
0
1
1
0
0.6
D-
MITCHELL
2
0
1
0
0
0.6
D-
MONROE
3
3
2
4
2
2.8
B-
MONTGOMERY
1
3
2
0
2
1.6
CC-
MORGAN
3
1
2
2
1
1.8
MURRAY
0
3
4
4
4
3
B
MUSCOGEE
4
4
0
3
2
2.6
B-
NEWTON
3
2
2
3
3
2.6
B-
OCONEE
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
OGLETHORPE
3
2
4
2
2
2.6
B-
PAULDING
0
3
4
4
3
2.8
B-
PEACH
4
3
0
1
1
1.8
C-
PICKENS
1
3
4
3
4
3
B
PIERCE
1
1
3
2
3
2
C
PIKE
3
2
4
3
4
3.2
B+
POLK
0
2
3
3
3
2.2
C+
PULASKI
3
1
2
1
1
1.6
C-
PUTNAM
3
3
2
2
2
2.4
C+
QUITMAN
1
0
1
0
0
0.4
F
RABUN
4
3
4
3
4
3.6
A-
RANDOLPH
1
0
0
0
2
0.6
DC+
RICHMOND
4
4
0
3
1
2.4
ROCKDALE
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
SCHLEY
2
0
1
1
1
1
D
SCREVEN
2
1
0
0
0
0.6
D-
SEMINOLE
1
1
3
1
2
1.6
C-
SPALDING
3
2
1
3
3
2.4
C+
STEPHENS
3
3
3
3
4
3.2
B+
STEWART
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
SUMTER
4
2
0
1
0
1.4
D+
D+
TALBOT
2
1
1
1
2
1.4
TALIAFERRO
0
0
1
0
0
0.2
F
TATTNALL
0
4
2
1
2
1.8
C-
TAYLOR
1
1
0
0
0
0.4
F
TELFAIR
2
0
3
0
0
1
D
TERRELL
3
0
0
0
1
0.8
D-
THOMAS
4
2
1
1
1
1.8
C-
45
SE 1980
County
TIFT
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcincm
Pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
4
3
2
3
2
2.8
B-
TOOMBS
3
1
0
1
0
1
D
TOWNS
3
4
4
3
4
3.6
A-
TREUTLEN
0
0
2
0
1
0.6
DC+
TROUP
4
2
1
3
2
2.4
TURNER
2
0
1
1
2
1.2
D+
TWIGGS
0
1
3
1
1
1.2
D+
UNION
2
2
4
2
3
2.6
B-
UPSON
1
2
1
3
1
1.6
C-
WALKER
0
3
4
4
4
3
B
WALTON
1
2
3
4
3
2.6
B-
WARE
3
2
1
2
1
1.8
C-
WARREN
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
WASHINGTON
3
1
0
1
0
1
D
WAYNE
1
2
3
2
1
1.8
C-
WEBSTER
1
1
3
0
1
1.2
D+
WHEELER
2
0
3
0
0
1
D
WHITE
3
3
4
4
4
3.6
A-
WHITFIELD
3
4
3
4
4
3.6
A-
WILCOX
0
1
3
0
0
0.8
D-
WILKES
3
2
2
1
1
1.8
C-
WILKINSON
1
1
2
2
3
1.8
C-
WORTH
2
1
2
2
2
1.8
C-
Averages
2
2
2
2
2
2
46
1990 Grades for a County as a Percent of SE States (HVI)
SE 1990
County
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcincm
pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
APPLING
1
2
1
0
2
1.2
D+
ATKINSON
0
2
1
0
1
0.8
D-
BACON
0
1
0
0
2
0.6
D-
BAKER
2
1
1
0
2
1.2
D+
BALDWIN
4
4
0
3
0
2.2
C+
BANKS
0
4
4
4
4
3.2
B+
BARROW
1
3
3
3
3
2.6
BB+
BARTOW
1
4
3
4
4
3.2
BEN HILL
0
0
0
0
0
0
F
BERRIEN
0
2
2
2
2
1.6
C-
BIBB
4
3
0
1
2
2
C
BLECKLEY
2
3
2
2
2
2.2
C+
BRANTLEY
0
3
3
3
3
2.4
C+
BROOKS
1
0
1
0
0
0.4
F
BRYAN
3
3
3
3
4
3.2
B+
BULLOCH
4
4
1
3
3
3
B
BURKE
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
BUTTS
0
4
2
3
2
2.2
C+
CALHOUN
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
A-
CAMDEN
4
4
2
4
4
3.6
CANDLER
2
1
1
1
0
1
D
CARROLL
3
4
2
4
3
3.2
B+
CATOOSA
1
4
3
4
4
3.2
B+
CHARLTON
0
2
1
1
2
1.2
D+
CHATHAM
4
3
0
2
2
2.2
C+
CHATTAHOOCHEE
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
CHATTOOGA
0
2
3
2
3
2
C
CHEROKEE
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
CLARKE
4
4
0
3
3
2.8
B-
CLAY
3
0
0
0
0
0.6
D-
CLAYTON
4
4
1
4
4
3.4
B+
D-
CLINCH
0
2
1
0
1
0.8
COBB
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
COFFEE
3
2
1
1
1
1.6
CD
COLQUITT
2
1
1
0
1
1
COLUMBIA
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
COOK
0
1
3
2
3
1.8
C-
COWETA
4
3
2
3
3
3
B
CRAWFORD
0
3
2
2
3
2
C
CRISP
2
1
0
0
0
0.6
D-
DADE
1
4
3
3
4
3
B
DAWSON
1
4
4
4
4
3.4
B+
DECATUR
3
1
0
0
0
0.8
D-
DEKALB
4
4
1
4
4
3.4
B+
47
SE 1990
County
DODGE
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcincm
pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
1
2
1
1
0
1
D
DOOLY
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
DOUGHERTY
4
2
0
0
2
1.6
C-
DOUGLAS
3
4
3
4
4
3.6
A-
EARLY
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
ECHOLS
0
3
3
2
4
2.4
C+
EFFINGHAM
0
3
3
4
4
2.8
BD+
ELBERT
1
2
1
1
2
1.4
EMANUEL
1
0
1
0
0
0.4
F
EVANS
1
1
1
0
2
1
D
C
FANNIN
0
2
4
2
2
2
FAYETTE
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
FLOYD
4
3
2
3
2
2.8
B-
FORSYTH
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
FRANKLIN
2
3
4
2
0
2.2
C+
FULTON
4
4
0
1
3
2.4
C+
GILMER
1
3
4
2
0
2
C
GLASCOCK
0
2
3
2
1
1.6
C-
GLYNN
4
2
1
3
3
2.6
B-
GORDON
1
4
3
4
4
3.2
B+
GRADY
0
1
2
1
1
1
D
GREENE
1
0
0
1
3
1
D
GWINNETT
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
HABERSHAM
3
4
4
4
3
3.6
A-
HALL
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
HANCOCK
0
0
0
0
0
0
F
HARALSON
0
3
4
3
2
2.4
C+
HARRIS
4
3
4
4
4
3.8
A-
HART
1
2
3
3
3
2.4
C+
HEARD
0
2
3
3
3
2.2
C+
HENRY
2
4
4
4
4
3.6
A-
HOUSTON
4
4
1
4
4
3.4
B+
IRWIN
1
0
0
0
2
0.6
D-
JACKSON
1
3
4
3
4
3
B
JASPER
3
2
0
2
3
2
C
JEFF DAVIS
1
3
1
3
3
2.2
C+
JEFFERSON
0
0
0
0
0
0
F
JENKINS
0
1
0
0
0
0.2
F
JOHNSON
0
0
1
0
1
0.4
F
JONES
3
4
2
4
3
3.2
B+
LAMAR
2
3
1
3
4
2.6
B-
LANIER
0
2
0
0
0
0.4
F
LAURENS
3
1
1
1
1
1.4
D+
LEE
4
3
1
4
4
3.2
B+
LIBERTY
4
4
1
4
4
3.4
B+
LINCOLN
1
2
1
2
4
2
C
48
SE 1990
County
LONG
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcincm
pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
0
3
3
3
4
2.6
B-
LOWNDES
4
4
1
2
2
2.6
B-
LUMPKIN
3
4
4
4
4
3.8
A-
MACON
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
B+
MADISON
2
4
4
3
3
3.2
MARION
0
2
0
0
2
0.8
D-
MCDUFFIE
2
2
0
1
1
1.2
D+
D+
MCINTOSH
1
2
1
1
2
1.4
MERIWETHER
0
1
1
1
2
1
D
MILLER
1
0
1
0
2
0.8
D-
MITCHELL
0
0
0
0
2
0.4
F
MONROE
3
3
3
4
1
2.8
B-
MONTGOMERY
2
2
2
2
2
2
C
MORGAN
3
2
2
2
1
2
C
MURRAY
0
4
4
4
4
3.2
B+
MUSCOGEE
4
4
0
2
3
2.6
B-
NEWTON
2
3
2
3
3
2.6
B-
OCONEE
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
OGLETHORPE
3
3
2
2
4
2.8
B-
PAULDING
0
4
4
4
4
3.2
B+
PEACH
4
4
0
0
2
2
C
PICKENS
1
3
4
4
3
3
B
PIERCE
0
3
2
2
3
2
C
PIKE
2
3
3
4
2
2.8
B-
POLK
0
2
2
2
2
1.6
C-
PULASKI
3
1
0
0
0
0.8
D-
PUTNAM
3
4
2
3
2
2.8
B-
QUITMAN
0
1
0
0
2
0.6
D-
RABUN
3
2
4
3
3
3
B
RANDOLPH
0
0
0
0
2
0.4
F
C-
RICHMOND
4
4
0
1
0
1.8
ROCKDALE
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
SCHLEY
1
2
3
0
3
1.8
C-
SCREVEN
1
0
0
0
2
0.6
D-
SEMINOLE
0
2
1
0
3
1.2
D+
SPALDING
3
3
1
2
3
2.4
C+
STEPHENS
3
3
3
3
3
3
B
STEWART
1
0
0
0
1
0.4
F
SUMTER
4
1
0
0
0
1
D
D+
TALBOT
0
2
0
0
4
1.2
TALIAFERRO
0
0
1
0
1
0.4
F
TATTNALL
0
4
1
0
1
1.2
D+
TAYLOR
0
1
0
0
1
0.4
F
TELFAIR
1
0
1
0
0
0.4
F
TERRELL
1
0
0
0
1
0.4
F
THOMAS
4
1
0
1
0
1.2
D+
49
SE 1990
County
TIFT
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcincm
Pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
4
2
0
1
2
1.8
C-
TOOMBS
3
2
1
0
0
1.2
D+
TOWNS
3
2
4
3
4
3.2
B+
TREUTLEN
0
1
1
0
1
0.6
DC+
TROUP
4
2
1
2
3
2.4
TURNER
0
0
0
0
1
0.2
F
TWIGGS
0
2
1
1
2
1.2
D+
UNION
2
2
4
3
3
2.8
B-
UPSON
1
2
1
2
3
1.8
C-
WALKER
1
3
4
4
3
3
B
WALTON
2
3
3
3
3
2.8
B-
WARE
2
2
1
0
0
1
D
WARREN
0
0
0
0
2
0.4
F
WASHINGTON
2
1
0
0
0
0.6
D-
WAYNE
2
2
2
1
0
1.4
D+
WEBSTER
0
1
2
1
3
1.4
D+
WHEELER
1
0
2
0
0
0.6
D-
WHITE
4
4
4
4
1
3.4
B+
WHITFIELD
3
4
3
4
4
3.6
A-
WILCOX
0
0
2
0
0
0.4
F
WILKES
2
1
1
1
2
1.4
D+
WILKINSON
1
2
1
1
3
1.6
C-
WORTH
0
2
0
1
2
1
D
Averages
1.8
2.3
1.7
1.8
2.2
2.0
50
2000 Grades for a County as a Percent of SE States (HVI)
SE 2000
County
APPLING
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcincm
Pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
0
3
2
1
2
1.6
C-
ATKINSON
0
2
1
0
2
1
D
BACON
0
3
2
0
1
1.2
D+
BAKER
1
2
1
0
2
1.2
D+
BALDWIN
3
4
0
3
0
2
C
BANKS
1
4
4
4
4
3.4
B+
BARROW
3
3
3
4
4
3.4
B+
BARTOW
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
BEN HILL
0
2
0
1
1
0.8
D-
BERRIEN
0
2
2
1
2
1.4
D+
C-
BIBB
4
2
0
0
2
1.6
BLECKLEY
2
2
1
1
3
1.8
C-
BRANTLEY
0
3
3
3
2
2.2
C+
BROOKS
1
1
1
0
2
1
D
BRYAN
4
3
2
4
4
3.4
B+
BULLOCH
4
4
1
3
3
3
B
BURKE
0
1
0
0
2
0.6
D-
BUTTS
0
4
2
3
3
2.4
C+
CALHOUN
2
4
0
0
1
1.4
D+
A-
CAMDEN
4
4
2
4
4
3.6
CANDLER
1
1
0
0
0
0.4
F
CARROLL
4
4
2
3
3
3.2
B+
B+
CATOOSA
3
3
3
4
4
3.4
CHARLTON
0
4
1
2
3
2
C
CHATHAM
4
3
0
2
3
2.4
C+
CHATTAHOOCHEE
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
CHATTOOGA
0
4
2
3
3
2.4
C+
CHEROKEE
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
B+
CLARKE
4
4
0
4
4
3.2
CLAY
0
0
0
0
1
0.2
F
CLAYTON
4
4
0
4
4
3.2
B+
D-
CLINCH
1
2
0
0
0
0.6
COBB
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
COFFEE
1
3
1
1
2
1.6
CD+
COLQUITT
1
2
1
1
2
1.4
COLUMBIA
4
3
4
4
4
3.8
A-
COOK
0
2
1
1
2
1.2
D+
A-
COWETA
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
CRAWFORD
0
4
3
3
3
2.6
B-
CRISP
2
1
0
0
0
0.6
DB+
DADE
1
4
4
3
4
3.2
DAWSON
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
DECATUR
2
1
0
0
0
0.6
D-
DEKALB
4
4
0
4
4
3.2
B+
51
SE 2000
County
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcincm
Pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
DODGE
1
3
1
1
2
1.6
C-
DOOLY
0
4
0
0
1
1
D
DOUGHERTY
3
2
0
0
2
1.4
D+
DOUGLAS
4
4
2
4
4
3.6
A-
EARLY
1
0
0
0
2
0.6
D-
ECHOLS
1
3
1
3
4
2.4
C+
EFFINGHAM
4
3
3
4
4
3.6
AD+
ELBERT
0
2
1
1
2
1.2
EMANUEL
0
2
0
0
0
0.4
F
EVANS
0
2
0
0
2
0.8
DC+
FANNIN
1
2
4
2
3
2.4
FAYETTE
4
3
4
4
4
3.8
A-
FLOYD
3
3
2
3
2
2.6
B-
FORSYTH
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
FRANKLIN
1
2
3
2
2
2
C
FULTON
4
4
0
2
4
2.8
B-
GILMER
4
3
4
4
3
3.6
A-
GLASCOCK
0
1
4
2
0
1.4
D+
GLYNN
4
2
1
3
3
2.6
B-
GORDON
2
4
3
4
3
3.2
B+
GRADY
1
2
1
0
2
1.2
D+
GREENE
4
2
0
1
2
1.8
C-
GWINNETT
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
HABERSHAM
4
4
4
4
3
3.8
A-
HALL
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
HANCOCK
1
4
0
0
0
1
D
HARALSON
0
3
3
3
2
2.2
C+
HARRIS
4
3
3
4
4
3.6
A-
HART
3
2
3
3
3
2.8
B-
HEARD
0
2
2
3
3
2
C
HENRY
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
HOUSTON
4
3
1
4
4
3.2
B+
IRWIN
0
1
1
1
2
1
D
B+
JACKSON
3
4
3
4
3
3.4
JASPER
3
3
2
3
4
3
B
JEFF DAVIS
0
3
2
2
2
1.8
C-
JEFFERSON
0
1
0
0
1
0.4
F
JENKINS
0
1
0
0
1
0.4
F
JOHNSON
0
0
1
0
1
0.4
F
B+
JONES
3
3
2
4
4
3.2
LAMAR
2
4
1
3
3
2.6
B-
LANIER
1
3
2
1
2
1.8
C-
LAURENS
3
2
1
1
2
1.8
C-
LEE
4
4
2
4
4
3.6
A-
LIBERTY
3
4
1
3
4
3
B
LINCOLN
1
3
2
2
4
2.4
C+
52
SE 2000
County
LONG
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcincm
Pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
0
3
1
3
4
2.2
C+
LOWNDES
4
4
1
2
3
2.8
B-
LUMPKIN
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
MACON
0
2
0
0
0
0.4
F
MADISON
2
4
3
3
3
3
B
MARION
0
3
1
0
2
1.2
D+
MCDUFFIE
1
2
0
1
2
1.2
D+
C-
MCINTOSH
2
2
1
1
3
1.8
MERIWETHER
0
2
0
1
2
1
D
MILLER
1
0
1
0
1
0.6
D-
MITCHELL
0
3
0
0
2
1
D
MONROE
4
4
2
4
3
3.4
B+
MONTGOMERY
3
4
2
2
3
2.8
BB+
MORGAN
4
3
3
3
3
3.2
MURRAY
0
4
2
4
4
2.8
B-
MUSCOGEE
4
3
0
1
3
2.2
C+
NEWTON
4
3
2
4
4
3.4
B+
OCONEE
4
3
4
4
4
3.8
A-
OGLETHORPE
4
3
1
3
4
3
B
PAULDING
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
PEACH
3
4
0
0
3
2
C
PICKENS
4
4
4
4
3
3.8
A-
PIERCE
1
3
3
1
2
2
C
PIKE
3
3
4
4
4
3.6
A-
POLK
0
2
2
2
3
1.8
C-
PULASKI
3
4
1
1
2
2.2
C+
PUTNAM
4
4
3
3
3
3.4
B+
QUITMAN
0
0
1
0
3
0.8
D-
RABUN
4
2
4
3
3
3.2
B+
RANDOLPH
0
1
0
0
1
0.4
F
RICHMOND
4
3
0
1
2
2
C
ROCKDALE
4
4
2
4
4
3.6
A-
SCHLEY
2
2
0
1
3
1.6
C-
SCREVEN
0
1
1
0
2
0.8
D-
SEMINOLE
0
1
1
0
1
0.6
D-
SPALDING
1
3
0
2
3
1.8
C-
STEPHENS
2
3
3
2
2
2.4
C+
STEWART
0
0
0
0
0
0
F
SUMTER
4
2
0
0
1
1.4
D+
D+
TALBOT
0
3
0
0
3
1.2
TALIAFERRO
0
1
0
0
4
1
D
TATTNALL
0
4
2
1
2
1.8
C-
TAYLOR
0
2
0
0
2
0.8
D-
TELFAIR
0
4
1
0
0
1
D
TERRELL
0
1
0
0
1
0.4
F
THOMAS
3
2
1
1
1
1.6
C-
53
SE 2000
County
TIFT
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcincm
Pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
3
3
1
1
2
2
C
TOOMBS
2
2
0
0
1
1
D
TOWNS
4
1
4
3
2
2.8
B-
TREUTLEN
0
2
1
0
1
0.8
D-
TROUP
3
2
0
2
3
2
C
TURNER
0
1
0
0
2
0.6
D-
TWIGGS
0
3
1
1
2
1.4
D+
UNION
3
1
4
3
3
2.8
B-
UPSON
1
2
1
2
2
1.6
C-
WALKER
0
3
3
3
3
2.4
C+
WALTON
4
3
3
4
4
3.6
A-
WARE
0
2
1
0
0
0.6
D-
WARREN
0
1
0
0
1
0.4
F
WASHINGTON
1
2
0
0
2
1
D
WAYNE
2
4
2
2
2
2.4
C+
WEBSTER
0
2
1
0
4
1.4
D+
D+
WHEELER
0
4
1
0
1
1.2
WHITE
4
3
4
4
4
3.8
A-
WHITFIELD
2
3
3
4
4
3.2
B+
WILCOX
0
4
1
0
0
1
D
WILKES
1
2
1
0
3
1.4
D+
WILKINSON
0
2
0
1
3
1.2
D+
WORTH
0
2
1
1
3
1.4
D+
Averages
1.9
2.7
1.6
1.9
2.5
2.1
54
1980 Grades for a County as a Percent of United States (HVI)
US 1980
County
APPLING
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcincm
Pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
1
1
2
1
2
1.4
D+
ATKINSON
0
1
3
0
1
1
D
BACON
1
1
2
1
2
1.4
D+
BAKER
0
0
0
1
2
0.6
DC+
BALDWIN
4
4
0
3
1
2.4
BANKS
0
3
4
4
4
3
B
BARROW
2
2
3
3
3
2.6
B-
BARTOW
0
3
3
4
4
2.8
B-
BEN HILL
2
1
1
1
1
1.2
D+
BERRIEN
0
2
3
2
3
2
C
C+
BIBB
4
4
0
2
1
2.2
BLECKLEY
3
4
2
2
0
2.2
C+
BRANTLEY
0
1
4
3
3
2.2
C+
D-
BROOKS
2
0
1
0
0
0.6
BRYAN
0
2
3
2
3
2
C
BULLOCH
4
4
2
3
3
3.2
B+
BURKE
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
BUTTS
1
3
1
2
2
1.8
C-
CALHOUN
1
0
1
0
0
0.4
F
C+
CAMDEN
2
3
1
3
2
2.2
CANDLER
3
0
1
1
0
1
D
CARROLL
4
3
2
4
3
3.2
B+
B+
CATOOSA
1
4
3
4
4
3.2
CHARLTON
0
0
1
1
2
0.8
D-
CHATHAM
4
4
0
2
1
2.2
C+
CHATTAHOOCHEE
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
CHATTOOGA
0
2
3
3
3
2.2
C+
CHEROKEE
3
3
4
4
4
3.6
A-
CLARKE
4
4
0
4
3
3
B
CLAY
3
0
1
0
0
0.8
D-
CLAYTON
3
4
1
4
4
3.2
B+
CLINCH
1
1
1
1
1
1
D
COBB
4
4
2
4
4
3.6
A-
COFFEE
2
2
2
1
1
1.6
CC-
COLQUITT
2
1
2
1
2
1.6
COLUMBIA
4
4
2
4
4
3.6
A-
COOK
0
1
1
2
3
1.4
D+
COWETA
3
2
2
2
2
2.2
C+
CRAWFORD
1
2
1
2
1
1.4
D+
CRISP
3
1
0
0
0
0.8
DB+
DADE
2
4
3
3
4
3.2
DAWSON
0
3
4
2
4
2.6
B-
DECATUR
2
1
2
1
1
1.4
D+
DEKALB
4
4
0
4
4
3.2
B+
55
US 1980
County
DODGE
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcincm
Pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
1
1
2
1
1
1.2
D+
DOOLY
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
DOUGHERTY
4
3
0
1
1
1.8
C-
DOUGLAS
3
3
4
4
4
3.6
A-
EARLY
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
ECHOLS
0
0
1
2
0
0.6
D-
EFFINGHAM
0
2
4
3
3
2.4
C+
ELBERT
2
2
2
1
2
1.8
C-
EMANUEL
1
1
3
0
0
1
D
EVANS
1
0
0
0
0
0.2
F
C+
FANNIN
0
3
4
2
3
2.4
FAYETTE
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
FLOYD
4
4
2
4
2
3.2
B+
A-
FORSYTH
3
4
4
4
4
3.8
FRANKLIN
2
3
4
3
1
2.6
B-
FULTON
4
4
0
1
0
1.8
C-
GILMER
1
3
4
2
2
2.4
C+
GLASCOCK
0
1
4
1
0
1.2
D+
GLYNN
4
3
1
3
3
2.8
B-
GORDON
1
3
4
4
4
3.2
B+
GRADY
1
0
2
2
3
1.6
C-
GREENE
0
0
0
2
1
0.6
D-
GWINNETT
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
HABERSHAM
3
4
4
4
4
3.8
A-
HALL
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
HANCOCK
1
0
0
0
0
0.2
F
HARALSON
1
2
4
3
3
2.6
BB+
HARRIS
4
3
3
3
3
3.2
HART
2
2
3
3
4
2.8
B-
HEARD
0
2
3
2
2
1.8
C-
HENRY
3
4
4
4
3
3.6
A-
HOUSTON
4
4
1
4
3
3.2
B+
IRWIN
0
0
1
1
1
0.6
D-
JACKSON
2
3
3
4
3
3
B
JASPER
3
1
2
2
3
2.2
C+
JEFF DAVIS
2
2
4
2
3
2.6
B-
JEFFERSON
1
0
0
0
0
0.2
F
JENKINS
1
1
1
0
1
0.8
D-
JOHNSON
0
1
2
1
2
1.2
D+
JONES
4
3
3
3
2
3
B
LAMAR
2
2
1
3
3
2.2
C+
LANIER
0
0
3
0
1
0.8
D-
LAURENS
3
2
2
2
2
2.2
C+
LEE
3
3
3
3
4
3.2
B+
LIBERTY
4
4
2
4
3
3.4
B+
LINCOLN
1
2
4
2
3
2.4
C+
56
US 1980
County
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcincm
Pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
0
3
4
1
2
2
C
LOWNDES
4
4
0
3
2
2.6
B-
LUMPKIN
3
4
3
3
4
3.4
B+
MACON
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
MADISON
2
3
3
3
3
2.8
B-
MARION
0
0
1
0
0
0.2
F
MCDUFFIE
2
2
0
2
1
1.4
D+
LONG
MCINTOSH
0
1
0
0
2
0.6
D-
MERIWETHER
1
1
1
2
1
1.2
D+
MILLER
1
0
1
1
0
0.6
D-
MITCHELL
2
0
1
0
0
0.6
D-
MONROE
3
3
2
4
2
2.8
B-
MONTGOMERY
1
3
2
0
2
1.6
CC-
MORGAN
3
1
2
2
1
1.8
MURRAY
0
3
4
4
4
3
B
MUSCOGEE
4
4
0
3
2
2.6
B-
NEWTON
3
2
2
3
3
2.6
B-
OCONEE
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
OGLETHORPE
3
2
4
2
2
2.6
B-
PAULDING
0
3
4
4
3
2.8
B-
PEACH
4
3
0
1
1
1.8
C-
PICKENS
1
3
4
3
4
3
B
PIERCE
1
1
3
2
3
2
C
PIKE
3
2
4
3
4
3.2
B+
POLK
0
2
3
3
3
2.2
C+
PULASKI
3
1
2
1
1
1.6
C-
PUTNAM
3
3
2
2
2
2.4
C+
QUITMAN
1
0
1
0
0
0.4
F
RABUN
4
3
4
3
4
3.6
A-
RANDOLPH
1
0
0
0
2
0.6
DC+
RICHMOND
4
4
0
3
1
2.4
ROCKDALE
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
SCHLEY
2
0
1
1
1
1
D
SCREVEN
2
1
0
0
0
0.6
D-
SEMINOLE
1
1
3
1
2
1.6
C-
SPALDING
3
2
1
3
3
2.4
C+
STEPHENS
3
3
3
3
4
3.2
B+
STEWART
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
SUMTER
4
2
0
1
0
1.4
D+
D+
TALBOT
2
1
1
1
2
1.4
TALIAFERRO
0
0
1
0
0
0.2
F
TATTNALL
0
4
2
1
2
1.8
C-
TAYLOR
1
1
0
0
0
0.4
F
TELFAIR
2
0
3
0
0
1
D
TERRELL
3
0
0
0
1
0.8
D-
THOMAS
4
2
1
1
1
1.8
C-
57
US 1980
County
TIFT
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcincm
Pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
4
3
2
3
2
2.8
B-
TOOMBS
3
1
0
1
0
1
D
TOWNS
3
4
4
3
4
3.6
A-
TREUTLEN
0
0
2
0
1
0.6
DC+
TROUP
4
2
1
3
2
2.4
TURNER
2
0
1
1
2
1.2
D+
TWIGGS
0
1
3
1
1
1.2
D+
UNION
2
2
4
2
3
2.6
B-
UPSON
1
2
1
3
1
1.6
C-
WALKER
0
3
4
4
4
3
B
WALTON
1
2
3
4
3
2.6
B-
WARE
3
2
1
2
1
1.8
C-
WARREN
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
WASHINGTON
3
1
0
1
0
1
D
WAYNE
1
2
3
2
1
1.8
C-
WEBSTER
1
1
3
0
1
1.2
D+
WHEELER
2
0
3
0
0
1
D
WHITE
3
3
4
4
4
3.6
A-
WHITFIELD
3
4
3
4
4
3.6
A-
WILCOX
0
1
3
0
0
0.8
D-
WILKES
3
2
2
1
1
1.8
C-
WILKINSON
1
1
2
2
3
1.8
C-
WORTH
2
1
2
2
2
1.8
C-
Averages
2
2
2
2
2
2
58
1990 Grades for a County as a Percent of United States (HVI)
US 1990
County
APPLING
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcincm
Pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
1
2
1
1
1
1.2
D+
ATKINSON
0
2
0
0
0
0.4
F
BACON
0
2
0
1
1
0.8
D-
BAKER
2
1
0
0
2
1
D
C+
BALDWIN
4
4
0
3
0
2.2
BANKS
0
4
4
4
4
3.2
B+
BARROW
1
3
2
4
2
2.4
C+
B+
BARTOW
1
4
3
4
4
3.2
BEN HILL
0
0
0
1
0
0.2
F
BERRIEN
0
3
1
2
0
1.2
D+
C-
BIBB
4
3
0
1
1
1.8
BLECKLEY
2
3
1
2
1
1.8
C-
BRANTLEY
0
3
3
3
3
2.4
C+
BROOKS
1
0
1
0
0
0.4
F
BRYAN
3
3
3
3
3
3
B
BULLOCH
4
4
1
3
2
2.8
B-
BURKE
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
BUTTS
0
4
1
3
0
1.6
C-
CALHOUN
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
CAMDEN
4
4
2
4
4
3.6
A-
CANDLER
2
1
1
1
0
1
D
CARROLL
3
4
1
4
3
3
B
CATOOSA
1
4
3
4
3
3
B
CHARLTON
0
2
1
2
2
1.4
D+
CHATHAM
4
3
0
2
2
2.2
C+
CHATTAHOOCHEE
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
CHATTOOGA
0
3
3
3
2
2.2
C+
CHEROKEE
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
CLARKE
4
4
0
4
2
2.8
B-
CLAY
3
0
0
0
0
0.6
D-
CLAYTON
4
4
0
4
4
3.2
B+
D-
CLINCH
0
2
1
0
0
0.6
COBB
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
COFFEE
3
2
0
1
0
1.2
D+
COLQUITT
2
2
0
1
0
1
D
COLUMBIA
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
COOK
0
2
2
2
2
1.6
C-
COWETA
4
4
2
3
3
3.2
B+
CRAWFORD
0
4
2
3
2
2.2
C+
CRISP
2
1
0
0
0
0.6
D-
DADE
0
4
3
4
3
2.8
B-
DAWSON
1
4
4
4
4
3.4
B+
DECATUR
3
1
0
1
0
1
D
DEKALB
4
4
0
4
4
3.2
B+
59
US 1990
County
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcincm
Pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
DODGE
0
3
1
1
0
1
D
DOOLY
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
DOUGHERTY
4
2
0
0
1
1.4
D+
DOUGLAS
3
4
2
4
4
3.4
B+
EARLY
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
ECHOLS
0
3
3
2
4
2.4
C+
EFFINGHAM
0
3
2
4
3
2.4
C+
D-
ELBERT
0
2
0
1
1
0.8
EMANUEL
1
0
1
0
0
0.4
F
EVANS
1
1
1
1
1
1
D
C
FANNIN
0
2
4
2
2
2
FAYETTE
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
FLOYD
4
4
2
3
1
2.8
B-
FORSYTH
4
4
4
4
3
3.8
A-
FRANKLIN
2
3
3
3
0
2.2
C+
FULTON
4
4
0
1
2
2.2
C+
GILMER
1
4
4
3
0
2.4
C+
GLASCOCK
0
2
3
3
0
1.6
C-
GLYNN
4
3
1
3
2
2.6
B-
GORDON
1
4
3
4
3
3
B
GRADY
0
1
1
1
0
0.6
D-
GREENE
1
0
0
1
2
0.8
D-
GWINNETT
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
HABERSHAM
3
4
3
4
2
3.2
B+
HALL
4
4
3
4
3
3.6
A-
HANCOCK
0
0
0
0
0
0
F
HARALSON
0
3
4
3
1
2.2
C+
HARRIS
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
HART
1
2
2
3
3
2.2
C+
HEARD
0
3
2
3
2
2
C
HENRY
2
4
4
4
4
3.6
A-
HOUSTON
4
4
1
4
3
3.2
B+
IRWIN
1
1
0
1
1
0.8
D-
JACKSON
1
4
3
4
3
3
B
JASPER
3
2
0
2
2
1.8
C-
JEFF DAVIS
1
3
1
3
2
2
C
JEFFERSON
0
0
0
0
0
0
F
JENKINS
0
1
0
0
0
0.2
F
JOHNSON
0
0
1
0
0
0.2
F
JONES
3
4
1
4
2
2.8
B-
LAMAR
2
3
1
3
3
2.4
C+
LANIER
0
2
0
0
0
0.4
F
LAURENS
3
2
0
1
0
1.2
D+
LEE
4
4
1
4
4
3.4
B+
LIBERTY
4
4
1
4
4
3.4
B+
LINCOLN
1
2
1
2
3
1.8
C-
60
US 1990
County
LONG
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcincm
Pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
0
3
2
3
4
2.4
C+
LOWNDES
4
4
0
2
1
2.2
C+
LUMPKIN
3
4
4
4
4
3.8
A-
MACON
2
0
0
0
0
0.4
F
MADISON
2
4
3
3
2
2.8
B-
MARION
0
2
0
0
1
0.6
D-
MCDUFFIE
2
2
0
2
0
1.2
D+
D+
MCINTOSH
1
2
0
1
2
1.2
MERIWETHER
0
1
0
2
2
1
D
MILLER
1
1
1
1
1
1
D
MITCHELL
0
0
0
0
1
0.2
F
MONROE
3
4
2
4
0
2.6
B-
MONTGOMERY
2
3
2
2
1
2
C
MORGAN
3
2
1
3
0
1.8
C-
MURRAY
0
4
4
4
4
3.2
B+
MUSCOGEE
4
4
0
2
2
2.4
C+
NEWTON
2
4
2
3
3
2.8
B-
OCONEE
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
OGLETHORPE
3
4
2
3
4
3.2
B+
PAULDING
0
4
4
4
3
3
B
PEACH
4
4
0
1
2
2.2
C+
PICKENS
1
4
4
4
2
3
B
PIERCE
0
3
1
2
3
1.8
C-
PIKE
1
3
3
4
0
2.2
C+
POLK
0
2
2
3
1
1.6
C-
PULASKI
2
2
0
0
0
0.8
D-
PUTNAM
3
4
1
3
2
2.6
B-
QUITMAN
0
1
0
0
1
0.4
F
RABUN
3
3
4
4
2
3.2
B+
RANDOLPH
0
0
0
0
1
0.2
F
RICHMOND
4
4
0
2
0
2
C
ROCKDALE
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
SCHLEY
0
2
2
1
2
1.4
D+
D-
SCREVEN
1
1
0
0
1
0.6
SEMINOLE
0
2
1
0
2
1
D
SPALDING
3
3
0
3
2
2.2
C+
STEPHENS
3
3
3
3
3
3
B
STEWART
0
1
0
0
0
0.2
F
SUMTER
4
2
0
0
0
1.2
D+
D+
TALBOT
0
2
0
1
3
1.2
TALIAFERRO
0
0
1
0
0
0.2
F
TATTNALL
0
4
1
1
0
1.2
D+
TAYLOR
0
2
0
0
0
0.4
F
TELFAIR
1
0
0
0
0
0.2
F
TERRELL
1
0
0
0
0
0.2
F
THOMAS
4
2
0
1
0
1.4
D+
61
US 1990
County
TIFT
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcincm
Pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
4
3
0
2
1
2
C
TOOMBS
3
2
1
1
0
1.4
D+
TOWNS
3
2
4
4
3
3.2
B+
TREUTLEN
0
1
1
0
0
0.4
F
C+
TROUP
4
2
1
3
2
2.4
TURNER
0
0
0
0
0
0
F
TWIGGS
0
2
0
1
1
0.8
D-
UNION
2
2
4
3
3
2.8
B-
UPSON
1
2
1
3
2
1.8
C-
WALKER
1
3
3
4
3
2.8
B-
WALTON
2
3
2
4
2
2.6
B-
WARE
2
2
0
1
0
1
D
WARREN
0
0
0
0
1
0.2
F
WASHINGTON
2
1
0
1
0
0.8
D-
WAYNE
2
2
1
1
0
1.2
D+
WEBSTER
0
2
1
1
3
1.4
D+
WHEELER
1
0
2
0
0
0.6
D-
WHITE
4
4
4
4
0
3.2
B+
WHITFIELD
3
4
3
4
3
3.4
B+
WILCOX
0
0
1
0
0
0.2
F
WILKES
2
1
0
1
2
1.2
D+
WILKINSON
1
2
0
2
2
1.4
D+
WORTH
0
2
0
1
2
1
D
Averages
1.8
2.5
1.4
2.1
1.7
1.9
62
2000 Grades for a County as a Percent of United States (HVI)
US 2000
County
APPLING
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcinc
Pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
0
3
2
1
0
1.2
D+
ATKINSON
0
3
1
0
1
1
D
BACON
0
3
2
0
0
1
D
BAKER
1
2
0
0
1
0.8
D-
BALDWIN
4
4
0
3
0
2.2
C+
BANKS
1
4
4
4
4
3.4
B+
BARROW
3
4
2
4
3
3.2
B+
A-
BARTOW
4
4
3
4
3
3.6
BEN HILL
0
2
0
0
0
0.4
F
BERRIEN
1
3
1
1
0
1.2
D+
BIBB
4
3
0
0
0
1.4
D+
BLECKLEY
2
3
0
1
1
1.4
D+
BRANTLEY
0
4
2
2
1
1.8
C-
BROOKS
1
2
0
0
0
0.6
D-
BRYAN
4
4
1
4
3
3.2
B+
BULLOCH
4
4
1
3
2
2.8
B-
BURKE
0
2
0
0
0
0.4
F
BUTTS
1
4
1
3
2
2.2
C+
CALHOUN
3
4
0
0
0
1.4
D+
CAMDEN
4
4
1
4
4
3.4
B+
CANDLER
2
2
0
0
0
0.8
D-
CARROLL
4
4
1
3
2
2.8
B-
CATOOSA
3
4
3
4
4
3.6
A-
CHARLTON
0
4
0
2
2
1.6
C-
CHATHAM
4
4
0
2
2
2.4
C+
CHATTAHOOCHEE
4
4
2
4
4
3.6
A-
CHATTOOGA
0
4
1
3
2
2
C
CHEROKEE
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
CLARKE
4
4
0
3
3
2.8
B-
CLAY
0
0
0
0
0
0
F
CLAYTON
4
4
0
4
3
3
B
D-
CLINCH
1
3
0
0
0
0.8
COBB
4
4
2
4
4
3.6
A-
COFFEE
2
4
1
1
1
1.8
CD+
COLQUITT
2
3
0
1
0
1.2
COLUMBIA
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
COOK
0
2
0
1
0
0.6
D-
COWETA
4
4
2
4
4
3.6
A-
CRAWFORD
0
4
2
3
2
2.2
C+
CRISP
2
2
0
0
0
0.8
DB+
DADE
2
4
4
3
3
3.2
DAWSON
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
DECATUR
2
2
0
0
0
0.8
D-
DEKALB
4
4
0
4
3
3
B
63
US 2000
County
DODGE
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcinc
Pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
2
3
0
0
0
1
D
DOOLY
1
4
0
0
0
1
D
DOUGHERTY
4
3
0
0
1
1.6
C-
DOUGLAS
4
4
1
4
4
3.4
B+
EARLY
2
1
0
0
0
0.6
D-
ECHOLS
2
4
1
3
3
2.6
B-
EFFINGHAM
4
4
3
4
3
3.6
AD
ELBERT
0
2
1
1
1
1
EMANUEL
0
2
0
0
0
0.4
F
EVANS
0
3
0
0
0
0.6
DB-
FANNIN
2
3
4
2
2
2.6
FAYETTE
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
FLOYD
3
4
2
3
1
2.6
B-
FORSYTH
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
FRANKLIN
2
3
2
2
1
2
C
FULTON
4
4
0
2
3
2.6
B-
GILMER
4
4
3
4
2
3.4
B+
GLASCOCK
0
2
3
2
0
1.4
D+
GLYNN
4
3
1
2
2
2.4
C+
GORDON
2
4
3
4
2
3
B
GRADY
1
2
0
0
1
0.8
D-
GREENE
4
3
0
1
1
1.8
C-
GWINNETT
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
HABERSHAM
4
4
3
4
2
3.4
B+
HALL
4
4
3
4
3
3.6
A-
HANCOCK
1
4
0
0
0
1
D
HARALSON
0
3
2
3
1
1.8
C-
HARRIS
4
4
3
4
3
3.6
A-
HART
3
3
2
3
2
2.6
B-
HEARD
0
3
2
3
2
2
C
HENRY
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
HOUSTON
4
4
1
4
3
3.2
B+
IRWIN
1
1
1
1
0
0.8
D-
JACKSON
3
4
2
4
2
3
B
JASPER
3
3
1
2
3
2.4
C+
JEFF DAVIS
0
3
1
1
0
1
D
JEFFERSON
0
2
0
0
0
0.4
F
JENKINS
1
2
0
0
0
0.6
D-
JOHNSON
0
0
0
0
0
0
F
JONES
3
4
2
4
3
3.2
B+
LAMAR
2
4
1
3
2
2.4
C+
LANIER
1
4
1
1
0
1.4
D+
LAURENS
3
3
0
1
0
1.4
D+
LEE
4
4
2
4
4
3.6
A-
LIBERTY
3
4
1
3
3
2.8
B-
LINCOLN
1
3
2
2
3
2.2
C+
64
US 2000
County
LONG
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcinc
Pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
0
3
0
3
3
1.8
CC+
LOWNDES
4
4
0
2
2
2.4
LUMPKIN
4
4
3
4
3
3.6
A-
MACON
1
3
0
0
0
0.8
D-
MADISON
2
4
3
3
2
2.8
B-
MARION
1
3
0
0
0
0.8
D-
MCDUFFIE
1
3
0
0
1
1
D
MCINTOSH
2
3
1
1
2
1.8
C-
MERIWETHER
1
3
0
1
1
1.2
D+
MILLER
1
1
1
0
0
0.6
D-
MITCHELL
1
3
0
0
0
0.8
D-
MONROE
4
4
2
4
2
3.2
B+
MONTGOMERY
3
4
1
1
2
2.2
C+
MORGAN
4
3
2
3
2
2.8
B-
MURRAY
0
4
1
4
3
2.4
C+
MUSCOGEE
4
4
0
1
2
2.2
C+
NEWTON
4
4
1
4
3
3.2
B+
OCONEE
4
4
4
4
4
4
A
OGLETHORPE
4
4
1
3
3
3
B
PAULDING
4
4
3
4
4
3.8
A-
PEACH
4
4
0
0
2
2
C
PICKENS
4
4
4
4
2
3.6
AC-
PIERCE
1
3
2
1
1
1.6
PIKE
4
4
3
4
3
3.6
A-
POLK
0
3
1
2
1
1.4
D+
PULASKI
3
4
1
0
1
1.8
C-
PUTNAM
4
4
2
3
2
3
B
QUITMAN
0
1
0
0
2
0.6
D-
RABUN
4
3
4
3
2
3.2
B+
RANDOLPH
0
1
0
0
0
0.2
F
RICHMOND
4
4
0
1
0
1.8
C-
ROCKDALE
4
4
1
4
4
3.4
B+
SCHLEY
3
3
0
0
2
1.6
CD-
SCREVEN
1
2
0
0
0
0.6
SEMINOLE
0
2
0
0
0
0.4
F
SPALDING
2
3
0
2
2
1.8
C-
STEPHENS
3
3
3
2
1
2.4
C+
STEWART
0
1
0
0
0
0.2
F
SUMTER
4
3
0
0
0
1.4
D+
D+
TALBOT
0
4
0
0
2
1.2
TALIAFERRO
0
1
0
0
4
1
D
TATTNALL
0
4
1
1
0
1.2
D+
TAYLOR
0
3
0
0
0
0.6
D-
TELFAIR
0
4
1
0
0
1
D
TERRELL
0
2
0
0
0
0.4
F
THOMAS
4
2
0
0
0
1.2
D+
65
US 2000
County
TIFT
BAP
Potwork
SFHH
Pcinc
Pcmed
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Quintile
Average
Grade
3
3
0
1
1
1.6
CD-
TOOMBS
2
2
0
0
0
0.8
TOWNS
4
2
4
3
1
2.8
B-
TREUTLEN
0
3
0
0
0
0.6
DC+
TROUP
4
3
0
2
2
2.2
TURNER
1
2
0
0
0
0.6
D-
TWIGGS
0
4
0
1
1
1.2
D+
UNION
4
2
4
3
2
3
B
UPSON
1
3
0
2
1
1.4
D+
WALKER
0
4
2
3
2
2.2
C+
WALTON
4
4
2
4
3
3.4
B+
WARE
1
3
1
0
0
1
D
WARREN
0
2
0
0
0
0.4
F
WASHINGTON
1
3
0
0
1
1
D
WAYNE
2
4
2
2
1
2.2
C+
WEBSTER
0
3
0
0
3
1.2
D+
WHEELER
0
4
1
0
0
1
D
WHITE
4
4
4
4
3
3.8
A-
WHITFIELD
3
4
3
4
3
3.4
B+
WILCOX
0
4
1
0
0
1
D
WILKES
1
2
0
0
2
1
D
WILKINSON
0
3
0
1
2
1.2
D+
WORTH
0
2
1
0
2
1
D
Averages
2.1
3.2
1.2
1.8
1.6
2.0
66
Maps
Figure 7. 1980 SE HVI
67
Figure 8. 1990 SE HVI
68
Figure 9. 2000 SE HVI
69
Figure 10. 1990 US HVI
70
Figure 11. 2000 US HVI
The Center for Agribusiness
& Economic Development
The Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development is a unit of the College of
Agricultural and Environmental Sciences of the University of Georgia, combining the
missions of research and extension. The Center has among its objectives:
To provide feasibility and other short term studies for current or potential Georgia
agribusiness firms and/or emerging food and fiber industries.
To provide agricultural, natural resource, and demographic data for private and
public decision makers.
To find out more, visit our Web site at: http://www.caed.uga.edu
Or contact:
John McKissick, Director
Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development
Lumpkin House
The University of Georgia
Athens, Georgia 30602-7509
Phone (706)542-0760
caed@agecon.uga.edu
The University of Georgia and Fort Valley State University, and the U.S. Department of
Agriculture and counties of the state cooperating. The Cooperative Extension Service
offers educational programs, assistance and materials to all people without regard to race,
color, national origin, age, sex or disability.
An equal opportunity/affirmative action organization committed to a diverse work force.
Report Number: CR-05-01
February 2005
Issued in furtherance of Cooperation Extension Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, the
University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, and the U.S.
Department of Agriculture cooperating.
J. Scott Angle, Dean and Director