Demande R-3640-2007
RÉPONSES DU TRANSPORTEUR
À LA DEMANDE DE RENSEIGNEMENTS NUMÉRO 2
DE LA RÉGIE DE L’ÉNERGIE
(« RÉGIE »)
RAPPORT 2007 DE PA CONSULTING
Réponse à la question 4.1
(Déposé seulement en version électronique)
Original : 2007-11-05
HQT-14, Document 1.2
(En liasse)
Polaris
2007 T&D Final Report - Transmission & Substations
August 24, 2007
Polaris Team
Mike Hormell
Carrie Koenig
Carl Wojcik
Kimberly Bakalars
Tony Rother
Matt Chwalowski
Arthur Sedestrom
PA Consulting Group. +1 (720) 566-9920
Or E-Mail anyone on the team at:
FirstName.LastName@paconsulting.com
I
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Reporting Companies
- Companies B.C. Hydro, BC
Baltimore Gas & Electric Company, MD
CenterPoint Energy, TX
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, NY
CPS Energy, TX
E.ON U.S.
El Paso Electric Company , TX
Entergy Arkansas, AR
Entergy GSU-LA, LA
Entergy Louisiana, LA
Entergy Mississippi, MS
Entergy Services, Inc., LA
Exelon - Commonwealth Edison Co, IL
Exelon - PECO Energy Co, PA
Florida Power & Light, FL
Hydro-Quebec, Canada
Omaha Public Power District, NE
Oncor Energy Delivery, TX
PPL Electric Utilities Corp.
Public Service Company Of New Mexico, NM
Public Service Electric & Gas Company, NJ
Texas-New Mexico Power Company
We Energies, WI
II
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Process Group Sections
- Process Group Sections T&D Substation Statistics
Focus Area: Distribution Substation Cost Detail
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
T&D Substation Field Construction
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment
Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation
Focus Area: On-line Monitoring of T&D Substation Components
T&D Substation Transformer Shops
Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes
Focus Area: T&D Substation Contracting
Transmission Line Statistics
Transmission Line Engineering & Design
Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Transmission Vegetation Management
Transmission Operations: Control Center
Focus Area: Transmission Line Support
Focus Area: Energy Management System
Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process
Focus Area: Transmission Line Contracting
®Currency values are reported in US, Dollars
III
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Pg. 1243
Pg. 1245
Pg. 1246
Pg. 1247
Pg. 1248
Pg. 1249
Pg. 1250
Pg. 1251
Pg. 1252
Pg. 1253
Pg. 1256
Pg. 1258
Pg. 1259
Pg. 1260
Pg. 1262
Pg. 1263
Pg. 1264
Pg. 1265
Pg. 1266
Pg. 1267
Pg. 1269
Pg. 1271
Pg. 1272
Pg. 1273
Pg. 1276
Pg. 1277
Pg. 1279
Pg. 1280
Pg. 1281
Pg. 1282
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
T&D Substation Expenditures - Per Distribution Customer
T&D Substation Expenditures - Per MWh Transmitted
T&D Substation Expenditures - Per Circuit Breaker
3-Year Average T&D Substation Expenditures - Per Circuit Breaker
3-Year Average T&D Substation Capital Additions - Per Circuit Breaker
3-Year Average T&D Substation O&M Expenses - Per Circuit Breaker
T&D Substation Expenditures - Per Assets
T&D Substation Expenditures - Per Assets Less Depreciation
T&D Substation Expenditures - Per T&D Substation MVA
T&D Substation Expenditures - Per Adjusted MVA
3-Year Average T&D Substation Expenditures - Per Distribution Customer
3-Year Average T&D Substation Expenditures - Per Assets
3-Year Average T&D Substation Expenditures - Per Assets Less Depreciation
T&D Substation O&M Expenses - Per Distribution Customer
T&D Substation O&M Expenses - Per MWh Transmitted
T&D Substation O&M Expenses - Per Circuit Breaker
T&D Substation O&M Expenses - Per Assets
T&D Substation O&M Expenses - Per Assets Less Depreciation
T&D Substation O&M Expenses - Per T&D Substation MVA
T&D Substation O&M Expenses - Per Adjusted MVA
3-Year Average T&D Substation O&M Expenses - Per Distribution Customer
3-Year Average T&D Substation O&M Expenses - Per Assets
3-Year Average T&D Substation O&M Expenses - Per Assets Less Depreciation
T&D Substation Capital Additions - Per Distribution Customer
T&D Substation Capital Additions - Per MWh Transmitted
T&D Substation Capital Additions - Per Circuit Breaker
T&D Substation Capital Additions - Per Assets
T&D Substation Capital Additions - Per Assets Less Depreciation
T&D Substation Capital Additions - Per T&D Substation MVA
T&D Substation Capital Additions - Per Adjusted MVA
T&D Substation Statistics NEXT >>
IV
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Pg. 1283 3-Year Average T&D Substation Capital Additions - Per Distribution Customer
Pg. 1285 3-Year Average T&D Substation Capital Additions - Per Assets
Pg. 1286 3-Year Average T&D Substation Capital Additions - Per Assets Less Depreciation
Pg. 1287 Distribution Substation Expenditures - Per Distribution Customer
Pg. 1288 Distribution Substation Expenditures - Per MWh Sold
Pg. 1289 Distribution Substation Expenditures - Per Assets
Pg. 1290 Distribution Substation Expenditures - Per Assets Less Depreciation
Pg. 1291 Distribution Substation Expenditures - Per Assets Less Depreciation
Pg. 1292 Distribution Substation Expenditures - Per Distribution MVA
Pg. 1293 Distribution Substation Expenditures - Per Adjusted Distribution MVA
Pg. 1294 Distribution Substation Expenditures - Per Distribution Transformer Bank
Pg. 1295 3-Year Average Distribution Substation Expenditures - Per Distribution Customer
Pg. 1296 3-Year Average Distribution Substation Expenditures - Per Assets
Pg. 1296.1 3-Year Average Distribution Substation Expenditures - Per Assets Less Depreciation
Pg. 1297 Distribution Substation O&M Expenses - Per Distribution Customer
Pg. 1298 Distribution Substation O&M Expenses - Per MWh Sold
Pg. 1299 Distribution Substation O&M Expenses - Per Assets
Pg. 1300 Distribution Substation O&M Expenses - Per Assets Less Depreciation
Pg. 1301 Distribution Substation O&M Expenses - Per Distribution MVA
Pg. 1302 Distribution Substation O&M Expenses - Per Adjusted Distribution MVA
Pg. 1303 Distribution Substation O&M Expenses - Per Distribution Transformer Bank
Pg. 1304 Distribution Substation O&M Expenses (FERC) - Percent of Total
Pg. 1305 3-Year Average Distribution Substation O&M Expenses - Per Distribution Customer
Pg. 1306 3-Year Average Distribution Substation O&M Expenses - Per Assets
Pg. 1306.1 3-Year Average Distribution Substation O&M Expenses - Per Assets Less Depreciation
Pg. 1307 Distribution Substation Capital Additions - Per Distribution Customer
Pg. 1308 Distribution Substation Capital Additions - Per MWh Sold
Pg. 1309 Distribution Substation Capital Additions - Per Assets
Pg. 1310 Distribution Substation Capital Additions - Per Assets Less Depreciation
Pg. 1311 Distribution Substation Capital Additions - Per Distribution MVA
<< BACK T&D Substation Statistics
T&D Substation Statistics NEXT >>
V
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Pg. 1312 Distribution Substation Capital Additions - Per Adjusted Distribution MVA
Pg. 1313 3-Year Average Distribution Substation Capital Additions - Per Distribution Customer
Pg. 1314 3-Year Average Distribution Substation Capital Additions - Per Assets
Pg. 1314.1 3-Year Average Distribution Substation Capital Additions - Per Assets Less Depreciation
Pg. 1316 Transmission Substation Expenditures - Per MWh Transmitted
Pg. 1317 Transmission Substation Expenditures - Per Transmission Substation Assets
Pg. 1318 Transmission Substation Expenditures - Per Transmission Substation Assets
Pg. 1319 Transmission Substation Expenditures - Per Assets Less Depreciation
Pg. 1320 Transmission Substation Expenditures - Per Transmission MVA
Pg. 1321 Transmission Substation Expenditures - Per Adjusted Transmission MVA
Pg. 1325 3-Year Average Transmission Substation Expenditures - Per Assets Less Depreciation
Pg. 1327 Transmission Substation O&M Expenses - Per MWh Transmitted
Pg. 1328 Transmission Substation O&M Expenses - Per Circuit Breaker
Pg. 1329 Transmission Substation O&M Expenses - Per Transmission Substation Assets
Pg. 1330 Transmission Substation O&M Expenses - Per Assets Less Depreciation
Pg. 1331 Transmission Substation O&M Expenses - Per Transmission MVA
Pg. 1332 Transmission Substation O&M Expenses - Per Adjusted Transmission MVA
Pg. 1334 Transmission Substation O&M Expenses (FERC) - As a Percent of Total
Pg. 1336 3-Year Average Transmission Substation O&M Expenses - Per Assets Less Depreciation
Pg. 1338 Transmission Substation Capital Additions - Per MWh Transmitted
Pg. 1339 Transmission Substation Capital Additions - Per Circuit Breaker
Pg. 1340 Transmission Substation Capital Additions - Per Transmission Substation Assets
Pg. 1341 Transmission Substation Capital Additions - Per Assets Less Depreciation
Pg. 1342 Transmission Substation Capital Additions - Per Transmission MVA
Pg. 1343 Transmission Substation Capital Additions - Per Adjusted Transmission MVA
Pg. 1345 3-Year Average Transmission Substation Capital Additions - Per Assets Less Depreciation
Pg. 1346 Substation Capital Additions - Per Current Year Depreciation
Pg. 1349 Current Year T&D Substation Depreciation Charges - As a Percent of Assets
Pg. 1350 Accumulated T&D Substation Depreciation Charges - As a Percent of T&D Substation Assets
Pg. 1351 Substation Staffing Level - Company FTEs per Transformer Bank
<< BACK T&D Substation Statistics
T&D Substation Statistics NEXT >>
VI
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Pg. 1352 Substation Staffing Level - Company FTEs per Circuit Breaker
Pg. 1353 Substation Staffing Level - Company FTEs per 1,000 Total System MVA
Pg. 1355 Company-Owned Transmission Substation Breakers - By Voltage Class
Pg. 1356 Company-Owned Substations - Distribution - By Size
Pg. 1357 Company-Owned Substations - Transmission - By Size
Pg. 1358 Company-Owned Substations by High-Side Voltage - Distribution - Per 100,000 Distribution Customers
Pg. 1360 Customer-Owned Substations, Company Maintained - Per 100,000 Distribution Customers
Pg. 1362 Substations Owned By Customers But Maintained By Utility
Pg. 1363 Distribution Substation Types - Company Owned
Pg. 1364 MVA for Customer-Owned Utility Maintained Substations - MVA per Substation
Pg. 1365 Total Substation MVA Installed - By Voltage
Pg. 1366 Average Percent Loading of Substation Transformers - Load Serving Substations
Pg. 1367 Average Percent Loading of Substation Transformers - Auto-Transformation Substations
Pg. 1368 Average Percent Loading of Substation Transformers (Non-Coincident Peak) - Load Serving Substations
Pg. 1369 Average Percent Loading of Substation Transformers (Non-Coincident Peak) - Transmission Transformation Substations
Pg. 1370 Substation Transformer Average Loading Definition
Pg. 1371 Substation Transformer Average Loading Definition (cont.)
Pg. 1372 Substation Transformer Non-Coincident Peak Loading Definition
Pg. 1372.1 Substation Transformer Non-Coincident Peak Loading Definition (cont.)
Pg. 1373 MVA Nameplate Rating Used
Pg. 1373.1 MVA Nameplate Rating Used (cont.)
Pg. 1374 Average Ratio Used to Convert from "Rated (e.g. Nameplate)" to "Operational" Capacity
Pg. 1375 Rules Used to Determine Substation Type - Distribution vs Transmission
Pg. 1376 Rules Used to Determine Substation Type (cont.) - Distribution vs Transmission
Pg. 1377 Distribution "Pole Top" Substations in Service By High Side Voltage Level - As a Percent of Total Substations
Pg. 1378 Distribution Circuit Control - At the Substation, Inside the Fence
Pg. 1379 Distribution Circuit Control (cont.) - At the Substation, Inside the Fence
Pg. 1380 Handling for Substation Transformers Returned From the Field
Pg. 1380.1 Transmission Substation Transformer Spares or Mobiles - Per 100 Transmission Substation Transformers in Service
Pg. 1380.2 Distribution Substation Transformer Spares or Mobiles - Per 100 Distribution Substation Transformers in Service
<< BACK T&D Substation Statistics
T&D Substation Statistics NEXT >>
VII
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Pg. 1380.3
Pg. 1380.4
Pg. 1380.5
Pg. 1380.6
Pg. 1380.7
Pg. 1380.8
Pg. 1380.9
Pg. 1380.91
Pg. 1380.92
Pg. 1380.93
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Transmission Substation Transformer Spares or Mobiles - Per 100 Substation Transformers in Service -- 500kV or Greater
Transmission Substation Transformer Spares or Mobiles - Per 100 Substation Transformers in Service -- 400kV - 499kv
Transmission Substation Transformer Spares or Mobiles - Per 100 Substation Transformers in Service -- 300kV - 399kv
Transmission Substation Transformer Spares or Mobiles - Per 100 Substation Transformers in Service -- 200kV - 299kv
Transmission Substation Transformer Spares or Mobiles - Per 100 Substation Transformers in Service -- 100kV - 199kv
Transmission Substation Transformer Spares or Mobiles - Per 100 Substation Transformers in Service -- 60kV - 99kv
Distribution Substation Transformer Spares or Mobiles - Per 100 Substation Transformers in Service -- 35kV - 59kv
Distribution Substation Transformer Spares or Mobiles - Per 100 Substation Transformers in Service -- 12kV - 34.5kv
Distribution Substation Transformer Spares or Mobiles - Per 100 Substation Transformers in Service -- 5kV - 11kv
Distribution Substation Transformer Spares or Mobiles - Per 100 Substation Transformers in Service -- Less than 5kV
<< BACK T&D Substation Statistics
VIII
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
T&D Substation Expenditures
Per Distribution Customer
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$54.47
$9.66 <= $28.00
$28.00 <= $42.43
$42.43 <= $63.05
$63.05 <= $228.93
$250.00
$
2
2
8
.
9
3
Expenditures per Distribution Customer
$200.00
$150.00
$100.00
$50.00
$
9
.
6
6
$
1
0
.
6
2
1
0
3
1
0
1
$
1
5
.
5
9
$
1
5
.
9
8
1
0
7
1
0
4
$
2
1
.
1
9
$
2
7
.
4
7
$
2
9
.
5
8
1
1
1
1
0
9
$
3
5
.
8
0
$
3
6
.
8
6
1
0
8
1
2
2
$
4
0
.
5
9
$
4
0
.
9
5
$
4
3
.
9
2
$
4
4
.
5
3
$
4
7
.
2
1
1
2
3
1
1
9
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
0
5
$
5
2
.
8
0
$
5
8
.
2
1
$
6
4
.
6
6
$
7
8
.
7
8
$
8
6
.
7
5
$
1
0
2
.
4
6
$
1
0
5
.
7
6
$0.00
1
0
2
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.6}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27}+SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23})/A.2.2
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:617
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1243
1
1
8
1
1
0
1
2
0
1
1
3
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
0
6
1
1
4
1
1
5
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
T&D Substation Expenditures
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$1.88
$0.09 <= $1.08
$1.08 <= $1.64
$1.64 <= $1.93
$1.93 <= $5.63
$6.00
$
5
.
6
3
Expenditures per MWh Transmitted
$5.00
$
4
.
2
6
$4.00
$
3
.
0
6
$3.00
$2.00
$1.00
$
0
.
0
9
$
0
.
3
4
$
0
.
9
6
$
1
.
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
9
$
1
.
1
6
$
1
.
3
7
$
1
.
4
5
$
1
.
6
4
$
1
.
6
4
$
1
.
7
0
1
1
9
1
1
0
1
1
3
$
1
.
7
8
$
2
.
0
9
$0.00
1
1
2
1
0
7
1
2
3
1
0
8
1
2
1
1
0
5
1
1
8
1
0
6
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23}+SUM{B.6}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/A.2.5
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1895
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1245
1
1
4
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
T&D Substation Expenditures
Per Circuit Breaker
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$30,420
$4,412 <= $17,409
$17,409 <= $23,264
$23,264 <= $29,409
$29,409 <= $106,434
$120,000
$
1
0
6
,
4
3
4
Expenditures per Circuit Breaker
$100,000
$80,000
$
5
4
,
9
5
8
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$
4
,
4
1
2
$
1
3
,
0
6
8
$
1
4
,
7
9
7
$
1
7
,
0
4
1
$
1
7
,
4
0
9
$
1
7
,
6
4
9
$
1
8
,
2
3
9
1
2
3
1
1
9
1
1
8
1
0
9
$
2
1
,
9
1
9
$
2
3
,
2
6
4
1
0
5
1
1
2
$
2
5
,
0
8
1
$
2
6
,
2
6
4
$
2
7
,
0
5
3
1
1
7
1
1
3
1
0
8
$
2
9
,
4
0
9
$
2
9
,
9
0
6
1
1
0
1
2
0
$
7
0
,
2
3
1
$0
1
0
7
1
1
1
1
2
1
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.6}+SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/SUM{AQ.4}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6419
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1246
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
1
4
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average T&D Substation Expenditures
Per Circuit Breaker
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$28,820
$4,762 <= $10,026
$10,026 <= $23,705
$23,705 <= $32,805
$32,805 <= $94,331
$100,000
$
9
4
,
3
3
1
$90,000
$80,000
Expenditures per Circuit Breaker
$70,000
$
5
0
,
6
6
2
$60,000
$50,000
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$
4
,
7
6
2
$
7
,
3
0
6
$
9
,
9
3
6
$
1
0
,
1
1
6
1
2
3
1
0
9
$
2
0
,
5
3
9
$
2
3
,
7
0
5
$
3
0
,
0
4
8
$
3
2
,
0
1
3
$
3
3
,
5
9
8
$0
1
0
7
1
0
5
1
1
2
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
1
3
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
1
4
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
9
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
((SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.6}+SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/SUM{AQ.4}+(B.9.1+B.9.3+B.29.1+B.29.3)/AQ.5.1+(B.9.4+B.9.2+B.29.4+B.29.2)/AQ.5.2)/3
Source/Calculation:
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27101
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1247
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average T&D Substation Capital Additions
Per Circuit Breaker
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$19,313
$2,060 <= $5,818
$5,818 <= $15,959
$15,959 <= $25,453
$25,453 <= $48,083
$50,000
$
4
3
,
7
4
4
$
4
8
,
0
8
3
1
1
6
1
1
4
Capital Additions per Circuit Breaker
$40,000
$30,000
$
1
4
,
3
9
7
$20,000
$10,000
$
2
,
0
6
0
$
3
,
6
8
6
$
5
,
1
1
6
$
1
5
,
9
5
9
$
2
1
,
9
7
6
$
2
3
,
4
3
5
$
2
7
,
4
7
1
$
6
,
5
2
0
$0
1
0
7
1
2
3
1
0
5
1
0
9
1
1
2
1
2
0
1
1
3
1
1
0
1
0
6
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
9
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.6})/SUM{AQ.4}+(B.9.1+B.9.3)/AQ.5.1+(B.9.2+B.9.4)/AQ.5.2)/3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:9508
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1248
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average T&D Substation O&M Expenses
Per Circuit Breaker
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$9,506
$2,190 <= $4,862
$4,862 <= $6,250
$6,250 <= $7,332
$7,332 <= $46,248
$50,000
$
4
6
,
2
4
8
Expenses per Circuit Breaker
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$
2
,
1
9
0
$
2
,
7
0
1
1
0
5
1
0
7
$
3
,
5
9
6
$
6
,
1
2
7
$
6
,
1
4
2
$
6
,
2
5
0
$
6
,
6
1
4
$
6
,
9
1
8
1
0
6
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
1
0
1
1
6
$
7
,
7
4
6
$
1
0
,
0
3
7
$0
1
0
9
1
2
0
1
1
3
1
1
4
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
9
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/SUM{AQ.4}+(B.29.1+B.29.3)/AQ.5.1+(B.29.4+B.29.2)/AQ.5.2)/3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27105
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1249
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
T&D Substation Expenditures
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
8.23%
4.26% <= 6.21%
6.21% <= 7.12%
7.12% <= 8.65%
8.65% <= 17.10%
18.00%
1
4
.
6
6
%
16.00%
1
7
.
1
0
%
Expenditures per Assets
14.00%
12.00%
10.00%
8.00%
6.00%
4
.
2
6
%
5
.
3
4
%
5
.
7
6
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
2
1
%
6
.
3
9
%
6
.
9
0
%
6
.
9
1
%
1
1
2
1
1
3
7
.
1
2
%
7
.
9
5
%
8
.
1
1
%
1
1
0
1
2
0
8
.
3
6
%
8
.
6
5
%
9
.
5
0
%
1
0
.
6
4
%
4.00%
2.00%
0.00%
1
1
9
1
2
1
1
1
8
1
0
9
1
0
8
1
2
3
1
0
7
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
7
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23}+SUM{B.6}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/SUM{B.11}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2105
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1250
1
1
6
1
0
6
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
T&D Substation Expenditures
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
13.05%
5.34% <= 9.38%
9.38% <= 11.76%
11.76% <= 14.39%
14.39% <= 35.17%
40.00%
3
5
.
1
7
%
35.00%
Expenditures per Depreciated Assets
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5
.
3
4
%
6
.
3
7
%
8
.
6
2
%
9
.
3
8
%
9
.
3
8
%
9
.
6
8
%
1
2
0
1
1
8
1
0
9
1
0
.
1
7
%
1
0
.
4
7
%
1
1
2
1
1
3
1
1
.
7
6
%
1
2
.
0
3
%
1
1
0
1
2
3
1
2
.
5
5
%
1
2
.
6
9
%
1
1
4
1
1
7
1
4
.
3
9
%
1
4
.
9
9
%
1
7
.
0
2
%
2
1
.
8
2
%
5.00%
0.00%
1
2
1
1
1
9
1
0
8
1
0
7
1
1
6
1
1
1
1
0
6
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.6}+SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/(SUM{B.11}-SUM{B.15})
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:7006
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1251
1
2
2
1
0
2
1
0
1
1
1
5
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
T&D Substation Expenditures
Per T&D Substation MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$2,993
$1,246 <= $1,797
$1,797 <= $2,111
$2,111 <= $3,731
$3,731 <= $8,619
$9,000
$
8
,
6
1
9
$8,000
Expenditures per MVA
$7,000
$6,000
$5,000
$4,000
$3,000
$2,000
$
1
,
2
4
6
$
1
,
2
9
8
1
0
8
1
0
7
$
1
,
6
8
8
$
1
,
7
3
1
1
0
9
1
1
2
$
1
,
8
6
3
$
1
,
9
0
4
1
1
3
1
1
1
$
2
,
0
8
1
$
2
,
1
1
1
1
0
5
1
2
3
$
2
,
2
3
3
$
2
,
8
1
0
$
3
,
3
7
8
$
4
,
0
8
4
$
4
,
8
1
8
$
5
,
0
3
7
$1,000
$0
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
9
1
1
4
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
8
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23}+SUM{B.6}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/(SUM{AQ.12}+SUM{AQ.13})
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:618
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1252
1
1
7
1
1
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
T&D Substation Expenditures
Per Adjusted MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$10,820
$1,623 <= $5,290
$5,290 <= $7,340
$7,340 <= $8,340
$8,340 <= $54,075
$60,000
$
5
4
,
0
7
5
Expenditures per Adjusted MVA
$50,000
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$
1
,
6
2
3
$
3
,
5
1
0
$
4
,
3
9
1
$
5
,
5
9
0
$
6
,
0
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
$
7
,
3
2
1
$
7
,
3
5
9
$
7
,
4
2
5
$
8
,
0
1
5
1
1
1
1
2
0
1
1
9
1
0
5
$
9
,
3
1
6
$
1
5
,
2
0
9
$0
1
0
7
1
0
8
1
0
9
1
1
0
1
0
6
1
1
4
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
1
3
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.6}+SUM{B.27}+SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23})/((SUM{AQ.12}*AQ.14.2)+(SUM{AQ.13}*AQ.14.1))
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2110
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1253
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average T&D Substation Expenditures
Per Distribution Customer
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$54.14
$15.74 <= $23.98
$23.98 <= $38.35
$38.35 <= $65.58
$65.58 <= $202.94
$250.00
$
2
0
2
.
9
4
Expenditures per Distribution Customer
$200.00
$150.00
$100.00
$50.00
$
1
5
.
7
4
$
1
6
.
4
2
$
1
7
.
0
1
$
1
9
.
7
1
1
0
5
1
0
9
1
0
7
1
2
2
$
2
3
.
9
8
$
2
6
.
2
8
1
2
3
1
1
1
$
3
5
.
7
2
$
3
6
.
3
8
$
3
8
.
3
5
$
3
8
.
6
3
1
1
9
1
0
8
1
1
8
1
1
2
$
4
8
.
8
0
$
6
0
.
0
1
$
6
5
.
5
8
$
7
4
.
0
7
$
9
6
.
4
4
$
1
0
4
.
2
9
$0.00
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
1
3
1
1
7
1
1
4
1
2
1
1
1
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.6}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27}+SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23})/A.2.2+(B.9.1+B.9.3+B.29.1+B.29.3)/A.3.1+(B.9.4+B.9.2+B.29.4+B.29.2)/A.3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27378
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1256
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average T&D Substation Expenditures
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
7.13%
3.34% <= 5.06%
5.06% <= 7.42%
7.42% <= 8.60%
8.60% <= 11.99%
12.00%
Expenditures per Assets
10.00%
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
3
.
3
4
%
3
.
7
4
%
4
.
1
2
%
4
.
7
7
%
5
.
0
6
%
6
.
2
1
%
6
.
2
5
%
1
1
2
1
0
8
6
.
7
1
%
7
.
4
2
%
7
.
5
3
%
1
1
6
1
1
4
7
.
7
2
%
8
.
2
4
%
8
.
6
0
%
8
.
6
1
%
1
1
1
1
1
3
9
.
6
8
%
1
1
.
2
9
%
1
1
.
9
9
%
1
1
7
1
2
2
2.00%
0.00%
1
0
9
1
2
3
1
1
8
1
1
9
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
0
7
1
1
0
1
0
6
1
1
5
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
((SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.6}+SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/SUM{B.11}+(B.9.1+B.9.3+B.29.1+B.29.3)/(B.13.1+B.13.3)+(B.9.2+B.9.4+B.29.2+B.29.4)/(B.13.2+B.13.4))/
Source/Calculation:3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27445
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1258
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average T&D Substation Expenditures
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
10.30%
5.06% <= 7.49%
7.49% <= 9.78%
9.78% <= 13.46%
13.46% <= 17.17%
18.00%
16.00%
Expenditures per Depreciated Assets
14.00%
12.00%
10.00%
8.00%
6.00%
5
.
0
6
%
5
.
3
7
%
6
.
4
2
%
6
.
6
7
%
7
.
7
7
%
8
.
3
1
%
8
.
7
1
%
9
.
2
1
%
1
0
.
3
6
%
1
0
.
3
9
%
1
1
6
1
1
0
1
1
.
1
4
%
1
3
.
0
5
%
1
4
.
6
9
%
1
5
.
1
0
%
1
5
.
4
1
%
1
7
.
1
7
%
4.00%
2.00%
0.00%
1
2
1
1
0
9
1
1
8
1
2
3
1
2
0
1
1
9
1
0
8
1
1
2
1
1
4
1
1
3
1
0
6
1
1
7
1
0
7
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
(((SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.6}+SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/(SUM{B.11}-SUM{B.15}))+((B.9.1+B.9.3+B.29.1+B.29.3)/((B.13.1+B.13.3)-(B.17.3+B.17.1)))+((B.9.2+B.9.
Source/Calculation:4+B.29.2+B.29.4)/((B.13.2+B.13.4)-(B.17.4+B.17.2))))/3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27113
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1259
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
T&D Substation O&M Expenses
Per Distribution Customer
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$19.59
$8.00 <= $9.41
$9.41 <= $13.89
$13.89 <= $19.53
$19.53 <= $101.59
$120.00
$
1
0
1
.
5
9
Expenses per Distribution Customer
$100.00
$80.00
$60.00
$40.00
$20.00
$
8
.
0
0
$
8
.
6
3
$
8
.
8
7
$
9
.
2
0
$
9
.
2
5
$
9
.
5
7
$
9
.
8
8
$
9
.
9
0
1
0
6
1
0
7
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
2
1
0
3
1
2
2
1
1
2
$
1
2
.
8
4
$
1
3
.
8
9
$
1
4
.
0
8
$
1
4
.
1
5
1
1
0
1
0
4
1
2
1
1
0
5
$
1
7
.
5
0
$
1
7
.
7
6
1
0
9
1
2
0
$
2
1
.
3
0
$
2
5
.
7
8
$
2
9
.
4
8
$
3
0
.
4
5
1
1
7
1
1
3
$0.00
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/A.2.2
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:620
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1260
1
1
9
1
2
3
1
1
4
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
8
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
T&D Substation O&M Expenses
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$0.57
$0.02 <= $0.29
$0.29 <= $0.50
$0.50 <= $0.68
$0.68 <= $1.89
$2.00
$
1
.
8
9
$1.80
$1.60
Expenses per MWh Transmitted
$1.40
$1.20
$1.00
$0.80
$0.60
$0.40
$0.20
$
0
.
0
2
$
0
.
1
9
$
0
.
2
3
$
0
.
3
1
$
0
.
3
6
$
0
.
4
6
$
0
.
5
3
$
0
.
5
9
$
0
.
6
6
$
0
.
7
4
$
0
.
8
5
$0.00
1
1
2
1
0
7
1
0
6
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
0
5
1
0
9
1
1
3
1
2
3
1
1
9
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/A.2.5
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1896
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1262
1
1
4
1
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
T&D Substation O&M Expenses
Per Circuit Breaker
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$9,899
$2,441 <= $4,819
$4,819 <= $7,394
$7,394 <= $9,878
$9,878 <= $47,231
$50,000
$
4
7
,
2
3
1
Expenses per Circuit Breaker
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$
2
,
4
4
1
$
4
,
1
5
9
$
4
,
2
1
8
$
4
,
6
7
8
$
5
,
2
4
2
1
0
6
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
$
6
,
4
8
6
$
6
,
5
7
1
1
1
0
1
0
5
$
8
,
2
1
6
$
8
,
5
2
5
$
9
,
0
5
6
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
9
$
1
0
,
1
5
2
$
1
0
,
7
8
7
$
1
0
,
8
2
3
1
0
9
1
2
3
$0
1
0
7
1
1
3
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27}+SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23})/SUM{AQ.4}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6420
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1263
1
1
4
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
T&D Substation O&M Expenses
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2.79%
1.11% <= 1.87%
1.87% <= 2.73%
2.73% <= 3.67%
3.67% <= 4.58%
5.00%
Expenses per Assets
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1
.
1
1
%
1
.
5
5
%
1
.
6
9
%
1
.
7
5
%
2
.
2
2
%
2
.
2
3
%
1
1
9
1
2
0
2
.
6
7
%
2
.
7
9
%
3
.
2
3
%
3
.
5
5
%
3
.
7
1
%
3
.
9
4
%
4
.
0
6
%
4
.
5
8
%
1.00%
0.00%
1
0
6
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
7
1
0
9
1
1
4
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/SUM{B.11}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2107
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1264
1
0
7
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
T&D Substation O&M Expenses
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
4.59%
1.65% <= 2.58%
2.58% <= 4.18%
4.18% <= 5.69%
5.69% <= 9.42%
10.00%
7
.
6
4
%
Expenses per Depreciated Assets
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
1
.
6
5
%
1
.
6
9
%
1
0
6
1
2
1
2
.
2
9
%
2
.
5
8
%
2
.
5
9
%
1
2
0
1
1
0
3
.
3
2
%
4
.
0
5
%
5
.
4
9
%
5
.
5
7
%
1
1
1
1
1
4
7
.
9
7
%
9
.
4
2
%
5
.
7
3
%
4
.
3
1
%
0.00%
1
1
2
1
1
9
1
1
3
1
1
7
1
0
9
1
2
3
1
0
7
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/(SUM{B.11}-SUM{B.15})
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:7007
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1265
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
T&D Substation O&M Expenses
Per T&D Substation MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$951
$381 <= $614
$614 <= $720
$720 <= $998
$998 <= $2,138
$2,500
$
2
,
1
2
4
$
2
,
1
3
8
1
1
9
1
1
4
Expenses per MVA
$2,000
$
1
,
3
4
1
$1,500
$1,000
$500
$
3
8
1
$
3
9
0
1
0
6
1
1
2
$
4
9
2
$
6
1
4
$
6
2
4
1
1
1
1
0
5
$
7
1
8
$
7
2
0
1
0
7
1
1
3
$
8
8
8
$
9
2
8
$
9
9
8
$0
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
0
9
1
2
3
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/(SUM{AQ.12}+SUM{AQ.13})
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:621
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1266
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
T&D Substation O&M Expenses
Per Adjusted MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$4,043
$898 <= $1,561
$1,561 <= $2,055
$2,055 <= $2,500
$2,500 <= $23,997
$25,000
$
2
3
,
9
9
7
Expenses per Adjusted MVA
$20,000
$15,000
$10,000
$5,000
$
8
9
8
$
1
,
1
5
1
$
1
,
3
5
4
1
0
7
1
0
6
1
1
2
$
1
,
7
6
7
$
2
,
0
2
2
$
2
,
0
5
5
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
0
$
2
,
3
6
3
$
2
,
4
0
3
$
2
,
5
9
7
1
1
1
1
0
5
1
0
9
$
3
,
8
6
2
$0
1
1
9
1
1
4
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
1
5
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/((SUM{AQ.12}*AQ.14.2)+(SUM{AQ.13}*AQ.14.1))
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2112
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1267
1
1
3
1
0
8
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average T&D Substation O&M Expenses
Per Distribution Customer
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$19.44
$4.72 <= $8.74
$8.74 <= $12.07
$12.07 <= $16.96
$16.96 <= $99.50
$100.00
$
9
9
.
5
0
$90.00
$80.00
Expenses per Distribution Customer
$70.00
$60.00
$50.00
$40.00
$30.00
$20.00
$10.00
$
4
.
7
2
$
5
.
8
3
1
0
5
1
0
9
$
7
.
7
0
$
7
.
8
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
$
9
.
6
5
$
1
0
.
1
3
1
0
7
1
1
6
$
1
1
.
5
3
$
1
2
.
0
7
$
1
3
.
2
1
1
1
2
1
0
6
1
1
0
$
1
5
.
1
1
$
1
5
.
8
7
1
2
3
1
2
0
$
1
8
.
0
6
$
3
0
.
2
0
$
3
0
.
2
7
1
1
3
1
1
7
$0.00
1
1
9
1
1
4
1
2
1
1
1
8
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27}+SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23})/A.2.2+(B.29.1+B.29.3)/A.3.1+(B.29.4+B.29.2)/A.3.2)/3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27380
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1269
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average T&D Substation O&M Expenses
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2.49%
0.99% <= 1.84%
1.84% <= 2.35%
2.35% <= 2.99%
2.99% <= 5.03%
6.00%
5
.
0
3
%
4
.
3
8
%
Expenses per Assets
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
0
.
9
9
%
1
.
0
9
%
1
.
1
8
%
1
.
8
1
%
1
.
8
6
%
1
.
8
7
%
1
1
0
1
1
2
1
0
6
2
.
2
0
%
2
.
3
5
%
2
.
4
2
%
2
.
5
6
%
2
.
7
0
%
3
.
2
8
%
3
.
7
0
%
1.00%
0.00%
1
1
6
1
2
1
1
0
9
1
2
0
1
2
3
1
1
9
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
7
1
1
4
1
0
7
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/SUM{B.11}+(B.29.1+B.29.3)/(B.13.1+B.13.3)+(B.29.2+B.29.4)/(B.13.2+B.13.4))/3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27447
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1271
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average T&D Substation O&M Expenses
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
3.65%
1.09% <= 2.35%
2.35% <= 3.48%
3.48% <= 4.35%
4.35% <= 8.74%
9.00%
8
.
7
4
%
8.00%
Expenses per Depreciated Assets
7.00%
6.00%
4
.
0
9
%
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1
.
0
9
%
1
.
3
7
%
1
.
9
1
%
2
.
2
9
%
2
.
5
5
%
2
.
7
6
%
4
.
2
1
%
4
.
2
7
%
1
2
3
1
1
9
4
.
3
8
%
5
.
1
1
%
5
.
4
6
%
2
.
8
7
%
1.00%
0.00%
1
2
1
1
1
6
1
0
9
1
1
0
1
2
0
1
1
2
1
0
6
1
1
3
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
0
7
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
((SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/(SUM{B.11}-SUM{B.15})+(B.29.1+B.29.3)/((B.13.1+B.13.3)-(B.17.3+B.17.1))+(B.29.2+B.29.4)/((B.13.2+B.13.4)-(B.17.4+B.17.2)))/
Source/Calculation:3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27116
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1272
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
T&D Substation Capital Additions
Per Distribution Customer
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$37.55
$0.09 <= $12.77
$12.77 <= $31.75
$31.75 <= $47.97
$47.97 <= $127.34
$140.00
$120.00
$
9
7
.
7
5
Capital Additions per Distribution Customer
$100.00
$
1
0
2
.
4
6
$
1
2
7
.
3
4
$80.00
$60.00
$40.00
$20.00
$
0
.
0
9
$
1
.
4
2
$
2
.
0
9
1
0
3
1
0
1
1
0
4
$
6
.
9
6
$
1
1
.
9
4
$
1
2
.
0
9
1
0
2
1
0
9
$
1
4
.
8
1
$
1
8
.
6
0
$
1
9
.
6
5
1
1
1
1
1
9
$
2
6
.
9
8
$
3
0
.
4
5
$
3
3
.
0
6
$
3
4
.
0
2
1
0
5
1
1
2
$
3
5
.
8
0
$
4
5
.
3
7
$
4
6
.
9
0
$
4
8
.
3
3
1
1
0
1
2
0
1
1
3
$
5
2
.
8
0
$
5
7
.
2
6
$0.00
1
0
7
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
2
1
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.6})/A.2.2
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:623
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1273
1
0
8
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
1
4
1
1
5
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
T&D Substation Capital Additions
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$1.42
$0.07 <= $0.54
$0.54 <= $1.04
$1.04 <= $1.73
$1.73 <= $5.63
$6.00
$
5
.
6
3
Capital Additions per MWh Transmitted
$5.00
$4.00
$3.00
$
2
.
0
9
$2.00
$1.00
$
0
.
0
7
$
0
.
1
5
$
0
.
4
1
$
0
.
4
2
1
0
9
1
2
3
$
0
.
6
5
$
0
.
7
8
$
0
.
9
9
$
1
.
0
4
1
2
1
1
1
3
$
1
.
2
5
$
1
.
2
8
1
0
5
1
1
0
$
2
.
3
7
$
2
.
8
2
$
1
.
3
7
$0.00
1
1
2
1
0
7
1
1
1
1
1
9
1
0
8
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.6})/A.2.5
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1906
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1276
1
1
8
1
1
4
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
T&D Substation Capital Additions
Per Circuit Breaker
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$22,268
$1,970 <= $8,850
$8,850 <= $16,556
$16,556 <= $22,923
$22,923 <= $70,231
$80,000
$70,000
$
5
0
,
7
9
9
Capital Additions per Circuit Breaker
$60,000
$
5
9
,
2
0
2
$
7
0
,
2
3
1
$50,000
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$
1
,
9
7
0
$
6
,
2
1
8
$
7
,
4
5
1
$
8
,
3
5
3
$
8
,
8
5
0
1
0
9
1
1
9
1
1
1
$
1
0
,
1
1
9
$
1
5
,
3
4
9
$
1
6
,
1
1
2
$
1
6
,
5
5
6
1
0
5
1
1
3
1
1
7
$
1
7
,
6
4
9
$
1
8
,
0
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
2
$
2
1
,
6
9
0
$
2
2
,
9
2
3
$
2
7
,
0
5
3
$0
1
0
7
1
2
3
1
2
1
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.6})/SUM{AQ.4}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:7002
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1277
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
0
8
1
0
6
1
1
4
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
T&D Substation Capital Additions
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
5.93%
2.04% <= 3.65%
3.65% <= 5.76%
5.76% <= 6.21%
6.21% <= 13.55%
14.00%
1
0
.
6
4
%
12.00%
1
2
.
5
2
%
1
3
.
5
5
%
1
2
2
1
0
6
Capital Additions per Assets
10.00%
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2
.
0
4
%
2
.
3
3
%
2
.
4
5
%
1
2
3
1
0
9
3
.
1
8
%
3
.
6
5
%
4
.
2
4
%
4
.
6
5
%
5
.
3
5
%
5
.
7
6
%
5
.
8
6
%
5
.
8
8
%
1
1
8
1
1
1
1
2
0
6
.
2
0
%
6
.
2
1
%
6
.
2
7
%
1
1
0
1
0
8
1
1
7
2.00%
0.00%
1
1
9
1
0
7
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
1
4
1
1
2
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.6})/SUM{B.11}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2104
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1279
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
T&D Substation Capital Additions
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
9.27%
3.06% <= 6.42%
6.42% <= 7.88%
7.88% <= 9.38%
9.38% <= 25.74%
30.00%
2
5
.
7
4
%
25.00%
Capital Additions per Depreciated Assets
2
0
.
1
7
%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
3
.
0
6
%
3
.
6
5
%
3
.
9
6
%
1
2
1
1
0
9
4
.
3
9
%
6
.
4
2
%
6
.
4
3
%
1
1
3
1
0
7
6
.
8
0
%
6
.
9
8
%
1
2
0
1
1
4
7
.
8
8
%
8
.
3
7
%
8
.
6
2
%
1
1
7
1
0
8
9
.
1
7
%
9
.
3
8
%
1
1
0
1
1
8
1
1
.
5
2
%
1
4
.
9
9
%
0.00%
1
1
9
1
2
3
1
1
2
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.6})/(SUM{B.11}-SUM{B.15})
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:7005
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1280
1
1
1
1
1
6
1
0
6
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
T&D Substation Capital Additions
Per T&D Substation MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$2,169
$580 <= $1,195
$1,195 <= $1,457
$1,457 <= $2,205
$2,205 <= $8,619
$9,000
$
8
,
6
1
9
$8,000
Capital Additions per Substation MVA
$7,000
$6,000
$
4
,
6
5
6
$5,000
$4,000
$3,000
$2,000
$1,000
$
5
8
0
$
6
9
0
$
7
7
0
1
0
9
1
2
3
$
1
,
1
4
3
$
1
,
2
4
6
$
1
,
2
8
9
$
1
,
3
4
1
1
0
8
1
1
1
1
1
2
$
1
,
4
5
7
$
1
,
7
4
0
$
1
,
9
2
1
$
1
,
9
5
9
1
2
1
1
1
9
$
2
,
4
5
0
$
2
,
6
8
0
$0
1
0
7
1
1
3
1
0
5
1
1
0
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.6})/(SUM{AQ.12}+SUM{AQ.13})
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:624
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1281
1
2
0
1
1
4
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
T&D Substation Capital Additions
Per Adjusted MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$7,115
$725 <= $3,549
$3,549 <= $4,807
$4,807 <= $6,024
$6,024 <= $30,079
$35,000
$
3
0
,
0
7
9
$30,000
Capital Additions per Adjusted MVA
$25,000
$20,000
$
1
4
,
0
5
8
$15,000
$10,000
$5,000
$
7
2
5
$
1
,
7
9
4
$
3
,
5
1
0
$
3
,
5
6
2
$
3
,
8
2
2
1
0
8
1
1
9
1
2
1
$
4
,
6
5
7
$
4
,
9
5
8
1
1
2
1
1
1
$
5
,
3
3
7
$
5
,
6
1
2
1
2
0
1
0
5
$
7
,
2
6
1
$0
1
0
7
1
0
9
1
1
0
1
0
6
1
1
4
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.6})/((SUM{AQ.12}*AQ.14.2)+(SUM{AQ.13}*AQ.14.1))
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2109
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1282
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
1
3
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average T&D Substation Capital Additions
Per Distribution Customer
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$36.98
$7.36 <= $12.01
$12.01 <= $32.94
$32.94 <= $53.52
$53.52 <= $103.44
$120.00
$
1
0
3
.
4
4
Capital Additions per Distribution Customer
$100.00
$80.00
$60.00
$40.00
$20.00
$
7
.
3
6
$
8
.
8
8
$
1
0
.
5
9
$
1
1
.
0
2
$
1
2
.
0
1
1
0
9
1
0
5
1
2
2
$
1
7
.
6
6
$
1
8
.
4
6
1
1
9
1
1
1
$
2
7
.
0
9
$
3
2
.
9
4
$
3
6
.
3
8
$
3
8
.
3
5
$
4
6
.
8
0
$
5
3
.
5
2
$
6
3
.
9
3
$
6
6
.
2
4
$
7
4
.
0
2
$0.00
1
0
7
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
2
0
1
0
8
1
1
8
1
1
0
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.6})/A.2.2+(B.9.1+B.9.3)/A.3.1+(B.9.2+B.9.4)/A.3.2)/3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27379
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1283
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
1
3
1
1
7
1
1
4
1
2
1
1
1
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average T&D Substation Capital Additions
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
4.93%
1.40% <= 3.83%
3.83% <= 4.51%
4.51% <= 6.42%
6.42% <= 8.01%
9.00%
8.00%
Capital Additions per Assets
7.00%
5
.
9
1
%
6.00%
5.00%
3
.
3
4
%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1
.
4
0
%
2
.
1
5
%
3
.
8
3
%
3
.
9
8
%
4
.
1
2
%
4
.
3
5
%
6
.
0
4
%
6
.
2
5
%
6
.
4
2
%
6
.
4
3
%
1
1
0
1
1
6
6
.
9
7
%
7
.
8
1
%
8
.
0
1
%
4
.
5
1
%
2
.
3
5
%
1.00%
0.00%
1
2
3
1
0
9
1
1
9
1
0
7
1
1
4
1
2
1
1
1
8
1
1
2
1
2
0
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
2
2
1
0
6
1
1
7
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.6})/SUM{B.11}+(B.9.1+B.9.3)/(B.13.1+B.13.3)+(B.9.2+B.9.4)/(B.13.2+B.13.4))/3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27446
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1285
1
1
5
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average T&D Substation Capital Additions
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
7.11%
2.46% <= 4.92%
4.92% <= 6.56%
6.56% <= 8.97%
8.97% <= 12.06%
14.00%
1
0
.
7
2
%
12.00%
Capital Additions per Depreciated Assets
10.00%
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2
.
4
6
%
3
.
4
6
%
3
.
9
8
%
4
.
0
4
%
1
2
1
1
1
9
5
.
2
2
%
5
.
6
8
%
6
.
4
2
%
6
.
4
5
%
1
1
8
1
1
2
6
.
6
7
%
8
.
1
0
%
8
.
7
1
%
8
.
9
6
%
8
.
9
9
%
1
1
3
1
1
6
1
1
.
8
2
%
1
2
.
0
6
%
2.00%
0.00%
1
2
3
1
0
9
1
2
0
1
1
4
1
0
7
1
1
0
1
0
8
1
1
7
1
0
6
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.6})/(SUM{B.11}-SUM{B.15})+(B.9.1+B.9.3)/(B.13.1+B.13.3-B.17.3-B.17.1)+(B.9.2+B.9.4)/(B.13.2+B.13.4-B.17.4-B.17.2))/3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:9509
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1286
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Distribution Substation Expenditures
Per Distribution Customer
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$29.72
$9.66 <= $18.99
$18.99 <= $26.83
$26.83 <= $35.29
$35.29 <= $84.29
$90.00
$
8
4
.
2
9
$80.00
Expenditures per Distribution Customer
$70.00
$60.00
$50.00
$40.00
$30.00
$20.00
$10.00
$
9
.
6
6
$
1
0
.
6
2
$
1
5
.
5
9
$
1
5
.
9
8
$
1
6
.
3
8
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
9
$
1
8
.
8
1
$
1
9
.
5
2
$
1
9
.
7
4
1
1
8
1
1
0
1
0
8
$
2
1
.
1
9
$
2
4
.
3
4
$
2
6
.
3
7
$
2
7
.
2
9
$
2
7
.
4
7
$
2
7
.
6
3
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
0
5
$
3
1
.
5
4
$
3
1
.
6
4
1
1
3
1
2
0
$
3
6
.
5
1
$
3
6
.
8
6
1
2
3
1
2
2
$
4
1
.
3
6
$
5
1
.
5
6
$
5
9
.
4
9
$0.00
1
0
3
1
0
1
1
0
2
1
1
9
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.6}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/A.2.2
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2235
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1287
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
1
7
1
1
4
1
1
5
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Distribution Substation Expenditures
Per MWh Sold
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$1.27
$0.47 <= $0.79
$0.79 <= $1.01
$1.01 <= $1.49
$1.49 <= $3.62
$4.00
$
3
.
6
2
$3.50
$
2
.
7
6
Expenditures per MWh Sold
$3.00
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
$
0
.
4
7
$
0
.
5
6
$
0
.
6
1
$
0
.
7
2
$
0
.
7
8
$
0
.
8
3
$
0
.
8
6
$
0
.
8
7
1
1
3
1
0
8
1
2
1
$
0
.
9
8
$
1
.
0
4
$
1
.
0
7
1
0
5
1
1
1
$
1
.
2
5
$
1
.
3
8
$
1
.
5
2
$
1
.
6
3
$
1
.
8
5
$0.00
1
0
7
1
1
0
1
0
9
1
1
2
1
1
8
1
1
9
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.6}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/A.2.4
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2160
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1288
1
2
2
1
0
6
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
2
3
1
1
4
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Distribution Substation Expenditures
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
8.37%
3.08% <= 6.51%
6.51% <= 8.22%
8.22% <= 9.57%
9.57% <= 17.10%
18.00%
1
7
.
1
0
%
16.00%
Expenditures per Assets
14.00%
12.00%
10.00%
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
3
.
0
8
%
3
.
3
8
%
5
.
1
8
%
6
.
0
7
%
6
.
5
1
%
6
.
9
4
%
7
.
0
8
%
7
.
1
2
%
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
0
7
8
.
2
2
%
8
.
6
5
%
9
.
1
0
%
9
.
3
8
%
9
.
5
7
%
1
1
6
1
2
0
1
1
.
6
1
%
1
1
.
6
6
%
1
1
.
7
2
%
1
2
3
1
1
7
1
1
4
2.00%
0.00%
1
1
8
1
1
9
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
0
8
1
0
9
1
1
1
1
0
6
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.6}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/B.11.2
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6384
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1289
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Distribution Substation Expenditures
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
13.46%
4.80% <= 9.73%
9.73% <= 13.18%
13.18% <= 16.12%
16.12% <= 35.17%
40.00%
3
5
.
1
7
%
35.00%
Expenditures per Depreciated Assets
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
4
.
8
0
%
5
.
1
8
%
5
.
3
0
%
1
1
9
1
2
1
1
1
8
9
.
1
1
%
9
.
7
3
%
1
0
.
0
2
%
1
1
3
1
1
0
1
0
.
6
7
%
1
2
.
3
7
%
1
3
.
1
8
%
1
3
.
4
9
%
1
0
9
1
1
6
1
4
.
3
5
%
1
4
.
3
9
%
1
0
6
1
0
7
1
6
.
1
2
%
1
7
.
0
2
%
1
8
.
2
0
%
1
9
.
7
9
%
0.00%
1
0
8
1
1
2
1
2
0
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.6}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/(B.11.2-B.15.1)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6483
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1290
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Distribution Substation Expenditures
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
13.46%
4.80% <= 9.73%
9.73% <= 13.18%
13.18% <= 16.12%
16.12% <= 35.17%
40.00%
35.00%
Expenditures per Depreciated Assets
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
1
1
9
1
2
1
1
1
8
1
0
8
1
1
3
1
1
0
1
1
2
1
2
0
1
0
9
1
1
6
Capital
1
0
6
1
0
7
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
0
4
1
1
5
1
0
2
1
0
1
1
0
5
1
0
3
O&M Expenses
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.6}/(B.11.2-B.15.1)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300528
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1291
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Distribution Substation Expenditures
Per Distribution MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$3,770
$1,298 <= $1,931
$1,931 <= $2,407
$2,407 <= $3,612
$3,612 <= $12,636
$14,000
$
1
2
,
6
3
6
$12,000
Expenditures per MVA
$10,000
$
7
,
9
6
4
$8,000
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
$
1
,
2
9
8
$
1
,
4
9
0
$
1
,
6
2
6
1
1
0
1
1
3
$
1
,
9
0
4
$
1
,
9
5
8
$
2
,
0
1
8
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
1
2
$
2
,
3
9
9
$
2
,
4
0
7
$
2
,
4
2
7
1
0
9
1
2
1
1
1
9
$
2
,
8
6
7
$
2
,
9
1
0
1
0
6
1
2
3
$
8
,
3
3
7
$
4
,
3
1
3
$0
1
0
7
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.6}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/(SUM{AQ.13})
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6383
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1292
1
2
0
1
1
4
1
1
6
1
0
5
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Distribution Substation Expenditures
Per Adjusted Distribution MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$9,511
$1,623 <= $4,600
$4,600 <= $6,993
$6,993 <= $7,892
$7,892 <= $36,103
$40,000
$
3
6
,
1
0
3
$35,000
Expenditures per Adjusted MVA
$30,000
$
1
9
,
9
1
1
$25,000
$20,000
$15,000
$10,000
$5,000
$
1
,
6
2
3
$
3
,
8
8
2
$
4
,
4
1
3
$
4
,
6
6
2
1
1
9
1
0
8
$
5
,
9
4
8
$
6
,
6
6
4
$
7
,
3
2
1
$
7
,
5
6
7
$
7
,
7
6
3
1
1
1
1
2
0
1
1
2
$
8
,
2
7
8
$0
1
0
7
1
2
1
1
0
6
1
0
9
1
1
0
1
1
4
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.6}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/(SUM{AQ.13}*AQ.14.1)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2214
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1293
1
0
5
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
1
3
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Distribution Substation Expenditures
Per Distribution Transformer Bank
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$117,392
$19,462 <= $43,419
$43,419 <= $81,563
$81,563 <= $151,162
$151,162 <= $319,724
$350,000
$300,000
Expenditures per Transformer Bank
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$
1
9
,
4
6
2
$
3
9
,
4
9
4
$
4
1
,
1
8
4
$
4
2
,
6
7
5
$
4
4
,
1
6
4
$
4
7
,
1
0
6
1
0
9
1
2
1
1
1
9
1
1
0
1
1
1
$
7
3
,
9
8
6
$
8
1
,
5
6
3
$
1
0
3
,
0
1
5
$
1
1
4
,
8
1
6
$
1
3
7
,
6
8
3
$
1
6
4
,
6
4
0
$
3
0
8
,
2
7
2
$
3
1
9
,
7
2
4
1
1
4
1
1
6
$
2
2
3
,
1
0
1
$0
1
0
7
1
0
8
1
2
0
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
0
6
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.6}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/SUM{AQ.3}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27337
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1294
1
0
5
1
1
3
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Distribution Substation Expenditures
Per Distribution Customer
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$28.15
$9.21 <= $18.71
$18.71 <= $20.57
$20.57 <= $35.23
$35.23 <= $71.35
$80.00
$70.00
$
6
9
.
2
5
$
7
1
.
3
5
1
1
7
1
1
4
Expenditures per Distribution Customer
$60.00
$50.00
$40.00
$30.00
$20.00
$10.00
$
9
.
2
1
$
9
.
5
6
1
0
5
1
0
9
$
1
6
.
8
6
$
1
7
.
0
1
1
1
9
1
0
7
$
1
8
.
7
1
$
1
9
.
7
1
$
2
0
.
2
7
$
2
0
.
5
0
$
2
0
.
5
7
1
2
2
1
1
0
1
1
8
1
2
3
$
2
4
.
1
5
$
2
4
.
3
6
1
1
2
1
2
0
$
2
6
.
2
8
$
3
5
.
2
3
$
3
7
.
2
4
$
3
8
.
2
2
$0.00
1
0
8
1
1
1
1
1
6
1
1
3
1
0
6
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.6}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/A.2.2+(B.9.3+B.29.3)/A.3.1+(B.9.4+B.29.4)/A.3.2)/3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27098
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1295
1
2
1
1
1
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Distribution Substation Expenditures
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
7.37%
3.10% <= 6.12%
6.12% <= 6.89%
6.89% <= 8.60%
8.60% <= 13.44%
14.00%
1
0
.
3
3
%
12.00%
Expenditures per Assets
10.00%
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
3
.
1
0
%
3
.
2
2
%
1
1
8
1
1
9
4
.
3
8
%
4
.
8
1
%
6
.
1
2
%
6
.
2
8
%
6
.
3
0
%
1
1
0
1
1
2
6
.
5
3
%
6
.
8
9
%
7
.
7
2
%
8
.
3
7
%
8
.
4
0
%
1
1
3
1
2
0
8
.
6
0
%
1
1
.
9
9
%
1
3
.
4
4
%
8
.
7
9
%
2.00%
0.00%
1
2
1
1
0
9
1
0
8
1
2
3
1
1
6
1
0
7
1
1
1
1
0
6
1
1
4
1
2
2
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.6}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/(B.11.2)+(B.9.3+B.29.3)/(B.13.3)+(B.9.4+B.29.4)/(B.13.4))/3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27114
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1296
1
1
7
1
1
5
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Distribution Substation Expenditures
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
10.91%
4.38% <= 8.38%
8.38% <= 10.33%
10.33% <= 14.32%
14.32% <= 18.63%
20.00%
Expenditures per Depreciated Assets
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
4
.
3
8
%
4
.
7
7
%
5
.
6
1
%
7
.
7
1
%
8
.
6
0
%
9
.
2
1
%
9
.
5
0
%
1
0
.
0
5
%
1
0
.
6
0
%
1
1
.
0
1
%
1
1
.
9
4
%
1
3
.
9
5
%
1
5
.
4
1
%
1
6
.
0
5
%
1
7
.
1
7
%
1
8
.
6
3
%
1
1
1
1
1
7
0.00%
1
2
1
1
1
8
1
1
9
1
0
9
1
0
8
1
1
0
1
1
2
1
1
6
1
2
3
1
2
0
1
1
3
1
0
6
1
0
7
1
1
4
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.6}+SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/(B.11.2-B.15.1)+(B.9.3+B.29.3)/(B.13.3-B.17.1)+(B.9.4+B.29.4)/(B.13.4-B.17.2))/3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600242
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1296.1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Distribution Substation O&M Expenses
Per Distribution Customer
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$11.99
$2.95 <= $7.96
$7.96 <= $9.25
$9.25 <= $12.32
$12.32 <= $36.46
$40.00
$
3
6
.
4
6
$35.00
Expenses per Distribution Customer
$30.00
$
2
2
.
7
2
$25.00
$20.00
$
8
.
6
3
$
8
.
8
7
$
9
.
2
0
$
9
.
2
1
$
9
.
2
5
$
9
.
5
7
$
9
.
8
8
$
1
0
.
2
9
1
0
7
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
2
1
1
0
2
1
0
3
1
2
2
1
0
9
$15.00
$10.00
$5.00
$
2
.
9
5
$
6
.
4
9
$
6
.
6
6
$
7
.
0
4
$
7
.
3
0
1
2
0
1
0
5
1
1
2
1
0
6
$
1
0
.
7
6
$
1
3
.
8
9
$
2
4
.
1
1
$
1
4
.
5
5
$0.00
1
1
0
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/A.2.2
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2236
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1297
1
1
9
1
0
4
1
1
3
1
2
3
1
1
7
1
1
4
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
8
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Distribution Substation O&M Expenses
Per MWh Sold
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$0.44
$0.08 <= $0.26
$0.26 <= $0.33
$0.33 <= $0.41
$0.41 <= $1.19
$1.20
$
1
.
1
5
$
1
.
1
9
1
2
3
1
1
4
Expenses per MWh Sold
$1.00
$0.80
$
0
.
6
6
$0.60
$0.40
$0.20
$
0
.
0
8
$
0
.
1
8
$
0
.
2
4
$
0
.
2
5
$
0
.
2
6
1
0
6
1
0
5
1
0
7
$
0
.
3
0
$
0
.
3
1
1
2
1
1
2
0
$
0
.
3
3
$
0
.
3
5
1
2
2
1
1
1
$
0
.
3
8
$
0
.
3
9
1
1
3
1
0
9
$
0
.
4
4
$0.00
1
1
0
1
1
2
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/A.2.4
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2165
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1298
1
1
9
1
1
7
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Distribution Substation O&M Expenses
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
3.31%
0.92% <= 1.81%
1.81% <= 3.00%
3.00% <= 4.69%
4.69% <= 7.23%
8.00%
7
.
2
3
%
7.00%
Expenses per Assets
6.00%
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
0
.
9
2
%
1
.
4
9
%
1
.
6
1
%
1
.
8
1
%
1
.
8
3
%
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
.
9
6
%
2
.
7
9
%
3
.
2
0
%
3
.
9
4
%
4
.
5
8
%
4
.
7
2
%
5
.
0
7
%
5
.
1
6
%
1
1
4
1
0
9
0.00%
1
1
0
1
1
9
1
0
6
1
2
0
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
0
7
1
2
2
1
1
7
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/B.11.2
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6385
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1299
1
2
3
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Distribution Substation O&M Expenses
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
5.40%
1.51% <= 2.53%
2.53% <= 4.99%
4.99% <= 7.94%
7.94% <= 12.32%
14.00%
1
2
.
3
2
%
12.00%
Expenses per Depreciated Assets
10.00%
8.00%
6.00%
4
.
4
9
%
4.00%
2.00%
1
.
5
1
%
1
.
8
1
%
2
.
1
2
%
2
.
5
3
%
2
.
5
4
%
1
0
6
1
2
0
5
.
4
9
%
6
.
5
3
%
7
.
8
7
%
7
.
9
7
%
1
1
4
1
0
7
8
.
2
7
%
9
.
4
2
%
2
.
7
5
%
0.00%
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
1
9
1
1
2
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
7
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/(B.11.2-B.15.1)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6485
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1300
1
0
9
1
2
2
1
2
3
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Distribution Substation O&M Expenses
Per Distribution MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$1,226
$225 <= $614
$614 <= $841
$841 <= $1,507
$1,507 <= $3,445
$3,500
$
3
,
0
4
7
$
3
,
4
4
5
1
0
5
1
1
4
$3,000
Expenses per MVA
$2,500
$2,000
$1,500
$1,000
$500
$
2
2
5
$
5
0
6
$
5
2
0
1
0
6
1
1
2
$
6
1
4
$
7
1
8
$
7
5
0
1
0
7
1
1
3
$
8
4
1
$
8
8
5
$
1
,
0
7
3
$
1
,
5
0
7
$
1
,
8
1
1
$0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
9
1
0
9
1
2
3
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/SUM{AQ.13}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6386
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1301
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Distribution Substation O&M Expenses
Per Adjusted Distribution MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$3,084
$898 <= $1,303
$1,303 <= $1,950
$1,950 <= $3,274
$3,274 <= $8,706
$9,000
$8,000
$
8
,
6
1
2
$
8
,
7
0
6
1
1
4
1
0
5
Expenses per Adjusted MVA
$7,000
$6,000
$
4
,
1
8
5
$5,000
$4,000
$3,000
$2,000
$1,000
$
8
9
8
$
1
,
0
4
9
$
1
,
2
5
0
$
1
,
3
5
7
$
1
,
5
5
3
$
1
,
9
5
0
$
2
,
0
0
2
1
1
9
1
1
2
$
2
,
3
6
3
$0
1
0
7
1
0
6
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
1
0
9
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/(SUM{AQ.13}*AQ.14.1)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2220
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1302
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
1
3
1
0
8
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Distribution Substation O&M Expenses
Per Distribution Transformer Bank
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$38,897
$6,667 <= $15,204
$15,204 <= $24,286
$24,286 <= $39,704
$39,704 <= $133,337
$140,000
$
1
0
2
,
9
0
2
$120,000
$
1
3
3
,
3
3
7
Expenses per Transformer Bank
$100,000
$
7
1
,
4
4
0
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$
6
,
6
6
7
$
1
0
,
7
7
0
$
1
4
,
3
9
3
$
1
5
,
2
0
4
$
1
6
,
7
4
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
0
$
1
8
,
8
5
9
$
2
4
,
2
8
6
$
2
4
,
8
0
0
1
0
6
1
0
9
$
2
6
,
5
6
1
$
3
9
,
7
0
4
$0
1
1
0
1
0
7
1
1
9
1
1
2
1
0
5
1
2
3
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/SUM{AQ.3}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27338
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1303
1
1
3
1
1
4
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
ALTERNATE
Distribution Substation O&M Expenses (FERC)
Percent of Total
120%
100%
Allocation of Expense
80%
60%
40%
20%
-0%
-20%
1
0
1
1
0
2
1
2
1
1
0
3
1
1
7
1
0
4
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
0
9
1
2
3
1
0
7
1
2
0
1
0
6
1
1
2
1
1
0
1
0
5
Ops Supv & Eng
Station Ops Expenses
Rent
Maint of Structures
Load Dispatching
Misc Ops
Maint Supv & Eng
Maint of Station Equipment
Source/Calculation:(B.25.1)/(SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27}-B.27.100-B.25.100)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8724
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1304
1
1
4
1
1
9
1
2
2
1
0
8
1
1
6
1
1
8
Maint of Misc Dist Plant
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Distribution Substation O&M Expenses
Per Distribution Customer
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$10.61
$2.22 <= $5.57
$5.57 <= $8.32
$8.32 <= $10.87
$10.87 <= $35.55
$40.00
$
3
5
.
5
5
$35.00
$
2
4
.
9
8
Expenses per Distribution Customer
$30.00
$25.00
$20.00
$15.00
$10.00
$5.00
$
2
.
2
2
$
2
.
9
3
$
3
.
4
3
$
5
.
2
4
$
5
.
8
9
$
7
.
7
0
$
7
.
8
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
$
8
.
3
2
$
8
.
9
9
$
9
.
0
1
1
1
9
1
0
6
$
9
.
6
5
$
1
2
.
0
9
$
1
5
.
2
7
$0.00
1
0
5
1
1
0
1
0
9
1
1
6
1
2
0
1
1
2
1
0
7
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/A.2.2+B.29.3/A.3.1+B.29.4/A.3.2)/3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27099
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1305
1
2
3
1
1
3
1
1
7
1
1
4
1
1
8
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
1
2
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Distribution Substation O&M Expenses
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2.83%
0.91% <= 1.77%
1.77% <= 2.18%
2.18% <= 4.10%
4.10% <= 5.16%
6.00%
Expenses per Assets
5.00%
3
.
4
2
%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
0
.
9
1
%
1
.
0
8
%
1
.
3
9
%
1
.
7
2
%
1
.
8
1
%
2
.
0
8
%
2
.
1
2
%
2
.
1
8
%
1
2
0
1
0
6
1
1
2
3
.
8
1
%
4
.
3
8
%
4
.
8
4
%
5
.
0
3
%
5
.
1
6
%
2
.
5
6
%
0.00%
1
1
0
1
1
6
1
2
1
1
0
9
1
1
9
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
3
1
0
7
1
1
7
1
2
2
Source/Calculation:(((SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/(B.11.2))+((B.29.3)/((B.13.3)))+((B.29.4)/((B.13.4))))/3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27117
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1306
1
1
4
1
1
8
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Distribution Substation O&M Expenses
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
4.24%
1.33% <= 2.75%
2.75% <= 3.34%
3.34% <= 5.92%
5.92% <= 8.74%
9.00%
8
.
0
3
%
8
.
7
4
%
1
1
4
1
0
7
8.00%
6
.
1
9
%
Expenses per Depreciated Assets
7.00%
6.00%
4
.
8
6
%
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1
.
3
3
%
1
.
3
9
%
1
1
0
1
2
1
2
.
7
4
%
2
.
7
6
%
1
2
0
1
0
9
3
.
2
8
%
3
.
3
1
%
3
.
3
8
%
1
1
2
1
1
9
1
0
6
6
.
7
1
%
5
.
1
1
%
1
.
6
0
%
1.00%
0.00%
1
1
6
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
7
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
Source/Calculation:(((SUM{B.25}+SUM{B.27})/(B.11.2-B.15.1))+((B.29.3)/((B.13.3)-(B.17.1)))+((B.29.4)/((B.13.4)-(B.17.2))))/3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600243
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1306.1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Distribution Substation Capital Additions
Per Distribution Customer
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$19.37
$0.09 <= $12.35
$12.35 <= $17.88
$17.88 <= $24.10
$24.10 <= $51.56
$60.00
$
4
7
.
8
3
Capital Additions per Distribution Customer
$50.00
$40.00
$30.00
$20.00
$10.00
$
0
.
0
9
$
1
.
4
2
$
2
.
0
9
1
0
1
1
0
4
$
6
.
0
9
$
6
.
9
6
$
1
1
.
9
4
$
1
3
.
5
8
$
1
3
.
7
9
1
1
9
1
2
3
$
1
6
.
5
7
$
1
6
.
9
9
$
1
7
.
1
5
1
1
0
1
1
3
1
2
1
$
1
8
.
6
0
$
1
8
.
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
$
1
9
.
7
4
$
2
0
.
2
6
1
0
8
1
1
2
$
2
0
.
9
7
$
2
5
.
1
4
$
2
6
.
9
8
$
3
4
.
0
6
$
5
1
.
5
6
$
3
5
.
3
9
$0.00
1
0
3
1
0
9
1
0
7
1
0
2
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.6}/A.2.2
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2211
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1307
1
0
5
1
2
0
1
2
2
1
0
6
1
1
7
1
1
4
1
1
6
1
1
5
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Distribution Substation Capital Additions
Per MWh Sold
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$0.90
$0.21 <= $0.54
$0.54 <= $0.75
$0.75 <= $0.95
$0.95 <= $3.62
$4.00
$
3
.
6
2
$3.50
Capital Additions per MWh Sold
$3.00
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
$
0
.
2
1
$
0
.
2
3
1
0
7
1
0
9
$
0
.
4
5
$
0
.
4
7
1
1
3
1
1
0
$
0
.
5
3
$
0
.
5
5
$
0
.
5
6
1
1
2
1
1
9
1
2
1
$
0
.
7
0
$
0
.
7
2
1
2
3
1
1
1
$
0
.
7
8
$
0
.
7
9
1
1
8
1
0
5
$
0
.
8
6
$
0
.
9
1
$
0
.
9
7
$
1
.
1
4
$
1
.
2
1
$
1
.
5
7
$0.00
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.6}/A.2.4
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2170
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1308
1
0
8
1
2
2
1
1
7
1
0
6
1
2
0
1
1
4
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Distribution Substation Capital Additions
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
5.65%
1.89% <= 3.37%
3.37% <= 5.26%
5.26% <= 6.93%
6.93% <= 12.52%
14.00%
1
2
.
5
2
%
12.00%
9
.
3
8
%
Capital Additions per Assets
10.00%
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
1
.
8
9
%
3
.
0
6
%
3
.
0
8
%
3
.
1
8
%
1
0
9
1
1
8
1
0
7
3
.
3
7
%
3
.
7
4
%
4
.
3
9
%
5
.
1
6
%
5
.
2
6
%
1
1
0
1
1
2
5
.
8
6
%
6
.
5
1
%
6
.
6
5
%
1
0
8
1
1
4
6
.
9
3
%
7
.
5
0
%
7
.
6
0
%
1
0
6
1
2
0
0.00%
1
1
9
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
2
3
1
1
1
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.6}/B.11.2
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6387
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1309
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Distribution Substation Capital Additions
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
9.01%
2.68% <= 5.30%
5.30% <= 8.51%
8.51% <= 10.33%
10.33% <= 25.74%
30.00%
2
5
.
7
4
%
Capital Additions per Depreciated Assets
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
2
.
6
8
%
3
.
3
7
%
4
.
9
0
%
5
.
2
4
%
5
.
3
0
%
1
1
3
1
1
8
6
.
4
3
%
7
.
4
8
%
7
.
9
2
%
8
.
5
1
%
9
.
1
1
%
9
.
5
9
%
9
.
8
3
%
1
1
7
1
2
0
1
0
.
3
3
%
1
1
.
5
2
%
1
1
.
8
2
%
1
1
1
1
0
6
1
3
.
4
9
%
0.00%
1
1
9
1
2
1
1
0
9
1
0
7
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
1
0
1
0
8
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.6})/(B.11.2-B.15.1)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:7004
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1310
1
1
4
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Distribution Substation Capital Additions
Per Distribution MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$2,707
$580 <= $1,182
$1,182 <= $1,498
$1,498 <= $2,894
$2,894 <= $9,589
$10,000
$
8
,
3
3
7
$
9
,
5
8
9
Capital Additions per MVA
$8,000
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
$
5
8
0
$
8
7
6
$
8
9
3
1
1
3
1
0
9
$
1
,
0
9
9
$
1
,
2
6
5
$
1
,
2
8
9
$
1
,
3
5
5
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
9
$
1
,
4
9
8
$
1
,
5
6
6
1
1
2
1
2
1
$
1
,
9
5
8
$
2
,
3
6
1
$
3
,
4
2
8
$
4
,
5
1
9
$0
1
0
7
1
2
3
1
0
8
1
0
6
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.6}/SUM{AQ.13}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6113
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1311
1
2
0
1
1
4
1
1
6
1
0
5
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Distribution Substation Capital Additions
Per Adjusted Distribution MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$6,684
$725 <= $2,514
$2,514 <= $4,928
$4,928 <= $6,267
$6,267 <= $27,396
$30,000
$
2
7
,
3
9
6
Capital Additions per Adjusted MVA
$25,000
$20,000
$
1
1
,
2
9
9
$15,000
$10,000
$5,000
$
7
2
5
$
2
,
4
6
3
$
2
,
4
8
0
$
2
,
5
2
5
1
1
9
1
0
9
1
2
1
$
4
,
6
6
2
$
4
,
8
9
9
$
4
,
9
5
8
1
0
8
1
0
6
1
1
1
$
5
,
7
6
1
$
6
,
0
1
3
1
1
2
1
2
0
$
7
,
0
2
8
$0
1
0
7
1
1
0
1
1
4
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.6}/(SUM{AQ.13}*AQ.14.1)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2209
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1312
1
0
5
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
1
3
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Distribution Substation Capital
Additions
Per Distribution Customer
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$18.79
$6.13 <= $8.48
$8.48 <= $18.46
$18.46 <= $21.97
$21.97 <= $44.27
$45.00
$
3
5
.
8
0
$40.00
$
2
9
.
2
1
Capital Additions per Distribution Customer
$35.00
$30.00
$25.00
$20.00
$15.00
$10.00
$
6
.
1
3
$
6
.
9
9
$
7
.
3
6
1
0
5
1
0
7
$
7
.
8
7
$
8
.
4
8
$
1
2
.
0
1
$
1
5
.
8
3
$
1
7
.
3
4
$
1
8
.
4
6
$
1
8
.
4
7
$
1
8
.
7
1
1
1
1
1
2
0
1
0
8
$
2
0
.
5
0
$
4
4
.
2
7
$
2
9
.
9
9
$
2
1
.
9
7
$5.00
$0.00
1
0
9
1
1
9
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
0
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.6}/A.2.2+B.9.3/A.3.1+B.9.4/A.3.2)/3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6481
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1313
1
1
8
1
1
3
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
1
4
1
1
7
1
2
1
1
1
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Distribution Substation Capital
Additions
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
4.87%
1.41% <= 3.10%
3.10% <= 5.16%
5.16% <= 6.12%
6.12% <= 8.60%
9.00%
8
.
6
0
%
8.00%
Capital Additions per Assets
7.00%
6.00%
5.00%
4.00%
2
.
7
2
%
3.00%
2.00%
2
.
9
9
%
3
.
0
9
%
3
.
1
0
%
1
2
1
1
0
9
1
1
8
3
.
3
4
%
4
.
1
3
%
4
.
9
5
%
5
.
1
6
%
5
.
3
7
%
5
.
8
0
%
6
.
0
4
%
6
.
1
2
%
1
1
1
1
0
8
6
.
3
2
%
6
.
6
7
%
6
.
9
7
%
1
.
4
1
%
1.00%
0.00%
1
1
9
1
2
3
1
0
7
1
1
2
1
1
3
1
1
4
1
1
0
1
1
6
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.6})/(B.11.2)+(B.9.3)/(B.13.3)+(B.9.4)/(B.13.4))/3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6484
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1314
1
2
0
1
0
6
1
2
2
1
1
7
1
1
5
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Distribution Substation Capital
Additions
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
7.20%
2.30% <= 4.91%
4.91% <= 7.47%
7.47% <= 8.49%
8.49% <= 12.06%
14.00%
1
0
.
5
7
%
12.00%
Capital Additions per Depreciated Assets
10.00%
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2
.
3
0
%
2
.
9
9
%
4
.
4
1
%
4
.
7
7
%
4
.
9
5
%
6
.
2
2
%
6
.
6
7
%
7
.
0
7
%
7
.
8
7
%
8
.
0
2
%
1
1
0
1
1
4
8
.
2
7
%
8
.
4
5
%
8
.
6
0
%
1
1
6
1
0
8
1
1
.
9
2
%
1
2
.
0
6
%
1
1
7
1
1
1
2.00%
0.00%
1
1
9
1
2
1
1
2
3
1
1
8
1
0
9
1
1
2
1
0
7
1
1
3
1
2
0
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.6})/(B.11.2-B.15.1)+(B.9.3)/(B.13.3-B.17.1)+(B.9.4)/(B.13.4-B.17.2))/3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600244
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1314.1
1
0
6
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Substation Expenditures
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$1.08
$0.03 <= $0.59
$0.59 <= $0.74
$0.74 <= $1.34
$1.34 <= $2.80
$3.00
$
2
.
6
9
$
2
.
8
0
1
1
4
1
1
6
Expenditures per MWh Transmitted
$2.50
$
1
.
8
6
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$
0
.
4
5
$0.50
$
0
.
0
3
$
0
.
5
9
$
0
.
6
1
1
2
1
1
0
8
$
0
.
6
6
$
0
.
7
4
$
1
.
0
2
$
1
.
0
9
$
1
.
3
4
$
0
.
1
2
$0.00
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
0
9
1
1
9
1
0
5
1
1
3
1
1
0
1
1
8
1
0
6
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23})/A.2.5
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2145
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1316
1
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Substation Expenditures
Per Transmission Substation Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
8.26%
1.27% <= 6.06%
6.06% <= 6.89%
6.89% <= 8.86%
8.86% <= 24.13%
25.00%
2
4
.
1
3
%
Expenditures per Assets
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
4
.
5
0
%
5.00%
5
.
6
0
%
5
.
8
8
%
1
2
1
1
0
8
6
.
6
2
%
6
.
7
7
%
6
.
8
8
%
6
.
8
9
%
7
.
0
8
%
7
.
1
6
%
1
1
2
1
1
7
1
1
3
1
1
9
1
2
0
1
1
4
9
.
4
3
%
1
1
.
1
7
%
1
2
.
3
2
%
1
.
2
7
%
0.00%
1
2
3
1
0
9
1
1
0
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23})/B.11.1
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6391
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1317
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
0
6
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Substation Expenditures
Per Transmission Substation Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
8.26%
1.27% <= 6.06%
6.06% <= 6.89%
6.89% <= 8.86%
8.86% <= 24.13%
25.00%
Expenditures per Assets
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
1
2
3
1
0
9
1
2
1
1
0
8
1
1
2
1
1
7
1
1
3
1
1
9
1
2
0
1
1
4
Capital
1
1
0
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
0
6
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
0
2
1
0
1
1
0
5
1
2
2
1
0
3
O&M Expense
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3})/B.11.1
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300526
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1318
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Substation Expenditures
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
11.59%
2.67% <= 7.73%
7.73% <= 10.04%
10.04% <= 12.73%
12.73% <= 32.79%
35.00%
3
2
.
7
9
%
30.00%
Expenditures per Depreciated Assets
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
2
.
6
7
%
5
.
6
0
%
7
.
2
8
%
7
.
6
1
%
1
0
9
1
2
0
8
.
0
9
%
8
.
6
6
%
9
.
4
6
%
1
0
.
6
3
%
1
1
.
0
3
%
1
1
4
1
1
3
1
2
.
2
5
%
1
2
.
8
9
%
1
6
.
3
4
%
1
6
.
9
0
%
0.00%
1
2
3
1
2
1
1
0
8
1
1
7
1
1
2
1
1
9
1
1
0
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23})/(B.11.1-B.15.2)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:7010
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1319
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
0
6
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Substation Expenditures
Per Transmission MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$3,272
$611 <= $1,164
$1,164 <= $2,430
$2,430 <= $3,763
$3,763 <= $9,801
$10,000
$
8
,
9
2
6
$
9
,
8
0
1
1
1
6
1
0
6
Expenditures per MVA
$8,000
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
$
6
1
1
$
8
6
1
$
9
5
5
1
0
8
1
0
5
$
1
,
2
3
4
$
1
,
4
0
4
$
2
,
0
6
3
$
2
,
7
9
7
$
2
,
9
8
4
$
3
,
7
1
2
$
3
,
9
1
6
$0
1
2
3
1
0
9
1
1
2
1
1
3
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
1
4
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23})/SUM{AQ.12}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6390
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1320
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
1
2
2
1
1
9
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
5
1
1
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Substation Expenditures
Per Adjusted Transmission MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$6,652
$2,692 <= $3,452
$3,452 <= $4,386
$4,386 <= $8,558
$8,558 <= $15,468
$16,000
$
1
5
,
4
6
8
$14,000
$
9
,
9
4
5
Expenditures per Adjusted MVA
$12,000
$10,000
$
7
,
1
7
1
$8,000
$6,000
$4,000
$
2
,
6
9
2
$
3
,
0
8
5
$
3
,
8
2
0
$
4
,
3
8
6
$2,000
$0
1
0
8
1
0
9
1
0
5
1
1
2
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
1
4
1
0
2
1
0
3
1
0
4
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23})/(SUM{AQ.12}*AQ.14.2)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2218
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1321
1
0
6
1
0
7
1
0
1
1
1
3
1
2
3
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
1
7
1
1
8
1
1
9
1
2
2
1
1
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Substation Expenditures
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
9.27%
2.09% <= 6.84%
6.84% <= 9.23%
9.23% <= 11.13%
11.13% <= 14.92%
16.00%
1
3
.
6
7
%
14.00%
Expenditures per Depreciated Assets
12.00%
10.00%
8.00%
5
.
9
6
%
8
.
7
7
%
8
.
8
2
%
8
.
9
1
%
1
1
2
1
0
8
1
1
8
9
.
5
5
%
1
0
.
9
7
%
1
1
.
0
7
%
1
1
.
1
5
%
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
1
0
1
3
.
8
6
%
1
4
.
9
2
%
1
1
3
1
0
6
6
.
2
0
%
6.00%
4.00%
2
.
0
9
%
3
.
7
8
%
2.00%
0.00%
1
2
3
1
0
9
1
2
0
1
2
1
1
1
4
1
1
9
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
Source/Calculation:(((SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23})/(B.11.1-B.15.2))+((B.9.1+B.29.1)/(B.13.1-B.17.3))+((B.9.2+B.29.2)/(B.13.2-B.17.4)))/3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27115
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1325
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Substation O&M Expenses
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$0.31
$0.01 <= $0.11
$0.11 <= $0.26
$0.26 <= $0.33
$0.33 <= $1.21
$1.40
$
1
.
2
1
$1.20
Expenses per MWh Transmitted
$1.00
$0.80
$0.60
$0.40
$0.20
$
0
.
0
1
$
0
.
0
2
1
1
2
1
0
6
$
0
.
0
9
$
0
.
1
6
$
0
.
2
4
$
0
.
2
8
$
0
.
2
8
1
1
0
1
0
5
$
0
.
3
4
$
0
.
4
2
$0.00
1
2
3
1
2
1
1
0
9
1
1
3
1
1
9
1
1
4
1
2
2
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23})/A.2.5
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2150
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1327
1
2
0
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Substation O&M Expenses
Per Circuit Breaker
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$5,378
$368 <= $1,545
$1,545 <= $3,961
$3,961 <= $5,051
$5,051 <= $30,281
$35,000
$
3
0
,
2
8
1
$30,000
Expenses per Circuit Breaker
$25,000
$20,000
$15,000
$10,000
$5,000
$
3
6
8
$
1
,
2
8
6
$
1
,
5
1
4
$
1
,
5
5
5
$
1
,
6
1
7
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
1
7
1
2
1
$
3
,
4
7
7
$
4
,
4
4
5
$
4
,
4
8
4
1
0
9
1
1
9
$
4
,
9
9
8
$
5
,
2
1
3
$
5
,
3
0
2
1
1
0
1
2
0
1
1
3
$0
1
0
6
1
0
5
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23})/SUM{AQ.4}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6496
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1328
1
1
4
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Substation O&M Expenses
Per Transmission Substation Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2.04%
0.27% <= 1.24%
1.24% <= 2.32%
2.32% <= 2.44%
2.44% <= 4.38%
4.50%
4
.
3
8
%
4.00%
3
.
2
2
%
Expenses per Assets
3.50%
3.00%
2
.
3
2
%
2.50%
2.00%
1.50%
0
.
9
5
%
1.00%
0.50%
1
.
1
4
%
1
.
3
4
%
2
.
4
1
%
2
.
4
2
%
2
.
4
6
%
1
1
0
1
2
0
1
0
9
1
.
5
0
%
0
.
2
7
%
0.00%
1
0
6
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
1
7
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
1
4
1
1
9
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23})/B.11.1
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6393
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1329
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
7
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Substation O&M Expenses
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
3.03%
0.36% <= 1.67%
1.67% <= 2.60%
2.60% <= 3.85%
3.85% <= 7.77%
8.00%
7
.
7
7
%
7.00%
Expenses per Depreciated Assets
6.00%
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
1
.
5
0
%
2.00%
1.00%
1
.
6
3
%
1
.
7
1
%
1
1
2
1
1
7
2
.
0
0
%
2
.
6
0
%
3
.
3
0
%
3
.
7
1
%
3
.
9
8
%
4
.
7
9
%
0
.
3
6
%
0.00%
1
0
6
1
2
1
1
2
3
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
1
3
1
0
9
1
1
4
1
1
9
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23})/(B.11.1-B.15.2)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6493
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1330
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
7
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Substation O&M Expenses
Per Transmission MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$702
$108 <= $389
$389 <= $684
$684 <= $907
$907 <= $1,763
$1,800
$
1
,
7
6
3
$1,600
Expenses per MVA
$1,400
$1,200
$
9
5
4
$1,000
$800
$600
$400
$200
$
1
0
8
$
2
4
1
$
3
6
5
$
6
7
4
$
6
9
5
1
0
9
1
1
3
$
9
9
4
$
7
6
3
$
4
5
9
$0
1
0
6
1
1
2
1
0
5
1
2
3
1
1
0
1
2
0
1
2
1
1
1
4
1
2
2
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23})/SUM{AQ.12}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6392
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1331
1
1
9
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Substation O&M Expenses
Per Adjusted Transmission MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$2,172
$754 <= $1,517
$1,517 <= $2,066
$2,066 <= $2,519
$2,519 <= $4,143
$4,500
$
4
,
1
4
3
$4,000
Expenses per Adjusted MVA
$3,500
$
2
,
4
4
7
$3,000
$2,500
$
1
,
4
6
1
$2,000
$1,500
$1,000
$
2
,
5
4
3
$
1
,
6
8
5
$
7
5
4
$500
$0
1
1
2
1
0
5
1
0
9
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
1
4
1
0
2
1
0
3
1
0
4
1
0
6
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23})/(SUM{AQ.12}*AQ.14.2)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2223
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1332
1
0
7
1
0
8
1
0
1
1
1
3
1
2
3
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
1
7
1
1
8
1
1
9
1
2
2
1
1
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Substation O&M Expenses (FERC)
As a Percent of Total
100%
Allocation of Expense
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
1
1
7
1
0
5
1
1
3
1
2
0
1
0
9
1
1
9
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
0
6
1
1
4
1
0
4
1
0
8
1
0
7
1
1
8
Ops Supv & Eng
Station Expense
Rents
Maint. Structures
Load Dispatching
Misc Trans Exp
Maint Supv & Eng
Maint. Station Equip.
Source/Calculation:(B.21.1)/(SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23}-B.23.100-B.21.100)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8722
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1334
1
1
6
1
0
3
1
0
1
1
1
5
1
0
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
Maint. Misc Trans Plant
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Substation O&M
Expenses
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2.58%
0.60% <= 1.58%
1.58% <= 2.01%
2.01% <= 3.04%
3.04% <= 6.63%
7.00%
6
.
6
3
%
6.00%
4
.
6
4
%
Expenditures per Depreciated Assets
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
0
.
6
0
%
1
.
3
3
%
1
.
3
5
%
1
0
9
1
1
6
1
.
6
6
%
1
.
8
4
%
1
.
9
6
%
2
.
0
5
%
2
.
4
6
%
2
.
8
8
%
3
.
5
2
%
0.00%
1
2
1
1
1
7
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
0
6
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
1
3
1
1
4
1
1
9
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
5
1
1
1
Source/Calculation:(((SUM{B.21}+SUM{B.23})/(B.11.1-B.15.2))+(B.29.1/(B.13.1-B.17.3))+(B.29.2/(B.13.2-B.17.4)))/3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27118
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1336
1
0
8
1
0
7
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Substation Capital Additions
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$0.84
$0.03 <= $0.24
$0.24 <= $0.61
$0.61 <= $1.34
$1.34 <= $2.80
$3.00
$
2
.
8
0
Capital Additions per MWh Transmitted
$2.50
$
1
.
8
4
$2.00
$
1
.
3
4
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
$
0
.
0
3
$
0
.
0
3
1
1
2
1
2
3
$
0
.
2
0
$
0
.
2
4
$
0
.
4
3
$
0
.
4
6
1
2
1
1
0
5
$
0
.
6
1
$
0
.
6
8
$
1
.
4
8
$
0
.
8
1
$0.00
1
0
9
1
1
9
1
0
8
1
1
3
1
1
0
1
1
8
1
1
4
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3})/A.2.5
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2155
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1338
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Substation Capital Additions
Per Circuit Breaker
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$12,924
$428 <= $5,016
$5,016 <= $10,060
$10,060 <= $13,343
$13,343 <= $36,964
$40,000
$
3
3
,
0
9
8
$35,000
$
3
4
,
8
8
9
$
3
6
,
9
6
4
1
1
6
1
1
4
Capital Additions per Circuit Breaker
$30,000
$25,000
$20,000
$15,000
$10,000
$5,000
$
4
2
8
$
2
,
5
7
8
$
3
,
6
9
4
$
4
,
4
2
0
$
5
,
6
1
3
$
6
,
3
2
5
$
7
,
2
9
2
$
1
0
,
0
6
0
$
1
0
,
4
4
8
1
2
0
1
1
3
$
1
1
,
3
6
2
$
1
2
,
1
3
7
$
1
4
,
5
4
9
$0
1
2
3
1
1
9
1
0
9
1
2
1
1
0
5
1
1
7
1
1
2
1
1
8
1
0
8
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.3}/SUM{AQ.4}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:7009
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1339
1
1
0
1
0
6
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Substation Capital Additions
Per Transmission Substation Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
6.66%
0.32% <= 3.98%
3.98% <= 5.05%
5.05% <= 6.73%
6.73% <= 23.87%
25.00%
2
3
.
8
7
%
Capital Additions per Assets
20.00%
15.00%
1
1
.
1
7
%
10.00%
5.00%
0
.
3
2
%
2
.
0
4
%
2
.
5
2
%
3
.
9
3
%
4
.
1
0
%
1
1
4
1
2
1
4
.
5
7
%
4
.
6
6
%
1
1
3
1
2
0
5
.
4
4
%
5
.
4
8
%
1
1
7
1
1
2
5
.
8
8
%
1
2
.
3
2
%
7
.
0
2
%
0.00%
1
2
3
1
0
9
1
1
9
1
0
8
1
1
0
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3})/B.11.1
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6389
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1340
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
0
6
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Substation Capital Additions
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
9.20%
0.67% <= 4.61%
4.61% <= 7.13%
7.13% <= 9.22%
9.22% <= 32.43%
35.00%
3
2
.
4
3
%
30.00%
Capital Additions per Depreciated Assets
25.00%
1
6
.
3
4
%
20.00%
1
6
.
9
0
%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0
.
6
7
%
3
.
3
1
%
4
.
1
0
%
4
.
4
7
%
1
2
1
1
1
9
5
.
0
1
%
5
.
8
4
%
6
.
9
5
%
7
.
3
1
%
1
1
7
1
1
3
7
.
8
3
%
8
.
0
9
%
1
1
2
1
0
8
9
.
6
0
%
0.00%
1
2
3
1
0
9
1
2
0
1
1
4
1
1
0
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.3}/(B.11.1-B.15.2)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:7008
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1341
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
0
6
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Substation Capital Additions
Per Transmission MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$2,687
$153 <= $794
$794 <= $1,605
$1,605 <= $2,345
$2,345 <= $9,693
$10,000
$
8
,
9
2
6
$
9
,
6
9
3
1
1
6
1
0
6
Capital Additions per MVA
$8,000
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
$
1
5
3
$
5
6
0
$
5
9
0
1
0
9
1
0
5
$
8
6
1
$
1
,
1
6
2
$
1
,
3
6
9
$
1
,
8
4
2
$
2
,
1
5
3
$
2
,
2
2
1
1
1
4
1
1
0
$
2
,
7
1
8
$0
1
2
3
1
0
8
1
1
2
1
1
3
1
2
0
1
2
1
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.3}/SUM{AQ.12}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27160
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1342
1
2
2
1
1
9
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Substation Capital Additions
Per Adjusted Transmission MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$4,791
$1,400 <= $2,525
$2,525 <= $3,632
$3,632 <= $6,063
$6,063 <= $11,326
$12,000
$
1
1
,
3
2
6
Capital Additions per Adjusted MVA
$10,000
$
7
,
4
0
2
$8,000
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
$
1
,
4
0
0
$
2
,
3
5
9
$
2
,
6
9
2
$
3
,
6
3
2
$
4
,
7
2
3
$0
1
0
9
1
0
5
1
0
8
1
1
2
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
1
4
1
0
2
1
0
3
1
0
4
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.3}/(SUM{AQ.12}*AQ.14.2)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2213
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1343
1
0
6
1
0
7
1
0
1
1
1
3
1
2
3
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
1
7
1
1
8
1
1
9
1
2
2
1
1
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Substation Capital
Additions
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
7.06%
0.25% <= 5.08%
5.08% <= 7.65%
7.65% <= 9.21%
9.21% <= 12.87%
14.00%
1
2
.
8
7
%
12.00%
Capital Additions per Depreciated Assets
10.00%
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
2
.
4
6
%
3
.
5
0
%
4
.
9
1
%
5
.
6
0
%
6
.
8
1
%
7
.
0
4
%
8
.
2
7
%
8
.
8
2
%
8
.
9
1
%
1
0
8
1
1
8
9
.
3
1
%
9
.
7
3
%
1
0
.
3
5
%
0
.
2
5
%
0.00%
1
2
3
1
0
9
1
2
0
1
1
4
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
9
1
1
0
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
1
3
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.3})/(B.11.1-B.15.2)+(B.9.1)/(B.13.1-B.17.3)+(B.9.2)/(B.13.2-B.17.4))/3
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6492
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1345
1
0
6
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Substation Capital Additions
Per Current Year Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
284.6%
98.5% <= 164.8%
164.8% <= 253.1%
253.1% <= 306.9%
306.9% <= 752.1%
800.0%
700.0%
5
9
6
.
5
%
Capital Additions per Current Year Depreciation
600.0%
4
8
2
.
3
%
500.0%
400.0%
300.0%
200.0%
7
5
2
.
1
%
9
8
.
5
%
1
0
8
.
7
%
1
1
3
.
4
%
1
1
9
1
0
9
1
3
3
.
3
%
1
7
5
.
3
%
1
8
4
.
4
%
2
2
8
.
6
%
2
4
1
.
1
%
2
6
5
.
0
%
2
7
2
.
7
%
2
7
4
.
3
%
1
1
0
1
1
8
1
1
2
3
0
0
.
3
%
3
2
6
.
7
%
100.0%
0.0%
1
2
3
1
0
7
1
1
3
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
0
8
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.3}+SUM{B.6})/SUM{B.19}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27417
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1346
1
1
7
1
2
0
1
1
6
1
0
6
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
5
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Current Year T&D Substation Depreciation Charges
As a Percent of Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2.2%
1.7% <= 2.1%
2.1% <= 2.2%
2.2% <= 2.4%
2.4% <= 2.6%
3.0%
2.5%
Percent of Assets
2.0%
1.5%
1.0%
0.5%
0.0%
1
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
9
1
1
2
1
1
7
1
1
8
1
0
9
1
1
6
1
0
6
1
1
0
1
2
3
Distribution Depreciation
1
0
7
1
1
3
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
4
1
2
1
1
1
5
1
0
2
1
0
1
1
0
5
1
0
3
Transmission Depreciation
Source/Calculation:B.19.1/SUM{B.11}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:9590
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1349
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Alternate
Accumulated T&D Substation Depreciation Charges
As a Percent of T&D Substation Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
35.5%
13.5% <= 31.4%
31.4% <= 33.3%
33.3% <= 40.6%
40.6% <= 51.4%
60.0%
50.0%
Percent of Assets
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
0
8
1
1
6
1
1
2
1
1
0
1
0
6
1
1
9
1
1
4
1
1
3
1
0
9
Distribution Depreciation
1
1
8
1
2
3
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
2
2
1
0
4
1
2
1
1
1
5
1
0
2
1
0
1
1
0
5
1
0
3
Transmission Depreciation
Source/Calculation:B.15.1/SUM{B.11}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300130
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1350
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Substation Staffing Level
Company FTEs per Transformer Bank
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
0.52
0.11 <= 0.22
0.22 <= 0.44
0.44 <= 0.67
0.67 <= 1.68
1.80
1
.
6
8
1.60
FTEs per Transformer Bank
1.40
1
.
0
6
1.20
0
.
9
1
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0
.
1
1
0
.
1
1
1
7
7
0
.
1
3
0
.
1
9
0
.
2
3
0
.
2
3
1
1
1
6
0
.
2
9
0
.
4
4
0
.
4
5
1
8
1
2
0
.
4
9
0
.
6
1
0
.
6
5
0
.
7
2
0.00
1
3
9
1
5
5
1
9
Source/Calculation:(SUM{P.3})/(SUM{AQ.2}+SUM{AQ.3})
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27344
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1351
8
6
1
2
4
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
4
1
0
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Substation Staffing Level
Company FTEs per Circuit Breaker
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
0.10
0.03 <= 0.05
0.05 <= 0.07
0.07 <= 0.11
0.11 <= 0.31
0.35
0
.
3
1
0.30
FTEs per Circuit Breaker
0.25
0
.
2
1
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0
.
0
3
0
.
0
4
0
.
0
4
7
1
3
0
.
0
4
0
.
0
6
0
.
0
6
1
6
6
0
.
0
6
0
.
0
7
1
1
1
0
.
0
7
0
.
0
9
0
.
0
9
0
.
1
3
0
.
1
4
1
8
8
0
.
1
0
0.00
1
7
9
1
2
1
5
5
Source/Calculation:SUM{P.3}/SUM{AQ.4}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27343
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1352
1
9
2
4
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
4
1
0
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Substation Staffing Level
Company FTEs per 1,000 Total System MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
10.39
4.39 <= 6.02
6.02 <= 8.10
8.10 <= 9.72
9.72 <= 37.98
40.00
3
7
.
9
8
35.00
FTEs per 1,000 MVA
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
4
.
3
9
4
.
5
6
1
6
1
5
.
2
2
5
.
3
7
1
2
1
3
7
.
9
9
8
.
0
1
8
.
0
8
1
5
1
7
1
1
8
.
1
1
9
8
.
6
1
9
.
5
6
9
.
7
7
2
1
9
1
2
.
3
7
1
5
.
4
7
0.00
7
Source/Calculation:(SUM{P.3})/((SUM{AQ.12}+SUM{AQ.13})/1000)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2016
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1353
1
8
8
4
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
4
1
0
6
5
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Company-Owned Transmission Substation Breakers
By Voltage Class
100%
Percent of Substation Breakers
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
1
3
7
4
6
1
7
1
9
1
1
8
1
9
1
4
5
1
2
1
8
1
6
1
5
2
2
1
Less Than 11kV
17kV to 34.5kV
60kV - 99kV
200kV - 299kV
400kV - 499kV
12kV to 16kV
35kV - 59kV
100kV - 199kV
300kV - 399kV
500kV or Greater
Source/Calculation:AQ.4.10/SUM{AQ.4}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27403
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1355
2
2
1
0
3
2
0
2
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Company-Owned Substations - Distribution
By Size
100%
Percent of Substations
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
1
3
1
6
8
1
5
1
9
Distribution: 0-10 MVA
2
1
2
1
4
1
8
Distribution: 11-24 MVA
4
1
1
9
1
7
Distribution: 25-49 MVA
Source/Calculation:AQ.6.1/(AQ.6.1+AQ.6.2+AQ.6.3+AQ.6.4+AQ.6.5)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1596
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1356
6
1
0
1
7
Distribution: 50-99 MVA
2
0
2
3
2
2
5
2
1
3
Distribution: >100 MVA
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Company-Owned Substations - Transmission
By Size
100%
Percent of Substations
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
1
8
1
4
1
6
8
2
Transmission: 0-10 MVA
1
9
9
1
7
6
Transmission: 11-24 MVA
1
1
4
1
5
1
2
Transmission: 25-49 MVA
Source/Calculation:AQ.6.6/(AQ.6.6+AQ.6.7+AQ.6.8+AQ.6.9+AQ.6.10)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1668
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1357
7
2
0
1
0
5
Transmission: 50-99 MVA
2
2
3
1
2
3
1
3
2
1
Transmission: >100 MVA
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Company-Owned Substations by High-Side Voltage Distribution
Per 100,000 Distribution Customers
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
23.64
7.84 <= 10.87
10.87 <= 21.95
21.95 <= 32.25
32.25 <= 61.93
70.00
60.00
Substations per 100,000 Distribution Customers
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
4
1
9
2
Less than 60kV
1
2
1
8
1
4
60kV - 99kV
6
1
5
1
6
100kV - 199kV
8
1
3
1
1
9
200kV - 299kV
Source/Calculation:AQ.7.14/(A.2.2/100000)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8127
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1358
1
7
2
0
300kV - 399kV
3
7
5
400kV - 499kV
2
2
2
3
1
1
0
2
1
500kV Or Greater
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Customer-Owned Substations, Company Maintained
Per 100,000 Distribution Customers
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
1.33
0.20 <= 0.48
0.48 <= 0.61
0.61 <= 1.46
1.46 <= 3.91
4.00
3.50
Substations per 100,000 Distribution Customers
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
1
6
1
1
1
7
1
8
5
1
0
1
9
6
4
1
1
4
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
5
Distribution Less than 60kV
Distribution 100kV - 199kV
Distribution 300kV - 399kV
Distribution 60kV - 99kV
Distribution 200kV - 299kV
Distribution 400kV - 499kV
Source/Calculation:AQ.9.14/(A.2.2/100000)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27486
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1360
7
8
3
9
1
3
2
0
2
2
3
Distribution 500kV or Greater
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Substations Owned By Customers But Maintained By
Utility
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
17
46 => 25
25 => 6
6 => 4
4 => 2
50
4
6
45
40
Substations
35
30
2
5
25
20
15
10
6
5
4
2
0
1
6
1
8
1
7
8
1
1
1
2
2
3
4
5
6
Source/Calculation:SUM{AQ.9}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6292
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1362
7
1
1
0
2
3
1
3
1
4
1
5
1
9
2
0
2
1
2
2
9
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Distribution Substation Types
Company Owned
Source/Calculation:AQ.10.1
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:10556
Page:1363
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
MVA for Customer-Owned Utility Maintained
Substations
MVA per Substation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
23.7
53.5 => 32.1
32.1 => 18.5
18.5 => 10.1
10.1 => 4.2
60.0
5
3
.
5
MVA per Substation
50.0
40.0
30.0
2
5
.
0
20.0
1
2
.
1
10.0
4
.
2
0.0
1
1
8
1
6
1
8
1
3
2
3
4
5
6
7
Source/Calculation:AQ.11.1/SUM{AQ.9}
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:3131
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1364
9
1
1
2
2
3
1
4
1
5
1
7
1
9
2
0
2
1
2
2
1
0
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Total Substation MVA Installed
By Voltage
100%
Percent of MVA
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
2
1
1
4
1
5
1
9
4
1
1
1
6
1
2
1
3
9
1
7
1
8
7
8
5
2
2
1
0
2
1
2
0
3
6
Transmission 500kV Or Greater
Transmission 200kV - 299kV
Transmission Less than 60kV
Distribution 300kV - 399kV
Distribution 60kV - 99kV
Transmission 400kV - 499kV
Transmission 100kV - 199kV
Distribution 500kV Or Greater
Distribution 200kV - 299kV
Distribution Less than 60kV
Transmission 300kV - 399kV
Transmission 60kV - 99kV
Distribution 400kV - 499kV
Distribution 100kV - 199kV
Source/Calculation:AQ.12.1/(SUM{AQ.12}+SUM{AQ.13})
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8774
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1365
2
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Average Percent Loading of Substation Transformers
Load Serving Substations
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
43.8%
80.0% => 55.5%
55.5% => 41.0%
41.0% => 32.8%
32.8% => 18.0%
80.0%
8
0
.
0
%
6
2
.
0
%
70.0%
Percent Loading
60.0%
5
7
.
0
%
5
5
.
0
%
50.0%
4
8
.
2
%
4
2
.
0
%
4
0
.
0
%
40.0%
3
6
.
0
%
3
5
.
0
%
30.0%
2
6
.
0
%
2
6
.
0
%
1
3
1
2
20.0%
1
8
.
0
%
10.0%
0.0%
1
7
9
8
7
1
8
1
4
2
1
5
1
9
Source/Calculation:AQ.14.1
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1608
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1366
1
6
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
1
0
6
5
4
3
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Average Percent Loading of Substation Transformers
Auto-Transformation Substations
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
31.7%
40.0% => 35.5%
35.5% => 32.0%
32.0% => 27.5%
27.5% => 24.0%
40.0%
4
0
.
0
%
3
9
.
0
%
35.0%
3
2
.
0
%
3
2
.
0
%
3
0
.
0
%
Percent Loading
30.0%
2
5
.
0
%
25.0%
2
4
.
0
%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
1
5
8
1
4
1
2
1
6
1
9
9
1
1
2
3
4
Source/Calculation:AQ.14.2
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1692
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1367
5
6
1
1
0
2
3
1
3
1
7
1
8
2
0
2
1
2
2
7
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Average Percent Loading of Substation Transformers
(Non-Coincident Peak)
Load Serving Substations
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
62.2%
95.0% => 70.5%
70.5% => 61.5%
61.5% => 51.8%
51.8% => 25.0%
100.0%
90.0%
9
5
.
0
%
9
1
.
0
%
7
2
.
0
%
80.0%
7
0
.
0
%
Percent Loading
70.0%
6
5
.
0
%
6
2
.
0
%
6
1
.
0
%
60.0%
5
8
.
0
%
5
3
.
0
%
50.0%
4
8
.
0
%
4
6
.
0
%
40.0%
2
5
.
0
%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
1
7
4
1
2
1
5
8
9
1
6
1
9
1
3
1
4
2
Source/Calculation:AQ.15.1
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27474
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1368
1
8
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
1
0
7
6
5
3
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Average Percent Loading of Substation Transformers
(Non-Coincident Peak)
Transmission Transformation Substations
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
53.9%
79.0% => 67.0%
67.0% => 57.0%
57.0% => 44.0%
44.0% => 24.0%
80.0%
7
9
.
0
%
70.0%
6
7
.
0
%
6
7
.
0
%
6
5
.
0
%
Percent Loading
60.0%
4
9
.
0
%
50.0%
4
8
.
0
%
3
2
.
0
%
40.0%
30.0%
2
4
.
0
%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
8
1
5
1
2
1
6
1
4
1
9
1
8
9
2
3
2
2
2
1
Source/Calculation:AQ.15.2
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27475
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1369
2
0
1
7
1
3
1
1
1
0
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Substation Transformer Average Loading Definition
Source/Calculation:AQ.16.1
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2301000
Page:1370
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Substation Transformer Average Loading Definition
(cont.)
If your definition of substation transformer loading (average) is different from our glossary
definition, please provide your definition.
Average hourly integrated loading at the transformer
Source/Calculation:AQ.16.99
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6257
Page:1371
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Substation Transformer Non-Coincident Peak Loading
Definition
Source/Calculation:AQ.17.1
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6258
Page:1372
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Substation Transformer Non-Coincident Peak Loading
Definition (cont.)
If your definition of substation transformer loading (non-coincident peak loading) is different
from our definition, please provide your definition.
Peak hourly itegrated loading at the transformer
Source/Calculation:AQ.17.99
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600124
Page:1372.1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
MVA Nameplate Rating Used
Source/Calculation:AQ.18.1
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:9597
Page:1373
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
MVA Nameplate Rating Used (cont.)
Which nameplate rating do you predominantly use for MVA?
65 C top rating
top rating
Source/Calculation:AQ.18.99
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600251
Page:1373.1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Average Ratio Used to Convert from "Rated (e.g.
Nameplate)" to "Operational" Capacity
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
26.4
1.0 <= 1.0
1.0 <= 1.2
1.2 <= 25.9
25.9 <= 105.0
120.0
1
0
0
.
0
1
0
5
.
0
Ratio
100.0
80.0
60.0
40.0
20.0
1
.
0
1
.
0
1
.
0
1
.
1
1
.
2
1
.
3
1
4
1
2
9
8
1
5
1
3
0.0
2
4
2
3
2
2
2
1
Source/Calculation:AQ.19.1
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300084
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1374
2
0
1
9
1
8
1
7
1
6
1
1
1
0
7
6
5
3
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Rules Used to Determine Substation Type
Distribution vs Transmission
Source/Calculation:AQ.20.1
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2751
Page:1375
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Rules Used to Determine Substation Type (cont.)
Distribution vs Transmission
What rules of thumb are used to decide whether a substation is distribution or transmission?
As filed with FERC
Control center jurisdiction
H.Q. rules
Source/Calculation:AQ.20.99
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6632
Page:1376
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Distribution "Pole Top" Substations in Service By High
Side Voltage Level
As a Percent of Total Substations
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
4027.7%
0.9% <= 2.7%
2.7% <= 4.4%
4.4% <= 6041.2%
6041.2% <= 12077.9%
14000.0%
12000.0%
Percent
10000.0%
8000.0%
6000.0%
4000.0%
2000.0%
0.0%
1
2
9
1
7
5
1
0
1
9
6
4
1
1
1
1
4
Distribution 100kV class
2
1
2
2
1
5
7
8
3
1
8
1
6
1
3
2
0
2
2
3
Distribution <60kV
Source/Calculation:AQ.21.1/(AQ.6.1+AQ.6.2+AQ.6.3+AQ.6.4+AQ.6.5)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:40199
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1377
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Distribution Circuit Control
At the Substation, Inside the Fence
100%
90%
80%
Percent of Circuits
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
4
1
3
1
2
7
8
2
Load Tap Change Transformers
1
6
1
Regulators
1
7
1
1
9
1
9
1
4
1
5
Not Controlled
Source/Calculation:AQ.22.1
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:10553
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1378
2
3
1
0
6
1
8
5
2
0
2
1
2
2
3
Other
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Distribution Circuit Control (cont.)
At the Substation, Inside the Fence
What percentage of distribution circuits are controlled at the substation by the following (inside
the fence)?
Capacitor Banks
Source/Calculation:AQ.22.99
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27278
Page:1379
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Handling for Substation Transformers Returned From
the Field
100.0%
Percent
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
20.0%
0.0%
1
4
4
1
8
1
Inspected And Salvaged/Scrapped
1
9
2
1
6
1
7
1
5
8
9
Inspected And Returned to Field w /o Repair
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
2
2
3
1
1
Inspected, Repaired And Returned to Field
Source/Calculation:AQ.23.1
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300894
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1380
1
0
7
6
5
3
1
3
Other
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Transmission Substation Transformer Spares or
Mobiles
Per 100 Transmission Substation Transformers in Service
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
17.01
1.83 <= 3.26
3.26 <= 6.05
6.05 <= 7.30
7.30 <= 109.52
120.00
1
0
9
.
5
2
Spares or Mobiles per 100 Transformers in Service
100.00
80.00
6
4
.
8
6
60.00
40.00
20.00
1
.
8
3
2
.
0
0
2
.
4
2
2
.
7
9
5
1
7
1
1
6
4
.
6
8
5
.
5
2
5
.
7
5
6
.
3
6
6
.
5
6
7
.
1
4
7
.
3
5
1
6
4
2
1
9
1
2
8
7
1
1
.
4
3
0.00
Source/Calculation:(SUM{AY.3}+SUM{AY.5})/(SUM{AQ.2}/100)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600033
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1380.1
1
4
1
1
5
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
8
1
3
1
0
9
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Distribution Substation Transformer Spares or Mobiles
Per 100 Distribution Substation Transformers in Service
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
4.82
0.41 <= 2.72
2.72 <= 3.65
3.65 <= 5.72
5.72 <= 15.27
16.00
1
5
.
2
7
14.00
Spares or Mobiles per 100 Transformers in Service
12.00
9
.
4
9
10.00
6
.
8
8
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0
.
4
1
1
.
1
9
1
.
5
8
2
.
7
1
2
.
7
3
7
1
1
3
.
1
1
3
.
5
5
3
.
6
5
8
1
8
4
.
4
7
4
.
5
5
4
.
5
7
1
6
1
2
1
8
.
1
0
0.00
2
1
4
1
5
4
Source/Calculation:(SUM{AY.4}+SUM{AY.6})/(SUM{AQ.3}/100)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600034
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1380.2
1
3
1
7
9
1
9
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
0
6
5
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Transmission Substation Transformer Spares or
Mobiles
Per 100 Substation Transformers in Service -- 500kV or Greater
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
25.08
0.79 <= 10.55
10.55 <= 20.00
20.00 <= 35.00
35.00 <= 63.64
70.00
6
3
.
6
4
60.00
5
0
.
0
0
Spares or Mobiles per 100 Transformers in Service
50.00
40.00
30.00
1
3
.
9
5
20.00
2
0
.
0
0
2
0
.
0
0
1
9
4
7
.
1
4
10.00
0
.
7
9
0.00
2
7
1
4
1
5
1
1
3
5
6
8
Source/Calculation:(AY.3.1+AY.5.1)/(AQ.2.1/100)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600035
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1380.3
9
1
0
3
1
2
2
3
1
6
1
7
1
8
2
0
2
1
2
2
1
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Transmission Substation Transformer Spares or
Mobiles
Per 100 Substation Transformers in Service -- 400kV - 499kv
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
100.00
Spares or Mobiles per 100 Transformers in Service
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
1
3
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
0
1
Source/Calculation:(AY.3.2+AY.5.2)/(AQ.2.2/100)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600036
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1380.4
1
2
2
3
1
4
1
5
1
6
1
7
1
8
1
9
2
0
2
1
2
2
1
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Transmission Substation Transformer Spares or
Mobiles
Per 100 Substation Transformers in Service -- 300kV - 399kv
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
13.38
2.70 <= 3.55
3.55 <= 9.09
9.09 <= 12.39
12.39 <= 50.00
50.00
5
0
.
0
0
45.00
40.00
Spares or Mobiles per 100 Transformers in Service
35.00
30.00
25.00
1
5
.
6
9
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
2
.
7
0
3
.
3
9
3
.
7
0
2
6
9
.
0
9
9
.
0
9
1
2
8
0.00
1
6
4
1
1
5
5
7
9
Source/Calculation:(AY.3.3+AY.5.3)/(AQ.2.3/100)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600037
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1380.5
1
0
1
1
3
1
4
2
3
1
7
1
8
1
9
2
0
2
1
2
2
1
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Transmission Substation Transformer Spares or
Mobiles
Per 100 Substation Transformers in Service -- 200kV - 299kv
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
13.88
4.88 <= 7.36
7.36 <= 8.78
8.78 <= 19.05
19.05 <= 31.51
35.00
3
1
.
5
1
30.00
2
2
.
2
2
Spares or Mobiles per 100 Transformers in Service
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
4
.
8
8
7
.
1
4
8
.
0
3
9
.
5
2
0.00
2
1
4
7
1
9
1
5
1
1
3
4
5
6
8
Source/Calculation:(AY.3.4+AY.5.4)/(AQ.2.4/100)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600038
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1380.6
9
1
0
3
1
2
2
3
1
6
1
7
1
8
2
0
2
1
2
2
1
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Transmission Substation Transformer Spares or
Mobiles
Per 100 Substation Transformers in Service -- 100kV - 199kv
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
22.37
1.11 <= 2.86
2.86 <= 5.84
5.84 <= 25.35
25.35 <= 125.00
140.00
1
2
5
.
0
0
120.00
Spares or Mobiles per 100 Transformers in Service
100.00
7
5
.
7
6
80.00
60.00
3
0
.
7
7
40.00
20.00
1
.
1
1
2
.
3
3
2
.
3
8
2
.
7
0
3
.
3
5
3
.
5
7
1
7
5
6
1
1
4
1
2
5
.
2
9
6
.
3
8
7
.
1
4
1
9
1
6
7
3
8
.
3
0
9
.
0
9
0.00
8
1
4
Source/Calculation:(AY.3.5+AY.5.5)/(AQ.2.5/100)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600039
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1380.7
2
1
1
5
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
8
1
3
1
0
9
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Transmission Substation Transformer Spares or
Mobiles
Per 100 Substation Transformers in Service -- 60kV - 99kv
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
5.26
1.64 <= 2.85
2.85 <= 5.30
5.30 <= 6.80
6.80 <= 10.00
10.00
1
0
.
0
0
9.00
8.00
6
.
5
2
Spares or Mobiles per 100 Transformers in Service
7.00
6
.
9
0
6.00
5.00
4
.
0
8
4.00
3.00
2.00
1
.
6
4
2
.
4
4
1.00
0.00
5
1
1
4
7
2
6
1
6
3
8
9
1
0
Source/Calculation:(AY.3.6+AY.5.6)/(AQ.2.6/100)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600040
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1380.8
1
2
1
3
1
1
5
2
3
1
7
1
8
1
9
2
0
2
1
2
2
1
4
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Distribution Substation Transformer Spares or Mobiles
Per 100 Substation Transformers in Service -- 35kV - 59kv
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
103.57
7.14 <= 55.36
55.36 <= 103.57
103.57 <= 151.79
151.79 <= 200.00
200.00
2
0
0
.
0
0
180.00
160.00
Spares or Mobiles per 100 Transformers in Service
140.00
120.00
100.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
7
.
1
4
0.00
1
2
1
7
1
3
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Source/Calculation:(AY.4.1+AY.6.1)/(AQ.3.1/100)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600041
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1380.9
1
1
1
2
3
1
4
1
5
1
6
1
8
1
9
2
0
2
1
2
2
1
0
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Distribution Substation Transformer Spares or Mobiles
Per 100 Substation Transformers in Service -- 12kV - 34.5kv
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
5.43
1.19 <= 2.86
2.86 <= 3.86
3.86 <= 5.55
5.55 <= 22.63
25.00
2
2
.
6
3
Spares or Mobiles per 100 Transformers in Service
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
1
.
1
9
1
.
5
8
2
.
7
1
2
.
7
3
7
1
1
3
.
2
6
3
.
3
8
1
8
8
3
.
7
8
3
.
9
4
4
.
0
2
1
2
4
1
6
4
.
5
7
8
.
1
3
8
.
2
7
9
1
3
5
.
8
8
0.00
1
4
1
5
1
1
7
Source/Calculation:(AY.4.2+AY.6.2)/(AQ.3.2/100)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600042
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1380.91
1
9
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
0
6
5
3
2
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Distribution Substation Transformer Spares or Mobiles
Per 100 Substation Transformers in Service -- 5kV - 11kv
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
51.51
3.01 <= 27.26
27.26 <= 51.51
51.51 <= 75.75
75.75 <= 100.00
100.00
1
0
0
.
0
0
90.00
80.00
Spares or Mobiles per 100 Transformers in Service
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
3
.
0
1
0.00
1
3
8
1
4
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
1
0
Source/Calculation:(AY.4.3+AY.6.3)/(AQ.3.3/100)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600043
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1380.92
1
1
2
2
3
1
5
1
6
1
7
1
8
1
9
2
0
2
1
2
2
1
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Statistics
Regular
Distribution Substation Transformer Spares or Mobiles
Per 100 Substation Transformers in Service -- Less than 5kV
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
11.93
2.31 <= 7.14
7.14 <= 12.50
12.50 <= 13.64
13.64 <= 24.07
25.00
2
4
.
0
7
Spares or Mobiles per 100 Transformers in Service
20.00
1
2
.
5
0
15.00
1
3
.
6
4
10.00
7
.
1
4
5.00
2
.
3
1
0.00
4
9
1
8
1
7
1
3
1
2
2
3
5
6
7
Source/Calculation:(AY.4.4+AY.6.4)/(AQ.3.4/100)
Volume: T&D Substation Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600044
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1380.93
8
1
1
1
2
3
1
4
1
5
1
6
1
9
2
0
2
1
2
2
1
0
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Distribution Substation Cost Detail
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Pg. 1388 Beautification Costs that Are Passed on to the Customer
Pg. 1388.1 Distribution Substation Installed Capital Cost - Per New Substation MVA
IX
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Distribution Substation Cost Detail
Regular
Beautification Costs that Are Passed on to the
Customer
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
98.8%
100.0% => 100.0%
100.0% => 100.0%
100.0% => 100.0%
100.0% => 90.0%
100.0%
90.0%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
9
0
.
0
%
1
8
1
6
1
4
1
3
1
1
9
8
1
80.0%
Percent of Costs
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
2
3
2
2
2
1
Source/Calculation:AR.4.1
Volume: Focus Area: Distribution Substation Cost Detail, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300920
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1388
2
0
1
9
1
7
1
5
1
2
1
0
7
6
5
4
3
2
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Distribution Substation Cost Detail
Regular
Distribution Substation Installed Capital Cost
Per New Substation MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$54,601
$1 <= $20,323
$20,323 <= $46,167
$46,167 <= $83,116
$83,116 <= $126,521
$140,000
$
1
1
1
,
7
9
1
$120,000
$
1
2
6
,
5
2
1
Cost per New Substation MVA
$100,000
$
7
3
,
5
5
7
$80,000
$
4
4
,
8
1
4
$60,000
$40,000
$
8
,
2
6
7
$20,000
$
4
7
,
5
2
0
$
2
4
,
3
4
1
$
1
$0
1
7
1
9
1
2
1
1
8
1
4
1
3
5
2
3
2
2
2
1
Source/Calculation:AR.3.1/AR.3.2
Volume: Focus Area: Distribution Substation Cost Detail, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2500000
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1388.1
2
0
1
8
1
6
1
5
1
0
9
7
6
4
3
2
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Pg. 1389 Substations Designed to Overcome Contingency Failure - Distribution
Pg. 1389.1 Substations Designed to Overcome Contingency Failure (cont.) - Distribution
Pg. 1390 Substations Designed to Overcome Contingency Failure - Transmission
Pg. 1390.1 Substations Designed to Overcome Contingency Failure (cont.) - Transmission
Pg. 1390.2 Distribution Substation Power Transformers Percent in Service - By Age
Pg. 1390.3 Transmission Substation Power/Autotransformers Percent in Service - By Age
Pg. 1392 Percentage of Distribution Substation Breakers - Put in Service by Decade
Pg. 1394 Percentage of Transmission Substation Breakers - Put in Service by Decade
Pg. 1395 Estimate of the Types of Transmission Substations
Pg. 1395.1 Estimate of the Types of Transmission Substations (cont.)
Pg. 1396 Estimate of the Types of Distribution Substations
Pg. 1396.1 Estimate of the Types of Distribution Substations (cont.)
Pg. 1397 Average Age of Substations and Their Components - Age in Years
Pg. 1403 Substation Design/Engineering Efficiency Measurement
Pg. 1404 Substation Design/Engineering Efficiency Measurement (cont.)
Pg. 1412 Percent of Time Spent on "Regular" Duties - Compared to Sum of Project and "Regular" Time
Pg. 1414 Budget Used for Funds for Substation Project Time
Pg. 1416 Substation Organization Structure
Pg. 1417 Use of "Substation Owners" - From Operating Perspective
Pg. 1418 Use of "Project Owners" on New Substation Developments
X
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
Regular
Substations Designed to Overcome Contingency
Failure
Distribution
100%
90%
80%
Percent of Distribution Substations
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2
1
6
1
5
1
1
1
3
1
4
7
6
8
Single Contingency Only
1
2
5
4
1
8
Double Contingency
Source/Calculation:AS.2.1
Volume: T&D Substation Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6271
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1389
1
7
9
1
9
2
3
1
0
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
3
Other
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
Regular
Substations Designed to Overcome Contingency
Failure (cont.)
Distribution
What percent of your distribution substations are designed to overcome contingency failure?
Mobile Transformer or Feeder Ties
Use of Portable
Source/Calculation:AS.2.99
Volume: T&D Substation Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600246
Page:1389.1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
Regular
Substations Designed to Overcome Contingency
Failure
Transmission
100%
90%
80%
Percent of Transmission Substations
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1
1
2
1
6
4
1
5
1
4
8
1
9
7
Single Contingency Only
9
6
1
2
5
Double Contingency
Source/Calculation:AS.3.1
Volume: T&D Substation Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6394
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1390
1
8
1
2
1
2
3
2
0
2
2
1
3
1
0
3
1
7
Other
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
Regular
Substations Designed to Overcome Contingency
Failure (cont.)
Transmission
What percent of your transmission substations are designed to overcome contingency failure?
NA
Source/Calculation:AS.3.99
Volume: T&D Substation Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600247
Page:1390.1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
Regular
Distribution Substation Power Transformers Percent in
Service
By Age
100%
Percent in Service
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
1
1
2
1
8
1
4
1
9
9
Less than 30 years old
1
2
8
1
6
31 to 40 years old
1
1
7
1
5
1
3
41 to 50 years old
Source/Calculation:AS.4.1/SUM{AS.4}
Volume: T&D Substation Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600054
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1390.2
4
1
0
7
51 to 60 years old
3
2
0
5
2
2
2
3
6
2
1
> 60 years old
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
Regular
Transmission Substation Power/Autotransformers
Percent in Service
By Age
100%
Percent in Service
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
1
1
1
8
1
4
1
9
1
2
8
Less than 30 years old
9
1
1
5
31 to 40 years old
5
4
2
1
6
41 to 50 years old
Source/Calculation:AS.6.1/SUM{AS.6}
Volume: T&D Substation Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600053
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1390.3
6
7
2
0
51 to 60 years old
1
0
1
3
1
7
2
3
3
2
2
2
1
> 60 years old
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
Regular
Percentage of Distribution Substation Breakers
Put in Service by Decade
120%
Percent of Distribution Substation Breakers
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
5
8
1
2
1
3
1
2000s
1
6
9
1990s
1
7
1
8
1980s
1
9
1
4
1970s
2
1
5
1960s
Source/Calculation:AS.5.8
Volume: T&D Substation Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:40200
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1392
2
0
2
2
1950s
2
3
3
1940s
1
0
7
2
1
6
4
1
1
Pre-1940
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
Regular
Percentage of Transmission Substation Breakers
Put in Service by Decade
100%
90%
80%
Percent of Transmission Substation Breakers
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
5
9
4
1
2
1
2000s
1
6
8
1990s
1
9
1
4
1980s
1
8
2
1970s
1
5
1
1
1960s
Source/Calculation:AS.7.8
Volume: T&D Substation Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:40202
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1394
1
3
2
2
1950s
2
1
2
0
1940s
3
6
7
2
3
1
0
1
7
Pre-1940
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
Regular
Estimate of the Types of Transmission Substations
100%
90%
80%
Percent
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
8
1
6
1
5
1
4
1
1
1
9
1
9
5
4
2
1
2
1
8
2
1
1
7
2
2
2
3
2
0
1
3
1
0
7
6
3
Type 1 - Including: fault interrupting breakers, control building, protective relays, communications and SCADA
Type 2 - Including: predominately transformer protection only (e.g.. High side fuse), and low side circuit protection w ith breakers or reclos
Other
Source/Calculation:AS.8.1
Volume: T&D Substation Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300086
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1395
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
Regular
Estimate of the Types of Transmission Substations
(cont.)
Source/Calculation:AS.8.99
Volume: T&D Substation Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600245
Page:1395.1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
Regular
Estimate of the Types of Distribution Substations
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
Percent
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
1
8
1
4
2
1
2
1
9
1
1
5
8
1
1
3
1
6
1
7
9
1
5
4
3
2
2
2
0
1
0
6
7
2
3
2
1
Type 1 - Including: fault interrupting breakers, control building, protective relays, communications and SCADA
Type 2 - Including: predominately transformer protection only (e.g.. High side fuse), and low side circuit protection w ith breakers or reclos
Type 3 - Distribution Pole Top Substations
Other
Source/Calculation:AS.9.1
Volume: T&D Substation Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300085
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1396
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
Regular
Estimate of the Types of Distribution Substations
(cont.)
Source/Calculation:AS.9.99
Volume: T&D Substation Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600248
Page:1396.1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
Regular
Average Age of Substations and Their Components
Age in Years
Source/Calculation:AS.10.1
Volume: T&D Substation Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1915
Page:1397
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
Regular
Substation Design/Engineering Efficiency
Measurement
Source/Calculation:AS.11.1
Volume: T&D Substation Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1221
Page:1403
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
Regular
Substation Design/Engineering Efficiency
Measurement (cont.)
Source/Calculation:AS.11.99
Volume: T&D Substation Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6571
Page:1404
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
Regular
Percent of Time Spent on "Regular" Duties
Compared to Sum of Project and "Regular" Time
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
46.2%
90.0% => 60.0%
60.0% => 42.0%
42.0% => 28.8%
28.8% => 10.0%
90.0%
9
0
.
0
%
9
0
.
0
%
80.0%
Percent of Time
70.0%
6
0
.
0
%
6
0
.
0
%
60.0%
5
0
.
0
%
50.0%
4
4
.
0
%
4
0
.
0
%
40.0%
3
5
.
0
%
3
0
.
0
%
30.0%
2
5
.
0
%
2
0
.
0
%
20.0%
1
0
.
0
%
10.0%
0.0%
1
9
9
1
5
6
1
7
1
4
2
8
1
1
6
1
1
Source/Calculation:AS.12.1
Volume: T&D Substation Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300921
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1412
4
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
8
1
3
1
2
1
0
7
5
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
Regular
Budget Used for Funds for Substation Project Time
Source/Calculation:AS.13.1
Volume: T&D Substation Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300840
Page:1414
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
Regular
Substation Organization Structure
Source/Calculation:AS.14.1
Volume: T&D Substation Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300842
Page:1416
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
Regular
Use of "Substation Owners"
From Operating Perspective
Source/Calculation:AS.15.1
Volume: T&D Substation Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300571
Page:1417
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Engineering & Design
Regular
Use of "Project Owners" on New Substation
Developments
Source/Calculation:AS.16.1
Volume: T&D Substation Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300572
Page:1418
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Construction
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Pg. 1451 Company-owned Substations Installed Last Year - By Size
Pg. 1451.1 New Substation Transformer Purchase Costs - Per New MVA Put in Service
Pg. 1451.2 Gross T&D Substation Field Construction 2006 ABC Spend - Per Substation MVA Put in Service
Pg. 1451.3 Average Total Installed Capital Costs - Per MVA for New Distribution Substations Put in Service in 2006
Pg. 1451.4 Percent of Total Substation Transformer MVA Installed in 2006 - Using Rebuilt/Rewound Units
Pg. 1451.5 New Substations Put in Service in 2006 - As a Percent of Total Substations in Service
Pg. 1451.6 Upgraded Substations Put in Service in 2006 - As a Percent of Total Substations in Service
Pg. 1451.7 Upgraded Substations Put in Service in 2006 That Included Adding Transformers - As a Percent of Total Substations in Service
Pg. 1451.8 Upgraded Substations Put in Service in 2006 That Included Replacing Transformers - As a Percent of Total Substations in Service
Pg. 1451.9 Upgraded Substations Put in Service in 2006 That Included Adding Switchgear - As a Percent of Total Substations in Service
Pg. 1451.91 Upgraded Substations Put in Service in 2006 That Included Replacing Switchgear - As a Percent of Total Substations in Service
Pg. 1451.92 Percent of Substations in Service - Improved by Adding/Replacing Feeders
Pg. 1451.93 Percent of Substations in Service - Improved by Adding/Upgrading Relaying
Pg. 1451.94 Percent of Substations in Service - Improved by Adding/Upgrading SCADA
Pg. 1451.95 Percent of Substations in Service - Improved by Adding/Replacing Fault Recorders
Pg. 1451.96 Percent of Substations in Service - Improved by Adding/Replacing Wildlife Protection Features
Pg. 1451.97 Percent of Substations in Service - Improved by Adding/Firewall Barriers
Pg. 1451.98 Percent of Substations in Service - Improved by Adding/Replacing Security
XI
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Construction
Regular
Company-owned Substations Installed Last Year
By Size
100%
Percent of Substations
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
6
7
2
1
9
1
2
8
1
3
0-9 MVA
1
7
5
1
10-24 MVA
1
4
1
6
25-49 MVA
1
1
2
0
1
0
50-100 MVA
Source/Calculation:AT.2.1/SUM{AT.2}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Construction, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1218
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1451
2
1
3
9
2
2
4
2
3
1
5
1
8
>100 MVA
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Construction
Regular
New Substation Transformer Purchase Costs
Per New MVA Put in Service
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$22,909
$2,777 <= $5,903
$5,903 <= $13,867
$13,867 <= $29,228
$29,228 <= $73,457
$80,000
$
7
3
,
4
5
7
$70,000
Costs per New MVA
$60,000
$50,000
$
3
8
,
0
6
7
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$
2
,
7
7
7
$
3
,
6
1
1
$
8
,
1
9
4
$
1
3
,
8
6
7
$
2
0
,
3
8
9
$0
7
1
2
6
1
3
5
1
8
1
7
1
4
2
3
4
Source/Calculation:(D.10.6+D.26.6)/SUM{AT.3}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Construction, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2500023
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1451.1
8
9
1
1
1
2
3
1
5
1
6
1
9
2
0
2
1
2
2
1
0
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Construction
Regular
Gross T&D Substation Field Construction 2006 ABC
Spend
Per Substation MVA Put in Service
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$115,636
$12,627 <= $31,452
$31,452 <= $49,948
$49,948 <= $90,802
$90,802 <= $734,695
$800,000
$
7
3
4
,
6
9
5
$700,000
Spend per Substation MVA
$600,000
$500,000
$400,000
$300,000
$200,000
$100,000
$
1
2
,
6
2
7
$
2
5
,
7
9
7
$
3
1
,
3
9
9
$
3
1
,
4
7
0
$
3
3
,
1
8
5
1
7
9
1
3
1
5
$
4
6
,
9
4
0
$
5
2
,
9
5
5
7
1
$
7
0
,
7
4
7
$
7
7
,
9
9
4
6
5
$
1
2
9
,
2
2
8
$
1
4
0
,
5
9
2
$0
1
2
2
1
8
8
2
3
2
2
2
1
Source/Calculation:(SUM{D.5}+(SUM{D.6}-D.6.8)+SUM{D.21}+(SUM{D.22}-D.22.8))/(SUM{AT.3}+SUM{AT.4})
Volume: T&D Substation Field Construction, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600024
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1451.2
2
0
1
9
1
6
1
4
1
1
1
0
4
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Construction
Regular
Average Total Installed Capital Costs
Per MVA for New Distribution Substations Put in Service in 2006
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$54,601
$1 <= $20,323
$20,323 <= $46,167
$46,167 <= $83,116
$83,116 <= $126,521
$140,000
$
1
1
1
,
7
9
1
$120,000
$
1
2
6
,
5
2
1
Costs per MVA
$100,000
$
7
3
,
5
5
7
$80,000
$
4
4
,
8
1
4
$60,000
$40,000
$
8
,
2
6
7
$20,000
$
4
7
,
5
2
0
$
2
4
,
3
4
1
$
1
$0
1
7
1
9
1
2
1
1
8
1
4
1
3
5
2
3
2
2
2
1
Source/Calculation:AR.3.1/AR.3.2
Volume: T&D Substation Field Construction, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2500021
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1451.3
2
0
1
8
1
6
1
5
1
0
9
7
6
4
3
2
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Construction
Regular
Percent of Total Substation Transformer MVA Installed
in 2006
Using Rebuilt/Rewound Units
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
45.73%
38.66% <= 41.24%
41.24% <= 46.05%
46.05% <= 50.54%
50.54% <= 52.17%
60.00%
5
0
.
0
0
%
Percent of MVA
50.00%
40.00%
3
8
.
6
6
%
5
2
.
1
7
%
4
2
.
1
1
%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
1
7
1
5
4
9
1
3
2
3
5
6
7
8
Source/Calculation:SUM{AT.4}/(SUM{AT.3}+SUM{AT.4})
Volume: T&D Substation Field Construction, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600025
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1451.4
1
0
1
1
2
2
3
1
4
1
6
1
8
1
9
2
0
2
1
2
2
1
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Construction
Regular
New Substations Put in Service in 2006
As a Percent of Total Substations in Service
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
0.83%
0.16% <= 0.36%
0.36% <= 0.62%
0.62% <= 0.83%
0.83% <= 3.31%
3.50%
3
.
3
1
%
3.00%
Percent of Substations
2.50%
2.00%
1.50%
1.00%
0.50%
0
.
1
6
%
0
.
2
4
%
0
.
3
6
%
0
.
5
2
%
0
.
6
2
%
0
.
6
2
%
8
6
0
.
8
3
%
0
.
8
4
%
1
6
1
3
0.00%
1
7
2
1
2
1
9
1
4
2
3
2
2
Source/Calculation:SUM{AT.2}/SUM{AQ.6}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Construction, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600026
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1451.5
2
1
2
0
1
8
1
5
1
1
1
0
9
7
5
4
3
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Construction
Regular
Upgraded Substations Put in Service in 2006
As a Percent of Total Substations in Service
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2.08%
0.58% <= 1.35%
1.35% <= 1.98%
1.98% <= 2.69%
2.69% <= 4.76%
5.00%
4
.
7
6
%
Percent of Substations
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1
.
3
0
%
1.00%
0
.
5
8
%
0
.
6
2
%
4
8
1
.
3
9
%
1
.
7
5
%
1
.
9
8
%
2
.
0
9
%
2
.
5
3
%
2
.
8
5
%
3
.
0
6
%
0.00%
1
8
1
5
6
1
7
1
9
1
3
1
2
9
2
Source/Calculation:SUM{AT.5}/SUM{AQ.6}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Construction, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600027
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1451.6
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
6
1
4
1
1
1
0
7
5
3
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Construction
Regular
Upgraded Substations Put in Service in 2006 That
Included Adding Transformers
As a Percent of Total Substations in Service
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
1.37%
0.29% <= 0.50%
0.50% <= 1.05%
1.05% <= 1.42%
1.42% <= 4.76%
5.00%
4
.
7
6
%
Percent of Upgraded Substations
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
0
.
2
9
%
0
.
4
9
%
0
.
5
0
%
1
7
6
1
.
0
2
%
1
.
0
5
%
9
1
9
1
.
1
1
%
1
.
4
2
%
1
.
6
9
%
0.00%
4
1
5
1
2
1
3
2
2
3
2
2
Source/Calculation:AT.6.1/SUM{AQ.6}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Construction, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2500017
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1451.7
2
1
2
0
1
8
1
6
1
4
1
1
1
0
8
7
5
3
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Construction
Regular
Upgraded Substations Put in Service in 2006 That
Included Replacing Transformers
As a Percent of Total Substations in Service
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
1.03%
0.12% <= 0.67%
0.67% <= 1.09%
1.09% <= 1.39%
1.39% <= 2.04%
2.50%
2
.
0
4
%
Percent of Upgraded Substations
2.00%
1.50%
1.00%
0
.
6
2
%
0.50%
0
.
1
2
%
0
.
8
4
%
1
.
0
5
%
1
.
1
2
%
1
.
3
0
%
1
.
4
2
%
1
.
4
8
%
0
.
2
9
%
0.00%
6
4
8
1
5
1
9
1
3
1
8
1
2
1
7
9
2
3
Source/Calculation:AT.6.2/SUM{AQ.6}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Construction, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2500016
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1451.8
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
6
1
4
1
1
1
0
7
5
3
2
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Construction
Regular
Upgraded Substations Put in Service in 2006 That
Included Adding Switchgear
As a Percent of Total Substations in Service
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
0.90%
0.37% <= 0.52%
0.52% <= 0.71%
0.71% <= 1.00%
1.00% <= 2.04%
2.50%
2
.
0
4
%
Percent of Upgraded Substations
2.00%
1.50%
0
.
8
4
%
1.00%
0.50%
0
.
3
7
%
0
.
4
9
%
1
.
0
5
%
0
.
5
8
%
0.00%
6
1
7
4
1
3
1
9
9
1
4
2
3
5
7
Source/Calculation:AT.6.3/SUM{AQ.6}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Construction, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2500015
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1451.9
8
1
0
1
1
2
2
3
1
5
1
6
1
8
2
0
2
1
2
2
1
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Construction
Regular
Upgraded Substations Put in Service in 2006 That
Included Replacing Switchgear
As a Percent of Total Substations in Service
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
0.74%
0.28% <= 0.34%
0.34% <= 0.69%
0.69% <= 1.09%
1.09% <= 1.30%
1.40%
1
.
3
0
%
1.20%
1
.
0
2
%
Percent of Upgraded Substations
1.00%
0.80%
0.60%
0.40%
0
.
2
8
%
0
.
3
6
%
0.20%
0.00%
1
3
1
2
9
1
8
1
4
2
3
4
5
6
7
Source/Calculation:AT.6.4/SUM{AQ.6}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Construction, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600028
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1451.91
8
1
1
1
2
3
1
5
1
6
1
7
1
9
2
0
2
1
2
2
1
0
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Construction
Regular
Percent of Substations in Service
Improved by Adding/Replacing Feeders
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
8.65%
1.15% <= 2.27%
2.27% <= 5.06%
5.06% <= 7.73%
7.73% <= 39.55%
40.00%
3
9
.
5
5
%
35.00%
Percent of Substations
30.00%
25.00%
1
8
.
5
1
%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
1
.
1
5
%
1
.
3
0
%
1
7
1
8
1
.
7
5
%
2
.
7
9
%
3
.
7
3
%
5
.
0
6
%
5
.
8
3
%
6
.
2
8
%
9
.
1
8
%
0.00%
6
1
5
8
1
3
4
1
9
9
1
2
1
4
Source/Calculation:AT.8.1/SUM{AQ.6}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Construction, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2500013
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1451.92
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
6
1
1
1
0
7
5
3
2
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Construction
Regular
Percent of Substations in Service
Improved by Adding/Upgrading Relaying
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
8.43%
0.82% <= 3.31%
3.31% <= 7.45%
7.45% <= 10.77%
10.77% <= 23.56%
25.00%
2
3
.
5
6
%
1
6
.
8
8
%
Percent of Substations
20.00%
15.00%
1
0
.
3
2
%
10.00%
5.00%
0
.
8
2
%
1
.
7
5
%
2
.
2
5
%
4
.
3
7
%
6
.
6
2
%
7
.
4
5
%
7
.
5
2
%
8
1
5
1
1
.
2
2
%
0.00%
1
7
6
1
3
4
1
4
1
2
9
1
8
1
9
Source/Calculation:AT.8.2/SUM{AQ.6}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Construction, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600029
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1451.93
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
6
1
1
1
0
7
5
3
2
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Construction
Regular
Percent of Substations in Service
Improved by Adding/Upgrading SCADA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
3.10%
0.16% <= 1.05%
1.05% <= 2.85%
2.85% <= 3.73%
3.73% <= 8.15%
9.00%
8
.
1
5
%
8.00%
6
.
1
2
%
Percent of Substations
7.00%
6.00%
5.00%
4.00%
2
.
0
9
%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
0
.
1
6
%
0
.
8
4
%
2
.
8
5
%
2
.
9
2
%
1
2
4
3
.
7
3
%
1
.
0
5
%
0.00%
1
7
1
5
1
9
1
4
8
9
1
3
2
3
2
2
Source/Calculation:AT.8.3/SUM{AQ.6}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Construction, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2500011
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1451.94
2
1
2
0
1
8
1
6
1
1
1
0
7
6
5
3
2
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Construction
Regular
Percent of Substations in Service
Improved by Adding/Replacing Fault Recorders
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2.92%
1.05% <= 1.06%
1.06% <= 1.58%
1.58% <= 3.43%
3.43% <= 7.45%
8.00%
7
.
4
5
%
7.00%
Percent of Substations
6.00%
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
2
.
0
9
%
1
.
0
5
%
1
.
0
7
%
1
4
1
2
1.00%
0.00%
1
9
8
1
3
2
3
4
5
6
7
Source/Calculation:AT.8.4/SUM{AQ.6}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Construction, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2500010
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1451.95
9
1
1
1
2
3
1
5
1
6
1
7
1
8
2
0
2
1
2
2
1
0
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Construction
Regular
Percent of Substations in Service
Improved by Adding/Replacing Wildlife Protection Features
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
4.58%
0.62% <= 1.72%
1.72% <= 2.55%
2.55% <= 7.56%
7.56% <= 11.69%
12.00%
1
1
.
6
9
%
9
.
1
8
%
Percent of Substations
10.00%
7
.
0
2
%
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
0
.
6
2
%
1
.
0
5
%
1
.
9
5
%
2
.
1
4
%
2
.
9
7
%
0.00%
8
1
4
1
5
1
2
1
7
1
3
9
1
8
2
3
2
2
2
1
Source/Calculation:AT.8.5/SUM{AQ.6}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Construction, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2500009
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1451.96
2
0
1
9
1
6
1
1
1
0
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Construction
Regular
Percent of Substations in Service
Improved by Adding/Firewall Barriers
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
1.06%
0.35% <= 0.71%
0.71% <= 1.06%
1.06% <= 1.42%
1.42% <= 1.78%
1.80%
1
.
7
8
%
1.60%
Percent of Substations
1.40%
1.20%
1.00%
0.80%
0.60%
0.40%
0
.
3
5
%
0.20%
0.00%
1
4
1
2
1
3
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Source/Calculation:AT.8.6/SUM{AQ.6}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Construction, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2500008
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1451.97
1
1
1
2
3
1
5
1
6
1
7
1
8
1
9
2
0
2
1
2
2
1
0
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Construction
Regular
Percent of Substations in Service
Improved by Adding/Replacing Security
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
1.80%
0.16% <= 0.62%
0.62% <= 0.84%
0.84% <= 1.46%
1.46% <= 8.54%
9.00%
8
.
5
4
%
8.00%
Percent of Substations
7.00%
6.00%
5.00%
4.00%
2
.
6
0
%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
0
.
1
6
%
0
.
2
8
%
0
.
6
2
%
0
.
7
0
%
8
1
4
0
.
8
4
%
1
.
0
2
%
1
.
4
6
%
0.00%
1
7
1
5
1
3
9
4
1
8
1
2
2
3
2
2
Source/Calculation:AT.8.7/SUM{AQ.6}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Construction, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2500007
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1451.98
2
1
2
0
1
9
1
6
1
1
1
0
7
6
5
3
2
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Pg. 1453 T&D Substation Operations Expenses - Per MWh Transmitted
Pg. 1454 T&D Substation Operations Expenses - Per Total Substation Assets
Pg. 1455 T&D Substation Operations Expenses - Per Substation Total MVA
Pg. 1456 T&D Substation Operations Expenses - Per Adjusted MVA
Pg. 1458 T&D Substation Maintenance Expenses - Per MWh Transmitted
Pg. 1459 T&D Substation Maintenance Expenses - Per Total Substation Assets
Pg. 1460 T&D Substation Maintenance Expenses - Per System Total MVA
Pg. 1461 T&D Substation Maintenance Expenses - Per Adjusted MVA
Pg. 1463 Distribution Substation Operations Expenses - Per Distribution Customer
Pg. 1464 Distribution Substation Operations Expenses - Per MWh Sold
Pg. 1465 Distribution Substation Operations Expenses - Per Distribution MVA
Pg. 1466 Distribution Substation Maintenance Expenses - Per Distribution Customer
Pg. 1467 Distribution Substation Maintenance Expenses - Per Distribution MVA
Pg. 1468 Distribution Substation Maintenance Expenses - Per Distribution Bank
Pg. 1469 Transmission Substation Operations Expenses - Per MWh Transmitted
Pg. 1470 Transmission Substation Operations Expenses - Per Transmission MVA
Pg. 1471.1 Improvement Initiatives Undertaken to Optimize Substation Costs (cont.) - 1 = Lowest, 5 = Highest
Pg. 1472 Transmission Substation Maintenance Expenses - Per Transmission MVA
Pg. 1474 Improvement Initiatives Undertaken to Optimize Substation Costs - 1 = Lowest, 5 = Highest
Pg. 1475 Methods Used to Measure Effectiveness of Preventive Maintenance Program
Pg. 1476 New Technologies Used to Prioritize Maintenance
Pg. 1477 Conduct Routine Root Cause Evaluation of Failures
Pg. 1478 Changes Made Based Upon Root Cause Analysis of Substation Failures
Pg. 1479 Implementation of Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) Program Status
Pg. 1480 Implementation of RCM Program Status (cont.)
Pg. 1481 RCM Implementation Affecting Maintenance Decisions
Pg. 1482 Planned Replacement Program for Substation Components
Pg. 1483 Initiatives in Wildlife Mitigation
Pg. 1484 Initiatives in Wildlife Mitigation (cont.)
Pg. 1485 Transformer & Breaker Diagnostic Testing Program
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations NEXT >>
XII
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Pg. 1486 Transformer & Breaker Diagnostic Testing Program (cont.)
Pg. 1487 Predictive/Diagnostic Tests Used to Change Planned Replacement Cycles
Pg. 1488 Predictive/Diagnostic Tests Used to Change Planned Replacement Cycles (cont.)
Pg. 1489 Diagnostic Tools Used to Evaluate Equipment - Breakers
Pg. 1490 Diagnostic Tools Used to Evaluate Equipment - Transformers
Pg. 1491 New Tests Performed on Substation Equipment
Pg. 1492 Frequency of Infrared Testing for Substation Equipment - In Years
Pg. 1493 Change in Maintenance Cycle Times - Due to Predictive Technology
Pg. 1494 Total Annual Labor Hours Required Specifically to Maintain 3rd Party-Owned Substations - Per MVA 3rd Party-Owned Substations Maintained
Pg. 1498 Determining Maintenance Plan for Major Equipment
Pg. 1498.1 Determining Maintenance Plan for Major Equipment (cont.)
Pg. 1503 Substation Electricians' Qualified to Work on Construction and O&M - Multi-Skilling
<< BACK T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
XIII
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
T&D Substation Operations Expenses
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$0.25
$0.00 <= $0.16
$0.16 <= $0.25
$0.25 <= $0.34
$0.34 <= $0.62
$0.70
$0.60
Expenses per MWh Transmitted
$0.50
$0.40
$0.30
$0.20
$0.10
$0.00
1
1
2
1
0
6
1
0
7
1
1
1
1
1
9
1
0
9
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
0
5
1
1
4
1
1
3
Transmission
1
2
3
1
0
4
1
1
5
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
0
2
1
0
1
1
0
8
1
1
6
1
1
8
1
2
2
1
0
3
Distribution
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.21}/A.2.5
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27161
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1453
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
T&D Substation Operations Expenses
Per Total Substation Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
1.40%
0.19% <= 0.86%
0.86% <= 1.32%
1.32% <= 1.69%
1.69% <= 3.39%
3.50%
3.00%
Expenses per Assets
2.50%
2.00%
1.50%
1.00%
0.50%
0.00%
1
0
6
1
1
2
1
1
9
1
1
4
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
0
9
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
Transmission
1
1
7
1
0
7
1
2
3
1
0
4
1
1
5
1
0
2
1
0
1
1
0
8
1
1
6
1
1
8
1
0
5
1
0
3
Distribution
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.21}/SUM{B.11}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2108
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1454
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
T&D Substation Operations Expenses
Per Substation Total MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$427
$66 <= $360
$360 <= $440
$440 <= $464
$464 <= $1,122
$1,200
$1,000
Expenses per MVA
$800
$600
$400
$200
$0
1
0
6
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
5
1
0
9
1
2
0
1
0
7
1
1
3
1
1
4
1
1
9
Transmission
1
2
1
1
2
3
1
0
4
1
1
5
1
1
7
1
0
2
1
0
1
1
0
8
1
1
6
1
1
8
1
2
2
1
0
3
Distribution
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.21}/(SUM{AQ.13}+SUM{AQ.12})
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:627
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1455
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
T&D Substation Operations Expenses
Per Adjusted MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$1,312
$199 <= $702
$702 <= $992
$992 <= $1,390
$1,390 <= $5,205
$6,000
$5,000
Expenses per Adjusted MVA
$4,000
$3,000
$2,000
$1,000
$0
1
0
6
1
1
2
1
0
7
1
1
9
1
2
0
1
0
9
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
5
1
1
0
1
1
4
Transmission
1
0
4
1
1
5
1
1
7
1
0
2
1
0
1
1
0
8
1
1
3
1
2
3
1
1
6
1
1
8
1
2
2
1
0
3
Distribution
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.21}/((SUM{AQ.12}*AQ.14.2)+(SUM{AQ.13}*AQ.14.1))
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2113
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1456
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
T&D Substation Maintenance Expenses
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$0.31
$0.01 <= $0.11
$0.11 <= $0.19
$0.19 <= $0.27
$0.27 <= $1.48
$1.60
$1.40
Expenses per MWh Transmitted
$1.20
$1.00
$0.80
$0.60
$0.40
$0.20
$0.00
1
1
2
1
0
7
1
1
0
1
2
3
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
0
6
1
0
5
1
1
3
1
0
9
1
1
9
Transmission
1
1
4
1
0
4
1
1
5
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
0
2
1
0
1
1
0
8
1
1
6
1
1
8
1
2
2
1
0
3
Distribution
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.23}/A.2.5
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27162
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1458
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
T&D Substation Maintenance Expenses
Per Total Substation Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
1.39%
0.47% <= 0.93%
0.93% <= 1.17%
1.17% <= 1.67%
1.67% <= 3.00%
3.00%
2.50%
Expenses per Assets
2.00%
1.50%
1.00%
0.50%
0.00%
1
1
0
1
2
3
1
2
1
1
0
6
1
1
3
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
0
1
0
7
1
1
9
Transmission
1
0
9
1
1
4
1
2
2
1
0
4
1
1
5
1
0
2
1
0
1
1
0
8
1
1
6
1
1
8
1
0
5
1
0
3
Distribution
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.23}/SUM{B.11}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2106
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1459
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
T&D Substation Maintenance Expenses
Per System Total MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$523
$132 <= $259
$259 <= $294
$294 <= $488
$488 <= $1,674
$1,800
$1,600
$1,400
Expenses per MVA
$1,200
$1,000
$800
$600
$400
$200
$0
1
1
0
1
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
0
5
1
0
7
1
1
2
1
0
6
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
0
9
Transmission
1
1
9
1
1
4
1
0
4
1
1
5
1
1
7
1
0
2
1
0
1
1
0
8
1
1
6
1
1
8
1
2
2
1
0
3
Distribution
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.23}/(SUM{AQ.12}+SUM{AQ.13})
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:629
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1460
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
T&D Substation Maintenance Expenses
Per Adjusted MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$2,731
$342 <= $833
$833 <= $1,002
$1,002 <= $1,334
$1,334 <= $18,791
$20,000
Expenses per Adjusted MVA
$15,000
$10,000
$5,000
$0
1
0
7
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
0
6
1
1
1
1
0
5
1
1
2
1
2
0
1
0
9
1
1
9
1
1
4
Transmission
1
0
4
1
1
5
1
1
7
1
0
2
1
0
1
1
0
8
1
1
3
1
2
3
1
1
6
1
1
8
1
2
2
1
0
3
Distribution
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.23}/((SUM{AQ.13}*AQ.14.1)+(SUM{AQ.12}*AQ.14.2))
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2111
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1461
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Distribution Substation Operations Expenses
Per Distribution Customer
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$6.92
$1.02 <= $2.96
$2.96 <= $5.34
$5.34 <= $8.68
$8.68 <= $20.55
$25.00
$
2
0
.
5
5
$
1
7
.
0
5
Expenses per Distribution Customer
$20.00
$15.00
$10.00
$5.00
$
1
.
0
2
$
1
.
3
7
$
2
.
2
4
$
2
.
3
6
$
2
.
5
0
1
1
2
1
1
9
1
2
0
$
3
.
4
2
$
3
.
5
5
$
3
.
7
4
1
2
2
1
0
5
1
0
9
$
5
.
1
8
$
5
.
3
4
$
5
.
6
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
2
1
$
8
.
2
2
$
8
.
4
6
$
8
.
6
4
$
8
.
7
1
1
0
1
1
0
2
1
1
4
1
0
3
$
1
0
.
5
7
$
1
2
.
8
7
$0.00
1
1
0
1
0
6
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.25}/A.2.2
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:534
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1463
1
1
3
1
0
4
1
1
7
1
2
3
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
8
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Distribution Substation Operations Expenses
Per MWh Sold
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$0.22
$0.03 <= $0.11
$0.11 <= $0.14
$0.14 <= $0.24
$0.24 <= $1.04
$1.20
$
1
.
0
4
Expenses per MWh Sold
$1.00
$0.80
$0.60
$
0
.
4
7
$0.40
$0.20
$
0
.
0
3
$
0
.
0
5
$
0
.
0
6
1
0
6
1
1
2
$
0
.
1
0
$
0
.
1
2
$
0
.
1
2
$
0
.
1
3
$
0
.
1
4
1
2
2
1
2
0
1
0
5
1
0
9
$
0
.
1
6
$
0
.
1
8
$
0
.
2
0
$
0
.
2
8
$
0
.
2
8
1
1
3
1
1
4
$0.00
1
1
0
1
1
9
1
0
7
1
2
1
1
1
1
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.25}/A.2.4
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27163
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1464
1
1
7
1
2
3
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Distribution Substation Operations Expenses
Per Distribution MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$569
$78 <= $235
$235 <= $445
$445 <= $548
$548 <= $1,638
$1,800
$1,600
$
1
,
6
2
5
$
1
,
6
3
8
1
0
5
1
2
3
Expenses per Distribution MVA
$1,400
$1,200
$1,000
$
8
1
7
$800
$600
$400
$200
$
7
8
$
9
5
1
1
0
1
0
6
$
1
6
5
$
2
3
5
$
3
4
1
$
3
5
9
1
2
0
1
1
1
$
4
4
5
$
5
1
3
$
5
4
5
$
5
4
8
1
1
3
1
0
9
$0
1
1
2
1
1
9
1
0
7
1
2
1
1
1
4
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.25}/SUM{AQ.13}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:536
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1465
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Distribution Substation Maintenance Expenses
Per Distribution Customer
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$5.07
$0.79 <= $2.05
$2.05 <= $3.69
$3.69 <= $6.19
$6.19 <= $27.81
$30.00
$
2
7
.
8
1
Expenses per Distribution Customer
$25.00
$20.00
$15.00
$10.00
$5.00
$
0
.
7
9
$
0
.
8
6
$
0
.
9
8
$
1
.
0
2
1
0
2
1
0
3
1
0
1
1
0
4
$
1
.
9
3
$
2
.
1
6
1
1
0
1
2
3
$
3
.
1
1
$
3
.
2
9
$
3
.
6
0
1
0
5
1
0
7
1
2
1
$
3
.
6
9
$
3
.
9
7
$
3
.
9
9
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
0
$
4
.
8
0
$
5
.
9
3
$
6
.
4
6
$
6
.
5
5
1
2
2
1
0
9
$
7
.
0
6
$
8
.
4
0
$0.00
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.27}/A.2.2
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:540
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1466
1
1
2
1
0
6
1
1
7
1
1
9
1
1
4
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
8
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Distribution Substation Maintenance Expenses
Per Distribution MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$657
$147 <= $256
$256 <= $355
$355 <= $837
$837 <= $2,628
$3,000
$
2
,
6
2
8
Expenses per Distribution MVA
$2,500
$2,000
$
1
,
4
2
3
$1,500
$
8
3
7
$1,000
$500
$
1
4
7
$
1
7
3
$
2
0
5
1
1
0
1
2
3
1
1
3
$
2
5
6
$
2
7
4
1
1
1
1
0
7
$
3
2
9
$
3
5
5
1
2
1
1
1
2
$
4
1
1
$
9
5
9
$
5
4
4
$0
1
0
6
1
2
0
1
1
9
1
0
9
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.27}/SUM{AQ.13}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:542
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1467
1
0
5
1
1
4
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Distribution Substation Maintenance Expenses
Per Distribution Bank
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$19,555
$4,102 <= $6,327
$6,327 <= $14,719
$14,719 <= $18,537
$18,537 <= $101,725
$120,000
$
1
0
1
,
7
2
5
Expenses per Distribution Bank
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$
4
,
1
0
2
$
4
,
3
6
6
$
5
,
6
2
2
$
6
,
3
2
7
$
6
,
8
0
6
1
0
7
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
$
1
0
,
2
8
8
$
1
4
,
7
1
9
$
1
5
,
7
7
9
1
1
9
1
0
9
$
1
8
,
1
1
4
$
1
8
,
5
3
7
$
1
9
,
7
3
2
1
1
2
1
0
5
1
0
6
$
2
8
,
1
0
3
$0
1
2
0
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.27}/SUM{AQ.3}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27346
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1468
1
1
3
1
1
4
1
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Substation Operations Expenses
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$0.117
$0.000 <= $0.044
$0.044 <= $0.096
$0.096 <= $0.189
$0.189 <= $0.249
$0.250
$
0
.
1
7
7
Expenses per MWh Transmitted
$0.200
$
0
.
1
9
3
$
0
.
2
3
6
$
0
.
2
4
9
1
1
0
1
1
4
$0.150
$0.100
$0.050
$
0
.
0
0
0
$
0
.
0
0
0
1
1
2
1
0
6
$
0
.
0
9
0
$
0
.
0
9
3
1
2
1
1
1
9
$
0
.
1
0
0
$
0
.
0
2
9
$0.000
1
2
3
1
0
9
1
0
5
1
1
3
1
2
2
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.21}/A.2.5
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:535
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1469
1
2
0
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Substation Operations Expenses
Per Transmission MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$314
$2 <= $171
$171 <= $319
$319 <= $473
$473 <= $646
$700
$
6
4
6
$
5
6
8
$600
$
5
0
1
Expenses per Transmission MVA
$500
$
3
6
3
$400
$300
$
2
2
9
$
3
9
0
$
2
7
5
$
1
5
2
$200
$100
$
2
$
1
7
$0
1
0
6
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
0
5
1
0
9
1
1
4
1
1
3
1
2
0
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
2
2
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.21}/SUM{AQ.12}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:537
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1470
1
1
9
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Improvement Initiatives Undertaken to Optimize
Substation Costs (cont.)
1 = Lowest, 5 = Highest
Please rank the initiatives you have undertaken to optimize substation maintenance costs?
Hired Maintenance Program Manager
Predictive Maintenance
Source/Calculation:AU.2.99
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600252
Page:1471.1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Substation Maintenance Expenses
Per Transmission MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$387
$106 <= $158
$158 <= $306
$306 <= $419
$419 <= $1,401
$1,600
$
1
,
4
0
1
$1,400
Expenses per Transmission MVA
$1,200
$1,000
$800
$600
$400
$200
$
1
0
6
$
1
1
7
1
0
6
1
1
0
$
1
3
6
$
2
2
4
$
3
0
4
$
3
0
7
1
1
3
1
2
3
$
3
9
9
$
4
2
6
$
4
5
3
$0
1
0
5
1
1
2
1
0
9
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
4
1
2
2
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.23}/SUM{AQ.12}
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:543
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1472
1
1
9
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Improvement Initiatives Undertaken to Optimize
Substation Costs
1 = Lowest, 5 = Highest
Source/Calculation:AU.2.1
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:7142
Page:1474
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Methods Used to Measure Effectiveness of Preventive
Maintenance Program
How do you measure the effectiveness of the preventive maintenance program?
Actual vs estimated time - preventative vs corrective - percent complete
Being evaluated,
effective, results are in resulting reliability and O & M costs
Effectiveness is measured by degree of equipment life extension, reliability metrics, cost metrics.
Fewer outages caued by S.S. equipment
Good, continuously evaluating.
Information system, maintenance audit
Level of increase in corrective maintenance work in the backlog.
Maintenance feedback, failure rates of equipment
Measure of forced outages.
Monthly Performance Indicator reports track PM completions YTD and number of overdue PMs. Additionally, we track the reduction of transmission and substation equipment
contribution to system SAIFI and CAIDI, as well as bus outages and euipment failures.
Number of breaker operations; misoperations;trouble reporting system for 21 unique equipment types.
Number of outages/failures
Target vs. actual cost, number of outages from equipment failures, and number of customer interruptions from equipment failures
The reduction in SAIFI, bus ouages, equipment failures, and reduction in CM backlog
Track Diagnostic VS. Overall maintenance, corrective work, equipment performance, maintenance compliance
Source/Calculation:AU.3.1
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:40206
Page:1475
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
New Technologies Used to Prioritize Maintenance
What new technologies are used to prioritize maintenance?
circuit breakers signature analysis, enhanced oil analysis for transformer LTC maintenance.
Computer based Maintenance Management System with priority coding for corrective only
DGA, Infrared
DGA; detailed inrared inspections; Doble testing.
Diagnostic testing (DGA, power factor, SFRA, etc.). We have just begun using TDS for repairing oil leaks. That has not been a big help in reducint outage time and manpower
requirements.
Infrared camera, P1 Breaker profiler
infrared thermography, oil sampling
Maintenance and rsk management software.
Oil tests, Infrared
See answer AU3
Sweep Frequency Response Analysis (SFRA)
TASA, BOA, thermal scanning, TCA
We have just begun using TDS for repairing oil leaks. That has been a big help in reducing outage time and manpower requirements.
Source/Calculation:AU.4.1
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:65235
Page:1476
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Conduct Routine Root Cause Evaluation of Failures
Source/Calculation:AU.5.1
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6278
Page:1477
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Changes Made Based Upon Root Cause Analysis of
Substation Failures
What changes have you made based upon root cause analysis of substation failures?
Adding surge arresters to some substations, adding inverters for HMI power supply
Arrester upgrade to MCOV LTC oil filtration units, transformer differential monitoring, cool cell units for statin batteries.
Changes in new equipment specifications, new or changed maintenance practices.
Eliminated tertiary feeds to reactors
Extend maintenance frequency cycle
Improvements in animal proffing, relay setting changes, thermography is included in routine substation inspections, adjusted maintenance frequncies and tasks.
Improvements in animal proofing, relay setting changes, thermography included inrouine substation inspections, adjusted maintenance frequencies and tasks.
Increased inspections and replace equipment on a planned time interval; Relay modifications
Increased intervals of infrared inspection on all substation components.
maintenance practices, new equipment specifications
Manufacturer/model specific programs - pro-active maintenance and replacemment programs
None
Relay settings
Work practices and design practices.
Source/Calculation:AU.6.1
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:65236
Page:1478
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Implementation of Reliability Centered Maintenance
(RCM) Program Status
Source/Calculation:AU.7.1
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1123
Page:1479
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Implementation of RCM Program Status (cont.)
What is the status of implementation of Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM)?
Implementing where cost effective
Source/Calculation:AU.7.99
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6567
Page:1480
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
RCM Implementation Affecting Maintenance Decisions
If you have implemented RCM, how is it affecting maintenance decisions?
Affecting budget prioritization and scope of planned maintenance.
Allows for targeted spending
Best maintenance practices determined using equipment and industry trends
Extended maint. cycles
Gas breaker maintenance has moved towards condition based intervals based on diagnostic testing.
Higher levels of maintenance controlled by patrols and condition monitoring.
intervals and maintenance types are changed
Maintenance decisions are based on the data collected. Affecting budget prioritization and scope of planned maintnenace.
Prevents unnecessary work.
Priortorizing maintenance work on the most important substation and equipment.
Yes, extending maintenance cycle and end of life evaluation
Source/Calculation:AU.8.1
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:65237
Page:1481
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Planned Replacement Program for Substation
Components
Source/Calculation:AU.9.1
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:3050
Page:1482
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Initiatives in Wildlife Mitigation
Source/Calculation:AU.10.1
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2739
Page:1483
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Initiatives in Wildlife Mitigation (cont.)
What are your initiatives in wildlife mitigation in substations?
Animal barriers installed on equipment
animal guards
Bird netting
Habitat control/removal
Professional rodent control services (Ehlich, etc.); animal guards applied to lower voltage (typically just 12kV) transformer and CB bushings.
Source/Calculation:AU.10.99
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6624
Page:1484
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Transformer & Breaker Diagnostic Testing Program
Source/Calculation:AU.11.1
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1621
Page:1485
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Transformer & Breaker Diagnostic Testing Program
(cont.)
Source/Calculation:AU.11.99
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6605
Page:1486
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Predictive/Diagnostic Tests Used to Change Planned
Replacement Cycles
Source/Calculation:AU.12.1
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27050
Page:1487
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Predictive/Diagnostic Tests Used to Change Planned
Replacement Cycles (cont.)
Which of the following predictive/diagnostic tests have you used to change planned
replacement cycles?
TASA's on LTC's (won't do LTC maintenance if TASA show's it's OK.
Source/Calculation:AU.12.99
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:7155
Page:1488
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Diagnostic Tools Used to Evaluate Equipment
Breakers
Identify what diagnostic tools you use to evaluate the following equipment?
Contact resistance, power factor, oil and gas analysis
DGA, Infrared
Doble PF, Timing, ductor.
Doble power factor tests; Doble timing tests; "Crakker" sequence of events analyzer; infrared camera.
Doble, BOA, timing test, and Kelman 1st trip test
Doble, breaker timing
Doble, Kelman, SF6 Tester, Ductor, Infrared Scan
Ductor, Oil Quality (kV), Infrared, Doble Speed Test, P1 Profiler, Condition Base Maintenance (# of fault operation algorithum)
Inservice prifile timing, oil dielectric tests, SF6 moisture/purity/arc byproduct tests, Doble power factor tests, Infra red scans, contact resistance tests.
Motion analyzer, power factor, ductur resistance
oil sampling, IR, PF
Oil sampling, thermography, power factor testing, travel timing tests
Power factor, infrared, gas analysis
reliability data
Travel test, P1/P2 timing test, power factor, oil quality, thermography, contact resistance, moisture in SF6 and gas purity
Source/Calculation:AU.13.1
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300226
Page:1489
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Diagnostic Tools Used to Evaluate Equipment
Transformers
Identify what diagnostic tools you use to evaluate the following equipment?
DGA, Infrared
DGA, Oil Quality, Meggar, TTR, Infrared, Doble Power Factor, FRA (Frequency Response Analyser)
DGA, thermography, oil quality, guage verification, power factor, LV excitation, TTR, winding resistance, SFRA, limited acoustic testing for PD
DGA/Oil quality testing, Doble power factor tests, transformer turns ratio test, Infra red scans, Sweep frequency response analysis tests.
Doble PF, TTR megger, winding resistance, leakage reactance, frequency response.
Doble power factor tests; DGA; infrared
Doble, DGA, Infrared, Paper insulation testing
Doble, DGA, TASA, online monitoring, Furan analysis, Corrosive Sulfur, TCA
Gas in oil
Oil analysis, Framit, Sonic, Infrared Scan
oil and gas sampling, IR
Oil quality, dga, thermography, power factor testing, TTR, tap changer continuity, FRA
On line monitoring, microprocessor relay monitoring, trending capacitance changes of windings, infrared, DGA main tank and tap changer
Power factor, incipent and dissolved gas analysis, oil dielectric test, ratio test
relaibility data, DGA and oil analysis
TGR, meggar, framet, DGA, power factor
Source/Calculation:AU.13.2
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300479
Page:1490
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
New Tests Performed on Substation Equipment
What new tests are you performing on substation equipment?
acoustical monitoring, corona
Doble Frequency Response Analyser on transformers.
FRAMIT
Frequency Response Analysis (FRA)
Frequency response analysis (FRA)
Infrared scan
None
None
Sweep Frequency Response Analysis (SFRA)
TCA
Use "Crakker" analyzer device when necessary to evaluate sequence of events for stuborn breaker mechanism operation problems and as a temporary annunciator to capture
spurious, non-latching alarms initiations at non-SCADA substations.
Vibration Analysis, Accoustic Analysis, Partial Discharge Analysis
vibro-acoustic analysis on tap changers
Source/Calculation:AU.14.1
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:65238
Page:1491
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Frequency of Infrared Testing for Substation
Equipment
In Years
Source/Calculation:AU.15.1
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1068
Page:1492
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Change in Maintenance Cycle Times
Due to Predictive Technology
If you have changed maintenance cycles in the last year, what were the changes and why?
Decreased intervals on 15kv or greater potential devices based on equipment trends in the industry.
Distribution vacuum breaker cycle shortened from 12 to 6 years due to observed failures.
Extended interval on certain gas breakers/switches after gaining several years of operating experience.
Financial driven change of Doble PF test on bushings from 4 to 8 years.
Maintenance cycles extended based on age of equipment to help reduce costs.
no
No change.
Question not marked
Run through neutral went from 6 years to 3. Vacuum circuit breaker maintenance went from 12 years to 6. All based on engineering review of the PDM and maintenance history
information.
Source/Calculation:AU.16.1
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1018
Page:1493
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Total Annual Labor Hours Required Specifically to
Maintain 3rd Party-Owned Substations
Per MVA 3rd Party-Owned Substations Maintained
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
3.9
0.1 <= 0.5
0.5 <= 2.8
2.8 <= 6.2
6.2 <= 9.9
10.0
9
.
9
9.0
8.0
Hours per MVA
7.0
6.0
5
.
0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0
.
1
0
.
6
0.0
1
9
1
1
8
1
8
1
3
2
3
4
5
6
7
Source/Calculation:AU.17.1/AQ.11.1
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27479
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1494
9
1
1
2
2
3
1
4
1
5
1
6
1
7
2
0
2
1
2
2
1
0
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Determining Maintenance Plan for Major Equipment
Source/Calculation:AU.19.1
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300227
Page:1498
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Determining Maintenance Plan for Major Equipment
(cont.)
How do you determine your maintenance plan for major equipment (breakers, transformers)?
Condition directed on 13.8kv oil breakers
Y, RCM
Source/Calculation:AU.19.99
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600253
Page:1498.1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Substation Electricians' Qualified to Work on
Construction and O&M
Multi-Skilling
Source/Calculation:AU.20.1
Volume: T&D Substation Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6284
Page:1503
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Pg. 1504 Methods Used to Determine Aging Substation Equipment
Pg. 1504.1 Methods Used to Determine Aging Substation Equipment (cont.)
Pg. 1505 Refurbishment and/or Replacement Policies for Major Substation Equipment Currently Used
Pg. 1506 Activities Included in a Typical Load Tap Changer Refurbishment
Pg. 1507 Activities Included in Refurbishment of a Typical Load Tap Changer (LTC) (cont.)
Pg. 1508 Methods Used to Detect Substation Equipment Deterioration Failures
Pg. 1509 Methods Used to Detect Substation Equipment Deterioration Failures (cont.)
Pg. 1510 Preventive Maintenance Period Much Longer Than the Average Duration of the Optimal Preventive Replacement Interval - For Major Substation Equipment
Pg. 1511 Definition of Substation "Refurbishment"
Pg. 1512 Line Between Refurbishment, Maintenance, and Capital Expenditures
Pg. 1513 Need for Refurbishment of Aging Substation Infrastructure Identification
Pg. 1514 Use of "Fleet" Studies of Substation Equipment to Determine the Need for Refurbishment or Replacement
Pg. 1515 Introduction of New Types of Substation Equipment
Pg. 1516 Introduction of New Types of Substation Equipment (cont.)
Pg. 1517 Procedure for Testing and Verifying New Equipment
XIV
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment
Regular
Methods Used to Determine Aging Substation
Equipment
Source/Calculation:AV.2.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300660
Page:1504
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment
Regular
Methods Used to Determine Aging Substation
Equipment (cont.)
What methods are utilized to determine aging Substation equipment in the system?
Maintenance History
Revenue Cycle Management
Visual inspection, operational history.
Source/Calculation:AV.2.99
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600125
Page:1504.1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment
Regular
Refurbishment and/or Replacement Policies for Major
Substation Equipment Currently Used
What are the refurbishment and/or replacement policies for major substation equipment
currently used in your company?
70% of replacement cost
Equipment determined to have failed by electrical test results; I/S equipment failure
Equipment is replaced if testing indicates failure is imminent.
Equipment type analysis, and business case
Life extension where financially feasible.
Mostly run to failure
No formal poicy. It is based on equipment performance, site and equipment criticality and available funding.
No formal policy, but it is based on equipment performance, site/equipment criticality, and available funding
none
None
Reclosers refurbished based on age, , Batteries replaced based on age and/or condition, , Transformers refurburbished or replaced based on condition on case by case basis,,
Breakers replaced based on condition,
Run to Failure/major problems revealed by diagnostics
Total rebuild or replacement
Transformers are run to failure but have spares. Breakers and relays are replaced based on conditoin, availability of arts, and importance
Under Evaluation
Upgrade
We do not have any refurbish or replacement program, run to failure.
Source/Calculation:AV.3.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300661
Page:1505
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment
Regular
Activities Included in a Typical Load Tap Changer
Refurbishment
Source/Calculation:AV.4.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300754
Page:1506
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment
Regular
Activities Included in Refurbishment of a Typical Load
Tap Changer (LTC) (cont.)
Refurbishment of a typical load tap changer (LTC) includes) which of the following?
Addition of LTC oil filters
Infared Thermography
May include retrofit of a new LTC.
No LTC's
Source/Calculation:AV.4.99
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300755
Page:1507
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment
Regular
Methods Used to Detect Substation Equipment
Deterioration Failures
Source/Calculation:AV.5.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300756
Page:1508
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment
Regular
Methods Used to Detect Substation Equipment
Deterioration Failures (cont.)
What methods are utilized to detect substation equipment deterioration failures?
Equipment diagnostics and failure trend / history
Equipment diagnostics and failure trend / history
IDB (Incidental Database)
Spare parts usage
Testing - Doble, DGA, etc.
Visual inspection, oil analysis, diagnostic testing, operational history, infrared
Source/Calculation:AV.5.99
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300757
Page:1509
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment
Regular
Preventive Maintenance Period Much Longer Than the Average
Duration of the Optimal Preventive Replacement Interval
For Major Substation Equipment
Source/Calculation:AV.6.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300576
Page:1510
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment
Regular
Definition of Substation "Refurbishment"
How is "refurbishment" of a substation defined?
Equipment upgrades and improvements to equipment that is not going to be replaced or equipment that has failed and sent in to a repair shop.
Good as new.
Key equipment improvement / performance and life extension
Key equipment improvement / performance and life extension
none
Not defined
Refurbishment is defined as restoring equipment to a state that results in a life extension beyond what was originally designed/planned.
Replace transofmer, switchgear, control house.
Replacement of all parts that wear
Replacement of bushing, gasket, pump and oil.,
Replacement or refurbishment of 40% to 60% of substation equipment
See Notes
Site and asset specific revamping/replacement/refurbishment/rebuilds
Source/Calculation:AV.7.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300662
Page:1511
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment
Regular
Line Between Refurbishment, Maintenance, and Capital
Expenditures
Where is the line drawn between refurbishment, maintenance, and capital expenditures?
"Replace vs. Maintain/Repair" cost analysis; corporate financial accounting rules for determination of capitalization and maintenance costs.
70% of replacement cost
All expenditures are divided between capital and maintenance dollars. If item can not be paid for in maintenance budget, look to capitalize the cost. Determination if capital or
maintenance on case by case basis.
Cost to benefit analysis.
Decisions regarding the 3 options are determined by repair versus replace costs analysis compared to an on-going cost to maintain
Failure history, Age , Number of Faults, Critical Customers
Maintain - maintenace or refurbishment/Capital - replacement or new installation,
maintenance is done during the life of an asset, refurbishment is done near end of life to extend end of life, and capital expenditures are done at end of life to replace the equipment.
No hard coded rule.
No solid line. Decisions regarding the 3 options are determined by a repair vesus replacement cost analysis compared to on-going cost to maintain.
Prioritization determined by software optimizer
Question not marked
System improvement and upgrades.
Unit of Property is determined by the Property Record Department; 80% refurbishment/replacement
Source/Calculation:AV.8.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300663
Page:1512
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment
Regular
Need for Refurbishment of Aging Substation
Infrastructure Identification
How is the need for refurbishment of aging substation infrastructure identified? Is it an
outgrowth of "normal" survey activity, or are focused surveys specific to refurbishment
conducted?
Based on equipment performance , site/equipment criticality and available funding
Close visual inspections during routine station visits; infrared inspections; electrical monitoring of secondary quantities via SCADA; periodic Doble tests; periodic electrical (relay)
tests.
Combination work management diagnosis. Evaluation system prioritization.
end of life
Equipment in low growth areas; no future system voltage upgrades; diagnostic testing shows good ratings.
focused surveys specific to refurbishment
It is based on equipment performance, site and equipment criticality and available funding.
It is generally an outgrowth of "normal" survey activitiy. Sometimes, after the need is identified, focused surveys specific to refurbishment are conducted to help prioritize.
Load, Age, Condition
Maintenance and survey activities identify degradation and parts availablity/cost issues. These are used to determine need for replacement
Normal study based on MAXIMO, age and maintenance requirements
normal survey activity
Outgrowth of "normal" survey activity.
System planning for load/revenue cycle management for aging asset specific
Typically results from normal activities.
Source/Calculation:AV.9.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300664
Page:1513
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment
Regular
Use of "Fleet" Studies of Substation Equipment to
Determine the Need for Refurbishment or Replacement
Source/Calculation:AV.10.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300577
Page:1514
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment
Regular
Introduction of New Types of Substation Equipment
Source/Calculation:AV.11.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300760
Page:1515
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment
Regular
Introduction of New Types of Substation Equipment
(cont.)
How are new types of substation equipment introduced to your company?
Trade shows and conferences
Source/Calculation:AV.11.99
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300761
Page:1516
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment
Regular
Procedure for Testing and Verifying New Equipment
Source/Calculation:AV.12.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300762
Page:1517
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Pg. 1521 Distribution Substation SCADA Sophistication - Substations with SCADA Equipment Installed
Pg. 1521.1 Distribution Substation SCADA Sophistication (cont.) - Substations with SCADA Equipment Installed
Pg. 1522 Transmission Substation SCADA Sophistication - Substations with SCADA Equipment Installed
Pg. 1522.1 Transmission Substation SCADA Sophistication (cont.) - Substations with SCADA Equipment Installed
Pg. 1523 Transmission Breaker Supervisory Control - EHV Transmission Breakers
Pg. 1524 Transmission Breaker Supervisory Control - HV Transmission Breakers
Pg. 1525 Distribution Breaker Supervisory Control
Pg. 1526 Use On-Line Monitoring of Substation Components
Pg. 1527 Future Strategies for the Use of SCADA in Substations
Pg. 1528 Strategies for the Use of SCADA in Substations (cont.) - Role of Control Center
Pg. 1529 Automated Distribution Substation Components - Status of Automation: N = None, M = Monitored, R = Remote Controlled, D = Distributed (Local Control)
Pg. 1530 Components Where an Increase in the Level of Automation Is Planned - In the Next Three Years (Distribution Substations)
Pg. 1531 Components Where an Increase in the Level of Automation Is Planned (cont.) - In the Next Three Years
XV
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation
Regular
Distribution Substation SCADA Sophistication
Substations with SCADA Equipment Installed
100%
90%
80%
Percent of Substations
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1
8
2
6
1
4
1
2
1
1
9
1
6
5
4
8
7
1
5
9
Full SCADA - Remote Monitoring & Operations
Partial SCADA
SCADA - Monitoring Only
No SCADA - Locally Operated & Monitored
Source/Calculation:AW.2.2
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1035
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1521
1
1
1
3
1
7
2
1
3
2
2
2
0
1
0
2
3
Other
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation
Regular
Distribution Substation SCADA Sophistication (cont.)
Substations with SCADA Equipment Installed
Source/Calculation:AW.2.99
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600249
Page:1521.1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation
Regular
Transmission Substation SCADA Sophistication
Substations with SCADA Equipment Installed
100%
90%
80%
Percent of Substations
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1
6
1
1
9
1
8
1
5
1
4
1
2
9
2
7
6
5
4
8
1
1
2
0
1
7
Full SCADA - Remote Monitoring And Operations
No SCADA - Locally Operated & Monitored
SCADA - Monitoring Only
Other
Source/Calculation:AW.3.2
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1036
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1522
2
1
3
2
3
1
3
1
0
2
2
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation
Regular
Transmission Substation SCADA Sophistication (cont.)
Substations with SCADA Equipment Installed
Source/Calculation:AW.3.99
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600250
Page:1522.1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation
Regular
Transmission Breaker Supervisory Control
EHV Transmission Breakers
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
100%
100% => 100%
100% => 100%
100% => 100%
100% => 100%
100%
90%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
9
1
8
1
6
1
5
1
4
1
2
1
1
8
7
6
5
4
2
1
80%
Percent of Breakers
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Source/Calculation:AW.4.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1039
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1523
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
7
1
3
1
0
9
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation
Regular
Transmission Breaker Supervisory Control
HV Transmission Breakers
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
100%
100% => 100%
100% => 100%
100% => 100%
100% => 100%
100%
90%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
9
1
8
1
6
1
5
1
4
1
2
1
1
9
8
7
6
5
4
2
1
80%
Percent of Breakers
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Source/Calculation:AW.4.2
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1040
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1524
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
7
1
3
1
0
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation
Regular
Distribution Breaker Supervisory Control
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
86%
100% => 100%
100% => 95%
95% => 77%
77% => 46%
100%
90%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
9
5
.
0
%
9
5
.
0
%
9
5
.
0
%
9
5
.
0
%
8
0
.
0
%
80%
7
9
.
0
%
7
0
.
0
%
Percent of Breakers
70%
6
7
.
0
%
60%
4
7
.
5
%
50%
4
6
.
0
%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1
2
1
8
2
1
4
4
6
1
6
1
9
1
8
7
Source/Calculation:AW.4.3
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1041
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1525
1
3
1
5
1
1
1
7
9
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
0
5
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation
Regular
Use On-Line Monitoring of Substation Components
Source/Calculation:AW.5.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6277
Page:1526
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation
Regular
Future Strategies for the Use of SCADA in Substations
Source/Calculation:AW.6.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1046
Page:1527
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation
Regular
Strategies for the Use of SCADA in Substations (cont.)
Role of Control Center
What are your future strategies for the use of SCADA in distribution substations?
Intelligent grid automation
update existing facilities when upgrades are made
Use HMI data for trouble shooting and maintenance periodicity determination/evaulation
Source/Calculation:AW.6.99
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6562
Page:1528
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation
Regular
Automated Distribution Substation Components
Status of Automation: N = None, M = Monitored, R = Remote Controlled, D = Distributed (Local Control)
Source/Calculation:AW.7.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1620
Page:1529
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation
Regular
Components Where an Increase in the Level of
Automation Is Planned
In the Next Three Years (Distribution Substations)
Source/Calculation:AW.8.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:7033
Page:1530
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation
Regular
Components Where an Increase in the Level of
Automation Is Planned (cont.)
In the Next Three Years
In which components do you plan to increase the level of automation in the next three years
(distribution substations)?
Voltage regulators
Source/Calculation:AW.8.99
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Automation, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:7078
Page:1531
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: On-line Monitoring of T&D Substation Components
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Pg. 1532
Pg. 1533
Pg. 1534
Pg. 1535
Pg. 1536
Pg. 1537
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Components Monitored
Components Monitored (cont.)
Percent of Equipment Monitored - T&D Substation Components
T&D Substation Alarm Monitoring - Groups Informed
Group Informed of Monitor Alarms (cont.)
Monitored Data Archived for Later Analysis
XVI
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: On-line Monitoring of T&D Substation Components
Regular
Components Monitored
Source/Calculation:AX.2.1
Volume: Focus Area: On-line Monitoring of T&D Substation Components, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2301001
Page:1532
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: On-line Monitoring of T&D Substation Components
Regular
Components Monitored (cont.)
What components do you monitor?
AC-DC systems, RTUs
Source/Calculation:AX.2.99
Volume: Focus Area: On-line Monitoring of T&D Substation Components, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:65244
Page:1533
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: On-line Monitoring of T&D Substation Components
Regular
Percent of Equipment Monitored
T&D Substation Components
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
71%
100% => 100%
100% => 90%
90% => 63%
63% => 1%
100%
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
9
5
%
9
0
%
9
0
%
90%
7
8
%
80%
7
2
%
Percent of Equipment Monitored
70%
6
3
%
60%
50%
40%
3
0
%
30%
20%
10%
1
%
1
%
1
9
1
0%
1
5
1
4
1
2
2
1
8
1
6
8
1
7
9
7
4
Source/Calculation:AX.3.1
Volume: Focus Area: On-line Monitoring of T&D Substation Components, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:65375
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1534
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
3
1
1
1
0
6
5
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: On-line Monitoring of T&D Substation Components
Regular
T&D Substation Alarm Monitoring
Groups Informed
Source/Calculation:AX.4.1
Volume: Focus Area: On-line Monitoring of T&D Substation Components, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2301002
Page:1535
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: On-line Monitoring of T&D Substation Components
Regular
Group Informed of Monitor Alarms (cont.)
Who is informed of monitor alarms?
Engineering
Process is not built, in the process of implementing systems
Source/Calculation:AX.4.99
Volume: Focus Area: On-line Monitoring of T&D Substation Components, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:65242
Page:1536
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: On-line Monitoring of T&D Substation Components
Regular
Monitored Data Archived for Later Analysis
Source/Calculation:AX.5.1
Volume: Focus Area: On-line Monitoring of T&D Substation Components, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:65091
Page:1537
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Transformer Shops
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Pg. 1546 Power Transformers Purchased Last Year - Percent of Existing Power Transformers
Pg. 1546.1 Spare Distribution Power Transformers - Per Distribution Substation Transformer Bank
Pg. 1546.2 Mobile Distribution Power Transformers - Per Distribution Substation Transformer Bank
Pg. 1547 Accounting for Installation of Power Transformers
Pg. 1551 In-Service Load Serving Load Tap Change Transformers - Percent of In-Service Transformers
Pg. 1552 In-Service Auto Transformation Load Tap Change Transformers - Percent of In-Service Transformers
Pg. 1553 In-Service Load Tap Change Transformers -- Breakdown Unavailable - Percent of In-Service Transformers
XVII
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Transformer Shops
Regular
Power Transformers Purchased Last Year
Percent of Existing Power Transformers
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
1.63%
0.33% <= 1.35%
1.35% <= 1.68%
1.68% <= 1.92%
1.92% <= 2.50%
3.00%
Percent of Existing Power Transformers
2.50%
2.00%
1.50%
1
.
1
7
%
1
.
3
1
%
1
.
3
5
%
1
.
3
8
%
9
5
1
.
5
6
%
1
.
6
8
%
1
.
8
2
%
1
.
8
4
%
1
9
1
8
1
.
9
2
%
2
.
1
5
%
2
.
2
1
%
2
.
5
0
%
1.00%
0.50%
0
.
3
3
%
0.00%
2
4
1
7
1
3
1
5
1
6
1
Source/Calculation:AY.2.1/(SUM{AQ.2}+SUM{AQ.3})
Volume: T&D Substation Transformer Shops, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300979
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1546
1
2
1
4
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
1
0
8
7
6
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Transformer Shops
Regular
Spare Distribution Power Transformers
Per Distribution Substation Transformer Bank
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
0.034
0.004 <= 0.012
0.012 <= 0.027
0.027 <= 0.044
0.044 <= 0.089
0.090
0.080
0
.
0
6
5
Transformers
0.070
0
.
0
7
3
0
.
0
8
9
0.060
0.050
0.040
0.030
0.020
0.010
0
.
0
0
4
0
.
0
0
6
0
.
0
0
9
0
.
0
1
0
0
.
0
1
8
0
.
0
1
9
0
.
0
2
4
0
.
0
3
1
0
.
0
3
5
0
.
0
4
2
0
.
0
4
5
0.000
2
1
4
1
5
1
8
8
4
7
1
6
1
1
2
1
3
Source/Calculation:SUM{AY.4}/SUM{AQ.3}
Volume: T&D Substation Transformer Shops, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2500006
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1546.1
1
7
9
1
9
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
1
0
6
5
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Transformer Shops
Regular
Mobile Distribution Power Transformers
Per Distribution Substation Transformer Bank
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
0.018
0.003 <= 0.008
0.008 <= 0.015
0.015 <= 0.023
0.023 <= 0.064
0.070
0
.
0
6
4
0.060
Transformers
0.050
0.040
0.030
0.020
0.010
0
.
0
0
3
0
.
0
0
4
7
1
2
0
.
0
0
6
0
.
0
0
7
0
.
0
1
1
0
.
0
1
2
0
.
0
1
4
0
.
0
1
6
0
.
0
1
8
0
.
0
2
2
0
.
0
2
3
0
.
0
2
6
0
.
0
2
7
0.000
1
4
1
5
1
4
1
6
1
7
8
9
1
3
Source/Calculation:SUM{AY.6}/SUM{AQ.3}
Volume: T&D Substation Transformer Shops, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2500005
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1546.2
1
8
1
1
1
9
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
0
6
5
3
2
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Transformer Shops
Regular
Accounting for Installation of Power Transformers
How is the installation of power transformers charged (e.g. first installation is capitalized)?
All are capital!
all capital
All installations and replacements are capatilized.
Capitalized
Capitalized
Capitalized
Capitalized
First installation and failure capitalized; Upgrade capitalized
First installation is capitalized
First installation is capitalized
First installation is capitalized
First installation is capitalized
First installation is capitalized
First installation is capitalized
First installation is capitalized.
First intallation is capitalized
Source/Calculation:AY.7.1
Volume: T&D Substation Transformer Shops, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300671
Page:1547
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Transformer Shops
Regular
In-Service Load Serving Load Tap Change
Transformers
Percent of In-Service Transformers
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
61%
6% <= 38%
38% <= 67%
67% <= 84%
84% <= 100%
100%
9
5
%
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
1
2
1
3
4
90%
8
0
%
80%
6
5
%
Percent of Transformers
70%
6
9
%
7
4
%
60%
4
7
%
50%
4
1
%
40%
2
8
%
30%
2
2
%
20%
10%
6
%
0%
1
4
1
9
9
1
1
1
6
1
2
1
7
8
Source/Calculation:AQ.24.1
Volume: T&D Substation Transformer Shops, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27048
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1551
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
8
1
5
1
0
7
6
5
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Transformer Shops
Regular
In-Service Auto Transformation Load Tap Change
Transformers
Percent of In-Service Transformers
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
42%
1% <= 5%
5% <= 30%
30% <= 84%
84% <= 99%
100%
9
0
%
9
8
%
9
9
%
1
2
1
5
90%
7
8
%
80%
Percent of Transformers
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
3
0
%
3
1
%
1
2
2
2
%
20%
10%
1
%
2
%
3
%
9
1
7
8
6
%
0%
1
6
1
9
1
1
1
4
Source/Calculation:AQ.24.2
Volume: T&D Substation Transformer Shops, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27047
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1552
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
8
1
3
1
0
7
6
5
4
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
T&D Substation Transformer Shops
Regular
In-Service Load Tap Change Transformers -Breakdown Unavailable
Percent of In-Service Transformers
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
100%
100% <= 100%
100% <= 100%
100% <= 100%
100% <= 100%
100%
1
0
0
%
90%
80%
Percent of Transformers
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1
8
1
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
Source/Calculation:AQ.24.100
Volume: T&D Substation Transformer Shops, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:10557
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1553
1
1
2
3
1
3
1
4
1
5
1
6
1
7
1
9
2
0
2
1
2
2
1
0
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Pg. 1556
Pg. 1557
Pg. 1558
Pg. 1559
Pg. 1560
Pg. 1561
Pg. 1562
Pg. 1563
Pg. 1564
Pg. 1565
Pg. 1566
Pg. 1567
Pg. 1568
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Years Since Substation Work Management System Was Installed
Substation Work Management System Vendor
Substation Work Management System Vendor (cont.)
Substation Crew Performance Measures
Substation Crew Performance Measures (cont.)
Management Processes Supported by a Computerized Work Management System
Management Processes Supported by a Computerized Work Management System (cont.)
Work Management System Activities
Work Management System Activities (cont.)
Tracking Substation Maintenance Activity by Component
Substation Maintenance Unit Costs Tracked (cont.)
Substation Maintenance Work Coordinated to Minimize Multiple Outages
Substation Maintenance Work Coordinated to Minimize Multiple Outages (cont.)
XVIII
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes
Regular
Years Since Substation Work Management System Was
Installed
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
6
2 <= 4
4 <= 7
7 <= 8
8 <= 12
12
1
2
1
1
Number of Years
10
8
8
4
1
8
6
6
8
6
7
7
7
1
7
1
4
1
2
6
5
4
4
1
5
2
4
3
2
2
0
1
1
1
3
1
8
Source/Calculation:2006-AZ.2.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8173
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1556
7
1
6
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
9
1
0
9
5
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes
Regular
Substation Work Management System Vendor
Source/Calculation:AZ.3.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2735
Page:1557
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes
Regular
Substation Work Management System Vendor (cont.)
Who is the vendor for your substation work management system?
Cascade
Cascade (Maintenance)
Digital Inspections (Cascade)
Marked N/A
Source/Calculation:AZ.3.99
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6620
Page:1558
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes
Regular
Substation Crew Performance Measures
Source/Calculation:AZ.4.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1588
Page:1559
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes
Regular
Substation Crew Performance Measures (cont.)
How is each substation crew's performance measured?
Accounting purposes only; no productivity measures or scheduling are utilized.
Adherance to Schedule
Marked N/A
Project schedule.
Source/Calculation:AZ.4.99
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6600
Page:1560
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes
Regular
Management Processes Supported by a Computerized
Work Management System
Source/Calculation:AZ.5.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2733
Page:1561
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes
Regular
Management Processes Supported by a Computerized
Work Management System (cont.)
Which of the following management processes are supported by a computerized Work
Management System?
Accounting purposes only; no productivity measures or scheduling are utilized.
Question not marked
Source/Calculation:AZ.5.99
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6618
Page:1562
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes
Regular
Work Management System Activities
Source/Calculation:AZ.6.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2734
Page:1563
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes
Regular
Work Management System Activities (cont.)
What type of activities are covered by the work management system?
Compliance Audit
Question not marked
Source/Calculation:AZ.6.99
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6619
Page:1564
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes
Regular
Tracking Substation Maintenance Activity by
Component
Source/Calculation:AZ.7.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6279
Page:1565
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes
Regular
Substation Maintenance Unit Costs Tracked (cont.)
Which of the following do you generally track by individual component (e.g. such as a circuit
breaker)?
Question not marked
Source/Calculation:AZ.7.99
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:627999
Page:1566
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes
Regular
Substation Maintenance Work Coordinated to Minimize
Multiple Outages
Source/Calculation:AZ.8.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27051
Page:1567
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes
Regular
Substation Maintenance Work Coordinated to Minimize
Multiple Outages (cont.)
How do you coordinate substation maintenance work to minimize multiple outages?
Dedicated outage coordinator for transmission level outages.
Long range planning
Question not marked
System Operations maintains functional equipment groupings
Source/Calculation:AZ.8.99
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Work Management Processes, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6291
Page:1568
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Contracting
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Pg. 1577
Pg. 1578
Pg. 1579
Pg. 1580
Pg. 1581
Pg. 1584
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Substation Engineering Contracting - Percent of Activity Contracted
Substation Construction Contracting - Percent of Activity Contracted
Substation O&M Contracting - Percent of Activity Contracted
Substation O&M Contracting (cont.) - Percent of Activity Contracted
Overall Percentage of Substation Work Contracted
Substation Management Activities Contracted - Percent of Activity Contracted
XIX
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Contracting
Regular
Substation Engineering Contracting
Percent of Activity Contracted
Source/Calculation:BA.2.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Contracting, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1093
Page:1577
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Contracting
Regular
Substation Construction Contracting
Percent of Activity Contracted
Source/Calculation:BA.3.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Contracting, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:3135
Page:1578
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Contracting
Regular
Substation O&M Contracting
Percent of Activity Contracted
Source/Calculation:BA.4.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Contracting, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:3137
Page:1579
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Contracting
Regular
Substation O&M Contracting (cont.)
Percent of Activity Contracted
Source/Calculation:BA.4.8
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Contracting, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27364
Page:1580
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Contracting
Regular
Overall Percentage of Substation Work Contracted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
43%
1% <= 25%
25% <= 45%
45% <= 61%
61% <= 91%
100%
9
1
%
90%
7
5
%
80%
Percent
70%
6
0
%
6
0
%
1
9
4
6
2
%
6
5
%
60%
5
0
%
5
0
%
8
3
50%
4
0
%
40%
30%
2
0
%
2
5
%
2
5
%
1
1
5
3
0
%
3
0
%
1
1
9
20%
1
0
%
10%
1
%
0%
1
8
1
3
1
7
6
Source/Calculation:BA.5.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Contracting, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300090
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1581
1
2
7
1
4
1
6
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
0
5
2
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: T&D Substation Contracting
Regular
Substation Management Activities Contracted
Percent of Activity Contracted
Source/Calculation:BA.6.1
Volume: Focus Area: T&D Substation Contracting, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300174
Page:1584
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Pg. 1586
Pg. 1587
Pg. 1588
Pg. 1589
Pg. 1590
Pg. 1591
Pg. 1592
Pg. 1597
Pg. 1598
Pg. 1599
Pg. 1600
Pg. 1601
Pg. 1602
Pg. 1603
Pg. 1604
Pg. 1605
Pg. 1606
Pg. 1607
Pg. 1611
Pg. 1612
Pg. 1613
Pg. 1614
Pg. 1616
Pg. 1617
Pg. 1618
Pg. 1620
Pg. 1621
Pg. 1623
Pg. 1624
Pg. 1625
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Transmission Line Operations Expenses - Per Total Transmission Circuits
Transmission Expenditures - Per Distribution Customers
Transmission Expenditures - Per MWh Transmitted
Transmission Expenditures - Per Transmission Structure Mile
Transmission Expenditures - Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Transmission Expenditures - Per Assets
Transmission Expenditures - Per Assets Less Depreciation
3-Year Average Transmission Expenditures - Per MWh Transmitted
3-Year Average Transmission Expenditures - Per Transmission Circuit Mile
3-Year Average Transmission Expenditures - Per Assets
3-Year Average Transmission Expenditures - Per Assets Less Depreciation
Transmission Line Expenditures - Per Distribution Customers
Transmission Line Expenditures - Per MWh Transmitted
Transmission Line Expenditures - Per Transmission Structure Mile
Transmission Line Expenditures - Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Transmission Line Expenditures - Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Transmission Line Expenditures - Per Assets
Transmission Line Expenditures - Per Assets Less Depreciation
3-Year Average Transmission Line Expenditures - Per MWh Transmitted
3-Year Average Transmission Line Expenditures - Per Transmission Circuit Mile
3-Year Average Transmission Line Expenditures - Per Assets
3-Year Average Transmission Line Expenditures - Per Assets Less Depreciation
Transmission Capital Additions - Per MWh Transmitted
Transmission Capital Additions - Per Transmission Structure Mile
Transmission Capital Additions - Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Transmission Capital Additions - Per Assets
Transmission Capital Additions - Per Transmission Assets Less Depreciation
3-Year Average Transmission Capital Additions - Per MWh Transmitted
3-Year Average Transmission Capital Additions - Per Circuit Mile
3-Year Average Transmission Capital Additions - Per Assets
Transmission Line Statistics NEXT >>
XX
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Pg. 1626
Pg. 1627
Pg. 1628
Pg. 1629
Pg. 1630
Pg. 1631
Pg. 1632
Pg. 1634
Pg. 1635
Pg. 1636
Pg. 1637
Pg. 1638
Pg. 1640
Pg. 1641
Pg. 1642
Pg. 1643
Pg. 1644
Pg. 1645
Pg. 1647
Pg. 1648
Pg. 1649
Pg. 1650
Pg. 1651
Pg. 1652
Pg. 1653
Pg. 1654
Pg. 1655
Pg. 1656
Pg. 1658
Pg. 1659
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
3-Year Average Transmission Capital Additions - Per Assets Less Depreciation
Transmission Line Capital Additions - Per Distribution Customers
Transmission Line Capital Additions - Per MWh Transmitted
Transmission Line Capital Additions - Per Transmission Structure Mile
Transmission Line Capital Additions - Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Transmission Line Capital Additions - Per Assets
Transmission Line Capital Additions - Per Assets Less Depreciation
3-Year Average Transmission Line Capital Additions - Per MWh Transmitted
3-Year Average Transmission Line Capital Additions - Per Circuit Mile
3-Year Average Transmission Line Capital Additions - Per Assets
3-Year Average Transmission Line Capital Additions - Per Assets Less Depreciation
Transmission O&M Expenses - Per Distribution Customers
Transmission O&M Expenses - Per MWh Transmitted
Transmission O&M Expenses - Per Transmission Structure Mile
Transmission O&M Expenses - Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Transmission O&M Expenses - Per Assets
Transmission O&M Expenses - Per Assets Less Depreciation
Transmission O&M Expense Allocation - Percent of Total
3-Year Average Transmission O&M Expenses - Per MWh Transmitted
3-Year Average Transmission O&M Expenses - Per Transmission Circuit Mile
3-Year Average Transmission O&M Expenses - Per Assets
3-Year Average Transmission O&M Expenses - Per Assets Less Depreciation
Transmission Line O&M Expenses - Per Distribution Customers
Transmission Line O&M Expenses - Per MWh Transmitted
Transmission Line O&M Expenses - Per Transmission Structure Mile
Transmission Line O&M Expenses - Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Transmission Line O&M Expenses - Per Assets
Transmission Line O&M Expenses - Per Assets Less Depreciation
3-Year Average Transmission Line O&M Expenses - Per MWh Transmitted
3-Year Average Transmission Line O&M Expenses - Per Transmission Circuit Mile
<< BACK Transmission Line Statistics
Transmission Line Statistics NEXT >>
XXI
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Pg. 1660 3-Year Average Transmission Line O&M Expenses - Per Assets
Pg. 1660.1 Transmission Operations Expense - Per Total Transmission Circuits
Pg. 1660.2 Transmission Operations Expense - Per Total Transmission Breakers
Pg. 1660.3 Transmission Line Operations Expense - Per Total Transmission Circuits
Pg. 1660.4 Transmission Line Operations Expense - Per Total Transmission Breakers
Pg. 1661 3-Year Average Transmission Line O&M Expenses - Per Assets Less Depreciation
Pg. 1661.1 Transmission Circuit Miles Added - Per Existing Circuit Mile
Pg. 1662 Current Year Capital Additions - Overall Transmission - Per Current Year Depreciation
Pg. 1663 Transmission Line Delivery Costs - Per kWh Hour Transmitted
Pg. 1664 Current Year Capital Additions - Transmission Line - Per Current Year Depreciation
Pg. 1666 Transmission Delivery Costs - Per kWh Transmitted
Pg. 1668 Transmission Book Value - Per MWh Transmitted
Pg. 1669 Transmission Book Value - Per Circuit Mile
Pg. 1670 Transmission Book Value - Per MVA
Pg. 1671 Transmission Depreciation - As a Percent of Assets
Pg. 1672 Transmission Circuits - By Voltage Class
Pg. 1673 Transmission OH Circuit Miles - By Voltage Class
Pg. 1674 Average Transmission Circuit Length - Transmission Circuit Miles per Transmission Circuit
Pg. 1675 Transmission UG Circuit Miles - By Voltage Class
Pg. 1676 Transmission OH Structure Miles - By Voltage Class
Pg. 1677 Transmission UG Trench Miles - By Voltage Class
Pg. 1678 Transmission OH Structures - Per Circuit Mile
Pg. 1679 Transmission OH Structure Types
Pg. 1680 Wood Overhead Transmission Structures - Per Total Overhead Transmission Structures
Pg. 1681 Percent of Transmission Circuit Miles with Distribution Attached (aka Underbuild)
<< BACK Transmission Line Statistics
XXII
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Regular
Transmission Line Operations Expenses
Per Total Transmission Circuits
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$182,696
$27,689 <= $51,374
$51,374 <= $82,106
$82,106 <= $290,841
$290,841 <= $781,795
$800,000
$
7
8
1
,
7
9
5
$700,000
$
4
6
7
,
2
8
5
Expenses per Total Transmission Circuits
$600,000
$500,000
$400,000
$300,000
$200,000
$100,000
$
2
7
,
6
8
9
$
2
8
,
3
7
5
$
3
4
,
1
1
9
$
4
0
,
4
5
6
5
1
9
2
1
$
5
5
,
0
1
4
$
5
7
,
2
4
4
7
6
$
7
0
,
4
4
8
$
7
1
,
5
8
7
3
1
8
$
9
2
,
6
2
4
$
1
3
2
,
7
5
0
$
1
5
5
,
0
0
6
$
2
8
7
,
1
2
6
$
3
0
1
,
9
8
4
$
3
1
9
,
6
3
9
$0
1
4
1
1
9
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}-SUM{B.21})/SUM{BB.2}
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2500043
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1586
8
4
1
5
1
6
1
2
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
7
1
3
1
0
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Expenditures
Per Distribution Customers
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$75.68
$25.17 <= $34.69
$34.69 <= $49.98
$49.98 <= $106.48
$106.48 <= $222.49
$250.00
$
2
2
2
.
4
9
Expenditures per Distribution Customers
$200.00
$150.00
$100.00
$50.00
$
2
5
.
1
7
$
2
7
.
9
9
1
2
3
1
1
9
$
3
0
.
8
4
$
3
4
.
1
3
$
3
4
.
8
8
1
0
5
1
2
1
$
3
8
.
4
3
$
3
8
.
7
2
$
3
9
.
9
2
1
1
5
1
1
7
1
0
9
$
6
0
.
0
4
$
7
2
.
0
4
$
8
9
.
1
0
$
1
0
3
.
7
4
$
1
1
4
.
7
2
$
1
2
9
.
8
7
$
1
4
8
.
8
5
$0.00
1
1
2
1
0
8
1
1
8
1
2
0
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.2}+SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22})/A.2.2)
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8504
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1587
1
1
3
1
1
6
1
1
0
1
0
6
1
1
4
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Expenditures
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$2.37
$0.06 <= $1.17
$1.17 <= $1.96
$1.96 <= $3.45
$3.45 <= $6.30
$7.00
$
6
.
3
0
$6.00
Expenditures per MWh Transmitted
$5.00
$
3
.
6
5
$4.00
$3.00
$2.00
$1.00
$
0
.
0
6
$
0
.
7
2
$
1
.
1
2
$
1
.
1
3
1
1
9
1
2
1
$
1
.
2
9
$
1
.
3
6
1
0
5
1
0
9
$
1
.
6
8
$
2
.
2
4
$
2
.
2
9
1
1
3
1
0
8
$
4
.
1
4
$
4
.
3
0
$
2
.
8
5
$0.00
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
1
5
1
1
8
1
1
0
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.2}+SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22})/A.2.5
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:639
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1588
1
1
4
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Expenditures
Per Transmission Structure Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$83,048
$5,592 <= $15,191
$15,191 <= $35,277
$35,277 <= $65,991
$65,991 <= $640,361
$700,000
$
6
4
0
,
3
6
1
$600,000
Expenditures per Structure Mile
$500,000
$400,000
$300,000
$200,000
$100,000
$
5
,
5
9
2
$
7
,
5
7
7
$
1
1
,
6
6
5
1
2
3
1
2
1
1
2
0
$
1
4
,
0
2
9
$
1
8
,
6
7
5
$
2
5
,
3
4
4
$
3
1
,
3
4
0
$
3
9
,
2
1
3
$
4
5
,
3
2
8
1
0
9
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
1
0
1
1
4
1
1
9
$
4
7
,
9
9
4
1
0
5
$
7
1
,
9
9
0
$
7
5
,
9
5
4
1
1
5
1
1
8
$
1
2
7
,
6
0
7
$0
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.2}+SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22})/(SUM{BB.5}+SUM{BB.6})
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:638
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1589
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Expenditures
Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$46,421
$5,309 <= $11,411
$11,411 <= $29,566
$29,566 <= $42,983
$42,983 <= $301,938
$350,000
$
3
0
1
,
9
3
8
$300,000
Expenditures per Circuit Mile
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$
5
,
3
0
9
$
7
,
4
4
1
$
1
0
,
4
4
9
$
1
0
,
6
4
9
$
1
1
,
6
6
5
1
2
3
1
2
1
1
1
7
1
0
9
1
2
0
$
1
7
,
0
7
7
$
1
7
,
3
3
6
1
1
2
1
1
3
$
2
7
,
4
7
0
$
3
1
,
6
6
3
$
3
2
,
5
3
9
1
1
0
1
1
4
1
0
5
$
4
0
,
0
3
8
$
4
1
,
6
3
4
1
0
8
1
1
9
$
4
7
,
0
2
9
$
6
8
,
5
9
7
$
7
1
,
9
0
5
1
0
6
1
1
5
$0
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.2}+SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22})/(SUM{BB.3}+SUM{BB.4})
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2004
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1590
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Expenditures
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
8.27%
2.93% <= 5.10%
5.10% <= 6.35%
6.35% <= 9.62%
9.62% <= 22.18%
25.00%
2
2
.
1
8
%
Expenditures per Assets
20.00%
1
6
.
2
1
%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
2
.
9
3
%
4
.
6
3
%
4
.
6
7
%
4
.
7
6
%
1
1
2
1
1
9
1
1
7
5
.
2
2
%
5
.
2
9
%
5
.
4
2
%
1
1
4
1
0
9
1
2
1
5
.
7
8
%
6
.
9
3
%
7
.
1
5
%
1
0
5
1
1
3
8
.
8
4
%
9
.
2
4
%
1
0
.
7
6
%
1
2
.
4
1
%
0.00%
1
2
3
1
1
5
1
0
8
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.2}+SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22})/B.10.1
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2120
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1591
1
2
0
1
1
8
1
1
0
1
1
6
1
0
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Expenditures
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
13.35%
6.52% <= 8.09%
8.09% <= 11.23%
11.23% <= 16.19%
16.19% <= 32.95%
35.00%
3
2
.
9
5
%
30.00%
2
5
.
2
8
%
Expenditures per Depreciated Assets
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
6
.
5
2
%
7
.
1
9
%
7
.
2
1
%
7
.
4
4
%
1
1
7
1
1
2
1
1
4
8
.
3
0
%
9
.
1
3
%
9
.
3
8
%
1
2
1
1
0
9
1
0
.
5
4
%
1
1
.
9
2
%
1
2
.
1
9
%
1
1
3
1
0
5
1
4
.
6
9
%
1
5
.
7
4
%
1
7
.
5
4
%
1
7
.
6
4
%
1
1
0
1
2
0
5.00%
0.00%
1
2
3
1
1
9
1
1
5
1
0
8
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}+SUM{B.2}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22})/(B.10.1-B.14.2)
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6491
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1592
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
0
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Expenditures
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$1.97
$0.45 <= $1.16
$1.16 <= $1.81
$1.81 <= $2.51
$2.51 <= $4.50
$5.00
$
4
.
5
0
Expenditures per MWh Transmitted
$4.00
$
3
.
1
7
$
3
.
5
7
$3.00
$2.00
$1.00
$
0
.
4
5
$
0
.
5
2
$
0
.
9
9
$
1
.
2
1
$
1
.
2
2
1
1
9
1
0
9
$
1
.
7
3
$
1
.
8
9
$
2
.
0
7
$
2
.
2
9
$0.00
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
0
5
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
1
8
1
0
6
1
1
0
1
1
4
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
7
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.2}+SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22})/A.2.5+(B.8.1+B.28.1)/(A.3.5)+(B.8.2+B.28.2)/(A.3.6))/3
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27125
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1597
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Expenditures
Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$41,044
$3,619 <= $17,746
$17,746 <= $26,184
$26,184 <= $34,594
$34,594 <= $217,972
$250,000
$
2
1
7
,
9
7
2
Expenditures per Circuit Mile
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$
3
,
6
1
9
$
9
,
1
1
0
$
1
3
,
9
6
6
$
1
7
,
2
9
1
$
1
9
,
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
$
2
3
,
3
0
6
$
2
5
,
0
5
3
$
2
7
,
3
1
6
1
1
0
1
0
5
1
1
4
$
3
2
,
6
6
7
$
3
3
,
6
6
9
$
3
4
,
9
0
2
1
0
8
1
1
8
1
0
6
$
4
5
,
0
8
6
$
7
1
,
5
4
3
$0
1
2
3
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
9
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
9
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.2}+SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22})/(SUM{BB.3}+SUM{BB.4})+(B.8.1+B.28.1)/(BB.8.1)+(B.8.2+B.28.2)/(BB.8.2))/3
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27129
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1598
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Expenditures
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
7.08%
2.00% <= 5.05%
5.05% <= 6.32%
6.32% <= 8.31%
8.31% <= 12.52%
14.00%
1
1
.
6
8
%
12.00%
Expenditures per Assets
10.00%
8.00%
4
.
6
2
%
6.00%
4
.
8
1
%
4
.
8
1
%
1
0
9
1
1
2
5
.
1
3
%
5
.
5
8
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
2
2
%
6
.
4
1
%
7
.
1
9
%
7
.
2
6
%
1
2
0
1
0
8
8
.
1
8
%
1
2
.
1
6
%
1
2
.
5
2
%
1
0
6
1
1
6
8
.
7
3
%
4.00%
2
.
0
0
%
2.00%
0.00%
1
2
3
1
1
4
1
1
9
1
0
5
1
1
5
1
2
1
1
1
7
1
1
8
1
1
3
1
1
0
1
2
2
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.2}+SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22})/B.10.1+(B.8.1+B.28.1)/B.12.1+(B.8.2+B.28.2)/B.12.2)/3
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27453
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1599
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Expenditures
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
11.57%
4.35% <= 8.85%
8.85% <= 10.81%
10.81% <= 14.08%
14.08% <= 20.09%
25.00%
Expenditures per Depreciated Assets
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
4
.
3
5
%
6
.
4
9
%
7
.
3
2
%
8
.
5
0
%
8
.
9
7
%
9
.
6
3
%
9
.
7
9
%
1
1
7
1
0
5
1
0
.
6
5
%
1
0
.
9
7
%
1
2
.
1
7
%
1
2
.
2
0
%
1
0
8
1
1
8
1
3
.
8
2
%
1
4
.
8
5
%
1
6
.
8
6
%
1
8
.
4
6
%
2
0
.
0
9
%
0.00%
1
2
3
1
1
4
1
1
2
1
0
9
1
1
9
1
2
1
1
1
5
1
2
0
1
1
3
1
1
0
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
Source/Calculation:(((SUM{B.2}+SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22})/(B.10.1-B.14.2))+(B.8.1+B.28.1)/(B.12.1-B.16.3)+(B.8.2+B.28.2)/(B.12.2-B.16.4))/3
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27140
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1600
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Line Expenditures
Per Distribution Customers
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$41.65
$11.38 <= $16.17
$16.17 <= $38.24
$38.24 <= $58.32
$58.32 <= $91.17
$100.00
$
7
7
.
8
5
$90.00
$80.00
Expenditures per Distribution Customers
$70.00
$60.00
$50.00
$40.00
$30.00
$20.00
$
1
1
.
3
8
$
1
1
.
4
7
1
1
9
1
1
7
$
1
4
.
2
2
$
1
4
.
5
5
1
1
2
1
0
5
$
1
6
.
7
1
$
2
1
.
0
9
$
2
6
.
7
2
$
3
8
.
0
5
$
3
8
.
4
3
1
1
8
1
1
5
$
4
3
.
9
8
$
5
6
.
0
8
$
5
6
.
4
9
1
2
0
1
1
3
$
8
4
.
4
5
$
9
1
.
1
7
$
6
3
.
8
2
$10.00
$0.00
1
2
1
1
2
3
1
0
9
1
0
8
1
1
6
1
1
4
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.2}+SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.3}-SUM{B.21}-SUM{B.23})/A.2.2)
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8505
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1601
1
0
6
1
1
0
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Line Expenditures
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$1.37
$0.03 <= $0.56
$0.56 <= $1.33
$1.33 <= $1.68
$1.68 <= $3.51
$4.00
$
3
.
5
1
$3.50
Expenditures per MWh Transmitted
$3.00
$
2
.
4
4
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
$
0
.
4
5
$
0
.
5
4
$
0
.
5
5
1
2
1
1
0
5
$
0
.
6
0
$
0
.
9
1
$
1
.
2
2
$
1
.
4
5
$
1
.
5
0
$
1
.
6
8
$
1
.
6
8
1
0
8
1
1
5
$
2
.
5
7
$
0
.
0
3
$0.00
1
1
2
1
1
9
1
2
3
1
0
9
1
1
3
1
1
4
1
1
8
1
0
6
1
1
0
1
1
6
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.2}+SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.3}-SUM{B.21}-SUM{B.23})/A.2.5
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:649
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1602
1
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Line Expenditures
Per Transmission Structure Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$47,304
$3,631 <= $9,585
$9,585 <= $16,072
$16,072 <= $35,590
$35,590 <= $356,235
$400,000
$
3
5
6
,
2
3
5
$350,000
Expenditures per Structure Mile
$300,000
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$
3
,
6
3
1
$
4
,
6
8
5
$
7
,
3
4
2
1
2
1
1
2
3
1
2
0
$
9
,
3
9
0
$
1
0
,
1
7
0
$
1
1
,
6
8
4
$
1
3
,
7
2
1
1
0
9
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
1
4
$
1
8
,
4
2
4
$
2
0
,
4
6
5
$
2
2
,
0
0
3
1
1
9
1
0
5
1
1
0
$
4
0
,
1
1
9
$
7
1
,
9
9
0
$
7
2
,
3
9
8
1
1
5
1
0
6
$0
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.2}+SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.3}-SUM{B.21}-SUM{B.23})/(SUM{BB.5}+SUM{BB.6})
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:546
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1603
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Line Expenditures
Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$27,313
$3,094 <= $7,288
$7,288 <= $12,477
$12,477 <= $25,962
$25,962 <= $167,969
$180,000
$
1
6
7
,
9
6
9
$160,000
Expenditures per Circuit Mile
$140,000
$120,000
$100,000
$
7
1
,
9
0
5
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$
3
,
0
9
4
$
3
,
5
6
5
$
4
,
4
4
8
1
1
7
1
2
1
1
2
3
$
7
,
1
2
8
$
7
,
3
4
2
$
7
,
8
7
2
$
9
,
4
4
1
$
1
1
,
0
7
9
1
0
9
1
2
0
1
1
2
1
1
3
1
1
4
$
1
3
,
8
7
4
$
1
6
,
9
2
2
$
1
9
,
2
8
6
$
2
4
,
8
4
1
$
2
9
,
3
2
8
$
3
8
,
9
1
8
$0
1
0
5
1
1
9
1
1
0
1
1
8
1
0
8
1
0
6
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.2}+SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.3}-SUM{B.21}-SUM{B.23})/(SUM{BB.3}+SUM{BB.4})
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2005
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1604
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Line Expenditures
Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$27,313
$3,094 <= $7,288
$7,288 <= $12,477
$12,477 <= $25,962
$25,962 <= $167,969
$180,000
$160,000
$140,000
Expenditures per Circuit Mile
$120,000
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$0
1
1
7
1
2
1
1
2
3
1
0
9
1
2
0
1
1
2
1
1
3
1
1
4
1
0
5
1
1
9
Capital
1
1
0
1
1
8
1
0
8
1
0
6
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
1
1
1
0
2
1
0
1
1
2
2
1
0
3
O&M Expenses
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.2}-SUM{B.3})/(SUM{BB.3}+SUM{BB.4})
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300529
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1605
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Line Expenditures
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
8.33%
2.79% <= 3.46%
3.46% <= 5.78%
5.78% <= 10.93%
10.93% <= 21.68%
25.00%
2
0
.
8
9
%
2
1
.
6
8
%
Expenditures per Assets
20.00%
15.00%
1
0
.
4
2
%
10.00%
5.00%
2
.
7
9
%
2
.
9
5
%
3
.
1
8
%
3
.
4
2
%
3
.
4
7
%
1
1
7
1
0
5
1
1
9
1
1
2
1
1
4
3
.
9
2
%
5
.
2
3
%
5
.
7
8
%
5
.
7
9
%
1
1
5
1
0
9
1
0
.
8
2
%
1
1
.
2
6
%
1
4
.
3
4
%
7
.
3
9
%
0.00%
1
2
3
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
1
8
1
0
8
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
0
6
1
1
6
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.2}+SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.21}-SUM{B.23}-SUM{B.3})/(B.10.1-B.11.1)
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2118
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1606
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Line Expenditures
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
19.33%
4.77% <= 5.65%
5.65% <= 11.85%
11.85% <= 22.94%
22.94% <= 78.75%
80.00%
7
8
.
7
5
%
70.00%
Expenditures per Depreciated Assets
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
4
.
7
7
%
5
.
1
2
%
5
.
2
0
%
5
.
6
5
%
1
1
4
1
1
7
1
0
5
1
1
2
5
.
6
5
%
1
1
9
9
.
0
5
%
1
0
.
5
4
%
1
0
.
9
3
%
1
1
5
1
0
9
1
2
.
7
8
%
1
5
.
2
5
%
2
0
.
7
2
%
2
0
.
9
3
%
1
1
0
1
0
8
2
8
.
9
7
%
3
3
.
0
8
%
4
1
.
8
5
%
0.00%
1
2
3
1
1
3
1
1
8
1
2
1
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
2
0
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.2}+SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.3}-SUM{B.21}-SUM{B.23})/(B.10.1-B.14.2-(B.11.1-B.15.2))
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6501
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1607
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Line Expenditures
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$1.19
$0.26 <= $0.67
$0.67 <= $1.19
$1.19 <= $1.54
$1.54 <= $2.39
$2.50
$
2
.
0
4
Expenditures per MWh Transmitted
$2.00
$1.50
$
0
.
7
5
$1.00
$0.50
$
0
.
2
6
$
0
.
4
2
$
0
.
9
9
$
1
.
1
6
$
1
.
2
2
$
1
.
3
6
$
1
.
4
8
$
2
.
3
9
$
1
.
7
3
$
0
.
4
6
$0.00
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
1
9
1
0
5
1
0
9
1
1
4
1
0
8
1
1
8
1
0
6
1
1
5
1
1
0
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
((SUM{B.2}+SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.3}-SUM{B.21}-SUM{B.23})/(A.2.5)+(B.8.1-B.9.1+B.28.1-B.29.1)/(A.3.5)+(B.8.2-B.9.2+B.28.2-B.29.2)/(A.3.6))/3
Source/Calculation:
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27123
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1611
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Line Expenditures
Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$24,633
$2,915 <= $9,007
$9,007 <= $16,045
$16,045 <= $21,822
$21,822 <= $115,875
$120,000
$
1
1
5
,
8
7
5
Expenditures per Circuit Mile
$100,000
$
7
1
,
5
4
3
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$
2
,
9
1
5
$
4
,
7
2
8
$
5
,
6
4
1
1
1
7
1
2
0
$
8
,
9
0
2
$
9
,
3
2
2
$
9
,
4
9
0
1
1
4
1
1
3
1
1
2
$
1
5
,
0
1
0
$
1
7
,
0
8
1
$
1
8
,
8
3
1
$
2
1
,
0
6
5
$
2
2
,
0
7
4
$
2
2
,
3
8
5
1
0
8
1
1
8
1
0
6
$0
1
2
3
1
1
0
1
1
9
1
0
5
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
9
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
((SUM{B.2}+SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.3}-SUM{B.21}-SUM{B.23})/(SUM{BB.3}+SUM{BB.4})+(B.8.1-B.9.1+B.28.1-B.29.1)/BB.8.1+(B.8.2-B.9.2+B.28.2-B.29.2)/BB.8.2)/3
Source/Calculation:
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27127
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1612
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Line Expenditures
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
6.69%
2.57% <= 4.21%
4.21% <= 6.12%
6.12% <= 8.70%
8.70% <= 13.05%
14.00%
12.00%
Expenditures per Assets
10.00%
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2
.
5
7
%
2
.
8
6
%
3
.
2
7
%
4
.
1
0
%
4
.
2
5
%
4
.
2
7
%
1
0
5
1
1
7
5
.
6
6
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
2
5
%
6
.
3
8
%
1
2
1
1
0
9
7
.
8
3
%
8
.
6
8
%
8
.
7
9
%
1
1
3
1
2
0
1
2
.
9
2
%
1
3
.
0
5
%
1
0
6
1
1
0
1
0
.
0
9
%
2.00%
0.00%
1
2
3
1
1
4
1
1
9
1
1
2
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
0
8
1
1
8
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
((SUM{B.2}+SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.3}-SUM{B.21}-SUM{B.23})/(B.10.1-B.11.1)+(B.8.1-B.9.1+B.28.1-B.29.1)/(B.12.1-B.13.1)+(B.8.2-B.9.2+B.28.2-B.29.2)/(B.12.2-B.
Source/Calculation:13.2))/3
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27448
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1613
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Line Expenditures
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
17.67%
3.90% <= 7.19%
7.19% <= 13.66%
13.66% <= 19.23%
19.23% <= 75.12%
80.00%
7
5
.
1
2
%
70.00%
Expenditures per Depreciated Assets
60.00%
50.00%
3
6
.
0
1
%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
3
.
9
0
%
5
.
7
5
%
6
.
0
7
%
6
.
4
0
%
1
1
9
1
2
3
1
1
2
7
.
4
6
%
7
.
4
9
%
1
0
5
1
1
7
1
0
.
9
7
%
1
2
.
0
2
%
1
5
.
3
0
%
1
5
.
3
8
%
1
6
.
1
8
%
1
0
8
1
1
8
1
1
3
1
8
.
6
8
%
2
0
.
8
7
%
2
5
.
0
6
%
0.00%
1
1
4
1
1
5
1
0
9
1
1
6
1
0
6
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
(((SUM{B.2}+SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.3}-SUM{B.21}-SUM{B.23})/(B.10.1-B.14.2-(B.11.1-B.15.2)))+(B.8.1-B.9.1+B.28.1-B.29.1)/(B.12.1-B.13.1-(B.16.3-B.17.3))+(B.8.2
Source/Calculation:-B.9.2+B.28.2-B.29.2)/(B.12.2-B.13.2-(B.16.4-B.17.4)))/3
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27138
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1614
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Capital Additions
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$1.56
$0.04 <= $0.53
$0.53 <= $1.18
$1.18 <= $2.44
$2.44 <= $3.64
$4.00
$
3
.
2
0
$3.50
Capital Additions per MWh Transmitted
$3.00
$2.50
$
1
.
9
8
$2.00
$
2
.
1
9
$
3
.
5
7
$
3
.
6
4
1
0
6
1
1
6
$
2
.
5
2
$
1
.
5
1
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
$
0
.
0
4
$
0
.
0
8
1
1
2
1
2
3
$
0
.
2
7
$
0
.
4
9
$
0
.
6
5
$
0
.
8
2
$
0
.
8
5
1
2
1
1
1
5
$0.00
1
1
9
1
0
9
1
0
5
1
1
3
1
0
8
1
1
8
1
1
4
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.2}/A.2.5
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:5525
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1616
1
1
0
1
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Capital Additions
Per Transmission Structure Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$50,409
$633 <= $8,803
$8,803 <= $20,099
$20,099 <= $34,343
$34,343 <= $369,883
$400,000
$
3
6
9
,
8
8
3
$350,000
Capital Additions per Structure Mile
$300,000
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$
6
3
3
$
5
,
0
8
0
$
5
,
4
6
1
$
8
,
0
6
9
1
0
9
1
2
1
1
2
0
$
1
1
,
0
0
6
$
1
2
,
5
7
4
$
1
6
,
2
7
5
1
1
9
1
1
3
1
1
2
$
2
3
,
9
2
4
$
2
4
,
3
3
3
$
2
7
,
4
6
4
1
1
4
1
0
5
1
1
0
$
3
6
,
6
3
6
$
5
8
,
3
1
3
$
1
0
6
,
0
7
3
$0
1
2
3
1
1
5
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.2}/(SUM{BB.5}+SUM{BB.6})
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:645
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1617
1
1
8
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Capital Additions
Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$28,468
$601 <= $7,614
$7,614 <= $14,085
$14,085 <= $34,970
$34,970 <= $174,404
$180,000
$
1
7
4
,
4
0
4
$160,000
Capital Additions per Circuit Mile
$140,000
$120,000
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$
6
0
1
$
3
,
8
5
6
$
5
,
3
6
3
$
6
,
2
5
0
$
8
,
0
6
9
$
1
0
,
1
0
9
1
0
9
1
2
1
1
1
7
1
2
0
1
1
9
$
1
0
,
9
6
6
$
1
1
,
6
7
2
1
1
2
1
1
3
$
1
6
,
4
9
7
$
1
9
,
3
1
7
$
2
4
,
0
7
2
$
3
4
,
5
9
1
$
3
6
,
1
0
6
$
3
6
,
5
9
3
1
0
8
1
1
8
1
1
5
$
5
7
,
0
2
1
$0
1
2
3
1
0
5
1
1
4
1
1
0
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.2}/(SUM{BB.3}+SUM{BB.4})
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2008
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1618
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Capital Additions
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
5.53%
0.33% <= 2.92%
2.92% <= 3.71%
3.71% <= 7.79%
7.79% <= 18.44%
20.00%
1
8
.
4
4
%
Capital Additions per Assets
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0
.
3
3
%
1
.
1
3
%
1
.
9
1
%
2
.
8
5
%
2
.
9
4
%
2
.
9
7
%
3
.
1
8
%
1
1
7
1
1
5
1
1
2
1
1
4
3
.
5
1
%
3
.
9
1
%
4
.
8
1
%
6
.
3
9
%
7
.
6
3
%
8
.
2
6
%
9
.
3
6
%
1
0
.
8
8
%
0.00%
1
2
3
1
1
9
1
0
9
1
0
5
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
2
0
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.2}/B.10.1
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2119
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1620
1
0
8
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
1
0
1
0
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Capital Additions
Per Transmission Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
8.76%
0.74% <= 4.48%
4.48% <= 6.38%
6.38% <= 12.33%
12.33% <= 27.39%
30.00%
2
7
.
3
9
%
Capital Additions per Depreciated Assets
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0
.
7
4
%
2
.
0
2
%
3
.
4
0
%
4
.
3
0
%
4
.
5
4
%
4
.
6
3
%
1
1
7
1
1
4
1
1
2
5
.
3
6
%
6
.
1
8
%
6
.
5
8
%
1
2
.
0
9
%
1
2
.
2
1
%
1
1
8
1
2
0
1
2
.
6
9
%
1
4
.
6
0
%
1
5
.
3
7
%
8
.
0
2
%
0.00%
1
2
3
1
1
9
1
0
9
1
1
5
1
0
5
1
2
1
1
1
3
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.2})/(B.10.1-B.14.2)
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:7021
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1621
1
0
8
1
1
6
1
1
0
1
0
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Capital Additions
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$1.18
$0.06 <= $0.44
$0.44 <= $1.14
$1.14 <= $1.82
$1.82 <= $2.68
$3.00
$
2
.
6
8
Capital Additions per MWh Transmitted
$2.50
$2.00
$
1
.
4
1
$1.50
$
1
.
6
4
$
1
.
7
8
$
1
.
9
5
$
2
.
1
3
$
0
.
8
8
$1.00
$0.50
$
0
.
0
6
$
0
.
2
8
$
0
.
4
4
$
0
.
4
4
$
0
.
4
5
1
0
9
1
1
9
1
0
5
$0.00
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
1
5
1
1
8
1
0
6
1
0
8
1
1
4
1
1
6
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.2}/A.2.5+B.8.1/A.3.5+B.8.2/A.3.6)/3
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6397
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1623
1
1
0
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Capital Additions
Per Circuit Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$22,817
$383 <= $11,041
$11,041 <= $15,718
$15,718 <= $24,703
$24,703 <= $102,769
$120,000
$
1
0
2
,
7
6
9
Capital Additions per Circuit Mile
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$
3
8
3
$
5
,
3
8
9
$
8
,
8
6
5
$
1
0
,
9
1
5
$
1
1
,
4
2
1
1
1
2
1
0
5
$
1
3
,
3
2
8
$
1
4
,
9
1
4
$
1
6
,
5
2
1
$
1
9
,
7
3
3
$
2
3
,
0
3
1
$
2
5
,
2
6
0
$
3
0
,
8
5
2
$
3
6
,
0
5
4
$0
1
2
3
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
3
1
1
4
1
1
9
1
1
0
1
1
8
1
0
6
1
0
8
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.2})/(SUM{BB.3}+SUM{BB.4})+B.8.1/BB.8.1+B.8.2/BB.8.2)/3
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6399
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1624
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
9
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Capital Additions
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
4.42%
0.21% <= 2.53%
2.53% <= 4.16%
4.16% <= 5.88%
5.88% <= 9.87%
10.00%
8
.
6
2
%
Capital Additions per Assets
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
1
.
7
1
%
2.00%
1
.
8
8
%
2
.
5
2
%
2
.
5
3
%
1
1
4
1
0
5
3
.
0
2
%
3
.
0
4
%
1
1
5
1
1
2
4
.
0
8
%
4
.
2
5
%
4
.
7
0
%
5
.
5
6
%
5
.
8
2
%
6
.
0
8
%
9
.
8
7
%
6
.
8
6
%
0
.
2
1
%
0.00%
1
2
3
1
0
9
1
1
9
1
1
7
1
2
0
1
2
1
1
1
8
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.2}/B.10.1)+(B.8.1/B.12.1)+(B.8.2/B.12.2))/3
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6442
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1625
1
1
6
1
1
3
1
0
8
1
0
6
1
1
0
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Capital Additions
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
7.12%
0.46% <= 4.22%
4.22% <= 7.08%
7.08% <= 9.54%
9.54% <= 14.24%
16.00%
14.00%
Capital Additions per Depreciated Assets
12.00%
10.00%
8.00%
6.00%
3
.
0
3
%
4.00%
2.00%
3
.
2
9
%
3
.
5
4
%
4
.
4
5
%
4
.
6
2
%
1
0
5
1
1
2
5
.
5
2
%
8
.
0
6
%
8
.
1
6
%
8
.
2
8
%
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
8
9
.
2
8
%
1
0
.
3
4
%
1
1
.
5
0
%
1
3
.
0
0
%
1
4
.
2
4
%
6
.
1
1
%
0
.
4
6
%
0.00%
1
2
3
1
0
9
1
1
9
1
1
4
1
1
5
1
1
7
1
1
6
1
1
3
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.2}/(B.10.1-B.14.2)+B.8.1/(B.12.1-B.16.3)+B.8.2/(B.12.2-B.16.4))/3
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6400
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1626
1
0
8
1
0
6
1
1
0
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Line Capital Additions
Per Distribution Customers
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$25.44
$0.73 <= $5.83
$5.83 <= $17.46
$17.46 <= $38.85
$38.85 <= $85.00
$90.00
$
8
5
.
0
0
4
$80.00
Capital Additions per Distribution Customers
$70.00
$
5
6
.
2
3
2
$60.00
$50.00
$
3
5
.
8
0
9
$40.00
$30.00
$20.00
$10.00
$
0
.
7
3
1
$
1
.
2
8
5
$
1
.
8
2
9
1
1
9
1
1
7
1
2
3
$
5
.
2
1
5
$
6
.
0
3
9
1
0
5
1
1
2
$
8
.
4
6
4
$
1
1
.
8
3
4
$
1
5
.
3
6
4
$
1
9
.
5
5
8
$
3
8
.
5
0
7
$
6
0
.
0
4
1
$
3
9
.
8
8
5
$
2
1
.
3
2
0
$0.00
1
0
9
1
2
1
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
1
8
1
0
8
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.2}-SUM{B.3})/A.2.2)
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:653
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1627
1
1
3
1
2
0
1
1
4
1
0
6
1
1
0
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Line Capital Additions
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$0.78
$0.01 <= $0.22
$0.22 <= $0.84
$0.84 <= $1.00
$1.00 <= $2.39
$2.50
$
2
.
3
9
Capital Additions per MWh Transmitted
$2.00
$
1
.
7
3
$
1
.
3
7
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
$
0
.
0
1
$
0
.
0
3
$
0
.
0
5
1
1
2
1
1
9
1
2
3
$
0
.
2
0
$
0
.
2
9
$
0
.
8
3
$
0
.
8
4
$
0
.
8
4
$
0
.
8
5
1
1
3
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
1
5
$
1
.
0
5
$
0
.
3
9
$0.00
1
0
5
1
0
9
1
2
1
1
1
4
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.2}-SUM{B.3})/A.2.5
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:655
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1628
1
0
8
1
0
6
1
1
0
1
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Line Capital Additions
Per Transmission Structure Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$18,454
$406 <= $3,471
$3,471 <= $7,133
$7,133 <= $21,987
$21,987 <= $85,757
$90,000
$
8
5
,
7
5
7
$80,000
Capital Additions per Structure Mile
$70,000
$
5
1
,
4
7
1
$60,000
$
3
6
,
6
3
6
$50,000
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$
4
0
6
$
1
,
1
8
4
1
2
3
1
1
9
$
2
,
5
7
1
$
2
,
9
7
4
1
2
1
1
0
9
$
4
,
9
6
3
$
5
,
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
0
$
6
,
9
3
2
$
7
,
3
3
4
1
1
3
1
0
5
$
9
,
9
1
1
$
2
0
,
5
1
4
$
2
2
,
4
7
9
$0
1
1
4
1
1
0
1
1
8
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.2}-SUM{B.3})/(SUM{BB.5}+SUM{BB.6})
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:654
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1629
1
1
5
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Line Capital Additions
Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$12,191
$347 <= $2,458
$2,458 <= $5,828
$5,828 <= $19,456
$19,456 <= $40,435
$45,000
$
3
6
,
5
9
3
$40,000
Capital Additions per Circuit Mile
$35,000
$30,000
$25,000
$
1
3
,
9
1
8
$20,000
$15,000
$10,000
$5,000
$
3
4
7
$
3
8
6
1
1
7
1
2
3
$
1
,
0
8
7
$
2
,
2
5
8
$
2
,
5
2
5
1
0
9
1
2
1
$
3
,
3
4
4
$
4
,
9
7
2
$
5
,
2
2
2
1
0
5
1
2
0
$
6
,
4
3
5
$
1
7
,
9
8
1
$
2
3
,
8
8
0
$
4
0
,
4
3
5
$
2
7
,
6
6
9
$
8
,
0
0
2
$0
1
1
9
1
1
2
1
1
3
1
1
4
1
1
8
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.2}-SUM{B.3})/(SUM{BB.3}+SUM{BB.4})
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2009
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1630
1
1
0
1
0
8
1
0
6
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Line Capital Additions
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
4.72%
0.20% <= 1.36%
1.36% <= 3.32%
3.32% <= 6.38%
6.38% <= 14.85%
16.00%
1
3
.
3
7
%
14.00%
1
4
.
8
5
%
Capital Additions per Assets
12.00%
10.00%
8
.
0
1
%
8
.
8
1
%
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
0
.
2
0
%
0
.
3
1
%
0
.
3
4
%
1
1
9
1
1
7
1
2
3
1
.
0
6
%
1
.
4
5
%
1
.
8
3
%
2
.
5
0
%
2
.
9
4
%
3
.
7
0
%
5
.
0
4
%
5
.
2
2
%
5
.
8
4
%
0.00%
1
0
5
1
1
2
1
0
9
1
1
4
1
1
5
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
1
6
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.2}-SUM{B.3})/(B.10.1-B.11.1)
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2122
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1631
1
1
8
1
2
0
1
0
8
1
1
0
1
0
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Line Capital Additions
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
11.37%
0.36% <= 2.26%
2.26% <= 6.95%
6.95% <= 17.61%
17.61% <= 56.01%
60.00%
5
6
.
0
1
%
Capital Additions per Depreciated Assets
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0
.
3
6
%
0
.
5
7
%
0
.
7
8
%
1
1
9
1
1
7
1
2
3
1
.
8
6
%
2
.
4
0
%
1
0
5
1
1
2
3
.
4
5
%
3
.
4
6
%
1
1
4
1
0
9
5
.
3
6
%
8
.
5
4
%
8
.
7
1
%
1
1
8
1
1
3
1
0
.
0
7
%
1
7
.
0
4
%
1
9
.
3
2
%
2
0
.
5
1
%
2
3
.
5
2
%
0.00%
1
1
5
1
1
6
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.2}-SUM{B.3})/((B.10.1-B.14.2)-(B.11.1-B.15.2))
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27131
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1632
1
0
8
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
0
6
1
2
0
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Line Capital Additions
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$0.61
$0.04 <= $0.25
$0.25 <= $0.50
$0.50 <= $0.89
$0.89 <= $1.84
$2.00
$
1
.
8
4
2
$1.80
$1.60
Capital Additions per MWh Transmitted
$1.40
$1.20
$1.00
$0.80
$0.60
$0.40
$0.20
$
0
.
0
4
4
$
0
.
0
5
4
1
2
3
1
1
9
$
0
.
1
4
0
$
0
.
2
8
2
$
0
.
2
8
4
$
0
.
3
0
0
1
1
6
1
0
9
1
0
5
$
0
.
7
0
8
$
0
.
7
1
1
1
1
8
1
1
4
$
0
.
8
7
6
$
0
.
9
2
6
$
1
.
1
1
2
$0.00
1
1
2
1
1
5
1
0
6
1
0
8
1
1
0
1
2
2
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.2}-SUM{B.3})/A.2.5+(B.8.1-B.9.1)/(A.3.5)+(B.8.2-B.9.2)/(A.3.6))/3
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6498
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1634
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Line Capital Additions
Per Circuit Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$9,892
$300 <= $3,723
$3,723 <= $6,797
$6,797 <= $13,568
$13,568 <= $36,054
$40,000
$
3
6
,
0
5
4
$35,000
Capital Additions per Circuit Mile
$30,000
$25,000
$20,000
$15,000
$10,000
$5,000
$
3
0
0
$
1
,
0
2
0
$
1
,
9
9
5
$
3
,
3
5
2
$
4
,
8
3
5
$
5
,
4
4
3
$
6
,
0
1
4
$
7
,
5
7
9
$
1
1
,
4
3
6
$
1
3
,
5
2
4
$
1
3
,
5
8
3
1
1
6
1
1
0
$
1
4
,
1
0
7
$
1
9
,
2
5
0
$0
1
2
3
1
1
7
1
1
9
1
2
0
1
1
2
1
1
4
1
1
3
1
0
5
1
1
8
1
0
6
1
0
8
1
1
5
1
2
2
1
2
1
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.2}-SUM{B.3})/(SUM{BB.3}+SUM{BB.4})+(B.8.1-B.9.1)/BB.8.1+(B.8.2-B.9.2)/BB.8.2)/3
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6500
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1635
1
1
1
1
0
9
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Line Capital Additions
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
3.78%
0.26% <= 1.73%
1.73% <= 2.55%
2.55% <= 5.33%
5.33% <= 11.77%
12.00%
1
1
.
7
7
%
Capital Additions per Assets
10.00%
7
.
1
6
%
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
0
.
2
6
%
0
.
3
8
%
1
2
3
1
1
9
0
.
9
2
%
1
.
7
1
%
1
.
7
3
%
1
.
7
4
%
1
.
8
3
%
1
0
5
1
1
6
1
1
4
1
0
9
2
.
0
9
%
3
.
0
2
%
5
.
2
2
%
5
.
2
6
%
1
2
0
1
1
8
8
.
0
4
%
5
.
5
5
%
3
.
8
4
%
0.00%
1
1
7
1
1
2
1
1
5
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
0
8
1
0
6
1
1
0
1
2
2
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.2}-SUM{B.3})/(B.10.1-B.11.1)+(B.8.1-B.9.1)/(B.12.1-B.13.1)+(B.8.2-B.9.2)/(B.12.2-B.13.2))/3
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:65021
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1636
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Line Capital Additions
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
9.82%
0.65% <= 2.85%
2.85% <= 4.48%
4.48% <= 13.21%
13.21% <= 43.37%
45.00%
4
3
.
3
7
%
40.00%
Capital Additions per Depreciated Assets
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0
.
6
5
%
0
.
6
7
%
1
2
3
1
1
9
1
.
4
6
%
2
.
3
8
%
3
.
0
1
%
3
.
2
4
%
3
.
3
5
%
3
.
4
5
%
1
0
5
1
1
2
1
1
6
1
0
9
5
.
5
2
%
8
.
0
1
%
1
0
.
3
8
%
1
2
.
9
4
%
2
2
.
1
5
%
2
2
.
4
9
%
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
4
.
0
0
%
0.00%
1
1
7
1
1
4
1
1
5
1
1
8
1
1
3
1
0
6
1
0
8
1
2
0
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.2}-SUM{B.3})/((B.10.1-B.14.2)-(B.11.1-B.15.2))+(B.8.1-B.9.1)/(B.12.1-B.13.1-(B.16.3-B.17.3))+(B.8.2-B.9.2)/(B.12.2-B.13.2-(B.16.4-B.17.4)))/
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6502
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1637
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission O&M Expenses
Per Distribution Customers
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$25.23
$8.17 <= $15.94
$15.94 <= $20.03
$20.03 <= $25.97
$25.97 <= $86.75
$90.00
$
8
6
.
7
5
$80.00
Expenses per Distribution Customers
$70.00
$
4
8
.
4
6
$60.00
$50.00
$40.00
$30.00
$20.00
$10.00
$
8
.
1
7
$
9
.
7
4
$
1
1
.
0
4
$
1
5
.
5
6
$
1
6
.
0
6
$
1
6
.
7
3
$
1
6
.
8
2
1
1
7
1
1
0
1
1
8
1
0
5
$
1
8
.
8
7
$
2
1
.
1
9
$
2
2
.
3
2
$
2
5
.
1
2
$
2
5
.
4
7
1
0
6
1
0
9
$
2
7
.
4
7
$
3
3
.
8
9
$0.00
1
0
8
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
5
1
1
9
1
2
3
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22})/A.2.2)
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8501
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1638
1
2
0
1
1
3
1
1
6
1
1
4
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission O&M Expenses
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$0.81
$0.02 <= $0.50
$0.50 <= $0.69
$0.69 <= $0.84
$0.84 <= $2.66
$3.00
$
2
.
6
6
Expenses per MWh Transmitted
$2.50
$2.00
$
1
.
6
1
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
$
0
.
0
2
$
0
.
3
1
$
0
.
3
2
1
0
8
1
2
1
$
0
.
4
5
$
0
.
6
3
$
0
.
6
4
$
0
.
6
6
1
0
5
1
2
3
1
1
8
$
0
.
7
3
$
0
.
7
3
1
0
6
1
1
3
$
0
.
8
2
$
0
.
8
5
$
0
.
8
7
1
1
5
1
1
9
1
0
9
$0.00
1
1
2
1
1
0
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22})/A.2.5
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:642
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1640
1
1
4
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission O&M Expenses
Per Transmission Structure Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$32,639
$2,117 <= $5,245
$5,245 <= $12,179
$12,179 <= $23,129
$23,129 <= $270,479
$300,000
$
2
7
0
,
4
7
9
Expenses per Structure Mile
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$
2
,
1
1
7
$
3
,
5
9
6
$
3
,
8
7
6
$
4
,
9
6
0
$
6
,
1
0
1
$
8
,
9
5
0
$
9
,
0
6
9
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
2
3
1
1
3
1
0
9
1
1
2
$
1
5
,
2
9
0
$
1
7
,
6
4
1
1
1
4
1
1
8
$
2
1
,
5
3
4
$
2
3
,
6
6
1
1
0
6
1
0
5
$
3
4
,
3
2
2
$
3
5
,
3
5
4
1
1
9
1
1
5
$0
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22})/(SUM{BB.5}+SUM{BB.6})
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:641
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1641
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission O&M Expenses
Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$17,953
$2,079 <= $4,581
$4,581 <= $6,452
$6,452 <= $13,270
$13,270 <= $127,534
$140,000
$
1
2
7
,
5
3
4
$120,000
Expenses per Circuit Mile
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$
2
,
0
7
9
$
3
,
3
9
8
$
3
,
5
9
6
$
4
,
1
9
9
$
4
,
7
0
9
$
5
,
4
4
7
$
5
,
6
6
3
$
6
,
1
1
1
$
6
,
7
9
3
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
2
3
1
0
8
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
0
9
$
1
0
,
9
2
3
$
1
1
,
5
7
6
$
1
2
,
3
4
6
1
1
8
1
0
6
1
1
4
$
1
6
,
0
4
2
$
3
1
,
5
2
5
$
3
5
,
3
1
2
$0
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22})/(SUM{BB.3}+SUM{BB.4})
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2006
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1642
1
0
5
1
1
9
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission O&M Expenses
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2.74%
1.20% <= 1.85%
1.85% <= 2.55%
2.55% <= 3.38%
3.38% <= 6.85%
7.00%
6
.
8
5
%
6.00%
Expenses per Assets
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1
.
2
0
%
1
.
5
1
%
1
.
5
4
%
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
.
6
6
%
1
.
9
1
%
2
.
0
3
%
2
.
3
4
%
2
.
5
0
%
2
.
6
0
%
2
.
8
4
%
2
.
8
5
%
1
1
5
1
2
0
3
.
3
7
%
3
.
4
2
%
1
0
9
1
0
5
3
.
5
4
%
3
.
7
4
%
1.00%
0.00%
1
0
8
1
1
2
1
1
7
1
1
4
1
1
3
1
1
8
1
2
3
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}+SUM{B.22}-B.20.6)/B.10.1
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:7020
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1643
1
1
9
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission O&M Expenses
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
4.60%
2.00% <= 2.81%
2.81% <= 4.53%
4.53% <= 5.83%
5.83% <= 10.68%
12.00%
1
0
.
6
8
%
Expenses per Depreciated Assets
10.00%
8.00%
5
.
1
7
%
6.00%
4.00%
2
.
0
0
%
2
.
1
7
%
2
.
5
5
%
2
.
5
8
%
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
.
8
9
%
2
.
9
0
%
1
1
7
1
1
4
3
.
6
6
%
5
.
4
4
%
5
.
5
6
%
1
2
0
1
0
6
5
.
7
8
%
5
.
9
8
%
6
.
0
1
%
1
0
9
1
0
5
6
.
2
9
%
3
.
8
9
%
2.00%
0.00%
1
0
8
1
1
0
1
1
8
1
1
3
1
1
5
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22})/(B.10.1-B.14.2)
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2121
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1644
1
2
3
1
1
9
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission O&M Expense Allocation
Percent of Total
100%
80%
Allocation of Expense
60%
40%
20%
0%
1
0
6
1
1
7
1
1
3
1
2
1
1
0
5
1
1
8
1
2
0
1
0
8
1
1
9
1
2
3
1
1
6
1
0
9
1
1
0
1
1
2
Operation Supervision And Engineering
UG Line Expenses
Maint. Structures
Load Dispatching
Misc. Trans Ops
Maint. Station Equip.
Station Expenses
Rents
Maint. OH Lines
OH Line Expenses
Maint. Supv & Eng
Maint. UG Lines
Source/Calculation:B.20.1/(SUM{B.20}+SUM{B.22}-B.20.6-B.20.100-B.22.100)
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8721
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1645
1
1
5
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
0
4
1
0
1
1
2
2
1
0
7
1
0
3
1
0
2
Maint. Misc Trans Plant
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission O&M Expenses
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$0.79
$0.10 <= $0.48
$0.48 <= $0.65
$0.65 <= $0.80
$0.80 <= $2.37
$2.50
$
2
.
3
7
Expenses per MWh Transmitted
$2.00
$
1
.
6
2
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
$
0
.
1
0
$
0
.
4
6
$
0
.
4
9
1
2
3
1
1
0
$
0
.
5
4
$
0
.
6
5
$
0
.
6
6
1
0
6
1
1
8
$
0
.
7
7
$
0
.
7
9
1
1
9
1
0
9
$
0
.
8
5
$
0
.
1
7
$0.00
1
0
8
1
1
2
1
0
5
1
1
5
1
1
4
1
1
6
1
2
2
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22})/A.2.5+(B.28.1)/(A.3.5)+(B.28.2)/(A.3.6))/3
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27126
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1647
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission O&M Expenses
Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$18,227
$1,816 <= $4,066
$4,066 <= $8,010
$8,010 <= $13,324
$13,324 <= $115,203
$120,000
$
1
1
5
,
2
0
3
Expenses per Circuit Mile
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$
1
,
8
1
6
$
3
,
2
3
6
$
3
,
5
7
3
$
3
,
7
2
1
$
5
,
1
0
1
1
0
8
1
2
3
1
1
0
1
2
0
1
1
7
$
5
,
7
8
4
$
6
,
3
7
7
1
1
3
1
1
2
$
9
,
6
4
2
$
1
0
,
6
3
8
1
0
6
1
1
8
$
1
2
,
4
0
2
$
1
3
,
6
3
2
1
1
4
1
0
5
$
2
8
,
5
6
5
$
3
5
,
4
8
9
$0
1
1
9
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
2
2
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22})/(SUM{BB.3}+SUM{BB.4})+B.28.1/BB.8.1+B.28.2/BB.8.2)/3
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27130
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1648
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
9
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission O&M Expenses
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2.66%
0.40% <= 1.81%
1.81% <= 2.63%
2.63% <= 3.06%
3.06% <= 6.70%
7.00%
6
.
7
0
%
6.00%
Expenses per Assets
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
1
.
5
2
%
2.00%
1.00%
1
.
7
7
%
1
.
7
9
%
1
.
8
1
%
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
1
0
2
.
1
0
%
2
.
3
4
%
2
.
6
2
%
2
.
6
5
%
1
1
8
1
1
3
2
.
9
4
%
2
.
9
9
%
3
.
0
4
%
3
.
1
0
%
1
2
0
1
1
5
1
0
5
1
0
9
3
.
2
4
%
3
.
5
4
%
0
.
4
0
%
0.00%
1
0
8
1
2
1
1
1
4
1
1
7
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22})/B.10.1+B.28.1/B.12.1+B.28.2/B.12.2)/3
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27454
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1649
1
1
9
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission O&M Expenses
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
4.45%
0.67% <= 2.89%
2.89% <= 4.22%
4.22% <= 5.46%
5.46% <= 10.81%
12.00%
1
0
.
8
1
%
Expenses per Depreciated Assets
10.00%
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
2
.
6
0
%
2
.
6
2
%
2
.
7
0
%
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
2
2
.
9
5
%
3
.
5
1
%
3
.
8
9
%
3
.
9
2
%
1
2
3
1
1
8
4
.
5
1
%
5
.
3
4
%
5
.
4
5
%
5
.
4
6
%
5
.
4
7
%
1
0
5
1
1
5
1
0
6
1
0
9
5
.
6
7
%
5
.
6
9
%
1
2
0
1
1
9
0
.
6
7
%
0.00%
1
0
8
1
1
4
1
1
7
1
1
3
1
1
6
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22})/(B.10.1-B.14.2)+B.28.1/(B.12.1-B.16.3)+B.28.2/(B.12.2-B.16.4))/3
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27141
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1650
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Line O&M Expenses
Per Distribution Customers
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$16.21
$4.88 <= $9.05
$9.05 <= $16.46
$16.46 <= $18.97
$18.97 <= $48.46
$50.00
$
4
8
.
4
6
$45.00
$40.00
Expenses per Distribution Customers
$35.00
$30.00
$25.00
$20.00
$15.00
$10.00
$5.00
$
4
.
8
8
$
6
.
1
7
$
8
.
1
7
$
8
.
1
8
1
0
8
1
1
2
$
9
.
3
4
$
1
0
.
1
8
$
1
0
.
6
4
1
1
7
1
1
9
$
1
6
.
2
0
$
1
6
.
7
3
1
2
0
1
1
8
$
1
7
.
9
8
$
1
8
.
2
6
1
1
3
1
0
9
$
1
8
.
8
7
$
1
9
.
2
6
1
1
5
1
2
3
$
2
1
.
6
2
$
2
4
.
4
1
$0.00
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
0
5
Source/Calculation:(((SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22})-SUM{B.21}-SUM{B.23})/A.2.2)
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8503
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1651
1
1
4
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Line O&M Expenses
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$0.59
$0.02 <= $0.32
$0.32 <= $0.41
$0.41 <= $0.65
$0.65 <= $2.66
$3.00
$
2
.
6
6
Expenses per MWh Transmitted
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
$
0
.
0
2
$
0
.
1
6
$
0
.
1
7
1
2
1
1
1
0
$
0
.
3
1
$
0
.
3
5
$
0
.
3
9
$
0
.
4
0
1
0
5
1
1
3
1
1
4
$
0
.
4
3
1
1
9
$
0
.
5
5
$
0
.
6
2
$
0
.
6
6
$
0
.
7
1
$
0
.
8
2
$0.00
1
1
2
1
0
8
1
2
3
1
0
9
1
1
8
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.21}-SUM{B.23})/A.2.5
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:652
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1652
1
0
6
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Line O&M Expenses
Per Transmission Structure Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$28,850
$1,060 <= $3,381
$3,381 <= $6,568
$6,568 <= $17,541
$17,541 <= $270,479
$300,000
$
2
7
0
,
4
7
9
Expenses per Structure Mile
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$
1
,
0
6
0
$
1
,
4
8
9
$
2
,
1
2
0
$
3
,
2
3
8
$
3
,
8
1
0
$
4
,
2
7
9
$
6
,
4
1
6
$
6
,
7
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
2
0
1
1
3
1
1
4
1
2
3
1
0
9
1
1
2
$
1
3
,
1
3
1
$
1
7
,
2
4
0
$
1
7
,
6
4
1
1
1
9
1
1
8
$
2
0
,
9
2
6
$
3
5
,
3
5
4
$0
1
0
5
1
0
6
1
1
5
1
1
6
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.21}-SUM{B.23})/(SUM{BB.5}+SUM{BB.6})
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:651
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1653
1
2
2
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Line O&M Expenses
Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$15,122
$1,041 <= $2,941
$2,941 <= $4,699
$4,699 <= $11,004
$11,004 <= $127,534
$140,000
$
1
2
7
,
5
3
4
$120,000
Expenses per Circuit Mile
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$
1
,
0
4
1
$
1
,
3
0
5
$
2
,
1
2
0
$
2
,
7
4
8
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
2
0
1
1
7
$
3
,
0
0
5
$
3
,
0
7
7
$
4
,
0
6
3
$
4
,
5
2
8
$
4
,
8
7
0
$
5
,
4
4
7
1
1
3
1
1
4
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
0
9
1
0
8
$
8
,
9
0
2
$
1
0
,
9
2
3
$
1
1
,
2
4
9
1
1
8
1
0
6
$
1
5
,
8
3
5
$
3
5
,
3
1
2
$0
1
0
5
1
1
9
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.21}-SUM{B.23})/(SUM{BB.3}+SUM{BB.4})
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2007
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1654
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Line O&M Expenses
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
3.62%
0.96% <= 1.95%
1.95% <= 2.66%
2.66% <= 3.68%
3.68% <= 16.46%
18.00%
1
6
.
4
6
%
16.00%
Expenses per Assets
14.00%
12.00%
10.00%
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
0
.
9
6
%
0
.
9
7
%
1
1
4
1
1
0
1
.
5
3
%
1
.
9
0
%
1
.
9
7
%
2
.
0
1
%
1
0
5
1
1
2
1
0
8
2
.
3
5
%
2
.
4
8
%
1
1
3
1
1
7
2
.
8
4
%
2
.
9
7
%
1
1
5
1
1
9
3
.
2
5
%
3
.
5
8
%
3
.
9
6
%
4
.
5
8
%
6
.
0
4
%
0.00%
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
2
3
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.21}-SUM{B.23})/(B.10.1-B.11.1)
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2117
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1655
1
0
9
1
1
8
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Line O&M Expenses
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
7.95%
1.33% <= 3.75%
3.75% <= 5.23%
5.23% <= 8.31%
8.31% <= 31.77%
35.00%
3
1
.
7
7
%
30.00%
2
2
.
7
4
%
Expenses per Depreciated Assets
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
1
.
3
3
%
1
.
4
0
%
1
1
4
1
1
0
3
.
2
5
%
3
.
3
4
%
1
1
2
1
0
5
3
.
8
9
%
4
.
0
7
%
1
0
8
1
1
3
4
.
5
4
%
5
.
1
7
%
5
.
2
8
%
1
1
5
1
1
9
6
.
7
0
%
7
.
4
7
%
8
.
2
7
%
8
.
4
5
%
1
2
3
1
2
1
9
.
5
6
%
0.00%
1
1
7
1
1
8
1
0
9
1
0
6
1
2
0
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.21}-SUM{B.23})/((B.10.1-B.14.2)-(B.11.1-B.15.2))
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6503
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1656
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Line O&M Expenses
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$0.58
$0.10 <= $0.33
$0.33 <= $0.45
$0.45 <= $0.67
$0.67 <= $2.11
$2.50
$
2
.
1
1
Expenses per MWh Transmitted
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
$
0
.
1
0
$
0
.
1
2
1
0
8
1
1
2
$
0
.
1
9
$
0
.
3
7
$
0
.
4
0
$
0
.
4
5
$
0
.
4
5
1
0
5
1
1
4
$
0
.
5
6
$
0
.
6
6
$
0
.
7
1
$
0
.
8
5
$0.00
1
1
0
1
2
3
1
1
9
1
0
6
1
1
8
1
0
9
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.21}-SUM{B.23})/A.2.5+(B.28.1-B.29.1)/(A.3.5)+(B.28.2-B.29.2)/(A.3.6))/3
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27124
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1658
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Line O&M Expenses
Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$14,741
$1,427 <= $2,788
$2,788 <= $4,182
$4,182 <= $11,098
$11,098 <= $102,351
$120,000
$
1
0
2
,
3
5
1
Expenses per Circuit Mile
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$
3
5
,
4
8
9
$40,000
$20,000
$
1
,
4
2
7
$
1
,
8
1
6
$
2
,
2
8
9
1
1
0
1
0
8
1
2
0
$
2
,
6
1
5
$
3
,
3
0
7
$
3
,
4
5
9
$
3
,
7
0
8
$
4
,
6
5
5
1
2
3
1
1
3
1
1
4
1
1
7
1
1
2
$
8
,
2
7
8
$
1
0
,
6
3
8
$
1
1
,
2
5
2
1
1
8
1
0
5
$
1
5
,
0
8
6
$0
1
0
6
1
1
9
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
9
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.21}-SUM{B.23})/(SUM{BB.3}+SUM{BB.4})+(B.28.1-B.29.1)/(BB.8.1)+(B.28.2-B.29.2)/(BB.8.2))/3
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27128
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1659
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Line O&M Expenses
Per Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2.90%
0.67% <= 2.23%
2.23% <= 2.94%
2.94% <= 3.66%
3.66% <= 4.87%
5.00%
Expenses per Assets
4.00%
3.00%
2
.
0
1
%
2
.
3
1
%
2
.
4
1
%
2
.
5
4
%
2
.
8
9
%
2
.
9
9
%
3
.
1
2
%
3
.
3
4
%
3
.
5
7
%
3
.
9
2
%
4
.
5
5
%
4
.
8
4
%
4
.
8
7
%
1
0
9
1
1
8
1
0
6
2.00%
1.00%
0
.
6
7
%
1
.
1
2
%
1
.
2
8
%
0.00%
1
0
8
1
1
4
1
1
0
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
1
1
0
5
1
1
9
1
1
5
1
1
3
1
1
7
1
2
0
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.21}-SUM{B.23})/(B.10.1-B.11.1)+(B.28.1-B.29.1)/(B.12.1-B.13.1)+(B.28.2-B.29.2)/(B.12.2-B.13.2))/3
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27449
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1660
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Regular
Transmission Operations Expense
Per Total Transmission Circuits
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$67,634
$7,549 <= $43,490
$43,490 <= $53,650
$53,650 <= $72,151
$72,151 <= $301,984
$350,000
$
3
0
1
,
9
8
4
$300,000
Expenses per Total Transmission Circuits
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$
7
,
5
4
9
$
2
3
,
0
2
6
$
2
6
,
6
1
4
$
3
4
,
1
6
0
$
4
6
,
6
0
0
$
5
0
,
2
2
9
$
5
2
,
6
4
4
$
5
3
,
0
7
1
$
5
4
,
2
2
8
1
6
1
6
1
1
$
6
5
,
5
4
9
$
7
0
,
4
4
8
$
7
1
,
6
5
7
$
7
3
,
6
3
1
$
7
4
,
1
8
1
$
7
6
,
5
7
3
3
1
8
8
1
9
7
$0
9
5
1
2
1
4
1
5
2
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}-B.20.6)/SUM{BB.2}
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2500044
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1660.1
4
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
7
1
3
1
0
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Regular
Transmission Operations Expense
Per Total Transmission Breakers
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$30,075
$4,857 <= $12,504
$12,504 <= $19,575
$19,575 <= $25,300
$25,300 <= $193,790
$200,000
$
1
9
3
,
7
9
0
$180,000
$160,000
Expenses per Total Transmission Breakers
$140,000
$120,000
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$
4
,
8
5
7
$
6
,
2
2
1
9
1
2
$
1
0
,
4
1
3
$
1
1
,
4
4
1
$
1
3
,
5
6
8
$
1
4
,
1
4
3
$
1
4
,
9
6
0
1
4
5
6
1
8
1
1
$
1
9
,
5
7
5
$
2
0
,
7
3
6
1
1
6
$
2
2
,
8
1
0
$
2
3
,
3
9
2
2
1
5
$
2
7
,
2
0
8
$
3
0
,
9
1
4
$
3
7
,
0
9
1
$0
7
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}-B.20.6)/(AQ.4.1+AQ.4.2+AQ.4.3+AQ.4.4+AQ.4.5+AQ.4.6)
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2500042
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1660.2
8
1
9
4
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
7
1
3
1
0
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Regular
Transmission Line Operations Expense
Per Total Transmission Circuits
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$53,384
$3,760 <= $22,972
$22,972 <= $35,118
$35,118 <= $53,236
$53,236 <= $301,984
$350,000
$
3
0
1
,
9
8
4
$300,000
Expenses per Total Transmission Circuits
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$
3
,
7
6
0
$
1
4
,
1
5
9
$
1
5
,
8
1
9
$
1
5
,
9
5
6
2
1
6
5
$
2
5
,
3
1
0
$
2
8
,
0
7
6
$
2
8
,
3
7
5
1
2
1
1
9
$
3
4
,
1
6
0
$
3
6
,
0
7
6
1
4
1
5
$
5
0
,
1
9
4
$
5
0
,
5
7
9
$
5
2
,
6
4
4
$
5
5
,
0
1
4
8
1
1
6
7
$
7
0
,
4
4
8
$
7
1
,
5
8
7
3
1
8
$0
9
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.20}-B.20.6)-SUM{B.21})/SUM{BB.2}
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600022
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1660.3
4
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
7
1
3
1
0
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Regular
Transmission Line Operations Expense
Per Total Transmission Breakers
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$23,806
$2,419 <= $7,055
$7,055 <= $13,568
$13,568 <= $16,148
$16,148 <= $193,790
$200,000
$
1
9
3
,
7
9
0
$180,000
$160,000
Expenses per Total Transmission Breakers
$140,000
$120,000
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$
2
,
4
1
9
$
4
,
9
2
7
$
5
,
9
1
6
$
6
,
1
8
1
$
7
,
9
2
9
2
1
2
1
6
5
$
1
0
,
4
1
3
$
1
0
,
9
4
2
1
4
1
$
1
3
,
5
6
8
$
1
3
,
9
5
3
$
1
4
,
1
2
9
$
1
4
,
1
8
7
6
1
1
1
8
1
9
$
1
8
,
1
0
9
$
1
9
,
5
4
7
$
2
1
,
0
7
4
1
5
7
8
$0
9
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.20}-B.20.6)-SUM{B.21})/(AQ.4.1+AQ.4.2+AQ.4.3+AQ.4.4+AQ.4.5+AQ.4.6)
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600023
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1660.4
4
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
7
1
3
1
0
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
3-Year Average Transmission Line O&M Expenses
Per Assets Less Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
7.85%
1.30% <= 4.13%
4.13% <= 5.63%
5.63% <= 8.08%
8.08% <= 31.74%
35.00%
3
1
.
7
4
%
30.00%
Expenses per Depreciated Assets
25.00%
20.00%
1
3
.
8
6
%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
1
.
3
0
%
1
.
5
2
%
1
0
8
1
1
4
2
.
5
6
%
3
.
1
6
%
4
.
4
5
%
5
.
0
7
%
5
.
4
2
%
5
.
4
5
%
5
.
8
1
%
6
.
0
4
%
1
1
9
1
2
3
1
1
5
1
1
3
1
1
7
7
.
3
7
%
7
.
9
3
%
1
5
.
3
3
%
8
.
5
6
%
0.00%
1
1
0
1
1
2
1
0
5
1
1
8
1
0
6
1
0
9
1
2
1
1
1
6
1
2
0
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
(((SUM{B.20}-B.20.6+SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.21}-SUM{B.23})/(B.10.1-B.14.2-(B.11.1-B.15.2)))+(B.28.1-B.29.1)/(B.12.1-B.13.1-(B.16.3-B.17.3))+(B.28.2-B.29.2)/(B.12.2-B.13.2-(B.16.4-
Source/Calculation:B.17.4)))/3
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27139
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1661
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Regular
Transmission Circuit Miles Added
Per Existing Circuit Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
0.66%
0.02% <= 0.06%
0.06% <= 0.22%
0.22% <= 1.24%
1.24% <= 2.28%
2.50%
2
.
2
8
%
Miles Added per Existing Circuit Mile
2.00%
1
.
4
2
%
1.50%
1.00%
1
.
5
9
%
0
.
7
0
%
0.50%
0
.
0
2
%
0
.
0
3
%
6
1
2
0
.
0
5
%
0
.
0
9
%
0
.
2
0
%
0
.
2
4
%
0.00%
5
1
9
8
2
1
6
4
1
4
2
3
Source/Calculation:SUM{BB.10}/(SUM{BB.3}+SUM{BB.4})
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600032
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1661.1
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
9
1
8
1
7
1
5
1
3
1
1
1
0
7
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Current Year Capital Additions - Overall Transmission
Per Current Year Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
178%
3% <= 50%
50% <= 116%
116% <= 224%
224% <= 593%
600%
4
3
1
.
8
3
%
Capital Additions per Depreciation
500%
400%
5
2
1
.
7
0
%
5
9
2
.
9
5
%
1
1
8
1
1
0
3
0
7
.
7
4
%
300%
200%
100%
2
.
7
6
%
9
.
6
0
%
1
2
.
0
4
%
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
9
.
9
3
%
7
9
.
5
3
%
8
0
.
6
2
%
1
0
6
1
1
9
1
0
1
.
1
1
%
1
1
6
.
1
0
%
1
1
6
.
9
6
%
1
1
7
1
1
2
1
3
2
.
2
6
%
1
4
0
.
7
7
%
0%
1
1
5
1
2
3
1
0
9
1
2
0
1
1
4
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.2})/B.18.2
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27388
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1662
1
0
8
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Regular
Transmission Line Delivery Costs
Per kWh Hour Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$0.003
$0.000 <= $0.002
$0.002 <= $0.003
$0.003 <= $0.004
$0.004 <= $0.007
$0.008
$0.007
Costs per kWh Transmitted
$0.006
$0.005
$0.004
$0.003
$0.002
$0.001
$0.000
1
2
7
1
1
Trans Line Capital Additions
1
9
1
5
9
1
4
Trans Line O&M
6
1
3
1
6
4
1
8
Trans Line CRF
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.2}-SUM{B.3})/(A.2.5*1000)
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8864
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1663
2
1
7
2
0
1
3
8
Trans Line Gen'l Plant Additions
5
2
2
2
3
1
0
2
1
Trans Line Gen'l Plant CRF
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Current Year Capital Additions - Transmission Line
Per Current Year Depreciation
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
145%
3% <= 13%
13% <= 49%
49% <= 176%
176% <= 742%
800%
7
4
1
.
8
0
%
700%
Capital Additions per Current Year Depreciation
600%
500%
3
5
8
.
4
8
%
400%
300%
200%
100%
2
.
7
6
%
4
.
5
2
%
6
.
8
0
%
1
1
.
2
0
%
1
4
.
5
1
%
1
9
.
8
7
%
1
1
5
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
1
7
1
1
9
1
2
3
3
9
.
8
9
%
4
8
.
6
1
%
1
0
6
1
1
2
9
8
.
1
7
%
1
1
3
.
2
1
%
1
2
6
.
7
8
%
3
6
8
.
6
8
%
2
2
4
.
5
1
%
0%
1
2
0
1
0
9
1
1
4
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.2}-SUM{B.3})/(B.18.2-B.19.2)
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27391
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1664
1
1
6
1
0
8
1
1
8
1
1
0
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Regular
Transmission Delivery Costs
Per kWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$0.010
$0.001 <= $0.008
$0.008 <= $0.010
$0.010 <= $0.011
$0.011 <= $0.028
$0.030
Costs per kWh Transmitted
$0.025
$0.020
$0.015
$0.010
$0.005
$0.000
1
2
1
9
7
1
4
6
Trans Cap Adds
1
1
3
1
8
Trans O&M
1
5
1
6
1
9
4
Trans CRF
Source/Calculation:((B.10.1+B.14.2)*.10)/(A.2.5*1000)
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8866
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1666
2
1
7
2
0
Trans Gen'l Plant Adds
1
3
8
5
2
2
2
3
1
0
2
1
Trans Gen'l Plant CRF
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Book Value
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$17.55
$0.85 <= $12.58
$12.58 <= $15.03
$15.03 <= $18.63
$18.63 <= $55.63
$60.00
$
5
5
.
6
3
Book Value per MWh Transmitted
$50.00
$40.00
$30.00
$20.00
$
1
0
.
5
6
$
1
1
.
0
5
1
0
5
1
2
3
$
1
2
.
4
2
$
1
3
.
0
5
$
1
3
.
4
7
1
2
1
1
0
6
1
1
9
$
1
4
.
4
6
$
1
5
.
6
0
$
1
5
.
9
4
1
0
8
1
1
5
$
1
8
.
0
9
$
1
8
.
8
0
1
1
8
1
1
3
$
2
0
.
8
3
$
2
4
.
9
4
$10.00
$
0
.
8
5
$0.00
1
1
2
1
0
9
Source/Calculation:(B.10.1-B.14.2)/A.2.5
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300117
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1668
1
1
0
1
1
6
1
1
4
1
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Book Value
Per Circuit Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$304,826
$66,114 <= $137,429
$137,429 <= $222,460
$222,460 <= $330,489
$330,489 <= $1,194,339
$1,200,000
$
1
,
1
9
4
,
3
3
9
Book Value per Circuit Mile
$1,000,000
$800,000
$600,000
$400,000
$200,000
$
6
6
,
1
1
4
$
8
1
,
4
1
0
$
8
1
,
4
7
2
1
2
3
1
2
1
$
1
1
3
,
5
3
9
$
1
4
5
,
3
9
2
$
1
4
5
,
4
9
2
$
1
5
6
,
5
7
2
1
1
7
1
1
3
1
1
0
$
2
0
8
,
1
6
5
$
2
3
6
,
7
5
5
$
2
6
6
,
8
5
9
$
2
7
2
,
5
1
7
1
0
5
1
0
8
$
2
9
8
,
7
0
5
$
4
2
5
,
8
4
0
$
5
0
1
,
5
1
5
$
6
8
2
,
5
2
3
$0
1
2
0
1
0
9
1
0
6
1
1
2
Source/Calculation:(B.10.1-B.14.2)/(SUM{BB.3}+SUM{BB.4})
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8748
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1669
1
1
8
1
1
4
1
1
9
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Book Value
Per MVA
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$51,207
$13,654 <= $37,539
$37,539 <= $49,924
$49,924 <= $71,068
$71,068 <= $81,014
$90,000
$80,000
Book Value per MVA
$70,000
$60,000
$50,000
$
3
6
,
1
0
2
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000
$
1
3
,
6
5
4
$
3
8
,
0
1
8
$
3
9
,
7
8
2
$
5
7
,
0
7
9
$
5
7
,
7
8
5
1
1
0
1
2
3
$
6
8
,
7
4
4
$
7
8
,
0
4
1
$
7
9
,
5
7
4
$
8
1
,
0
1
4
1
2
1
1
1
6
1
1
4
$
4
2
,
7
6
9
$
2
1
,
9
1
9
$10,000
$0
1
0
5
1
0
8
1
1
2
1
1
3
1
0
9
1
2
0
1
0
6
Source/Calculation:(B.10.1-B.14.2)/SUM{AQ.12}
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300116
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1670
1
2
2
1
1
9
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Transmission Depreciation
As a Percent of Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
39.2%
29.3% <= 33.5%
33.5% <= 39.9%
39.9% <= 43.6%
43.6% <= 55.1%
60.0%
Percent of Assets
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
2
9
.
3
%
2
9
.
8
%
1
1
0
1
1
4
3
1
.
7
%
3
2
.
7
%
3
3
.
8
%
3
5
.
8
%
3
5
.
9
%
1
1
2
1
1
6
3
9
.
9
%
4
0
.
0
%
1
0
8
1
1
3
4
0
.
7
%
4
3
.
2
%
4
3
.
6
%
4
3
.
7
%
1
0
5
1
0
9
1
1
9
4
5
.
2
%
4
7
.
7
%
5
5
.
1
%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
1
1
8
1
0
6
1
1
7
1
2
1
Source/Calculation:B.14.2/B.10.1
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8750
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1671
1
1
5
1
2
0
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Regular
Transmission Circuits
By Voltage Class
100%
Percent of Circuits
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
2
1
9
7
1
5
8
1
1
4
3
6
4
1
8
1
1
1
6
9
1
2
5
1
7
1
0
2
0
500kV or Greater Circuits
300kV - 399kV Circuits
100kV - 199kV Circuits
Less than 60kV
400kV - 499kV Circuits
200kV - 299kV Circuits
60kV - 99kV Circuits
Breakdow n Unavailable
Source/Calculation:BB.2.1/SUM{BB.2}
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8759
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1672
2
1
1
3
2
3
2
2
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Regular
Transmission OH Circuit Miles
By Voltage Class
100%
Percent of OH Miles
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
2
3
1
9
7
1
4
1
1
5
8
6
4
5
1
2
1
6
1
1
1
8
9
2
1
2
2
500kV Or Greater
300kV - 399kV
100kV - 199kV
Less than 60kV
400kV - 499kV
200kV - 299kV
60kV - 99kV
Breakdow n Unavailable
Source/Calculation:BB.3.1/SUM{BB.3}
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8756
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1673
1
3
2
3
2
0
1
0
1
7
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Alternate
Average Transmission Circuit Length
Transmission Circuit Miles per Transmission Circuit
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
13.35
4.28 <= 7.35
7.35 <= 11.88
11.88 <= 16.38
16.38 <= 30.25
35.00
2
6
.
9
6
30.00
Circuit Miles per Circuit
25.00
2
1
.
0
3
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
3
0
.
2
5
4
.
2
8
5
.
0
5
6
.
2
5
6
.
3
9
1
1
9
1
2
1
7
.
6
7
1
0
.
2
3
1
0
.
2
7
1
0
5
1
0
6
1
1
.
5
0
1
2
.
2
6
1
3
.
4
2
1
4
.
8
3
1
6
.
1
5
1
7
.
0
8
0.00
1
1
6
1
1
5
1
1
7
1
1
2
1
1
8
1
0
9
1
1
3
Source/Calculation:(SUM{BB.3}+SUM{BB.4})/SUM{BB.2}
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27362
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1674
1
0
8
1
2
3
1
1
0
1
1
4
1
2
0
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Regular
Transmission UG Circuit Miles
By Voltage Class
100%
Percent of Miles
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
7
1
5
1
5
4
1
9
1
2
1
6
1
8
6
1
4
3
2
2
1
1
7
2
0
1
1
8
500kV Or Greater
300kV - 399kV
100kV - 199kV
Less than 60kV
400kV - 499kV
200kV - 299kV
60kV - 99kV
Breakdow n Unavailable
Source/Calculation:BB.4.1/SUM{BB.4}
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8768
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1675
9
1
0
1
3
2
3
2
2
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Regular
Transmission OH Structure Miles
By Voltage Class
100%
Percent of Miles
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
2
1
9
3
7
1
1
5
8
6
4
1
2
1
1
1
6
9
1
8
5
2
1
2
2
2
3
500kV Or Greater
300kV - 399kV
100kV - 199kV
Less than 60kV
400kV - 499kV
200kV - 299kV
60kV - 99kV
Breakdow n Unavailable
Source/Calculation:BB.5.1/SUM{BB.5}
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8767
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1676
1
0
1
7
2
0
1
3
1
4
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Regular
Transmission UG Trench Miles
By Voltage Class
100%
Percent of Miles
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
1
6
1
9
6
1
8
4
7
2
1
1
2
3
1
5
8
2
0
9
5
2
1
1
7
1
0
500kV Or Greater
300kV - 399kV
100kV - 199kV
Less than 60kV
400kV - 499kV
200kV - 299kV
60kV - 99kV
Breakdow n Unavailable
Source/Calculation:BB.6.1/SUM{BB.6}
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8766
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1677
1
1
2
2
2
3
1
4
1
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Regular
Transmission OH Structures
Per Circuit Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
6.9
1.3 <= 5.2
5.2 <= 6.2
6.2 <= 8.6
8.6 <= 13.3
14.0
12.0
Structures per Circuit Mile
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
4
1
8
3
6
7
2
1
9
8
1
2
1
6
1
1
1
1
4
1
5
9
1
7
2
0
1
3
5
2
2
2
3
Steel Poles
Concrete Poles
Concrete H-Frames
Steel Lattice
Other
Wood Poles
Wood H-Frames
Steel H-Frames
Wood equivalent steel pole
Breakdow n Unavailable
Source/Calculation:BB.7.1/(SUM{BB.3}+SUM{BB.4})
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8762
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1678
1
0
2
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Regular
Transmission OH Structure Types
100%
Percent of Structures
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
7
2
1
9
1
8
1
5
4
8
1
1
1
1
2
3
9
1
6
1
4
6
2
3
1
7
1
0
1
3
2
0
2
2
Steel Poles
Concrete Poles
Concrete H-Frames
Steel Lattice
Other
Wood Poles
Wood H-Frames
Steel H-Frames
Wood equivalent steel pole
Breakdow n Unavailable
Source/Calculation:BB.7.1/SUM{BB.7}
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27329
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1679
5
2
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Regular
Wood Overhead Transmission Structures
Per Total Overhead Transmission Structures
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
53.4%
1.9% <= 31.8%
31.8% <= 64.2%
64.2% <= 72.2%
72.2% <= 94.9%
100.0%
8
1
.
1
%
90.0%
80.0%
6
0
.
7
%
Percent Wood
70.0%
6
7
.
7
%
6
8
.
8
%
6
9
.
3
%
1
5
1
6
1
8
8
.
8
%
9
4
.
9
%
1
1
9
60.0%
50.0%
3
0
.
5
%
40.0%
3
2
.
2
%
3
3
.
2
%
1
2
1
4
30.0%
1
1
.
3
%
20.0%
10.0%
1
.
9
%
0.0%
4
7
1
9
2
8
Source/Calculation:(BB.7.2+BB.7.4)/SUM{BB.7}
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8700
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1680
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
8
1
7
1
3
1
0
6
5
3
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Statistics
Regular
Percent of Transmission Circuit Miles with Distribution
Attached (aka Underbuild)
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
17.5%
0.0% <= 4.5%
4.5% <= 10.0%
10.0% <= 13.8%
13.8% <= 100.0%
100.0%
1
0
0
.
0
%
90.0%
80.0%
Percent of Transmission Circuit Miles
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0
.
0
%
3
.
0
%
3
.
0
%
9
5
9
.
0
%
1
0
.
0
%
1
0
.
0
%
1
0
.
0
%
1
4
8
1
1
5
.
0
%
1
5
.
0
%
1
8
1
1
0.0%
6
1
9
1
2
2
3
Source/Calculation:BB.9.1
Volume: Transmission Line Statistics, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300511
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1681
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
7
1
6
1
5
1
3
1
0
7
4
3
2
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Engineering & Design
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Pg. 1682 Project Management Technique Usage
Pg. 1683 Project Management Technique Usage (cont.)
Pg. 1684 Most Successful Design Improvement Initiatives for Reducing Costs - 1 = Lowest, 3 = Highest
Pg. 1685 Most Successful Design Improvement Initiatives for Reducing Costs (cont.)
Pg. 1686 Method Used for Measuring Design/Engineering Efficiency
Pg. 1686.1 Method Used for Measuring Design/Engineering Efficiency (cont.)
Pg. 1687 Measuring Effectiveness of Formal/Systematic Project Management Organization
Pg. 1688 Measuring Effectiveness of Formal/Systematic Project Management Organization (cont.)
XXIII
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Engineering & Design
Regular
Project Management Technique Usage
Source/Calculation:BC.2.1
Volume: Transmission Line Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1166
Page:1682
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Engineering & Design
Regular
Project Management Technique Usage (cont.)
Which project management techniques are used?
Assign portfolio's of projects to Project Manager.
Source/Calculation:BC.2.99
Volume: Transmission Line Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6569
Page:1683
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Engineering & Design
Regular
Most Successful Design Improvement Initiatives for
Reducing Costs
1 = Lowest, 3 = Highest
Source/Calculation:BC.3.1
Volume: Transmission Line Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:7061
Page:1684
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Engineering & Design
Regular
Most Successful Design Improvement Initiatives for
Reducing Costs (cont.)
Which design improvement initiatives have been most successful in reducing costs?
Computer design techniques
Individual initiatives not specifically tracked
Source/Calculation:BC.3.99
Volume: Transmission Line Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:7105
Page:1685
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Engineering & Design
Regular
Method Used for Measuring Design/Engineering
Efficiency
Source/Calculation:BC.4.1
Volume: Transmission Line Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27471
Page:1686
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Engineering & Design
Regular
Method Used for Measuring Design/Engineering
Efficiency (cont.)
How do you measure design/engineering efficiency?
Schedules + cost per mile
Source/Calculation:BC.4.99
Volume: Transmission Line Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600126
Page:1686.1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Engineering & Design
Regular
Measuring Effectiveness of Formal/Systematic Project
Management Organization
Source/Calculation:BC.5.1
Volume: Transmission Line Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27472
Page:1687
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Engineering & Design
Regular
Measuring Effectiveness of Formal/Systematic Project
Management Organization (cont.)
How do you measure the effectiveness of the formal/systematic project management
organization?
Communication of status and budget.
Internal Audits, Self Assessments, Process Improvement
Source/Calculation:BC.5.99
Volume: Transmission Line Engineering & Design, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:40229
Page:1688
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Pg. 1691
Pg. 1692
Pg. 1693
Pg. 1694
Pg. 1695
Pg. 1696
Pg. 1697
Pg. 1698
Pg. 1699
Pg. 1700
Pg. 1701
Pg. 1710
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Methods Used to Determine Aging Transmission Line Equipment in the System
Refurbishment and/or Replacement Policies for Major Transmission Line Equipment Currently Used
Methods Used to Detect Transmission Line Equipment Deterioration Failures
Methods Used to Detect Transmission Line Equipment Deterioration Failures (cont.)
Preventive Maintenance Period Much Longer Than the Average Duration of the Optimal Preventive Replacement Interval - For Major Transmission Line Equi
Definition of "Refurbishment" of Transmission Line Equipment
Distinction Between Refurbishment, Maintenance, and Capital Expenditures
Identifying Need for Refurbishment of Aging Transmission Line Infrastructure
Determining Which Type of Structures to Use When Refurbishing a Transmission Line
Handling of Grounding Issues When Installing Transmission Line Structures
Criteria Used to Decide How to Proceed After Initial "Reasonable" Efforts to Achieve a Grounding Target Fail
Use "Fleet" Studies of Transmission Lines by Outside Consultants to Determine Need for Refurbishment/Replacement
XXIV
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment
Regular
Methods Used to Determine Aging Transmission Line
Equipment in the System
What methods are utilized to determine aging Transmission Line equipment in the system?
Aerial patrol, GLIT
Age of components and inspections
climbing inspection/condition assessments
Climbing inspections and aerial inspections
Close visual inspections from helicopter using gyro-stabilized telephoto lens camera; infrared inspections; foot patrols; wood pole inspections.
Engineering Decision
Failure Rates & Industry Trends
Ground line inspections
Ground line testing, visual damage do to aging.
In some cases both installed dates or asset age records which are maintained at the grid locations. Manufactures life expectancy information is also useful.
Lab and engineering analysis is performed on failure specimens.
Outage data; Inspection data
Review and analysis of outage data and inspection data
Routine patrols and inspections
Visual Inspection
We have a 5 year inspection and rehab cycle for our transmission system. All components are inspected for conditions and replaced, if needed. We have a GLT program on a 10
year cycle. We have a tower painting program for our corrosive areas.
Source/Calculation:BD.6.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300674
Page:1691
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment
Regular
Refurbishment and/or Replacement Policies for Major
Transmission Line Equipment Currently Used
What are the refurbishment and/or replacement policies for major transmission line equipment
currently used in your company?
As required only
Engineering provides this information
Equipment obsolescence and overall transmission line outage performance
Equipment obsolescence and overall transmission line outage performance.
In general, replacement used over repair/reinforce
Inspections, outage statistics, age
Keep ahead with rigorous inspection programs
No formal policies. Xonditions often determine type of fix (replace or maintain).
Refurbishment vs. Replacement is based on good Engineering practices and analysis.
See Notes
Usually needs upgrade in capacity before end of life
We have a selective replacement guideline that is part of the inspection and rehab program. It contains the criteria for replacement or repair of the transmission facilities. We repair
or replace any item that will not provide reliable operation.
Source/Calculation:BD.12.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300675
Page:1692
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment
Regular
Methods Used to Detect Transmission Line Equipment
Deterioration Failures
Source/Calculation:BD.8.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300772
Page:1693
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment
Regular
Methods Used to Detect Transmission Line Equipment
Deterioration Failures (cont.)
What methods are utilized to detect transmission line equipment deterioration failures?
Established 5 year inspection cycle and 10 year GLT program. We employ ground based inspections with high power stabilized binoculars and spotting scopes. We use OHM
meters to test grounding systems. We use IR on switches.
Routine inspections
Special inspection (i.e., infrared and comprehensive helicopter inspection).
Standard routine inspection /failure analysis
Visual Inspection
Source/Calculation:BD.8.99
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300773
Page:1694
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment
Regular
Preventive Maintenance Period Much Longer Than the Average
Duration of the Optimal Preventive Replacement Interval
For Major Transmission Line Equipment
Source/Calculation:BD.14.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300578
Page:1695
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment
Regular
Definition of "Refurbishment" of Transmission Line
Equipment
How is "refurbishment" of a transmission line equipment defined?
Any significant maintenace or improvement to existing line components.
climbing inspection / condition assessment
Complete replacement of towers, conductors, insulator strings and/or hardware end-to-end. This may or may not be associated with an increase in transmission capacity.
Everything short of total rebuild
New structures
Refurbishment is the replacement of degraded componenets on a proactive basis.
Refurbishment is the replacement of degraded components on a proactive basis.
Repair or replacement of deteriorated line components to ensure optimal performance of a transmission line between inspection cycles.
Repair, rebuild
Replacing like/or polymer to replace porcelain
Thermal upgrade, life extension, refurbishment.
We don't use that term. We maintain or replace.
When a major component (poles, timbers, insulatore) are replaced throughout the line.
Wire and associated hardware replaced
Works of an non repetitive nature when important costs are added to one or several units of existing properties with the aim of prolonging the life expentancy in a substantial way
Source/Calculation:BD.15.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300676
Page:1696
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment
Regular
Distinction Between Refurbishment, Maintenance, and
Capital Expenditures
Where is the line drawn between refurbishment, maintenance, and capital expenditures?
70% of replacement cost.
Age of line, cost to repair, outage statistics; Maintenance is performed until no longer effective
Each major expenditure is handled on a case by case basis.
If line is totally rebuilt or anything that adds life is capital
In general, replacement used over refurbishment or maintenance
Refurbishment is the replacement of degraded components that have not failed. A refurbishment is typically a capital expenditure because of the extent of the work completed.
Maintenance is the replacement of failed components.
Refurbishment is the replacement of degraded components that have not failed. A refurbishment is typically a capital expenditure. Maintenance is replacement of failed
components
Renewal of assets
See notes
Sometimes depends on outage availability, updoming projects, and or budgets.
That is determined on the spot in the field by the inspection team. The selective replacement guidelines are the resource for decision making to repair or replace. If an item can be
economically repaired, then that decision is made.
The works of refurbishment have to restor in the unit of existing property at least 50% of its original life expentancy, and put back the asset to the state of nine by restoring the
original life expentancy
Source/Calculation:BD.16.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300677
Page:1697
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment
Regular
Identifying Need for Refurbishment of Aging
Transmission Line Infrastructure
How is the need for refurbishment of aging transmission line infrastructure identified? Is it an
outgrowth of "normal" survey activity, or are focused surveys specific to refurbishment
conducted?
An outgrowth of normal survey activity
Analysis of normal inspection and survey results
Both -outgrowth of normal surveys plus focused surveys
Engineering and Planning Decision
focused surveys spécific to refurbishment
Ground normal line inspections
It is an outgrowth of the normal survey activity.
No specific surveys are conducted.
Normal
Normal Survey
Normal survey activity
Normal Survey Activity
Outgrowth of "normal" survey activity.
Patrols are focused on identifying maintenance items
We employ a normal inspection on a 5 year cycle for all transmission circuits. We are on our 3rd round of the system. If a circuit is not performing well or has repeat outages, then
special off cycle inspections are made to determine the problem.
Source/Calculation:BD.7.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300678
Page:1698
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment
Regular
Determining Which Type of Structures to Use When
Refurbishing a Transmission Line
How do you decide what type of structures to use when you refurbish a transmission line? Are
wood poles perceived as more aesthetically acceptable than steel towers?
Depends on location. We use "cor-ten" weathering steel for most new installations
Economics & delivery
Engineering Decision
engineering design, cost analysis
Generaly replace-in-kind. No preference on wood or steel.
It depends on location.
No wood poles used, primarily steel poles
No, depends on structural loads
See Notes
Steel lattice towers are replaced with steel poles. Wood poles are replaced with steel poles. Wood poles are not perceived as more aesthetically acceptable than steel towers or
poles.
This is determined during the engineering design phase on a line-by-line basis.
Upgrade to current design standards
We use the most efficient structure for the specific location. It is typical to replace wooden H frames with single pole concrete or steel poles. Wood is still used to replace smaller
class wood poles such as in multi-pole structure.
When refurbishing, steel towers are replaced with steel poles. Wood poles are replaced with steel poles. Wood poles are not perceived as more aesthetically acceptable than steel
towers.
Wood/Steel for 115kv single circuit. Steel poles for everything else. Wood not perceived more acceptable than steel towers.
Source/Calculation:BD.13.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300679
Page:1699
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment
Regular
Handling of Grounding Issues When Installing
Transmission Line Structures
How do you handle grounding issues when installing transmission line structures?
Con Edison has a standard specification that requires a grounding grid to be installed with an impedance of 10 ohms or lower.
Design Standards require 10 ohms or less
Do Not Ground / Only Ground for Lightning
Every structure is grounded using ground rods and counterpoise
Follow grounding procedures and practices
Ground rods and counterpoise for H/K frame; also depends on construxction type (steel, wood, latice, etc.)
Grounding is always done plus counterpoise
lightning performance and code requirements
safe operating procedures/installation standards
See Notes.
Structures are grounded by approved engineering standards
The maximum grounding target footing resistance for 69 kV - 230 kV is 25 ohms; for 345 kV - 500 kV is 15 ohms.
The maximum grounding target footing resistance for 69kV - 500kV is 10 ohms
We have a construction standard of 5 OHMs for new installations and a maintenance standard of =/< OMHs. We design for a withstand of 40 KA lightning strokes on all of our
transmission lines.
Source/Calculation:BD.9.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300680
Page:1700
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment
Regular
Criteria Used to Decide How to Proceed After Initial "Reasonable"
Efforts to Achieve a Grounding Target Fail
If initial "reasonable" efforts to achieve a grounding target (measured in ohms) fail, what
criteria do you use to decide how to proceed?
3 point measurement if high additional ground rods are added until resistance is acceptable
add more counterpoise and ground rods until target is acheived
additional ground rods. sometimes, counterpoise is installed.
Engineering Decision
Engineering is contacted for further evaluation and guidance.
If problems occur then we improve grounding
Install G.E.M. with grd rod & re-measure
minimum ground resistance criteria
See Notes
The best you can. If the structures are within the first 2 miles of a substation we put in more effort.
We achieve target most often. Every structure is grounded.
We install a maximum of five 8' ground rods in a series no matter what the final reading is . Our OHM standard can usually be met with three 8' ground rods in a series. We have
very good soil in our area.
Will first attempt to add additonal ground rods at the base of the structure. If still unable to achieve the desired target, then we will install counterpoise.
Will install counterpoise until the desired ground target ios achieved.
Source/Calculation:BD.10.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300681
Page:1701
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment
Regular
Use "Fleet" Studies of Transmission Lines by Outside Consultants
to Determine Need for Refurbishment/Replacement
Source/Calculation:BD.11.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Refurbishment, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300582
Page:1710
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Pg. 1716 Transmission Operations Expenses - Per MWh Transmitted
Pg. 1717 Transmission Operations Expenses - Per Transmission Structure Mile
Pg. 1718 Transmission Operations Expenses - Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Pg. 1718.1 Transmission Operations Expenses - Per Total Transmission Circuits
Pg. 1718.2 Transmission Operations Expenses - Per Total Transmission Breakers
Pg. 1719 Transmission Operations Expenses - Per Transmission Assets
Pg. 1721 Transmission Line Operations Expenses - Per MWh Transmitted
Pg. 1722 Transmission Line Operations Expenses - Per Transmission Structure Mile
Pg. 1723 Transmission Line Operations Expenses - Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Pg. 1723.1 Transmission Line Operations Expenses - Per Total Transmission Circuits
Pg. 1723.2 Transmission Line Operations Expenses - Per Total Transmission Breakers
Pg. 1724 Transmission Line Operations Expenses - Per Transmission Line Assets
Pg. 1725 Transmission Maintenance Expenses - Per MWh Transmitted
Pg. 1726 Transmission Maintenance Expenses - Per Transmission Structure Mile
Pg. 1728 Transmission Maintenance Expenses - Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Pg. 1729 Transmission Maintenance Expenses - Per Transmission Assets
Pg. 1731 Transmission Line Maintenance Expenses - Per MWh Transmitted
Pg. 1732 Transmission Line Maintenance Expenses - Per Transmission Structure Mile
Pg. 1733 Transmission Line Maintenance Expenses - Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Pg. 1734 Transmission Line Maintenance Expenses - Per Transmission Line Assets
Pg. 1735 Frequency of Aerial Patrol of Transmission Lines - Months Between Patrols (Helicopters, Fixed-Wing Fly-By)
Pg. 1742 Authority of Inspection Personnel to Make Correction Decisions
Pg. 1742.1 Authority of Inspection Personnel to Make Correction Decisions (cont.)
Pg. 1746 Percent of Transmission System Maintained Last Year - Preventive Maintenance
Pg. 1747 Percent of Maintenance Done with Energized Lines - Per Voltage Class
XXV
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Operations Expenses
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$0.38
$0.01 <= $0.27
$0.27 <= $0.33
$0.33 <= $0.44
$0.44 <= $1.47
$1.60
$
1
.
4
7
$1.40
Expenses per MWh Transmitted
$1.20
$1.00
$0.80
$0.60
$0.40
$0.20
$
0
.
0
1
$
0
.
1
2
$
0
.
1
8
$
0
.
2
6
$
0
.
2
9
$
0
.
3
2
$
0
.
3
3
$
0
.
3
3
$
0
.
3
4
1
1
4
1
1
5
1
1
9
1
1
0
$
0
.
4
3
$
0
.
4
4
$
0
.
4
4
$
0
.
4
4
1
2
3
1
0
6
1
1
3
1
0
9
$0.00
1
1
2
1
0
8
1
2
1
1
1
8
1
0
5
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}-B.20.6)/A.2.5
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:659
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1716
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Operations Expenses
Per Transmission Structure Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$16,580
$1,203 <= $3,094
$3,094 <= $4,112
$4,112 <= $12,404
$12,404 <= $149,670
$160,000
$
1
4
9
,
6
7
0
$140,000
Expenses per Structure Mile
$120,000
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$
1
,
2
0
3
$
2
,
4
3
4
$
2
,
8
7
9
$
3
,
0
1
1
$
3
,
3
4
4
$
3
,
4
3
5
$
3
,
6
4
9
$
4
,
5
7
6
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
1
4
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
1
3
1
0
9
$
6
,
9
3
3
$
1
0
,
6
9
5
$
1
2
,
9
7
4
$
1
3
,
3
4
8
$
1
3
,
9
6
7
1
0
6
1
1
9
1
1
5
$0
1
1
8
1
0
5
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}-B.20.6)/(SUM{BB.5}+SUM{BB.6})
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:658
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1717
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Operations Expenses
Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$8,833
$1,182 <= $2,433
$2,433 <= $3,281
$3,281 <= $7,044
$7,044 <= $70,571
$80,000
$
7
0
,
5
7
1
$70,000
Expenses per Circuit Mile
$60,000
$50,000
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$
1
,
1
8
2
$
2
,
1
1
5
$
2
,
3
1
5
$
2
,
4
3
1
$
2
,
4
3
4
$
2
,
5
2
3
$
3
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
1
7
4
$
3
,
3
8
7
$
3
,
4
7
3
$
4
,
2
9
3
1
0
8
1
1
2
1
1
4
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
1
7
1
2
3
1
1
3
1
0
9
1
1
8
$
6
,
9
7
5
$
7
,
2
5
1
1
0
6
1
0
5
$
1
2
,
2
6
1
$
1
3
,
9
5
1
$0
1
2
1
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}-B.20.6)/(SUM{BB.3}+SUM{BB.4})
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2010
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1718
1
1
9
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Operations Expenses
Per Total Transmission Circuits
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$67,634
$7,549 <= $43,490
$43,490 <= $53,650
$53,650 <= $72,151
$72,151 <= $301,984
$350,000
$
3
0
1
,
9
8
4
$300,000
Expenses per Total Transmission Circuits
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$
7
,
5
4
9
$
2
3
,
0
2
6
$
2
6
,
6
1
4
1
1
7
1
1
2
$
3
4
,
1
6
0
$
4
6
,
6
0
0
$
5
0
,
2
2
9
$
5
2
,
6
4
4
$
5
3
,
0
7
1
$
5
4
,
2
2
8
1
0
9
1
1
3
1
1
8
1
1
0
1
2
3
$
6
5
,
5
4
9
$
7
0
,
4
4
8
$
7
1
,
6
5
7
$
7
3
,
6
3
1
$
7
4
,
1
8
1
$
7
6
,
5
7
3
1
1
5
1
0
6
1
2
0
1
0
5
1
1
9
$0
1
2
1
1
0
8
1
1
4
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}-B.20.6)/SUM{BB.2}
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600107
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1718.1
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Operations Expenses
Per Total Transmission Breakers
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$5,921
$1,840 <= $2,806
$2,806 <= $6,027
$6,027 <= $7,903
$7,903 <= $18,379
$20,000
$
1
8
,
3
7
9
Expenses per Total Transmission Breakers
$15,000
$10,000
$5,000
$
1
,
8
4
0
$
2
,
1
9
8
$
2
,
2
1
4
$
2
,
3
9
7
1
1
8
1
1
2
1
0
8
$
3
,
2
1
5
$
3
,
5
0
3
$
3
,
5
3
1
1
1
9
1
0
5
$
6
,
0
2
7
$
6
,
3
1
8
$
6
,
7
5
7
$
7
,
8
6
5
$
7
,
9
4
2
$
8
,
0
2
8
1
0
6
1
1
4
1
0
9
$
8
,
5
9
8
$0
1
2
1
1
1
7
1
1
0
1
2
3
1
1
3
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}-B.20.6)/SUM{AQ.4}
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600108
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1718.2
1
2
0
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Operations Expenses
Per Transmission Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
1.42%
0.40% <= 0.95%
0.95% <= 1.37%
1.37% <= 1.73%
1.73% <= 3.79%
4.00%
3
.
7
9
%
3.50%
Expenses per Transmission Assets
3.00%
2.50%
2.00%
1.50%
1.00%
0.50%
0
.
4
0
%
0
.
4
7
%
0
.
6
3
%
0
.
8
6
%
0
.
9
8
%
1
.
1
2
%
1
.
1
4
%
1
1
5
1
1
0
1
.
3
7
%
1
.
3
8
%
1
.
4
0
%
1
1
7
1
1
9
1
1
3
1
.
5
4
%
1
.
7
2
%
1
.
7
5
%
1
0
9
1
2
3
1
.
9
3
%
2
.
2
6
%
0.00%
1
1
4
1
0
8
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
8
1
0
5
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}-B.20.6)/B.10.1
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2116
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1719
1
2
0
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Line Operations Expenses
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$0.30
$0.01 <= $0.10
$0.10 <= $0.24
$0.24 <= $0.34
$0.34 <= $1.47
$1.60
$
1
.
4
7
$1.40
Expenses per MWh Transmitted
$1.20
$1.00
$0.80
$0.60
$0.40
$0.20
$
0
.
0
1
$
0
.
0
7
$
0
.
0
9
$
0
.
1
0
$
0
.
1
1
$
0
.
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
0
5
1
0
8
$
0
.
2
4
$
0
.
2
4
$
0
.
2
6
1
1
9
1
1
3
1
1
8
$
0
.
3
3
$
0
.
3
4
1
1
5
1
0
9
$
0
.
4
0
$
0
.
4
4
$0.00
1
1
2
1
1
4
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}-B.20.6-SUM{B.21})/A.2.5
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:662
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1721
1
2
3
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Line Operations Expenses
Per Transmission Structure Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$15,211
$599 <= $1,754
$1,754 <= $3,405
$3,405 <= $8,926
$8,926 <= $149,670
$160,000
$
1
4
9
,
6
7
0
$140,000
Expenses per Structure Mile
$120,000
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$
5
9
9
$
6
5
0
$
8
5
8
$
1
,
6
5
9
1
2
1
1
1
4
1
1
0
1
2
0
$20,000
$
2
,
0
4
0
$
3
,
1
1
9
$
3
,
2
6
7
$
3
,
5
4
2
$
4
,
0
9
1
1
1
3
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
0
9
1
0
5
$
6
,
9
3
3
$
9
,
5
9
0
$
1
2
,
9
6
2
$
1
3
,
9
6
7
1
0
6
1
1
5
$0
1
1
8
1
1
9
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}-B.20.6-SUM{B.21})/(SUM{BB.5}+SUM{BB.6})
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:661
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1722
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Line Operations Expenses
Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$7,802
$525 <= $1,835
$1,835 <= $2,445
$2,445 <= $4,962
$4,962 <= $70,571
$80,000
$
7
0
,
5
7
1
$70,000
Expenses per Circuit Mile
$60,000
$50,000
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$
5
2
5
$
5
8
8
$
7
5
2
1
1
4
1
2
1
1
1
0
$
1
,
6
5
9
$
1
,
8
9
3
$
2
,
0
7
9
$
2
,
1
1
5
$
2
,
2
0
1
$
2
,
6
8
9
$
2
,
7
7
3
$
2
,
9
6
1
1
2
0
1
1
3
1
1
7
1
0
8
1
1
2
1
0
9
1
0
5
1
2
3
$
4
,
2
9
3
$
6
,
9
6
8
$
8
,
8
0
9
$
1
3
,
9
5
1
$0
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.20}-B.20.6)-SUM{B.21})/(SUM{BB.3}+SUM{BB.4})
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2013
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1723
1
1
8
1
0
6
1
1
9
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Line Operations Expenses
Per Total Transmission Circuits
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$53,384
$3,760 <= $22,972
$22,972 <= $35,118
$35,118 <= $53,236
$53,236 <= $301,984
$350,000
$
3
0
1
,
9
8
4
$300,000
Expenses per Total Transmission Circuits
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$
3
,
7
6
0
$
1
4
,
1
5
9
$
1
5
,
8
1
9
$
1
5
,
9
5
6
1
1
4
1
1
0
1
1
7
$
2
5
,
3
1
0
$
2
8
,
0
7
6
$
2
8
,
3
7
5
1
1
2
1
1
3
1
0
5
$
3
4
,
1
6
0
$
3
6
,
0
7
6
1
0
8
1
0
9
$
5
0
,
1
9
4
$
5
0
,
5
7
9
$
5
2
,
6
4
4
$
5
5
,
0
1
4
1
2
0
1
2
3
1
1
8
1
1
9
$
7
0
,
4
4
8
$
7
1
,
5
8
7
1
1
5
1
0
6
$0
1
2
1
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.20}-B.20.6)-SUM{B.21})/SUM{BB.2}
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600109
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1723.1
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Line Operations Expenses
Per Total Transmission Breakers
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$4,347
$917 <= $1,951
$1,951 <= $2,397
$2,397 <= $5,877
$5,877 <= $18,379
$20,000
$
1
8
,
3
7
9
Expenses per Total Transmission Breakers
$15,000
$10,000
$5,000
$
9
1
7
$
1
,
3
5
1
$
1
,
7
1
5
$
1
,
7
9
6
1
1
4
1
1
0
$
2
,
1
0
6
$
2
,
1
9
8
$
2
,
2
2
8
$
2
,
3
9
7
$
2
,
5
1
7
1
1
2
1
1
8
1
1
7
1
0
8
1
1
9
$
3
,
7
7
7
$
5
,
8
6
1
$
5
,
8
9
3
1
2
0
1
2
3
$
6
,
2
1
5
$
7
,
8
5
7
$0
1
2
1
1
0
5
1
1
3
Source/Calculation:((SUM{B.20}-B.20.6)-SUM{B.21})/SUM{AQ.4}
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600110
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1723.2
1
0
9
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Line Operations Expenses
Per Transmission Line Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2.00%
0.16% <= 0.84%
0.84% <= 1.57%
1.57% <= 2.27%
2.27% <= 9.11%
10.00%
9
.
1
1
%
Expenses per Transmission Line Assets
8.00%
6.00%
3
.
7
4
%
4.00%
2.00%
0
.
1
6
%
0
.
5
6
%
0
.
5
9
%
1
1
0
1
0
5
0
.
7
8
%
0
.
8
6
%
0
.
9
6
%
1
0
8
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
.
1
2
%
1
.
4
8
%
1
.
6
5
%
1
.
8
0
%
1
.
8
7
%
1
1
8
1
1
7
2
.
1
8
%
2
.
5
4
%
2
.
6
1
%
1
2
0
1
2
3
0.00%
1
1
4
1
1
5
1
1
3
1
1
9
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.20}-B.20.6-SUM{B.21})/(B.10.1-B.11.1)
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2123
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1724
1
0
9
1
0
6
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Maintenance Expenses
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$0.42
$0.01 <= $0.20
$0.20 <= $0.32
$0.32 <= $0.48
$0.48 <= $1.30
$1.40
$
1
.
1
9
$1.20
$
1
.
3
0
Expenses per MWh Transmitted
$1.00
$0.80
$0.60
$0.40
$0.20
$
0
.
0
1
$
0
.
1
2
$
0
.
1
4
$
0
.
1
9
$
0
.
2
1
$
0
.
2
9
$
0
.
2
9
1
0
6
1
1
3
$
0
.
3
5
$
0
.
4
0
$
0
.
4
2
$
0
.
5
0
$
0
.
5
2
$0.00
1
1
2
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
0
8
1
2
3
1
0
5
1
1
8
1
0
9
1
1
5
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.22}/A.2.5
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:665
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1725
1
1
9
1
1
6
1
1
4
1
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Maintenance Expenses
Per Transmission Structure Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$16,059
$913 <= $1,825
$1,825 <= $7,097
$7,097 <= $12,795
$12,795 <= $120,809
$140,000
$
1
2
0
,
8
0
9
$120,000
Expenses per Structure Mile
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$
9
1
3
$
9
9
7
$
1
,
1
6
2
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
2
0
$
1
,
6
1
6
$
2
,
4
5
2
1
2
3
1
1
3
$
4
,
3
7
4
$
5
,
6
3
4
1
0
9
1
1
2
$
8
,
5
5
9
$
1
0
,
7
0
8
$
1
2
,
2
7
9
$
1
2
,
9
6
6
1
1
8
1
1
4
1
0
5
$
2
0
,
9
7
4
$
2
1
,
3
8
6
1
1
9
1
1
5
$0
1
0
6
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.22}/(SUM{BB.5}+SUM{BB.6})
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:664
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1726
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Maintenance Expenses
Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$9,120
$874 <= $1,451
$1,451 <= $3,564
$3,564 <= $9,072
$9,072 <= $56,963
$60,000
$
5
6
,
9
6
3
Expenses per Circuit Mile
$50,000
$40,000
$30,000
$
1
9
,
2
6
5
$20,000
$10,000
$
8
7
4
$
8
9
7
$
1
,
1
6
2
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
2
0
$
1
,
1
9
9
$
1
,
5
3
4
1
1
7
1
2
3
$
2
,
2
7
6
$
3
,
3
2
0
$
3
,
3
3
2
$
3
,
7
9
6
1
0
9
1
0
8
1
1
2
$
4
,
6
0
1
$
6
,
6
3
0
$
8
,
7
9
1
$
2
1
,
3
6
1
$
9
,
9
1
5
$0
1
1
3
1
0
6
1
1
8
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.22}/(SUM{BB.3}+SUM{BB.4})
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2011
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1728
1
0
5
1
1
4
1
1
9
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Maintenance Expenses
Per Transmission Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
1.32%
0.39% <= 0.82%
0.82% <= 1.26%
1.26% <= 1.67%
1.67% <= 3.06%
3.50%
3
.
0
6
%
3.00%
Expenses per Transmission Assets
2.50%
2.00%
1.50%
1.00%
0.50%
0
.
3
9
%
0
.
5
5
%
0
.
6
5
%
0
.
7
4
%
0
.
8
5
%
0
.
9
2
%
0
.
9
4
%
1
2
0
1
1
3
1
.
4
9
%
1
.
5
2
%
1
0
6
1
1
8
1
.
6
3
%
1
.
6
5
%
1
1
4
1
0
9
1
.
7
2
%
1
.
8
7
%
2
.
1
6
%
1
.
0
3
%
0.00%
1
1
0
1
1
7
1
2
1
1
0
8
1
2
3
1
1
2
Source/Calculation:SUM{B.22}/B.10.1
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2125
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1729
1
1
5
1
0
5
1
1
9
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Line Maintenance Expenses
Per MWh Transmitted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$0.29
$0.01 <= $0.15
$0.15 <= $0.22
$0.22 <= $0.32
$0.32 <= $1.19
$1.20
$
1
.
1
9
Expenses per MWh Transmitted
$1.00
$0.80
$0.60
$0.40
$0.20
$
0
.
0
1
$
0
.
0
7
$
0
.
0
7
1
2
1
1
1
0
$
0
.
1
4
$
0
.
1
5
1
1
3
1
2
3
$
0
.
1
9
$
0
.
1
9
1
1
9
1
0
8
$
0
.
2
4
$
0
.
2
7
$
0
.
2
8
1
0
6
1
0
9
$
0
.
3
3
$
0
.
4
0
$
0
.
5
0
$0.00
1
1
2
1
0
5
1
1
4
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.23})/A.2.5
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:671
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1731
1
1
8
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Line Maintenance Expenses
Per Transmission Structure Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$13,640
$460 <= $1,170
$1,170 <= $3,307
$3,307 <= $8,771
$8,771 <= $120,809
$140,000
$
1
2
0
,
8
0
9
$120,000
Expenses per Structure Mile
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$
4
6
0
$
4
6
1
$
6
3
1
$
1
,
1
6
1
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
2
3
$
1
,
1
9
8
$
2
,
8
7
4
$
3
,
1
6
0
$
3
,
4
5
4
1
1
3
1
0
9
1
1
4
1
1
2
$
7
,
6
5
0
$
7
,
9
6
5
$
9
,
0
4
0
1
1
9
1
0
6
1
0
5
$
1
0
,
7
0
8
$
2
1
,
3
8
6
$0
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.23})/(SUM{BB.5}+SUM{BB.6})
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:670
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1732
1
1
8
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
8
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Line Maintenance Expenses
Per Transmission Circuit Mile
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$7,321
$452 <= $994
$994 <= $2,439
$2,439 <= $6,254
$6,254 <= $56,963
$60,000
$
5
6
,
9
6
3
Expenses per Circuit Mile
$50,000
$40,000
$
2
1
,
3
6
1
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$
4
5
2
$
4
6
1
$
5
5
3
$
6
6
8
$
1
,
1
0
2
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
1
7
1
2
3
$
1
,
1
1
2
1
1
3
$
2
,
1
8
1
$
2
,
3
2
7
$
2
,
5
5
2
1
0
9
1
1
2
1
1
4
$
3
,
3
3
2
$
4
,
2
8
1
$
6
,
1
2
9
$
6
,
6
3
0
$
7
,
0
2
6
1
0
5
1
1
8
1
1
9
$0
1
0
8
1
0
6
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.23})/(SUM{BB.3}+SUM{BB.4})
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2012
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1733
1
1
5
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Alternate
Transmission Line Maintenance Expenses
Per Transmission Line Assets
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
1.61%
0.41% <= 0.78%
0.78% <= 1.12%
1.12% <= 1.73%
1.73% <= 7.35%
8.00%
7
.
3
5
%
7.00%
Expenses per Transmission Line Assets
6.00%
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
0
.
4
1
%
0
.
6
0
%
0
.
6
6
%
0
.
7
1
%
0
.
8
0
%
0
.
8
7
%
1
1
7
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
4
1
1
3
0
.
9
7
%
1
.
0
1
%
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
.
2
3
%
1
.
3
1
%
1
.
3
2
%
1
0
8
1
0
5
1
1
9
1
.
7
2
%
1
.
7
7
%
1
1
5
1
0
9
2
.
3
0
%
2
.
7
8
%
0.00%
1
1
0
Source/Calculation:(SUM{B.22}-SUM{B.23})/(B.10.1-B.11.1)
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2124
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1734
1
0
6
1
1
8
1
1
6
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
7
1
0
4
1
0
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Frequency of Aerial Patrol of Transmission Lines
Months Between Patrols (Helicopters, Fixed-Wing Fly-By)
60
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
14
60 => 12
12 => 12
12 => 6
6 => 1
6
0
Months between Patrols
50
40
30
20
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
10
6
6
6
1
3
1
8
1
5
1
2
7
6
1
9
1
6
8
4
2
3
Source/Calculation:BD.2.1
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1242
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1735
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
7
1
4
1
3
1
1
1
0
9
5
2
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Authority of Inspection Personnel to Make Correction
Decisions
Source/Calculation:BD.3.1
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:9625
Page:1742
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Authority of Inspection Personnel to Make Correction
Decisions (cont.)
To what extent do inspection personnel have authority to make correction decisions?
The need to prevent outage or protect life/property
Source/Calculation:BD.3.99
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600127
Page:1742.1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Percent of Transmission System Maintained Last Year
Preventive Maintenance
Source/Calculation:BD.4.1
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:40232
Page:1746
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations
Regular
Percent of Maintenance Done with Energized Lines
Per Voltage Class
Source/Calculation:BD.5.1
Volume: Transmission Line Field Maintenance/Operations, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:9626
Page:1747
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Vegetation Management
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Pg. 1748 Percent of Service Territory That Is Urban, Mixed, or Rural Density
Pg. 1750 Average ROW Width
Pg. 1752 Structure Miles Maintained Last Year per OH Structure Mile - As Part of Vegetation Management Program
Pg. 1755 Transmission Vegetation Management O&M Expense for the Past Four Years - Per Transmission Service Territory - Square Miles
Pg. 1762 Percent of Transmission Vegetation Management Budget Used
Pg. 1763 Percent Transmission Vegetation Management Budget Used (cont.)
Pg. 1764 Methods Used to Measure Effectiveness Transmission Vegetation Program
Pg. 1765 Methods Used to Measure Effectiveness Transmission Vegetation Program (cont.)
Pg. 1768 Transmission Vegetation Management Department Organization Structure
Pg. 1769 Transmission Vegetation Management Department Organization Structure (cont.)
Pg. 1770 Number of Tree Contracting Companies Used on Transmission System
Pg. 1773 Percent of Vegetation Contractors Spot Inspected for Work Quality
Pg. 1778 Frequency of Transmission Rights-Of-Way Management Activities - Number of Years
Pg. 1778.1 Frequency of Transmission Rights-Of-Way Management Activities (cont.) - Number of Years
Pg. 1779 Typical Unit Costs - For the Following Activities
XXVI
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Vegetation Management
Regular
Percent of Service Territory That Is Urban, Mixed, or
Rural Density
100%
90%
80%
Percent
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
3
1
5
1
8
4
1
2
8
9
6
1
4
1
1
Urban
1
9
1
6
Mixed
1
5
2
2
2
2
0
2
3
1
7
1
3
1
0
7
2
1
Rural
Source/Calculation:BE.3.1
Volume: Transmission Vegetation Management, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:40255
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1748
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Vegetation Management
Regular
Average ROW Width
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
119
40 <= 75
75 <= 100
100 <= 150
150 <= 262
300
2
6
2
Width in Feet
250
2
0
0
200
1
5
0
1
5
0
1
9
3
150
1
2
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
2
1
1
1
100
7
5
7
5
1
8
5
5
5
50
4
0
0
9
8
1
6
4
Source/Calculation:BE.4.1
Volume: Transmission Vegetation Management, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:40257
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1750
2
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
7
1
5
1
4
1
3
1
0
7
6
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Vegetation Management
Regular
Structure Miles Maintained Last Year per OH Structure
Mile
As Part of Vegetation Management Program
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
28.5%
0.3% <= 7.2%
7.2% <= 20.0%
20.0% <= 23.5%
23.5% <= 102.6%
120.0%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
2
.
6
%
Percent of Structure Miles
100.0%
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
20.0%
0
.
3
%
1
.
9
%
5
.
1
%
7
.
2
%
1
3
.
6
%
1
7
.
1
%
2
0
.
0
%
2
0
.
5
%
1
2
1
6
2
3
.
4
%
2
3
.
5
%
7
1
8
3
4
.
9
%
0.0%
2
9
1
1
8
1
9
3
6
Source/Calculation:BE.5.1/SUM{BB.5}
Volume: Transmission Vegetation Management, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:40259
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1752
4
1
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
7
1
5
1
4
1
3
1
0
5
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Vegetation Management
Regular
Transmission Vegetation Management O&M Expense
for the Past Four Years
Per Transmission Service Territory - Square Miles
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
$3,517
$2 <= $397
$397 <= $1,160
$1,160 <= $5,998
$5,998 <= $16,453
$18,000
$16,000
Expenses per Square Mile
$14,000
$12,000
$10,000
$8,000
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
$0
9
5
1
1
6
8
1
4
1
5
1
8
1
2
6
2006
7
2005
1
9
4
2004
Source/Calculation:BE.6.1/BE.2.1
Volume: Transmission Vegetation Management, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27330
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1755
3
1
7
2
2
0
1
3
2
2
2
3
1
1
1
0
2
1
2003
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Vegetation Management
Regular
Percent of Transmission Vegetation Management
Budget Used
100%
Percent of Budget
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
3
1
9
5
7
8
4
1
5
1
2
1
6
1
1
9
1
8
1
2
Tree trimming/removal
Chemical Herbicides
Brush Re-Clearing
Mow ing (ordinance w eek/grass control)
Source/Calculation:BE.7.1
Volume: Transmission Vegetation Management, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:40263
Calculation shown is for the first piece of the stacked bar only.
Page:1762
1
4
2
0
2
3
1
7
2
1
1
0
6
1
3
2
2
Other
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Vegetation Management
Regular
Percent Transmission Vegetation Management Budget
Used (cont.)
What percent of your Transmission Vegetation management budget is spent on the following?
Patrolling
Prescriptions based on an arborist assessment
Source/Calculation:BE.7.99
Volume: Transmission Vegetation Management, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:40412
Page:1763
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Vegetation Management
Regular
Methods Used to Measure Effectiveness Transmission
Vegetation Program
Source/Calculation:BE.8.1
Volume: Transmission Vegetation Management, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:40265
Page:1764
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Vegetation Management
Regular
Methods Used to Measure Effectiveness Transmission
Vegetation Program (cont.)
What performance measures do you use to measure effectiveness of your Transmission
Vegetation program?
Contractor QA, Cost variance, Inspected on time
cost per span
cost per system mile
Cost per unit
Line Dept. complaints
Source/Calculation:BE.8.99
Volume: Transmission Vegetation Management, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:40413
Page:1765
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Vegetation Management
Regular
Transmission Vegetation Management Department
Organization Structure
Source/Calculation:BE.9.1
Volume: Transmission Vegetation Management, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:40267
Page:1768
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Vegetation Management
Regular
Transmission Vegetation Management Department
Organization Structure (cont.)
Where does the Transmission vegetation management department fall into the company
organization structure?
T&D Engineering & Ops
Technical Services
Transmission maintenance
Source/Calculation:BE.9.99
Volume: Transmission Vegetation Management, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:40415
Page:1769
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Vegetation Management
Regular
Number of Tree Contracting Companies Used on
Transmission System
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
5
1 <= 2
2 <= 4
4 <= 6
6 <= 16
16
1
5
1
6
14
Number of Companies
12
10
8
6
6
1
2
2
6
5
4
4
1
5
9
4
3
3
3
1
9
1
8
8
2
2
1
1
1
7
6
4
0
5
3
Source/Calculation:BE.10.1
Volume: Transmission Vegetation Management, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:40268
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1770
1
6
1
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
7
1
4
1
3
1
1
1
0
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Vegetation Management
Regular
Percent of Vegetation Contractors Spot Inspected for
Work Quality
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
68.8%
10.0% <= 38.8%
38.8% <= 87.5%
87.5% <= 100.0%
100.0% <= 100.0%
100.0%
8
5
.
0
%
90.0%
9
0
.
0
%
9
8
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
1
1
2
1
9
1
4
4
3
2
80.0%
6
5
.
0
%
Percent Inspected
70.0%
5
0
.
0
%
60.0%
50.0%
3
5
.
0
%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
1
0
.
0
%
1
0
.
0
%
1
6
5
2
0
.
0
%
10.0%
0.0%
6
1
8
8
1
5
9
Source/Calculation:BE.11.1
Volume: Transmission Vegetation Management, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:40270
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1773
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
7
1
3
1
1
1
0
7
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Vegetation Management
Regular
Frequency of Transmission Rights-Of-Way
Management Activities
Number of Years
Source/Calculation:BE.12.1
Volume: Transmission Vegetation Management, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:3176
Page:1778
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Vegetation Management
Regular
Frequency of Transmission Rights-Of-Way
Management Activities (cont.)
Number of Years
What is frequency of transmission rights-of-way management activities?
Mowing
Ordinance maintenance
Patrols and Hot Spotting
Some are restricted due to permitting.
Urban trimming is on a 3 year cycle, rural side trimming is on a 7 year cycle.
Source/Calculation:BE.12.99
Volume: Transmission Vegetation Management, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600128
Page:1778.1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Vegetation Management
Regular
Typical Unit Costs
For the Following Activities
Source/Calculation:BE.13.1
Volume: Transmission Vegetation Management, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:10563
Page:1779
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Operations: Control Center
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Pg. 1780
Pg. 1781
Pg. 1782
Pg. 1783
Pg. 1786
Pg. 1787
Pg. 1807
Pg. 1808
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Organization of Energy Operations and Transmission Operations Functions
Organization of Energy Operations and Transmission Operations Functions (cont.)
Energy Controls Centers Currently in Service
Energy Controls Centers Currently in Service (cont.)
Functions Provided By the Energy Control Center for Transmission Operations
Functions Provided By the Energy Control Center for Transmission Operations (cont.)
Use of 24-Hour Shift Coverage in the Transmission (or Combined Transmission/Distribution) Operations Center
Use of 24-Hour Shift Coverage in the Transmission (or Combined Transmission/Distribution) Operations Center (cont.)
XXVII
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Operations: Control Center
Regular
Organization of Energy Operations and Transmission
Operations Functions
Source/Calculation:BF.2.1
Volume: Transmission Operations: Control Center, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:40235
Page:1780
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Operations: Control Center
Regular
Organization of Energy Operations and Transmission
Operations Functions (cont.)
How are the Energy Operations and Transmission Operations Center functions organized?
Energie and Transmission are together Distribution is apart
Enerty, Transmission, Distribution
No energy. Separate Transmission & Distribution.
Source/Calculation:BF.2.99
Volume: Transmission Operations: Control Center, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:40336
Page:1781
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Operations: Control Center
Regular
Energy Controls Centers Currently in Service
Source/Calculation:BF.3.1
Volume: Transmission Operations: Control Center, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:65428
Page:1782
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Operations: Control Center
Regular
Energy Controls Centers Currently in Service (cont.)
Please indicate the number of Energy Controls Centers currently in service.
Combined T&D Back-Up Center
Energy + T&D
Source/Calculation:BF.3.99
Volume: Transmission Operations: Control Center, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:65304
Page:1783
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Operations: Control Center
Regular
Functions Provided By the Energy Control Center for
Transmission Operations
Source/Calculation:BF.4.1
Volume: Transmission Operations: Control Center, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:40237
Page:1786
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Operations: Control Center
Regular
Functions Provided By the Energy Control Center for
Transmission Operations (cont.)
Please list the functions that your Energy Control Center provides for Transmission
Operations.
Distribution functions
Scheduling, bulk power reliability look-aheads, unit commitment, coordinating with neighboring companies.
Transmission tagging/scheduling/OASIS Functions
Source/Calculation:BF.4.99
Volume: Transmission Operations: Control Center, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:40338
Page:1787
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Operations: Control Center
Regular
Use of 24-Hour Shift Coverage in the Transmission (or Combined
Transmission/Distribution) Operations Center
Source/Calculation:BF.5.1
Volume: Transmission Operations: Control Center, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:65309
Page:1807
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Transmission Operations: Control Center
Regular
Use of 24-Hour Shift Coverage in the Transmission (or Combined
Transmission/Distribution) Operations Center (cont.)
How is 24-hour shift coverage maintained in the Transmission (or combined
Transmission/Distribution) Operations Center?
Our five transmission switching centers use three 8 hour shifts while the System Operations Center (which handles the typical bulk power transmission issues) uses two 12 hour
shifts.
Varies by Position - All 24/7
Source/Calculation:BF.5.99
Volume: Transmission Operations: Control Center, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:65308
Page:1808
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Support
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Pg. 1809.1 Providing Services to the Transmission Line Department - Mapping & Records
Pg. 1810 Providing Services to the Transmission Line Department - Shops (e.g. rubbers goods, tool repair, etc)
Pg. 1811 Providing Services to the Transmission Line Department - IT infrastructure
Pg. 1812 Providing Services to the Transmission Line Department - Communications
XXVII
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Support
Regular
Providing Services to the Transmission Line
Department
Mapping & Records
Please describe how the following functions are provided to the transmission line department
(we are mainly interested in the organizational locations).
Both Centralized and De-centralized
Central Engineering Group provides support
Centralized in 4 locations
Centralizes Engineering group provides support
Facilities records is the owner department of the records. Records are updated and monitored by: design staff, field staff, operating staff
Function is done internally in the transmission engineering group. Once the job is completed, the layouts are forwarded to the department for mapping and record keeping.
Mapping and records for the transmission line department are handled by Transmission personnel in the T&D Organization.
N/A
Provided as a support function by the Surveying & ROW Division which is part of the Customer Service & Support Operations Business Unit. Some records are kept by the
Transmission Operations Dept., and some are corporate records in the SAP system.
Transmission Department Centralized Mapping & Records is centralized with one are called the Engineering Support Section. The existing transmission lines are being converted
using an ABB GIS process improvement.
Transmission Engineering
within transmission department
Within Transmission Department
Source/Calculation:BG.2.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Support, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600129
Page:1809.1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Support
Regular
Providing Services to the Transmission Line
Department
Shops (e.g. rubbers goods, tool repair, etc)
Please describe how the following functions are provided to the transmission line department
(we are mainly interested in the organizational locations).
All Rubber good are coordinated through the Meter shop for testing and routine maintenance on a regular basis. Company has tool repair facility located at the a construction
center where tools are repaired and maintained.
Both Centralized and De-centralized
Central group
Centralized group
Centralized system shops provides service to entire company.
corporate - inventory services
In General Services
N/A
Operational support group
Provided as a support function by Fleet & Shop Services Dept. which is part of the Customer Service & Support Operations Business Unit.
Shops report to the Distribution function, and support areas requiring testing.
The function is done internally by the tool room.
Source/Calculation:BG.2.2
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Support, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300726
Page:1810
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Support
Regular
Providing Services to the Transmission Line
Department
IT infrastructure
Please describe how the following functions are provided to the transmission line department
(we are mainly interested in the organizational locations).
Central Group
Centralized
Centralized group
Centralized IT department provides service to entire company.
corporate - information management
In General Services
IT infrastructure reports to the VP-SERVCO. General support services are provided by this organization. Includes data center and support staff. Support provided via remote
control tools and personnel dispatching.
N/A
Outsourced to CAPEGEMINI Energy
Provided as a support function by the corporate IT Business Unit
The IT infrastructure is coordinated through our ICS Business unit which is responsible for all communication and computer infrastructure in the Energy Delivery business unit.
The support is provided by the Share Services group that is afiliated to the parent company
Source/Calculation:BG.2.3
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Support, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300727
Page:1811
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Support
Regular
Providing Services to the Transmission Line
Department
Communications
Please describe how the following functions are provided to the transmission line department
(we are mainly interested in the organizational locations).
Central group
Centralized
Centralized group
corporate - radio telecom
In BGE Coporate
Infrastructure for the communication paths consists of radio, Microwave, Fiber optics, and land line facilities mostly owned and operated by the company.
Microwave, radio, and fiber optics communications are provided as a support function by Telecommunications Services which is part of the regulated Operations Technology
Business Unit. PBX telephone is a corporate function of the IT Business Unit.
N/A
Outsourced to CAPEGEMINI Energy
The communications department is an integral department within the Transmission, Substation and Project Management Group. Providing primary support to T&D, they also
provide communications to the Company in general. ,
The support is provided by the Share Services group that is afiliated to the parent company
Source/Calculation:BG.2.4
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Support, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300728
Page:1812
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Energy Management System
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Pg. 1817 EMS Software Vendor
Pg. 1817.1 EMS Software Vendor (cont.)
Pg. 1818 State Estimator Integrated into EMS
Pg. 1820 Tracking the State Estimator
Pg. 1821 Average Statistics for State Estimator Last Year
Pg. 1822 Availability Calculation Counting Non-Convergent Solutions as Unavailable
Pg. 1823 Calculations Used for Accuracy and Availability - Availability
Pg. 1824 Calculations Used for Accuracy and Availability - Accuracy
XXVII
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Energy Management System
Regular
EMS Software Vendor
Source/Calculation:BF.6.1
Volume: Focus Area: Energy Management System, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:1600130
Page:1817
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Energy Management System
Regular
EMS Software Vendor (cont.)
Who is the software vendor for your EMS?
Open Systems International
SNC Lavilin
Source/Calculation:BF.6.99
Volume: Focus Area: Energy Management System, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300223
Page:1817.1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Energy Management System
Regular
State Estimator Integrated into EMS
Source/Calculation:BF.7.1
Volume: Focus Area: Energy Management System, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300222
Page:1818
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Energy Management System
Regular
Tracking the State Estimator
Source/Calculation:BF.8.1
Volume: Focus Area: Energy Management System, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300220
Page:1820
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Energy Management System
Regular
Average Statistics for State Estimator Last Year
Source/Calculation:BF.9.1
Volume: Focus Area: Energy Management System, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300219
Page:1821
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Energy Management System
Regular
Availability Calculation Counting Non-Convergent
Solutions as Unavailable
Source/Calculation:BF.10.1
Volume: Focus Area: Energy Management System, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300218
Page:1822
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Energy Management System
Regular
Calculations Used for Accuracy and Availability
Availability
Please describe the calculations used for accuracy and availability.
# of convergent solutions / # of state estimation executions
{(Number of SE solutions) - (Number of Non-Convergent solutions)} / (Number of SE solutions)
100% (minus) Abortion % (equals) Availability %:
Abortion % (equals) # of Abortions per Month (divided) by # of calculated 5 minutes intervals per month (times) 100
based on the amount of non-convergent solutions.
Number solved solutions/number unsolved (abort)
One valid solution every 5 minutes
see note
The number of minutes per year minus the sum of forced outage duration minues plus the minutes of non-convergent solutions
The number of SE solutions divided by the number of SE executions
Total number of actual CA runs / total number of expected CA runs
Source/Calculation:BF.11.1
Volume: Focus Area: Energy Management System, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300217
Page:1823
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Energy Management System
Regular
Calculations Used for Accuracy and Availability
Accuracy
Please describe the calculations used for accuracy and availability.
(Number of SE solutions that provide a useful power flow solution) / (Number of SE solutions)
5 MW or 5% of the bigger conductor ratings
Maximum error rate is set to be 15%
measures megawatt mismatches
N/A
see note
Source/Calculation:BF.11.2
Volume: Focus Area: Energy Management System, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300480
Page:1824
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Pg. 1825
Pg. 1826
Pg. 1827
Pg. 1828
Pg. 1829
Pg. 1830
Pg. 1831
Pg. 1832
Pg. 1833
Pg. 1834
Pg. 1835
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Crew Performance Measures
Crew Performance Measures (cont.)
Benefits Seen From Having a Fully-Implemented Work Management System
Benefits Seen From Having a Fully-Implemented Work Management System (cont.)
Management Processes Supported by a Work Management System
Management Processes Supported by a Work Management System (cont.)
Work Management System Activities
Work Management System Activities (cont.)
Transmission Work Management System Vendor
Transmission Work Management System Vendor (cont.)
Years Since Transmission Work Management System Was Installed
XXX
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process
Regular
Crew Performance Measures
Source/Calculation:BH.2.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:7035
Page:1825
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process
Regular
Crew Performance Measures (cont.)
How is each crew's performance measured (e.g. what criteria are used)?
Adherance to schedule
Bid Comparison (Bid versus Actual, Bid vs. Bid)
Closing review meetings on major projects
Schedule Compliance
We use estimates based on past history.
Source/Calculation:BH.2.99
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:7080
Page:1826
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process
Regular
Benefits Seen From Having a Fully-Implemented Work
Management System
Source/Calculation:BH.3.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:7054
Page:1827
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process
Regular
Benefits Seen From Having a Fully-Implemented Work
Management System (cont.)
If you have fully-implemented a work management system, what benefits have you seen?
Better records of problems/maintenance
Better Tracking and Reporting
Improved System Reliability
Project Tracking
TnMP does not have a WMS but does operate under the guidelines of ERCOT (Electric Reliability Council of Texas) that manages the transmission grid for the state of Texas.
Source/Calculation:BH.3.99
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:7098
Page:1828
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process
Regular
Management Processes Supported by a Work
Management System
Source/Calculation:BH.4.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2718
Page:1829
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process
Regular
Management Processes Supported by a Work
Management System (cont.)
Which of the following management processes are supported by a work management system?
Need missing clerk to use other functions
Outage coordination
We follow TNMP Policy & Procedure Manual.
Source/Calculation:BH.4.99
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6613
Page:1830
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process
Regular
Work Management System Activities
Source/Calculation:BH.5.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2719
Page:1831
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process
Regular
Work Management System Activities (cont.)
What type of activities are covered by your work management system?
Indirect time, unavailable time, outages
TNMP has a Policy & Procedure Manual that insures proper management of TNMP transmission system.
Source/Calculation:BH.5.99
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6614
Page:1832
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process
Regular
Transmission Work Management System Vendor
Source/Calculation:BH.6.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2720
Page:1833
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process
Regular
Transmission Work Management System Vendor
(cont.)
Who is the vendor for your transmission work management system?
ERCOT (Electric Reliability Council of Texas)
Microsoft Project
Source/Calculation:BH.6.99
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:6615
Page:1834
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process
Regular
Years Since Transmission Work Management System
Was Installed
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
7
0 <= 4
4 <= 6
6 <= 10
10 <= 26
30
2
6
Number of Years
25
20
15
1
0
1
1
1
2
10
8
7
6
5
5
4
4
1
5
2
3
1
0
0
3
1
9
1
8
8
6
1
6
1
1
2
7
1
4
Source/Calculation:2006-BH.7.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Work Management Process, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:8171
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1835
4
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
7
1
3
1
1
1
0
9
5
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Contracting
Section Contents
100% Stacked
Pg. 1844
Pg. 1845
Pg. 1846
Pg. 1847
Pg. 1848
Pg. 1849
Pg. 1850
Column
Dot Table
Letter Table
Pie
Scatter
Shaded
Stacked Sum
Symbol Table
Number Table
Combo Table
HiLo
Memo Tables
Transmission Engineering Contracting - Percent of Activities Contracted
Transmission Construction Contracting - Percent of Activities Contracted
Transmission O&M Contracting - Percent of Activities Contracted
Transmission O&M Contracting (cont.) - Percent of Activities Contracted
Precent of Overall Transmission Work Contracted
Most Successful Initiatives Undertaken to Improve Contracting Effectiveness - 1 = Lowest, 5 = Highest
Most Successfull Initiatives Undertaken to Improve Contracting Effectiveness (cont.)
XXXI
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Contracting
Regular
Transmission Engineering Contracting
Percent of Activities Contracted
Source/Calculation:BI.2.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Contracting, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:549
Page:1844
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Contracting
Regular
Transmission Construction Contracting
Percent of Activities Contracted
Source/Calculation:BI.3.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Contracting, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:3195
Page:1845
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Contracting
Regular
Transmission O&M Contracting
Percent of Activities Contracted
Source/Calculation:BI.4.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Contracting, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:3196
Page:1846
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Contracting
Regular
Transmission O&M Contracting (cont.)
Percent of Activities Contracted
Source/Calculation:BI.4.8
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Contracting, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27062
Page:1847
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Contracting
Regular
Precent of Overall Transmission Work Contracted
Mean
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
56.5%
13.0% <= 47.5%
47.5% <= 60.0%
60.0% <= 66.3%
66.3% <= 90.0%
90.0%
80.0%
Percent Contracted
70.0%
60.0%
6
0
.
0
%
6
0
.
0
%
6
0
.
0
%
1
5
6
4
6
5
.
0
%
6
5
.
0
%
1
6
1
2
7
0
.
0
%
7
5
.
0
%
9
0
.
0
%
5
0
.
0
%
50.0%
4
0
.
0
%
40.0%
3
0
.
0
%
30.0%
20.0%
1
3
.
0
%
10.0%
0.0%
9
1
4
2
7
5
1
9
Source/Calculation:BI.5.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Contracting, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:2300093
Only companies with all the data are shown.
Page:1848
1
8
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
1
7
1
3
1
1
1
0
8
3
1
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Contracting
Regular
Most Successful Initiatives Undertaken to Improve
Contracting Effectiveness
1 = Lowest, 5 = Highest
Source/Calculation:BI.6.1
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Contracting, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:7149
Page:1849
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved
Focus Area: Transmission Line Contracting
Regular
Most Successfull Initiatives Undertaken to Improve
Contracting Effectiveness (cont.)
Source/Calculation:BI.6.99
Volume: Focus Area: Transmission Line Contracting, Final Report, 2006
ID Code:27063
Page:1850
©2007 PA Consulting Group, All Rights Reserved