BEFORE THE RÉGIE DE L'ÉNERGIE IN THE MATTER OF: HYDRO QUÉBEC DISTRIBUTION

advertisement

BEFORE THE RÉGIE DE L'ÉNERGIE

IN THE MATTER OF:

HYDRO QUÉBEC DISTRIBUTION

Demande d'approbation du Plan d'approvisionnement 2008-2017 du

Distributeur

DOSSIER R-3648-2007

IEc Undertaking

2 May 2008

prepared on behalf of: l'Association québécoise des consommateurs industriels d'électricité (AQCIE)

Conseil de l'industrie forestière du Québec (CIFQ)

Undertaking of:

Robert D. Knecht

Industrial Economics, Incorporated

2067 Massachusetts Avenue

Cambridge, MA 02140

U N DERTA K I N G 1

2

3

4

Please provide the analysis that supports Mr. Knecht’s conclusion at page 5 of his evidence that supports his conclusion that it is “unlikely that new gas-fired capacity could be placed in service at a cost of less than $80 or $85 per MWh (in 2008 dollars).

Please include supporting information.

RE SPONSE 5

6

7

8

9

10

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

In preparing my evidence, I reached this conclusion based on informal calculations using current natural gas prices, as well as parameters from the “Assumptions to the

Annual Energy Outlook 2007” (which is attached). To respond to this undertaking, I prepared the attached analysis which is a more formal approach to the issue, with three scenarios.

The basis for each of the assumptions in the calculation is as follows:

Gas Prices at Henry Hub: The low scenario is based on a simple average of deflated

NYMEX gas futures prices for 2013 through 2017. The base scenario uses only the

2013 futures prices, and the high scenario is based on near-term gas price expectations. While I recognize that the futures markets are predicting a decline in gas market prices, I note also that even current gas prices are substantially below fuel oil prices on an energy-equivalent basis. This situation is counter to the expectations of some analysts. See, for example, NEB presentation at http://www.neb.gc.ca/clfnsi/rpblctn/spchsndprsnttn/2007/cndnrgftrfcsntrlgs/cndnrgftrfcsntrlgs-eng.html

To derive gas prices in Québec, I looked at differentials between Henry Hub, AECO spot (in Alberta) and Dawn. The current price differential between Henry Hub and

AECO spot prices is about $1.20 per mmbtu (see attached), but the NYMEX futures swaps show a narrowing of the Henry Hub premium to $0.65 to $0.70 by 2012 (which is the end of the series). The current Dawn/AECO differential is $1.60, and this is the value used in the base and high scenarios. While I have not performed a detailed analysis of historical patterns, I note some periods in which the differential is lower.

Thus, in the low scenario, I use $1.20 per mmbtu. Note that reviewing historical differentials between Dawn and Henry Hub produce a similar range of results.

Transportation rates Dawn to Québec in the low scenario are based on Union’s M12 transportation rate (at 80 percent load factor), including fuel charges. The base and high scenario include a provision for SCGM transport.

The EIA assumptions for the low and base scenario are based on a conventional combustion turbine, with established technology. For the high scenario, the EIA assumptions for an advanced combined cycle facility with carbon capture.

The capital recovery factor assumptions are detailed in the backup sheets, and are consistent with analysis that I presented to the Régie in 2006. A 15 percent figure, used in the base case, is a typical industry rule-of-thumb. The 80 percent capacity factor for combined cycle facilities is my estimate.

Undertaking of Robert D. Knecht Docket No. R-3648-2007

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

2

3

4

This more detailed analysis suggests a relatively wide range of possible prices needed to support a new gas-fired plant in Québec, including the possibility of a prices below

$80 per MWh (in 2008$). Nevertheless, the base case scenario is reasonably consistent with HQD’s replacement cost forecast for the 2013 to 2017 period.

Note also that I have not included any provision to reflect the flexibility benefit of the proposed contract modifications with HQP. As I mentioned, that contract provides

HQD with significant flexibility about when and how much capacity it will need to take in any year (and even within a year) from HQP. Were an independent generation supplier to provide a product with similar flexibility, it would likely charge a price premium above its costs, to reflect the value of this option that is provided to HQD.

Undertaking of Robert D. Knecht Docket No. R-3644-2007

Docket No. R-3648-2007 Undertaking of Robert D. Knecht

Estimate of Fully Loaded Combined Cycle

Cost per KWh: @ 2 May 2008

For 2013 to 2017

Delivered Gas Cost

Average $2008 HH Price

AECO Differential

AECO-Dawn Differential

Firm Transport to Quebec

Gas Cost

Low Scenario Base

$ 8.06

$ (0.70)

$ 1.20

$ 0.18

$ 8.74

$ 8.27

$ (0.70)

$ 1.60

$ 0.30

$ 9.47

High

Scenario

$

$

10.85

$ (1.20)

$

$

1.60

0.30

11.55

EIA Parameters for Conv. Gas/Oil CC

Heat Rate (Btu/kWh)

Overnight Capital Cost $2005/kW $

6,800

603.00

Variable O&M 2005$/MWh

Fixed O&M 2005 $/kW

$ 1.94

$ 11.75

6,800

$ 603.00

$ 1.94

$ 11.75

7,493

$ 1,185.00

$ 2.77

$ 18.72

Other Assumptions

Assumed Capacity Factor

US GNP Deflator 10/04 to 10/07

Capital Recovery Factor

Calculations

Fixed $2008 per kW

Fixed $2008 per MWh

Gas $2008 per MWh

Fully Loaded CC Cost

$

$

$

$

80%

8.9%

12.4%

94.24

13.45

59.46

72.90

$

80%

8.9%

15.0%

111.31

$

$

$

15.88

64.39

80.27

$

$

80%

8.9%

16.2%

229.48

$

$

32.75

86.54

119.29

2 May 2008

Docket No. R-3648-2007 Undertaking of Robert D. Knecht

Month-Year

Deflated to

Mid- 2008

8.44

8.62

8.60

8.39

7.65

7.62

7.76

7.71

7.75

7.80

7.83

7.83

7.88

8.12

7.98

7.98

8.03

8.26

8.56

8.76

8.74

8.52

9.03

9.01

8.78

7.89

7.85

7.90

7.95

8.50

8.29

7.57

7.53

7.57

7.62

7.65

7.71

7.74

7.73

7.79

8.02

8.34

8.52

7.65

7.65

7.70

7.93

8.25

Settlement

Price

8.694

8.659

8.719

8.784

8.834

8.844

8.924

9.204

9.584

9.809

9.804

9.574

8.744

8.719

9.869

9.864

9.634

8.674

8.639

8.704

8.779

8.829

8.844

8.914

9.179

9.534

9.769

9.764

9.534

8.779

8.854

8.904

8.914

8.994

9.279

9.659

9.889

9.884

9.654

8.824

8.799

8.859

8.934

8.984

8.994

9.069

9.359

9.749

Apr-14

May-14

Jun-14

Jul-14

Aug-14

Sep-14

Oct-14

Nov-14

Dec-14

Jan-15

Feb-15

Mar-15

Apr-15

May-15

Jan-13

Feb-13

Mar-13

Apr-13

May-13

Jun-13

Jul-13

Aug-13

Sep-13

Oct-13

Nov-13

Dec-13

Jan-14

Feb-14

Mar-14

Jun-15

Jul-15

Aug-15

Sep-15

Oct-15

Nov-15

Dec-15

Jan-16

Feb-16

Mar-16

Apr-16

May-16

Jun-16

Jul-16

Aug-16

Sep-16

Oct-16

Nov-16

Dec-16

NYMEX US Dollar Henry Hub Futures Prices

Most Recent Settlement Values: 2 May 2008

Month-Year

Settlement

Price

Deflated to

Mid- 2008

9.074

9.049

9.109

9.189

9.239

9.254

9.334

9.629

10.029

10.264

10.259

10.029

9.229

9.209

9.984

9.979

9.749

8.929

8.904

8.964

9.044

9.094

9.109

9.189

9.479

9.879

10.119

10.114

9.884

9.269

9.349

9.399

9.414

9.489

9.779

10.179

10.409

10.404

10.174

9.374

9.354

9.414

9.494

9.544

9.564

9.654

9.954

10.354

8.16

8.34

8.32

8.12

7.46

7.43

7.48

7.45

7.48

7.54

7.57

7.57

7.62

7.85

7.60

7.60

7.65

7.88

8.20

8.38

8.36

8.16

8.44

8.42

8.21

7.51

7.47

7.51

7.57

8.27

8.07

7.43

7.40

7.43

7.48

7.47

7.52

7.55

7.55

7.59

7.81

8.12

8.29

7.51

7.51

7.57

7.80

8.10

Apr-18

May-18

Jun-18

Jul-18

Aug-18

Sep-18

Oct-18

Nov-18

Dec-18

Jan-19

Feb-19

Mar-19

Apr-19

May-19

Jan-17

Feb-17

Mar-17

Apr-17

May-17

Jun-17

Jul-17

Aug-17

Sep-17

Oct-17

Nov-17

Dec-17

Jan-18

Feb-18

Mar-18

Jun-19

Jul-19

Aug-19

Sep-19

Oct-19

Nov-19

Dec-19

Jan-20

Feb-20

Mar-20

Apr-20

May-20

Jun-20

Jul-20

Aug-20

Sep-20

Oct-20

Nov-20

Dec-20

2 May 2008

Docket No. R-3648-2007 Undertaking of Robert D. Knecht

Capital Recovery Factor (Inflation-Adjusted)

Nominal Debt Rate

Nominal AT Equity Rate

Tax Rate

Inflation Rate

Investment

0

(1.00)

YE Book Value

Dep'n (DDB-20)

Debt Balance

Equity Balance

1.00

1.00000

0.50

0.50

6.3%

12.0%

40.0%

2.0%

1

0.90

0.10

0.45

0.45

2

Debt Share

0.81

0.09

0.73

0.08

0.41

0.41

0.36

0.36

3

50%

0.66

0.07

0.33

0.33

4 5

0.59

0.07

0.53

0.06

0.30

0.30

0.27

0.27

6

0.48

0.05

0.24

0.24

7 8

0.43

0.05

0.39

0.04

0.22

0.22

0.19

0.19

9 10

0.35

0.04

0.17

0.17

15 20

0.17

0.03

-

0.03

0.09

0.09

-

-

Revenue

Dep'n

Debt Cost

Book Income

Taxes

Net Income

Depreciation

Debt Cash Flow

Net Cash Flow

Capital Recovery Factor ==>

Note columns hidden

($0.50)

$0.50

0.12

(0.10)

(0.03)

(0.01)

0.00

(0.00)

0.10

(0.05)

0.05

0.13

(0.09)

(0.03)

0.01

(0.00)

0.01

0.09

(0.05)

0.05

0.13

(0.08)

(0.03)

0.02

(0.01)

0.01

0.08

(0.04)

0.05

0.13

(0.07)

(0.02)

0.04

(0.01)

0.02

0.07

(0.04)

0.06

0.13

(0.07)

(0.02)

0.05

(0.02)

0.03

0.07

(0.03)

0.06

0.14

(0.06)

(0.02)

0.06

(0.02)

0.04

0.06

(0.03)

0.07

0.14

(0.05)

(0.02)

0.07

(0.03)

0.04

0.05

(0.03)

0.07

0.14

(0.05)

(0.02)

0.08

(0.03)

0.05

0.05

(0.02)

0.07

0.15

(0.04)

(0.01)

0.09

(0.04)

0.05

0.04

(0.02)

0.07

0.15

(0.04)

(0.01)

0.10

(0.04)

0.06

0.04

(0.02)

0.08

0.16

(0.03)

(0.01)

0.12

(0.05)

0.07

0.03

(0.02)

0.09

0.18

(0.03)

(0.00)

0.15

(0.06)

0.09

0.03

(0.02)

0.10

12.4%

2 May 2008

Docket No. R-3648-2007 Undertaking of Robert D. Knecht

Capital Recovery Factor (Inflation-Adjusted)

Investment

AA Utility Bond Rate

EIA Premium

Debt Rate

Beta

Rf

Market Premium

Nominal AT Equity Rate

Tax Rate

Inflation Rate

0

(1.00)

YE Book Value

Dep'n (DDB-20)

Debt Balance

Equity Balance

1.00

1.00000

0.50

0.50

6.0%

1.3%

7.3%

140.0%

4.9%

8.5%

16.8%

38.0%

2.0%

1

0.90

0.10

0.45

0.45

2

Debt Share

3

50%

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20

0.81

0.09

0.41

0.41

0.73

0.08

0.36

0.36

0.59

0.07

0.30

0.30

0.53

0.06

0.27

0.27

0.43

0.05

0.22

0.22

0.39

0.04

0.19

0.19

0.17

0.03

0.09

0.09

-

0.03

-

-

Revenue

Dep'n

Debt Cost

Book Income

Taxes

Net Income

Depreciation

Debt Cash Flow

Net Cash Flow

Capital Recovery Factor ==>

($0.54)

$0.50

0.16

(0.10)

(0.04)

0.02

(0.01)

0.02

0.10

(0.05)

0.07

0.16

(0.09)

(0.03)

0.04

(0.02)

0.03

0.09

(0.05)

0.07

0.17

(0.08)

(0.03)

0.06

(0.02)

0.04

0.08

(0.04)

0.08

0.17

(0.07)

(0.03)

0.07

(0.03)

0.04

0.07

(0.04)

0.08

0.17

(0.07)

(0.02)

0.08

(0.03)

0.05

0.07

(0.03)

0.09

0.18

(0.06)

(0.02)

0.10

(0.04)

0.06

0.06

(0.03)

0.09

0.18

(0.05)

(0.02)

0.11

(0.04)

0.07

0.05

(0.03)

0.09

0.18

(0.05)

(0.02)

0.12

(0.05)

0.07

0.05

(0.02)

0.10

0.19

(0.04)

(0.02)

0.13

(0.05)

0.08

0.04

(0.02)

0.10

0.19

(0.04)

(0.01)

0.14

(0.05)

0.09

0.04

(0.02)

0.11

0.21

(0.03)

(0.01)

0.17

(0.06)

0.11

0.03

(0.02)

0.12

0.23

(0.03)

(0.00)

0.20

(0.08)

0.12

0.03

(0.02)

0.14

16.1%

Note columns hidden.

0.66

0.07

0.33

0.33

0.48

0.05

0.24

0.24

0.35

0.04

0.17

0.17

2 May 2008

Docket No. R-3648-2007 Undertaking of Robert D. Knecht

Title:

Series ID:

Source:

Gross National Product: Implicit Price Deflator

GNPDEF

U.S. Department of Commerce: Bureau of Economic Analysis

Release: Gross Domestic Product

Seasonal Adjustment: Seasonally Adjusted

Frequency:

Units:

Date Range:

Quarterly

Index 2000=100

2004-01-01 to 2007-10-01

Last Updated:

Notes:

2008-03-27 11:16 AM CDT

The number of decimal places reported varies over time. A Guide to the National Income and Product Accounts of the United States (NIPA) -

(http://www.bea.gov/bea/an/nipaguid.pdf)

DATE VALUE

2004-01-01 108.170

2004-04-01 109.173

2004-07-01 109.786

2004-10-01 110.666

2005-01-01 111.717

2005-04-01 112.442

2005-07-01 113.403

2005-10-01 114.384

2006-01-01 115.350

2006-04-01 116.338

2006-07-01 117.019

2006-10-01 117.511

2007-01-01 118.736

2007-04-01 119.512

2007-07-01 119.814

2007-10-01 120.535

8.92%

2 May 2008

Download