Assignment Ideas and Task Prompts as a Function of Developmental Level Developmental Level Foundation: Knowledge and Skills (Stage 3 – PreReflective; lowest cognitive complexity) Repeat or paraphrase information from textbooks, notes, etc. Reason to single “correct” solution, perform computations, etc. Step 1: Identify the Problem, Relevant Information, & Uncertainties (Stage 4 – Quasi-Reflective; low cognitive complexity). Identify problem and acknowledge reasons for enduring uncertainty and absence of single “correct” solution. Identify relevant information and uncertainties embedded in the information (may include “stacking up” evidence to support a given conclusion). Step 2: Explore Interpretations & Connections from Multiple Viewpoints (Stage 5 –Quasi-Reflective; moderate cognitive complexity). Interpret evidence from multiple perspectives. Recognize and control for own biases. Articulate assumptions and reasoning associated with alternate points of view. Organize information in meaningful ways to encompass problem complexities. Task Prompts That Address These Skills Calculate _______________________. Define _____________________. Define in your own words ______________. Describe _______________. List the pieces of information contained in __________ (specific narrative/paragraph/text). Recite the arguments about ___________ (assuming arguments are explicitly provided in textbook, notes, etc.). Identify Relevant Information: List data or types of information relevant to _________. Identify relevant theories, laws, standards, or rules for _______________. Identify different points of view or potential solutions to ______________. Describe arguments in favor of ____________. Identify evidence that supports a given solution to _______. Identify Uncertainties: Explain why people disagree about _____________. Explain why _______ can’t be known with certainty. Identify aspects of _______ in which uncertainty is a major factor. Explain why even an expert about _________ can’t predict with certainty what will happen when __________. Describe why there is no single “correct” way to _______. Identify risks associated with ___________. Describe the pros and cons (or strengths/weaknesses) of ___________. Analyze the costs and benefits of _____________. Identify assumptions associated with ___________ (a given viewpoint or multiple viewpoints). Interpret and evaluate the quality of evidence related to __________. Compare/contrast the arguments related to two or more solutions to ______________. Explain how alternative solutions might affect ______ (one or more individuals, organizations, groups, or other stakeholders). Identify and discuss the implications of your own experiences and preferences for how you think about ___________. Develop one or more ways to organize information and analyses to help you think more thoroughly about _______. *Note: the 3 developmental levels described here on this page are the most common exhibited among undergraduates. In terms of independent/functional level, most Freshmen typically enter at the Foundational level (Prereflective). Most graduating seniors exhibit independent mastery of Step 2 skills (Quasi-reflective). Higher levels may be seen among undergraduates, but typically only in the context of high contextual support (optimal level). Independent functioning at these higher levels is typically only observed among advanced graduate students and professionals. Developmental Level Step 3: Prioritize Alternatives & Communicate Conclusions (Stage 6 – early Reflective; high cognitive complexity) After thorough analysis, develop and use reasonable guidelines for (a) prioritizing factors to consider and (b) choosing among solution options. Communicate appropriately for a given audience and setting. Task Prompts That Address These Skills Prioritize & Conclude: Prepare and defend a solution to _____________. Identify which issues you weighed more heavily than other issues in arriving at your conclusions about ___________. Explain how you prioritized issues in reaching a solution to _____________. Develop reasonable policies for _____________. Develop an effective plan for addressing ___________. Describe how the solution to ___________ might change, given different priorities on important issues. Explain how you would respond to arguments that support other reasonable solutions to _____________. Tailor Communication to Audience: Identify the most important information needs of the audience for communicating your recommendation about ___________. Explain how you designed your memo/presentation/etc. to effectively communicate to your audience. Describe how you would communicate differently about ___________ in different settings. Step 4: Integrate, Monitor, & Refine Strategies for Re-addressing the Problem (Stage 7 – Reflective; highest cognitive complexity) Acknowledge and explain limitations of endorsed solution. Integrate skills in on-going process for generating and using information to monitor strategies and make reasonable modifications. Acknowledge Limitations: Describe the limitations of your proposed solution to ___________. Explain the implications of limitations to your proposed solution to ______________. Describe conditions under which you would reconsider your solution to ______________. Explain how conditions might change in the future, resulting in a possible change in the most reasonable solution to _____________. Creating & Monitoring Strategies: Develop strategies for generating new information about _____________. Establish a plan for monitoring the performance of your recommended solution to _____________. Establish a plan for addressing the problem strategically over time. Adapted from Wolcott & Lynch (2001, 2006). Original versions available at http://www.WolcottLynch.com. Based on King and Kitchener’s (1994) reflective judgment model and Fischer and Bidell’s (1998) dynamic skill theory.