ASCRC Writing Committee Minutes, 2/4/13 TODD 203 Members Present: G. Burns, B. Chin, C. Corr, J. Glendening, J. Melcher, M. Triana, G. Wiex Ex-Officio Members Present: C. Coder, D. Raiford, K. Ryan, K. Webster Members Absent/Excused: J. Drew, M. Stark Guest: J. Hanson The meeting was called to order at 10:10 p.m. The minutes from 12/3/12 were amended and approved. Communication Items: Jacob Hanson, Associate Director of the Writing Center was welcomed to the Committee. He will be filling in for Director Webster starting in March. Student member Joey Moore and Professor Sattler resigned from the committee. The committee is meeting the first Monday of the month spring semester (March 4th, April 8th, and May 6th .) The Information Literacy Workshop is scheduled for Thursday, March 7, 11-12, MLIB 283. The workshop is co-sponsored by the Writing Committee, the Faculty Development Office, and the Mansfield Library. The focus will be to facilitate understanding of Information Literacy in a broader way in terms of critical thinking and reading. Director Webster and Professor Stark have been involved with the planning, but Sue Samson in the Mansfield Library is taking the lead. ASCRC did not approve the suggested labels of “Writing to Learn” and “Writing in the Discipline.” Mostly the criticism was regarding “Writing to Learn.” All writing assigned in courses is designed for students to learn, so is not a sufficient descriptor. The Committee suggests “to learn” be dropped and sent back to ASCRC with the request for suggestions if not acceptable. Chin Chair will attend ASCRC next week to make the argument for the change. The Committee briefly discussed the Writing Symposium feedback comments. More outreach is needed for faculty teaching English as a Second Language. The Committee should think about offering an advanced writing workshop in the future. A podcast of the symposium is available on the Faculty Development web page: http://www.umt.edu/provost/fdo/profdev/fdseries%2011-12/Videos.aspx. It was suggested that the link be sent to the attendees so they might share the information with colleagues. Members suggest a website for faculty resources. It is believed that the Faculty Development Office is the resources for this. Chair Chin will communicate with Director Amy Kinch. Business Items Professor Weix requested consideration of an issue with Anthropology courses listed incorrectly in the catalog/ schedule. In 2010 ANTY 336 was granted a one-time-only writing designation that was never removed. In addition ANTY 440 was accidently listed as an upperdivision writing course. She is willing to teach it as such so the students can graduate. The Writing Committee would like to see a form for the course, but is willing to approve the writing designation. The way the schedule is built is problematic for one-time-only designations. The schedule rolls over from the previous year with the same listing of courses. The Registrar’s Office adds and removes courses at the departments’ request. Professor Weix is concerned that departments do not take ownership for teaching their majors how to write. Her department has 300 majors and no lower-division writing courses. Many faculty to not understand what is required for the upper-division writing courses that they teach. She wonders how other departments are serving their students. Some have creative ways of distributing the writing. Political Science, for example has a 1-credit writing only add on to upper-division courses. The Committee reviewed the survey and suggested several changes. The survey will be revised and sent to members for comment. Both the Writing Course Form and the Upper-division Writing Course Form were revised based on feedback from last semesters review. Exemplary responses to the form questions, syllabus, and handouts with comments /arrows would be helpful. Members should keep an eye out for such example during next fall’s review. The Committee reviewed the holistic rubric and suggested a few changes. Members should apply the rubric to the student papers in the green folder as well as the two additional papers that were distributed with the assignments. Please submit these by next Monday to allow for processing. A workgroup consisting of Jill, Mark, Cathy, Jacob, Carl and Jody will help annotate training papers. Members are needed to help draft the interpretation of the data from the fall review of lowerdivision writing course forms. Professor Ryan agreed to help. The meeting was adjourned at 12:00 p.m.