Eyewitness Memory Bob Campbell Lourdes University Eyewitness Testimony Loftus & Palmer (1974) Contact speed was 31.8 mph Smashed speed was 40.8 mph 12% (contact) incorrectly recalled broken glass 32% (smashed) incorrectly recalled broken glass The Problem of Duality of Error in Law Convicting the innocent Acquitting the guilty Beyond a reasonable doubt protects the individual at possible cost to society Preponderance of evidence protects the society at possible cost to the individual Hammond (1996) Estimator and System Variables Some factors that influence the accuracy of eyewitness testimony are beyond the control of the justice system Other factors that influence the accuracy of eyewitness testimony can be controlled by the justice system Wells (1978) At the Scene of an Accident or Crime The behavior of the officer at the scene of an accident or crime is a system variable which may alter the memory of the witness Expectations Hall et al. (1978) Expectations of the police officer at the scene may influence the witness The officer at the scene must be careful not to impart information to the witness either verbally or nonverbally Type of Question Asked Free Narrative such as “What did you see?” Controlled Narrative such as “What was the assailant wearing?” Interrogatory Reports such as “Where did the incident happen: in a lot, in the street, or on the sidewalk?” Accuracy versus Completeness Accuracy: Free, Controlled, Interrogatory Completeness: Interrogatory, Controlled, Free Officer on the scene must be aware of the need to balance the quest for accuracy with the need for completeness The Effects of DNA Evidence A recent study identified 62 individuals convicted of crimes they did not commit 52 cases involved mistaken identification on the part of 77 highly confident eyewitnesses Scheck, Neufeld, & Dwyer (2000) As of 2010, 254 individuals exonerated as a result of “project innocence” The Guide In 1999 the US Justice Department created a guide for law enforcement that details the handling of an eyewitness to an accident or crime Panel consisted of 34 experts from law enforcement, the legal profession, and academia Recommendations Encourage rapport with the eyewitness and encourage them to talk freely Conduct the interview at a slow pace and ask primarily open ended questions Communicate your investigative needs to the witness System Variables Avoid surrounding a potentially innocent suspect with dissimilar fillers The eyewitness should be instructed prior to viewing the lineups that the suspect may or may not be in the lineup System Variables Continued Present sequential rather than simultaneous lineups Avoid giving the eyewitness feedback about the accuracy of the identification after a selection has been made This must be done before assessing the confidence of the eyewitness Eyewitness Research Campbell (2003) Control 45% accuracy 66% confidence Exp 75% accuracy 74% confidence Extra Extra