. -

advertisement

.

-

Not to be cited without Drior Dermission [rom the authors

International Council [or the Exploration of the Seas. C.M. 1995 K:23 (Poster)

PATTERNS IN REPRODUCTION AND RECRUITMENT OF

LOLIGO FORBESI AROUND THE BRITISH ISLES

Boyle, P. R., CoIIins, M. A. and Pierce, G.

J.

Zoology Department, Aberdeen University, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen, AB9 2TN.

Abstract

Interannual and geographic variation in the timing of reproduction and recruitment of

Loligo forbesi in Scouish and Irish waters is compared by two methods: the proportions of maturity stages present in monthly sampies and estimation from the landings data of the abundance of recruits and mature males and females present each month. In all areas and all years squid in spawning condition (maturity stages IV and V) were prescnt during the winter months (November-April), with the highest proportions of mature animals occurring between January and March.

Recruitment, aS indicated by an increase in the proportion of immature animals principally occurred in the late summer in both Scouish and Irish waters, with an additional period of recruitment in April in

Scottish waters. Estimating the abundance of mature animals showed the peaks in reproduction to be in December-January in Scouish waters and in November-December in lrish waters. The numbers of recruits

«

150 mm ML) in landings peaked in the autumn in lrish and Scottish waters, with an additional spring recruitment evident in

Scottish waters.

Introduction

The squid Loligo forbesi Stccnstrup is distributcd in coastal waters throughout the north-east Atlantic. where it is caught, mostly as a by-caich, in commercial fisheries.

The timing of rcproduction and rccruitment of L. forbesi has bcen the subjcct of a number of studies in recent years (Lum-Kong et al., 1992; Boyle and Ngoile, 1993;

Pierce et al., 1994a; Guerra and Rocha, 1994; Moreno et al., 1994; Collins et al., 1995).

The results of these studies support the theory of a one year life cycle for L.

forbesi across the range, but some annual arid geographie diffcrences are apparent in the timing of life eycle events in different areas. In Scottish and Irish waters the main periods of breeding are reported during the winter months, (Lum-Kong et al., 1992; Boyle &

Ngoile, 1993; Pierce et al., 1994a; Collins et al., 1995), but differences are reported in the timing of recruitment to the fishery.

In L.

forbesi, as in other squid species, the spawning season has usually becn idcntified as the time of year at which the highest proportion of mature squid are present in sampies from eommercial catchest however since this could oceur at a time when squid are relatively scarce it may not reflect the period of maximum spawn production.

Likewise recruitment has been indicated by an increase in the proportion of immature animals or by the presence of squid below a certain size threshold (e.g. 150 mm, sec

Pierce et al., 1994), but this may not reflect the absolute abundance of recruits.

This paper deseribes annual and geographie variation in the timing of recruitment and spawning of L forbesi around the British Isles and takes a more quantitative approach to assessing the timing of reeruitment and spawning by taking into aeeount monthly landings of L forbesi.

Methods

Monthly sampling of commercially eaught Loligo forbesi has been undertaken during the last 5 years, with sampies obtained from a number of Scottish ports, but primarily from Peterhead, Fraserburgh, Aberdeen and Kinlochbervie. The target sampie size of

200 individuals was not always attained due to differenees in the seasonal availability of

Loligo jorbesi.

Additional sampIes were obtained from the southern Irish ports of

Dunmore East, Ding1e and Kilmore Quay during the years 1991-1995, again with a target of 200 animals per month.

Each animal sampled was measured to the nearest mm dorsal mantle length, weighed

(g) and assigned a maturity stage in accordance with Ngoile's (1989) modifieation of

2

Lipinski's (1979) malurily scale.

All

measuremenls were conducted where possihle on freshly caught animals.

Two approaches were made \0 assessing the timing of reproduction and recruitment in

L.

farbesi.

In Ihe first approach the proportion o[ eaeh maturity stage in each monthly sampie is examincd to show the monlhs in which the highest proportion o[ malure animals were presenl (indicating Ihe spawning season) and the months in which immature animals appear (indicating recruitment).

The second approach comhincs the monthly landings n[ L.

farbesi with the proportion o[ malure animals or recruits in the sampies to produce ao estimate o[ Ihe numher o[ mature animals or recruits each month, termed 'population Malurily Index' or

'population Recruilmenl Index'. Equation I iIIuslrates hnw the population Maturity

Index is ealeulated [or male L.

farbesi.

This approach was applicd 10 Scotlish squid ars landings dala [or the ycars 1990·1994, and 10 the lrish data [or the ye 1991-1993 using monthly landings in the port o[ Dunmore Easl as an indication o[ squid abundance. By applying the proportion o[ squid o[ size less Ihan 150 mm ML 10 the monthly landings figures a 'Recruitment Index' was produced using a similar calculation.

Equation 1.

Calculation of population Maturity Index for male Loligo jorbesi.

PMM x L(Kg)

MML(Kg) +

=

MML(Kg)

MeanMMW(Kg)

=

NoMML

PMM = Proportion of mature males (by weight) in monthly sampIe

L

=

MML =

MeanM

MW

=

Monthly landings

Weight of mature males in monthly landings

Mean weight of mature males in monthly sampIe

Number o[ mature males landed thaI month (Male population MalurilY

Index for that month)

Resutts

Timing of Maturation

Figure I shows Ibe proportion o[ each maturity stage in monthly sampIes o[ L.

farbes i from Scottish waters in the years 1990-1995. In a11 years mature females were present from Novemher until May. with Ihe highest proportions presenl belween lanuary and

March. Mature males were usually presenl slightly earlier (Ocloher). Figure 2 shows comparati ve da'a [or lrish waters (partly [rom Collins et al•• 1995). Mature [emales

3

were present from November until April with, as in Scottish waters, the highest proportion of mature squid occuring between January and March. As in Scottish waters mature males were found in sam pIes in Getober. Irish sampIes eould not be obtained from May or June in any year duc to the absence of L forbesi in commerciallandings.

Figure 3 shows the population maturity index calculated for male and [cmale L.

forbesi in Scottish waters for the years 1990-1994. This analysis shows that the peak in numbers of spawning animals in the commercially exploited population occurs bctween

December and January, slightly earlier than is indicated by looking at the proportion of mature squid in sampies. These rcsults also indicate that mature males are present before mature females. Figure 4 shows the population maturity index for L forbesi in

Irish waters, with peaks in November and Dceember in both sexes.

Timing of recruitment

An increase in the proportion of immature animals gives an indication of recruitment.

In Scottish waters rccruitment occurred sporadically through the year, with the principal peaks in April-May. In Irish waters the main recruitment appears to be in July-August, with additional recruitment in December or January.

Figure 5 iIlustrates the recruitment index calculated for L forbesi in Scottish waters for the years 1990-1994 and in Irish watcrs for the years 1991-1993. The analysis indicatcs scattered reeruitment in Scottish waters, but with some evidence of two main peaks in spring (April-May) and in autumn (August-November). In Irish waters there appears to be only one rccruitment season, in the autumn.

Discussion

The reHance on relatively small monthly sam pies to predict life-eyde events in L.

forbesi means that results must be treated with a degree of caution, since a single sampie of squid may not be truly representative of the cxploited squid population. It is quite common to see different vessels landing different sized squid from apparently similar areas, although the proportion of maturity stages is usually more consistent (MAC, personnel observation). The two methods used here to identify the timing of spawning spawning and recruitment produeed slightly different rcsults. Thc usc of an' index that aceounts for squid abundance is clearly a belter method of identifying the scasonality of life cycle events and in this study showcd the peak of reproduction to occur carlier than would be predicted by rclying solelyon the proportion of mature animals.

The difference betwcen the rcsults is mostly duc to thc higher abundance of squid in the late

4

.'

• autumn. The index used here did not take into account fishing effort, mainly because this was unavailable for the Irish data, however Pierce et

ai

(1994b) has showed that since squid is predominantly a by-catch, landings and CPUE are closely couplcd. The use of a population maturity or recruitment index, such as those employed here also a110ws interannual comparisons between the relative sizes of the spawning and recruiting stocks.

Although there are some interannual variations, repeated trends are clearly apparcnt in both the Irish and the Scottish data.

In a11 years and in both regions the peak in spawning is in the winter months, with the highest numbers of mature animals occurring between November and December in Irish waters and betwccn Dccembcr and

January in Scottish waters. In Spanish (Galician) watcrs spawning of L. forbesi is also rcported to occur during the winter (Guerra and Rocha, 1994), whilst in Portuguese waters spawning is during autumn and winter (Moreno et

ai.,

1994). Holme (1974) identified a summer spawning group of L. forbesi in the English channel and two mature females were found in Irish waters in June 1992 (CoIlins et

ai.,

1995), but there is no evidence from commercial sampIes of a significant summer spawning group in

Scottish or Irish waters. Egg masses of L.forbesi have been rcported in Irish (Collins et aI., 1995) and Scottish (Collins, unpublished) waters in the summer months.

Recruitrnent of squid in Scottish waters is less predictahle than the timing of spawning, hut there appear to be two main periods of recruitment, one in spring and one in autumn, and it might be expected that these periods of recruitment would lead 10 two distinct spawning periods, but there is no evidence of this. If the autumn recruits produce the winter spawners, then what happens to the spring rccruits?

It is possible that these squid spawn on the Rockall Bank in the late summer and early autumn (Pierce er aI., 1994a), an area that is outside the normal sampling range of the present study. In Irish waters the only identified period of rccruitment is in the autumn.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to AiIeen Shanks from SOAFD and the staff of Dunmore East Fishermen's Cooperative for providing squid landings figures, and to Linda Key and other members of the research group in Aberdeen who helped process biological data. This work was fundcd undcr EC Contract NO AIRI-CT92-0573.

5

References

Doyle, P. R. and Ngoile, M. A. K. 1993a. Assessment of maturity state and seasonality of reproduction in Lo/igo [orbesi (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) from Scouish waters. In Recent advances in cephalopod fisheries biology, pp. 37-48. Ed. by T. Okutani, R.

K.

O'Dor and T. Kubodera.

Tokai University Press, Tokyo. 752pp.

Collins, M. A., Durnell, G. M. and Rodhouse, P. G. 1995a Recruitment, rnaturation and spawning of

Loligo [orbesi Steenstrup (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) in lrish waters. ICES Journal of Marine

Science, 52: 127-137.

Guerra, A and Rocha F.

1994. The life history of Loligo vulgaris and Lo/igo [orbesi (Cephalopoda:

Loliginidae) in Galician waters (NW Spain). fisheries Research, 21: 43-70.

Holme, N. A. 1974. The biology of the squid Loligo [orbesi (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) in the PI)lllouth area. Journal of the Marine Diological Association of the Uniled Kingdom, 54: 481-503.

Lipinski, M.

R.

1979. Universal maturity scale for the commercially important squids (Cephalopüda:

Teuthoidea). The results of maturity cIassification of lllex illecebrosus (LeSueur, 1821) population for years 1973-1979. International Commission for Northwest Atlantic Fisheries

(ICNAF), Research Document 79nI138. Serial No. 5364, 4Opp.

Lurn-Kong, A, Pierce, G. J. and Yau, C. 1992. Timing of spawning and recruitment in Loligo [orbesi

(Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) in Scottish waters. Journal of the Marine Diological Association of the United Kingdorn, 72: 301-311.

Moreno, A, Cunha, M. M. and Pereira. J.

F.

M. Population biology of veined squid (Loligo [orbesl) and

European squid (Loligo vulgaris) from the Portuguese coast. Fisheries Research, 21: 71-86.

Ngoile, M. A. K. 1987. Fishery biology of the squid Loligo [orbesi Steenstrup (Cephalopoda:

Loliginidae) in Scottish waters. PhD. Thesis, University of Aberdeen.

Pierce, G. J., Doyle, P. R., Bastie, L. C. and Key, L. 1994a Life history of Loligo [orbesi (Cephalopoda:

Loliginidae) in Scottish waters. Fisheries Research, 21: 17-41.

Pierce, G. J., Boyle, P. R., Bastie, L. C. and Shanks, A. M. 1994b. Distribution and abundance of the fished population of Loligo[orbesi in UK waters: analysis of fishery data. fisheries Research,

21: 193-216.

6

100

75

~

50

25

·.I990-91 rn

I

0

4

5

~5O

75

25

0

100

100

0

100

0

100

75

75

~

50

25

~

50

25

11

0

)

~5O

75

25

0

100

0

111

4 tI'

50

75

25

100

0

100

75

• tI'

50

25

0

100

0

5 tI'

50

75

25

100

~

75

50

25

0

4 tll

75

50

25

>.

~ ::l

<

..

Q,

~

8 > z 0

0

~

Month

] .D

tt l;J

;:;0 li.

>.

<

;:;0

..

~ >.

~ ::l

<

..

Q,

~

8

0

> z 0

~

Month

] .D

tt l;J

;:;0 li.

..

>.

Sl

<

;:;0

~

Figure 1. Percentage of each maturity stage in sampIes of male (Jeft) and female (right) Loligo forbesi in Scottish waters for the years 1990-95. The scale used is Ngoile's (1987) modification of Lipinski's

(1979) Universal maturity scale.

100

75

100

75

100-.---..,."..........

-=-"..,..,..,...,...,--.,.-.,.-.,.--.,.-------,

:::

:l:~~:i;~i

..

75

111

0

0

1

2

eil

50

75

25

100

.1

• o

2

111'

Os

Cl3 .-

Os

75 75 eII~

25

....:-/~;ii~~~:::

.

.

. .

..

.

.

..

eil

50

25

0

• rn

3 z

~

0

1ä..o

..,

~ ~ < i .~

Month Month

Figure 2. Percentage of each maturity stage in sampies of male (left) and female (right) Loligo forbesi in

Irish waters for the years 1991-95. The scale used is Ngoiles's (1987) modification of Lipinski's (1979)

Universal maturity scale.

.

I

30000

20000

10000

20000 o

15000

400000

1990.91

J.

j

i i!:' a

200000

100000

100000

oll·

....

Imm

1991·92 y

75000 soooo

2SOOO lsoo&>

"

~

I m

1992·93

100000 soooo

:

I Im m

1993·94 m

II

19'4.'5

400000 lOOOOO

1990·91

100000

0

100000

Im m

75000 soooo

25000 ls0008

Im

1I

IRrnmi_

1991·9%

~

11

1992·93

100000 o

40000 m

30000

11

."'"

1993·94

10000 m

15000

-ll oS

?>

§

~

..

10000

5000

0

Im

1994·95

No data available

5000

.B

No data available

Figure 3. Population Maturity Index for fcmale (Icft) and male (right)

Loligo /orbesi

in Scottish waters for the years 1990-95. Index bascd on an cstimation of the numbcr of mature animals landed each month.

, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1

~

.5

..

."

.!3

0

"

!

~

?>

1000

500

0

6000 sooo

..

I

~

~

4000

?>

'E:

3000

0

'iij

"

2000

1000

3000

2500

2000

1500

"""

~

.ll

~ I ~

<

.!l

" 1: !l

0.

J!

0

:z: c!l

Month

1991·92

1992·93

~ ~

~

.15

... lt

.c

'2 i;'

= ~ ~ ~::t

~

,'J

.5

..

i

." 0

.!3

"

!

!

~

.5

?>

'E:

;:

0

6000

SOOO

4000

3000

2SOO

2000

\500

1000

500

3000

2000

1991·92

1992.93

1000

0

~ 1ll ~

.ll

E

~

~

<

.!l

J!

"

1t

0

:z:

I .ll

~

8

~

~

~ lt

~ .c

:a ;;-

]

~

~::t

~

Month

Figure 4. Population Maturity Index for female (left) and male (right) Loligo forbesi from the south-east of Ireland for the years 1991-93. Population index based on an estimation of numbers of mature squid landed at the port of Dunmore East.

·

,

200000 . . , . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - .

1990·91

j

150000 i

J

100000

.~

I

50000

1991·91

150000

100000

ISoooo

50000 0'

I

im

200000..,.....------~-----.

1991·93

100000

19'3·94

60000

40000

1994·95

SOOO..,.....-----------.

1991.92

4000

3000

2000

1000

2Soooo o..J..,-. . . . . .

~~,._,......,__r__r_~

-r-----------..

no data available

Figure 5. Population Recruitrnent Index for Loligo jorbesi in Scottish waters (lefl) and the south-east of

Ireland (fight). Scottish index calculated by estimating the number of recruits (ML < 150mm) in each months landings. Irish index calculated by estimating the numbcrs of rccruits landed each month in the port of Dunmore East.

Download