Argentina: Was it lost or never found? The news, the views, and the clues Claudio M. Loser Inter-American Dialogue Washington DC March 18, 2005 1 Argentina: the News The Argentine Government has been successful in its debt restructuring exercise. While bondholders were complaining, the government played its cards right, and 76 percent accepted. However bonds for US$20 billion are not in the exchange yet. Pres. Kirchner remains hostile to the IMF, but Minister Lavagna seems to send signals of a possible program negotiation. 2 Argentina: the views (I) How Argentines think the Argentina-IMF fight is seen from abroad Let me loose…Let me loose.. If I catch him, I’ll make him chopped liver K. IMF 3 Argentina: The views from the Empire (II) -How it is really seen Blustein Book cover 4 Argentina: The Views from the Scene (III) Tenembaum, book cover Argentina and the IMF: the fascinating discussion between a journalist an a key IMF man of the nineties 5 Why is this book relevant? This is the publisher’s interpretation: ¿What role did the IMF play in the Argentina economic crash? Why did it recommend politics that had failed in other countries? How much did personal interests impact in the decisions that affected millions of Argentines? Ernesto Tenembaum presents a unique book: during four months he exchanged mails with Claudio Loser, … Loser, responsible for the Fund in Latin America between 1994 and 2002, presents the toughest self-criticism (they say) of a former official of the IMF has done about that agency during the nineteen-nineties. 6 Why is this book relevant? The book states, for example: “Many times, I felt that the IMF fulfilled the role of the marines role.” “By its level of vertical discipline and cohesion, the International Monetary Fund can be compared perfectly to the old Communist Party, the Vatican or any army.” “we sinned for being arrogant. Many times, involuntarily, we prompted measures that finished in corruption.” 7 The views from the Scene (III) Doing well Monthly Evolution of Gvt. Confidence Monthly Index of Consumer Confidence Universidad Torcuato Di Tella 8 The clues: Even after more than two years of strong expansion GDP has not yet reached the levels of seven years ago GDP(seas. Adj.) Leading Indicators 9 Inst. Di Tella Unemployment, while declining markedly, remains very high Unem ploym ent rate % 30 Without "Plan Jefes" With "Plan Jefes" 26.6 25 23.0 20.4 21.4 19.7 20 19.5 19.1 17.6 16.2 14.5 15 12.1 10 5 4Q-04 3Q-04 2Q-04 1Q-04 4Q-03 3Q-03 2Q-03 1Q-03 0 10 Inflation, which had declined steadily, is on the rise CPI Inflation % Var YoY 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% Dec-04 Oct-04 Aug-04 Jun-04 Apr-04 Feb-04 Dec-03 Oct-03 Aug-03 Jun-03 0% 11 Several years after the crisis, Argentina’s GDP still lags behind the rest of the region 130 125 GDP (2000=100) 120 115 Argentina 110 Brazil Chile 105 Mexico Venezuela 100 LA 95 90 85 80 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 12 The picture is even more dramatic when compared to the peak GDP year of 1998, for Argentina 130 125 GDP (2000=100) 120 115 Argentina 110 Brazil Chile 105 Mexico Venezuela 100 LA 95 90 85 80 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 13 Argentina in the Nineties- The good.. The economy grew at the fastest rate at least since the great depression. Inflation declined sharply. The level of investment was high, and productivity increased rapidly. There was a significant process of modernization. Financial intermediation increased. Foreign direct investment rose, attracted by a massive process of privatization. 14 The bad.. The process of privatization, while in many cases effective, was marred with incidents of inefficiency and corruption. The reform process was not carried out fully, particularly in the public sector. Except when faced with the Tequila crisis, the public finances were never strengthened sufficiently, with little willingness to “save for a rainy day” . The fixed exchange rate, cornerstone of the plan, was inconsistent with fiscal policy, and a weakening external environment. The availability of foreign capital both to the private and public sector led to imprudent lending and borrowing. 15 And…the Sad The problems that started during Menem period, did not indicate an inevitable doom De la Rúa’s government, implemented “good” policies, but with little credibility, and activity started to decline As debt problems mounted, monetary policy became inconsistent with the Currency Board, and fiscal policy (mainly at provincial level) weakened Confidence was lost, a default was declared, and domestic deposits were frozen IMF support was withdrawn after September 2001, after a well documented and painful process. Political and economic chaos led the government to fall. By early 2002 the peso floated and GDP was in free fall. 16 16 What was the role of the IMF? The blames (as I hear them) The IMF is blamed by many for the collapse of Argentina: • Argentina was the “perfect student” , and the IMF was seen as letting it down at the moment of need, and not taking full responsibility for the collapse. • The IMF was seen as being too lax with Argentina during the good times, and too tough otherwise. • The IMF allowed the creditors to leave, without punishment. • The IMF forced the default. • The IMF did not pay the cost of its association with Argentina. 17 What was the role of the IMF? The facts (as I see them) Argentina was, in the eyes of the staff of the IMF (and likely management) never the perfect student. The IMF protested initially against the fixed exchange rate, and always against the lax fiscal and structural policies. External pressures were applied to continue with support, in a world that believed in the forces of open financial markets. Financial markets did not like the IMF warnings. The IMF provided only limited financial support until 2001, when Argentina was experiencing a major upheaval in its financial situation. The IMF was extremely concerned about the high costs of leaving convertibility (as was the case eventually). The IMF did not protect private capital, but respected the rules. 18 And the mistakes … The IMF was not strong in fighting the weakening fiscal position of the government, and in opposing the pressures from other governments and the market participants during the “good times”. The IMF gave too much benefit of the doubt to the various governments, even if the chances of success were limited. The IMF was not willing to look into the political process, which showed that there was no support for the government and for significant adjustment. The IMF and others did not emphasize the importance of strong legal and judiciary institutions to proceed with reforms, and we were arrogant as much as the LatinAmerican reformers in believing that taking the broad measures guaranteed success. 19 But… The responsibility for the loss remains squarely with the Argentine government, which may have operated irresponsibly (and defending certain groups), but was the true reflection of a vibrant even though chaotic democracy. Of course Argentines have paid for it dearly. Foreign and domestic investors did pay. Between the loss in value of foreign investment after the devaluation, and the sharp hair-cut in debt, the rate of return on investment must have been likely negative. US$80 billion of capital came in and may be US$20 billion left. Most profits during the 90’s were reinvested in the country and capital held by argentines abroad grew little on account of outflows. The IMF lent at the time when nobody else did; its interest rates are low; and the burden-sharing among countries, entails that the costs go to large and small members, lenders and borrowers alike. 20 The aftermath (T) The current Government has done well in many ways,thanks to a TLC process: It has been tough with foreign creditors, including the IMF, after the default, and has obtained good conditions in its new debt. 21 The aftermath (L) The government has had lucky external conditions, regarding high commodity prices, and low interest rates and spreads abroad. De La Rua did not have such luck. BCRA's Commodity prices index Sovereign spreads in emerging markets JPMorgan's EMBI Index number 1995=100 115 EMBI+ 2,500 105 EMBI_BRAZIL 2,000 95 Oct-04 Jun-04 Jan-04 Sep-03 Apr-03 Dec-02 Jul-02 Mar-02 Oct-01 Jun-01 Jan-01 Sep-00 Apr-00 Dec-99 Jul-99 Feb-99 Oct-98 May-98 Jan-05 Jul-04 Jan-04 Jul-03 Jan-03 Jul-02 Jan-02 Jul-01 Jan-01 Jul-00 Jan-00 Jul-99 Jan-99 Jul-98 0 Jan-98 55 Jul-97 500 Jan-97 65 Jul-96 1,000 Jan-96 75 Dec-97 1,500 85 22 The aftermath (C) The government has the best fiscal record, in recent Argentine history, and until recently, very cautious monetary policy, showing a conservative policy line that is very much in line with IMF doctrine. 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 PSBR(%GDP) 2000 2001 2002 PrimBlnc(%GDP) 2003 2004 2005 23 But… Success for Argentina is not guaranteed, It requires hard work, and… It is for Argentina to find or loose 24