Des Moines Register 12-29-06 Cloned-food ruling is a win for science Like FDA, public should resist scare tactics. REGISTER EDITORIAL BOARD Most Americans don't think twice when they chomp into an apple, even though an apple tree begins life as a cutting from another apple tree. It is a clone. For thousands of years farmers have manipulated Mother Nature by cutting plants for roots to create other genetically identical plants. This "cloning" is standard practice in the plant world because it produces superior products - tasty products we humans enjoy eating. But cloning livestock for food makes people lose their appetites. Surveys show the majority of Americans are troubled by the idea of eating meat and milk that come from cloned animals. They find it creepy. And that's understandable. After all, this is a culture that associates cloning with something unnatural, the stuff of science-fiction movies. Carol Tucker Foreman, director of food policy at the Consumer Federation of America, said polls show Americans believe it is immoral to clone animals. "It ranks only lower than the immorality of cloning humans," she said, and it's the same technology that could be used to clone humans. But critics' arguments fall short when it comes to food safety - and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is in the business of food safety. On Thursday, the agency announced that meat and other foods from the offspring of cloned livestock are safe. Final approval of cloned animals for food is still months away, and the agency will be accepting public comments for the next three months. The FDA's confirmation of safety comes on the heels of a study by federal scientists, to be published in January, concluding that the milk and meat of cloned animals are safe to eat and should be approved and sold with no special labeling. The agency "concluded that food from cattle, swine and goat clones was as safe to eat as food from animals of those species derived by conventional means," FDA scientists wrote in the Jan. 1 issue of the scientific journal Theriogenology. Dr. Christopher Tuggle, a professor of molecular genetics in the Animal Science Department at Iowa State University, said he can't see how cloned animals could pose a threat to consumers. "If it's just a cloned animal, it still has all the same genes. It's a growing, living animal, and I don't see the danger at all," he said. Aside from science, common sense tells us cloned animals and their byproducts present no danger to the food supply. Cloning is using an animal's DNA to create another animal that is an exact genetic copy. It's essentially a twin born a generation later - just like an apple tree. If one cow is a good milk-producer, one could expect its clone to be as well. The FDA deserves credit for choosing to side with science over scare tactics in vouching for the safety of foods derived from cloned animals. Now it's time for Americans to acknowledge the science, get over their squeamishness and enjoy a steak and a tall glass of milk.