Health Systems y Interventions to Reduce Disparities: Incorporation of Genomics in Routine Care in the Veterans Health Administration Sara J. Knight, PhD Interdisciplinary Program to Improve Care for Veterans with Complex Comorbid Conditions San Francisco VA Medical Center Evidence on disparities in genomics p g health services • Ethnic/racial and socioeconomic variation in attitudes risk perception and uptake of attitudes, risk perception, and uptake of genetic testing primarily in cancer; • Mostly Mostly from high risk groups, familial from high risk groups familial applications; • Hypothesized barriers to care include socioeconomic, geographic, ethnocultural, psychosocial health literacy and logistical psychosocial, health literacy, and logistical factors. Common Diseases and Health Systems lh • Less is known about the potential for disparities in access to genomic services for disparities in access to genomic services for common chronic diseases; • Littl Little information on disparities in access to i f ti di iti i t genomic health services that are incorporated in health care systems; in health care systems; • Need models to understand how disparities may occur as new technologies are introduced may occur as new technologies are introduced within health care systems. VHA Considerations VHA Considerations Equal access to health care system E li itl Explicitly serves vulnerable populations l bl l ti Emphasis on equity in care p q y Empirical work supports equity Critical to consider definition of disparities Patient complexity Literacy and level of educational attainment Social isolation Disparities and Diffusion of Innovation Early model to understand access • Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) provides g in VHA. an illustration of current integration – Colon cancer is common and one of the leading causes of cancer death. – HNPCC is rare (5% of colon cancers), but is associated with 80% risk of colon cancer and lesser risk of ten other cancers (e.g., ovarian and endometrial cancer). g standing g and widely y disseminated clinical g guidelines • Long recommend individualized care: – National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN); – American Gastroenterology Association (AGA). Disparities in colon cancer Disparities in colon cancer Social disparities observed in colorectal cancer Social disparities observed in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, access to clinical trials, and treatment. and treatment. Race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, gender, age language and literacy insurance and age, language and literacy, insurance, and geography have been examined. However, recent review suggests mixed results H i i d l in several domains, such as screening and treatment. treatment Person with CRC Potentially Due to HNPCC Genetic Counseling Analyze Tumor for MSI or IHC High MSI and/or Low IHC Low MSI or Stability of MS and/or IHC Germline Testing for Mismatch Repair Genes Unlikely Due to HNPCC Germline Mutation in Mismatch Repair Genes HNPCC No Germline Mutation MLH1 Methylation Studies and/or BRAF Assessment if MLH1 Loss Normal Methylation and/or BRAF M t ti Mutation Hypermethylation yp y or Mutation in BRAF Gene Tumor Likely Due to Undetectable Mutation in MLH1 Tumor Unlikely Due to HNPCC Referral of Family Members for Genetic Counseling What genomic services are available? • Three types of services specified in guidelines: – Family history collection and documentation – Ge Genetic et c Counseling Cou se g – Molecular analysis and genetic testing • G Goals l off genomic i services i ffor colon l cancer patients: – Identify patients who may benefit from more intensive surveillance and more aggressive treatment; – Identify family members for more intensive screening. Central Questions • How is genomic information being integrated in to colon cancer care in the VHA? • What are the p patient,, p provider,, organization, g , and innovation characteristics associated genomic services in VHA? • What are the barriers and facilitators for appropriate utilization of these services thorough-out the VHA? What we have learned so far Retrospective cohort design focusing on young Veterans (under age 50) cared for in the VHA who would be expected to receive a genomic service relevant to hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer HNPCC. Documentation appropriate for three health services when diagnosed with colon cancer or HNPCC HNPCC-related related cancer under age 50: Family history Genetic counseling Genetic testing, g DNA analysis y Administrative Data Sources Initial Data sources (2003 to 2007): – National Patient Care Database Outpatient Event – National Enrollment – Fee Basis – Inpatient Main – Inpatient Observation – Non-VA Inpatient Main – Extended Care Main – Inpatient Procedure and Surgery – Non-VA Procedure and Surgery – Extended Care Procedure and Surgery Qualitative Methods • Limited chart review of records at San Francisco to explore evidence of documentation of genomic services and potential reasons for lack of documentation. • Charts randomly sampled from individuals diagnosed with colon cancer among Veterans of age 50 years and younger. • Selected queries of key informants (oncologists (oncologists, pathologists) regarding types of documentation expected genomic services ((e.g., g g genetic testing, g family y history). y) on g • Focus group of Veterans cared for in VHA primary care clinic. clinic Results Genomic Services Documented for Possible HNPCC 2003-2007 Family y History y Colon Cancer Age 50 or < (3,282 ) Genetic Counseling DNA Analysis y N % N % N % 220 6.7 <25 0.1 89 2.7 ICD-9 and CPT codes used to determine presence of family history, genetic counseling, and DNA analysis. Geographical Variation in Presence of Family History Documentation Coding of Genomics for Veterans age 50 and under with Colon Cancer (N= 3,282) Family History Counseling DNA Analysis N % N % N % Female 35 84 8.4 <25 25 02 0.2 <25 25 19 1.9 Male 185 6.5 <25 0.1 81 2.8 Unknown <25 8.0 <25 0.7 <25 1.4 Not Married 124 6.5 <25 0.1 62 3.2 Married 85 6.9 <25 0.2 25 2.0 Unknown 127 7.2 <25 0.2 31 1.8 Other <25 10.4 <25 0.0 <25 5.7 African AM <25 50 5.0 <25 00 0.0 <25 45 4.5 Caucasian AM 58 6.3 <25 0.1 30 3.3 2-4 163 7.7 <25 0.2 36 1.7 5 or Greater 57 4.9 <25 0.0 53 4.5 GENDER MARITAL RACE CHARLSON Chart Review Potential P i l reasons ffor llacking ki d documentation i include: – Multiple competing health and psychosocial problems among patients; – Structure of charts, including clinical reminders, does not allow for easy or clear documentation of family history or individualized follow up up. Key Informant Results • Little standardization of services. • Services, such as genetic counseling, not located in the VA, but at affiliated medical center. • Lack of agreement among clinical services about when to test (e.g., (e g oncology versus laboratory). laboratory) • VA and academic affiliate differ in policy regarding genetic testing. testing Conclusions From 2003 to 2007, 2007 little coding of genomic services for young colon cancer patients. – C Coding di off ffamily il hi history t more common th than genetic ti counseling or molecular analysis or genetic testing; • L Less th than what h t would ld b be expected t db based d on previous studies (approximately 20% of colon cancer cases have positive family history) history). – Little variation in coding according to sociodemographic characteristics. characteristics – Substantial variation in coding according to geographic region. region Challenges • ICD-9 ICD 9 and CPT codes for family history, genetic counseling, and genetic testing; • Limitations Li i i off sample l size; i • Chart review and key informants in single geographic area. Next Steps • To characterize integration of genomics into routine colon cancer care in VHA: – Trends over time and geographic variation; – Patient, health professional, and organizational characteristics associated with integration of genomic services. To examine barriers and facilitators of integration genomic information and services into routine of g care for f Veterans diagnosed with colon cancer – Organization factors; – Innovation factors; – Patient factors including complex comorbid conditions and psychosocial factors. Triangulation Process Sampling p g Process for Qualitative Study y Key Messages Key Messages • H Health disparities in genomic health services l h di ii i i h lh i may be difficult to identify even in an integrated health care system with excellent integrated health care system with excellent data sources. • Challenges Challenges include: include • Lack of strong conceptual models that integrate access to care with innovation; integrate access to care with innovation; • Limitations of existing administrative data to account for race/ethnicity and for other to account for race/ethnicity and for other variables that rely on coding; • Small numbers. A k Acknowledgements l d t This work was supported by two VA Health Services Research and Development Service awards to Sara J. Knight, PhD, Interdisciplinary Program to Improve Care for Veterans with Complex Comorbid , Conditions, San Francisco VA Medical Center. The contents do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.