Advances in Qualitative Methods in Health Research: Making the Case for Ethnography Daniel Dohan, Ph.D. Institute for Health Policy Studies & Dept. of Anthropology, History, & Social Medicine University of California, San Francisco Overview • What is ethnography? – and how does it compare with other HSR and policy research methods? • What are recent advances in ethnography? – and in its potential role in policy and services research? What is ethnography? A tool for social analysis • Qualitative data – Often from participant-observation (p-o) – Findings, themes, ideas, and interpretations emerge holistically through iterative analysis • Analysis guided by theoretical reflexivity – Engagement with theory & focus on understanding separates ethnography from non-fiction writing. – Commitment to self-reflexivity distinguishes ethnography from other qualitative research. How does ethnography compare to other HSR and policy research methods? Ease of Research Design HARD • Bench EASY • Humanities • Philosophy Sciences • Physics RCT Psychometrics Econometrics Epidemiology Ethnography SEM Interpretability of Results • Humanities • Philosophy HARD Ethnography Epidemiology SEM EASY • Bench Sciences • Physics Psychometrics Econometrics RCT Ease of Research Design Harder to Design Easier to Design DATA COLLECTION Focus grps Semi-strc iv’s Ethnography Content analysis Grounded theory Ethnography DATA ANALYSIS Easier to Interpret Harder to Interpret Interpretability of Results Producing qualitative research: Intrusiveness, control & scalability DATA COLLECTION Focus grps Semi-strc iv’s Ethnography HIGH LOW Content analysis Grounded theory DATA ANALYSIS Ethnography What are recent advances in ethnography? • None, really; ethnography is an old craft • Yet constantly contested and in turmoil Last big ‘innovation’ was post-modernism (1970s) —neither very recent nor much of an ‘advance.’ • A more relevant question: what are recent developments in the potential role for ethnography in health policy and services research? Advancing policy & practice via ethnographic understanding* • Goal: “advancing” policy & practice • Hazards of advancement: unintended consequences, ironies of good intentions, self-interest lurking behind altruism and the “public good” • By surfacing, documenting and illuminating these hazards, ethnography may allow policy to focus less myopically on improvement, perfection, efficiency, justice, happiness, health, etc. * Bosk AcademyHealth ARM 2005 The need to deploy ethnography selectively • As a research method, ethnography is time-consuming and inefficient • Its findings are complex and highly contextualized, i.e. hard to digest – And once digested, these findings may not be seen as good or uplifting news • So, pick ethnographic cases (and battles) carefully Case studies 1. Explore the sensitive: errors in surgery or stigma in the ED (how disagreement about appropriate care shapes decision-making) 2. Document the significant: how doctors are trained or what is good care (when cancer MD’s introduce issue of end of life care) 3. Elaborate the obvious: how we die or how clinical trials recruit (why E.H.R. reminder systems stop working) Explore the sensitive: Stigma in the ED • • • Case study of how social stigma arises in the emergency department Observation is only method available Stigma arises as a seemingly inevitable product of well-designed care processes and despite the individual good intentions of providers Document the significant: What is good care • • • Comparative ethnography of what people consider “high quality care” in multiple cancer practices Document that no “right” definition exists and how definitions vary by role, place, & organization Potentially significant implications for quality reporting & pay for performance Elaborate the “obvious”: How clinical trials recruit • • Clinical trials have elaborate protocols defining eligibility and institutionalized ethical standards to guide recruitment Requirements of minority inclusion is an opportunity to “lift the hood” via ethnography – – It turns out providers often can’t or don’t follow the protocols or standards The informal & interactional often structure recruitment processes Conclusions • Ethnography is a good tool to investigate a limited class of questions and problems • This class includes several potential “growth areas” in health policy and services research, e.g. the meaning & measurement of quality, mechanisms underlying health disparities • Including projects that embrace a critical and self-reflexive mode of social analysis may potentially advance the field generally