Overview of Presentation Non-visit-based Communication: Early Experience of an Integrated Care System

advertisement
Non-visit-based Communication:
Early Experience
of an Integrated Care System
Overview of Presentation
• Implementation of e-connectivity at
Park Nicollet
• Issues
• Screen shots
• Use
• Patient evaluation
Jinnet Briggs Fowles PhD, Allan Kind MD,
Cheryl Craft RN, Elizabeth A. Kind MS, RN
Park Nicollet Institute, Minneapolis, MN
Funder: Arleen M. Carlson and the
Curtis L. Carlson Family Foundation
AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting
June 26, 2005
1
2
E-connectivity: Patient Online®
Pilot: One Primary Care Clinic
4 Modes of Communication
• Formal research protocol
• 360‘ impact
• Secure e-messages to staff
• E-visits to physicians
• Access to portions of medical record online:
– Demographics
– Immunizations
– Medications
– Selected lab test results
– Allergies
– Problem list
• Health information resources
– Patients, physicians, nurses, frontline
•
•
•
•
•
3 month pilot (March-May 2005)
551 adults (639 patient accounts)
11 physicians
17 nursing staff
12 frontline staff
3
E-connectivity Issues
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
4
Accessing Patient Online
IT design
Security
Legal
Clinical culture
Patient culture
Finances
Training
5
6
1
Demographics
E-Messages
7
E-Visits (1 of 2)
8
E-visits (2 of 2)
9
Online Record: Problem List
11
10
Online Record: Medications
12
2
Evaluation Data Sources
3 Months’ Use
• Electronic trail
• Content analysis
• 65% of accounts were used (415/639)
• 224 e-messages sent from 134 accounts
(21%)
• 15 e-visits attempted
• 4 e-visits billed
– E-messages, e-visits
• Pre, post surveys
– Patients, physicians, nurses, frontline staff
• Debriefing interviews
13
14
Content of E-messages to Staff
Distribution of Messages by Patients
2
3
10
# of Messages
ne
w
12
re
ne
w
Te
st
re
su
l ts
1
9
12
R
x
0
8
Rx
0
sy
m
pt
om
0
7
st
io
n
2
6
13
g
1
5
pt
om
1
4
Ne
w
1
15
n
18
10
0
24
qu
e
28
30
20
32
Re
cu
rr
in
Number
50
40
45
Co
rr
ec
ti o
# of Patients
70
60
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
M
ed
83
80
Sy
m
90
Most frequent types
Type of E-message
15
Content of E-visits to Physicians
Not Billed
Anxiety
Calcium intake
Eye infection
Hypertension
Aspirin recommendation
Night sweats
Pain medications
Pink eye
Prescription refill
Sinus infection
Knee pain
URI
Urinary frequency
Warts
16
Patient Survey Sample Characteristics
Demographics
Billed
Allergies
Prescription Refill
Warts
•
•
•
•
95% white
68% female
Average age 43 years
56% college graduates or more
•
•
•
•
67% very good or excellent
30% with regular care or chronic conditions
28% are somewhat or very worried about their health
20% using more than two prescriptions on a daily basis
•
•
•
•
36% of households earn $90,000 or more
54% work full time; 15% part-time
18% spend one month or more out of state
97% with internet at home; 57% like e-mail “a lot.”
General health
Economic status
17
18
3
Patient Survey
Use vs. Continued Access
Patients face system challenges
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
55.1
53
23.3
21.9
20.4
18.8
Percent
Percent
(percent reporting problems)
11.2
t
"
e
d
d
isi
or
or
r ID t Us
tem sag
se
s
ys
e-v
c
sw
rec
as
g u onta
g s e-me line
ng
i
p
n
n
t
i
i
r
s
g
n
at
"C
be
ue
rin
ing ng o
vig
be
ing
em
i
nd
req
na
us
ss
se
em
rem
ce
c
rem
a
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Use
Continued Access
70.1
60.2
52.5
40.2
27.6
21.3
3.9
online record
health
e-message to
information
staff
e-visit to
physician
19
Effect of Having Access to Online Record
Record Section
Percent
40.5
44.4
Willingness to
recommend
51.4
57.8
e
ap
p
qu
al
it
y
ro
ac
h
43.2
ch
an
g
io
n
s
im
pr
ov
e
co
m
m
un
ic
at
ns
ib
i
in
cr
ea
se
50.3
21
Patient Outcomes - Pre and Post
(percent selecting highest category response)
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
im
pr
ov
e
re
sp
o
es
De
m
og
ra
ph
ic
s
t
A
lle
rg
i
lis
le
m
io
n
Pr
ob
iz
at
m
Im
m
un
C
ur
re
nt
s
ed
s
lit
y
23.5
50.5
es
t
35.3
59.3
qu
42.7
64.7
io
n
49.2
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
ne
w
54.1
Percent Agree or Strongly Agree
Percent
60.3
La
b
Percent
Percent of Patients Reading
Sections of Online Record
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
20
59.4
63
Pre
Post
22
Physician Response
(anecdotal)
• Appears to have been a non-event
• No effect on workflow
– E-messages were integrated into established
telephone call flow
– Minimal use of e-visits
• Concerns have narrowed to record access
Satisfaction with Satisfaction with
PN
MD
communication communication
23
24
4
Nursing Response
(anecdotal)
Next Steps
• Cardiology pilot (May-July)
• Nurses who staff telephone lines prefer
asynchronous responses of e-messages
• No effect on telephone call volumes
– Specialist (vs. generalist)
– Includes nurse practitioners (CHF clinic)
– Serious illness
– Progress notes added (since Feb ’05)
– Radiology reports added
25
26
Try It Yourself
• www.parknicollet.com
• Patient Online login is on the right
side, in the middle of the screen
• Login as a guest
27
5
Download