Successful EU-projects for universities and research institutes: Some key properties Ketil Stølen SINTEF ICT University of Oslo UiO October 5, 2005 ICT My EU-project experiences CORAS (IST-2000-25031) 5th Framework EU project Full title: A platform for risk analysis of security critical systems iTrust (IST-2001-34910) 5th Framework EU project Full title: Working group on trust management in dynamic open systems TrustCoM (01945) 6th Framework EU integrated project under priority IST-2002- 2.3.1.9 (Networked Businesses and Governments) Full title: A trust and contract management framework enabling secure collaborative business processing in on-demand created, self-managed, scalable, and highly dynamic virtual organisations ICT CORAS basics NORWAY - SINTEF - Telenor - NCT - IFE - NR UK - QMUL - CLRC January 2001 -> July 2003 Budget 4,8 million EURO Trials within e-commerce and telemedicine GERMANY - Solinet GREECE - CTI - Intracom - FORTH ICT Challenges addressed by CORAS How to deploy security technology correctly The basic technology is there The systems are nevertheless not secure How to identify the right level of security Not more security than required How to ensure the specified level of security How to handle security as an integrated part of system development Security should not be an add-on after the system has been completed ICT System development and risk analysis Requirements Functionality Risks Vulnerability User Misuser Use case diagram Misuse case diagram login Unauthorised login registered user Customer database misuser Customer database Complete use case diagram registered user login uauthorised login misuser Customer database ICT Model-based risk assessment Risk assessment Graphical models as media for communication Precise input at the right level of abstraction Model-based risk assessment Graphical modeling Documentation of assessment results and assumptions ICT Interested in CORAS results? Computerized tool and full methodology available as open source (LGPL-license): http://coras.sourceforge.net/ CORAS language for threat modelling standardized by Object Management Group (OMG) as part of the UML Profile for Modeling Quality of Service and Fault Tolerance Characteristics and Mechanisms ICT Experiences Applying for a project Managing a project Exploiting the results of a project ICT APPLYING: Quality of the consortium Must have industrial technology providers, research institutions and end users The different partners should be assigned with relevant tasks Industrial project management preferred Industrial involvement in exploitation required! SMEs are preferred May contradict potential impact Respected academic partners is good Many academics among the reviewers Include figure to illustrate complementarity of partners Also geographic spread is an issue ICT APPLYING: Potential impact A clear added-value of running the project at the European level? Strengthen competetiveness? Solving societal problems? Must have a good exploitation plan Both academic (publications) and industrial (flyers, ...) Influential player in the field appreciated Standardisation or open source efforts may compensate Should argue for importance of topic Quotes from other sources stating the importance of the topic is good ICT APPLYING: S&T excellence Must have clearly defined objectives Many unfocussed proposals Good research method Suitable to reach the objectives Case studies are welcome WP description consulted, but B1 is most important Include a figure to illustrate method/dependencies between WPs Must have state-of-the-art overview Should argue that the consortium know and will use state-of-the- art, and should point to areas where progress to state-of-the-art will be made Include references to own publications/products, expand in partner presentation ICT APPLYING: Management Difficult to evaluate Almost everyone has a reasonable management structure Project co-ordinator, technical co-ordinator, project board, WP leaders, … Include figure to illustrate! Each partner should have some management resources in the work plan Not only prime Experienced co-ordinators appreciated (include CVs!) A plan for management of IPR, knowledge and innovationrelated activities is very much appreciated! ICT APPLYING: Additional advice Write good English; keep one layout Length constraints are not absolute Include a table showing partner involvement per WP Refer to your own work in S&T excellence, detail further in the partner description sections Include #employees in the partner descriptions (if more than 15…) If training is included: Specify clearly the target audience Focus on developing new technology, not on applying new technology in a new domain ICT MANAGEMENT: Overall Maintain good relationship with the Commission Make sure management is sufficiently funded Consortium agreement is important However: make sure the technical people are in control Technical manager in addition to administrative manager Make sure there is a steering committee of partner representatives that are not involved in the technical work Do not invent unnecessary rules and administration ICT MANAGEMENT: Technical Person management just as important as technical management Identify the hidden agendas (each partner has one) Don’t kick the dead bodies (unless you have to) Face-to-face meetings important; as well as group-work Plan the meetings carefully Don’t be afraid of re-organising Find the strong people and put them in key positions Try to create enthusiasm Paper writing important Make use of a trial-driven research process ICT TRIAL based Establishment 1st R&D Phase inputs 3 rd R&D Phase drives used Standards 2 nd R&D Phase CORAS Tools and methodology results addresses IT System Organisational Business Context Context SYSTEMS Business Technical Context Context Technical Context ICT EXPLOITATION: General Make sure you have you something concrete in the end; e.g. a tool Make sure the results are published Don’t hide things away Look for possibilities Maintain your contacts ICT EXPLOITATION: How we continued CORAS iTrust (IST-2001-34910) 5th Framework EU Full title: Working group on trust management in dynamic open systems SECURIS (152839/220) Funded by the Research Council of Norway as a Competence Project with User- Involvement Full title: Model-driven development and analysis of secure information systems TrustCoM (01945) 6th Framework EU integrated project under priority IST-2002-2.3.1.9 (Networked Businesses and Governments) Full title: A trust and contract management framework enabling secure collaborative business processing in on-demand created, self-managed, scalable, and highly dynamic virtual organisations ENFORCE (164382/V30) Funded by the Research Council of Norway under the ICT SOS Research programme Full title: Tool supported methodology for the formalization, analysis and enforcement of policies within trust managment ICT Conclusions EU projects are challenging, but rewarding! If you are a beginner, make sure you have some experienced people in the team Proposal writing is time-consuming: get involved only if you have to, and, then be prepared to do it yourself I’m not sure courses is the right thing I had some sleepless nights, but CORAS went very well in the end My current research group of 10+ people is funded on the CORAS results Look for possibilities; think positive EU projects give you many possibilities ICT