Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
College of Media and Communication
Chairs and Other Mid-Level Administrators as Evaluated by All Faculty of a College
Survey participation: 20 (37.7%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
department
interests
making
7
Supports
faculty
development
8
9
Conducts fair Actively
and rigorous promotes
tenure and
diversity
promotion
within the
processes
department
10
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Has a clear
Conducts fair and
strategic plan
rigorous processes
and allocates
to hire new faculty
resources
members in the
consistently
department
with that plan
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
department
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
No-Response out of
20
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
20
4.85
5
5
4
0.36
0.08
20
4.80
5
5
3
0.51
0.11
20
4.80
5
5
3
0.51
0.11
20
4.80
5
5
2
0.68
0.15
20
4.85
5
5
3
0.48
0.11
20
4.90
5
5
4
0.30
0.07
20
4.80
5
5
3
0.60
0.13
15
4.60
5
5
3
0.80
0.21
19
4.58
5
5
3
0.75
0.17
20
4.80
5
5
3
0.60
0.13
18
4.78
5
5
3
0.63
0.15
20
4.75
5
5
3
0.62
0.14
20
4.70
5
5
2
0.78
0.17
20
4.85
5
5
3
0.48
0.11
17
4.29
5
5
1
1.18
0.29
20
4.80
5
5
3
0.51
0.11
309
4.75
5
5
1
0.61
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
5
25%
1
5%
0
0%
2
10%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
3
15%
0
0%
11
3%
0
0
0
3
17
20
0
0
1
2
17
20
0
0
1
2
17
20
0
1
0
1
18
20
0
0
1
1
18
20
0
0
0
2
18
20
0
0
2
0
18
20
0
0
3
0
12
15
0
0
3
2
14
19
0
0
2
0
18
20
0
0
2
0
16
18
0
0
2
1
17
20
0
1
1
1
17
20
0
0
1
1
18
20
1
1
1
3
11
17
0
0
1
2
17
20
1
3
21
21
263
309
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15.0%
85.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
85.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
85.0%
100%
0.0%
5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
90.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
5.0%
90.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
10.0%
90.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
10.0%
0.0%
90.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
20.0%
0.0%
80.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
15.8%
10.5%
73.7%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
10.0%
0.0%
90.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
11.1%
0.0%
88.9%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
10.0%
5.0%
85.0%
100%
0.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
85.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
5.0%
90.0%
100%
5.9%
5.9%
5.9%
17.6%
64.7%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
85.0%
100%
0.3%
1.0%
6.8%
6.8%
85.1%
100%
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low ratings
No low ratings
No low
ratings
18.0
No low
ratings
7.0
No low
ratings
71.0
0.03
`
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
19.0
No low
ratings
Institutional Research, 1/25/2016, page 1 of 1
Chairs and Other Mid-Level Administrators as Evaluated by all Faculty of a Department
Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
College of Media and Communication
Media and Communication
Chair: Brian Ott
Survey participation: 7 (38.9%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
department
interests
making
7
Supports
faculty
development
8
9
Conducts fair Actively
and rigorous promotes
tenure and
diversity
promotion
within the
processes
department
10
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Has a clear
Conducts fair and
strategic plan
rigorous processes
and allocates
to hire new faculty
resources
members in the
consistently
department
with that plan
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
department
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
No-Response out of
7
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
7
4.71
5
5
4
0.45
0.17
7
4.57
5
5
3
0.73
0.28
7
4.57
5
5
3
0.73
0.28
7
4.43
5
5
2
1.05
0.40
7
4.57
5
5
3
0.73
0.28
7
4.71
5
5
4
0.45
0.17
7
4.43
5
5
3
0.90
0.34
6
4.33
5
5
3
0.94
0.38
7
4.29
5
5
3
0.88
0.33
7
4.43
5
5
3
0.90
0.34
5
4.60
5
5
3
0.80
0.36
7
4.43
5
5
3
0.90
0.34
7
4.29
5
5
2
1.16
0.44
7
4.57
5
5
3
0.73
0.28
6
3.83
5
5
1
1.67
0.68
7
4.71
5
5
4
0.45
0.17
108
4.47
5
5
1
0.84
0.08
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
14%
0
0%
0
0%
2
29%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
14%
0
0%
4
4%
0
0
0
2
5
7
0
0
1
1
5
7
0
0
1
1
5
7
0
1
0
1
5
7
0
0
1
1
5
7
0
0
0
2
5
7
0
0
2
0
5
7
0
0
2
0
4
6
0
0
2
1
4
7
0
0
2
0
5
7
0
0
1
0
4
5
0
0
2
0
5
7
0
1
1
0
5
7
0
0
1
1
5
7
1
1
0
0
4
6
0
0
0
2
5
7
1
3
16
12
76
108
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
28.6%
71.4%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
14.3%
14.3%
71.4%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
14.3%
14.3%
71.4%
100%
0.0%
14.3%
0.0%
14.3%
71.4%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
14.3%
14.3%
71.4%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
28.6%
71.4%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
28.6%
0.0%
71.4%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
33.3%
0.0%
66.7%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
28.6%
14.3%
57.1%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
28.6%
0.0%
71.4%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
20.0%
0.0%
80.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
28.6%
0.0%
71.4%
100%
0.0%
14.3%
14.3%
0.0%
71.4%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
14.3%
14.3%
71.4%
100%
16.7%
16.7%
0.0%
0.0%
66.7%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
28.6%
71.4%
100%
0.9%
2.8%
14.8%
11.1%
70.4%
100%
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
6.0
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low ratings
No low ratings
No low
ratings
5.0
No low
ratings
2.0
No low
ratings
22.0
Institutional Research, 1/26/2016, page 1 of 1
Chairs and Other Mid-Level Administrators as Evaluated by all Faculty of a Department
Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
College of Media and Communication
Public Relations
Chair: Trent Seltzer
Survey participation: 5 (50%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
department
interests
making
7
Supports
faculty
development
8
9
Conducts fair Actively
and rigorous promotes
tenure and
diversity
promotion
within the
processes
department
10
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Has a clear
Conducts fair and
strategic plan
rigorous processes
and allocates
to hire new faculty
resources
members in the
consistently
department
with that plan
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
department
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
No-Response out of
5
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
5
5.00
5
5
5
0.00
0.00
5
5.00
5
5
5
0.00
0.00
5
5.00
5
5
5
0.00
0.00
5
5.00
5
5
5
0.00
0.00
5
5.00
5
5
5
0.00
0.00
5
5.00
5
5
5
0.00
0.00
5
5.00
5
5
5
0.00
0.00
4
5.00
5
5
5
0.00
0.00
4
5.00
5
5
5
0.00
0.00
5
5.00
5
5
5
0.00
0.00
5
5.00
5
5
5
0.00
0.00
5
5.00
5
5
5
0.00
0.00
5
5.00
5
5
5
0.00
0.00
5
5.00
5
5
5
0.00
0.00
5
4.80
5
5
4
0.40
0.18
5
5.00
5
5
5
0.00
0.00
78
4.99
5
5
4
0.03
0.00
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
20%
1
20%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
2
3%
0
0
0
0
5
5
0
0
0
0
5
5
0
0
0
0
5
5
0
0
0
0
5
5
0
0
0
0
5
5
0
0
0
0
5
5
0
0
0
0
5
5
0
0
0
0
4
4
0
0
0
0
4
4
0
0
0
0
5
5
0
0
0
0
5
5
0
0
0
0
5
5
0
0
0
0
5
5
0
0
0
0
5
5
0
0
0
1
4
5
0
0
0
0
5
5
0
0
0
1
77
78
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20.0%
80.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
98.7%
100%
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low ratings
No low ratings
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low ratings
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
Institutional Research, 1/26/2016, page 1 of 1