Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
College of Agriculture
Chairs and Other Mid-Level Administrators as Evaluated by All Faculty of a College
Survey participation: 50 (46.3%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
department
interests
making
7
Supports
faculty
development
8
9
Conducts fair Actively
and rigorous promotes
tenure and
diversity
promotion
within the
processes
department
10
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Has a clear
Conducts fair and
strategic plan
rigorous processes
and allocates
to hire new faculty
resources
members in the
consistently
department
with that plan
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
department
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
No-Response out of 50
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
50
4.24
5
5
1
1.05
0.15
50
4.08
5
4
1
1.06
0.15
50
4.08
5
4
1
1.11
0.16
50
4.12
5
5
1
1.24
0.18
50
4.32
5
5
1
1.14
0.16
50
4.12
5
5
1
1.21
0.17
49
4.35
5
5
1
1.15
0.16
43
4.26
5
5
1
1.10
0.17
47
4.28
5
4
1
0.92
0.13
50
4.10
5
5
1
1.28
0.18
47
3.96
5
5
1
1.38
0.20
50
3.74
5
4
1
1.26
0.18
48
4.27
5
4
2
0.86
0.12
50
4.06
5
4
1
1.17
0.17
50
4.12
5
4
1
1.03
0.15
46
4.15
5
5
1
1.25
0.18
780
4.14
5
5
1
1.14
0.04
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
7
14%
3
6%
0
0%
3
6%
0
0%
2
4%
0
0%
0
0%
4
8%
20
3%
2
3
2
17
26
50
2
3
5
19
21
50
3
2
5
18
22
50
4
2
6
10
28
50
3
2
3
10
32
50
3
4
4
12
27
50
4
0
3
10
32
49
2
2
4
10
25
43
1
2
3
18
23
47
4
4
3
11
28
50
4
6
4
7
26
47
4
4
12
11
19
50
0
3
4
18
23
48
4
1
6
16
23
50
2
2
6
18
22
50
4
2
3
11
26
46
46
42
73
216
403
780
4.0%
6.0%
4.0%
34.0%
52.0%
100%
4.0%
6.0%
10.0%
38.0%
42.0%
100%
6.0%
4.0%
10.0%
36.0%
44.0%
100%
8.0%
4.0%
12.0%
20.0%
56.0%
100%
6.0%
4.0%
6.0%
20.0%
64.0%
100%
6.0%
8.0%
8.0%
24.0%
54.0%
100%
8.2%
0.0%
6.1%
20.4%
65.3%
100%
4.7%
4.7%
9.3%
23.3%
58.1%
100%
2.1%
4.3%
6.4%
38.3%
48.9%
100%
8.0%
8.0%
6.0%
22.0%
56.0%
100%
8.5%
12.8%
8.5%
14.9%
55.3%
100%
8.0%
8.0%
24.0%
22.0%
38.0%
100%
0.0%
6.3%
8.3%
37.5%
47.9%
100%
8.0%
2.0%
12.0%
32.0%
46.0%
100%
4.0%
4.0%
12.0%
36.0%
44.0%
100%
8.7%
4.3%
6.5%
23.9%
56.5%
100%
5.9%
5.4%
9.4%
27.7%
51.7%
100%
8.6
8.0
8.0
6.3
8.4
5.6
10.5
8.8
13.7
4.9
3.3
3.8
13.7
7.8
10.0
6.2
7.0
Institutional Research, 1/25/2016, page 1 of 1
Chairs and Other Mid-Level Administrators as Evaluated by All Faculty of a College
Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
College of Architecture
Clifton C. Ellis
Survey participation: 20 (36.4%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
department
interests
making
7
Supports
faculty
development
8
9
Conducts fair Actively
and rigorous promotes
tenure and
diversity
promotion
within the
processes
department
10
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Has a clear
Conducts fair and
strategic plan
rigorous processes
and allocates
to hire new faculty
resources
members in the
consistently
department
with that plan
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
department
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
19
3.58
5
4
1
1.18
0.27
20
3.40
5
4
1
1.28
0.29
20
3.10
5
3
1
1.45
0.32
20
2.75
5
3
1
1.37
0.31
20
2.95
5
3
1
1.43
0.32
20
2.55
5
2
1
1.40
0.31
18
3.06
5
3
1
1.18
0.28
18
3.06
5
3.5
1
1.39
0.33
17
3.41
5
3
1
1.14
0.28
20
2.70
5
3
1
1.31
0.29
17
3.00
5
3
1
1.24
0.30
18
2.06
5
2
1
1.22
0.29
12
2.42
4
3
1
0.95
0.28
20
2.75
5
2.5
1
1.55
0.35
18
3.28
5
3
1
1.10
0.26
10
2.90
5
3
1
1.37
0.43
287
2.93
5
3
1
1.28
0.08
No-Response out of 20
1
5%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
2
10%
2
10%
3
15%
0
0%
3
15%
2
10%
8
40%
0
0%
2
10%
10
50%
33
10%
1
3
4
6
5
19
3
1
5
7
4
20
5
1
5
5
4
20
5
4
5
3
3
20
4
5
3
4
4
20
6
5
4
2
3
20
3
2
5
7
1
18
3
5
1
6
3
18
2
0
7
5
3
17
6
1
8
3
2
20
3
2
6
4
2
17
8
5
2
2
1
18
3
2
6
1
0
12
6
4
4
1
5
20
1
3
7
4
3
18
2
2
3
1
2
10
61
45
75
61
45
287
5.3%
15.8%
21.1%
31.6%
26.3%
100%
15.0%
5.0%
25.0%
35.0%
20.0%
100%
25.0%
5.0%
25.0%
25.0%
20.0%
100%
25.0%
20.0%
25.0%
15.0%
15.0%
100%
20.0%
25.0%
15.0%
20.0%
20.0%
100%
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
10.0%
15.0%
100%
16.7%
11.1%
27.8%
38.9%
5.6%
100%
16.7%
27.8%
5.6%
33.3%
16.7%
100%
11.8%
0.0%
41.2%
29.4%
17.6%
100%
30.0%
5.0%
40.0%
15.0%
10.0%
100%
17.6%
11.8%
35.3%
23.5%
11.8%
100%
44.4%
27.8%
11.1%
11.1%
5.6%
100%
25.0%
16.7%
50.0%
8.3%
0.0%
100%
30.0%
20.0%
20.0%
5.0%
25.0%
100%
5.6%
16.7%
38.9%
22.2%
16.7%
100%
20.0%
20.0%
30.0%
10.0%
20.0%
100%
21.3%
15.7%
26.1%
21.3%
15.7%
100%
2.8
2.8
1.5
0.7
0.9
0.5
1.6
1.1
4.0
0.7
1.2
0.2
0.2
0.6
1.8
0.8
1.0
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
Institutional Research, 1/25/2016, page 1 of 1
Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
College of Arts and Sciences
Chairs and Other Mid-Level Administrators as Evaluated by All Faculty of a College
Survey participation: 201 (40.9%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
department
interests
making
7
Supports
faculty
development
8
9
Conducts fair Actively
and rigorous promotes
tenure and
diversity
promotion
within the
processes
department
10
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Has a clear
Conducts fair and
strategic plan
rigorous processes
and allocates
to hire new faculty
resources
members in the
consistently
department
with that plan
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
department
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
No-Response out of 201
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
193
4.12
5
4
1
1.03
0.07
198
4.05
5
4
1
0.97
0.07
191
3.93
5
4
1
1.00
0.07
197
3.84
5
4
1
1.25
0.09
199
4.00
5
4
1
1.24
0.09
200
3.87
5
4
1
1.32
0.09
197
4.10
5
5
1
1.13
0.08
169
3.86
5
4
1
1.26
0.10
188
3.91
5
4
1
1.14
0.08
200
3.74
5
4
1
1.37
0.10
181
4.07
5
4
1
1.07
0.08
192
3.59
5
4
1
1.35
0.10
187
3.79
5
4
1
1.33
0.10
200
3.83
5
4
1
1.36
0.10
200
4.02
5
4
1
1.18
0.08
193
3.78
5
4
1
1.17
0.08
3085
3.91
5
4
1
1.20
0.02
8
4%
3
1%
10
5%
4
2%
2
1%
1
0%
4
2%
32
16%
13
6%
1
0%
20
10%
9
4%
14
7%
1
0%
1
0%
8
4%
131
4%
4
15
22
64
88
193
3
11
38
67
79
198
3
13
45
63
67
191
12
23
31
49
82
197
15
13
23
54
94
199
18
19
25
47
91
200
7
15
31
43
101
197
12
12
40
29
76
169
7
17
38
50
76
188
22
20
29
46
83
200
7
6
37
48
83
181
21
23
37
44
67
192
19
14
32
44
78
187
18
26
19
47
90
200
10
18
23
56
93
200
10
17
46
52
68
193
188
262
516
803
1316
3085
2.1%
7.8%
11.4%
33.2%
45.6%
100%
1.5%
5.6%
19.2%
33.8%
39.9%
100%
1.6%
6.8%
23.6%
33.0%
35.1%
100%
6.1%
11.7%
15.7%
24.9%
41.6%
100%
7.5%
6.5%
11.6%
27.1%
47.2%
100%
9.0%
9.5%
12.5%
23.5%
45.5%
100%
3.6%
7.6%
15.7%
21.8%
51.3%
100%
7.1%
7.1%
23.7%
17.2%
45.0%
100%
3.7%
9.0%
20.2%
26.6%
40.4%
100%
11.0%
10.0%
14.5%
23.0%
41.5%
100%
3.9%
3.3%
20.4%
26.5%
45.9%
100%
10.9%
12.0%
19.3%
22.9%
34.9%
100%
10.2%
7.5%
17.1%
23.5%
41.7%
100%
9.0%
13.0%
9.5%
23.5%
45.0%
100%
5.0%
9.0%
11.5%
28.0%
46.5%
100%
5.2%
8.8%
23.8%
26.9%
35.2%
100%
6.1%
8.5%
16.7%
26.0%
42.7%
100%
8.0
10.4
8.1
3.7
5.3
3.7
6.5
4.4
5.3
3.1
10.1
2.5
3.7
3.1
5.3
4.4
4.7
Institutional Research, 2/10/2016, page 1 of 1
Chairs and Other Mid-Level Administrators as Evaluated by All Faculty of a College
Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
Rawls College of Business
Survey participation: 43(41%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
department
interests
making
7
Supports
faculty
development
8
9
Conducts fair Actively
and rigorous promotes
tenure and
diversity
promotion
within the
processes
department
10
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Has a clear
Conducts fair and
strategic plan
rigorous processes
and allocates
to hire new faculty
resources
members in the
consistently
department
with that plan
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
department
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
No-Response out of 43
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
42
4.38
5
5
2
0.95
0.15
43
4.14
5
5
1
1.27
0.19
42
4.17
5
5
1
1.11
0.17
43
4.12
5
5
1
1.32
0.20
43
4.19
5
5
1
1.33
0.20
43
3.93
5
4
1
1.39
0.21
43
4.30
5
5
1
1.15
0.18
28
4.14
5
5
1
1.33
0.25
42
4.24
5
5
1
1.11
0.17
43
4.09
5
5
1
1.36
0.21
38
4.16
5
5
1
1.25
0.20
43
3.91
5
4
1
1.22
0.19
39
4.31
5
5
2
0.91
0.15
43
3.88
5
4
1
1.38
0.21
41
4.56
5
5
2
0.77
0.12
41
4.05
5
5
1
1.32
0.21
657
4.16
5
5
1
1.20
0.05
1
2%
0
0%
1
2%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
15
35%
1
2%
0
0%
5
12%
0
0%
4
9%
0
0%
2
5%
2
5%
31
5%
0
4
2
10
26
42
3
4
2
9
25
43
1
4
5
9
23
42
4
3
2
9
25
43
5
1
2
8
27
43
6
1
4
11
21
43
2
4
0
10
27
43
3
1
2
5
17
28
1
4
4
8
25
42
6
0
2
11
24
43
3
2
3
8
22
38
3
3
7
12
18
43
0
3
3
12
21
39
5
3
5
9
21
43
0
1
4
7
29
41
4
2
5
7
23
41
46
40
52
145
374
657
0.0%
9.5%
4.8%
23.8%
61.9%
100%
7.0%
9.3%
4.7%
20.9%
58.1%
100%
2.4%
9.5%
11.9%
21.4%
54.8%
100%
9.3%
7.0%
4.7%
20.9%
58.1%
100%
11.6%
2.3%
4.7%
18.6%
62.8%
100%
14.0%
2.3%
9.3%
25.6%
48.8%
100%
4.7%
9.3%
0.0%
23.3%
62.8%
100%
10.7%
3.6%
7.1%
17.9%
60.7%
100%
2.4%
9.5%
9.5%
19.0%
59.5%
100%
14.0%
0.0%
4.7%
25.6%
55.8%
100%
7.9%
5.3%
7.9%
21.1%
57.9%
100%
7.0%
7.0%
16.3%
27.9%
41.9%
100%
0.0%
7.7%
7.7%
30.8%
53.8%
100%
11.6%
7.0%
11.6%
20.9%
48.8%
100%
0.0%
2.4%
9.8%
17.1%
70.7%
100%
9.8%
4.9%
12.2%
17.1%
56.1%
100%
7.0%
6.1%
7.9%
22.1%
56.9%
100%
9.0
4.9
6.4
4.9
5.8
4.6
6.2
5.5
6.6
5.8
6.0
5.0
11.0
3.8
36.0
5.0
6.0
Institutional Research, 1/25/2016, page 1 of 1
Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
College of Education
Chairs and Other Mid-Level Administrators as Evaluated by All Faculty of a College
Survey participation: 59 (43.1%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
department
interests
making
7
Supports
faculty
development
8
9
Conducts fair Actively
and rigorous promotes
tenure and
diversity
promotion
within the
processes
department
10
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Has a clear
Conducts fair and
strategic plan
rigorous processes
and allocates
to hire new faculty
resources
members in the
consistently
department
with that plan
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
department
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
57
3.91
5
4
1
1.19
0.16
58
4.22
5
5
1
1.08
0.14
56
3.91
5
4
1
1.15
0.15
58
3.78
5
4
1
1.34
0.18
58
3.79
5
4
1
1.32
0.17
57
3.67
5
4
1
1.34
0.18
56
4.04
5
4
1
1.18
0.16
46
3.91
5
4
1
1.21
0.18
52
3.92
5
4
1
1.19
0.17
59
3.75
5
4
1
1.37
0.18
49
3.88
5
4
1
1.26
0.18
56
3.54
5
4
1
1.27
0.17
44
3.91
5
4
2
1.02
0.15
58
3.78
5
4
1
1.37
0.18
56
4.18
5
5
1
1.10
0.15
54
3.74
5
4
1
1.31
0.18
874
3.87
5
4
1
1.23
0.04
No-Response out of 59
2
3%
1
2%
3
5%
1
2%
1
2%
2
3%
3
5%
13
22%
7
12%
0
0%
10
17%
3
5%
15
25%
1
2%
3
5%
5
8%
70
7%
4
3
10
17
23
57
3
2
5
17
31
58
3
4
10
17
22
56
6
5
9
14
24
58
5
7
7
15
24
58
5
8
10
12
22
57
3
5
5
17
26
56
2
5
9
9
21
46
2
5
12
9
24
52
6
6
11
10
26
59
4
2
12
9
22
49
5
6
16
12
17
56
0
4
13
10
17
44
6
6
8
13
25
58
2
3
9
11
31
56
4
6
13
8
23
54
60
77
159
200
378
874
7.0%
5.3%
17.5%
29.8%
40.4%
100%
5.2%
3.4%
8.6%
29.3%
53.4%
100%
5.4%
7.1%
17.9%
30.4%
39.3%
100%
10.3%
8.6%
15.5%
24.1%
41.4%
100%
8.6%
12.1%
12.1%
25.9%
41.4%
100%
8.8%
14.0%
17.5%
21.1%
38.6%
100%
5.4%
8.9%
8.9%
30.4%
46.4%
100%
4.3%
10.9%
19.6%
19.6%
45.7%
100%
3.8%
9.6%
23.1%
17.3%
46.2%
100%
10.2%
10.2%
18.6%
16.9%
44.1%
100%
8.2%
4.1%
24.5%
18.4%
44.9%
100%
8.9%
10.7%
28.6%
21.4%
30.4%
100%
0.0%
9.1%
29.5%
22.7%
38.6%
100%
10.3%
10.3%
13.8%
22.4%
43.1%
100%
3.6%
5.4%
16.1%
19.6%
55.4%
100%
7.4%
11.1%
24.1%
14.8%
42.6%
100%
6.9%
8.8%
18.2%
22.9%
43.2%
100%
5.7
9.6
5.6
3.5
3.3
2.6
5.4
4.3
4.7
3.0
5.2
2.6
6.8
3.2
8.4
3.1
4.2
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
Institutional Research, 1/25/2016, page 1 of 1
Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
College of Engineering
Chairs and Other Mid-Level Administrators as Evaluated by All Faculty of a College
Survey participation: 67 (41.1%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
department
interests
making
7
Supports
faculty
development
8
9
Conducts fair Actively
and rigorous promotes
tenure and
diversity
promotion
within the
processes
department
10
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Has a clear
Conducts fair and
strategic plan
rigorous processes
and allocates
to hire new faculty
resources
members in the
consistently
department
with that plan
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
department
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
No-Response out of
67
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
67
3.76
5
4
1
1.21
0.15
67
3.91
5
4
1
1.19
0.15
67
3.75
5
4
1
1.20
0.15
65
3.68
5
4
1
1.33
0.16
66
3.68
5
4
1
1.38
0.17
66
3.73
5
4
1
1.49
0.18
64
3.80
5
4
1
1.26
0.16
59
3.66
5
4
1
1.32
0.17
62
3.77
5
4
1
1.18
0.15
67
3.55
5
4
1
1.46
0.18
57
3.44
5
4
1
1.35
0.18
64
3.44
5
4
1
1.33
0.17
60
3.82
5
4
1
1.12
0.14
67
3.57
5
4
1
1.51
0.18
67
4.03
5
4
1
1.04
0.13
63
3.49
5
4
1
1.38
0.17
1028
3.69
5
4
1
1.30
0.04
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
2
3%
1
1%
1
1%
3
4%
8
12%
5
7%
0
0%
10
15%
3
4%
7
10%
0
0%
0
0%
4
6%
44
4%
4
8
11
21
23
67
4
6
9
21
27
67
5
6
11
24
21
67
5
10
11
14
25
65
7
8
11
13
27
66
11
5
4
17
29
66
5
5
14
14
26
64
7
4
11
17
20
59
4
3
19
13
23
62
12
2
15
13
25
67
7
7
14
12
17
57
7
10
13
16
18
64
3
3
17
16
21
60
10
10
7
12
28
67
3
2
11
25
26
67
8
9
9
18
19
63
102
98
187
266
375
1028
6.0%
11.9%
16.4%
31.3%
34.3%
100%
6.0%
9.0%
13.4%
31.3%
40.3%
100%
7.5%
9.0%
16.4%
35.8%
31.3%
100%
7.7%
15.4%
16.9%
21.5%
38.5%
100%
10.6%
12.1%
16.7%
19.7%
40.9%
100%
16.7%
7.6%
6.1%
25.8%
43.9%
100%
7.8%
7.8%
21.9%
21.9%
40.6%
100%
11.9%
6.8%
18.6%
28.8%
33.9%
100%
6.5%
4.8%
30.6%
21.0%
37.1%
100%
17.9%
3.0%
22.4%
19.4%
37.3%
100%
12.3%
12.3%
24.6%
21.1%
29.8%
100%
10.9%
15.6%
20.3%
25.0%
28.1%
100%
5.0%
5.0%
28.3%
26.7%
35.0%
100%
14.9%
14.9%
10.4%
17.9%
41.8%
100%
4.5%
3.0%
16.4%
37.3%
38.8%
100%
12.7%
14.3%
14.3%
28.6%
30.2%
100%
9.9%
9.5%
18.2%
25.9%
36.5%
100%
3.7
4.8
4.1
2.6
2.7
2.9
4.0
3.4
5.1
2.7
2.1
2.0
6.2
2.0
10.2
2.2
3.2
Institutional Research, 1/25/2016, page 1 of 1
Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
College of Human Sciences
Chairs and Other Mid-Level Administrators as Evaluated by All Faculty of a College
Survey participation: 50 (45.9%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
department
interests
making
7
Supports
faculty
development
8
9
Conducts fair Actively
and rigorous promotes
tenure and
diversity
promotion
within the
processes
department
10
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Has a clear
Conducts fair and
strategic plan
rigorous processes
and allocates
to hire new faculty
resources
members in the
consistently
department
with that plan
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
department
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
50
4.18
5
4
1
0.93
0.13
50
3.86
5
4
1
1.17
0.16
48
4.02
5
4
1
1.05
0.15
49
4.18
5
5
1
0.98
0.14
50
4.00
5
4.5
1
1.26
0.18
50
3.90
5
4
1
1.28
0.18
49
4.14
5
4
1
1.09
0.16
37
4.08
5
4
1
1.12
0.18
46
4.02
5
4
1
1.03
0.15
50
3.96
5
4
1
1.13
0.16
41
3.88
5
4
1
1.19
0.19
50
3.80
5
4
1
1.33
0.19
47
4.13
5
4
2
0.98
0.14
50
3.68
5
4
1
1.38
0.19
50
3.98
5
4
1
0.99
0.14
47
3.98
5
4
1
1.02
0.15
764
3.99
5
4
1
1.12
0.04
No-Response out of 50
0
0%
0
0%
2
4%
1
2%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
13
26%
4
8%
0
0%
9
18%
0
0%
3
6%
0
0%
0
0%
3
6%
36
5%
1
2
6
19
22
50
4
2
8
19
17
50
2
2
8
17
19
48
1
1
11
11
25
49
4
3
7
11
25
50
4
4
8
11
23
50
3
0
8
14
24
49
2
1
7
9
18
37
1
3
9
14
19
46
2
5
6
17
20
50
3
2
8
12
16
41
6
1
11
11
21
50
0
4
8
13
22
47
7
3
7
15
18
50
2
1
10
20
17
50
2
1
10
17
17
47
44
35
132
230
323
764
2.0%
4.0%
12.0%
38.0%
44.0%
100%
8.0%
4.0%
16.0%
38.0%
34.0%
100%
4.2%
4.2%
16.7%
35.4%
39.6%
100%
2.0%
2.0%
22.4%
22.4%
51.0%
100%
8.0%
6.0%
14.0%
22.0%
50.0%
100%
8.0%
8.0%
16.0%
22.0%
46.0%
100%
6.1%
0.0%
16.3%
28.6%
49.0%
100%
5.4%
2.7%
18.9%
24.3%
48.6%
100%
2.2%
6.5%
19.6%
30.4%
41.3%
100%
4.0%
10.0%
12.0%
34.0%
40.0%
100%
7.3%
4.9%
19.5%
29.3%
39.0%
100%
12.0%
2.0%
22.0%
22.0%
42.0%
100%
0.0%
8.5%
17.0%
27.7%
46.8%
100%
14.0%
6.0%
14.0%
30.0%
36.0%
100%
4.0%
2.0%
20.0%
40.0%
34.0%
100%
4.3%
2.1%
21.3%
36.2%
36.2%
100%
5.8%
4.6%
17.3%
30.1%
42.3%
100%
13.7
6.0
9.0
18.0
5.1
4.3
12.7
9.0
8.3
5.3
5.6
4.6
8.8
3.3
12.3
11.3
7.0
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
Institutional Research, 1/25/2016, page 1 of 1
Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
College of Media and Communication
Chairs and Other Mid-Level Administrators as Evaluated by All Faculty of a College
Survey participation: 20 (37.7%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
department
interests
making
7
Supports
faculty
development
8
9
Conducts fair Actively
and rigorous promotes
tenure and
diversity
promotion
within the
processes
department
10
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Has a clear
Conducts fair and
strategic plan
rigorous processes
and allocates
to hire new faculty
resources
members in the
consistently
department
with that plan
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
department
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
No-Response out of
20
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
20
4.85
5
5
4
0.36
0.08
20
4.80
5
5
3
0.51
0.11
20
4.80
5
5
3
0.51
0.11
20
4.80
5
5
2
0.68
0.15
20
4.85
5
5
3
0.48
0.11
20
4.90
5
5
4
0.30
0.07
20
4.80
5
5
3
0.60
0.13
15
4.60
5
5
3
0.80
0.21
19
4.58
5
5
3
0.75
0.17
20
4.80
5
5
3
0.60
0.13
18
4.78
5
5
3
0.63
0.15
20
4.75
5
5
3
0.62
0.14
20
4.70
5
5
2
0.78
0.17
20
4.85
5
5
3
0.48
0.11
17
4.29
5
5
1
1.18
0.29
20
4.80
5
5
3
0.51
0.11
309
4.75
5
5
1
0.61
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
5
25%
1
5%
0
0%
2
10%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
3
15%
0
0%
11
3%
0
0
0
3
17
20
0
0
1
2
17
20
0
0
1
2
17
20
0
1
0
1
18
20
0
0
1
1
18
20
0
0
0
2
18
20
0
0
2
0
18
20
0
0
3
0
12
15
0
0
3
2
14
19
0
0
2
0
18
20
0
0
2
0
16
18
0
0
2
1
17
20
0
1
1
1
17
20
0
0
1
1
18
20
1
1
1
3
11
17
0
0
1
2
17
20
1
3
21
21
263
309
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15.0%
85.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
85.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
85.0%
100%
0.0%
5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
90.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
5.0%
90.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
10.0%
90.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
10.0%
0.0%
90.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
20.0%
0.0%
80.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
15.8%
10.5%
73.7%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
10.0%
0.0%
90.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
11.1%
0.0%
88.9%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
10.0%
5.0%
85.0%
100%
0.0%
5.0%
5.0%
5.0%
85.0%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
5.0%
90.0%
100%
5.9%
5.9%
5.9%
17.6%
64.7%
100%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
85.0%
100%
0.3%
1.0%
6.8%
6.8%
85.1%
100%
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low ratings
No low ratings
No low
ratings
18.0
No low
ratings
7.0
No low
ratings
71.0
0.03
`
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
No low
ratings
19.0
No low
ratings
Institutional Research, 1/25/2016, page 1 of 1
Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
College of Visual and Performing Arts
Chairs and Other Mid-Level Administrators as Evaluated by All Faculty of a College
Survey participation: 59 (48.4%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
department
interests
making
7
Supports
faculty
development
8
9
Conducts fair Actively
and rigorous promotes
tenure and
diversity
promotion
within the
processes
department
10
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Has a clear
Conducts fair and
strategic plan
rigorous processes
and allocates
to hire new faculty
resources
members in the
consistently
department
with that plan
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
department
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
59
3.97
5
5
1
1.35
0.18
59
4.24
5
5
1
1.14
0.15
59
4.34
5
5
1
0.91
0.12
59
4.02
5
5
1
1.33
0.17
59
3.78
5
4
1
1.35
0.18
59
3.61
5
4
1
1.53
0.20
59
4.05
5
5
1
1.27
0.17
57
4.07
5
5
1
1.18
0.16
57
4.05
5
5
1
1.23
0.16
59
3.80
5
4
1
1.48
0.19
55
3.89
5
4
1
1.36
0.18
59
3.66
5
4
1
1.43
0.19
59
3.88
5
5
1
1.40
0.18
59
3.53
5
4
1
1.56
0.20
59
4.02
5
4
1
1.20
0.16
58
3.86
5
4
1
1.31
0.17
935
3.92
5
4.5
1
1.32
0.04
No-Response out of 59
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
2
3%
2
3%
0
0%
4
7%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
1
2%
9
1%
5
7
4
12
31
59
3
3
6
12
35
59
1
1
9
14
34
59
5
6
4
12
32
59
5
8
8
12
26
59
9
8
7
8
27
59
4
6
4
14
31
59
3
4
8
13
29
57
4
3
9
11
30
57
9
4
6
11
29
59
5
6
6
11
27
55
8
6
8
13
24
59
6
7
5
11
30
59
11
7
5
12
24
59
4
4
6
18
27
59
5
4
12
10
27
58
87
84
107
194
463
935
8.5%
11.9%
6.8%
20.3%
52.5%
100%
5.1%
5.1%
10.2%
20.3%
59.3%
100%
1.7%
1.7%
15.3%
23.7%
57.6%
100%
8.5%
10.2%
6.8%
20.3%
54.2%
100%
8.5%
13.6%
13.6%
20.3%
44.1%
100%
15.3%
13.6%
11.9%
13.6%
45.8%
100%
6.8%
10.2%
6.8%
23.7%
52.5%
100%
5.3%
7.0%
14.0%
22.8%
50.9%
100%
7.0%
5.3%
15.8%
19.3%
52.6%
100%
15.3%
6.8%
10.2%
18.6%
49.2%
100%
9.1%
10.9%
10.9%
20.0%
49.1%
100%
13.6%
10.2%
13.6%
22.0%
40.7%
100%
10.2%
11.9%
8.5%
18.6%
50.8%
100%
18.6%
11.9%
8.5%
20.3%
40.7%
100%
6.8%
6.8%
10.2%
30.5%
45.8%
100%
8.6%
6.9%
20.7%
17.2%
46.6%
100%
9.3%
9.0%
11.4%
20.7%
49.5%
100%
3.6
7.8
24.0
4.0
2.9
2.1
4.5
6.0
5.9
3.1
3.5
2.6
3.2
2.0
5.6
4.1
3.8
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
Institutional Research, 1/25/2016, page 1 of 1
Administrator Evaluation Surveys 2015
Library
Chairs and Other Mid-Level Administrators as Evaluated by All Faculty of a College
Survey participation: 21 (46.7%)
1
2
Actively
Actively
promotes
promotes
research and
teaching
scholarly
excellence
excellence
3
Actively
promotes
excellence in
institutional
and public
service
4
5
6
Seeks
Effectively Is responsive
faculty input
represents the
to faculty
in decision
department
interests
making
7
Supports
faculty
development
8
9
Conducts fair Actively
and rigorous promotes
tenure and
diversity
promotion
within the
processes
department
10
Overall, this
leader inspires
confidence
11
12
Has a clear
Conducts fair and
strategic plan
rigorous processes
and allocates
to hire new faculty
resources
members in the
consistently
department
with that plan
13
Effectively
manages
financial
resources
14
15
Administers
Has an effective
in an open
and competent
and
administrative
transparent
staff
manner
16
Promotes
cooperation
between
disciplines
within the
department
ALL
Statistics
Count
Average
Maximum
Median
Minimum
Standard Deviation
Standard Error (±)
20
3.45
5
4
1
1.07
0.24
16
3.31
5
3
1
1.16
0.29
20
3.70
5
4
2
0.95
0.21
21
3.62
5
4
1
1.13
0.25
21
3.71
5
4
2
0.82
0.18
20
3.40
5
4
1
1.11
0.25
21
4.00
5
4
2
0.82
0.18
15
3.73
5
4
1
1.06
0.27
19
3.63
5
4
2
0.74
0.17
20
3.60
5
4
1
1.11
0.25
19
3.74
5
4
2
0.85
0.19
20
3.30
5
3
1
1.19
0.27
17
3.53
5
3
1
1.09
0.26
21
3.43
5
4
1
1.29
0.28
17
3.47
5
4
1
1.09
0.26
19
3.26
5
3
2
1.07
0.25
306
3.56
5
4
1
1.04
0.06
No-Response out of 21
1
5%
5
24%
1
5%
0
0%
0
0%
1
5%
0
0%
6
29%
2
10%
1
5%
2
10%
1
5%
4
19%
0
0%
4
19%
2
10%
30
9%
1
3
5
8
3
20
1
3
5
4
3
16
0
3
4
9
4
20
1
3
4
8
5
21
0
2
5
11
3
21
1
4
4
8
3
20
0
1
4
10
6
21
1
0
5
5
4
15
0
1
7
9
2
19
1
2
6
6
5
20
0
1
7
7
4
19
1
5
5
5
4
20
1
1
7
4
4
17
2
4
3
7
5
21
1
2
5
6
3
17
0
6
5
5
3
19
11
41
81
112
61
306
5.0%
15.0%
25.0%
40.0%
15.0%
100%
6.3%
18.8%
31.3%
25.0%
18.8%
100%
0.0%
15.0%
20.0%
45.0%
20.0%
100%
4.8%
14.3%
19.0%
38.1%
23.8%
100%
0.0%
9.5%
23.8%
52.4%
14.3%
100%
5.0%
20.0%
20.0%
40.0%
15.0%
100%
0.0%
4.8%
19.0%
47.6%
28.6%
100%
6.7%
0.0%
33.3%
33.3%
26.7%
100%
0.0%
5.3%
36.8%
47.4%
10.5%
100%
5.0%
10.0%
30.0%
30.0%
25.0%
100%
0.0%
5.3%
36.8%
36.8%
21.1%
100%
5.0%
25.0%
25.0%
25.0%
20.0%
100%
5.9%
5.9%
41.2%
23.5%
23.5%
100%
9.5%
19.0%
14.3%
33.3%
23.8%
100%
5.9%
11.8%
29.4%
35.3%
17.6%
100%
0.0%
31.6%
26.3%
26.3%
15.8%
100%
3.6%
13.4%
26.5%
36.6%
19.9%
100%
2.8
1.8
4.3
3.3
7.0
2.2
16.0
9.0
11.0
3.7
11.0
1.5
4.0
2.0
3.0
1.3
3.3
Ratings Distribution:
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
1=Strongly Disagree
2=Disagree
3=Neutral
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Ratio of high ratings to
low ratings
(4+5)/(1+2)[all
agreements divided by all
disagreements)
Institutional Research, 1/25/2016, page 1 of 1