Engineering 11
CDR
GuideLines
Bruce Mayer, PE
Registered Electrical & Mechanical Engineer
BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu
Engineering 11 – Engineering Design
1
Bruce Mayer, PE
BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-11_Tank_Agitator_Design_Project.ppt
Design Presentations
 Assumes 4 Member Teams: M1 → M4
 Presentations Last 20-30 min
• Two Members Team Up for Presentation
– Must Divide Presentation Approx. Equally
 Formal Presentations (as would be
given to Management or Customers)
• Done Using POWERPOINT
• Professional ATTIRE
 FollowUp → Write Action Item List
• WHO will do WHAT by WHEN
Engineering 11 – Engineering Design
2
Bruce Mayer, PE
BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-11_Tank_Agitator_Design_Project.ppt
CDR Presentation Order  Sp14
1. Team ENGELBART
2. Team SCHMIDT
3. Team BHATT
4. Team SIKORSKY
5. Team McADAM
Engineering 11 – Engineering Design
3
Order Set by
MSExcel
“RandBetween”
Function
174 Team ENGELBART (Douglas)
371 Team SCHMIDT (Eric)
476 Team BHATT (Ajay)
818 Team SIKORSKY (Igor)
999 Team McADAM (John Loudon)
Bruce Mayer, PE
BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-11_Tank_Agitator_Design_Project.ppt
PowerPoint Files to Room Computer

Presenting Teams to Supply the
PowerPoint file to the Instructor by one
of two Methods:
1. 24Hrs BEFORE the presentation by
way of an eMail Attachment
2. 10 Minutes BEFORE the start of the
Presentation class by way of a USBDrive
Engineering 11 – Engineering Design
4
Bruce Mayer, PE
BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-11_Tank_Agitator_Design_Project.ppt
Design Presentation - CDR
 CONCEPTUAL Design Review (CDR)
• By Team Members M1 & M2
• Describe Alternatives Considered
– Why the Selected Alternative?
 Identify Risks
• Concept Drawings and Sketches
• Likely Materials
• ROUGH $-Cost Estimate
• Team Member Assignments →
Division of Project Effort
Engineering 11 – Engineering Design
5
Bruce Mayer, PE
BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-11_Tank_Agitator_Design_Project.ppt
CDR Score Sheet (on WebPage)
ENGR11 GOAL =
Present a complete, detailed, and justified conceptuallevel design for a bench-top tank wave-making apparatus. Defend
and/or Explain the design if questioned by the Reviewer(s)
Criteria
Engineering Analysis
supporting the concept.
Math or Graphical
Analysis that indicates
functionality
Basic Materials
Selection
Basic Purchased
Component Selection
±15% Cost Estimate
Completed
Full Scale Engineering
0. No measurable
achievement
1. Beginning
2. Developing
Graphical Analysis
to show Form & Fit
Some Engineering
Calculations
Performed to
Predict
Performance
No materials
Specified
Materials described
generically
Some Materials
specified, sources
of supply identified
No Components
Specified
Components
described
generically
Some Components
specified, sources
of supply identified
Most Components
specified, sources
of supply identified
±50%
Determination of
Costs for some
procured materials
and/or components
±50%
Determination of
Costs for All
procured materials
and/or components
±25%
Determination of
Costs for All
procured materials
and/or
components, and
some custom
fabricated parts
Hand Sketched,
Hand Drawn,
CAD produced,
No Analysis done
No Cost Analysis
No Engineering
Engineering 11 – Engineering Design
6
3. Competent
4. Accomplished
Substantial
Engineering
Calculations
Performed to
Predict
Performance
Materials specified,
and some
Assessment of
Predicted
Performance
(Wear, Corrosion)
Structural Analysis
on critical
mechanical Parts.
Power
Consumption
Analysis
All Materials
Specified and
Performance
Predictions
Carefully Justified
Most Components
specified, sources
of supply and
Catalog Numbers
identified
±15%
Determination of
Costs for All
procured materials
and/or
components, all
custom fabricated
parts, and
assembly labor
costs
CAD produced,
Bruce Mayer, PE
BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-11_Tank_Agitator_Design_Project.ppt