Planning and Budget Committee Evaluation – DRAFT
The purpose of this document is to assist the PBC in the evaluation of the committee's structure and processes, to identify accomplishments of
14/15, identify tasks that have not been uncompleted, and to develop goals for 15/16. It also serves to begin the development of a process to
evaluate the Budget Allocation Model (BAM).
Committee Structure/Process
Evidence
Comments
Philosophy/Mission Statement
1. Has committee's action been guided by
the philosophy/mission statement
developed last fall?
2. Does the statement still reflect the
philosophy/mission of the committee?
3. Does the philosophy/mission statement
need to be revised?
4.
Committee Membership
1. Is the number of Committee members
appropriate?
2. Does the composition of the Committee
membership serve the purpose of the
Committee?
3. Should the number of Committee
members or composition of the
membership be revised?
4.
Committee Charge
1. Is the charge of the committee
functional?
2. Does it support the long term direction
of the district?
3.
PBC/BAM Evaluation—Draft
Page 1 of 5
Committee Meetings
1. Is the frequency of meetings appropriate
to the work of the committee?
2. Is the length of Committee meetings
appropriate to the work of the
committee?
3.
Committee Effectiveness
Accomplishment for 14/15
1. True-up of 3A
2. True-up of reserves
3. Development of form for
recommendations
4. _______________________
5. _______________________
6. _______________________
Unfinished/Partially-finished Tasks
1. Questions on BAM
implementation/impacts
2. Presentations from service areas
3. __________________________
4. __________________________
5. __________________________
Overall Committee Effectiveness
What has worked well?
PBC/BAM Evaluation—Draft
Page 2 of 5
Where have we faced challenges?
What is keeping us from doing our work
effectively and/or from following our
philosophy/mission statement?
Is the PBC supporting the long term direction of
the district
Other?
15/16 Goals
What should be our focus for 15/16?
PBC/BAM Evaluation—Draft
Page 3 of 5