Chabot College Photography Program Review Report Check one: _X_ SLO Portion of Upcoming ’16-’17 Program Review (Submitted May 2015 in Preparation for Oct 2015) ___ Revision to ’15-’16 Program Review (Originally Submitted Oct 2014) ___ Revision to ’14-’15 Program Review (Originally Submitted Oct 2013) Submitted on May 1, 2015 Contact: Aaron Deetz 1 Appendix B: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections. Course Semester assessment data gathered Number of sections offered in the semester Number of sections assessed Percentage of sections assessed Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion PHOT50 Spring 2015 2 1 50% Spring 2015 2 Form Instructions: Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Reporting Schedule. Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all sections assessed in eLumen. Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual CLO. Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a whole. PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS (CLO) 1: DEMONSTRATES TECHNICAL MASTERY OF A 35MM SLR CAMERA. IS ABLE TO UTILIZE APPROPRIATE SHUTTER SPEEDS AND APERTURES (DEPTH OF FIELD) IN IMAGE MAKING. Defined Target Scores* (CLO Goal) 70% of students score a 3 or 4 (meet the CLO). (CLO) 2: DEMONSTRATES TECHNICAL MASTERY OF FILM DEVELOPING. FILM IS EVENLY DEVELOPED WITH CONSISTENT EXPOSURES THROUGHOUT. 70% of students score a 3 or 4 (meet the CLO). (CLO) 3: DEMONSTRATES TECHNICAL MASTERY OF BLACK & WHITE DARKROOM PRINTING. PHOTOGRAPHS EXHIBIT A FULL 70% of students score a 3 or 4 (meet the CLO). CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE) TONAL RANGE WITH APPROPRIATE CONTRAST AND SHARP FOCUS. Actual Scores** (eLumen data) Based on the midterm critique, 83% of students met the target goal. Based on the midterm critique, 92% of students met the target goal. Based on the midterm critique, 71% of students met the target goal. (CLO) 4: If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table. * Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4) **Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle? 2 PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS A. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1: 1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? Scores exceed the target outcome for student success. 2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? CLO and assessment target appropriate. B. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2: 1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? Scores far exceed the target outcome for student success. 2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? CLO and assessment target appropriate. C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3: 1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? Scores meet the target outcome for student success. 2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? CLO and assessment target appropriate. D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4: 1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? N/A 2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? N/A 3 PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS 1. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions? Being a new faculty hire for the 2014/2015 academic year I did not participate in previous assessment cycles. The photography program is being reactivated for the first time in a number of years. 2. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights? Assessing CLO’s during the midterm critique is appropriate for both CLO #1 and CLO #2, as students have had a sufficient amount of time to master the technical aspects of camera operation and film developing. However for CLO #3 it would be beneficial to assess student outcomes later on in the semester once they have had an appropriate amount of time to work in the darkroom. 3. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)? Curricular Pedagogical Resource based Change to CLO or rubric Change to assessment methods Other:_________________________________________________________________ 4 Appendix B: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections. Course Semester assessment data gathered Number of sections offered in the semester Number of sections assessed Percentage of sections assessed Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion PHOT60 Spring 2015 1 1 100% Spring 2015 2 Form Instructions: Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Reporting Schedule. Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all sections assessed in eLumen. Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual CLO. Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a whole. PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS (CLO) 1: DEMONSTRATES TECHNICAL MASTERY OF ADVANCED BLAKC & WHITE DARKROOM TECHNIQUES; EXPOSURE, DEVELOPING, PRINTING, AND TONING. Defined Target Scores* (CLO Goal) 70% of students score a 3 or 4 (meet the CLO). (CLO) 2: DEMONSTRATES TECHNICAL PROFICIENCY COMBINING MULTIPLE MEDIA IN IMAGE MAKING; DIGITAL, FILM, AND ALTERNATIVE PROCESS. 70% of students score a 3 or 4 (meet the CLO). (CLO) 3: DEMONSTRATES PERSONAL ARTISTIC EXPRESSION USING DYNAMIC IMAGERY AND CREATIVE COMPOSITIONS; RULE OF THIRDS, PERSPECTIVE, FRAMING, NEGATIVE SPACE, LINE, TEXTURE AND CONCEPTUAL MEANING. 70% of students score a 3 or 4 (meet the CLO). CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE) Actual Scores** (eLumen data) Based on the midterm critique, 77% of students met the target goal. Based on the midterm critique, 84% of students met the target goal. Based on the midterm critique, 92% of students met the target goal. (CLO) 4: If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table. * Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4) **Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle? 5 PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1: 3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? Scores exceed the target outcome for student success. 4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? CLO and assessment target appropriate. However, with improved equipment (fiber print dryer) student success rates will increase. D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2: 3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? Scores meet the target outcome for student success. 4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? CLO and assessment target appropriate. C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3: 3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? Scores far exceed the target outcome for student success. 4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? CLO and assessment target appropriate. D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4: 3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? N/A 4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? N/A 6 PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS 4. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions? Being a new faculty hire for the 2014/2015 academic year I did not participate in previous assessment cycles. The photography program is being reactivated for the first time in a number of years. 5. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights? Student success rates for CLO #1 can be increased with the addition of a fiber print dryer. Currently the darkroom lacks an appropriate way to dry fiber prints creating a bottleneck in student output. Students use a screen door as a print dryer that has limited functionality and space for work. 6. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)? Curricular Pedagogical Resource based Change to CLO or rubric Change to assessment methods Other:_________________________________________________________________ 7 Appendix B: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections. Course Semester assessment data gathered Number of sections offered in the semester Number of sections assessed Percentage of sections assessed Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion PHOT66 Spring 2015 1 1 100% Spring 2015 2 Form Instructions: Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Reporting Schedule. Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all sections assessed in eLumen. Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual CLO. Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a whole. PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE) (CLO) 1: DEMONSTRATES TECHNICAL MASTERY OF A DIGITAL SLR CAMERA. IS ABLE TO UTILIZE APPROPRIATE EXPOSURE MODES, WHITE BALANCE AND APERTURES (DEPTH OF FIELD) IN IMAGE MAKING. (CLO) 2: DEMONSTRATES TECHNICAL MASTERY OF DIGITAL WORKFLOW FROM CAPTURE TO OUTPUT AND THE USE OF APPROPRIATE HARDWARE: CAMERA, PRINTER, SCANNER, Defined Target Scores* (CLO Goal) 70% of students score a 3 or 4 (meet the CLO). 70% of students score a 3 or 4 (meet the CLO). MONITOR, AND CALIBRATOR. (CLO) 3: DEMONSTRATES TECHNICAL MASTERY WORKING IN ADOBE PHOTOSHOP AND ADOBE LIGHTROOM TO EDIT AND OPTIMIZE IMAGES FOR BOTH WEB AND PRINT APPLICATIONS. 70% of students score a 3 or 4 (meet the CLO). Actual Scores** (eLumen data) Based on the midterm critique, 94% of students met the target goal. Based on the midterm critique, 82% of students met the target goal. Based on the midterm critique, 76% of students met the target goal. (CLO) 4: If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table. * Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4) **Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle? 8 PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1: 5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? Scores far exceed the target outcome for student success. 6. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? CLO and assessment target appropriate. However the program lacks necessary equipment (cameras) to fully judge student success in the technical operation of DSLR cameras. F. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2: 5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? Scores exceed the target outcome for student success. 6. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? CLO and assessment target appropriate. However the program lacks necessary equipment (printers) to fully judge student success using digital hardware. C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3: 5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? Scores meet the target outcome for student success. 6. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? CLO and assessment target appropriate. D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4: 5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? N/A 6. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? N/A 9 PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS 7. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions? Being a new faculty hire for the 2014/2015 academic year I did not participate in previous assessment cycles. The photography program is being reactivated for the first time in a number of years. 8. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights? For CLO #1 and CLO #2 the photography program has limited digital hardware for the students to use. There are 5 DSLR cameras and 2 inkjet printers currently shared among 17 students and 2 other classes. In order to appropriately measure student success with digital hardware an additional 5 DSLR cameras and 2 tabletop printers will be added to the program equipment request. 9. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)? Curricular Pedagogical Resource based Change to CLO or rubric Change to assessment methods Other:_________________________________________________________________ 10 Appendix C: Program Learning Outcomes Considering your feedback, findings, and/or information that has arisen from the course level discussions, please reflect on each of your Program Level Outcomes. Program: Photography, Associate in Arts PLO #1: Demonstrate technical mastery of manual camera operation utilizing multiple formats: SLR (film), DSLR (digital). PLO #2: Demonstrate technical mastery making a photographic print utilizing multiple formats: Gelatin Silver (film), Inkjet (digital), Alternative Process (film/digital). PLO #3: Effectively communicate a unique vision through personal artistic expression, compositional awareness, and conceptual meaning. PLO #4: Familiarity with contemporary and historical photographers. Ability to discuss photography in terms of technical merit, aesthetic value, and conceptual meaning. What questions or investigations arose as a result of these reflections or discussions? The photography program is being reactivated for the first time in a number of year. 2014/2015 is the first academic year that the PLO’s have been implemented. The PLO’s have not been assessed yet. What program-level strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? The photography program is being reactivated for the first time in a number of year. 2014/2015 is the first academic year that the PLO’s have been implemented. The PLO’s have not been assessed yet. What actions has your discipline determined might be taken to enhance the learning of students completing your program? The photography program is being reactivated for the first time in a number of year. 2014/2015 is the first academic year that the PLO’s have been implemented. The PLO’s have not been assessed yet. Program: Photography, Certificate of Completion PLO #1: Demonstrate technical mastery of manual camera operation utilizing multiple formats: SLR (film), DSLR (digital). PLO #2: Demonstrate technical mastery making a photographic print utilizing multiple formats: Gelatin Silver (film), Inkjet (digital), Alternative Process (film/digital). 11 PLO #3: Effectively communicate a unique vision through personal artistic expression, compositional awareness, and conceptual meaning. PLO #4: Familiarity with contemporary and historical photographers. Ability to discuss photography in terms of technical merit, aesthetic value, and conceptual meaning. What questions or investigations arose as a result of these reflections or discussions? The photography program is being reactivated for the first time in a number of years. 2014/2015 is the first academic year that the PLO’s have been implemented. The PLO’s have not been assessed yet. What program-level strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? The photography program is being reactivated for the first time in a number of years. 2014/2015 is the first academic year that the PLO’s have been implemented. The PLO’s have not been assessed yet. What actions has your discipline determined might be taken to enhance the learning of students completing your program? The photography program is being reactivated for the first time in a number of years. 2014/2015 is the first academic year that the PLO’s have been implemented. The PLO’s have not been assessed yet. 12