‐
“You are in the same cycle as last year!”
Final Forms, 1/18/13
1
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course ‐ Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
COMM 50
Spring 2013
1
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
1
100%
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion Fall 2013
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion Jason, Veronica, christine
Form Instructions:
Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course ‐ Level assessment reported in this
Program Review.
These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
Part I: CLO Data Reporting .
For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all sections assessed in eLumen.
Part II: CLO Reflections .
Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
Part III: Course Reflection.
In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a whole.
P ART I: C OURSE ‐ L EVEL O UTCOMES – D ATA R ESULTS
C ONSIDER T HE C OURSE ‐ L EVEL O UTCOMES I NDIVIDUALLY ( THE
N UMBER OF CLO S WILL DIFFER BY COURSE
)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
70% ‐ 3 or 4
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 1: Recognize, define, and apply the principles of communication theory.
(CLO) 2: Listen to, evaluate, and respond appropriately to the ideas of others.
80% ‐ 3 or 4
60% ‐ 3 or 4
86% ‐ 3 or 4
(CLO) 3: Practice collaborative group decision ‐ making.
70% ‐ 3 or 4 79% ‐ 3 or 4
(CLO) 4: Adopt an ethical perspective when presenting original ideas and/or incorporating the ideas of others
80% ‐ 3 or 4
If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
97% ‐ 3 or 4
* Defined Target Scores : What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO?
(Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
2
P ART II: C OURSE ‐ LEVEL O UTCOME R EFLECTIONS
A.
C
OURSE
‐ L
EVEL
O
UTCOME
(CLO)
1:
1.
How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome?
Slightly lower
2.
Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
This is a new course; only the second semester being offered.
We are rotating the teaching of this course, so we have been working together on the types of assignments we should be using to develop our students’ understanding of key theories and concepts.
We will continue to work together to find consistency and success in this area.
B.
C
OURSE
‐ L
EVEL
O
UTCOME
(CLO)
2:
1.
How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome?
Above target
2.
Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Continue to model appropriate listening and encouraging students to engage one
another in respectful, critical listening exercises and speaking opportunities.
3
C.
C OURSE ‐ L EVEL O UTCOME (CLO) 3:
1.
How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome?
Above target
2.
Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Continue to assign and facilitate group projects.
D.
C OURSE ‐ L EVEL O UTCOME (CLO) 4:
1.
How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome?
Above target
2.
Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Continue to require work with required sources and to demonstrate appropriate ways of incorporating research into their work.
E.
C
OURSE
‐ L
EVEL
O
UTCOME
(CLO)
5:
A
DD IF NEEDED
.
4
P ART III: C OURSE R EFLECTIONS AND F UTURE P LANS
1.
What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
None yet.
One of our colleagues still has to teach the course.
We offer it once a year and
rotate teaching, so it is imperative all try it to see what insights we might have.
2.
Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course ‐ level and programmatic strengths have the assessment reflections revealed?
What actions has your discipline determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
We are creating a Gender communication course based on conversations in this class.
3.
What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
Curricular
Pedagogical
Resource based
Change to CLO or rubric
Change to assessment methods
Other:_________________________________________________________________
5
Appendix C: Program Learning Outcomes
Considering your feedback, findings, and/or information that has arisen from the course level discussions, please reflect on each of your Program Level Outcomes.
Program: ____COMM AA ‐ T__
PLO #1: Pursue and evaluate knowledge through the skills of inquiry research and critical
thinking.
PLO #2: Demonstrate effective skills in written and spoken communication.
PLO #3:
PLO #4:
What questions or investigations arose as a result of these reflections or discussions?
Are two PLOs enough?
Do each of our classes promote these ideas?
What program ‐ level strengths have the assessment reflections revealed?
Yes.
These ideas inform our curriculum.
What actions has your discipline determined might be taken to enhance the learning of students completing your program?
Find new ways to assess, as the elumen data ‐ gathering is not producing insightful conversations.
Think about using qualitative inquiry and methodology to assess, including focus groups and interviews with students.
Program: ___SPEECH COMM AA__
PLO #1: Pursue and evaluate knowledge through the skills of inquiry research and critical thinking.
PLO #2: Demonstrate effective skills in written and spoken communication.
PLO #3:
PLO #4:
6
What questions or investigations arose as a result of these reflections or discussions?
What is the need for both AA degrees?
What is the difference of this to the AA ‐ T?
What program ‐ level strengths have the assessment reflections revealed?
See above.
What actions has your discipline determined might be taken to enhance the learning of students completing your program?
See above.
7