The Moduli Space of Real Binary Octics
Kenneth Chu
Doctoral Thesis Defense
Department of Mathematics
University of Utah
chu@math.utah.edu
March 9, 2006
The Moduli Space of Real Binary Octics
. – p.1/12
The Moduli Space of Real Binary Octics
Binary octics
. – p.1/12
The Moduli Space of Real Binary Octics
1
Binary octics := Hypersurfaces in CP of degree 8
. – p.1/12
The Moduli Space of Real Binary Octics
1
Binary octics := Hypersurfaces in CP of degree 8
= P
(
coeff. space of
binary octic forms
)!
. – p.1/12
The Moduli Space of Real Binary Octics
1
Binary octics := Hypersurfaces in CP of degree 8
= P
(
coeff. space of
binary octic forms
)!
= P(P)
. – p.1/12
The Moduli Space of Real Binary Octics
1
Binary octics := Hypersurfaces in CP of degree 8
= P
(
coeff. space of
binary octic forms
)!
= P(P) ∼
= CP8
. – p.1/12
The Moduli Space of Real Binary Octics
1
Binary octics := Hypersurfaces in CP of degree 8
= P
=
(
(
coeff. space of
binary octic forms
)!
= P(P) ∼
= CP8
unordered 8-point configurations
1
in CP , counting multiplicity
)
. – p.1/12
The Moduli Space of Real Binary Octics
1
Binary octics := Hypersurfaces in CP of degree 8
= P
=
(
(
coeff. space of
binary octic forms
)!
= P(P) ∼
= CP8
unordered 8-point configurations
1
in CP , counting multiplicity
)
Real
. – p.1/12
The Moduli Space of Real Binary Octics
1
Binary octics := Hypersurfaces in CP of degree 8
= P
=
(
(
coeff. space of
binary octic forms
)!
= P(P) ∼
= CP8
unordered 8-point configurations
1
in CP , counting multiplicity
)
Real := defining polynomial has coeff’s in R
. – p.1/12
The Moduli Space of Real Binary Octics
. – p.2/12
The Moduli Space of Real Binary Octics
MR
s
. – p.2/12
The Moduli Space of Real Binary Octics
R
:=
P(P
MR
s )/PGL(2, R)
s
. – p.2/12
The Moduli Space of Real Binary Octics
R
:=
P(P
MR
s )/PGL(2, R)
s
[
MR
0
. – p.2/12
The Moduli Space of Real Binary Octics
R
:=
P(P
MR
s )/PGL(2, R)
s
[
MR
0
=
M0R,0
G
M0R,1
G
M0R,2
G
M0R,3
G
M0R,4
. – p.2/12
The Moduli Space of Real Binary Octics
R
:=
P(P
MR
s )/PGL(2, R)
s
[
MR
0
=
M0R,0
G
M0R,1
G
M0R,2
G
M0R,3
i
0 1
2 3 4
# complex conjugate pairs
0 1
8 6
2 3 4
4 2 0
# real points
G
M0R,4
. – p.2/12
Main Results
. – p.3/12
Main Results
MR
0
=
M0R,0
G
M0R,1
G
M0R,2
G
M0R,3
G
M0R,4
. – p.3/12
Main Results
MR
0
=
M0R,0
G
M0R,1
G
M0R,2
G
M0R,3
G
M0R,4
5
R
∼
1.
= PΓi \ RH − H , i = 0, . . . , 4, with PΓR
i
explicitly given. They are arithmetic groups.
MR,i
0
. – p.3/12
Main Results
MR
0
=
M0R,0
G
M0R,1
G
M0R,2
G
M0R,3
G
M0R,4
5
R
∼
1.
= PΓi \ RH − H , i = 0, . . . , 4, with PΓR
i
explicitly given. They are arithmetic groups.
MR,i
0
R , PΓR , PΓR are finite-index subgroups of
2. PΓR
,
PΓ
0
1
2
4
discrete reflection groups in Isom(RH5 ).
. – p.3/12
Main Results
MR
0
=
M0R,0
G
M0R,1
G
M0R,2
G
M0R,3
G
M0R,4
5
R
∼
1.
= PΓi \ RH − H , i = 0, . . . , 4, with PΓR
i
explicitly given. They are arithmetic groups.
MR,i
0
R , PΓR , PΓR are finite-index subgroups of
2. PΓR
,
PΓ
0
1
2
4
discrete reflection groups in Isom(RH5 ).
3. The Allcock-Carlson-Toledo construction of MR
s is not a
hyperbolic orbifold.
. – p.3/12
Main Results
MR
0
=
M0R,0
G
M0R,1
G
M0R,2
G
M0R,3
G
M0R,4
5
R
∼
1.
= PΓi \ RH − H , i = 0, . . . , 4, with PΓR
i
explicitly given. They are arithmetic groups.
MR,i
0
R , PΓR , PΓR are finite-index subgroups of
2. PΓR
,
PΓ
0
1
2
4
discrete reflection groups in Isom(RH5 ).
3. The Allcock-Carlson-Toledo construction of MR
s is not a
hyperbolic orbifold. (In contrast with the cases of real
cubic surfaces and real binary sextics.)
. – p.3/12
The Deligne-Mostow Construction of MC
s
. – p.4/12
The Deligne-Mostow Construction of MC
s
MC
s
. – p.4/12
The Deligne-Mostow Construction of MC
s
MC
s
p
−→ PΓ\CH5
. – p.4/12
The Deligne-Mostow Construction of MC
s
MC
s
p
−→ PΓ\CH5
∪
MC
0
. – p.4/12
The Deligne-Mostow Construction of MC
s
MC
s
p
−→ PΓ\CH5
∪
MC
0
∪
p
5
−→ PΓ\ CH − H
. – p.4/12
The Deligne-Mostow Construction of MC
s
MC
s
p
−→ PΓ\CH5
∪
MC
0
∪
p
5
−→ PΓ\ CH − H
PΓ := PIsom(Λ)
. – p.4/12
The Deligne-Mostow Construction of MC
s
p
−→ PΓ\CH5
MC
s
∪
∪
p
MC
0
PΓ := PIsom(Λ)
Λ :=
Z[ i ]6 ,
5
−→ PΓ\ CH − H
2
4
−2
1−i
1+i
−2
3
2
5⊕4
−2
1−i
1+i
−2
3
2
5⊕4
0
1−i
1+i
3
0
5
. – p.4/12
The Deligne-Mostow Construction of MC
s
p
−→ PΓ\CH5
MC
s
∪
∪
p
MC
0
PΓ := PIsom(Λ)
Λ :=
Z[ i ]6 ,
5
−→ PΓ\ CH − H
2
4
−2
1−i
1+i
−2
3
2
5⊕4
signature(Λ) = (1+, 5−)
−2
1−i
1+i
−2
3
2
5⊕4
0
1−i
1+i
3
0
5
. – p.4/12
The Deligne-Mostow Construction of MC
s
p
−→ PΓ\CH5
MC
s
∪
∪
p
MC
0
PΓ := PIsom(Λ)
Λ :=
Z[ i ]6 ,
5
−→ PΓ\ CH − H
2
4
1+i
−2
1−i
−2
3
2
5⊕4
signature(Λ) = (1+, 5−)
CH
5
:= CH Λ ⊗Z[ i ] C
−2
1−i
1+i
−2
3
2
5⊕4
0
1−i
1+i
3
0
5
. – p.4/12
The Deligne-Mostow Construction of MC
s
p
−→ PΓ\CH5
MC
s
∪
∪
p
MC
0
PΓ := PIsom(Λ)
Λ :=
Z[ i ]6 ,
5
−→ PΓ\ CH − H
2
4
1+i
−2
1−i
−2
3
2
5⊕4
−2
1−i
1+i
−2
3
2
5⊕4
0
1−i
signature(Λ) = (1+, 5−)
5
:= CH Λ ⊗Z[ i ] C
[n
H :=
CH(r⊥ ) ⊂ CH5
CH
r ∈ Λ, hr, ri = −2
1+i
3
0
5
o
. – p.4/12
The Allcock-Carlson-Toledo Construction of MR
s
. – p.5/12
The Allcock-Carlson-Toledo Construction of MR
s
(
periods of
real octics
)
⊂
. – p.5/12
The Allcock-Carlson-Toledo Construction of MR
s
(
periods of
real octics
)
⊂
[
RH ( Fix(χ) ⊗Z R )
[χ]∈PIAI(Λ)
. – p.5/12
The Allcock-Carlson-Toledo Construction of MR
s
(
periods of
real octics
)
⊂
[
RH ( Fix(χ) ⊗Z R )
⊂
CH5
[χ]∈PIAI(Λ)
. – p.5/12
The Allcock-Carlson-Toledo Construction of MR
s
(
periods of
real octics
)
⊂
[
RH ( Fix(χ) ⊗Z R )
⊂
CH5
[χ]∈PIAI(Λ)
p ∈ P0
. – p.5/12
The Allcock-Carlson-Toledo Construction of MR
s
(
periods of
real octics
p ∈ P0
)
⊂
[
RH ( Fix(χ) ⊗Z R )
⊂
CH5
[χ]∈PIAI(Λ)
1
branched cover Xp −→ CP
with cyclic action σ
. – p.5/12
The Allcock-Carlson-Toledo Construction of MR
s
(
periods of
real octics
p ∈ P0
)
⊂
[
RH ( Fix(χ) ⊗Z R )
⊂
CH5
[χ]∈PIAI(Λ)
1
branched cover Xp −→ CP
with cyclic action σ
Λ(Xp ) ∼
= Λ integral cohomology with intersection form
. – p.5/12
The Allcock-Carlson-Toledo Construction of MR
s
(
periods of
real octics
p ∈ P0
)
⊂
[
RH ( Fix(χ) ⊗Z R )
⊂
CH5
[χ]∈PIAI(Λ)
1
branched cover Xp −→ CP
with cyclic action σ
Λ(Xp ) ∼
= Λ integral cohomology with intersection form
p ∈ P0R
. – p.5/12
The Allcock-Carlson-Toledo Construction of MR
s
(
periods of
real octics
p ∈ P0
)
⊂
[
RH ( Fix(χ) ⊗Z R )
⊂
CH5
[χ]∈PIAI(Λ)
1
branched cover Xp −→ CP
with cyclic action σ
Λ(Xp ) ∼
= Λ integral cohomology with intersection form
p∈
P0R
κp
antiholomorphic involution Xp −→ Xp
. – p.5/12
The Allcock-Carlson-Toledo Construction of MR
s
(
periods of
real octics
p ∈ P0
)
⊂
[
RH ( Fix(χ) ⊗Z R )
CH5
⊂
[χ]∈PIAI(Λ)
1
branched cover Xp −→ CP
with cyclic action σ
Λ(Xp ) ∼
= Λ integral cohomology with intersection form
p∈
P0R
κp
antiholomorphic involution Xp −→ Xp
1
κ
1
induced by complex conjugation CP −→ CP
. – p.5/12
The Allcock-Carlson-Toledo Construction of MR
s
(
periods of
real octics
p ∈ P0
)
⊂
[
RH ( Fix(χ) ⊗Z R )
CH5
⊂
[χ]∈PIAI(Λ)
1
branched cover Xp −→ CP
with cyclic action σ
Λ(Xp ) ∼
= Λ integral cohomology with intersection form
p∈
P0R
κp
antiholomorphic involution Xp −→ Xp
κ
1
1
induced by complex conjugation CP −→ CP
κ∗p
involutive anti-isometry (IAI) Λ(Xp ) −→ Λ(Xp )
. – p.5/12
The Allcock-Carlson-Toledo Construction of MR
s
(
periods of
real octics
p ∈ P0
)
[
⊂
RH ( Fix(χ) ⊗Z R )
CH5
⊂
[χ]∈PIAI(Λ)
1
branched cover Xp −→ CP
with cyclic action σ
Λ(Xp ) ∼
= Λ integral cohomology with intersection form
p∈
P0R
κp
antiholomorphic involution Xp −→ Xp
κ
1
1
induced by complex conjugation CP −→ CP
κ∗p
involutive anti-isometry (IAI) Λ(Xp ) −→ Λ(Xp )
χp
IAI Λ −→ Λ, which fixes the period of p
. – p.5/12
The Allcock-Carlson-Toledo Construction of MR
s
(
periods of
real octics
p ∈ P0
)
[
⊂
RH ( Fix(χ) ⊗Z R )
CH5
⊂
[χ]∈PIAI(Λ)
1
branched cover Xp −→ CP
with cyclic action σ
Λ(Xp ) ∼
= Λ integral cohomology with intersection form
p∈
P0R
κp
antiholomorphic involution Xp −→ Xp
κ
1
1
induced by complex conjugation CP −→ CP
κ∗p
involutive anti-isometry (IAI) Λ(Xp ) −→ Λ(Xp )
χp
IAI Λ −→ Λ, which fixes the period of p
5
:
Re-assemble
the
RH
’s
A-C-T construction of MR
s
“appropriately.”
. – p.5/12
PIAI(Λ)R and PIAI(Λ)antip
. – p.6/12
PIAI(Λ)R and PIAI(Λ)antip
PIAI(Λ)
. – p.6/12
PIAI(Λ)R and PIAI(Λ)antip
PIAI(Λ)
=
PIAI(Λ)
R
G
PIAI(Λ)antip
. – p.6/12
PIAI(Λ)R and PIAI(Λ)antip
PIAI(Λ)
=
PIAI(Λ)
R
G
PIAI(Λ)antip
PIAI(Λ)
PIsom(Λ)
. – p.6/12
PIAI(Λ)R and PIAI(Λ)antip
PIAI(Λ)
=
PIAI(Λ)
R
G
PIAI(Λ)antip
PIAI(Λ)R G PIAI(Λ)antip
PIAI(Λ)
=
PIsom(Λ)
PIsom(Λ)
PIsom(Λ)
| {z }
| {z }
5 elements
1 element
. – p.6/12
PIAI(Λ)R and PIAI(Λ)antip
PIAI(Λ)
=
PIAI(Λ)
R
G
PIAI(Λ)antip
PIAI(Λ)R G PIAI(Λ)antip
PIAI(Λ)
=
PIsom(Λ)
PIsom(Λ)
PIsom(Λ)
| {z }
| {z }
5 elements
1 element
PIAI(Λ)R
PIsom(Λ)
. – p.6/12
PIAI(Λ)R and PIAI(Λ)antip
PIAI(Λ)
=
PIAI(Λ)
R
G
PIAI(Λ)antip
PIAI(Λ)R G PIAI(Λ)antip
PIAI(Λ)
=
PIsom(Λ)
PIsom(Λ)
PIsom(Λ)
| {z }
| {z }
5 elements
PIAI(Λ)R
PIsom(Λ)
↔
n
1 element
connected components of MR
0
o
. – p.6/12
MR
0 and Its Connected Components
. – p.7/12
MR
0 and Its Connected Components
MR
0
. – p.7/12
MR
0 and Its Connected Components
∼
MR
0 = PIsom(Λ)
-

G
[χ]∈PIAI(Λ)R

RH5[χ] − H 
. – p.7/12
MR
0 and Its Connected Components
∼
MR
0 = PIsom(Λ)
∼
=
4
G
k=0
-
StabPIsom(Λ)

G
[χ]∈PIAI(Λ)R
(RH5[χk ]

RH5[χ] − H 
/
5
RH
[χk ] − H
)
. – p.7/12
MR
0 and Its Connected Components
∼
MR
0 = PIsom(Λ)
∼
=
4
G
k=0
-
StabPIsom(Λ)

G
[χ]∈PIAI(Λ)R
(RH5[χk ]

RH5[χ] − H 
/
5
RH
[χk ] − H
)
where PIAI(Λ)R /PIsom(Λ) = { [χ0 ], . . . , [χ4 ] } .
. – p.7/12
MR
0 and Its Connected Components
∼
MR
0 = PIsom(Λ)
∼
=
4
G
-
StabPIsom(Λ)
k=0
∼
=
4
G

G
[χ]∈PIAI(Λ)R
(RH5[χk ]

RH5[χ] − H 
/
5
RH
[χk ] − H
)
MR,k
0 ,
k=0
where PIAI(Λ)R /PIsom(Λ) = { [χ0 ], . . . , [χ4 ] } .
. – p.7/12
Enumerating Elements of PIAI(Λ)R & PIAI(Λ)antip
. – p.8/12
Enumerating Elements of PIAI(Λ)R & PIAI(Λ)antip
PIsom(Λ)\CH5 has only one cusp.
. – p.8/12
Enumerating Elements of PIAI(Λ)R & PIAI(Λ)antip
PIsom(Λ)\CH5 has only one cusp. Λ has only one rankZ[ i ] -one
PIsom(Λ)-conjugacy class of null sublattices.
. – p.8/12
Enumerating Elements of PIAI(Λ)R & PIAI(Λ)antip
PIsom(Λ)\CH5 has only one cusp. Λ has only one rankZ[ i ] -one
PIsom(Λ)-conjugacy class of null sublattices. Λ has only one
PIsom(Λ)-conjugacy class of primitive null vectors.
. – p.8/12
Enumerating Elements of PIAI(Λ)R & PIAI(Λ)antip
PIsom(Λ)\CH5 has only one cusp. Λ has only one rankZ[ i ] -one
PIsom(Λ)-conjugacy class of null sublattices. Λ has only one
PIsom(Λ)-conjugacy class of primitive null vectors.
Every element of IAI(Λ) fixes a primitive null vector.
. – p.8/12
Enumerating Elements of PIAI(Λ)R & PIAI(Λ)antip
PIsom(Λ)\CH5 has only one cusp. Λ has only one rankZ[ i ] -one
PIsom(Λ)-conjugacy class of null sublattices. Λ has only one
PIsom(Λ)-conjugacy class of primitive null vectors.
Every element of IAI(Λ) fixes a primitive null vector.
Fix a primitive null vector e6 ∈ Λ.
. – p.8/12
Enumerating Elements of PIAI(Λ)R & PIAI(Λ)antip
PIsom(Λ)\CH5 has only one cusp. Λ has only one rankZ[ i ] -one
PIsom(Λ)-conjugacy class of null sublattices. Λ has only one
PIsom(Λ)-conjugacy class of primitive null vectors.
Every element of IAI(Λ) fixes a primitive null vector.
Fix a primitive null vector e6 ∈ Λ.
Then, every element of IAI(Λ) has a PIsom(Λ)-conjugate that fixes e6 .
. – p.8/12
Enumerating Elements of PIAI(Λ)R & PIAI(Λ)antip
PIsom(Λ)\CH5 has only one cusp. Λ has only one rankZ[ i ] -one
PIsom(Λ)-conjugacy class of null sublattices. Λ has only one
PIsom(Λ)-conjugacy class of primitive null vectors.
Every element of IAI(Λ) fixes a primitive null vector.
Fix a primitive null vector e6 ∈ Λ.
Then, every element of IAI(Λ) has a PIsom(Λ)-conjugate that fixes e6 .
A complete list (but with redundancy) of Isom(Λ, e6 )-conjugacy classes of
e6 -preserving involutive anti-isometries is computable:
φI , φI′ , φII , φII′ , . . . , φVII′ .
. – p.8/12
Enumerating Elements of PIAI(Λ)R & PIAI(Λ)antip
PIsom(Λ)\CH5 has only one cusp. Λ has only one rankZ[ i ] -one
PIsom(Λ)-conjugacy class of null sublattices. Λ has only one
PIsom(Λ)-conjugacy class of primitive null vectors.
Every element of IAI(Λ) fixes a primitive null vector.
Fix a primitive null vector e6 ∈ Λ.
Then, every element of IAI(Λ) has a PIsom(Λ)-conjugate that fixes e6 .
A complete list (but with redundancy) of Isom(Λ, e6 )-conjugacy classes of
e6 -preserving involutive anti-isometries is computable:
φI , φI′ , φII , φII′ , . . . , φVII′ .
The above is also a complete list (with redundancy) of representatives of
elements of PIAI(Λ)/PIsom(Λ).
. – p.8/12
Enumerating Elements of PIAI(Λ)R & PIAI(Λ)antip
PIsom(Λ)\CH5 has only one cusp. Λ has only one rankZ[ i ] -one
PIsom(Λ)-conjugacy class of null sublattices. Λ has only one
PIsom(Λ)-conjugacy class of primitive null vectors.
Every element of IAI(Λ) fixes a primitive null vector.
Fix a primitive null vector e6 ∈ Λ.
Then, every element of IAI(Λ) has a PIsom(Λ)-conjugate that fixes e6 .
A complete list (but with redundancy) of Isom(Λ, e6 )-conjugacy classes of
e6 -preserving involutive anti-isometries is computable:
φI , φI′ , φII , φII′ , . . . , φVII′ .
The above is also a complete list (with redundancy) of representatives of
elements of PIAI(Λ)/PIsom(Λ).
Each “primed and unprimed” pair has isometric fixed lattices.
. – p.8/12
Identifying “Topological Types” of φI , φI′ , . . . , φVII , φVII′
. – p.9/12
Identifying “Topological Types” of φI , φI′ , . . . , φVII , φVII′
O
Λ
(1+i)Λ
∼
= S8 .
. – p.9/12
Identifying “Topological Types” of φI , φI′ , . . . , φVII , φVII′
∼
= S8 . The monondromy group PIsom(Λ) is generated by “half
turns” of pairs of roots.
O
Λ
(1+i)Λ
. – p.9/12
Identifying “Topological Types” of φI , φI′ , . . . , φVII , φVII′
∼
= S8 . The monondromy group PIsom(Λ) is generated by “half
turns” of pairs of roots. The S8 above is realized as the permutation
group of the 8 distinct roots of a smooth octic.
O
Λ
(1+i)Λ
. – p.9/12
Identifying “Topological Types” of φI , φI′ , . . . , φVII , φVII′
∼
= S8 . The monondromy group PIsom(Λ) is generated by “half
turns” of pairs of roots. The S8 above is realized as the permutation
group of the 8 distinct roots of a smooth octic.
O
Λ
(1+i)Λ
Compute induced action of each of φI , φI′ , . . . , φVII , φVII′ :
. – p.9/12
Identifying “Topological Types” of φI , φI′ , . . . , φVII , φVII′
∼
= S8 . The monondromy group PIsom(Λ) is generated by “half
turns” of pairs of roots. The S8 above is realized as the permutation
group of the 8 distinct roots of a smooth octic.
O
Λ
(1+i)Λ
Compute induced action of each of φI , φI′ , . . . , φVII , φVII′ :
IAI
cycle structure
type
re-labeling
φI , φI′
(1)(2)(3)(4)(56)(78)
2
χ2
φII , φII′
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(78)
1
χ1
φIII , φIII′
(1)(2)(34)(56)(78)
3
χ3
φIV , φIV′
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
0
χ0
φV , φV′
same as φI , φI′
2
φVI , φVI′
(12)(34)(56)(78)
4 or antip
φVII , φVII′
(12)(34)(56)(78)
4 or antip
. – p.9/12
About StabPIsom(Λ) RH5[χk ] and Distinguishing φVI & φVII
. – p.10/12
About StabPIsom(Λ) RH5[χk ] and Distinguishing φVI & φVII
5
StabPIsom(Λ) RH[χk ]
= PStabIsom(Λ) (Fix χk ) .
. – p.10/12
About StabPIsom(Λ) RH5[χk ] and Distinguishing φVI & φVII
5
StabPIsom(Λ) RH[χk ]
Fix(χk )
= PStabIsom(Λ) (Fix χk ) .
is a Z-lattice; its computation is straightforward. So
is that of PStabIsom(Λ) (Fix χk ).
. – p.10/12
About StabPIsom(Λ) RH5[χk ] and Distinguishing φVI & φVII
5
StabPIsom(Λ) RH[χk ]
Fix(χk )
= PStabIsom(Λ) (Fix χk ) .
is a Z-lattice; its computation is straightforward. So
is that of PStabIsom(Λ) (Fix χk ).
StabIsom(Λ) (Fix χk ) ( Isom(Fix χk )
. – p.10/12
About StabPIsom(Λ) RH5[χk ] and Distinguishing φVI & φVII
5
StabPIsom(Λ) RH[χk ]
Fix(χk )
= PStabIsom(Λ) (Fix χk ) .
is a Z-lattice; its computation is straightforward. So
is that of PStabIsom(Λ) (Fix χk ).
StabIsom(Λ) (Fix χk ) ( Isom(Fix χk )
The Vinberg diagrams for the following are computed:
Isom(Fix φVI ), Isom(Fix φVII ), and Isom(Fix χk ), for k = 0, 1, 2.
. – p.10/12
About StabPIsom(Λ) RH5[χk ] and Distinguishing φVI & φVII
5
StabPIsom(Λ) RH[χk ]
Fix(χk )
= PStabIsom(Λ) (Fix χk ) .
is a Z-lattice; its computation is straightforward. So
is that of PStabIsom(Λ) (Fix χk ).
StabIsom(Λ) (Fix χk ) ( Isom(Fix χk )
The Vinberg diagrams for the following are computed:
Isom(Fix φVI ), Isom(Fix φVII ), and Isom(Fix χk ), for k = 0, 1, 2.
These computations show that each of the above is a
reflection group.
. – p.10/12
About StabPIsom(Λ) RH5[χk ] and Distinguishing φVI & φVII
5
StabPIsom(Λ) RH[χk ]
Fix(χk )
= PStabIsom(Λ) (Fix χk ) .
is a Z-lattice; its computation is straightforward. So
is that of PStabIsom(Λ) (Fix χk ).
StabIsom(Λ) (Fix χk ) ( Isom(Fix χk )
The Vinberg diagrams for the following are computed:
Isom(Fix φVI ), Isom(Fix φVII ), and Isom(Fix χk ), for k = 0, 1, 2.
These computations show that each of the above is a
reflection group.
The fundamental domain of Isom(Fix φVI ) “has a discriminant
wall”, while that of Isom(Fix φVII ) does not,
. – p.10/12
About StabPIsom(Λ) RH5[χk ] and Distinguishing φVI & φVII
5
StabPIsom(Λ) RH[χk ]
Fix(χk )
= PStabIsom(Λ) (Fix χk ) .
is a Z-lattice; its computation is straightforward. So
is that of PStabIsom(Λ) (Fix χk ).
StabIsom(Λ) (Fix χk ) ( Isom(Fix χk )
The Vinberg diagrams for the following are computed:
Isom(Fix φVI ), Isom(Fix φVII ), and Isom(Fix χk ), for k = 0, 1, 2.
These computations show that each of the above is a
reflection group.
The fundamental domain of Isom(Fix φVI ) “has a discriminant
wall”, while that of Isom(Fix φVII ) does not, which implies
φVI = χ4
and
φVII = χantip .
. – p.10/12
A-C-T Construction of MR
s is NOT a Hyperbolic Orbifold
. – p.11/12
A-C-T Construction of MR
s is NOT a Hyperbolic Orbifold
Two kinds of real smooth 3-point configurations can deform to a real triple
point.
. – p.11/12
A-C-T Construction of MR
s is NOT a Hyperbolic Orbifold
Two kinds of real smooth 3-point configurations can deform to a real triple
point.
d
/
d-
d-
t
3
d
d-
t
3
S
o
d
. – p.11/12
A-C-T Construction of MR
s is NOT a Hyperbolic Orbifold
Two kinds of real smooth 3-point configurations can deform to a real triple
point.
d
/
d-
d-
t
d
d-
3
t
3
S
o
d
6
@
I
π/4
@
@
@
@t
6
tπ/2
-
. – p.11/12
A-C-T Construction of MR
s is NOT a Hyperbolic Orbifold
Two kinds of real smooth 3-point configurations can deform to a real triple
point.
d
/
d-
d-
t
d
d-
3
t
3
S
o
d
6
@
I
π/4
@
@
@
@t
6
tπ/2
vertex angle =
3π
4
6=
-
2π
n
. – p.11/12
THE END
THANK YOU!
. – p.12/12