licensed under a . Your use of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License . Your use of this material constitutes acceptance of that license and the conditions of use of materials on this site.

Copyright 2006, The Johns Hopkins University and Donna Strobino. All rights reserved. Use of these materials permitted only in accordance with license rights granted. Materials provided “AS IS”; no representations or warranties provided. User assumes all responsibility for use, and all liability related thereto, and must independently review all materials for accuracy and efficacy. May contain materials owned by others. User is responsible for obtaining permissions for use from third parties as needed.

Current Controversies in

Perinatal Health

Donna Strobino, PhD

Bloomberg School of Public Health

Presentation Overview

Trends in . . .

Š Low birth weight rates

Š Multiple birth rates

Š Artificial reproductive technology

Š Cesarean delivery rates

Š Live births vs. fetal deaths

Š Racial disparities in content of care

Š Early discharge postpartum

3

Section A

Trends in Low Birth Weight and Reasons for the Rise in Multiple Births

Increasing Low Birth

Weight Rates

Š United States

Š Some Western European countries

– England and Wales

– France

– Norway

5

Reasons for Rise in LBW Births

Š Rising percentage of multiple births

Š Rising percentage of LBW among multiple births

6

Live Births by Multiplicity and Birth Weight:

England and Wales, 1983, 1995–1997

1983

1995–1997

1983

1995–1997

1983

1995–1997

1983

1995–1997

<1500

0.7

0.9

7.7

9.1

27.8

35.1

0.8

1.2

Birth Weight (grams) (%)

1500-2499

Singletons

5.1

5.1

Twins

42.7

43.8

Triplets and More

66.4

60.8

All Births

5.9

6.1

<2500

5.8

6.0

50.4

52.9

94.2

95.9

6.7

7.3

7

Live Births by Multiplicity and Birth Weight

United States, 1981–1983, 1995–1997

1981–1983

1995–1997

1981–1983

1995–1997

1981–1983

1995–1997

1981–1983

1995–1997

<1500

1.1

1.2

10.7

10.5

37.0

37.5

1.3

1.5

Birth Weight (grams) (%)

1500-2499

Singletons

4.9

5.0

Twins

40.2

43.1

Triplets and More

52.3

55.7

All Births

5.6

6.0

<2500

6.0

6.2

50.9

53.6

89.3

93.2

6.9

7.5

8

Trends in Multiple Births

Š Increase in twin births in Western Europe and U.S. since the 1970s

Š Precipitous increase in triplets or greater births since the 1970s

9

Increase in the Number of Twins and Triplets in France and in the United States,

1998 Compared to Mid-1970s

France

741,765

United States

3,941,553

1998 Data

Number of Births

Twins

% Increase

Number

Excess Number

Triplets

% Increase

Number

Excess Number

62%

21,106

8,000

310%

745

500

58%

110,670

40,500

696%

7,625

6,500

10

Percentage Increase in Triplets or Higher

Order Births, Lowest Point 1960-1975 to 1990

Germany

United Kingdom

Spain

France

Netherlands

Italy

Finland

Norway

Belgium

Sweden

Year of Lowest Rate

1960

1965

1960

1970

1965

1975

1960

1975

1960

1960

Percentage Increase in 1990

367

336

275

528

801

532

630

719

1158

695

11

Rise in Multiple Births

Twin Deliveries

Š 1980—68,339

Š 1999—114,307

Š 2001—121,246

Š 2002—125,134

Triplet Deliveries

Š 1980—1,337

Š 1999—6,742

Š 2001—6,805

Š 2002—6,898

Š (7,401)

12

Rise in Multiple Births

Quadruplets

Š 1989—269

Š 1994—336

Š 1996—641

Š 1998—641

Š 2002—434

13

Reasons for the Rise in

Multiple Births

Š Delayed childbearing

Š 25-33 % of the rise between 1975 and

1998 attributable to increase in maternal age

Š Data from England and Wales, France,

Sweden, and the U.S.

14

Reasons for the Rise in

Multiple Births

Š ART

– 10–24% of twin pregnancies

– 22–59% of triplet pregnancy

Š Ovulation stimulation alone

– At least 75% of triplet pregnancies in

France in 1993 and the U.S. in 1997

Š Ovulation stimulation in general

– 5.4% of twins and 69.8% of triplet pregnancies in Italy in 1993–1994

15

Infertility Treatment

Š Variability among countries in a number of embryos transferred in ART procedures

Š Variability among countries in a number of multiple pregnancies

Š U.S. has higher success rates than Europe but greater numbers of embryos transferred and resulting multiple births

16

ART Cycles, Births, and Percentage of All

Births, 1999, All Clinics Reporting in Country

Iceland

Denmark

Finland

Sweden

Norway

France

Switzerland

Total

Number of Cycles

415

8793

7320

8660

4029

51868

4166

99629

% of All Births

2.6

1.8

1.4

0.7

1.6

3.6

3.2

2.7

ART Births (N)

(149)

(2119)

(1553)

(2293)

(1058)

(10167)

(548)

(17887)

17

Percentage Distribution of the Number of

Embryos Transferred after IVF and ICSI,

Western Europe Countries, 1999

Finland

Sweden

Switzerland

Belgium

France

Germany

Portugal

Italy

Greece

Ireland

Spain

11.1

12.8

11.3

10.0

8.2

8.6

One

20.8

11.2

12.9

10.6

13.8

37.3

30.1

31.1

20.0

22.0

16.3

Number of Embryos Transfer

Two Three Four Total N

73.9

84.3

5.3

4.5

0.0

0.0

4,052

6,247

57.1

46.7

42.3

28.1

34.0

37.2

1.9

8.6

6.7

2,415

8,015

30,459

51.6

40.9

40.9

32.2

67.3

45.6

0.0

16.9

16.9

37.8

2.5

29.4

41,490

10,198

10,198

5,209

972

8,355

18

Percentage Distribution of Singleton, Twin and Triplet or Greater Births after IVF and

ICSI, 1999, Western Europe Countries

Spain

Italy

Ireland

Germany

Portugal

Iceland

Switzerland

France

Finland

Greece

Norway

Sweden

Denmark

Total (Range)

Singleton

48.5

57.7

55.6

58.4

51.9

67.2

54.4

59.3

60.1

58.6

59.0

60.3

60.8

(42–79)

37.7

37.9

39.8

39.5

38.8

38.6

(19–44)

Twin

40.3

33.6

36.3

35.2

42.0

28.4

42.5

Triplet or Greater

11.2

8.7

8.1

6.3

5.1

4.5

3.1

3.1

1.6

1.6

1.4

0.6

0.6

(0.6–14.6)

9,230

1,670

1,670

1,058

2,087

1,965

36,135

Total N

2,547

2,775

259

9,112

362

134

391

19

Multiple Births by ART Transfer

Procedure, U.S. 2000

Number of

Multiple Birth

Deliveries

Percent of

Multiple Birth

Deliveries

Number of

Multiple

Birth/Infants

Percent of

Multiple

Birth/Infants

Patients eggs used

Freshly fertilized embryos

Thawed embryos

Donor eggs used

Freshly fertilized embryos

Thawed embryos

Total transfers

19,219

2.360

3,041

608

25,228

35.3

25.8

40.6

29.1

34.9

26,800

3,048

4,382

795

35,025

53.6

42.6

58.8

45.8

53.1

Source: Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance Systems, 2000

20

Ethical Dilemmas

Assisted Reproductive Technologies

Š High cost of technology—who pays the bill?

Š Who is responsible for decisions about multiple pregnancies?

Š What is the cost of success?

21

Embryo Transfers in the U.S.

Š Reduction in higher order transfers

Š Increase in transfer of two embryos

Š No change in transfer of one embryo

Š Less than 5% of transfers

22

Strategies to Reduce Multiple

Births after IVF

Š UK—regulatory bodies determine number of transferred embryos

Š U.S.—American College of OB/GYN statement

– Limit the number of embryos transferred

– Withhold ovulation inducing drugs with many mature follicles

23

Additional Clinical

Recommendations

Š Transfer good quality embryos one at a time

Š Ovulation stimulation

– Performed only by specialists

– Network of providers of ART

24

Impact of Reducing Embryo

Transfers

Š Finland

– 50% reduction in triplet rate

– Better outcomes for IVF newborns

Š Norwegian IVF clinic:

– LBW percent declined from 47% to 14% after limiting number of embryos to three

25

Reduce Multiple Births

Š Collect data about multiple births . . .

– Do not report them as success of infertility treatment

– Report them as complications of ART

26

Section B

Trends in Cesarean Deliveries and

Other Concerns

Increasing Cesarean Delivery

Rates, 1990–1999, 2002

Š Across Western Europe—7% to 53% increase

Š Specific trends in the U.S.—3% decline, but increase to 2002

28

Cesarean Delivery Rates, 1990, 1994–

1996, 1996 for Selected Western European

Countries and the United States

United States

Italy

Portugal

Germany

France

Spain

Finland

Norway

United Kingdom

Sweden

Belgium

Netherlands

1990 1994 1995 1996 1999 % Change

22.7

21.2

20.8

20.7

22.0

20.8

24.8

26.1

26.4

31.1

18.6

23.9

24.2

24.6

27.5

15.7

17.1

17.2

17.6

19.8

-3

+49

+48

+26

13.9

15.1

15.0

15.4

15.7

14.2

17.8

18.8

19.3

--

14.2

15.2

15.5

15.5

15.5

12.8

12.6

12.6

12.7

13.7

12.4

15.5

15.8

16.0

17.0

10.8

11.7

12.0

11.8

14.4

10.4

12.9

13.4

13.7

15.9

7.4

9.2

9.6

10.1

11.3

+13

(+36)

+9

+7

+17

+33

+53

+53

Source: OECD Health Data, 2002, 4 th Edition 29

Vaginal Birth after Cesarean

30

Strategies to Reduce Cesarean

Deliveries

Š Consumer education

Š Clinical guidelines with feedback

– Individual physicians

– Maternity units

– Promote normal births in low risk settings

– Medical and review/education—little influence on practices

31

Other Trends

Š Rise in the smallest births

– Among live births

– Not comparable for stillbirths

32

Percentage of Very Low Birth Weight Births

Less than 500, 500-999, 1,000–1,499, and Less than 1500 Grams, 1974–1994, Alabama

Percentage of Births

Year of

Birth

1974

1977

1980

1984

1988

1990

1992

1994

60,228

62,707

64,128

60,964

61,374

64,110

62,885

61,421

Total Births

Less than

500 grams

0.20

0.21

0.33

0.37

0.46

0.46

0.45

0.51

500–999

Grams

0.72

0.72

0.81

0.85

0.92

0.92

0.98

0.90

1000–1499

Grams

Less than

1500 Grams

0.94

0.80

0.77

0.76

0.96

0.96

0.88

1.01

1.86

1.73

1.91

1.98

2.21

2.24

2.31

2.42

33

Percentage of Live Births of All Births (Live and

Stillbirths), Less than 500, 500-999, 1,000-1,499, and Less than 1500 Grams, 1974–1994, Alabama

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

1974 19

77

1980 198

4

19

88

1990 199

2

19

94

Year of Birth

Less than 500 grams grams 500-999 grams 1000-1499

Less than 1500 grams

34

Recent Changes or Advances in Perinatal Care

Š Extending the limits of viability

– To as early as 23–24 weeks gestation

Š High mortality and subsequent morbidity

– Results in increase in VLBW births?

35

Ethical Dilemma

Š Extension of the limits of viability

– How does it affect obstetrical practice?

– How does it affect population statistics?

– What are the ultimate costs?

• To the family

• To society

36

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Use of Prenatal Interventions

Š Lower rates among black, Latina, and poor women in the use of . . .

– Ultrasound

– Amniocentesis, CVS

Š Question whose preferences

37

Receipt of Health Education

Greater among Minorities and Low Income

Women on Sensitive Issues

Š HIV testing

Š Family violence

Š Family planning

Š Substance use

38

Recent Changes in

Perinatal Care

Š Early discharge

– SVD—12–24 hours

– CS—48-72 hours

Š Due to changes in the following:

– Medical practices

– Reimbursement

– Patient preferences

39

Early Discharge

Š Guidelines for the Mother

– Minimal criteria for early discharge

– Mechanism for asking questions

– Follow-up telephone contact or home visit

– Little documentation

– Capacity in question?

40

Early Discharge

Š AAP Suggested Guidelines

Š Medical and social evaluation before early discharge

Š Clinical follow-up within three days of discharge

– Type not specified

41

Early Discharge

Š Effects—inconclusive

– No increase in neonatal mortality

– Rehospitalization—jaundice, dehydration, sepsis?

42

Remaining Concerns

Š Inadequate time for detection of breastfeeding problems

Š Increase maternal-infant bonding at expense of maternal well-being

Š Reduction in time for in-hospital teaching and support

Š Completeness of newborn metabolic screening

43