Rev May 2015 rmg Comprehensive Examination Assessment Rubric

advertisement
Rev May 2015 rmg
Comprehensive Examination Assessment Rubric
Department of Leadership and Teacher Education
Elementary, Early Childhood and Reading
Levels of
Performance
Indicators
Content
Exceptional (4)
Response is at a level
far beyond peers
• Essential and
supplementary content are
addressed
• Development of information
is well organized and
expressed in priority order
• Content is defended with
precise and relevant
evidence
Proficient (3)
Response meets
expectations
• Essential content is
addressed
• Evidence of essential
content is limited
• Development of
information is well
organized
• Lacks clear organization
of information to address
content of question
• Ideas are supported in a
logical fashion
• Support of ideas is
limited
• Most resources correctly
cited (APA)
• Few resources are
correctly cited (APA)
• All resources correctly cited
(APA)
• Between 1600-1800
words
• 1800-2000 words
Written
Expression
Basic (2)
Response indicates only
initial understanding
• About 1500 words
Unacceptable (1)
Response does not
demonstrate minimal
understanding
• There is little or no
evidence that essential
content is addressed
• There is little or no
evidence that information
is organized
• There is little or no
evidence that ideas are
supported
• No resources correctly
cited (APA)
• Less than 1500 words
• Few or no errors in
mechanics, usage,
grammar or spelling
• Some errors in
mechanics, usage,
grammar, or spelling
• Several errors in
mechanics usage,
grammar, or spelling
• Expression of information
is clear and response
includes effective
transitions
• Expression of
information is clear and
writing maintains a
consistent tone
• Expression of information
lacks clarity and use of
effective transitions
• Response includes an
introduction, development
of essential and
supplementary information,
and a conclusion
• Response includes an
introduction,
development of essential
information and a
conclusion
• Word choice or spelling
may hinder easy
comprehension
• Response lacks a clear
organization or conclusion
• Numerous errors in
mechanics, usage,
grammar, or spelling
interfere with meaning
• Expression of information
lacks organization and use
of transitions
• Word choice or spelling
may interfere with
comprehension
• Response lacks logical
development
Comments
Download