Evaluating LIS Library Services for Faculty and Staff SUE SEARING SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 Background Fall 2008 survey (population = 1,443) : Students, faculty, staff Library & GSLIS 329 responses http://www.library.illinois.edu/nsm/comm_lis/LIS_L ibrary_Survey_Report.pdf Survey response 67% of respondents were students 13% were staff 13% of respondents were tenured faculty 8% of respondents were untenured faculty Key findings Overall, users reported heavier use of virtual LIS collections and services than of physical library. All categories of GSLIS users made greater use of virtual. Library faculty used virtual slightly more often than physical. Library staff used virtual slightly less often than physical. What users valued Virtual services: Students: databases, e-content, LibGuides Faculty: new book list, databases, e-content • GSLIS: gateway/portal to discipline, connections to subject experts in library • Library: ease, convenience What users valued Physical services: “One-stop shopping” Ability to browse shelves Environment conducive to study and research Access to knowledgeable, helpful people Affective and symbolic meaning Status of the discipline and GSLIS Sense of belonging How we used the data New service model for LIS: • Embedded services at GSLIS • Retained Main Library offices • Virtual LIS Library o Easy search o New books display o News feature o More browsable content (website lists, LibGuides, etc.) What do we need to know now? Wrong question: • Is the new model better than the old one? Right questions: How well (or poorly) is the new model working? Who is it working (or not working) for? How can we make it better? Assessing the new model Summer 2010 survey (population = 634) : • Faculty (including adjuncts), staff, GAs • Library & GSLIS • 105 responses Faculty response rate: 29% of GSLIS faculty 34% of Library faculty Library respondents 38 % 35 % 21 % 6% Faculty (n=20) Staff (n=18) Academic professionals (n=11) Grad assistants (n=3) 100% All library respondents (n=52) Findings: New books How do you stay aware of new LIS publications in the UI libraries? (check all that apply) 11% 11% 7% 26% 23% 43% Browsing print books Browsing print journals Browsing electronic books Browsing electronic journals RSS feeds/blogs/alert services New LIS titles list 36% I don't try to stay aware of new publications in the UI libraries Findings: New books list access If you use the LIS new titles list, how do you access it? (Please choose the mode you use most often) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 LIS Virtual Library website RSS feed iPhone/iPod app I don't use the new titles list Findings: Current awareness How do you stay aware of new publications in LIS generally? 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 RSS feeds/blogs/alert services Interacting with colleagues at work, conferences, or workshops Professional/scholarly email lists Direct email from publishers Printed catalogs and flyers from publishers Book reviews in magazines or journals I don't try to stay aware of new publications in LIS Other Findings: Reference Where do you seek answers to LIS reference questions? 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 LIS Library Services staff (i.e. Sue or Sandy) LIS Virtual Library website Other librarians Professional literature Discussion groups/listservs Web search engines (Google, Bing, etc.) I don't have any LIS reference questions Other Findings: Accessing library content When you're aware of a publication you want from our local UI collection, how do you get it? (Please choose the method you use most often.) 40 35 Retrieve it myself 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Request delivery to me or to the closest library Look first for an online copy Findings: Contacting subject experts How often do you contact the LIS library services staff (i.e. Sue or Sandy)? 70 Never 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Rarely (once a semester or less often) Sometimes (approximately monthly) Often (weekly or more often) Findings: Mode of interaction How do you contact LIS library services staff? (Please choose the mode that you use most often for non-urgent matters.) In person By phone By email I don't contact them Findings: Use of office hours How often do you visit the LIS Librarian during her regular office hours at GSLIS? Never Rarely (once a semester or less often) Sometimes (approximately monthly) Often (weekly or more often) Findings: Interest in Main Library office hours If the LIS Librarian held regular office hours at the Main Library, would you visit her there? Yes, very likely Maybe No, probably not Findings: Non-use of office hours If you do not/would not use the LIS Librarian's office hours, why not? No need for service (n=22) “I usually can find information and materials on my own, and haven't had a major reference question yet.” Prefer a different mode (n=14) “I prefer email or scheduling an appointment.” “I can email her anytime with questions or call.” “I would be more likely to use a chat service.” “I see the LIS Librarian at meetings and ask questions then.” Not on campus; not familiar with service; other (n=11) Findings: Use of virtual library How often do you use the LIS Virtual Library website? Never Rarely (once a semester or less often) Sometimes (approximately monthly) Often (weekly or more often) Findings: Best parts of virtual library If you do use the LIS Virtual Library, which part do you find most helpful? Why? 18 16 14 Easy Search Database links Links to journals 12 General praise 10 Access to library tools 8 New books list 6 Interface design 4 2 0 News Affective/outcome Other Findings: Social networking preferences Which social networking or communication tools would you like to see LIS library services adopt? 50 45 40 35 Facebook 30 25 20 Twitter LinkedIn Instant messaging None Other 15 10 5 0 Findings: Benefits of NSM What are the benefits of the current service model? 16 14 12 More/better online Access to experts None 10 Saving money Convenience 8 6 4 Flexibility Gripes Better space use Collection still developed General praise 2 0 More efficient Findings: Drawbacks of NSM What are the drawbacks of the current service model? 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Not able to browse Collection not together None General loss of dept lib Loss of study space Loss of access to experts Other Loss of service point Poorer online access Not convenient Not radical enough Poor re-use of space Loss of patron-patron interactions Findings: Suggestions for improvements What suggestions do you have for improving LIS library services? General (ex.) “Bring back the LIS library.” “Just stay available.” “Keep up the good work!” Specific (ex.): “…Hav[e] a page somewhere of the hashtags for current library conferences so folks who can’t go can easily click through to see the twitter discussions/blog posts/flickr images coming out of different events.” “A general reference and current-issue journal library at GSLIS?” “PLEASE lobby to get the opac fixed!” “Go rogue, get donations, build your own library ” What else? Is there anything else you’d like to tell us? Positive (n=21) Negative (n=15) Next steps Analyze and compare by group. Share with Library faculty and staff; gather reactions. Share with GSLIS faculty and staff; gather reactions. Develop and prioritize service enhancements and refinements. Present at ALISE in January; write up for publication. Decide how often to repeat assessment.